WEBVTT - Dollar Steadies as Greenland Tensions Ease

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>A joy to having the studios right now. Rebecca Patterson

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>with all of her work working with a trust, the Bessemer,

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>and also of course I worked with JP Morgan Ages

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Ago and with a small shop up in Connecticut called Bridgewater.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>She came in because it gets too cold, you know,

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 2>like for like two weeks. Yeah, Connecticut can get like

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>the Dakota have.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Good coffee for the beverages.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>We don't all We have a beverage of your choice

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and we'll give you a Titos and tang give packed

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>when you leave. You wrote any ft about everything you do,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>just a comeback to the foundation of a dollar is

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 2>a dollar under threat after the foolishness of the last.

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 4>Number of days, I think the important thing about the

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 4>dollar is time frame and degree. You know, a lot

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 4>of the media coverage this week with the threats of

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 4>possible military intervention to acquire Greenland against its will, and

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 4>then the backing off it. You saw some market reaction,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 4>but it was really just a one day sell America

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 4>and everyone's saying, well, gosh, no one sold treasuries. Everything's fine,

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 4>it's all hype. I'm like, no, it's not. It's time frame.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 4>What we're seeing is a slow erosion of confidence in

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 4>dollar based assets. This is something that will play out

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 4>over years, not a day or a week or a month,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 4>but it's happening. We saw news this week that Sweden's

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 4>largest private pension fund is reducing significantly it's treasury holdings.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 4>And yes, Denmark is not a large country, but they're

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 4>getting rid of their treasuries. There's more to come.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Paul, can you I just love it having

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Rebecca and could you just say the poor soul who

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>had three martinis in the city in London goes back

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to the desk in a major bank calls up when

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the phony goes celibate exactly.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 5>So how do we I mean, what does that mean

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 5>for the dollar?

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 5>We had did the dollar sell from early last year, yep,

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 5>that it could stabilized and actually had decent second half

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 5>of the year.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Here is that dollars still at risk?

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 3>Do you think modest risk this year.

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 4>So you know, there are a lot of factors that

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 4>come together that drive currency markets. Part of it is

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 4>cross border capital and trade flows. Part of it is

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 4>expectations for interest rates to the relative yield of a currency.

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>What helped the dollar in part and the second half

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 4>of last year we didn't see as much hedging action,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 4>so foreign or US investors hedging out dollar risk. And

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 4>then we also saw a reduction in expectations for FED

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 4>rate cuts i e. Relatively higher rates, and that also

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 4>gave us support to the dollar this year. You know,

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>given how strong the US economy is at a high level,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 4>and given sticky inflation, which you talked about earlier this morning,

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be hard for the Federal Reserve to

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 4>cut much unless something drastic changes. So that is going

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 4>to prevent the dollar from weakening a lot. The dollar

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 4>hedging the diversification, Like I said, this is kind of

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 4>a slow drip, drip drip. This isn't a sudden flood.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 4>So I wouldn't be shocked to see a stable or

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe slightly lower dollar this year.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, given that backdrop, the global geopolitical backdrop, I guess

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 5>it's no surprise that we've seen gold been ripping, Yes,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 5>like crazy, that's still kind of the place.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So to me, that's the most obvious reflection of

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 4>the diversification trade that's taking place. We know some of

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 4>it is investors, and those could be speculative investors as well.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 4>But underlying that, we continue to see central bank demand.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Central banks diversifying slowly but surely out of the US

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 4>looking for other liquid assets. You talk to my good

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>friend Mark Sobel at omfif the World Gold Council. Both

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 4>of them do really good surveys of central banks every year,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 4>asking them what do you intend to do going forward,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 4>and the data shows that they're going to keep buying gold.

