WEBVTT - Don't Be A Quid Pro Schmo

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. The walls are closing in.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>This time Trump is finished. This is his Watergate moment.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>This time he's gone too far. Just kidding. Lives are

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>losing their minds. None of that is true. But there's

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>another impeachment hearing today. We'll get to that coming up.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Make no mistake America, You're a great American. Again the

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. Now, Welcome

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Buck Sexton Show, everybody. Last night I was

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>taking a break from working on the book that I'm

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm tentatively calling Crushed the Commies, but I don't think

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that's actually going to be the title. But you'll find

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>out the title eventually. It's coming out. I got a

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>draft to drafts, gotta be in full draft before Christmas.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I was writing, taking a moment to think about life

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I turn on the TV. I don't know,

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was seven o'clock, eight o'clock at night and

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>seven o'clock at night, I guess it was. And this

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hearing had been going on still for what was it

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:30.559
<v Speaker 1>eleven plus hours sitting there. I was like, oh, who

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>thought that this was a good idea? I mean, this

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.919
<v Speaker 1>is absurd, asking a million questions about an unimportant event

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that didn't even happen, that nobody should care about. And

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>liberals have somehow convinced themselves this is where Trump's supporters

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to flee him. This is where independence will

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>come over to their side, and maybe even Republican senators

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>will vote to remove him from office, these people who

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have completely lost their minds. Was there? Did you order

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the quid pro quo? Remember that with Colonel Nathan R. Jessup,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>United States Marine Corps, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Remember that guy,

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole moment where he's asked, did you order the code? Read?

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's the build up in the whole movies that

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a very watchable movie, even though it's really not

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that interesting if you think about the storyline. But anyway,

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it's okay, I've watched it many times. Did you order

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the quid pro quote? That is the question that I

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>suppose we're dealing with now. Even though before we get

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>into the thick of this, before we get down into

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the weeds, let's keep in mind. What have I been

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>telling you all along. I don't care if there was

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a quid pro quo investigating the twenty sixteen election Ukraine, Shenanigans,

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden and Bresma, is all legitimate for the president to request.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I do not care. I don't know how. There is

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>no statutory infringement here. If they don't like how the

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States uses his powers and his

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>constitutional authority, that's what elections are for. That's not what

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>impeachment is for. There is no abuse here. Just because

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't like the thing that he asked about. That's

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not an abuse, right. But here we are being told

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is the moment that it all turns around.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the incident that we look at and we

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>think to ourselves, Oh my gosh, I simply can't handle

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>supporting this president anymore because of what I think. Maybe

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>an ambassador said to another ambassador who heard from a

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>guy who worked at the NSC, who talked to his brother,

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>who talked to a lawyer who talked to the whistleblower

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that Trump wanted an investigation of Barisma and Hunter Biden.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, so what I see I see here? And

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I ask from the beginning of You know, we can

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>argue about whether there was a quid pro quot and

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>how it's even possible to be upset over a quid

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>pro quo when nothing happened. The aid was not was

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not taken away from Ukraine, they got the money, and

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>there was no investigation started of the bidens. So what

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about even with but that that goes deeper,

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>that really plays the game from their side of the field,

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't particularly want to do that. Notice how

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they've gone back to quid pro quot because bribery didn't work.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That was what they were trying, bribery, and before that

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>it was an abuse of power, and before that it

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was a campaign finance violation, and after that it was

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a violation of the Administrative Procedures Act according to the

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Ninth Circuit of Appeals. I don't know changing it every day.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>If you have a real case to make against somebody,

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't change the charge every day. Well, today this

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is pulling better, so we'll just say this thing. Tomorrow

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that one might be pulling better, so we'll say that thing.

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You have more testimony today, Ambassador Sonlon. I was watching

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it this morning. The guy actually kind of reminds me

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of the insurance salesman from Groundhog Day, Ned Ryerson. Oh hey, buddy,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he bought whole life blah beady blah health insurance from me,

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>remember from Groundhog Day? Or Bill Murray hugs the guy

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>ned Ryerson. Anyway, it's Almond just kind of reminds me

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of that actor. Very good comedic actor, by the way.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That guy was fantastic in that role. So all right,

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we got this solon, Let's dig in this together, because folks,

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is it's wall to wall. The journals are

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all fired up about this. They think this really matters

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>so much they really want to talk about it. It's okay,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's going to go on for like

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>another twelve hours today, I mean, was endless yesterday, and

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>then we'll get into some other components of this narrative

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>also some other things talking about there's a Democratic debate tonight.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if anyone wow, I don't know if

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>anybody really cares, But there's a Democrat debate tonight. Mayor

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Pete is surging. Maybe Mayor Pete is the Democrat savior

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that they have been waiting for, at least in terms

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of their primary campaign. May Or Pete's way up in

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire, way up in highways. I'm just putting it.

