WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How Miranda Rights Work

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>M Hey everyone, it's me your buddy Josh, and for

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>this week's s Y s K Selects, I've chosen for

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys, my buddies, how Miranda Rights Work. It's a

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty great episode. It's full of stuff like irony, interesting history,

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 1>uh and sometimes unpalatable but important civil rights. So I

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>hope you all enjoy it. It's one of my favorites.

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff Works

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Clark and there's Charles W Chuck Bryant, and um this

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. Jerry just told us right before

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>she pressed record, don't forget to be clever. What is

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that about? I don't know, man, I pressure I'm a

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>little to own off right now. Well, I think maybe

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>because you said Miranda rights sort of named after the

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Sex in the City character. Is that what you're talking about?

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>That was like forty five minutes ago. It's a call back.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that was clever in Cherry's book. That's

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Like, I didn't even consider that clever, you know,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>juvenile maybe so Miranda from Sex in the City. So

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>what was your response to that one? I don't remember

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>what I said. I thought it was fairly clever. We'll

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>just skip over that. You said you have the right

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to remain fabulous. Oh yeah, that's right. So that's the

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>recap of a conversation we had a little while ago. Everybody, well,

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>people always say that I want to know what happens

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. Just tom foolery. There you go, Chuck. Yes,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I know that. Uh, you and I have both been

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>arrested many times, and we've done some time in the

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>stir and all that, so we know what miranda rights are.

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Not true, But the average person also knows what Miranda

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>rights are because they're so ubiquitous on every cop show,

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>every lawyer show, every every show. I think they show

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>up on like e er, it's still on, it's on, right.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea that I'm like season seven. I

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. I don't think it is. I had

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good long run, sure, But Miranda rights are

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just this thing that have become totally ingrained in our culture.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>We can all say it, well, let's say it together.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>can and will be used against you in a court

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of law. But hey, buddy, don't fret. You have the

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>right to an attorney, and if you cannot afford one,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one will be appointed to you. Right. And then over time,

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:39.839
<v Speaker 1>apparently some agencies have added and if you waive these rights,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you can invoke them at any time. Yeah, I hadn't

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>heard that one. They know, they hadn't made it to

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>TV yet, really, right, Yeah, you know the goes like

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>short and sweet. I'm not even gonna tell you that. Yeah, Castle,

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he's all business. Yeah. Is he a cop though? And

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a private investigator, although I'm not sure.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So he wouldn't have to mirandize anybody, but he just

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>cast so he he does. I've never seen it. I

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>love Nathan Fillon though, Oh who doesn't. Yeah, he's a

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>nice guy. But this idea that Miranda rights are. You know,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they're everywhere and everybody knows them and knows what they

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You know that they exist. But the first of all,

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the case behind him, I think is probably unknown, and

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>then secondly, like what they're designed to do, really, the

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>real nuts and bolts of it, I hadn't. It hadn't

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>really occurred to me, even though it's pretty self evident

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it. Yeah, and it seems really straightforward,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but it can't get a little tricky, uh, which will

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>discuss how that happens. Well. So the idea of the

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Miranda rights is fairly recent, um, goes back to nineteen

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty six, the case called Miranda versus Arizona, the Arizona Yeah, yeah,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>which is like the legal profession came and be bothered

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to include the s when they abbreviate versus. You know.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And we should also point out that, um, it wasn't

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just this one case. Uh, it was Miranda v. Arizona

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gets all the press because the name Miranda, but it

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>was actually four cases that they consolidated. Um. But we

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>want to give Vignera v. New York West over the

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>United States, and California v. Stewart their due as being

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>part of this thing. And they basically all the cases

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>were similar in that them there were confessions after interrogations, um,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and those confessions were used against these various people. Right.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But we're with Miranda though. The lawyers of these um,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>well not just us, I mean everybody does. It's called

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the Miranda case, the Miranda laws, the Miranda rights.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>You're miranda ized, you know. Um. But the the the

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>whole point behind these In all of the cases, the

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that the complainants had was that they're the people who

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>committed these crimes and made these confessions, and we're are

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>convicted for him. We're not aware that they didn't have

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to talk to the police. Right, And this is actually

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the Miranda case goes back to nineteen sixty six. But

