WEBVTT - #581 Jason Flom with Pierre Rushing

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Hi, It's Connor Hall, the senior producer for Wrongful Conviction,

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>with another update and more behind the scenes insights. And

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this one is another that we've been involved with for

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>far too long with not enough movement. Pierre Rushing. The

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>first time I'd even heard about him was December twenty nineteen,

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and by the time I was approved to speak with

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>him on the phone, COVID was in full swing and

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we were rapidly trying to figure out how to keep

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast going. But it turned out that remote recording

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>made it way easier to cover more stories and we

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>ended up like nearly doubling our annual output. But I

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>digress Pierre, And I mean we were talking on the

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>phone so much that my wife would just like come

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>into the room and see me on the phone and

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, who are you talking to? Pierre uh Man?

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, And we still talk less. Oh, but you know,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>every few months or so, he'll give me a ring

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'll see that California prison number that I have

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>saved as him in my phone, and every time there's

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like a mix of hope and despair, and you know,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is he finally calling with that good news? Anyway? I

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>pick up and just in the sound of his voice,

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I can tell that it's just another Tuesday. So we

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, what new information he's found out

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>or new strategies that, you know, we could try. For

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a while, I was trolling everything. The Almada County DA's

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>social media account was posting with hashtag free Pierre Rushing

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and like when are you gonna do something now? Obviously

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't very effective, but you know, there were rallies

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and protests and Jason went on the Breakfast Club Joe Rogan.

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Whoever would lend their ear and their platform. There's even

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a movie Undefeated the wrongful conviction of Pierre Rushing. In

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this case, it's you know, an Oakland drug dealer named

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>c who killed one of his customers, want Taylor Dwan

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>had allegedly pocketed an iPod from Sea's apartment during a

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>drug deal. So once he figured that out, he went

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with three others in a car to chase down Dewan

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and shot him. One of the three in the car,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Robert Green, eventually told the police, who

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>knows why, I mean, maybe he was picked up for

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>something else, but he named the two others in the

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>car while not naming C, and then gave varying descriptions

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of C over time, like wildly different right. And then

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>two weeks after the murder, Robert Green comes forward again

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and says, oh, I saw Sea at a BART station

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>wearing a red hat. And around that same time, Pierre

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Rushing was stopped at a bart station. He tells you

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about it in the episode, and he was wearing a

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>red hat. And despite not matching any of Robert Green's

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>varying descriptions, Green picked Pierre out of a photo lineup

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 1>as C. Now, at the time of our initial coverage,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the other two named accomplices had already sworn in affidavits

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that Pierre was not C, and another witness went as

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>far as to name C. Then, by the time of

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>our twenty twenty three coverage, the star witness, Robert Green,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>had recanted his testimony clearing Pierre's name, so they had

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing left in this case. We thought the Almeda County DA,

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Pamela Price, might do the right thing, but at that

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>time she was another alleged progressive DA who had become

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the target of a so called tough on crime recall campaign,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so she chose to not rock the vote with an exoneration,

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but she still got voted out in a twenty twenty

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>four special election. Now since that time, Pierre's team has

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>uncovered even more. They finally were allowed to test crime

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>scene biological evidence, namely the car seat where C sat,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as cigarette butts said to have belonged to him,

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all of which cleared Pierre. And I'm gonna guess it

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>would match C if they just knew who he was.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, it turns out that Pierre's team discovered that

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a whit and This had named C for investigators before

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Pierre went to trial, the same name that Pier's team

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>had during our initial coverage. But that report of an

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>alternate suspect that appears to be quite consequential, that was

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>hidden from the defense at trial. You gotta wonder why

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they'd hide that information. This guy was known to operate

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the building from which this whole saga began.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they were just so far out over their skis

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and this investigation and prosecution that they just buried it

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and plodded ahead. Maybe it was tunnel vision. Maybe they

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>actually believed, well, this is inconsequential, Or maybe C was

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>more useful to police on the outside will never know.

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand he went away for something else not too

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>long after, while Pierre is still serving a sentence that

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>most likely belongs to him. And I just want you

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep that in mind, that he's still in there

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.239
<v Speaker 1>serving someone else's time while you listen to this coverage,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.039
<v Speaker 1>some of which is from twenty twenty and then the

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>final segment most of it it's from twenty twenty three.