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been telling you along, it's not gonna be Biden,

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>just like I've been telling you along, doesn't matter if

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a quid pro quo, stick with the buckster, I don't.

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to do a lot of corrections here

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on this show. Oh I was way Sam tonight. I

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was way off. So Sondlin, let's get to what he

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>has to say. This is all about whether the storyline

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>today they want you to take away from this. I'm

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna distill down for you, and this is, I hope

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>why one of the reasons why I listened to this show.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I will distill down for you everything that is said

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>over you know that has that has been said today

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and was said yesterday, over the course of Lord knows

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>how many hours of testimony into the very simple narratives.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats are then going to try to force free,

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>try to ram down the throats of the American public

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring about the outcome of at least a change

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in public opinion that will politically disadvantage Trump going into

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>reelection and maybe in their while this dreams perhaps get

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans in the Senate to start to go along

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>with the possibility of removal, but I don't think. I mean,

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that's just it's just not going to happen. I think

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats have never really even thought about what the

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>implications would be if they removed Trump in that manner,

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>after the leveraging and the manipulation of the deep state,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and all the dishonesty not just from the media, but

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>from very senior Obama appointees trying to get an investigation

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and successfully getting investigation of the president going based on lies,

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>based on the abuse of power that was seen there.

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>If they managed to remove Trump from office, I would

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>lose all faith in the American political system, and a

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of us who really do believe in this country

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in the constitution, would very quickly understand this place to

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be under direct threat, that the institutions that we have

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>grown up with and that have we have defended, in

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>some cases, for many of you defended with your lives

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>by serving the armed forces, that they are corrupted and

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps corrupted beyond repair. Democrats are so shrill, they shriek

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so loudly with their hatred of Trump They don't seem

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to understand what the implications would be of getting what

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they want if they really remove this president based on

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 1>this based on a phone call that a lot of

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>people heard, and we'll get into this didn't think was

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, and based on a policy dispute that

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't lead to anything. And I mean, what they really

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>believe that will just go that that things will return

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to normal after that. I think that's one of the

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>fundamental fallacies that the left indulges for itself, is that

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>they that they'll be able to pretend this whole Trump

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>thing never happened. And we're going to go back to

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a point where the elite media, the Libs, the Democrats

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>could just sort of pat people on the heads and

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>say this is the way this system is, this is

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 1>the way the system in our government works. And a

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of Republicans, of course going along with them, don't.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of machine GOP that needs to be

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>swept away. But then that brings me to the storyline today.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The one thing they're trying to get everybody to believe

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or to hear so many times that it will influence

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and affect their judgment, and that will change minds about

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the President of the United States. Did everybody know Mulvaney

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and Pompeo and well, at least everybody in the Trump's

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>inner circle and Trump's inner circle, because we had a

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of testimony as from senior NFC guys. I will

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>say it's Vulker and this other guy, Morrison. They're square

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>away dudes. They kind of remind me of some of

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the individuals that I worked with at the CIA in

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of their demeanor, in terms of their approach to

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.839
<v Speaker 1>their jobs, in that they were really spot on, They

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>really know their brief They I thought they were impressive

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>under that pressure, and you weren't really aware of what

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their politics were. I even though I forget the name,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but the aide depends yesterday. I don't think that she

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>showed up as a We know who the partisans are, right,

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we know who the partisans are in this whole process.

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean Vinman and I love seeing yesterday. You know

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you had on Twitter Rob O'Neill, who's a Fox contributor

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>guy I know a bit and has has never been

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>shy on the Twitter, just saying all you need to

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>know about Vinman. You found out when he insisted on

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>being called lieutenant colonel. People, people who serve, they don't

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>flex like that because they don't have to unless they're

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to prove something, trying to do something a little weird.

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So I thought that was that was a noteworthy incident.

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>But we know who the partisans are, and we know

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>who the people are heard just showing up and telling

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what they know about this. And the fact that Adam

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Schiff provides presides over all of this tells you really

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>all you have to know about the legitimacy and the

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>decency and the fairness of the proceeding, which is that

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>there is none. But okay, you're supposed to believe that

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Mulvaney knew that Pompeio knew that everybody knew that the

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>President had drawn a line in the sand about an

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>investigate getting dirt on his political opponents. That's what they

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we say, which I would note is a distortion, an

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>intentional distortion of what has even said in the phone call.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>On the phone call in question, can you find out

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about what happened here? I've heard bad things. Is not

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the same as manufacture lies about my opponents so that

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I can feed them to the press. That is what

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats did, by the way, with the dossier paid

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for by the DNC, using foreign sources, running into the

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fires accord, corrupting the top of the DOG and the

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>FBI under Obama. So they already know all about that,

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>They know how to do that. That's not what happened here.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>They keep saying, get dirt on your political opponent. Is

