WEBVTT - MNF Recap, Ravens Beat Cowboys & All-In or Fold

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jireel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Who's got a longer losing shriek right now? Trevor Lawrence

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 2>or Demonse's teasers they said, can the producers look this up?

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in what I know? I know, but now I'm oh,

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 2>by the way, we were having a good conversation, but uh,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I've got I've got some news for you to monse.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>As I'm walking out the door, your mother says to

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 2>me and tell my son I'm looking for him. I'm like,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 2>what do you mean you're looking for him? She was like,

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>she was like, I haven't talked to him recently enough,

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>so you might want to get on that on you

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 2>after the podcast. Sorry, we were having a great conversation.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Sorry to kind of hit you with a little kind

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 2>of one two combo. And then also and then your

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>mom coming after you, uh, speaking of here, did you

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>see this the video that was going around of the

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I It was probably a lot of people didn't see it.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>My algorithm probably sends me more of this, but it

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.559
<v Speaker 2>was Chiefs players being asked like the viral TikTok question

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of the day, and it was when the last time

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you talked to your mother? And like the first nine

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>guys were like this morning, this morning, last night. One

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>guy was like, oh man, I didn't call her this morning.

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, I'm gonna call her right now. And they

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>got to remind you how young these guys are. They're

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're twenty one, twenty two, twenty three years old.

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 2>But I so, I honestly think it might be my

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 2>fault that your mom said that, because I showed her

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that video recently, and so it might she might have

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>been feeling stuf. She was like, oh, my son doesn't

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 2>call me every morning. One guy was like, I do

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>my prayers and I call my mom and I'm like Okay,

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 2>this kid was built in a lad like this guy's

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>pro athlete wakes up every morning, does his prayers and

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>calls his mother like he has he ever made a mistake.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>If it sounds like I'm filibustering to avoid discussing Trevor Lawrence,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I might be. Uh, this is episode two sixty five.

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's what's not on. Didn't make the show's Malik Neighbors

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>just an unbelievable player, unbelievable bow and the Broncos beat

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Baker and the Bucks. That's well done with the alliteration.

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 2>And Christian McCaffrey seeing a specialist in Germany that don't

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That usually means there are certain procedures, like I think

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>it's PRP platelet rich plasma that is legal in Germany.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 2>That is harder to do over here. Kobe did it,

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>other guys have done it. So usually when you go

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 2>to Germany it's to see a specialist for some stuff

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that you can't do as easily in the United States.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>It's usually effective. It also shows this might be a

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 2>pretty significant or concerning injury for it to be week

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 2>three and he's like, I gotta go to Germany to

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>check this out. But none of that is the lead.

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs are not the lead. The Cowboys loss is

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>not the lead. Because we had a Monday night football

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>doubleheader that all four teams involved have serious implications for

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>how we're and what happened last night for how we're

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna view this season. So demanse, let's start with the

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>game that ended last in the game that had the

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>most intrigue, the Bengals and Washington. Go ahead.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the Bengals obviously just lost to Washington last night.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 3>We might have found some identities there. We spent all

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 3>week talking about what would happen if my Ravens went

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>oh to three. It turned out we had the wrong

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>AFC North team after starting oh and three this year?

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Are you ready to say that the Bengals are cooked?

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 2>So I'm here's where I think my own bias is

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>the wrong word. It might be the right word, but

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 2>it implies the wrong thing. I'm not biased towards the

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Bengals because I like them, But I think I might

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 2>be biased in a positive way towards the Bengals because

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 2>I respect how well they play the Chiefs so much

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>that I might be overrating who they've been the last

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 2>season and a quarter. Next year, we wrote them off

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>early because Joe Burrow was clearly not healthy. Now they

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 2>did end up rallying, and then Joe Burrow got hurt

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>again and they were done. This year is something different. Altogether.

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>They have lost three games in three very unique ways.

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 2>They lose to the Patriots in Week one when they

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>simply cannot get the ball in the end zone. They

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>lose to the Chiefs in Week two when they play

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>really well and just get beat by the Champs at

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>the very end because a rookie makes a mistake with

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 2>the pass interference. And then they lose to the Commanders

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 2>last night because Jadeen Daniels more on him in a moment.

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Has quite literally, arguably, not definitively, but arguably the greatest

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 2>game any rookie quarterback has ever had. The Bengals had

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>no turn had no punts, and they lost to Washington.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>So here's my problem, Demonse. One of the reasons I

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>was so much more concerned about the Ravens than I

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 2>was the Bengals was because of the schedule, because who

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens had coming up. The Ravens have had the

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys and then the Bills before they play Cincinnati. Well,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals had Washington and then Carolina before they play Baltimore. Well,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>you've now lost to Washington, And while I believe you're

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 2>going to beat Carolina, what I think is this because

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>after Carolina they get the Giants, and after the Giants

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>they get Cleveland. And I understand folks right now might

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.559
<v Speaker 2>be like Nick, they're zero to three, Stop talking about

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>them like they're a good team. It's in for me

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 2>to believe a Cincinnati team with a healthy Joe Burrow,

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a healthy Jamar Chase and T Higgins coming back is

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>not going to be dynamic offensively. So I am not

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>going to right off the Bengals. I am not going

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>to say they are finished, because they have a very

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 2>real chance of a month from now being three and

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>four just by beating three of the worst teams in

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>football Carolina, New York and Cleveland. Get so, I think

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>that was temporary rejuvenation. That's a fair point. But I

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>think that was temporary rejuvenation in part cause by playing

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders and in part cause by the momentary lift

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>of we're not having Bryce play quarterback for us anymore.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't think that's going to be I

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 2>don't think all of a sudden they're a very good team.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 2>But listen, but I don't think Washington was a very

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>good team. Washington hung thirty eight on him. This Bengals

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 2>defense has real problems right now, and Cam Taylor Brick

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>can talk all this shit he wants and keep getting

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 2>cooked in these games. And he's a good player, by

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the way, he is a legitimate good player, but he's

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of gotten out ahead of himself a little bit.

