Speaker 1: Team Buck Welcome to the Freedom Hunt Monday, November fifteenth edition.
Speaker 1: We have the closing arguments of the Written House trial
Speaker 1: and a verdict imminent as I'm speaking to you. Now
Speaker 1: break that down for you. Plus Fauci says boosters for
Speaker 1: all adults, all adults very necessary. And The New York
Speaker 1: Times comes after the Buckster with a dishonest hit piece,
Speaker 1: the first of many. I am sure because they are
Speaker 1: comed scumbags. We will get into all of that in
Speaker 1: just a moment. For hard working Americans, finding healthcare can
Speaker 1: be an expensive struggle, can feel like you don't have
Speaker 1: any real choice at all. That's why I'm introducing our
Speaker 1: friends at one share Health as a Christian healthcare sharing ministry.
Speaker 1: They're a nonprofit dedicated to helping thousands of Americans find
Speaker 1: affordable healthcare and support their members communities through charity and
Speaker 1: volunteer missions. Their acaxem programs are perfect for small business owners,
Speaker 1: a self employed, or anyone who is fed up with
Speaker 1: the broken traditional healthcare system. Look, you can get seventy
Speaker 1: five dollars off your enrollment fee right now. With promo
Speaker 1: code buck. You can get one hundred and fifteen dollars
Speaker 1: a month for your healthcare or two hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: nine dollars a month for your family, plus you'll get
Speaker 1: this seventy five dollars off enrollment fee when you use
Speaker 1: promo code buck. Call eight three three two three zero
Speaker 1: four four to five five now or go to one
Speaker 1: sharehealth dot com for a fast quote in seconds. That's
Speaker 1: eight three three two three zero four four five five
Speaker 1: or one sharehealth dot com with promo code buck for
Speaker 1: your special offer. Rittenhouse should be found not guilty of
Speaker 1: all charges. Let's just start with that for a second.
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse didn't do anything illegal and didn't do anything wrong.
Speaker 1: In fact, I would take the position and I do
Speaker 1: today at Bucksexton dot com. You can read my piece there.
Speaker 1: There's no real justice for Kyle Rittenhouse. It's my view
Speaker 1: on all of this that Kyle Rittenhouse is suffering because
Speaker 1: of politics. He has been put into the jaws of
Speaker 1: all of this madness, because the left decided to embrace
Speaker 1: the angry mob of BLM in the summer of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: in an election year, no less, we always have to
Speaker 1: remind ourselves of this. There was a coercion in the
Speaker 1: background of the twenty twenty election vote for Biden or else.
Speaker 1: There will be race riots, vote for Biden or else.
Speaker 1: Stores will burn. But of course the bigger problem we're
Speaker 1: supposed to be worried about is Donald Trumping so mean
Speaker 1: in his tweets. Oh my gosh, the tweets are so mean.
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouse never should have been on trial in the
Speaker 1: first place. In a sane and honest society, he never
Speaker 1: would have been charged with a crime at all. He
Speaker 1: shot three as Saunds killed two of them who were
Speaker 1: clearly attacking him. There's video of this. If there was
Speaker 1: not actually that level of evidence in his defense, I
Speaker 1: would think he's probably out of luck and would be
Speaker 1: facing at least one very serious count of homicide and
Speaker 1: would be spending decades in prison. Fortunately for him, there
Speaker 1: is video and lots of it. And also the people
Speaker 1: attacking him are the usual left wing lunatic, coward psychopaths
Speaker 1: who show up at these protests. We're here for social justice.
Speaker 1: We're here to bring justice to the streets by burning
Speaker 1: down stores, looting a CBS, stealing sneakers. Yeah, a lot
Speaker 1: of justice in the streets when that happens. If it's
Speaker 1: not lethal force that can be applied here when you're
Speaker 1: being attacked by a violent mob. If that's not self defense,
Speaker 1: what is What are you allowed to do to defend yourself?
Speaker 1: But you have to remember that there were mobs of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden voters who were terrorizing the small city of Kenosha,
Speaker 1: Wisconsin in the summer of twenty twenty, and Rittenhouse stood
Speaker 1: against that. He wanted to protect people from that madness.
