WEBVTT - Vance & Walz Become Friends During Debate

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Also media. I just want to start off by saying

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I love you.

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh God, yeah, yeah, I love you.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think jd Vance should be saying the word

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 2>love because it it just makes it clear every time

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>he does that he's never felt that emotion.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 4>No, No, there was something particularly unsettling about him saying that.

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like when I try to order food in French

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, Robert, you're not fooling anyone, Like you

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>look this up on Google right before getting to the restaurant,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Like you're not going to impress anyone. No, I guess

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>let's start with a fuck Mary kill for the guys

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>that know the Secret Service will get pissed at us

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>if we do that one.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 4>No, it could happen here and this is the US

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 4>the Shit VP Debate episode.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm so Felix Triven. I'm here with Kirsten Davis

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>at Robert Evans.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 3>Wow, what a great use of two hours that was?

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>That really was?

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I am behind this week horribly, still haven't picked the

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>subject for this week. Desperately desperately behind, and I shared

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 2>in love that this was a complete waste of all

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>of our fucking time, not a complete waste because we

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>learned something important, which is that the Democrat who seemed

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>to have the best understanding of how to fight Republicans

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe just got lucky or or got coached into some

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 2>very bad advice by a Democrat who should have known better.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Robert, I just want to say thank you for

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 4>saying that, Like I agree with you. I just want

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 4>to say thank you for saying Zoby.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>You and I are great friends. Everything you say is

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 2>terrible and wrong, but I agree with you on most

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 2>of it, And thank.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You and thank you and thank you for saying that.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>I just really appreciate that.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, whoever told him that Americans wanted to see

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>him be friendly with jd Vance was not a friend

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 2>of the republic or of him. I think I don't

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>think it'll work. I've been wrong before. It definitely seems

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to have worked if your recollection of like what Fox

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 2>and the other anchors were saying, they seem to be

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.639
<v Speaker 2>pretty positive on Walls's performance, So it may be working

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>online media gules.

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's who watched the VP debate.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 3>That is who watches the debate.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, I mean that is the audience.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, only the fucking sickos. Who are keening on politics

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 4>watch the VP debate.

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess I don't really believe this, but I'm going

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 2>to like my devil's advocate would be, maybe it's smart

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>strategy to accept that only media gules listen to this.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>The only real way for the debate to matter is

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 2>if you like fuck up. Sure, And there was more

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 2>risk of seeming like a lunatic if he went in

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 2>there attacking JD as hard as he could and getting

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>negative press, as opposed to this, which probably is not

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 2>going to get him negative press.

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 4>I think he probably had multiple strategies, And like if JD.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Vance had come in there and started saying some of

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the things that he normally says, which are fucking weird

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 4>and creepy, but he didn't an unhinged and fascist, misogynistic,

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>and I could continue, but then we might have seen

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 4>a different Tim Walls.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>But because JD.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Vance's entire strategy was like, hey, I can appear normal

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 4>even though I'm not.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't quite understand the hesitancy to then actually

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 3>bring those things just forefront. They were there, and why

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 3>not talk about it, Because like my initial takeaway here

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 3>is I don't think anyone necessarily clearly won. I think

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>both of them did just fine. But if anyone comes

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 3>out slightly better than what they were going in, I

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 3>would say it is Vance.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 2>It's Vance.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I would agree, because somehow Walls was able to humanize

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Vance over the course of the debate. They were it

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 3>was a very very friendly exchange, and that just serves

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 3>to undercut the months of work that Walls has done

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to paint Vance as a weird, unhinged extremist, which he is,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>and instead making him seem like just a reasonable politician

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 3>that although we may disagree on a few things, we

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 3>actually agree on a lot of a lot of the

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>problems and solutions.

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>We both care about this country. We're trying to help people,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and like no jd. Vance. Like there was that bit

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>where they were talking about mass shootings and he was like,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I truly believe that Vance cares about these kids. Jadie.

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Vance doesn't give a shit about dead kids, never has,

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 2>never will. He's not capable of it. And it undercut

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the more powerful moments that Walls had where

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 2>he was like, my son was at a.

