WEBVTT - Episode 852: One Big Beautiful Bill Act

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>On this episode in each world. The One Big Beautiful

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Act reduces taxes, reduces or increases spending for various

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>federal government programs, increases the statutory debt limit, and addresses

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>agencies and programs throughout the federal government. It is known

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>as a reconciliation bill and includes legislations submitted by eleven

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>House committees. The Act passed the House on May twenty second,

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with two hundred and fifteen yea's, two hundred and fifteen

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>o's and one member voting president, but as narrow margin

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as you can get. The Act is now being considered

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>by the Senate, Andrew's receiving some criticism from Elon Musk

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 1>and others. Here to talk about the bill, I am

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>really pleased to welcome my guest, Matthew Henderson. He is

0:00:50.720 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>the interim Chief Government Affairs Officer at America First Policy Institute. Matthew, welcome,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for joining.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Me on Newsworld. Absolutely, it's a pleasure to be here.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Would you just start by talking about the work you

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>did would Save America Coalition to help kill the Biden

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Build Back Better Bill in twenty twenty one, and how

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that led you into the work you've done over the

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>last three years on one big, beautiful bill.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I'm happy to taking a step back. If we

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 3>remember what was going on in twenty twenty one, America

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>First Policy Institute was just getting started and the Biden administration,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>who had just come into office, was looking at passing

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 3>their agenda. And it's almost like they took their entire

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>agenda and they put it into legislative build text. They

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>passed one reconciliation bill rather quickly. The other bill, it

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>was the Build Back Better Agenda. This was a monster

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 3>of a bill. This was introduced early on in the year,

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>and as America First Policy Institute was building up as

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 3>a think tank, we were attracting talent from the first

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration, and a lot of folks were coming together

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>and watching this process unfold in front of us. And

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 3>this bill, there's really no other way to explain it

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>other than a big government socialism bill. This bill would

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>have fundamentally reshaped the society that we lived in, turning

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 3>it into a socialist society. And there was tremendous momentum

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>against this bill. And as the process moved along, I

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 3>came on board with AFPI in about October and I

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 3>was hired to run a conservative coalition of a number

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 3>of organizations. At the time, we had about sixty organizations, conservative,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>bisically conscious organizations and groups that decided to come together

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 3>and really make an effort to take a stand against

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>this bill. There were about six organizations initially that came together,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 3>and as time went on, I was tasked with the

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 3>responsibility of putting together a campaign identifying some of the

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 3>worst provisions that were in this bill.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 2>And it's no.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Wonder it was such a bad bill. It couldn't get

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 3>traction in Congress. It wasn't moving, and that granted us

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>an opportunity and a window to highlight some of these

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 3>horrible provisions that were in this bill. And ultimately it

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 3>came down to the end of December and a lot

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 3>of the work that we had done in highlighting some

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>of these issues, issues that you've written about before, mister Speaker,

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 3>and I think you can remember that time very clearly

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>of what was going on, because it was outrageous some

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 3>of the things that were being proposed. Eventually made it

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>to December and we're able to successfully kill that portion

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 3>of the bill. It came down to what was going

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 3>on with Senator Mansion in West Virginia. We were able

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>to simply talk about how this bill would have decimated

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>energy jobs. This bill would have raised gas prices. This

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 3>bill would have outsourced jobs to China and the Communist

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Party of China. This bill would have essentially condoned the

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 3>use of slave labor of what was going on with

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the weaker population that was in China. And we just

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>brought those issues to the voters. They spoke up and

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 3>they told Center Mansion, absolutely, don't vote for this bill.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 3>And he held a press conference saying that he was

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>not going to support the bill, and that was the

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 3>epitaph of the Build Back Better Bill. So we successfully

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 3>were able to stop that bill. Unfortunately, it reared its

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 3>head again. But the reality is we were able to

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>save about four point five trillion dollars in taxpayers savings,

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 3>and that's something pretty remarkable.

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me that the brilliance of creating with

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Brooke Rollins and Linda McMahon taking the lead and thinking

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>through and creating the America First Policy Institute and bringing

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>together an extraordinary level of talent who had already had

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>experience in the first Trump administration. Describe for folks the

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>impact of America First Policy Institute and how you saw

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it operating and the things that was doing well.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Coming into the organization, I had spent time on campaigns,

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I had spent time working in the House as a

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 3>staffer and then the Senate as a staffer, and people

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>were expecting the president to have a second term, and

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the minds that came together that came

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 3>out of that first administration, there was a lot of

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 3>work that went into a second agenda and how that

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>agenda was going to look in the president's second term

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 3>and when we weren't afforded to have a second term.

