WEBVTT - Vita Vea Trade Request, Baker's Dilemma and All-Under-25 Team

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to NFL Daily, where we're a long way away

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>from being eligible for the All Under twenty five team.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg Rosenthal. I'm with a man who's well over

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty five as well. It's Nick Shook. He wrote the

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>article we're going to be talking about a little later,

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>but not before we get to some news. First day.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Teams are all showing up to training camp, and like

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>as we're taping, more and more news is popping, like

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jalen Carter contract just now.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, teams, players show up, contracts get done

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>apparently when you need a little FaceTime just to get

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the pen on the paper. I don't know what it is,

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's flying left and right. And you know what, Greg,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>You're right about the All under twenty five. As I

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>get older, I just thank god. I'm thinking myself in

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>athlete years and I'm close to retirement in athlete years.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>That's rough. That's a rough admission.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>It is eye opening when you realize, yeah, you're older

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>than almost everyone you're unquote covering, so you're almost there, Shook,

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud of you. You really know you're old when

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you start calling like professional athletes kids if they're in

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>their young twenties.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's pretty much where we are.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's talk about the Bucks first, so I will

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>get to that Jalen Carter contract extension. We have some news,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and like I mentioned, we're going to talk about Shook's

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>All Under twenty five team. It is an amazing list

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to be on. All the players want to be on.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>It's highly coveted, and he had his big list out

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on NFL dot com. But we'll start with the Bucks,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who had two big items of news. Vita Vea has

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>requested a trade and Baker Mayfield has showed up to

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.279
<v Speaker 1>training camp with the news that he will no longer

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>negotiate a contract and he will be a free agent

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>after the year. Have thoughts on that one, but let's

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>start with the vita Vea news because it was more surprising.

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a real chance he ends up back

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Bucks and that this is just negotia. Nick,

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the odds that you think Videvea could

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>actually get traded.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh God, I mean, I think it's it's less than

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>like fifty percent possible. UK, just because I don't think

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>that he's it's not that he's not an excellent player,

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>because he is, but you have to consider age with

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>this in contract demands.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>He's thirty one years old.

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be hard to find a partner that

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>is going to be willing to give up the capital

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 2>necessary to acquire Vita Vea that the Buccaneers will demand

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 2>without considering his age. And then also there's the idea

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 2>of you acquire him to then extend him, and he's

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 2>going to want money that mirrors his production. That's where

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>the way it gets weird is because he was a

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>rookie in twenty eighteen, which is crazy because it feels

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>like just yesterday I was listening to him talk at

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 2>the combine. But that's how quickly time goes and how

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>fast these things can change. So I think that you're right.

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 2>They do come to terms on an agreement eventually. I

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 2>don't think it lands near the money that he wants,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 2>though there's going to be. It could be a drawn

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>out process. And the weird thing about this is that

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be a training camp but they don't

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 2>know about his participation yet. I anticipate a hold in.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>We'll see how long that goes on and whether that

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 2>force is either side's hand, but I don't think that.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna take a lot of negotiating.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>A lot more than has happened so far, which led

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 2>to this trade request, and it's a really weird time

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>for Jason light the general manager of the Buccaneers.

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>It is really tricky between this one and the Baker

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield contract, because I think they're both complicated. I would

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>put the over under if I had been setting it

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>for you, like around thirty five percent, which is actually

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>high in my mind. I think there's a legitimate chance

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>he could get traded. I think the most likely outcome,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the one that makes the most sense for the Bucks

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as Vidave was okay for it with it,

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>would be to get a big one year raise and

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they just make him happy by making him a top

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>five to eight top defensive tackle for money this year.

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that enough to get him into the building and

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>just happy and they're not worrying about the long term

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of it all. I put it as high as thirty percent, though,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think the Bucks don't want to give him

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a big contract. He is older than most people that

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>were drafted back in twenty eighteen. He was an old prospect.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>He's a very unique player. John Ledyard, who I really respected,

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>did a list on his sub stack. People should check

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that out. Audibles and analytics. He had him as the

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>number twelve defensive tackle that feels about right where he lands,

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>like he gives you pass rush that most guys that

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>strong don't. But he's not peaked Exter Lawrence. He's not

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Carter. You know, he's not Jeffrey Simmons. Though you

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>know Jalen Carter we're going to get to is making

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty four million dollars a year on his extension, and

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Vidavey is at eighteen, so I could see him getting

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a big raise. He's also a type of player that

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just tricky body size, how much he's actually on

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the field. Do you want to be paying huge money

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for his age thirty two that's next season, age thirty

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>three season maybe, But it's all about like where the

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>guaran Teas would be. And yet, if you're Vita Vea

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, if I had hit free agency, if

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for instance, I have to write about it, I'm now

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going from his voice to my voice. I'm now Greg Rosenthal.

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>If I have to write about it like some team

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>like Tyler Linden Bram got twenty eight million dollars like

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Fight a Veil would make it an insane amount of

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>money if he actually got out there. And so it's complicated.

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>He's complicated. You don't think so, I'm not sure because

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we're in this weird place now where veteran d tackles

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Are valued more than they've been over the last decade.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I think about guys like I used the Browns as

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 2>an example because they were plugging their defensive interior with

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 2>veterans for years. It was Sheldon Richardson, More recently it

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>was MALIEK. Collins and Shelby Harris, and they do still

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>carry value both with experience and production if you can

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 2>marry the two and prove that that's still within a player.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But I'm glad that you brought up the dexter lawrence

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>and the connection to the Bengals, because I think that

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 2>there's actually could mirror what happened with Trey Hendrickson and

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals last year, which is that they gave him

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 2>that one year raise and they basically agreed after this done.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I like that that is your projection, is that that

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 2>could be the possible outcome of a just a hefty

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>one year raise and then you part your ways, because

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>let's think about it at thirty two years old. Yeah,

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 2>you might cash in with a team that's desperate for

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 2>defensive interior help, that believes that they can win now,

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 2>but that market's going to be a lot smaller. So

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>it's a very very precarious situation for Vidavea to be in.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 2>But I also understand because if you look at him

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>versus the rest of the market, he's pretty far down

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the list. He's behind Cam Hayward, He's just slightly ahead

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>of Ed Oliver, He's behind Christian Barmore, Kenny Clark, Leonard Williams.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 2>In terms of apy way at the top is Jeff

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Simmons at thirty five point two. We got vidave at

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>seventeen point seven, so he's not going to double it,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 2>but he's got to climb a little bit based on

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>his production. I don't think the Buccaneers are necessarily going

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>to be the team willing to do that over multiple years.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Milton Williams got about twenty six per year last year?

