WEBVTT - Occupy Gotham

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Alson Media.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to It Could Happen Here, a podcast about stuff

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 2>falling apart and how it can maybe come back together.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Garrison Davis. Joining me today is Mia Wong. Hello. Hello.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what this episode is about. I

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have been told the words David Graeber, and that's that's

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that's all I know.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Gra Graber will will come up. So we've we've been

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>We've had a lot of you know, upsetting stuff that

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 2>that's been covered on the pod recently. It's it's it's

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>not a it's not it's not a great time in

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the world. It's a lot of upsetting things happening. But

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought we we might get a small reprieve from

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>all of the all of the uh real real world

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>chaos and mayhem to talk about some fake world chaos

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>and mayhem. And it's also the it's also you know,

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>it's we are we are vastly approaching the holiday season,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>which means that I I think next week am doing

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 2>my yearly Batman Returns watch party, which I am extremely

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>excited about. Is it's gonna it's gonna be a fun time, uh,

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>which is it's probably it's probably the best Batman movie.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh No, it's just about the aesthetics. The aesthetics are unparalleled.

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 2>But I'm discovering what this episode is about. But there

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 2>is another Batman movie that's also set during winter time,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 2>which is also also very political, because Batman Returns is

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>weirdly political. We have the Penguin running for mayor. It

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>exposes the the corrupt core of our political system. And

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>there is another Batman movie, also set during winter that

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>tries to expose the corrupt core of the political system,

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>which is Christopher Nolans twenty twelve. The Dark Knight Rises,

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>a not very good movie which which I think we

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.559
<v Speaker 2>have We have referenced before because there's this one essay

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>by one David Graber which really gets into the film

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 2>which we're gonna which we're gonna get to. But the

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 2>reason why I actually put together this episode, or I

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do this, is because when I was at

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the Ghost conference earlier this year in Seaside, Oregon, as

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>you can listen to that two parter which came out

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.959
<v Speaker 2>last Halloween, I got a whole bunch of old magazines

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>from this conspiracy talk radio host. Now I love collecting

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 2>old magazines. I find them endlessly fascinating. We have this

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 2>one from two thousand and three called MK Zine. Uh

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>oh no. On the cover, we have a mind control,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 2>ritual abuse and political implications, the cult of national insecurity.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I've not I've not flipped through this one super in

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>depth before because I'm more taken aback by the other

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>magazine I got from twenty twelve called Paranoia the Conspiracy Reader.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>On this cover, we have beyond MK Ultra Satellite Terrorism

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>in America, science fiction or space faction. Oh no, and

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Dark Knight kill programming, which is obviously the one we're

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be talking about here today. No is this

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the Sandy thing? No? No, this is this is this

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>will briefly get into the Aurora mass shooting because this

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 2>comes up in this in this article. I'm not going

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to get too into that's actually not the focus.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I'm realizing, I'm confusing, my you're confusing.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Your's actually no twelve mass shootings. No, there's that because

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>there is actually a Alex Jones conspiracy that there was

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>predictive programming in the Dark Knight returns or the Dark

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Knight rises.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>That's what this is going to be about. Oh okay, Okay, okay, yes,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 2>this is by discount Alex Jones, Clyde Lewis, who lives

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>in power. Goddamn it. There's there's some pretty fun stuff

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>in this issue, which we might get to later at

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the end to kind of close out all of our

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>political mamba jomba that that we will actually get into

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>as well. But I want to first look at how

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy theorists read this movie and how they read the

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 2>political aspects of this movie, because this movie is obviously

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>very political if you've seen it, we will we will

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>get into some of some of the stuff, but I

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 2>want to I want to talk about how these conspiracy

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>theorists saw this movie because the way that they do

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>political analysis of media is very different from the way

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>actual academics and people who take this stuff seriously do

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>political analysis of media. And I think there's an interesting

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>juxtaposition there. So this is this is the cover page

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 2>for this story. The Storm is coming.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, saves one already off for bands start, yes, yes,

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>all right, So I will read a little bit from

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 3>this magazine and then we can kind of talk about

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 3>it and then compare to uh to our our colleague

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 3>David Graeber, as I was watching Christopher Nolans The Dark

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Knight Rises, I didn't know the political substance right away,

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>which is a great way to start.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 4>This because the film is so obviously political. This this movie,

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 4>like the Reeple whoever like this movie like starts with

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 4>Bain literally saying he's going to occupy Wall Street and

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 4>like seizing beflow.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 2>See this is Wall Street, this, this is this is

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>what we will soon be debated. But anyway, I only

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>saw it as a bit of predictive programming and a

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>believable scenario as to how it might all begin. In

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>The Dark Knight Rises, Catwoman as Selena Kyle and Batman

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 2>as Bruce Wayne are dancing at a socialight gathering when

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Selena purs in his ear. There's a storm coming, mister Wayne.

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>As it turns out, The Dark Knight Rises is a

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 2>damning indictment of the anti corporate movement and the threat

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>of social chaos it poses. Despite rallying people around their

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 2>deceased hero Harvey Dent, the rich are losing their grip

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>on Gotham City. Antagonist Bain played by Tom Hardy, and

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 2>his League of Shadows rise up against the bankers and

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the elite billionaires like Bruce Wayne and attack Wall Street,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>savagely beating the rich while promising the good people of

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Gotham that tomorrow you claim what is right for yours.

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Bain's organized violence against the wealthy evokes the reality of

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Occupy Wall Street, but Bain is no Robin Hood. He

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 2>is plotting a massive transfer of wealth through stock exchange

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>after inciting civil unrest and taking control of cutting age

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>weapons technologies whose algorithm can be directly traced to Bruce Wayne,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 2>software which will avail them from the fortunes of the rich.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>As the war between the people and the police in

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the Dark Knight Rises indicates, the predictive programming of statistical

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 2>data could very well undermine the one percent and send

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>them into the streets where the disgruntled will eat them.

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Fraudulent practices will be exposed, identity theft, credit card fraud,

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 2>securities fraud, and a number of other practices that the

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>elite do in order to bilk the poor out of

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>their money. This is one interesting thing about these sorts

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.239
<v Speaker 2>of kind of conspiracy radio guys, how they're both against

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the elite but also fundamentally also for the elite. Like

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 2>this film is celebrated as being you know, like it's

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>deriding the anti corporate occupy movement, which they hate because

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 2>they hate they would dislike, you know, a left wing

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>popular uprising. But in the end they actually prefer this

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 2>corporate like illuminati to the actual alternative.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, and it's it's interesting too, Like the ways that

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they think that, like rich people exploit people is through.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Like credit card fraud is like that, that's how you

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 2>think rich people get rich, Like really, like all right,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>we are almost at the end here. Christopher Nolan's epic

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 2>sounds the alarm of the advent of an organized puppet

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>master anarchy that plans to topple the government by exposing

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.239
<v Speaker 2>and gutting the fortunes of the elite. In real life,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>it might look like an occupy. In this reads sands

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 2>and evil drums soundtrack pounding out the perennial battle between

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>the haves and the have nots, while the dark Knight

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>rises acknowledges the systemic inequality and injustice. It is not

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the rich, but anarchy that is the bane of Gotham's existence.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Get It, Get it on. Nolan portrays the occupy anti

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>hero bane as a demagogue, ultimately seeking to speculate on

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>legitimate grievances and when Baine or hands the reigns of

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>power over to the people, they really won't know what

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to do with it, which is something that never happens

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>in the movie. By the way. Oh now this is

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>at this point Clyde Lewis stops talking to the movie

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and instead it talks about this bit of predictive programming

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>in the movie, which has which has a few kind

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>of aspects. Then there is the intriguing subplot that seemingly

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 2>seeped into reality on the eve of The Dark Knight

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Rise's release, that a software company takes its findings to

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court and exposes so called political heroes which

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 2>would lead to riots and marauding shooters creating mass casualties.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Imagine that intelligence is aware of the threat and issues

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 2>a declassified memo from the Department of Homeland Security warning

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement that terrorists could be killing people in movie theaters.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 2>All that is needed is the catalyzing event, and immediately

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the police estate is activated. Flash riots take place in cities,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>civil unrest bruise under the radar. Truth becomes stranger than

