WEBVTT - Political HOT Topics

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Native Land Pod is a production of iHeartRadio in partnership

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with Resent Choice Media.

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome, Welcome, Welcome.

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Well everyone, whether you call it Gratitude Day, Thanksgiving, or

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 3>somewhere in between, this is a special time for us

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 3>because we would not exist without our NLP fan So

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 3>it's so important to us that we welcomed you to

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>our table. You're gonna hear from voices, our supporters, our fans,

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 3>and our family talking about the importance of this show,

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 3>this platform as we continue to go into the unknown.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 3>But welcome home, y'all, and we're so happy to be

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 3>sharing this moment with you.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Hey, guys, love the podcast, and I've been a fan

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 4>of all of your work individually for a while. I

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 4>wanted to talk about the rainbow coalition conversation you guys

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 4>had on today's episode. As someone who's mixed with a

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 4>black mother from York, New Jersey an immigrant father from Guatemala,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 4>I personally feel like the rainbow coalition, or the idea

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 4>of a rainbow coalition is not happening, least in practice

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 4>or in my lived experience. As someone who's been in

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 4>community with black folks and Latinos, I don't see the

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't see the teamwork in that or I don't

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 4>see it happening the way I wish it was happening.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 4>And so I guess my question is do you think

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 4>during this time and during these next four years, the

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 4>black community should turn inwards and focus more on black

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 4>folks and not necessarily leave everyone else behind? Because we

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 4>know that when black folks win, actually everyone wins. But

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 4>what do you think should be happening, because I think

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing that, you know, other people of color don't

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 4>have black people's backs the way we wish they would.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 5>Reading's Native Land Podcast. My name is Keith, I'm from DC.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 5>How you doing, Tiffany?

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 3>What's going on?

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 6>Angela?

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>How you doing?

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 6>Andrew?

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 5>I just wanted to make a firm comment that Tiffany

0:01:55.280 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 5>made on our last session about Trump getting half the country,

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 5>and she was correct when it's saying.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 7>That he didn't necessarily get to have Trump prossimately got

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 7>approximately got thirty two percent of the voting population, Kamala

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 7>Harris got thirty percent of the voting population, Approximately thirty

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 7>point four percent of the voting population, and thirty seven

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 7>percent of the voting population decided to stay Homeles sit

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 7>on the couch. If the Caulcu was on the ballot,

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 7>it would have gotten the popular vote and it would

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 7>have won every electorial vote in the Union with ninety

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 7>million votes, which is a fourteen million margin separation. And

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 7>if you provide that by the fifty states, you get

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 7>a two hundred and eighty thousand margin on average for

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 7>each state, and it could be higher depending on how

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 7>they were voting. Again, that is my two cents. I

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 7>appreciate it.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 8>Yos.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 6>Keep it going.

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 5>We look forward to your shop.

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Thanks.

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 9>Hey Native Lampard. My name is Rica. I am from Seattle.

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 9>Hey Angela. So I believe that we lost this election

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 9>on education. And when you're not educated about how this

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 9>country is run and civics, you will vote vote against

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 9>your best interests.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 3>So here's what I propose.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 9>Trump is going to elect fifteen people to his cabinet,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 9>maybe sixteen with Elon Musk, and then there's the president

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 9>and vice president. What does the attorney general do? What

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 9>does the vice president do? What does the Secretary of

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 9>State do? What is Vivek and Elon Musk going to

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 9>be doing?

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 10>Right?

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 9>So that's what like fifteen, eighteen twenty people that we

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 9>should be watching. What if we divvied up gave homework

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 9>to fifteen twenty people in the Native Lampod universe. So,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 9>for example, say Matt Gates, say he's appointed, Say I

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 9>Rica am assigned to follow all things Matt Gates and

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 9>what he is doing as the Attorney General and what

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 9>the Attorney General of the United States does and can

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 9>do has.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Done in the past. What if we divvied all of.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 9>That up, somebody else had Secretary of State and so

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 9>on and so forth, and then we report it back

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 9>to the Native Lampod to let each other know what

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 9>is happening. Right, because we're all so busy, there's so

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 9>much going on, we're just trying to survive that all

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 9>of us don't have time to do all of that homework.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 9>So what if we collectively did the homework together and

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 9>educated each other on civics in this country.

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 3>That's what I propose.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 11>So, yeah, Hey, what's up, Native Land.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 3>This is Craig and Brooklyn just wanted to say that I.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 11>Just got to the part of the last show where

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 11>you guys were bringing up the question of whether or

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 11>not you should continue as a podcast, and emphatically I say,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 11>please continue We're at a point in our country where

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 11>a lot of us are asking whether or not we

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 11>should continue. And you guys represent the hopes and the

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 11>dreams and some of the fears and anguish of what

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 11>we're dealing with right now. So we need to know

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 11>that there are people out there that are speaking for

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 11>us and that are just as concerned about this nation's

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 11>future as us. So please please please continue. I love

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 11>you guys.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 4>Take care.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 10>Okay, Hey that Native lampod Hi Native lampod I'm I'm

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 10>Kimberly Archie, and we are dropping in to say hello

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 10>because both of us have old friends that are part

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 10>of your organization.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So Andrew, I don't even know if you remember me.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 10>Andrew Hi Janie from w FSU MPR. And Kimberly Archie

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 10>you know me Angela Rai and you introduced me to

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 10>Andrew and Tiftony previously. So we have things to say,

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 10>we'll send them under another cover.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>But one of the.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 10>Things is keep the show going. Yes, it is incredibly important.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 10>Your voices are necessary exactly.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So on this day, as we remember the lies that

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we learned, we want to honor the indigenous community and

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the truth around what this day means for all of us.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But as we reflect on lies, we didn't think of

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a better segment to highlight. And that's when we discuss

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Projects twenty twenty five. Take a listen.

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 8>What is Project twenty twenty five. It is everyone here,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 8>This is the movement. We are going to be prepared

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 8>day one January twenty twenty twenty five to hit the

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 8>ground running as conservatives to really help the next president.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 8>Heritage got on the book on the marker as an

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 8>organization by delivering the first mandate for leadership in nineteen

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 8>eighty to President elect Reagan. This task in twenty twenty

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 8>four is too big for any one think tank. This

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 8>has to be a movement, and what we've done is

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 8>use our convening power haired Heritage to bring the entire

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 8>movement together. So twenty twenty five is not a Heritage thing,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 8>it's a Conservative movement thing. What we're doing is systematically

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 8>preparing to march into office and bring a new army

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 8>of aligned, trained, and essentially weaponized conservatives ready to do

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 8>battle against the deep state.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 3>That was Paul Dan's from Project twenty twenty five telling

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>us the truth about what this really is. The one

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>thing I want to flag for y'all. On the outset

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 3>is Peter Navarro, who is credited with being the master

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 3>architect of Project twenty twenty five, was just sentenced to

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 3>serve time in federal prison two weeks ago for refusing

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 3>to comply with the congressional subpoena about his role in

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>the insurrection. And alas here we are with the insurrectionist Blueprint,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>also known as twenty Project twenty twenty five. All nine

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred plus pages of it have been shared with you,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Tiff and Andrew. I did not go through every single page,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>but I went through enough. And here's the thing that

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>stood out to me. Woke progressivism, woke culture warriors, woke bureaucrats,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>woke extremism, woke propaganda, woke agenda, woke ism, woke dominated

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 3>system of public schools and university, woke revolutionaries who radicals

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 3>supposedly woke faction, woke policies in corporate America, woke gender ideology,

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and even the Department of Education caught some strays with

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>as a convenient one stop shop for the woke education cartel.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you notice the trend?

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I do?

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Can?

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 12>I is this crazy?

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I just can? I just I want to discoverer. A

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit of background for the viewers. So this is

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the birth child of the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is a very conservative think tank that came out under

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>President Nixon, so that should tell you something. But they

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>really started gaining traction of power under President Ronald Reagan.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>The Project twenty five. A lot of organizations, a lot

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of groups, a lot of constituencies have policy agendas. So

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>policy or Project twenty five is kind of like that,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but extremely more dangerous. And I'll tell you why. It's

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a boor of more than eighty conservative organizations all as

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>one hundred Project is one hundred, one hundred organizations, all

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>linked in this whole cesspool of policies to dark money,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>including Leonard Leo, who was very influential in shaping the

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court of the United States under Donald Trump, very

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>attached to him. It does not respect the separation of

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>church and state, and it is literally trying to reimagine

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the executive brands of government. You heard him say weaponized conservatives.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>They've put millions of dollars in their political arm Heritage

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>for America. The interesting thing about this, angeliau U and

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Andrew you both probably know this Heritage Foundation used to

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be led by a black woman, k Cole James, who

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is a Hampton University graduate and sister Girl, was definitely

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>parroting all the talking points, all the ridiculous statements coming

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>out of Heritage Foundation. They're not new. A lot of

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>these policies aren't even new, they're just repackaged and put

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>out there. The reason why we should take this seriously,

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>because like I said, a lot of groups will put

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.479
<v Speaker 1>out these policy agendas, is because they have all aligned.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>And so Andrew makes this point. I don't want to

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>steal your point, Andrew, but Andrew makes the point all

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the time that we talk about Donald Trump and the

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party as though they're separate things, and they have

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>now merged. The Republican Party is now run by right

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>wing zealots and MAGA extremists. These are the people they

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are beholden to. And so the whole list that Angela

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just ran down. Should Republicans take the presidency and potentially

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the House and potentially the Senate, they will be able

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to rough house and ramshot all of these policies through

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level, which is their agenda. Andrew and

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Angela go through all of it. I have more questions

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>than I do answers, but I want to punctuate how

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>dangerous Project twenty twenty five is. It's not the first

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>time we've seen it, and hopefully it will be the

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>last time we talk about it. But I have my doubts,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and Andrew.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Agree to if the dangers here can't be underscore. So

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>all of us know the name Koch Brothers. We say

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 2>it is talked about all the time, very wealthy Koch

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 2>brother Industries, Da DA Da DA. Well before there were

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the Koch Brothers, there was Richard Mellon Scaithe He is

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 2>the person responsible for founding the Heritage Foundation and setting

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 2>up the initial cadre of conservative organizations that didn't exist then,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>but were created in the mid nineteen seventies after Republicans

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>felt frankly annihilated after Nixon's stepping down from the White House.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 2>At that time, liberals frankly actually had organization. They had

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 2>funded media outlets, they had funded think tanks, their ideas

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 2>had gotten traction. They had just passed the Voting Rights Act.

