WEBVTT - Steven Wilson

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bath West That's Podcast.

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>My guest today is artist remixer All Around That Pool

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>musician Stephen Wilson. Stephen, Hello, Hello, Hello, Hello. Okay, you

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>just put out a new album, Future Baites. What motivate

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you to make new music today? Well, you know, I'm

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of one of those people that years and

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>years and years and years and years ago when I

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>was when I was a kid, when I was a teenager,

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>fell in love with the idea that I could make records,

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and for me it was a magical thing and a

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gift to be able to do that professionally. So I've

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>made it my business to make rather a lot of them. Actually,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm slowing down a bit. There was three years between

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this album and the preceding one, which is almost unheard

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for me. But as an excuse, I did get married

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Eden and acquire a family in the meantime, so that

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of slowed me down a little bit. Yeah, No,

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've I've just you know, I've just been

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in love with the idea of making records ever since

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>I can remember, even before I knew what things like

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>producer lyrics, you know, even what those words I was

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>reading on record sleeves, even before I knew what they meant,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of subconsciously and intuitively knew that's what I

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to end up doing, and that's what I've

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>dedicated my life to doing. Okay, you have this new album,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Future Baits. What was the inspiration for that? So

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a couple of years ago, and and really

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the future bias. There's a couple of

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>themes go on on the record. One I guess that

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the dominant theme is about how sense of self and

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>identity have changed in the Internet era. So the idea

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that we now, well, let's just say that before the Internet,

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we used to look out as a species. We used

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to look out at the stars. We used to look

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>out the world with incredible curiosity. Now we spend most

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of our time gazing at a little screen to see

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>how many likes, how many comments, how many views, etcetera, etcetera.

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that now we see ourselves pretty much

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>reflected back in the mirror of social media, and how

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that has affected us as a species, how that has

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>affected the course of human evolution, because I really believe

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't quite severely. So the album deals with a

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the kind of issues spinning off from that

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>new era, I guess of what I call the new

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>era of narcissism. Okay, you said you wrote it a

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. Yeah, So what was the interim about. Well,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>right here in the UK about two eighteen, we were

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>going through this hideous thing called Brexit. In fact, we're

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>still going through it. It was a very very depressing time. Um.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of, you know, seeing on social media

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the increasing polarization of people, you know, the belligerents, what

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I call the politics of hate really coming to the

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>fore that that whole thing brought out some of the

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>worst aspects of humanity, seemed to me. And we were

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>also in the middle of the Trump administration, so ditto

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to that really, So I you know, I I think

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt for the first time in my life, I

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really looked looking forward to the future particularly, and

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of course, low and behold, just as I finished the album,

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>along comes the pandemic and it's become even more sadly

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and ironically, it's become even more relevant and even more topical. Okay,

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear, you wrote it was there an

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>interim between writing it and recording it, or you just

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>held the album back because of the pandemic. Yes, so

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the album is finished last January, so it's just before

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic came along. It was being scheduled for release,

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and then of course as soon as it kicked in,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we pulled it and and now it's just come out. Okay.

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But in your particular case, because most people will hold

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>albums back, it's primarily because they want to associate the

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>release with the tour. You have a very dedicated fian base.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you find that the were maximize's consumption or use

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>some more tickets if there's everything happening at the same time,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the thinking there, Yeah, for sure. Ideally right now

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I would be on tour, I would be doing record

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>store signings, I'll be doing TV appearances, whatever I can

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>do to to kind of bolster up the you know,

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the record, But I can't do any of that, So ironically,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm left with the only thing I can do to

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>promote this record is social media and making videos and

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>posting that sort of stuff online so I can reach

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>my fan base that way. Um, I think the idea

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of originally of postponing the album wasn't necessarily to do

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>with touring. It was more to do with I wasn't

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sure when the pandemic first kicked in, and when Lockdown

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>first kicked in, I wasn't sure if it was the

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>right time to release a record that was essentially about

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the dystopian world that we lived in. And I'm still

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not sure that the truth is, I'm still not sure,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't want to hang onto it any longer.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I felt like a year was already more than enough,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, to hold it back. Well, the historically there

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have been great dysturpian records. Are do you feel that

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you're a pioneer of the twenty century or is anybody

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>else carrying the flag with you? I don't know. I

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think there's lots of people. Certainly there's going to be

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of people writing songs about, you know, what the

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>human race is going through right now. I've no I've

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>no doubt there already are many records that have been

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>released in the last few months that deal with that.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 1>The difference for me, I suppose, is I have a

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>commitment and a dedication to the idea of the album

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>as a continuum, as a journey as a kind of

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>analogist with a film or a short story. I love that.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I love people. I love the idea of people sitting

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>down and listening to a record in the way in

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the same way they would engage with a movie from

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>beginning to end. You wouldn't just watch a scene of

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie in the middle, would you. You'd watch it

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>from beginning to end. So that kind of art of listening,

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>which I think is definitely being what has been and

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is continuing to be compromised and eroded by what they

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>called playlist culture, um is you know, I I do

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>find myself kind of unusual in that respect. I'm sure

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the only one, but I don't think there

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>are many of us left committed to that idea of

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the album as a continuum. And that comes from from way,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>way way back when I used to listen to my dad,

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing Dark Side of the Moon and my

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>mom playing the classic Dona Summer Georgia Moroda records. Just

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, if you know, many of those have, like

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>this sidelong, what I would call disco symphonies. So I

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>was just completely in love with the idea that you

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that music didn't have to be about the three minute

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>pop form. It could be something much more sophisticated, much

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>more in the long form in that sense. So I'm

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>still committed to that idea. I find it hard to

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>let go of that, even though I know it's kind

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of an old fashioned idea in the age of Spotify,

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>streaming and playlist culture. But I have it. As you said,

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a very dedicated fan base, so I know

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>there is still people out there that feel that way too. Okay,

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>de fire, what you mean by playless culture? Well, so

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>these days people aren't interested in albums, They're interested in songs. Okay,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So rather than somebody actually listening to a song they

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>really like, hearing a song they really like on the

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>radio or you know, on YouTube or whatever it is,

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and saying, wow, I love that song, I want to

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>find out what else that artist has done and listened

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to that too. People don't tend to do And obviously

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm generalizing here, but I think a lot of people

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>now they don't have that mentality. Uh, it's the song,

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that's all they're interested in. They don't care what the

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>what the rest of the albums like. They're not interested

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in in what else that artist might have done. And

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that's completely anathema to me, because I grew up being

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by the cult of personality. So I would get

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>into an artist and immediately I fell in love with

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the song. I wanted to hear the record. Not only

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to hear the record, I wanted to hear

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>all the other records in that artist catalog. I wanted

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand the trajectory of that artist's career, the bad stuff,

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the good stuff, the amazing stuff, they're not so good

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff that fails. I was fascinating with all of that.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that's true a lot of perhaps

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the younger generation of listeners now, they just like a song.

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>They're not interested in finding out much more about the artists.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>They're not interested in hearing the album. They're not interesting,

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly not interested in here, you know, in being you know,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>familiarizing themselves with the whole catalog of a particular artist.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what I mean by playlist culture. Okay, what do

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you view the general landscape of music today? Being the

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>way I always say, you know, I grew up in

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the air sixties and seventies, where music drove the culture.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>There was faltering with corporate rock and disco. At the

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>end of seventy nine, there was another injection as a

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>result of MTV. Music is still very influential. But I

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to answer the question for you. But today's

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>things have changed. How do you view the landscape of

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>music today? Are you optimistic pessimistic? Two things need to change?

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Will there be an evolution? Yeah? All of the above. Really,

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I think it's true to say

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>there's more music coming into the world than any other

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>time in history right now. It's crazy. I mean the

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of songs. I think Spotify get some like ten

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>thoud new songs added every day or something crazy or week,

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I forget what it is. Anyway, it's a lot. Anyway,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of new music being made. And a

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>part of that, of course, is the democratited eight. Democratization

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of making music by the fact now that it's very

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>easy for anyone to buy a cheap piece of software,

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>put it on their laptop, and they can make music

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in a reasonably high quality. You know, um plug ins,

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>virtual instruments. Pre preset culture enables people to sound like

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>their favorite artists almost instantly, just by pressing the right

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>button or choosing the right option on their on their

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on their computer, laptop, on their laptop. So I think

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that's good that people are able to make music. Unfortunately, um,

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the downside of that is that most of that music

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that's being made is extraordinarily generic. And that also is

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a problem and a symptom of the preset culture. When

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy to sound like everyone else, that's what happens.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Everyone does sound like everyone else. So you don't have

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>those kind of um, you don't have that kind of

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>situation you have perhaps in the sixties and seventies, the eighties,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>even the nineties, where people had to find their own tone,

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>their own sound, their own personality because it wasn't easy

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to sound like anybody else. Um. So I think that's

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the downside of of the ease of accessibility of

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>now making music is that everyone pretty much sounds the

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>same as everyone else. I'm you know. But on the

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I'm I'm kind of talking mainly about rock

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>music here and I and I acknowledge the fact that

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I come from the tradition of rock and classic rock music.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what I grew up with. But there is a

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>new generation of music which does sound much more fresh

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and is much more contemporary, is much more innovative, which

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>has come out of electronic and urban music in the

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty one century, and I've been immersing myself up a

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit more in that world. I don't like it all,

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>but I'm fascinated by it because a lot of the

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>people that make it are kind of doing things that

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>rock musicians don't do. That it's kind of like they

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they don't know, they don't know the rules.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>They're not kind of burdened with that kind of legacy

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Beatles and led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd the

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>way I am and a lot of my musicians in

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>my generation are. They're not burdened by that, and they're

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>doing some extraordinary things. So I do feel, you know, um,

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that there is some really interesting music going on. I

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just don't feel it's coming from the you know, the

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of area that I came from, the classic rock background.

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It's there's nothing coming from that background that that kind

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of interests me these days. What are the rules that

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>these young people are breaking because they don't have the

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>history that is burdening them. Well, one of them, for example,

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is just in terms of structure. They have no interest.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, you know, people like Kanye West, Billie Eilish,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Lamar, those kind of guys. They're they're the big

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>names that you know, you you might pick out pick

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>out of the current scene, but there's a lot of

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>other people doing it too. If you listen to the

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>music those guys make, there's no adherence to anything what

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>you might call a conventional song structure, and that fascinates

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>me because of course I've grown up with all of

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>those legacy artists understanding that the whole notion of introverse chorus,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>first chorus, middle eight chorus, you know, the classic kind

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of tim panale structure that are that are apparently a

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>great pop song has, although of course there's been exceptions

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to that, but these guys don't. They don't kind of

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>seem to care about that at all. And I like

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that because it makes the music unfolding more unpredictable ways,

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and in a way that reminds me that's like going

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>back to what, you know, what I was talking about

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, this idea the albums could take you on

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a journey, and part of the the appeal of that

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>was you didn't know what was coming next. You didn't

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>know what was coming next on a concept album, you

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what was coming next if a if a

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>song was ten minutes long. Um, So that adherence to

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>classic pop song structures seems to be disappearing and I

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of I kind of like that. I kind of

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>applaud that that that interests me certainly. Okay, you know,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of documentation that you have to

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>put the hook up close so that people don't skip

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the song. Is that something you think about when you're

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>making new music. No, I don't. You know, the only

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>thing I think about when I'm making new music is

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just getting myself excited about it. That's all I think about.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And I've I've had this question come up in you know,

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>various different forms. Do you think about your fans when

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you're making music? And I really don't. And it's an

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>incredibly selfish way to go about your career, But I

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that's what an artist is, that someone who's essentially

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>very selfish. You know, people talk about the music industry

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>as if it's one thing, and of course it's never

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>really been one thing. It's always been at least two things.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been the entertainment industry and the music in industry,

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's been a crossover. Of course, there has in

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>certain in the case of certain artists, but generally speaking,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe art is something that is made by people

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>who have this kind of vocation to do something which

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from their very being, and they have to be

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>true to themselves. And that's where we get to these

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>words like integrity, you know. And then there's the other

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>side of the business, which is, you know, the reality

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>TV side of the business and the very kind of

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>contrived modern pop side of the business making songs that

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>will fit a particular demographic fit on daytime radio that

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>basically look at what their audience want and try to

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>give it to them, or worse, look at what radio

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>produces want and streaming services want and try to give

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that to them. I'm actually incapable of doing that, and

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think anything, I think anyone that has integrity and

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>considers themselves to be an artist would also be largely

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>incapable of doing that too, because there's something about creation

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and being an artist and being a musician. I think

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that you means you have to kind of do what

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you do in a vacuum. So you're absolutely right. I

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that that whole thing about, you know, modern pop

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>music being almost a hundred percent about the lead vocal now,

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>no intro, no solos, no characters of the backing track

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>at all, just all about the lead vocal. And that

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>does sadden me a bit because you know, obviously I

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>grew up in listening to music where the music was

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>often as important, if not more important, than the top

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>line vocal melody. And what do you think about the

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>overuse of the elite drum sound and the lack of

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>melody in so much of today's current music. It's interesting,

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. How how rhythm has become so fundamentally important

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but more important than melody in modern pop. That's something

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously I don't particularly I mean, my album is still

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>incredibly melodic, and I worked very hard to make it um,

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, very strong melodically, as well as being hopefully

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>sophistication and having all the other stuff going on too.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, you listen to modern pop and it

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>seems that often the hooks are kind of the things

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that my kids were chanting the playground. That's about the

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>level of banality that a lot of the hooks have

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>almost like you know, playground chance, but it seems to

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>work for them. And then the music is, as you say,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of it's all about the rhythm and

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the base. There's not a lot of

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what you might call harmonic movement in in modern pop

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>music with you know. Again, with some exceptions, Taylor Swift

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>writes great melodies, for example, great great harmonic shifts in

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>her music, but a lot a lot of the modern

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>urban R and B artists now are just basically creating

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a rhythm track and then playground chance over the top.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me, Okay, you're blowing my mind. I

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have seen Porcupine Tree, granted that you know, seventeen or

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years ago, and I certainly have followed your career

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and I see your picture associated with different certain works

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that you've done. You always seems so serious. I'm talking

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to you now. Not only can you talk fluidly, you're

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>so are you date? Where the hell did all this

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>come from? Um? Well, I'm very you know, I'm very

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a student of music. I've always been a nerd

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>um and I've always been very passionate about music. And

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the history of music. And I've talked a lot about

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it by b over the ears, you know. I mean,