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>There's even you know, the call to action is outdated

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because Bamela Price isn't in an office anymore. But I'd

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like you to renew the effort to reach out to

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the new DA. We're going to have contact information listed

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in the episode description, So please keep making noise because

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>here it is twenty twenty six. He's still in there,

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, wouldn't it be even more tragic if

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I was back here again in three more years.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 2>In the early morning of April fifteenth, twenty eleven, Dwan

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Taylor stole an iPod for an Oakland drug dealer named c.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Two of his other customers, Patrick Smith and Robert Green,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 2>gave Ce a ride in search of the iPod thief

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>they spotted. Mister Taylor pulled up next to him, and

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 2>See proceeded to shoot and kill him over this trivial slight.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Nearly a week we'ld go by before Robert Green would

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 2>offer cops information and an uncertain description of the shooter.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>A few weeks and several descriptions later, Green would claim

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>to have seen c wearing a red hat. A few

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>days after that, police would approach Pierre Rushing, a man

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 2>who had never been known as Sea, but wearing a

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 2>red hat. They'd bring Pierre's juvie photo and his name

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>to Robert Green, who went on to identify him as

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the shooter, despite a solid alibi, no physical evidence whatsoever

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 2>or anything to corroborate Robert Green's highly questionable identification. Pierre

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Rushing's burgeoning rap career and promising future were stolen by

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Green and the criminal legal system. He's currently serving fifty

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 2>to life for a frivolous and tragic crime committed by

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>a drug dealer named C. Patrick Smith has since signed

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>affidavits and testified to Pierre's innocence, and another of C's

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>customers that night has bravely set a legal name to

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the culprit, and even though mister Rushing did not name Se,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 2>we have censored his name from this episode for mister

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Rushing's safety. Meanwhile, the state of California and used to

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 2>ignore evidence of Pierre's actual innocence and to fight his

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>honest attempts to regain his freedom. This is Wrongful Conviction

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>with Jason Flamm. Welcome back to Wrongful Conviction with Jason Flamm.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>That's me and today we're going to tell you about

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the case of Pierre Rushing. We'll speak with one of

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 2>his post conviction attorneys, Marvin Lou as well as taking

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>a call from Kern Valley Correction in California to hear

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 2>from Pierre himself.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Global tail Lenge.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You have a free post call from you.

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>This call ANGELA telephone number will be monitored and recorded.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 4>To accept this call, say or.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Dial five now. Thank you for using Global tail Link.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Hello, good morning, good morning. I'm glad you're here. I mean,

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry you're here under these circumstances, but I'm definitely

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>glad you're here. And I know we have limited time,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>so let's get right into it. Today's episode, we're going

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>to tell the story of the man we have on

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the phone now, Pierre Rushing, who's serving fifty years. The

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 2>nightmare starts on April fifteen, twenty eleven, at three forty

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>five am, when there's a murder. But let's go back

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to your childhood, because you had a difficult upbringing and

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>you were coming out of that and building a career

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 2>in music when it all went haywire.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>So I grew up in Oakland, California. My father was

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 3>a passentee and then out of prison smug with a

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 3>dig crack cocaine. So I don't want to say like

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>any other Oakland kid, but I mean a lot lot

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 3>of kids in the in the that grew up in

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the nineties were just products of our environment. We grew

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 3>up looking at things that we believed to be right,

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 3>so we as we mature, we get to see that

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 3>they were really wrong.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 2>And how did you get into music?

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 3>My auntie used to work for Keith Switt her name

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 3>with Tracy Rush. She since passed in twenty thirteen. But

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 3>just being around her, she took me in her wing,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 3>just taking me to the studio whor her as I

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 3>became a big contribute.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it fair to say by twenty eleven, things were

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>starting to look up for you in terms of possibly

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 2>building a career, and yeah.

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 3>When I was arrested for this case, actually friends of

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 3>mine has said that the police were looking for me

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 3>for this time, and we all laughed about it because

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 3>everybody knew that I couldn't have done. And I had

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>been wrapping and going to the studio state assistant shooting videos.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 3>And actually when I was arrested, I was open enough

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 3>for Bay Area Leegen by the name of Saint Quinn,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 3>and we had a big black tour van with my

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 3>pictures on and promoting my music and everything. So, yeah,

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 3>it was coming up for me.

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you were exactly You're on your way up. And

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 2>then everything went completely haywire. Now let's turn the conversation

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>to Marvin Lou. Marvin is a criminal defense attorney of

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>some repute and he has been representing Pierre for some time. Now,

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 2>let's just paint a picture of what happened.

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 5>The date was April fifteenth, twenty eleven, and what happened

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 5>was two individuals by the name of Patrick Smith and

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 5>Robert Green. We're doing crack cocaine for the day and

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 5>a half leading up to this young man's killing. And

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 5>Patrick Smith and Robert Green went to an apartment in

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 5>Oakland to purchase more crack cocaine. Patrick Smith was driving.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Robert Green stayed in the car while Patrick Smith went

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 5>up to the apartment to purchase more drugs. So Patrick

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Smith meets up with his drug dealer. Patrick Smith knows

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 5>him as see the letter C who is the actual

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 5>person responsible for the murder of Dewane Taylor. While Patrick

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Smith was in the apartment, there were several other people

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 5>present and mister Taylor left the apartment. Shortly after mister

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 5>Taylor left, then sees iPod turned up missing and someone

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 5>in the apartment said that mister Taylor had taken sees iPod.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 5>What happened next was Patrick Smith, the shooter, SE and

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 5>another individual who was also charged as a co defendant

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 5>named Andre Morris. They all left the apartment and went

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 5>and got in Patrick Smith's car to go find mister Taylor,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 5>who had allegedly taken SE's iPod. Robert Green was waiting

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 5>in the car sitting in the front passenger seat, so

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 5>pat Smith drives around the corner. They see mister Taylor

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 5>walking down the street and see or Andre Morris. Pat

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 5>Smith wasn't sure which told him to stop the car.