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I was not expected a meeting of the President of

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the United States with mister Zelenski of Ukraine clearly off

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the radar given yesterday's festivities. Mister Zelenski now speaking at

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the meetings of the World Economic Forum and Davos. Our

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 2>team there will give you all that coverage. We'll look

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 2>for the headlines here and bring them to you when

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 2>we can. I look at your counsel and foreign relations.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean froman hasn't slept in six days. It's nuts.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's publishing. I know you're going to publish and give

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>us a head start on that, But I look back

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to back in the Foreign Affairs magazine Elizabeth Economy on

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the international relations of the Arctic Ocean, and then you

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 2>followed up with your senior fellow on China. With all

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that's going on in the frenzy, it's CFR. What are

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you focused on most? What does Rebecca Patterson study?

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 4>I always look at the intersection of geopolitics, the economy,

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>and financial markets because they all influence each other. One

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 4>of the things I'm looking at now ahead of the

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Supreme Court decision about US tariffs is if we reduce

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs, take them off, shift them around, how does

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 4>that translate into the affordability narrative in the United States?

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 4>If tariffs are removed, do we actually see any price

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 4>change that benefits you as consumers? How does that play

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 4>out in the midterm election. So again, as looking at

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 4>all these connections, So that is a piece of work

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm working on right now because I think we should

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>get the Supreme Court decision fairly shortly. So that's one

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I think. The other one I'm trying to spend time

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 4>on is the Federal Reserve. So we know we're going

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 4>to get an announcement probably in the next week or

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 4>so with the next nominee. But I never, none of

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 4>us ever had to think about the legal intricacies of

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 4>the FED before. Now I'm trying to understand things like,

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 4>could you see not only two hundred billion buying of

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 4>mortgage backed securities? Could you see a trillion mortgage?

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Paul's got eight questions? Let me be rooting in a

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>rum once more a bestmer trust ages ago. Yep, you

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 2>don't go to cash? I mean, with all the cacophony

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you just mentioned, how do you handle this news at

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 2>CFR and where else? How do you do it and

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 2>not go to cash?

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the big takeaway for me is that

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 4>while treasuries US government bonds still act as a diversifier

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 4>in a portfolio, you can't expect them to work as

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 4>effectively as they have for the last several decades. So

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 4>when you diversify a portfolio, you have to think about

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 4>it differently. That is part of the support for gold prices,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 4>which is extraordinary. It's part of why we see people

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 4>going into alternatives more different types of alternative assets, and

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 4>I think it's part of why again. So far this

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 4>year we're seeing foreign markets out performing the US, So

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 4>it's asset diversification, geographic diversification. But you're right, Tom, getting

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 4>out of the markets given that risk assets outperform diverse

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 4>fine assets eight years out of ten, because the economy

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 4>is growing eight years out of ten. So to get

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 4>out to react to the geopolitical headlines, you're doing yourself

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 4>a disservice in balls.

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, you got to get back in. I mean

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I was in cash, but I took the leverage away

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 2>and I went further to cash two or three days ago. Fine, No,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm hammered I missed this.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean even professional investors, the smartest ones in

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 4>the world, timing when to get in and out is

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 4>a fool's errand that's why you stay in the market.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 4>You just make tactical shifts on the margin.

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 5>All the news this week, coming out of Davos, coming

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 5>out of Greenland, we kind of forgot about. Japan had

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of a problem in their bond market

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 5>earlier this week. That's spook people big time earlier in

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 5>the week. Yes, that's just a technical thing. Should we

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 5>not worry about it?

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Is there any contangent issue there, yes, yes, yes, so

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 4>yes you should worry about it. Yes, there is contagion.

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about US treasuries and are we going to

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 4>have enough buyers to meet the amount of supply we

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 4>have to issue to pay for our deficits. But it's

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 4>important to remember over the last twenty or so years,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 4>global bond markets have gotten much more integrated. People own

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>global bonds, not just their own countries bonds today, and

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 4>that means something that happens in Japan or France or

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 4>the UK can and will affect the US treasury market also.

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 4>So we do need to care about Japan, what the

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 4>Bank of Japan does at its next meeting, which I

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 4>believe is tonight, right. And then of course Prime Minister

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Takeichi when she has this snap election, do we see

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 4>additional stimulus after that? How does that make people think

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 4>about the fiscal dynamics.