0:11:55.960 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 2>We were thriving in many ways, and at that point point,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 2>rich white men, as represented by scathe melonscafe meals, cokes.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>All those folks there were top five cores as we

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 2>know the course beer at Corps Family. The top five

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>conservative donors got together and put tens of millions, now

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of millions of dollars into building what we now

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>know today as the new Conservative movie.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>They were aided by white women under school to add.

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>That, no doubt about it, but certainly this was these

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 2>were white men and billions of money either inherited or

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 2>manipulated through the system, and they put their money back

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>in protecting their hides. Now this is this is where

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I found the danger of Tiff and Angela. It is

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 2>that these folks. Before it was about getting Republicans elected

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>right and governing through the elected process. Now it is

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>about the tens of I don't know hundreds of thousands

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of federal workers who will now be replaced as public servants,

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 2>which means these are individuals who serve regardless of whether

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a democratic or Republican administration. Where these folks kept

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 2>getting caught up were because they wanted to achieve one goal.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 2>But career service people, professionals who worked in the Department

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of Agriculture and Energy and Education would say, oh, I'm

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 2>so sorry, mister secretary, you can't do that because that's

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>against the law per section such and such and such

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and such and such. Well, they don't want people checking

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 2>them like that. They want loyalists who are willing to

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>do whatever the executive says. These people envisioned something that

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is known as the unitary executive, and what that means

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 2>is not just They don't believe in a separation of powers.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>They don't believe in a separation of states, separation of governance,

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>meaning the judiciary, the executive in the legislative. They believe

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that the president, when elected president, has all the power.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I have news for those folks. We got rid of

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>that when we were founded. The American Revolution was about

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>throwing off the yoke of the unitary executive, the king.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.359
<v Speaker 2>We don't elect kings in the United States of America.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>So if anybody ever gets deluded that these folks are

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 2>actually championing democracy, that these folks actually believe in standing up, protecting,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>conserving the constitution, or that their strict construction is we

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 2>hear that term a lot of times referred to Republicans

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 2>or conservatives. That's not what it is at all. They

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 2>only believe that to this end that their agenda wins.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>When their agenda doesn't win, they don't believe in the judiciary,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 2>they don't believe in the legislative, and if the president

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>is the problem, they don't believe in the executive. At

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that time, there are no commitments to beliefs, as we've

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 2>all heard in politics, no permanent friends, no permanent enemies,

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>only permanent interest So their interests and their beliefs and

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>their philosophy is all about winning for them. And the

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>moment that they're not winning, oh, that philosophy can be

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>offended at any moment. And that's what we are right now.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>That's I think the thing. So we talked about the

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Koch brothers. We talked about the one hundred plus organizations

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 3>who've signed onto this coalition to participate in dismantling the

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 3>federal government department by department, agency by agency, appointee by

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 3>appointee and burrowed in employees. Yes, but they would burrow in,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 3>which is also not new. They talked about it being

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 3>an issue long before even Barack Obama was president, and

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 3>people burrowed in they would be political and they just

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>found the safest career job and they stay there. They've

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>been talking about doing that, and now I think now

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 3>it's on a larger scale. I think the other thing

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 3>that's very fascinating to me. I just want to acknowledge

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>that I envy their ability to unite around some common goals.

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I am jealous of it. I am frustrated by the

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 3>fact that we don't have something like this, we meaning

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Black folks that represent our interests, because when we do.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 3>I talk about it all the time, the Black Agenda

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that was put forth by the Black to the Future

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Action Fund, by our dear sister Alicia Garza. It is

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>like pulling teeth to get Black folks to support something

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 3>that benefits our best interest. They want to know who

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 3>wrote it, why they wrote it, When did they write it,

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Who's in charge? Was it a man. If it's not

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>a man, I can't get behind it. If it was

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 3>a woman, is a woman that I like? All of

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 3>that is so frustrating to me, and I get so

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 3>upset when we can't set aside a thing to focus

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 3>on the main thing. And they've done this here and

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 3>they've been doing it for many years. Here's one place

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 3>where I will say that they have a big benefit

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 3>speaking of DEI and dollars they didn't earn. They put

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the dollars, they didn't earn towards something that benefits them

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 3>in a very towards a common goal twenty two million dollars.

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>So I bet, I'm just thinking we probably could get

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 3>on the same page, and we probably could move the

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 3>needle a little bit further down the road if we

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 3>had the same resources they have to expend on these things,

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Americans for Prosperity or the American Legislative Exchange Council,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>or the Heritage Foundation or now Project twenty twenty five,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 3>all of which have benefited from the infrastructure that they've

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 3>been establishing. Frankly since sixteen nineteen. How about that.

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>There may be a point of disagreement here because I

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>so I think the Republican Party they're easier to coalesce

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because they have one common goal. I mean, racism is

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>at the root of everything they want. So I don't

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>want to compare black folks to them like our I

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think our fractured interest is because we're not a homogenous

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>group of people. We have different interests, we have different goals.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the beauty of us as a people,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and I often hear people credit the Republicans with like, oh,

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but they have such a simple message or they're better

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>at communicating. I don't know if that's true. I think

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>their audience is a little more simple and wilfully ignorant

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of things around policy. I think on

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the left and look, listen, ignorance extends to no matter

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what political party, no matter what kills our economic background. Yeah, exactly,

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not partisan. However, I think on the right side

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you have people who are just pretty much flatlined. They're

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>an easier group to coalesce. On the left, you have

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>people who I would argue are a bit more curious

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>about things, are not so easily manipulated, and is a

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>much bigger tent of people, and so we all represent

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>our interests passionately. On the right, you you know, have

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>something that's very complicated, like the Affordable Care Act, and

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you could throw out something like death panels and people

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>will latch onto it. On the left, it's a little

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>more intellectual. People have questions about that, and certainly when

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes to black folks, I think we because we

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have been so out of the process for so long,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we have been denied for so long that now that

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we're in this process, I think we've done an amazing

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>job of working together and being a tight community and

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>supporting each other and fighting for a lot of our

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>rights in a much more wholesome and holistic way than

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, whose entire agenda is based on hate,

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>uh and hating other people who they think is taking

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>something from them.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that their their agenda. If I could

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 3>andrew just really quick, their agenda is more simple. But

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's intellectually dishonest too for us to say

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 3>everyone who votes conservative is dumb. I agree, you know,

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 3>like I think that we have to be careful with that.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm also saying that they're the the organization behind and

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 3>the operation behind what they've done is actually massive, and

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 3>it's incredibly intricate. Even if the messaging is simple, I

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 3>think that it would be really uh, it's not smart

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>for us to say that it's not very complex. They

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 3>have five oh one C three C fours packs. They

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 3>have again an American Legislative Exchange Council, which is boilerplate

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 3>legislation for people in all fifty states to send in

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 3>and to ensure that it all gets past. That's what

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 3>all this anti DEI legislation is now in thirty plus states.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 3>So it is incredibly complex, and we could argue that

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 3>many of them are focused just on the racism of

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 3>it all. But it started under the guise of fiscal conservativism.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Even when you look at their four pillars that they're

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 3>all saying that they had to agree on, they're still

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 3>really broad and honestly, Joe Biden's border policy fits in

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 3>with number three. I'll read it. It says, restore the family.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>This is number one. Restore the family as the centerpiece

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 3>of American life, and protect our children. We know what

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 3>that really means to somebody else. Maybe it means something

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 3>exactly what it is. Number two, dismantle the administrative state

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and return self governance to the American people. Expect for

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 3>what is Yovagina. Number three, defend our nation's sovereignty, borders

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 3>and bounty against global threats. Sounds like, in my not

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 3>be a bad idea if you don't read between the lines.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 3>And four secure our God given individual rights to live.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry to live freely, I said, to lie to

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 3>life freely, that too, to live freely? What our constitution