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 5>She and Andre Morris got out of the car, confronted

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 5>mister Taylor, and s shot and killed mister Taylor on

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 5>the sidewalk in front of a fast food restaurant. They

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 5>then got back into the car. Pat Smith drove a

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 5>short distance. Both See and mister Morris got out of

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 5>the car and ran away. So that's the factual backdrop

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 5>for this thing.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Follow along here because Pierre, who were on the phone

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 2>with now had no connection to viction, no knowledge of

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the actual perpetrator, and he was at his grandmother's at

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the time with a young lady named Lauren Richardson on

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 2>the time and date of the murder. Have you ever

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>had a nickname of ce before it?

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Never? Never, I've always went by the name of Stink

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 3>or people from my neighborhoods to call me peace, thank beer.

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 3>For my first name is Pierre. I have never ever

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 3>went by the namacy.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So what happened? How did you end up getting wrongfully

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 2>convicted here?

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, one of the pastors, Robert Greed, he goes to

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the police n five days after he allegedly seated this time,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 3>and he tells them that he's seen as murdered. A

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 3>guy named Seca missed this murder. He gives the police

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 3>multiple different descriptions. I believe his first description is five eight,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 3>light skinned, one hundred and twenty pounds. I haven't been

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty pounds since I was eighteen years old,

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 3>let alone at nineteen years old. I'm not light skinned.

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>The second time I believe sees the police, he switches

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>it up again. So allegedly he says he sees se

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 3>on April thirty, which would have been fifteen days after

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the crime, and he went back to the police and said,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>you know what, I lied again. I believe he was

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 3>six foot two, brown skin, and they had on red

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 3>shirt and a red hat. I'm not sure what kind

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 3>of lineup they were showing it, but he still couldn't

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 3>identify who they believed to be seen. The police seen

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 3>in an area that he said that he had seen seeing.

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 3>I believe it was May third, wearing a red hat.

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 3>And they stopped me. And when they stopped me and

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 3>they said, what is your name? I don't lie to

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 3>the police. Here, Russian is my man. I say, hey,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 3>we're looking for a guy that beat the guy up.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I haven't beaten the guy up. And then they leave.

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 3>When they take that name back to I believe Robert Green,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 3>who was at the police station, and they show him

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 3>a picture four days after he's seen a guy with

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 3>a red hat. He said, you know what, Yeah, that's me.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm past see. And that's how the whole way of

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 3>respond would have red had four days after the Barbara

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 3>grid Fife seen this guy.

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 2>And a month after the crime. When they first questioned you,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to know what you were doing on the

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 2>day of the crime. But when they were asking you

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>this question, it was already five weeks later, right, And

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 2>this is a trick that they use. Sometimes you're like,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you're supposed to remember exactly. Like I'll ask anybody in

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the audience right now, what were you doing. Let's go

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 2>back thirty five days from whatever day you're listening to this.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Tell me right now what you were doing at a

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>particular time on that day, and I'll give you a dollar.

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Because that's impossible, but it is very effective because then

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 2>they can say you lied, because there's no way anyone

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 2>could possibly remember that unless it was their birthday or

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 2>some other like really important day.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Right April fifteenth, you would have it is my father's birthday.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>So without me even thinking you say April fifteen, Hey,

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 3>there's nothing I was with my dad? I say, my

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.359
<v Speaker 3>dad on his birthday? Not one time at any trial transcript,

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Police ADVA Torti's theermory. Do they ever say where were

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 3>you three forty five a m. So if they said no,

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 3>you weren't with your dad. I also remember that I

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>had a traffic stop that day and they went chick

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and it showed that I was untruth for they say no,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>not at that time. It took me, I believe my attorney,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>for about a week of jog in my memory to

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 3>figure out where did I sleep at three forty five

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 3>a m. That morning? And I remembered it was my grandma.

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 3>So was because my mom came to me that morning

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and said, where are you going to get your dad

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 3>for his birthday? That's how I was. They able to

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 3>put the pieces of a puzzle together, but by that

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 3>time it was trial, so they looked at it as if, oh,

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 3>this is a third alibi. Well, no, I've given you

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 3>everywhere I went from April fifteenth, and so that's how

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 3>they played it, which is very nefarious because they see

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 3>that I was trying to tell them.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Everything at the time that This crime was committed at

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 2>three forty five in the morning. Now we know what

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 2>you were doing when you were supposedly out shooting somebody

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>who you never knew and don't know and still don't

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>know and never will know.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, height belfourteenth shooting a video. Thank you go on

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>YouTube right now. The song is called young Stink Take

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 3>a Trip. Lauren Richerson was associate of the camera man

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 3>helped shoot the video. She was also my girlfriend April fourteenth,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 3>going in table fifteen. She came to my grandma talk

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 3>roughly about nine forty five round timmy clock, and we

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>spent the night. We enjoy each other's company. We deal

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 3>with any other boy for their girlfriend.

