Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from Bucket buck
Speaker 1: Sexton dot com. It's remarkable that there are so many
Speaker 1: people who make a living supposedly bringing you information, and
Speaker 1: they're supposed to have an excellent grasp of what's going
Speaker 1: on of the facts, and they should be discerning in
Speaker 1: their judgment, right The news media, the journalists, the experts
Speaker 1: in different fields. They're supposed to be able to enlighten
Speaker 1: the public, and yet when we see very obvious things happening,
Speaker 1: we can see clear cause and effect. They're always the ones,
Speaker 1: the corporate media, the so called expert class, the elites
Speaker 1: that can't draw the most straightforward conclusion. You see this
Speaker 1: with the huge spike in murders and violent crime last
Speaker 1: year in the United States, which will certainly be talking about.
Speaker 1: You see this with stories like the Hunter Biden laptop,
Speaker 1: which will be discussing, where just now nprs come out
Speaker 1: and said, yeah, you know what, we probably shouldn't have
Speaker 1: said that was debunked. They've still never apologized for the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion madness, which is the most absurd and insane
Speaker 1: conspiracy theory to have ever gripped, at least in the
Speaker 1: modern era, the media in a way that change the
Speaker 1: future of the country. I mean the way that the
Speaker 1: corporate media were able to come together and do everything
Speaker 1: in their power to make sure that Donald Trump wouldn't
Speaker 1: win reelection, including by spewing all kinds of lies and
Speaker 1: acting like they're dumber than they actually are. It was
Speaker 1: quite a sight to behold. We'll be discussing much of
Speaker 1: that today on the show. But as you know, if
Speaker 1: you trust the gatekeepers, if you trust the people that
Speaker 1: are able to present you some information as they see fit,
Speaker 1: you're going to end up being poorly informed, misinformed, and
Speaker 1: so media sites are no better. The left wants to
Speaker 1: silence and remove any voices they don't agree with. Twitter
Speaker 1: and Facebook. We're supposed to be open platforms. I don't
Speaker 1: need their content moderators acting like the op ed section
Speaker 1: of the New York Times. Okay, neither to you. So
Speaker 1: instead of letting social media sites revoke your right to
Speaker 1: free speech, how about revoking their right to your data.
Speaker 1: This is what I do. I use express VPN. Express
Speaker 1: VPN anonymizes a lot of your online presence by hiding
Speaker 1: your IP address. That makes your activity more difficult to
Speaker 1: trace and sell to advertisers, and Express VPN couldn't be
Speaker 1: easier to set up. You just tap one button on
Speaker 1: your phone or computer and you're protected. Express vpn also
Speaker 1: encrypts one hundred percent of your data to protect you
Speaker 1: from hackers and internet bad guys. It's finally time to
Speaker 1: say no to censorship and take back your online privacy
Speaker 1: at express vpn dot com slash buck. That's right. Just
Speaker 1: go right now online to express vpn dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: By visiting at link, you'll get an extra three months
Speaker 1: of Express VPN service for free. That's Express vpn dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck to protect your data today. Are you
Speaker 1: seeing it clearly enough yet that the Biden administration is
Speaker 1: all rooted in built upon a fraud. I told you
Speaker 1: this was going to be a trojan horse presidency. I
Speaker 1: told you that this would be a case in which
Speaker 1: we'd see that the president of the United States was
Speaker 1: just doing the bidding of the far left while pretending
Speaker 1: to be something other than a leftist, progressive authoritarian. And
Speaker 1: that that's why, at this time, in this moment, Biden
Speaker 1: was the perfect candidate for the Democrats because he's such
Speaker 1: a phony. He's such a fraud that it was able
Speaker 1: to fool enough people, sadly in a pandemic year. And
Speaker 1: now we're stuck with this guy. Now we've got somebody
Speaker 1: who was I mean, he's lying all the time. He's
Speaker 1: lying on all kinds of stuff. His whole presidency in effect,
Speaker 1: is built on a lie. And even people who you
Speaker 1: would think would be on his team or starting to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, he is a trojan horse. How many times
Speaker 1: you can go back and and see, I'm sure there
Speaker 1: are even whole episodes of the Buck Sexton Show that
Speaker 1: we titled with something like Biden is a trojan horse.
Speaker 1: That that was the whole point here, was that it
Speaker 1: was a fundamental dishonesty about the Biden administration, that oh,
Speaker 1: you know, Joe's been in politics so long, he's you know,
Speaker 1: he's good, old blue collar Joe. You can trust him.
Speaker 1: Here are some political reporters talking about this one, and
Speaker 1: even they and remember political as Democrats, they're pretty left wing,
Speaker 1: they're very left wing. In many cases, they're saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's true, Biden is a trojan horse. Play ten, he's writing.
Speaker 1: President Biden has been operating as a progressive and The
Speaker 1: reason is one we spent all what two years of
Speaker 1: the campaign him being the most moderate of the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: After all those debates and talking with Bernie and having
Speaker 1: you know, figuring out that Democratic Party platform, the progressives
Speaker 1: got a lot of wins. And the reason we still
Speaker 1: we the collective way not Tara and I talk about
Speaker 1: him as a moderate is because his decades of operating
Speaker 1: as a moderate, but also because he's like an old
Speaker 1: white guy and he doesn't look like a progressive, right people,
Speaker 1: We have this stereotype in our head of what a
Speaker 1: progressive looks like, looks like and sounds like, and it
Speaker 1: talks more calmly than Bernie Sanders, who's also an old
Speaker 1: white man who's obviously a progressive, but he doesn't. They
Speaker 1: have a very different way of approaching things. Why Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders is very like in your face, until Baden's not.
Speaker 1: He's a little there's more dulcet tones. And you know,
Speaker 1: I keep asking Eugene to write this piece, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe a Saturday playbook. Trump right, Oh god, you're not
Speaker 1: get that story and all of the outrage that will
Speaker 1: follow when we use the words Trump was right, Trump
Speaker 1: was right. Biden is a trojan horse for progressives. That
Speaker 1: was Tara Paul Mary of of Politico there. And I
Speaker 1: know that they're saying it. They're they're trying to be
Speaker 1: a little provocative, they're joking around with each other, but
Speaker 1: it's obvious that's actually what's happened. That is what's going
Speaker 1: on in the country right now. Biden is a trojan horse.
Speaker 1: The reason that the Democrats put Biden, for the reason
Speaker 1: the Democrat establishment swooped in. You remember, it was looking
Speaker 1: like it was going to be Bernie or Warren, and
Speaker 1: then the Democrat establishment decided to turn the screws, decided
Speaker 1: to bring the pressure to bear, and right in time,
Speaker 1: you had people drop out just so that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: could get the necessary votes in the primary and become
Speaker 1: the candidate. Because they saw that while the country was
Speaker 1: reeling from a pandemic, and while people were scared, this
Speaker 1: pretense of the grandfatherly figure that you could trust. You know, yeah,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, he's sort of just stairs in the camera
Speaker 1: and you just can phrases and you know, how scary
Speaker 1: can this guy be? You feel like he's scared of
Speaker 1: the stairs going up to Air Force one. I mean,
Speaker 1: how bad you know, everyone understands that the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: is further left than has ever been in my lifetime, certainly,
Speaker 1: and I argue at least in the last fifty or
Speaker 1: sixty years relatively to where the rest of the country is,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party has gone far left. The country is
Speaker 1: not with them. So how do you win? How do
Speaker 1: you win in a country where thirty percent are lunatic
Speaker 1: progressive leftists, but you need to get to fifty one
Speaker 1: percent to force your will upon the other forty nine percent.
Speaker 1: How do you do that? Well, you put forward someone
Speaker 1: like Joe Biden who is dishonest about what he's really
Speaker 1: going to do, what he really stands for. You know,
Speaker 1: you look at all these executive orders. He didn't say
Speaker 1: he was going to shut down the Keystone XL pipeline
Speaker 1: during the candidacy. He didn't say he was gonna make
Speaker 1: biological males able to compete against biological females also known
Speaker 1: as males competing against females in sports. He didn't say that.
Speaker 1: I mean, did you go down a whole list of things.
Speaker 1: He didn't promise to kick the border wide open and
Speaker 1: look at what we're dealing. He didn't say he was
Speaker 1: going to spend, try to spend in the first year
Speaker 1: of his presidency, what a few trillion dollars a few
Speaker 1: trillion dollars on items that if they were bipartisan in nature,
Speaker 1: if it was just about COVID relief or just about
Speaker 1: getting the economy back up and running, getting out of
Speaker 1: the way, helping people who need help, they would get
Speaker 1: Republican votes. They got multiple packages passed when Republicans were
Speaker 1: in the majority in the last year the Trump presidency.
Speaker 1: So this is now a matter of fact. Republicans will
Speaker 1: play ball with the other side to help the American people.
Speaker 1: Democrats are like our way or the highway. You know,
Speaker 1: you can you can have a nice warm glass to
Speaker 1: shut the heck up. That's that's their version of outreach
Speaker 1: of unity of a moderate And you're seeing this with
Speaker 1: with everything that Joe Biden's doing on a on a
Speaker 1: major level, everything that's going on here with this Biden
Speaker 1: administration lines up with exactly what we expected. Um here's
Speaker 1: even you know, Chris Christie's a big critic of Donald
Speaker 1: Trump in many ways, has been a big critic of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Here he is on the I told you, Yester,
Speaker 1: I mean that the title of our show yesterday was
Speaker 1: that the Biden administrations lying to you about the Georgia
Speaker 1: voting law. The Bid administrations lying to you about it.
Speaker 1: They are, they're lying to you about it. Do you
Speaker 1: don't have to take take just my word for it.
Speaker 1: Here's Chris Christie play eleven. So here he is doing
Speaker 1: exactly what he accused President Trump of doing back during
Speaker 1: the campaign, and doing it in a way that is
Speaker 1: just brutally bad. I mean, even the Washington Post gave
Speaker 1: him fort pinocchios for the statements that he made. The
Speaker 1: Washington Post guy, you can imagine how it pained them
Speaker 1: to have to do that to their hero, this Democratic president. Listen,
Speaker 1: the Georgia law is a reasonable law, it is a
Speaker 1: smart law, and I'll say it's something else. You know.
Speaker 1: It still stuns me. And I had this fight in
Speaker 1: New Jersey and lost it because of my Democratic legislature.
Speaker 1: I had to show ID to go into an office
Speaker 1: building for an appointment, but I don't have to show
Speaker 1: ID to vote. And now you have to show if
Speaker 1: the Democrats get their way, a COVID passport to go
Speaker 1: pretty much anywhere. That's what they're pushing for. They're hoping
Speaker 1: a private sector will do their dirty work for them.
Speaker 1: But remember the government has many ways of coercing the
Speaker 1: private sector, and so they're just using them as an
Speaker 1: agent here of the of the control and an agent
Speaker 1: of the oppression that the government doesn't want to actually
Speaker 1: have placed at its at its feet, doesn't want to
Speaker 1: be held responsible for. Well, yeah, Biden's the whole Georgia push.
Speaker 1: They're just lying. They're lying about it. They're shamelessly lying
Speaker 1: about it doesn't matter, they don't care. Now. I bring
Speaker 1: this up because for many reasons. One of them is
Speaker 1: that do you remember how much they told you about
Speaker 1: how Trump was dishonest? How they would run news stories, oh,
Speaker 1: Trump has told fifteen thousand lies. They would say, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump is and then you'd say, okay, what's And I
Speaker 1: sit here to say, you know, what was the lie
Speaker 1: that Trump told before the whole election thing came down
Speaker 1: and Trump believed that they had stolen the election from him?
Speaker 1: What was the thing that Trump said when he was
Speaker 1: president on a policy matter that was an egregious lie.
Speaker 1: The way Joe Biden and is straight up lying about
Speaker 1: what's going on in Georgia, he's just being mendacious. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. You know, they talk about lies with Trump,
Speaker 1: and it was usually things like Trump saying he's the
Speaker 1: greatest or he's the best. He's lying. No, it's going
Speaker 1: on in Georgia is a lie that really matters. What's
Speaker 1: going on in Georgia is a problem, meaning the lies
Speaker 1: about it is a problem. And yet the people that
Speaker 1: were so quick to tell you that their jobs were
Speaker 1: to speak truth to power, to separate fact from fiction,
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly not all of them, because it's so obvious. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you believe what Biden's saying about Georgia, you're just
Speaker 1: not very smart or very well informed. But unfortunately, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people, a lot of people who voted
Speaker 1: for Biden who fall into that category. That's the plan here,
Speaker 1: to just keep going with it, keep pushing it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: They don't care they believe it, or even if they
Speaker 1: don't believe it, they know that it's useful for them politically.
Speaker 1: But there are many lies in and around this Biden
Speaker 1: administration already, and it's only going to get worse because
Speaker 1: their governance is incompetent. These people don't have a good
Speaker 1: vision for the country. Well, I think one lesson he
Speaker 1: learned is that putting the Vice president in charge of
Speaker 1: working with these countries can be very effective, and that's
Speaker 1: one reason why he asked Vice President Harris to lead
Speaker 1: this effort in his administration to focus on trying to
Speaker 1: deal with the root causes of this migration. As the
Speaker 1: President said it is a press conference. Parents don't send
Speaker 1: their minor children on a multi thousand mile hazardous journey
Speaker 1: as a frolic or detour. They do it because conditions
Speaker 1: where they are living are so desperate, because of natural disasters,
Speaker 1: because of economic collapses, because of crime and violence. Conditions
Speaker 1: are so desperate. Do they feel like they have no choice?
Speaker 1: We can. Our best way to attack this migration issue
Speaker 1: is to help these countries rebuild their economies and make
Speaker 1: life in Guatemala, in Elsa, or in Honduras more more
Speaker 1: commodious for the people who live there. Let people live
Speaker 1: their lives where they want to live their lives in
Speaker 1: their home countries. That is what Vice President Joe Biden
Speaker 1: worked on. That's now what Vice President Harris is going
Speaker 1: to work on on behalf of the administration. Oh, the
Speaker 1: help is on the way here. Help is on the
Speaker 1: way with the Vice President. Help is on the way
Speaker 1: with the Vice President. Oh my, yeah, she's gonna fix this.
