WEBVTT - Week 15: Feel The Hurts

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>advice League dot Com. Here's your host, Paul. Welcome to

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>my playoff edition of Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Charchi and my coast today are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, gentlemen,

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Chart your sounding excited, maybe a little spooky? Playoffs? Yes?

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>How many? How many teams do you have alive? Still? Three?

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>That's good? I have three alive, that's good. Yeah. I've

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>got a guillotine, a regular and a and a twentyman redraft.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>That's good. How about you, Scott? I also got three? Uh?

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Is your fish Bowl team alive? Oh? Man? Mine died

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>last week. Mine died in August. It's been over for

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a long time. On fourt inly for me and that one.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got lots to get to. Over the course of

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the show, We're gonna break down every game fantasy style

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>like we always do, letter grades on each of the

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>notable players. You will hear three tough questions which we

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>will answer and you can play along. We'll give you

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>nine players upon whom you can take a chance. And honestly,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you're still there are still players you can get off

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire, even with a playoff roster that can

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>be better than your guys. The single biggest mistake you

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>can break make right now is just blindly assuming the

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>guys that got into the playoffs and Allen best guys,

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and Allen, I had Tyrand Johnson in three leagues on Thursday,

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and then I dropped him right before the game about

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>right they ended up playing. I wasn't gonna waste a

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>spot on a player that was going to play. Go

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>look at that man the Raiders secondary? Who was that

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bad Dolphins for Week sixteen? You have no kidding. Let's

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>let's let's start with our Saturday games. There are two

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Saturday games. We've got a mid afternoon game and an

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>early evening game. Let's begin with the Buffalo Bills taking

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Denver Broncos. And for me, this is a

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>this is a green light start for Josh Allen. All

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>three of Denver's starting cornerbacks are out for this game.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a great opportunity for Josh Allen.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>So the guy who's got multiple touchdowns and or three

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and all but one game this year is

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a green lights breaking right, thanks, I do have an

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>A grade on him. Uh. The weird thing is Denver's

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>only allowed to passing touchdowns since Week nine, but they

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed three rushing and the competition was not Josh Allen,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh not even close. In fact, um Allen I mentioned,

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:47.119
<v Speaker 1>had multiple touchdowns and or three plus yards in almost

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>every game. But every game that he's attempted at least

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five passes, he has done it. And that's a

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>fairly low bar against the team that has allowed that

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in basically every single game. I have an A grade

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 1>on Allen. Digs is basically unbenchable at this point. I

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think I need to spend a lot of time

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on him. I have an A grade there. With John

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Brown out, Gabriel Davis has scored every game John Brown

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>has been out. He just has no wide receivers top

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards against the Broncos since Week nine. But with

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Davis's ability to score and Beasley having ten plus targets

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in three the last four, three of those with John

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown out, I gave them both C grades. I think

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Beasley gets a lot of targets I think Davis might

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>score again. I like him more than you do. I've

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>got high rank I got I've got B grades on

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>both guys. Alright, I'm more optimistic. Well, I do have

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Moss and Singletary on the bench. I'm sorry charged they

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>flipped again last week. I Moss is getting more snaps,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>but the touches that they're not just not coming. Uh.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Singletary and more touches. Moss had more touches in the

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Steelers game, and then Singletary had more touches last week,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and neither of them are barely averaging over three yards

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>per carry right now. It's really frustrated. The running back

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you want on this team is Josh Allen. Is really

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what it is. So I have them on the bench.

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Over to the Broncos side. I do have a C

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>grade on Drew Lock. The Bills have allowed multiple passing

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four the last five, plus yards in three

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the last five, and that's not really a recent trend.

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed six games over three hundred passing yards this year.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>They have allowed multiple touchdowns in games nine times, nine times.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Lock has been in consistent. He's been hot lately, so

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a C. Grade here high lately is

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe an even and under. He just seven game of

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his career last week. Yea, seven touchdowns the last two weeks,

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's getting but you know, matchups, this is

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a Bill's matchup. It's a little different. Uh. I do

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have C grades on most of his receivers as well,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>though Handler gets deep. He's got two big deep plays

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>each game. Drew Lock has kind of a d g

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>F attitude. He'll flow it up to him. Yeah, so, uh,

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 1>with the chance that Handler gets a big play, Tim Patrick,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he's scoring. He's he's got six touchdowns in the last

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>seven games. He has three in the last two games,

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and they've thrown it to him in the end zone

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>three times in the last two games. He's just getting

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>those plays. But he can also go off for a hundred.

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>He's done that twice in the last six games. So

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>their range of outcomes really is a four for forty

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>floor based on the last few weeks, with much more upside.

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So I have SEA grades on both of them. No,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Fan also a C grade because nearly every tight end

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>against the Bills to hit seven targets had a really

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>good day. We're talking sixty plus yards a bunch of catches,

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>some touchdowns, and uh Fant has done that a bunch

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of times this year. I think that he's in for

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a SEA grade. Their Bills allowing the fifth most points

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to tight ends on the running backs. Gordon, I'm given

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a C grade and I got Lindsay on the bench. Yeah,

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been a bad for Lindsay, my guy, and I

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>just said, really disappointing. Yeah. Really recently the Chargers for

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>in IROs and Steelers barely did anything against the Bills,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but Ekeler had a good day through the air, so

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 1>did several others. Gordon has been catching about three balls

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a game, uh Denver and uh Gordon's also probably in

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>like for sixteen in line for sixteen plus touches, which

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he's done a bunch of times recently. Almost every game

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he's had a full game this year. So he's gonna

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>get that that really nice volume. CE I like to

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>give out the volume. See, you're not tricking anybody with

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the volume. CE Carolina takes on Green Bay, Matt and

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the way you beat the Packers is on the ground

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 1>and to a to a certain degree, through the air

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for running backs. So Christian McCaffrey wait, oh, not again

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>another But it's an awfully good looking one on paper.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't think Mike Davis would have a good

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>week last week against Denver and they're tough run defense

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>because Denver is a good run defense, and his numbers

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>were just trending the wrong way. But I was totally

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>off on that one. Sult fire him up this week

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>against the pack with a B grade. Basically every team

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but the Lions and Eagles have had a running back

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just put up awesome numbers against the Packers this here.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Um moving on to the passing game Teddy Bridgewater, I'm

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>only going to give him a C grade here. In

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>his last fourteen starts, Teddy Bridgewater has two yard games

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and has topped two touchdown passes never He's thrown over

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>forty passing attempts only three times this year. He doesn't

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>have enough volume to elevate his game past the C

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>grade in my opinion, and the Packers have knocked out

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>each of the last two quarterbacks they faced, either with

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>poor play or injury. Prior to that, Sad trombon Sky

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>did rack up some nice garbage time numbers, and Philip

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Rivers actually did pick apart this secondary, but I don't

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>see it for Bridgewater. D J. Moore is back from COVID,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but he just gets to see because Teddy still hasn't

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>really focused on more this year. He's averaging only four

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>catches per game and will probably draw more gight Ear

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Alexander coverage than Robbie Anderson, who I'm also giving a C.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel he gets a see. I actually prefer benching

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>them all, but the prospect of garbage time points is there.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>With the Packs past defense, there's no real angle unless

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>your name is Richie James. He's the only player to

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>beat the Packers for more than a hundred yards on

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the season. They're tough against the slot, and they're tough

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>against the outside. Over to the Packers side, Aaron Jones,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, and Davante Adams all are getting A grades,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really even need to talk about that.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers aren't good enough to stop them. Uh, the

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>two guys in the Packers we do need to talk

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>about Jamal Williams. I am giving a C grade to

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers run defense made you believe Ronald Jones was

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>good and in games where that are in hand, Jamal

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Williams gets double digit touches. He did it last week

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit. He did it two weeks ago against Chicago.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay is an eight and a half point favorite

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>at home, so this is a great possibility of plenty

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a garbage time in the second half. Finally, Robert Tony

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in strong B grade here. He's been. He's been very

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>effective for most of the second half of the season.

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>How about this efficiency? Tonyan has five targets in four

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>straight games, five receptions in three of those four games.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good, and a touchdown in each of those four games.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>That's bankable right there. So Tongyan gets a B. The

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Panthers have allowed a touchdown to a tight end three

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>times in the last four games, and two of those

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>games where they didn't allow a tight end score, they

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed exactly sixty eight yards to opposing tight end. So

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I think tongans in a in a nice little spot here.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And if he's available in your league for some dumb reason,

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>no chance, probably not, But yeah, he's startable. He's my

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>number four ranked tight ends. Wow, I got that kind

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of right, Yeah, you absolutely did. Yeah, well, as as

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>will be proven on Saturday. Don't forget to set your set,

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>all your lineups, double check everything Saturday morning before those

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>games go off. And if you're listening to this after Saturday,

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll already know whether or not we're right about Robert Tonyan.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't listen to it after Saturday. Some stations air it

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>after SATURDH I get you after Saturday's tell us how

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Robert Togyan did at explosive output. So if we did

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>really bad, there might be people turning it off right

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, these guys know nothing. I have the luxury

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of not having Saturday game. Oh, I see how this

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>worked out. Funny Seahawks taking on the Washington football team.

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin with Chris Carson. Washington started the season as

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a daunting run defense, but since there Week eight by

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>even mediocre teams have had good rushing games against Washington.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>The Giants, the Lions, the forty niners backs have averaged

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred sixty two total yards and almost one and

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdowns per game against Washington. Chris Carson his

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>top five yards per carrying scored in every game since

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>his return from injury. He hasn't seen a ton of touches,

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>which is concerning, but I think he's now sitting on

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what should be a closer game, and I think more

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>touches they had working in Carlos hide before before because

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't fully healthy, they had a blowout win against

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. I think now that this game means a lot.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Chris Carson and we'll be closer. Chris Carson

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>will get a ball, and the Seahawks lost their division

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>lee it, so they need to start winning again. That's right.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>No dorking around Carlos Hi, thank you very much. Now

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the passing game, which is way more

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and really tricky for fantasy owners. Russell Wilson only

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a B grade here. First, just erase last week's Jets

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>game from your memory because they do not count. In

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the five games prior to playing the league's worst team,

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Wilson average just two d thirty one yards and one

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game, two thirty one and one. That is

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>downright Glennonian watching Watchington's defense has been great since Week six,

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>their past defense in particular, allowing almost exactly those numbers

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifteen yards and one point three touchdowns per game.

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Russell Wilson is not an automatic start. On

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.359
<v Speaker 1>your team. He is my quarterback ranked I believe eleven

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>right now for this week, you may have better options

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>as that guy that you don't normally start. And you

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>know this. You should know this because you've been starting.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson hasn't always paid off. Let's go to DK Metcalf.

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm still giving him an A grade in spite of

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>everything I just said because he's DK Metcalf and the

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>football team has been exposed a bit recently, allowing a

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>one yard receiver or multiple receiver touchdowns in three straight.

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf lines up on the left the most often. That

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>puts him up against Kendall Fuller, who is usually a

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>very good cornerback, although he has had some inconsistent games

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of late. Then Tyler Lockett slumping down to a C grade.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Mostly he's been a boomer bust receiver and he doesn't

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>When he does not score, he busts. And this is

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a bad matchup for a touchdown dependent player because working

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the slot, he lines up against Jimmy Morland,

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>who is not allowed to touch down and is giving

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>up just forty yards in his coverage since Week two.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>So Tyler lockets C grade and honestly, it might be

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a charitable C grade at that. Let's go to the

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington side where Dwayne Haskins you're starting quarterback, and that

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty much tells you where this is going to add.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>The only starting players with A only players are starting

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>grade Logan Thomas and J. D. Mckissic. Let's just touch

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on them briefly. For Logan Thomas, over the last three weeks,

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>he's roughly tight end six depending on your scoring system.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>He's been very effective in those games. In the last

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, He's caught eighteen of nineteen passes that have

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>been thrown his way while averaging six catches for fifty

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>four yards. He's scored twice in three games, so he's

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he comes in on a good role here. Logan Thomas

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>will face a Seattle secondary that's been hit hard by

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight ends for much of the second half of

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the season. C grade. J D. Mckissic also a C grade.