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 6>Hello. My name is Lauren Richardson. I am an Oakland

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 6>resident and current legal apprentice. I entered the field with

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 6>a lot of motivation from the tragic situation that happened

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 6>with Pierre Rushing. I originally was into video. On April fourteenth,

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Pierre went to shoot a video. It's called take a Trip.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 6>We were super excited because he had so much support

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 6>from our neighborhood. Everybody knew he was a great rapper.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 6>When he finally shot the video, we were super excited.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 6>We went back to his grandmother's house afterwards, just to

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 6>kind of recap, and we stayed up all night watching movies, laughing,

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 6>making plans for the future. We you know, did what

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 6>couples do late night, and I left early in the

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 6>morning because I had to take my son to school.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 6>And it was some weeks after that he kind of disappeared,

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 6>you know, when somebody else found me and was like,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 6>you know, he's in jail. I'm like, what, because I

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 6>was kind of mad, you know I was. I thought

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 6>he ghosted me, to be honest, so it was no

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 6>way that he could have committed the crime. I have

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 6>never felt as powerless as I felt in this situation

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 6>to express reality and be believed, and you know, this

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 6>huge power structure for them to be able to create

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 6>a false reality, like even with the witness, the witness

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 6>is not a credible witness, nowhere near as credible as

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 6>I am. Because I'm not going to go perjure myself.

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to risk my life to keep a

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 6>killer out of jail. So for me to go up

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 6>there in front of all of these people and for

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 6>them to not take my word for it when they

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 6>had no other evidence. It bothers me to this day.

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 6>It's a big part of the motivation for me to

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 6>go into this apprenticeship program because I want to learn

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 6>how to speak up for other people who can't speak

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 6>up for themselves, because this has to stop. They ruined

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 6>an entire family.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>The idea that we in this country can sent in

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 2>somebody like you, a promising young man with his life

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 2>ahead of him, to fifty years based on the testimony

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of an admitted crackhead. It was up for two days

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 2>or changed the story four times really should make everybody

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a little scared. Yeah, can you tell us a little

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 2>bit about the trial itself?

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And killing it on camera. When I heard they had

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>it on camera, I started to kick my feet up

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and just wait for the trold days because I'm like,

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 3>if it's on camera, I'm going home. I never in

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 3>a million years imagined that the camera would be low

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 3>quality or you really can't see anything on the camera.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 3>You see a vehicle pull up and it's just draining,

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>so you can't really see anything. And I remember my

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 3>heart just dropping because I knew that that was what

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to exonerate music. They had no evidence, no

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 3>corrupt no, no physicals. They have the murder vehicle with

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>twelve fingerprints inside the car, and say I got in

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and out of that car a four time. None of

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the fingerprints Mats Mott. One of the prosecution's witness was

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 3>a lady by the name of the Carls Smith or so.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 3>She witnessed the crime her and pass s meth for

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 3>best friends. She had been in that car a week

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 3>before when the police forensic pathologists became the call on

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 3>every twenty second they found to call this fingerprints in

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 3>that car. Therefore, when she testified she hadn't been in

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 3>the car seven days prior to the killing, that means

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 3>that the car couldn't have actually been wiped down. And

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 3>if the car wasn't wiped down, and you count twelve

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 3>to fourteenth fingerprints in that car, per Robert Greene's testimony,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I got in and out of that car four times,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 3>and I killed this guy with no glove. Why don't

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 3>wear my fingerprints on the car? Second, if Robert greens

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 3>took the leave, why would you ever call me five

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 3>day light skinning one hundred and twenty pounds? Why would

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 3>you ever change it to five ten one hundred and

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 3>sixty pounds? In that preliminary hearing, when the judge allowed

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 3>me to leave the court room, they brought Robert Green in.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 3>They said, could compleatly describe to kill it. This guy

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 3>switched it up to six to two hundred and twenty pounds.

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 3>This guy's not to be believed. It was addicted to cracking.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Aroon said he had been up for two days off cracking. Aroon,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 3>I hadn't been initially seven times failing. Third, you have

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 3>to call the smith another prosecutions with us. I didn't

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 3>see him. I don't know who that is.

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean our standard in this country is

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be reasonable doubt, and this goes way beyond

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 2>that standard.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 3>I had hoped that, you know, I would I would

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 3>be exacted.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>And did you have proper representation?