Speaker 1: It's gonna make things more commodious. Ron Klain says, let's
Speaker 1: make things more commodious in Central America. Is ron Klain
Speaker 1: and moron? I mean, you have to think for a
Speaker 1: second out loud about this. You have to ask the question,
Speaker 1: is he a moron? Yeah. The way we're going to
Speaker 1: fix this problem is we're going to fix Guatemala and
Speaker 1: Honduras and El Salvador. We're gonna fix them so well
Speaker 1: that people in those countries would rather stay there then
Speaker 1: come to America when they have the choice of just
Speaker 1: showing up and staying in America forever. You know, there
Speaker 1: was a I think it was a recent Gallup survey
Speaker 1: that suggested that there are at least forty million people
Speaker 1: in Latin America who would come who would come to
Speaker 1: America permanently tomorrow if they could forty million. I'm just
Speaker 1: wondering that our Democrats is that the plan. I think
Speaker 1: it is. By the way, they just want to spread
Speaker 1: the forty million out over the next ten to twenty years.
Speaker 1: But I think that is the plan, And you have
Speaker 1: to wonder what do they really think the likelihood is
Speaker 1: that they'll be able to turn around a Central American
Speaker 1: country ever, but in the next four years even let's
Speaker 1: just look at this in terms of an election cycle. Really,
Speaker 1: the plan here, the focus of the argument is going
Speaker 1: to be how do we make Guatemala stable, secure, and
Speaker 1: happy as a country that hasn't worked out in a
Speaker 1: lot of other places all of the world where we've
Speaker 1: tried it, including places where we've sent a lot of soldiers,
Speaker 1: spent billions and billions of dollars trying to rebuild for them,
Speaker 1: still hasn't really worked. We're going to try to do
Speaker 1: this now. I mean, this is this is an unseerious thing.
Speaker 1: An intelligent person doesn't say this out loud. Yeah, we're
Speaker 1: gonna make things in those countries so much better. Really,
Speaker 1: are we going to create stable rule of law, the
Speaker 1: most dynamic economy in the history of the world, a
Speaker 1: massive welfare state, incredible abundance, and relative safety, and we're
Speaker 1: going to do that for Central American countries. Really, that's
Speaker 1: a magic trick he's talking about pulling. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: fantasyland stuff, But that's the White House Chief of Staff
Speaker 1: speaking about how oh Kamala Harris is going to work
Speaker 1: with these countries now to improve things. Notice how they
Speaker 1: also suggest that these countries, there's the only reason they're
Speaker 1: having problems with natural disasters, you know, economic issues that
Speaker 1: are I'm sure beyond their control. I mean, here's if
Speaker 1: you're really wondering. I mean, aos who is the spiritual
Speaker 1: leader of the Democratic Party today? She is the spiritual leader.
Speaker 1: I mean Nancy Pelosi is you know, still clings to
Speaker 1: power as a decrepit power mad old woman. I mean,
Speaker 1: but she does. But Pelosi isn't the one that really
Speaker 1: speaks to the ID doesn't does. She doesn't speak to
Speaker 1: the central part of the progressive left brain. AOC does.
Speaker 1: And here's where her mind is on this border issue.
Speaker 1: Play seven. But when you rip a baby out of
Speaker 1: the hands of a mother, you cannot draw the same comparison,
Speaker 1: And anyone who is trying to do that is doing
Speaker 1: a profound disservice to the cause of justice. So I
Speaker 1: don't want to excuse any of this, But I'm also
Speaker 1: I don't think we should also get them twisted together,
Speaker 1: because one is not the same, and we cannot dust
Speaker 1: that under the rug. And by the way, those families
Speaker 1: are owed reparations period reparations you now are going to
Speaker 1: According to the AOC view of the world, you should
Speaker 1: be paying as a taxpayer in this country. You should
Speaker 1: have a debt, a financial debt to people that came
Speaker 1: into this country illegally that violated violated US law. You
Speaker 1: should have to send them or the government should send
Speaker 1: them a check on your behalf. That's the mentality And understand,
Speaker 1: that's the mentality in so many ways of the Democrats
Speaker 1: right now, the Democrat Party believes. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: go ask a progressive, I mean, they'll probably say crazy
Speaker 1: stuff to you about a lot of things. And I
Speaker 1: can't be held responsible for the insanity they spew in
Speaker 1: your direction. But ask a progressive. Is Central America having
Speaker 1: problems right now because of the United States? Is it
Speaker 1: essentially all our fault? A lot of them will tell
Speaker 1: you yes, that that Central America is poor and lawless
Speaker 1: and violent. And by the way, not all of Central America. Obviously,
Speaker 1: Costa Rica is doing well, and Panama's doing pretty well,
Speaker 1: and Nicaragua is actually a relatively safe country now. I mean,
Speaker 1: but the Northern Triangle countries, right are they doing poorly
Speaker 1: as countries because of America. The answer the Democrats believe
Speaker 1: is yes, it's our fault. You see, it's always our
Speaker 1: fault because that then allows the preferred group to become victims.
Speaker 1: They have victims status, and we are the victimizers as Americans. Therefore,
Speaker 1: we're responsible for making this right. We're responsible for improving
Speaker 1: the situation of all of these migrants. It's not that
Speaker 1: we're being kind and generous by taking them in. We
Speaker 1: owe it to them, we owe them. AOC just touched
Speaker 1: on this mentality with the reparations for these migrant families.
Speaker 1: But I'm telling you this is a much more widespread belief,
Speaker 1: and this is really at the center of the way
Speaker 1: the left views all American foreign policy international relations. Remember Obama,
Speaker 1: all the bowing, all the apologizing for you know, insufficient
Speaker 1: respect from the United States for Islamic countries or whatever
Speaker 1: throughout history. Remember all that. That's just symbolic. It's emblematic
Speaker 1: of the way democrats view US foreign relations. We mess
Speaker 1: everything up, we're the bad guys, and we have to
Speaker 1: fix it. We're obligated to fix it. And if the
Speaker 1: best way to fix it, in their minds is to
Speaker 1: just allow anybody from these countries that we've messed up
Speaker 1: to come here and it's all on us great or
Speaker 1: it's our fault because of climate change. You know, they
Speaker 1: call them climate refugees sometimes including from Central America, because
Speaker 1: there was a bad storm a year ago or two
Speaker 1: years ago or something, and so now it's and we
Speaker 1: look at the logic, we do the most damage the environment,
Speaker 1: according to Americans, even though that's not leftist, even though
Speaker 1: that's not true, but they'll say that. You know, we're
Speaker 1: the main reason for fossil fuel usage around the world.
Speaker 1: Therefore we are responsible for the climate change that causes
Speaker 1: the climate refugees. It is really frustrating to try to
Speaker 1: have an honest and open conversation in public about what's
Speaker 1: going on right now with COVID lockdowns and the public
Speaker 1: health guidance. You know, they're telling us once again, oh,
Speaker 1: we've got to all be terrified. We've got another surge happening.
Speaker 1: And what do you think they're they're they're claiming, is
Speaker 1: the reason for the surge, Well, it's because of It's
Speaker 1: it's your fault, you see. It's not that this virus
Speaker 1: just has a life cycle that it goes through at
Speaker 1: different times in different places and They really have no
Speaker 1: idea why it spreads the way it does at different times.
Speaker 1: They it's not that or there are so many different
Speaker 1: reasons for it that they can't pin it on one. No,
Speaker 1: it's it's we're not listening to Fauci enough. That's what
Speaker 1: they'll say. That's what they'll tell you. And if you
Speaker 1: have a problem with that, like I said, you're you're
Speaker 1: a bad person, and they'll even shut you down. I
Speaker 1: can't tell you how many of these posts on social
Speaker 1: media I have where they'll it'll say, for more CDC information,
Speaker 1: go to CDC dot gover. For more COVID information, go
Speaker 1: to the following website. And it's just meant to tell
Speaker 1: you big brother is watching you. That's what that's all about.
Speaker 1: You know. The social media companies have decided that they
Speaker 1: are firmly on the side of Fauciism and the little
Speaker 1: health stalinist, Fauci is a health policy stalinist is out
Speaker 1: there and they're supporting him with everything that they can.
Speaker 1: And of course the tech companies, you know, just had
Speaker 1: a big rally and so they're doing well, so they're
Speaker 1: they're fine during this lockdown. The tech workers, tech companies,
Speaker 1: they're just great. You know, if you've tried to share
Speaker 1: your political opinions about anything on social media lately, though,
Speaker 1: you know it's really hard to have a civil conversation. Luckily,
Speaker 1: there's Caucus Room dot com that's a social media network
Speaker 1: exclusively for concernervatives. Caucus Rooms an online community for conservatives
Speaker 1: to gather and engage locally. It's only real people who
Speaker 1: are verified Conservatives who can become Caucus Room members. The
Speaker 1: Caucus Room will never share your information with anyone ever.
Speaker 1: Sign up process ensure as you're communicating with real conservatives
Speaker 1: in your neighborhood, no bots or trolls. It's a great
Speaker 1: way to get engaged on issues where you can make
Speaker 1: the biggest difference locally. At Caucus Room, you can participate
Speaker 1: in live virtual meetings that are so secure the platform
Speaker 1: played host over a dozen virtual Republican Party conventions last year.
Speaker 1: Also share news, jokes, and find ways to get involved
Speaker 1: with causes near you without the fear of Silicon Valley
Speaker 1: overlords stepping in and stopping you. Caucus Room is made
Speaker 1: by conservatives for conservatives to get organized and make a difference.
Speaker 1: Join the buck Sexton Listeners group right now on Caucus
Speaker 1: Room dot com. That's right, there's a Buck Sexton listeners
Speaker 1: group on Caucus room dot com. That's c au Cus
Speaker 1: r oom dot com to interact with other listeners from
Speaker 1: Team Buck just like you. We are the CDC director
Speaker 1: talk of impending doom as people loosen up and gather.
Speaker 1: Do you share her concern? Well, you know, I don't
Speaker 1: know if I would use the word impending doom. I
Speaker 1: you know, if you talk to doctor Lensky, which we
Speaker 1: do every single day, the point she's making is a
Speaker 1: very valid point. We're seeing the cases that have plateaued
Speaker 1: over the last couple of weeks and now they're starting
Speaker 1: to inch up. So the point that she was making
Speaker 1: was very valid. It's a very valid point to say
Speaker 1: there is impending doom. Maybe not use those words because
Speaker 1: that's psychotic, but you know it's valid to say you
Speaker 1: know bad things are coming. So you know, you know,
Speaker 1: you do everybody? You know how we you know, how
Speaker 1: we stop this virus right in its tracks. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe not because it's been terrible for over
Speaker 1: a year now, but you know what we say is
Speaker 1: mitigation measures. You need those mitigation measures. Okay, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: go back into this now, huh. The state that got
Speaker 1: rid of the mask mandate, Texas doing fine cases going down.
Speaker 1: States that keep them, like New York and New Jersey, California,
Speaker 1: they're having a really rough time right now. But still,
Speaker 1: even even when you're running the experiment and it shows
Speaker 1: you the result, when the lockdown left doesn't like the results,
Speaker 1: they ignore them. They just put Fauci back on TV
Speaker 1: to talk about the measures. Oh okay, well, this is
Speaker 1: this is where I'm gonna have to tell you that
Speaker 1: if we keep listening to these people we got we
Speaker 1: got a couple of problems here. If we keep listening
Speaker 1: to them, this is not going to stop for another year.
Speaker 1: And I know that sounds extreme, but it's going to
Speaker 1: keep happening for now. That doesn't mean it will be
Speaker 1: the same for the next twelve months, but they're going
Speaker 1: to be right in the background ready to tell you.
Speaker 1: First of all, you're wearing masks for another year, easily.
Speaker 1: If we continue to listen to these people, we're wearing
Speaker 1: masks for another year. And remember, masks are also a symbol,
Speaker 1: and with masks comes a whole lot of other policies too.
Speaker 1: Everyone's wearing masks. Well, I guess we got to lockdown businesses.
Speaker 1: Everyone's locking down businesses. Oh, I guess we gotta socially
Speaker 1: distance from each other, not just outside but also inside
Speaker 1: of buildings and inside of private homes. And you know,
Speaker 1: it all comes together that way. That's how it happens.
Speaker 1: Masks are the gateway drug, if you will, to lockdown lunacy.
Speaker 1: That's what we've seen. Once everyone starts masking up, it's well,
Speaker 1: you know, we're already obeying, We're already betting the knee
Speaker 1: and dehumanizing ourselves. And do not ever forget that for
Speaker 1: apparently about one hundred years, wearing masks was not considered
Speaker 1: an effective public health measure against aerosolis virus in the
Speaker 1: United States or the western world for about one hundred years,
Speaker 1: and it wasn't even at the beginning of this pandemic.
Speaker 1: But then they change that guide one hundred and eighty degrees,
Speaker 1: in fact more than that, because now it's double masking.
Speaker 1: As you know, and if you have any issues, if
Speaker 1: you question this at all, you don't believe the science,
Speaker 1: right because viral particles in the air that are moving
Speaker 1: in a flow that we can't even begin to actually
Speaker 1: trace and understand in any meaningful way are those must
Speaker 1: be stopped by a loosely fitted piece of cloth around
Speaker 1: your mouth that you pull down and pull up depending
Speaker 1: on if you're eating or where you are what you're doing,
Speaker 1: you know, But oh no, it's a great it's a
Speaker 1: great tool. It really saves us. That's why it works
Speaker 1: so well that when they actually look at places that
Speaker 1: implement mandates, it has about a one point five percent,
Speaker 1: which is within the margin of error according to the
Speaker 1: CDC Zone Numbers efficacy one point five percent over sixty days.
Speaker 1: It's a long time. Yeah, but don't ask any questions, peasant.
Speaker 1: Just listen to advisors like this guy Auster Home. Listen
Speaker 1: to him. We've got this up on buck Sexton dot
Speaker 1: com right now. It's a story you should check out.
Speaker 1: Biden Advisor. Okay, Biden advisor. We are in another surge
Speaker 1: of COVID nineteen and what is he saying is happening?