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think he's gonna run for very

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>much and the Seahawks have been a good run defense

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>all year long. But Seahawks are bottom seven and allowing

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>receptions and receiving yards two running back, so I think

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mckissic gets back to something close to the double digit

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>targets that he does periodically enjoy. What about Terry McLaurin,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>You might be asked, McLaren, he's on the bench. Oh no, yeah,

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>right soon. For two straight weeks, McClaren had two catches

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in less than twenty five yards. Dwayne Haskins is under helm.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not a death sentence to have Dwayne Haskins, and

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he's throughout his careers put up decent enough box scores

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>with Dwayne Haskins. But Seattle's past defense has gotten to

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be downright good. They're not the worst past defense anymore. No,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>they're one of the best. Right now. Seattle hasn't allowed

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a receiver to reach fifty yards in three games and

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't allowed to receiver to score in five games. They're

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best past defense over the last three weeks,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a total one eight for the Seattle defense. And that's

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>why they we'll want to That's why I think they

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>will be able to shut down Terry McLaurin. You want

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to keep him on the bench. I'm not even gonna

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>discuss Peyton Barber. We can agree here in the fantasy playoffs.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Barber has business being anywhere near your roster. When

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we come back, Nine players upon whom you can take

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance segment week. I'll take a chance on me.

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Guys would not normally start a lot of these guys

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire right now, but have very good

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>matchups or other circumstances that make them playable. Find out

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>who they are when we return to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. You guys have good news.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>We may have a replacement. Take a chance of the song.

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, I'm working on it. Some original material

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>from a band that's interested in uh in helping us

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>out with a better version of David which is anything

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>other than this a better version not wait, I know

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it will be. It'll be a happy day debut in.

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping next week for our final final show of

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the year full for our final full show of the year,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the two hour edition the full podcast podcast st all

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>year long Fantasy Football Weekly, but the over the air

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>two hour version comes to an end next week, so

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure you subscribe to Fantasy Football Weekly wherever you

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts. Absolutely true, take a chance on me.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Nine players you would not normally start. We'll beginning at

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position, Scott, I am going with Jared Goff.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>He gets those Jets who are the second worst against

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback's third most yards UH and touchdowns allowed to two

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks over the last six weeks. This is what the

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Jets have allowed to opposing quarterbacks on average, three yards

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and three point four touchdowns. That is, those are can't

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>mess this up. No, no, no, as he can be,

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he cannot mess this up. All right, you take a

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>chance at me. Quarterback Matt Baker Mayfield. He's thrown for

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>over three hundred thirty yards and two straight games, multiple

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes in three straight. The Giants a pretty tough

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>past defense all year long, anchored by the great play

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>by corner James Bradberry. But he's gone. He's on the

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>COVID list and he won't play this week. That opens

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the field for Baker. I like it. Yes, three straight weeks.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm using Sad Trombones. You gotta stop calling him sad

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>trombon Ski at this point. You know what, you might

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>be right, happy trombone Ski. He's worked out for me.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>In all of his starts so far, he's thrown multiple

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four of his five full games. The key

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to trombone Ski's renewed success is having the good sense

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to throw to Alan Robinson constantly. Since returning to the

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>starting job, He's targeting Robinson eleven times per game, creating

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>nine yards and one touchdown per game. Justin Robinson and

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Robinson's got positive matchups all over the field against the

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Vikings tissue thin secondary. Let's go to the running back position, Scott,

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I am going with Jeff Wilson, despite the fact that

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he mostered his off the injury report and he's he's

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>supposedly ready to go. He's he's been dealing with an

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury, and I do think it's going to be

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a split. Wilson has seven red red zone

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>touches in just the last two weeks. All the other

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>running backs for the Foreign Niers combined have three. Uh

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>He's had nine plus touches in five of his eight

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>healthy games, including four straight. Um and The Ravens had

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>two running backs do great against the forty Niners. The

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Vikings had two running backs sorry against the Cowboys. The

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Ravens and the Vikings both had two running backs do

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>great against so I think that there's room for Wilson.

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I think it's a savvy move. Uh, Matt,

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>let's go with you and take a chance of me

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>running back. I've got Damien Harris who's down to fifty

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>ownership in ESPN leagues. And that's because since the return

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of Sony Michelle, Harris is down to the heavy end

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sixty time share. Uh. That still probably works

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in this case because they play the Dolphins this week.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And what did the Patriots do the first time they

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>played the Dolphins. It's absolutely bonkers. They ran the ball

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty six times with their running backs, they ran the

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>ball fifteen times with their quarterback, and they added another

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>six receptions by their backs. They're gonna run a single

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>wing or a wishbone here and just run it over

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and over. And a few weeks ago, the Dolphins faced

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos, who were not passing well at that time.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>They had Melvin Gordon and Philip Lindsay in the backfield.

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Each of them carried the ball fifteen times. Each of

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>them went over eight yards on the ground. I think

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the blueprint for the Patriots here. Might take a

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>chance on me running back. Is Lynn Bowden up the

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins might be a wide receiver in some weeks,

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>but depend on his eligibility pretty much every every online scoring,

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>every online system. Lynn Boden's treated like a running back,

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and really he does take a few snaps in the backfield,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but mostly he's a wide out. Some combination of the

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>following Dolphins are gonna miss this game, Miles Gaskin, Savon Akhmed,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Parker, Mike Kaseki, and Jakim Grant. I don't know

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which ones are gonna be in around and they're all

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>game time, he said, I don't know for sure, but

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>some combination they're gonna be out, and that's gonna give

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>space for our hybrid utility runner receiver Lynn Voden. Like

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>last week when he let the Dolphins in targets, receptions,

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and yards, he was on the field more than any

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins skill player other than two a last week. New

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>England's a good defense, but not the impenetrable defense we

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have seen in recent years. Charge He also played quarterback

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and he threw a past last week. Are you going

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to call the quarterback touchdown from we have a controversy.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Not only that I am I am not only calling

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback passing a passing touch on to himself also

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>as wide receiver. In fact, I think we're gonna I'm

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna go one step further. I think he is going

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to execute a halfback option from quarterback him to running

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>back him throwing the ball to receiver him all all,

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Lynn Boden, how about didn't Nelson do that on the

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons one time? Probably? I think he should do a

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>double fleet flicker. He should get two hands it to

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a fluff flee flicker to it to flip it back

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to him and then he throws it downfield Mr. Perfect style. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the wide receiver position. Scott, your take

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a chance for me receiver. I'm going with Jared Cook,

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>which feels a little gross. There's three different players in

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this game I could definitely take a chance on. But

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that just allowed a hundred and

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>ten yards and two scores to the Gisecky shaheen smythe group.

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 1>That's a weird uh the firm, isn't it? I think? So?

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>They allowed four for fifty seven to Fan, they allowed

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>ten for hundred forty two Gronk and Braid eighty eight

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and one to Waller. Wouldn't even scoring that one over

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the last four They're just getting demolished by tight ends.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>With Michael Thomas out, I think Jared Cook might see

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>some work, all right, And your receiver matt Richard Higgins

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Browns. Did I mention that James Bradberry is out? Yes,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you did. Higgins has nine and ten targets in the

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks, six receptions in both nine games. He

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>has scored a touchdown in each of those games. He's

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>putting up the numbers we wanted Odell Beckham to put

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>up in Cleveland, and he's doing it right now. The

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Eagles secondary is a disaster. Safety Rodney McLoud towards a

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>c l last week. Cornerback Davante Maddox is going to

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>miss this game of the knee injury, and Darius slays

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in the concussion protocol. So you're all that together. Christian

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Kirk he remains a instrumental part of the Cardinals offense,

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>averaging a nine snapshare over the last month. He's kind

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of a low volume guy. He's usually like three catches

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>four catches, so you gotta pick your spots. But against

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that banged up secondary. This feels like one for Christian Kirk,

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and Christian Kirk's been very predictable this year in the

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>wide open like this, he's been really good. I think

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you're right. Detroy takes on Tennessee Scott and I just

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>got this feeling. This is like the big DeAndre Swift,

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, big, the big blowout game coming right here.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to believe it's all going to come together.

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The heavy usage, he should be fully health SPA. This

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>feels like the spot, especially if Stafford doesn't go Staffords

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the tough s B I don't think. I don't think

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going uh. In fact, I'm not sure he ever

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>plays another game as a Lion. But that's a whole

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>other conversation. Here's the thing. I had Swift as a

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>B grade with Daniel because I'm worried about that offense

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping it moving, and an A grade with Stafford, and

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>which I think that's fair. Yeah, Titans are seventh worst

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>against running backs. Swift returned and he was supposed to

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be limited, and he kind of was because he didn't

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of touches, but he did a lot

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with them. He also has five targets, got five targets,

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which I love to see, you know, I love to

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>see that kind of workload. Given the matchup, the fifteen

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>plus touch range, forty five balls, I I put a

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>B grade on him with Daniel in because it's a

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>good matchup against the seventh worst ranked the Titans. There

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Chase Daniel, I'm actually gonna put a C grade on

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually gonna give him C grade. But in in practicality,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 1>who's going to start him in a game like it

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>has to be a super flex you just lost Tasting

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Hill or something. Who you were starting? Maybe? Uh, Titans

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>fifth worst against quarterbacks, second worst against wide receivers, so

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that passing game might be able to get some work going,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're likely to fall behind, so they're gonna have

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to pass to catch up. I have Marvin Jones with

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Kenny Golladay out again. I'm not even

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>sure he plays for the team anymore at this point.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Franchise tag might muck up the works up. We'll see. Yeah, Uh,

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I like a lot Jones Jones a lot more if

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Stafford goes but under Chase Daniel. The matchup Systu to

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Juicy Tennessee Ranks twenty six against the pass. Uh, he's

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a good match up against Kenny Vicarlo and

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Jones is averaging nine point six targets per game over

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the last five which is a lot of volume. That

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of ammudolive on the bench. But Hackinson

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I got a B grade too, because in a year

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>of terrible tight ends, like every year, no matter how

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>much we try to pretend to ourselves that it won't

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be Uh, he's been consistent every day in week at

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>least fifty yards and or a touchdown in all but

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>one game, even with Daniel Ann I'm I'm gonna give

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him the B grade. On the other side, Uh,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry should have been my take a chance on

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>me player. Obviously for Derrick Henry, obvious A for a J.

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Brown who has only one dot all year. I over

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>analyzed it that week, gave him like a C grade

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>or something, but he's only got one dot all year.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>A grade for a J. Brown. Ryan Tannehill B grade.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We called the get right game for Tannehill a couple

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago against Cleveland, he had multiple scores Again

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>last week. The lines have allowed multiple scores UH to

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>nine quarterbacks two forty plus to all but one, and

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they've had three touchdowns per game two quarterbacks over the

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>last three I think it's another good spot for Tannehill

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>be grade there, Corey Davis. He's been a little more

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>hit and missed recently. But this is a Lions team

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that is fourth worst against wide receivers in the last

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>five weeks alone. They've allowed over twelve hundred yards to

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers five weeks the next closest team. So that's

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>unreal separation there. Uh So that's two d one yards

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>per game to wide receivers. I think he's gonna have

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>some room to work. Can we get tann Hill to

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>an A then I love his receiver. I got him

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>as an A. I do too. I wonder if Derrick

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Derrick Henry gets two hundred plus yards.

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're saving him for the playoffs. Now they're gonna

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>chuck it. I'm I'm keeping Tanning b because I think

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>they might run too much. They might get up too

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>much and run too much. New England takes on Miami.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt and you already said you like Damien Harriss as

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you take a chance on me running back. Is there

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>any part of the rest of the team that you like?