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>there dirt? Are they are? They taking it as already

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>established that there must be. So the only reason you'd

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>ask for dirt is if there is dirt. So I

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>guess the Biden situation Ukraine is perhaps shadier than they've

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>been willing to admit up to this point. That's an interesting,

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>an interesting admission that I don't think they intended. They

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>keep saying this though, I'll get dirt on the opponent,

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong and I will not veer from this.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Nothing will change my mind about this, because it's so

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>obvious when you think about it. There's nothing wrong with

0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>requesting a look from a foreign counterpart at what happened

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty sixteen election. There are active DJ investigations

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>right now about that matter. The Democrats all they could

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about for over two years was that, but they

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>had they were in control of that and they knew it.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>They had Weissman, their little attack guy going after Trump

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>with all those little Democrats. So they were fine with

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>investigations then. But now the shoe is on the other foot.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Now the other side maybe gets to take a look

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>under the hood and see what's going on. H okay,

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But we're told that there was a quid pro quo,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that the president's top advisors all knew about this, and

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that is Sonlin's position, Except there's one problem with that.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>As he is saying this, don't looks Sonlin is a

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is another example. Maybe we shouldn't a

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>point ambassadors based on how much money they're raised for presidents.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But that is what ends up happening. This guy who

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>was ambassador to EU, he's a hotelier and you know,

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>he is a Trump pointe who raised money for Trump.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So Trump doesn't appoint the best people. Never gonna change

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>my mind on that. Trump Trump does not have the

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>best people. I don't hear him say that anymore because

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't. He does not have good instincts about human beings.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just real good instincts about politics, good instincts about

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>fighting back against the opposition. But when it comes to

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>picking the best people, I mean, I'm sitting here in

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>my White House Press Secretary Trumpster, you're missing out. But

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem with Sonlin's point of view on all this. Please, producer, Mark,

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>would you play twenty six from this morning's hearing. Do

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you have any reason to doubt Ambassador Taylor's testimony, which

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>he said was based on his meticulous contemporaneous notes. President

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump never told me directly that the AID was conditioned

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on the meetings. The only thing we got directly from

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Juliani was that the barissima in two thousand and sixteen

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>elections were conditioned on the White House meeting. The AID

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>was my own personal you know guests, based again on

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>your analogy two plus two equals for so you didn't

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to President Trump. When Ambassador Taylor says that that's

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>what you told him, is that your testimony here? My

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>testimony is I never heard from President Trump that aid

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was conditioned on an announcement of elections. So you never

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>heard those specific words, correct, right, but never heard those words.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So the president draws, we are to believe just follows

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>through just applot logic. Forget about it Akham's razor, my man,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just go to it this way, the President draws this

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>line in the sand, you must do these investigations. You must.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But nobody has ever told this in a meaningful and

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>straightforward way. Nobody his policy chain of command seems to

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>remember the President saying that this must happen or else.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he said he wanted them investigate me. It was important. Maybe,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know the whole thing, here's the quid pro quo.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Nobody remembers being told us. And somehow the investigations didn't happen,

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and there were no consequences from the investigations not happening.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So if this was a quid pro quote, it was

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the worst one anyone has ever come up within history.

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is why you can't believe the narrative that

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to feed you on this one. You can't

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>believe the story they're telling you. Don't be a quid

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>pro quot, Schmo. Don't listen to the fake news on this.

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats fake outrage that President Trump used his own

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>channel to communicate with Ukraine. Or remind my friends on

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the aisle that our first president

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>George Washington directed his own diplomatic channels to secure a

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>treaty with Great Britain. If my Democratic colleagues were around

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in seventeen ninety four, they'd probably want to impeach him too. Yep,

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>probably would. This is something that has left out of

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the feverish media coverage. Oh my gosh, Trump and the

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>abuse of power and all over. Really, Oliver sat Biden,

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do this guy. I think he's seventy

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>eight years old today, by the way, and not going

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to be there their primary victor. But the president can

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>appoint people to act on his behalf and foreign policy.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Presidents have done this, as Devin Nun has pointed out.

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>But you don't hear that. There's always this talk of

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the unofficial channels. Rudy Giuliani is skulking around in corners

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and just you knowing, wringing his hands and just how

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>can I, how can I undermine policy? He's a policy

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>emissary of the President of the United States. The President's

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do that. Presidents allowed to conduct secret diplomacy,

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>is allowed to have people doing diplomacy in his behalf

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>present is allowed to do this. Folks. Media doesn't want

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to tell you that ah, but as predictable as night

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>follows day the better On CNN Witness implicates Trump, Oh

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, implicates him in what ask that question? What

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.239
<v Speaker 1>is the crime? What is there an anti quid pro

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>quos statute? Because all foreign policy is based on quid

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>pro quos all the time. Their entire case hinges on