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 2>But so I am not going to write off the Bengals.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>What I am going to say is this, going into

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>their rubber match, not their rubber match, their second meeting

0:08:54.760 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>with Baltimore, which is Week ten, they need to be

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>a minimum of four and five, which means they got

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 2>to go four and two through there and probably have

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 2>to be five and four. So what they have is Carolina, Baltimore,

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>New York, Cleveland, Philly, Vegas, so that's their next six,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 2>so they have to go at least four and two

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and probably five and one. I just think they can

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 2>do that. So I'm not going to write them off entirely.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>But you could also say if they could lose all

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 3>of those games.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, when you lose to the Patriots. Every game

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 2>is losable and on its marriage Tomansey, You're right, I am,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I am. I think a lot of people are prone

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>early in the NFL season to overreaction. I might be

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 2>prone a bit to underreaction. I might be really anchored

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>by my preseason priors to a degree that. Yes, I

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>mean the only winless teams in the league, is it

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.239
<v Speaker 2>at this point? Is it just Tennessee and the Bengals?

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh and the Jags? Jesus, yeah, Jazz, Tennessee, The Bengals

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 2>and the Jags are the only winless teams. So you're right, Like,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I get every team that I listed that I say

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>stinks has more wins than the Bengals, do I get that?

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 2>But seeing the offense move the way it did yesterday,

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>when that's what they have to be, It's why I

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 2>am not going to just say they're dead in the water.

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 2>What I want to see is what Vegas thinks right now? Vegas,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 2>right now, Oh, Steelers fans have to be furious about this.

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>The Bengals right now have better odds to win the

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>AFC than the three and o Pittsburgh Steelers. Yeah, that's

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a space, that's gotta be Yeah, it owned three Bengals,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 2>three and oh Steelers. So right now, odds to win

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the AFC the Chiefs plus two forty, the Bills more

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 2>on them in a moment, plus three ninety, the Ravens

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>plus six point fifty, the Texans plus seven hundred, the

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Jets plus nine to fifty, and then the only two

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>teams that aren't at least thirty five to one are

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals at sixteen to one and the Steelers at

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 2>seventeen to one. So I don't think the Bengals are

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 2>dead yet, but my goodness, gracious, they are on absolute

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 2>life support.

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Did that game last night change your opinion on Jaden

0:11:59.200 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Daniels at all?

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So I want my opinion on Jaden to be very clear,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 2>which is I never doubted the kid's talent. My concerns

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>about Jaden Daniels were twofold. He's far too skinny and

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a little on the old side. And that was when

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 2>I say a little on the old side. What I

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>mean is he played college football for so long. He

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 2>turned twenty four in a couple months, so that he

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 2>was a little concerning. But the real concern was is

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 2>he going to be able to stay d Is he

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be durable enough? Is he going to take

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>too much punishment? Because it's not only that he was

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the skinniest quarterbacks I'd ever seen go in

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the first round. He also took massive hits in his

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>college career, almost like cartoonish hits, sometimes running the football.

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>But I watched him at LSU win the Damn Heisman,

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 2>and I like Heisman Trophy winners in general. I like Baker,

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I like Trevor never wanted he could have Kalb obviously,

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Like so, I am predisposed to excellent college quarterbacks in

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>that regard. What he did last night, though, he is

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 2>better than I thought he would be, and he is

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 2>better quicker than I thought he would be. That's two

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>games in a row now where they don't punt. Against

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the Giants, they I mean, it was field goals every time,

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>but they scored on seven drives. Last night. They scored

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 2>every time. And so that is what he and that

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 2>past to McLaurin when he was taking a massive hit

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 2>to win the damn football game is one of the

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>plays of the year in the NFL. And if you

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 2>remember before the season, one of the reasons I picked

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Washington to finish second in the NFC East was because

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I thought Jaden could be good this year. I worry

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 2>about his long term viability and I still worry about that,

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>but right now he has been head and shoulders the

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>most impressive rookie quarterback. That's not even a question. As

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>much as I love Caleb, that's not a debate who's

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>been more impressive right now, Jaden or Caleb. Now. I

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 2>also don't think it's a debate right now on if

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the Bears made the right choice. I think Caleb is

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be the better player of the two and

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 2>have the longer career of the two. But through three games,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Jaden's been spectacular. He's gotten better every week, and last

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>night he.

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Was a supers myste incompletely pastes total.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a record for a rookie to throw

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 2>at least twenty passes have night over ninety percent completion.

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>It also, if you remove rookies just those numbers, he

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>put up twenty one of twenty three, two hundred and

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty four yards, two touchdowns, ran for another touchdown, and

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 2>another thirty nine yards. I mean, that is a brilliant

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 2>game of quarterbacking. And so if you're the Commanders. Now

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 2>your next two Cardinals, Browns. So the Cardinals defense is

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 2>not very good, the Browns offense is miserable. I mean

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I can go past that. The Washington's next half dozen

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 2>games Cardinals, Browns, Ravens. That's a tough one. But that'll

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>be fun Jaden and Lamar, that'll be really fun. Yeah,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>and then after that Panthers Bears, Giants. So what like,

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Washington keep an eye on him. Now. Now the schedule

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 2>gets way tougher later in the year. They haven't played

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 2>any of their divisional games. They have four games against

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles and Cowboys second half of the season, along

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 2>with games against the Steelers, Saints, Falcons, and a Titans game.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, but they could get out to a hot start.

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>And Jaden, there's gonna be no hate for me on Jayden,

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing to hate on with that performance. That was

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>well through three weeks. It's no question through three weeks.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>The only person who's in the argument is neighbors, like

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>through like right now through well neighbors, Yeah, I mean

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>neighbors been the week ago he was pretty good too,

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>but that he had the big drop. But right now

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I would think and I don't know if the producers

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 2>because I can't get individual Player Award odds. It's like

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 2>a weird New York thing. I think they won't show up.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I would guess the odds for offensive Rookie the year

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 2>demons a go like this right now, Jaden a big favorite,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>followed by Neighbors, followed by Marvin Harrison Junior, followed by Caleb.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I would think those are the top four and then

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a very significant drop off after that. If they put

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>that in the dock all I'll respond to it. Okay,

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>they're in there now, Oh, there they are. It is

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 2>exactly what I wait, yeah, no, you're it's left to right. Yeah,

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Jaden at plus one fifty, Neighbors at plus two fifty,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Marvin at plus three point fifty, Caleb at plus six fifty.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 2>And that makes sense, Like that's and Caleb. Well, we'll

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>talk Caleb later in the show. Caleb is not so

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>much based on no the Caleb is not so much

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>based on how he's played to this moment, more based

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 2>on the projection sim to league MVP odds right now.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes is second. That's not based on how he's played

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>to now. It's that we're three of eighteen weeks through

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and they think Mahomes will play better. All right, now

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 2>to the MVP favorite Josh Allen and the Bills go ahead.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah to that blowout? First off, do you need any

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 3>time to mourn the fall, the fall of the prince

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 3>that was promised? Understand that was an unfortunately I did.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Well. It's eight straight losses and this is an ultimate

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>life comes at you fast moment. So it was November,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 2>we were It was less than a year ago that

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Trevor was coming off delivering the Jags their first playoff

0:18:55.200 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>victory in a half decade, in rooms to delivering them

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 2>their first back to back winning seasons in two decades,

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>sitting at eight and three, playing for the one seed

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>that night on Monday Night Football. Since then, he hasn't

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 2>won a game and has not only not improved, seemingly regressed.