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there any part of the rest of the game

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't already talked about? So Newton, I'm giving

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade. These two teams did square in

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>week one. Like I mentioned, the Pats didn't even try

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to pass the ball. Uh. Newton ran fifteen times, had

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy five rushing yards and two scores in that game.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Considering cam is averaging nine passing yards per game over

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>his last three games. High school quarterback, but he's averaging

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ten rushing attempts per game. That sounds like a high

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>school quarterback. Um, that's why I'm giving him a C.

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Because the Pats just might run the wishbone the whole time.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm gonna go with Jacoby Myers and

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>any of the receivers with nine yards per game. And

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like Julian Edelman looks like he might return

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in this one, but you're not picking him up at

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this point. To ah, I got him on the bench

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>this week. The Pats just held Kyler, air Bear and

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Goff to an average of one seventy two passing yards

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>over the last three weeks, with only one score between

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the three of them, and two looked all right last

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>week against Kansas City, but he's just not generating enough

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with his feet to overcome this really bad passing matchup,

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>especially when you consider the injuries at wide receiver. Church

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Davante Parker with a hamstring, Jachem Grant with a hamstring,

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>bolt trending the wrong way, so is Mike Sticky with

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a shoulder injury. I fear all three will miss time,

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>so incerta Lynn Bowden as you take a chance on

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>me wide receiver slash running back. And then Myles Gaskin

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is still on the COVID list and they're talking like

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>he might not go again this week, which is why

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Washington started last week and looked like a dumpster fire.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So we might see Patrick Laird more this week. Speaking

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of dumpster fires, he's looking brutal too. That's yeah, that's it.

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not really He's just looked like Patrick Lair. He's been.

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>He's been very Patrick Laird, hasn't he. Yeah, it certainly

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>has looked that way. When we come back, Chicago takes

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on Minnesota. The Vikings passing attack missed a great opportunity

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>last week to roll up big numbers. How about this week?

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you trust Kirk Cousins, Justin Jefferson and Adam Feeling

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in a matchup against the Bears. Will tell you when

0:28:49.440 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back to

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment of our number one Fantasy

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Paul Geargie and Scott Fish and Matt Harrison

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>with you. Chicago takes on Minnesota. Let's start on the

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Chicago side. Mitch true Biscy was my take a chance

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on me quarterback, and I do like him in this spot.

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So why are you sad? It's just he just likes

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that one. I just like he does it. It's like

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>seconds long it is, and you want to waste time

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>on the show. I do like to waste time on

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the show. It just a little soothing background trombone solo

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>behind this epic matchup with Allen Robinson getting an A grade.

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned earlier, averaging nine one yards over the

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>past three games with Travisky under center. That bears another

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>positive going up against division rival Minnesota for allowing one

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>two yards per game to receivers over the last four games.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That is the eighth most over the last four Robinson

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>has traditionally struggled against the Vikings, though, averaging just fifty

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>eight scoreless yards in four games. But I still think

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got good matchups and especially two of the three spots,

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so he lines up all across the I'll have a

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>fun stat here, YEA, give it to me. The Vikings

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have allowed forty eight class plays of over twenty yards.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson has not eighteen on his on his own.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>For a guy who's been catching balls from Nick Foles

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>for half the season, that's a lot of deep plays

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>for Allen Robinson. Also, Darnell Mooney gets a C grade here.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>He scored last week and I frequently mentioned him as

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a dark throw. I mentioned it last week. We did

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>get a touchdown out of that. Wait a minute, same

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>thing here. Vikings are down to undrafted Journey and Chris

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Jones at cornerback who most often see Mooney, who runs

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>from the right side of the field the most often.

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>That's Jones side of the field. So I like Darnel

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Mooney with a C grade cole Commit tight end. He

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>spiked to a new high with an eighty five percent

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>snap share last week, and the Vikings are without star

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>linebacker Eric Kendricks once again without Kendricks the past two weeks,

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Rob Gronkowski scored in the week before that, the anonymous

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars tight ends combined for ten catches and eighty five yards.

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I like Cole Commit in this game. And then David

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery A grade for him. Over the last three games,

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery has averaged one hundred thirty six total yards and

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>one point three touchdowns per game. And over the Minnesota's

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>last four games, the Dallas Carolina, Jacksonville, and Tampa Backs,

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and these are not exactly rushing powerhouses. In Dallas, Carolina,

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville and Tampa have averaged one hundred thirty total yards

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown per game. And again, the loss of

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>tackling machine Eric Kendricks makes this a particularly good matchup

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for David Montgomery. Let's go to the Viking side, where

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook is an obvious A and we're not going

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to spend extra time on that, but let's talk about

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the passing game that is down last week. Kirk cousins

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Um is a B grade here. The Chicago Past defense

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>was slumping until last week when it went largely unchallengable

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>win against an injury depleted team and put Prior to that,

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have allowed multiple passing touchdowns in six straight

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>games Cousins through and two in his Week ten matchup

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with Chicago, it looks like the Bears are going to

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be without two starting cornerbacks in this game. UM we

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that it's going to be buster screen out and

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Johnson shaping up like a game time decision, So

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that should that should tilt the scales towards Jefferson and

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Feeling here. Chicago is allowed one hundred yard receiver or

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>multiple receiver scores and four of the past five UM

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the again, only the Texans and their depleted receivers did

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not make that happen. Jefferson will mostly square off with

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>rookie Jalen Johnson if he can go, and if he

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can't go, then I like Jalen. I like Justin Jefferson

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>even more this week. And if he doesn't go, if

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Johnson does not go, elevate Justin Jefferson to an

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>A grade. Feeling will draw the tougher coverage against Kyle Fuller,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>who's allowing just thirty five yards in his coverage. Thus

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the b grade on Adam Feeling last Viking to mention

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>IRV Smith. Cayle Rudolph has been ruled out, so Irv

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Smith becomes viable in those situations. The Bears have been

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>incredibly vulnerable to tight ends, Chicago allowing the third most receptions,

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>seventh most yards, eighth most touchdowns. Too tight ends. Let's

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>go to our next matchup San Francisco taking on Dallas

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for San Francisco where he Morris It Morris, He's a coach.

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He most dirt is expected to be available for this game.

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>He already told us you like Jeff Wilson. What about

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Raheemo Sterret I do I I have a B grade

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>on Raheem Mostret. I do think he'll probably get the

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>most work of them. The Cowboys sixth worst against running backs.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that before, and they have allowed multiple runners

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to have good games. Uh most are if he does

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get the most touches, I'm gonna give him the b

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and Wilson the sea. Uh. In the passing game, I

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>got Mullins on the bench. He looked really bad last

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>week and Shanahan toyed with the idea of moving on

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>from him, but early in the week decided, Okay, I'm

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick with Mullins, But that concerns me that he

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>might be on a short leash. That's that's a fair concern.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Although I thought Mullins looked very good the week before Buffalo. Yeah. Um,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have also held the last three quarterbacks they

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>played to two seventeen or fewer yards and just four

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns combined. That's a shocking improvement for Dallas. Yeah.

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Ayouk, however, I have an a grade on the

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>last two games that he played with Nick Mullins, with

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Kurt with Deebo Samuel out twenty four targets, seventeen catches,

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly two hundred yards and a score that's you know,

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>last week plus the week three, the game three weeks

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>before that. So Mullins tends to get tunnel vision for

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>him apparently in that situation. So I have an a

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>grade on Ayouk. I think he might be targeted at

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Ton against the Dallas team that's allowed twenty two wide

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdowns on their way to be in the second

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>worst of the position. When we when fantasy, when you

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>know those of us in the fantasy community, well what's

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>listening when we still when we go back and look

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>at the rookie receivers from this year. I think Justin

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson might be one. I might be two, and it

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>might there's still time to even flip flop. You might

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>end up being the best fantasy receiver out of this

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>draft class. And it's in the rookie season. Yeah, And

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine if Lam had Prescott and had a quarterback like

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Higgans didn't lose his I mean, so many really good ones,

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so many good ones. You might be the best of them,

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is the point I'm trying to make. I don't think

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we're done on Reagor yet either. Uh. I have have

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>born In James on the bench. Uh. In that Week

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ten game with I with I you can and Samuel out,

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they had three and four catches each of them, and

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in the week in last week with that same scenario

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>each had three catches about five to forty yards for

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>each of them. I think that's probably what you're looking at. Again, here,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the matchups a little easier, so it's it's a risk.

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could, but I have him on the bench.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Reid also on the bench. He's splitting time with

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Dwelly way too much, and Dallas hasn't allowed a tight

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 1>end over thirty yards since week seven. Yeah, so another

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>big improvement for Dallas. Yea, when Layton vander ash is healthy,

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they locked down the tight ends pretty well. Over on

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas side, I have Dalton on the bench. To

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bench players here over the last six

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to seven games. Here's what quarterbacks have done against the

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>four nine ers. Wilson, Rodgers and Josh Allen torched them

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>for four touchdowns each and average over three yards. Are

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>really good quarterback the other the other the other five

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in that span under two hundred yards and no scores each.

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Dalton the Newton golf Alex Smith types that that's where

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Dalton fits. Dalton fits in that group, so I have

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench. I will put give Cooper a

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>see though, since Dalton took over, Cooper has eighty plus

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>yards and or a score in all four. He has

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at least four grabs in each of them. That's seaworthy.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>He's getting enough volume piece like a boat. Yeah. The

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>other guys seaworthy, well, Kenny float traditionally Cooper's or woodworkers,

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're four very buoyant, very buoyant, right, you know,

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they work with like curved wood and then you know

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the wood floats and those people probably many of them

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>went from Cooper's to shipbuilders. Yes, that was in all

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>those games with the non stud quarterbacks, the second and

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>third wide receivers did absolutely nothing. So lamb and gallop

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>around the bench. Sheltz is on the bench because the

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fortnight is allowed the fewest yards and fused receptions. Tonight

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>end not to the running game. Ezekiel Elliott. I almost

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 1>do it like my bowls loosen talking about Ezekiel now

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>since your question a few weeks ago, that's what that

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>smell is. Forty Lamar Jackson was in here before me

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>forty seventh best against running backs, second fused rushing touchdowns.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>But over the last six weeks they've given up a

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>six touchdowns over the last six weeks, so they're starting

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to give it up. The lead back is topped eighty

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>yards in four straight and that's likely to be Elliott.

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So I have the C grade on Elliott. I know

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>he's got an injury. I still think he's gonna get

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the workload. If we find out more before game time,

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe bench both him and Pollard because I don't trust

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to split. Agreed. Tampa Bay takes on the Atlanta Falcons

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt And for the Bucks, no Ronald Jones in this one,

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Falcons are missing some key parts of their

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>secondary as well. Yeah, I feel like this is shaping

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>up like a Tom Brady passing game. Yeah, I'm I'm

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>giving him a b here um. The Bucks will also

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be missing left tackle Donovan Smith, but Chart you did

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>mention that Darkeys Dinard and Ricardo Allen are gone for

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons secondary. But Atlanta has not allowed a quarterback

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to top two fifty yards in a month and over

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks. The Falcons are sixth in league

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and passing yards allowed, and Brady is thrown from multiple

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>scores and seven of the last eight, but the yardage

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>total have been wildly inconsistent, including last week. As far

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 1>as his receivers. The last Tampa Bay wide receiver to

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>top one underd yards can you guess who it was?

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Miller in Week seven. It's been a long time,

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>That's wild. But Atlanta's biggest week spot seems to be

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the slot, where Keenan, Allen, Hunter, renfro and Michael Thomas

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>twice have led their team's wide receiver groups and fantasy

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>points during a date with Atlanta in the last month.