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 5>So again I come back to I have to buy

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 5>US treasuries, buy treasuries in gold.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 3>No no, no, no, no no.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Look, I'm not saying dump all your treasuries by any stretch,

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 4>but you want to think more diversified. It's been fascinating

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 4>to me to see that you are seeing institutional investors

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 4>looking at more fiscally sound bond markets today, So countries

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 4>that don't have those big debt difficulties looking at.

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Hell the boat in Germany. Is that what I'm hearing here?

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean some of the some of the European bond

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 4>markets are attractive. Canada, Australia relatively better, Norway, Singapore. The

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 4>problem is these markets don't have as much liquidity, so

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 4>that's only so far it can take you. But you

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 4>do want to have a global basket of bonds and

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 4>emerging markets. EM is the new DM, So emerging market

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 4>fiscal dynamics today are much better than they've been in general.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not talking about every country for a long time.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Should we steal that phrase? EM is the new DM,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 2>or DM is the new You got to go nerd

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 2>on your back to foreign exchange with JP Morgan here,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sorry, the Japanese mess, when it goes

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 2>to me, is wildly nonlinear. Discuss the jump condition we

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>could see in Japan. I fit on ravels well.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 4>The JGB market, the Japanese government bond market is not

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 4>the most liquid bond market, to say the least. So

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 4>to your point, Tom, the risk of a jump right

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 4>of a big move, and we saw a bit of

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 4>that on Tuesday, another one of those happening. You will

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 4>have contagion to the Japanese stock market, and a lot

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 4>of investors have added Japanese exposure over the last fifteen

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 4>eighteen months, so there's contagion risk there that could come

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 4>back and affect global markets.

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>With a cold coming. I mean Rebecca and I live

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>in the same neighborhood. I mean Rebecca, Saturday eleven above

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>zero on the east side of Central Park, I mean

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>ten degrees on Tuesday. It's even worse next week. How

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 2>much wind do you need to take an uber the

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>three blocks you need to walk? Gee? Is it like

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>two miles an hour? Or do you need to see

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>ten or fist?

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm just toting not to go outside at all. God

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 4>bless Zoom and teams in the delivery Ectly. I'm going

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 4>to be making a lot of soup, I think Saturday

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 4>morning I'm going to be stocking up.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>With it's a favorite soup.

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 4>My favorite is butternut squash. But I a good homemade

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 4>tomato cream of tomato soup, and I'm going to play

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 4>with some lentils. I think this weekend.

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 2>There you go. See it's at nine o'clock hour a

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 2>lexus where you just go into the food.

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 6>Said, but you know what yesterday I made ago lemono.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 6>It's a Greek and lemon soup. I'll give you the restaurant.

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Greek restaurant on York Avenue. It starts

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 2>with a why it's.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 6>Phenomenal, yesie, yes, yes, yes, I think that's it. I

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 6>have to look out. I know what I can picture.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 6>I get that soup fantastic. I call it super lexus.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 2>It's great. So you can you bring in like lemon

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Greek potatoes.

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 6>I can do that.

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Are they delicious? I tried to cook them like eight

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 2>times and I'm going.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 6>To get dried out, and yeah, I'm a failure.

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 4>See this is one of the many reasons I love Bloomberg.

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 4>I have great conversations with you all. I never know

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 4>where it's going. And when I'm done, you have this

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 4>amazing food and coffee spread upstairs.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>It is a little treat. Well, mister Bloomberg's. People stopped

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 2>by today said is it true Rebecca Patterson's and I

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 2>said yes, I said, They said, well, the cheese it's

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 2>outson thank you so much. The counts on foreign relations

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>or a recent essay in the Financial Times and the challenges,

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>including important quotes there from the pension system of Denmark

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 2>as well. Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 2>up after this.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 2>We are privileged now, whatever your politics, after what we

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 2>saw yesterday, here to pick up the pieces. Wendy Shiller,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Professor of Chaos, Brown University. Wendy, is there a permanent

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 2>change in the diplomacy of the United States after Trump?