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Would he be asking for something around then? Are the

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Bucks at all worried about the fan base? He's beloved.

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>They just lost Mike Evans, the most beloved player on

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the roster. Their quarterback is entering a free agent year.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Vidavea is now probably the most beloved player on the roster.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a relatively young team and he is still productive.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He tied with Byron Murphy for the most pressures last

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>season of anyone from a zero one or two technique,

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>which is you know about how far you are and

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what gap you're in geared to the ball, basically a

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>gap or right over the nose. He was second in

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>double team's face and that's partly because of the position

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that he plays. But he's unique, and if he's declined,

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only, you know, by a little. He's

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a one of one and so it's tricky

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and why I give it as high as thirty thirty

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>five percent, Like, yeah, sounds like a lot. You got

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay him the money and give up what I

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>would imagine would be a second round pick. I think

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that might get it done. I don't think a third

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>should get that done. I mean, we just saw like

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Trent McDuffie go for a lot like hendrickson the original

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Max Crosby trade. The Dexter Lawrence trade what Miles Garrett is.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I know if Vitave is not at this level, but

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Odiggy Zuos is one that's a little lower

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for a third. But like people are giving up picks,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>people are just doing things, and there are there is

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cap room out there. And so there

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was a report that he wanted to play for a

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>West Coast team California. His former GM is with the Raiders.

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>To me, that makes no sense. Why would they do that?

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, who has the most cap space in the

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>NFL right now? It sort of doesn't make sense to me.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the San Francisco forty nine. How about Vida Veya?

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Just how about him adding to that group? Give up

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>another draft pick? This team's old anyways, you have so

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>much cap space, like a team that's trying to win

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. Could it be at arms race, you know

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC West. That would be fun.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that would be very exciting for forty

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>nine Ers fans that are looking for reasons to you know,

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're already excited based on what the team

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 2>did last year, and then they think, well, we're gonna

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>be healthy this year.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 3>So they're gonna have a better chance.

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 2>It would be another thorn or another you know, twist

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of the knife and Buccaneers fans hearts if they were

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to use Mike evanston Niners and then trade Vida Veya

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>to the Niners and just kind of make this whole thing.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 2>It's funny because I got a text from one of

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>my closest friends who is a diehard Buccaneers fan going

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 2>way back to when we were you know, kids, We

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>met in high school, and he just texted me out

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of nowhere, this Bucks blow up and rebuild is going

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 2>to be legendary, lol, Basically him coping with the idea

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that more of his favorite players are going to be gone.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Soon, that that's a good transition to Baker Mayfield, who

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>showed up to camp and according to Greg Auman of

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports, who was a longtime beat writer there too,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>said he showed up with the intention that contract tacts,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>contract talks are over, that they maybe never even really happened,

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and Baker Mayfield doesn't want the distraction. ESPN said earlier

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>this week Jeremy Fowler that Baker Mayfield was comfortable, you know,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if if they had to use the franchise tag on

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>him next year, he would be comfortable with that, and

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be you know, upwards of forty five close

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to fifty million dollars a year if they had to

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>tag him. It makes sense for both sides, really, but

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>especially the Buccaneers. And yet Baker Mayfield on a prove

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it contract year has some recipe to be chaotic in

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe a good way for us as podcasters, but maybe

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not the best if you're a Bucksman.

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>If you saw Netflix's new quarterback season this year, have

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Baker one of them. I almost feel like he came

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to the realization that, hey, maybe trying to play through

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>every injury to give my team the best chance of success,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 2>and also to be stubborn because I refuse to go

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 2>off the field as not the best move for me.

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>He reflected on him, you know, suffering a shoulder injury

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 2>with the Browns and it kind of derailing his time there,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and then he experiences a similar thing with the Buccaneers

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 2>this past season as part of their late season meltdown.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 2>And now he's going to go into a contract year

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>in which you know, he's going to have to prove

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 2>to them that he's worthy of another extension. But it's

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>funny because I don't really necessarily think that he Like

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I think he's earned more than that in his time

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 2>with the Buccaneers. Like, let's think about where they were

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 2>as a franchise post Tom Brady. They had no idea

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>where they were going. Oh, Baker Mayfield happens to be

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>out there, needs a job, Let's take a flyer on him.

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>He succeeds, Let's give him a three year extension. Because

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>we still really don't fully believe in him, but we

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>believe in him enough to give him a three year extension.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like he still is never going to earn

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 2>the trust of this front office that he needs to

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to really get this contract that he desires. And it

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.719
<v Speaker 2>feels as if he is aware of that at this

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 2>point and is going to take that, put the chip

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 2>on his shoulder and make it even bigger than it

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 2>already is and say, fine, I'll just go prove to

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 2>you that I'm worth all the money this year. But

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>is he going to risk it by playing through a

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 2>potential another injury if he were to get injured again.

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Obviously you don't want any players to get hurt, but

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 2>it's like there's a weird balance between the two of

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 2>like contract year, Stubborn got to prove my point, but

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>also have experienced in recent years that playing through injury

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 2>is not the best. So it's gonna be one of

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 2>those things that we're going to monitor week by week

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 2>throughout this season. Because he's got the most to lose

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 2>this year, he also has a lot to gain. And

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 2>he's also one of the streakiest quarterbacks in the NFL.