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 2>The pick to DeMar Hamlin was as bad of a

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 2>throw as any veteran quarterback will make all year. He

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 2>wasn't pressured, he wasn't panicked, the guy was wide open,

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 2>and he just missed him by five yards. Just absolutely brutal.

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 2>So I am I'm gonna make a plea to the

0:19:54.720 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville Jaguars organization. That is out of the box and

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>unprecedented because we have seen coach firings midyear and early

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and when that happens, they upgrade, you know, they promote

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>someone on the staff to interim head coach. That's not

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 2>what I'm asking for here. I am asking the Jacksonville

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Jaguars to fire Doug Peterson and immediately, as of that day,

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 2>hire Belichick and tell Belichick you know what, Bill, you

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>can be the one to tell Doug he's fired. He

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 2>beats you in a Super Bowl. I'm sure you have

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a little one to get back from that and let

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 2>him take over and bulk he's out to the organization.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Because I still believe in the talent of Trevor Lawrence.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 2>But everything about the Jags right now is a mess.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Trevor's play is a mess, the roster is a mess,

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the coaching is a mess. They they had two incredibly

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>winnable football games in weeks one and two, they found

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 2>ways to lose both of them, and then they came

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>out last night and got embarrassed and annihilated. And I

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know what can fix that, but if anything can,

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 2>it's the greatest coach of all time. I know Bill

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 2>will have to resign from a half dozen media opportunities,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 2>but I also know he wants to be coaching and

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>probably would rather not wait all full year. I get

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 2>what I'm saying right now is not realistic and unprecedent

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>for someone to come in from outside the organization mid season,

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 2>but I am the prince is drowning, and I want

0:21:59.960 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>to make it clear I am not putting all of

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 2>this or even most of this on Doug Peterson. I

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>think Trevor has been bad. He hasn't been mid He's

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 2>been bad, There's no denying it. He also is Remember

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 2>what I was saying about the age thing, He also

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 2>is twenty four years old. He's twenty four. I just

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 2>told you Jade and Daniels turns twenty four in a

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>couple months. Trevor's twenty four. I know how talented he is,

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>and we've seen the flashes, but at year four, with

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 2>that salary, that contract, it's gotta be more than flashes.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>There's no escaping that. And so I hate everything about

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the offense. I hate the way he's playing, and Peterson

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 2>seems resigned to his fate, and if anything could get

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 2>Bill Belichick excited. It would be to vanquish one of

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 2>the guys who beat him in a Super Bowl and

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>take over a team that's underachieved with an excellent quarterback.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 2>But at this point, I don't know what to tell you.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I know people want me to say I was wrong

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 2>about Trevor. Up to this point, I have been wrong.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 2>I think he's got all the traits and all the

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>talent of an excellent quarterback. But you get this deep

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 2>into your career, you need to produce like one. And

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>he has not done that. And now he has paid

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>like one. And now he's going to be on his

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 2>third head coach and his third offensive coordinator. And this

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>is how she goes sideways on guys. So I always

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>mus and I can't believe I'm going to make this

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 2>comp And it's not a fair comp to Trevor because

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 2>this player never had you know, the success Trevor did,

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the season he had, near to the playoff win, all

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of that. But you know, time is a flat circle,

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and it would be somewhat poetic if, much like my

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>professional mentor, Colin Cowherd, has Sam Darnold, the top three pick,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 2>amazing college player who he simply cannot quit who eight

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 2>years into his career, He's now like, this is the

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I told you this was in him, and I mock

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>him for not being able to, you know, let go

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 2>of it. Maybe that'll be Trevor for me. Maybe in

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 2>six years I'll be on TV and Trevor Olvi's who knows.

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not defending him, and I get that the

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>audience right now thinks this is gonna be my loudest

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 2>and wrongest Classic three. I still believe in the player,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 2>but there is no basis to defend the player or

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the team, which right now looks like a helpless and

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>hopeless team. Was that enough?

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 3>Did I?

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 2>Did I take my thirty lashes there? Or move on

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 2>to the Bills?

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 3>That was the morning onto the Bill side of it.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 3>Are you ready to say that the Bills are the

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs only competition in the AFC?

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's what I will say. Oh yeah, no, they're good.

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>They're good. And this is where folks are gonna get

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 2>really annoyed with me. And when I's not Bills fans

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:37.479
<v Speaker 2>but the other media members. I can't believe you guys

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 2>overcorrected on the Bills like the whole world for years

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 2>had been too high on the Bills. So I got

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to be arrogant and annoying and mocked everyone and then

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>be proven right. And then somehow, seemingly everyone except for

0:25:54.160 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe Greg Rosenthal, was like, well, they're not even the

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 2>best team in the AFC East. They could miss the

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 2>playoffs and all all off season. I said, they're still

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 2>clearly the best team in the AFC East, and this

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 2>version of Josh Allen is still a terrifying version of

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen, and they're gonna be fine. And now people,

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>now I do fear today we are now going to

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 2>overcorrect in the other direction where I think you're gonna

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 2>see a bunch demanse. You're gonna see a lot of

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 2>power rankings that have the Bills is the best team

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. Now that's obviously Domino Bridge too far,

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 2>but it's fine to call him second. You're going to

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 2>see some quarterback rankings that have Josh Allen is the

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>best quarterback in the league. Now that's gonna be Dombin

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 2>too far, but it's totally fair to call him second.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I now I am going to say something that Bills

0:26:55.920 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 2>fans are going to love to hear. There are some

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>striking similarities between this Bills team and this version of

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs from two

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 2>years ago. So Mahomes and the Chiefs two years ago

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 2>had come off to heart wrenching playoff defeats, a Super

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Bowl loss where they got destroyed, and a home AFC

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Championship loss that they feel like they felt like they

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 2>blew the game. And then in the offseason they traded

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Hill, and people really wondered, Ah, man, is this

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 2>are the Chiefs in the midst of a reb build,

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 2>retool on the fly. The Buffalo Bills two years prior

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 2>get blasted in the playoffs by the Bengals embarrassingly last

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 2>year and absolutely gut wrenching three point home playoff loss.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>They trade digs, they retool, people question or they rebuilding.