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Mass shooting, christ have mercy.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>It was so interesting too, because I know Walls is

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and I know that I'm coming into this as the

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 2>guy who's generally pretty anti gun control, but I'm just

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 2>from perspective of Democratic Party strategy. Number one, this is

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>something they go after hard, so you can't half asset right.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>This is not like the border where they really do

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>feel the need to lean into the right wing argument.

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 2>The dims are very unequivocal about what they about, like

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they want to ban IRA fifteen's. Walls

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't really commit to that until a little bit when

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>he was specifically pushed on whether or not he agreed

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 2>with an assault weapons ban, and instead his language up

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 2>until that point was not very different from Vance's aside

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>from their disagreement over fortifying schools, but it was all

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>stuff around the guns, whereas the Democratic Parties line and

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the line of most Democratic politicians has been it's about

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the guns. And I did find it interesting that Walls

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 2>he had to kind of be goaded into really embracing

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 2>that by the moderator.

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Now, one of the first things I noticed from watching

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>the debate, which just happened like once or twice, then

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I realized this was just like a reoccurring trend across

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 3>the whole night, is that each candidate would try to

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 3>separate the other, yeah, from their running mate, to be like,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure Walls or I'm sure Vance agrees with me

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 3>on this, but their running mate doesn't and that's the

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 3>real problem. And this just kept happening. They kept trying

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 3>to like, yep, be nice to the actual opponent in

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>the debate by separating them out from their running mate.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Who's the real source of the problem. And that's just like,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>it just just kept happening, Like what are you doing,

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.679
<v Speaker 3>Like you're running on a joint ticket. There's no reason

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 3>to do this. And I think kind of part of

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 3>what their strategy may have been. Yes, these debates are

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.559
<v Speaker 3>probably only watched by freaks, but I think they're also

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>in freaks who are like weird, like independent centristy freaks,

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 3>and I think this is who they were going after this.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>This entire debate was focused on appealing to the center.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't really based on like going heavy into like

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 3>each side's own base because people they've already made up

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 3>their minds. And I think the the issue for me

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>at the end of this debate is because both of

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 3>them were we're trying to court the center vote. I

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 3>think Vans did about just as good as Walls did

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 3>going after the center by and and Walls kind of

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 3>even even helped them. And in effect, if Vance comes

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>off as just a slightly better debater when they're going

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 3>after the same base, that just leaves Walls with like

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>not really making any ground where he could have actually

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>just hit hit Vance quite hard and actually gone more

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>on like a party line or actually just like gone

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 3>more towards like all the reasons that Advance is fucked up,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>which he just would she would, she just avoided to do. Yeah,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 3>so my my my main takeaway was like, if they're

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 3>both according to the Center and Vance kind of barely edged

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 3>him out in some regards, maybe Walls should have just

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>actually been way more aggressive, and the kind of lack

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 3>of aggression really only hurt the Democrats because in the

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>end it kind of benefits Vance. If you give this

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>like half assed mediocre performance.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll see where it Because again, this is not being

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>listened to by average people in the same way that

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 2>like the last presidential debate was. This is not I

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think moves the needle one way or the other.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Because it was so close, I would be inclined to

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>agree with you that I think Vance did more of

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the things he needed to do for this to be

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>a benefit to him. I'm not sure in a way

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that helps the campaign, because most of what Vance did

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>that probably helps him was stuff that I think would

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>set him up better in a world where Trump doesn't

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 2>win reelection. Sure that would set him up to continue

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to have a career and to be re embraced by

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>respectable kind of politics. The thing that makes me kind

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>of doubt myself because I think there's a possibility this

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>comes out as a Wall win. And if that is

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the case, it will be entirely because of the last

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>question on January sixth, Because the way these things tend

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to work in popular memory, not again people like us

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>who sit through the whole thing, all of nearly all

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>of them are journalists or unusually engaged voters. But the

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>thing that there's two moments that are most likely one

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>from each of them, in my opinion, to get clipped

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 2>out and go viral. And for Vance it was the

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>January sixth thing where Walls drilled him, and I think

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>this was actually one of his few fairly effective aggressive

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 2>moments where he was like yeah, forced him to answer,

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 2>and Vance refused to answer as to whether or not

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 2>he thought Trump had lost in twenty twenty in a

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>way that was I think kind of embarrassing for him

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>and is easy, probably pretty easy to clip out. That

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 2>might wind up being the big kind of viral moment

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 2>of the night. If it's not that, it'll be Walls flubbing.