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 2>fiction as we examine the media stories surrounding the main

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>story of the so called brainwashed low nut James Holmes

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 2>opening fire in a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, on

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>July twenty, twenty twelve, and allegedly killing twelve and injuring

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 2>fifty nine others. Interesting use of the word allegedly there

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 2>in regarding regarding the people that were killed. Oh boy.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>And then the next sentence is really where things pick up.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Not only is James Holmes connected to the neuroscience super

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Soldier Peak Soldier performance experiments, but his fa there works

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>for a software company that analyzes fraud. So I'm not

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 2>going to actually read the next bit because it is

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 2>just the ramblings of conspiracy brained lunatic who thinks that

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>because the shooter's dad was a neuroscientist, that therefore his

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 2>son must have been this victim of a super soldier

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>program to brainwash you to activate the police state once

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 2>you receive a bit of predictive programming, and the other

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 2>will I will get to one other paragraph and then

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>will be done with this article, because there's really not

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>much more substance quote. The chilling predictive programming looming behind

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the dark Knight Rises does not escape at least the

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 2>unconscious of those watching. Bain, the leader of the fictional

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>anarchist mob, decides to plant bombs in the Gotham underground,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the final target being a stadium where the Mayor of

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Gotham attends a sports event. A young boy sings the

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>national anthem with a British act scent. Bain pauses to

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>listen to the distinct voice, then says Nott the gerberge brigand,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>after which the stadium is bombed and the mayor is

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>killed in his reserved viewing box. Now, Clyde Lewis believes

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 2>that this was a bit of predictive programming in order

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to prepare people for a mash casualty event at the

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>London twenty twelve Olympics, which you might you might know

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>did not happen. Was not yea was not a thing.

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>But he is convinced that this is part of some

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 2>predictive programming to either trigger this event, or cover up

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>this event, or allude to this event again an event

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that did not happen. So that's you know, as as

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 2>as we're going to be talking about, you know, how

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>people view mass uprising and political movements in media. For

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 2>the for the rest of this episode. This is how

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>a certain sect of conservative does their own media analysis,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>which I think is a really is a really fun,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 2>really fun look into how their brains operate sorting a

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 2>very political film into these into these predictive programming boxes.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>But we will we will return to talk about the

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Virgin David Graeber and the Chad Mark Fisher. After this

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>ad break, we are back. I am. I am waiting

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 2>watching for the rich to be thrown from their balconies

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 2>as wealth as redistributed and a man in a very

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>fancy coat takes over a sporting event. So I read

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 2>almost every like serious political analysis of the doctment rices

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 2>that I could find from fascists, from conservatives, from liberals,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and from leftists and anarchists. Everyone agrees that this film

0:12:55.160 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 2>has some very very obvious occupy parallels. We're going to

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>get into how much of those are actually kind of

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>built into the film's production versus how much of those

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 2>are more or less coincidental. Now unfortunately for me, not

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>actually unfortunately, because I actually do like Graber a lot,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>but his analysis was by far the best out of

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 2>anybody else's in regards to this film. Unfortunately, the UH

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the schizoid, acid fueled chaos magic of Mark Fisher kind

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.359
<v Speaker 2>of paled in comparison to the precision of the anthropologist

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>David Graeber in terms of their analysis of this film,

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>but both of them had roughly the same opinion. Graber

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>has just went into a lot more depth about how

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of this film actually politically operates. So I'll be

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 2>mostly talking about in quoting from Graber, with a few

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>things from Fisher kind of mixed in, and then we'll

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 2>compare it to some stuff in Breitbart and The Daily

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Caller and a few other reactions from liberals who enjoyed

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the film too much and are are are unwilling to

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 2>kind of seed this conservative ground to Nolan's twenty twelve film.

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is actually really interesting to talk

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.599
<v Speaker 2>about this film this year after the release of Oppenheimer,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>which I think is Nolan's probably most politically mature work.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>And he has definitely grown a lot in the past

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>ten years as a filmmaker, at least in terms of

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>his ability to get into politics in a way that

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 2>is not just purely reactionary, where I think a lot

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 2>of his early films are kind of absorbed by this reactionariness,

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think I think he has matured a decent bit,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>at least as as a political filmmaker. So we will

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>start with a paragraph from Graber quote Christopher Nolan's Batman.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>The Dark Knight Rises, not the title of the film

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>is really a piece of anti occupy propaganda. Christopher Nolan,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>the director, claims that the script is written before the

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 2>movement even started, and that the famous scenes of the

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 2>occupation of New York Gotham City were really inspired by

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Dickens's account of the French Revolution. This is probably true,

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 2>but it's disingenuous. Everyone knows Hollywood scripts are continually rewritten

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 2>while movies are in production, and when it comes to messaging,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 2>even details like precise wording or where a scene a

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>shot can make all the difference. Then there's the fact

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that the villains actually do attack the stock Exchange. Still,

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 2>it's precisely this ambition, the filmmaker's willingness to take on

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the great issues of the day that ruins the movie.

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>So the script was written well before Occupy started. Shooting

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 2>for Dark Knight Rises ended two months after the start

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 2>of Occupy. Most of the shooting for the film took

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>place before Occupy even happened, and now in twenty eleven,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>it was widely misreported that the movie was going to

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 2>be filming at Occupy itself, which started from like I

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>think something in the La Times, which just got blown out,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>blown out of proportion. Was not true. They did shoot

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 2>in New York, but they did not shoot at Occupy

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>yeampubliccause you would have got run out probably Now, leading

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>up to twenty eleven, both Nolan and what became Occupy

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>were on very similar conceptual roads. They were just leading

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to two very different places. The Dark Knight released in

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the two thousand and eight financial crisis,

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>right after the two thousand and eight writers strike ended,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>so there were a lot of class issues circling around

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>in Nolan's bubble. So it made sense that Nolan's next

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Batman flick would tackle these things that rose to cultural

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>prominence by the time he finished The more Patriot Act

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 2>inspired at The Dark Knight. Now, Nolan and other writers

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously saw economic inequality and corruption seating people's anger and

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the rising possibility of civil unrest, and that was put

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>into the script and then it just happened two months

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>before they finished shooting. Now Nolan also took a lot

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 2>from the Tale of Two Cities. This probably more than

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 2>anything else. The Dark Knight rices is actually based on

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the Tale of Two Cities, a passage of which is

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 2>read at the end of the film, And there's plenty

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>of parallels to the Front Revolution, including the storming of Bestile.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Actually two prison breaks inside the Dark Knight rises. There

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 2>is the release of Black Eight, and then there's of

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>course when Bruce Wayne escapes the giant hole in the

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 2>ground and frees the other prisoners as well. So still,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>throughout all of these kind of class issues that Nolan

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 2>is talking about in this film, he still shows a

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>deep distrust of populism, or at the very least feared

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>how easily it could be subverted in a charged financial climate.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to read one quote from Fisher here. Quote.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 2>When Nolan revived the Batman franchise in two thousand and five,

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the setting Gotham in the midst of an economic depression

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 2>seemed like an achronistic reference to the superhero's origins in

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen thirties. Two thousand and eight, the Dark Knight

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 2>was too early to register the impact of the financial crisis,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 2>but the Dark Knight Rises clearly attempts to respond to

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 2>the two thousand and eight situation. The film isn't this

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 2>simple conservative parable that the right wingers would like, But

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 2>in the end it is a reactionary vision, which I

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 2>think is the fairest way to look at this film.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 2>But now we're going to go deep into into Graber's analysis,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 2>which is by far, probably one of the best write

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>ups on twentieth century superheroes and their role in American culture.

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>It's my it's my favorite by far. This is the

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>one that I always like push on people when people

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about Marvel.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Because yes, no, absolutely, I mean this is this is

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 2>an essay that you've referenced a lot on this show.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>I've been I've been going into a bit of a

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>graver resurgence lately. I deeply enjoyed his essay on Puppets,

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 2>which I'm going to respond to by writing an essay

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 2>on why nihilists hate puppets and except the U and

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>accept the adversarial framing of the police. But that is

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 2>a digression. Now we will we will get back to

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Graber's essay in the New Inquiry titled Superposition.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh the thing, the thing I want to mention here

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>about this essays he wanted to oh god, what was that?