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs that year won fourteen games, Mahomes won league MVP.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>They have the highest scoring offense in all of football.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 2>They won the Super Bowl. Josh Allen this year right now,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 2>he's the MVP. They have the highest scoring team in

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the league. They're undefeated. There are a lot of similarities,

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not going to ignore them or pretend they're

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>not there. I'm not even going to congratulate the Bills

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 2>this week on winning their third straight September championship, which

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>was a lock that was going to happen. They are

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 2>a dominant September team, and we've talked about that. All

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying is, and I've said this before, Oh man, Okay,

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 2>in my back, we're good. Okay, the Bills, when they

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 2>put the game in Josh Allen's hands and let him run,

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 2>they're terrifying. Now, it's terrifying in both directions because you

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.479
<v Speaker 2>worry he's gonna get banged up. But when they do that,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 2>they are as dangerous as any team in the league.

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 2>And so I've got all the This Bills team was

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 2>considered oh they're good but not great by all almost

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 2>everyone before the year. I disagreed with them. Then I

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 2>thought it was insulting that the Jets were the favorites

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 2>to win the AFC East, And yeah, there are. I'm

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna make this point on TV today in full, and

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Bill's fans are gonna be shocked by it. There are

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of similarities between the twenty twenty four Buffalo

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Bills and the twenty twenty two Kansas City Chiefs. That

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 2>ended up having the highest scoring offense in the league,

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>league MVP at quarterback, and they did win the Super Bowl.

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 2>So just something to keep in mind, all right, speaking

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Chiefs.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, speaking of the Chiefs. These guys just keep

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>finding ways to win, no matter how difficult the circumstances

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.479
<v Speaker 3>that or the refs had them. In a parlay. You

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 3>infamously predicted the Chiefs going twenty and zero last year.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it's possible that you were just a

0:30:58.600 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 3>year early on that.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think they're gonna go undefeated. Uh, but

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 2>here's what I do think, And I'll be quick listen.

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 2>If you want to bitch about the refs, if that's

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 2>how if you're if you're gonna have your mind warped

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>by the by the anonymous Twitter accounts and the stupid

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Twitter algorithm that just feeds you missed calls and act

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 2>like that same feed is not showing you that. On

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons touchdown drive, they it was extended after a

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>third and long incompletion, there was a phantom roughing the

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 2>passer penalty, or if you want to act like we

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't see last year, the single most egregious missed defensive

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 2>pass interference penalty of the season happened in the Packers

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs game that demonds you and I watched from Wayne's

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 2>house in Los Angeles. And if you want to act

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 2>like we didn't just see a damn Monday night football

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 2>game last night, we're on a vertical two point conversion.

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 2>The exact type of past interference that was committed by

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs with four minutes left was committed by Washington

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>in the end zone. There, those calls get missed. And lastly,

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>if you want to pretend that if they had called

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 2>that past interference and then if Cincinnati had scored, I'm sorry,

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 2>if Atlanta had scored and gone up by either one

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 2>or let's you know, and if they got the two

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>point conversion that you really believe in your heart of

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 2>hearts that Patrick Mahomes getting the ball back down three

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 2>with four minutes left means oh, the Falcons were gonna win.

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Then go ahead, live your life that way. I think

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 2>it's a dumb way to consume sports. I also think

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>this The Chiefs haven't played a great game. They played

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty well for most of the Baltimore game. They played

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 2>poorly against Cincinnati. They had moments against Atlanta. Mahomes hasn't

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 2>had a great season. He played really well save one

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 2>pass against Baltimore, played terribly against Cincinnati, was hit or

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 2>miss against Atlanta. Travis Kelcey hasn't done anything. Isaiah Pacheco

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 2>is out injured. All of these things are true. They

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 2>have also had one of preseason rankings wise, the hardest

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>schedule of anyone to open the season. They haven't played well,

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:36.959
<v Speaker 2>incredibly hard schedule, dealing with injuries, and they're undefeated. And

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 2>so here's the thing about the Chiefs. They don't lose.

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 2>It might not be pretty, it might not be the

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 2>way you're used to it, but you take every other

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 2>We did this yesterday on the show. The next the

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 2>biggest Super Bowl contenders, Right, So who Vegas thinks the

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 2>best teams are after the Chiefs, Niners, Bills, Eagles, Ravens, Lions, Texans,

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys since the Chiefs last lost, Because the Chiefs have

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 2>won nine in a row, those seven teams, so that's

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 2>seven to those six teams. Pardon me, oh, and the

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Bengals include them in that. Those seven teams are twenty

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 2>six and twenty two, while the Chiefs are nine to zero.

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I say that to say this, like other teams lose,

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and the Chiefs have this crazy ability not to lose,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 2>which is what makes them great. And unless they have

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 2>to play a Chiefs team of a previous era, comparing

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 2>them to previous Chiefs teams is kind of foolish Against

0:34:55.520 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 2>today's NFL. We'll see what the Bills turn en two.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Right now, they look great. The Chiefs also have a

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 2>decided and massive psychological edge over Buffalo, and we'll see

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 2>how that plays out. But no one else in the

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 2>league is within spitting distance of this team. The Bengals

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 2>are falling apart. The Texans haven't looked good on both

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 2>sides of the ball once all year. Week one, the

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 2>offense looked great, the defense looked terrible. Week two, the

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 2>defense looked excellent, the offense looked mediocre. Week three, they

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>looked bad in both spots. The Niners are falling apart.

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 2>The Eagles might have the single most clueless coach in

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the league today. The Lions Jared goff is Jared Goffing

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>a bit lately. The Ravens are hanging on by a thread.

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 2>There's nobody out there. The Bills have my attention and

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 2>my respect. Everybody else you're playing for a bronze medal,

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 2>and so say all you want about the Chiefs and

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>how lucky they are. It's crazy how the team with

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the best quarterback, the best coach, most well prepared, most

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 2>well rounded roster, they're also the luckiest. It's crazy how

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 2>that works out. But we'll see you in January when

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 2>the games actually matter for Kansas City, when they finished

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 2>the year around fourteen and three.