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the public understands the request. It's not

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a demand, it wasn't enforced. The request for

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a look from a foreign counterpart into issues of concern

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to this country, including twenty sixteen and whether there was

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>corruption going on in Ukraine and whether that corruption directly

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>touched on the Biden relationship in Ukraine. Is that a

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>legitimate request or not. I'm here to tell you it

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is a legitimate request. Do not listen to what they

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are trying to feed you. Oh my gosh, getting dirt

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on his opponent? Is that what he said? Did Trump say, Hey,

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>can you guys just give me give me something? Just

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>makes have one of your guys rite up a memo

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>about how Hunter Biden took a duffel bag full of

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>cash under the table to tell his dad not the

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get the prosecutor fired or whatever it was. Oh,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, I've heard bad things. Can you look it?

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Can you look into this and get us some answers

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on the situation now in a crowd strike, the Ukrainian

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>server situation that is perhaps not as strong a case,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>that's not territory that is quite as valid for this,

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But the twenty sixteen election in Ukraine over all is

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>very valid, my friends. And I will get into why

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pose this question to you, and I will

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>return to it in a moment. But and byron Yorke,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>who is just he's just this understated, steady hand in

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>writing about this and covering this issue. Who just he

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>lets his writing, He lets his thoughts do the talking

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>for him. He's not a lot of bluster. He's not

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>running around calling people out. He's just like, what about this?

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>How about that? Anyone want to take a look at this?

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And he's very, very consistently I think, insightful on these

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>matters of not just impeachment, but Russia collusion and all

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it. I mean, there's a whole crew

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Andy McCarthy, Byron York, Molly Hemingway, I mean, these people

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>have been correct on this all along. Which I think

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>should matter, and ones CNN and MSNBC keep putting these

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>people on TV or are like, oh my gosh, any

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>day now the walls are closing in on no false,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not true. It wasn't happening, but it was I

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>suppose good for ratings, good for ratings at the time.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But I would want to take you to a piece

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that Byron has written where he goes through what if

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump is right about Ukraine? They just hold that thought

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>for him because I have to get a little more

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of this testimony today on what they're saying, Oh qui

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>pro quo They're back to this now because sounds shady,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that the White House and the

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have made a rhetorical mistake by saying there was

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>no qui pro quote. Mick mulvaney was actually right, but

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it was counter the narrative the White House was putting

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>out at the time. He was right when he said

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the quit pro quos happened all the time in form

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the way he said it wasn't excellent. But

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the truth is that Mick mulvaney was more on target

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>here because quit pro quos aren't something that foreign policy

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just have it's a it's not a bug, it's

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>a feature. It is central to how you do this.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So if the President has a valid a valid request,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>or a valid national interest, or just an valid interest

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for it for the administration of the in the executive

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>branch of the United States government, he is allowed. There's

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing improper with him asking about that matter. There's nothing

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>improper with him requesting more information or even an investigation

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>from a counterpart about that. You you must remember this

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>because they want you to. They want you to forget

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>all about that aspect of this debate and just skip

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>right too. Well, if he conditioned aid for the you know,

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>for the Ukrainians based on whether they would look into

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>his political rivals. Did did President Trump make Hunter Biden

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>take fifty thousand dollars a month while daddy was running

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy in Ukraine? No? He did not. Is that

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>a legitimately shady and perhaps even corrupt arrangement? Yes, it is.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Have far less credible and serious things been investigated ferociously

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>by Democrats over the course of the two year Special Counsel,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>as well as you know, everything else they throw to

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this president. Of course, of course, look at the way

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>they went after the Stormy Daniel hush money hush money payments,

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>which they were trying to say might have been a

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>non criminal campaign finance violation. That that's what they're gonna

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>go with. It's it's it's mind boggling. There is plenty

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of reason to look into whether there was a corrupt

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>situation between the Bidens and Barisma in Ukraine. It is

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just reality. Everyone can pretend like, no big deal, it's

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>not illegal. Well it's a big deal because it is unethical.

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It was gross. That's established. What happened was gross. Hunter

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden is an imbecile. He was getting paid fifty grand

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a month because of who daddy was, because daddy had

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of power in your name. The daddy in

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this case, Joe Biden, was acting on behalf of the

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration, who was your president and my president at

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the time. He was acting on behalf of the American people,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>carrying that weight, carrying that power. And there was at

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>least the appearance of corruption. So why can't we look

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>into this and find out if there was more than that?