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the American right guaranteed by the Bill of Rights in

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the constitution Fifth Amendment to to refrain from self incrimination.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>That goes back to, like you said, the Fifth Amendment

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>basically says that you don't have to tell on yourself.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The cops can't make you talk, is what that is. Yeah,

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but until nineteen sixty six they I guess you just

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>needed to be you know, up on your constitutional knowledge.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And then in nineteen sixty six they eventually will get

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to the case they said, you know, maybe we should

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>start telling people this when we arrest them. Um. So

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 1>let's go back in time to nineteen sixty three. Uh

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in Phoenix, Arizona, UM, the cops picked up Ernesto Miranda

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for questioning and a kidnapping and rate case. His car

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was spotted near of the scene of the crime. He

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>was called in. When he got there, he was like,

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do this. Man like, he was completely cooperative.

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I didn't do any of this. Two hours later,

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>an interrogation they had he was not identified in a lineup,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but the cops said, the girl identified you in the

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>lineup and he went, oh, well, I guess I think

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>his direct quote was, well, I guess I ought to

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you about it then, And so the cops lied

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to him. And this is a clear case of you know,

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like not doing things the right way. Well, this no,

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court is upheld the use of deception by

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>police in interrogation. They can lie there their tails off

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to you, right, but not if you're not Miranda. I

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That was the point is he didn't know that he

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>could just be quiet and not say anything. So he

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just volunteered the information, signed a written confession. And that's

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole point. And that's what the justices in the

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court who heard the Miranda case and all the

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>other cases that combined to make it um we're getting

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>at was that you, when you are being interrogated by

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the place you're in their custody, they are allowed to

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>use deception. They are allowed to UM use all sorts

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of tactics to core course, you two talk, But if

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not aware that you don't have to talk, then

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying amounts to an involuntary confession and hence

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be able to be used against you because you

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have a constitutional right against self incrimination. If you're informed

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have that right, then you are making the

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>decision to go ahead and confess against yourself and you're

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>waiving that right, yes, and that can be used in

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>court exactly, so they give you the option essentially. So

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this is what the whole case was about. UM. In

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety six, like we said, the Supreme Court heard this

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>case and ruled he was convicted we should say, right

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>based on that confession and sentenced to thirty years I believe,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and that the Supreme Court case was part of an

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>appeal that's right from that three years later they heard

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this case. Yeah, and apparently, like the the other three

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>people probably represent even more than just those four cases total.

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Usually when the Supreme Court here's something, there's a lot

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of it going on in the courts. Yeah, yeah, um,

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And they said in a five to four decision, you

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>know what the the suspect has to be read his rights,

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>which one now'll cause miranda rights. Yeah, and they specifically said, um,

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>prosecution may not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation of

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the defendant unless it did demonstrates the use of procedural

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self incrimination. But

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the key there is custodial interrogation and established a couple

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of things. Is one, you can't self incriminate from the

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>moment you're in custody. Um, So like it's not like

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on trial or something, and that any confession is

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>uh involuntary basically. And again the reason that they're differentiating

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>between in custody and not in custody is because once

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you're in custody, the cops can do things like lie

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to you or something like that. That's right, um. And

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>in custody is those the three key words taken into

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>custody or is where all the gray area has been

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>since then and still is today. Yeah, Because they were

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear in their ruling, like, yeah, this person has

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be read their rights, and how let's even print

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some cards for police officers to carry around with them

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so they can read off of the card if they

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>have to. Yeah, and we should point out that Miranda.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Actually they retried him without his confession and his girlfriend

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>um said he he confessed to me, so that was

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>used in court. So he was found guilty again since

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty thirty years again, paroled after five years and

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.599
<v Speaker 1>then sold those little Miranda cards with his autograph on

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>him for a while for like a buck fifty. And

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>then he was stabbed to death in a bar fight

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in the nine Yes, and the suspect who stabbed him

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was read his Miranda rights and so he never talked

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and he walked. Really, oh my god, the irony. It's

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely irony. Wow, And like the the truest form of

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the word. That's right, man. So custodial interrogation is is

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the keys here. Um in custody is where

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it gets a little hinky. Like if you're in the

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>back of a police car and you get your handcuffs on,

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>then you're in custody, right, that's pretty straightforward. Or even

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have handcuffs on, if you're if the

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>cops lock you in the car and you're you're are

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's understood by you that you're not allowed to get out.