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Is this the way it's going to be? Well, I

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 7>You know, we have to say permanent when we talk

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 7>about American politics. But the president is simultaneously projecting power,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 7>but not in the way that I think europe is

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 7>used to, which is through treaty diplomacy, sort of a

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 7>whole coordinated effort balancing countries off each other, consultation.

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 3>That's not happening. But the president is still really extending.

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 7>A very long arm a very long reach of American power,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 7>and he's trying to leverage i think economic power over

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 7>military power. He's had success in terms of NATO, NATO,

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, Europe kicking in more money for their own

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 7>defense and basically telling Europe, you know, will be your

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 7>partner when it's in our interests, but we're not going

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 7>to be on call for you anymore. And I think

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 7>that's a significant shift for Europe to deal with.

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Wendy.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 5>What have we seen from Europe this week at Davos

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 5>and then just in the last twelve months of this

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 5>second Trump administration about.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Show them some solidarity here?

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 5>It just doesn't feel like it's even there even this

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 5>week in terms of trying to craft a response to

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 5>President Trump's discussions about Greenland, it just doesn't seem like

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Europe's that unified yet.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, Paul, that's an excellent point.

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 7>I Mean, the stunning thing is how President Trump sets

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 7>the world's agenda. You know, this is really something I

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 7>mean we saw Reagan.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 3>But Reagan had a.

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 7>Sort of a consistent platform and a solid enemy quote

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 7>unquote in the Soviet Union, so it was sort of

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.359
<v Speaker 7>easy to sort of dominate that conversation.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Now the world is such a very different place.

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 7>But President Trump still dominates international politics this way, and

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.359
<v Speaker 7>Europe seems to be scrambling. They have their own problems internally.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 7>I think issues like the economy, transitional economy, tech, and

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, emigration have really royaled Europe.

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 7>Europe's trying to each individoal contr's trying to get their

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 7>own footing, particularly since Grexit.

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 3>I think losing the Great Britain as a real.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 7>Partner in the EU, I think has really created more

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 7>turmoil there than we would have expected.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Where are the senators? I mean, you know, I can

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>pull out any number from the past. Let's go with

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the Richard Lueger, who is you know, wonderful Republican senator?

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Are there? Richard Luger is out there monitoring this, discussing this,

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>being senatorial tom.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 7>I just think there isn't as much capital or political

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 7>value to senators and focusing on international affairs, particularly in

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 7>the Republican Party. I think the Democratic Party and the

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 7>Republican Party have traded places there. But right now, you know,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 7>Americans are concerned about what's going on in America. I

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 7>think that's what twenty twenty four told us, and I

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 7>think that the polls continue to tell us, you know, affordability, housing, healthcare,

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 7>these are domestic issues, and I think that's where there's

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 7>no real political gain for reminding America that being a

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 7>partner to Europe is a safer place to be than

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 7>not being a partner of Europe.

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's the smartest single thing I've heard Paul in

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 2>all this thirty hour extravaganza with the president. I mean

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Richard Lueger and on the Wikipedia page, Sam Nunn Evan

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>by Victoria Neuland I mean, Paul, we are in a habit,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 2>a method of how we do this, and it shattered.

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he certainly upended the political spectrum. So Wendy, again,

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 5>it is election year here. To what extent do we

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 5>think President Trump, when he does get back to the

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 5>States maybe does refocus a little bit more on the

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 5>domestic agenda? Hack, How important do you think he's going

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 5>to be in these midterm elections?

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, that's sens I'm not sure he focuses

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 7>on the policy agenda, but it does look like he's

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 7>refocusing his attention on Republican primaries and using that power

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 7>among the really loyal Republican primary voter base, which tends

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 7>to be the most ideological, the most conservative, and the

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 7>most in love with Trump to affect things like Bill

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 7>Cassidy's racing Louisiana Senator Cassidy to get Cassidy to vote.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>For things that Trump wants. But right now, the President

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>hasn't articulated.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 7>What he wants from Congress going forward this year. So

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 7>it's one thing to hold the sort of down, cleaves

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 7>their heads, but what are you asking for? And I've

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 7>been surprised that he hasn't wanted to resolve the issue

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 7>of a longcare premium subsidies.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>You know that's going to continue to.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 7>Ripple and filter and affect people and affect his Brewer writings.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 3>So how come he's not leaning on Congress to get

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 3>that done?