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Now I went to a trial with a posite defender

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 3>and I went speedy trial. I was arrested in May,

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 3>I was convicted and all of this. And the reason

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 3>I went Steed Troup because I feel like I had

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>nothing to add I didn't do it. So why would

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I wait? Where I see in my counting people wait

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 3>four or five years to fight the case because they're

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 3>trying to wait for the better deal. The first day

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 3>of trial, I remember the judge saying something like, hey,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I know the DA is going to give you a deal.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 3>She looked to your left, get a deal because I

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 3>know that he's going to give you one. And I

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 3>just remember shaking my head. No, no, no, because why

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 3>would I take time for something if I didn't do it.

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 3>They know I'm not Sea, so they want to know

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>if what we call in the urban community, I'm going

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the stench. I know a lot of seas. That's that's

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the one for two. It's not my job to do.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 3>The police are job for them, you know. So if

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't there, what if you expect me to do?

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe it could have been this guy, Maybe he

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 3>could be this guy. If I do that, I'm worse

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 3>than Robert Green because you were not there and they

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 3>know that. The feet off that.

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, jail house nitches has just sort of become like

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 2>standard operating procedure.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Correct. It's a nightmare, a living nightmare. But that that

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 3>was the summ of the trial.

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is a nightmare scenario. So the jury goes out.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>When they came back in, what was that moment like

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 2>when they actually found guilty of a crime you didn't commit.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 3>When they came back with it, it was It was

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 3>weird because the whole trial, I had twenty to thirty

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 3>people every single day of my trial, friends from the neighborhood, family, girlfriend, associates.

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 3>But on that day, nobody was in the cooorroom, not

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 3>even the victim's family, nobody from my faund That was

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 3>just like a sense of loneliness, a sense of like

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 3>me against the world, because you're sitting here convicting me

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 3>for a crime that I didn't commit. And I know

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>that you know I didn't commit this crime. And I

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 3>couldn't even look back to look in the eyes of

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 3>my mother, my father, and my grandmother, and I felt

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 3>like that was already saving. I'm like, why was even

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 3>the Baker family? Like? Where was a feeling that I

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 3>never want to feel again.

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Marvin, take it back to how you first met Pierre

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 2>or how you first became aware of his case, and

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 2>why you chose to get involved in this case. You

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 2>must get hit with cases all the time.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 5>I actually came to represent Pierre after a different attorney,

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 5>Stephen Frederick, who was handling his direct appeal in state court,

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 5>also filed the habeas corpus petition in the California State

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Court of Appeal.

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 2>What is the literal interpretation of habeas corpus.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 5>Habeas corpus means to produce the body in Latin, and

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 5>what that means is that it's an allegation by us

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 5>that Pierre is being unlawfully incarcerated. And once I dug

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 5>into the case and reviewed the evidence in Pierre's case

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 5>and did some investigation on my own, that very much

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 5>turned out to be true.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 2>What went wrong here?

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 5>I think a number of things went wrong, but most critically,

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 5>there was evidence which could have exonerated Pierre which was

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 5>not introduced. The only witness in the case, Robert Green,

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 5>testified that Pierre was supposedly the person who committed this crime.

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 5>That is the only evidence in the case and in

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 5>the trial against Pierre, that witness testified that the person

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 5>who committed this crime was talking on his cell phone

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 5>a mere minute before shooting the victim. In this case,

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Pierre's phone records were available and that was part of

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 5>the habeas petition and got him a hearing subsequently, and

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 5>those phone records established conclusively that Pierre was not talking

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.959
<v Speaker 5>on his cell phone at the time when the perpetrator was,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 5>and if those records were introduced, I think that it

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 5>would be a pretty compelling piece of evidence to establish that,

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 5>in fact, Pierre is not the pers responsible for this murder.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>But they weren't introduced.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 7>The jury never heard of them.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 2>What about the fingerprint stuff? How did they manage to

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 2>get around that? That seems like that could have been

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 2>enough on its own. How did he not leave his fingerprints?

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Is he a ghost?

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 5>The fingerprint evidence was introduced by way of a stipulation

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 5>or the evidence technician who actually gathered the latent fingerprints

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 5>from the car that was used in the homicide. That

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 5>witness did not testify. Rather, Pierre's trial attorney chose to

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 5>have that evidence admitted by way of an agreement with

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 5>the prosecutor, simply the conclusion that Pierre's fingerprints were not

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 5>in fact recovered from that car, and had that witness

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 5>been called, it would have led to another important piece

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 5>which was not introduced and not known to the jury.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 5>That evidence technician also collected DNA from that car, swabbed

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 5>all of the areas of that car where the killer

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 5>fat just before the murder occurred. In addition, there was

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 5>a cigarette but that was recovered from the floorboard of

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 5>that car, which was also swabbed for DNA. That DNA

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 5>evidence was not tested in time for Pierre's trial, and

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 5>that was also the subject of his subsequent avias petition.