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 3>A lot of work went into that agenda. And Brooke Rollins,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 3>who was our CEO and president at the time, and

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Linda McMahon, who's now Secretary of Education, so of course

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 3>Brooke Rollins' Secretary of Agriculture, and mister Cudlow came together

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>as well. Really recognized that there was an opportunity to

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 3>take that agenda and some of the issues that they

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 3>were working on, and to still further the momentum of

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 3>the movement, to keep that momentum going because there was

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 3>a desire to retain staff, to keep people engaged, to

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>keep the movement engaged. You know, the president started something

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 3>and nobody knew that he was going to run again

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 3>at that time. But we knew that the ideas were powerful.

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>We knew that the ideas needed to continue. We recognized

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 3>that the ideas needed research and they needed to be

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 3>built out. So as you look back and kind of

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 3>see how America First first started, it was in a

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 3>small room in northern Virginia where Broo Browns was head

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>of the Domestic Policy Council in the White House. Several

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 3>others who were in the West Wing went from the

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>West Wing to a small office in Virginia just to

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 3>continue this cause and movement. And it's kind of astonishing

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 3>that a handful of staffers, I want to say, maybe

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>about ten or fifteen individuals who were in that room

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 3>grew into an organization of over two hundred strong just

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 3>over a few short years. And one of the things

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 3>that we first published was the America First Agenda. This

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>was a collection of about one hundred and ninety six

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 3>policies that were recommendations that we took to members' offices,

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 3>that we took to the Senate, and we kept those

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>ideas alive. We kept those ideas moving forward, and a

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of that paved the way to the policies that

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing now. The policies that we're seen in this

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>One Big Beautiful Bill really originated from that agenda that

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the President first came up with in his first term.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I really believe that without the hard work of the

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>American First Policy Institute, that it would have been impossible

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.239
<v Speaker 1>to have had the last five months moving as rapidly

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>as they did. That you really have a clear coming together,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if you will, of the ideas, the people, and also

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the practicality. It wasn't just a think tank in the

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>abstract sense. These are people who had been in government,

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>understood government, and wanted to force real change, not just

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>write interesting papers. Now you sort of reverse your role.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You played a significant role in defeating the Biden Bill,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and now you're playing a significant role in trying to

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>pass the One Big Beautiful Bill. How does it feel

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to have flipped from opposition yelling no to governing majority

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a way to say yes.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit of a learning curve. I remember

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>when we first kind of started on this process and

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>when the sequencing of issues was going on, and you

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 3>look at what can be included in what can't. It's

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 3>not every day that you get the opportunity under unity

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 3>of governance to have an opportunity like this to pass

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 3>one big, beautiful bill. So the mindset was for so

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 3>long we had these policies that we had to highlight

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 3>how bad they were for the last four years to

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 3>suddenly a shift and voters spoke very loud and clear

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>last year in November, overwhelmingly rejecting a lot of those

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>radical policy ideas. And now we're put in a position

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of governance, and so instead of highlighting the worst of

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the issues, you want to highlight really the best of

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the issues. And we know that this is a hard task,

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 3>it's a long road, and that members who are working

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 3>on these issues in the House and the Senate need

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 3>to be supported for their work. So it's a shift

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>from really attacking to supporting. And I remember the first

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 3>time I was in a leadership office and we were

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 3>talking through some of these issues, and it's important to

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 3>remember that this is a conservative approach and that we're

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 3>not looking to attack, we're looking to support and highlight

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and educate. So it's a little bit more on the

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 3>education side instead of the highlighting some of the other.

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Things going way up to say a fifty thousand foot level,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>how would you describe to an average, everyday American the

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>difference in the future between this bill passing and this

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>bill failing to pass.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 3>This bill is our one shot. To put it in perspective,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>This bill is part of a larger plan. This bill

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 3>is part of the president's strategy to accelerate economic growth.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 3>This is one pillar to that plan, and it needs

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>to happen. Our spending is too high. Our spending needs

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>to come down. We also need to cut taxes to

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 3>accelerate growth. This bill does all of that. This bill

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>includes more in it that will actually create American jobs,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:20.479
<v Speaker 3>fat and middle class wallets.