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Well? Can we go inside Brown University now?

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 5>Sure?

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Professor Scholler William Rhodes ninety one years old, all that

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>he's done for Brown University at City Group, folks, he

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 2>codified the idea central banker to the world. Bill Rhodes

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>with an essay in the Ft walking through how all

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 2>this is shattered? And he says, you know what all

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 2>King Charles has to do is step up and see

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 2>the Royalty of Denmark, and that would change the dialogue.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was literally Bill Rhodes thrown back to

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 2>the nineteenth century. Can the royal family actually get in

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 2>the middle of this Greenland issue and change the dialogue

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 2>of President Trump?

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 7>No, but I mean a phone call to President Trump

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 7>probably wouldn't hurt.

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 3>He likes the royal family, he likes the.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 7>Pomp and circumstance, so I don't think it's a terrible idea.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 7>And we do have the Road Center at the Boston Institute,

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 7>and it's a terrific political economy center, so we are

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 7>grateful for that kind of support. But I think here

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 7>we saw the President recognizing that he had maybe gone

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 7>just a little too far.

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's a trunk way of doing things.

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 7>Right, go too far, blow things up, but then back

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 7>off very quickly when you realize that you can, and

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 7>no other president has done this recently, negotiate for favorable

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 7>terms on access to minerals or access shipping lanes. But

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 7>he backed off pretty quickly, and that was something we're

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 7>not quite used to with this person.

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 2>So in the fourteenth edition of your Classics Civics book,

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>is there going to be a chapter twenty three Trump

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>and Taco. Is that what we have to look forward to, Wendy.

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm literally negotiating how many changes I can make to

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 7>the existing chapter on the President as we go forward with.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Our next edition. So I will tell you that in

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Wendy Sheller, thank you, thank you, thank you at

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Bill Rhodes Brown University today. Really really appreciate it. Stay

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch US Live

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>watch US live on YouTube.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Jane fully with us now with Rabobank. They have a

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 2>very interesting relationship, folks. They do all sorts of commercial activities.

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So Jane has really got the pulse of trade and

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 2>commerce within what she's doing with foreign exchange strategy. Jane,

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 2>right now, I'm looking at the cross rates. You look

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 2>at the majors dollar yen e're a yen da da

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>da da da Okay, fine, but I look at the

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>nuances and I'm unsure what they're signaling, like I see

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 2>euro yen finally signaling euro strength versus yen. How does

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Japan get to their Monday morning our Sunday afternoon in

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>New York.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, we know that the market's very skeptical

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 8>of the yen, and it has been for months now.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 8>We still have I think a lot of the speculative

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 8>community really still seeing the yenna as the basis or

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 8>the funding currency of a Carrie Traven And I think

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 8>the onus has got to be on the Bank of

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 8>Japan as well as maybe the Ministry of Finance to

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 8>really shake and rattle that view. So we do have

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 8>a Bank of Japan policy meeting tomorrow, and I think

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 8>we need a significantly more hawkish Uwada, that's the governor,

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 8>to to really change that few. Now, he was pretty

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 8>hawkish at the start of the year, but you know,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 8>most people were still on holiday right then, and of

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 8>course you know, we have had these reassurances from the

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 8>Ministry of Finance on the fiscal position too, but it

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 8>yea and that market's just not convinced. So the yen

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 8>really still very much on the back foot.

