WEBVTT - TechStuff Predictions for 2013: The Results

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Get in test with technology with text stuff from that everyone,

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tex Stuff. This is Jonathan Strickland and

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lauren And you know what, there's something that we

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like to do every year. Uh. And then there's also

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>these prediction shows that we do. So every year we

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>do on tech Stuff of prediction about what's going to

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.159
<v Speaker 1>happen in the world of technology over the course of

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>the following twelve months. Jonathan despises doing this, and it's

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>not so much that I despise it, it's just that, Uh,

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I dread it. Um. I love making the predictions. I

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>dread this time of year where we take the predictions

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>we made twelve months ago and then we ourselves harshly. Yeah,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we do a report card. If you remember in past episodes, Uh,

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>when it was me and Chris, I would get all

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>check marks and Chris got all x is. But I

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>understand we have a different grading system this time that

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>involves some form of life. So I guess we'll have

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to judge how well we do as we go along.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>We'll work it out as we go. Um. This was

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>actually one of the first episodes that I recorded with

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff, and listening back to it was pretty embarrassing,

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I want to say thank you to everyone

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>who has continued listening to tech stuff despite the fact

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that you had to hear my learning curve, considering that

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you had never podcast before. Really, I don't think it was,

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, dreadful or anything. So you're being really hard

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on yourself. I no, no, no, that that's but that's

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's a good indicator for this episode to come. Yes, yes,

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we are now going to take a look at the

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>predictions we made and say what happened. So now both

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of us made a bunch of pretty safe predictions, or

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at least what seemed like safe at the time. Yeah,

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we haven't discussed when we're gonna

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>do our our predictions for two thousand and fourteen. We

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>are planning on doing that, but I think I might

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>go a little more crazy next time because some of

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the ones when I went back over and I'm like, well, geez, Jonathan,

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks for predicting that if you go into the water

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you will get wet. Yeah, your first one is a

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit like that. Yeah, And my first one was

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that mobile web browsing would outpace desktop browsing. Now, granted

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this was one of those things that seemed pretty pretty

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>sure based upon the trend on the edge at the

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>end of but it hadn't actually pushed over, which it

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>really pretty promptly didn't. Yeah, exactly, I didn't take very long.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>And the way that there are different ways of measuring

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this obviously, but calm Score, which is often cited as

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the analysts companies that will look into this

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff, the way they looked at it as

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they looked at mobile web browsing when it came to

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>online shopping, and they discovered that online shopping through mobile

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was being done like fifty at the time and that

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the other were PCs. So if you look at it

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>just from a shopping standpoint, mobile browsing overtook PCs, and

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they extrapolate to say that other types of browsing follows

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>suit based upon the the online shopping model. Uh, out

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of that most of that of that was from smartphones

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and the other eleven percent of that was from tablets.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So even with online shopping, smartphones are still outpacing tablets

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to that particular version of mobile web browsing.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, it appears that this prediction was pretty much true.

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So gave me so according to our new scoring system,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I get two squids and an ink sac. That's pretty good.

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Als okay, I guess alright, So, Lauren, what was your

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>first prediction? My first prediction was that laptop sales would

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>make a comeback while desktop sales continued to decline, and

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that tablets um wouldn't perform as well as as they

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>had been, like, it'll slow down, that it would kind

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of slow down and even out as people realize that

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they needed more power and practicality and tablets could really

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>provide UM. And I was pretty wrong. I was not

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>correct about that. Well. To be fair, there were a

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of factors that went into making this complicated issue,

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>one of which was something that will factor into another prediction,

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>which I would say is Windows eight. Windows eight I

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think actually discouraged people from getting laptop. Yeah. It did

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>way more poorly than I think anyone expected it. At

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of to do. Yeah, a lot of companies

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>had declines that continued in both desktop and laptop sales,

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>although one company started to make up some ground and

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>market share. From what I understand, Apple apples have always

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>been trailing behind like Windows based PCs when it comes

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to market share, particularly in the US, but inten they

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>hit twelve percent of the market share, and some analysts

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>were saying that they have the potential to get up

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to the market in the near future, which would be

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge coup for Apple. Yeah. Um was actually the

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>first year since two thousand three that Max sales dropped,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but their laptops are outsell in their desktops three to one. Yeah,

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>which not a big surprise because it wasn't until recently

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that the desktop's got a major update. Yeah. According to MPD,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>desktop and laptop sales fell by five and two percent

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>respectively during the whole back to school season, as opposed

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to yeah, um, which is supposedly you know it's it's

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>usually the biggest time that computer sea sales. Yeah. Back

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>back to school and the holiday shopping season are like

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the two most important times of the year for most

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>laptop However, those declines were mild compared to the rest

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Um uh sales each quarter according to Gardner,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>we're down about ten percent UM each quarter compared with

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>each quarter last year. But the tablet market is still growing.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Um Well, I mean, okay, it is slowing a little bit.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't completely wrong about it flattening a little. Um,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's over thirty six percent growth, which is not insignificant.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's true. Uh, but you know, you also have

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to look like the tablet market is still smaller than

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the overall PC market, so when they grow, the percentages