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 2>That's one fundamental.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Way to think about this bill, and that's the approach

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 3>we need, and we need the policies to achieve that

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 3>in cutting taxes. Expanding the base is a key fundamental

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 3>way of achieving that growth.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>The tax side of this is pretty complicated. Can you

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of walk us through the key elements, starting, of course,

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that if we don't extend the twenty

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen tax cuts, we will have a massive tax increase

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and virtually every American is opposed to increasing taxes.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 3>A good way to think about it, and of course

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 3>it changes based on where you live, how large your

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 3>family size is. But a good way to think about

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 3>it is if this wasn't extended. Of course, we're talking

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 3>about the President's tax cuts, the Trump tax cuts, the

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was put in place

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 3>and enacted in twenty seventeen. If it was not extended,

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>if this is something that doesn't pass, that means families

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>will lose between of a range about seven hundred to

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 3>about seventy two hundred dollars per year. Now that's based

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>on family size and of course where they actually live,

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 3>but that is a sizable amount of money. And for

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 3>families living, for example, in Arizona, they could see a

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>loss of close to four thousand dollars in take home pay.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 3>According to our own analysis at AFPI. This is something

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 3>that we don't need in this economy right now. And

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 3>when I speak to the economic growth side of it,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>we have an economy that's growing. I don't know if

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 3>you saw the latest numbers coming out of the Atlanta FED,

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 3>but the number was three point eight. Now what that

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>means is already our economy is growing twice as fast.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>The Q two numbers came out, and our economy is

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 3>growing twice as fast. Based on everything that the President's

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 3>doing on his trade agenda, and based on the anticipation

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>of this bill as it moves through Congress. Already we're

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>seeing a lot of the positive effects of some of

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the policies that are going through right now.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about the combination of what he's doing

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>with tariffs to make it more desirable to manufacturing the

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>United States, what he's doing with this bill, and what

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>he's done just as a good marketer. I mean, in

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>his one trip to Saudi Arabia, guitar and the UAE

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he picked up in four days a billion dollars in

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>orders for American products and a trillion dollar commitment to

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>invest in the United States economy. Now, the momentum of

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>those kind of deals has to mean I think by

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>next summer we could be in a Trump boom. But

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the key to that is to pass this bill. And

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's an extraordinarily complicated bill. Can you walk through just

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the provisions that people need to be aware

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of that give you a sense of the scale of

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>effort going into this.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, absolutely, and I think really the best way to

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 3>describe it is Americans are going to support this bill,

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 3>and we're already seeing them. More and more they learn

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 3>about that, the more supportive they are because it spends

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 3>less government money, it prevents one of the largest taxis

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>in history, which is the tax savings that I was

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 3>talking about a little bit earlier. And of course, it

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 3>supercharges economic growth and that means more investment coming into

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 3>this country, which creates jobs, which grows jobs, and creates

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 3>fatter paychecks, which is something that everybody likes to see.

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>I think some of the important components to the one.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>It stops maligned foreign actors from undercutting our American workers.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 3>And what I mean by saying that is that it

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 3>secures the border. We've heard about border security for years.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Voters are beginning to recognize that when the president says

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>he's going to secure the border, he actually means it,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and he has the policies that can show action on that.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 3>This bill provides extra funding so that he can finish

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 3>building the wall higher than necessary to personnel to put

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 3>in place to make sure that border is secure, and

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 3>also invest in technology in order to keep that border secure.

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 3>This helps him continue to fulfill the largest deportation effort,

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 3>which is something that the President has talked about. We

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 3>keep seeing these stories about some of the hatred and

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>some of the unrest that's going on on college campuses,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 3>which is something that's just outrageous to think about it

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 3>in this beautiful country of ours. That's happening. That has

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to do with some of these visas that haven't been

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>updated in such a long time, and it's maligned foreign

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 3>actors who are in a lot of these places and

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 3>they're not actually Americans. Another one is this bill actually

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 3>keeps more money in the pockets of every American. I've

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 3>talked about the tax component, but when we see things

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>like no tax on tips or no overtime pay, an

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 3>enhanced deduction for seniors, no tax on car loan interest,

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>and of course the ever famous no death tax, these