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>I even have my own podcasts and you have my

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>own podcast where I just basically argue with my friend

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about about albums. It's called the Album Years, and we

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>pick a year and we basically just argue about what

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>our favorite records are. So I've had a bit of

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>practice at this. Um. You know, it's not only being

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>able to talk fluidly. You know, there's an ability to

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>analyze in the society where analysis is tertiary. If it's

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there and all, let's go back to the beginning. So

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>where did you grow up? I grew up just outside,

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>just outside of London, a place called Hamma Hampstead. Okay,

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 1>And what did your parents do for a living? So

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>my parents was an electronic engineer and my mother worked

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in the local bank. So there was no there were

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>before you asked the question, there was no sort of

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>history of music in my family. How many kids in

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the family. So I have one brother who's a couple

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of years younger than me, who again has nothing to do,

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with music. He has a proper job.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>But I I think my parents, Um, As I kind

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of alluded to earlier, my parents were certainly responsible for

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>me falling in love with music because they kind of

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>brainwashed me, you know, when I was too young to

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>even understand in a good way. I mean, when I

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>was too young to even understand what I was hearing.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>They were playing great records and I would hear them

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on repeat. You know, the soundtrack to Saturday Night Fever,

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Abbot's Greatest Hits, Dark Side of the Moon, Tubla Bells,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Frank Sinatra, these great records, and I was brainwashed.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 1>And still I feel like those records I heard as

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a kid when my parents played them are still very

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>much the foundation of my of my musical DNA. But

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>ever since then, i've i think partly also because of

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>my parents and the kind of eclecticism of what they

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>listened to. I've never really recognized this idea of genre.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And I know people associate with me with with a

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>genre particular one. It's never one I described myself as

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>being a part of. I don't describe myself as being

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>generic in any way. I have no interest in being generic,

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and I've always been very much a fan of that

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>idea of listening, you know, across genres, being curious about

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>everything that's out there. And I think again that was

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>because of the music my parents listened to. And how

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>much formal education have you had? I left school at eighteen.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I did. I did my what in England was my

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>O levels and then my A levels. I didn't go

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to university because I already knew what I wanted to do.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Um much to my parents dismay, I I kind of

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was set already on actually what I wanted to do.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I would say, probably from the age of about thirteen

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>or fourteen. And did you go to regular public school?

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that these words in different meaning in the UK,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but you did not go to a private, elite school. No.

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I went to a very regular grammar school. In fact,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a sports It was called a sports college,

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>which is just a fancy way of saying that they

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the emphasis in the syllabus was more on sport than

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it was on the arts. So I had everything stacked

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>against me in that respect. I didn't really have any

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>proper music education even at school, so everything was kind

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of self taught. But it was all from listening, just

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>being curious and listening. It's as much music as I

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>could get my hands on. Okay, so you were listening.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>At what point did you start playing? I think almost

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as soon as as soon as I realized that I

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was in love with this notion of making records. I

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>mean just that, just the whole thing of being able

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to hold something in my hand and say that I

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>did it. That was my ambition, you know, just to

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hold a record in my hand, and we're talking about

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>good old fashioned vinyl records here. To be able to

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hold one of those things in my hand and say

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this is my record. That was my That was my

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>dream and ambition from twelve thirteen. So I my parents

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>did send me to guitar and piano lessons, and I

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>hated it because I wasn't interested in being um. I

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.959
<v Speaker 1>wasn't interested in learning repertoire. I still to this day,

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't play anybody else's music. If you give me

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a guitar and say play me something, I know, I

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't play anything. I could only play my music. And

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>so my my guitar teacher would would be furious with

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>me because he'd sent me away with a bunch of

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>homework to do, to learn I don't know, Segovia piece

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or something, and I come back the next week and

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he'd say, if you learned the piece, and I say no,

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>but I've written my own and and that was that.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>That that that was basically what I was interested right

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, just being able to create and beat.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>My dad, being an electronic engineer. He built me stuff,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, that that I had no right to have

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>access to when I was a kid, you know, like

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a little multi track cassette record, which meant I could

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>start experimenting with overdubbing and ound on sound from a

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>very very early age. And but you know, and I

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>have to say, I was never interested in being a

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>singer a guitar player. What I was interested in was

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>making records. I didn't realize it at the time, but

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>what I'd kind of fallen in love with was the

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>idea of being the producer stroke or to you know,

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember having el O Records early on and looking

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>jeff Lyn, this guy does everything. That's what I want

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. He writes the songs, he produces, he plays guitar,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he sings. I'm going to be that guy. So those

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>those were the kind of inspirations to me. Those kind

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of people like Jeff Lynn now were you alone ranger,

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>or did you have friends who talked about this stuff

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>with that helped you in your formative era. Yeah, I

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of buddies at school that we formed.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>We formed our first bands together with m and also

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>had an interest in music. I had a very very

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>good friend of mine who had an older brother there

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>was about five years older than him, and actually that's

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>how I really became immersed in world of early seventies

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>conceptual rock music, because all the music that was happening

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when I was at school, when I was at secondary

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>school or high school as you call it in the States,

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was you know, post punk, uh, sort of the early

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of new romantic stuff, electronic early electronic stuff like

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Gary Human and New Order. That was what with the

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>kids were listening to a school. But my best friend

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Mark had this older brother, Stewart, and he had this

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>record collection, so he kind of he wasn't interested in anymore,

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so we just kind of borrowed records from his collection,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's how I discovered things like Hawk, Winn, Camel,

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, all that early seventies conceptual rock stuff. So

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that was another big kind of watershed moment. I think

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>him in my childhood, because that's where I found I

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>had access to to this this form of music that

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>had only really happened, you know, ten years before, but

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>it was like it might have well has been a

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred years before. Because we're talking about the eighties here.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>No one talked about music from the early seven and teas,

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 1>at least in my in my particular area, it was

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>an althema, right, but not only prog rock everything, you know,

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>all of the musical genres that come out of the seventies,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's fusion music, you know, or the whole singer

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>songwriter tradition or progressive or whatever it was, if it

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>came from the seventies, no one listened to it, no

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>one talked about it, no one name checked it. So

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I was very lucky. I had this this friend of

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>mine with his big brother who had this amazing record collection,

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff by Aphrodite's Child, you know, which is

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>quite obscure you know at the time. I still is,

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess, you know. Anyway, So that that was a

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>really important factor I think as well in my in

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>my youth. Yeah, Okay, the obvious question, as an American

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>you're eight team, you leave school, what do you do

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>for money, So I ended up being very poor for

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a while. I did go and work for a computer

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>company for a couple of years, but I got out

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>of as soon as I could. And for about the

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>first ten years of my career, when when I had

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Porkepontry and No Man Commentary was still a solo project.

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>No Man was a duo I had with another singer guy,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and I did music for TV commercials. I basically got

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>by by doing music for TV commercials. But but that

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was that was good, and I didn't mind that, you

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>know why, because it meant I didn't have to even

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>entertain the idea of compromising the other stuff. I was

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>making money and I could do the other stuff without

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>having to think about I've got to make this work

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for me financially. And it didn't. It was a disaster,

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you know. Uh. Poukeuponary lost money for years. No Man likewise,

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't matter because I had this kind of

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>safety net of being able to do music for for

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>these TV things. I was okay, how did you get

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>those gigs? Again? I was very lucky. I had a

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine who happened to be um in an

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>advertising agency who came to me one day and said

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it was really funny. It would have been about and

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he came to me and said, we want we're doing

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this commercial for Lego and basically the production team want

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>hastiche of Metallica, Master of Puppets. And I said, hey,

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll have a go. I can do that. And I

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>did a really terrible, terrible version of Metallica Thrash Metal.

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>But luckily the production team were no wiser. They didn't

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>really know what they were talking about it, so they

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of it was really lame, but it kind of

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>convinced them, and I got my foot in the door,

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>and um and and so I started to get more

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and more work from agencies and and some of the

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff I did later on was was genuinely quite good.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 1>So I got a pretty good name for myself. Generally speaking,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>musicians who are not household names are incredible networkers. So

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at yourself, everybody's humble. Do you work

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the connections certainly back then, work on relationships, or really

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>somehow you blundered through when things came your way. I

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think the latter. Yeah, I'm not. I'm certainly not very

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>good at schmoozing and networking. Um, I think, you know, largely,

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I felt most of my here, I felt very much

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>out on a limb. I've never really been part of

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a scene. I'm not sure if I would have wanted

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to have been part of a scene. I mean, it's

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of be careful what you wish for in a way. Um.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's also been frustrating not being part of a scene,

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>because being part of a scene gives you a big

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>leg up, you know. I feel like most of my

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>career has been a little bit of a war of attrition,

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, particularly with the genre I was associated with,

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>being you know, persona non grat for most of the

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 1>nineties and most of the first ten years of this

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of this millennium too less so now I think it's

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kind of world of progressive rock, conceptual

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>rock is a little bit more accepted now, partly because

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the younger generation don't care about genre as

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>much as my generation did, which is another good thing

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>about about the way people engage with music these days.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>But for years, it was a struggle to get pressed,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it was a struggle to get radio play, um, and

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I felt like I would have been better off perhaps

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>being someone who was better or at networking and associating

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>with me, part with myself with part of the scene.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think part of the reason I never did

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is because I loved I love the music too much.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I loved the whole romantic notion of making music too much,

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>too to to kind of get into that mindset and

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.959
<v Speaker 1>more cynical mindset I guess you maybe need to get into.

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been very lucky the whole remixing things just fallen

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>into my lap two and I'm sure we're going to

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>come on, Yeah, let's see that. Because I got so

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you do this podcast? What years do you tend to cover?

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Were random? So so basically the idea was a very

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>good friend of mine, Tim Bones, so I've known for

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>more than thirty years, and basically whenever we get together,

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we'd just nerd off and argue about music. And at

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of Lockdown, I was looking for some things

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to do, you know, creatively, to fill the time that

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I suddenly had in my hand. And one of these

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas was let's do a podcast. And I said to him,

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>why don't we just take what we do, you know,

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>naturally on onto a podcast and see if people love it?

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is basically, we pick a year at random,

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and we then go and see what albums were released

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that year. And the first thing we do is we

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>throw out all the ones that we consider to be canon.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>So we don't talk about Sergeant. If we do seven,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about Sergeant Pepper, if we do three,

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about Dark Side of the Moon. There

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is nothing left to say about these albums. Nothing, So

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we deliberately pick ones that we think maybe people haven't

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>heard about. So give you an example. We did and

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Van Morrison's Common One as our favorite

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>album of that year, which isn't even an album that

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Van Morrison fans talk about very often, but for us

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like one of the all time classics and a

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>beloved album. So that gives you a kind of example

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of how we go about it. We're trying to introduce

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>people that listen to it, which a lot of them

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are my fans and Tim's fans, trying to introduce them

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps two albums that are not part of the cannon,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but we think are just as good as those albums.

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Would we ever picked a year from the twenty first century,

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't yet. We haven't yet, but we are going to.

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We've only done about twelve episodes so far. We've we've

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we've been back as far as sixty seven

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and as far forward as night So we've been relatively focused,

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the last thirty years or thirty thirty

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>five years of the twentieth century. At the moment, let's

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>jump into today's era. We have Van Morrison along ironically

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>with Eric Clapton making a anti lockdown songs. Is COVID

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Mutate and in you know, basically indeed the UK. How

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about that, and how do you feel

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about Brexit? Well, I mean, I think I think I

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned to you earlier on the Brexit for me was

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>something extremely depressing because it brought out it brought out

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>those extremes in in viewpoint, It made people ten times

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>more belligerent, ten times more polarized. It didn't seem like

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>there was any room for discussion or a gray area anymore.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And that was really what the future bias became about,

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and a lot of that I do lay

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the blame a lot a lot of that social media,

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's unfair to do that because of course the

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>technology itself is not to blame. It's about the way that,

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the human beings engaged with the technology that's

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the problem. How do I feel about Eric Clatton and

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Van Morrison writing anti what is it they're doing? They're

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of writing and and they're not saying that the

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>COVID is a conspiracy? Are they? They're not one of

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>those people that they're basically saying, Well, Van Morrison is

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>verging into that territory. But he's basically saying you the

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>lockdown as BS, you should open everything up. We should

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to tour, or we should be able to

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>go to restaurants, etcetera. Yeah, it's kind of pretty responsibility.

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the thing about Van Morrison is

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>if you really really take a long look at him

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>as a person, you probably wouldn't want to listen to

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>his music. And I think, you know, sometimes you just

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.239
<v Speaker 1>have to divorce the art from the artists, don't you,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And possibly that's the case with him. Yeah, Okay, let's

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>go back to the remixing things. So how did it

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>fall into your lap? So? I in about two thousand

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and two, I and my band Pokepine Tree, signed to

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>an American record label. We signed to Jason Flom's label,

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Lava through Atlantic, and it was a big thing for

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>us because it was the first time we'd signed directly

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to an American label, and we thought, you know, we thought,

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>oh great, we're gonna We're gonna crack America. Um and

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we didn't obviously crack America, but we had a couple

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 1>of let's let's stop there because I remember, you know,

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.239
<v Speaker 1>trains I liked on the first Lava record. Why do

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you think you did not crack America? Because what we listen,

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to blow my own trumpet, and I hate,

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I hate to do it, but I'm going to do

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it anyway. I think what we were doing was just

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too head of the curve. Basically, what

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.479
<v Speaker 1>we were doing in two thousand two, which has been

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>much imitated since, very flatteringly, but no one had done

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it at the time, was combining extremely heavy riffs with

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>classic singer songwriter with textual ambient music and a lot

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of sound design elements that you might associate with conceptual

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>rock music. And I don't think anyone had really done

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that before. There was a lot of you know, really

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>crushingly great heavy rock records around at that time, but

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have the kind of layering and the sophistication

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in the production that we were that we were doing,

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and for whatever reason, it just it was the classic

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>case of the record company couldn't figure out how to market.