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to call it on Batman and the problem

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of constituent power, but they wouldn't let him do it.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's well super position instead. This is that is

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>certainly what it's actually about, constituent power. We will get

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 2>to that very shortly. So quote. Superheroes are a product

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 2>of their historical origins. Superman is a Depression era displaced

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 2>to Iowa farmboy. Peter Parker, a product of the sixties,

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>is a smartass, working class kid from Queens. Batman, the

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>billionaire playboy, is the scion of the military industrial complex

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that was created just as he was at the beginning

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of World War Two. I will say the early origins

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 2>of Batman are far divorced from that, but that is

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.959
<v Speaker 2>certainly what Batman has evolved into. Quote. These heroes are

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 2>purely reactionary in a literal sense. They have no projects

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>of their own, at least not in their roles as heroes.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Almost never do superheroes make, create, or build anything. The villains,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 2>in contrast, are endlessly creative. They are full of plans

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and projects and ideas. Clearly we are supposed to at first,

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 2>without constently realizing it, identify with the villains. After all,

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 2>they're the ones having all the fun. Then, of course

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 2>we feel guilty about it, reidentify with the hero and

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 2>have even more fun watching the super ego clubbing the

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the Errant. It back into submission. This essay that Grab

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>wrote is very Freudian. Craper makes a lot of freud

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 2>references in this. I'm not gonna be getting into that

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 2>as much, but superheroes are also very very Freudian.

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to I want to say one thing

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about this specific passage or specifically the the the way

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're encouraged identify with the hero and then like

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that gets like that gets subverted. You're supposed to come

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the hero.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So this used to be a kind of so to

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 2>identify with the villain and then yeah, and then come

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 2>back back to the era.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so and this is part this works as like

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a conserv ave project of conservative ideology, and this used

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to be like an implicit thing in these movies. And

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>then you get to Black Panther, which is literally well

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>literally they just like that. That is just the me,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like like they they stopped being subtle and we're like, hey,

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>here's a guy who's an anti imperial list and then

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the ending reveal is, oh my god, he's actually evil.

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>In terms of Marvel, I would say, yes, I think

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 2>my two favorite superhero movies, which would be Tim Burton's

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Batman and Batman Returns, do the reverse of this where

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 2>very obviously the villain is the main characters of both

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of those and Batman is really just a side character.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think that was actually work better for this

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>medium so much more. Oh yeah, but when it comes

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 2>to Marvel, absolutely, yeah, yeah, they're just like openly doing this. Now.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>It's really sort of like, yeah, it was what the

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 2>second one's about? Two? Yes, yes now. Grayber then talks

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 2>about kind of what the project of these comic books

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>were originally supposed to be and how that kind of

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>continues on today into pop culture. Quote. Politically speaking, superhero

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 2>comic books can seem pretty innocuous. If all a comic

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is trying to do is tell a bunch of adolescent

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 2>boys that everyone has a certain desire for chaos and mayhem,

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>but ultimately such desires need to be controlled, the implications

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 2>would not seem especially dire, especially because the message still

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>does carry a healthy dose of ambivalence. After all, the

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>heroes of even the most rightly ining action movies seem

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to spend much of their time mashing up suburban shopping malls,

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 2>something that many of us would like to do at

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>some point in our lives. In the case of most

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 2>comic book superheroes, however, the mayhem has an extremely conservative

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 2>political implication. This is where we can start getting into

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 2>God versus the people and using both of these things

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 2>as constructs. Right, neither of these things really fully exist

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 2>in a super material way. Both of these things are

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 2>constructs quote unquote God, quote unquote the people. They both

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 2>occupy a very similar ontological role, and this is something

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that Graper gets into quote any power capable of creating

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 2>a system of law cannot itself be bound by them.

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 2>In the Middle Ages, the solution was simple. The legal

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 2>order was created either directly or indirectly by God. The English,

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>American and French revolutions changed all that when they created

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the notion of popular sovereignty, declaring that the power once

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 2>held by kings and by extension, God, is now held

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 2>by an entity called the people. The people, however, are

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 2>bound by the laws. They are able to create the

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 2>laws through those revolutions themselves. But of course revolutions are

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 2>acts of law breaking, so laws emerge from illegal activity.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>This creates a fundamental incoherence and the very idea of

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>modern government, which assumes that the state has a monopoly

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>on the legitimate use of violence. It's okay for police

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to use violence because they are enforcing the law. The

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>law is legitimate because it's rooted in the constitution. The

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>constitution is legitimate because it comes from the people. That

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 2>people create the constitution by acts of illegal violence. It

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 2>all circles back on itself. Quote. The obvious question then,

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 2>is how does one tell the difference between the people

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and a mere rampaging mob, Which is a question that

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 2>comes up all the time across the political spectrum, from

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 2>anarchists to fascists to liberals. This is a debate that

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 2>still goes on. Is without the law, what is the

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 2>difference between the people and just a lynch mob. Now

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 2>Graber doesn't really give an answer to this, because this

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really have an answer. This is a very vague question,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 2>and kind of, as Graver points out, it's vague by design. Quote.

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 2>The response by mainstream, respectable opinion is to push this

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 2>problem as far away as possible. The usual line is

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 2>that the age of revolutions is over. Now we can

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 2>change the constitution or legal standards by legal means. This

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>of course means that the basic structures will never change, unquote.

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And this is where kind of Graver talks about how

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the role of tradition has totally taken over the legal

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>implications of our system. Here, how the US, which was

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, at once progressive in its like in its

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>electoral college and two party system, is now quite old

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 2>fashioned compared to a lot of other you know, popular

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 2>democratic countries. There's a good line quote we base the

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>legitimacy of the whole system on the consent of the people,

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact that the only people who were ever

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>really consulted on the matter lived over two hundred years

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 2>ago in America at least, quote unquote, the people are

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>long since dead. So now we have this situation that

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 2>we have this idea of the legal order which comes

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 2>from God, which then came from armed revolution, and now

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 2>it just comes from this idea of sheer tradition. Now

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>there's obviously a lot of American politicians who would want

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to give this power back to God.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but even then I was like, it's really hard

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to actually do that. Like, even governments that are very

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>explicitly theocratic, like for example, like Oron, it's like, well,

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>they still have elections and they still have this like

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the notion of popular sovereignty belonging to the people is

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>very hard to dislodge unless you're going to straight up

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>impose a monarchy. And even a lot of the monarchies

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>now are like, you know, they follow the European thing

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of like claiming to like derive the authority from the

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>people or something.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but we also we also have people like like

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a Wall Michael Knowles, who are very openly like Castlic monarchists,

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>who yeh, you're getting a lot of prominence in American culture.

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's it's a like, I don't know, I

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>wish them bad luck.

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is a that is a more moderate thing

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I wish upon them. So back to Graber, quote, for

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 2>the radical left and the authoritarian right, the problem of

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 2>constituent power is very much alive, but each takes dimetrically

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 2>opposite approaches to the fundamental question of violence. Unquote. Now,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I think this is something that has I'd be interested

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 2>to see Graber revisit this idea now. Unfortunately that cannot

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 2>be the case, because this question of violence has certainly

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>evolved a lot in the ten years in which he

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 2>wrote this, both in terms of how the alt right operates,

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 2>but also also in terms of how the quote unquote

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 2>left views violence as a necessary political tool. But getting

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 2>into his analysis of the twentieth century, I think it

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 2>is still fairly accurate quote. The left, chastised by the

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 2>disasters of the twentieth century, has largely moved away from

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 2>its older celebration of revolutionary violence, preferring nonviolent forms of resistance.