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 3>calls the blessings of liberty. So when you hear these

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 3>things on their face, they don't sound bad. But when

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.239
<v Speaker 3>you get into the nine hundred plus pages and they

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 3>want to dismantle the Department of Justice and they want

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 3>to ensure that a president can manipulate what's happening in

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the FBI and DOJ to target political opponents, that reads

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 3>a little differently. So I just I think that there's

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 3>something smart here.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I there is something smart, But guess what they got

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 2>it from us. Before there was ever an American Legislative

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Exchange Council, there was something known as the Center for

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Policy Alternatives. This was a national coalition of progressively aligned

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 2>legislators across all fifty states of the United States, and

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 2>they came together produce the Policy Manual every year, and

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 2>then progressive legislators in the states to take those policies

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 2>and then work toward implementation. Now that that pre existed,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>what the right existed. A lot of people know me

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 2>as a candidate, but perform as a candidate, And while

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 2>I was running for office and serving an office, I

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 2>was part of building progressive pipelining. In my case, it

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>was candidate development, recruitment, and then after that it was

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 2>gathering those same people that we saw and helped get

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>elected to make sure that they were then pushing the

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 2>policies that would advance our goals. Tiffany, I agree with

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 2>you from the standpoint that there's some is so much

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>easier to organize people who are all similarly interested in

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, and that same thing we can all

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 2>differ about. But I think that same thing is about

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 2>We've had power for a very long time. There are

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>threats to our access to that power. We exist to

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>maintain our power. The Koch brothers are not gratuitous. The

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>reason why they helped build a conservative pipeline on the right,

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>it is because they are the largest polluting industries. The

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>coke industries and the subsidiaries that they own are among

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the largest polluters in the country. So it would make

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 2>all the sense in the world to see them elect

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 2>conservatives who are anti EPA, who are judges who say,

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 2>oh no, we're not going to be the big enforcement state.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 2>We are going to be the little, small government state

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 2>where these issues are handled discreetly and not with a

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>big hammer like the EPA. They were acting in their interests.

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>I'll say this, I think the left has fallen off

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 2>on uh on girding up our institutions that then advance

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 2>our ideas these But what the right has taught us

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>is that they are willing to go all the way

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 2>in and and and constitution be damned, and courts be damned,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter. We're willing to go all the way

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 2>in to conserve our power. The reason why the left,

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, is a harder group to to organize and

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 2>coalesce around a single idea is because largely we're motivated

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 2>by what our need is, just as the right is.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Their need is to maintain the power that they've always

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>had For us. Our need might be food on the table,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 2>gas in the tank, women, protections at the workplace, and

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 2>also with autonomy on their bodies. Black people's ability to

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 2>go to schools are then our ability to maintain those

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 2>same institutions. When those institutions start producing black folks who

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>then end up becoming successful parts of boards, elected officials,

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>potentially presidents of the United States, and then they challenge

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 2>our power. So what do we do. We go and

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 2>delegitimize their institutions so that they can't continue to produce

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the folks who are going to threaten our power. The

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 2>right is the right is they're no more brilliant than

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 2>we are. We did this first, they learned from us,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 2>and then we fell off the bus because our needs,

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>as basically as they may be, became more divergent with

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the diversity of people in our coalition and the needs

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that each of us have had. And so we've got

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to get back to the basic, y'all. And even if

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>we were dealing with your point here, Angela, which is

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 2>just amongst black folks, how do we do this? My

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 2>suggestion would be one we need to get a political

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>operation in order that trains the candidates we want to

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>see then can get those folks successfully elected. Right, So

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a whole political arm to this thing.

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We have that we don't support it a lot. Yes

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 3>we do. We have the CBC Institute, let me collective

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 3>back doing that. We have the Joint Center, which almost

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 3>went completely under because we don't support the things that

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 3>we have.

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>This is what I'm talking about, Angela. That that that

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>is the point to be had here, which is from

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 2>a resource standpoint, the left has.

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Money're not talking about the left.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 2>You got money plenty every but but this is why

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 2>it's but but, but the left doesn't exist without the blacks.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>In fact, the left doesn't exists at all and could

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 2>never exist without us. And so if you are interested

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>in advancing the less agenda, then your interests must coincide

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 2>with building an electoral operation that, by the way, doesn't

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 2>just train, doesn't just elect, but has a hammer at

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, which means if you don't

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>do what you committed to doing, if you get in

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 2>there and then you get sold out to the power

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>interests that you were elected to dismantle, we're taking you out,

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>all right, We're taking you So our enforcement mechanism has

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 2>to exist on a level that's bigger than the fact

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 2>that we share the same skin tone. That, ain't it.

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 2>We can be that, right. You just gave examples of

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the Hampton woman who used to be you know, over heritage.

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 2>They got them everywhere. I would venture to argue that

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 2>the people who are being appointed to the board of

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 2>trustees at Tennessee State University, who all may look like us,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 2>have a different interest in mind. They didn't get a

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.239
<v Speaker 2>pointer on the same that they that the others got

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 2>booted out for no reason. All right, So we got

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 2>to be suspicious about those intentions. But we have the

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 2>power to build those same structures on our side and

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 2>maintain them on our side. We just have to decide

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 2>that that's what we're in the interest of doing. And instead,

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I think we all get freaked out by election cycle

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 2>to election cycle, we have this big old threat of

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 2>democracy diminishing over our heads, and we compromise our way

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 2>out of what we want and sake of what we know,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and sake of what we have available at this current time.

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But I just want to say I agree with everything

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, Andrew, and I just think it's tragic that

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you are not on Every campaign ought to be calling you,

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Every consultant group ought to be calling you, because this

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is the work that you've done, and you just informed me.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean mine was much more anecdotal, and then they

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>get all their shit from us. The way that black

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>folks have organized in this country has cast a wide

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>net of influence across the globe. So even their language

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>comes from us. They didn't know what woke was ten

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago. They literally cut in paste, and none of

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is new. We've already had to make America

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a great again. Candidate that was Ronald Reagan. That was

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>his whole slogan. We already saw all these policies come

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the Nixon error, and that's why I think

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so important to say they were aided by white

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>women because Phyllis Slapley let a whole army of folks

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>trying and even physical conservative movements Angela are rooted in racism.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>So I think we all agree the same, but I

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think we all have different approaches. I think this could

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>be a mini pod personally, but I think we all

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>have different approaches. It needs to be come to how

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to get there. But I know we got to move

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on and to have a question for you because so, okay,

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we see this policy that the Heritage Foundation is putting

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>out Project twenty twenty five. Let's say, worst case scenario,

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is elected and the Republicans have one of

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the chambers of Congress the Upper Chamber and the Senator

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>or lower Chamber in the House. How likely is it

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that this policy will start to take shape? How likely

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>will they be able to reimagine the executive branch of

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>government because they can't do much without congressional approval.

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, first and foremo host Project twenty twenty five is

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 3>already well underway, Like, this isn't something that they're waiting

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 3>for Donald Trump to be elected for. The point where

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 3>they would have to wait for his election is around

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 3>who gets into these schedule f jobs, federal government jobs

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 3>that aren't appointed. The part that they would need to

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 3>wait for, who is appointed as those cabinet secretaries, other

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 3>federal appointments that are not Senate confirmed. If they have

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 3>you said, he has a chamber, if he has the Senate,

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 3>he can confirm his full slate of judges, his full

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 3>slate of everybody that is senior enough in the administration

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>that needs a Senate confirmed appointment. So there's a lot

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that they can do. He can do a lot with

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the executive order. If Donald Trump is elected again, he

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 3>will dare the Supreme Court to challenge anything that he

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 3>tries to get through via executive order. And I think

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 3>it will be including things that should be reserved for legislation.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 3>So I yeah, like at this point, go ahead, I.

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, Angela, and I would just say this, Remember we

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 2>used to we would we heckled Mitt Romney about the

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Binders School of Women. That way they're talking about candidate's heaps.

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the binder full of conservatives. What they are

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 2>building are the resumes of individuals that they want to

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 2>go in. And Angela talked about the appointment level. But

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 2>but what makes this even more dangerous is that they're

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 2>talking about this at the careers. They're saying, we want

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>you in the fuck the appointments. Excuse me, lord, please

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 2>forgive me, y'all, forget the appointments. This is about We're

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>going to go into these departments and staff up with

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 2>conservatives who will effectuate our agenda regardless of who the

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 2>president is. And if the president is the president of

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>our choosing at this time, then you act in their interest.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>If they're not, then you act in our interests, and

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you be a stop gap to whatever progressives may want

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 2>to do, because now you're part of the wheel that

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>keeps this machine running and that we have to all

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 2>be tearing refied.

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to just this, This is my last thing

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>on this. I just want to point out to Tip's

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 3>point on page four of the nine hundred page document,

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 3>in the foreword the it says, today the American family

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 3>is in crisis. Forty percent of OD children are born

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.959
<v Speaker 3>to unmarried mothers, including more than seventy percent of black children.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 3>They go on to talk about pornography must be outlawed

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 3>illicit drug. Their product is as addictive as idyollicit drug

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and as psychologically destructive as any crime. I mean, it's

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I just think.