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 2>We should talk about the China question now. Yeah, but

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the China question that Walls flubbed is

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 2>on an issue that like Americans overall care about, which

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 2>is Tim Walls now maybe exaggerating when he talked about

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 2>his vacation in China one time in the eighties.

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's take a quick break and then let's dive

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 4>in a little bit on that.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 2>So, first off, everyone in this debate pronounced China correctly,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 2>which is a step forward from the ones that have

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>involved Trump the last couple of cycles. The downside is

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>no one knows how to say it on not a

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 2>single person.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And not a single mention of Ukraine.

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, well that was interesting to me, That is interesting.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not one moment where we talked about Ukraine, which.

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 3>They kind of blazed past foreign policy really quickly, which

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 3>is a little surprising. Considering the events of this morning.

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 2>There are literally missiles landing in Tel Aviv right now,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 2>like people are talking with I think some reason as

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to whether or not Israel might consider it nuclear response,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Like shit is legitimately a problem.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, And this is how they started the debate.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 3>They started by talking about how this was going to

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>be like a debate focused on how presidents or these

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 3>vice presidents will handle like America in a sudden crisis

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 3>as we've seen with the hurricane this weekend and now

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>escalating or in the in the Middle East. And although

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 3>that was their kind of opening framing, they really got

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>over those hurdles quite quick and then started talking about

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 3>extremely boring shit for the rest of the hour and

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 3>a half.

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 2>The very first question was basically, you know, Iran's bombing Israel,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>which like I don't know with the Israel do anything

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 2>to fucking Lebanon right before that, like interesting context from

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the journalist there, But Iran's bombing Israel. If you're in

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 2>the situation room, Tim Walls, what do you tell the

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 2>president if you're the last voice, should he let Israel

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>carry out a strike on Iran? And his response was

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a carbon copy of what Kamala has said every time

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>she's been asked on it, Israel has a right to

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 2>defend itself. October seventh was horrible, but you know, civilian

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 2>casualty is bad too, So it was a non answer,

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 2>but it was the same non answer that the campaign

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 2>has always given, So I was not surprised by Well,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 2>it was exactly what I expected from him.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Started off a little shakey, certainly sounded nervous. I think

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 3>this immediately kind of gave Vance a head up.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 2>His first like three minutes, he was clearly uncomfortable.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 3>He got better, especially because like Vance has like a

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 3>debate kid energy, right, But Walls did start getting better

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>as soon as he pivoted away from this question to

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 3>just attacking Trump, which is kind of his strong suit.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think Vance's responsor is interesting. So Walls gave

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 2>He was a little shaky, I think just because they

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 2>had started because he got better on that, But he

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 2>gave what has become the standard non answer answer for

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the campaign. JD. Vance started his answer on the question

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 2>of what would you tell the president if he was

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>asking if he should allow potentially, you know, a massive

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 2>escalative strike by Israel and Iran. What would you tell

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 2>him if you're the last guy in the situation room,

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and Jdvan started the response to that by summarizing the

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>book He'll Billy ellig That was in fact, the bulk

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>of his response was him talking about who he is

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and where he comes from and then being like, yeah,

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's fine if Israel does whatever. It was

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 2>an incredible response, and it struck me as the response

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 2>of a guy who doesn't think his partner is going

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 2>to become the president. Again, I thought that was very odd.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he was positioning himself for future jobs.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, he was different kind of than the

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 2>other answers. Maybe it was just they were both a

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit off their game. First question. You know that

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>happens to everybody in a debate.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>They both were nervous.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean, and this is this also when

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Vance deployed his one of his reoccurring catchphrases is a

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 3>peace through strength. Yeah.

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I hated that. I hated that because it's also

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that is very close to the quote from

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 2>the Brotherhood of Nod and Command and Conquer and JD. Vance,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you are no Kine. You know who lives in death?

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 3>By the way, in general, I think vance painted Trump

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 3>is having like a provable track record of proving him

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>as like, like Trump is going to end the chaos

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 3>that we've faced as a nation in the past four years,

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 3>whether that be economic or with war.