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Jane, as we look at the dollar trading against major

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 5>currencies around the world. We had a big soft any

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 5>US dollar in the first half of twenty twenty five.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 5>Then it's kind of stabilized kind of around these levels.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 5>How do you think about it in twenty twenty six years,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 5>This is this kind of the new normal level for

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 5>the dollar versus some of these major currencies.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, that's certainly what we think. I mean,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, the market consensus is that the dollar will

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 8>continue to weaken. But if you look at the performance

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 8>of the green back through the second half of last year,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 8>well in the second half it's ended, you know, that

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 8>period something like the second or maybe the third best

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 8>performing G ten currency. So you know, it's still the

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 8>worst performing currency last year, but that's because of its

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 8>falls at the start of the year, and that of

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 8>course has spooked an awful lot of people, because you know,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 8>in recent months, I've had conversations at numerous times about

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, g dollarization, about even debasement, those sorts of things.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 8>But I do think the one phrase that most people

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 8>would agree upon is diversification. And I think relative to

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 8>say the buy America trades, which really sort of dominated

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 8>from say the global financial crisis into the end of

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty four, there is more appetite to diversify now,

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 8>and that I think is probably going to keep the dollar,

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 8>not necessarily in a week footing, because I think the

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 8>US still offers great investment opportunities, you know, for a

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 8>lot of investors. I think we're going to be more choppy,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 8>and I think choppy ranges is how we see the dollar,

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, against some of the majors going into twenty

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 8>twenty six.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 5>And I think Jene along those lines, I mean, I

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 5>think what we're we've heard so far from Davos is

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 5>business folks bullish.

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 2>On the US.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 5>Jonathan Ferrer from Bloomberg Television setting a study by PwC saying,

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 5>you know, you go pull a lot of these corporate

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 5>CEOs around the world, they're still investing heavily in the

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 5>US market, that maybe that bodes well for the dollar.

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I would agree that, you know, and if you

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 8>look at the surveys, say from equity houses, you know,

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 8>they're relatively bullish in terms of the potential performance of

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 8>the US equity market in twenty twenty six, and that's

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 8>not what you see in the foreign exchange surveys. With

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 8>the economists thinking oh, you know, the dollar is going

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 8>to carry on falling. So you know, that's why we're

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 8>not really one of the reasons we're not as bearish

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 8>as the market consensus on the view for the dollar.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, if you look, you know at the US

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.479
<v Speaker 8>stock market, well, you know, the US houses almost all

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 8>of the top ten tech companies in the world, are

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 8>large part of the top one hundred. If you're going

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 8>to get companies gaining from productivity gains because of AI,

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 8>well the US is really well positioned. On top of that.

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 8>Of course, the dollar now is cheap and making those

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 8>companies look even cheaper than they were, So from that

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 8>point of view, you know, we don't really see the

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 8>dollar as as really on this downturn. What we sort

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 8>of see last year was a big position adjustment and

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 8>chopping train rege traded is what we expect.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 2>On a question not to turn into history or Patrick

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>O'Brien from the eighteenth century, let's go there. Robal Bank

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 2>owns the Netherlands and up north to the Baltic Sea.

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 2>From where you sit, Jane, with all of your years

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of experience, how coordinated attached are the Scandinavian states from

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Denmark into Saint Petersburg. Is everybody on the same page. Sweden, Norway,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the Baltic States, is everybody on the same page.

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, it is notable that you had Sweden

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 8>and Finland moving into NATO really very recently, and I

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 8>think that really gives us a pretty strong message as

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 8>to who's aligned with whom. You know, Denmark is that

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 8>side of you know, the Eurozone, but it is very

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 8>much part of Europe and I think we again we've

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 8>seen that in some of the reactions from the European

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 8>politicians this week. So yeah, you know, Europe is very

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 8>much a different you know, from a federal position, that

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 8>nationalism within the different countries is very strong and that

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 8>can add to significant barriers and getting things done. But

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 8>you know we've seen this week were still able, you know,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 8>to come together and pull together with a single message.

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Jane, Thank you so much. Jane Foley a rabble bank,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 2>just can't say enough about the continental perspective she brings.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. E's Durn listen

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the Alexis Is going Why am I

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 2>doing this? Let's do the newspapers Alexis Goos office.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 6>Hey, good morning guys. So I saw this one on

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 6>the Wall Street Journal. I immediately thought of mister Paul Swainey

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 6>because it's Duke Right. Just had their first first outright

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 6>ACC championship more than half a century, thanks in large

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 6>part to who their quarterback, of course, Darian Menza. Well

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 6>guess what he was bolting for the exit. He wanted

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 6>a bigger payday, so we went into the portal, tried

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 6>to change schools thanks to you know, I'm talking nil

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 6>right name image likeness. So Duke filed a lawsuit against Max.