Speaker 1: That was his crime. As far as the left is concerned,
Speaker 1: it's this is not a self defense case. This is
Speaker 1: a Rittenhouse is a young white conservative male who armed
Speaker 1: himself and stood up against the mob. That's it. Not
Speaker 1: a lot. They don't want anyone else to think they
Speaker 1: have a right to do this. What the left believes
Speaker 1: is that if a BLM mob were to come into
Speaker 1: your neighborhood to burn down your business, or your police station,
Speaker 1: or perhaps your home, your duty is to let them
Speaker 1: vent their rage. You see, stand aside. They get to
Speaker 1: use force, you don't. There's some real maoist undertone to
Speaker 1: Wallows too. Of course, the cultural revolution that is ongoing
Speaker 1: in this country right now, the weaponization of political corre
Speaker 1: mereness through wokeness. You must bend the knee to the
Speaker 1: ever changing dictates of leftist orthodoxy, or they will destroy you,
Speaker 1: and you certainly are not allowed to use force to
Speaker 1: defend yourself against their force. Mob violence is a tool
Speaker 1: of the left, don't you see. They don't want that
Speaker 1: tool being taken out of their kit. They like to
Speaker 1: have that at hand. Now on our side, of course,
Speaker 1: has any riot that occurs, we hear about it forever.
Speaker 1: It's a threat to the nation. It is undermining our
Speaker 1: very democracy. When they have months of riots all across
Speaker 1: the country, far more destructive, far more people killed, far
Speaker 1: more police officers assaulted. That's in the pursuit of social justice.
Speaker 1: They tell you, well, with Kyle Rittenhouse, they created a
Speaker 1: monster through lies, and that's why they wanted him destroyed.
Speaker 1: It didn't matter that it wasn't true. They don't care that.
Speaker 1: As the facts have come out, we have seen that
Speaker 1: he is innocent of these charges, and they have the
Speaker 1: dumbest people you will ever come across in your life
Speaker 1: weighing in on this, including CNN's Jim Acosta, where he says,
Speaker 1: I mean just the usual. CNN is a bad place
Speaker 1: now for bad people. That's what it has become. I
Speaker 1: have to be honest with you. Have to have to
Speaker 1: tell you the truth about it. Yeah, I mean he
Speaker 1: sounds like he's watched too much Bill O'Reilly. I mean
Speaker 1: he's acting like Archie Bunker in there, and I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: it's supposed to be a courtroom. I don't get it.
Speaker 1: You know, I know there are cameras in the courtroom.
Speaker 1: It's really sort of an argument against cameras in the courtroom,
Speaker 1: which I'm a big proponent of. We should have cameras
Speaker 1: in the courtroom. But none of the judge is going
Speaker 1: to act like Archie Bunker. Yeah, the judge is the problem. Sorry,
Speaker 1: the judge has seen too many too much, Bill O'Reilly.
Speaker 1: That's what he says. That I heard someone, and I
Speaker 1: know this is if I tweeted this, I thought about this.
Speaker 1: Either you're lying. I heard some leftists walking on the
Speaker 1: street and I assume they're talking about this trial. They said, oh, dude,
Speaker 1: the judge has been bought off. Someone paid him. That's
Speaker 1: what they all say now, because they all alternative is
Speaker 1: they're just wrong. The alternative is that they smeared a
Speaker 1: kid who, whether you think he should have been there
Speaker 1: on the streets or not, had a god given right
Speaker 1: to defend himself against leftist mob lunatics. That's it. It's
Speaker 1: actually very straightforward. But this country hasn't really come to
Speaker 1: grips yet with how disgusting and destructive the Biden voting
Speaker 1: mobs of twenty twenty were, and how it is a stain,
Speaker 1: It is a shame on our national honor that that
Speaker 1: was allowed to occur in The Democrats did not stand
Speaker 1: against it. They encouraged it. They fan the flames, in
Speaker 1: some cases literally fanned the flames. They made it worse
Speaker 1: than it would have otherwise been, and the country is
Speaker 1: a worse off place because of it. Kyle Rittenhouse stood
Speaker 1: against the mob. That was the only crime you could
Speaker 1: say he committed, and that is not, in fact a crime.