Speaker 1: What does he say we have to do about this? Well,
Speaker 1: Brucer mark play eighteen and right now, get ready for
Speaker 1: this surge. You know, Alison, I take no comfort at all,
Speaker 1: but I'm telling you right now, as you just said,
Speaker 1: we are just beginning this surge and are denying. It
Speaker 1: is not going to help us. We are walking into
Speaker 1: the mouth of this virus monster as if somehow we
Speaker 1: don't know it's here. And it is here. Now is
Speaker 1: the time to do all the things that we must
Speaker 1: do to slowdown transmission, not open up. And we got
Speaker 1: to get more vaccine out to more people. See, this
Speaker 1: is going to be. This is going to be the
Speaker 1: way it is for at least the next well actually
Speaker 1: the end, for the rest of this year. For the
Speaker 1: rest of this year, you're going to be hearing about how,
Speaker 1: oh we haven't gotten everyone in the vaccine, so everyone
Speaker 1: hide everyone, You can't do anything. Oh no, I just
Speaker 1: got COVID ten days ago. I've been obeying all the
Speaker 1: rules and regulations. I have no idea how I got it.
Speaker 1: And you know that I hate obeying the rules, but
Speaker 1: I have no choice, but I did obey them. No
Speaker 1: idea how I got it. Can't even begin to tell
Speaker 1: you where it came from or anything else. I can't
Speaker 1: tell you how many people I've talked to who have
Speaker 1: also gotten COVID in the last couple of weeks in
Speaker 1: New York, and they always have the same thing of
Speaker 1: I have no idea and I'm saying, yeah, of course
Speaker 1: you have no idea. This is you can see virus
Speaker 1: with an electron microscope. Friends, you know, we have no
Speaker 1: real sense of how a lot of this, a lot
Speaker 1: of this virus is spreading all across the country in
Speaker 1: terms of where it's We know what's happening, we know
Speaker 1: what's happening in large numbers, but you know, are people
Speaker 1: getting it? They say it's because of fifteen minutes of
Speaker 1: close personal contact. I can't think of anybody who I
Speaker 1: was in close personal contact with who was at least
Speaker 1: sick with virus. So then oh, maybe it's asymptomatic spread.
Speaker 1: But the point is there's so many different ways. They
Speaker 1: don't know how people are getting this, and they're they're
Speaker 1: acting like the mitigation measures, as Fauci calls them, have
Speaker 1: been some success. We've over half a million people that
Speaker 1: have died from this. We've over thirty million cases that
Speaker 1: are confirmed. I mean, they don't even notice. They don't
Speaker 1: even try to do surology testing anymore, they don't even
Speaker 1: try to extrapolate. Really, if we have thirty million confirmed tests,
Speaker 1: how many actual infections do we think there I mean
Speaker 1: confirmed positives? I mean how many actual infections are there
Speaker 1: in this country over the last thirteen months, really longer
Speaker 1: than that, because the virus was spreading even you know,
Speaker 1: in the end of twenty nineteen. But how many people
Speaker 1: do you think have gotten this? You know, are we
Speaker 1: going to get to a point I'm just putting this
Speaker 1: out there where when we really look at this, we'll
Speaker 1: see that thirty forty, maybe even fifty percent of the
Speaker 1: country got the virus. That's gonna be a real moment
Speaker 1: of recognition for the country. When I say got it
Speaker 1: over at some period of time, they were exposed to it,
Speaker 1: they had an infection, maybe it was totally asymptomatic, maybe
Speaker 1: they were fine. But is that really is that evidence
Speaker 1: of how effective all of these measures, the public health
Speaker 1: measures have been, or is that just showing us that
Speaker 1: this virus just did what a virus does and spread
Speaker 1: all over the country. And we have a large population
Speaker 1: of people with comorbidities, We have a large population of
Speaker 1: people who are elderly but are largely able to continue
Speaker 1: on because of the incredible medical system that we have.
Speaker 1: And so we suffered more than a lot of other places.
Speaker 1: Some places suffered more than we did, too, you know,
Speaker 1: that's always left out of this as well. You know,
Speaker 1: this country has people who really believe that Trump and
Speaker 1: Trump supporters are the reason we didn't beat COVID, And
Speaker 1: that's a really stupid position when you just spend two
Speaker 1: minutes thinking about it, because he's say, well, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, why do the UK have a higher per
Speaker 1: capita death rate than the United States with its socialized healthcare?
Speaker 1: By the way, why does France, Well, France, I think
Speaker 1: might be a little bit behind us, actually not a
Speaker 1: great example, but close, it's very close to us. Why
Speaker 1: does Spain which is worse, in Italy which is worse,
Speaker 1: and Belgium which is worse. Why was it Trump supporters?
Speaker 1: Were Trump supporters the reason that those countries had a
Speaker 1: higher death rate from this virus? Or is this just
Speaker 1: a really dangerous and rapidly spreading, more than anything virus
Speaker 1: that some populations are more susceptible to than others, That
Speaker 1: some you know, population density, and just some cultures are
Speaker 1: more able to withstand than others. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: you look, there's so many different factors, but they act
Speaker 1: like we if we only we just listen to them,
Speaker 1: it would all be taken care of. So is the
Speaker 1: answer then that people in Italy and in Spain and
Speaker 1: Belgium just didn't listen to the authorities. That's the belief
Speaker 1: now the people in other countries, though, they listened so
Speaker 1: much more. I always think it's so funny people say
Speaker 1: in New Zealand, Yeah, if we lived on a tiny
Speaker 1: island with more sheep than people. True fact, by the way,
Speaker 1: we might have been able to contain the virus if
Speaker 1: we were also willing to go into long, extended actual lockdowns.
Speaker 1: You have to remember, lockdown in America means the you know,
Speaker 1: the elites and the you know, the college educated uber
Speaker 1: eats ordering work from the couch zoom meeting class gets
Speaker 1: to just stay home and watch Netflix and order in food,
Speaker 1: while essential workers, grocery store clerks, delivery people, cops, firefighters,
Speaker 1: you know, etc. They all still do their jobs. So
Speaker 1: what lockdown has really meant in a lot of places
Speaker 1: in this country is that upper middle class and above
Speaker 1: people get to just sit around in the couch, do
Speaker 1: what they want to do, order in exotic food if
Speaker 1: they live in a city, and you know, buy things
Speaker 1: on Amazon and feel really self righteous as they post
Speaker 1: their mask photos, while working class people have to show
Speaker 1: up and do stuff and still get the virus and
Speaker 1: still you know, pass it on to their families and
Speaker 1: so forth. That's what lockdown has actually meant in America,
Speaker 1: in addition to the destruction of tens of hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of businesses we didn't even know, in addition to
Speaker 1: the debts from suicide, debts of despair, the loss of
Speaker 1: a year of study for children that are never going
Speaker 1: to be able to catch up to their peers as
Speaker 1: a result. We were never in this together, friends. That
Speaker 1: was one of the there have been many lies told
Speaker 1: about this. That was one of the biggest ones. We're
Speaker 1: not in this together. There are some people that are
Speaker 1: fine with this, that like this, that benefit from this lockdown,
Speaker 1: and there are others who suffer the consequences of the
Speaker 1: fauciite absurdity. They absolutely should you know where is at
Speaker 1: and t on this. You know, these big companies, corporations
Speaker 1: and businesses, these are their customers who are being affected, intimidated, suppressed,
Speaker 1: and who will not be able to participate in our democracy, which,
Speaker 1: as you pointed out, whether it's service members on the
Speaker 1: field of battle, whether it's civil rights marchers and freedom writers,
Speaker 1: people have given their lives in order to protect and
Speaker 1: promote the right to vote, and that's being taken away
Speaker 1: from our fellow text our fellow Americans at a level
Speaker 1: not seen since the Voting Rights Act passage in nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty five. This is the greatest coordinated attack on democracy
Speaker 1: we've seen in our lifetimes. And it's happening right here
Speaker 1: in Texas now ground zero. I mean, Democrats are a
Speaker 1: bunch of hysterical loons, apparently, at least their leadership, their
Speaker 1: elected officials, the people who go on TV to represent
Speaker 1: their ideas. There's Batau talking about how it's like the
Speaker 1: biggest assaults on our democracy ever. Really notice that there's
Speaker 1: never any specifics in this. It's just all rhetoric. It's
Speaker 1: all lies. It's lies. They're lying to you, No problem,
Speaker 1: the lies work. As long as the lies work, then
Speaker 1: it's no big deal. And you know, Betta is a
Speaker 1: perfect example of somebody who appeals to the dumbest and
Speaker 1: most self righteous members of the Democrat Party. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: people who vote for Biden, who really think that taking
Speaker 1: a photo and putting it on Facebook that shows them
Speaker 1: asking makes them better people than you. You know that
Speaker 1: they're a better person than you are. Those same people
Speaker 1: here better rouric and they say, oh yeah, see the
Speaker 1: greatest assault on democracy and it's all racism. And this
Speaker 1: is like the destruction of the Civil Rights Act because
Speaker 1: they want voter ID for absentee ballance. Do you know
Speaker 1: the polling all shows that majorities of Americans across all
Speaker 1: categories that they look at, and overall it's something like
Speaker 1: seventy five percent all in of Americans believe in voter ID.
Speaker 1: Seventy five percent. You can't get seventy five percent of
Speaker 1: Americans degree on very many serious political decisions of any
Speaker 1: kind these days, but seventy five percent support voter ID.
Speaker 1: And yet Democrats run around saying voter ID is racist
Speaker 1: because the thirty percent roughly, I guess it's twenty five percent,
Speaker 1: but I always like to say the thirty thirty percent
Speaker 1: of you know, super left wingers out there. And I
Speaker 1: know it's not the same numbers set we're talking about,
Speaker 1: so I'm getting my numbers all mixed up here, but
Speaker 1: I say about thirty percent of the Democrat parties just insane.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't matter that about seventy five percent of
Speaker 1: all Americans believe that voter ID is a good thing.
Speaker 1: The crazy wig of the Democrat Party likes the narrow,
Speaker 1: likes the storyline that it is racist. It's racist to
Speaker 1: bring this up, racist to feel that way, that that
Speaker 1: voter ID is legitimate. You can't. You're not allowed to
Speaker 1: say that, not allowed to do it. And so that's
Speaker 1: why you have. You have, really, I mean, morons like
Speaker 1: Beta betta 'rourke is a dumbass. He's not a smart man.
Speaker 1: He married a rich lady and now he goes around that.
Speaker 1: He kind of looks the part and sounds the part.
Speaker 1: Sky's like a glorified actor, very much like Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: In fact, Joe Biden is really an actor. He's been
Speaker 1: an actor for a long time. Doesn't really stand for anything,
Speaker 1: not a thoughtful guy, doesn't really have any beliefs. But
Speaker 1: you know, he kind of wears the suits and you know,
Speaker 1: says the words, and you know that's all he's got
Speaker 1: to do. I mean, the guy who was the senator
Speaker 1: from Delaware, for heaven's sakes, no offense, the Delawarector has
Speaker 1: some great beaches, some really cool places in Delaware, but
Speaker 1: you know, not exactly a political powerhouse, folks. And and
Speaker 1: now he's the president the United States. This guy won
Speaker 1: like one percent of the vote when he ran in
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight. I'm not even I'm not even
Speaker 1: execat I think it was maybe two percent. It was
Speaker 1: something that's among Democrats. Nobody wanted this guy to be president.
Speaker 1: But oh but the great, the great fraud of this
Speaker 1: election was the was the forced forgetting by the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party of who even they knew Joe Biden was even
Speaker 1: they know who this guy is. But now they're just
Speaker 1: they're going to continue with this. They don't care, They're
Speaker 1: going to keep lying about this and that the Georgia
Speaker 1: situation is this, This is their emotional impulse on display here.
Speaker 1: This is the Democrat parties, you know, emotion over reason
Speaker 1: and facts approach. And just wait until we get to
Speaker 1: the point where we can actually have a conversation about
Speaker 1: where things stand with the Chauvin trial, because you know,
Speaker 1: the Democrats are already they're aligning them they're they're aligning
Speaker 1: themselves up to make this a huge referendum on the
Speaker 1: country and on racism. And it doesn't even matter what
Speaker 1: the outcome is. And I'll tell you, I believe, I
Speaker 1: believe that they're going to the jury is going to
Speaker 1: find Chauvin. This is my prediction. Okay, so I could
Speaker 1: be wrong. I believe the jury is going to find
Speaker 1: Chauvin guilty of the lesser murder charge, and perhaps not that.
Speaker 1: I don't think they'll find him guilty of the top count,
Speaker 1: but I think they'll find him guilty of the lesser
Speaker 1: murder charge, and even then that will not be considered justice. Right.
Speaker 1: The Democrat Party will use this, they will demogogue the
Speaker 1: issue recklessly, and they'll make things worse for the actual
Speaker 1: American people. But it will help their power, and that's
Speaker 1: what really matters, just like when we see in Georgia,
Speaker 1: they're lying, they're demogoguing based on the lies. But it
Speaker 1: helps Democrat Party power. That's all that matters. My question
Speaker 1: is we're going to change out of the White House
Speaker 1: the tone for a bill that limits voting access and
Speaker 1: makes it more difficult for people to engage in voting
Speaker 1: in Georgia. No, that's actually not what the governor of
Speaker 1: Georgia has said. Well, I think that is not based
Speaker 1: in fact what the governor of Georgia has said. So no,
Speaker 1: our tone is not changing. We have concerns about the
Speaker 1: specific components of the package, including the fact that it
Speaker 1: makes it harder and more difficult for people to vote
Speaker 1: by limiting absentee options, by making it not viable, not
Speaker 1: possible for people to provide water to people who are
Speaker 1: in line, by not standardizing longer hours. So if you're
Speaker 1: making it harder to vote, no, we don't support that
Speaker 1: lies being lied to Those are lies. Let's actually go
Speaker 1: through them. That's from the White House Press secretary. Let's
Speaker 1: start with providing water to people in line? Does this
Speaker 1: law said? Does this law mean that you that there
Speaker 1: is no provision of water to people? First of all,
Speaker 1: whatever is everyone is? Is it like the Kalahari desert
Speaker 1: or something? Is everyone dying of thirst in line to vote?
Speaker 1: It's this tends to happen in November, folks. Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: You know if without water in line, I mean, okay,
Speaker 1: some places, some people may want some water. Guess what.
