WEBVTT - U.S. China Trade Talks--Who'll Blink First?  Meredith Sumpter talks to Armstrong & Getty

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We begin today's meditation with a few sipping exercises to

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>remind it the little treat can go a long way.

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So pick up your McCafe iced coffees, close your eyes,

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and deep sipping and deep satisfaction out take a street

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>retreat at McDonald's right now, getting mccaffee iced coffee in

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>any size and any flavor for just ninety nine cents

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>until eleven a m price of participation. Maysberry. I hope

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you happy the horn running, Michael, because we're in a

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>trade war with fun. It's a trade war, Sturry midnight.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>We're in a trade war. Oh boy, slightly forward to

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the west. Are you auditional news? Welcome to the show.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Glad you're here. This is a real pleasure to welcome.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Meredith Sumter. Whoops, my screen just went black. Artist who

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is the head of research, strategy and operations for the

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Eurasia Group. We frequently talked to Mystery and Bremer, who

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>had up that fine out fit. Meredith, how are you? Oh,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm well, thanks for having me on. Is he and

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>technically your boss? Yes? He certainly isn't. He's a great

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>boss to have sounds now, are you just saying that

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>or wink. If you need Jack and Joe, you guys

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have had him on the show. You know how much

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>funny is and what what dynamic content we get to

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>work with which has an impact on everyday lives here

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in America. So it's just a real pleasure to be

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>speaking with you and to be part of this part

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of this roder discussion. Well cool. One of the things

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that makes us crazy is just the breathless um coverage

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the current trade negotiations with China. And it's all

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>about Trump and the rest of it, But to us,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting what both countries are trying to achieve

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in their strategies. Um, can you just give us a

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>brief description of why the US and the Trump administration

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to the wall over trade issues with China? Well,

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a great question. But first point is this is really

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not about trade and it's really not about tariffs. This

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is about which economic model sort of the U s

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>led liberal market economy that we all know and love

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>here or China's state directed economic model is going to

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be the leading economic force for the century. But those

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>are pretty high stakes. Yeah, they are very high stakes,

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>which is why you see that the kind of backing

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>up to the wall pressure that President Trump is putting

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on here. Look, he was elected on a platform of

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>revitalizing US industry, and when it comes down to that,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what he's trying to force China to do is to

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>play by the same rules that every other major developed

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>economy or our market driven economy plays by. And it

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that big of a deal when you know, twenty

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when China was relatively of a lower level

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>economic power and was not directly competing with US companies

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and US industry leaders. China now is in some of

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>these strategic sectors of the future. Actually, China is making

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>more investments than we are here at home and is

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>aiming to be a leading driving force and some of

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>these strategic growth drivers of the future. So US is

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>watching this and saying, hey, if you're going to try

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to lead, that's fine, but you've got to fairly compete.

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>You can't get where you are by doing things like

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, unfair market access rules, force technology transfer funding

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to take I P and then build off of

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that without actually having to do the research and development

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to make it yours. So that's what this is really about.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The President is using the threat of tariff and actually

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>using tariffs to try to force China and to force

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Chinese President Fijian King to change these structural rules by

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>which China's economy currently functions. And that's the key point here.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's an enormous task for a totalitarian, you know,

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>semi communist regime. Uh, kind of cap lest communist hybrid Uh.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it even possible to get halfway there on some

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of these giant issues like um, stop stealing our patents

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and quick demanding all of our I T and all

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of our R and d um or is it all

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>or nothing? It's certainly worth an effort to try to

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>put as much effort as possible on China to reform

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the way that it functions. And the way that that

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the White House has been trying to do this is

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>say like, look, these kinds of market based reforms are

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not only good for us and for all the other

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>economies they're trying to fairly compete, but they're also necessary

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for China to really develop and transform your own economy.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So they've been phrasing these reform concessions in a way

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that would make sense for China's own domestic comparative need

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>for reform, but that you've really touched on the key

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>problem here, which is that in order to function like

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in market based economy, the political center has to let

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>go of control of the economy. And there's no sign