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 2>That the trip on this pornography. When the Republican Convention

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 2>was held in Florida down to Tampa a couple of

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 2>years ago, the hotel, the highest search rates they had

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 2>were to porn sites, and the and the strip of

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>houses sol record profits over the super poor.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 3>I am not confused about the hypocrisy. All I'm saying

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 3>is if they can slide that twenty two million this way,

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 3>we watch out because we've always been able to do

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot with a little, and I'm just saying we

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 3>ain't got the same resources, but what can.

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I My challenge is to the progressive white donors who

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 2>want to be in alignement, stand up some money and

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 2>allow us to build the institutions that protect us and

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 2>move our issues more progressively forward.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 3>If they're not afraid of DEI challenge it.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say the most important thing that

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Angela said that I hope everybody takes note of Project

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five is already underway. The Civil War didn't

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>start with the first gun fire between the Union and

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the Confederacy. Battles don't start with the first knuckles thrown

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like the battle is already happening. We are already in

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the thick of it. So if we're all sitting around

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the big bad Boogeyman, the big bad boogey

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Man is here.

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say, for the record, y'all don't

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 3>even want to talk about this. Y'all thought you were

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 3>gonna have nothing. I knew you was lying. Anyway, we

0:32:55.600 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 3>got a lot, You got a lot, We got warmer

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 3>commercial break, but we will be back.

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 2>So we talked about it before presidential immunity and the

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>wake of the Supreme Court decision, and now under a

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration, we may have to really deal with it.

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>This next segment that we'll revisit is on the fallout

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 2>from the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity.

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 13>Hello Andrew, Hello Tiffany, and Hello Angela. My name is

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 13>Jason Bowman. I am from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Love Native Land Podcast,

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 13>and I'm hoping that you guys can answer my question

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 13>because I'm sure, like most Americans, we are confused over

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 13>the Supreme Court ruling in regards to the January sixth insurrection.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 13>So here goes. So I'm confused because I would love

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 13>to know what exactly does the Supreme Court mean? Do

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 13>they mean that Donald Trump has the immunity over his

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 13>behavior that basically excited a riot to happen on January sixth?

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 13>Does this mean that he was on official president duty

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 13>while sitting in laying duck status. Does this mean that

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 13>he's immune from all charges? What exactly does this mean?

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 13>And from my understanding, I assume that when the president

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 13>was taking office that they were under oath to protect

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 13>the constitution. Everything that he did on January sixth did

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 13>not protect the constitution. So I'm just confused. What message

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 13>does this send to future presidents of this nation?

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Apparently the Supreme Court is still boning so and apparently

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 3>just this Clarence Thomas is still dropping it like it's

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 3>hot and the bar couldn't be lower. So we have

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court which talked about Donald Trump having immunity.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 3>We have absolute immunity, which was on the table, and

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 3>presumptive immunity, which was on the table before this particular ruling.

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 3>This Court it's John Roberts. Justice Roberts starts this decision

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 3>saying that they've never had to consider criminal immunity for

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 3>a president before, and that's what was at stake in

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 3>this particular case. The most critical line in the opinion

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 3>is this, this case is the first criminal prosecution in

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 3>our nation's history of a former president for actions taken

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 3>during his presidency. Now, you would think with the line

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 3>like that that they are going to side with morality,

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 3>that they are going to side with a president having

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 3>to be above reproach, kind of like a bishop in

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the Bible. Right, That's not what happens here. They instead

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 3>say that there is no immunity for unofficial acts. Great, right,

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 3>you meet us where we are. There's no immunity for

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 3>our official, unfutual acts, but that there is absolute immunity

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 3>from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 3>constitutional authority. We'll talk about that. And he is entitled

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 3>to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 3>official acts. That's a lot of word salad, but here's

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the bottom line. Donald Trump, if he takes any number

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 3>of actions, is not going to be criminally prosecuted. Should

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 3>not be as the office of the president. And many

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 3>of you have asked, well, this applies to Donald Trump,

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 3>How's how does it apply to Joe Biden. I just

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 3>want to give you this one, this one observation Joe

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Biden was being uh, they were considering trying Joe Biden

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 3>for a violation of how of handling classified documents that

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 3>particular case. In that particular case, Special Prosecutor Richard Hurst

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 3>says he's too old to be to be to be

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 3>tried on this matter. There should be no criminal liability. Well, now,

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 3>under this case doctrine, he couldn't be because he's the president,

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 3>and while it was while he was officially in office.

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I could argue because he was a vice president

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 3>at the time, right that he didn't do anything that

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 3>he could actually be liable. It is interesting to see

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 3>how this philosophy will will come to pass with other

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 3>officials in a president's cabinet. But the thing that's most

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 3>interesting to me at this point, y'all, and we can

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 3>get it more into the weasis, but I want us

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 3>to have a conversation, not just a lecture, but the

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 3>thing that I think is interesting about this particular case

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 3>as well is Donald Trump, And this is what we've

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 3>been talking about on this podcast, kind of litigating on

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 3>this podcast. Is Donald Trump using this immunity to say,

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 3>therefore I should not be convicted or sentenced on these

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 3>other counts. As we know, there are eighty eight indictments

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 3>against Donald against Donald Trump, eighty eight counts, thirty four

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 3>he was found guilty of in a New York court.

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 3>He used this case for me yesterday, this holding in

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 3>this case, and said I should not be criminal prosecuted.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I should have never been convicted and I certainly shouldn't

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.840
<v Speaker 3>be sentenced in this New York case because this should

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 3>apply even in state. In state matters well. The verdict

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 3>and the sentencing is now postponed by two weeks. We

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:16.320
<v Speaker 3>are supposed to get levin Lucky on seven eleven, not anymore.

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 3>And now he's saying that this should apply. Here's the problem.

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump was not a sitting president when this happened.

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump was running for office. That is not an

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 3>official act. So I'm interested to see what this judge does.

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 3>It makes me nervous that he's postponed this, but I

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 3>want y'all weigh in because it's a lot of things

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and I want and I want to get into some

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 3>of the what IF's and ask y'all my pole questions

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 3>because you know, y'all, y'all know we are poland firm.

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, well one, thank you for helping to break that

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 2>down for US Angela. And on the last point, with

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 2>regard to the New York case, he did sign a

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 2>number of the checks while in the White House, and

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>apparently in the in the trial there uh there was

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 2>evidence allowed to be view by the jury of public statements,

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 2>public tweets that were administered by the President from the

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 2>White House. And it is now their contention that because

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that now protected and privileged information was allowed to be

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 2>shown to the jury, and some might say, possibly reasonably

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 2>calculated in their in their verdict, that the entire verdict,

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 2>all thirty four counts ought to be vacated. In fact,

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:36.439
<v Speaker 2>the first chilling effect that occurred yesterday was the US

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice in New York was supposed to submit

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 2>their recommendations to the judge privately to the judge around

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 2>around what he should be facing Visavis sentencing. They did

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>not submit that document to the judges.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 3>New York State's attorneys.

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 2>No, well, the United States Department of Justice District was

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 2>supposed to submit recommendations. I'm sorry, you're right, I apologize.

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Angela's Alvin Braggs and they did not submit those recommendations

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 2>to the judge yesterday when they were due. Then, as

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a result, the Alvin Bragg's office that we would be

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 2>in favor of delaying the sentencing by two weeks. And

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the judge, of course has has complied. But Angela, one

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 2>of the shocking decision in the sense that not only

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 2>get bake. It is because it is one thing to

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 2>give Donald Trump what he asked for. They went way

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 2>above and beyond the simple parameters of what of what

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump asked for. In fact, in one of the

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 2>extreme ways, while they said of president, a former president

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 2>can be prosecuted for actions he's taken that are of

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 2>a personal nature. It precludes being shown as submitted as

0:40:55.120 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 2>evidence any discussions conversations planning his method he's thinking of

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 2>those actions taken while he was president. They preclude a

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 2>jury from being able to have access to any of

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that information for fear that it may chill the bold

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 2>actions of a president from doing, saying and acting as

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 2>a bold president.

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:16.760
<v Speaker 14>Should.

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 2>It confused me because There was never, ever, ever an

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 2>argument that presidents are not bold and haven't been bold

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 2>prior to Donald Trump because of fear of prosecution. That's

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 2>never I've never heard that before. In fact, we've seen

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 2>very activists and strong demonstrations of individuals in the presidency.

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 2>In fact, the court said that the reason why we

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 2>have to go so far to protect this president and

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 2>give him immunity so that this decision, which is for

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the ages, doesn't cause us to have presidents who are

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 2>trepidacious about making the kinds of decisions that they must

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 2>make while in office. But that assumption, that statement by

0:41:56.520 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the Chief Justice assumes that presidents prior to Donald Trump,

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 2>but we're under the suspension that they could never be prosecuted,

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 2>and that can't be right. Let's just look at the

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.439
<v Speaker 2>case of Lyndon B. Johnson and Ford. Why would Ford

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 2>have pardoned I'm sorry, why would Ford have parted Nixon

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 2>if I didn't yes too, but not but but but

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 2>why would he have issued a pardon to Nixon if

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 2>there was not a reasonable fear that a president could

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 2>be prosecuted for actions that they took in office?