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Next Yeah, So my Ravens season was on the line

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 3>down in Dallas, and they went there and they took

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 3>care of business for at least three quarters. So a

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 3>win is a win. But why do the Ravens keep

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>not being able to take care of business down the

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 3>stretch late in these games.

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, man, I don't know. This was a

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>weird one because this wasn't The comeback was not on

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Lamar in the offense at all. Lamar, it's twenty eight

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 2>to six, okay, demands he gets them in field goal

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 2>range and Justin Tucker misses it. Because a sneaky big

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 2>story of this season is Justin Tucker might be cooked.

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 2>And Justin Tucker is I mean, ever since Travis Kelcey

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 2>tossed his helmet he seems to have snatched his soul.

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what's happened to him, but he's not

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the same guy. So he misses that kick. Yeah, so

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.479
<v Speaker 2>he's also he was the greatest kicker of all time.

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 2>But here's the point I'm making. Lamar puts him in

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 2>position to Monte to go up four scores. It's twenty

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 2>eight to six. A field goal puts you up thirty

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 2>one to six. Put the hay in the barn. Game over.

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Between that moment and when it was twenty eight to

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, Lamar threw one pass. It went like this,

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 2>touchdown Dallas on side kick recovered, touchdown Dallas, Ray on

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 2>side kick not recovered. Evens get the ball, run, run

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Lamar in completion, touchdown Dallas. So that's not on the offense.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 2>The Devens allowed three straight scores and the special teams

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>allowed a on side kick recovery. What should Lamar should

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 2>feel great about is everyone's focusing on the run to

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 2>ice the game. And that was a great play by Lamar.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 2>But if he doesn't pick that up, Demons, the Cowboys

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 2>are getting the and they don't pick up the next one,

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys are getting the ball. Back with like thirty

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 2>seconds left, down three. Now Aubrey can kick from eighty

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 2>it seems like but they're still okay. It was the

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 2>series before when I was like, oh my god, the

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Ravens are going to lose in the most devastating fashion imaginable.

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>We were north of the two minute warning, the Cowboys

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 2>had timeouts. It was third and six, and if the

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 2>Ravens don't pick that up, I believe they lose that

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 2>game because I think the Cowboys, with that much time,

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 2>the way they'd been marching down the field, were gonna

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna go score. And Lamar threw a perfect pass

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 2>to Jay Flowers on the sideline to pick up the

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 2>first down. So Lamar did his thing, Derrick Henry did

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 2>his thing. This defense is shaky, the receiving court is shaky.

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Mark Andrews has not shown up yet this year, and

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 2>Isaiah likely hasn't shown up since Week one. So I

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 2>want to give Lamar massive credit. I thought he played

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.359
<v Speaker 2>awesome and Derrick Henry was awesome. But the Ravens are

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 2>That wasn't that. That looked like the type of win

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 2>that was gonna restore all confidence. Then they did a

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 2>very ravensy thing, which is almost blow another huge lead,

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and so oh, I'm not writing them off, of course,

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And I was wrong because I picked the Cowboys to

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 2>win and the Cowboys, you know, just got run all

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 2>over for three quarters and their offense could do nothing

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 2>until the end. But that was a little jekylin hide

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 2>from the Ravens there. All right, let's go last topic

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 2>of the block.

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 3>So, despite Nick Sierrani's best efforts to throw the game,

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles still get the win over the Saints. You've

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 3>been on Nick Sirianni's coaching decisions for a while. Now,

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 3>how soon do you think it is before they get

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 3>him out of the building and get Belichick in there.

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean they are two and one, so I mean,

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you know his job is safe for now.

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 2>But Nick Sirianni doesn't call the defense. Nick Sirianni doesn't

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 2>call the offense anymore. So his job is game management,

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and he's been brutal at it, brutal at it. This year.

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 2>We talked at nauseum about how ridiculous of a decision

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 2>he made with the pass and then field goal in

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons game. Somehow, I think what he did before

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the half of this Saints game was worse if people

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 2>weren't paying attention. Let me set the scene. The Eagles

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 2>have the ball around the fifteen yard line. There is

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 2>fourteen seconds left, they have one timeout. It is fourth

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and one. The score is three to nothing in that spot.

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 2>It is one one hundred percent of the time, the

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 2>most obvious field goal you've ever seen. Why well, because

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 2>if there's fourteen seconds left, you have one time out.

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 2>So if you go for it and it works and

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 2>you get it, you're almost assuredly still just kicking a

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 2>field goal. Let play it out. You go for it,

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you get it, you use your last timeout. You now

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 2>have first and ten from the thirteen yard line with

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 2>ten seconds left. Yeah, I suppose you get one shot

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 2>into the end zone, but that is an easy play

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 2>to defend when the other team knows you can't come

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 2>up short of the end zone, you can't take a

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 2>sack because you have no timeouts, and then you just

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 2>kick a field goal instead. He went for it seemingly

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>on a tush push, but it was an end a

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 2>round to Berkley. He gets stuffed and they get no points.

0:42:55.480 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm all for risk reward decision. If the risk and

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the reward are properly accounted for. This is the second

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 2>time in two weeks Nick Sirianni has made a decision

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 2>that is all risk, no reward. If you pick that up,

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 2>you're still almost assuredly just kicking a field goal. And

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 2>if you don't pick it up, you lose zero, you

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>lose three points. So I just think I think he's

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.760
<v Speaker 2>pressing and I think he's in over his head. And

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the other the Eagles defense shout out to him, they

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 2>played a good game, Jalen hurts Man, that's another bad

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 2>turnover for him. We're now at six turnovers through three

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 2>weeks for jailing. So I don't believe in the Eagles.

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe in their coach, and I'm starting not

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 2>to believe in their quarterback. Quick break right back, what's right?