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>You're in police custody. Right. The official definition of custody

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and the mirand decision is quote unquote denial of complete

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>freedom of action. But that's open to interpretation. You know

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>it is because, um, you know, if you're being if

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you're handcuffed and you're putting the back of a locked

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>police car, you're obviously denied freedom of action. You obviously

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have to be mirandized. Right, you can bang your head

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on the little clear glass in front of you, right,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>What were you saying in police chases like the the

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you can defecate or urinate or whatever, do whatever you want,

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>but that is not freedom of action. Um. It's been

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>brought up though that because of the um the legal

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.239
<v Speaker 1>authority that cops represent with their uniforms and their outwardly

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 1>worn guns and you know, tasers, all that stuff, their

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>mirrored sunglasses, that they have some sort of um, they

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>project a sort of just talking to a cop, a

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>person might feel detained. Yeah, it's an implied Um. Yeah,

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like an implied detention. Like if the

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>cop came to my front door and said he had

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>some questions for me regarding a crime. I don't think

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I would feel even though it's within my right, I

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think I would feel like I was able to

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>say no, actually, I'm going to go to the grocery

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.719
<v Speaker 1>store right now, right exactly, and just walk past them

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and get in my car, or even I'm gonna have

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask you guys to leave, which again you said

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it is your right to do. They haven't placed you

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>into custody, but you you don't have to be Miranda's

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in this situation because you can tell the cops to leave.

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>If you are in an interrogation room and you tell

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the cops to leave, they're not gonna listen to you.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>If they're on your front doorstep and you tell them

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 1>to leave, they are supposed to listen to you, and

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>because of that, you're not being you. You have freedom

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>of movement. You can go back in your house, you

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>can go to the grocery store. You can tell the

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>cops to leave. So, even though the perception might be

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that you are being detained by the cops just by

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>their very presence, and you don't feel like you can

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>tell them to leave, the law isn't this. This law

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't designed to let you be slippery, right, like a

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>trap fix stop, for instance, is a is a kind

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of a not weird. But if you get stopped by

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>a cop and you'd say, um, you know, I've got

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>five pounds of weed in my trunk by the way,

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>mr officer, you caught me, that can be used in

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>court because that is a non custodial situation, right, which

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is weird. Though I didn't realize that a traffic stop

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is considered non custodials. That mean you can just drive

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>off because then you know, then that's a custodial situation.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean that you can drive off legally

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>or does that mean that the courts just it is

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a gray area that the courts of That means you're fleeing.

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That means you're evading, evading what arrests a traffic stop? Okay, well,

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>then that means you can't leave, you don't have freedom

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of movement. Therefore, that's a custodial situation and you should

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have to be mirandized when you're pulled over. Well, hey,

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you talked to the Supreme Court, my friend, I've been trying.

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But I do have a question if there are any

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>um constitutional lawyers or any kind of lawyer really who

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>knows what they're talking about. Defense attorney, Um, I'm very

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>curious about that, Like, are you allowed legally to just

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>drive off once a cop pulls you over since it's

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a non custodial situation. My answer is no. I would

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine no too, because every time you do, they well,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>because you have committed a crime and the in the

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>cop has has pulled you over. Maybe uh, I don't know.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's where the language gets tricky. You're not

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in custody, maybe you're temporary detained a bit of there's

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>some specific language that allows for this. And I would

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>never like argue this with a cop who pulled me over.

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I'm getting at. I'm just genuinely, like,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm genuinely curious. If you can't drive off, then how

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is it a non constidious situation? That's my question. Yeah,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. Um, but that shows the slippery

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>slope in the gray area, you know, right, And like

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you said, I mean if you say, hey, I've got

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>five pounds of weed in my trunk and the cop

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>never mirandized you, and then after they says, well, you're

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>under arrest, and then he mirandizes you and you shut up.