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>That bode's wealth for Chris Godwin, who all given a

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>grade to. Mike Evans gets the b as the guy

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who's getting the targets closer to the red zone. And

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm benching Antonio Brown. He hasn't scored yet

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and he looks like just a guy since returning. You know,

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time Antonio Brown was signed, if you you know,

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were the guy that acquired Antonio Brown on

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that news, you could have traded him for almost anybody

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>at any other absolutely, and to this point he has

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>not scored. You should have trade on this is just

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like the stock market. Trade on news and hype. And

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>look at Levy on Bell same thing. Trade on news

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and hype another guy you probably could have traded on

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>news a few times this year. Gronk, who I'm giving

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a C grade to. Atlanta's really cleaned up their tight

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>end issues since dan Quinn left, only allowing two in

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the eight games since he departed. Uh Gronk had two

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>targets last week but cashed one in for a score.

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>He's startable. But there's about fifteen guys I like better.

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Roe Joe's on the COVID list four net. Looks like

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the lead dog this week, even

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>though he was a healthy scratch last week. Atlanta hasn't

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed a one yard rusher all year. They did just

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>allow Austin Ekeler to record nine catches last week, something

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen against the Falcons in many moons, many moons.

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I missed a nine times there. Geez,

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what am I doing? Slipping in my old age? Let's

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>go to another guy who's in his old age. That's

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones who's been ruled out of this one, and

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>another guy who's gaining an age, Calvin Ridley. It's a

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>birthday game for Calvin Ridley this weekend he's gaining literally

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 1>gaining an age. Weekend Sunday is his birthday. He gets

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the birthday a that's at the Ardvarks. No, it would

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be I can't give a fonsi away, but you know, um,

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.879
<v Speaker 1>when Jones is dinged up or doesn't play, Ridley gets

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards or scores. It's as simple as that.

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's happened four times this year together. It's always one

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 1>or the other. He's had a hundred in three of them,

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and he's scored in the other one, so fo he's

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>four or four. Tampa held the Vikings receivers in check

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, but we're only a game removed from Tyreek

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Hill almost hitting three hundred yards and both Rams wide

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>receivers top two hundred yards three games ago. Finally, uh

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>from the from the passing game, Matt Ryan's getting a

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>C grade here. Ryan's hit the three hundred yard mark

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>only three times this year and zero times in his

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:48.439
<v Speaker 1>last six. But he's startable because Goff and Mahomes each

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>roasted this defense in the last three games, both going

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>over three seventy yards with multiple scores. And you don't

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>have a Falcon's running back on your roster if you're

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>still in the playoffs, they're on the bench. Jets take

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Rams, Scott and for the Jets, I don't

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's anybody that we're talking about here again against

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a maybe the best defense in the NFL. No, we're not,

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but I gotta say you're throwing major shade at Russell

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Gauge man. I love Russell Gauge. I love Russell Gauge

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and with Zekias on I R and Juliu Jones out,

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get some work. We went back to the

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Falcons matchup. How'd that happened? I'm giving a C grade

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to Russell. I like it alright, New York Jets. I

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>am starting No. One the Rams of the top team

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>against quarterback's, fifth best against running backs, the best against

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, their middle of the pack against tight ends.

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But do you want to start Christma? So I'm giving

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>a B grade to Sam Donald. I would rather start

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Russell Gauge over Sam Donald. Alright, Jared goff over On

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the Rams side, the Jets are second worst against quarterbacks.

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I already mentioned him as might take a chance on

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>me player, so I obviously like him. I like his

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in this one cup third most receptions and

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>fifth most yards allowed to watch receivers. The Jets are

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Seattle just had three different receivers score on this team.

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>All had lower yardage. But given guys like Beasley and

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen, even Myers, Parker, Hopkins, Patrick, a bunch of

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:21.439
<v Speaker 1>players have just crushed the Jets and several slot guys.

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a B on Cup and I have a

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>B on Woods, I would expect similar to the Bucks

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>game where the top two guys both went over a hundred.

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what I'm explained. Woods is an A grade.

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:33.399
<v Speaker 1>To my mind, I think I don't. I don't think

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong. These are like this is like the B

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>plus A minus range. I think is what it is.

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm fine with your A. I'll let you convince

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 1>me and do an A there. Uh, Tyler Hagbe, I'm

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>giving a C grade to the Jets are terrible against

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Uh. It's tough to start a guy like Higbee,

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but the Jets have allowed the third most touchdowns to

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, third most yards. Cam Akers, It's finally time, baby.

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him an A grade. Two straight with twenty

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>two plus touches uh fifty plus snaps last week. Only

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>two backs have tory plus touches against these Jets, but

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 1>they both went over a hundred fifteen yards. One had

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred sixty six yards. Gentser on defense is pretty good,

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>though they're way easier to beat through the air. The

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>path of least resistance is through the Still think he

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:16.359
<v Speaker 1>gets twenty plus touches in the game they're running out

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the clock on very that that scenario is very likely

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. Plenty more to get to, including

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions play along see if you can go

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>three and oh on Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchy and my co hosts

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>are Matt Harrison and Scott Fish. You can follow us

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:54.479
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Paul Charchy and you'll have to figure

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>out how to spell it at Scott Fish twenty four.

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>At Scott Fish, you act like I didn't know that

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm a if you mind at explosive output. Very nicely,

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>said Lamar Jackson's burner account. Yes it's me Lamar Jackson.

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not Mario's Jackson, the Italian Lamar Jackson, Luigi Jackson,

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Lamar D Jackson. Three tough questions. This is where you

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>try to play along. I'll pepper my co host, with

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.919
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions. See if you come to the same

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>conclusions that they do. To question, what's the single best

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>way to handle ties in a playoff game? Scott, I

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's just highest seed advantage advances. I I usually

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like to in my personal leagues push both teams through

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to the next round and then have a three way

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and have the top winner go. But when you have

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to break ties if you're at least if you're going

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to the hundredth stessmal point, it's gonna be super rare.

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And I give a little credence to to you know,

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>what they've done in the sular season, how they got there.

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>That's that's just a small home field. Home field, your home. Yeah,

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that. There's the you know, pick a pick

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a starter, you're starting running back, a wide receiver, pick

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>a non start running the lots of ways. I just

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think I see give them that home field advantage. Okay, Matt,

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>what is the best way to handle ties in a

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>playoff game? I'm gonna get this right because you've done

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>this for years with me. Um what Scott said? Answer? Okay, fine,

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 1>here's the most important thing, commissioners, and you can do

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this right now. Have a rule established, anything in place.

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Anything is good. So if you do not have a

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>playoff tiebreaker written down edged in stone, find something anything

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that you can that you can get a coin flip

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that even even that bad it's a bad one, but

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>if it's one of those Fantasy Football weekly coins, then

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a much better answer. Would have your fastest child

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>run videotape. It Here's what it can't be about head

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to head in the regular season. That is not your

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>tie breaker here, because hey, it has nothing to do

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 1>with what happened to this current week and be it

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>could be that when these teams played had to had

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one team was at full strength, the other team had

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>three guys on by or whatever, So don't use that.

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>It also can't be about backups. I hear this all

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the time. I hate the well we go to our backups.

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're watering down one of the key elements

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 1>of skill for fantasy managers, which is deciding bench start players.

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I want, I want the outcome to be decided by starters.

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>On to that point, you could just fill your bench

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>with quarterbacks, yes, which I've done and been in the

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>past when I've had these, when I've been in leagues

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.799
<v Speaker 1>that have that, I'll just drop everybody I've got, pick

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>up nothing but quarterbacks, and even if they're bad quarterbacks,

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll get a bunch of points from them. And well

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a free point, so why not, right, Um, I

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>use total yards among start yards in total total total

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mark yards amongst starters are never gonna there's never gonna

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:01.280
<v Speaker 1>be a tie that way. Totally yards among starters. Tough

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>question number two. In the playoffs particularly, should fantasy managers

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>take their opponent's roster into consideration when setting their own

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 1>line up? Matt Oh, I was gonna say what Scott said,

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what Scott is about? What Scott is about to say.

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope he's about to say, Uh, there is some

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>gamesmanship to him to this. Uh. If you know your opponent,

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for instance, has a guy like DeAndre Hopkins and you

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 1>play Kyler Murray, that mitigates a little bit of what

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins can do on the high end. But I only

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>really consider it in that kind of scenario where I'm

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>playing against a stud wide receiver and I have his

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in a good matchup as well. So if that

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver goes off in all likelihoods, so does my

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and I erase his big moment in the sun Scott.

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 1>In the playoffs in particular, should fantasy managers take their

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>opponent's roster into consideration when setting their own line up? Nah?

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I barely. That's not what Scott said about

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>its about its line up. I think the only only

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>position I would is that is a tiebreak, Like if

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I have two players that are similar and I think

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's an advantage to glean versus my opponent's UH

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lineup for that, maybe, but not. I don't really care

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>about my I'm trying to get as many points as

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.319
<v Speaker 1>i can, and I'm starting the players that I think

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to score the most points. Yes, you should

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>take your opponents of roster in consideration because you need

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to know am I a favorite or am I an underdog,

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>especially if I'm a big favorite or a big underdog,

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's what sets the risk profile of your roster.

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>As an underdog, you need to play more high risk,

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 1>high reward players. I'm I'm more willing to couple, for example,

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as one example, I'm more willing to couple wide receivers

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and quarterbacks together if I need to have. If I'm

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 1>an underdog, I need to have something big hit for

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>me to succeed, or high or other players that are

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:06.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent that Now I'm a lot more interested Cam Newton,

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>who I hate in most regards. This is a scenario

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 1>if I'm an underdog and I need him to run

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns in this is a scenario where I'm starting

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton. It's all about the risk profile. You need

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to know if you're a favorite or an underdog, if

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's relatively even. Now I'm where Scott was standing a

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>minute ago. Now I'm just playing for the most points.

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm a favorite or an underdog, I do

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>change it. What if I'm a favorite, Well, now I

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>can manage situations like well, you just describe if one

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of if my opponent has got a great wide receiver

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm the favorite, I absolutely want to be able

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to start that quarterback if I can, because I do

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:45.799
<v Speaker 1>want to mitigate points. Then However, if I'm a big

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>underdog and Matt's got a great receiver, I have to

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 1>go to a different direction and hope that receiver does

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>not sure. So correct answer is yes. Tough question number three,

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson is going to finish the season as a

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>top ten back for or and maybe a top five

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>back next year. Will you draft James Robinson in rounds

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one or two, three or four or later than round four?

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Scott probably still in the three to four range. Uh,

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:18.320
<v Speaker 1>much much like for Net last year. But uh, I

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:21.439
<v Speaker 1>think James Robinson has less injury risk and he's younger.

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna be off the team, So but probably

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the higher end of that three to four range. Uh.

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>This year, there's there's just been so many injuries up top,

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to risk it as much. But more

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>than that, he might have a different quarterback, he might

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have a different coaching staff. UM. I can see it

0:51:37.160 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>going up if he gets a guy like Brady Joe

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Brady or b Enemy or something and gets a better

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that can run that offense better. Um, But for

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>right now, where we're sitting right now, I think I

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>have him in the three to four range. All right, Matt,

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>are you going to take James Robinson next year in

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:54.839
<v Speaker 1>rounds one or two, three or four or later than

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>round four? Well, the answer is Scott's not going to

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>get him, because you're not going to get James Robinson

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and rounds three year four where I know I'm getting there, charged, geez,

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>get your pants back. I also didn't get for Net

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 1>last year because I was I would have drafted him

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth third. I was able to obtain a

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:18.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of mocks and some a DPS already way too

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>early a DPS right next Um, right now, he's going

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between ten and fifteen in mocks right now, so

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that puts him in that weird end of round one

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>beginning of round two turn where people often take two

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 1>running backs and it often fails miserably. So at the

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>end of that round, you're going to be choosing between

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Robinson and guys like Travis Kelsey, DK metcalf A, j Brown,

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes if you're into that, and more established runners

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like Aaron Jones, Josh Jacobs or Zeke So those are

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the guys that you're going to be choosing. Weird with

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson, So you're a what are you doing? You're

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:01.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to take between round one and two, So

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm not getting him. But that's so risky,

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Like he has nobody behind him. What if they draft

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a good running back to share with him? What if

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the offense is different with Can I go nope? Thanks?

