WEBVTT - China’s Mega Restructure; Trouble in India

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crumbie. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Today's guests so Alice Wong, who covers China's credit markets

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News from Hong Kong. She's been all over

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the biggest scoops from that region. We're delighted to have

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you on the show. Thank you for having me to.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>We're also very happy to welcome Mary Ellen Olsen, who

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>looks at commodity producers throughout Asia for Bloomberg Intelligence, also

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>based in Hong Kong. Thanks for having me. We'll be

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>discussing a big Indian story with her in a bit.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Spoiler alert, it's not a danny that it could be

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>heading that way. Before we get to that, Alice, what's

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the mood in Hong Kong right now? I was there

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago and everyone was still wearing masks

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in the street. Anyone who didn't risk the hefty fine

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole worlds now is betting on a big China reopening.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>What's the story there? Yeah, I mean personally, I'm definitely

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a very excited. No, but you know what surpride new

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is after all, almost a thousand days of the mask

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>mandate and now the government dropping it. Actually, most people

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>still choose to wear a mask, so we actually had

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a story on that today about walk out on the street,

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and most people are still wearing it. But I think

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the market is very excited about Chinese and Hong Kong

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>government opening out. So you can see all the markets

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.919
<v Speaker 1>are turning up in the region here today. Very interesting.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope it keeps moving in that direction. And I

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>really do look forward to getting back to Hong Kong.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>What great city. So Alice, let's talk ever Grand. But

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>before we dig into the credit story for listeners maybe

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>not familiar, what is it? Why do we care? And

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.639
<v Speaker 1>why has it dominated the headlines in Asia and around

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the world for so long? Yeah? What is ever Grand

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and why do we care about? The story? So the

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sheer size of it that should be enough to catch

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>reader's attention and listeners. In this case, this is the

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>company that was founded in nineteen ninety six and just

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of other developers in China, property developers

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in China, IF relied heavily on borrowing to feel its growth,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and dollar bombs is among them. So it had about

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>one point ninety seven trillion yen that is two hundred

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and eighty seven billion US dollars in liabilities as of

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>June twenty twenty. First, that is the most among its

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>developer peers in China. It also was the largest dollar

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>debt borrower among its peers. So what happens when it

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really carries broader implications for the whole dollar bond market

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in the region as well as China's nearly sixty trillion

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>US dollar financial system, and it has defaulted in It

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>defaulted in his US dollar bob in late twenty twenty

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>First Fastful, We're now in March twenty twenty three, and

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>creditors are still not see in concrete progress on this

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>debt restructuring. So that is why it's still dominating that lie,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, because people are paying attention to debt restructuring progress.

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>And also Everground's restructuring will set examples for other real

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>estate firms from the nation. The sector has snowballed into

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>record amount of default from once being one of the

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>hardest bomb markets in the world. And Everground's own restructuring

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>will be China's largest ever and it is only the

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>only restructuring that's going on in the sector right now.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>That is carried out by dominated by the government. So

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>let's just back up. The Everground is a property developer.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>They make property. Surely that's a good business to be in.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge population, there's a need for housing in China.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>What's what's going Why can't they why can't they pay

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>their debt? Yeah, so let's talk about that first. How

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a private developer in China. It's one

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of the largest. It owns. It says it owns more

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>than one thousand projects across almost three hundred cities in China.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>UM and really it's problems started in twenty twenty one.

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It had in liquidity scare and then it's that it's

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>going to outline a problem to solve its liquidity issue.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But at that time China wanted to address UM the

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>overleveraged problem that has been existing in this sector for

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time. UM and that is essentially what's happened.

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is not an issue that is only

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>belonging to everigrants. All of them are under the government's

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>regulatory crackdown. So all of them had run into the

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>regulatory tightening. And again that is not happening only with

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the real estate sector. Either China has cracked down or

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>as we have seen on the education sector as well

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as the technology sector. So China's housing markets began to

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>slow down because the government don't want people to the

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>government's chanting slogan. Slogan is housing is for is not

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>for speculation, So they don't want you to speculate on

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>buying anymore. Um And we also know what happened during

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. China's economy is not growing as fast as

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>it used to be um And China's population is also

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>shrinking now for the first time in a long time.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Um And so there's the demound size of or shrinking.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So all of those components adding up together right now