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are larger. Right Like Like if you if you sell

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>two units and then the next year you sell eight units,

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that percentage growth is huge. If you're selling two million

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>units and the next year you sell two and fifty

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>million units, that relative growth is small. So it's tablet

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>market really didn't exist until what was a two thousand

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>nine when the first I pad came out. Yeah, I

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah, the the previous tablets had not really had

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>any consumer penetration at all. So uh, yeah, it's but

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it is. It does look like it's starting to mature,

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's starting to slow down. So I agree that

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you were right on that one. So, um, I'm gonna

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>give you. I'm giving you a squid and a half,

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but you also apparently get a squid squeaky toy. I

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that means. That sounds fine, okay, Um,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I got My next prediction was enterprises will resist adopting

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Windows eight another gimme um, because I mean, any time

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>a new operating system comes out, enterprises are going to

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>lag behind consumers, even if the operating system is is

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>received with great joy and love. Oh absolutely, Because I

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>mean enterprises have companies have a whole systems that are

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>based upon a single operating system and changing them all

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>over is time consuming and there's testing involved, and it's

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>expensive and u scary, so you never know if it's

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>going to work and and then you end up having

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>made an investment and then you eat the expense if

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work out. So not a big surprise. What

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was kind of interesting to me was that Windows eight

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>did seem to be a little bit of a of

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>an albatross, Like it didn't get a lot of love

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for many people. Like a lot of people really didn't

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>like that operating system when it came out. And like

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, it may have even contributed to that two

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>people resisting purchasing a new notebook. So that's not great.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But um but but but but good call on that one.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Umdeed do you have do you have a I'm looking

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm consulting my squid uh profile here According to this,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't get a squid, but I get a squib.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you shoot me, then I get the little

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of pop noise like in an action movie. So

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that's something. Did some tentacles come out along with the

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>blood with me? Yes? Excellent. Yes, it's mostly because we're

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>eight lunch. I'm not even going to ask about that.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So my second prediction was that UM touch screens would

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>be integrated into more products, including most laptops and UM

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and display. Yeah, like things like that, like a secondary

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>display for your computer or even a main display for

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>your computer. That was that was you were you were

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you were. I think being very optimistic. I was, and

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the trend is definitely there. I

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's there and I and it definitely didn't happen

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think it's going to happen in the

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>next like two years. I think I was being way

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>too optimistic. But still the trend is obviously there. I mean,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>because people have grown to love the whole touch screen experience.

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just a question of does that translate to the

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>laptop and desktop experience and can you create something that's

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>compelling enough to make that a reason for you to

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>have that feature in your in your device. Everyone was

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping that Windows eight was going to be that thing.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>It was not. It was not that thing, and the

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>new mac os is kind of also not that thing.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not something that Apple has moved toward yet, but

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still a possibility to And it's not like it's

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.599
<v Speaker 1>not like people weren't including them. There were lots of

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of models out there that did include them. Yeah. According

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to MPD, about of all notebooks shipped in had touch screens,

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like a relatively small number until you think

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that before basically none, ye hardly like

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>some at the very tail end of just leading into

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>c E S and uh yeah, so that's actually quite

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a large number. I mean, that's a big gamble for

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a company to do, is to invest in that kind

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of new technology because that's going to impact everything that

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that product encounters from that moment on. Right. So, Um,

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so eleven percent is actually pretty big, and it all

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>depended upon which company you're talking about. They had different numbers. Yeah,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Sony had a lot, didn't think Yep, seventeen

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>point six percent of all notebooks they shipped were equipped

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with touch screens. However, um, they did not make up

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>a majority of the actual touch screens on the market,

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>whereas Lenovo, Uh, they only had seven point four percent

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of all of their laptops shipping with touch screens, but

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they they accounted for fourteen point seven percent of the

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>touch screen laptop market share. Yeah. So, in other words,

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Lenovo had if you look at all the stuff they offered,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a smaller percentage of it had touch screens, but they

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>made up the majority of the touch screens based upon

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>other companies are buying. Yeah, so that might mean that

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Lenovo's you know, cheaper. Yeah, they were more attuned to

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>their customers a cheaper Yes, that is usually what that means.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Um so, uh so what are what are we What

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are we going to give me? According to our squid

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>valuation system, you get a sucker, not tentacle sucker, but

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like a lollypo, it's squid flavored. Yeah, that's what you get.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, I'm failing to see how that's a positive. No,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it all depends on whether or not you

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like squid. Uh. You know, it's like, you know, Calamari pops.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the newest thing. So the next part another gimme, man,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to stick my neck out more next year,

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm reading these and just like, how lamed could I get?

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I said that the the NFC near field communication would

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>not receive wide adoption in the United States, partly because

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple would not play ball. In other words, Apple was

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to incorporate NFC and its next iPhone. I'll

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have more to say about their next iPhone shortly, but

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I said that NFC just wasn't gonna get any traction

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in the United States on a meaningful level, and indeed

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it did not know because again Apple did not include it.