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>He was extremely consistent on that.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 3>And he's trying to point to, like was your life

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 3>better under Trump? Especially economically, and like everyone's brains were

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 3>completely fired by twenty twenty, so we actually no one

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 3>remembers what twenty seventeen was like at all, So you

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 3>actually can't recall that because whatsoever, let alone kind of

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump's mishandling of the pandemic led to like the biggest

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 3>recession in modern history, which also for some reason Walls

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 3>just never brought up.

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, well he does it. He did a little. He

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>said that, like he talked about how when they came

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 2>in they were dealing with a massive recession.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 4>The second thing they talked about was climate change, which

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 4>was Jesse Waters of Foxes was very mad that that

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 4>was the second thing they talked about.

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Were framing through Hurricane Helene.

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he was very he was very upset about which

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 4>is okay, sir.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 3>That's oddly, you know, quickly accepted the climate change framing

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 3>for the sake of the argument, talked about how moving

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 3>energy production from the quote unquote dirtiest parts of the

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 3>world back to America, where we are the cleanest, would

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 3>be one way to help.

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it would have worked on my dad that response,

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>like the whole you know, well, we'd cleave, so we

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 2>just got to bring back manufacturing. You know. It was

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>not a bad answer in terms of doing what he

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>needed to do. It was obviously nonsense, and the moderator

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 2>called him very well on that, like by just being like,

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>by the way, like there's no argument among scientists about

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>like how carbon impacts global warming. I think overall a

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>tire maybe slightly favoring walls that whole section. Yea, Like

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 2>he did not, Oh, I don't think he did badly there.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 3>No, I think Walls did a good job. Connecting the

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>economy to the environment. Yeah, how as the environment gets worse,

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the local economy gets worse, especially for like farmer. It's

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>not like fly yeah green New Deal Democrats, but for

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 3>like everyday farmers. And again pivoted very quickly to just

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>attacking Trump and Trump's climate denial. I tried to press

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 3>vance on Trump's climate denial, and Vance kind of, you know, again,

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>tried to just blame for manufacturing, saying that Kamala's like

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 3>rhetorican record does not match her actual actions, which are

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>increasing foreign manufacturing in general. Advance kind of fell back

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>on a whole bunch of like nationalistic framing regarding the

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 3>environment and regarding like the economy, especially manufacturing. That was

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 3>one of his reoccurring talking points.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we are getting to see some of the

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 2>times as spent in real time where they just published

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Ross Duthat's article Vance's dominant debate performance shows why he's

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump's running mate, And the url of the article shows

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 2>that it was initially put into the CMS about a

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 2>week ago on the twenty fifth, and they dropped the

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>article about halfway through the debate.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 5>So cool.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>That said, it's kind of unclear to me how the

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>rest of this is going to shake out.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 3>They also could have just written two articles, one where

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Vans did well and one where Walls did well. Yeah,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 3>but that is still that's funny.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that that'll matter either. We'll see where

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 2>people land. It was interesting to me Walls did do

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>something that I liked twice. Neither time did he give

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it enough force. But he pointed out twice that a

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>big part of the housing crisis is vcs buying up

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>affordable housing, jacking up the price, jacking up the price

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 2>of rent, that that is like a massive issue. He

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>brought that up. He said housing shouldn't be treated as

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a commodity, which I never expected to hear from a

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>candidate in one of these debates, but he brought them

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>both up like like a guy on a debate who

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>is like just kind of throwing out a side point

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>so you don't forget to say it as opposed to

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 2>someone emphasizing it. And the thing to do with jd

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Vance is to point that you are one of those

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 2>venture capitalists. You are one of the people who was

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 2>hollowing out this country. And you know, Walls was good

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>at trying to repeatedly say it's not migrants who are

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>ruining like housing in this country, but he failed to

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>connect enough and he had the pieces there to be like,

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>it's guys like you, Yeah, it's fucking it's fucking white

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>dudes in suits and earpieces who have made housing expensive.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 2>It is not people coming here from fucking Honduras, like

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 2>it's people like you who need to be rained in

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 2>by the government, and he just wasn't willing to commit

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to the answer that he clearly had in his pocket.