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that Beijing under Stegent Ping especially is prepared to do that.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So on one hand, you can force as much pressure

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as possible to see how far you can get to

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>push China to make baseline structure reforms. They are going

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to be good for US companies, good for US industry,

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>good for fair competition. But at some point you're gonna

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna hit that wall. And that's the key question

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is how do you shift your strategy when the tariff

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure is not getting you the full response that you

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>need to protect US industry and to protect onward growth

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>prospects with the US economy. H I've got a question

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>about that, But first, um, I forgot my question. Maybe

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with mother questions. Meredith Sumter of the Eurasia

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Group is on the line, Oh, to what extent is

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>this our last best chance to put this kind of

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>pressure on China? Do we have to do it when

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we've got a president who just doesn't care and have

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>a strong economy. Well, certainly, both the the unorthodox approach

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of President Trump and the US economy remaining resilient are

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the two most important factors as to why

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the US is taking this position now. But there's there's

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>more to this as well. Uh, looking at how are

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>we going to A couple of things need to happen. One, Yes,

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>you need to put pressure on China, and you've got

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to find the most viable way to do that. So

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try this with tariffs. And the President has

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>already hinted that if this level of economic pain with

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>tariffs is not enough to push China, he's prepared to

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>issue even additional tariffs on Chinese goods. What you need

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch here is which economy is going to be

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the most resilient and in taking on this kind of

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>economic pressure, because the moment that one or the other

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>economies begins to weaken, that also weakens the negotiating hand.

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And both sides know that. Well, yeah, I hate to

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>interrupt you, but I just was ocurred to me that

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we So you've got two things going on there. On

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, you've got the incredibly strong economy of

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the United States. On the other, hand, You've got our

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>clitical process where when there starts to be pain, there's

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of pressure on a lot of

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>politicians to say some really scary things to try to

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>get trumped back down. Is their political pressure in China

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>too of that sort? There is political pressure in China,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but not of the sort that we have here in

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>our own democratic country. So that the political pressure in

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>China is to ensure that China does what it needs

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to do so that more Chinese are able to see

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>their livelihoods continue to develop an increase as as as

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it has. She didn't actually believed that he's in the

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>stronger position because he doesn't have the same kinds of

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>political democratic pressures that Trump has here account president for life. Yeah,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>but I've heard that they're they're critically interested in saving

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>face and not being seen as being strong armed by

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the US. Is that true? That is true, And that's

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>why we see it as highly unlikely that despite the

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>elevation of tariff overnight that Chinese Vice Premier Leal Hood,

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>who's the chief negotiator here in Washington right now, we

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>see it highly unlikely that China is going to agree

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to the concessions that Washington wants. We're almost out of time.

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I get two quick questions, who blinks first? And what day?

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Please tell us that who blinks first, Jack and Joe

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>depends upon which economy is going to blink first, So

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>watch that very closely. Point two is in order to

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>really be successful in the long term, the US needs

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to do more than put pressure on China and work

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>with like minded allies to do so. We need to

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>really invest here at home, to double down on investments

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and scaling up our workforce across the country. Love doing

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the basic R and D in our industry so we

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can compete with China and outcompete China. Meredith Sumter, Meredith,

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry to jump in. We're up against a heartbreak.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Meredith Sumter, head of Research, Strategy Operations your Asia Group.

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>A pleasure. Thank you, really great. I'm really great. Thank you.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>That's the best conversation I've heard on that yet. Marshall's

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>got his news coming up, but I know more about

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it than I did before the whole China trade thing.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to blink win? That's the shan for all

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>your foodies out there. I'm unwrapping a McDonald's steak, egg

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and cheese bagel. Look at this steak and the juice

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>running down the side. Get a little bit on a

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>wrapper here M. And then the fluffy egg and real

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cheese floted over the side looking just so good. M M.

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Grilled onions and a butt of bagel too. Thumbs up

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a McDonald steak, egg and chaves bagel for breakfast. Love it,

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>M bomp up. I participate in McDonald's