Speaker 1: It's just something that upsets people who believe that their
Speaker 1: emotions and their authoritarian and impulses should rule the day.
Speaker 1: And anybody who would exercise their Second Amendment rights in
Speaker 1: defense of their or others basic rights is something to
Speaker 1: be a person to be squashed by the left. That
Speaker 1: is what you see with all of this. I got
Speaker 1: some great sleep this weekend, and it was thanks to
Speaker 1: my pillows, because I've got the best pillows you could
Speaker 1: ever have On my bed. Mike Lindelle hooked me up
Speaker 1: with my very own my Pillow. They've got such an
Speaker 1: incredible assortment of other products, the mattresstopper, the Geza sheets,
Speaker 1: my towels, my slippers and more. Listeners like you have
Speaker 1: helped build My Pillow into the amazing company it is,
Speaker 1: and Mike Lindelle, the founder of it, wants to give
Speaker 1: back to all of you. Right now, you can get
Speaker 1: great discounts on My Pillow products by going to my
Speaker 1: Pillow dot com right now and clicking on the radio
Speaker 1: Listeners special square. You're going to see rotational offers up
Speaker 1: to sixty six percent off on products like their pillows,
Speaker 1: mattress topper, and the Geza sheets, but also new products
Speaker 1: like their slippers, weighted blankets, robes, waffle blankets and more.
Speaker 1: All My Pillow products come with a sixty day money
Speaker 1: back guarantee enter promo code buck for these great radio specials. So,
Speaker 1: speaking of authoritarian impulses and the madness of the left
Speaker 1: wing apparatus in this country, here's the latest on I mean,
Speaker 1: fauci Is is straight up saying you don't have individual rights.
Speaker 1: You take the shots, you do the things we tell
Speaker 1: you to do or else. That's this guy's position. He's
Speaker 1: Foucci the Fascist. He's an evil little smurf tyrant, and
Speaker 1: people that still listen to him, that still believe in him,
Speaker 1: should be ashamed, ashamed at either they're cowardice or their stupidity,
Speaker 1: depending here he is talking about his view. This guy's
Speaker 1: a public health bureaucrat, and now we're we're supposed to
Speaker 1: listen to him like he's what the provost of America,
Speaker 1: he's the dean of the United States, or what exactly
Speaker 1: is his role. Well, one of the things that to
Speaker 1: me was most difficult to accept is that we put
Speaker 1: together a good plan for how we were going to
Speaker 1: try and dampen down the spread of infection early on,
Speaker 1: thinking that that was accepted by everybody, and then the
Speaker 1: next day the President saying free Michigan, free Virginia. I
Speaker 1: didn't quite understand what the purpose of that was, except
Speaker 1: to put this misplaced perception about people's individual right to
Speaker 1: make a decision that supersedes the societal safety. That to
Speaker 1: me is one of the things that I think went
Speaker 1: awry in all of this. I mean, you do you hear?
Speaker 1: Do you hear? How the tyrant thinks individual rights supersedes society.
Speaker 1: We've lived with flu and all kinds of viruses, you know,
Speaker 1: that spread through droplets for our entire lives. Now all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, it's hide, mask up, mask up, between bites.
Speaker 1: I saw your grocery. Social distance six feet, maybe three,
Speaker 1: maybe ten feet, maybe twenty feet. The vaccines are ninety
Speaker 1: five percent effective. Actually, the vaccines are fifty percent effective
Speaker 1: after six months, and you're gonna need another shot. Will
Speaker 1: know only people that are high risk will need the
Speaker 1: additional booster shot. Actually turns out as of a couple
Speaker 1: of days ago. Fauci's now saying, if you look at
Speaker 1: the Israeli data, everybody who's an adult needs the booster.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, so they're allowed to be entirely wrong again,
Speaker 1: They're allowed to be incorrect after saying they knew, they
Speaker 1: didn't say they thought they said they knew. Meanwhile, the
Speaker 1: rest of us are supposed to listen or else or else.
