1 00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:09,080 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Let's stay on the 2 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:09,880 Speaker 1: UK Commune. 3 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:12,799 Speaker 2: Inflation slowing lesson expected last month as fuel price has 4 00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 2: crept higher, underscoring the reluctance of central banks to actually 5 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:19,440 Speaker 2: begin cutting rates. Well, here to discuss the UK's economic 6 00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 2: outlook is a former Chanceer of the Exchequer at Philip Hammond. Mi, 7 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:24,200 Speaker 2: tra Hammond, thank you for joining us. I mean we 8 00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 2: talk about the economy, but also you're also Defense Secretary, 9 00:00:26,600 --> 00:00:29,040 Speaker 2: and it almost feels almost more important in this day 10 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:31,160 Speaker 2: and age, with all of the uncertainty and the defense spending. 11 00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:34,160 Speaker 2: Would you first of all agree with the former defense 12 00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 2: secretaries that we just have to increase defense. 13 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 3: Spending now, well, I think we will have to increase 14 00:00:39,479 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 3: defense spending in a measured way over a period of time. 15 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:46,400 Speaker 3: And I think a great deal depends on post the 16 00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 3: American elections, what the position of the US is around 17 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:53,199 Speaker 3: NATO in Europe and how clearly we can rely on 18 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:59,240 Speaker 3: the continuing guarantee of the American Alliance in the defense 19 00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 3: of Europe in the future against potential Russian aggression. But 20 00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:05,200 Speaker 3: there's no doubt we're not spending enough on defense. None 21 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:07,399 Speaker 3: of us are spending enough on defense, and we're going 22 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:09,280 Speaker 3: to have to factor that into what is already a 23 00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:12,880 Speaker 3: very difficult public spending agenda for the UK. 24 00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 1: So what happens to UK defense and European defense? 25 00:01:16,680 --> 00:01:18,959 Speaker 2: If Donald Trump is, for example, it like did and 26 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:21,959 Speaker 2: says actually NATO means reforming and we're. 27 00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:23,920 Speaker 3: Going to give a lot less to it, then the 28 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:26,160 Speaker 3: Europeans have to step up and fill the gap. And 29 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,640 Speaker 3: that's quite a big gap to fill because we're heavily 30 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:32,639 Speaker 3: dependent on the Americans for many strategic elements of our defense. 31 00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:36,200 Speaker 3: I don't just mean the nuclear deterrent, but the ability 32 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:39,319 Speaker 3: to airlift large numbers of troops, for example, depends crucially 33 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:43,920 Speaker 3: on American support. So we would need to invest quite 34 00:01:43,959 --> 00:01:47,800 Speaker 3: a lot more money in defense. I think the important 35 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 3: thing here is that the overall envelope of public spending 36 00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:56,960 Speaker 3: cannot continue to expand. So when we talk about these 37 00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 3: things that we have to do decarbonization, increasing our defense spending, 38 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 3: we also have to talk about what we are going 39 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:06,640 Speaker 3: to do less of in order to be able to 40 00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:09,400 Speaker 3: afford these things. That's the grown up debate, and to 41 00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:11,639 Speaker 3: be very honest with you, it's quite difficult to get 42 00:02:11,639 --> 00:02:14,200 Speaker 3: that debate going in an election year, So how. 43 00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:14,640 Speaker 1: Would you do it? 44 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:17,840 Speaker 2: You know, you're always look at the numbers and always 45 00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:20,200 Speaker 2: try to balance out. First of all, defense does it 46 00:02:20,240 --> 00:02:22,040 Speaker 2: need to go to three percent of GDP? Or is 47 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:23,959 Speaker 2: five hundred million one off enough? 