Speaker 1: Polling places can set up water for people so they
Speaker 1: can have water there. That's fine. That's what the law
Speaker 1: actually says. The law also says they don't want people
Speaker 1: walking up and down the line giving people things right
Speaker 1: before they vote. This is not complicated, all right, It
Speaker 1: doesn't stop people from getting water in line. It just
Speaker 1: means that you can't have electioneering going on while people
Speaker 1: are waiting in line to vote. You can set up
Speaker 1: if you're so worried about people, you can set up
Speaker 1: on the corner and give them food. And it's just
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty feet away from the poll the
Speaker 1: polling station. That's it. So no one's gonna die here
Speaker 1: from starvation. All right, They're not being left in the
Speaker 1: middle of the Gobi desert and oh my god, what's
Speaker 1: going to happen? They can't get any mean, but the Democrats,
Speaker 1: it's so shameless, but they're doing they're such liars. And
Speaker 1: then when she said that that they're cutting off early voting,
Speaker 1: if that's not true early voting hours, that's not accurate.
Speaker 1: Um what was And there was a third I mean
Speaker 1: everything that she's saying. Oh that that they're cutting down
Speaker 1: on absentee voting. No, it actually says absentee voting is fine,
Speaker 1: but you just have to provide id why didn't she
Speaker 1: say that? Who who has the time and the and
Speaker 1: the you know, the inclination to set up early voting
Speaker 1: and to do early voting. But they can't. They can
Speaker 1: get a free state ID cost them nothing, but they
Speaker 1: can't do They can't do that. I mean, you can't
Speaker 1: cash a check, you can't do so many things. You
Speaker 1: can't get on an airplane unless you have an ID.
Speaker 1: But they pretend that all of a sudden when it
Speaker 1: comes to voting, asking people to have ID, even though
Speaker 1: seventy five percent of the country is completely on board
Speaker 1: with it, is racist and bad. What a bunch. It's
Speaker 1: just they're disgusting, these democrats. It's gross. They're just lying
Speaker 1: to you. They don't even care, and the media just
Speaker 1: goes along with it because they know. Do you realize
Speaker 1: what happens if a journalist really points out that what
Speaker 1: Jensaki is saying here is either an outright falsehood, meaning
Speaker 1: it is a statement of fact that is untrue, or
Speaker 1: that is highly misleading. I mean, to say that they're
Speaker 1: cutting back on absentee voting options and not say, well
Speaker 1: what does that mean? I mean, I could say that
Speaker 1: someone's cutting back on absentee voting because they insist that
Speaker 1: you have to be a resident of that state. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: technically that's cutting back on absentee voting. But we all
Speaker 1: agree that that's fine. That's exactly I believe what she's
Speaker 1: doing saying they're cutting back on absentee voting COMMA and
Speaker 1: leaving out that they're cutting back at it by not
Speaker 1: allowing people to vote without showing ID is intentionally dishonest.
Speaker 1: But that's the whole game here, is to be intentionally dishonest. There,
Speaker 1: their whole plan, the whole plot is to do just that.
Speaker 1: And that's what's going on. And it just drives it
Speaker 1: just drives me. Man. But if you are a journal
Speaker 1: right now, if you're a journal and you you decide
Speaker 1: that you're going to speak the truth about this, not
Speaker 1: only does your inbox fill with hatred, people hate you?
Speaker 1: What are you doing? This is about? This is about
Speaker 1: stopping Trump, don't you see? No, wait, Trump's not president anymore.
Speaker 1: It's really not about stopping Trump. It's actually about what's
Speaker 1: happening in the country right now. But the Democrats don't
Speaker 1: see it that way. Oh Trump is you know, he's
Speaker 1: waiting in the closet, he's waiting under the bed. He's
Speaker 1: he's going to get them any moment now. And if
Speaker 1: you aren't on board for whatever it takes, if you're
Speaker 1: not on board for whatever it takes to defeat the
Speaker 1: opposition to Biden. You are the enemy. That's the way
Speaker 1: our our modern media, that's the way our journalists operate today.
Speaker 1: You are either with us or against us on everything
Speaker 1: when it comes to Biden. That's their approach, and it's
Speaker 1: it's distressing to see, but it's true. If they point
Speaker 1: out what's really happening here, if someone says, here's the
Speaker 1: truth of this situation, they could be ruined, ruined. And
Speaker 1: that's what that's the biggest advantage of them. They lied
Speaker 1: about Trump and Russia collusion, and the and the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: the corporate media, went all in, all in on this,
Speaker 1: so they made up a huge story to destroy Trump.
Speaker 1: They will ignore and cover up anything to protect Biden.
Speaker 1: That's the environment we're in. That's that's the situation which
Speaker 1: we find ourselves. I'm, as you know, a critic of
Speaker 1: the overreach and the absurdity of what's going on here
Speaker 1: with lockdowns, and how we're never really going to get
Speaker 1: out of this if we allow these people to continue
Speaker 1: to make these decisions, because there'll always be variance, there'll
Speaker 1: always be some cases, there'll always be a a point
Speaker 1: one or a point zero zero one percent chance that
Speaker 1: you could get COVID even if you're vaccinated ever, you know,
Speaker 1: a vaccinated. If we had one hundred percent vaccination in
Speaker 1: this country, there'd be some people who get COVID. It
Speaker 1: would still happen. And we're nowhere near getting to one
Speaker 1: hundred percent vaccination, as you know, and we're never ever
Speaker 1: actually going to get to one hundred percent vaccination. But
Speaker 1: the point is that there's always going to be some
Speaker 1: degree of risk involved, and we've handed over all the
Speaker 1: decisions about risk to people in lab coats who tell
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party what they want to hear. And when
Speaker 1: the CDC wants to control you, it's listened to the science.
Speaker 1: But when the science contradicts their narrative of control, it's
Speaker 1: all of a sudden we can't be one hundred percent
Speaker 1: sure that's how it goes. And that then brings me
Speaker 1: to this. This really weirded me out. The Well Health
Speaker 1: Safety Rating advertisement that's going around here now. Some of
Speaker 1: you may have seen this. I wouldn't really spend much
Speaker 1: time thinking about it except for just how creepy the
Speaker 1: whole thing is and that they have in this advertisement
Speaker 1: for a service that is absurd, that is meaningless, and
Speaker 1: that is clearly just trying to exploit the overwrought fears
Speaker 1: and mass psychosis that has been inflicted upon all of
Speaker 1: us now by the COVID lockdowners. They have Jennifer Lopez,
Speaker 1: Lady Gaga, and Serena Williams, all of whom I can
Speaker 1: assure you are very expensive spokespersons for any advertisement, all
Speaker 1: of them in this ad. So they've clearly raised or
Speaker 1: have a lot of money at this company. For the
Speaker 1: Well Health Safety Rating, you gotta listen to this play
Speaker 1: one if you want to get back to your favorite
Speaker 1: places and feel confident they have put your health and
Speaker 1: safety first. Look for the well Health Safety Seal. Look
Speaker 1: for the well Health Safety Seal. Look for the well
Speaker 1: Health Safety Seal. I'm doctor Richard Carmona, the seventeenth Surgeon
Speaker 1: General of the United States of America. This is the
Speaker 1: Well Health Safety Seal from the International Well Building Institute,
Speaker 1: the global authority on healthy buildings. The Well Health Safety
Speaker 1: Rating was informed by years of research and input from
Speaker 1: hundreds of leading virologists, health experts, epidemiologists, and building professionals
Speaker 1: around the world. You'll see it at schools, offices, banks,
Speaker 1: childcare centers, all the places we go. The well Health
Speaker 1: Safety seal means that we'll feel better going into restaurants, theaters, stores, hotels, stadiums,
Speaker 1: all the places that we love. Everything may look the same,
Speaker 1: but the well health Safety Seal means that your health
Speaker 1: and safety are top of mind when it comes to
Speaker 1: cleaning and sanitizing procedures, air and water quality management, emergency
Speaker 1: preparedness programs, and health services. So look for the well
Speaker 1: health Safety seal outside and feel more confident going inside.
Speaker 1: What the hell is this? I mean what you hear
Speaker 1: that ad and they're running it all over the place,
Speaker 1: and I don't even they got de Niro in there too.
Speaker 1: I mean, they got all these mega celebrities, the well
Speaker 1: health safety rating, they got the little you know, mellow
Speaker 1: piano playing in the background, the whole thing. Oh, everything's
Speaker 1: fine because because this place is in line with the
Speaker 1: international expert on safety inside of a building. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is you see what's going on? This is a
Speaker 1: a global market now of exploitation of the mass psychosis
Speaker 1: that we're talking about here. There's nothing, there's nothing they
Speaker 1: can do to know if there's virus in any of
Speaker 1: these establishments that there's no way of checking. There's no
Speaker 1: safety seal for this. This is idiocy, obviously, but they'll
Speaker 1: charge you, you know, four thousand dollars or two thousand
Speaker 1: dollars or whatever it is. You get this seal of approval.
Speaker 1: And this is just it's it's almost it's almost like
Speaker 1: protection money, mafia style, except instead of will break your kneecaps,
Speaker 1: it's well, you know, nice business you got there. People
Speaker 1: might think there's some COVID flying around though, unless you
Speaker 1: get our well health where well health safety c well.
Speaker 1: President Biden said to the Texas Ranger baseball team talking
Speaker 1: about baseball, you need to listen to doctor Faucci about
Speaker 1: urging people to come to the baseball game opening day.
Speaker 1: Doctor Faucci, you need to go to the border. And
Speaker 1: here's what you will see. You will see nine hundred
Speaker 1: people in a room built for eighty. You will see
Speaker 1: people living on top of each other, a ten percent
Speaker 1: positive rate, where the positive people intermingle with everybody else,
Speaker 1: and all these illegal immigrants are dumped off in Texas
Speaker 1: and the rest of the country. So doctor Faucci, you
Speaker 1: need to go to the border. And if you're not
Speaker 1: compelled to shut down this illegal immigration program, I don't
Speaker 1: want to hear anything you got to say about baseball
Speaker 1: or restaurants. It is the biggest in my view, COVID
Speaker 1: spreader in the world along the border, where thousands of
Speaker 1: legal immigrants are coming to this country positive ten percent
Speaker 1: positive rate intermingled with each other, dropped out all over
Speaker 1: Texas and the rest of America. So I'm not worried
Speaker 1: about the baseball game in Texas. I'm worried about a
Speaker 1: league lammigrants infecting the whole country. Given the paracies at
Speaker 1: Biden Heads, You've got hundreds and hundreds of people in
Speaker 1: very close quarters and closed facilities with a high COVID
Speaker 1: positivity rate who aren't supposed to be in the United
Speaker 1: States at all, and yet not only are they not
Speaker 1: stopping this flow from coming into the See that's the
Speaker 1: fundamental problem here is how do you we want them
Speaker 1: to stop the inflow because people are breaking the law
Speaker 1: and they're abusing the law. Once they break the law,
Speaker 1: they break the law by coming into the country illegally,
Speaker 1: and then they abuse the law by pretending they're going
Speaker 1: to show up for an asylum hearing when they if
Speaker 1: you know, they're even if they show up, they're not
Speaker 1: going to get deported and even if they're supposed to
Speaker 1: be deported, then they won't be found. And this is
Speaker 1: what's actually happening. The Democrats just be the problem. As
Speaker 1: can we slow down the flow so it doesn't look
Speaker 1: as bad. These are very different approaches to this. This
Speaker 1: is what you have to see. This is the difference
Speaker 1: that I'm talking to you about and the COVID realities here.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, it is true that right now, in
Speaker 1: say San Diego, there are children who are being held
Speaker 1: in a large facility and they're being given in person instruction.
Speaker 1: Now I understand that giving children, you know, schooling when
Speaker 1: they're held in US custody. Find we don't believe that
Speaker 1: they could be h they could avoid in person schooling
Speaker 1: for a couple of weeks. Why can't we roll in?
Speaker 1: I mean, if it's good enough for your kids, why
Speaker 1: isn't it a good enough for a legal limitmen? Kids
Speaker 1: to you know, roll in a big flat screen TV
Speaker 1: and you know, play some lessons and they can play
Speaker 1: them and espagnole or you know, whatever language is necessary.
Speaker 1: And right right, no in person instruct teachers showing up
Speaker 1: in a in a classroom setting to teach the kids
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants while in a lot of places in
Speaker 1: the country, your kids are still told, sorry, enjoy those
Speaker 1: zoom lessons. It's amazing, isn't it. The Democrats they're so
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, they're so self righteous about this stuff
Speaker 1: that they really are okay with treating illegal immigrants in
Speaker 1: it as superior to as more deserving of state funds,
Speaker 1: resources and attention than Americans. Democrats really believe that, you know,
Speaker 1: they they have this mentality, they have this thought process of, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm a better person because I want to to sanctify
Speaker 1: the illegal immigrants, you know, I want to elevate illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants as as this uh symbol of the greatness and
Speaker 1: the morality of the Democrat Party. It's it's amazing. It's
Speaker 1: just a virtue signaling ploy but it's very powerful. It
Speaker 1: works on their psychology very very well. The reality always
Speaker 1: that there are more and more illegal immigrants coming to
Speaker 1: the border, and the numbers are completely out of control.
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz has been down there a few times and
Speaker 1: here's what he says, Play thirteen. For four years we
Speaker 1: heard Democrats at much of the media going on and
Speaker 1: on about kids in cages, kids in cages. They never
Speaker 1: acknowledged that it was Barack Obama who built those cages.
Speaker 1: I went and toured those cages in twenty thirteen and
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen when Obama built them. And now Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is building new cages. He's building bigger cages, and they're
Speaker 1: more full. You know, at the Donna facility, there were
Speaker 1: children just lined up in those cages, not six feet apart,
Speaker 1: not three feet apart, not even three inches apart, side
Speaker 1: by side by side, in the midst of a pandemic.
Speaker 1: Ten percent of those kids are testing positive for COVID.
Speaker 1: And then just a couple of days ago, I went
Speaker 1: to another detention facility the Biden administration had stood up
Speaker 1: in downtown Dallas, the Kay Bailey Hutchinson Convention Center. A
Speaker 1: giant room. It is the size of three and a
Speaker 1: half football fields to give you a sense of the scope.