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Those who act in the name of something higher than

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the law can do so precisely because they don't act

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 2>like a rampaging mob. For the right, on the other hand,

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and this has been true since the rise of fascism

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 2>in the twenties, the very idea that there is something

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>special about revolutionary violence, anything that makes it different from

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>mere criminal violence, is so much self righteous twaddle. Violence

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 2>is violence, but that doesn't mean a rampaging mob can't

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 2>be the people, because violence is the real source of

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 2>law and political order. This is why, as Walter Benjamin noted,

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 2>we cannot help but admire the great criminal, because, as

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 2>so many movie posters have put it, he makes his

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>own law. After all, any criminal organization does inevitably begin

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 2>developing its own, often quite elaborate set of internal laws.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 2>They have to as a way of controlling what would

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 2>otherwise be completely random violence. From the right wing perspective,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 2>that's all law, ever, is. It is a means of

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>controlling the very violence that it brings into being and

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 2>through which it is ultimately enforced. Now, I think this

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 2>is also true of even certain aspects of the left,

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 2>where we have we don't call them laws, we might

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 2>call them like community guidelines or something, but we often

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 2>actually do this same process, especially in the anarchist kind

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 2>of formations that try to replicate gang formations, like purposefully

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>we get this this same essence that is developed in

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 2>order to people might you know, reject these to the

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 2>word police, but at least, you know, make some kind

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 2>of structure that deems which violence is acceptable and which

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>violence isn't. But back to Graber quote, this makes it

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 2>easier to understand the often surprising affinity between criminals, criminal gangs,

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 2>right wing political movements, and the armed representatives of the state. Ultimately,

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 2>they speak the same language, they create their own rules

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>on the basis of force. As a results, they typically

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>share the same broad political sensibilities. In Athens nowadays, there's

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 2>active collaboration between the crime bosses in poor immigrant neighborhoods,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 2>fascist gangs, and the police. In fact, in this case,

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.479
<v Speaker 2>it was clearly a political strategy. Faced with the prospect

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of popular uprisings against a right wing government, the police

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 2>first withdrew protection from neighborhoods near the immigrant gangs, then

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 2>started giving tacit support to the fascists for the far right.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Then it is in that space where different violent forces

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 2>operating outside of the legal order interact that new forms

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 2>of power and hence of order can emerge. What does

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>this have to do with costume superheroes. Well everything, because

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 2>this is exactly the space that superheroes and supervillains also inhabit.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>An inherently fascist space inhabited only by gangsters would be dictators,

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>police and thugs with endlessly blurring lines between them. Sometimes

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the cops are legalistics, sometimes they're corrupt. Sometimes the police

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>themselves slip into vigilanteism. Sometimes they pursue the superhero, sometimes

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 2>they look the other way. Sometimes they help villains and

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 2>heroes a case a team up. The lines of force

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 2>are always shifting. If anything new where to emerge, it

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>could only be through such shifting forces. There's nothing else

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 2>since in the DC and Marvel universes, neither God nor

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the people really exist. Now this is I think this

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 2>is great hitting on something that really actually does hit

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 2>at the core of this whole genre is that this

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 2>is the genre which is really only inhabited by the

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 2>uber mench as this like governing body. Right, there's there

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>really isn't the God in any kind of meaningful way.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>There isn't the people in any kind of meaningful way.

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 2>There is just the super individual, the uber minch himself

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 2>is what inspired Joe Schuster and Jerry Siegel to create Superman.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Like that, this is this is the origin of this

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 2>entire genre.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way I want to I want to mention

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>some some comic book nerds are gonna get very angry

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>here and be.

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:48.959
<v Speaker 2>Like, Wow, there's some one above all.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like okay, like God, like there are there is

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>technically God in this right, but like God is the

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that you can beat the crap out of. Like

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not God in the sense of like God or

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>dame authority is bla bla bla blahah, Like no, it's not.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not the same thing this is. That's not what

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about. Leave don't be pedanic in the comics,

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Talking like as like a literary tradition. God does not

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>operate as a significant role in these pieces of art

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 2>like that that like that, like if you're gonna be

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>looking at this genre as art for twelve year old boys,

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 2>God does not operate in a specific crucial role in

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 2>in this world's ontology.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny too because one of the things that

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>happens after this is there's there's a thing called there's

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a thing called Occupy Avengers, and they make this attempt

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring the people.

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a shit show. It is awful.

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It's so bad, like it's well, and it's interesting to

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you because like anytime they try to so that, that

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was an attempt to bring in like sort of the

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>people as like a left wing constitutive body, and that

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was a disaster. They tried to do it, like they've

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>tried to do it again, but the people exist as this.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Sort of like very right wing like.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Forced that is like as like this Bob that's constantly

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on the edge of sort of like destroying society whatever,

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's been like the most yeah, attempts to do it.

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, there are certainly attempts to bring in, like the

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 2>American political system into various aspects of comics, whether that's

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 2>like Lex Luthor being president, whether it's stuff like in

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the I know this stuff and I think it's called

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the Immortal Hulk has has has a lot of politics.

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>But I do think Raper's kind of point here is

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 2>still still still accurate and rings true. I have one

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 2>other paragraph from Graper then we'll kind of get into

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more more discussion. Quote. Insofar as there

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 2>is a potential for constituent power, then it can only

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 2>come from purveyors of violence. The super villains and evil masterminds,

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 2>when they are not merely indulging in random acts of terror,

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 2>are always scheming of imposing a new world order of

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>some kind or another. Surely, if Red Skull King the

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Conqueror or Doctor Doom did ever succeed in taking over

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the planet, there'd be lots of new laws created very quickly.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And there was actually after he wrote this, there

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was an arc where doctor dun successfully conquered the entire universe,

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and he did, in fact do exactly that, which also

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>one another w for common David Graeber w.

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Which also does not last very long because if if

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that happened for a while, it would make the story incredibly boring. Yeah,

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 2>things doing things will always return to the status quo,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>which is also another crucial aspect of this genre. That

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>things have to return to the status quo, which is

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 2>something I will get to very shortly. Back to Greber quote,

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 2>although their creator would doubtless not himself feel bounded by them,

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 2>superheroes resist this logic. They do not wish to conquer

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the world. Now, this is where I'm gonna actually disagree

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 2>slightly with Graber. He writes that superheroes quote remain parasitical

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 2>off the villains, in the same way that police remain

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 2>parasitical off criminals. Without them, they'd have no reason to exist. Now,

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd argue that the police actually create the spectral ca

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 2>category of criminals to justify their own existence. Yeah, criminals

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't create the police. It's the other way around, right.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You can look at you can look at like the

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 2>way even the past few years, police have been lying

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 2>about inflated crime rates to justify their own increased funding.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And now, obviously people always broke social norms, but if

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at the actual, like the actual like political

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 2>class of criminal and the political class of police, this

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 2>is like it's like everyone has done a crime, right,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Like police commit more crimes than the average person, but

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.399
<v Speaker 2>they do not often get called a criminal. I'm talking

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 2>about like a very political class that we call criminal,

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 2>and this is something that the police create. And curiously,

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 2>in the same way, most superheroes also predate their respective supervillains,

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 2>as it is the presence of the superhero that often

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 2>births the adversarial supervillain. We see this across tons of

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 2>superhero medias where they use the example of how the

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 2>superhero predated the of these theatrical villains, and this is

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 2>actually the superhero's fault, right, this is this, This happens in Batman,

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.479
<v Speaker 2>this happens in Spider Man. This is this is very

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 2>very common. We even see this in something like The

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Boys or The Watchmen, both of which targets superheroes as

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a reactionary right wing tendency, which are our line of

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the police and military. We we literally have Homelander creating

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 2>supervillains to justify his own existence, or super terrorists in

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the Watchman, the actual team predates the arrival of many

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 2>super villains. So this, this is this is one one

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 2>small nitpick I might I might say with this article,

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>at least in terms of the like the the causality

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 2>loop between superheroes and villains and criminals and police. Do

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 2>you know what also pre dates all all of us,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 2>every every single person listening. We're gonna have like someone

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>who's one hundred and the advertising industrial complex predates every

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 2>single one of you fuckers. The surrealists burst this hell

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 2>hole of h of advertising which tricks your mind via

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 2>predictive programming, the ditch to buy this fucking food box. Okay,

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>we are we are back. We have returned to the

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 2>status quo of our podcast. Speaking, speaking of which we're

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about returning to the status quo. So

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>what what superheroes and the police, which are very ontologically

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 2>similar roles in a lot of cases, what their end

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 2>project is is that they seek to maintain what is

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 2>and then seek out and destroy anything that threatens to

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 2>alter our civilizational fabric. They fundamentally are defenders of the

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 2>status quo. That is, that is the that is the

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 2>role of the superhero across almost all media. This is why,

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 2>if you had the powers of Superman, why are you

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 2>just saving cats from trees and instead not fundamentally reshaping

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the world in something that is better. Now, this is

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 2>a question that gets tackled by people like Grant Morrison

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and Alan Moore. Is to they often give reasons for

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 2>why someone shouldn't do that, but still, this is a

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 2>fundamental aspect of this genre is that these guys never

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 2>really have any generative political project. They are purely reactionary,

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and they purely are made to hold up the status

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 2>quo and always return to this single point from which

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 2>they emerged. Back to grayber quote, they remain defenders of

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 2>a legal and political system which itself seems to have

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 2>come out of nowhere, and which, however faulty or degraded,

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 2>must be defended because the only alternative is so much worse.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 2>They aren't fascists. They're just ordinary, decent, super powerful people

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 2>who inhabit a world in which fascism is the only

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 2>political possibility. Why might we ask what a form of

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 2>entertainment premised on such a peculiar notion of politics emerge

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 2>in the early to mid twentieth century America at just

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 2>around the time that actual fact was on the rise

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in Europe. Was it some kind of fantasy American equivalent?