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Right the streakiness you hit it there, the pressure of

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it all like it could be electric. You know, Joe

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Flacco's Super Bowl run and him finishing on the NFL

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>network desk and literally saying like, well that that contract's

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be expensive after he won the Super Bowl

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and the owner like having to fork over the biggest

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>contract ever. It's high variance. And yet when I watched that,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Baker comes across as very likable, much more mature. I

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of thoughts on that quarterback. I think

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been able to finish it the first couple

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of times because I just found it boring the first

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>two seasons. I thought this season was easily the best

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one because Jayden Daniels was probably the only one to

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>me that wasn't ultra compelling, But Flacco, Baker, and especially

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>cam Ward all really dynamic in different ways. Cam Word

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was incredible. But it got me thinking about Baker of like, man,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>his career outcome, it could have been, it could have

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>been different, worse in a lot of different ways. Like

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>he's really carved out like a pretty incredible career. And

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>even when he's going through all these injuries and yeah,

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he's drinking beers at the New York City Marathon and

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just he's not a big guy. You do wonder

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>how he's gonna age a little bit, Like have we

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>already seen the peak of Baker Mayfield. I feel like

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's possible. I could he could have another big season

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>or two, Like it's certainly possible. But he hasn't won

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>with overwhelming physical skills. He's an extremely accurate quarterback with

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a great arm, don't get me wrong. Like he's very

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>athletic and you can keep to like, but he is streaky.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The whole chip on his shoulder, like cliche in the

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>mentality does seem like it really does matter for him

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and like those players are validable and like

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>he's had a volatile career. So you do wonder if,

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the Bucks are a little worried.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 3>About I'm gonna I'm gonna go out on a.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Limb here, And I think you're right because they worry,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>like well, his style of play, his build. Is it

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 2>really the long term success that we're looking for in

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback, especially as he's thirty years old now, which

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>again reminds me of my.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Age thirty one, thirty one?

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, even worse, how about this for a career ender,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 2>like an ending arc.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 3>This is a bit of a reach.

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>And I understand this because they're not the same quarterback,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>but I do see some similarities.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you remember.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 2>John Elway's physical state in his last like three to

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 2>four years in the NFL.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, one of the most physically dominant quarterbacks of all time. Yes,

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I hear what you're saying.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>But age hit him pretty hard. Now we all remember,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, the helicopter hit in the super Bowl.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 3>And everything else. That was one of his defining moments

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 3>of his career and everything else.

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>If you trunk that down in terms of timeline and

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 2>then reduced the overall athletic ability, you could maybe find

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>a comparison during the two so it could it could

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>drop off a lot sharper and it could be a

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 2>bad situation for them, So I understand their hesitance.

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Baker just looks like a normal dude a lot of

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, which.

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Is yes, he's not built like saros No.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>For an NFL player. I mentioned the Jalen Carter contract.

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll move on from Baker because we'll be talking about

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>him plenty, but just a lot on the line. By

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, free agents next year, I've already started looking,

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk about a guy who would be excited

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to hit the free agent market. I mean he would

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>get a good contract. Him and Kyler Murray right now

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are the class of the potential free agents. Mac Jones,

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, you know, to like it's it's not great.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It's basically him and Kyler at the top. So great

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks don't get to free agency. Great defensive tackles don't either.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Carter didn't even get to the second to last

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>year of his rookie contract because they had already put

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a fifth year option on So what they did on

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday is they extended him four years, which means it's

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a total six year contract. The extension part of it

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is four years, one hundred and fifty two million with

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred and six million dollars guaranteed. So hit

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, topping one hundred million dollars guaranteed is big

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>time the next three years, essentially knowing that are are

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be locked up. That said, they he gives

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>up his control for six years. If you tack on

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the years that were already on his contract, it's more

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like a six for one to eighty. Then it's thirty

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>one per year. And more importantly, like that, the percentage

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of the cap is going to go down and down

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and down as you go. My takeaway when the contract

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is this long for such young players, the Eagles will

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>have Jalen Carter on their roster as long as they

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>want to for the rest of his career. He is

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>giving up that control. If he has a Hall of

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Fame caliber, all pro type of career, he's going to

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be an Eagle until he's ineffective. And that's what you

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>give up when you when you take this much guaranteed money,

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>this long and contract and makes a lot of sense

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>for both sides.

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it does.

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I felt like this is obviously the big question mark

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 2>that was next on Howie Rosman's agenda when it came

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to who's he going to extend next?

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>That are these key pieces. And I know that.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>There had been some chatter that maybe they weren't long

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>for each other. But anybody who's got a working pair

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of eyes and understands football knows how important he is

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to this team. Anybody who watched this defense play last

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 2>year when they didn't have him knows how important he

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>is to this team. And so if you go try

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to go through exactly real quick and contextualize all this,

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Ye're like, well, he wasn't an All Pro last year. Yeah,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 2>he played eleven games, got himself tossed from the first

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>game of the season before it even started.

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Was a little up and down. Was a little up

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and down, you like, sometimes he's kind of been up

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and down his whole career though, to be honest, Yes,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>so you think.

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Lash plays are so big that they justify the lulls.

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 2>And we can always go back to their run to

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl two seasons ago as a concrete example

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>of how important he is to that team. On that

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, fantastic defensive front that they have, so while

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 2>you keep key guys like this on your team and

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 2>continue to try to retool around them. You're following the

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs method to a degree, but in the Howie Roseman fashion,

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 2>this makes a lot of sense. This is money that's

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 2>well deserved, and as long as he can stay healthy,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 2>he'll probably prove that he's worth it. And like you said,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 2>as the years go on, the cap continues to increase,

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be more and more team friendly.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Where does it play him? You said it was one.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it would be. It depends on the way

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that schefter frames it. In the agent's Drew Rosenhouse, so

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he cites so it's it's to make the agent look better.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Carter is the highest paid defensive tackle by about three

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>million over Jeffrey Simmons, who's three million over Chris Jones,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Dexter Lawrence, and Milton Williams last. But that's only counting

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the extension money. I'd have to go into like how

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>their deals worked with the extension, but either way, even

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>on average for the six years, he's over thirty million dollars.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>We are now at that point where defensive linemen are

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>making quarterback money. Okay, Jalen Carter is making quarterback money

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and he's making it next to Jordan Davis, you know,

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>who just got a big extension too. So this is

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a team that pays their defensive lineman. And this this

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>might be a pretty you know, direct result of them

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>not being able to keep Jalen Phillips, Like maybe there

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is more money in the cookie jar this offseason instead

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of putting it off another year before they played paid Carter.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you take their ap wise per year and

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the two extensions of the sign with their defensive interior,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 2>which I think is important, especially when they're healthy, because

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 2>it's the best defensive interior duo I think in the

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 2>NFL when they're healthy, million dedicated per year to those

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>two guys. That's a lot of money. That's money.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Who is next to Fletcher Cox all those years? I

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like they had a great, a good defensive tackle duo.