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in? What that's right? With Nick? Right? And

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 2>let me remind you guys, I love to travel. Whether

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm heading out for work or vacation, or maybe just

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>want to drop into Kansas City to see a game,

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm always looking for the best places to stay, and

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 2>that's why I turn to Airbnb. Anytime I stay at

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 2>an Airbnb, I'm reminded how great of an idea it

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 2>is to airbnb your home while you're away. Maybe yourself

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 2>have stayed in Airbnb before and thought, hey, you know what,

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I could easily turn my space into an Airbnb. Now

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 2>that football season is back, lots of fans will be

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 2>traveling to catch a game. You could airbnb your home

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 2>or extra room and make some extra money while people

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:42.359
<v Speaker 2>are in town for the game. Whether you use that

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.959
<v Speaker 2>money for tickets to go cheer on your favorite team

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 2>or something else. Entirely, your home might be worth more

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 2>than you think. Your home might be worth more than

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 2>anything with airbnb demands. Before we get back to the show,

0:44:56.040 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I surprisingly I didn't realize it it, but I a

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 2>clip from this show went like semi viral with the

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Swifties in a negative way because they're very mad that

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 2>they think I'm writing off Travis Kelcey, and I think

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 2>that it is a misunderstanding of what I think is

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 2>a smart use of the oldest skilled position player in

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>the league by far. And when I say the oldest

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 2>by far, like don't I don't think people also understand

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:45.359
<v Speaker 2>that the spot we're in with Kelsey, the only guy

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.919
<v Speaker 2>close to his age is Adam theln and what happened

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 2>to Adam Thielen this week. By the way, Adam Feeling

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 2>had an unbelievable catch, but he had to all out

0:45:56.160 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 2>sprint for it and ended up, instead of celebrating touchdown,

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 2>holding his hamstring because thirty four year old wide receiver

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 2>is just not a thing, really. And Travis Kelcey, as

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 2>we've discussed, is the same age as Gronk, who retired

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 2>for the first time six years ago. Gronk, if Travis

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 2>kelce in a month is going to be playing the Bills,

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Gronk in a month is going to be enjoying the

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 2>second year of his second retirement, playing poker with me

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:35.919
<v Speaker 2>in Vegas the like. And so this is this, This

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.840
<v Speaker 2>is what we're dealing with here. And so when I

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 2>said I think he has six to ten excellent games

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:50.359
<v Speaker 2>left in him, the point that I am making is

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 2>not that he has six to ten games left in him.

0:46:53.920 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 2>It's that Kelsey doing what he did in the playoffs

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 2>was to me not a coincidence that it was the playoffs,

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Meaning last year he didn't have many huge games and

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 2>then went four for four in kicking ass in the playoffs.

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I think what it takes to get his body ready

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 2>and to perform at that level for three and a

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 2>half hours consistently is something he flatley cannot do every

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 2>week anymore. It's why guys don't play this position at

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 2>this age hardly ever, And so I think that they

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 2>are and he is not like running on a governor

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 2>right now, because I also think he might want to

0:47:56.360 --> 0:48:01.879
<v Speaker 2>play not just this year but one year. So if

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 2>he has two years left, then he should, you know, theoretically,

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 2>he absolutely should be judicious with how often he hits

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the accelerator to the floor. And it's not a bad

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 2>thing for the Chiefs early on in a season to

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 2>figure out how not to be so Kelsey reliant. And

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>so I don't think it's a bad thing. And I

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's surprising that this is where Travis is

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 2>where I still in the playoffs, he was the best

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 2>weapon in football. That was a few months ago. I

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 2>don't think he has drastically changed his caliber as a

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 2>player from a few months ago. I think he is

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 2>just ramping up to that and I think that's the

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 2>smart thing to do. All right. Next, let's go to

0:48:59.040 --> 0:48:59.720
<v Speaker 2>our next topic.

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Things are not looking too hot for your NFC pick

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 3>and Caleb Williams. Meanwhile, Justin Fields is undefeated over there

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 3>in Pittsburgh. So who's the most to blame for what's

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 3>happening in Chicago? Caleb, the coaching staff or Nick right

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 3>for Poland on the pressure saying they're going to go

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:17.760
<v Speaker 3>to the Super Bowl.

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, it's the pressure things nonsense. Right now, Caleb's

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:28.280
<v Speaker 2>gotten markedly better in each game I thought he'd played.

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought Week three was a super promising rookie performance.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Obviously wasn't what Jaden Daniels did last night, but meaning

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:42.280
<v Speaker 2>he made some big time throws. He finally had statistically

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 2>a big time game. He hung tough in the pocket,

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>also made a couple terrible mistakes, and that's kind of

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 2>what you expect early on for a rookie. Right now,

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I you want to put the first two weeks. They

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 2>won Week one, but Caleb was awful. Week two they

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:05.319
<v Speaker 2>could have won, but he wasn't that good. Week three.

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 2>The mistakes, yes, listen. He made one terrible pick down

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the sideline trying to do too much. The other one

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 2>he got a little unlucky on the strip. Sack. Gotta

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 2>have more awareness. Also, just a whift block by the

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 2>tight end on the d end, but the Bears not

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 2>being able to run the ball on the Colts, who

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 2>were giving up two hundred and forty yards per game

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 2>rushing is absolutely categorically insane, and the Bears right now

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 2>offensive play designing coaching staff is driving me nuts. They

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 2>were doing at the goal line running a speed option

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 2>like all of that that the offensive coaching for the

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Bears and the lack of a running game in this

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 2>last game against the Colts is an abomination. The defense

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:57.239
<v Speaker 2>has been awesome. Caleb has been not quite as good

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 2>as I thought he would be initially, but he's been fine.

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 2>My Bears belief was that early in the year they

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 2>had a super soft schedule, Caleb could go through his

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:11.760
<v Speaker 2>struggles early get better and better and better. My hope though,

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 2>was that through three weeks they'd be two to one,

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that they'd beat the Titans, and that they'd beat the Colts,

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 2>probably lose in Houston. Losing this Colts game is painful

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 2>and it means they've got to steal one back. I'm

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:30.720
<v Speaker 2>if people though, again, if people right now the stocks

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:32.840
<v Speaker 2>at a bit of a low, want to sell me

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 2>some more. Caleb Williams Stock. I'll take it. He went

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 2>from like seventy yards passing to one hundred and twenty

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 2>yards passing to three hundred and sixty yards passing. It's

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 2>exponential growth. So I'm okay with where Caleb is at,

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 2>but I the offensive line and the offensive coaching has

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:54.800
<v Speaker 2>been highly problematic. All right, let's go to all inn.

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Fold today or we are going to play all in

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 3>her fold. First off, little Steelers situation over here, with

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Russell Wilson still injured, Justin Fields is taking QB one

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 3>reins in Pittsburgh and doesn't look like he's going to

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 3>be giving that job back. All interfold, Fields leads Pittsburgh

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 3>to the playoffs.

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I know this isn't the game, but

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:24.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I'm I'm gonna do neither the So I'm

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:28.440
<v Speaker 2>certainly not all in on him leading them to the playoffs,

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 2>but I think right now it's a coin flip. Now.