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is a hard time for China's real estate sector. So

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they built too much, They browed too much money, They

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>built the wrong kind of housing. What was wrong with

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the business model? Yeah, like you know, you pointed out exactly,

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they borrow too much. They rely too heavily on borrowing

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to fund its growth. And it's been a lot of

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>borrowing in a very short amount of time that is

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really posing risks to the whole nation's financial system. That's

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>why China wanted to crack down on it. So they

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>have how much debt? Well, I just mentioned ever, grind

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>alone has over two hundred eighty billion US dollars in

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>liabilities as of June twenty twenty first, and that's this

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>company alone. Yeah, and what's the latest situation with them

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure that out? They're in the restructuring. What

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are the key dates we're looking for here? Yeah, they're

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in the restructuring. And what's really refrustrating for people is

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it has promised timeline and debtline over and over again

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and it has failed to deliver on them over and

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>over again. So the next date that we are watching

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 1>for really is March twenties. It's a court hearing date.

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And last time at the court's hearing which has been

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>adjoined to March twenties, every grant had promised the judge

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that it will present a plan and have creditors support

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>by early March, and we know, we know now is

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>March first, and that is nowhere to be seen. So yeah,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>those are the key dates that we're watching for right now.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And the back up, just let me go back a

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit on this lawsuit that I'm talking about so

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what's called is it's a winding up lawsuit. We have

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>seen several developers creditors use this strategy in Hong Kong

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Core in the past few months. That is, essentially, when

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the company owes a certain amount of money that has

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>not paid, the creditor can go to court and said

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this and say, this company owes me debt that is

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not paying me. I want to plan it to be insolvent.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go into liquidation, sell its assets, and

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>repaying is dead. So many creditors have taken up this approach.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not ideal because if a company actually goes into liquidation,

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it needs to fire sell its assets, and you know,

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>creditors will get their money. But that is not the

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>result that everyone wants. Someone just wants some of them

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just wants a better recovery. And so everyone is now

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in this lawsuit and it has repeatedly adjourned its hearings

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and delayed presenting a restructuring plant. It keeps telling the

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Core I'm working on a plan, but it's just not

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>presenting it. Do we know what's holding things up? Yeah? Actually,

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so there are a few things that the company is

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>having disagreements with a major group of dollar bond holders

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>over that we have learned from sources UM, so we

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>may get into a bit of litergree details here. UM.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>The source has told us before that every ground has

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>presented two solutions. The first one is to just extend

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the debt UM and the second one will require swapping

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the debt into its shares as well as

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>shares of the Hong Kong listed units UM. And now

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they have some disagreements over you know, the equity valuation

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of those shares UM, which you know, if the company

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is more bullish on its own share valuation whereas if

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>creditors think it's less, it would imply a deeper haircut

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>for the bondholders UM. So valuation is one thing. We

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>also learned that the company is only willing to offer

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a small percentage of its stakes in those teamiths, whereas

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the editors are demanding almost entire Evergrand's entire stakes in

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>those units. So that's another sticking point. There are other

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>things like the the group is actually demanding the company

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to address is corporate governance issue that we have seen

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this happening, How do we prevent this from happening again?

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's among their demands. Those are a few things

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that they just cannot get on the same page at

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment. And as you mentioned, it's not just local investor,

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>its foreign bond holders as well. Who are we talking about?

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Are there any big names in there? Yeah, Unfortunately, I'm

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure I can disclose that at the moment, but yeah,

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. Um. Evergrand debt is not just held

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>by local creditors. It really has deep implication for China's

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>onshore financial system. But let's not forget it used to

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>be the largest dollar debt borrower. Like I said, in China,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>China's a real estate sector. So dollar bonds are held

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>by a lot of global investors, big and small. And

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the group that I'm talking about here is an ale

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>group of dollar bond holders and they are just some

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of the big ones that are talking with the company.