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Here's the deal.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 5>They have a two year contract with him, and he

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 5>completed his first year and he was going to bolt

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 5>before his second year. So that's an issue. The second

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 5>issue is he told the school and the world in December,

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm coming back for my second year. And so therefore

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 5>Duke did not pursue a quarterback in the portal. Now

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 5>they're left hind dry because he went into the portal

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 5>literally an hour before it closed, and Duke's a little miffed.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 5>So you got a temporary restraining order on the guy

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 5>so he can't enroll in Miami.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Can you warn me next time when you're doing this,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll just go sandwich.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 8>I got this.

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 2>You need a Tito and tang.

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, what I would have said to you, young man,

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure you've got very good lawyers. Has more lawyers,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 5>so be carefully buddy.

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 2>Leave him.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 6>Second, I do have a second one, unfortunately not a

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 6>Duke one. But this comes from the New York Times.

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 6>So federal regulators now looking at late night TV, right,

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 6>So the FCC wants to enforce these old, they're largely

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 6>unenforced media rules. Remember public interest standards when you had

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 6>to give a politician the same amount of time if

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 6>they're buying for a position.

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 2>It kind of has gone by the wayside.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 6>So under the new guidance, the FCC wants these talk

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 6>shows that are carried on local TV stations to offer

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 6>candidates vying for the same office equal airtime. So who

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 6>does this going to affect Jimmy Kimmel ABC, Stephen Colbert CBS,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 6>who we already know is going away in June, right,

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Seth Myers on NBC. Also daytime talk shows like The View,

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 6>which we know President Trump is not a fan of.

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 6>So you know, conservatives have complained for years at these

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 6>late night shows tilt far to the left. They have

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 6>more Democrats on than Republicans. So we'll see if this

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 6>public interest standard.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Ye, because it take. It's a real thing.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 5>It's been out there since nineteen thirty four.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 6>But you do feel like you see less and less

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 6>of it. There's not a lot of the balanced approach.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 2>To comment that. I think. I'm like, are you lots

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 2>of people aren't staying up to watch this stuff anymore?

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 6>Right, because you can watch it the next day on YouTube.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I don't. I don't the whole eleven

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 2>eleven thirty midnight thing. I think it's sort of dripped

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 2>it away.

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, even SNL I don't watch it. I rarely watch

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 6>it in real time. Well with these hours, we're really

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 6>watching anything in real time late at night.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 5>All right, listen wonderfully one this story.

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 6>I like, Yeah, did you guys have Lincoln logs growing up?

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, of course I love it? Right, it was

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 2>our legos?

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 6>All right, Well, I'm glad you're both sitting down because

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 6>the factory that makes Lincoln logs, it's in Maine shutting down.

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yep. Yeah, this national crisis is Trump should address this shit.

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean this is big. Yes, So now they're trying

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 5>to scramble and find someplace in China or somewhere else

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 5>that can make these things.

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, of course, I mean, so here's I guess the

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 6>good news is Lincoln logs isn't going away. It's just

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 6>factory that made them. So the Pride Manufacturing is now

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 6>scrambling or Basic Fund is scrambling. That's the name of

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 6>the Basic Fund, scrambling to find a new factory to

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 6>manufactory these there are sexually you.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Can't make Lincoln logs in Vietnam, I think.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 5>And then tariff, so the guys are saying, hey, we're

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 5>gonna have to make them outside the US. With the tariff,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 5>they're gonna be more EPENSI we're gonna have to.

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Better when the dog shoe, the green roofs your father goes,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna die from them.

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 6>Were you stepped on a Lincoln log in the middle

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 6>of the night.

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>You may have to go buy some Lincoln logs.

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 8>He was married s