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>How could we know if there was something explicitly illegal, Yes,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a quid pro quo of corruption unless we asked our

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>counterparts and found out more about what was happening here.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They just wave all of this away. I tell you,

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to see here. Everything is fine. Joe Biden,

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden, never have an error in judgment like that.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, Hunter Biden, the drug addict who got kicked

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the Naval Reserves as a public affairs officer

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>within six months of getting his commission because of who

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>his dad was for failing a drug test for I

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>believe it was crack cocaine. That guy would never have

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>an error of judgment that would implicate the Vice president

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. No, of course not. How stupid

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>do they think we really are? Unfortunately quite stupid, it seems,

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because at least today they believe they're winning. They're cheering,

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>they think they finally got Trump. They're finally going to

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.959
<v Speaker 1>hammer this whole thing until we give up and Trump

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is in real trouble. Here is part of what Solomon

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>said this morning. Play twenty three producer Mark Everyone was

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in the loop. It was no secret. Everyone was in

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>armed Via email On July nineteenth, days before the presidential call,

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>as I communicated to the team, I told President Zolenski

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in advance that assurances to run a fully transparent investigation

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and turn over every stone were necessary in his call

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump on July nineteenth, in a WhatsApp message

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>between Ambassador Taylor, Ambassador Volker, and me, Ambassador Volker stated,

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>had breakfast with Rudy this morning. That's Ambassador Volker and

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Giuliani teeing up call with your mac monday that

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>senior Advisor Andre yourmack must have helped. Most important is

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for Zolensky to say that he will help investigation and

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>address any specific personnel issues if there are any. None

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of that is illegitimate to me at all, assuming if

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that's all true, which still seems a little bit hazy.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not even arguing with the truth of it

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as a necessary defense of Trump. I'm just saying, even

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if all that is true, Yeah, Ukraine's like the most

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>corrupt country on planet Earth. The son of the vice

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>president is getting fifty thousand dollars a month. There are

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors getting fired who are supposed to be rooting out corruption.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>There's all kinds of shenanigans which I will get into

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of Ukrainian government officials publicly, and this is on the

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>record speaking out against Trump during the election, but no

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>investigations all of a sudden, Democrats, you know, investigations are kryptonite.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats are vampires, and investigations are the sunlight coming

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>out catching on fire. What's wrong with finding out what

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>happened here? I thought they love finding out what happened.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>We just went through a two and a half year

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>long special counsel debacle that in the end told us,

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe some stuff happened with the obstruction of

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the investigation, but really the investigation never needed to happen

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>because there was no Trump Russia collusion. Oh, that investigation

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was totally legitimate, totally necessary. Though it is not what

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a baudism to look at these issues and say, hold

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on a second, when you have this other concern, when

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>there was another situation like this, did you apply the

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>principle equally? Are democrats applying principles and rule of law

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and expectations of government officials equally to both sides? If

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>someone says, yes, there are moron, that's where we are. Clearly.

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>The principle, the regulation, the interpretation, the ethical expectation is

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>changing every day depending on who well, is this going

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to affect the Democrats? It's going to affect a Republican.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Is Trump the person that's going to get in trouble

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>because of this? Or is somebody that we like as

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats going to get in trouble because of this? And

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that's all the matter. Ambassador Taylor in a WhatsApp message

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to Ambassador Sonland Taylor, as I said on the phone,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with a political campaign, Sonland, Bill, I believe you're incorrect

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>about President Trump's intentions. The President has been clear, no

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quos of any kind. The President is trying

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>transparency and reforms that President Zelenski promised during his campaign.

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I suggest we stop the back and forth by text.

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>If you still have concerns, I can recommend you give

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Kenna or s a call to discuss them directly. Thanks.

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>What what so? As the Ambassador Solan saying no qui,

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the President has said no quid pro quos. If a

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of little confused bureaucrats running around in circles worried

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about you know who's in charge of of their portfolio,

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and who as the directear of the president, and who's

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing most effectively on foreign counterparts. I know how all

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>these like State Department people talk, you know, circle the

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>loop and circle back and close the loop, and you

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>know all this stuff, all this bureaucrats they speak and

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time. If they were confused about the president's intentions,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's on them. And if Rudy Giuliani was running around

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>throwing elbows and that ruffled some feathers, and maybe some

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>people got confused about what he wanted, or maybe Rudy

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>went a little rogue. I like Rudy, but that's on him. Otherwise,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.959
<v Speaker 1>I need someone to explain to me how something that

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>would need to be as clear for it to have

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>any impact as a quid pro quo, you do this

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or else. We have all these people talking about this,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but there was no real establishment of what was supposed

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:58.959
<v Speaker 1>to be done, and there never wasn't or else. And

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>even if those things were true, I said here and

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I tell you fine, he's a president of the United States.

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Keep hearing people say, well, you know, the president was

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>going against the interagency consensus. The president wasn't wasn't conducting

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the foreign policy of the United States. No, he he

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is when the President says, this is the foreign policy

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of the the United States, it is the foreign policy of

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States. That's what the Libs and the deep

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Staters and the mainstream media don't I believe. I just

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>asked him an open ended question, mister chairman, what do

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas and theories and this and that. What do you want?