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a huge part of it is that,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, without without Apple getting on board, there's uh,

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's that's big. That's a that's a sizeable

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the smartphone poppy of your smartphone population can't

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>use the technology. Yeah, then you're like, well, why would

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I invest in this if potential, especially if you've made

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the determination that perhaps your customers happen to be iPhone customers,

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>They're like, well, I could spend a hundred thousand dollars

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>retrofitting my my my vending so that I can take

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>advantage of this, but if my clientele don't use it,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>then that's just a waste of money. So then, uh, yeah,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and the reasons, the reasons for this, I mean are

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>are basically what we talked about in that episode. It's

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it's the cost of implementation, the concern about security, that's

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a big one, oh sure, the you know, the lack

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of consumer awareness about it. I mean, if you haven't

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>been to Europe recently here in the US, and you're

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>from the US, then yeah, you don't even know, Like

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you might not even be aware that this is a possibility.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean people who have been using things like I've

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>got a Nexus four phone and that has an n

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>FC chip in it. I've got a Nexus seven tablet

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and that has an NFC chip in it. I have

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>never used either of those products with the NFC, so

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm aware of it because I own two of them.

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But even I haven't used them. And uh and even

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>vendors not realizing the benefit that they would have of

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>getting that kind of thing out here, right, So, so

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of things that challenges that have

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to be overcome before we see this become something that

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>actually is is in widespread use in the United States.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's a gimme. According to this I get h

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just a beak. I think it's from a squid. I

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta make better predictions. We we we really need to

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to to this squid referral provider. It's it's stuff

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to blow your minds. Robert, I don't know what he's

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>been going through. Apparently he got really upset when we

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>suggested that perhaps he was leaving human teeth around the office. Yeah,

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>there was, So this is a tangent, you guys. But

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but I found like a little plastic baggy of of

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be human teeth in one of our

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>conference rooms, just sitting on the on the tray of

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>our white board. Yeah, like just hanging out. I mean

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're clean looking. And Robert claims he didn't do it,

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but he would have been my number one suspect. I

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>personally blame Matt. And that is right here, that is

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting in for us, and he's staring at us with

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>creepy eyes. But technically those were just Matt's eyes. So

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's nodding slowly. All right, Well, anyway, let's get

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>back to another one of your suggests, your suggestions, your predictions. Yes,

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>my next prediction was that the Internet of things would

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>become more of a thing. Um, with more interconnected systems

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>taking off. Yeah, and commercially speaking, this is this is accurate.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>We saw it, We saw a few launched. I think

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that you're more willing to give me that

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>one than I am. Um. I mean, I've I've kind

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of incidentally seen a lot of seen and heard a

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of commercials for this kind of stuff. I haven't

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>been able to find any numbers of the number of

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>adoption yet. Um, but the fact that it's a product

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that more people have access to is pretty nifty. Yeah.

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>It used to be that you were only only like

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>bleeding edge adopters who had ridiculous amounts of money and uh,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're willing to go through a contractor to get

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>home automation. Only they had access to this kind of stuff.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We're just now starting to see it enter into the

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>consumer marketplace where the average person can go into like

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a hardware store and buy stuff that has Internet of

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Things capabilities, Like the next Thermostatic came out with a

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>new model this year, and they came out with a

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>new smoke detector this year. So we're seeing it more

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and more. I personally happen to have Internet Internet connected

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>light bulbs, so I can turn my lights on and

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>off wherever I am. Yeah, so, uh, it's too bad.

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I should do the thing they did in the Big

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Bang theory, where I create a lamp that has one

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of these bulbs in it and then just give the

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Internet access to it and they can turn the lamp

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>on and off whenever they want. That sounds like a

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>project of terror to me personally. It could be interesting.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I could end up getting Morse code. But I have

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>not done that Internet, so don't expect to find it

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. But you know I do have. I mean,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>most know whether or not you're interested. Maybe I'm biased

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Internet of Things because I'm I'm technically an

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>early adopter. Yeah well, I mean, okay, predictions from both

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Disco and Intelligence estimate that the decade long growth of

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the technology will will will be ninefold um. And that's

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's big um. But you know, I'm still I am

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>still saying that I was a little bit premature on

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this one. All right, Well, you're you are your own harsh,

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>harshest critic, right, you get for that six squid. But

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they all are occupying the exact same space at the

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>exact same time. So it's terror to look at. So

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't look at it for too long or you will

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>lose your sanity. I I think that I spent all

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>morning looking at that. Is that a bad thing? I

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>looked right in the trap ray? All right? So um,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>let's go on to my next one. I said that

0:16:58.160 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there will be a new iPhone, but it will be

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>an incriminal improvement and not a huge departure from the

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>previous generation of iPhones. So the iPhone five I said

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't going to be a big change from iPhone five.