48 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:27,880 Speaker 3: Not yet three percent of GDP? And money isn't the 49 00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:30,200 Speaker 3: only issue. We've also got to be able to recruit 50 00:02:30,639 --> 00:02:34,840 Speaker 3: enough people. At the moment, the defense establishment is struggling 51 00:02:35,120 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 3: to recruit the people it needs to spend its current 52 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 3: budgets to use its current budget allocations. So the two 53 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:45,280 Speaker 3: things go hand in hand. But I think look go 54 00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:47,600 Speaker 3: back to what the Chancellor was just saying about growth. 55 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 3: In the end, this is all about growth. If we 56 00:02:50,280 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 3: have strong, consistent economic growth driven by productivity increases, not 57 00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:59,760 Speaker 3: just by a growing population, then we will be able 58 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:03,760 Speaker 3: to forward to do more, including over time more public spending. 59 00:03:04,639 --> 00:03:06,200 Speaker 3: But first of all, we have to get that growth 60 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,760 Speaker 3: equation right. And although it looks like we are now 61 00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:12,799 Speaker 3: getting on top of the inflation problem, which has been 62 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:15,919 Speaker 3: the predominant theme for the last couple of years, we 63 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:19,240 Speaker 3: still have this long term challenge in the UK that 64 00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:23,640 Speaker 3: our productivity growth has been very flat for ever since 65 00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:28,160 Speaker 3: the global financial crisis. And our economic growth is simply 66 00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:33,840 Speaker 3: not strong enough to support an aging population with a 67 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:36,880 Speaker 3: very sharply rising demand for public services. 68 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 2: But so how do you actually fix the productivity problem? 69 00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:43,120 Speaker 2: The US productivity numbers are a little bit better because 70 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 2: of a large number of immigrants actually coming to the country. 71 00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:50,160 Speaker 1: Does AI help with productivity? How would you go around it? 72 00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:54,000 Speaker 3: Technology can indeed help with productivity, but we've got to 73 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:58,960 Speaker 3: make sure that we adopt and innovate in the right way, 74 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 3: that we sees the opportunities that are available. I agree 75 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 3: with the Chancellor. I think the UK growth prospects are significant. 76 00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:11,240 Speaker 3: We've got a very good track record of technology adoption. 77 00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:16,640 Speaker 3: The British people are very open to using technological innovations 78 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:20,359 Speaker 3: in their everyday lives, more so than in many other countries. 79 00:04:20,640 --> 00:04:23,960 Speaker 3: So the raw material is there, but we've got to 80 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:26,960 Speaker 3: make sure we seize the opportunity. And one of the 81 00:04:27,040 --> 00:04:30,200 Speaker 3: challenges of democracy, of course, is that we have to 82 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:33,880 Speaker 3: persuade people that they want things to change. And people 83 00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:38,440 Speaker 3: are very conservative with a small c often don't like change, 84 00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:42,560 Speaker 3: and it's about selling change to people. Working out how 85 00:04:42,680 --> 00:04:46,440 Speaker 3: in a democracy we have those big debates and we 86 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:50,520 Speaker 3: reach the right long term decisions around these big difficult 87 00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:54,359 Speaker 3: issues because many of our adversaries and even many of 88 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:56,919 Speaker 3: our friends around the world who are competitors with us, 89 00:04:57,800 --> 00:05:00,800 Speaker 3: don't operate the same kind of democratic cistm them don't 90 00:05:00,839 --> 00:05:03,920 Speaker 3: have to build the same kind of consensus that we 91 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:06,919 Speaker 3: do in the liberal democracies of Europe. 92 00:05:07,160 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 2: So one of the more immediate and these are longer term, 93 00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:11,799 Speaker 2: extremely difficult subjects. 94 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:13,880 Speaker 1: Very important. On the short term, I mean. 95 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 2: Does it make more sense to increase defense spending or 96 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:19,719 Speaker 2: cut taxes and that could also lay the foundation actually 97 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:20,760 Speaker 2: for future growth. 