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But that the company still need to after convincing them,

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>still need to convince is Broader set all of his

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar bond holders at some point to agree on a

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>restructuring plan to really move the progress forward. You mentioned

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it right down as well, and obviously the company needs

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of some of that. What are we

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about, do we have any sense at this point

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of how much of a haircut credits might be taking

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>hire That unfortunately is not very clear at the moment yet. Okay,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and so what will happen if Everground loses its lawsuit? Yeah,

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the scary thing. As I was saying, a lot

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of creditors have been threatening with such lawsuits to get

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the company to come to the negotiation table. And I

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>would say in Everground's case, it has definitely worked because

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the company's restructuring did pick up pace after that winding

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>up lawsuit was filed. But we have started to see

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>some developers actually getting the winding up order from Hong

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Kong court and facing liquidation. So that's what's going to

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>happen to Evergrants if they lose this lawsuit, the court

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>can appoint a liquidator, comes these all of its off

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>score assets and sell them and use them to repay

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>its credit tres. Another thing here is you know if

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Evergrand doesn't want to lose this lawsuits. It's also important,

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>also important because the company's shares and this unit shares

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have been on pause. They have been halted since March

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two because it could not deliver is earnings results,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>but it has seen them been on pause, and to

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get this lawsuit dismissed or result is among many conditions

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for it to resume his shares trading again. And if

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the shares do not trade for over eighteen months, it

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>could be delisted from Hong Kong Stock Exchange. So that's

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>another thing that you know, the company needs to watch

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>out for. So it's obviously a huge story in China

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, and it also involves a man who was

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>once the richest in the country and one of the

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>most influential people. You know, he was across business, across politics,

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and worth about forty two billion dollars at one point.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a bit of a flavor of that,

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>please sell us? Yeah? Sure, So Hui Kayan, like you

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>were saying, was once China's one of China's richest and

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>most influential business meant he used to be worth forty

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>two US billion US dollars you were men mentioning, and

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>now there's lost ninety three percent of that wealth he used.

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>He also was very politically stabby. He has been part

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of the political advisory body since two thousand and eight,

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but now he's no longer part of China's People's Political

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Consultive Conference anymore. So he's lost as wealth and he's

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a political status. And in terms of the ripple effect

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>from this whole Evergrand situation, what are the bigger implications

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for China's credit markets? I mean, has the default at

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this scale scared away foreign investors? Are they are the

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>developers now shut out of capital markets? Yeah? Absolutely, both

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of those things. So for one, a lot of developers

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>cannot come to the market now. It is, like I said,

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not Evergrand alone, because this is part of the making

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of China's crackdown on the whole sector. But Evergrand being

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the highest profile casualty is no doubt contributing to a

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>large part of this. And as I was saying, the

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sectors no ball into require amount of default. What that

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>has led to is the yields in the secondary market

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>has become way too high. So they have not come

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>down a bit to around sixteen percent that previously reached

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>almost thirty percent. And that means if issuers want to

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>come to the primary market to borrow new debt, they

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>would need to pay that much or even more to

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have an edge over the secondary market. And that is

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just way too much, you know, way too expensive for

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>borers to come to this market again. So this sector

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>really used to be dominating, not just China, about Asia's

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>whole dollar bond issuance, and has shrunk a lot in

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>this past year. So that's part one that is issuers

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are shot out of the market, and another one is

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just yeah, like I said, there are a ton of

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>defaults and unresolved debt issues, and people are watching out

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for these restructurings and watching to ever Grand because that

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is led by government's efforts right now and suport looking

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for a clue of how the government wants to resolve

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these issues. Okay, that's very interesting. Investors in

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>these situations they often have quite a short memory. They

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they take a hit, they move on, they

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>come back because they want to invest in a huge

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>economy like China. You do we really think that Evergrand

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to leave a lasting impression that there's going

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to be something that China is not going to bounce

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>back from. That's hard to say. Today. Actually we're seeing

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>China's property market, um, I mean in terms of sales

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are finally bounding back a little bit. Um. So that

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is the latest data from February. However, for dollar bond investors,

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe they will they will carry to his memory

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with that's for how long, I'm not sure, but you know,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for one, if the companies really also depends on the

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>company's restructing plan. Right, is just going to extend its

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>debt for twelve years as we had reported previously, than

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>keep pointing to wait out those twelve years until they

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>can finally get their money back, And I bet they're

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>going to seem a matter of memory. Alice One of

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, thank you so much for joining us. This

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>is a fascinating story with broad implications, and we look

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>forward to reading all of your scoops on the Bloomberg

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>terminal and of course at Bloomberg dot com. Thank you

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Switching gears here a bit. As I mentioned earlier, we

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are very fortunate to have Mary Ellen Olsen from Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>also based in Hong Kong. Now, when we met a