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>From that point on, they can still use that initial

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>exact confession because it was non custodial. Yeah. Uh. And

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>here's the other thing. A lot of people, well not

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, some folks may be confused by

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're not read your Miranda rights, then you just

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you get released or whatever. Right, not true at all.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>That just means that they can't use what you have

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>said in court, and any ancillary, uh incriminating evidence that

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>came from that confession can't be used either, right, Like

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>if they arrest you and you say, they tell you

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you're placed under arrest, and then they're like, so, um,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get some tacos rather than here's what

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we have to tell you about your Miranda rights, And

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>then you say, I've got a bunch of weed on me, Like,

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they can't use that confession about the weed two against

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you because you hadn't been mirandized. You've been told that

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the cops wanted tacos. Yeah. I wonder what keeps someone

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from voluntarily talking about evidence so it won't be able. Yeah, man,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we are criminal minds right here. I'm sure there's workarounds

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for all this. You're like Mandy Patinken and like the

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the cast right here at this table and Entel. No,

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it is any in Criminal Minds. I don't know. He's

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Homeland. I watch that. He's also in the

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Prince's Pride. He's in Nego Montoya Monday thinkin. He was

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>also the alien cop in Alien Nation. A lot of

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>people don't know that. Jimmy Cohn, you never saw Alien Nation.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That was that good. That was a great movie. It

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>always looked silly to me. I'll tell you what when

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you're it is a great movie. Yeah, it was cruel.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that one? Yeah? It was nothing like

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I had, like a good plot and it was like

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to live in Die in l A with aliens right

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or enemy Mine on Earth? Yeah, I never saw that one.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was just kind of the same deal.

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's Lucas at Jr. In an alien suit

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and Dennis Quaid, right, Uh, Randy quick, Dennis Quaid. It

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely wasn't Randy. It wasn't like banking Dennis Quaid. I'm

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure. All right, So Miranda rights here is the

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>requisite meandering tangent. Uh So there's an important thing we

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>haven't covered yet. Um, in regards to Miranda rights. And

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>it was recently got a lot of press with the

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>bombings in Boston, and that is the public safety exception

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>UM in the case of the the Boston bombing. What

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was his name, Uh, Joe Car Sarnia. Okay, so jos

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Car Joe Car did Joe Car. There's a lot of

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to say it that are wrong, and then there's

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>one right one which I may have had in there.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So he is in the hospital. They everyone knows what happened.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You know that the bombings went off. The one brother

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was killed, they caught the other one, uh, and he

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was wounded. And so he was in a hospital and

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they had what they called an urgent public safety interview

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the hospital with out reading him his rights. He's

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>asking for an attorney. They're like, you're not getting an attorney.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Why why don't you tell us what's going on? And

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 1>he did, Yeah, he did. He confessed to the bombing.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>He told them about um possible other bombs. I think

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's how they found out that the apartment was possibly

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>rigged with explosives, or at very least there were explosives

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in his apartment, his brother's apartment, UM. And they found

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>all this out by denying him his right to keep quiet. Yeah,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people were saying, well, you guys

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just blew the case. You guys, why didn't you mirandize him?

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was because of this public safety exemption that

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>came about, um that the Supreme Court ruled on in Yeah,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>New York v. Quarrels. Benjamin Quarrels was in custody at

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>a grocery store in nineteen eighty and rape victim had

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>identified him, and the cop frist them and said, hey,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got an empty gun holster. Here is there a

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>gun nearby? And he was like, yeah, it's right over there.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Cop Win got the gun unloaded. It obviously secured the scene.

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>And that became a court case because he was the

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>gun evidence was thrown out. An appellate court agreed, and

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>then later on the Supreme Court said, no, you know

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>what that's called, Uh, you know, securing the scene. That's

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a public safety exception. You can't have a gun loaded

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>gun in there. You can't have bombs waiting to go

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>off potentially somewhere else. So forget the mirandizing. You need

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to secure everything, right and um, once that once that

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>threat to public safety is secured, then you have to

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>mirandize them. Yeah, in which the Boston case, he just

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>shut up after that, so too late. Yeah, exactly, the

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Feds had gotten all they wanted out of him and

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>were like sure, whatever, And apparently a judge ordered the

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>FEDS to mirandize the guy after like two days of

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this questioning. I bet that was a pretty satisfying reading

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of the rights at that point. I'm sure, you know,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>because they knew they were covered. But I mean, this

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is such a gestapo tactic too, like, well, this question

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you about everything we want for two days until the