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he has paid a lot of defensive linemen

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>over the years, and it's a position that usually you

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't at your best the first two or three years

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>just physically it is just hard to hold up. And

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>so the fact Jordan Davis we've seen like dramatic improvement,

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>so their their Betty on Jalen Carter getting even better.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>And when I say he's up and down, what I

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>mean is that for entire games, for entire weeks stretches

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at a time, he looks like the best defensive player

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, Like he's right there with like Miles Garrett,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>literally like he is that dominant a player for like

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>a game or two at a time, and then he

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just he gets a little quiet and maybe you don't.

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't see it like on an every snap basis,

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that the great greats, like a

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Miles Garrett, dude, game after game. But he'll he'll be

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>paid like a great you know who was a great

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. Upcoming Hall of Famer Luke Keighley

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be inducted into Canton. You'll be there not

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>only a week away, is that right?

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? The Hall of Fame game is next week.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Nine days. Crazy. He is going in as a linebacker

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's a big Louke Keighley year. Not only was

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he on NFL daily at some point, maybe that was

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, he's going to be the number one analyst

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>for Netflix football. I don't know if you're aware of this.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm throwing this into the the news rundown. Luke kick

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Keikley is going to be their first number one analysts.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Before they were kind of like rotating guys that worked elsewhere,

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's going to be like the dedicated Netflix guy

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on all the big Netflix games. So the second game

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of the season is Noah Eagle, who's usually with NBC,

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and it is an NBC production. It's a little confusing

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix, but Keickley get gets a big spot in

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Australia with the Rams and the forty nine Ers.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 2>So NFL Daily has long been established as a fan

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 2>of alternate broadcasts, you know, especially on primetime games, and

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Luke Keigley sees the spotlight in the alternate broadcast space

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>last year with ESPN specifically, it was the Colts primetime

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 2>game Philip Rivers first start against I believe the forty

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 2>nine Ers, right where Keikley is doing the Tony romo,

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>but doing it a million times better, which is that

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 2>he's essentially telling you what's going to happen on the field,

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 2>doing it with less words, and doing it more clearly

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and without the whole rise and fall of energy that

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 2>often accompanies Tony romo and just showing his expertise and

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 2>how he was He made himself into one of the

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 2>best players in the NFL during his time, which guys

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 2>would often, you know, recall stories in which he would

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 2>be calling their plays out before the snap because he

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 2>knew what was coming and then would go make the tackle.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Now he brings that to the broadcast booth.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 2>He was excellent in that ESPN broadcast on that primetime night,

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and he's going to be excellent in this job.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 3>It's a well deserved opportunity for Luke Keighley.

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to it. You know, I've interviewed him.

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I've seen him in interviews over the years. He's so

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>low key and I was like, does he have the

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>juice to be like a broadcaster type has been.

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 3>That's the key, though. You don't have to have the

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 3>juice and be screaming into them, but.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.719
<v Speaker 1>A little though. There's like a balance.

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>You can't have no juice, and I think that that

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 2>will come. But what he's going to be able to

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 2>do is educate the average viewer on a platform that

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>has lacked that voice in there still. You know, it's

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 2>like the nascent era of Netflix streaming NFL games. I

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 2>think that's going to be so valuable that he's going

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 2>to be a fan favorite among anybody who's curious about

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 2>the game of football.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, all I mean is you got to speak authoritatively.

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you have to scream or anything like that.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And for all I know, like he already is and

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>can and does, and I'm really looking forward to it.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>They said he had great chemistry with no Eagle. That

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was Andrew Marshawan in the Athletic with that report. And

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been doing radio for the Panthers. It's not like

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening to the radio broadcast of the Panthers,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so that that is great practice of like learning your craft.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's pivot to the Kyle Shanahan news, which we talked

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>about on Monday, in terms of his car accent. I

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>did just want to date he has been showing up

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to practice on a very limited basis. He's still coming

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>off of that concussion and we'll see when he's back fully.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Grant Cone of Sports Illustrated dot Com, who covers the

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers, found a public records report that said

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan reportedly had a cell phone in his hand

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time of the accident. But the officers made

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>no charges because it was the victim who he crashed

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>into that actually went over the median into his side

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and crashed and they determined afterwards that no one was

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at fault. So that is the official police vantage point

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Kyle Shanahan accident. And I don't think that

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be much more on that, And we

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 1>just hope that Kyle Shanahan is ready and eventually, obviously

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he'll answer questions about the accident and about his recovery

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>when he's back and good enough to be in front

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>of a microphone. The Vikings signed Jamal Adams. Remember Jamal

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Adams was in the league last year on the Raiders. Yes,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings also suspended their defensive backs coach Gerald Alexander

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>for three weeks for a dui. This is the second

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>dui from a position coach in as many days. When

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>it came to the Commanders, their coach, Gerald Alexander was

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>suspended for three weeks. And then I'm just going to

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>run through some news really quick before we get to

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you're all under twenty five team. When it comes to

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>pupp lists, just you tell me what stands out to

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you off of this list that I give you. Devon

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>ah Chan not on the pup list. We'll be ready

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to practice tomorrow. And if you're just tuning in, six

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>teams have been practicing now, the Panthers and Cardinals for

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about a week, the Seahawks, the Patriots, the forty nine ers,

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rams now for about three days. So we've had

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>these practice reports. Every other team was showing up on Tuesday,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>and we'll start practicing on Wednesday. So that's why we

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of pupp list information and more will

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be coming tomorrow. Devon eight Chan of the Dolphins will

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>be ready to practice tomorrow on some basis. DeForest Buckner,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the defensive tackle for the Colts, was cleared to return

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>from a neck injury, will not be on the pup list,

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>will be practicing. His teammate Alec Pierce will be on

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the pup list. He is at least a week or

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>two away from any level of practice. According to the GM,

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ballard, Tucker Kraft no surprise coming off at torny

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>acl is on the pup list, and Jalen Ramsey is

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be out for a few weeks with an

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>injury we didn't know about. For the Pittsburgh Steelers. What

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>stands out to you for those injury updates to start camp.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Probably Ramsey given his age and importance to the Steelers

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 2>defense as kind of a star. Not you know, he's

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a safety slash slot corner type

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 2>of guy at this point in his career. Not encouraging,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 2>but they're also not too worried about it. That's probably

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>what stands out to me the most good news for

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>a chan because he's going to have to carry that

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 2>offense this year in Miami, so it's nice for him

0:25:58.359 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 2>to hit the ground running.