Speaker 1: You're a bad person. You're a person who is dangerous
Speaker 1: to be around. You want to make things worse for
Speaker 1: everybody in the country. Let me let me say to
Speaker 1: you now, friends, it is a badge of honor for
Speaker 1: anybody who loves this country and the constitution to be
Speaker 1: attacked by the New York Times. This came out on
Speaker 1: Friday by Tiffany Sue and Mark Tracy to obvious live
Speaker 1: activists at the New York Times who are media reporters.
Speaker 1: Oh gee, that's a really that requires a lot of
Speaker 1: expertise for that job. On podcasts and radio, misleading COVID
Speaker 1: talk goes unchecked. False statements about vaccines have spread on
Speaker 1: the Wild West of media, even as some hosts die
Speaker 1: of virus complications. Okay, well, I've had the virus, and
Speaker 1: I've told plenty of people to get the shot, including
Speaker 1: my own family members. And I am not opposed to
Speaker 1: people getting the shot if they are at risk or
Speaker 1: if they just choose to get it. And I'm not
Speaker 1: somebody who even thinks that the risks from the vaccine
Speaker 1: are particularly high for most healthy people. And yet I'm
Speaker 1: lumped in here in this hit piece with some guy
Speaker 1: who is a self described citizen reporter, and he says
Speaker 1: that the vaccines were the product of a global coup
Speaker 1: data by an evil cabal. So that's how they start
Speaker 1: the piece, and then they go a little bit further
Speaker 1: and they get down to me. Interesting. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm not a citizen reporter. I have millions of social
Speaker 1: media followers altogether and co host the largest radio show
Speaker 1: in the country. So that's an interesting one. Why am
Speaker 1: I included with this guy? You would say, well, why
Speaker 1: does that make any sense. I've never heard of Rick
Speaker 1: Wiles before. I have no idea who this person is. Oh,
Speaker 1: he does a podcast. I do a podcast, so you know,
Speaker 1: same thing. Anyway, they have a photo of me up
Speaker 1: here and this is what they write. Buck sex And,
Speaker 1: the host of a program syndicated by Premier Networks, recently
Speaker 1: floated recently floated the theory that mass COVID nineteen vaccinations
Speaker 1: could speed the virus's mutation into more dangerous strains. He
Speaker 1: made this suggestion while peering on another host podcast, the
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly Show, My Man Jesse Kelly. The theory appears
Speaker 1: to have its roots in a twenty fifteen paper about
Speaker 1: vaccines for a chicken alment called Mareck's disease. It's author,
Speaker 1: Andrew Reid, a professor of biology, said, as research has
Speaker 1: been misrepresented by anti vaccine activists. Okay, let's let's have
Speaker 1: some fun with this one. For a second shot. The
Speaker 1: New York Times a trash heap am I an anti
Speaker 1: vaccine activist. That would be fascinating to know, considering that
Speaker 1: I have said for eighteen months now, well for as
Speaker 1: long as you've had the vaccine, and then leading up
Speaker 1: to when we had the vaccine, when I was saying
Speaker 1: Operation warp Speed would hopefully be a huge success that
Speaker 1: if you are at high risk, I think it makes sense,
Speaker 1: and I've advocated for people to get the shot. So
Speaker 1: I'm a hell of an anti vaccine activist when I'm
Speaker 1: somebody who has gotten the shot, as you know, against
Speaker 1: my will really, but and has told everybody else who
Speaker 1: is at any substantial risk to get the shot as well.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, I'm anti mandate. Ah, that's not the
Speaker 1: same thing, is it. No, But they just lump it
Speaker 1: all together. But let's actually break it even a little
Speaker 1: bit further down here. I mean, on the one hand,
Speaker 1: it's fascinating that the whole point of this article is
Speaker 1: to call for the censorship of podcasts. Just so you know,
Speaker 1: The New York Times, a newspaper, wants corporate censorship of
Speaker 1: podcasts that talk about COVID for being for misinformation. So
Speaker 1: and I want to be clear. The New York Times
Speaker 1: a bunch of gutless, coward libs that's full of it.