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>judge ordered us to mirandize. That means that some attorneys

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to go through all two days

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of that confession to pick out what at what point

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the public safety exemption was basically exhausted. And I mean,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you can argue that any question that has to do

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with possible future terrorist attacks is you know, preventing or

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>protecting public safety. Yeah, but it's just like, uh, I mean,

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it definitely skirts the spirit of the law,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I would think. Yeah, And I found an article written

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>by the guy who originally I think wrote the Quarrels

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>verdict and he he was like, you know what, in

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the case with the Boston bomber, you they shouldn't even

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 1>done that anyway, because there was so much evidence they

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't even need these confessions, and it was in the

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>true spirit of trying to secure public safety to find

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>if there was other explosives. But from that point on,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.239
<v Speaker 1>they're like, it was completely unnecessary because the guy was

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>convicted just from you know, the evidence was so strong

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't even need that confession exactly. So like

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>after they found out about the bombs or whatever, whether

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>their word weren't bombs, then it seems to me like

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the public safety exemption would have been exhausted and they

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>would have had to have mirandized him. It's a slippery slope.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, it's not like the CIA has to have,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, admissible evidence in court to go after all

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the people that um Joe kar named, if he named

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody or whatever, he gave up, you know. So it's

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know, Yeah, I'm coming to trust like

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Obama's security policies like less and less real. That's my opinion. No,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I get it. It's it's a it's a very fine

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>line between like, hey, this guy's a terrorist and get

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that information or people still have their human rights right exactly.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's such a difficult thing to to swallow to

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the concept that some little punk who him and his

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>brother blew people up in Boston and took people's lives

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and legs and that they did this, that the concept

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that they have any rights whatsoever is pretty unpalatable. But

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we as a society have decided that, yeah, you do

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have rights. If you're an American system, you have certain

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rights that are guaranteed by the Constitution and the Bill

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>of Rights and and court interpretation of those rights. And

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that's the law of the land. And um, I guess

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to just routinely skirt around those whenever, whenever it's determined

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to be called for by whoever is in charge and power.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's equally impalatable. Impalatable to me because also, um

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the courts judged a criminal suspect when you

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>invoke the public safety exemption. It's not that that person

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any rights, it's that the safety of the

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>public trumps that person's constitutional rights right then, but just

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for that narrow window of time, and then after that

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's exhausted. That's right, and this is not the first time.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It was just three years ago that the FEDS did

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. They invoked the public safety exemption for

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the Times Square bomber. Yeah, and he sang like a canary,

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which is if they just did it to Joe Carson, Naieve,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I would have a problem. But just

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it popped up three years ago too,

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that's starting an indicative pattern to me. Yeah, terrorism, I

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>think is the key. Yeah, key agent there you know

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>anything else, I'm done, then we're gonna get so much

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>mail for that one. Hey, buddy, you have the right

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to remain fabulous. Thank you. That's my takeaway. Thank you.

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want to learn more about being fabulous, you

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>can type that word into the search bar how stuff

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. You can also type Miranda rights m

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I R A N D A rights Uh. And since

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I said search bar somewhere in there, it's time for

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>message ye, and now it's time for listening to mail. Yeah.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Before listener mail, we have a quick shout out. And

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't usually do this because we get inundated with

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>requests for shoutouts. Yeah, so every once in a while,

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because at the right time exactly. This is an anniversary

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>shout out from Josh Underwood. Uh. He and his wife

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>are teachers in h Robertson County, Kentucky, and they've listened

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to our show incorporated in their classrooms and they are

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>celebrating their tenure anniversary. And uh, he said, if we

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>could say happy anniversary to Amanda, it would I can't

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think of anything that would make her smile more so.

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>On June fourteenth, he said, if it's late, you know,

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>do't worry about it. So this is probably gonna be late,

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but I hope you guys had a great anniversary on

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>June fourteen. Happy tenth Josh and Amanda Underwood. Yeah, happy

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>improtrate you guys. Or I don't know if Amanda took

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>your name whatever her name might be. Yeah, so the

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>real listener mail speaking of taking names. Uh, it's a

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>good one and I'm gonna call it Royal tann ebombs.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh theory. Oh I like this already. Yeah, it's one

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite movies. As it's losing finger you know,

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a boy chopping accent? Right, Hi, guys, My wife Molly

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and I've been listening for about three years. We both

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 1>love it. Um I've always wanted to email you, but

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a reason, and I didn't want to

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>sound like a twelve year old girl talking to in

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Sync or something. Those guys pretty out of touch. Yeah,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's I wanted to say something interesting. So

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>here are two interesting things. One, my name is Josh Bryant.