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:25.359
<v Speaker 3>are things that are all focused on growing the economy

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>and keeping more money in americans paychecks. We also see

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 3>some other provisions in here that are meant to empower

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>parents and really protect women and children. I don't think

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the long term play is that there will be men

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 3>playing in girls' sports, but we want to make sure

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 3>that we're able to restore American values, which is a

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 3>key pillar for change and something that we need to

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 3>get back to and something that voters spoke loud and

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 3>clearly to support. It stops taxpayer funds for child sex mutilation,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 3>which is something that's astonishing that has gone on for

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 3>such a long period of time, but youre speaker, for

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>the longest time, Medicaid dollars have actually been going to

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 3>fund some of these surgeries. This bill puts a stop

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 3>to that. We see some other things in here that

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 3>are very good for education as well, in terms of

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>putting parents' rights over their children's education again, we have

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 3>expanded educational options for school choice. What that means is

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be more support for things like homeschooling.

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 3>That means there's going to be more support for things

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 3>that are alternatives to public education but doesn't erode from

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 3>public education. We also see certain things that just need

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>to be restored, like DEI or radical gender ideology that

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 3>has really penetrated a lot of schools. So certain funding

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 3>elements are really reformed and put back to where they

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>should be. And we also see some very unique things

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 3>like the pro life enhanced Adoption tax credit. What that

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 3>means is that for families who want to adopt, that

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 3>means you can get five thousand dollars off five thousand

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 3>dollars refund in terms of the costs and fees that

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 3>you're actually moving forward with an adoption. And as we know,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 3>adoptions can be incredibly expensive. So this is a step

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 3>in the right direction towards our values. And I can

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>keep going on and on and on. There's actually a

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>list I know that we've seen come out of all

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the latest and greatest things, but that's just a little

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 3>bit of some of the great things that are in

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 3>this bill.

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I do want to focus on just

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>from it as I understand it, on the tax zone,

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's actually very favorable to small business and significantly help

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>small businesses.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Does there's a number of pro business things that are

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.719
<v Speaker 3>in this bill, full expensing that is able to help manufacturing.

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 3>This bill is pro manufacturing, it's pro startup business. It

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 3>is some very unique things that the American First Policy

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Institute has spent a lot of time on. Are these

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 3>opportunity zones. We've heard about these opportunity zones perhaps before,

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 3>but what these are are certain tax zones and structures

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 3>that we're up for renewal next year. These were renewed

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 3>and continue to be put in place. It's their pro

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 3>growth element, so they allow for reinvestment in economically challenged

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>areas urban areas, so it allows for reinvestment in our community,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 3>and it's a good alternative for businesses to invest in

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 3>and also reinvest in our cities. There's also other pro

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 3>growth tax reforms, and that key word there is pro growth.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 3>We just want to be really focused on growing the

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 3>economy in a positive way. There's a lot of pro

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 3>growth reforms to boost up economic growth, like small business

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 3>exemptions for manufacturing, which I've already mentioned, and just a

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 3>number of provisions that actually helped that regard and push

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the economic pro growth side forward.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, in terms of being pro growth, it

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that one of the great problems in

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>passing this bill is that the Congressional Budget Office is

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculously left wing and refus us to score economic growth.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>That if you actually take what will probably happen based

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Reagan years we did when I was speaker,

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this bill should get us up to at least three

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>or three and a half percent growth, And I think

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>they're scoring it at like one point two. So what

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that does for our listeners is it means all of

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the extra revenue that would come in because the economy

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>gets bigger, more people go to work, more people get

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>pay raises, more companies make a profit, All of those

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>things help pay for the bill. And consistently, the Congressional

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Budget Office has refused to score the scale of change

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that occurs when you get the right kind of positive

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>pro growth policies. And it seems to me that that's

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things Congress should fix is that the

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Congressional Budget Office is very left wing and is five

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five bureaucrats who specialize in underrating how

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>good our reforms are and really underrating how effective our

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts are. What's your thought on that?