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Not exactly. It's more that both fascism and superheroes were

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 2>products of a similar historical predicament. What is the foundation

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of social order when one has exercised the very idea

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 2>of revolution, and above all, what happens to the political imagination?

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 2>So at this point Graver starts talking about how basically

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 2>all power goes to the individual, but the individual who

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 2>is embedded within a system. He discusses how the core

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>audience for superhero comics are adolescent or pre adolescent, to

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 2>white boys. At least that was in the nineteen twenties

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 2>or thirties and forties, and roughly is still the case.

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 2>It's that these comic books and now Marvel films, although

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately Marvel films have a much broader audience, but they

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 2>are targeted to people who are at a point in

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 2>their lives where they're like where they're likely to be

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>both like the most imaginative and a little bit rebellious. Right,

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 2>this is the twelve year old white Boy is the

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 2>is the thing that that this is targeting. So they're

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 2>both very imaginative, they're a little bit rebellious, but they're

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 2>also being groomed to take on positions of power and

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 2>authority in the world. Right, They're about to transition to

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 2>being fathers, share of small business owners, middle management. Right.

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 2>So this is what this genre is targeted towards. So

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 2>what are they supposed to learn from these kind of

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 2>endlessly repeating stories that are all very much the same story.

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>One aspect is that imagination and rebellion will inevitably just

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 2>lead to violence, right, And then second is like imagination

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and rebellion violence can actually be a lot of fun,

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 2>but ultimately violence must be directed back against any overflow

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 2>of imagination and rebellion or else everything will kind of

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 2>go into chaos. These things have to be contained. So

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 2>this is why superheroes are only allowed I'm gonna I'm

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.919
<v Speaker 2>gonna quote from Graper again quote their imagination can only

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 2>be extended to the design of their clothes, their cars,

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 2>maybe their home, and their various successories unquote. Basically, all

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of their imagination for the superhero is limited to commodities. Right.

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 2>This is this is the fundamental aspect where that's the

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 2>only acceptable outlet for your imagination. It's it's it's just

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 2>with these, it's just with commodity fetishism like that. That's that,

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that's the only possible way. Back to grayber quote, it's

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 2>in this sense that the logic of the superhero plot

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 2>is profoundly, deeply conservative. Ultimately, the division between left and

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 2>right sensibilities turns on one's attitude towards the imagination. For

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the left, imagination creativity and by extension, production, the power

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to bring new things and new social arrangements into being

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 2>is always celebrated. It's the source of all real value

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 2>in the world. For the right, it's dangerous and ultimately evil.

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 2>The urge to create is also a destructive urge. But

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 2>this is also what separates conservatives from fascists. Both agree

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 2>that the imagination unleashed can only lead to violence and destruction.

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Conservatives wish to defend us against this possibility. Fascists wish

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to unleash it anyway. They aspired to be, as Hitler

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 2>imagined himself, great artists painting with the minds, bloods, and

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 2>sinews of humanity. I think this is a really good

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 2>distinction between conservatives and fascists in terms of how they

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 2>view creative violence. And to get back to superheroes, I

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 2>think this medium, as Grab points out, has this kind

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 2>of built in essence of a guilty pleasure. It revels

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.720
<v Speaker 2>in the absurdity of both the costumed heroes and villains,

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 2>all while still targeting in imagination which is too expansive

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 2>to outside the norm as being the ultimate crime. This

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>guilty pleasure aspect even applies to the great superhero satires

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 2>like The Watchmen and The Boys, which we applaud for

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.879
<v Speaker 2>poking and prodding at the conservative superhero all while still

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 2>reveling and watching the outlandish antics on screen or on

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 2>the page. Now. Graver even applies this guilty pleasure aspect

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 2>into explaining the kind of the conservative backlash to superheroes

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 2>in the forties and fifties, particularly with the book Seduction

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of the Innocent, which kind of viewed superheroes as this

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 2>weirdly fetishistic kind of naughty impulse, which resulted in superheroes

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 2>getting very sanitized and much more much more silly, much

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 2>more campy, which all which resulted in the fantastic nineteen

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 2>sixty six Batman show. But but but still it kind

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 2>of it kind of points at this this this guilty

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 2>pleasure aspect. There's there's something inherently kind of naughty about

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 2>about viewing this material. All right, we are we are

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 2>nearing the end of Graber's analysis here. Quote. If the

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 2>message was that rebellious imagination was okay as long as

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 2>it was kept out of politics and simply confined to

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 2>consumer choices like clothes, cars, and accessories, this had become

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the message that even executive Hollywood producers could easily get behind,

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 2>which results in stuff like the nineteen sixty six Batman

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 2>show and now leading us back into Christopher Nolan, Uh,

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 2>we get we get this. This really good, really good

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 2>paragraph from Graber. Quote. If the classic comic book is

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>extensively political about mad Been trying to take over the world,

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 2>but really psychological and personal, about overcoming the dangers of

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 2>rebellious adolescents, but then ultimately political after all, then the

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 2>new superhero movies are precisely the reverse. They are sensibly

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 2>psychological and personal, but really political, but ultimately they go

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 2>back to being psychological and personal. So this is me

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 2>just ripping. Now let's take Batman begins, right, we have

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Racial Ghul, who operates in this psychological role of a

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 2>second father for Bruce right after Bruce's training initiation to

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the League of Shadows. Only then does Race reveal his

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 2>political goals to destroy Gotham and rid the world of corruption.

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 2>So this is like the psychological is the first bit,

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 2>then it's actually political, and then by the end it

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 2>actually it goes all the way back into being truly psychological.

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm gonna I'm gonna read one paragraph from Graver,

0:43:55.960 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 2>which is only because it has a very funny oh

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 2>two word combination. In the ritual comics, we learned that

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>racial Ghoul, a character introduced telling Lee in A nineteen

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 2>seventy one, is in fact a zerzen Esque primitivist and

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 2>no terrorist, determined to restore the balance of nature by

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 2>reducing the Earth's human population by roughly ninety nine percent.

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 2>None of the villains in any of the three movies

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 2>want to rule the world. They don't wish to have

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 2>power over others or to create new rules of any

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 2>sort unquote. And I just really like the term Desi

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Esque primitives to describe the seventies racial Ghoul, which is

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 2>a deeply a deeply brain poisoned way to describe a

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 2>comic book likelier. John Zergeon is an eco anarchist writer

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 2>who certain sects of kind of social anarchist theorists liked

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>to make fun of.

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I think Great Graver's most devastating thing about the premi

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of this was calling them all Marxists, because they're the

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>only people on earth who say it's a program, not

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a critique.

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 2>He's very funny.

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I think like one of the things that's kind of

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>going on here is like everyone who's writing about superhero

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>movies is also trying to settle their own grudges a

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and oh absolutely grudges in this is like

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 1>one of Graber's grudges that he was like like he

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>was tear gased, like very very close to a lot

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of where these things were shot, like a month before.

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And his second grudge is that he had to spend

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole fucking nineties arguing with a bunch of primitivests.