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>No, he just never went on the attack. And it's

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 3>just odd because he kept he was probably coached on this.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>But like I think it's coaching.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 3>He did not do any of the things that gave

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 3>him this job in the first place. He didn't play

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 3>to any of his strengths. Instead, Vance was able to

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 3>play to Vance's own strengths, and Walls was able to

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 3>just be a slightly less polished moderate, Which why are

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 3>you trying to frame him as a slightly less polished

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 3>moderate going up against a debate kid like Vance. Walls

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 3>needs to be like on the attack. He actually needs

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 3>to show like a strong resistance in order to actually

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 3>like make a large impact in the debate. And that's

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>why I think this kind of largely swung towards Vance.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes by the end, if they're both trying, if they're

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 3>trying to court this same like moderate vote. Now, as always,

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the immigration section of these is always frustrating. No one

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 3>talks about how fentanyl was largely brought in via citizens.

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>No one feels the need to bring that up CBS

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>did have a little fact check, or not a fact

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 3>check necessarily, but like a little comment talking about how

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the majority of Americans pulled are in favor of deportations.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 3>But they specifically asked Vance, like, how is your military

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 3>deportation plan going to work and willly separate like children

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that are born in the United States from illegal immigrants,

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 3>And Vance just refused to answer that question repeatedly to

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>try to get him to answer multiple times, he continually

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 3>refused it, instead saying that, like kommlass, border policy is

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 3>already a child separation policy. Yeah.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 2>There was a great moment there where he got angry

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 2>at them for fact checking, fact checking specifically on his clims.

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 3>But illegal immigrants in Springfield.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, because those migrants in fact had legal status.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 2>And he was like, you guys said you weren't going

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 2>to fact check.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, he didn't say, he shouted.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he yelled the rules were that you were not

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of fact checked that. He just explained how immigration

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 3>like works, how legal immigration works.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 2>They were like, thank you for explaining how immigration works.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for explaining the legal process of immigration. This

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 3>has been one thing that Vance has been doing on

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the campaign trails just explaining the legal process of immigration

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>and just saying I'm still gonna call this illegal because

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to be illegal, and you're like, okay, you can't.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Like I guess, I guess we could just use words

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to read whatever we want. Sure, why not?

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>M Yeah, if this comes out in the public opinion

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>being in Wolves's favor, it'll be because of those moments. Yeah,

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>that one at the end, in those moments where Vance

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 2>was like yelling and they cut out his mic at

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 2>one point. Yeah, like that kind of stuff. I don't think.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Again, I don't think anyone's going to

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>really listen to this beta debate enough for there to

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 2>be it to make much of an impact. But those

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 2>were not great moments for him.

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but those are the kind of things that get

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 4>clipped out and spread across the internet. Yeah, so we'll

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 4>see and so the people that didn't watch the entire thing,

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 4>well some of them will see clips like that.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the immigration section certainly showed kind of walls.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>In his stronger moments, talking about how the past year

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>we've actually seen a decrease in opia deaths, he continued

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 3>to talk about how Trump killed the bipartisan, a conservative

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>immigration bill, which we're probably not fans of, but he's

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 3>trying to make it play well electorally. And then pivoted

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 3>to Springfield and said, how like the Republican mayor came

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 3>out and said none of this stuff was true, but

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump and Vance kept viewing it. State law enforcement had

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 3>to escort kids to school. But even in this like

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Springfield section, which Walls was the first one to bring up,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Vance was the big driver of this lie. But even

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 3>in Walls's mention of this, he tries to separate Vans

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 3>from Trump. He primarily blamed Trump for this and totally

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 3>just like ignore Advance's massive contribution to this, like big

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 3>this information campaign that led to these bomb threats. You

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 3>just let Vance get off easy, and I think this

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>part was saved. Kind of buy this little fact check

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 3>and Vance's little meltdown over this legal immigration comment. But

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 3>still it kind of showed a little bit of Even

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 3>in Walls's stronger moments, he refused to like really harp

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 3>on Vance for being weird.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, speaking of people who watched the debate, I don't

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 2>think our sponsors did because they have real jobs.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Hello, we are back now. One of the biggest issues

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 3>for me in this campaign is how much time exactly

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 3>did Walls spend in Hong Kong. This is like really

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 3>one of the primary issues impacting my vote.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 2>There were one hundred and fifty thousand people in the

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 2>streets in New York City today demanding to know whether

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>or not to Walls was really in China during the

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Taneman Square uprisings.