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Depending upon how you look at it, you might agree

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or disagree with that. I'm willing to give you this

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one because I think that the I mean, yes, there

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>were some some big bits to the to the five

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>S and the five C more the five S, right Yeah.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>The five C was more or less the five but

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in different colors. Right Um? Yeah, casing does not count

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>as an upgrade. That is exactly the sort of thing

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that you were talking about in in your and I

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>think that if it had just been the five C released,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>then you wouldn't find your your win or failed to

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>be Yeah, I wouldn't be Yeah, I wouldn't it be

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a debate at all. And to be fair, it's funny

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>because in that episode, if you go back and listen

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to it, Lauren, you refer to it as it's probably

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like an iPhone five S, which is exactly

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>what they called it, and so that also indicates from

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Apple that it is not a huge jump, because I

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't call it the iPhone six. So I guess you know,

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that kind of fits in there. Obviously, anyone who's followed

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone news you are all aware of this. So UM,

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on that one, it looks like I'm getting a Technicolor squid,

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>mostly because of the cases. So that's kind of cute.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Lots lots of squids come in technicolor. Actually, yeah, well

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know they do. When I'm done with them, that's

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Not positive what that means, neither do I.

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to the next one, okay. Um I

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>predicted that Apple, speaking speaking of Apple, that Apple would

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>hold on to its share of the mobile market and

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that Android would be in second place, and this was um.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple was holding forty eight percent of the mobile market

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>share at the time of the podcast. UM. Due to

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone five release, it was it was up from

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>about right, and and Google had dropped down to below

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what Apple had. It was somewhere in the forty range. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was so wrong. Um, I was really completely wrong,

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys, because according to com Score, Apple had a

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>forty point six percent of the US market and Google

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>had fifty one and BlackBerry was down to three point

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>eight ouch boy, BlackBerry. But we neither of us made

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>any predictions for BlackBerry this for this past year. But

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because you were too depressed. Yeah, I mean,

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I never owned My wife owned a BlackBerry once,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but I never owned a BlackBerry. But you know, it's

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those companies that I really wanted to see

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>turn it around because obviously more competition benefits everybody ultimately.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, they've just had such a rough time of it.

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>But despite the fact that you know, Apple fell and

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:42.719
<v Speaker 1>market share, they still are the dominant hardware because Apple

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>makes its own mobile sets right by far dominant and hardware,

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>So they have forty point six you know, that is

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for the operating system. Uh, they also is for the

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>hardware because Apple makes both operating system and the hardware,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>whereas Google just makes the operating system. And unless you're there.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>You can to their Motorola Google too, since they acquired it.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But but there are dozens upon hundreds of Yeah, there's

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a new one every every every darn week, he said,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>self editing. Yeah, there's a new one every darn week.

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And and so when you look at the actual hardware,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple is the dominant player in the mobile market space

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>market market space marketplace. There are words that Jonathan can say.

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Jonathan's going to say a lot more words,

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>but Jonathan is going to wait to say those words

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for the second half of our podcast. And we're gonna

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break to thank our sponsor. Okay, we're back,

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, We're not done with Apple yet.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So all all the all the people who are on

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>one side of the camp or the other can yell

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>at us. So I welcome that. I welcome the yelling.

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>But they're they're they're a big company we we like,

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're very influential as it turns out. So my

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>next prediction was that the next versions of iOS and

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>mac os will be similar to one another, but the

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>two would not yet merge into us thele operating system

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>across multiple platforms, because you know, we're seeing this sort

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of one of my favorite words in the world, convergence

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>between the energy synergy scissor g wait, know that's something else.

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing, uh, we're not seeing the plants come

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>into alignment, but we are seeing these operating systems get

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>closer and closer to one another, so that you have

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of a smooth transition across multiple platforms, so that

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're using an Apple phone and then you switch

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>over to an Apple laptop or an Apple desktop, that

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that transition is fairly seamless. It's not to the point

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>where the operating systems are identical. And I said that

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that was not going to happen this year, and I

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was right. But I think I think that you might

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>have overstated how similar at the next Yeah, I don't.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they got as similar as in my

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>mind they were more similar. They were going to be

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>more similar than they've turned out to be. I think

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 1>that you were basing this on on the Windows eight model,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that part of part of why it

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen is that Apple looked at how Windows eight

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>performed and you and I think Apple may have come

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to a conclusion that it's just two different is two

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>separate sets of things that you need to be able

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>to do with these different types of hardware, and therefore

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no need to make it the same thing, whereas

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft doesn't seem to follow that. Microsoft's like, no, we

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>want the same approach for everything. And you know, it's

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>one of those arguments that keeps getting battered around. It's

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>not saying that one is obviously better than the other.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.719
<v Speaker 1>It all depends on the implementation as well. So if

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you make crappy OS and that's not going to help you,

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>whether whether you make a CRAPOS for your mobile handset

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 1>or for the desktop. Sure, something about the OS that

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>we could not have in any way predicted well two things.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>My favorite is the naming departures. Right that the naming

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>departure was a big one. The latest one is not

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>named after a kittie cat. It is big big cats.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that most I was really think it's gonna

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>be mac os ten Snuggles. It was just gonna be

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>They're just gonna go with names that would be cute

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>for kittens. I guess Mavericks could be the name of

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a cute kitten. I guess, so yeah, mac Os ten

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Mavericks is the that's the name. And also it was

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>a free upgrade. You didn't have to pay for it.