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 2>He's very annoying in it because two thousands. Yeah, so

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 2>that those those are his grudges going into And I

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 2>do believe his his kind of framing of the Nolan

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 2>supervillains of not really having any desire to like rule

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the world as ringing true. They they really only want

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.240
<v Speaker 2>to like wape the slate clean. I think a. Graber

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 2>correctly identifies Nolan's supervillains as being primarily some form of anarchist,

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 2>just a very peculiar type that really only exists in

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Nolan's imagination. Graber describes them as quote, they are the

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 2>anarchists who believe that human nature is fundamentally evil and

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 2>corrupt unquote. I think this has taken to its most

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 2>obvious extent in the Dark Knight, with the Joker, who

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 2>openly claims affiliation with anarchy and fetishizes destruction. His sick

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and twisted imagination is the real villain, even with the

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 2>backdrop of the film's kind of deceptive war on terror framing. Now,

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 2>between the production of The Dark Knight and The Dark

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Knight Rices, the funniest thing happened. The economy completely collapsed

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and eight, and it wasn't due to

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 2>an eco terrorist cult or a clown set on a

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 2>total negation. Instead, it was bankers and finance managers and

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Wallstree bros. Who became the obvious villains in their quest

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to maintain the lie of endless growth. Millions of people

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 2>lost their homes and source of income. So in response,

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.839
<v Speaker 2>there was a whole bunch of popular uprisings that took

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 2>place all around the world. Graber lists regimes being toppled

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 2>in the Middle East and people occupying squares everywhere from

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland to Karachi trying to create new forms of democracy.

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:12.800
<v Speaker 2>So there's this resurgence of constituent power, right, and this

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 2>imagination driven kind of radical and largely non violent form

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of resistance at least hearing the States. And this is

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the sort of political situation which superhero universes can never

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 2>really fully tackle because it can't exist within their own

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 2>weird ontology. To quote Graver or quote in Nolan's world,

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 2>something like occupy could only have been the product of

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 2>some tiny group of ingenious manipulators who are really pursuing

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 2>some secret agenda. Why does Bain wish to lead the

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 2>people in a social revolution if he's just going to

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 2>nuke them all in a few weeks anyway, it's anyone's guess.

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 2>He claims that before you destroy someone first, he must

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 2>give them hope. So is the message that utopian dreams

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 2>can only lead to nihilistic violence presumably it's something like that,

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's singularly unconvincing, since the plan to kill everyone

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.959
<v Speaker 2>came first and the revolution was a decorative afterthought. In fact,

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:02.720
<v Speaker 2>what happens to the city can only possibly make sense

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 2>as a material echo of what's been most important, what's

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 2>happening in Bruce Wayne's tortured brain. Yeah, it's like it's

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 2>a good line, which, yes, yeah, because in the end,

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Batman and the police rise from the abyss. Literally in

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 2>both cases, both of them are trapped underground. They both

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 2>rise from underground join forces to battle the people occupying

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 2>outside of the Gotham City Stock Exchange. Batman fixed his

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 2>own death by disposing of this nuclear bomb, and Bruce

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Wayne gets to live happily in Florence with the criminal

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Selena Kyle. And then a new new phony martyr legend

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 2>is born in the role of Batman, and people of

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Gotham are returned once again to the status quo. I'm

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 2>gonna read kind of Graver's final final kind of overview

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 2>of the entirety of this message, right, like, of what

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 2>this thing is really trying to convey, right quote, if

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 2>they're supposed to be a take message from all of this,

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 2>it must run something like, yes, the system is corrupt,

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>but it's all we have anyway. Figures of authority can

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 2>be trusted if they've first been chastised and endued terrible suffering.

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Normal police might let children die on the bridges, but

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the police who've been buried alive for weeks can employ violence. Legitimately,

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:22.280
<v Speaker 2>charity is much better than addressing structural problems. Any attempts

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.879
<v Speaker 2>to address to such structural problems, even through nonviolent civil disobedience,

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 2>really is a form of violence, because that's all it

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 2>could possibly be. Imaginative politics are inherently violent, and therefore

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing inappropriate If police respond by smashing protesters' heads

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 2>repeatedly against the concrete as a response to occupy, this

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 2>is nothing short of pathetic. When The Dark Knight came

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 2>out to this in eight, there was much discussion over

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 2>whether the whole thing was really just a vast metaphor

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 2>for the War on Terror. How far is it okay

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:50.919
<v Speaker 2>for the good guys America obviously to adapt the bad

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Guy's methods. The filmmakers managed to respond to these issues

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and still produce a good movie. This is because the

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 2>War on Terror actually was a battle of secret networks

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 2>and manipulative spectacles. It began with a bomb and ended

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 2>with an assassination. One can almost think of it as

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 2>an attempt on both sides to actually enact a comic

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 2>book version of the universe. Once real constituent power appeared

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 2>on the scene, the universe shriveled into incoherence. Revolutions were

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 2>sweeping the Middle East, and the US was still spending

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of billions of dollars fighting a ragtag bunch of

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:26.239
<v Speaker 2>seminary students in Afghanistan. Unfortunately for Nolan, for all of

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 2>his manipulative powers, the same thing happened to his world

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 2>when even the hint of real popular power arrived in

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 2>New York. So that is kind of the essence of

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Graber's view of this movie. I think it's pretty good.

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 2>This is a This is a pretty a pretty solid

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 2>take on this. Now, there's obviously people who have opinions

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that are less good than this. I'm gonna read I'm

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna read this. This right up from from these two guys,

0:50:55.560 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Sprousse and Zach Buchemp, who argue that Batman represents

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 2>this symbolic defense of liberal democracy, which I think is true,

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 2>but the way that they go about their analysis I

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 2>think is heavily flawed, because yes, I do think he

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 2>represents a defensive liberal democracy. I just don't think that's

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 2>necessarily a good thing. Yeah. So they talk about how

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 2>fear is the kind of the core emotion across all

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of Nolan's Batman films. Right, we have in Batman begins

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:30.880
<v Speaker 2>fear and takes the form of Scarecrow, as you know,

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:32.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the main villains. But we also have this

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 2>terror of there being a powerful criminal underworld which overwhelms

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.919
<v Speaker 2>the power of political and social intitutions that are meant

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 2>to address such criminal underworlds. We have Batman, in his

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 2>role is to fight injustice by turning quote fear against

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 2>those who pray on the fearful right Batman is this

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 2>terrifying symbol meant to restore the balance of fear between

0:51:56.120 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the anarchic private underworld and the gutless public spear to

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:03.439
<v Speaker 2>quote jeffin zax rite up quote. In The Dark Knight,

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Nolan continues his examination of the terror of anarchy, as

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 2>well as the potential for the state and allied institutions

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to abuse their enormous power. Bain and each of Nolan's

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 2>other villains attempt to exploit fear for ideological projects, revenge

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.400
<v Speaker 2>or simple fun. Batman aims to channel it to make

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:24.240
<v Speaker 2>his opponent's legitimate grievances subject for debate in an orderly system,

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:29.760
<v Speaker 2>rather than through violent resolution, which is not what Batman does.

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Thatman punches people. They were we watching the same movies

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 2>quote to entrust Gotham to heroes with a face, as

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 2>he says in The Dark Knight, and to democratize Batman

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 2>as a symbol that can be embodied by anyone. It's

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 2>not that it's not that Christopher Nolan is taking a

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.760
<v Speaker 2>side in our political debates. He's simply defending a particular

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:57.800
<v Speaker 2>system through which we address them. Which is nonsense of

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 2>a writer from Forbes that this analysis is quach a

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 2>beautiful rebuttal to those critics who viewed the film as

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 2>fascistic or as a critique of left wing populism. Batman

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 2>as the defender of liberal democracy, not of conservatism or liberalism,

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 2>but the system itself from the forces of fear and chaos.

0:53:16.760 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Gotham as an examination of the frailties and pressure points

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 2>that make this system weak in the face of the

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 2>unexpected and uncontrollable. While there is indeed both praise for

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:27.839
<v Speaker 2>the role of civil society in these films, there's also

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a portrait of economic inequality that provides the brittleness needed

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 2>for men like Bay to truly succeed. This is not

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 2>a critique of the government or private sector as so

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 2>much as it is a critique of the frailty and

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 2>fragility of our system and its institutions and the power

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of symbols to combat this fragility, which is a deeply

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:49.400
<v Speaker 2>liberal analysis.