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, thankfully CBS News is on the case.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we didn't have a second for Ukraine, not one second.

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>There was at no point any questions asked about the

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>loss of life due to the genocide in Gaza, not one.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 3>But by god, this this was really goofy. Basically, they

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 3>asked Walls with this comment he made in twenty fourteen

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 3>about being in Hong Kong during the Tanneman Square massacre,

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 3>when kind of reporting shows that he only arrived in August,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 3>basically like two or three months later. And I don't

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>know if either Walls just misunderstood the question or purposely

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 3>avoided it. But instead of talking with this, you know,

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 3>summarized his entire career, both as a school teacher and

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 3>in politics, and then emphasized that although he spent time

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 3>in China, he is he is loyal to the United States,

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 3>And it was just really odd and like you can

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 3>even see events like slowly like smirking the longer. Walls

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 3>just kept going on about his career, and at the

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 3>end of his like weird like non answer about his

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 3>commitment to the United States, the moderators asked again, They're like, well,

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 3>were you there for the massacre? And then he very

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 3>quickly clarified. I was like, uh, I mean, yeah, I

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 3>might have. I might have misspoke. I don't understand why

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't just very clearly say yeah, I misspoke. I

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 3>was there for the aftermath of the massacre. I was

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>there during the uprising.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 2>More I got misquoted. I was there the year of

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the uprising. Yeah, he was there.

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 3>During some of the uprising, but he was but he

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 3>arrived in the aftermath of the massacre. I don't know

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:40.959
<v Speaker 3>why I can just say, yes, I arrived the aftermath

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 3>of the massacre. I misspoke ten years ago. Like it's

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 3>very simple. Your weird, long, two minute avoided answer just

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 3>makes you like look like weak and unnecessarily slimy. It

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make any sense.

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 4>It just is weird, because of course were gonna ask

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 4>that question, why, Why did you not have a prepared answer?

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this only became a new story today, like

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 3>this this, this only became a new story like like

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a few hours ago.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Still have some kind of a prepared generic answer.

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he did. My guess is that if I

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>was debate prepping him, I would have assumed they were

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 2>going to ask one of the questions about his service

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 2>based on all of like the different sort of like

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>totally right wing shit coming out. Everything about his performance

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 2>was the result of a guy who was over prepared

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>and prepared by people whose focus was on him not

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>upsetting the apple cart and embarrassing the campaign, not on

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 2>him winning. That is how he was coached, and he

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>was well prepared as a general rule for the most part.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 2>When JD. Vance would like make a claim about you know, Fittanel,

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 2>he had a counter fact right that he could bring up,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 2>and he did that reasonably well. He seemed confident about

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the information he clearly put in the work, but none

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 2>of what he was prepared for was hurting Vance. He

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:59.479
<v Speaker 2>was entirely prepared to not make an easy fuck up,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 2>which maybe is the smart move if you're just like

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 2>we just don't want this to upset anything, because there's

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>no way it'll help. Like, my guess is that he

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 2>was told going into this by his handlers this debate

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 2>is not going to win us the election, but it

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 2>could lose us the election. So what we need to

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>make sure happens is that you don't fuck anything up

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>or seem too mean or seem too weird yourself. So

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 2>we are going to like train you to be as

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 2>boring as possible, and they did that.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And like, as a follow up, Vance was asked about

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 3>his previous like anti Trump like Hitler comments and specifically

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 3>was asked, like if he can be trusted to actually

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 3>like give Trump good honest advice and not just to

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>say whatever he thinks Trump wants to hear, which Vance

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 3>gave us similarly avoidant answer and just talked about tariffs.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 3>And then the moderators did not follow up with Vance

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 3>no about his avoided answers, So there you go. The

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 3>abortion segment is basically a rehash of what happened in

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the in the Kamala Trump debate, with like Vance talking

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 3>about a billin Minnesota who that he claimed like leads

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 3>to the death of like babies who were aborted, Like

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>after birth or like some kind of odd thing that