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 3>I think you're absolutely right, and that's why i wanted

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to lead with that surprising news. I'm not going to

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>say it's surprising because it's a realistic approach. The Atlantica

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve came out with their number for the accelerated

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 3>growth based on Q two this year alone at three

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>point eight percent, So that means our economy is already

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 3>growing twice as fast and in terms of the CBO

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>three times as fast.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go on X and Truth Social and

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, what was the Congressional Budget Office score

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>for the second quarter.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it was right around one point two percent

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 3>or something ridiculous.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you just adjust how wrong they were for

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire bill, you literally pay for the bill by

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the scale of economic growth, which they refuse to admit exists.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>It's a fascinating story. Let me ask you, though, I

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>mean the one glyphs that's come up in the last

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>few days. We can't talk about the bill without confronting

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the set on. We get this writing on X by

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Eon Musk, who says, quote, I'm sorry, but I just

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork filled congressional

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>voted for it. You know you did wrong. You know it.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Now I have to tell him. My first reaction was

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>he was off his meds, and I don't quite know

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing. But if you were debating him, how

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>would you answer all those charges?

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a little confusing.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm perplexed because this bill actually reverses the

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 3>spending cursed plague. There's been a spending curse on DC.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 3>And you know this more than anybody else in this country.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>But DC has been on a trajectory of more and

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 3>more and more and more spending. It's continuous. This bill

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 3>actually delivers the largest deficit reduction in nearly thirty years,

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 3>with one point six trillion in mandatory savings. To put

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 3>that in layman's terms, it's the largest single reduction in

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 3>spending in Congress's history in terms of the level of

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 3>mandatory spending that this bill actually cuts. So that is astonishing.

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think that no tax on tips, or

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 3>no tax on overtime, or things like saving costs for

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 3>seniors are elements that would be considered pork. You know,

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 3>pork is bringing something back for enriching that wealthiest one

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 3>percent of people in this country. And that is something

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 3>that the bill Back Better Bill did. That bill was

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 3>riddled with special interest savings. I don't understand how this

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>bill something like finishing the President's border wall keeping Americans safe,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand how that's pork. I don't understand how

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 3>this bill protects medicaid for Americans who truly need it.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that that would be something that would

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 3>be considered pork. On top of saving taxpayers in some cases,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I've mentioned some of those numbers before, but in some

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>cases it's close to fourteen thousand dollars in take home pay.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 3>So it keeps going on and on and on and

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Plus the bill includes some recommendations that even Elon Musk

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 3>put in himself in terms of the Doze cuts. Now

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 3>that has to do with a separate companion package to this,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>but that nine point four billion dollars in savings that

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 3>Doze initially identified, that's something that's going to be a

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 3>companion of this bill. So he's essentially trashing in his

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>own work. I guess I'm a little perplexed at what's

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 3>going on.

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious. You have, I think, very significant bill. It

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>has lots of pieces in it. Everybody can find some

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>reason to be a no, but if you're going to govern,

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you also have to find a reason to be a yes.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little surprised that some of the members who

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>go bouncing back and forth, but it strikes me that

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really central to having the economy grow and to

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>begin to bend the spending curve that this bill passed.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I say this from a background. When I was Speaker,

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we balanced the federal budget for four years in a

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>row for the only time in the last one hundred years.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So we have some sense of how to do this,

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and I think that this actually helps us move in

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. I think people need to confront this.

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This is one piece of a series of things that

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>need to happen over the next three or four years.

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that if you do those things, you're

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact going to dramatically reduce the deficit and ultimately

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>get to a balanced budget, which we proved in the nineties.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You could actually do it. It's not a theory. Well,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what's your thinking about the notion that this is step

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one of a series of steps that have to be taken.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right. This is step one to a larger plan.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Step one is fat and middle class while it's passing,

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 3>this bill delivers the tax cuts that we need to

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 3>stimulate the economy. Step two is aggressive deregulation. That's something

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 3>that the president's been doing since day one, breaking down

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 3>the barriers making it easier to invest in this country

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 3>across every sector. These regulatory burdens of I need to

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 3>file this form, I need to do it by this date,

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 3>and I need to comply with the myriad of different

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>agencies that are around Washington, d C. Or within state

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>government that needs to be deregulated. It needs to be

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 3>easier to invest, it needs to be easier to get

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>things done. That deregulation is continuing to occur. Then, another

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 3>important component of this plan is re establish American energy dominance.