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That was that was what really shocked me. I mean,

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>depart despite the the first shock of it not being

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>named after a big cat. So yeah, it was a

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>free upgrade and you could run more and more iOS

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>apps on that operating system. So that's a little bit

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like what I said, but it's not exactly what I

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>had envisioned. So yeah, according to this, I get a

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>tiny model of Cathulhu which I can find sitting on

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>my desk. Actually, that's totally true. That's why I've got it.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that this list was made by Roberts.

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So all right, well, I mean that's the squid ish,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, So let's go back to you. Uh yeah,

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I predicted that the new consoles would not have impressive

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sales initially, um, and that the Xbox One would out

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sell the past four like like crazy pants party time. Yeah. Well,

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, it's still early because we are recording this,

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in early December, which that means that

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the holiday shopping is still in full swing. Um. Okay,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're being You're being too kind, because both the

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>PS four and the Xbox one sold a million consoles

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty four hours. They did it under different conditions though,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>which actually doesn't help you. It doesn't help my case, yeah,

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>because the PS four sold a million consoles and was

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>only offered in two countries initially, and Xbox One was

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>offered in thirteen, so it was a different playing field

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for both of them. Sony has reported selling two point

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>one million of these consoles. Microsoft hasn't said how many

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's sold, just that it's unprecedented. So yeah, well, I'm

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>glad that you sold more Xbox ones than you've ever

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>sold Xbox ones in the past, considering that you just

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>started selling Xbox ones. I think that unprecedented is a

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>terrific corporate speech for for for look to pay no

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>attention to this man behind the curtain. Yeah, but anyway, Yeah,

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>so it does like the sales have gone really well.

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And the one thing that someone pointed out I thought

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this was really interesting, is that you cannot really compare

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the sales of these this new generation to previous generations,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>because in previous generations, one of the issues was that

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the supply was never enough to meet the initial demand.

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So you had Sony selling out a p S three

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and Xbox selling out of Xbox three sixty shortages and stores,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and that that kind of colors are perception of how

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>popular these things are because you couldn't get them anywhere.

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>We was the same way. Yeah, yeah, although there's there's

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that going on now. I checked

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on on Amazon today and you can currently purchase neither

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the PS four North the Xbox One just put an

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>order in weight, So yeah, I mean we we are

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>recording this on December five, which is, you know, the

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>week after Thanksgiving, so that might have something to do

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with it. Probably had a little to do with it.

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, they have sold pretty well. We don't know

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>yet which one is going to win out. It looks

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like the PS four is doing really really well initially,

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>but personally, for this is just my own personal perspective,

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>neither console right now has a game that I really

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>want to play on it, Like, neither of them have

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a killer game where I'm like, I have got to

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>get this console so I can play that game. I

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think that I think the developers are very smartly holding

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>off on on the finalization of games that they know

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't ready to be finalized yet. And I think that

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that's just a wonderful, gorgeous thing that we have on

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>this modern um console platforms where where you know it,

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>it's letting game designers actually design the games that they

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>want to and not not pushing something to go out early.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Is we are living in the future, my friend. Any

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>any time, any time you have ever had a an

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>experience of playing a game that obviously had not been finished,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it is one of the most frustrating experiences, particularly if

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you were going into it expecting a great game. So

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I think it's a better thing. So uh,

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm personally gonna I have not order it either. Uh disclosure.

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I expect that I will be buying one of these

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>consoles probably within the next twelve months. And I'm right

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>now just based on features, not based on games. I

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>am leaning towards the Xbox Yeah. And here here's why.

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the PlayStation is going to have some amazing

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>independent games on it, and I want to be able

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to play those, and that would be like if you're

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about just games, that lets me lean towards the

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>PS four. But the Xbox One has some really cool

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>uh voice activation features in it and some Connect features

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that originally I don't think the Connect was fully ready

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for prime time when it came out, But them the

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>implementation I'm hearing from the Xbox One sounds much more

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>promising to me. It sounds completely creepy to me, but

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>also very promising. I mean, I mean, I'm blown away

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>by the capacity that they're talking about. A yeah, you

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>know what, that's enough talking about that. But anyway, according

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to this, you get a gumball that has melted into

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the shape of a squid. You get a lot of candy. Lauren,

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you guess sweet tooth that's um I do, but I

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that's it's someone trying to poison this podcast with my

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>sugar rash. I have no idea. I mean, it's you know,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I I can't make heads or tails out of any

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, mostly because squid don't have tails. I wonder

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>if this has to do with those teeth. Okay, So

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>my next prediction said that Intel will struggle due to

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>customers moving more towards mobile platforms. This is related to

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>my first prediction. Obviously, UM and Until's certainly had kind

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of a rough year. They tried a lot of different things.