0:25:59.160 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 3>It's about it.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>As we're taping this. By the way, more contracts are happening.

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings signed tackle Brian O'Neil to a four year,

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety six million dollar contract extension. That's too bad. I've

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>been working on my top my early top twenty five

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>list for next year's free agents. Brian O'Neill was under

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>consideration in aging. You know, tackle that's had some injury issues,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but rock solid, good starter when he's been out there.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>He's been on the Vikings forever. So we'll get into

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the details, at least I will behind the scenes and

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just see where the contract guarantees are, but I'm sure

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be locked in for the next couple

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of years. So that's good news for the Vikings, bad

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>news for my list. Baker Mayfield would be very good

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>news for my list, so I hope he makes it

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to free agency. The Chiefs lost in edge Ethan Downs

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to a torn acl You hate to see that. Early

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in camp, people that cover the team closely thought he

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>was a good bet to make that team as a

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of edge depth special team er. So unfortunate for

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Downs that the Panthers keep having bad luck. The cart

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>was out for Titan Mitchell Evans at practice on Tuesday,

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>so we'll find out more on him. It's an ankle injury.

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Dave Canalis didn't sound that worried, but we'll see. And

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>then JC Horn, their cornerback, is off the PEP list.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>That's it for the injury news. Who knows more might

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>happen by the time we finished taping, but we're gonna

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>take a break and then we're gonna come back with

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the controversial picks on Nick Chook's all twenty

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>five and underta or is it under twenty five?

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 3>It's under twenty five?

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Back on NFL Daily. It is contract season, Shook. You're

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>an important part of NFL Daily. Your eyes are raised.

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Where is this dude going? You know, we got iHeart,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we got NFL media. Is it out with the new

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities you have on the written side yet for NFL media?

0:27:58.760 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Big responsibility.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that that's public yet. But you're coming

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 3>to be seeing me more this year, I'll tell you that.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're working on it. We're working on making sure

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Nick Shook is locked in like Jalen Carter and making

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>him a bigger part of the NFL Daily universe. And

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't be happier. He'd be on my all under

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty five team. You're still under thirty five.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yes, I'm thirty four. Let's go.

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>You're playing days long past. But you are an offensive

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>line expert. We will get to the offensive lineman in

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a minute. But this exercises on NFL dot Com. Check

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>it out. You can find it just look up Shook

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>All under twenty five team, and we start at quarterback.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Was easy to go with Drake May.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know I understand that you could think about Caleb,

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 2>you could think about Stroud.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 3>I had to go with Drake May.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 2>The guy finished second in NFL MVP last year, he

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>led his team to the Super Bowl. I just couldn't.

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't pick anybody else, regardless of the arguments. And

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Jade Daniels doesn't qualify because he's not under twenty five,

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 2>and that's the key. Under twenty five. By the start

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 2>of the NFL season, we have a couple of guys

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 2>that missed it by mere days.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Jayden Daniels wouldn't even have been an option.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But it is amazing how things change fast, because I

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>think Jayden Daniels would have been the consensus answer a

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>year ago. Caleb Williams would definitely have been the consensus

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>answer two years ago. And yet I think there's a

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty big gap right now. And Caleb and Drake May

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>both have the advantage that they were compared to a

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of these quarterbacks drafted pretty young. So it's like, yeah,

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Drake May's just turned in twenty four and he could

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>still be getting better. I like that CJ. Stroud is

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>eligible for this list, but but Jaden Daniels is not

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that's see, he's still developing at running back.

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's really just deciding between the best running backs in

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the league. This was just kind of a reminder to

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>me that John Robinson and Jamier Gibbs are still both

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>under twenty five entering the season, and so is Devon

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>e Chan. By the way, you could absolutely make the

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>argument that's one, two three in the league depending on

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>where you have James Cook and eight. Chan's only he's

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>under twenty four. I think like it really is something

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that running backs. It's unfortunate for them, but they're at

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>their very best right right away.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they are, they are, and then they usually fall

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>off a cliff. That's the old dreaded age thirty wall,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 2>not always true for everybody. Derek Henry looking at you,

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>congratulations on beating the allegations of the age thirty wall.

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, they're usually their best right when they get

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>the NFL because of the wear and tear that iss

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 2>associated with the position. But it was nice to have

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 2>two running back slots so I could put Bijon and

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Jamier in there.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, well, that's because you're making the slots. I didn't.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's okay. I would have just padded.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Follow in previous formats in a column that I picked

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 3>up with.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So you're just a lemming. I know you're picking up

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of columns. Yes, just send me taking this past.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>You can do whatever you want. So if you wanted

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that, you absolutely could. And the argument would

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>be that Jamir Gibbs is a better player than any

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>third receiver you could find, because you're your top two

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers was Jackson Smith Injigba and Tetoa McMillan, which was

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>cool to see on this list already, And so is

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Jamir Gibbs better than any third receiver? I would imagine

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he is. The options would have been Malik Neighbors, who's hurt,

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Thomas Junior who wasn't the same in his second year.

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Lad mcconkee, I guess would be an option there. But

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy when they do the top one hundred reveal.

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how high Bijon and Jamiir Gibbs are going

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to be period. I mean, if you're kind of taking

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>away positional value, are they top ten players in the NFL?

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would put them there just because of how

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 2>important they are to their offenses, like both just as

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>three down backs. I mean, we know that Bijon's like

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>the central focus of the Falcons offense both under the

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>previous regime and will be into this one too because

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the best players in the NFL, and

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 2>the same as large as true for Jamior Gibbs, who

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>took over that backfield and gave the Lions reason to

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>trade away David Montgomery. But you're right, it is the

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 2>process that I can still do thing I want right

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and you know what affords me that opportunity the flex position,

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 2>which is where Devon h Chan landed.