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And I don't blame them. I'm not one of those

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>people that lays the blame always at the you know,

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the feet of the record company. Andy Carper was the

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>guys signed has worked so hard to try and get

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it off the ground. But the point is that people

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>just didn't really know what to do with us, didn't

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>quite get it. It was like, well, they're kind of

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>like a heavy pink Floyd, aren't they. What do we

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>do with that? You know? Um? And I think subsequently

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that sound became almost, you know, a genre in its

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>own right, and there's been lots of bands now have

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of imitated those early Porcupine Tree records and what

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of those would be. Well, there's they're not

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>massively successful bands, but there are there are a lot

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of bands. There's a label over here called case Scope

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Music who basically that's the sound of that label, and

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they have some bands that do quite good business, not

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>probably not in America, but that you know that it

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>became a kind of like a sound and a recipe

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in a combination that other other bands adopted and and

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those interesting things that in absentially the

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>album you talked about they had trains on. It sold

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing when it came out, but it now sells year

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in year out, It sells ten thou copies. Every year

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>it sells tenos. Okay, this begs a question. Those two

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Lava albums, were you happy with them? Yeah? Yeah, yeah,

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm really proud of Okay, so how did you fall

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>into the remixing? You made a deal with Lava, right, so,

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, we we've we've gone slightly off topic and

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we so basically we did those albums and one of

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the things that the record company came to us and

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>said they wanted to do as part of the trying

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>way to break because they thought, Okay, this band that

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they've got this kind of conceptual, layered production thing going on,

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's hook them up with DTS and we'll do a

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>five point one mix, and we'll hire Elliott Shina, this

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>legendary a legendary engineer to do the five point one mix.

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So cut along, story short, that's what happened. I'd never

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>heard music in five point one. I was completely ignorance

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of it. I've never heard it, but I said, I'm

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>going to book a studio in London. Send me over

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the mix I want to hear. I'm a control freak,

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. I'm not going to let somebody just mix

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the record put it out without me listening to it.

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>So I hired the studio in in in London, and

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Elliott sent the mix over and I went and listened

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>to it, and I hated it. I hated it not

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>because he's done a bad job. It sounded beautiful, but

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. It wasn't why. It wasn't the way I

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>would have done it, and it wasn't. It didn't sound

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>right to me. It didn't sound like ust to me. Okay,

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very very specifically, what was wrong? Do you know what?

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Bob is? So long ago I can't remember. I think

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I hated the way the drums sounded. There's too much

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>reverb on the drums or the guitars were to recess,

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>so literally it literally had to do with the sound

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of the instrument as opposed to how they were put in.

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>The varying for speakers also also this also this year.

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>The balance and the distribution of this. You know, it

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like I said, Elie, it was a you know,

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>master he'd done, he had done what he was doing

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>with it with his other acts. But for me, for

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, it didn't feel right for us. So I

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>said to the record label, I don't like this. I

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>want to go over there and sit with him and

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 1>just basically go through it, go through it with him

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know, sort of do it as a as

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a sort of co co mixing job. And that's what happened.

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I went over there. I flew over there, and I

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>spent a week sitting there with him while he rather

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>begrudgingly remixed the whole album, and we got something that

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we both were really happy with at the end of it. Anyway,

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's cut a long story short. While I was sitting

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>there listening to I was thinking, I can do this.

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>This is fantastic. I love this. I'm going to do

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all my records in it. So I got back and

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I put myself a little put a little five point

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>one system together in my in my own studio, and

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>from that point on I started to remix all the

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>records I was working on in five point one and

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Lo and Behold. Three or four years later, Fear of

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a Blank Planet, which is a couple of Porkeypine Try

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>albums down the line later gets a Grammy nomination for

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Best five point one Mix. Where where were How did

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you get that gig? What do you mean? What do

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you mean? How do you have a black pianot planet?

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You did not work on? No, no, no, not the

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Public Enemy album. No, this is Fear of a Blank Planet.

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a Poke Pine Try album. This is a

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Poke Pone Trey album that was kind of riffing off

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the Public Enemy title. Okay, I guess I was unaware

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. Okay, yeah, yeah, it was the altist. So

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two albums after an absentially the Pork Pantry album is

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>called Fear of a Blank Planet, So it was kind

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of a riff on the Fear of a Black Planet

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was a riff on the public everything. Anyway, that album

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>got a Grammy nomination for the Best five point one Mix,

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just out of the blue, I mean, and and somebody

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>rung me up one day and said, do you know

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you've been nominated for a Grammy for your for your

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>mixed of a Blame Planet? Anyway, So to cut another

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>long story short. My manager at that point started to

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>put out some feelers and say, I've got a guy.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>He's just been nominated for five point one mix. Do

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>you are you interested in having it? And one of

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the people that responded in a positive way was Robert

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Fripp and King Crimson, who I was a lifelong fan of. Anyway,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't completely sure, but he was interested, So I

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>did a couple of tracks on spect for him. He

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 1>came up, we played the two tracks to him and

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the first track he was jumping

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>up and down his chair and saying, We're going to

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>do the whole King Crimson catalog in five point one.

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So I started with the King Crimson Catalog. It was

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>very well received. One door led to another a little

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>bit slower, a little bit slower. So what year was

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the King Crimson remixes? Was two thousand nine. This was

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the story of in the Court of the Crimson King. Okay, now,

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. Most people would say five point

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one is a field format, not so much as S

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a c D. But it's really for a very small

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>percentage of people who have high level home theaters. So

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't the market appears to be small and dwindling.

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>From being inside the beast, what do you see are

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you talking about at that time? Are you talking about

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>right now? Because right now it's growing. Right now, it's growing.

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But you're absolutely right. In two thousand and nine, it

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>was dwindling, and part of the reason it was dwindling

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was because the record companies had given up putting out

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff from five point one. Now, what actually happened was

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that they put enormous in two thousand. In the early

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand's, they put an enormous amount of money into

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>getting stuff remixed into five point one. They were paying

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred thousand dollars to get pet sounds mixed

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>into five point one, you know, and a hundred and

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars to get room as mixed into five

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And then when and then with surprised when they only

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.959
<v Speaker 1>sold ten thousand units and they didn't make their money back. Now,

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>fast forward to two thousand seven and eight. There's not

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people putting our catalog in five point one.

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But the people that are doing it are making no

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>money from it. They're doing it as a labor of love.

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>And there is a small dedicated audience four five point

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>one that have been starved of catalog since the record

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>companies had spent so much money doing the early records

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that they basically completely pulled out. But I was a

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>champion for it, and I started remixing King Crimson, and

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 1>there weren't many other records coming out at five point one,

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but the ones that we were ravenously received by the

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>people that listened to it. And there was still a

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>category in the Grammys for multi channels surround sound mixing,

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>so it was actually relatively easy for me to get

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the nod the nomination because there wasn't a lot of competition.

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But people notice things. People notice things like Grammy nominations.

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So I started with Crimson and then I got invited

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to do Jethrow Tells Aqual Lung War. You're working with Fripp.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. The first album's results of having Gregg League

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>did pretty well commercially, then it became more of a

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>cult item. The obvious question is was that a labor

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of love? Did you make any money? How many copies

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of these how many copies of one of these albums

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>would sell? Um, Well, that's a difficult thing to quantify

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>because the fourti anniversary editions were CD DVD A combos,

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>so so that that's the trick. And that's another thing

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that's changed from those early years when record comans were

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>doing surround mixes. They're very rarely now released to stand alone.

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 1>They are considered to be extra value content. And I'm

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sure we'll come onto this, but nowadays surround mixes are

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>almost always added as a kind of extra to a

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 1>box set or a deluxe edition. Um. But in those days,

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>two tend the Crimson fourtieth anniversary editions were put out

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 1>as CD, DVD A combos and they did extremely well,

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely well, partly because I think it was coincided with

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the time when bands like King Crimson were being completely

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>rediscovered and reevaluated, particularly by mainstream media. And Robert will

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you that because he put out thirtieth anniversary editions

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of those albums around too about and they got no press,

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and the little press they did get was quite derogatory.

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>When the forty anniversary editions came out, five star reviews

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 1>right across the board, it was extraordinary. It was absolutely

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 1>even for albums that had never been part of the

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the core favorites of that band we're getting

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the most extraordinary reviews, and that band started to really

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>start to sell again, and of course that led to

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>him reforming King Crimson around that time too. Okay, let's

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>just talk at that particular time. You said, at first

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you did the five point one mixes at your home,

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and then when you were working with Fripp, did you

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>also do them, and what kind of equipment were you using,

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and what was the studio experience as you went further

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>into the project. So it was all done in the

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>digital domain. Basically, what would happen is the multi track tapes.

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is true. Pretty much every project have done,

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the multi track tapes gets sent to a professional tape

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>transfer facility where they baked the tapes and then they

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 1>transfer them to high resolution digital files. I get sent

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>those files, so I get raw multi track tapes, but

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as digitized files. So then part of it for me

0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is just kind of detective work seeing what's on the tapes,

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>making sure everything's there, and then essentially recreating the stereo

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.839
<v Speaker 1>as closely as possible before breaking out to five point one.

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And I do all that in Logic, the software called

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Logic Audio, and it's a very simple set up logic

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>audio basically going out to six self powered speakers, the

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>two at the front, the two at the back, the

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>one in the middle, and the sub the low frequency speaker.

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And that was based atally set up in my little

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 1>home studio. I have a proper studio now, but for

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>years because there's no money in it. No, they weren't

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>paying a lot of money to do any of this.

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding when I say it was a labor

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>love um and I was just having fun doing it,

0:44:15.080 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and learning a lot, learning a lot

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 1>by how those guys made those records. It was an education.

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 1>So making the album of the old days, yes, there

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>might even be multiple twenty four track machines. Then you

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>have twenty four track, then you mix it down to

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>two track, So we're in the process. Were your teeps

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>coming from all of the also send you the two track?

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>They send you the last version of the track, would

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>you actually get So I'm not interested in I'm not

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in the two track bounced down master. I'm interested

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in the raw multi track tapes. So the tapes where

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the guitar is isolated, the bass drum is isolated, the

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 1>vocals are isolated, the back in, etcetera, etcetera, and there's

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>no there's no usually no processing at it, so things

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like reverbs, compression EQ or any phaser of anything like

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that has to be reapplied to the mix um. So

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty much I'm very much working from from the

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>very raw source recordings upwards. Yeah, okay, Well this is

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to me because prior to your work, I was

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent against remixing the most egregious examples. Although

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a nice guy and a friend of mine, Jiles Martin,

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what they've done with the Beatles I just find horrific. Okay,

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it has changed the music, and I'm very fearful that

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>those will become the default products going forward. But when

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I first listened to your tall mixes, it sounded just

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like the original, just like with a lot of steel

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>wool scrubbed off, and you were closer. How could you

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.720
<v Speaker 1>do that without did you just know the material? Without

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>having the two tracks? How did you get so close

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to the finished product that had previously been released? Well,

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I do, obviously I do have the two tracks.

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I have the CD, I have the vinyl. So what

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm what I'm doing? So my work process is basically

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to load up the multi track tapes, and then alongside

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the multi track tapes is to load up the original

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>stereo mix. And then I'm literally on a pair of

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:21.839
<v Speaker 1>headphones listening in little five second chunks to the stereo mix,

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to the original stereo mix, and then my new mix,

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm hearing are okay, they've pushed the lead

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>guitar up a couple of dB there, so I'll do

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that now. My whole philosophy with this is the people

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that these mixes are aimed at, the people that these

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>reissues are aimed at, whether it's part of a box

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>set or it's part of a CD combo, as a

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>stand alone blue ray, whatever it is. The people that

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to listen to these products and buy these

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>products are people that probably have bought these albums at

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>least three times before. They bought the original vinyl when

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it came out, they bought the first CD edition, and

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they probably bought the deluxe CD with the extra disc

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>or the bonus tracks. Now you're a expecting them to

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>buy the deluxe hundred dollar plus box set with a

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>blue ray in it or a DVD in it with

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a five point one mix. So the point is that

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.760
<v Speaker 1>these people know the music probably better than the artist.

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And I say that advisedly because most of these artists

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't listened to their records for years, and I'm the same,

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't listen to my music. So Ian and Robert,

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, the two people we've talked about so far,

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>King Crimson and told they haven't listened to their records

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.799
<v Speaker 1>for years, and I find quite often I'm fighting them

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>to not change the music. So Robert will come in

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and say I never liked that bit, let's you raise it,

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm saying, you can't do that, Robert, you can't

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>do that because the people that listen have been listening

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to this record for sometimes for fifty years or forty

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 1>years or fifty years. It's like a bible to them.

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like a sacred text. So we can't change. And

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I've had these kind of fights with with some of them.

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean not fights, but it's a heated discussions with

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these guys. The worst was Greg Lake when

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I did an e LP album, Greg Lake come mean

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and saying bless him, you know, rest in peace and

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>all that, but coming in and saying we always played

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>that too, fast. Can you slow it down? I said,

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>well I can, but I'm not going to because I

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're missing the point. You know, this this was Tarkas.

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think you're missing the point Greg that

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this is not for you to to, you know, fix

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>things that you didn't like the way you played it

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>forty years ago. This is about creating a more immersive,

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional version that's essentially doesn't sound in a way,

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:33.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound different. But I can't remember what analogy you use.

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>You use, Bob, the steel wool one, but I mean,

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I always use the analogy. It's like cleaning the Sistine Chapel.

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like just taking off a layer of grime off

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>off of the Michael Angelo beneath, but you're not changing

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 1>anything about the art itself. So I'm very committed to

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea of recreating that stereum, all of those mixed

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>decisions that they made in nine or whenever it was

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>figuring out all of those mixed decisions and recreating them

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because fans don't want to hear any other way. Um,

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of a there's kind of a contradiction to

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>work here, which obviously the fact you're remixing in the

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>first place. It's going to sound a bit different. But

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a way to do it that it

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't jar. It doesn't sound like someone has tried to

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>reimagine the music, and I'm very, very against that. Okay,

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Is it just technology? How do you achieve a clearer

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.280
<v Speaker 1>version than the original? A lot of it is technology.

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I would love to take the credit. You know, I'm

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.800
<v Speaker 1>doing some incredible act of necromancy to make it sound better.

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Not really, um, it is the technology working with digital files,

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 1>not having to work with multiple generations of analog tape.

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example. In the Court of the

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Crimson King was actually recording on eight track, but it

0:49:56.440 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 1>was done in the old fashioned way of they would

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>record the band on eight tracks. They would bounce those

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>eight tracks down to two tracks on a second eight track.