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Of course, and I think when I was even pushing

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 3>back in, Tip, I love for you to weigh in here.

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 3>When I was pushing back on that it was shocking.

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that there was a part of us that

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of knew this was going to happen. We saw

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 3>just based on what this Supreme Court is ruling around

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 3>reproductive justice, what they've ruled around homelessness, what they ruled

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 3>in Chevron, what they ruled around assault weapons. I mean,

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 3>we ain't keep going. I don't know that we were

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 3>really shocked. And then of course January sixth itself just

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:58.240
<v Speaker 3>last week. So I don't know that we were super

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 3>shocked because of the makeup of this court, not because

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 3>this is what this court would do. So Tip, I

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 3>want you to weigh in here, and then I have

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 3>some you know, I got some focused group questions for you.

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, I have to say, like, it's so frustrating when

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I have consumed some of the media around this, in

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 1>both print and broadcast, because I do think people are

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:22.320
<v Speaker 1>so into the leeds that for people out there who wonder, like,

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>why do I care about this? This seems like, you know,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a thousand miles away from me, this is why you

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>should care. Essentially, the court there is no appeal the

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court is the highest court of the land, and

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>they have essentially given the office of the president free

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>reign to do whatever they like. So Donald Trump, were

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>he to win another election, could have a political rival assassinated.

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, were he to win reelection, could use that

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>office to enrich his pockets, which he did the first term.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe Jared and Ivanka made eighty million dollars. It's

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the first year he was in office, and it continued

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to grow. Let's not forget that this is a man

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>who had Kislak Russian operative in the oval office. What

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>would stop him?

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>One thing that the one of the attorneys argued, who

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was arguing on Donald Trump's behalf a question that he

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>posed which I thought was legitimate. If we're going to

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>allow presidents to be prosecuted, Let's say a president has

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to make the call to have a foreign adversary taken out.

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Could he then later be subjected to criminal charges? And

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, you know that is a legitimate question.

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Now that they've essentially said you can do whatever you

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 1>want in office, that should give everyone chills, because imagine

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what an unhinged, politically inept person whose first job in

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>government was president of the United States.

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Imagine what he might do or the second term. I

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 3>want to roll Katanji Brown Jackson sends sound from when

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 3>they heard the oral arguments in April, because she raises

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 3>some of the very points in questions or you made

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 3>them statements as declarations to have she raises them as

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 3>questions to Trumps lawyer Let's wrote that sound.

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:17.800
<v Speaker 12>I'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 12>the Oval office into the seat of criminal activity in

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 12>this country.

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 15>I don't know if there's any allegation of that in

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 15>this case. And what George Washington said is what Benjamin

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 15>Franklin said is we viewed the prosecution of a chief

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 15>executive as something that everybody cried out against us unconstitutional.

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 15>And what George Washington said is we're worried about factional strife,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 15>which will no.

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 12>I also let me let me let me put this

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 12>worry on the table. If the potential for criminal liability

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 12>is taken off the table, wouldn't there be a significant

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 12>risk that future presidents would be emboldened to commit crimes

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 12>with abandon while they're in office.

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 3>It's right now.

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 12>The fact that we're having this debate because oh, well,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 12>see has said that presidents might be prosecuted. Presidents from

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 12>the beginning of time have understood that that's a possibility.

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 12>That might be what has kept this office from turning

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 12>into the kind of crime center that I'm envisioning. But

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 12>once we say no criminal liability, mister president, you can

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 12>do whatever you want. I'm worried that we would have

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 12>a worse problem than the problem of the president feeling

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:27.840
<v Speaker 12>constrained to follow the law while he's in office.

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 3>So I wanted to I wanted to play that clip because,

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 3>as Tiff said, we are very much in the weeds

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 3>on this. It is important for me to try to

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:45.439
<v Speaker 3>lay out how many layers and how detailed they were

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 3>and meticulous they were about showing all of the ways

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:53.240
<v Speaker 3>that Trump is protected in this role. When we learn Civics,

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 3>and this is the danger of taking textbooks out of schools,

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 3>we learn that the legislative branch makes law us, that

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the judicial branch interprets or evaluates laws, and that the

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 3>executive branch carries out the laws. What they're saying now

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 3>is that the executive branch will make the law, will

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 3>break the law, will take the law, and will do

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 3>as they see fit with the law. That's the point.

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think when we look at those pieces, that

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 3>is very, very scary. This isn't about what Donald Trump

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 3>will do in office. This is about what anybody elected

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 3>to the highest office of the land can do. And

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Justice Jackson Kazanji Brown Jackson was absolutely right. There are

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 3>people who would have never considered running for office, Tiffany

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and Andrew, who now will consider it because they see

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 3>it as a way to get away with all of

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the things that they never could potentially unless they're a

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 3>CEO of a big company. Some of those folks have

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 3>been running circles and running game for a long time.

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll lie in Ron, but I think that we have

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 3>to really consider what all this means. Now you have

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 3>a court not just turning a blind guy putting pin

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 3>in the paper to say this is these are the

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 3>things you can do that even and this was the

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 3>part that was scary for me too. I don't know

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 3>if this if you all saw this, but they talked

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 3>about the outer perimeter of official responsibilities, and that outer

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 3>perimeter it still covers your actions as long as they

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 3>are not manifestly or probably beyond his authority. But they

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:25.760
<v Speaker 3>go on to say all these things that are beyond authority.

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Clarence Thomas went into talking about how, you know, even

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the role of a special prosecutor should not be.

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>A thing that they're perimeter like when you say it,

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, I'm as.

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Basically like, yeah, and I don't know either, but tip

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying is they look like what it looks

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 3>like they were doing is like, here are these things

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 3>that are your official responsibilities. Here are these things that

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 3>are like kind of related to your official responsibilities. And

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 3>even if it looks like you were signing the checks

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 3>for the hush money even though you already made some

0:48:57.760 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 3>payments in a twenty sixteen campaign, That's what I was

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna say earlier, Andrew. But if you signed the checks

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 3>because you were sitting in the taxpayer paid chair in

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.279
<v Speaker 3>the Oval office, that is the outer perimeter of your

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 3>official responsibility, because you were signing them while engaging in

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 3>the course of other activity. They didn't use that example specifically,

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 3>but I can see that saying it's not manifestly or

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:22.440
<v Speaker 3>probably beyond his authority, because if he were convicted of this,

0:49:22.680 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 3>it could be frowned upon and looked bad upon by

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the you know, the rest of the world leaders, or

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 3>it could look bad for the country. So because it

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:32.320
<v Speaker 3>looked bad for the country, we should allow this in

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 3>as an official activity or out of perimeter activity.

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And Angela, I don't think they were opake about that.

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.879
<v Speaker 2>I think they were very clear, which is, even if

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it is a act that is non presidential outside of

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 2>your duties and responsibility, nothing, you can't get any evidence

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:51.840
<v Speaker 2>gathered from why you were president and support of you

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 2>having broken the laws. So they've made it, they've handicapped.

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 2>They say he can be accountable, but then they handicap

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 2>his responsibility. And I just want to cite a few examples.

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.799
<v Speaker 2>One the Department of Justice, which we all previously thought

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 2>was was the chief attorney on behalf of the United States.

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 2>The court was explicit. In fact, they said all charges

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.760
<v Speaker 2>regarding his conversations and his directions given to the Attorney

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 2>General to take certain actions like a letter saying we

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 2>need to investigate your state and send fake electors or

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 2>send a whole another slate, which Donald Trump asked the

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:24.800
<v Speaker 2>attorney the acting Internet General to do, and he refused

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 2>to do it and say he would resign the court.

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 2>The US Supreme Court said, it will be it is

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:35.320
<v Speaker 2>not permissible for you to account that as a charge

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:37.800
<v Speaker 2>against the president, because the Department of Justice is his.

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 2>The Department of Justice and the Attorney General reports to him,

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:46.279
<v Speaker 2>and the President can give direction, have conversation with the

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Attorney General as well about active investigations, direct who he

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 2>should investigate, direct who they can bring charges against. All

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:57.920
<v Speaker 2>of this they have They have quote in the universal

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Unitary Executive Donald Trump or whomever else may come after him.

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 2>The president can also take a bribe for pardoning somebody.

0:51:08.239 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Pardon power is exclusively in the jurisdiction of the President

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:14.320
<v Speaker 2>of the United States, which means it is a core function,

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 2>constitutional function, and anything that he does regarding pardons cannot

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 2>be questioned and he cannot be prosecuted. So if you

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:22.839
<v Speaker 2>went to him to with a million dollars and say

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I give you a million dollars if you give me

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 2>a pardon, that cannot be prosecuted in office, out of office,

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 2>no day of the week.

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's absolute immunity too. So pardoning if he does

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 3>anything associated with partner, that's absolute immunity. Anything associated with

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:43.400
<v Speaker 3>any member of his cabinet that he wants to remove

0:51:43.520 --> 0:51:46.320
<v Speaker 3>because he's trying to break the law absolute immunity, but

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 3>there's presumptive immunity for pressuring Mike Pence to reject the

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 3>state's electoral votes or send them back to state legislatures.