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 5>So what happened was after we obtained an evidentiary hearing

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 5>in state court to attempt to prove Pierre's innocence, As

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 5>I started reviewing the case materials, I realized that this

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 5>DNA evidence existed which would completely exonerate him, and no

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 5>one had tested it. So there's a procedure under California

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 5>law that allows the convicted individual to ask the court

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 5>to now have that evidence tested because it would prove

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 5>that he's innocent. The government opposed our efforts to have

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 5>that evidence tested, and ultimately the judge in this case

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 5>refused to allow it to test that evidence. I then

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 5>appealed that refusal, and the Court of Appeal refused to

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 5>allow us to test that evidence. Why is it that

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 5>they wouldn't want to have the DNA evidence in the

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 5>case tested if they're so confident that, in fact, he's

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 5>the perpetrator.

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 2>I never can understand in any case, especially in a

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>case as serious as this one. A murder case. Why

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 2>they wouldn't want to have every stone turned over and

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 2>have every piece of evidence tested so that they can

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 2>find out not only that in this case, Pierre didn't

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>do it, but they could find out who actually did. Marvin,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Yolanda Washington, and Patrick Smith are pivotal players in this

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 2>whole wrongful conviction. Can you explain their role in what

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 2>went wrong here?

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 7>Sure?

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 5>Of course Pat Smith was a charged co defendant in

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 5>the case at the time of Pierre's trial, so he

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 5>did not testify at the trial. He had his fifth

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 5>Amendment right. But after Pierre's trial was long over and

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 5>after Patrick Smith was his part of the case for

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 5>accessory after the fact, he then signed an affidavid which

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 5>helped Pierre get an evidentiary hearing. He indicated both in

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 5>his affidavit as well as in his testimony at the

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 5>evidentiary hearing that his drug dealer is a man who

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 5>goes by the name of f and that individual was

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 5>not Pierre Rushing. Pat Smith at the hearing refused to

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 5>name that individual because he was afraid for his life.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 5>But one of the people who was in that apartment

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 5>was a woman by the name of Yolanda Washington, and

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 5>she also did not testify a trial, But after Pierre

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 5>was convicted, she signed an affidavid under penalty of perjury,

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 5>indicating that she, of course, having been in that apartment,

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 5>knew who she was. She obviously knew who Andre Morris was.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 5>And what she said in her affidavit was that Pierre

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 5>Rushing is not the drug dealer who shot and killed

0:28:58.360 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 5>mister Taylor.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 7>Rushing is not C.

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 5>But that's not all. Indeed, Yolanda Washington went so far

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 5>as to identify who that person was. Now, before we

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 5>get into this, let me make one thing clear, which

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 5>is that Pierre does not know the identity of the

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 5>perpetrator of this homicide. Yolanda Washington, in her affidavid did

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 5>name that individual who goes by the nickname C. In fact,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 5>his first name is his name is And of course

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 5>it would make perfect sense that he would go by

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 5>the nickname C because his name is Pierre Rushing does

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 5>not have a cea in his name, and she has

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 5>never been Pierre's nickname. Because Pierre is not the person

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 5>responsible for this killing. That affidavit was part of what

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 5>enabled Pierre to get a hearing in superior court. Unfortunately,

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Miss Washington was a homeless individual at that time, and

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 5>my investigator was essentially unable to locate her to get

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 5>her to testify in court. So I filed emotion essentially

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 5>asking that her affidavit be considered because she was unavailable,

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 5>and that request was denied.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow, it's pretty courageous, even after the fact that these

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>two people both were willing to put their own lives

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>at risk to identify someone who they know is a killer,

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think that speaks volumes to the veracity of

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>their statements.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 3>You have any doubt in my innagmence? How would I

0:30:55.680 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 3>use this thing on the points? What person would for

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 3>DNA testing of the materials that were sought out the

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 3>vehicle if I wasn't innocent, What yilty man would place

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 3>for the enhancement of the video if I wasn't innocent,

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 3>A man going to push for the phone records? Amnis,

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I think you meant this crime. I have nothing to

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 3>do with this.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Crime, Pierre. Last time we spoke Dwan Taylor's actual murderer,

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the guy known as C now his co conspirator Andre Marris,

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>as well as an accessory after the fact, Patrick Smith,

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 2>they had both come forward to definitively state that you

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 2>had absolutely nothing to do with the ones murder and

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 2>are not, in fact C.

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not you.

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 2>You and C are different people, but for their own safety,

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>understandably they would not name C. However, a woman named

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Yolanda Washington, who was prepared to do just that, she

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>couldn't be located for your ebidentiary here and then Smith

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and Morris were just explained away. And additionally, your request

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>for DNA testing against items from the car was denied.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And you're right, why would a guilty person, what guilty

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 2>person would be seeking DNA testing on items that might

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 2>contain their own DNA?