98 00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:25,120 Speaker 3: Either way, well, I'm strongly in favor of an agenda 99 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:28,400 Speaker 3: to cut taxes over time as we can afford to 100 00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:31,280 Speaker 3: do so. But we can only cut taxes if our 101 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 3: public spending is less than our tax receipts. Driving economic growth. 102 00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 3: Achieving higher levels of economic growth should increase tax receipts 103 00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 3: and should ultimately enable us to have both lower taxes 104 00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:50,920 Speaker 3: and higher spending on public services, including things like defense. 105 00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:53,719 Speaker 3: But we've got to do things in the right order. First, 106 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 3: you grow your economy, and that requires investment, maybe at 107 00:05:58,120 --> 00:06:01,480 Speaker 3: the expense of consumption. The consistent theme if you look 108 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 3: across countries around the world that have achieved decent levels 109 00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:08,400 Speaker 3: of economic growth over long periods of time. The consistent 110 00:06:08,520 --> 00:06:11,960 Speaker 3: theme is high levels of saving and high levels of investment, 111 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:14,800 Speaker 3: and we've got to do better in that area. Once 112 00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 3: we've done that and we're running surpluses in our public finances, 113 00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:21,760 Speaker 3: then we can start looking at cutting taxes. I'm afraid, 114 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:26,680 Speaker 3: as Liz Trust and Quasi Quaite demonstrated a couple of 115 00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:29,000 Speaker 3: years ago, trying to do it the other way around, 116 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:32,839 Speaker 3: cutting taxes first, funding it by borrowing simply doesn't work. 117 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 2: When you look at UK defense and foreign policy. Should 118 00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:41,240 Speaker 2: the UK continue to sell arms to Israel if they 119 00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:42,680 Speaker 2: are in breach of international law? 120 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:47,239 Speaker 3: Well, we have a very clear and strict regime about 121 00:06:47,279 --> 00:06:49,800 Speaker 3: who we can and can't sell arms to, and these 122 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:52,720 Speaker 3: things are reviewed very intensively when there's a period of 123 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 3: conflict or disturbance going on in the world. So you know, 124 00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:59,800 Speaker 3: it's not for me to second guess that chargement that 125 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 3: will be made internally within government according to the rules. 126 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:07,120 Speaker 3: But we have one of the strictest arms export regimes 127 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:09,240 Speaker 3: in the world and I'm confident that it will be 128 00:07:09,279 --> 00:07:12,840 Speaker 3: operated properly. Often people on the outside say, well, it's 129 00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 3: obvious you shouldn't be selling arms to this country or 130 00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:18,520 Speaker 3: that country. Things are often a little bit more complex 131 00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:21,880 Speaker 3: than that in terms of the way international law works 132 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:23,280 Speaker 3: and the way the rules are applied. 133 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:26,600 Speaker 1: When you look at you know, we're on tenderhooks. 134 00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 2: And this was quite difficult four days in the Middle 135 00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 2: East trying to understand how Israel retaliates if they retaliate. 136 00:07:32,360 --> 00:07:34,679 Speaker 1: Do you think the Prime Minister will. 137 00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:39,440 Speaker 3: The Prime Minister of Israel, Look, I think it's very 138 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:42,560 Speaker 3: difficult for Israel not to retaliate in some form to 139 00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:47,120 Speaker 3: this Iranian action. Prime Minister Netanya, who will be getting 140 00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:50,720 Speaker 3: urged from all sides, including the UK, to ensure that 141 00:07:50,760 --> 00:07:57,880 Speaker 3: any response is moderate and non escalationary. I honestly don't 142 00:07:57,920 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 3: believe the regime in Tehran wants to provoke and all 143 00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:04,400 