0:51:54.600 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 3>So I don't understand they're saying that because it's an

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 3>official act, but it's not associated it specifically with his

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 3>constitutional powers. That that is presumptive. It's it is it

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 3>is presumed that he would be immune from this, but

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 3>absolute for anything that is that is written in and

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 3>enshrined in the Constitution. So I want to ask you all,

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 3>based on what you've seen from this Supreme Court, if

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 3>you think they will try to expand this doctrine to

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 3>qualified immunity, where that, of course you know, has been

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 3>in debate and in hot contention around law enforcement and

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 3>police in this country. Do you think that they will

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 3>try to extend this doctrine to police officers who are

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 3>pursuing qualified immunity for shooting, killing injuring.

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Us And just to explain to the listeners, qualified immunity

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is it basically you're shielded from.

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Your actions that you're taking as a law.

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Enforcement from from, yes, from being civilly serious. So any

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 3>civil liability, and in some instances it is extended to

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 3>criminal liability.

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Sure, sure enough, they operate, in my stay, at least

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:11.439
<v Speaker 2>under the cloak of of uh immunity from prosecution through

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 2>anything that they do in the in the in the

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 2>course of their work as a law enforcement officer, civil criminal.

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:21.399
<v Speaker 2>I honestly tell you, Angela, I wish I could even

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 2>get to that concern. I mean, I in so many

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 2>ways it's already been extended, if not, if not in

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:32.720
<v Speaker 2>black and white, certainly in practice. Remember our friend Marilyn

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Moseby one of the very first, about the first prosecutor

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to take these law enforcement officers on. And that's not

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 2>because they've never done anything wrong before. It's because the

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 2>norms of society say that you can't. You know that

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 2>it is that it's beyond the pale, you can't pursue

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 2>them in that way. But this, honestly, this, this is this.

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Is in writing as the law now though, So I'm wondering, kids,

0:53:57.000 --> 0:54:00.319
<v Speaker 3>this is now going to be extended like you cannot, right,

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 3>So That's what I'm curious about, Like, yeah, if we

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 3>and I know we gotta take a break, I know

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 3>we gotta take a break, But I want to know,

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 3>do we think it's going to be extended to capas,

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Do we think it'll be extended to mayors and governors?

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Do we think this would be extended to other people

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 3>on the federal level? But do we think that this

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 3>same U, this same letter of the law, interpretation of

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:22.959
<v Speaker 3>the law, well, and really the making of a brand

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:26.080
<v Speaker 3>new law will be extended to other folks who are

0:54:26.239 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 3>acting on behalf of the government in these roles. Or

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 3>is it only going to be the president?

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the Court has already proven that they know

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no bounds with the egregiousness of some of these decisions

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that they issue. I would say, though, specifically to your

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>question around qualified immunity as it relates to officers, my

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:48.120
<v Speaker 1>understanding is that would only extend to federal officers, which

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is why we always talk about the first step. Act

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>needs a second step and a third step. I think

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of shielding law enforcement officers who are not

0:54:56.440 --> 0:54:59.760
<v Speaker 1>federal police, that would have to happen at the local level,

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like the state rights Yes, State Supreme Court,

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about Yeah. But I but I think

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the question you're raising is a legitimate point. I understand

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 1>your question. I'm making a different point, and that if

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that has to happen at like at the state Supreme

0:55:13.239 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 1>court level, and that is also a potential challenge because

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>while we pay so much attention to the Supreme Court,

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:22.359
<v Speaker 1>before something makes it to the Supreme Court, they've gone

0:55:22.400 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>through the lower courts first. So it's even more I

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:28.240
<v Speaker 1>think a reason to pay attention to those down ballot

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 1>issues that are on that that that are on the

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:35.359
<v Speaker 1>ballot when when you're voting for something, because I can see,

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the state like Florida that Andrew was talking about,

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>where absolutely Ron DeSantis could do something like that. You

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:44.719
<v Speaker 1>think about red states like Alabama Governor k Ivy and

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>already the abysmal decisions that she's made, especially when it

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:52.000
<v Speaker 1>comes around criminal justice in prisons Mississippi with Tate Reeves, like,

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't even imagine where this might go.

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 2>So yes, I think they already started rolling. Take me

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 2>to your point. States have already in this legislative session,

0:56:01.040 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 2>have already preempted the Court by laying down law in

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the states that are shredding doctrines around ethics, around being

0:56:12.040 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 2>able to be prosecuted for what they do in their office.

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is the steing that to Angela, Now that

0:56:17.120 --> 0:56:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I understand your question better, the Court said that in

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the executive branch, the executive branch is the President of

0:56:23.239 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the United States, singularly that the Congress has four founder

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and thirty five members, the Court has nine members and

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.320
<v Speaker 2>thousands of judges underneath it. But in this case, what

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 2>makes him so exceptional is that he alone is the

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 2>executive branch. So as it relates to extending immunity to officers,

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 2>people who work with under him, cabinet members, so on,

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:47.479
<v Speaker 2>and so forth, that's off the table. But what isn't

0:56:47.520 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 2>off the table is that the president can direct them

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:52.359
<v Speaker 2>to take an action, and he can then immediately part

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 2>immediately pardon them from any future prosecution.

0:56:57.600 --> 0:57:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Or anyone he deputizes with some of them is enshrined

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.719
<v Speaker 3>in the Constitution, which is absolute immunity, and any other

0:57:03.760 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 3>official act, again, is that presumed immunity. I know we're

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 3>over time to take a break, So Joe Biden still

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 3>has a lot that he could get done before he leaves.

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I know that we all have a laundry list, y'all.

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully this can become banter for y'all's tables at the

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 3>hot during this holiday, but I really want to see

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 3>him knock some things out before he leaves. We talked

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 3>about it once before on this show. What should President

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Biden do before he leaves office?

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 6>Greetings, Angela, Andrew, and Tiffany, the trifecta of the Native

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 6>Land Podcast, and my name is Keith Singleton, coming from Atlanta, Georgia.

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:55.960
<v Speaker 6>We found out the President of Joe Biden has dropped

0:57:55.960 --> 0:58:00.200
<v Speaker 6>out of the twenty twenty four presidential election. I was

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 6>saddened by that, however, I was elated with his endorsement

0:58:05.200 --> 0:58:09.440
<v Speaker 6>of Kamala Harris for president, the top of the ticket

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:13.960
<v Speaker 6>for the Democratic presidency. For me, it's the only choice,

0:58:14.600 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 6>any other choice. I am not staying with the Democratic Party.

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm going somewhere else, and it's not going to be

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 6>the Republican Party or that grand old Party. Again. Thank

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 6>you for taking the time to look at my video.

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:31.520
<v Speaker 6>Hope this helps out again. You're listening to the Native

0:58:31.680 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 6>Land Podcast, the Innovators of US politics.

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Keith, We're so grateful for your comments, and y'all make

0:58:39.560 --> 0:58:41.919
<v Speaker 3>sure you keep them coming. I thought that we could

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 3>use this, y'all as a jumping off point for what

0:58:46.400 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 3>should Joe Biden do with the rest of his term. Well,

0:58:49.840 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 3>we know that he just recently did, not only dropping

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 3>out of the presidential race was just historic in and

0:58:54.920 --> 0:58:58.400
<v Speaker 3>of itself, but endorsing Kamala Harris on that same day,

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:00.680
<v Speaker 3>saying that she was the person and that could take

0:59:00.960 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the party in this country to the next level. It

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 3>is so important that he continues to solidify his legacy

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:11.440
<v Speaker 3>with the rest of his term. So since on this podcast,

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:15.240
<v Speaker 3>we like to keep our imagination as Tiffany always challenges us,

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and our good brother Andrew challenges us. Y'all when you

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 3>dream big, What does Joe Biden accomplish for the rest

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 3>of his term.

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if legally he can do some of

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:28.720
<v Speaker 1>these things, but definitely federal pardons, which we know he

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>can legally do through the DJ Parton office. Obviously for

0:59:32.040 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Marilyn Moseby. Angela works so hard on that, but multiple

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:38.800
<v Speaker 1>other people. I would like to see more non violent

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 1>offenders pardon and not in a way that's safe, you know, like, oh,

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but what will the Republicans say, Like if you want

0:59:44.240 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to pardon the fifty thousand people, like do it? There

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>are people sitting I mean, what happens in our prisons

0:59:50.760 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is inhumane. I used to focus on that a lot.

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And when you take away somebody's liberty, like it needs

0:59:56.800 --> 1:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to be like no other choice. And we we've just

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>been adversely impacted by a very punishing criminal justice system.

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So pardon is probably at the top of my list. Legally,

1:00:07.640 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he can do this, but a

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>federal protection for bodily autonomy for women, I think if

1:00:17.000 --> 1:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he can pull that off, I'd like to see that.

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And if we're really letting our imaginations just like run free,

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine in America that is fair and you know, for

1:00:24.760 --> 1:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the people, by the people. Other people include us. Reparations.

1:00:27.800 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I think reparations is something in a form. It may

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not be cash payments, maybe as land, maybe's home ownership.

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we don't pay taxes for the rest of our lives,

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever that looks like. See, I would like him to

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>be bold enough to do that. So off the top

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of my head, those are the three things I'd say.