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, Mary Ellen, we talked a bit about India,

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>which has been in the news quite a bit because

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of a Danny. Just to catch everyone up a bit.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Danny is an Indian ports to renewable energy conglomerate that

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was accused of accounting fraud and stock manipulation and experienced

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a big route in its stock hand bond prices. There's

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of concern now over whether it can repay

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the debt. The news has really shone a light on

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>all Indian companies, the way they're structured and how they run.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But we're not here to talk about Donnie. Instead, we're

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>going to dig into another big Indian firm, Vedanta Resources,

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a getting a lot of attention and involves

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>a highly also involves a highly leveled tycoon. So to

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>start with, I've got to ask Mary Ellen, is this

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the next to Danny we're looking at here? Well, I

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's some similarities between the two companies, but I

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>think Vedanta is starting from a much different point than

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>where we saw a Donnie's start. A Donnie's Sports company

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is rated in the investment grade category in the low

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>triple B space, and of course Vedanta is rated in

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the low single B space. So I think we can

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>expect that it has more governance issues, more liquidity and

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>financial risk than a Donnie to start with. So, just

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to kind of set the state, I think it's starting

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>off from a weaker position I think the similarity similarities

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>between the two companies, however, do raise some some flags.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think the key similarities would be that they're

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>both you know, run by the promoter, which directs the

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the direction that the company goes in. They

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>both have very complex corporate structures and that can limit

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>transparency and also to some extent give rise to information risk.

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And finally, the companies both have a lot of debt

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and have used debt to grow their businesses. So I

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think that in general there is some flags that can

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>be seen across both of the names. So we just

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to back up. Let's let's talk about the company itself.

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>For those not familiar, what is Vadanta Resources? What do

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>they do? And you know why why why do we

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.479
<v Speaker 1>care about them in terms of like the you know,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the Indian and the Asian commodity market. So the Danta

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is a mining company. Its key industries are oil, aluminum,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and zinc. Those are what comprise the bulk of its

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>EBIATA generation. And I think that we care about them

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in the US dollar bond space is because they've been

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.959
<v Speaker 1>a heavy dollar bond issuer. At the moment, the holding

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>company has about five billion in dollar bonds outstanding, and

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it does have liquidity risks, and people are worried about

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they have the resources to pay the debt,

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>especially given the fact that their their debt maturity profile

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is relatively short term. But the metals that you mentioned

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and the set that they're in generally, I mean, that's

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>been a good, good one over the last few years, right,

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the commodities have rallied, the metals have been in demand,

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>there's been a big boom. Why why would this company

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not do well well? I think there's a story. Obviously,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with all high yield companies, I think there's a story.

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And the story with this company really goes back to

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>its corporate structure. The US dollar bond bower and obligore

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is Vedanta Resources, so that sits at the top of

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the corporate structure. But it's not an operating company. So

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>even though it has all that, it doesn't have any

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>operations itself. So it relies on the upstream of dividends

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>from its subsidiaries. So its core subsidiary is Vedanta Limited

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and it owns about seventy percent of that and Vedanta

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Limited owns one hundred percent of the oil and gas

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>assets and they account for about twenty five percent of EBIDA,

0:21:55.480 --> 0:22:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and Vedanta Limited owns sixty five percent of the zinc assets,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>which account for about fifty percent of EBIDA, and then

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>it owns about fifty one percent of the aluminum company,

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which is about fifteen percent of EBIDA. So you've got

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind that all these subsidiary companies they

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>also have debt and they also have you know, capex

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>needs that they need to fund. So what's left over

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>is then you know, what can be upstreamed to eventually

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Danta resources to cover the obligations there. So

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that complexity creates a problem in terms of the efficiency

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>of you know, cash flows throughout the corporate structure to

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to repay all of the obligations. So can it means

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.479
<v Speaker 1>repents and how does it do that? Well, Um, you know,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it has some levers that it can pull. It's it's

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>primary level lever has been over the past several months,

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the dividend upstreams, particularly from the zinc subsidiary, which is

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>cash risk rich. Um. In addition to that, it has

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>some nominal fees that it can assess on its subsidiaries

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and it can bring those moneys up to the holding company,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course it can also rely on new funding

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>from from banks, either domestic banks or international banks. So

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>those are the key levers that they're looking at at

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment. They actually came out today saying that they

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>were looking at raising about one point eight billion from

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>banks and were in advanced negotiations in that regard at

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment, although they did not really name any counterparties

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or disclose any time frames that they're looking for foreign

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>investors in that they didn't really specify the banks, but

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the sense is that some of that would come from

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>domestic and they're also looking at some international banks. Okay,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but based on the yields right now in the dollar market,

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>would they have too they be able to get an

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>affordable rates on that that remains to be seen. Um.