0:53:13.080 --> 0:53:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Do it? Do it all right? Matt Scott, close your eyes,

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>close your eyes if you're driving, Do not close your eyes,

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>keep them open. I want you to picture highlight moments

0:53:26.000 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 1>from James Robinson. I got a couple, but I would

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>guess I don't think I've seen a Jaguars game. He

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>has hurtled people at least twice one twenty yard reception

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.879
<v Speaker 1>on like his first game, he hurdled someone. Here's why

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical. Is he a good runner? It's James Robinson,

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.279
<v Speaker 1>a good runner. He's good. He's a good he's a

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>good runner. He's a good I don't see enough athleticism

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:52.879
<v Speaker 1>from him to suggest he's going to make a year

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to leap and he's not going to get of the

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>workload next year. There's no chance he's going to do that.

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>The Jaguars simply couldn't find other ways to score or

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>move the ball this year. Almost by default, it has

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:09.279
<v Speaker 1>to get better next season. It just feels like he

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:11.839
<v Speaker 1>caught lighting in a bottle this year. I'm not I'm

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just not buying it because I don't think he's a

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:16.439
<v Speaker 1>special back. And at the end of the first round

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I want special backs to me is ADP right now?

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>This early ADP is absurd. I want special players at

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>that stage For me, he hits. He fits the profile

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for the kind of guys I totally avoid doing the

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 1>He's the exact guys I don't take. And if they

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>somehow linger into round five, now we're talking now that

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where I want my James Robinson's I think to

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Scott to the point you were starting to make, there's

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be other players there that are gonna start eating

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>into his into his work that load next year, I

0:54:47.840 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>am round four or later on, James Robinson. Let's get

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>back to our matchups, including Houston taking on the Indianapolis Colts.

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll be in with David Johnson, who faces an elite

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>run defense and this is a very icy start for him.

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Just a C grade. Non Derrick Henry running backs haven't

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>gone over eighty eight rushing yards this season against Indie.

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, they haven't gone over one hundred yards

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in Indianapolis last fifty eight games. There's a lot of

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>non Derrick Henry runners out there, a lot of I

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 1>am a non Derrick Henry runner. Yes, Johnson is a uber,

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 1>low ceiling plotting runner who gets bailed out with a

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdown every now and again. He did against India a

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, which saved him from an otherwise

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 1>horrible game. And that's the only reason you would start.

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is the hope for a touchdown here. Let's go

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game, where Deshaun Watson is a B grade.

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>He played well. Against Indianapolis two weeks ago, he rolled

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>up three one scoreless yards. Cold secondary maybe missing its

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 1>best cornerback Xavier Rhodes, who left last week's game, and

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they've struggled lately, allowing over three hundred passing yards and

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 1>three of the past four Colts have allowed quarterback rushing

0:55:56.680 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in three straight games and four the past five games.

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think that adding the rushing opportunities here, and

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I think Deshaun Watson's actually a safe play. Still don't

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>love the receiver set. Still don't know for sure that

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks is gonna go, but we think he's gonna play.

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I've got Cooks and Kiki Cutie with b grades Cook's

0:56:15.480 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>log just sixty five scoreless yards against this team two

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:21.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago when they met, and receivers just don't score

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>against the cold secondary. They've surrendered only eleven touchdowns to

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>white outs all year. That is fourth fewest. The good

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 1>news is though, they've allowed a ninety eight yard receiver

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in four straight games, so maybe that'll be him. Cutie

0:56:32.680 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>mostly runs from the slot, where he's got a daunting

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>matchup with Kenny Moore, who is the current defensive player

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of the week on that part of it is yet

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>awesome interception that Kenny Moore at last week. That thing

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 1>was blonkers. Uh so just to see grade on key

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>k QT. Then Chad Hansen, who I did players, I

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>did not expect to be talking about it at any

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 1>point in this season. This is what happens in hey

0:56:54.360 --> 0:56:57.080
<v Speaker 1>crazy story. He was out of football for three years,

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>comes back, he had nine NFL catches, and then he

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.399
<v Speaker 1>gets forced into action two weeks ago. He posts back

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to back solid games. But I think Brandon Cooks comes

0:57:06.120 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 1>back and that's the end of it for Chad Hanson.

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Indianapolis side, beginning with Philip Rivers

0:57:11.800 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>surging of late. He played these same Texans two games ago,

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:16.439
<v Speaker 1>put up a very good game two it at eighty

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>five yards and two scores, and sandwich. Between the two

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Texans games, Houston got lit up by Sad trombone Ski

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for three touchdowns without suspended cornerback Bradley Roby. You can

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:30.760
<v Speaker 1>bank on a bad game from the Texas Texans secondary. Meanwhile,

0:57:30.840 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Rivers enters the game red hot, as they mentioned, multiple

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four straight and over two five passing yards

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and four of the past five games, Philip rivers a

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>B grade, A grade to one of his receivers, t

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton, who has spoiled us with ninety two yards

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 1>per game over the last three games, a complete one

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty degrees change from his horrible first nine games. He

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>has now crossed the stripe four times in those last

0:57:55.960 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>three games, which is more than he had had in

0:57:58.080 --> 0:58:01.919
<v Speaker 1>his previous eighteen games combined. Houston surrendered one yard scoring

0:58:01.960 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 1>efforts to a receiver and back to back games including Hilton,

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like this is a great opportunity. He's

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna light up, primarily against cornerback Keyon krosson a career backup.

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Also among receivers Michael Pittman with a C grade. I

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:20.080
<v Speaker 1>don't love his low volume, but this matchup is tantalizing.

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 1>He has a healthy five catches in this game two

0:58:22.920 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, and in recent weeks, Houston has yielded good

0:58:25.760 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy games to second tier receivers like Darnell Mooney and

0:58:29.160 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed Sanu and Demere Bird. If those guys can do it,

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pittman's in play here as well. Houston's allowed the

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>second most touchdowns to wide receivers I like Pittman with

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a coin flips chance for a touchdown. Here all the

0:58:40.320 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>tight ends cannibalize each other. They're all on the bench.

0:58:43.000 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Jonathan Taylor, who has finally turned into

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the bell cow back we wanted him to be, averaging

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen carries over his past three games. He rocked the

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Texans for a buck thirty five. Two weeks ago, Texans

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most fantasy points to running backs, and Taylor

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is and a grade. Let's feel awfully good about his prospects.

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel about nine Heinz nime Heinz. Wait is this

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>nime Heinz? I've got a bench grade on him? But

0:59:14.200 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>he does have He does get the ball enough and

0:59:16.840 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in a PPR format, he does catch enough that I

0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think he is serviceable in this game. He's a kind

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of an extra take a chance on me guy in

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. With that matchup, you know what you're right.

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's give him a solid Sea Grede in this one. Um,

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 1>when we come back the Philadelphia Eagles at the Arizona Cardinals,

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what to do about Jalen Hurts? Are we chasing last

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 1>week's rushing production? Find out when we come back to

0:59:39.080 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Scott Fish

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison with you. Matt. What can people find

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it Shock Fantasy dot Com? Oh, lots of stuff we're

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>doing the podcast, still doing a lot of mail bag

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff to help set some lineups. And also we got

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the new trade value chart out and we're gonna have uh,

1:00:24.040 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl prop bat game is going to be

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>exclusive to Shock Fantasy this year, so we'll be selling

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that there. Uh. Philadelphia Eagles are selling hope that they've

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>turned around their franchise with a new quarterback. Jalen Hurts.

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen carries last week, over one hundred rushing yards. Now

1:00:42.640 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>he goes up against Arizona. I think I've gotten more

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>questions about Jalen Hurts than any other player this week. Yeah,

1:00:48.560 --> 1:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and six rushing yards last week, but only one

1:00:51.240 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven in the passing game. He only dropped back

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to pass thirty times in that game, and the Eagles

1:00:57.160 --> 1:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>ran the ball thirty six times. That doesn't bode well

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for a quarterback normally. Um, so I'm only giving him

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here. I'm not looking heavily into the

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>passing option. I think that's just gravy. So what about

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the running the Cardinals his opponent had a stretch of

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>five games in a row where they allowed thirty five

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>or more rushing yards to every quarterback they faced, and

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that stretch just ended two weeks ago. So he's going

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to get about sixty yards on the ground. I'd say

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe two yards through the air for Lucky, but the

1:01:30.040 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>eight ball won't tell me anymore. So he's only a

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>C grade, Miles Sanders. I'm giving a b uh the ball.

1:01:36.880 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>The eight ball will tell me that the Cards have

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed six rushing touchdowns in the last four weeks. Did

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that fit on the little the little eight ball thing? Mean?

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a lot of data to fit on that

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>little triangle. I gotta custom magic eight ball. It's really

1:01:51.320 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you, yes, um, Miles Sanders benefited greatly from having

1:01:56.560 --> 1:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a mobile quarterback with eighteen touches and thirty six yards

1:01:59.600 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and two wars last week he was back. The only

1:02:02.440 --> 1:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>other Eagles that I think that you can consider starting

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are Dallas Goddard and Zach Ertz, who I'm both giving

1:02:09.360 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>really low level C grades. Two Hurts is generating very

1:02:13.440 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>low depth of target on his throws, which brings into

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>play the tight ends. I think Goddard is a little

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>bit better in this matchup. He's seen eight targets from

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Hurts in his game and a half as opposed to Arts,

1:02:25.160 --> 1:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>who's only seen five. The Eagles ran two tight ends

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>sets copiously last week against the Saints, meaning both of

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>them will be on the field or more of the snaps,

1:02:35.120 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that this brings up start, energy, brings

1:02:37.680 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>up They're missing their two best offensive line Lane Johnson

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Peters are out and that's the problem. I

1:02:43.120 --> 1:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think that they're going to be stuck in blocking a

1:02:44.920 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time too. So either way, the Cards

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>have been very solid against tight ends this year as

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>opposed to last year. They only allowed three touchdowns on

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the season and no tight end his top to fifty

1:02:55.120 --> 1:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>three yards all year. On the other side, Kyler Murray,

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him an a aid. Do you know which

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>team has allowed the most quarterback rushing yards this season? Well,

1:03:05.200 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it might be the Philadelphia Eagles, it sure is. After

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>three weeks of struggling through an injury and exactly five

1:03:11.200 --> 1:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>carries in each game, Kyler seemed spry and with it

1:03:14.400 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and ready last week had thirteen carries again. I like

1:03:17.360 --> 1:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>his chances of outdueling Hurts in the run game, and

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>his pass game is better and more refined than Hurts

1:03:23.160 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is uh. DeAndre Hopkins getting an A grade two. The

1:03:26.040 --> 1:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Eagles have just been torched by big number one wide

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>receivers DK and DeVante each had huge days in just

1:03:32.680 --> 1:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks. Christian Kirk was you to take

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me wide receiver chart. I'm even gonna

1:03:37.960 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>throw a little love at Brian's boy, Dan Arnold. I

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>know how about this. He's become fantasy relevant if you

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>need a home run hitter of a tight end and

1:03:48.000 --> 1:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you're banking only on touchdowns for this. Dan Arnold has

1:03:51.600 --> 1:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>scored four times in his last four games, and Philly

1:03:54.360 --> 1:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>has allowed eight tight end touchdowns on the year, so

1:03:57.040 --> 1:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna need Arnold to get to But if you

1:03:59.520 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>need a home run dan Arnold C grade. Finally, Kenyan Drake,

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>he gets a B. Drake has control of the backfield again,

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>even more since Chase Edmonds dinged up his ankle last

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>week and might not go this week. The Eagles have

1:04:11.400 --> 1:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>been a bottom ten run defense over the last month,

1:04:15.080 --> 1:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so the matchup is kind of ripe here for Kenyan

1:04:17.560 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Drake and his twenty touches. Jacksonville takes on Baltimore. We

1:04:21.680 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>begin with James Robinson, who has proven himself to be

1:04:23.960 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>matchup proof. The last four Fantasy relevant backs the Ravens

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have faced have average five yards per carry. There we

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>go Robinson's average nearly five grabs per game in minshow's

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>last five starts. He's gonna chip in some air production

1:04:36.960 --> 1:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. I don't see an explosive game coming, but

1:04:39.160 --> 1:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a good game for James Robinson with a B grade

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>every other Jaguars on the bench the entire passing game.