Speaker 1: And the room is filled with nothing but cots lined up,
Speaker 1: one after the other after the other. Two thousand, two
Speaker 1: hundred cots, all in a row, all filled with teenage
Speaker 1: boys aged thirteen through seventeen, just one slice of the
Speaker 1: children who are suffering, who are being brought in by
Speaker 1: human traffickers, who are being abused, who are being sexually abused,
Speaker 1: and all of that's the direct result of Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: political mistakes. It is the result of Joe biden policies
Speaker 1: and the Democrat parties approach to immigration. And ultimately we're
Speaker 1: going to have to shift this conversation nationally. This is
Speaker 1: what's going to have to happen to. Okay, Yes, the
Speaker 1: plight of these illegal immigrants, including unaccompanied mind is a
Speaker 1: very sad thing, and there needs to be there needs
Speaker 1: to be basic humanitarian effort and care given to this,
Speaker 1: But we also need to stop people from coming here.
Speaker 1: In this way, you have to get it to stop.
Speaker 1: And this is the part of it that no one
Speaker 1: talks about right now. The only way you get it
Speaker 1: to stop is if there is no benefit to doing it.
Speaker 1: If the incentive structure remains in place, the illegal immigration
Speaker 1: will continue as we are seeing it right now. It
Speaker 1: will not stop ever, it will keep going month after month.
Speaker 1: This will become the new normal. And Democrats, by setting
Speaker 1: up all these facilities and all this processing, are preparing
Speaker 1: for that. They're not trying to stop this, They're trying
Speaker 1: to better control the flow of it. Crime is getting
Speaker 1: worse in this country. That's a very strange thing, isn't it.
Speaker 1: We would usually assume that if we had a pandemic
Speaker 1: and are fewer people interacting with each other, fewer people
Speaker 1: outside and just human back and forth in our day
Speaker 1: to day that you'd have less crime, right, But that's
Speaker 1: not happening. In fact, the opposite has happened and last year.
Speaker 1: We don't have the full official numbers yet, but the
Speaker 1: numbers we've seen so far indicate that things are going
Speaker 1: very poorly from the perspective of violent crime in America
Speaker 1: as of the last eighteen months. And there's a very
Speaker 1: specific spike that occurs starting right around last May or
Speaker 1: June that we will be addressing as well. But this
Speaker 1: is the kind of information that if you rely on
Speaker 1: corporate media you won't find out, and even if you
Speaker 1: rely on seeing it on social media, you may not
Speaker 1: find out because the social media companies have picked sides
Speaker 1: in our political debates, and they are very clearly supportive
Speaker 1: of the narrative, the narrative of the left, and that's
Speaker 1: why they are silencing and removing any voices that don't
Speaker 1: agree with that narrative. Twitter and Facebook are clear examples
Speaker 1: of this. They're supposed to be open platforms, but they're
Speaker 1: not anymore. They've got content moderators who act like editorial writers.
Speaker 1: So instead of letting these social media companies just destroy
Speaker 1: your rights to free speech and use your data to
Speaker 1: get super rich, I've got an idea. Why not use
Speaker 1: Express vpn to anonymize much of your online presence by
Speaker 1: hiding your IP address. That makes your activity much more
Speaker 1: difficult to trace and sell to advertisers. Express VPN couldn't
Speaker 1: be easier to set up. You just tap one button
Speaker 1: on your phone or your computer and you're protected. Express
Speaker 1: VPN also encrypts one percent of your data to protect
Speaker 1: you from hackers and Internet bad guys. It's finally time
Speaker 1: to say no to censorship and take back your online privacy.
Speaker 1: At Express vpn dot com slash buck. By visiting my
Speaker 1: special link, you'll get an extra three months of express
Speaker 1: VPN service for free. Go right now. You have to
Speaker 1: have this. This is a must for your devices, for
Speaker 1: your computers. Don't allow the spying to continue. Who knows
Speaker 1: what they're going to do with that data in years
Speaker 1: to come. Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express
Speaker 1: vpn dot com slash buck. To protect your data today,
Speaker 1: I said, America is on trial, and I say, yes,
Speaker 1: George Floyd is US. And I get so much pushback
Speaker 1: from people saying, it's not us because he, you know,
Speaker 1: had this in his pass and he had this, and
Speaker 1: what does that? What does that have to do with
Speaker 1: his encounter with a police officer? What does that have
Speaker 1: to do with something that you did years ago? What
Speaker 1: does that have to do with anything? Why are you
Speaker 1: making that excuse? Why are you trying to justify in
Speaker 1: your mind the inhumane treatment of a person by bringing
Speaker 1: up everything that has happened in their lives. You bring
Speaker 1: up all the negatives. What about the positives? Yeah, what
Speaker 1: about the positives? Don Lemon says, okay, let's let's address this.
Speaker 1: He says, George Floyd is US. And many people would say,
Speaker 1: I am saying right now, that's absurd, and that's actually
Speaker 1: pretty offensive. It's nonsense. We can say that we need
Speaker 1: to look at the evidence presented in a trial here
Speaker 1: of police brutality, without pretending that George Floyd didn't make
Speaker 1: the situation that he found himself in more dangerous by
Speaker 1: the drug use, Without pretending that George Floyd didn't have
Speaker 1: an extensive criminal past, including a home invasion where he
Speaker 1: held a gun at the belly. He pointed a loaded
Speaker 1: firearm at the belly of a pregnant woman during a
Speaker 1: home invasion and threatened to shoot her. But he is
Speaker 1: all of us. No, I'm sorry, that's a disgusting, a
Speaker 1: disgusting move that he made a disgusting statement to say now,
Speaker 1: And it just goes to show you how this is
Speaker 1: all going to be an emotional argument that's made. They
Speaker 1: will stray from the facts. Here's here's the bottom line
Speaker 1: is that the coroner's report indicates that there is at
Speaker 1: least three times the amount of there was three times
Speaker 1: the amount of fentonel in his George Floyd's system required
Speaker 1: for it to be a lethal situation, and that alone,
Speaker 1: you would think, would raise the prospect of reasonable doubt
Speaker 1: because they also cannot prove nor does the evidence support
Speaker 1: that he was asphyxiated by Officer Chauvin. Now, Officer Chauvin
Speaker 1: and if anybody watching the video did seem to me
Speaker 1: all right, like he should have taken action sooner than
Speaker 1: he did based upon what we can see in the
Speaker 1: video to get aid to George Floyd. But I'm not
Speaker 1: sitting in that trial and I'm not sitting through the
Speaker 1: presentation of every bit of evidence. I'm talking about what
Speaker 1: I can see in the video, but what may be
Speaker 1: what it may be involuntary manslaughter, let's say, or what
Speaker 1: may be a circumstance of an officer who should be
Speaker 1: fie he's already been fired, but should be fired from
Speaker 1: his job for not giving rendering aid quickly enough. Is
Speaker 1: a different thing from a murder charge, which is what
Speaker 1: he currently faces, that he intended to kill George Floyd.
Speaker 1: I don't see any evidence of that. I've also never
Speaker 1: seen any evidence of the presentation or any evidence presented
Speaker 1: of racial animus that does not. Now you can say
Speaker 1: he's a white officer, George Floyd was black, Therefore there's
Speaker 1: clearly racial animus, but that that's actually not how our
Speaker 1: justice system works. That's actually not how human beings should
Speaker 1: be judged in their interactions. But that's what the left
Speaker 1: will say, that there's racial animals just because of the
Speaker 1: racial makeup here. Now, if you had a black cop
Speaker 1: and a white individual here, nobody would make that claim,
Speaker 1: right Nobody make that claim. So there's a narrative, there's
Speaker 1: a construct that this is fit into right away, and
Speaker 1: Don Lemon is a man who has paid millions of
Speaker 1: dollars a year to say very silly things on a
Speaker 1: regular basis on television and has not spent any time
Speaker 1: in near or around dangerous law enforcement situations in certainly
Speaker 1: his recent life. But he identifies with this right because
Speaker 1: it's it's a way of elevating the narrative and a
Speaker 1: way of elevating the left, and he views this as
Speaker 1: something that is professionally It professionally advances him to take
Speaker 1: the positions that he does on this. But there's a
Speaker 1: downside to all of this stuff that is just beginning
Speaker 1: to be seen by the general public. There's a there's
Speaker 1: a real cost a cost in lives that comes from
Speaker 1: all of that that if you just look at the data,
Speaker 1: if you look at the numbers, you can see it
Speaker 1: quite clearly. And for one, it's from these FBI statistics
Speaker 1: that show a twenty five percent rise last year in
Speaker 1: murders in a lot of cities, twenty five percent increase
Speaker 1: in murders in twenty twenty. Now, the official number doesn't
Speaker 1: come out until the fall of this year. For all
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty, it takes that's when they do all
Speaker 1: their compilation. For whatever reason, that's what happens. The official
Speaker 1: number does not come out till September of twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: But assuming the preliminary numbers are correct, and there's no
Speaker 1: reason to believe they're not, if anything, they'll go up.
Speaker 1: A twenty five percent increase in murders in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: would mean that we are over twenty thousand murders a
Speaker 1: year for the first time since nineteen ninety five. We
Speaker 1: would be at the highest murder rate the United States
Speaker 1: has seen nationally in twenty five years. Have you heard
Speaker 1: this anywhere? Have you been seeing the headlines about this?
Speaker 1: Is this? Is this something the media is focused on. No? No,
Speaker 1: In fact, I'm sure for a lot of you, this
Speaker 1: may be the first time you've even heard that number. Chicago,
Speaker 1: for example, had seven hundred and eighty people killed it
Speaker 1: murdered in twenty twenty. That is a fifty five percent
Speaker 1: increase from the five hundred and two deaths it had
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen. A fifty five percent increase in murders
Speaker 1: in a city with far too many murders to begin with.
Speaker 1: Now understand that they're not going to be able to
Speaker 1: hide from this forever. The narrative is not going to
Speaker 1: be sufficient to shut down the facts here. But when
Speaker 1: you look at a sample of thirty seven cities with
Speaker 1: data available for the first three months of this year,
Speaker 1: they're up thirty seven major US cities for the first
Speaker 1: three months of twenty twenty one, mind you, up eighteen percent.
Speaker 1: This is stunning. There's far more murder happening in the
Speaker 1: United States over the course of this pandemic. And this
Speaker 1: is not an anomaly. This is not just some statistical fluke.
Speaker 1: It's clear, it's obvious, and once the numbers are in
Speaker 1: and official, it's going to be hard for the Democrats
Speaker 1: to hind from this. Now, what happened from twenty twenty
Speaker 1: to present, From the beginning of twenty twenty to now
Speaker 1: we're four months into twenty twenty one, what happened. Yes,
Speaker 1: there was a pandemic, and there're gonna be a lot
Speaker 1: of people who try to say, oh, because of the pandemic,
Speaker 1: we've had this increase in violence. That's interesting because the
Speaker 1: flu pandemic of nineteen eight, the Great Depression, and the
Speaker 1: Great Recession of two thousand and eight all had substantial
Speaker 1: declines in violence. So there's no reason to believe that
Speaker 1: the pandemic itself was the cause of greater violence. In fact,
Speaker 1: if anything, if you just think of it logically and
Speaker 1: you look at historical historical comparisons, I mean the Spanish
Speaker 1: flu pandemic of nineteen eighteen being one example, a very
Speaker 1: clear example, violence should have gone down during the pandemic.
Speaker 1: So why did violence go up? And why was I
Speaker 1: talking about the George Floyd case and Derek Chauvin's trial
Speaker 1: at the start of this. We all know why violence
Speaker 1: went up the b LM movement, which, as I've said
Speaker 1: to you, and I'm very proud of the fact that
Speaker 1: even last June, when a lot of people, including the
Speaker 1: Trump supporters in the White House and you know, a
Speaker 1: lot of the Trump people in the administration some level
Speaker 1: the President himself, I'm just gonna say it, were really
Speaker 1: weak on BLM. There was a lot of talk about how, oh,
Speaker 1: we need criminal justice reform. What criminal justice reform? They're
Speaker 1: burning down buildings, there's riots going on across the country.
Speaker 1: You're talking about criminal justice reform. You think you're going
Speaker 1: to reason your way through this mob situation. A lot
Speaker 1: of republic and including a lot of people in Trump world,
Speaker 1: and I know, you know, Kushner was the Trump advisor
Speaker 1: on this issue, and it was a horrible idea to
Speaker 1: have that guy in that role. And it did not
Speaker 1: It did not result in sound policies, especially in response
Speaker 1: to things like the rise again of the BLM movement.
Speaker 1: But we all know at some level why there was
Speaker 1: a huge spike in violence, and yet the media is
Speaker 1: gonna they're gonna say, oh, I already saw the New
Speaker 1: York Times claiming it's because of the spike in gun sales,
Speaker 1: that's why there's more violence. Oh okay, Yeah, so people
Speaker 1: just started buying guns and killing people. But there's no
Speaker 1: actual cause behind it other than the buying of the guns. No,
Speaker 1: the spike in gun sales was lawful gun owners who
Speaker 1: wanted to be able to protect themselves from the surge
Speaker 1: in violence that they all knew was coming because of
Speaker 1: the BLM movement. Because of the BLM movement, And why
Speaker 1: does BLM result in more death and more violence and
Speaker 1: more misery in American cities. It's rather straightforward when you
Speaker 1: think about it. BLM results in political cowardice from politicians
Speaker 1: who all of a sudden start throwing police under the bus,
Speaker 1: They start bailing on law enforcement, and they're hoping that
Speaker 1: by capitulating, byaving to the demands of the BLM mob
Speaker 1: in whatever way they can, they will keep their positions
Speaker 1: of power and they essentially leave the police high and dry.
Speaker 1: They start talking about defunding. In some cases in major cities,
Speaker 1: they actually take action to defund police. I mean, it
Speaker 1: was just a little over a year ago, friends, that
Speaker 1: we were being told that the way to stop violence
Speaker 1: in this country is to send social workers instead of
Speaker 1: cops to domestic violence calls for example. So remember, not
Speaker 1: a social worker and cops, send a social worker instead
Speaker 1: of cops. This was considered cutting edge law enforcement theory
Speaker 1: from the BLM. Abolish the police, defund police left, that's
Speaker 1: the kind of stuff they're talking about. Well, what I'm
Speaker 1: here to tell you is that there have been at
Speaker 1: least hundreds, if not a few thousand people who are
Speaker 1: dead now who would not have been dead. And it's
Speaker 1: primarily people in poor, high crime neighborhoods in a lot
Speaker 1: of parts of the country that are predominantly minority neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: A lot of people are dead that wouldn't be dead
Speaker 1: because of the cowardice of politicians in the face of
Speaker 1: the BLM movement and the media's absurd and disgraceful pandering
Speaker 1: to the BLM movement, holding it up as some kind
Speaker 1: of a civil rights struggle, holding it up as though
Speaker 1: it's it's a group of people who are all heroes here.