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They actually created a web based television platform called on q,

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but on Que never really took off, an according to

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>c Net, Intel's looking to offload the product now trying

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to sell it off yeah. Um. They were also starting

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to focus more on enterprise customers, meaning other companies, which,

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, similar to what IBM had done in the past,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>where IBM was like, you know what, maybe we want

0:28:57.840 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to get out of the consumer market and just market

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to other companies as well, because those are the customers

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that tend to have a stable need for performance PCs.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So even if your consumers get a little flaky in

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they're like, I think I just want to have something

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I could play, you know, Candy Crush on that's the game, right, Yeah,

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I keep getting a request for something called that I

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't played Canny Crush Slaga. I don't know anyway, Um,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Holly can talk to us about that. Not necessary for

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you to have an Intel machine to play that game, apparently,

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>uh no. Um. And And also, like like we said earlier,

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, PC performances generally dropping. Yeah, so until you know,

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that's their main market. They they've tried to get into

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the mobile market, but it hasn't been nearly as successful.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of their competitors. However, they have started to develop

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>some interesting chips that should work with Internet of things

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>style sensors. So it may be that we see until

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>bounce back in an emerging industry that is still you know,

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just picking up speed. M'd be great to see. And yeah,

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>despite all of this, there's relatively even new was on

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the on the overall, Yeah, until Q three earnings in

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>were pretty much the same as it's Q three earnings

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in twelve, so it didn't lose ground, but it wasn't

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>gaining ground either. And you know, I don't know if

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>any of you work for big companies, but usually the

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>rule of thumb is that they want growth year over year.

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not just it's not just profit, it's growth, right

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>because profit is profit is number one. You want, you

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>want to make more money than you spend, but you

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make more and more money. Yes before yeah,

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the previous year, like, yeah, we made a lot of money.

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to figure out how we're going to

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>make more than that next year. And you know it's

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I find it exhausting. I'm so glad

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one of those executives who has to make

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>those kind of decisions. Yeah, so, so I think I

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>think that that prediction was pretty accurate. Yeah yeah, according

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to this, I get an animated gift of a squid juggling.

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty cute. Okay, alright, your turn. My next one

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was going back to Apple. Um I I boldly stated

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that Apple was going to this would be the year

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that they would make a TV. This was the Crisp

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Pallette suggestion. This was the Crisp Palette prediction because Chris.

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>If you guys are longtime listeners to tech stuff, you

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>probably realize that Chris made this prediction I think in

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven and two thousand twelves. So Lauren was

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>carrying on the text stuff tradition and rumors, you know,

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>rumors from from mac rumors dot com say that that

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we could we could totally expect one in yeah, the

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>earliest sixteen. Um So, I think that this rumor tradition

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>continues on. We'll find out if one of us predicts

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that will really be the year. Really, my only note

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for this one is just f That's all I had

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to say. Get an Apple that's got a little squid

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in it. I don't want. That's squid can't live in apples.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm very concernous. It's because your prediction was so awful, Lauren,

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>You've got a dead squid in an apple. Sorry, that's

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the way it works, all right. So I have an

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>electronic public sing will completely overtake traditional publishing in sales. Uh, Nope. Trends.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Trends at the end of two thousand twelve made it

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>look that way. But again, this is where that deceptive

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 1>number comes in, right, where you have a relatively small

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.959
<v Speaker 1>number increasing, that means the percentage of increase is huge.

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But eventually those numbers get bigger and that percentage starts

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.479
<v Speaker 1>to shrink because it starts to reflect that you know,

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe in reality, this isn't This isn't growth industry, right.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It is similar to tablets. It's they're kind of evening out. Yeah,

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we started to see it. I mean, seriously, plateau it

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>started plateau ing big time in twelve, and really plateau

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in That doesn't mean that there's not a lot of

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of e publishing going on or electronic books sales. There are,

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but it is not. It has not overtaken traditional publishing.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Um Amazon reports that sales of its e readers have

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>hit record numbers. That's not a big surprise, but traditional

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>books are still sold more than e books in the

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>grand scheme of things. And according to some reports, a

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of different sectors of publishing of physical books actually

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>went up at a couple of points during the years. Yeah. Yeah,

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so this one was a total mess on my part.

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And this one apparently I get a book about squids

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>where every page that had the name words squid on

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it has been ripped out. There are there's a dedication

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>page and a copyright page left. Okay, all right, Lauren,

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>your turn. My next prediction was that this would be

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a record year for people going out and getting their

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>their genes sequenced. Um and that there would also be

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a big move to digital health records UM and this

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting news on this one. All right, so yeah, this

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this was so so basically I could not have predicted

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that here in the US anyway, that the whole Affordable

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Care Act could could have been as much of a

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>mess as it really was caused, as much of a

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>mess in the industry. Um. And And again I was

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>being pretty optimistic about stuff. You think that overall, you know,

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the trends are are looking good for both of those

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>things right, but just this specifics are some rough parts,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not the year that they were really implemented to be fair,

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>uh twenty three and me which was a leading company

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that this genetic sequencing here in the US, had more

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>than four hundred thousand customers, which shows that this was

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a record year. That's one of the things you said

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be a record year. That was true,

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>But then the US Food and Drug Administration kind of

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.919
<v Speaker 1>uh put the brakes. And the thing is that there's

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of legislature that hasn't really caught up to

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>this technology yet. Because okay, so so the first human

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>gene sequencing UM took like fifteen years and three billion

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars UM. We're at a point right now where we

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>can do it in a few days for three thousand UM,

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>which is incredible and amazing, and there's a push to

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 1>get it even lower and that's wonderful and magical. However,

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>legislature is still going like so, if you're recommending these