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And it was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>not in a good mood, and he just said, I

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>want nothing. I want nothing, I want no quid pro quote.

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell lives Lenski to do the right thing, something to

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that effect. I want nothing, tells Lenski to do the

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>right thing. That that's what the president. You know. I

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>know this president is mercurial and his mind a lot

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and everything else. But maybe there was just some confusion

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about what was real here. Maybe there was some confusion

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>about whether the president what the president's real intentions were.

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Here is one of the problems we run into Democrats.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And you see this not just in this impeachment mess,

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but you see it in a new legal jurisprudence that

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>democrats apply to this president and only to this president,

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>where it no longer matters if what he did is

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>strictly speaking, within his power or legal or constitutional. They

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>decide because they can see into his heart, they understand

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>his intentions, they know who he really is on the inside.

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They decide that it is de facto illegitimate because Trump

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is doing it. Perfect example of this would be with

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the so called Muslim ban. Turn out, the Supreme Court said, yeah,

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you can. You're allowed to ban people from these countries

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that your president. The statute that Congress wrote that says

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you can do this, and you can just do it.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>It's up to the president's discretion. They don't think this

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>president is allowed to have presidential discretion because they don't

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>accept that he's really the president. That's what is also

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>playing out through this whole debate over what was going

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on in Ukraine and what he said. And you see,

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>even if the president is legally speaking a lot which

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>he is allowed to tell a foreign counterpart, Hey, can

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you look into this issue? I want answers that is

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the sum total of what action occurred. Can you look

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>into the following thing twenty sixteen, You know Burisma and

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and the Bidens. He is completely legally entitled to

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. There is no legal prohibition against any of this. That.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it would be bad for Joe Biden if

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that they found real corruption involving his

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>son or something. Doesn't mean that Trump doesn't have that

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>authority anymore. Oh but they just take it. The left

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and the Libs take it to a special place where

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>because Donald Trump is the one making the request, it

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is inherently illegitimate because he is bad. He is evil,

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Orange Man, bad and evil. That's all. Everything else is

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>just trying to, you know, put more more adornments and

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>babbles on the tree, so to speak. And I'm just

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to add meat to the bone. I haven't used

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the word babbles in a long time. I don't know

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>where that came from. All right, team, let's go deep

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>down the rabbit hole here for a second together. What

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>if Trump was right about Ukraine. This is an analysis

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that Byron Or has put out from the Washington Examiner,

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and it just lays out what I have, what is

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially an argument or at least information data points that

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>bolsters what I've been saying all along to you. Which

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is that looking into the Bidens and Ukraine and Barisma

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is an entirely legitimate exercise. In fact, it would be

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>legitimate from my perspective, to have the Department of Justice

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>look into those matters. Which if Trump really wanted to

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just go after Biden as aggressively as possible, he could do, right,

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he could say, you know, look, I need the attorney

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney general. People would say, oh, would ever publicly

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>do this? I mean, tell the Attorney General. I want,

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I want answers about what happened in Ukraine, look into it.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Open the investigation. There is no special immunity from investigation

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for Senator for issues that touch upon Senator Joe Biden

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>or his family. There's certainly no immunity for investigation as

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>far as Libs are concerned. When it comes to Trump,

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they claim there's immunity from prosecution, right, and that's what's

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>been said now as well by the White House. We'll

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>see if that's true. They would love to bring charges

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>against him. But let's just go over some of the facts. Yesterday,

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I read to you from that Politico article and that

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>political article, and that was at a time when there

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>was a belief that Hillary Clinton was definitely going to

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be the president, and Obama's foreign policy apparatus was tightly

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 1>enmeshed in situations going on in Ukraine and his ambassadors,

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>his appointees, Obama's we're running foreign policy in that country,

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>and political did this story though, on how there were

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>people at the Ukraine embassy, employees of the Ukrainian government

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>who were trying to be helpful to their American and

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.879
<v Speaker 1>in this case under a Democrat administration counterparts, to give

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>information damaging that is damaging to President Trump, specifically information

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about Paul Manafort and his dealings in Ukraine. But that,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>my friends, would be for an interference in an election,

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it. This is what we've always been told that

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>even if, for example, nothing was exchange in a meeting

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>between Donald Trump Junior and Jared Kushner and all the

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>rest at Trump Tower, just sitting down and listening to

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody who said they had information about Hillary Clinton that

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they said that was treason at one point, which is insane,

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, These people are nuts. But I got

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to put that aside for a moment. So the political

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>story still stands. There were journalists at that time who

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>were willing to look into this and find out that

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there were Ukrainian government officials that seem to want to

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>help Hillary, and we should know about that. We should

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>also know if those Democrat appointees in the State Department

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>apparatus were perhaps even not just happy to try to