Speaker 1: Over there. They completely BACKFOUCHI never criticize them. They backed
Speaker 1: the people who told you mask up between bites lysol
Speaker 1: your groceries. It mostly spreads on surfaces. We need a
Speaker 1: million ventilators. Masks don't work. Actually they do work. Actually
Speaker 1: you need to actually need it in ninety five. Actually
Speaker 1: you need one. Kids need masks in school Why the
Speaker 1: data shows they don't shut up in mask up in schools?
Speaker 1: Schools need to be closed. Why it's perfectly safe. There
Speaker 1: are plenty of other places where people are congregating. No,
Speaker 1: the teachers' unions wanted The vaccines are ninety five percent effective,
Speaker 1: one and done. Take the mask off, you're finished. Actually no,
Speaker 1: they reduce it activeness dramatically over the course of six months.
Speaker 1: You're gonna need boosters. Maybe you're gonna need boosters forever.
Speaker 1: The people that have been wrong on all of that
Speaker 1: have absolutely no They get no heat from the New
Speaker 1: York Times. They're still to be obeyed, never mind listened
Speaker 1: to obeyed the mandates that they put out there. You
Speaker 1: must listen to them. Fauci has been wrong and wrong
Speaker 1: and wrong again. I could see here. I would debate
Speaker 1: any person on planet Earth on these issues and crush
Speaker 1: them because the record speaks for itself. They say, oh,
Speaker 1: the data change. No, that's to see. That's not the point.
Speaker 1: The point is they said they knew and then they
Speaker 1: were wrong. If I tell you I know something for
Speaker 1: a fact and then I am wrong, that's not okay.
Speaker 1: That's what Faucci does. So let's start with that. This
Speaker 1: is a hit piece. It's grotesque it. You know, they
Speaker 1: even bring in you know, they bring in my parent
Speaker 1: company at I heart to try to bring some heat
Speaker 1: from the top down on me. I mean, the worst,
Speaker 1: the worst kind of gutter character assassination from them. About what. Now,
Speaker 1: let's get into what I said. First of all, the
Speaker 1: notice how they don't quote me. That's always a tell,
Speaker 1: is it? Where's the quote? Where's me floating? The idea floating?
Speaker 1: That's such an interesting word to you use, isn't it.
Speaker 1: Did I say that was what was happening? Did I
Speaker 1: say we were going through Americ syndrome? Did I make
Speaker 1: that claim? Ever? No? I did not. How long ago
Speaker 1: was this? They wrote this piece on Friday. When did
Speaker 1: I say this thing that they're now bringing up early September,
Speaker 1: over two months ago, almost three months ago. Now, I'm
Speaker 1: just wondering, just wondering, why leave that out? Oh, because
Speaker 1: we were having a conversation in August September about what
Speaker 1: the heck is going on? Why our case is spiking
Speaker 1: so rapidly? Why did they spike all summer? Do you
Speaker 1: know what the answer was? Because the vaccines don't work
Speaker 1: very well for very long to stop transmission. That's the
Speaker 1: real answer. That's why we all have to get boosters now,
Speaker 1: a possibility we discussed then. Boh, but what what is
Speaker 1: my sin? According to The New York Times, my COVID
Speaker 1: misinformation sin I said in the course of I said
Speaker 1: it on the radio show too, by the way, and
Speaker 1: on this podcast. It's not like I was just saying
Speaker 1: it randomly to my buddy Jesse Kelly on his show.
Speaker 1: I said it in plenty of places. I said. There
Speaker 1: are people I still have the emails and text messages
Speaker 1: from infectious disease doctors who weren't saying this is happening.