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>this genetic sequencing as medical advice, UM, that falls under

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>our purview and we need to regulate that, and that

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 1>means that every single gene you're testing has to be

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>has to be approved through us, and there's an expensive

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.399
<v Speaker 1>process for that, which means that it turns any kind

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of consumer level genetic sequencing completely impractical. Right. And furthermore,

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like we've talked about in our genetics episodes, genes

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are tricky things. They do, they do more than one

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>thing at once, and it's really difficult to label one

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in many cases as being like this gene causes that thing.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And on top of that, the the FDA has a

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>couple of of arguments that I think are pretty valuable,

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 1>things like, you know, you don't want to give people

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a message that will end up having the mishandle their

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>medication therefore suffer some sort of toxic effects because they

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and it may not even be the direct fault of

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the genetic sequencing company. It may be that the consumer

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is misinterpreting the results. The point that the FDA was

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>making is that this is something that that a a

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>medical professional needs to handle and be able to communicate

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to the person so that they can make use of

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that information. It's too much information without enough expertise. So

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but but still was a record year. It was just

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where the law began to try

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and catch up to the technology. So I think he

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>got I think you'd get at least a half point

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 1>on that. And what what what does that equal out

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to in squid? Squid with five tentacles, Yes, squire with

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>five tentacles. We call him Lefty. Yeah, they're all the

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>left tentacle. I don't know how that works personally, I

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>don't get us. I mean whatever, I'm the same. You

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>can name him George. Alright. So my next one was

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that Zinga, the Zinga Board of directors, would attempt to

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>purchase the company back and turn it into a private corporation. Now,

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this was based on some rumors that were circulating at

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of two thousand twelve. Mark Pinkas, who was

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the former CEO of Zinga, was rumored to be talking

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. He had hinted at the prospect of getting

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the board directors to buy up enough shares of Zinga

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to make it go back into being a private company

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and said that a lot of the problems of the

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>company were due to shareholder expectations and requirements, and that

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if it were a private company could operate however it

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>needed to in order to make to to do business.

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>H Zinga, of course, is the game company that's behind

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of those social media games that were really

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>popular on things like Facebook, from things like World Words

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with Friends to Farmville and all that kind of stuff.

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So Zinga UM did not try and purchase the the

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the shares back to become a private company. That did

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>not happen. What did happen was that instead Mark Pinkas

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially fired himself and then hired Don Matric as the

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>new CEO. If you're not familiar with Matric, he was

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the former head of Microsoft's Xbox to In fact, news

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>broke today that one of Matrix uh moves in the

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Xbox division has been undone. He established a an Xbox

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>division in London called Xbox Victoria, and that has just

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>been shut down, so all the all the developers in

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that particular office are now looking for work. UM and

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>what he did over at Zingo was basically clean house. Yeah,

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he fired a whole bunch of people, UH and started

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to restructure the company. So it's remained publicly traded, but

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a very different organization now. However, because I

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>said that as the Zinga board would attempt to purchase

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the company back, technically my prediction was wrong, and UH

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I get an octopus wearing a squid costume. So there's

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>these two extremely fake tentacles hanging down from it. I

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know that sounds I would watch an Internet video

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>about that. An octopus posing as a squid. I bet

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole cartoon series speaking if if not. I

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 1>want one of you guys more than I can even express.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I might. I might really enjoy cephalopods, And I think

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that someone should make that happen. Um. I think. I

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think Erin's got a new job to do. Um. We

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>we love you, photoshoppers. My next prediction had to do

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>with the Internet. Uh, it was. It was a non prediction, really,

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I said that nothing of note would happen with HTML five. Yeah.

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.320
<v Speaker 1>HTML five, of course, is supposed to be the big

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>replacement for HTML four, which is what a lot of

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the webs based on a lot of sites have made

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the move over to HTML five. But as it turns out,

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>it's had some problems. Like it it just it's not

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>working quite to the level that we were expecting. Like

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>it was supposed to replace a lot of the need

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>for all those plug ins that h t m L

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>four requires if you want to have a rich web experience. Right, So,

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like anything like a flash player, you have to have

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Flash installed for you to be able to watch that.

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is that with HTML five all those

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of features would be natively supportive, I think, would

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>be integrated to so you wouldn't have a single app crashing.

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:05.479
<v Speaker 1>But as it turns out, just just the whole code

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is not really coming together. Um. And so you know,

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we were talking about with Windows eight.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, just people aren't willing to adopt something if

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't know it's going to work. Right. A lot

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of developers who are making apps do not have not

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>been making apps for HTML five because they just felt

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't doing what they needed it to do,

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the results they were getting were not satisfactory, So

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>they had to go back to developing apps for older

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 1>legacy style platforms like Flash because if they tried at

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>for HTML five, it just wasn't doing what they needed.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a smooth transition. Yeah. So I was on

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the money for this one. Yeah. So you get a

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>squid smoothie, it's extra smooth. Oh it's not. It's not

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>made of squid. It was made by a squid. Oh yeah, well,

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that's great on this little uh that's a little card

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that came with it. I think it's important to support

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>our squid employees. Yes, um, high ten. I guess because

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they've they've got tent tentacles. I think two of them

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 1>are technically arms. Are they have you armed your squid? Okay,

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm moving on before I get shot by a squid.