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>We're just not even good, like I mean, this is

0:53:51.480 --> 0:53:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing. This is the thing that really pisses me

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>off about. So the cadre of liberal intellectuals that we've

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten in the last like twenty years is like, look,

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be like unable to form coherent

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and that like it is. It is not a precept

0:54:10.360 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of liberal of like of like liberal intellectualism that you

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are unable to form a coherent argument or do any

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>piece of analizamble like they used to be able to

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>do this, and then at some point, like after the

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>War on Terror, they just stopped. Now all we have

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:25.919
<v Speaker 1>is like matt Iglesias, and it's like these.

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I think this is what a greater talks about when

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 2>there's like a fundamental incoherence, And I think this is

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:34.399
<v Speaker 2>really exemplified by like the structure of The Dark Knight,

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Rice is. It's a very messy film. The pacing is bad,

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the plot is very convoluted. It's it's so it's so plotting,

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 2>which is often Nolan's kind of biggest failure as a

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 2>as a filmmaker. In my opinion, it's it's it's very

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:51.720
<v Speaker 2>structurally just confusing, whereas The Dark Knight is actually pretty clear.

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 2>It still has a few of those weird plot like

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:57.320
<v Speaker 2>super plotty elements, but overall it's it's it's it's much clearer.

0:54:57.440 --> 0:54:59.759
<v Speaker 2>But in the wake of the War on Terror and

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:03.000
<v Speaker 2>then financial crash, there's this fundamental incoherence that kind of

0:55:03.040 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 2>seeps into everything. I have two final takes to read.

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:09.839
<v Speaker 2>I know we are getting along here, but I think

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it's important to look at what the conservatives and the

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 2>fascist rite actually said about this movie, beyond just the

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 2>conspiracy rattled ramblings that we started this episode with. This

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 2>is from The Daily Caller twenty twelve. The film is

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:27.839
<v Speaker 2>sympathetic to the concerns of the poor and points out

0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 2>that some who achieve wealth don't earn it legitimately. But

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 2>these themes disappear as soon as the hulking terrorist Baine

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:38.839
<v Speaker 2>takes over Gotham City. All that criminals are released, rich

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 2>people are executed in sham trials headed up by Baines's

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 2>lunatic friends, Government officials and police officers are killed or captured.

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Bain claims that he is solving inequality by leveling the

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 2>playing field, but his true plan is to perpetuate massive

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 2>murder by setting off a nuclear bomb. In this way,

0:55:55.200 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 2>viewers see a familiar story unfold, and that's reminiscent of

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:05.320
<v Speaker 2>communist and fascist revolutions in Russia, Germany, Cambodia, and North Korea.

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 2>No matter how legitimate criticisms of the economic, political, and

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 2>social order may be, any revolution that shatters the rule

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 2>of law or eliminates the market entirely well necessarily resulted

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:18.120
<v Speaker 2>in greater inequality, suffering, and death.

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:21.480
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny you can tell how on the defensive

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they are, like in the wake of occupied because you

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>have these people going like, wait, social inequality is real,

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 1>but if you try to do anything to it, it's

0:56:28.719 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 1>also so funny, and this is this is the interesting

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thing about like I think I think the fundamentally incoherence

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of it politically is that they've tried to graft the

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>French Revolution onto Occupied because like, yes, yes, the two

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>things that Occupied resolutely refused to do was one have

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a leader and two like do any kind of mass violence,

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like well, arguably outside of Oakland, but that wasn't even

0:56:48.680 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>like what that was like in Oakland.

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes they fought the.

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Cops, like in New York, like not the only bank

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 1>window in New York that was broken the entire time

0:56:56.880 --> 0:56:59.319
<v Speaker 1>was I think it was a Bank of America window

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that was broken with a hop smash of protests head

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 1>through it, like.

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 2>That's it's that's why, That's why I really don't think

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the Dornet Rices isn't about Occupy. It just like it

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 2>just isn't It arose from similar conditions that Occupy a

0:57:12.280 --> 0:57:14.840
<v Speaker 2>rose from, and then in its final tunes of filming

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 2>they did some parallels to Occupy, But it is much

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 2>more about the French Revolution, especially in like Bean is

0:57:20.560 --> 0:57:22.720
<v Speaker 2>like a vanguard, like he is a leader of this

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:25.240
<v Speaker 2>there is there's no but there's no such rule. And

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Occupy now during during the editing and final production of

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the film, obviously they realize that there is some obvious

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 2>parallels here, which they do they did indulge in. But

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean most of the writing and the filming of

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 2>this took place before occupy. I think it just came

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:43.240
<v Speaker 2>from a very similar social place. Yeah. Also, though even

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:45.240
<v Speaker 2>as a French Revolution thing, it's incoherent.

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Because it's not like it's not like rose Fier got

0:57:48.280 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in there and was like this is all a secret

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:54.880
<v Speaker 1>plot executing beggars, like it doesn't make any sense. It's

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like that's why it has that fundamental incoherence, right. Yeah,

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>there's one othergraph from the from the Daily Caller. Then

0:58:01.640 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we will read something from Breitbart, like the communist parties

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of real authoritarian states. Bain and his Cohurtz represent a

0:58:09.920 --> 0:58:13.200
<v Speaker 1>new ruling class that pretends to care about equality and liberation,

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but in practice resorts to oppression and extreme violence. The

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>film's good guys are Batman and the police officers of Gotham,

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>who bravely go to war to prevent Baine's genocide.

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 2>These guys have these guys.

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Have never had more than two thoughts like consecutively. It's

0:58:34.120 --> 0:58:35.160
<v Speaker 1>surely impressive.

0:58:35.160 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 2>If the political message of The Darkness Rises seems muddled,

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 2>which it does, it's because real life problems can't be

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 2>solved with Batman. There is no well funded superhero with

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 2>a glut of fancy gadgets and moral incruptibility. No, a

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 2>core Parties films is that Batman is morally corrupt. This

0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 2>is sorry. Nor are there villains in America as damning

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 2>and transparently evil is Baine. The film doesn't offer much

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 2>right there. The film doesn't offer much of a practical

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 2>answer for what The film doesn't offer much of a

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:15.080
<v Speaker 2>practical answer for what to do about inequality, social unrest

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:21.479
<v Speaker 2>or terrorism. Great great work, daily collar God. Now where

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 2>do they find these guys?

0:59:22.480 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess they find these guys from failed actors. So

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:26.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense.

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned Bush as being an obvious villain. Well,

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Breve Part disagrees. Obviously, Bright Part disagrees. Here is Here's

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:39.000
<v Speaker 2>here's our final take on on The Dark Knight Rises.

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Quote Bain, a hulk of a man burning with resentment

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:48.960
<v Speaker 2>against a society whose only provocation is being prosperous, generous, welcoming,

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:55.480
<v Speaker 2>and content instead of miserable like him. That is not

0:59:55.600 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Bain's gripes, but anyway, in Gotham sewers Bain recor fruits

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:04.760
<v Speaker 2>those like himself, the insecure thumbsuckers, raging with a sense

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>of entitlement, desperate to justify their own laziness and failure,

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and to flaunt a false sense of superiority through oppression, violence, terror,

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and ultimately total and complete destruction As expected, The Dark

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Night Rises is a love letter to Gotham City, its

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>flawed but ultimately decent people, its industry and generosity, all

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:35.439
<v Speaker 2>of which are by products of liberty, free markets, and capitalism.

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 2>In other words. In other words, just as The Dark

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Knight was a touching tribute to an embattled George W.

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Bush who chose to be seen as a villain in

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>order to be the hero, Rises is a love letter

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to an imperfect America that, in the end always does

1:00:56.240 --> 1:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the right thing. And Nolan loves the American people, the

1:01:00.200 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 2>wealthy producers who are more often than not trickled down

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 2>their hard earned winnings, the workaday folks who keep our

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>world turning a financial system worth saving because the benefits

1:01:10.200 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>it's all, And those everyday warriors who offered their lives

1:01:13.920 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 2>for the greater good with every punch of a clock.