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 3>So we did make the team. Jokes on the haters.

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is where I have a problem, and I'd

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have very few problems. I wanted to have more problems.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It would have made a better segment. Welik Neighbor's just

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>too hurt to put on.

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>And no, you can't.

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't justify any of the other receivers because Brian,

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Here's the thing. I would much rather

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>have run a two tight end set here with Brock

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowers and Colston Loveland than put a Chan out there

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>with the third running back. I think you could even

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>make the argument you just leave Bajhon Robinson, you say sorry,

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamiir Gibbs, and you go thirteen personnel and you go,

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you go Tyler Warren and Colston Loveland. That's actually too much.

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Tyler Warmon Warren is as good. I

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>do think Colston Loveland. If I'm just buying stock in players,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I would rather have him on my team than Devon

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ah Chan or any third receiver. I'm going Loveland.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were going to say that you wanted

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 2>three receivers, because the modern NFL often sees three receivers.

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Although you're right, the shift toward twelve thirteen personnel create

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 2>space for not.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Love One kind of is that third receiver. He is,

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but he is a bigger Puka Nakua. I mean, he's

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>not as good as Puka nakuah, but he can do

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same things.

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 2>But he's also operating in an offense that also has

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>another good tight end opposite him in Cole Commit. So

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 2>you have to consider that as well. And let's consider

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the positional value argument that you just made. I think,

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>if I'm looking at each of those players individually, who

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 2>is most important to me. If I'm building this roster

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 2>out this offensive and I'm taking eight Chan over Love Loveland.

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You're crazy.

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm not.

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I love h Chan and ultimately I would put Gibbs

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in my starting lineup just because he's so good. I

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have a little of a bit of an issue putting

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>him as high as Bajon. Like I guess, I want

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to see another year of Gibbs in this all do

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>everything that's fair inside runs to just but to me,

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like a top twenty five player in the league,

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's a strong number two running back. H N.

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not there yet. I'm not all the way there,

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be a difficult. Yeah, I'm worried

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get there this year either. Would

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you take Loveland over Warren if you're drafting right now.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 2>That's tough because you have to consider how do they

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>use Tyler Warren. You have to think about the quarterback

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>situation and how it evolved over the course of the

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 2>season with the Colts.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 3>You only have one year of sample size.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 2>That's because like Loveland's your long term answer at that

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 2>position in Chicago.

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Oo, yes, I will, I will.

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 2>You know why, because for as good as Tyler Warren is,

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>and he's excellent, he's almost a bit too much of

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 2>a throwback for me to want to take him as

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 2>highly as I would take Colston Lovelin. But I do

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 2>think that the jury is still out on this debate

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>because we haven't seen Loveland thrust into a tight end

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 2>one situation yet.

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you was the last five games of the year.

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But I hear what you're so, there's two guys on

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the field. He doesn't have to do everything, but that's fine.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>That's just the NFL. And he can block, and it's

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>why I had Trey McBride as my tight end one.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I got into trouble on Twitter on Monday with Raiders

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>fans when I said Trey McBride is tight end one

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in the league. I was making the case that the

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals offense is really exciting in one of the things

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I said was Trey McBride's side in one. This isn't fantasy,

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>bro Trey McBride is the king right now. It's not

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bauers could go to Canton Brock Bauers. I've been

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>pumping up since the day he got into the league.

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.959
<v Speaker 1>He is special, special, but he wasn't fully healthy last year.

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And the two way flexibility that Trey McBride gives you,

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>he has a chance to be like the best at

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that since maybe gronk in Kittle, like, you got to

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>put Kittle in that. You can't just ignore Kittle. But

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he is in that conversation already with Pete Kittle, and

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 1>so so for now I know we're getting off track.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Y're all twenty five team, but well, no, no, a

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end one to me.

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah he is.

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Obviously he's not eligible because he's twenty six years old

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 2>coming up on twenty seven. But you know who agrees

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 2>with you the folks who make madd An NFL because

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 2>they listened him as one of their six nine nine

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 2>overall players.

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think you're onto something here.

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Top six players in the NFL. That's pretty wild. It

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>was Stafford, Josh Allen, Miles, Garrett, did JSN get in there?

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 3>JSN? And Jamar Chase and Trey McBride. That was your six.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I feel bad for Justin Jefferson. What did he do?

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I know it wasn't great season, but he's probably.

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 3>In ninety eight.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I would put Bajan in there at a ninety nine.

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree, offensive Lineman. You went Joe Alt and Josh

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Simmons as your tackles. It's interesting. Tyler Booker as one

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of your guards. Grays Abel as another one, Tyler Booker

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of course with the Cowboys, grays Abel of the Seahawks,

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh Simmons, the first round pick of the Chiefs last

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>year who missed a lot of time, and Joe All

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>who was hurt for the Chargers, but it's look when

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 1>he's been out there, and then at center a little

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of a surprise. Tanner born A Bordalini, who was

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the toughest one of these guys to put on. Who

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>did you think about?

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Joe Alt was a slam dunk.

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Simmons was difficult just because he hasn't played a full season,

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>but when he was out there, he was very good.

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I Zabel was a bit of projection, I think because

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't super consistent as a rookie, but you see

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the signs of what he can become. I think about

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>when he played against the Steelers and kind of got

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 2>victimized by Cam Hayward, but that happens to young guys.

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the NFL. Tanner BORDERLINI was very easy to pick.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 2>He's been one of my favorites since I saw him

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 2>at the Combine a few years ago, and he really

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 2>took a huge step forward last year on a Colts

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 2>offensive line that I think you and I both agreed

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 2>they were headed in the wrong direction a couple of

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and then their rebuild turned out to be

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the right move and surprised a lot of us.

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 3>He's a key part of that. So that was an

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 3>easy choice as well.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think Tyler Booker maybe there's a bit of

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 2>like personal to him on that list. I'm telling you

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 2>it's a little bit more projection. But he still finished

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 2>sixteenth among eighty one qualified offensive guards according to PFF,

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 2>So I'll roll with it.