Speaker 3: out war with the United States and Israel. That is 144 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 3: not in their interest. But they also have their domestic 145 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 3: audience that they have to satisfy. Prime Minister Netanya, who's 146 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:14,520 Speaker 3: in the same space. He has a very difficult domestic 147 00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 3: balancing act. And that's one of the big drivers in 148 00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:22,960 Speaker 3: the evolving geopolitical situation in the Middle East. The trick 149 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 3: which the Americans, in particular will be working on at 150 00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:29,240 Speaker 3: the moment. Is finding an action that the Israelis can 151 00:08:29,280 --> 00:08:34,680 Speaker 3: take which satisfies Israel's are more proper without provoking Iran 152 00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:37,080 Speaker 3: into a further counter response. I don't know what that is, 153 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:40,280 Speaker 3: but I hope very much that they managed to find 154 00:08:40,280 --> 00:08:41,040 Speaker 3: something that works. 155 00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 2: Okay, speaking about your prime minister, the UK premisore Ishi Sunak. 156 00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:48,840 Speaker 2: Is there a chance actually that the Tories do something 157 00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:51,920 Speaker 2: that will not be complete wipe out at the next 158 00:08:51,960 --> 00:08:52,520 Speaker 2: general action. 159 00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:56,640 Speaker 3: Well, there's always a chance because the world is an 160 00:08:56,760 --> 00:09:01,240 Speaker 3: unstable and unpredictable place and lots of things could happen 161 00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:04,160 Speaker 3: between now and the autumn when the election will probably 162 00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:08,960 Speaker 3: be held. I think it's what the Chancellor has said 163 00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:15,040 Speaker 3: to you is probably right that the feel good factor 164 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:18,200 Speaker 3: will be starting to creep back into the economy. So 165 00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:22,840 Speaker 3: the economic situation, after a very difficult few years post 166 00:09:22,880 --> 00:09:26,440 Speaker 3: COVID will start to look and feel a bit better. 167 00:09:26,800 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 3: But we've got a long way to go, let's be honest. 168 00:09:29,080 --> 00:09:33,080 Speaker 3: The polls are suggesting that the Conservative Party has a 169 00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:36,920 Speaker 3: mountain to climb at the next election. But never say never, 170 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:40,520 Speaker 3: because events can change people's minds very quickly. 171 00:09:40,640 --> 00:09:43,200 Speaker 2: But is it possible for the Conservative Party to win it. 172 00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:46,560 Speaker 3: On the economy, I think it's a challenge to be 173 00:09:46,600 --> 00:09:50,240 Speaker 3: honest because I think although I think the economy will 174 00:09:50,280 --> 00:09:54,400 Speaker 3: be improving by the autumn, I think that many people 175 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:58,960 Speaker 3: have in their minds the events of the autumn of 176 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 3: twenty twenty to the mini budget, spike in interest rates 177 00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 3: and so on. And you know, the Tory Party's principal 178 00:10:08,760 --> 00:10:13,320 Speaker 3: pitch to the public has always been our responsible management 179 00:10:13,360 --> 00:10:16,600 Speaker 3: of the economy. I trust Jeremy Hunt Rishi Sunat completely 180 00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:19,880 Speaker 3: on responsible management of the economy. But I think what 181 00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:24,920 Speaker 3: has happened in the recent past has damaged that brand 182 00:10:24,960 --> 00:10:27,120 Speaker 3: to be honest, and we've got to rebuild it. 183 00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:29,240 Speaker 2: Does it matter if the election is too close to 184 00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:29,960 Speaker 2: the US election? 185 00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:31,800 Speaker 1: Would that worry you? 186 00:10:31,800 --> 00:10:33,719 Speaker 3: No? I suspect our election will be close to the 187 00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:36,240 Speaker 3: US election. I think the question is whether it's just 188 00:10:36,280 --> 00:10:37,280 Speaker 3: before or just after. 189 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:40,400 Speaker 1: Does it make a difference, I. 190 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 3: Really I'm not sure. I'm not sure whether it makes 191 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:44,320 Speaker 3: a huge difference. 192 00:10:44,559 --> 00:10:46,440 Speaker 2: Philip Avon, thank you so much for joining us today. 193 00:10:46,440 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 2: That was a former UK Chancellor of the exchequerat