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Then they would fill up the other six tracks on

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:09.959
<v Speaker 1>that tape with malotron. They would then bounce that down

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to two tracks on a third tape and fill up

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the six tracks with a vocal. They

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be Einstein to work out that. That

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 1>means that by that time the drums, guitar, and bass

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that were on the original reel our third generation analog

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>tape copies with all the attendant hiss and degradation of

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:31.800
<v Speaker 1>sound that that entails. So when I get those tapes,

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I go back to the original source reels and I

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>resynchronize all of what they call those slave reels. So

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm dealing for the very first time, the very first

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 1>time anyone has been able to mix that album from

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>first generation copies of the drums, bass and guitar, and that,

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:52.959
<v Speaker 1>by definition, gives you more clarity. Less tape is less

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>harmonic distortion. Now, I say that with the caveat that

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:59.560
<v Speaker 1>some people like all that ship and one of the

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>complaint it's I have had, and I completely acknowledge it,

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 1>is that some people don't like the fact that the

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>music sounds clearer. The part of the sort of sludge

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and cross talk and tapeist is all part of the

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>experience for them. And all I would say is that

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what I do probably isn't for those people. And you know,

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a minority anywhere, but those purists.

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not for those people. But does that sort explain

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to you, you know how some of that clarity is

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of coming back in in that respect, and you know,

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>being able to clean. Yes, and what about in terms

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of effects, you say, you start with raw and then

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 1>you add reverb delay whatever is. The modern technology also

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:42.279
<v Speaker 1>helped there. The modern technology is amazing. One of the

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:45.840
<v Speaker 1>things I hear a lot is that digital can't replicate analog.

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that was true for years. I think it's

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:51.760
<v Speaker 1>becoming less and less and less true, and it's becoming

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:56.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more redundant as an argument against digital technology

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is so good now the plugins what we call the

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>plugins that we use, which are the kind of pro

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, equivalence of what used to be like old outboards,

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:07.359
<v Speaker 1>effects units, compressors, delays, a reverbs. The plugins now are

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>so good, and the emulations of the vintage plug in

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>specifically are phenomenal, to the point that some of the

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>guys that used to use them in the sixties and

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seventies can't tell the difference between the emulations now. But

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that's really been happening, particularly the last five six years.

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They've just becoming There's a company called Universal Audio that

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>make plug ins that are such a high quality, and

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 1>they are emulations. So I'm using, you know, when I'm

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>going and remixing aqualung for example, I'm using an emulation

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the old e MT one forty rever plug chamber,

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly the same reverb that they used on aqualung.

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It just happens to be a digital emulation of it,

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>which is phenomenal. So that's been also kind of one

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's really helped me is these kind

0:52:51.120 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of emulations, modern digital emulations of all of the original

0:52:55.280 --> 0:53:02.320
<v Speaker 1>analog outboard gear. Okay, we'red you stand on raw source

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:06.799
<v Speaker 1>forget remixing, are you someone? You know? There are people

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>who cut on the ANALYG transfer the digital. There are

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>people who talk about digital. They talk about sampling rate

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 1>c D versus violent, analyged versus digital. If we're starting

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>from ground zero, where do you stand? Let's just say

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 1>that all these days, everything I do, and I think

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>everything almost everyone I do in the digital domain is

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>done at a very high resolution. So the days when

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we were working on digital at c D resolution, you know,

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sixteen bitty four point one, I mean I'm now doing

0:53:35.560 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff at K twenty four bits, sometimes even K twenty

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>four bit. The resolution is just off the scale. Um,

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.319
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there's any compromise in terms of

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the quality of digital. But there is something missing from digital,

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and what it is missing is that it doesn't have

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a kind of signature sound the way analog does. Analog

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>does have um It imprints its personality and its signature

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on the music, and some people like that. I like that,

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like I like old records that recording

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sixties and seventies. Part of what I like about them

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>is that kind of golden glow, that kind of gradual

0:54:16.000 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>top end roll off that you get with analog. It's

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a very sweet kind of roll off at the top end.

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And I don't understand these things. The truth, I'm kind

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of bluffing here a little bit. I don't understand this

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff that there are people that really do. But all

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll say is that I grew up in the age

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of digital recording. I started in the industry when digital

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:38.720
<v Speaker 1>recording was very young and it didn't sound very good.

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>These days, it sounds fantastic. And you can cut analog

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 1>from a digital, a digital recording uh K twenty four bit,

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it should sound amazing. It should sound amazing. Okay, I

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>completely understand releasing vinyl records of things that we originally

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:02.799
<v Speaker 1>quite ano be al never made any sense to me

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to have something that we recorded digitally trim through the vinyl.

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>What is your take on that? Well, I think I

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.719
<v Speaker 1>understand completely where you're coming from. But I think the

0:55:14.760 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing you're discounting there is the whole romance and

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the kind of tactile experience of vinyl, aren't you You

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>know so, I think a lot of the time it's

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not about the source audio. It's it's you know, a

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 1>c D made from the same master as a vinyl.

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, what's the point? What's the point where

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you can get a CD for five bucks and you

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have to pay thirty bucks with the vinyl and you've

0:55:37.520 --> 0:55:40.959
<v Speaker 1>got all that surface noise and potential crackle involved too,

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, to contend with I feel that way sometimes,

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>but I also like vinyl and I like to have

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>certain things on vinyl because I love the ritual of

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>final I love the kind of tactile, tangible experience of

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:57.320
<v Speaker 1>taking a record off the shelf, taking out of the sleeve,

0:55:57.400 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>putting it on the turntable. Honestly, I think a lot

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of it is that for people. And I also think

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people hear things that they want to hear,

0:56:08.200 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so when they listen to vinyl. Oh, it sounds so

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>much better than the digital files. I think what they're

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>hearing is the kind of compromises they're inherent in vinyl,

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact you can't cut very high top end to vinyl.

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 1>There is a natural roll off. So people hear that

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and they say, oh, it sounds so much warmer than

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the CD or the digital file. Yeah, it sounds warmer

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:31.080
<v Speaker 1>because they couldn't cut the trouble to the vinyl. So

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot. I think there's a lot of that

0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:35.319
<v Speaker 1>mythology that goes into vinyl. But I have to say

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I love Final because I love the ritual of it

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and I have a nostalgic attachment to it as obviously

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>growing up with vinyl. Okay, forget the rituals purely talking

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>about the sound. Is there any reason to take something

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that was cut digitally creator the vinyl such that you

0:56:54.320 --> 0:56:58.880
<v Speaker 1>either have a comparable but different sound or a better sound,

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or inherently or you're going to get a word sound

0:57:01.880 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 1>because of the compromises of vinyl itself. Okay, with the

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>caveat that, it does depend on what the sources. Okay,

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you've got if you've got a source file,

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a very high resolution, then it would make

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sense to cut its vinyl. If it's a digital file

0:57:17.040 --> 0:57:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that's CD resolution already in the sense that the artist

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:24.760
<v Speaker 1>recorded it as CD resolution is probably pointless. But even

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:26.520
<v Speaker 1>then there is the caveat that you may have a

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 1>fantastic vinyl cutting engineer who will get something out of

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the audio that the guy cutting the CD didn't get.

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But these are caveats. Basically your question, The answer is no.

0:57:37.440 --> 0:57:40.320
<v Speaker 1>The answer is no. Just so I understand you're saying

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be you get a higher chance of getting

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 1>good quality if you had a higher resolution digital recording. Yeah,

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 1>if you've got digital recording that's done at four bit,

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:53.160
<v Speaker 1>putting that on a CD, you're naturally having to dial

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:55.439
<v Speaker 1>it that down to forty four point one sixteen. You're

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 1>losing a lot of the information. A lot of the

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>digital information is being thrown away because c D has

0:58:01.360 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a lower resolution, lower bit rate going to vinyl.

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. You have a pure analog wave, which

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is a continuous thing. There's no information being thrown away.

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But if your digital file is already CED resolution, there

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is nothing to be gained by cutting it to vinyl.

0:58:18.360 --> 0:58:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Does does that make sense, okay, So tell us how

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you got the Toll gig. So it came from the

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>King Crimson, you know, the King. It was like I

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>was saying to you earlier, one door led to another.

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The King Crimson series was very successful, very well received,

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:39.880
<v Speaker 1>very well reviewed. Next thing I know, I get a

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>call from Tim, Tim Shacksfield at e M. I as

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was then this would have been two thousand eleven. We're

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>doing Aqualung fourth anniversary. We'd like to get a five

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>point one mixed done? Would you like to do it?

0:58:50.200 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So that started me off on the whole Toll catalog again.

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 1>That Aqualu and came out. It was extremely successful because

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it basically sounded the same as the original all but

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>so much better. And I'm paraphrasing what a lot of

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:06.320
<v Speaker 1>people said about it. You know, I'm not That's not

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what I think. That's what most people said about it.

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And again I don't take credit for that. That album

0:59:11.800 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was originally mixed onto a faulty quarter inch tape machine.

0:59:16.320 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>There was out of alignment. So every single version of

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the album that came out before we remixed it had

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:24.400
<v Speaker 1>been from a master that was was mixed onto a

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>faulty machine. So it used to make me laugh when

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:29.640
<v Speaker 1>he used to see some of these people on forum saying,

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>how dare Stephen Wilson remixed this album? The original mix

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 1>will never be bettered. When Ian himself said, we mixed

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that onto a machine that wasn't working properly. I've been

0:59:39.560 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>waiting forty years to fix it. So we fixed it.

0:59:44.040 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't hard to fix it because the original

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>session tapes sounded beautiful. It was the quarter inch master

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that was where the problems had come in. So we

0:59:54.360 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>did a mix of that. It came out beautiful. It

0:59:56.720 --> 1:00:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sounded much more alive and vibrant and three dimensional insert

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>your own cliche. And it was very well succeeds, very

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>well received, and I've gone on now and done I

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think something like ten toll records now we've we've basically also,

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, at what point did you shift from doing

1:00:14.800 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in addition to five point one two tracks and how

1:00:18.680 --> 1:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>did that come down? That's a very good question. Um, yeah,

1:00:21.800 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we haven't touched on that have weak So what happened

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>was essentially I was hired to do the five point ones,

1:00:28.840 --> 1:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but my first the first part of my process always

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>was to recreate the Sarah stereo mix to the point

1:00:37.840 --> 1:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that I could hardly tell the difference when I beat them.

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>When I would go from the original mix to my

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>new mix. The only thing I wanted to hear that

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was different was perhaps a little bit more clarity. I

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to hear any difference in the levels. I

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to hear any any difference in the reverb treatments,

1:00:52.440 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the EQ, the compression, stereo placement I matched exactly to

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>any moves and he rides in the volume, and he

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>moves in the stereo field, something panning from left to right,

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>or I recreated everything meticulously because I wanted the five

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>point one mixed to reflect as closely as possible what

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the stereo mix that people have been as as you know,

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as much as it's possible within thein the surround field,

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to reflect what was happening in the stereo mix. And basically,

1:01:21.720 --> 1:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to cut a long story short again, while we were

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this, people like Robert and Ian and myself, we're

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>listening to the stereo mix and saying, this sounds better

1:01:30.880 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>than the original mix. We should include this in the package,

1:01:33.600 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a bonus for people. You know, we won't.

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>We won't take the original mix out include the original

1:01:39.680 --> 1:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>mix two, which is almost always what happens. The original

1:01:42.440 --> 1:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>mixes included too. But let's throw in this new stereo

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>mix too, because even though it was a byproduct of

1:01:47.880 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>doing the five point one, it is it does sound different.

1:01:51.880 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It sounds arguably better, clearer. Maybe a little bit of

1:01:56.080 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that analog magic has been compromised, but you know what,

1:01:58.800 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a different perspective. So that was the kind of

1:02:01.120 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>mindset originally, let's throw it in. Let's throw it in

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>as a bonus um and a lot of people started

1:02:06.440 --> 1:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>responding very very well to the stereo remix, to to

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the point that some of my jobs have been like

1:02:13.000 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Chicago Chicago second album I just got

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>hired to do a stereo mix of that wasn't even

1:02:18.520 --> 1:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a five And the Sabbath albums I've just done stereo

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>only not that the record company didn't even ask me

1:02:23.560 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to do surround mixes. So that was kind of how

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that came about. Yeah, okay, just in terms of process,

1:02:31.360 --> 1:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you do after you make the stereo mix

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to make at five point one? You know, in technical terms,

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on the workstation, I flip, I just flip on each fader.

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I go from stereo out to surround out. And when

1:02:45.560 --> 1:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you do that, your stereo pan pot becomes a surround

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>pan pot. So instead of just something where you go

1:02:52.960 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>from left to right, it becomes a little sort of

1:02:55.040 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>diagram which is like essentially like a little picture of

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>your room, and it has a dot in each corner

1:03:02.000 --> 1:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>where each speaker is, and you just start to break

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>things out into the room. So I might say to myself,

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I really approached it like an idiot,

1:03:09.200 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>because apart from those mixes i'd seen Elliott do, I

1:03:11.960 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>hadn't listened to anyone else's mixes, and I just kind

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of did it like a bit of a you know,

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of intuitive way, like an idiot. So, well, this

1:03:20.040 --> 1:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>might sound good, and let's try to put in the

1:03:22.080 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>backing vocals in the back and and if it sounded

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>good to me, that's what I went with. And when

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the mixes came out, I started to realize I was

1:03:29.640 --> 1:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>doing it in a way that not many people have

1:03:31.880 --> 1:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>done it before. I was doing it quite aggressively. A

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of surround mixes had tended to be quite conservative

1:03:39.600 --> 1:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in that they kept pretty much the whole stereo image

1:03:42.360 --> 1:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in the front and they would just occasionally put a

1:03:44.840 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of reverb or sound effect in the back speakers.

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't know this because I had seen Elliott

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>doing and Elliott was quite aggresive with his surround mixing.

1:03:52.960 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But apparently he's one of the one of the exceptions too.

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And I was putting all sorts of things in the back,

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and in the center speaker and moving things

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>around the room, and it just sounded good to me.

1:04:01.800 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>This is fun, you know. So they answer your question is,

1:04:05.200 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>technically speaking, you just get presented with a little sort

1:04:07.440 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of pan, a surround pan pot which has a little

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>dot where each of your speakers is, and you just

1:04:13.400 --> 1:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>move using the mouse. You just move things where you

1:04:16.560 --> 1:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>want them to be in the surround field. It's easy. Okay,

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's been a learning curve and you're much better now.

1:04:22.960 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>How long did it take you to do in the past?

1:04:24.800 --> 1:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, someone called you today. I just wanted

1:04:27.640 --> 1:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to track and forget the preparatory, you know, baking it.