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got two more. That was the rat last of Lawrence.

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I think this next one, what we should

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>do is just come up with a specific number of

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>predictions will each make and that way it will even

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.439
<v Speaker 1>out for next year. Because I've never done that, and

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you would think that after like five years of predictions,

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I would have said, hey, let's each make five, and

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you would think but anyway, And my next one is

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that manufacturers will attempt to build and market devices specifically

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>to serve as a second screen. I'm right for the

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>wrong reason I was when I said this. What I

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 1>was thinking was that a company would make something like

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a mobile handheld device like a tablet or a smartphone

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or something along those lines, and specifically say this is

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>so that you can see more information as you watch

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's on your TV. So in other words, the

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>second screen part would literally be the second screen, right.

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>That would be the entire purpose empt the device, right.

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And as it turns out, there are a lot of

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>second screen devices that have entered the market, things like

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Google Chrome Cast or the net Gear has the push

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to TV set, and there are a lot of other

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>ones too. They're designed to stream content from your computer

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to the television, So you have a second screen in

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the sense that the TV becomes your second screen, that

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>becomes your display, and then you can use your computer

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever else you want to do. But that's

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>not how I envisioned it. So it's interesting that what

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I had predicted came to pass, but in a totally

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>different implementation than what I expected. And apparently I get

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a I get an insight out squid. Oh man, oh

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that is all over that keyboard. Well, luckily I've already

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>scrolled down to the bottom here. Okay, I said, we'll

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>see the peak and then decline of crowdfunding in two

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen as people get burned out on it. Um.

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing, guys, Reliable sticks, statistics and funding just

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>don't exist. I can't find a truly reliable, unbiased source

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>every source I could find was one that was like

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this brought to you by crowdfunding, Like, wait a minute,

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you you have a clear conflict of interest in this. However,

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just based on what I've personally observed, it does not

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 1>look like this is slowing down at all. No, No,

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that. You know, of course, there's still some

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>projects that don't get funded, and I think that some

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>people are in fact getting getting burnt out on spending

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the money on every single new project that

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>comes up. But I'd say that, if anything, there are

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>more more awesome projects out there than there were. And yeah,

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean for me, like all the evidence is anecdotal.

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, I have certainly supported more campaigns

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:53.760
<v Speaker 1>crowdfunding campaigns this year than I have ever done before.

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I essentially about about once every couple of months have

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to tell myself to get off of the internet before

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I spend all of my money on all my money

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on kickstarter art. Yeah. So apparently, according to since I

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>got that one totally wrong, I don't get a squid,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I get a quid. So I get a squid without

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the s which is one pound sterling, but I'm taxed

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 1>on it. Yeah, alright, Well, I guess I'm not as

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 1>gross as the inside out thing. No, but I guess

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I deserve being taxed for such a wrong prediction. Well,

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there we go. That wraps up our predictions round up

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and how things turned out. So I guess we're gonna

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:34.360
<v Speaker 1>have to somehow carry all these squid back to our desks.

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll just leave them here for stuff to blow

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>your mind. They'll be coming in here before too long.

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Squid party, squid party. Um yeah, I'm gonna take my

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>quid though, I gotta have this English pound, all right.

0:44:44.560 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that wraps it up. I think it was

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a kind of fun one. We're gonna try and see

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what sort of crazy predictions will come up. I think

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we will try and limit it to maybe five predictions

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 1>per person, with maybe a couple of extra just in

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 1>case one of us predicts the same thing as the

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>other one. So that way we've got some wiggle room,

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but nothing on the lines of what we've done this time.

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Because this is just ridiculous, people, I mean, I can

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>only be so wrong for so long. Yeah, and and

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>this is I mean, I mean, no matter what the

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>system is of ranking next year, I clearly have way

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>too many squid at this point, well, I'm sure. I mean,

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>there there's one thing that's consistent with our predictions episode,

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>which is that the scoring is completely inconsistent. So I

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't worry too much because by next year I will

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>completely forgotten about the squid thing, so it'll be some

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 1>other ridiculous level of of of grading. So anyway, guys,

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have any predictions for two thousand and fourteen,

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Lauren and I will be making those very soon, so

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'll hear that episode before the end of the

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 1>year probably or if not at the end of the year,

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>at the very beginning of next year. Um, if you

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>have any predictions that you want to make, we can

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>even have a small section set aside for listener predictions. Alright, listeners,

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 1>if you have a prediction for two thousand fourteen, something

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that you believe is going to happen in the year

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's related to tech, let us know. It could

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>be a conservative guest, it can be a wild estimate.

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Let us know. Send us a message. Our email addresses

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:14.879
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff at Discovery dot com, or if you want

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to let us know on Facebook, Twitter, or Tumblr, you

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>can find us there. Our handle is tech Stuff HSW,

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>so put your prognosticator hats on and let us know.

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And I predict that Lauren and I will talk to

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. For more on this and thousands

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Does it have stuff works dot com