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Well. The theory that if you're closer to the ball

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that it might take you a little longer to develop,

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and that makes sense because you need to get the

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>strength to hold up the NFL is born out when

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you look at the options, because there just aren't many

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>good guard and center options. There are not many good

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle options, and these are all the interior players.

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 1>And so I didn't have a problem with that because

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know where I would go at guard. Scaransky

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:37.959
<v Speaker 1>from Tennessee would have made sense. He was a month

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>too old, so yep, no fault there. He was initially

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on the list in the center could have been Zach

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Frazier Graham Barton are two good young centers. But I

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>have no problem BORDERLINI makes sense tackles where I would

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>change Simmons. Simmons and you're calling your shot. The ceiling

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is probably the highest it It might look best, and

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>nflgms might agree with you. The fact that he was

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>away from the team and you're not really sure what

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>was going on there at some personal issues. You got

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>armand Membu just sitting right there, who was there the

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>whole time and is physically awesome. You also have Darnell Right,

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>who bears. Fans will tell you and real ball knowers

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>will tell you he has developed into one of the

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>best right tackles in the league, and he's going to

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>get paid and he's still under twenty five. So those

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are two good options. I would have taken Membo over Simmons.

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Plus you kind of took two left tackles and cheated.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest.

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.479
<v Speaker 2>I know, well, well All's playing right because he doesn't

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 2>have to play left.

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh my bad, No, No, I'm an idiot. You're you're right.

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 1>He could be playing left, but left.

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 3>He's a left archetype.

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>For sure he could be playing left. He might play

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>left someday, but actually no darnifi.

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Donald right doesn't qualify. He turns twenty

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 2>five in August. Ah, I just waited to make it.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Just like Scronsky.

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>At Edge, you have Nick Herbig, We've talked a lot

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>about him. Abdul Carter. I feel like we were ahead

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of trend having Abdol Carter in our top twelve. I

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think I think Edge draft some options, although I agree

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>with your two picks would be touly Polotu. He's only

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty three years old. How is that possible? How young

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he got drafted? Super incredible and he's doing a new contract.

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>He's someone to watch in terms of a possible holdout.

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Not many other great options. It got me thinking there's

0:40:23.960 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>been a few busts and slow developers at Edge the

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. Dallas Turner, I think Jalen Walker

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>has potential for the Falcons, but Chop Robinson, Miles Murphy,

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Green some players that haven't worked out, and so

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>there weren't a ton of options. I think behind your

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Edge picks, any thoughts on your edges?

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 2>No, because I thought about because part of the exercise

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 2>is going through the recent draft classes to make sure

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 2>he didn't miss anybody, and I land on a guy

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>like Chop Robinson, landing on a Miles Murphy, and I'm

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 2>just like, it's just not there. I think that what

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 2>I've found is the trenches are where the young guys

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 2>have the hardest time to find instant success and end

0:40:59.000 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 2>up on a team like this.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's crazy Will Anderson, who might be in

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the top three, top five, top ten, certainly of the

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred players list. He only missed this by

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a week, So that's how.

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Yep, he's still makes the job that much harder.

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Defensive tackles, I mentioned not much depth. You have Byron

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Murphy from the Seahawks, Man, what a good young player

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that is. And Walter Nolan from the Cardinals, And this

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>was the position where, yeah, they're just you had to

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of make a projection from Nolan. Why did you

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 1>do that?

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because when he stepped on the field, you could

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 2>see that he was immediately one of their best players

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 2>and made an instant impact. He just didn't play very

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 2>much as a rookie because of injuries. He began the

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 2>season injured. He suffered an injury, ended the season injured.

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 2>It was just a rough rookie year for him. But

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>when he's healthy. I mean, there was a reason that

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 2>when we went into the pre draft process last year

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 2>you heard his name being mentioned all the time because

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 2>his college tape was fantastic and in the games that

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 2>he played, it translated immediately. It's just a matter of

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 2>if he needs to stay healthy for a whole year.

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm really excited to watch him play football this year.

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I hope he can stay healthy for a full season.

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he's the name that a lot of people

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know yet and they're gonna know it soon.

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Totally agree, and yet it points out how hard it

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is to find a good young defensive tackle and the

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>classes recently have been pretty disappointing. TYLERK Williams for the

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Lions last year. Jerry Newton for the Commanders has been

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt his first two years. Mason Graham will see not

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a bad rookie year, but makes sense he went with

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Nolan like Kenneth Grant struggled his rookie year. Moro Ojamo

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>from the Eagles just missed the cutoff good good young player,

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but only missed it by a month or two. I

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to poke some holes in your list, and finally

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I found one. At linebacker, you have Cedric Gray and

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Carson Schwestinger. I would definitely go Edrin Cooper. This is

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the first one. I was just like, I'm going Edrin

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Cooper over Cedric Gray and Cooper with the Packers by

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the way for everyone yes tuning in.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And as soon as we arrived at this group, I thought, oh,

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Cooper's not on the list. And that's where I think

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 2>I got lost in the process, because not to say

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that these picks that I made weren't good, but I agree.

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I think Edge Cooper is one of the better inside

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 2>linebackers and he probably deserves to be on this list.

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's a blind spot missed for me.

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.799
<v Speaker 2>But Cedar Gray piled up a ton of tackles on

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 2>a bad Titans team, but also on a Titans defense

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that has Jeff Simmons on it that had to Andandre

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Sweat in the interior last year. He did his job well.

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think that there's always going to be value

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 2>in a player who consistently piles up a lot of tackles,

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.399
<v Speaker 2>unless you're like a Joe Shobert and you're making those

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 2>tackles six years down the field.

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, CRA's a good player. I like him too,

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I just I just think Cooper could be special. John

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Campbell of the Eagles is one to watch this year

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as someone who could really emerge. I started thinking about Schwetzinger,

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the defensive Rookie of the

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Year winners, he used to always be off ball linebackers.

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>At one point, like five straight years it was off

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>ball linebackers. It was like Jonathan Vilma and Demitoe Ryan

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Drod Mayo. And I was starting to think there are

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of two archetypes of defensive Rookie of the Years

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>at linebacker, and some turn out to be all time greats. Erlacker, Keikley,

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Willis. Jonathan Bilma was like a tick below that,

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>but he was an incredible player. And then others are

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 1>more like they were so mature and smart and professional

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 1>right when they were rookies. They were kind of like

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>as good as they would ever be as a rookie,

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and they were good players, but defensive Rookie of the

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Year that never kind of went to the next level.