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 2>The courts, the courts, the courts, the courts, the courts,

1:00:47.600 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the courts, the courts. I just think now he is

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to do that. No, no, no, but I mean

1:00:55.040 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>for it to be done. There's a lot that is intended,

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>which means that they are going to have to be

1:01:00.600 --> 1:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>likely some maneuvers that center Democrats are going to have

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>to make within their rule making process, within the accommodations

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that they have been willing to make to Republicans up

1:01:11.040 --> 1:01:15.479
<v Speaker 2>to this point. I mean, we've even seen under Mitchell

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 2>McConnell's leadership where they had basically temporary suspensions.

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 14>Of the sixty sixty vote rule and they brought they've

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:31.880
<v Speaker 14>used that process instead of preventively like they have used

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:35.080
<v Speaker 14>it toward the Democrats to prevent Democrats from moving along

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:38.160
<v Speaker 14>nominations and slowing down the process.

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to see us use it the other way.

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd like Schumer, hopefully with the support of all forty

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 2>nine other fifty other Democrats, be willing to make some

1:01:49.600 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>rule changes in order to get the president's agenda around

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the courts through the process. I think they're going to

1:01:56.920 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>be Republicans who are critical enough of of of the

1:02:02.080 --> 1:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court that they may be willing to come with

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>us in the House to get a bill through. And

1:02:07.480 --> 1:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I think obviously we'll have to do what we can

1:02:09.560 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Senate, and then lastly on the courts is

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the appointments of of of judges. Uh, this process has

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>been slowan by Republicans to to screeching Holt, You've got

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Senate Republicans who are from states where vacancies occur, who

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>have literally stood, you know, figuratively stood in the doorway

1:02:33.120 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 2>from letting any nominations get through. They will not provide slips,

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I forget what they call them, maybe blue slips or

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>or angela you may know, the terminology which basically green

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>lights the name of the person coming from their state

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to move forward in that committee process. And then the

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:51.840
<v Speaker 2>only that was just on the course. And then the

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>last thing I'll throw in there is just we've got

1:02:53.720 --> 1:02:55.960
<v Speaker 2>a letter already out there on the on the Fearless Fund.

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:58.959
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to see the President take very simple action

1:02:59.440 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>as a relate to what is being requested by the

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Fearless Fund, which is additional protection and an executive order

1:03:06.720 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>to expand on that protection.

1:03:08.960 --> 1:03:10.920
<v Speaker 3>The Fearless Fund is actually where I was going to

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:13.200
<v Speaker 3>go to if you know, it's so important for us

1:03:13.200 --> 1:03:16.840
<v Speaker 3>to understand Fearless Fund is one of many victims of

1:03:18.160 --> 1:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, a people and an infrastructure that is trying

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:26.320
<v Speaker 3>so diligently to keep us back from and keeping us

1:03:26.360 --> 1:03:29.479
<v Speaker 3>out of equitable outcomes. They you know, and one hand,

1:03:29.560 --> 1:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>it's like you didn't earn it. You you there's affirmative

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>action policy that you shouldn't be able to be a

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 3>part of. You didn't earn it. You shouldn't be able

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 3>to to to go to schools to get funding with us,

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>to get access to capital. So you start your own

1:03:43.760 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 3>thing and then they target you for that. So I

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 3>absolutely think there should be an executive order not only

1:03:48.960 --> 1:03:52.320
<v Speaker 3>protecting entities like the Fearless Fund, but really doing the

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>disparity studies necessary across the board, in every industry, in

1:03:57.440 --> 1:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>every organization, and all of all systems of education to

1:04:01.520 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>demonstrate why discriminatory impact is still just as significant as

1:04:09.240 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 3>discriminatory intent. You cannot prove intent without the data. The

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:15.640
<v Speaker 3>data is there. We all know it, we've seen it,

1:04:15.720 --> 1:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>we've witnessed it. So we need something, some federal protection

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:21.560
<v Speaker 3>VI severe executive order to help us get across that

1:04:21.680 --> 1:04:23.960
<v Speaker 3>finish line. I think the other thing that I want

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>to see him do is an executive order on voting rights.

1:04:27.040 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Everything that they've said in the past, the Supreme Court

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 3>is said has not been the makeup of this court.

1:04:32.520 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>So I believe if Donald Trump was were in office,

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:39.320
<v Speaker 3>they would give him broad sweeping authority on executive orders.

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I think Joe Biden should test that leading up to

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 3>the fall. I really do. I think that he should

1:04:44.640 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 3>go hard on executive orders like he's If you can

1:04:47.240 --> 1:04:49.720
<v Speaker 3>legislate from the bench, certainly you can do it from

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 3>the oval and prove them wrong. So yes on abortion

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:56.840
<v Speaker 3>or reproductive justice. Yes on affirmative action and equitable outcomes

1:04:56.880 --> 1:05:01.160
<v Speaker 3>and opportunities. Yes on everything else and voting rice, all

1:05:01.200 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the things that we know that we need, and reparations.

1:05:03.440 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely So I like all those answers.

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I you know, we were just focused on domestic policy,

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>but I would add to that, I would revisit some

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of our foreign policy as well. This is in the

1:05:13.440 --> 1:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>world of you know, a blank wall that we can

1:05:16.160 --> 1:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>create democracy ourselves on what it looks like, because you know,

1:05:19.320 --> 1:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how realistic this is, but I would

1:05:20.920 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly rethink our allieship with the state of Israel. You know,

1:05:27.080 --> 1:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Israel is a nuclear power and a powerful entity, largely

1:05:30.400 --> 1:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the United States funds. What we've seen in

1:05:34.080 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just the abhorrent things that we've seen happen in Gaza,

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and now it used to be an unsafe thing to

1:05:40.640 --> 1:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>even say this. And I think we can stand in

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>allieship with our Jewish brothers and sisters, but we mainly

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>stand on the right side of what is good and righteous,

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing happening there is not that, and

1:05:55.240 --> 1:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the money being used to fund the inhumane treatment there,

1:06:00.000 --> 1:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I would hope that President Biden could reconsider. I would

1:06:03.680 --> 1:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>also realign our foreign policy to some of the shifting

1:06:07.320 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign powers that we actually see. It kind of feels

1:06:10.360 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like the United States is like, you know, a few

1:06:12.600 --> 1:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>decades behind the rest of the world on when it

1:06:16.640 --> 1:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to global powers. So that's from a foreign policy expert,

1:06:21.040 --> 1:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but also a few decades behind even when it comes

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to infrastructure when you look at public transit in other

1:06:25.960 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>countries and their bullet trains and you know their streets

1:06:29.480 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know just how different countries look. So I

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>would love to see some change on that side as well.

1:06:36.600 --> 1:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And I you know, I have to say watching when

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I do watch news and it is not domestic news,

1:06:43.200 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you really would be, you know, just terrified when you

1:06:47.480 --> 1:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>look at what's happening in the country, and I'm as

1:06:50.880 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I said on our main podcast, I hope you guys

1:06:53.000 --> 1:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>tune in if you haven't already. I could see an

1:06:57.720 --> 1:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>all out war happening in the Middle East, and that

1:07:00.400 --> 1:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>would not benefit Vice President Harris. I do think, unfortunately,

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that would likely benefit Donald Trump for this country to

1:07:06.880 --> 1:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>see its first female commander in chief, and so that

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:12.479
<v Speaker 1>definitely has my attention, as well as if there's something

1:07:12.520 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden could do before he left office to

1:07:15.120 --> 1:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>stay that state of unrest, that would also be helpful.

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:21.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, y'all, well, we are going to take a

1:07:21.840 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 3>quick break and we'll be right back.

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think our brother Andrew is gone. I was just

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>about to say, Andrew Andrew dropped. Andrew got dial up,

1:07:36.920 --> 1:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like y'all said about me.

1:07:38.560 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, we all do today minus even reporting

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:43.800
<v Speaker 3>on here. They got local audio recording that Andrew. I

1:07:43.880 --> 1:07:47.439
<v Speaker 3>wanted to come back to him because he it looked

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:49.600
<v Speaker 3>like the cameras feed was picking up and then it dropped.

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>But I was also gonna say, I have one that

1:07:52.000 --> 1:07:53.920
<v Speaker 3>is kind of petty, but I think some of the

1:07:54.080 --> 1:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>things should be done like right away. I for a

1:07:58.400 --> 1:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>long time on this podcast been calling for Merrick Garland's

1:08:01.520 --> 1:08:04.040
<v Speaker 3>resignation I think you should just appoint another head of

1:08:04.080 --> 1:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Justice. I don't think that this Department

1:08:07.080 --> 1:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>of Justice. Their failures around Tulsa, you know, the shortcomings

1:08:11.560 --> 1:08:15.280
<v Speaker 3>around some of the police killings that we've seen, and

1:08:15.560 --> 1:08:19.200
<v Speaker 3>their inability to reach a conclusion on investigations, the targeting

1:08:19.400 --> 1:08:23.679
<v Speaker 3>of black prosecutors, black elected officials, including our own brother

1:08:23.760 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Andrew under this Department of Justice. For failure to revisit

1:08:29.040 --> 1:08:33.640
<v Speaker 3>any of Trump's targeted prosecutions is highly problematic. They have

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:38.880
<v Speaker 3>been non responsive to what we know is a necessary

1:08:39.640 --> 1:08:42.719
<v Speaker 3>justice for the Tulsa race massacre survivors. We have lost

1:08:42.800 --> 1:08:46.519
<v Speaker 3>one since this administration has been in with Uncle Red's passing.