Speaker 1: They're just fighting for justice. They say, really, you're not
Speaker 1: fighting for justice. If you're attacking cops, you're not I
Speaker 1: mean physically attacking them like in a mob. You're not
Speaker 1: fighting for justice. If you're lighting buildings on fire, if
Speaker 1: you're looting stores, stealing sneakers and handbags, is not fighting
Speaker 1: for justice. But there were craven, disgusting people in the
Speaker 1: media and the Democrat Party and even some Republicans. Mitt
Speaker 1: Romney was marching with BLM. You remember that. What a
Speaker 1: feckless little coward. People like that saw it as an
Speaker 1: opportunity to show how good they are. Oh, there's such
Speaker 1: good people. Their egos, their vanity is all that needs
Speaker 1: to actually be dealt with here. The suffering, the misery,
Speaker 1: the death that doesn't really concern them. Was that your
Speaker 1: laptop for real? I don't know, I know, but you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know. You don't know, yes or no? If
Speaker 1: the laptop. I don't was the idea. I have no idea.
Speaker 1: So it could have been yours. Of course, certainly there
Speaker 1: could be a laptop out there there was stolen from me.
Speaker 1: There could be that I was hacked. It could be
Speaker 1: that there was that it was Russian intelligence. It could
Speaker 1: be that it was stolen from me. Oh man, Hunter Biden. Everybody,
Speaker 1: it's amazing, isn't it. I mean, this guy is he
Speaker 1: is truly remarkable. I mean, it could be it could
Speaker 1: be mine. I mean, I don't know. I don't know, man,
Speaker 1: Maybe the laptop's mine, Maybe laptops somebody else. I don't know.
Speaker 1: That's the best this guy can do. Trust me, Friends,
Speaker 1: if if someone had a laptop of yours that had
Speaker 1: intimate photos on it that were real, you would know
Speaker 1: that that was your laptop, right, you would know that
Speaker 1: this is all true. Hunter Biden is a liar, now,
Speaker 1: I he's such a He's such a casualty in so
Speaker 1: many ways. I mean, the guy is it's so sad
Speaker 1: really that this he's just you know, he's an addict,
Speaker 1: and he's he's a just kind of a scummy guy.
Speaker 1: Now there's a story, but he had an affair with
Speaker 1: his with his dead brother's widow, and he's married. I mean,
Speaker 1: the whole thing. It's just he's a disaster and the
Speaker 1: guy's a disaster. But notice how the media still is
Speaker 1: gentle with him because he's Hunter, he's Hunter Biden, he's
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's kid. You gotta step away from that year.
Speaker 1: You're not allowed to really dig in, You're not allowed
Speaker 1: to really get into it when it comes to Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: So you're going to accept a story like that. I
Speaker 1: love that NPR or accept his excuse. Oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: Maybe it's mine. I mean, man, maybe it's Russian disinformation. Really, dude,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the Yeah, I don't know if
Speaker 1: that was me at the restaurant last night where there's
Speaker 1: a video of me. It could be me, or and
Speaker 1: by the way, that I wasn't a restaurant. I'm under quarantine.
Speaker 1: But you know what I'm saying. It could be me,
Speaker 1: or it could be aliens who landed, who created a
Speaker 1: very life like organism that's a copy of me that
Speaker 1: you see on that video. I can't prove to you,
Speaker 1: In fact, I can't prove to you that there's not
Speaker 1: a doppel ganger made by space aliens of Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: doing this radio show right now. I cannot prove that
Speaker 1: to you. This is the kind of seriousness with which
Speaker 1: we should take a hundred bidens. I don't know if
Speaker 1: that's my laptop excuse. We're not all morons, but the
Speaker 1: press will pretend to be morons because that's what they're
Speaker 1: supposed to do, because they play along with the game
Speaker 1: with the left, with the narrative. That's what they do,
Speaker 1: and that's why I love this NPR. NPR recently wrote something.
Speaker 1: They had some story where they said the debunked the
Speaker 1: debunked Hunter Biden laptop story. Yeah, that's right, debunked. And
Speaker 1: fortunately and sorry, the New York Post story was debunked.
Speaker 1: This is what NPR was saying about the hundred Biden laptop.
Speaker 1: And they had to withdraw that and say something like, oh,
Speaker 1: it turns out news media suggested it was debunked or something.
Speaker 1: They had some massaging of it. These people never cared
Speaker 1: about the truth. These people never cared about getting to
Speaker 1: the bottom of the hundre Biden story. It does not
Speaker 1: matter to them. They are supporting a team, They are
Speaker 1: supporting a cause. Everything else is not even secondary. It's
Speaker 1: it's irrelevant beyond that. They are helping Team Democrat. That
Speaker 1: is what the corporate media exists to do. Don't ever
Speaker 1: forget it. Don't ever let that slip out of your mind.
Speaker 1: Our friend Ryan Gurdusky joins us. Now he's the author
Speaker 1: of They're not Listening How a GOP Populace Revolution Started?
Speaker 1: And also he's got something he wants to talk to
Speaker 1: us about here with a GOP how's GOP memo? Embrace
Speaker 1: of Trump agenda is the only option for a comeback. Ryan,
Speaker 1: Good to have you man, Thanks for having me. So
Speaker 1: let's talk about this. How this is The document is
Speaker 1: titled Cementing the GOP as the Working Class Party? How
Speaker 1: do we do that? What is this memo and what
Speaker 1: is it telling us that the GOP has to do
Speaker 1: to get back on track? So the memo was authored
Speaker 1: by Congressman Jim Banks, who's the head of the Republican
Speaker 1: Study Committee, and this basically it was a memo to UM.
Speaker 1: The Republican Study Committee is the largest committee on the
Speaker 1: Republican House. UM it's got hundreds of members and the
Speaker 1: main focus of it was written to Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy,
Speaker 1: and it focuses on how do we coalesce the working
Speaker 1: class Trump base along with the traditional suburban voters, because
Speaker 1: even though Trump lost the election, a lot of suburban
Speaker 1: voters still continue to vote for the House candidate's House
Speaker 1: Republican candidates. It was probably a lot of people who
Speaker 1: liked the policies but didn't like the personality attached to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Well, how do we won? The memo starts
Speaker 1: off by breaking out some old beliefs about you know,
Speaker 1: who is who is the Republican base, and it goes
Speaker 1: on like this. Seventy nine percent of mechanics voted to
Speaker 1: Trump in twenty twenty, twenty one percent vote for Biden.
Speaker 1: Sixty percent of small business owners who have donated to
Speaker 1: Trump donated to Biden. Fifty custodians donated to Trump, and
Speaker 1: forty one percent donated to Biden. So that's the base
Speaker 1: small business owners, custodians, mechanics who donated to Biden. College
Speaker 1: professors ninety four to six, marketing professionals eighty six to fourteen,
Speaker 1: bankers sent seventy three to twenty seven. And yet despite
Speaker 1: it being overwhelmingly a white collar party, the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: they are considered to be the party of the people. Well,
Speaker 1: this tries to reverse it and tries to sit there
Speaker 1: and say, now, how do we rebrand ourselves? Blue collar
Speaker 1: people of all races, white, Hispanic, and black have increasingly
Speaker 1: voted for the Republican Party by double digits. It's been
Speaker 1: increased by twelve points among white blue collar workers, thirteen
Speaker 1: points by Hispanic blue collar workers, and about seven points
Speaker 1: by black blue collar workers. So how do you make
Speaker 1: an agenda to continue that growth of blue collar people
Speaker 1: and maybe detach yourself from more of the toxic personality
Speaker 1: traits that Trump had by tweeting constantly or going out
Speaker 1: people personally that turned off a lot of suburbanite or
Speaker 1: college educated voters. So keeping those people in the coalition,
Speaker 1: but extending and adding to the working class base. First
Speaker 1: and foremost, he talks about immigration, which is the most
Speaker 1: important issue basing our country, you know, from the border
Speaker 1: crisis to legal immigration to our visa system. It's about
Speaker 1: how do we both reduce legal immigration, crackdown completely on
Speaker 1: illegal immigration, and work to stop massive fraud within the
Speaker 1: system that replaces American workers for foreign workers. It talks
Speaker 1: about having trade agreements that don't benefit the Chinese Communist
Speaker 1: Party and destroy our industry is especially the ones that
Speaker 1: the few remaining we have in the manufacturing department, and
Speaker 1: how to bring home supply chains. It's about an anti
Speaker 1: woe agenda that it's there entails white people that they're
Speaker 1: born evil, and that's the agenda that's being pushed by
Speaker 1: corporate America. And why do we still give tax breaks
Speaker 1: to corporations that that hate us? I mean, this is
Speaker 1: the opinions that promote things like black Lives Matter aren't
Speaker 1: embraced by large portions of the Democratic Party. There was
Speaker 1: a scene an exit poll from the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: They found the forty two percent of Hispanics that voted
Speaker 1: for Biden had a negative opinion of black Lives Matter.
Speaker 1: And then lastly, it's about how to reconnect with labor.
Speaker 1: You know, while a lot of union leaders tend to
Speaker 1: be very liberal, the union members themselves aren't liberal. So
Speaker 1: how do we create kind of a connection with union
Speaker 1: workers by and talk to them about issues that they
Speaker 1: truly care about and by side and sidestepping their union leadership.
Speaker 1: Speaking to Ryan Grdusky, a political analyst, writer and author
Speaker 1: of They're Not Listening, and Ryan, you know the you
Speaker 1: mentioned the corporate approach on all this stuff. And I've
Speaker 1: got to say, you know, we have finally in Georgia
Speaker 1: a case where it seems like the lies that are
Speaker 1: being told about this Georgia SP two O two are
Speaker 1: so you know, the Voter Integrity Act are so egregious
Speaker 1: and so obvious that maybe now some GOP pushback in
Speaker 1: that state may happen. And they've they've said they might
Speaker 1: actually cut a massive tax break for Delta Airlines, for example,
Speaker 1: for slapping down at them on this thing. It feels
Speaker 1: to me like this is this needs to be the
Speaker 1: standard now. I mean, the Republicans need to understand that
Speaker 1: they're in a political war here, right. Actually, what's so
Speaker 1: funny is that Steve Banner, when who's in the White House,
Speaker 1: proposed income tax height for people who made like fifty
Speaker 1: million dollars a year, so basically just fifty million dollars
Speaker 1: a year and over, so basically just walster tycoons and
Speaker 1: Hollywood actors and ends or celebrities who generally hate the GOP.
Speaker 1: And it was considered like insane, sit there and do that.
Speaker 1: But what did what did conservatives get from massive deductions
Speaker 1: and taxes for corporations? Yes, maybe some corporations created new jobs,
Speaker 1: but we also got corporations like Nike that you gave
Speaker 1: millions of dollars to Colin Kaepernick to sit there and
Speaker 1: sells cultural Marxism to children. I mean, do we really
Speaker 1: need a corporation that's sponsoring little nas X to sit
Speaker 1: there and make sure and his satan choose that their
Speaker 1: maketion that they get a tax deduction. I mean, they
Speaker 1: want to do well, they can do well, but they're
Speaker 1: the ones who are benefiting primarily from this these old philosophies,
Speaker 1: unlike corporations are your friend. Talk about the vaccine passport
Speaker 1: for a second. That's all going to be done through
Speaker 1: private corporations, the same kind of corporations who've been selling
Speaker 1: our data to China. So it makes us sit there
Speaker 1: for a second, and maybe we need to reconsider the
Speaker 1: idea that corporations are always our friend and the private
Speaker 1: sector has all the answers just outsourced everything to private corporations.
Speaker 1: That's probably not a good idea anymore. Um and it's
Speaker 1: it's not been a good idea for a long time.
Speaker 1: But the GOP messaging, which at this point dates back
Speaker 1: to the Cold War, is just it's not in tune
Speaker 1: with the realities of the day. You know, for for
Speaker 1: most Americans, it's just not there. What do you think
Speaker 1: about the role of MAGA and the Trump movement, let's say,
Speaker 1: in trying to mobilize against this in time for the midterms.
Speaker 1: It feels like there's a there's a vacuum right now. Well,
Speaker 1: I mean, I am speaking to all because you know,
Speaker 1: I consult for a living, that's why I make most
Speaker 1: of my money, and um I speak to a lot
Speaker 1: of candidates and a lot of them. The problem is
Speaker 1: that Trump didn't exactly leave them with a concise blueprint.
Speaker 1: So they're trying to figure it out, and there is
Speaker 1: a vacuum and they're trying to learn really what it's about.
Speaker 1: So the party I think has moved generally on certain issues,
Speaker 1: like when it comes to immigration. For example, nearly the
Speaker 1: entire party now says, even the liberals, that we need
Speaker 1: to change our immigration to be merit based instead of
Speaker 1: family reunification. Most of our immigration system is based on
Speaker 1: if you know somebody to relate to, somebody with already
Speaker 1: within the country. Now they're saying it should be skilled based.
Speaker 1: That was a transformation under Trump. What they haven't sat
Speaker 1: there and adopted to yet is oh, maybe we should
Speaker 1: cut our numbers from having you know, we bring in
Speaker 1: one point two million legally, we bring another half to
Speaker 1: one million illegally, and then we have a visa system
Speaker 1: that brings in another millions, maybe three million people per year,
Speaker 1: thirty million over a decade, which is tempers on the population.
Speaker 1: I says, maybe that's not the best solution to sitting
Speaker 1: there and trying to build a cohesive culture. I think
Speaker 1: that those conversations are actually happening. What I'm afraid of
Speaker 1: more for the midterms is that there's a bunch of
Speaker 1: people across the country who are going to a stamp
Speaker 1: a maga bumperstricut to the back of their campaign bus
Speaker 1: and they're not going to believe in any these issues whatsoever.
Speaker 1: And we're seeing it already, like in Ohio you have
Speaker 1: Jane Timpion, who's an establishment hack whose family literally makes
Speaker 1: money from the Chinese Communist Party to build wind mills
Speaker 1: in China. Uh and Josh Mandel, who's a neo Khan.