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>get that information. But we're giving them instructions, collection requirements,

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>if you will, saying hey, go get this for me,

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Go get that for me. First up Byron new York's

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>piece here government Minister's attack. During the summer of twenty sixteen,

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>candidate Trump was under constant criticism for being insufficiently critical

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of Russian President Vladimir Putin. From Ukraine's perspective, Trump's Crimea

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>statements were linked to the presence of Paul Manafort in

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign. First hired in March of twenty sixteen

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to organize delegate support, Manaport was promoted to campaign chairman

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in June. Trump's comments on Crimea set off a strong

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>reaction in Ukraine. Some high ranking members of the Ukrainian

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>government took to social media in an attempt to influence

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>as best they could the US presidential race. Arzin Avakov,

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>at that time, the Interior Minister, tweeted that Trump was

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a quote clown, and added that the Republican candidate was

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>quote an even bigger danger to the US than terrorism.

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the Interior minister of Ukraine. Oh yeah, yeah, that

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like somebody has something to say. On Facebook, Avakov wrote,

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the shameless statement of you President candidate Donald Trump on

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the possible recognition of crimea as Russia is a diagnosis

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of a dangerous outcast. He is dangerous both for Ukraine

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and the US to the same extent, an outcast bowing

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>down to Putin's dictatorship cannot be the guaranteur of democratic

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>freedoms in the US and the world. Avacov suggested Manaphort

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was responsible for Trump's position. Where will Manafort take Trump,

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Avacov asked. He completed the post by adding a photo

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of a mural in Vilnius portraying Trump and Putin in

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a passionate kiss, which is popular in hashtag resistant circles

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world. End quote here from this Byron York

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>piece in the Washington Examiner. Okay that no, remember what

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we're establishing here is the context the environment in twenty

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>sixteen in Ukraine and Kiev, which everyone says, now I

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>used to be Kiev, right, But ever now all the

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>cool kids say Kiev, just like no one says the

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine now ever knows it's just Ukraine was in Kiev

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 1>at the embassy there. What were the sentiments like of

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the government before Zelenski came in? Right? What what was

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>going on in this Ukrainian regime at the time. And

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the answer is that you had very, very top figures

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>who were decidedly openly anti Trump and worried about Trump.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>And not just they didn't like him, but they were

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>worried about a Trump presidency because I mean the recognition,

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, of Crimea's legitimate, that would be an enormous

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>slap in the face to Ukraine. They would completely freak

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>out about that. And so you start thinking, we'll hold

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>on a second. Explain to me, then, the lengths that

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>these different Ukrainian politicians and ministers and officials would be

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>willing to go to to prevent an American president from

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>winning a US election that could result in a cutoff

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>of the aid that we've all been told is so

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>near and dear to the Ukrainians and fighting against the Russians,

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a friendly voice for Putin and recognition of Crimea none

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of those things, by the way, I ended up being true,

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>which also makes one think how much of the perception

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of these Ukrainian officials was driven by Democrat Obama administration

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>appointees and employees in Ukraine, Americans who were telling the Ukrainians,

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:45.399
<v Speaker 1>if Trump wins, you guys are screwed. I'm just I'm

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just putting we're working through this together. Okay. So there's

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.799
<v Speaker 1>clearly motive. And we already have one individual here, the

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Interior minister not sting, you know, not a coffee boy

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that no one's ever heard of, Okay, the Interior Minister

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine saying that Trump is a huge danger and

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>it's terrible and he's awful. M interesting back to this

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Byron York piece. At about the same time, a former

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>prime minister arsny yat sen Yuk it's a fun name

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to say, made the case that Trump's statement on Crimea

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and Putin made his campaign fair game for Ukrainians. Trump's

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 1>comments quote go beyond any form of domestic political campaigning.

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Yet Saniok, Yet, Saniok wrote, an official candidate for the

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>United States presidential election, has challenged the very values of

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the free world, civilized world order. And international law. This

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>guy's a former Prime minister of Ukraine. Let's be like,

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I imagine if you know, George W. Bush is writing

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that about somebody and they're like, oh, but there was

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>no anti sentiment from the government. M strange, isn't it.

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>What about Donald Trump? Oh? Sorry, what Donald Trump said

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>about crimea today? Yet, Sanioch wrote, might tamarrow extend to

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>some other part of the world, in Europe, Asia or

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Americas? And that makes it worrisome for everyone, for everyone,

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>including apparently perhaps employees of the Ukraine embassy, or rather

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>employees of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry working with and interacting

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>with Americans at the embassy in Kieth. Perhaps we wouldn't

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>really know, though, would we, unless we had a full

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>accounting of this, unless there was an investigation of this.