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 3>That's another component to this plan to accelerate economic growth.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 3>And a great speech I like to point folks back

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to as a speech that or a conversation between Larry

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Cudlow and Secretary Besant at the Economic Club of New

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>York where they were talking about what does it take

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to accelerate the economy, and they were laying this plan

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 3>out and it really crystallizes exactly what the potential of

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 3>our country. And when we talk about some of those

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 3>economic growth rates, what that means is that three percent

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 3>forecasted or that three point eight percent forecasted economic growth.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about trillions of dollars here, or you know,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars here, or some of these small arguments

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 3>that are being had but what that actually means is

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 3>that's ten trillion dollars of economic growth that comes into

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 3>our country that would be created if this plan has followed,

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 3>and that really brings the affordable abundance that the President

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 3>talks about that we had AFPI have talked about of

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 3>a plan to bring incredible growth to this country to

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 3>realize our full potential, and we have every opportunity to

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 3>do it, and this is one step in that larger process.

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I've participated twice in first helping with the Reagan three

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>year tax cut and the deregulation of the Reagan era,

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the work that we did with the Contract

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with America and our tax cuts and the impact of

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>economic growth and the impact of things like reforming the

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>welfare system. So I know this can be done. I

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>want to ask about one last thing which I've begun

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to work on, and that is I was at the

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>announcement in the White House of the Make America Healthy

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Again Report on Children's Health. It is terrifying how badly

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the health of American children have decayed in the last

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. It was startling to me. If you're a

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>fiscal conservative, you really want to help accelerate getting to

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a healthy America, both because it's so much better for

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>children to grow up healthy. If we could get back

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to say, the kind of health we had for young

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>people in nineteen sixty or nineteen seventy, the amount we

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>would save by moving from what is now a sick

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>care system, well you only take care of you once

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you're sick, to a genuine health care system where we

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>actually try to minimize the likelihood of you ever getting sick.

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're not saving money by cutting spending or by

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>bureaucratic controls. We're actually saving money by having people be healthier.

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And my guess is, when you realize that healthcare in

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>America is about eighteen percent of the economy, yes, is

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>we would save at least four percent of the gross

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>domestic product by getting to make America healthy again goals.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That is more than enough savings to balance the budget

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and start to pay down the national debt. And I'm

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>just curious what your reaction is to the idea that

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we need to approach very profound shifts from sick care

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to healthcare takes seriously making America healthy again, and that

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>it has both a human component that's enormously important, but

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it also has a really powerful fiscal component.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 3>What you said and what's been this Maha movement, I

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 3>think is critical to not just every individual in their

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 3>personal health, in the health of our families, but also

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the future of our country. It was President Kennedy who

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 3>put in place a concept of gym class and establishing

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 3>that concept, so it really comes full circle that Secretary

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Kennedy is also putting something else in place. And when

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 3>you look at that eighteen percent of GDP of what

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 3>we spend on health healthcare, it seems like there's an

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>issue in this country of we take those whatever is

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 3>that largest percentage, and we just throw money at it. Well,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 3>we don't understand it, so we're going to throw more

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 3>money at it. We need to stop that trend, and

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 3>we need to start taking responsibility for ourselves. And it

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 3>starts with a choice of choosing to live healthier and

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 3>making those choices available, and that's what the start of

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the Maha movement actually is doing and putting those things

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 3>in motion.

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me that when we think about the

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>next phase after this bill, that having the right kind

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of steps towards making America healthy again maybe the biggest

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>single step we can take towards balancing the federal budget.

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely correct. I couldn't set it better myself or

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 3>anyone else for that matter.

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, in that cheerful note, Matthew, I want to thank

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you for joining me. Our listeners can learn more about

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the work you're doing at America First Policy Institute by

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>visiting your website at America Firstpolicy dot com, which we'll

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>also have on our show page. And I really really

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time to talk with us.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely humbled, Thank.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You, Thank you to my guest Matthew Henderson. You can

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>learn more about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>our show page at newtsworld dot com. News World is

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>produced by ginglis Stree sixty and iHeartMedia. Our executive producer

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is Guarnsey Sloan. Our researcher is Rachel Peterson. The artwork

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for the show was created by Steve Penley. Special thanks

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to the team at Gingershtree sixty. If you've been enjoying Newtsworld,

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I hope you'll go to Apple Podcast and both rate

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>us with five stars and give us a review so

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>others can learn what it's all about. Right now, listeners

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of Newtsworld can sign up for my three free weekly

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>columns at ginglerstree sixty dot com slash newsletter. I'm Newt Gingrich.

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Nutsworld.