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 3>just isn't true. That was pretty silly. This was one

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of the issues where he was weakest, and I think

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>we were also maybe slightly upset that Walls again was

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 3>kind of was kind of hands off on this. Historically,

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Vance has made some a lot of crazy comments on

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>podcasts about this topic, and neither the moderators nor Walls

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 3>really pressed him super hard on it. Advanced himself tried

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 3>to largely be on the attack with this like late

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 3>term abortion, killing babies after birth thing that Walls just

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 3>tried to easily kind of brush aside as just not

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 3>being true. Speaking of healthcare, Vance oddly tried to claim

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 3>that Trump like saved Obamacare. At this point in the debate,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 3>things just kind of started getting a little bit boring.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think this debate had as many like good

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 3>questions as the last one. It was a very like

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty twelve style debate. It just it just it was flat.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 3>It didn't feel kind of like present. So they talked

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 3>about Obamacare, how Trump saved Obamacare, and Walls talked about

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 3>how Trump hurt Obamacare. Just kind of boring back and forth,

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 3>and then finally the last question was about like democracy

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 3>in January sixth, election denial, that kind of stuff. Vance

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 3>opened by saying, like, we have other issues to solve

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 3>beyond election denial. He said that we should we should

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 3>have like open debate about the issues of the twenty

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty election. He then downplayed January sixth and emphasized instead

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the bigger threat to democracy was Facebook censorship and how

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 3>people are like ending friendships over political disagreements, and this

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 3>was bizarre. I think this was Wall's strongest moment. He

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 3>talked about how there was one hundred and forty police

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 3>officers assaulted on January sixth, some who later died. He

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 3>mentioned this other story about how, like on January sixth,

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 3>there were similar protests in a whole bunch of different states,

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 3>and he mentioned one in Minnesota whre people threatened to

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 3>like march to his home and his kid and his

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 3>dog need to be like escorted out by police because

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 3>people were like threatening to go to his home saying

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 3>that there might be casualties. I thought that was maybe

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 3>that was that was a pretty good moment for Walls

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 3>brought up how people in January sixth tried to kill

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Mike Pence, which everyone seems.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>To forget it's not talked about enough.

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, look that's one of those things where

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 2>like my issues, so there are political not about the

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 2>specific ads.

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, yeah.

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Vans tried to be like, hey, you know everyone does

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 3>a little election denial. In twenty sixteen, there was Russia Gate,

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 3>and I think Walls did a pretty good follow up

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 3>by saying, like January sixth wasn't about Facebook ads, It

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 3>wasn't like that wasn't the problem. The problem was the

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 3>people storming the capital trying to kill everyone inside, like

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 3>that was the real issue. And real censorship is stuff

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 3>like book banning. First time we had a mention of

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 3>any of that. But even in this section about Jay

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 3>six he still like thanked Vance for having this conversation

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 3>and then asked him if Trump lost the election, which

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Vance just avoided avoided answering, instead asking Walls did Combalesce

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 3>censor Americans on Facebook? Which is just great, Yeah, just

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 3>a great equally important problems.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these two, these two issues, and unfortunately Walls's initial

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 2>response was like I don't run Facebook, which just say

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>he's lying, Like, just call him a liar to him, Yeah,

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>he's a liar.

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 3>It's wild that like we're talking about like January sixth,

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>and Advance's biggest concern is people being banned on Facebook. Like,

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that's not going to play well for him.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to play well. But also, yeah, it

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>was just a missed opportunity. There were a lot of those.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The entire debate was a missed opportunity.

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 3>RT. Yeah, and like Walls is I think slight fumble here.

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 3>You can point to his like closing statements saying like

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm surprised that we have this coalition from like Bernie

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Sanders to Dick Cheney to Taylor Swift. You're like, yeah,

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 3>that is that is a little surprising. Maybe that's the

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 3>bit of the problem.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that was a nightmare line for.

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Me, Of all the names to drop Dick Cheney.

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Dick Cheney and Taylor Swift hand in hands.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, because like even among moderates, do you think Dick

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Cheney's popular?

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That was my last straw.

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 4>I was like, who who prepped him? Who did his

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 4>debate prep? Who agreed that statement?

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Someone who really likes fucking Dick Cheney? Was it Carl Rove?