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you want to.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Submit your own guilt if you were doing that, if

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you actually had a guilty conscience. Or why would they

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.239
<v Speaker 2>try to enhance crime scene video if they knew it

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>was going to point to their guilt. All of this

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 2>in addition to how flimsy the state's evidence was to

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 2>begin with the sole witness I'm talking about Robert Green,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 2>of course, the whole witness who cooperated with police to

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 2>avoid being charged as well, whose description of C changed

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>three count them three times, and one of those times

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Green said that C had worn a red hat again.

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Robert green knew sy knew just how dangerous he really was,

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 2>yet he felt quite comfortable identifying you, Pierre, after you

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>were picked up while wearing a red hat.

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 4>They stopped me two days after that description was given,

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 4>So I guess this quote unquote killer was supposed to

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 4>have been wearing the same clothes and hat for two

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 4>days straight. I mean, like it was bananas from the beginning.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 4>I've never fit a description of being five to eight

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 4>light skin, I've never rocked the ball, and haven't been

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and twenty pounds since I was ten years old.

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it just has been bananas from the game.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Nobody can convince me that he thought I was ever

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 4>the guy in the car with.

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Him, because you weren't. What you were was you were

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>with Lauren that night at your grandmother's house, and her

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 2>testimony was corroborated by the absence of your fingerprints in

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the vehicle. Since your episode aired in twenty twenty, your

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 2>case was picked up from Marvin leu pro bono, by

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the way, by one of the biggest and baddest law

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>firms in the country, Greenberg Trauig and one of their

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:56.479
<v Speaker 2>star attorneys, Jordan Gratzinger has been hard at work. I

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 2>mean that's an understatement.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, he's a beast.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 4>We have a great investigator by the name of Grant

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Fine overturning all the stones in the case, getting half

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 4>a Davis that wouldn't have gotten before, talking to witnesses

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 4>that hadn't spoken before, and tracked Robert Green down. I

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 4>was sitting here on my bunk and Jordan grass Singer

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 4>he sent me a message and he just was saying

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 4>Robert Green every candidate and I had to look at

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 4>the message twice take it.

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 7>All in, and I was like, damn.

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was like some kind of like April

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Fool's joke or something, and I just immediately dropped his tears.

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 4>So from what I've been told, it was just like,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, weighing on his soul. He finally did the

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 4>right thing. We'll just tell the truth. I mean, I've

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 4>gotten with anybody in my position of fighting wrong for

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 4>comvision as asked for. The one and only witness has

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 4>fully recanted.

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm both well, very happy for you, but also

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>i gotta admit I'm confused. Why am I? Why are

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 2>we talking to you over a prison phone? It seems

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.240
<v Speaker 2>like that should have been, it should have resolved the case.

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 2>You should have walked out the door. And now there's

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>actually literally zero evidence against you. So where does that

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 2>leave your case.

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 4>We're in court and we're trying to get this case dismissed.

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Speaking with a progressive da by the name of Pamela Price,

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 4>and she has eyes on it.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 7>I don't have the declaration in front of me, but

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 7>Robert Green.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 4>Says he knew the whole time that it wasn't me,

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:21.959
<v Speaker 4>and it just gave validation and what I've been saying

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 4>the whole time that I didn't commit this crime and

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 4>there was no way that I would have or could

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 4>have committed this crime. As well as one of the

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 4>guys that were actually convicted after me, Andre Morris, he

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 4>did a written declaration and said that he was a

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 4>participant in the killing and that I wasn't with him.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>That was that.

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 7>So we're just waiting and praying for good news very soon.

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's hope the Pamela Price doesn't just put on

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the progressive sort of bona FIDE's at election time, right,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 2>but that she takes this case as what it is,

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 2>which is an example of why we need prospersuters with

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the brains and the heart that we know she possesses.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, it shouldn't take a reform minded

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor when we're dealing with actual innocence. Every prosecutor should

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 2>want to get the innocent guy out and go after

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 2>the person that actually did it. And this is a

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 2>guy whose name we know and we know they know,

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 2>So what is the hold up?

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 7>I believe Pamela Price is under a lot of scrutiny.

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 4>She's cleaning up Alameda County, and she's being took to town

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 4>by some as being too soft on crime. And really

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 4>there's all type of guys walking around here in three

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 4>strikes and weed and all type of just craziness. She's

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 4>by the book, and by her being by the book,

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 4>it's making her seem as if she's soft on crime

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 4>if you don't have enough evidence to convict beyond a

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 4>reasonable doubt. She's not taking it into some that that

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 4>seems if she's soft on krime in my instance, as

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 4>far as my habeas petition, I haven't heard from Pamela Price,

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 4>and Jordan hasn't either. She's aware of the situation, she's

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 4>aware of the Joe Rogan podcast, She's aware of the

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Wrongful Provision podcast, She's aware of the Breakfast Club interview,

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 4>and she still hasn't responded to Jordan Grassinger, and she's

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 4>supposed to file some kind of rebuttal to my release.