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I would throw Girod Mayo, the former Patriots coach, in

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that mix. Demiko Ryans as a player is kind of

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in that mix. He was a good player, but but

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't really take that set. Brian Cushing is another

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>text in the Texans had a few which bucket do

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you think Swesseninger fits in.

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question because I think about archetypes when

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you're describing those two groups, what made them, you know, special?

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 2>And when you mentioned the likes of a keik Ley

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 2>or Patrick Willis, it's not only the understanding of the

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 2>game and the instinctive play, but it's also the athleticism,

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the ranginess of it, and especially now as we lean

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>so heavily on sub packages defensively that if you have

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 2>that range and you can go sideline to sideline, then

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 2>you can carve out a very productive long career.

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think Schwestinger leans in that direction. That's the

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:27.439
<v Speaker 1>big strength of his It's just a matter of can

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.879
<v Speaker 1>he stay on the field. I mean, he played sixteen

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 1>games last year and he got it out his final

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>game to win over the Steelers, which earned him a

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of praise in the locker room from his teammates.

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Can you do that?

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Consistently over the next five to ten years. That's really

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 2>what's going to define it. And I hate to like

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 2>couch it with like ooh, can you stay healthy? But

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I think for him, especially because that's his greatest strength, athleticism,

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 2>I think that's going to be an important part of it.

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, player type, You're absolutely right, and what do they

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Similar questions were asked about er Locker, Keighley, maybe even

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Willis in terms of size. So in terms of range,

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Schrestenaier has got it. And yeah, he was

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a walk on. He hasn't been playing big time football,

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like he's still learning things. I do think like archetype,

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he kind of fits into that mold versus the other.

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And then the secondary list was almost laughable because it

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 1>was so good. Kamari Lassiter, Christian Gonzales, Cooper Degene you

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>have kind of as a flex but I put him

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>at let's say slack cornerback basically safety is NICKI min

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Worry and Brian Branch. I mean that that could just

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>be your all pro that could just be who are

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the five best defensive backs in the league. They all

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>happen to be twenty or under twenty five, which is

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 1>just an interesting thinking about different positions, which ones are

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>good early, which ones aren't. That it's just it's instructive.

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Sas Gardner's not even on this list, and he only

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>missed it by a week or else you would have

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:47.839
<v Speaker 1>had to make a tougher decision. But he got that

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>monster contract before he was twenty five. So still like

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good young defensive backs.

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the like we said, it's harder, I think,

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 2>to flourish early in your career when you're closer to

0:46:57.160 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 2>the ball as opposed to when you're playing secondary. The

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 2>same as true ethic for a receiver for young guys.

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 2>That and especially now we get guys to come out

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of college with a complete route tree and can immediately

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 2>make a difference at the NFL level. The same is

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of true now for cornerbacks. You know, it's kind

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 2>of the evolution of the game. Receivers getting better, so

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 2>our cornerbacks need to get better, our safeties need to

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 2>get better. But it is funny little inside Baseball the

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 2>debate I had with editors about how exactly to classify

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 2>some of these guys, because like Dejean, spent his career

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 2>as a slot corner. He was also an All Pro

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 2>corner opposite Quinion Mitchell last year. Does he end up

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 2>in the flex because he's a slot corner even war

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 2>he played all over the place. Right, He's classified as

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.880
<v Speaker 2>a safety everywhere except next Gen, but he played all

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 2>over the place. Some people could see him as a

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 2>slot as well. I keep him with his standard classification

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 2>as it stands right now. Branch gets on the list

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.280
<v Speaker 2>because even though he battled injuries last year, his production

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 2>over his first three years has been worthwhile. The one

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 2>guy that I need to see a little bit more from,

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and this is going to rub you the wrong way,

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 2>is Christian Gonzalez. He's the I think, of the five

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:55.399
<v Speaker 2>in this group, he's the one that I still need

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to see more from. Because Lassiter opposite Derek Stingley has

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 2>been an excellent player for the Texans.

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Christian Gondalas is almost like the Jalen Carter

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of cornerbacks in that you see it, it's just everything

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you want. He's going to get this monster contract. He's

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>taking a surprising route that he's practicing fully at camp

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>despite needing the new contract, wanting the new contract, and

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be in pads and everything. Good on

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>him for doing that, but I respect either way of

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I agree with you. I don't think it's

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>been in every week, every month, every game situation for him.

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just the flashes. The streaks are capital elite like

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>better than Kamari Lassiter even and as good as anything

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Sauce did. But I agree. I kind of am with

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>you there.

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Awesome. I'm glad that we don't. I will say this.

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 2>I want to give one mention because I didn't have

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 2>room for honorable mentions. And again, apologies to Edge Cooper,

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 2>but the one guy that I wanted to put in

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:57.839
<v Speaker 2>the secondary group that I.

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Tried my hardest was Xavier. I know, my favorite was

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the only one you asked me about. I was flat

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>at you, yeah, because I couldn't. I was.

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 3>I lost sleep over it. I wake up at the morning.

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I was like a god, text great because I need

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 3>to eliminate one.

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Brian Branch has done so much and I know he's

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:13.919
<v Speaker 1>coming off in exactly that he's been great.

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:17.240
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, what Wats had five makes last year, Wats

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a good player.

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 3>He was really good at Notre Dame. I don't know

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 3>how he lasted to the third round. I can't wait

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:23.879
<v Speaker 3>to watch him this year as well.

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Shout out Terry Fatteno for that Falcons team that draft

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 1>with Jalen Walker actually my age. Well, but he won't

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he won't get to see it. We're on another rebuild.

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to see any more out of Nick Schuck.

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We know he's contract extension worthy. I'm looking forward to

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>working with you all season long. Shook but not tomorrow.

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Hit that music. We're going to do some news. We're

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do another division preview. People have been liking

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the division preview format. Thank you for that. Jordan will

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>be with me in the studio. We're going to be

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:58.439
<v Speaker 1>talking AFC North. Shoot. We should have Shooky on that show.

0:49:58.480 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll get him in the mix.

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 3>See of the

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>H