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore isn't impenetrable against the past, but third tier passers

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>almost always struggle against them, and the receivers in particular

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>dead here. Baltimore is allowed the second fewest touchdowns to whiteouts.

1:04:56.040 --> 1:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>DJ Chark's got a bad matchup with Jimmy Smith. The

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Ravens get ding by tight ends a little, but nobody's

1:05:02.120 --> 1:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>playing Tyler Eiffort in the semifinals. Let's go over to

1:05:04.760 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore side, where things are a lot more interesting.

1:05:07.840 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Um and one of the really big storylines to watch

1:05:11.040 --> 1:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Maybe without both starting wide receivers because they're

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID list. Offsetting that the Jaguars will be

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>down all three starting cornerbacks and possibly two depth corners

1:05:22.720 --> 1:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. They might be missing five cornerbacks in this game.

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>This is probably the NFL's worst secondary the Jaguars now

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>opposite that, the Ravens through the fewest passes for the

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>second fewest yards, so this thing could go a lot

1:05:38.000 --> 1:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of different directions through the air. The only thing that

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can take Lamar Jackson down in this game is meta

1:05:42.320 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>musil very welcome. Jackson usually provides very little through the air,

1:05:48.160 --> 1:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>as you already know. Um Still, there's an opportunity here

1:05:52.000 --> 1:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for him to do some real damage. And wouldn't that

1:05:54.680 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be handy if he had both the rare this year

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>explosive game on the ground owned and through the air

1:06:02.160 --> 1:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and in his pants? Sorry, Mark Lamar, I apologize. Mostly

1:06:08.840 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in it for Jackson's running the top fifty rushing

1:06:11.120 --> 1:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>yards in sixth straight games, which gives him a safe

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>floor in a massive upside. If Marks Brown is able

1:06:15.440 --> 1:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to go, then he's a B grade here. He's finds

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>himself in the midst of an improbable three games scoring streak,

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>which he never does and this matchups about as positive

1:06:23.760 --> 1:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>one as he'll see all year long for the reasons

1:06:26.080 --> 1:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>already discussed, And and if Brown and boy Can are

1:06:31.440 --> 1:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>both out, you could even dart throw to Devin DuVernay

1:06:35.120 --> 1:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>or Dez Bryant in this matchup. It's that positive both

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of those guys, and in daily formats they're kind of compelling.

1:06:42.880 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>If Boykin and Brown are out, let's talk about the

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs. No, wait, one more receiver to get to

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews. The tight end A grade for Mark Andrews.

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars are allowing the most yards per reception to tight ends,

1:06:55.400 --> 1:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which is great news for Andrews, who came to life

1:06:57.320 --> 1:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with chunk plays last week. Jackson will also allowing ten

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to tight ends, that second most. Now, Andrews hasn't

1:07:04.440 --> 1:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>been the scoring machine he was last season, but he

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>still sees twenty percent of his team's targets in the

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>red zone. That's the ninth highest clip among all players

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in the league. So tight end potential is there for

1:07:14.880 --> 1:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews. A grade for him. Now, let's get to

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the running backs and J. K. Dobbins, who is now

1:07:20.520 --> 1:07:23.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing double digit carries in five of the last six

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>games and I think that he will continue to get

1:07:25.440 --> 1:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work, especially with the Ravens likely getting

1:07:28.000 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>out to a big lead here, and if the Ravens

1:07:30.400 --> 1:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>whiteouts missed this game, all the more work for j K. Dobbins.

1:07:33.520 --> 1:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>He has scored in three straight games. He faces a

1:07:36.040 --> 1:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>bad Jacksonville defense that's allowed the fourth most fantasy points

1:07:39.720 --> 1:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and second most touchdowns to running backs. Now where it

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>gets a little bit sticky, is Lamar Jackson runs in

1:07:46.400 --> 1:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of touchdowns and Gus Edwards gets the red

1:07:48.480 --> 1:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>zone carries, So Dabbin still has some downside in an

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>otherwise favorable matchup. Let's talk about Gus Edwards. You don't

1:07:56.400 --> 1:07:59.439
<v Speaker 1>like Gus got two red zone carries and scored on both.

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Jake has seven in the last two weeks, so Jak

1:08:03.840 --> 1:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>does get it too. I like Gus Edwards here for

1:08:06.400 --> 1:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the red zone carries and the fact that he's a

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>finisher in the end zone. Jaguars all all the seventh

1:08:10.120 --> 1:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>most rushing touchdowns and touchdowns in four straight games to

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>running backs in tight end in touchdown heavy leagues. He

1:08:17.320 --> 1:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is a viable dart throw with a C grade in

1:08:20.360 --> 1:08:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that game. UM, let's work in one more matchup, Kansas

1:08:23.760 --> 1:08:28.439
<v Speaker 1>City taking on the New Orleans Saints. Scott for Kansas City,

1:08:28.560 --> 1:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the toughest matchups and maybe the

1:08:31.120 --> 1:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>toughest matchup of their season. You can't bench any of

1:08:34.640 --> 1:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the studs, but Mahomes, Kelsey, Hill, You're not mentioned, but

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:43.879
<v Speaker 1>they all have mortal play potentially in them this week. Yeah, Mahomes,

1:08:44.120 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Like when Mahomes throws for three and two, we don't

1:08:47.479 --> 1:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>even beat and eye, that's his mortal play. At this point,

1:08:50.200 --> 1:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I I I still have a grades on all of them.

1:08:53.479 --> 1:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's it's the rest of the staff that

1:08:56.560 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, is uh really tough for really to gonna

1:09:00.280 --> 1:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be a really tough matchup. Watkins and Hardman, both of

1:09:03.479 --> 1:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>them on the bench. There's been room for a third receiver,

1:09:06.680 --> 1:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and of course Hill and Kelsey the first two to

1:09:09.400 --> 1:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have a good game against the Saints. That happened in

1:09:11.920 --> 1:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the Saints, in the Bears game, the Panthers game, the

1:09:14.439 --> 1:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons game. What are those teams haven't coming no tight ends,

1:09:17.880 --> 1:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't really have tight ends doing anything, alright, So

1:09:20.240 --> 1:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this one has Kelsey at tight end. So the third

1:09:23.120 --> 1:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>receivers and I don't have anything for the third receiver

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in this one. Nothing for Watkins or Hardman. Onto the

1:09:29.120 --> 1:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>running game. Clyde Edwards E Lair Levan Bell tweeted he

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:35.519
<v Speaker 1>was confused this week. I'm not sure if that was

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because Clyde had twenty one touches or if he had

1:09:38.360 --> 1:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>finally listened to his own rap album and just wasn't

1:09:41.120 --> 1:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sure what was going on there, what he was

1:09:43.080 --> 1:09:46.519
<v Speaker 1>thinking when he made that thing. The Saints has actually

1:09:46.640 --> 1:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>held down some held down Sanders last week a lot

1:09:51.040 --> 1:09:53.639
<v Speaker 1>better than his stat line shows. Due to that eighty

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two yard touchdown. The rest of his carriers went thirteen

1:09:56.280 --> 1:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for thirty three. I hate doing that. I hate doing that,

1:09:59.760 --> 1:10:02.599
<v Speaker 1>but I do that because c H isn't the kind

1:10:02.640 --> 1:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of back to break those eight yard runs. He's not

1:10:05.560 --> 1:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the type of back to have those and and several

1:10:08.600 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>running backs recently have been that way against the Saints.

1:10:11.360 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>No running back his top fifty rushing yards against them

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>since Week eight. Yeah, and that's that's where c H

1:10:17.200 --> 1:10:19.639
<v Speaker 1>gets it. Only one back had more than thirty receiving

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>yards I give. I want to give him a BE,

1:10:23.720 --> 1:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think I'm only going to give him a C.

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll get the fifteen plus touches, but the

1:10:28.120 --> 1:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>low yardage from all the running backs recently except for Sanders,

1:10:31.280 --> 1:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and mostly due to that big run I'm giving I'm

1:10:33.960 --> 1:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>giving Clyde a C. I think it's a strong seed,

1:10:36.400 --> 1:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm giving him a C. On the other side,

1:10:39.800 --> 1:10:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is back, but Michael Thomas is out. Casey

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>has allowed multiple touchdowns in five straight. Breese had multiple

1:10:47.200 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in all but one of his fall games. Uh

1:10:50.040 --> 1:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and in that one he had three and twelve and

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a score. This is before the injury, though, He's gonna

1:10:54.200 --> 1:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be playing maybe with some sore NOAs maybe with maybe

1:10:57.080 --> 1:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with a vest on those ribs. They say he's fully healthy. Yeah,

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Now many of those games are also without practically all

1:11:02.520 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of them without Michael Thomas as well. He's you know,

1:11:05.560 --> 1:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so he's fully acclimated to game plans without Michael Thomas's

1:11:08.680 --> 1:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>just put Taysom Hilla in a wide receiver now and

1:11:11.240 --> 1:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they might they you know, there's the opportunity to do that.

1:11:15.320 --> 1:11:17.799
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to build in with Drew Brees,

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the threat that he gets knocked out of this game.

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Now he's gonna be He's gonna be loaded with pain killer, right,

1:11:24.840 --> 1:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but this is a very good Chiefs defensive line. And

1:11:29.400 --> 1:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one thing to be able to practice

1:11:32.320 --> 1:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>pain free, it's another one to have, you know, a gigantic,

1:11:36.120 --> 1:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>three enter pound lineman spear you in the ribs. You

1:11:38.760 --> 1:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>know there are only a few places you can hit

1:11:40.840 --> 1:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. The ribs is one of them. This is

1:11:44.080 --> 1:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to build in the prospect that

1:11:47.479 --> 1:11:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees ends up not finishing the game. Yeah that's uh,

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess so, I I don't. I don't think he's

1:11:54.680 --> 1:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave the game, but I I guess you can

1:11:57.600 --> 1:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe should I drop him from a B two SC?

1:11:59.640 --> 1:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that way you're saying, just based on see, I

1:12:02.479 --> 1:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>would okay, alright, alright, sounds good. It's your call, but

1:12:05.479 --> 1:12:07.759
<v Speaker 1>that's what I would do. I gave Smith and Sanders

1:12:07.880 --> 1:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>both CE grades. In the last three games without Michael Thomas, uh,

1:12:12.040 --> 1:12:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders had fifty plus yards and or a touchdown,

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>which is sea level and tre Kwon Smith was starting

1:12:18.280 --> 1:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to break out with Drew Brees before he went down.

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>He had a couple eight yard games, couple score games,

1:12:22.960 --> 1:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and Drew Brees had talked about this is gonna be

1:12:24.760 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a breakout season for and then he got hurt. You're

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:30.519
<v Speaker 1>so nautical today, Scott. You just said sea level. This

1:12:30.680 --> 1:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is great. Jared Cook was might take a chance on

1:12:34.720 --> 1:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>me player. I think tight ends have been crushing them

1:12:36.880 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for four weeks. Here's where I love it. I love Alvin.

1:12:41.680 --> 1:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>That that's true. Yes, yes, very aquatic over here. I

1:12:46.040 --> 1:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>actually don't have Gilts. Why didn't you name one of

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>your kids gil Nobody names that kids kill anymore. That's right.