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I do think he's going to be their quarterback the

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 2>rest of the year. I do think that, and the

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Steelers defense is awesome. So if I had to pick

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a side right now, I would say, yeah, they make it. However,

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you know what I don't know if that's the case,

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that I feel that.

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Way, not the faith in Cincinnati, but Pittsburgh is just

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:56.879
<v Speaker 3>not going to the right.

0:52:57.080 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 2>No, that's just what I was about to say, though,

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:03.799
<v Speaker 2>the well, I don't even know if it. No, I

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 2>bet the I mean. So, here's what's weird. Vegas believes

0:53:08.520 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 2>in Cincinnati more is a super Bowl team than Pittsburgh.

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 2>But I'm guessing they have Pittsburgh better playoff odds. I'm

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 2>gonna check right now. Pittsburgh to make the playoffs is

0:53:17.880 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 2>minus one forty. Cincinnati to make the playoffs is plus

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 2>one twenty two. So those two things might sound incongruous

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to you, so let me just explain it. Vegas thinks

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 2>it's more likely that Pittsburgh is a playoff team, but

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 2>not by a ton. But they also clearly believe if

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati makes the playoffs, they are way more likely to

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 2>be a viable contender than Pittsburgh is. So that's how

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 2>a team that has somewhat significantly worse odds to make

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs has better odds to win the actual Super Bowl.

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 2>But that is my problem, Demond s. I don't think

0:53:57.120 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 2>three AFC North teams are making the playoffs. They did

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:04.240
<v Speaker 2>last year. I understand. I don't think that's happening again,

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 2>So that doesn't happen again. Baltimore, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh. Even though

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh's three and zero and the other teams are combined

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 2>one and five, I still don't know how I feel

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:17.960
<v Speaker 2>about Pittsburgh being able to hold on. I do think

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Field's gonna be able to hold onto the job. All right, next,

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 3>The Anthony Richardson experience is not for the faint of heart,

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 3>but hey, he was still good enough to be Caleb Williams.

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 3>His potential is there, but he's completing under fifty percent

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 3>of his passes at the moment. All in her fold,

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Richardson is a quarterback.

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 2>One no, he is a starting quarterback in this league.

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm all in on that. But here's the thing. This

0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:47.319
<v Speaker 2>is his rookie year. I know it's not, but it is.

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 2>He played two and a half games the equivalent of

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 2>two and a half games last year. His raw physical

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:58.120
<v Speaker 2>talent is so remarkable that you're just gonna have to

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:01.320
<v Speaker 2>deal with at least this season and the growing pains

0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 2>of can he become an accurate quarterback? The pick he

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 2>threw in the end zone was egregious. He has made

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 2>some terrible decisions and his accuracy is awful. But you

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 2>don't draft a guy in the top five, you know

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, and not give him at least two

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 2>seasons unless it's Bryce Young level bat. And so I mean,

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not Trey Lance is a different example, because no,

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're right they. I mean Trey Lance. They

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 2>sat his first year, then his secondary broke his leg,

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know what I mean, So he was in

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 2>a different and they and they had their quarterback, So

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 2>you're right, Trey Lance. They did do it too, but

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:48.799
<v Speaker 2>the culture not in the spot where it's like, right,

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Richardson got hurt, but they don't. Right. They had a

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 2>chance to come back. And Richardson also had more college

0:55:58.040 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 2>not a lot more, but more college tape than Tray

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:03.319
<v Speaker 2>and at least he played D one. Trey is kind

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:07.240
<v Speaker 2>of an outlier situation. And there's nobody. There's no brock

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Purty in Indianapolis, all right.

0:56:10.560 --> 0:56:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Next, the three no Vikings face the twol one Packers,

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 3>who have been led by Sam Darnold and Malik Willis

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:19.760
<v Speaker 3>all in her foal of the floor or O'Connell wins

0:56:19.800 --> 0:56:20.479
<v Speaker 3>Coach of the Year.

0:56:23.960 --> 0:56:31.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh I like that. I'm let me think, trying to

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:34.960
<v Speaker 2>think of the other possible contenders. Dan Quinn all of

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:38.280
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, a sneaky contender depending on what Washington does.

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Mike McDonald and Mike Tomlin sneaky contenders. Oh my god,

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Big Bob Slas fourteen to one. I will not be

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 2>placing that bet, but I listen. The spirit of the

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:58.239
<v Speaker 2>question is, I think Laflor and O'Connell have done a

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 2>remarkable job so well. I that's you know. I think

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:04.920
<v Speaker 2>they have both done spectacular jobs. All right.

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Next, everyone is busy all off season talking about the

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Rams and Niners. But Seattle is undefeated in Arizona. Arizona

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 3>looks pretty solid all in our fall. San Francisco wins

0:57:15.040 --> 0:57:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the NFC West.

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure there's still the favorites for it. Looking at

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 2>it right now, let me see, Yeah, they are. They're

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 2>there even money. Seattle's two to one, Arizona five to one,

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the Rams eight to one. Uh, Seattle's good. I I

0:57:39.080 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think some of what we've seen from

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Seattle is good coaching. Gino's played great, some of it

0:57:46.880 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 2>is Broncos, Patriots, Dolphins, that's the three teams they've played.

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. The injuries are just mounting and mounting and mounting,

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:58.479
<v Speaker 2>and the Niners are The Rams were the one team

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:01.439
<v Speaker 2>more injured, and the Rams just stole a victory from him.

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not on party. Party played very well in that game.

0:58:05.600 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 2>That was an egregious loss, a truly horrifying loss for

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. There's still probably the smart money bet to

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:18.480
<v Speaker 2>win the division, but it's not a bet I would make.

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, last.

0:58:20.600 --> 0:58:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Andy Dalton led the Panthers to a row win against

0:58:23.760 --> 0:58:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders, and apparently teams have already started asking a

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 3>trade for Bryce Young. All interfold. Bryce can thrive elsewhere fould.

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to pile on the kid, but no,

0:58:35.240 --> 0:58:38.480
<v Speaker 2>he's not gonna thrive. He doesn't have NFL traits. And

0:58:38.520 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I've said it. I should have taken this question out

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 2>because I feel mean, he doesn't have NFL traits. I

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 2>don't blame him, it's not his fault, but he just doesn't.

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I hope he can catch on somewhere as a backup,

0:58:50.160 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 2>but he's not an NFL starting quarterback. He's just not

0:58:52.960 --> 0:59:01.080
<v Speaker 2>quick break right back with listener questions what's right? All right,

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 2>let's get to the listener questions.