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>You know that's not done in your studio. Once you

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>get the files. How long from start to finish? Well,

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that really depends, like for example, I'm doing a project

1:04:41.120 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>now which unfortunately has to remain nameless, but it's it's

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a big American record from from the nineties that sold

1:04:48.080 --> 1:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of copies, and the tapes came to me

1:04:51.680 --> 1:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and they recorded. Some of the tracks were recorded on

1:04:55.520 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>four twenty four track tapes running in SYNCHRONI station. So

1:05:01.560 --> 1:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm loading up these sessions and it's just insane. There's

1:05:04.360 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred channels of information. And the thing is

1:05:08.640 --> 1:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the track sheets that come along, which the track sheets

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>being the original documentation that's like on the tape boxes.

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>They're usually not very helpful because these guys that recorded

1:05:16.040 --> 1:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>these albums never really anticipated there's someone like me twenty

1:05:20.000 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>years later I was going to have to figure out

1:05:22.360 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what's on these tapes ever again. So I'm literally then

1:05:25.520 --> 1:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>going through all of these tracks, listening to say, okay,

1:05:28.840 --> 1:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a backing vocal label as such, that

1:05:33.120 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it could be a you know, as our

1:05:37.880 --> 1:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>sitar whenever it is. I'm listening through and I'm kind

1:05:40.880 --> 1:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of labeling labeling each of those tracks. And this is

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>before I've done any mixing at all. I'm literally just

1:05:46.680 --> 1:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>identifying what is on each track of the multi track,

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and then I can start to have an idea about

1:05:53.080 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what sort of what sort of time is involved this

1:05:55.600 --> 1:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>project I'm doing right now, I've been working on since

1:05:58.440 --> 1:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the year, off and on, you know,

1:06:00.200 --> 1:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>because I have got my other, my other consideration of

1:06:02.520 --> 1:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>my record coming out, but I've been promoting that. But

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been working on it on and off since the

1:06:07.480 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year. It's probably gonna be the best

1:06:09.680 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>part of four to six weeks by the time I

1:06:11.480 --> 1:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>finished the surround mix of this particular album. But then

1:06:14.480 --> 1:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I've had other records where it's just record on eight track,

1:06:17.160 --> 1:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>like when I did I think it was Benefit or

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>stand up for Jethrow Toll. No, this was the first

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>albums record on four track, so I had there was

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>very little, you know, to sort of figure out and

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do with that. Um so that I mean, obviously that

1:06:31.240 --> 1:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>was a much quicker process. Someone comes in with twenty

1:06:34.320 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>four tracks, how long do you think it'll do. I'll

1:06:36.640 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>take me about a week. Take me about a week

1:06:38.600 --> 1:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to recreate stereo mix from a well recorded twenty four track,

1:06:43.360 --> 1:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>forty minute album. You'll tell me about a week. And

1:06:47.040 --> 1:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you establish a fee? I don't I don't.

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care about the money. I mean, I'm

1:06:53.920 --> 1:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in a very privileged position to be able to say that.

1:06:56.040 --> 1:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I always say to the people that asked me, um,

1:07:00.680 --> 1:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what have you got, it's fine. And the other the

1:07:03.960 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>other sort of consideration for me is I must genuinely

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like the album uh and have some um pre knowledge

1:07:12.880 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the album. I must know that. I mean, I'm

1:07:14.760 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to take on a record that I've never

1:07:16.160 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>heard before, I don't know, I have no affinity with.

1:07:19.000 --> 1:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And part of that is simply because I you know,

1:07:20.880 --> 1:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I do acknowledge to myself that the people I'm doing

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this for are the people that have bought the album

1:07:27.400 --> 1:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>over and over again and their fans, and I think

1:07:30.000 --> 1:07:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to be able to do a good job.

1:07:31.480 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to be a fan too, so I have

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to genuinely be a fan of the record. And at

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that point I just say to the label or the

1:07:37.880 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>management or the artist, whoever it is, it's asked me,

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>what have you got? What's comfortable for you budget wise?

1:07:44.040 --> 1:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And usually it's fine. I've never turned down a job

1:07:46.640 --> 1:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to do because of the money. And

1:07:51.000 --> 1:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you get an override or royalty sales, no I would

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>never accept that. Never, it's not my work. It's not

1:07:58.800 --> 1:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>my work, it's not my career activity. Even my mix,

1:08:01.840 --> 1:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of copying the original guy that mixed it,

1:08:03.920 --> 1:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm kind of recreating his mix in a way.

1:08:07.000 --> 1:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So the only part of the process that I'm really

1:08:08.840 --> 1:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>being creative is in breaking out into the room. You

1:08:11.800 --> 1:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>know that the surround field. No, I would never on principle,

1:08:15.480 --> 1:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I would never take an override a royalty. Okay, the

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>five month stepard is very important and can change record mastering.

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>So how are these projects mastered? Wow? Wow, you've You've

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>hit on one of my favorite subjects there. Early on,

1:08:31.160 --> 1:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>these five point one mixes were being and and the

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>stereo mixes were being sent off to be mastered in

1:08:37.439 --> 1:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>various They will remain nameless for some very reputible master

1:08:41.479 --> 1:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>ing rooms. And I had sent the mixes off being

1:08:45.640 --> 1:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>really happy with the way they sounded, and they kept

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>coming back and they sounded worse to me. And I

1:08:51.640 --> 1:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>remember having conversations some of the guys that commissioned them

1:08:54.439 --> 1:08:57.479
<v Speaker 1>from me, and I would say to them, you thought

1:08:57.560 --> 1:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that makes it sounding great, didn't you to start with?

1:08:59.560 --> 1:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And they'd say, yeah, they sound it amazing. Why are

1:09:01.680 --> 1:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you having the master because they're coming back basically compressed

1:09:05.000 --> 1:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>with big smiley eques, which is what you would do

1:09:08.800 --> 1:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with a new You might arguably do that with a

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:14.519
<v Speaker 1>new record that you wanted to get on radio or

1:09:14.560 --> 1:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to part when it's on Spotify and the playlist.

1:09:17.320 --> 1:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But the point is that these records were doing are

1:09:19.760 --> 1:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>selling to the fans who are listening to them at home,

1:09:23.960 --> 1:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>generally on pretty good high fives. Why are we crushing

1:09:27.160 --> 1:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics out of them? And this is one of

1:09:29.400 --> 1:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>my big bug best crushing dynamics. Um So, I actually

1:09:34.439 --> 1:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>managed to persuade almost in every almost every case since

1:09:37.479 --> 1:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>say the early days, the first two or three years,

1:09:40.120 --> 1:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>these mixes get released by passing the mastering stage completely.

1:09:44.840 --> 1:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So the mixes come out of my studio, they go

1:09:47.400 --> 1:09:50.519
<v Speaker 1>on the disc exactly as they are, and the labels

1:09:50.560 --> 1:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>love that because they say five dollars not to have

1:09:54.439 --> 1:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it masters. You know. Okay, let's be talking about the

1:09:57.720 --> 1:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>very specific equipment, because do an equipment has difference? First hardware,

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>what are you using for a computer? So I'm I'm

1:10:06.320 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a I'm a Mac user. I've been a MacUser ever

1:10:08.760 --> 1:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning. Um so I just bought myself. I

1:10:11.920 --> 1:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>love one of the brand new towers, you know, very expensive,

1:10:15.960 --> 1:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but for Dolby atmost particularly which is what I've now

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>transition to, which is the next step out from five

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>per one, which maybe you want to talk about that too,

1:10:23.439 --> 1:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Dolby Atmosses is obviously, as you can imagine,

1:10:26.439 --> 1:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>quite process or intensive. So I've got a very very

1:10:29.040 --> 1:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>powerful Uh those machines you can buy for five thousand

1:10:33.200 --> 1:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>or ninety thousand dollars. How much rem did you put it?

1:10:36.240 --> 1:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you do for chips? I spent about ten

1:10:39.280 --> 1:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand pounds, So what's that about thirteen thousand that I

1:10:42.920 --> 1:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>forget exactly? I threw quite a lot of ram at it. Yeah,

1:10:46.439 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>because surround mixing is quite particularly this project i'm doing now,

1:10:49.920 --> 1:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>where as I've got a hundred channels of audio and

1:10:54.479 --> 1:10:57.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm breaking out into Dolby at mooss it's quite it's

1:10:57.640 --> 1:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>quite CPU intensive, it's quite memory intensive. And what do

1:11:02.080 --> 1:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you use? How many screens and what screens? I just

1:11:06.160 --> 1:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have one screen, but it's a big screen. It's a

1:11:09.000 --> 1:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>big screen. I can't I can't be doing with the

1:11:11.400 --> 1:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>two screens thing. So I have a big screen, one

1:11:14.400 --> 1:11:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of those ones that kind of curves around you. It's

1:11:16.640 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like a wraparound thing, so I can see the whole

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>mix all the time. Basically, Okay, what headphones do you use? Um?

1:11:27.960 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I am using? Hold on, I'll tell you audio audio technical?

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Headphones audio technical? And did you make a specific choice

1:11:36.520 --> 1:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on those? And how expensive are those? Do you know what?

1:11:40.120 --> 1:11:42.639
<v Speaker 1>They're not that expensive? They're not. I think they're good.

1:11:42.960 --> 1:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>They're good. Um, I did make a choice. They're you know,

1:11:46.000 --> 1:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they're like a three quid pair of headphones. I mean,

1:11:48.120 --> 1:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you can spend three thousand. But the question would become

1:11:51.520 --> 1:11:53.759
<v Speaker 1>this was like the old days of mixing Tora tones

1:11:53.960 --> 1:11:57.519
<v Speaker 1>or exactly Yamaha and as ten. You know, you don't

1:11:57.520 --> 1:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>want to get too far from the average listener. So

1:12:00.200 --> 1:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people use these Sony as a standard.

1:12:02.880 --> 1:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>How did you discover these audio technicals? I can't remember.

1:12:06.439 --> 1:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I probably just went to my local music equipment supply

1:12:09.400 --> 1:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and said, you know, I think I bought these headphones

1:12:12.240 --> 1:12:14.519
<v Speaker 1>not for mixing on. I bought them for probably tracking

1:12:14.560 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>with you know, I wanted a good pair of headphones

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to work with when I was tracking vocals and stuff

1:12:18.400 --> 1:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for my own stuff, and I just started mixing on them.

1:12:21.040 --> 1:12:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I know how they sound, I understand what I'm hearing

1:12:23.800 --> 1:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>through them, and of course that's the most important, which

1:12:25.960 --> 1:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what you're alluding to. You know. The

1:12:27.840 --> 1:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>point is if you know what you're hearing, if you

1:12:30.000 --> 1:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>understand what you're speakers or your headphones are giving you,

1:12:32.600 --> 1:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that is a hundred times more important than having the

1:12:34.640 --> 1:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>fancy you know, amazing expensive speakers are amazing expensive headphones.

1:12:41.280 --> 1:12:44.639
<v Speaker 1>And then what speakers do you use? So for mixing

1:12:44.960 --> 1:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in stereo, I use Vocals, a company to I think

1:12:48.240 --> 1:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the Italian company called Focal French. Actually I know, because

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't in my car. I beg your pardon, French

1:12:54.120 --> 1:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>company called Focal, Yeah, yeah, so I have to. I

1:12:57.680 --> 1:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think they called Triads, the Triads Stery Monitors. And for

1:13:01.439 --> 1:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the mixing instaurround, I use General Lex Jenny Lex speakers,

1:13:05.439 --> 1:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>self powered speakers. And why did you choose those specific

1:13:09.120 --> 1:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>brands because Elliott used them. So I used basically my

1:13:13.400 --> 1:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>original five point one setup was based on his because

1:13:16.040 --> 1:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>he's the only one i'd seen and he was using

1:13:18.840 --> 1:13:20.799
<v Speaker 1>General X. So I just went out and bought myself

1:13:20.880 --> 1:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>five or six General X speakers and now I have

1:13:23.840 --> 1:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Dolby atmos, so i have another seven or eight in

1:13:25.840 --> 1:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the room, but I've just stuck with them. Again. I

1:13:29.080 --> 1:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>understand what I'm hearing when I hear general X, I've

1:13:31.120 --> 1:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I've grown up, you know, hearing them. Okay, for people

1:13:34.240 --> 1:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>who at this point still don't understand, explain Dolby atmos.

1:13:39.520 --> 1:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So Dolby, you know, I don't completely understand all of

1:13:42.880 --> 1:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it myself, because it's it's a much more complex thing

1:13:46.720 --> 1:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that five point five one is very straightforward. You've got

1:13:49.200 --> 1:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>five speakers, you can put sound in any of the

1:13:51.240 --> 1:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>five speakers, and you've got the sub which is the

1:13:53.479 --> 1:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>dot one, which is for the low end frequencies. Dolby

1:13:57.160 --> 1:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>ATMOS is more complicated because it's it's it's to do

1:14:00.040 --> 1:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with it's more to do with object orientation, which means

1:14:03.080 --> 1:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you can basically place the sound anywhere in the room.

1:14:07.200 --> 1:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>It will sound like it's coming of a particular spot

1:14:09.680 --> 1:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the room, in the air. I don't know how

1:14:11.680 --> 1:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they do it, but they do. But the bottom line

1:14:14.240 --> 1:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the most standard configuration of Dolby atmost, which

1:14:17.840 --> 1:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is the one I've got, is seven point one point four,

1:14:21.760 --> 1:14:24.439
<v Speaker 1>which means that you still have the five speakers you

1:14:24.479 --> 1:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have in five point one, the two in front, two behind,

1:14:26.880 --> 1:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the one in the center, and the sub but you

1:14:29.160 --> 1:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have two additional speakers in the horizontal plane which are

1:14:32.080 --> 1:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>at the sides, so they fill in between the front

1:14:35.400 --> 1:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and the back pair, so you can discreetly put something

1:14:38.280 --> 1:14:41.639
<v Speaker 1>that feels like it's coming specifically right from beside you

1:14:42.120 --> 1:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than from behind you or in front of you.

1:14:44.720 --> 1:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And the point four are two sets of speakers above you,

1:14:49.360 --> 1:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>two at the front, two behind you, which means you

1:14:52.160 --> 1:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>can now move sound not just in the horizontal plane

1:14:55.479 --> 1:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but also in the vertical plane. And it's incredible, and

1:14:58.680 --> 1:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it does mean you can give the impression of literally

1:15:01.360 --> 1:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you can put point something in the air and say

1:15:03.840 --> 1:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that sound is coming from there and point at it.