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Certainly their you know, their bonds themselves are yielding in

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the double digit territory, and press reports a couple of

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago did indicate that the potential funding for the

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>company was was quite high. But previously the company has

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>shown a willingness to finance at pretty high rates. Back

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one, they issued US dollar debt at

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>at about thirteen percent or over so they do show

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>an ability to to bring in funds even if they

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have to pay high rates. And that yield you mentioned,

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to what extent do you think that's influenced

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>by the situation at A Donnie at the moment, you know,

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think that there has been a

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>huge impact just because the starting rates, um, you know,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>pre the Hindenburg report on a Donnie, we're pretty high.

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, right now they're in the double digits. They

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>were there then as well. Where I've seen more of

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a crossover impact probably would be on the stock prices,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>which took a dive just this week. They were down

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think up to twenty no, about ten percent this week,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of coincided with all this rhetoric coming

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>out comparing Vedanta and Donnie. And of course here before

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the stockholders had been receiving good dividends because of all

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>these upstreams. But I think this idea that there's a

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>contagent risk feeding into Vedanti helped push the stock prices.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So I've seen more of an impact probably in the

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>stock than in the bonds. That at least I can discern. Okay,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they already have a very low credit rating, right, do

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we expect more downgrades in the next few weeks. Well, so,

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, the SMP is the only company that

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>officially rates Vedanni, and they rate it at B minus

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and they have a stable outlook. Moodies did rate the company,

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but Danta reportedly withdrew the contract after Moodies downgraded them

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to the triple C category on liquidity risks, and SMP

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>has said that the rating could come under pressure if

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't make progress in getting some financing in the

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>door in a timely fashion. And as a rule of thumb,

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the rating agencies like to see you an

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>answer for how they're going to repay debt anywhere from

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>three to six months before the debt matures, so they're

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>coming up to that benchmark. They do have bonds that

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>mature in April and May this year, so the agent

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and then again in January twenty twenty four. So I

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>would expect that in the next couple of weeks the

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rating agency would have to follow up on its indication

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about where it sees the financing coming from and making

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a decision about whether or not they need to change

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the rating. One of them has a triple C that's um.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you read the small print of the

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>rating agencies reports, that implies very high probability of default.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that what we're expecting? Well, I think that that's

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, this is a high yale company, and

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there's always stories with these companies, and Danta has been

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>here before. It has had a triple C rating before

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>and has pulled out of it. And I think, you know,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, the company is still saying that it

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is speaking to banks, and I don't think that we

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>can totally discount that even though they have not really

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>produced anything concrete at the moment. I think one of

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that's in the company's favor is that they

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>do have some time to play with. They can upstream dividends,

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and SMP confirm that in their view, they could probably

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>fund the debt repayments through the end of June through

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>these dividend upstreams and other fees that the company could

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>get in. So even if SMP does change its outlook

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or it's rating on the company, it still has some

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>time to play with before there would be a danger

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of a default. And given the company's pass track record

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in you know, coming up with a solution. I think

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>that that would be what's on everybody's mind. What can

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they do to turn this around in the absence of

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>additional bank funding. But it does seem at the moment

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that that is what they're focused in on and what

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping to target in the near term. Okay, but

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they could also sell some assets right when they have

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.239
<v Speaker 1>things like Zinc International. They've been trying to get rid

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on there, so that so the sale

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of Zinc International would be would have a profound and

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>material impact on their liquidity if if it were to happen,

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and it does look as though that's being sidetracked at

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment due to government objection. So what's happening is

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Zinc International are the African assets of um Vedanta Limited,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>which which are wholly owned, and they are trying to

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>sell those assets to their sixty five percent owned Hindustand Zinc,

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>which is the cash which company, and that would in

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>effect help transfer or pull about three billion out of

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Hindustan Zinc up to the Vedanta Limited level, which could