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's time for these folks to get and receive

1:08:50.479 --> 1:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>the justice they deserve, and their descendants to get and

1:08:53.280 --> 1:08:56.120
<v Speaker 3>receive the justice they deserve. If that can happen under

1:08:56.160 --> 1:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Merrit Garland's watch, then we should get a new Attorney General.

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:02.000
<v Speaker 3>That's another thing that I think he should do before

1:09:02.040 --> 1:09:05.120
<v Speaker 3>he leaves, appoint someone else at DOJ.

1:09:05.360 --> 1:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, since we're imagining things, is there, do you have

1:09:09.439 --> 1:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>someone in mind for Attorney General under.

1:09:12.600 --> 1:09:14.759
<v Speaker 3>Who would be so good? I would be so excited

1:09:14.800 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 3>about it. I don't know if she's gonna come back

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:23.160
<v Speaker 3>to the administration. Marcia Fudge really as Attorney General. Yes,

1:09:23.600 --> 1:09:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that Marcia Fudge does not play. She is

1:09:26.520 --> 1:09:29.080
<v Speaker 3>so serious about voting right. She was great on that

1:09:29.200 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 3>issue as chair. She cares deeply about children and snap

1:09:33.600 --> 1:09:39.720
<v Speaker 3>benefits and equal education opportunities. She has an organizing arm

1:09:39.840 --> 1:09:42.360
<v Speaker 3>behind her as a former president of Adulta Sigma Theta.

1:09:42.520 --> 1:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Like I think that, and she does not let me

1:09:45.720 --> 1:09:48.920
<v Speaker 3>tell you about October babies. She gonna go hard in

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the paint. She get right up there and be like,

1:09:51.000 --> 1:09:52.960
<v Speaker 3>let me tell you what you're not gonna do. Yeah, okay.

1:09:55.040 --> 1:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So Marcia Fudge is a former Congressoman of Ohio. She

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>left Congress to lead HUD under the Biden administration. She

1:10:02.040 --> 1:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>since I left her and as Angela said, former president

1:10:05.280 --> 1:10:06.479
<v Speaker 1>of Delta sigm with data.

1:10:07.360 --> 1:10:08.200
<v Speaker 3>She would be a gangster.

1:10:08.400 --> 1:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:10:08.600 --> 1:10:11.400
<v Speaker 3>The other person who would be really good is.

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:15.599
<v Speaker 1>A girl can dream.

1:10:15.960 --> 1:10:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I would like being crump.

1:10:17.640 --> 1:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I like that.

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I would like.

1:10:20.760 --> 1:10:25.439
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's time that the the the department

1:10:25.560 --> 1:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that sits in the j. Edgar Hoover Building, can you

1:10:28.640 --> 1:10:30.960
<v Speaker 3>also rename that with an executive worker? By the way,

1:10:31.439 --> 1:10:34.280
<v Speaker 3>but if he's not going to rename that, I would

1:10:34.479 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 3>like to see somebody who fights for the civil rights

1:10:38.200 --> 1:10:41.519
<v Speaker 3>of all people running it, like just as an affront

1:10:42.000 --> 1:10:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to j Edgar Hoover, just like hiss on the building.

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So I have to be I hate to be a

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:49.599
<v Speaker 1>dream damper, but I do wonder with all the things

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 1>that the DLJ is responsible for, would Ben Krump be

1:10:53.880 --> 1:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>ideal in that space. I don't know, and I know

1:10:56.760 --> 1:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we all know Ben in love Ben. But like when

1:10:58.720 --> 1:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to.

1:11:00.240 --> 1:11:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Foreign policies, yes, yes, yes, that bankrupt should be the

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:10.600
<v Speaker 3>attorney general. And I would just remind Tiff that you

1:11:10.680 --> 1:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>know everybody, I mean, there are divisions, but just to

1:11:19.320 --> 1:11:20.040
<v Speaker 3>get them back.

1:11:22.080 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>As well, I would just say Justice Katanji Brown Jackson

1:11:25.439 --> 1:11:28.880
<v Speaker 2>comes from the tradition of being a public defender in

1:11:28.920 --> 1:11:32.519
<v Speaker 2>the federal court system, which is unprecedented, unheard of to

1:11:32.640 --> 1:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>be appointed to the Supreme Court. We have to do

1:11:35.160 --> 1:11:38.679
<v Speaker 2>the same thing with the U. S. Attorney Attorney's General

1:11:38.720 --> 1:11:43.280
<v Speaker 2>because we've we've looked almost exclusively at prosecutors as a

1:11:44.040 --> 1:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, tried and true guaranteed must have in order

1:11:47.920 --> 1:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to be a US attorney or the Attorney general. And

1:11:51.800 --> 1:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the truth is. The legal system is much more complex

1:11:54.080 --> 1:11:57.360
<v Speaker 2>than that. There are many way manners of accountability with injustice,

1:11:57.600 --> 1:11:59.479
<v Speaker 2>and I'd love to see someone who comes from a

1:11:59.680 --> 1:12:03.040
<v Speaker 2>different front seated background with a respect for the law

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:05.519
<v Speaker 2>to come in there and shake it up.

1:12:07.200 --> 1:12:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I love the public defend Okay, I have one more idea,

1:12:11.600 --> 1:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Tis James. I could get with his James James. But

1:12:17.520 --> 1:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>now y'all got just kind of sold on the Ben

1:12:19.200 --> 1:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Crump thing, Like I like the idea of a public defender.

1:12:22.200 --> 1:12:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, he's not a public a public.

1:12:25.600 --> 1:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I know he's not now, but he never worked as

1:12:27.360 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a public defender.

1:12:29.840 --> 1:12:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But his his his his alignment with the the intersections

1:12:36.520 --> 1:12:39.559
<v Speaker 2>of law and justice, both through the civil as well

1:12:39.600 --> 1:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>as the criminal uh elements that he's represented that he's

1:12:44.920 --> 1:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>worked at. Because of the nature of his work, he's

1:12:47.320 --> 1:12:49.479
<v Speaker 2>gotten to get involved with these families who sit at

1:12:49.479 --> 1:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the intersection of prosecutions as well as victimhood within the

1:12:53.840 --> 1:12:57.559
<v Speaker 2>criminal justice system, long before you ever typically see civil

1:12:57.680 --> 1:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>attorneys getting engaged and involved. He's there from day zero,

1:13:02.080 --> 1:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes ushering these families through the criminal justice process and

1:13:08.080 --> 1:13:10.960
<v Speaker 2>then being there as a backstop when the civil side

1:13:11.080 --> 1:13:13.799
<v Speaker 2>kicks up and kicks in. I just think his nuanced

1:13:13.960 --> 1:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>understanding is different than really much of what we can

1:13:19.200 --> 1:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>find anywhere wholesale endorser.

1:13:22.200 --> 1:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that idea.

1:13:24.120 --> 1:13:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Guess what. I love you guys.

1:13:26.920 --> 1:13:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, ill missed half of it.

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:28.839
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back.

1:13:31.640 --> 1:13:31.760
<v Speaker 13>Well.

1:13:31.800 --> 1:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I hope y'all are enjoying some good food. We're about

1:13:34.720 --> 1:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>to joy our good food. So happy, thanks too, and everybody.

1:13:38.240 --> 1:13:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm about to go and get my next playing

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:43.519
<v Speaker 3>yams that I make myself too bad. I can't share

1:13:43.600 --> 1:13:47.519
<v Speaker 3>with you, Tiffany Andrew, but maybe soon, y'all. There are

1:13:47.680 --> 1:13:51.840
<v Speaker 3>still seven hundred and six days left until the midterm election.

1:13:52.000 --> 1:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>You know we're gonna keep counting you down.

1:13:53.320 --> 1:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome home, y'all.

1:13:55.880 --> 1:13:57.360
<v Speaker 13>Thank you for joining the Natives.

1:13:57.520 --> 1:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Attention of what the info and all of the latest

1:14:00.240 --> 1:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Rock Gillim and cross connected to.

1:14:01.920 --> 1:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>The statements that you leave on our SoC shows.

1:14:04.360 --> 1:14:07.599
<v Speaker 13>Thank you sincerely for the patients reason for your choice

1:14:07.680 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 13>is cleared.

1:14:08.280 --> 1:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>So grateful it took the to execute roles for serve,

1:14:12.000 --> 1:14:14.559
<v Speaker 2>defend and protect the truth, even if pay. We welcome

1:14:14.600 --> 1:14:16.640
<v Speaker 2>home to all of the Natives. We thank you.

1:14:17.800 --> 1:14:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Welcome y'all.

1:14:19.160 --> 1:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcomes Native Land Pod is the production of iHeart Radio

1:14:31.200 --> 1:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in partnership with Reason Choice Media. For more podcasts my

1:14:34.000 --> 1:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:14:37.439 --> 1:14:38.759
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.