1:15:08.160 --> 1:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's the incredible thing about Almoss. It's I mean

1:15:10.920 --> 1:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to say it's immersive is an understatement. It's the next

1:15:13.320 --> 1:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>level up from from immersive. Okay, you know, Dolby, always

1:15:16.840 --> 1:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>start theatrically. How many people you're mixing these records, you're

1:15:20.760 --> 1:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>mixing them for home use, How many people have these systems?

1:15:25.160 --> 1:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I've no idea. Um that's never really been a motivating

1:15:29.040 --> 1:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fact for me, and I've always been of the philosophy

1:15:30.960 --> 1:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that if there's there's catalog out there is more likely

1:15:34.160 --> 1:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>people will go out and buy systems. Now, when the

1:15:36.720 --> 1:15:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Beatles are doing Dolby Atmos, that's a big help. That's

1:15:40.600 --> 1:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a big help. I know you're not a fan of

1:15:41.840 --> 1:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Giles Is mixes necessarily, but the fact that he's done

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Delby Atmos mixes, the Beatles have done Delby Atmos mixes

1:15:49.160 --> 1:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>probably has sent a lot of people out to look

1:15:51.800 --> 1:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>at the possibility of putting Dolby Atmos in their rooms.

1:15:54.439 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>And I think that was always the problem. When I started.

1:15:56.520 --> 1:16:00.439
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't catalog like that out there. Um, And when

1:16:00.479 --> 1:16:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you get people putting out albums like the Beatles catalog

1:16:03.800 --> 1:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in in at moss, then that's such a great kick

1:16:07.439 --> 1:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>start to the whole industry. The other thing I think

1:16:09.920 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Altmos has got in his favor is that there there

1:16:11.880 --> 1:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are now Again, I don't understand the technology, but there

1:16:14.360 --> 1:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are there are soundbars, and there are headphones that are

1:16:17.960 --> 1:16:21.519
<v Speaker 1>able to They are able to decode Dolby Atmos mixes

1:16:21.680 --> 1:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and give you a kind of pseudo I think. I mean,

1:16:24.280 --> 1:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it. It It was amazing. I heard I listened

1:16:26.280 --> 1:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to one of my mixes on a pair of headphones

1:16:28.560 --> 1:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't completely discreet, but you know what it

1:16:31.360 --> 1:16:34.639
<v Speaker 1>was se of it was there. I don't know how

1:16:34.680 --> 1:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they do it, but that's that's again I think a

1:16:37.160 --> 1:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>big advantage is going to have over the previous attempts

1:16:40.000 --> 1:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>at creating multi channel sound in the domestic market. Tell

1:16:44.240 --> 1:16:49.559
<v Speaker 1>me two albums that you've remixed that you're like the

1:16:49.600 --> 1:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>most or you're proud of stuff. M Well, there's different criteria.

1:16:54.360 --> 1:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Then there were some that I'm proud of because I

1:16:55.960 --> 1:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>feel we made the most improvement in the sound, and

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Aqua Lung would be pretty near the top of the list,

1:17:05.240 --> 1:17:07.559
<v Speaker 1>if not the top of the list, because that was

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>not as as I mentioned before, to that had a

1:17:09.880 --> 1:17:15.519
<v Speaker 1>problematic original mixdown phase. So being able to really clean

1:17:15.560 --> 1:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that up and make it shine and sound like it

1:17:17.479 --> 1:17:20.519
<v Speaker 1>never sounded before, I had a mensum out of proud

1:17:20.800 --> 1:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>pride of doing that in terms of actual creatively, the

1:17:24.439 --> 1:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>most challenging but probably the most rewarding, Seeds of Love

1:17:28.880 --> 1:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>by Tears for Fears was a nightmare to do, uh,

1:17:35.600 --> 1:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's one of my favorite records of all time,

1:17:38.280 --> 1:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and the final result was incredibly rewarding just a beautifully

1:17:42.479 --> 1:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>recorded album with great playing, great songs, great performances, but

1:17:47.439 --> 1:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>an early generation of digital recording. And another album that

1:17:50.520 --> 1:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>took three years to make was recorded multiple times in

1:17:53.800 --> 1:17:57.479
<v Speaker 1>different studios with different lineups, different arrangements, and then the

1:17:57.520 --> 1:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>final versions of the songs would be one version of

1:18:00.400 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 1>the song recorded in this year with this band stitched

1:18:03.520 --> 1:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>onto another version of the song done two years later

1:18:06.000 --> 1:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in a different studio with a different engineer and a

1:18:08.080 --> 1:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>different band. I mean, it was just a nightmare to

1:18:10.640 --> 1:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>piece it together, but I'm very proud that I did

1:18:14.280 --> 1:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and persevered and we got through to the other end,

1:18:16.640 --> 1:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds terrific. Okay, that was an album that

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>was recorded digitally from source, yes, yeah, And what machine

1:18:25.400 --> 1:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>did they use? Do they do use the Mitsubishi or

1:18:27.640 --> 1:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>do you know? I think I think it was the Mitsubishi. Yes,

1:18:30.080 --> 1:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And it was recorded forty eight forty eight K, which

1:18:32.920 --> 1:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>was you know, that was all the digital machines were

1:18:34.840 --> 1:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>capable of then. But you know what, when digital is

1:18:37.200 --> 1:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>recorded well, it can still sound amazing. I'll tell you

1:18:39.880 --> 1:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>another example, Skylarking by EXTC another out my remix, which

1:18:43.160 --> 1:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is a beautiful you know, recorded by Todd of course

1:18:46.160 --> 1:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>up in Woodstock, and that was recorded. I think, no,

1:18:52.360 --> 1:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm thinking the wrong album. No, it's not that

1:18:53.920 --> 1:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>album's Oranges and Lemons, the follow up to Skylarking, not

1:18:56.439 --> 1:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the Todd one. Oranges and Lemons was recorded at forty

1:18:59.520 --> 1:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>eight A sixteen bit, which is like CD resolution. But

1:19:03.760 --> 1:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it sounds amazing. It sounds amazing, And

1:19:06.760 --> 1:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I think sometimes people forget that a great producer and

1:19:09.960 --> 1:19:12.559
<v Speaker 1>a great engineer is a lot more important than the

1:19:12.600 --> 1:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>resolution of the recording. Um, those things are, obviously, they

1:19:17.120 --> 1:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>are important. I'm not saying they're not. But the fact

1:19:20.240 --> 1:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that the album sounds as good as it done when

1:19:22.040 --> 1:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>it was a relatively low you know, in terms of

1:19:24.479 --> 1:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>digital terms, quite primitive forty eight K sixteen bit sounds phenomenal.

1:19:30.200 --> 1:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about that Tard albums. I discussed this with

1:19:32.439 --> 1:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Tard himself. I find there's a signature kind of high

1:19:37.200 --> 1:19:41.719
<v Speaker 1>end compressed sound that his records have in the final mix.

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you find his mixes like that different from other mixes?

1:19:46.280 --> 1:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you have a take on that? Yeah, his mixes

1:19:49.400 --> 1:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>are quite eccentric, in a in a in a in

1:19:51.880 --> 1:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a good way. Um, And of course wasn't particularly a

1:19:55.040 --> 1:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fan of the original mix. Andy Partrish wasn't a fan

1:19:57.280 --> 1:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the original mix. Um Todd's mixes are quite um.

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>They're quite sort of murky in a nice way. Um

1:20:10.840 --> 1:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>quite homogenized. There's not a lot of clarity, and there's

1:20:13.439 --> 1:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of detail. There is that kind of

1:20:15.600 --> 1:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>slightly muddy top end, which I think is what you're

1:20:18.960 --> 1:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of alluding to. This very much a signature to

1:20:21.040 --> 1:20:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the way the top end on his record sound, which

1:20:23.720 --> 1:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't doesn't allow the instruments to really have clarity or separation,

1:20:29.320 --> 1:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if that's something he likes. He likes

1:20:31.880 --> 1:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the fact that mused the all instruments in a sense

1:20:35.360 --> 1:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>combine into this kind of cohesive sound rather than sounding

1:20:39.240 --> 1:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like different instruments in a in a mix. If you,

1:20:42.840 --> 1:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>if you, if you see what I'm getting at. So

1:20:44.760 --> 1:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>what we were doing with the remix was trying to

1:20:47.000 --> 1:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>get into the mix and put some air around the

1:20:49.200 --> 1:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>different instruments, which was definitely what Andy wanted. I mean,

1:20:52.360 --> 1:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what he wanted at the time, and he didn't

1:20:53.960 --> 1:20:56.519
<v Speaker 1>get it. So we were kind of trying to reetro

1:20:56.800 --> 1:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>retroactively put some of that separation and clarity back into

1:21:00.320 --> 1:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the album. You know, again, one of my favorite albums

1:21:02.280 --> 1:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of all times. So that that was that was one

1:21:04.479 --> 1:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite projects I've done year for sure. One

1:21:06.720 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>would say at the end you ended up with a

1:21:08.560 --> 1:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>product that was somewhat different from the one the fans

1:21:11.640 --> 1:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>were used to. In that case, we did. Yeah, I

1:21:16.280 --> 1:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have no idea how he made it sound like he did.

1:21:18.520 --> 1:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>There is there are occasions where I simply, you know,

1:21:21.840 --> 1:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for all, for all my ambitions to try and replicate

1:21:24.560 --> 1:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the stereo as closely as possible, there are times when

1:21:27.800 --> 1:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I just cannot get close to I cannot figure out

1:21:31.360 --> 1:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>why it sounds the way it does. So in that sense,

1:21:34.880 --> 1:21:36.599
<v Speaker 1>I just have to get as close. And it could

1:21:36.640 --> 1:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>be as simple as they were using some piece of

1:21:39.479 --> 1:21:43.479
<v Speaker 1>outboard gear that was specially made for them. It was

1:21:43.520 --> 1:21:46.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, a a piece of equipment that

1:21:46.560 --> 1:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>had been made by some boffin that Todd knew that

1:21:49.280 --> 1:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he was putting through all his mixes through and it

1:21:51.479 --> 1:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>did something weird to the mix, and nobody quite knew

1:21:53.920 --> 1:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what it was. I mean, they're all those stories about

1:21:55.880 --> 1:21:57.519
<v Speaker 1>those things that come out of Abbey Road, you know,

1:21:57.640 --> 1:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the special Perry combobulator that they put all the tracks

1:22:01.960 --> 1:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>through that made it sound like an Abbey Road mix,

1:22:04.160 --> 1:22:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, and all those things are very coveted by

1:22:06.600 --> 1:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>collectors of analog outboard equipment. I don't know, so sometimes

1:22:10.920 --> 1:22:13.519
<v Speaker 1>I cannot get close and I do feel like, you know,

1:22:13.560 --> 1:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I just have to do the best I can. Had

1:22:17.040 --> 1:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you end up working with Chicago, that's the one act

1:22:19.240 --> 1:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that sticks out your catalog. So that was Steve. Would

1:22:23.080 --> 1:22:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you know Steve Willard over over Rhino in l a step.

1:22:27.000 --> 1:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I know the guys we started Rynod with Steve. I

1:22:28.800 --> 1:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>do not now, Okay, so Steve, Steve the Ready way.

1:22:32.760 --> 1:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>He's not the red hair guy, is he? Do you know?

1:22:35.200 --> 1:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I've only met him in person I think once, and

1:22:36.720 --> 1:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a few years ago because over in l

1:22:38.360 --> 1:22:40.559
<v Speaker 1>a hem, not really important. I'm thinking now I think

1:22:40.600 --> 1:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I do not, but keep going. I think he's a

1:22:42.400 --> 1:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lovely guy. Anyway, he asked me, He asked me, and

1:22:45.240 --> 1:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that was that was a That was a slightly interesting

1:22:49.280 --> 1:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>project because the band didn't really know who I was,

1:22:52.120 --> 1:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and they weren't right. It kind of involved in the project,

1:22:55.240 --> 1:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>which is unusual for me because usually one of my

1:22:59.800 --> 1:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it's one of my stipulations, but it's

1:23:02.400 --> 1:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly one of my requests, strong requests, is that I

1:23:06.080 --> 1:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>would like the band to be on board and approving everything,

1:23:09.840 --> 1:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>um and with Chicago. For whatever reason, Steve was like, no, no,

1:23:14.240 --> 1:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the band are interested, but they're happy for me, you know,

1:23:16.320 --> 1:23:18.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, do it. And when it came out, the

1:23:18.640 --> 1:23:21.559
<v Speaker 1>fans really liked it. And then there was a couple

1:23:21.600 --> 1:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of comments from the band that were a bit snotty

1:23:24.520 --> 1:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about it. This kind of English geeks done this mix,

1:23:27.760 --> 1:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, and then um, you know. And then

1:23:32.080 --> 1:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the next one they got there they got the Chicago

1:23:34.240 --> 1:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Transit Authority in the the first time, they got it done

1:23:35.920 --> 1:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>by their own guy, and I don't know what happened there,

1:23:38.240 --> 1:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>but obviously they decided after that they didn't want me

1:23:41.040 --> 1:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to do anymore. But no, So that one was, you know,

1:23:44.200 --> 1:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>these projects can come from management, they can come from

1:23:46.920 --> 1:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>record label, and they can come from artists. In that case,

1:23:49.240 --> 1:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it definitely came from from Steve at the record label. Yeah,

1:23:52.840 --> 1:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>he wanted me to do it, and I was very

1:23:54.320 --> 1:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>happy to do it. Okay, Traditionally the actors not the engineer.

1:23:58.000 --> 1:24:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever talk to the mixer or the engineer

1:24:00.520 --> 1:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on some of these projects to find out where they

1:24:02.360 --> 1:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>were coming from, what they did very occasionally. Most of them,

1:24:05.880 --> 1:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, are either dead or retired, so you know,

1:24:10.400 --> 1:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't talk to Eddie offered about doing the Yes

1:24:12.439 --> 1:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>mixes because he's retired. He's not interested. But I did

1:24:14.880 --> 1:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>speak to Hugh Pagem, I spoke about one of the

1:24:17.240 --> 1:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>XTC mixes I did. I spoke to Dave Bascombe, who

1:24:20.240 --> 1:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>recorded Seeds of Love for Tears for Fears, for example.

1:24:24.200 --> 1:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I've occasionally sort sought their kind of input,

1:24:27.280 --> 1:24:33.479
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, to dream projects you haven't yet done. Oh wow.

1:24:34.360 --> 1:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Kate Bush has always been top of my list. Um.