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Pretty interesting. It's like the two of us together. It's right.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you taking my name. Uh. Number two he

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>actually had three things, but one wasn't so interesting. Number

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>two is I watched Wes Anderson's Royal Tannebombs. Was amazing

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>at how different and unique all the characters were and

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>how well they all worked together as a family. After

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>reading other theories about the movie, I think the one

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I love most is that every character represents a different

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>stage of grief. So Denial I collect fan theories. Oh

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it. That is a great one. Have you

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>seen Room two thirty seven? Yet? No of you know

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm dying to them. They didn't release it in Atlanta.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Um alright, So Denial is Margot Tannembaum, her unknown smoking habit,

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>numerous marriages, secret crush on Richie, totally demoral anger, Chaz

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tannebaumb need I say more. Pretty much throughout the whole movie,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>he's angry and full of resentment, bargaining Royal Tannembaum himself.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>He lies to get out of bad gambles and gambles

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to cover up bad lies. This is like pretty good.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't make this up. He got off the internet.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's still good still. But Joshua Brant, you get

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>no credit. It's like that kid who stole that haiku

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from a T shirt and um depression. Richie Tannebaum again

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>very obvious. Sees when he tries to see when he

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>tries to commit suicide. Great scene. Uh and except Upstince

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.959
<v Speaker 1>is Ethylene Tannenbaum. Her role is more subtle. Her acceptance

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is seen when she accepts Mr. Sherman's marriage proposal. It's

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a little thin there. It's also seen when she finally

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>moves on from her own marriage and accepts her new

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>life with her new husband. So that's sort of that's

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the most tenuous. But he that's what we think, and

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's pretty good. I love fan theories like you. Yeah,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>five stages of gree I doubt if that's the case. Well,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what makes fan theories so great if like, if

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you just unlocked the director's secret, sure, then it's done.

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It's whine not you figured it out. One of the

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>great things about fan theories is if it rivals what

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the director was trying to do or the writer was

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. Yeah, it was like English class. Remember

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>back in English class, it was always and I had

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem with it back then, but now I love it.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I would always be well, just teachers just interpreting this,

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like who knows what the author meant? Oh yeah, but

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the point. Now in my old age,

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I realized, Yeah, I remember feeling my brain unfurl. Yeah,

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and start to get like, yeah, there are specific interpretations

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of things that that that kind of fit within a framework,

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but still are it's pretty wide. Yeah, but great, it's nice,

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool fan theories. I'm writing a blog post on

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>him right now. I'm collecting him. Oh yeah, so that's

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from Joshua Bryant. Joshua, I guess is a result of

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some weird stuff you should know in breeding. But yeah,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>he's an experiment, that's right, Yeah, tree dish, let us

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>know where you are right now. He escaped. Yeah, uh,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>if you escape from our lab. We want to hear

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about it, especially if you have some cool fan theory. Man,

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>send us fan theories like good ones. Yeah, I mean

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like good ones, not like uh it's stupid ones. Yeah.

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been on feral Children lately. What just that's been

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>my obsession lately, reading about feral children. I might try

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and write a think for a show fan theory feral Children.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>What does that have to do with fan theories? Nothing,

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>That's just that's my obsession. Yours has been fan theories. Oh,

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I got you, I got I've just been obsessed with

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>feral children. Yeah, because there have been like actual ones

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the like um, the Emerald Forest, the many cases.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So okay, if you have a good fan theory and

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or a good feral children's story, we want to hear

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about it. You can tweek to us at s Y

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>s K podcast. You can join us on Stuff you

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Should Know, which is prior to that slash, prior to

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook dot com. Uh. You can send us an

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>email the Stuff podcast that Discovery dot com, and you

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.719
<v Speaker 1>can join us at our home on the web, Stuff

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know dot Com. For more on this and

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics, visit how Stuff Works. Dot com