Speaker 1: He believes in permanent war and permanent massive immigration. And
Speaker 1: they're both saying magamagamagamagamag all day long. But they don't
Speaker 1: actually believe in any of the issues. That's and that's
Speaker 1: just in the state of Ohio, and we're seeing it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna see it across the entire country. Um. So
Speaker 1: hopefully we can find a good, solid, you know, five
Speaker 1: six Senate candidates, especially with so many retirements. I know
Speaker 1: Moe Brooks just announced in Alabama and he's fantastic. But
Speaker 1: hope they're gonna find a good five or six and
Speaker 1: sit there and make sure they get in and that
Speaker 1: will start changing the party. I mean, because at the
Speaker 1: end of the day, the success like success. Once they
Speaker 1: see more people winning under wondering, more coke here and
Speaker 1: ideology astside and just Trump, I think that they'll be
Speaker 1: drawn to those issues. Ryan, who in the GOP right
Speaker 1: now is actually speaking to the kind of populism that
Speaker 1: could resonate in a way that it would allow us
Speaker 1: to start winning some elections. Well, I mean I think that,
Speaker 1: I mean, we did win pretty well in the House
Speaker 1: last time, but I think that you know the problem
Speaker 1: with Trump is that his candidacy was like a puzzle,
Speaker 1: right there was a million pieces to it and everyone's
Speaker 1: been trying to pick up portions of the puzzle, but
Speaker 1: no one's really grasped the entire thing yet. So I
Speaker 1: think that I think that you people like Jim Banks
Speaker 1: is really good on China, and maybe he's starting to
Speaker 1: get good on immigration. You have people like Tom Cotton
Speaker 1: who's really great in immigration. You have Rampaul who's fantastic
Speaker 1: on foreign policy or or the deep state. And you
Speaker 1: have people like Marco Rubio who really understand family or
Speaker 1: family policy is like really good family policy. Even Mitt
Speaker 1: Romney's actually see someone family policy. So you have you
Speaker 1: have people who are who are you who are good
Speaker 1: on this issue or that issue. I don't think any
Speaker 1: there's no person who's going to carry the mantle on
Speaker 1: a federal level. I think if you have to point
Speaker 1: to a state person, I mean it's obviously m de
Speaker 1: santist over in Florida. I mean, he's he's the closest
Speaker 1: thing and in some cases he's better buy a mile.
Speaker 1: So I think that's the person want to look to.
Speaker 1: Do you have a strong feeling as to whether Trump
Speaker 1: himself will run again or not. I don't think he's
Speaker 1: going to. I mean, I have no insight and information.
Speaker 1: This is just me, you know, my believing this. I
Speaker 1: don't think he's running again. It'll be almost eighty years old. Ess.
Speaker 1: I understand Joe Biden is that age, but the man
Speaker 1: looks like, you know, the crypt keeper. I don't think
Speaker 1: that Trump wants to be that, and I don't think
Speaker 1: he wants to. I can't imagine at that age wanting
Speaker 1: to go out and do massive rallies across the country
Speaker 1: every day, have your name on line instead might lose.
Speaker 1: I just don't think that that that's in it. And
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, Trump is going to
Speaker 1: go out. Is one of the only forty six people
Speaker 1: in the history of this country to out of the
Speaker 1: hundreds of millions I've ever lived in this country, to
Speaker 1: be a president. I mean, he goes out, as you know,
Speaker 1: as one one of literally a handful of people to
Speaker 1: be president the United States. So I don't think he
Speaker 1: needs to do it again. I you know, maybe he will,
Speaker 1: but I don't believe you will. Ryan Grodusky, everybody go
Speaker 1: check out they're not listening his book How the Elites
Speaker 1: Created the National Populous Revolution. Ryan, my man, have a
Speaker 1: great weekend. Thanks for joining you too. You know, it
Speaker 1: tests a positive for COVID our old lipstick on a
Speaker 1: pitfall herself, Sarah Palin announced that she and her two
Speaker 1: of her kids contracted the virus. How she doesn't know.
Speaker 1: Sarah Palin lives in Alaska. He almost have to try
Speaker 1: to catch COVID in Alaska. It's easier to catch a
Speaker 1: bald eagle than COVID in Alaska. But Palin is encouraging
Speaker 1: others now to wear masks, which is rich because at
Speaker 1: the beginning of this back in May, she traveled all
Speaker 1: the way to Texas to visit a beauty salon to
Speaker 1: support the owner of that salon and what the jail
Speaker 1: because she refused to shut her business down. She said
Speaker 1: it was her constitutional right to endanger her community. But
Speaker 1: now that Sarah has herself been bitten by the bug,
Speaker 1: she changed her tune. I love these people who only
Speaker 1: believe in science when it happens to them. They only
Speaker 1: acknowledge that COVID is real after they get It's like saying,
Speaker 1: now that I have been mauled by a bear personally,
Speaker 1: I realize that their claws and teeth are very sharp.
Speaker 1: I hate this, this line that you hear from the
Speaker 1: libs all the time. And look, that's Jimmy Kimmel, who,
Speaker 1: as you know, it's not really even a comedian anymore.
Speaker 1: I mean, he just tells jokes that Democrats might laugh at.
Speaker 1: He's a pundit that tries to make jokes. Basically, that's
Speaker 1: the idea. He's not really I'm not trying to make
Speaker 1: everybody laugh. And if he is, he's not doing a
Speaker 1: good job. And he's got no Look I'm not Hollywood
Speaker 1: connected or anything else. I'm just a guy does a
Speaker 1: radio show. But that guy's reputation, it's it's well known
Speaker 1: just on the internet. That guy's reputation is he's a
Speaker 1: huge jerk. He's he's a bad just like David Letterman,
Speaker 1: by the way, another guy, so comedian David Letterman a
Speaker 1: terrible reputation for being a nasty, nasty person. But anyway,
Speaker 1: and I heard I knew some people that worked on
Speaker 1: that show, and they said, oh my god, Letterman was
Speaker 1: the worst, well the worst. Jay Leno actually apparently pretty nice,
Speaker 1: for whatever it's worth. I've always said that, but I've
Speaker 1: heard Jay Lenos actually a pretty nice guy. Here here
Speaker 1: you have this, Oh, because you catch COVID, now you
Speaker 1: change your mind? On this thing. And I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: tell you this right now. I'm still dealing with the
Speaker 1: after effects of COVID and I have I haven't changed
Speaker 1: anything about what I've said. If anything, all it is
Speaker 1: done is made me even more confident and everything that
Speaker 1: I've said all along, because yeah, I have no idea
Speaker 1: how I got it. Wear masks all the time when
Speaker 1: I was supposed to wear masks. Have always told you
Speaker 1: that that's insufficient. And I got sick anyway, after twelve
Speaker 1: months of just living my life and being somebody who's
Speaker 1: willing to go out and you know, be in congregate
Speaker 1: settings and be around I didn't do any of that
Speaker 1: though when I got sick. So just bind you that
Speaker 1: that's what has actually happened here. I got sick even
Speaker 1: though I did the things that they tell you will
Speaker 1: prevent you from getting sick or make you less likely
Speaker 1: to get sick. And I did a lot of things
Speaker 1: that they said are really risky before that, and the
Speaker 1: months before that, like last summer, traveling going to events
Speaker 1: was fine, totally fun. It's random. It's a virus. They
Speaker 1: can't control this, but they still like to make these
Speaker 1: these stupid jokes about this anyway, Yeah, believe the science.
Speaker 1: You know, you know, there's another way you could believe
Speaker 1: the science, and that's that the the Biden administration is
Speaker 1: listening to the climate scientists, and that's going to create jobs.
Speaker 1: This is a this is a funny a funny one
Speaker 1: play sixteen. We need to have an infrastructure that's resilient.
Speaker 1: We need to grow workers in this country. We need
Speaker 1: to build hope and opportunity. So for me, it's a
Speaker 1: very exciting moment in time for us to marry the
Speaker 1: work of the federal government and what we do to
Speaker 1: actually build a climate resilient country, but also one that
Speaker 1: grows jobs, union jobs, good paying. When the President says
Speaker 1: that says he hears the word climate, he thinks jobs,
Speaker 1: And I think that's great. He hears the word climate,
Speaker 1: he thinks jobs. Yeah. These people don't really understand how companies,
Speaker 1: how balance sheets, how you profit and loss works. The
Speaker 1: people that are pushing this and thinking that it's going
Speaker 1: to create all these jobs. First of all, they're going
Speaker 1: to destroy better jobs in this process, as we all know.
Speaker 1: And then when they say they're going to create jobs, yeah,
Speaker 1: they can take taxpayer money and pay someone to dig
Speaker 1: a ditch somewhere. But that doesn't mean that they created
Speaker 1: an industry that is self sustaining and supports people and
Speaker 1: creates long term value. But I mean, that's all way,
Speaker 1: be honest, Joe Biden doesn't know a damn thing about
Speaker 1: running a business or the economy, and he's the president
Speaker 1: of United States. That's what this really is going to
Speaker 1: come down to. Rock and roll, fellow patriots, it's time
Speaker 1: for roll call. Alrighty Facebook dot com, slash bucks Sexton
Speaker 1: or Teambuck at iHeartMedia dot com. If you want to
Speaker 1: send us your thoughts for the roll call, by all means,
Speaker 1: please do, and we'd love to get getting new folks
Speaker 1: in the roll call. If you've ever written to us before.
Speaker 1: We'll share your thoughts here with the whole country, with
Speaker 1: lots and lots of folks all across America and some
Speaker 1: of them around the world in fact. And this is
Speaker 1: also where we pop in and ask our friend producer Mark.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, what exciting things do you have planned for
Speaker 1: your weekend? Well? I turn a year or older today,
Speaker 1: so I guess whatever my wife has planned. Happy birthday,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark. Thank you. Look at that, buddy. You know
Speaker 1: I would sing to you. But as as you know,
Speaker 1: you apparently can't do that on the radio. Well, no,
Speaker 1: and nobody should have to hear that. Yeah, that's that's
Speaker 1: a whole other component of it, I will say. But yeah,
Speaker 1: there's rights issues with singing the happy birthday songs. There's
Speaker 1: rights issues with everything, and they and they are, they're
Speaker 1: quite litigious for what I understand about happy Bird. We
Speaker 1: also cannot talk about the basketball tournament that's going on
Speaker 1: using the specific words they like to say. Is that
Speaker 1: really true? Yes, I'm not calling an official name without
Speaker 1: paying for it. Wow, I did not know that, which
Speaker 1: is I mean? And I obviously also never watched it
Speaker 1: and could care less about it. But it is interesting
Speaker 1: to me that that's that's how they are. I think
Speaker 1: with the oscars, the way it works is there's like
Speaker 1: a twenty four hour period after the oscars where you
Speaker 1: can play some of the audio or something like that. Right,
Speaker 1: they come up with these little loopholes so they can
Speaker 1: get a little extra coverage, but then they want you
Speaker 1: to pay for it after that, so everyone wants they're cut. Everybody,
Speaker 1: everybody wants their cut. But a happy birthday, buddy, how
Speaker 1: will you tell everybody how old you are. Yeah, they
Speaker 1: think you're like fifty. Just so you know, they think
Speaker 1: I'm fifty. I'm certainly not fifty. I'm twenty. Well no,
Speaker 1: but it's because of your surly and and sarcastic ways.
Speaker 1: I believe they assume that you're older than you are.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of Team Buck thinks you're older
Speaker 1: than me, when in fact, I am the elder statesman
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hunt. I am the youngest person in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt. But not I'm not gonna be under
Speaker 1: thirty much longer. So you're at the big three. Oh buddy, No,
Speaker 1: I'm at twenty eight. Oh, man, you'll be younger than
Speaker 1: I thought. My god, younger than you thought. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: thought you thought I was like twenty two. Well, now
Speaker 1: that was originally, but then I got confused. But then
Speaker 1: I thought you were almost thirty. Now look at you.
Speaker 1: I am almost thirty. Yeah, I'm gonna be forty, all right, buddy,
Speaker 1: I'll be forty this year. You're old. I'm almost old, man. Man,
Speaker 1: is missus and missus mark the same age? Yes we are.
Speaker 1: She's a couple of months older than me. Oh nice, nice,
Speaker 1: nice little guests, enter my warm regards and I hope
Speaker 1: you have a great birthday. Do you have a is
Speaker 1: there a favorite? Do you have, like a cake that's
Speaker 1: your what's the the ideal birthday cake for producer Mark?
Speaker 1: What flavors? What are we talking about? It's definitely something chocolate. Look,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter as long as it's just lots of
Speaker 1: chocolate cake with chocolate fudge there, anything like that. But
Speaker 1: I'm thinking I haven't had a good chocolate cheesecake in
Speaker 1: a while, and that's one of my favorites for sure. Okay, so,
Speaker 1: but so like you, you'd go chocolate bread or whatever
Speaker 1: you call it, right, chocolate the you know, the bread
Speaker 1: of the cake. I don't know what you call that, right,
Speaker 1: the cake of the cake? I guess. Yeah. You go
Speaker 1: chocolate cake with chocolate frosting in the middle and chocolate icing,
Speaker 1: or do you like some variation? Just a chocolate is fine?
Speaker 1: You go all in vanilla cake. My wife prefers to
Speaker 1: an all cake and not that that's bad. I just
Speaker 1: like chocolate. Yeah. See, My thing is I never like
Speaker 1: I never want fruit flavored fillag in my cakes. Never
Speaker 1: I want it. I want chocolate, I want vanilla. I'll
Speaker 1: do the sort of yellow the yellow cake. Um, you
Speaker 1: know that's okay, but you know I want the classic
Speaker 1: cake flavors. You can do a little caramel or hazel
Speaker 1: nut or something like that. That's fine. But the moment
Speaker 1: you start getting into fruit flavors in a birthday cake,
Speaker 1: I'm like, what what are what is this? Is this?
Speaker 1: What are we communists? I don't know. I don't like it.
Speaker 1: A birthday cake that is heavenly? What is? Oh no,
Speaker 1: tell my God to tell us. My problem to Tela
Speaker 1: is that I'm I'm embarrassed by all the ways that
Speaker 1: I find to eat the nattella. So I'll be like, oh,
Speaker 1: what do you mean, I've got some celery sticks in
Speaker 1: the fridge. I think they need some Natella. I don't
Speaker 1: think you even need the celery sticks. Just get a spoon.