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure where we're at. We're close to justice,

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 4>but I still feel like they're trying to hold on

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 4>to something that they know is wrong, because why are

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:24.439
<v Speaker 4>they not talking to us?

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 7>Why are they following the rebuddle? What are you rebudding?

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 4>You have every single person that was in the vehicle

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 4>except to kill her yourself, that has done sworn declarations

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 4>and given testimony that I did not comment the crime.

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Everybody has said, wrong guy. There is no physical or

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 4>tangible or corroborating evidence that goes with this case.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 7>What are you rebudding?

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it either. I mean, are they going

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 2>to say we don't find Robert Green's recantation credible? And

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 2>if so, was he then credible before when he was

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 2>facing accessory after the fact doing all kinds of drugs.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget he changed the description of c three times,

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 2>a guy who he knew to be capable of murder,

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 2>yet he was brave enough to identify you a man

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 2>who did not fit any one of his multiple descriptions.

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's hard not to think that maybe he

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 2>thought that you were the type of guy who wouldn't

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>come after him, which leads us to believe that you

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>were not a dangerous guy in the first place, never were,

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 2>and never will be. I mean, this conviction happened well

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 2>over a decade before Pam Price was elected. She could

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 2>fix this. It wouldn't reflect badly on her or her office,

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 2>because after all, it was one of her predecessors that

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 2>made these mistakes.

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 4>It was a lady but the name of Nancy O'Malley.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 4>So I understand she has a lot to go on.

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 4>But it's like Jordan says, there is no case in

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 4>Alamina County that is as compelling in an innocence claim

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 4>as mine.

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 2>So is there anything our audience can do to help?

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Is there a petition to sign? At a very minimum, I.

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Think we're past signing a petition. I believe that we

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 4>have to do a CEP Newton shiit. We have to agitate,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 4>we have to call, we have to email, we have

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 4>to show up unannounced to the d DA's office. Some

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 4>might say that that's hurtful. Sitting in jail for twelve

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 4>years with a fifty to life sentence is hurtful. Duwan

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 4>Taylor's family deserves justice like this is not justice. So

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 4>I would ask that a call Family Prices office and

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 4>ask for justice for Perre Russian.

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, this is all hands on deck, people, We

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 2>can we can do this. We put out the original

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 2>coverage three and a half bucking years ago. All right,

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 2>so we're gonna post her office's number, her email, her

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 2>snail mail address, all of it in the bio. And remember,

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 2>be respectful when you call. It doesn't help anyone in order.

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Does she deserve Everyone deserves to be treated ris respect

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 2>in that office whoever answers the phone, So please keep

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that in mind, but do call, write, email, whatever. And

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>with that we're going to move on to closing arguments,

0:39:56.360 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 2>where I thank you Pierre for calling in once again again.

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 2>You know you're in our thoughts here at Rafel Conviction

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 2>more often than you know. And now I'm just going

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 2>to sit back and listen to anything else you want

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:10.879
<v Speaker 7>I would just like to speak directly to her.

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go for it.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Pamela Price, Robert Green get his declaration in February when

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 4>he lied on me. They instantly put a word out

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 4>the same day. That's tooking longer to exonerate me than

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 4>it took to convict me.

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 7>There's no evidence in this case.

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Rely on your common sense, Rely on your expertise and

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 4>the Civil Rights Arena. Rely on your intelligence. I didn't

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.240
<v Speaker 4>commit this crime. You know I didn't commit this crime.

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Every mind of second that passes by is an injustice.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 7>I could be your son. I could be your little brother.

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 7>I could be your nephew.

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 4>I do not deserve to continue to sit here while

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 4>you and your office place politics. I have a family

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 4>to get to. My little sister was murdered in twenty eighteen.

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 4>My niece has no mother, she has no father.

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 7>She needs me.

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 4>My family needs me. My mother needs me, my father

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 4>needs me. The community needs me. I have a story.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 4>I can stop a lot with my story. I'm asking

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 4>you to please step up and do the right thing.

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Give Jordan Grassen your a call, and please do the

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 4>right thing.

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. You can listen

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to this and all the Lava for Good podcasts one

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 2>week early and ed free by subscribing to Lava for

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Good plus on Apple Podcasts. I want to thank our

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 2>production team Connor Hall and Kathleen Fink, as well as

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 2>my fellow executive producers Jeff Kempler, Kevin Warnis, and Jeff Cleiber.

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 2>The music in this production was supplied by three time

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 2>OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 2>across all social media platforms at Lava for Good and

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 2>at Wrongful Conviction. You can also follow me on Instagram

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 2>at It's Jason Flamm. Wrongful Conviction is the production of

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Lava for Good Podcasts and association with Signal Company Number One.

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We've worked hard to ensure that all facts reported in

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this show are accurate. The views and opinions expressed by

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the individuals featured in this show are their own and

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>do not necessarily reflect those of love of for Good