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Did they get Carl Rove again? God damn?

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It was Hillary involved with this debate prep.

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Like shoot, like, I know the Clintons were involved with

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 4>with commwa's debate prep.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Were they involved with with Tim Wallas's debate prep?

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not sure, but I think this kind of

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 3>underlines I know, this is kind of a larger issue

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 3>with like the Democratic Party in the year twenty twenty four,

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 3>but I think this also underlines, like the my issue

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 3>with Walls's performance here is, like this debate, both candidates

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 3>were going after the Dick Cheney voter. They were going

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 3>after like neo cons and independence.

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 2>The literal devil yes, and like for that base.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I think Vance does appeal to them more in this debate.

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 3>I think Vance did a better job appealing to those

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 3>people in this debate, which left Walls coming off is

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 3>just slightly worse and not really giving him any like

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 3>standout like performances. I think if if Walls actually like

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 3>emphasized all the reasons that Vance is a freak and

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>is bad, I think that may have showed him to

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 3>be more of a unique candidate. Instead, they both came

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 3>off as just kind of boring moderates, which just doesn't

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 3>make sense because that's like the opposite reason that both

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.239
<v Speaker 3>of these men were picked for their chops. They were

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 3>both picked to represent this slightly more extreme wing of

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the party, with Walls being a bit more progressive and

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Vance being a bit more fascist. Now it makes sense

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>that Vance is going to go after the moderates. I

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.479
<v Speaker 3>just don't think Walls needed to agree.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Hmm.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of all my all my thoughts on this

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 3>riveting to our debate.

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to say me too, man, m Well, we've.

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Got a flash poll from CBS News forty two percent

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 2>for Vance, forty one percent for Walls sixteen percent set

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a tie.

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Great, Yeah, that was the general. That was the general.

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 3>That was the general vibe.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Fox Fox News was Walls was good enough. Vance

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>did just fine.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 4>No, the moderator's obnoxious moderators smug and arrogant bias, but

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 4>that's just typical.

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 3>I think the moderators were fine. I think overall, it

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a very well laid out debate. I think the

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 3>fact that Vans was able to be humanized with the

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>assistance of Walls makes Vance kind of the winner in

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the way that like this did more to benefit Advance

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 3>than it did to benefit Walls, and the fact that

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Walls kind of acted counterintuitively to his whole line of

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 3>messaging from the past year is a fundamental mistake that

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I think I hope that Democrats would like reevaluate going forward,

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 3>but they're the Democrats.

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 4>So just interesting, interesting take that I've seen online, and

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 4>also a take for my Midwest moderate Democrat mother is

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 4>She said to me, just remember Tim is from the Midwest.

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 4>In Minnesota is the most Midwest there is. It is

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 4>not it is nature to be anything but polite. Not

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 4>what we're used to seeing in a debate. But it

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 4>was a little refreshing, So okay, So I'm.

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Just saying, yeah, if you went into this already liking Walls,

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 3>this won't make you dislike Wall.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm already My mom definitely already liked.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Right like and like. That's why I think this is

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 3>largely just largely inconsequential. Even e Vance got a little

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 3>bit of a lake up, it is largely inconsequential.

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you know who the winner of the debate was?

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Minnesota sounds like a great place to live, got great

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 4>pr tonight, I guess.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>So Walls was clearly doing the best here when he

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 2>was like just talking about how nice Minnesota is.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It's great here.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 2>And Tim. We all know what the winters are like there.

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>You're fool You're not fooling anybody like come on, sir.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 2>That said, if you live in the Portland area, or

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 2>really anywhere in southern California, move to Minnesota. Just just

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 2>get on out of here. You'll love it. You're gonna

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 2>have a great time. Everyone in Minnesota is gonna love you.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>People love Californians when they move other places, it goes well.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 2>It's always happy, always is always a good time. So

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>if I had any advice to end on, it's people

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>who are currently in Los Angeles. Move to Minnesota. You

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 2>will be beloved. People will want to listen to your

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 2>policy ideas. It'll be great.

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 6>It could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 6>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 6>Foolzonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:26.959
<v Speaker 6>Apple Podcasts, or wherever.

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You listen to podcasts. You can now find.

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.