Speaker 1: They're saying they were concerned given the spike in cases,
Speaker 1: and given that it didn't seem to make any sense,
Speaker 1: considering we were told that the files are vaccine was
Speaker 1: ninety five percent effective at preventing infection. They said they
Speaker 1: were wrong, but I still have the communications. They said,
Speaker 1: there's a concern that we could be seeing some version
Speaker 1: of a Merrick syndrome, which and I know that, Oh
Speaker 1: the epidemiologists. Yeah, this guy stumbled on something that was true.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that he knows everything about everything and
Speaker 1: we have to listen to him for every either. I
Speaker 1: think it's so funny. Oh, people are misrepresenting my research
Speaker 1: and they're not. Is it possible? Here's some statements of fact.
Speaker 1: Is it possible for a virus to come into contact
Speaker 1: with a weak vaccine and mutate? Specifically, in response to that,
Speaker 1: the answer to that question, I can point you to
Speaker 1: the journals and places that they cannot refute. The answer
Speaker 1: that question is yes, it is possible. Is that happening.
Speaker 1: It doesn't look like it right now. At one point,
Speaker 1: people were concerned that it could have been happening, so
Speaker 1: I raised the possibility from medical professionals, but that Joe
Speaker 1: Rogan talked about the same thing on his show, and
Speaker 1: they went crazy on him for it too. So their
Speaker 1: whole point here is what it was misinformation to think
Speaker 1: that the vaccines were so we're weak enough that maybe
Speaker 1: they were creating the grounds for some kind of a
Speaker 1: speed up in mutations that turned out to not be
Speaker 1: the official that that turned out to not be with
Speaker 1: the official data shows. What it does show is the
Speaker 1: vaccines basically stopped working to prevent transmission after a period
Speaker 1: of time, and the people who were saying they work
Speaker 1: so well for the last six months, they go, they
Speaker 1: get away unscathed on all of this. Fauci and the
Speaker 1: rest of them, Oh, that's fine, that was science. Would
Speaker 1: you ask any questions? And it's misinformation. Shameful little cowards
Speaker 1: at the New York Times. Don't say when I said it.
Speaker 1: Don't say what I said. Make it seem like I
Speaker 1: said it was happening. I didn't say it was happening.
Speaker 1: I said there were people who were raising this as
Speaker 1: a concern and a plausible explanation for the spike in
Speaker 1: cases at that time. Notice they do the thing with
Speaker 1: Fauci constantly. Oh well, new data came in and Fauci
Speaker 1: evolved with it, So he's okay, all right. First of all,
Speaker 1: that's not true. But to second of all, notice that
Speaker 1: doesn't apply here, does it. Someone said something a few
Speaker 1: months ago about what was possible. Let's pretend they said
Speaker 1: it was happening and are being dangerous and misinforming people,
Speaker 1: and then put them in line with actual anti vaccine activists,
Speaker 1: people that believe in no vaccines. How could anyone take
Speaker 1: the New York Times seriously? How could anyone listen to
Speaker 1: or read the work of these absolute cowards. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so many words I want to use, and I
Speaker 1: probably could because we're on a podcast. You know, there's
Speaker 1: not enough censorship on podcasts. I can see whatever I want.
Speaker 1: But Tiffany Sue and Mark Tracy are scum there, scum.
Speaker 1: They should call in, They should call into the radio show.
Speaker 1: They should call in and try to address on air
Speaker 1: with me. Why didn't they quote me? At least they
Speaker 1: quoted the other guy. It's an egg that hatches into
Speaker 1: a synthetic parasite and grows in your body, mister Wiles
Speaker 1: said on his October thirteenth episode. They quoted the other
Speaker 1: guy and gave the date. Why didn't they quote me
Speaker 1: and give the date of when I said it? Two oh?
Speaker 1: Because the quote would show that I was just explaining
Speaker 1: something that is, by the way, still true. It is
Speaker 1: still possible that that could happen. And we are engaged
Speaker 1: in a mass vaccination campaign for a rapidly mutating virus
Speaker 1: with a new technology. This is a global first for humanity.