1:12:52.520 --> 1:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>It was a thing in the like sixties. I think

1:12:54.439 --> 1:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Gilbert the Gilbert is not that's not a winner. It's

1:12:58.200 --> 1:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not popular. Alvin Kamar came back into the receiving game

1:13:01.360 --> 1:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>last week with seven receptions. Uh, it was something he

1:13:04.680 --> 1:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>was missing when Taysom Hill was out. He gets when

1:13:06.680 --> 1:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is in, and with Michael Thomas out, he's

1:13:09.360 --> 1:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>only going to see more work. I have an a

1:13:11.400 --> 1:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>grade on Alvin Kamorrow. Murray went back to the bench.

1:13:15.520 --> 1:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Yeah, that's right. I think you're right about that. Yeah.

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>When we come back final set of matchups, including the

1:13:22.720 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns and the New York Giants. We already talked

1:13:26.160 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit earlier about some elements of the passing

1:13:28.200 --> 1:13:31.639
<v Speaker 1>game for the Browns, but trick the giants improved defense

1:13:31.840 --> 1:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>make for a tricky matchup even for guys like Nick

1:13:35.000 --> 1:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Chubb and Kareem Hunt. Will tell you what kind of

1:13:37.840 --> 1:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>grades they get when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:14:08.360 --> 1:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charchs got Fish

1:14:13.080 --> 1:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison with you. Thank you for joining us.

1:14:16.120 --> 1:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening over the air, you should know that

1:14:18.880 --> 1:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is also a podcast. So if you've

1:14:21.840 --> 1:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>missed any part of this show, it's a two hour

1:14:24.240 --> 1:14:26.479
<v Speaker 1>long show, then we encourage you to go to the

1:14:26.520 --> 1:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast Fantasy Football Weekly. It's available on the I Heart

1:14:31.479 --> 1:14:35.439
<v Speaker 1>podcasting platform and really all really every podcasting platform, whatever

1:14:35.479 --> 1:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>your favorite is, you're gonna be able to find Fantasy

1:14:37.320 --> 1:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. We encourage you to tune in. Matt, the

1:14:41.200 --> 1:14:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns take on the New York Giants. You've already

1:14:43.680 --> 1:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>talked a bit about the passing game earlier in the show,

1:14:46.400 --> 1:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and I take a chance on me segment. I know

1:14:48.080 --> 1:14:50.599
<v Speaker 1>there's some guys who like here let's talk. Let's start

1:14:50.640 --> 1:14:52.639
<v Speaker 1>with the runners, because I think this is a more

1:14:52.760 --> 1:14:55.559
<v Speaker 1>interesting matchup. Nick Chubb is obviously awesome. I know you're

1:14:55.560 --> 1:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna start him, but this is not a trivial matchup. Yeah,

1:14:59.160 --> 1:15:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm still giving Ubin a grade in this one. The

1:15:01.560 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Giants have given up good but not great fantasy days

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to every team they faced in the last five weeks

1:15:08.240 --> 1:15:11.799
<v Speaker 1>except for the Bengals, who don't actually have a running

1:15:11.800 --> 1:15:15.559
<v Speaker 1>back right now. Since returning from injury, Chubb has had

1:15:15.640 --> 1:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>either yards or a touchdown in every game, and he's

1:15:19.000 --> 1:15:21.599
<v Speaker 1>scored in four of those five. So I think Chub

1:15:21.840 --> 1:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is an obvious A. He's fresh and healthy right now.

1:15:25.120 --> 1:15:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Really like him. Kareem Hunt. I'm even given a B

1:15:27.720 --> 1:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>two in this one. Hunts touched totals concerned me a

1:15:30.680 --> 1:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but he did score twice last week on

1:15:33.200 --> 1:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>only twelve touches. That's not enough touches for me to

1:15:36.920 --> 1:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>feel really comfortable going more than a B. But the

1:15:39.640 --> 1:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>good thing is the Giants are bottom four in receptions,

1:15:43.960 --> 1:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards, and receiving touchdowns allowed to the running back position.

1:15:48.720 --> 1:15:52.479
<v Speaker 1>That plays into Kareem Hunt's favor. Yes, Baker Mayfield was

1:15:52.560 --> 1:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on the quarterback, and Richard Higgins

1:15:55.040 --> 1:15:57.719
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on me wide receiver Jarvis Landry.

1:15:57.720 --> 1:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give a B grade two as well. This

1:16:00.560 --> 1:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>was the Landry we expected at the beginning of the year,

1:16:03.280 --> 1:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Landry we've seen in the last three weeks, averaging

1:16:06.240 --> 1:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ten targets per game, averaging seven receptions per game over

1:16:09.400 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the last three The Giants have given up a handful

1:16:11.960 --> 1:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of really good games to slot receivers this season, and

1:16:15.160 --> 1:16:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Landry really is Baker's guy. Right now, Let's go to

1:16:18.720 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the Giants side, where it's very notable that among the

1:16:22.439 --> 1:16:26.799
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen cancelations for the Giants this week, Jason Garrett

1:16:27.320 --> 1:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>tested positive for COVID. Yes, so he will be calling

1:16:30.600 --> 1:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>plays for the Giants this week. But do you know

1:16:33.240 --> 1:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>who will Yes, I do last year's head coach of

1:16:36.120 --> 1:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns, Freddie Kitchens. It's a revenge game for

1:16:39.960 --> 1:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Kitchens. So it's time to fire up all those Giants,

1:16:43.560 --> 1:16:48.679
<v Speaker 1>right well, revenge game for Cult McCoy is, yes, former

1:16:48.760 --> 1:16:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Brown Cult McCoy, who may get the start in this one,

1:16:51.640 --> 1:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>or injured Daniel Jones, who's nursing an ankle and a

1:16:55.120 --> 1:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury and has been limited in practice all week.

1:16:59.120 --> 1:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Jones was just hobbling and kind of warm garbage last

1:17:02.960 --> 1:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>week against the Cards, and the Giants got blown out

1:17:06.439 --> 1:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of that game and they lost their NFC East lead.

1:17:08.920 --> 1:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The Browns have been pretty good against quarterbacks, and they

1:17:12.160 --> 1:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>did get top corner Denzel Ward back this week, so

1:17:15.120 --> 1:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to start a Giant's quarterback in your

1:17:17.400 --> 1:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>fantasy semifinals. The two guys that you might be interested

1:17:20.720 --> 1:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in starting on the Giants. Number one is Evan Engram,

1:17:23.479 --> 1:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>who I'm giving a B grade to. Ingram actually had

1:17:27.080 --> 1:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>his best game of the season with Colt McCoy under center,

1:17:29.960 --> 1:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're kind of cheering for Colt McCoy to get

1:17:32.040 --> 1:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this nod here. The Browns are bottom six in receptions,

1:17:35.800 --> 1:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>yards and touchdowns allowed to the tight end position, so

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram's kind of a sneaky play here. And then

1:17:41.240 --> 1:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Gallman, I'm giving him a C grade in this one.

1:17:43.840 --> 1:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging about eighteen touches per game since solidifying the job.

1:17:47.920 --> 1:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>But Cleveland has been good against the run until they

1:17:51.360 --> 1:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>face the Ravens last week. Allowing five running back touchdowns

1:17:55.000 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>over the last three weeks. That's not good, but they

1:17:57.520 --> 1:18:00.479
<v Speaker 1>only allowed seven in the prior ten games, so I'm

1:18:00.520 --> 1:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>only gonna give Wayne Gallman to see, but he's probably

1:18:03.120 --> 1:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>their best chance at keeping it close. Yes, I do

1:18:06.160 --> 1:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>worry a little bit there. Giants might fall behind by

1:18:08.720 --> 1:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot and they might have to abandon ship on

1:18:11.120 --> 1:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the running game altogether. I worry about that a bit.

1:18:14.960 --> 1:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's go to our final matchup, Steelers taking

1:18:18.320 --> 1:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Cincinnati Bengals. We begin with the moribund running

1:18:23.360 --> 1:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>game of the Steelers. James James Conner likely doesn't play

1:18:26.840 --> 1:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with his quad injury, and even if he does, he's

1:18:28.840 --> 1:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>been brutal. Get this, Over the last three weeks, the

1:18:32.120 --> 1:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Steelers are averaging forty five rushing yards per game as

1:18:36.800 --> 1:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a team. You know hard it is to do that

1:18:39.439 --> 1:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>for three weeks. I think one of those games he

1:18:41.200 --> 1:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>had UN's unbelievable. Roethlisberger should start chipping in. Huh, he might.

1:18:46.120 --> 1:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He might have to. Steelers on the season ranked thirty

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>feet in rushing yards per game. It's been a disaster here.

1:18:52.840 --> 1:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Benny Snell horrible. Anthony McFarland has been equally bad, and

1:18:57.080 --> 1:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he gets less used. There's no plays here among the

1:19:00.080 --> 1:19:03.519
<v Speaker 1>Ler's runners, and they are all on the bench. Let's

1:19:03.520 --> 1:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>go to the passing game, where Ben Roethlisberger gets a

1:19:05.720 --> 1:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>B grade. But let's talk about his game a bit,

1:19:08.320 --> 1:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's changed a lot. He has turned into

1:19:12.560 --> 1:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a dink and dunk passer. Only Alex Smith throws shorter

1:19:18.400 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>passes than Ben Roethlisberger at three point eight yards per completion.

1:19:23.840 --> 1:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Three point eight yards is like me to Matt right

1:19:26.800 --> 1:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>now is about to have a hundred catch nine yards seasons,

1:19:30.000 --> 1:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and yet somehow his receivers have dropped twenty seven passes.

1:19:33.800 --> 1:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that from three point eight yards away?

1:19:36.600 --> 1:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Can you fall forward for three point eight yards? Yes,

1:19:39.560 --> 1:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't. A matter of fact, maneu Bull Now Roethlisberger

1:19:43.360 --> 1:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>eviscerated the Bengals for three hundred thirty three yards and

1:19:46.760 --> 1:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns in the Week ten meeting. That wasn't that

1:19:49.000 --> 1:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>long ago. The Bigel's past defense looks improved since then,

1:19:53.160 --> 1:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>but they've faced Daniel Jones to a Tonga Via looa

1:19:57.760 --> 1:20:01.519
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith and Andy Dalton, and those are not great passers.

1:20:01.560 --> 1:20:04.559
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not convinced the Cincinnati secondary is really any

1:20:04.640 --> 1:20:07.599
<v Speaker 1>better than the version Ben took apart five games ago.

1:20:07.920 --> 1:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So again, it be great on Ben. Let talk about

1:20:10.320 --> 1:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>his receivers. Chase Claypool's yardage has declined in each of

1:20:13.800 --> 1:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>four games, and he has currently is currently in the

1:20:17.439 --> 1:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>middle of the three game scoreless streak. Where he was

1:20:19.280 --> 1:20:24.479
<v Speaker 1>really very helpful was the touchdowns earlier. Fortunately, outside cornerback

1:20:24.640 --> 1:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Lashawn Simms offers Claypool a get right matchup, as he's

1:20:27.720 --> 1:20:30.599
<v Speaker 1>allowing scores, has allowed scores and back to back games,

1:20:30.960 --> 1:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and yields a massive eight percent catch rate in his

1:20:34.080 --> 1:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>coverage and a passer rating of one hundred thirty eight.

1:20:38.600 --> 1:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>That's approaching perfection. Let's go Claypool. I love Chase Claypool

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in this matchup. Not a grade, but I like him

1:20:45.040 --> 1:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to be grade. I also have a B grade in

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster, particularly in PPR leagues. Juju has garnered

1:20:50.880 --> 1:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>nine targets per game in his last five while notching

1:20:57.520 --> 1:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>three scores in that span. He put together a nine catch,

1:21:02.439 --> 1:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven yard one touchdown game against Cincinnati four weeks ago,

1:21:06.360 --> 1:21:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and should farewell against Mackenzie Alexander in the slot. He's

1:21:09.520 --> 1:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>giving up a sev catch rate in his coverage. Here's

1:21:13.880 --> 1:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the trickiest Steeler by a mile. What are you doing

1:21:17.200 --> 1:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about Deonte Johnson? You may recall last week one of

1:21:22.720 --> 1:21:26.719
<v Speaker 1>our three tough questions was, can you trust Deonte Johnson

1:21:27.280 --> 1:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>knowing he could get benched if he drops a pass?