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>then be upstreamed more readily to the holding company to

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>help support its liquidity needs, so that that actually would

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have been a helpful transaction. But again it does look

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 1>as though the government has objected to it, and even

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Fidanta itself has kind of stepped back and said that

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they need to get shareholder approval in order for that

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>transaction to go forward. And the government is a shareholder,

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>why does the government object? I think there's a couple

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of different things that have come out in the press.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>In general, I think there's been some concern on the

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>valuations that perhaps they're too high. I think also, you know,

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a related party transaction and you know, the shareholder interest,

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to make sure that they're being you know,

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>wholly met. From my perspective, the transfer of the Zinc

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>International assets, you know what, they do require some CAPEX

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>investment for growth, so that could be a drag potentially

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:57.479
<v Speaker 1>on the consolidated company. And the final consideration is just

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the government itself, the Indian government, it has divestment targets

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to meet under its budget and it was planning on

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>divesting a piece of Hindustan Zinc. When the announcement came

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>out from Vedanta about the asset sale, the share price

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>did drop on Hindustan Zinc, so that also could have

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>affected the government's view of the transaction. So those are

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that you know, have kind of

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>been in the press or I've been thinking about about

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>why the government could be objecting. Okay, you mentioned levers

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of There any other levels that the

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>company can pull I think I think you mentioned one

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of asset sales. They have spoken in the

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>past about potentially selling down pieces of their steel business

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or even some of their copper business. But the question

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>there is on you know, timeliness, you know, because those

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>things may not happen within a time frame that could

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>meet their liquidity needs. Previously they talked about selling down

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>pieces of their listed companies, but you know, that could

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be more problematic in terms of you know, uh, opening

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>up new shareholders, which could create some some leakage from

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>dividend distributions. And another avenue would be intercompany loans, although

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the government but the company has said that they're not

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really interested in doing or what wouldn't do those anymore

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>previously and some of the calls that they've had, But um,

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I suppose that could be another avenue. You mentioned the

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>very high yields that they're paying. Do you think investors

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>are being compensated for the risks here. Well, I mean,

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess that there's a you know, a right price

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for for every every Bondum. Certainly, I think that they're

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>factoring a lot of the risks, and I think that

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, you know, there's there's plenty of people

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>out there that are on both sides of the fences

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not the government is going. Um. Sorry

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying the government the company can pay or

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>not pay m But I guess that remains to be seen.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, if they if they come through with the liquidity,

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the financing, and we're able to resolve their

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>liquidity issues, then some people will benefit for sure. And

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You've been looking at this company for a long time,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad, I'm glad you raised the point that

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they are not. This is not the first time that

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been in the situation. You know, the owner has

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>faced the liquidity woes in the past. He has always

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>managed to get the money and pay on time. Um,

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>what's different about it this time around? I think the

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>big difference, um, would be that there's probably a few

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>more doors that are closed so that they do have

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to in the near term, perhaps lean a little bit

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>more heavily on the banks um and I guess I'm

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about just market access. Given the state of the

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the bond market at the moment, especially for high yeld issuers,

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen a lot of issue WinCE and

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem a likely avenue for Vedanta to refinance

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in at the moment. We already talked about, you know, HCl.

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that that, you know, gave a lot of

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>people a lot of hope, but that avenue seems to

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have been shut down by the government objection. And previously

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you had a situation where they were hoping to privatize

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Videnta Limited. They've been down that road and have increased

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>their stake, but I'm not sure that you know, they

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>would renew that at any time in the near term.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like they have a few more doors

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that have closed on them, at least unless unless they're

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>able to come up with some new ideas. Okay, great,

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll definitely be watching with a lot of interest. We'll

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>read your analysis. Have it done to in All Things

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Asia Commodities and thank you how much, Mary Ann Mary

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Ellen Olson of Bloomberg Intelligence. You can read all of

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Mary Ellen's analysis on the Bloomberg Terminal, and thanks again

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to Alice Huang from Bloomberg News. Read all of her

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.720
<v Speaker 1>scoops on the terminal and at Bloomberg dot Com. Definitely

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on that evergrand story, Alison. Her team

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>will continue to break a lot of news there over

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the coming weeks. I'm James Crombie. It's been a pleasure

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>having you. See you next week on the Credit Edge.