1:24:37.800 --> 1:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think her albums would be so perfect for

1:24:41.920 --> 1:24:46.519
<v Speaker 1>surround um that it's frustrating to me, not even that

1:24:46.640 --> 1:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I would do it, but just that no one is

1:24:48.200 --> 1:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>doing it. But apparently she's she's not she's not interested.

1:24:51.360 --> 1:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>She's not if she's just not heard surround, or she

1:24:55.080 --> 1:24:57.559
<v Speaker 1>has and she just didn't particularly care for it as

1:24:57.600 --> 1:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>an idea. So yeah, Kate, Kate would be And and

1:25:02.000 --> 1:25:05.519
<v Speaker 1>the Prince Catalog. The Prince Catalog. Prince was my when

1:25:05.520 --> 1:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up in the eighties. Prince was was

1:25:07.560 --> 1:25:09.599
<v Speaker 1>my hero. He was the guy that had posters on

1:25:09.600 --> 1:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>my wall, and to be able to get my hands

1:25:11.880 --> 1:25:15.559
<v Speaker 1>on on Parade or Purple Rain or any of those

1:25:15.600 --> 1:25:18.519
<v Speaker 1>seminar eighties records would would be a dream. I mean,

1:25:18.520 --> 1:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just to be able to go into his world. I mean,

1:25:20.240 --> 1:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for me, the single most gifted musician the world of

1:25:23.680 --> 1:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>pop has ever produced, to be able to go into

1:25:26.680 --> 1:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>his world and deconstruct and reconstruct the music would just

1:25:30.360 --> 1:25:33.599
<v Speaker 1>be mind blowing for me to be able to do that. Okay,

1:25:33.680 --> 1:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>so this lead deep. Are you a musician or a remixer?

1:25:38.200 --> 1:25:40.599
<v Speaker 1>And how do you split up the time into what degree?

1:25:40.640 --> 1:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you frustrated by one or the other? Oh? I

1:25:43.720 --> 1:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>mean my job is to make my own records, and

1:25:46.400 --> 1:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and that would allay. That is always my priority to

1:25:49.040 --> 1:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>make my own records. That's what That's what I feel

1:25:50.920 --> 1:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I was put on this earth to do, not to

1:25:53.520 --> 1:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>not to tart up other people's records, you know, the

1:25:56.920 --> 1:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tarting up of the old other people? Sorry, is that

1:25:58.920 --> 1:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>an amerrit Do you have that express in America times? No?

1:26:01.320 --> 1:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We don't. Just watching a Last Night and you know

1:26:05.280 --> 1:26:07.479
<v Speaker 1>they had someone using an expression they don't use and

1:26:07.560 --> 1:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>ran and everybody got freed out. So it's kind of funny.

1:26:10.160 --> 1:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It sounds bad, but I don't know what you're talking

1:26:12.400 --> 1:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about it, but they don't. There's certain things that don't

1:26:14.840 --> 1:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>mean such a negative things in the UK. It's not rude.

1:26:18.080 --> 1:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry, it's not rude. It just means to basically,

1:26:20.040 --> 1:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, give give something a sort of clean you know,

1:26:22.560 --> 1:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>clean up a bit, or make it look better than

1:26:24.439 --> 1:26:26.599
<v Speaker 1>it deserves to, or or make it look as good

1:26:26.600 --> 1:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>as it deserves too in the case of these albums.

1:26:28.800 --> 1:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's not my job. My job is

1:26:31.680 --> 1:26:34.559
<v Speaker 1>not to but it's become a sideline and you know what,

1:26:34.560 --> 1:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it's one I love to do. And you know, I

1:26:37.760 --> 1:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>keep saying to myself, I'm going to try and try

1:26:40.000 --> 1:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, back off doing as much as I've

1:26:42.120 --> 1:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>been doing. But then people keep approaching me with these

1:26:44.720 --> 1:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>amazing albums. You know, I'm not going to say no

1:26:48.400 --> 1:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>when you know, if principal cap Bush ever did come on,

1:26:51.160 --> 1:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say no. I'm not going to

1:26:52.800 --> 1:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>say no when I get asked to do XTC Skylarking

1:26:55.479 --> 1:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or songs from the Big Chair. Of course I'm not so.

1:27:00.120 --> 1:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And as I say, I think there's also an element

1:27:01.920 --> 1:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that it is feeding back into what I do as

1:27:05.360 --> 1:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>an artist. Anyway, I've learned so much from from from

1:27:09.760 --> 1:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>being able to go inside this music. I mean, what

1:27:12.320 --> 1:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>better education could there be for someone who likes who

1:27:16.880 --> 1:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>believes in sonic excellent excellence and it's fascinated with production

1:27:21.800 --> 1:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>um and the techniques of the past and present. What

1:27:24.439 --> 1:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>better education could there be than to be able to

1:27:26.840 --> 1:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>go inside these classic records and actually have to figure

1:27:30.280 --> 1:27:33.559
<v Speaker 1>out for yourself because nobody's apart from those engineers that

1:27:33.560 --> 1:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>gave me a little help, they don't remember, they don't

1:27:36.160 --> 1:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>remember how they did, They don't remember a lot of

1:27:37.880 --> 1:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the time how they got those sounds. So I have

1:27:39.840 --> 1:27:42.519
<v Speaker 1>to figure out for myself, and in doing so, those

1:27:42.560 --> 1:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>things become part of my own tool kit. So the

1:27:45.320 --> 1:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, Bob, it's definitely. You know, my day

1:27:47.520 --> 1:27:50.519
<v Speaker 1>job is doing what I do as as a musician

1:27:50.520 --> 1:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as a songwriter. But I'm very very happy to do

1:27:53.080 --> 1:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this too. I know every year is different, but what

1:27:55.360 --> 1:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>percentage of your time has spent on your music as

1:27:58.200 --> 1:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>opposed to working on someone else's. I think it's eight twenty.

1:28:03.439 --> 1:28:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as I say, if I get a well

1:28:05.640 --> 1:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>recorded album record on twenty four tracks, I can turn

1:28:08.880 --> 1:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it around probably in a week without feeling like I'm

1:28:11.840 --> 1:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>rushing it turn around in a week, and I'm doing

1:28:14.800 --> 1:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe seven eight albums a year, So you can figure

1:28:18.280 --> 1:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>out from that that may be spending a couple of

1:28:19.880 --> 1:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>months a year working on the back catalog remixing projects.

1:28:25.600 --> 1:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>The next question would be where are you making your money?

1:28:29.040 --> 1:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you making your money primarily from those projects? From

1:28:33.960 --> 1:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>going on the road? Music itself doesn't generate as much

1:28:37.800 --> 1:28:40.639
<v Speaker 1>revenue as used to unless you're drink. I think I've

1:28:40.680 --> 1:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>been quite fortunate. I have a I have a substantial

1:28:44.640 --> 1:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>back catalog. Some would say there's too many records I've made,

1:28:49.280 --> 1:28:50.519
<v Speaker 1>and I would be one of those people. I've made

1:28:50.560 --> 1:28:53.439
<v Speaker 1>too many records over the years. But because I've made

1:28:53.439 --> 1:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of records, and I have a very very

1:28:55.280 --> 1:28:59.639
<v Speaker 1>loyal fan base which continues to grow incrementally continues to grow,

1:29:00.720 --> 1:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>my back catalog generate is pretty good income for me.

1:29:04.320 --> 1:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm never going to be, you know, multimillion or anything

1:29:06.960 --> 1:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like that, but I don't want to be. I don't

1:29:08.280 --> 1:29:11.439
<v Speaker 1>need to be. I'm very comfortable. I've managed to make

1:29:11.439 --> 1:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a career by basically doing what the hell I want

1:29:15.760 --> 1:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and not many people can say that, And I continue

1:29:19.160 --> 1:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to make it, continue to make a career by doing

1:29:21.680 --> 1:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what the hell I want musically speaking, uh and creatively speaking,

1:29:26.160 --> 1:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm completely fulfilled. So my I'm make enough money from

1:29:28.920 --> 1:29:30.519
<v Speaker 1>my back castalk and I get paid a little bit

1:29:30.560 --> 1:29:34.599
<v Speaker 1>to do these remix projects too. It's it's um, it's um.

1:29:34.640 --> 1:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not why I do them, and it doesn't matter

1:29:36.920 --> 1:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, but it's always appreciated when there is a

1:29:39.040 --> 1:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>budget from the label or the artist or whatever. You said.

1:29:42.240 --> 1:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You recently got married. Is this your first marriage? It is?

1:29:46.320 --> 1:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>And what was the motivation of this lead deep to

1:29:48.400 --> 1:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get married? I fell in love. I fell in love, Bob,

1:29:52.800 --> 1:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I fell in love. You know. I always thought that

1:29:54.280 --> 1:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't the sort of person who would ever get

1:29:55.760 --> 1:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>married and have kids. But then I met my wife, Hydrometer. Well,

1:30:00.439 --> 1:30:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I actually met her. I met her twenty years ago,

1:30:03.640 --> 1:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>although we only we really got together properly about four

1:30:06.240 --> 1:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I originally met her twenty years ago. She's Israeli.

1:30:08.960 --> 1:30:11.599
<v Speaker 1>She's from Israel. I met her twenty years ago when

1:30:11.640 --> 1:30:14.639
<v Speaker 1>she's a very young young lady. She was only eighteen

1:30:14.720 --> 1:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>years old at the time I met her backstage at

1:30:17.400 --> 1:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a gig in Israel where she was working for the promoter.

1:30:20.600 --> 1:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>She wasn't a fan, she didn't know who I was.

1:30:23.240 --> 1:30:27.599
<v Speaker 1>But we we kept in touch for many, many years,

1:30:27.640 --> 1:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and about four years ago, um, and she did in

1:30:30.840 --> 1:30:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the meantime had two kids and I hadn't, so we

1:30:34.560 --> 1:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we got together about four years ago and the rest

1:30:36.840 --> 1:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is history, as they say. So I'm now a stepfather

1:30:38.640 --> 1:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>as well as as well as her husband. Now four

1:30:41.040 --> 1:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago when she still living in Israel, or she

1:30:43.240 --> 1:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>moved to the UK. Now she moved to the UK

1:30:45.439 --> 1:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a long, long time, many years ago. In fact, her

1:30:47.280 --> 1:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>first marriage had also been in England. So we've kind

1:30:50.760 --> 1:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of been in touch all this time. Yeah, Well, it's

1:30:53.120 --> 1:30:55.439
<v Speaker 1>always tough when you're an artist and you're living in

1:30:55.479 --> 1:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>your own head so much to balance home life in

1:30:59.080 --> 1:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>work life. And sometimes they're significant others who accept less

1:31:03.840 --> 1:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>time and other people don't. So what's it like now

1:31:06.000 --> 1:31:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that you're married. It's really been four years you said

1:31:09.439 --> 1:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been two years. No, it's been eighteen months since

1:31:11.439 --> 1:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we got married and kind of bought a house together,

1:31:14.040 --> 1:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and most of that time I haven't been on the road,

1:31:16.200 --> 1:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if at all of that time I have been on

1:31:17.960 --> 1:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the road for you know, and during the last year

1:31:20.280 --> 1:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for obvious reasons. But the last time I actually played

1:31:22.840 --> 1:31:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a show was towards the beginning of two thousand nineteen.

1:31:25.680 --> 1:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I've been enjoying I've I've since we

1:31:28.000 --> 1:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>moved into the new house. I've built my new studio.

1:31:29.960 --> 1:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It's actually the first time I've really had a proper studio.

1:31:34.360 --> 1:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean every time, every every studio I've had before

1:31:37.840 --> 1:31:39.839
<v Speaker 1>that has really been whichever room I put my computer

1:31:39.920 --> 1:31:43.719
<v Speaker 1>into my guitars, and that's been quote unquote the studio.

1:31:44.240 --> 1:31:46.719
<v Speaker 1>And I actually this time, we bought a new house together,

1:31:46.920 --> 1:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we built a proper studio, a proper room on the

1:31:49.920 --> 1:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>side of the house, proper acoustically treated, and it's the

1:31:53.360 --> 1:31:55.479
<v Speaker 1>first time I've had a really special room. And of

1:31:55.520 --> 1:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>course it's all been made dogby atmost compatible, which is

1:31:58.000 --> 1:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>great to be able to do that. So I've been

1:32:00.479 --> 1:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>enjoying eighteen months being home, being married, being with the kids,

1:32:04.360 --> 1:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>um doing a lot of work in the studio, and

1:32:08.080 --> 1:32:11.439
<v Speaker 1>not having to worry about motivating myself to go out

1:32:11.439 --> 1:32:13.679
<v Speaker 1>on the road, although I'm beginning to miss that obviously,

1:32:13.720 --> 1:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I am, and that's a big part of what I

1:32:15.240 --> 1:32:17.679
<v Speaker 1>love to do well. Are you the type of person

1:32:18.120 --> 1:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>who works strict hours or you're getting to run and

1:32:20.920 --> 1:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you might work till two in the morning, or you

1:32:23.360 --> 1:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>start for dinner at a specific time. I have a

1:32:26.600 --> 1:32:29.519
<v Speaker 1>pretty good work ethic, you know. So the answer is

1:32:29.720 --> 1:32:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the answer to your question is the latter. I do

1:32:31.520 --> 1:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have a kind of time. I kind of go to

1:32:34.320 --> 1:32:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the studio around midday and I will work to about

1:32:36.560 --> 1:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight in the evening, and then I'll stop

1:32:38.000 --> 1:32:40.519
<v Speaker 1>to have dinner with my family, and then after that

1:32:40.560 --> 1:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll spend the evening with my wife, watching TV, watching

1:32:42.880 --> 1:32:46.639
<v Speaker 1>a movie, listening to records. So the days of me

1:32:46.680 --> 1:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I used to I think I used to do that

1:32:48.280 --> 1:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thing of going through till two in the morning. But

1:32:49.800 --> 1:32:51.559
<v Speaker 1>those days, you know a lot of people say that,

1:32:51.600 --> 1:32:53.559
<v Speaker 1>don't they As they get older, I think they stopped

1:32:53.560 --> 1:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>doing that burning the midnight all thing and getting some

1:32:56.439 --> 1:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>more of a a routine. And I'm in that stage. Now.