1:01:17.480 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Nolan's love for this country is without qualifiers, and is

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:24.760
<v Speaker 2>symbolized and all of its unqualified sincerity in the form

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>of a beautiful young child sweetly singing a complete version

1:01:28.840 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Star Spangled Banner, just before Occupy attempts to

1:01:32.960 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 2>fulfill its horrific vision of what equality really means. Nolan, sorry,

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:38.919
<v Speaker 2>I can.

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Like this is this is one passage, this whole thing is.

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It's such a great explanation if you weren't around for it,

1:01:48.600 --> 1:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>for how the Trump guys just completely blew aside all

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the old George Bush coalition because all of the

1:01:54.480 --> 1:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>George Bush guys were fucking like this. They all talked

1:01:57.440 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like this. It was this like absolutely insufferable. Like since

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's completely completely sincere nonsense, it's crazy. It's still all

1:02:07.680 --> 1:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this shit because it.

1:02:09.480 --> 1:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Fundamentally misunderstands Nolan's a filmmaker. He is purposely juxtaposing a

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 2>British child singing the Star Spangled Banner at a sporting

1:02:17.560 --> 1:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>event with this destruction inherent to America. He's he's, he is,

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>He's making these things kind of combat each other like

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 2>this is this is actually pretty good framing, and this

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>guy fundamentally misunderstands this. Nolan's genius is a filmmakers. Well,

1:02:32.760 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Nolan's genius as a filmmaker is, without question, the pacing,

1:02:36.320 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the editing, the performances, the humanity of the duc Knight

1:02:39.640 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Rises will be talked about for decades, which it doesn't.

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>This is by far one of his worst films. This

1:02:45.920 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>is widely seen as one of one of his worst films.

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>The editing, pacing, performances are all heavily criticized. This is

1:02:52.480 --> 1:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>actually like a bad movie. I do like the juxtaposition

1:02:56.840 --> 1:02:59.240
<v Speaker 2>of the star spangled banner at the sporting event with

1:02:59.240 --> 1:03:01.880
<v Speaker 2>this like spectacle of destruction. I think that plays very well,

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:06.520
<v Speaker 2>but like that is this is come on, come on,

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>like these are the people who and this is this

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is the thing. This is this.

1:03:10.040 --> 1:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>This is why the sort of trumpest like the sort

1:03:14.120 --> 1:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of sort of like ironic detachment stuff became so popular,

1:03:17.560 --> 1:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>because these are the people who listen to Born in

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the USA and are like this rules this rue like

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this is this is this is about how America is good.

1:03:25.480 --> 1:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's just like like these people they have nothing,

1:03:28.960 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing going on with them. There's just just like

1:03:31.080 --> 1:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing going on in their heads. They don't have

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>any ideas whatsoever. They just have that like they just

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have this like reflexive flag worship stuff and that it's awful.

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like the whole fucking American right was like this.

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just like yeah, and then the South TRUMPI has

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>just destroyed them because this is a really good example

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of nothing of the conservative political conditions that led to

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>populace to takeover right.

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:57.240
<v Speaker 2>We have all of these guys who are lamb poooning

1:03:57.280 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>populism and have this very like deeply sincere neoconservative outlook

1:04:02.560 --> 1:04:06.200
<v Speaker 2>which then got all got decimated in three years by

1:04:06.240 --> 1:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Trump's very kind of basic childish rhetoric. Just just blew

1:04:09.720 --> 1:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>this stuff out of the water. I think this is

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>all this stuff is a very fascinating snapshot into the

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>politics of ten years ago. I know there's a lot

1:04:17.680 --> 1:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of zoomers who listened to this who may not has

1:04:19.160 --> 1:04:21.720
<v Speaker 2>been as politically kind of engaged in twenty twelve. All

1:04:21.720 --> 1:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>this stuff is a very good look at that. And

1:04:25.800 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 2>I know this is too long, but the final final

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>thing to just laugh at. We will return, as as

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:34.600
<v Speaker 2>all good superhero stories do, return to the status quo

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of my Paranoia Conspiracy Reader magazine, which also had a

1:04:40.120 --> 1:04:43.960
<v Speaker 2>review for The Cabin in the Woods movie, which it

1:04:44.000 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>thinks is a secret Illuminati message about how there's secretly

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:51.000
<v Speaker 2>control rooms that are that are like navigating your entire life.

1:04:51.040 --> 1:04:53.840
<v Speaker 2>There's like people in control rooms who are like controlling

1:04:53.880 --> 1:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>every spect of your life. The Cabin in Woods was

1:04:56.800 --> 1:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>an ironic admission of this pretty good, Pretty good. Our

1:05:01.000 --> 1:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>technico credit controllers and manipulators are crass and evil pretenders,

1:05:04.080 --> 1:05:07.040
<v Speaker 2>able to get off only spectacles of pain and torture.

1:05:07.120 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Pretty funny. There's some quite racist stuff in the middle,

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:12.360
<v Speaker 2>which I'm is not not even gonna mention. Oh yeah,

1:05:12.360 --> 1:05:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that's the everything. It was like. People were really racist.

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:17.040
<v Speaker 2>People are still really racist. People are still quite racist.

1:05:17.040 --> 1:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Shit that like like you could say ship back, like

1:05:20.120 --> 1:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>like people who are ostensibly liberals would say shit back

1:05:22.960 --> 1:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>then that like would get you like thrown off a building.

1:05:26.080 --> 1:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Today we have an article by someone who says, quote,

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>my father worked with Jimmy Carter on the submarine one

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Killer and chased flying saucers for a Project blue book,

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>which is a fascinating article. Then it talks it also

1:05:42.200 --> 1:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>talks about here that a cern is building a matrix

1:05:45.640 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>like you know, like the movie The Matrix. Fucking God,

1:05:48.880 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>we have one. When you do an episode about about

1:05:52.680 --> 1:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the cern Concira, we should this the silliest thing. We

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>really should do an episode about certain conspiracies, because yeah,

1:05:59.040 --> 1:06:02.040
<v Speaker 2>they are they are certainly quite amusing. There's one other

1:06:02.160 --> 1:06:05.200
<v Speaker 2>aspect in this article that I wanted to mention. Here's

1:06:05.240 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>discerns to Oh here it is here? What it is?

1:06:07.360 --> 1:06:07.480
<v Speaker 3>This?

1:06:07.480 --> 1:06:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It is in the Alistair Crowley section of the article. No,

1:06:11.040 --> 1:06:16.840
<v Speaker 2>oh no, you know, I think we've actually suffered enough.

1:06:16.880 --> 1:06:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I will I will let you imagine what this guy

1:06:20.440 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 2>what this guy says it about Alistair Crowley, Hitler and

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:28.360
<v Speaker 2>BIFA Vendetta. Oh no, so I'll let you imagine what

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that says. Because we've gone on too long. I' I'm

1:06:31.200 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>happy you were able to join us in our in

1:06:33.040 --> 1:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>our deep dive into the twenty twelve disaster. The Dark

1:06:37.240 --> 1:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Knight Rice is not very good movie. And instead, if

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>you want to watch a Batman film about politics and Christmas,

1:06:43.960 --> 1:06:46.240
<v Speaker 2>just watch Batman Returns. That's what I'm doing this week,

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:49.439
<v Speaker 2>So get your friends together. Watch Danny DeVito vomit black

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Doo for two hours. Watch Michelle Feifer's Catwoman in a

1:06:52.200 --> 1:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>latex suit. It is much much better. So that does

1:06:56.360 --> 1:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>it for us today here. It could happen here. I

1:07:00.440 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>hope we learned a little bit something about constituent power

1:07:04.240 --> 1:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>police superheroes and how CERN is building a matrix and

1:07:08.720 --> 1:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>this predictive programming targeting the next Winter Olympics. It could

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>happen here as a production of cool Zone Media.

1:07:19.320 --> 1:07:22.000
<v Speaker 4>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

1:07:22.040 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 4>coolzonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

1:07:28.560 --> 1:07:31.280
<v Speaker 4>find sources for It could Happen here, Updated monthly at

1:07:31.280 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 4>coolzonemedia dot com slash sources.

1:07:33.720 --> 1:07:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.