Speaker 1: A pet points Well, that's when you've really gone all
Speaker 1: it on your nattella, as whether you just you just
Speaker 1: eat it with a spoon, because it is it is
Speaker 1: that good, It is that amazing. So we'll dude, happy
Speaker 1: happy birthday. And you know, we we all, we all
Speaker 1: wish you a very a very happy one. And I
Speaker 1: would say, you know, if we were, if we were
Speaker 1: actually glad to see each other in an office. I'd
Speaker 1: bring you some some form of sweet treat and cake
Speaker 1: and things. But as you know, we are both living
Speaker 1: in the lockdown world. So I have not seen Producer.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen you in a year. It's an over
Speaker 1: a year now. I think early March of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: was the last time. Yeah, you still haven't gone. You're
Speaker 1: still unbearded, right, you haven't gone beard. I cannot grow
Speaker 1: beard from my life. But see, because you say that,
Speaker 1: now we all want to see you try and then
Speaker 1: have the photos posting. My wife would let it go
Speaker 1: a week maybe, and then we want to see your scraggly,
Speaker 1: patchy beard so bad. It wouldn't think Cole looked like that.
Speaker 1: It would look like nothing. For some reason, you you were.
Speaker 1: The goatee just would be a basic I don't know why,
Speaker 1: but a goatee up producer Mark would be. It would
Speaker 1: have to be a fake one. Yeah. I'd have to
Speaker 1: go to some movie prop guy or movie stylist to
Speaker 1: have him do it for me. Yeah, all right, well
Speaker 1: there we go. Happy birthday, Producer Mark. And if you
Speaker 1: guys want, you could write him in a belated birthday
Speaker 1: note because I should have known, but you know, I've
Speaker 1: had COVID, So that's my excuse for everything. Now, you know,
Speaker 1: I forget to pay my rent. I tell my landlord
Speaker 1: I got COVID. Come on, back off. I don't expect
Speaker 1: you to remember almost anything at this point. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: that's true, Kyle. First up here, Buck, glad you're back
Speaker 1: from your COVID hiatus. That being said, I was happy
Speaker 1: to hear Mike Slater fill in. He's one of the
Speaker 1: full one of the few guest hosts that I'll listen
Speaker 1: to for the full show. First listen to both of you.
Speaker 1: Want to live in San Diego about a decade ago.
Speaker 1: Speaking of Slater in San Diego, if you end up
Speaker 1: in San Diego again, check out Slater's fifty restaurant in
Speaker 1: Liberty Station. Their base burger is fifty percent ground beef
Speaker 1: and fifty percent ground bacon. Great COVID or hangover recovery food. Well,
Speaker 1: I will say that does sound delicious. What do you think,
Speaker 1: Producer marks. I've never heard of fifty percent ground bacon
Speaker 1: and fifty percent ground beef, but that has to be good.
Speaker 1: I have had that before. There's a restaurant on Long
Speaker 1: Island that does that and it is fantastic. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: sounds amazing. I want to make it myself. Now. I'm
Speaker 1: very in midtown. There's a not too far from where
Speaker 1: I live. There's a place called the Bacon Bar, and
Speaker 1: I've always wanted to go, and they serve all different
Speaker 1: kinds of bacon as the food, of course, but also
Speaker 1: bacon drinks. But it has been shut down for COVID,
Speaker 1: and so I have not been able to go. I
Speaker 1: have always wanted to try that as well. Yeah, I've
Speaker 1: heard I've heard good things. The best thing that the
Speaker 1: Trumpet or the trump Hotel in DC was there flamed
Speaker 1: or flombade bacon strips. It's like twenty five dollars or something.
Speaker 1: But they had these big thick bacon strips and they
Speaker 1: take out a little a miniature flamethrower, but it's not
Speaker 1: really called up, you know, it's like a little flame gun,
Speaker 1: and they seared them right in front of you. They're
Speaker 1: already cooked, but then they kind of blackened them a
Speaker 1: little bit in front of you and there and they're
Speaker 1: maple glazed. Oh so good, so good. Highly recommend. Fernando.
Speaker 1: Sorry to hear you got COVID. I got it. Last June,
Speaker 1: and I didn't lose sense of taste or smell, but
Speaker 1: the shortness of breath was brutal when combined with the
Speaker 1: fever and fatigue. My parents just got it, and my
Speaker 1: father actually has two different variants at the same time,
Speaker 1: which I wasn't sure could happen. His symptoms were like mine.
Speaker 1: But my mother is doing fine. Crazy. Oh, Fernando, man,
Speaker 1: I'm glad you're okay. It sounds like your family's doing
Speaker 1: okay too with it. And yeah, it's uh, you know,
Speaker 1: COVID is rough and I've you know, I've always said
Speaker 1: that based on everything that I had read and then
Speaker 1: heard about and friends of mine that had had it.
Speaker 1: You know, COVID is definitely something you want to you
Speaker 1: want to avoid getting it if you can, but it's
Speaker 1: very hard to really avoid. That's the point, you know.
Speaker 1: Of course, I want to never get a cold, but
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get colds. I want to never get the flu,
Speaker 1: but I've gotten the flu. It's really hard to avoid
Speaker 1: these things, and even with the mitigation measures, it's still very,
Speaker 1: very challenging to avoid. A producer, Mark, have you gotten
Speaker 1: the vaccine yet? Yeah, I'm fully vaccinated as a two
Speaker 1: weeks ago. That's right, I thought, so I remember this note.
Speaker 1: Look at you, Look at you, and I got the
Speaker 1: Johnson and Johnson, so it was only one shot. Look
Speaker 1: at you, fancy man with your vaccine. Huh, you're all
Speaker 1: good now. Stuff. You're like the bionic Man. You're like
Speaker 1: thor and Ragner Rock or something. You know, you could
Speaker 1: take on anybody. I can breathe whatever air. I you
Speaker 1: can breathe whatever you like. Yeah, you didn't. Did you
Speaker 1: have any um, you know, rash, or any pain or
Speaker 1: anything as a result of the shot. No. I mean
Speaker 1: my arm hurt for a while, but that's normal with
Speaker 1: any shots. So other than that, I was completely fine. Yeah,
Speaker 1: usually get that little bit of arm soreness. Yeah. Look,
Speaker 1: I would get it. I would get a vaccine pretty
Speaker 1: you know, not that soon because I'm I'm still you know,
Speaker 1: beat the virus, so I don't really need it right now,
Speaker 1: but I would get one. It's up. I know a
Speaker 1: lot of people listening to the show say they're not
Speaker 1: going to get one. I'm just look, you know, I
Speaker 1: think it should be an individual's choice. I will just
Speaker 1: say this, if you are over sixty, please get the vaccine.
Speaker 1: Please get the vaccine. Okay, if you're over sixty, please
Speaker 1: do it. If you are under sixty, I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna do it, But I'm by no means suggesting that
Speaker 1: people should be made to do it, Nor do I
Speaker 1: think that people. You know, I can understand why if
Speaker 1: you're at the lower risk category, you know you you
Speaker 1: were going to hold off on, a hold off a
Speaker 1: bit or whatever. So I get it. But I'm just
Speaker 1: telling you I'm doing it. Folks. See, I'm just giving
Speaker 1: it to you straight. I'm gonna get it when I can.
Speaker 1: And I and I really do ask the folks listening
Speaker 1: to this wherever, and I'd say, over fifty, really give
Speaker 1: it a lot of thought. And over sixty, i'd say,
Speaker 1: please do it, Please get it. You don't, you don't
Speaker 1: want to deal with this. I mean, I'm a pretty young,
Speaker 1: healthy guy. I don't smoke, I barely drink. I you know, okay,
Speaker 1: I put on like ten or fifteen. But I don't
Speaker 1: think it's considered a comorbidity to have a little bit
Speaker 1: of a dadbod. And you know, and I got wrecked
Speaker 1: by this thing for ten days, so you know, I'm
Speaker 1: just trying to help you avoid even if you think
Speaker 1: you'd be fine if you got it, and you probably
Speaker 1: would buy the numbers. You know you don't want to
Speaker 1: You don't want to deal with this for ten days
Speaker 1: if you can avoid it. So anyway, I'm glad Producer
Speaker 1: Mark got it and I'm recommending to folks. Now. It
Speaker 1: gets trickier when people say what about kids, because I
Speaker 1: mean kids seem to clear this thing very quickly, So
Speaker 1: I you know that's a and with no symptoms. Really,
Speaker 1: so that's a whole other thing. But we're not talking
Speaker 1: about that right now. I don't you know. I'm just
Speaker 1: going with what I know and telling you what I think. keV,
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, I'm in Columbia, South Carolina. I think you
Speaker 1: would like it here. I'm in the midlands of South Carolina.
Speaker 1: Barbecue means pulled pork. Our sauce is a tangy mustard basse.
Speaker 1: Give it a shot. Also, we eat boiled peanuts here.
Speaker 1: They're sold roadside and they're unregulated by the health Department.
Speaker 1: It's like redneck at a mamme shields high, love you man,
Speaker 1: praying for you. Thanks, keV. Redneck at a Mama. Have
Speaker 1: you ever heard that before, Producer Mark, that's a first,
Speaker 1: but that's hilarious. Yeah, I kind of like I kind
Speaker 1: of like that. And a tangy mustard basse. Tangy mustard basse.
Speaker 1: That sounds pretty good if you ever had. Have you
Speaker 1: ever had this form of barbecue. I'm sure I have,
Speaker 1: but I definitely prefer barbecue sauce because I see, this
Speaker 1: is what I was to say. I think the tangy
Speaker 1: mustard basse. I would like the barbecue sauce style I love.
Speaker 1: I tried the North Carolina vinegar sauce and I couldn't
Speaker 1: get I couldn't get that excited about it. I had
Speaker 1: about and I love my North Carolina folks listening. I
Speaker 1: love the state, great people, But just the Texas barbecue,
Speaker 1: the Nashville barbecue, the Dallas barbecue I've had. It definitely
Speaker 1: beat what I had when I was making my way
Speaker 1: to burn North Carolina. I'm just saying better, better barbecue.
Speaker 1: It's all I've just. I keep it real, folks, I
Speaker 1: keep it real, all right? More, roll call, get us
Speaker 1: going for the weekend. Here, Chip Rights, come on, buck
Speaker 1: Marco finally finds some Huevos and you got a dish
Speaker 1: for his statement. What he said was true and needed
Speaker 1: to be said pick on the left, not when someone
Speaker 1: on our side finally finds their voice and speaks the truth.
Speaker 1: My only criticism is he should have thrown Disney in there. Chip.
Speaker 1: I wasn't picking on him. And by the way, you're
Speaker 1: completely I completely understand what you're saying, and I think
Speaker 1: you have a point. I wasn't picking on Marco. What
Speaker 1: I'm saying, though, is pointing to pointing to corporate hypocrisy
Speaker 1: when it comes to US policy and Chinese policy is
Speaker 1: never gonna get us anywhere. Really, it doesn't that they're
Speaker 1: not shamed by this. They just view China as something else.
Speaker 1: It's different, you know that they don't care and it
Speaker 1: doesn't move the needle here politically for them, so they
Speaker 1: don't feel like, oh, you know, they they embrace a
Speaker 1: philosophy of global moral relativism and that's not going to change.
Speaker 1: That's all I'm trying to say. That doesn't it doesn't
Speaker 1: land with the impact we wanted to when we say, oh,
Speaker 1: the NBA panders to China, Yeah, they do, but that's
Speaker 1: not going to stop them from pandering to China relative
Speaker 1: to the political stances they'll take here in the US.
Speaker 1: But Chip, you know, fair point, you know, and I
Speaker 1: wasn't When Marco says good things, I should say Marcos
Speaker 1: says good I didn't. I shouldn't call him Lil Marco.
Speaker 1: It's just get stuck in my head. That's what Trump
Speaker 1: called him. I've interviewed Mark Rubio a few times. I
Speaker 1: gotta say he was very he was very professional and pleasant.
Speaker 1: And you know, I'm not anti Mark. I am not
Speaker 1: anti Marco Rubio as a politician. I don't know the
Speaker 1: guy personally, obviously, but I'm not anti Marco Rubio as
Speaker 1: a politician. I think he's got some skills, and I
Speaker 1: think that, you know, sometimes he's on the right side
Speaker 1: of things, and one he is I like to say. So,
Speaker 1: you know. So there's that, Chris. I was listening to
Speaker 1: your show this evening. You were asked why all these
Speaker 1: woke bag companies were condemning Georgia's new Jim Eagle bill.
Speaker 1: We're gonna see a lot more of this, unfortunately, as
Speaker 1: they're frantically trying to raise their EESG score. It stands
Speaker 1: for Environmental Social Governance. Our credit scores will go out
Speaker 1: the window, will be replaced by this new wokeness score.
Speaker 1: The Almighty Facebook currently has a low ESG score because
Speaker 1: they're not doing enough to silence the deplorables, so the
Speaker 1: bar is set pretty high. Love the show and listen
Speaker 1: every chance I get. Thanks for all the hard work, Chris.
Speaker 1: I've never heard of an ESG score before, so maybe
Speaker 1: you're you're educating me on something, and I thank you
Speaker 1: for writing in and telling me about this. And we
Speaker 1: got time, I think for one more here before we
Speaker 1: get to the weekend. Jeremiah hey back. Question. If businesses
Speaker 1: are opening up all across the country and aren't currently
Speaker 1: requiring proof of vaccination now when most people are not vaccinated,
Speaker 1: then what is the justification for requiring proof later when
Speaker 1: most people will be vaccinated. Well, Jeremiah, they just they'll
Speaker 1: move the goalposts on this like they do with everything.
Speaker 1: That's the way that this works. They'll find some way
Speaker 1: to say that, oh, the data changed or something, and
Speaker 1: so you got to do what we tell you to do,
Speaker 1: and you shut up and do what we tell you.
Speaker 1: That's basically what it's going to come down to. That's
Speaker 1: what you can expect from all this. So yeah, I
Speaker 1: think we are heading toward a lot of states where
Speaker 1: there are seen passports at least required by businesses, if
Speaker 1: not required by the state health authorities. But we will
Speaker 1: fight against all the madness. Friends, as we always do,
Speaker 1: have a great weekend. Talk to you Monday, Shields High