Speaker 1: What we are being where we are being told we
Speaker 1: must do right now. These are all facts, This is
Speaker 1: all reality. Do I know what's going to happen? Do
Speaker 1: I know how many cases? No? I don't know what
Speaker 1: the winter's going to look like. I don't know how
Speaker 1: many more boosters we're gonna have to get. Maybe they
Speaker 1: come up with a pill that finally kills COVID entirely
Speaker 1: this spring, or something. I don't know. But I'm honest
Speaker 1: with you about what I do and don't know. This,
Speaker 1: This little piece in the Times disgusting. Notice how I
Speaker 1: can just pull it all apart. They don't quote me,
Speaker 1: they leave out the date, They quote and date other people.
Speaker 1: They start with other people that I've never even heard of,
Speaker 1: that are saying objectively insane things. And then they say
Speaker 1: that I floated a theory. Did I say that it
Speaker 1: was true? Or did I say that this was a
Speaker 1: theory that was under discussion at the time by medical professionals. Oh,
Speaker 1: it was the ladder, but that doesn't seem crazy, right,
Speaker 1: So they don't want to put that in the piece
Speaker 1: because then it's, Oh, you're just trying to hit at
Speaker 1: somebody who's been right on COVID over and over again.
Speaker 1: Who's been more accurate me or Faucci who said last fall,
Speaker 1: the little idiots in charge, you're gonna call for double masking.
Speaker 1: Months before Fauci shows up, it goes, I think you
Speaker 1: need to double mask that's on record, folks, public record published,
Speaker 1: and go check online. They're gonna call for double masking
Speaker 1: because single masking is such a debacle and doesn't work,
Speaker 1: and it's so obvious. How many times have I gone
Speaker 1: through this? How many times have I said they're wrong
Speaker 1: about this and then I end up being right? But oh, Fauci,
Speaker 1: he's just changing with the data and the lives at
Speaker 1: the New York Times and walk around outside with their
Speaker 1: masks on, and there's all this COVID misinformation. I mean,
Speaker 1: referring to me in any way as an anti vaccine
Speaker 1: activist is a slander. It's a slander, it really is.
Speaker 1: It's like calling me a member of the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 1: It's an idiotic thing to say for which there is
Speaker 1: no basis in truth. This is from the New York Times.
Speaker 1: I dare them, I dare them to come at me publicly. Fine,
Speaker 1: they can do it on Twitter, so I know they
Speaker 1: ait a little beata belt that theer tabs to call
Speaker 1: it his voice, Will Scandy bring it? Explain yourselves? Why
Speaker 1: didn't you quote me? Why didn't you give the date
Speaker 1: of what I said? Why don't you explain what I said?
Speaker 1: Why don't you explain that I never said it was happening,
Speaker 1: but I was discussing a theory among several theories, And
Speaker 1: why didn't you admit that the answer turned out to
Speaker 1: be the vaccines don't work for very long. What's a
Speaker 1: bigger deal? Me saying that there are concerns among some
Speaker 1: in the epidemiology community that the vaccines are ineffective to
Speaker 1: a degree that they may actually be allowing the virus
Speaker 1: to get a taste of what it's going to have
Speaker 1: to overcome, which which that was the whole, the whole thesis,
Speaker 1: that's we don't have that proven, that we haven't seen
Speaker 1: that occur. Absolutely. I mean, I'm telling you the truth
Speaker 1: about it. But that was the theory and it was
Speaker 1: based in science. It still could happen, by the way,
Speaker 1: notice the uses of the word could. And yet the
Speaker 1: problem isn't the people that told you the vaccine was
Speaker 1: one and done and you're safe and you're fine and
Speaker 1: it will stop the spread problems. People like me that
Speaker 1: tell you about those other folks who actually make decisions
Speaker 1: for you are not having discussions that you get to
Speaker 1: make your own decisions about the people that are mandating things.
Speaker 1: They're fine, they don't upset the New York Times. People
Speaker 1: like me, we're the problem. Okay, bring it your little
Speaker 1: New York Times comie scum anytime anywhere. The fight continues.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being here with me on the Bucks Extent podcast. Appreciated.
Speaker 1: Team back tomorrow, Shields High