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Joe Schmoe says, Trevor Lawrence should should henceforth be known

0:59:06.160 --> 0:59:10.640
<v Speaker 3>as the squire. He's been demoted until further notice. Maybe reag.

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh reek, Wow, that's a good pull. Next, it's not

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:16.200
<v Speaker 2>even a.

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Question, Nick, Nick Adams honest question? Why was Joe Burrow?

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Why has Joe Burrow gotten so much more benefit of

0:59:26.400 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the doubt than Jalen Hurts. Their resumes are very similar.

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Burrow is very good, but outside of one season is

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 3>not equated to winning.

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Well by If by outside of one season you mean

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 2>two seasons, it's a good take. I mean it's two seasons.

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 2>He went to a Super Bowl and then he went

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 2>to an AFC Championship game. A year they won twelve

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:52.479
<v Speaker 2>or thirteen games. So yeah, if Joe Jalen has one

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:56.440
<v Speaker 2>excellent season, Joe has two excellent seasons. So that might

0:59:56.440 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 2>not seem like a lot more. But it's double. And

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 2>it also, I think, is the fact what tomans I

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 2>mean it is it's double, it's twice as many. I mean,

1:00:10.040 --> 1:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>it's the difference between one and two is significantly more

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>than the difference between eight and nine, Like I understand,

1:00:19.400 --> 1:00:22.240
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well, it's actually just one more than the other. Yeah,

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>but comparatively speaking, it is significantly ratio. Also the yeah,

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>yes correct. Also the fact that I think Burrow was

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a far far better college player and the number one

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>pick the draft vers the second round pick certainly helps him.

1:00:39.680 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Next, Justin Jones says, I bet the over six and

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:47.920
<v Speaker 3>a half on games Taylor Swift attends she's already been

1:00:47.960 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>to two. If they make the playoffs, I win that

1:00:50.440 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>bet for sure.

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean I think she's gonna probably go to

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>almost all the home games, so I yeah, I think

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>that's a she will go to. And if they make

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, the hell are you talking about? Are they

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>going to cancel the playoffs this year? She'll go to

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>all the playoff games? And so yeah, that's a smart bet.

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Next, JS, which teams do you think Sanders will have

1:01:13.040 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the most impact on? And which do you think he

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>would be the and which do you think would be

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 3>the best for it?

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh? I mean I'd like to see him on the Giants.

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I assume we're talking about Shoodo or Sanders. I listen,

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that, I love I don't know that

1:01:29.160 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I love him as a super high first round pick.

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:35.919
<v Speaker 2>But if that's the implication of the question, I would

1:01:35.960 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>say the Giants next Nick.

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Uh No, sorry, Christian, Christian lazo or Laiso Nicks start

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 3>bench cut Purdy, Trevor and Richardson.

1:01:48.120 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Start bench cut Purdy, Trevor and Richardson. No, I won't.

1:01:51.880 --> 1:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I won't play that game. I actually won't play that

1:01:54.200 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>game today. That is too mean. And you guys are

1:01:57.440 --> 1:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>going to force my I mean, I mean they were

1:01:59.480 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>answer is you start bench Trevor and you cut Richardson

1:02:03.440 --> 1:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>is the right answer right now. But I don't want

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the that's that's I don't want to participate in that. Next.

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Uh, Demon's Are you playing intramule basketball at school or

1:02:14.560 --> 1:02:17.920
<v Speaker 3>in your rec league basketball this season? If so, how

1:02:18.040 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 3>is your team? No? I just played straight pick up

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>at the gym.

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Random to play pick up again?

1:02:26.120 --> 1:02:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Very well?

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Really wow? I mean rearkable achilles tendon recovery.

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thousand, it does not at all. If anything, the

1:02:40.640 --> 1:02:43.800
<v Speaker 3>ankle that I broke my ankle on like two years

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:46.360
<v Speaker 3>ago gives me fits like it tightens up. But no,

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 3>my achilles feels good.

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm playing the other leg.

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's my right foot, and I tore my

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 3>achilles on the left.

1:02:55.040 --> 1:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen someone so you tore your achilles.

1:02:58.840 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>In January, like January twenty six.

1:03:00.800 --> 1:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Or long like that, Okay, in January of this year. Yeah,

1:03:06.280 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and you're and you can play a ball for the

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 2>last month and a.

1:03:09.120 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Half, probably like two and a half months, to be honest,

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>like two months.

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome, man, that makes me so happy. That also

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 2>is the second I mean again, knock on wood, and

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, I believe you're gonna stay healthy. But that's

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the second significant injury that an initial opinion from a

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>doctor was surgery. A second opinion from a doctor was

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:38.919
<v Speaker 2>don't have surgery. That I think you're definitively glad you

1:03:39.000 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 2>did not have the surgery.

1:03:40.760 --> 1:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Thanks, No, there's no way. I played basketball ago two

1:03:45.320 --> 1:03:47.360
<v Speaker 3>months ago, I five five? I again the surgery.

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>No are you kidding me? No? I mean the only

1:03:51.720 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers can play competitive sports A couple months after

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>achilles surgery. You ain't him, man, you're not listening to

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>dolphin videos. He good show, good job. That makes me

1:04:01.920 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 2>so happy. Demnse call your mother, all right, talk to

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>you guys later. I'll see you on Colin, I'll see

1:04:06.320 --> 1:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>you on the show. See you guys. What's right? Hey,

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>thanks for watching. If you're still here, do me a favor.

1:04:12.960 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Hit the subscribe button, then hit the bell so you

1:04:15.560 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>can be notified when we have new episodes. After you've

1:04:19.040 --> 1:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>done that, one more favor, go to your favorite audio

1:04:21.640 --> 1:04:25.440
<v Speaker 2>platform of choice and subscribe there as well. Don't forget.

1:04:25.760 --> 1:04:29.760
<v Speaker 2>We're live every Tuesday and Thursday ten thirty am Eastern

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Ish ten thirty five, ten forty. It sometimes changes, but

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that's why you hit the bell. You hit the bell

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>so you're notified. You subscribe so we can get to

1:04:38.880 --> 1:04:41.760
<v Speaker 2>two hundred thousand followers. We're right around one hundred and

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:44.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand. We'd love to get to two hundred thousand.

1:04:44.200 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Get de Monday another plaque, so like subscribe rate, send

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a rating to do all that cool stuff. Thanks guys,