1:21:30.479 --> 1:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>What happened last week? He got benched after he dropped

1:21:33.920 --> 1:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a pass. So he did come back in. He did

1:21:37.000 --> 1:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>come back in later in the game. Now, I can't

1:21:40.080 --> 1:21:43.719
<v Speaker 1>promise you that Johnson starts this game over James Washington,

1:21:43.920 --> 1:21:47.759
<v Speaker 1>or that he finishes this game over James Washington. Washington

1:21:47.840 --> 1:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>has tallied seven drops. Sorry, Johnson has tallied seven drops

1:21:52.040 --> 1:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in his last three games. He's averaging just fifty two

1:21:54.400 --> 1:21:57.519
<v Speaker 1>yards per game over those last three games. That compares,

1:21:58.240 --> 1:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that's half of the hundred one yards he was averaging

1:22:01.280 --> 1:22:05.959
<v Speaker 1>the three games prior to drop Fest. He smoked Cincinnati

1:22:06.000 --> 1:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred sixteen yards in a score in Week ten.

1:22:08.439 --> 1:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he is as as big a high risk,

1:22:11.560 --> 1:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>high reward player as anybody in this week, outside of

1:22:16.280 --> 1:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe Russell Wilson, who I think is a super high

1:22:18.280 --> 1:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>risk high reward player as well. Would you guys start

1:22:21.720 --> 1:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Deonte Johnson in a typically sized league in a semifinal game, Yep,

1:22:28.400 --> 1:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I still think I would. I still think I would.

1:22:31.439 --> 1:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>You just like him that much? Yeah, I think it

1:22:33.720 --> 1:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>really depends on who else I got on my team,

1:22:35.439 --> 1:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's you know, it's close, like I mean it

1:22:38.640 --> 1:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>like a Russell Gauge type guy. I'm just kidding. Well, no,

1:22:42.840 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what if it's not a Russell Gauge type guy. And

1:22:45.160 --> 1:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's not a Russell Gauge type guy. Yeah, that's

1:22:47.960 --> 1:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. I just I'm I'm believing that I

1:22:50.560 --> 1:22:54.519
<v Speaker 1>probably don't have a better option than Deonta Johnsonside is high.

1:22:54.640 --> 1:22:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk Eric Ebron for just a minute. He only

1:22:56.640 --> 1:22:59.479
<v Speaker 1>managed thirty eight scoreless yards when these teams met again

1:22:59.560 --> 1:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and keep affereneing the previous game Week ten. But the

1:23:01.680 --> 1:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Bengals are horrible against tight ends. They've allowed the sixth

1:23:05.360 --> 1:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>most receptions, the most yards, and the eighth most touchdowns

1:23:08.840 --> 1:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to the position. Eric Ebron clocks in with a B grade.

1:23:12.520 --> 1:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I like him this week, uh, and I consider him

1:23:15.240 --> 1:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to be startable. And you know, if you don't trust

1:23:17.280 --> 1:23:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Deante Johnson and you've been looking around and all those

1:23:19.720 --> 1:23:22.799
<v Speaker 1>all those extra passes have to go somewhere, potential uptick

1:23:22.840 --> 1:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for Ebron is pretty good. Uh. Marcus Mariota looks like

1:23:26.439 --> 1:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be a starter for a while, maybe the

1:23:29.000 --> 1:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season. Potentially probably for the rest of

1:23:32.120 --> 1:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the all Right, I want to let's talk it. Let's

1:23:34.400 --> 1:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>talk this through for a minute. And by the way,

1:23:35.920 --> 1:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought he looked really, really good. I was very

1:23:39.000 --> 1:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>impressed with with the version of him that I saw. Um,

1:23:42.439 --> 1:23:45.519
<v Speaker 1>would you pick him up in a redraft league? Would

1:23:45.560 --> 1:23:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you pick him up Scott in a dynasty or Empire format?

1:23:48.800 --> 1:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>We're already thinking about next year. It's got to be

1:23:51.280 --> 1:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>super flex if I am, because he's the type of

1:23:54.800 --> 1:23:58.599
<v Speaker 1>guy that is going to hit the market after this year. Well,

1:23:58.680 --> 1:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he's under contract most by the way, an astounding ten

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:06.559
<v Speaker 1>million dollars next year. Really bad. Yeah, man, for some reason,

1:24:06.720 --> 1:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I was backup quarterback. So yeah. So then then he's

1:24:10.120 --> 1:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not the kind of guy that sets a market and

1:24:11.800 --> 1:24:16.479
<v Speaker 1>gets gets a job. So yeah, I don't, I don't.

1:24:16.560 --> 1:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. Well you should, you should everything.

1:24:20.760 --> 1:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Then he gets a matchup with TA next week and

1:24:24.200 --> 1:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it could be a matchup of running quarterbacks all over

1:24:27.760 --> 1:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the field and Hawaiian quarter Hawaiian quarter. You got Oregon

1:24:34.479 --> 1:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>versus Oregon on Thursday night, and next week you got I.

1:24:39.560 --> 1:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>That is impressive. Um, I think if you're in a

1:24:43.240 --> 1:24:45.519
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a two quarterback league. You reflex two

1:24:45.560 --> 1:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback league. Mariota next week is Is is a potential starter.

1:24:50.040 --> 1:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But that Miami secondary has been awesome. You don't have.

1:24:53.200 --> 1:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Miami defense is pretty dann good. It is pretty darn good.

1:24:56.000 --> 1:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the under underrated stories of this season.

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:00.559
<v Speaker 1>I think charge let me ask you a question, and uh,

1:25:01.000 --> 1:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Mariota famously came into the league in the same draft

1:25:03.680 --> 1:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as Jamis Winston. Which of those two players from a

1:25:07.120 --> 1:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>dynasty perspective, people maybe trying to pick up a few

1:25:09.720 --> 1:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>guys here and there, which of those two guys has

1:25:12.000 --> 1:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a better chance of starting in the NFL next season?

1:25:14.520 --> 1:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Winston because he's not under contract and he's going to

1:25:17.000 --> 1:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>hit the free agent market and be able to, you know,

1:25:19.360 --> 1:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>try to secure a job that he was not able

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to get his past off season. So I think he's

1:25:24.920 --> 1:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>got a clearer path now. If Mary, if Mariota goes

1:25:28.640 --> 1:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bonkers down the stretch here, maybe you know, who knows,

1:25:31.240 --> 1:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the issue maybe maybe just trying to trade him. Maybe, Uh.

1:25:37.439 --> 1:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Run quarterbacks with more than five carries against the Dolphins,

1:25:41.360 --> 1:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton sudenty five yards and two scores, Kyler Murray

1:25:43.960 --> 1:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and six yards in the score, a little

1:25:45.960 --> 1:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>preview of next like, well, let's see what Cam does

1:25:49.920 --> 1:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Dolphins again this week. That might give us

1:25:52.280 --> 1:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the perfect preview for what Mariota can do next week.

1:25:56.400 --> 1:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to look ahead to next year with a

1:25:57.760 --> 1:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of quick questions for you guys. Keenan Allen has

1:26:02.160 --> 1:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously been resurgent under air bear. We have an air

1:26:06.880 --> 1:26:13.599
<v Speaker 1>bear enough, we thay that's why. So Keenan Allen resurgent

1:26:13.720 --> 1:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>under air bear next year? What round do you believe

1:26:18.960 --> 1:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen will go? And by the way, Eric the

1:26:20.960 --> 1:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Enemy is gonna be the head coach because Eric can

1:26:23.360 --> 1:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>pick his spots, you know he can. He can go

1:26:25.520 --> 1:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever he wants. He will go to the team with

1:26:28.360 --> 1:26:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the awesome young quarterback because you've been crazy not to.

1:26:32.080 --> 1:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That is how coaches keep jobs and have longevity is

1:26:35.360 --> 1:26:37.519
<v Speaker 1>they hook their wagon to a great young corn. What

1:26:37.600 --> 1:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you also don't do that also played for the Chargers.

1:26:40.240 --> 1:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a great point, But you also don't want to

1:26:43.280 --> 1:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>go into the same division as Patrick Mahomes where you

1:26:46.880 --> 1:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>might never a division titles. A fair point that that

1:26:49.880 --> 1:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>part would be tricky. I don't know. He probably watches

1:26:52.880 --> 1:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the air Bear on TV and he's like, man, I

1:26:55.760 --> 1:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>can do some things out there. I know. So where

1:26:58.240 --> 1:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>where does Keenan Allen fit in? He was the guy,

1:27:01.360 --> 1:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>he was criminal, he was I was just like a

1:27:04.760 --> 1:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>sixth round pick. In August. We're like, fine, you know

1:27:08.040 --> 1:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a fourth round. I'll just take Keenan Allen now

1:27:12.160 --> 1:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>second round. Yeah, I think I think he's a tail

1:27:16.560 --> 1:27:18.519
<v Speaker 1>end of the second round, early third round kind of

1:27:18.560 --> 1:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy. He was leading the NFL in targets and

1:27:21.080 --> 1:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>receptions for quite a while under air Bear. Yeah, I

1:27:24.960 --> 1:27:28.839
<v Speaker 1>think he's definitely a second round guy. Well, people remember

1:27:28.920 --> 1:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>too much the end of his season, especially if he

1:27:31.120 --> 1:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of slides out of the season injured. Yeah, people

1:27:34.920 --> 1:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to do that when we get to a draft

1:27:37.080 --> 1:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>time in July in August. So that's why it's second round.

1:27:40.439 --> 1:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It should be first, second corner probably probably probably should

1:27:44.920 --> 1:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>um one last one last topic for you guys before

1:27:48.400 --> 1:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got a spare moment next year for the Chiefs.

1:27:51.360 --> 1:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>As we we mentioned the Chiefs, Sammy Watkins and not

1:27:54.080 --> 1:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on our contract, and I believe he's gonna be gone,

1:27:55.840 --> 1:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think they've had enough of his four

1:27:57.479 --> 1:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>catches and thirty yards a game that's he doesn't move

1:27:59.760 --> 1:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the kne is. Next year finally the Meek Cole Hardman

1:28:03.600 --> 1:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>year where he finally, you know, stays on the field,

1:28:06.120 --> 1:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets of the snaps like Watkins does, and he

1:28:09.280 --> 1:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually does something. You're three. I don't know that there's

1:28:12.320 --> 1:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>enough room for that third receiver to do behind Travis,

1:28:16.360 --> 1:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, he's probably gonna get a little more, a

1:28:18.880 --> 1:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. But I think what they should do

1:28:20.880 --> 1:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is sign Watkins to a one week contracts just a

1:28:24.760 --> 1:28:29.479
<v Speaker 1>week one, a week one contract. There's a lot of

1:28:29.560 --> 1:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting wide receivers who are hitting the free agent

1:28:32.160 --> 1:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>market next year. I would not be surprised of Kansas

1:28:34.439 --> 1:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Cities in play for a guy like Chris Godwin, uh

1:28:37.280 --> 1:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Fishes guy, Kenny Golladay, Smith Schuster, really really interesting guys

1:28:45.240 --> 1:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>who Patrick Mahomes could help light up the league. Teams

1:28:48.080 --> 1:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>might players might take a discount to play with Patrick

1:28:50.400 --> 1:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and we you know, go play for a winner.

1:28:52.160 --> 1:28:54.479
<v Speaker 1>We would understand that. Thank you for listening to the

1:28:54.600 --> 1:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>semifinals version of Fantasy Football Weekly. Will be here Championship

1:28:58.360 --> 1:29:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Week next week. Talk to then Bye bye. Fantasy Football

1:29:03.680 --> 1:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio for more

1:29:06.320 --> 1:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

1:29:09.200 --> 1:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.