1:33:00.080 --> 1:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to the new album. You have an

1:33:02.840 --> 1:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>incredible marketing plan with people. Can see the air quote

1:33:08.120 --> 1:33:12.719
<v Speaker 1>your merchandise tell us about the generation of a thought

1:33:12.760 --> 1:33:17.439
<v Speaker 1>behind that. So the idea with the album was I've

1:33:17.439 --> 1:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>always been fascinated by by this idea part, you know,

1:33:19.800 --> 1:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the what we've been talking about during this conversation.

1:33:22.360 --> 1:33:25.599
<v Speaker 1>This idea of trying to reconcile the idea of being

1:33:25.640 --> 1:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a professional musician by also being completely true to yourself

1:33:29.200 --> 1:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and having integrity, all that stuff. Blah blah blah. It's

1:33:31.680 --> 1:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a very hard, you know, tight rope to walk, and

1:33:35.240 --> 1:33:37.799
<v Speaker 1>it's always fascinating me. This idea of music is commerce.

1:33:37.960 --> 1:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you sell music? What is involved in selling music?

1:33:41.240 --> 1:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you how do you if you're a creative person,

1:33:44.320 --> 1:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you also get your brain to be involved

1:33:46.840 --> 1:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in the commercial side of things, selling yourself, schmoozing and

1:33:50.840 --> 1:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff we talked about. And I've been fascinated

1:33:53.360 --> 1:33:54.639
<v Speaker 1>by that. And one of the things I've been really

1:33:54.640 --> 1:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>interested about is how what would it be like to

1:33:56.840 --> 1:33:59.519
<v Speaker 1>sell a piece of music in the same way that

1:33:59.560 --> 1:34:03.479
<v Speaker 1>apples are one of their products for example, um, and

1:34:03.479 --> 1:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what would it be like to almost remind the listener

1:34:06.000 --> 1:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>relentlessly or the purchaser that they are involved in a

1:34:10.080 --> 1:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>financial transaction when theyre buy a record. So kind of

1:34:14.200 --> 1:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>riffing on that, I got together with the design and

1:34:16.080 --> 1:34:17.799
<v Speaker 1>we came up with this idea, why don't we parody

1:34:17.840 --> 1:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the world of high concept high design. This These companies

1:34:20.800 --> 1:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that buy a fifty cent T shirt put their logo

1:34:23.920 --> 1:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>on it and then charge five dollars for it, like

1:34:26.360 --> 1:34:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a company like Supreme, for example, and people love that.

1:34:30.640 --> 1:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>They love that, And what interests me about that is

1:34:33.400 --> 1:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how it means that the purchasing of a lot of

1:34:37.040 --> 1:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>these items is no longer about the utility. It's about

1:34:39.760 --> 1:34:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the ownership. It's about the status of owning the item

1:34:44.080 --> 1:34:47.599
<v Speaker 1>rather than its utility. And I believe that applies very

1:34:47.680 --> 1:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>much to my world. You thought we talk about these

1:34:50.439 --> 1:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>deluxe edition box sets that are coming out of left,

1:34:52.479 --> 1:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>right and center these days, and this seems like barely

1:34:54.360 --> 1:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a week goes past now and there's not ten more

1:34:56.680 --> 1:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>deluxe edition box sets being announced. These are absolute utely,

1:35:00.720 --> 1:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, for most people about ownership rather than utility.

1:35:04.760 --> 1:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Most of the contents of these box sets you will

1:35:06.920 --> 1:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>never listen to more than once. But it's nice to

1:35:10.200 --> 1:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have them. It's fun to have them. It's fun to

1:35:12.840 --> 1:35:15.559
<v Speaker 1>have the coffee table book. It's fun to have the

1:35:15.560 --> 1:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>CD of Demos, it's fun to have the CD of

1:35:18.240 --> 1:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cleaned up board tape. It's fun to have the

1:35:21.000 --> 1:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>CD of the alternate mix, where the only difference is

1:35:23.120 --> 1:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the backing vocals a bit further over to the left

1:35:25.360 --> 1:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>hand side of the stereo spectrum. Jimmy Page, I'm looking

1:35:28.040 --> 1:35:30.559
<v Speaker 1>at you here with your led Zeppelin deluxe editions. It's

1:35:30.600 --> 1:35:33.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of fun to have those things, but actually what

1:35:33.520 --> 1:35:35.479
<v Speaker 1>you really need is the original album. That's all you

1:35:35.560 --> 1:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>really need. Maybe a five point one makes if you're

1:35:37.800 --> 1:35:41.800
<v Speaker 1>into that thing too. So it's fascinating to me this

1:35:41.920 --> 1:35:45.240
<v Speaker 1>world where things have moved towards ownership rather than use,

1:35:45.800 --> 1:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we're kind of riffing off that with the

1:35:48.080 --> 1:35:50.240
<v Speaker 1>with these kind of what I call high concept, high

1:35:50.280 --> 1:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>designer products. A can of air for two hundred dollars,

1:35:53.280 --> 1:35:55.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, doesn't really exist. It's it's not what

1:35:55.320 --> 1:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to say. You know, when you casual lookwards

1:35:57.800 --> 1:36:00.559
<v Speaker 1>say it's sold out, but in it should when you

1:36:00.600 --> 1:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>click on there, there's like a laptop bag. Everything is

1:36:04.200 --> 1:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>exorbitantly praised, and that's when you realize it's a joke.

1:36:08.720 --> 1:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a conceptual joke here, it's a conceptual gang. But

1:36:11.200 --> 1:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, but the point is that a lot of

1:36:12.439 --> 1:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>these things are not completely ridiculous because there are I mean,

1:36:15.880 --> 1:36:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they are ridiculous, But what I mean is they're not

1:36:18.080 --> 1:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous in the sense there are companies out there that

1:36:21.040 --> 1:36:23.519
<v Speaker 1>really are marketing things that are not a million miles

1:36:23.520 --> 1:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>away from these things. You know, paying a thousand bucks

1:36:27.080 --> 1:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for a pair of sneakers just because it's got a

1:36:29.800 --> 1:36:32.240
<v Speaker 1>particular logo on it. This is the kind of world

1:36:32.240 --> 1:36:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. And also the other thing that kind

1:36:34.240 --> 1:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of span off from this was this idea of the

1:36:36.600 --> 1:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of elitism of limited editions. So we did one

1:36:40.160 --> 1:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>edition of the album, which is a limited edition of

1:36:42.400 --> 1:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>one copy, and we put it on so and by

1:36:45.240 --> 1:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, this is real. This is not something we

1:36:47.120 --> 1:36:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was a gag. This was real. We created myself and

1:36:49.840 --> 1:36:54.599
<v Speaker 1>my designer created one a one edition, one sorry, one

1:36:54.680 --> 1:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>copy edition of one version of the album. That version

1:36:58.080 --> 1:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of the album came in a big box which had

1:37:00.200 --> 1:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a seven inch single with the song of which only

1:37:03.040 --> 1:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>one copy was pressed. It had it had my Grammy

1:37:06.240 --> 1:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>certificate and Grammy Medal nomination, It had handwritten lyrics, basically

1:37:10.400 --> 1:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>had a load of really exclusive stuff of which there

1:37:13.160 --> 1:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was only one thing, you know, one version of that,

1:37:16.720 --> 1:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>and we put it on self a ten thousand pounds

1:37:19.160 --> 1:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>with all the money going to the Music Venue Trust,

1:37:22.080 --> 1:37:24.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's sold out within five minutes, sold up within

1:37:24.640 --> 1:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>five minutes. And I love that because it played it

1:37:27.800 --> 1:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of. Also, it's also playing on the idea of

1:37:30.000 --> 1:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>music selling music in the same way that art sells

1:37:33.960 --> 1:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what it produces. So this idea that a painting or

1:37:36.840 --> 1:37:41.559
<v Speaker 1>sculpture is produced in an addition of one and that

1:37:41.680 --> 1:37:46.439
<v Speaker 1>one sells at a premium price. That's that's what basis

1:37:46.520 --> 1:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that the whole world of art is predicated on. You know,

1:37:49.160 --> 1:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you create one original piece, you sell it for an

1:37:51.840 --> 1:37:54.599
<v Speaker 1>exorbitant price, and then the person that buys it has

1:37:54.640 --> 1:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the choice to either share it by putting in an

1:37:56.920 --> 1:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>art gallery, or they can hang it over their front

1:37:59.240 --> 1:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>room and Frank hang it over their fireplace in the

1:38:00.920 --> 1:38:02.559
<v Speaker 1>front room, and no one ever else gets to see it.

1:38:02.600 --> 1:38:05.599
<v Speaker 1>That's their prerogative. And I was fascinated by what would

1:38:05.640 --> 1:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be And I know I'm not the only person to

1:38:07.280 --> 1:38:09.519
<v Speaker 1>do this. Woutan Clang did an album of one I

1:38:09.560 --> 1:38:11.599
<v Speaker 1>think one copy a few years ago, which I think

1:38:11.600 --> 1:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>they sold from a million dollars. Uh, So I know

1:38:15.200 --> 1:38:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this is not a completely original notion, but but it

1:38:17.800 --> 1:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>all kind of was riffing on this idea of elitism

1:38:20.720 --> 1:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and snobbery and the idea of ownership rather than utility. Okay,

1:38:26.400 --> 1:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people might be listening to this primarily

1:38:29.840 --> 1:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for your remixes. Obviously we've talked about the new album,

1:38:33.800 --> 1:38:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and you also said you have a lot of work.

1:38:36.120 --> 1:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted them to further explore your work, where

1:38:40.080 --> 1:38:42.879
<v Speaker 1>else should they look? I mean in terms of your catalog,

1:38:44.080 --> 1:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to question to us, I've done so

1:38:46.080 --> 1:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>many different kinds of records, So I mean, without knowing

1:38:50.240 --> 1:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>what the sort of agenda, what the agenda of the

1:38:52.200 --> 1:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>person you know that you'd be asking on behalf of

1:38:55.040 --> 1:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is in terms of what their tastes are, I couldn't say.

1:38:57.160 --> 1:39:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I think The Future Bites is probably my face record

1:39:00.479 --> 1:39:02.479
<v Speaker 1>of all the records have ever made. Now. I know

1:39:02.720 --> 1:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I say that every time I make a record, because

1:39:04.920 --> 1:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I do say that every time I make a record.

1:39:06.640 --> 1:39:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's something special about this record to me because

1:39:09.240 --> 1:39:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it sounds completely like me, but it's completely a record

1:39:13.400 --> 1:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of the now. It sounds like a record that could

1:39:16.080 --> 1:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>only have been made now. It's very contemporary sounding record.

1:39:19.360 --> 1:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And I say that because I think a lot of

1:39:20.880 --> 1:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>my previous records have got more of a nostalgic element

1:39:24.320 --> 1:39:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to them. If people are really into progressive rock, they

1:39:27.640 --> 1:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>probably like my album Hand Cannot Erase, for example. If

1:39:30.400 --> 1:39:32.599
<v Speaker 1>people are really into metal, they probably like those early

1:39:32.640 --> 1:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Porcupine Tree Lava Atlantic records like Fear of a Blank Planet.

1:39:36.400 --> 1:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And in absentia, if people like more eighties pop stylings,

1:39:40.000 --> 1:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they might like my record to the Bone. So it's

1:39:43.360 --> 1:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a hard question to answer without knowing the taste of

1:39:46.880 --> 1:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the post involved, but I would say definitely. The current record,

1:39:49.920 --> 1:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The Future Bites, is a real landmark record for me,

1:39:54.320 --> 1:39:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very accessible but no less sophisticated because

1:39:58.479 --> 1:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of it record for him, A lot record, Okay, And

1:40:02.040 --> 1:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>since we live in this playlist world, one track where

1:40:05.240 --> 1:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>someone should start on the new album, Um, I really

1:40:10.200 --> 1:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like this song called Man of the People, which I

1:40:12.200 --> 1:40:13.720
<v Speaker 1>think is a beauty. It was in my head it

1:40:13.760 --> 1:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to be Marvin Gay collaborating with Pink Floyd.

1:40:16.360 --> 1:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And I know that sounds rather lofty aspirations to have

1:40:20.800 --> 1:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for someone like me who can't really sing anywhere near

1:40:24.120 --> 1:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>like Marvin Gay, but that was it was kind of

1:40:26.280 --> 1:40:27.479
<v Speaker 1>in my head. I had this idea. I wanted to

1:40:27.479 --> 1:40:29.760
<v Speaker 1>do it almost like this kind of soul ballad, but

1:40:29.880 --> 1:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with the kind of production aesthetic of classic Floyd And

1:40:34.320 --> 1:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>when you listen to it, that's kind of what it

1:40:36.200 --> 1:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds like, I think. And I'm really proud of that song.

1:40:39.080 --> 1:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Man of the People is beautiful song. I would go

1:40:42.040 --> 1:40:46.519
<v Speaker 1>with Personal Shopper, but that's okay. You're the person who

1:40:46.520 --> 1:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>made the record, you know. I love the whole record.

1:40:49.280 --> 1:40:51.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm so proud of everything. It's like trying to choose

1:40:51.479 --> 1:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>one of your you know, your favorite child. I love

1:40:53.920 --> 1:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>them all. I love Personal shop is great to Yeah,

1:40:56.800 --> 1:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and I've loved talking to you. Know. It's funny until

1:40:59.120 --> 1:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you actually connect someone, you have no idea what they're like.

1:41:02.479 --> 1:41:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea. As I say, you were so

1:41:04.520 --> 1:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>erudite and articulate. There are many people who are musicians

1:41:07.920 --> 1:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>who really can make it but not really talk about it.

1:41:11.720 --> 1:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And I can see why you have this podcast, and

1:41:14.920 --> 1:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I would love to argue with you about some of

1:41:16.960 --> 1:41:19.479
<v Speaker 1>these records, but I think we've come to the end

1:41:19.520 --> 1:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of the feeling we've known for today, so Steve and

1:41:22.400 --> 1:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you so much for doing this pleasure.

1:41:25.120 --> 1:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of fun Bob is great to

1:41:26.640 --> 1:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot of stuff that I don't normally

1:41:28.200 --> 1:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>get to talk about because I've been I'm on the

1:41:29.800 --> 1:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>intervilled interview treadmill right now for the future. BIS and

1:41:34.000 --> 1:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>questions are always the same, so it's been great to

1:41:36.200 --> 1:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>have some different things to talk about. Thank you for that.

1:41:38.520 --> 1:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It was great. I'll leave it at that until next time.

1:41:41.160 --> 1:41:42.479
<v Speaker 1>This is Bob left sets