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Number two here environs list. The ambassador takes a position

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>at about the same time as a government minister and

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.799
<v Speaker 1>a former top official. We're taking to social media. Ukraine's

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>ambassador to the US, Valerie Chalie, wrote an op ed

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>published in The Hill. He used much more temperate language,

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>but he said that Trump's statements on I have raised

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>serious concerns in Kiev and beyond Ukraine, and they were

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 1>in sharp contrast to the Republican Party platform, and they

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>were in contrast to bipartisan support for sanctions against Russia.

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 1>So the acting or the actual ambassador from Ukraine to

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the United States wrote or op ed at the Hill

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:26.919
<v Speaker 1>or I used to work saying, yeah, Trump's really bad

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff. Guys, We're really worried. M But I

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>mean we think that Ukraine in the government, there no

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>one working for it, tried to help Hillary. Right, That's

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the premise we're told, and anybody it's a debunk

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory to say otherwise. Okay. Then he goes into

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Leshenko and the black Ledger. He is a member of

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>former member or I think still a member of parliament.

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Leshenko now and quote. A few weeks after

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump's statements about Crimea in August of twenty sixteen, Leshenko

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>took on a new task. On August twenty eighth, the

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Financial Times publish a story Ukraine's leaders campaign against pro

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Putin Trump, which began for years. Sarah Leshenko, a top

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian anti corruption campaigner, worked to expose kleptocracy under former

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>president Victor Yannakovich. Now he is focusing on a new

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 1>perceived pro Russian threat to Ukraine US presidential candidate Donald Trump. Okay,

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:41.280
<v Speaker 1>how many more powerful government and anti corruption and anti

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Russian figures in the Ukrainian government apparatus do we have

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to find who are openly deeply opposed to Trump winning

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the presidency in twenty sixteen because of his Ukraine policy,

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>before we think well, maybe maybe Ukrainians did kind of

0:46:57.640 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want to help out Hillary a little bit. I'd be

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a little be a little strange, right, And then we

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>get to the mysterious Alexandra Chalupa. The Trump Ukraine bruhaha

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>has shed light on the activities of a woman named

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Chalupa, who worked in the Clinton White House and

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 1>later with Democratic National Committee. Chalupa's parents emigrated the US

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>from Ukraine, and she maintained strong ties to the US

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>American sorry to the American Ukrainian diaspora, and the US

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Embassy in Ukraine. This was, according to a twenty seventeen

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>January twenty seventeen article in Politico, Ukrainian efforts to sabotage

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump backfire. Politico reported in twenty fourteen Chalupa had a

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 1>client or that. In twenty fourteen, Chalupa had a client

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>interested in the Ukrainian crisis. As part of that, she

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 1>began looking into Manifort's activities in Ukraine. Julupa developed a

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 1>network of sources in Kiev and Washington, including investigative journalist,

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>government officials, in private intelligence operatives. When Trump was leading

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the Republican presidential nominating contest, Chalupa began focusing her research

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>on him. In March of twenty sixteen, Chalupa went to

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington and shared her concerns with

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador Chali and one of his deputies. Not long after,

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Chalupa spoke again with the DNC and, according to Politico,

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>with the d n c's encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to interview arrange an interview in which President

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Poroshenko would discuss Manaforts ties to Yannikovich. The embassy said no,

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but was helpful. According to Chalupa, my friends, this is

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of evidence. It's a lot of evidence of

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump feelings in Ukraine from the previous Ukrainian government

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and involving the previous administration in this country's political appointees

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and even some d nc APO researchers were any was

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:10.799
<v Speaker 1>any of this investigator has an even looked into any

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of this What really happened here? Here's a problem for Democrats.

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I am quite confident that if there was a real

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.359
<v Speaker 1>look into all of this, we would find out that

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrat channels somehow got information from Ukrainian counterparts about Paul Manafort,

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>who then became the single biggest target other than Trump,

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, but the single biggest criminal target of the

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:41.279
<v Speaker 1>entire Russia collusion probe. A lot of these people really

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hated Manafort, and people knew early on who the Manafort

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to be in a lot of trouble, which

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:48.919
<v Speaker 1>also why the Trump campaign fired him. That's a whole

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>other thing. So what would it mean though, for this

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>whole narrative about foreign interference and you know, getting involved

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:58.839
<v Speaker 1>in our elections if it turns out the Democrats themselves

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>were taking a thing of value, as they call it,

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>information about the opposing political campaign's campaign chairman from a

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>foreign government, getting oppo research from a foreign government, and

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:18.359
<v Speaker 1>then pretending like nothing ever happened. And then what would

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we think about all of the things they've said about

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Wiki leagues and Russia and Russian interference was Ukraine, And

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:31.399
<v Speaker 1>by Ukraine I mean was the previous Ukrainian administration which

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was clearly terrified of Trump's reported fondness for Putin in Russia,

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 1>which as we know, was not even an accurate way

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to describe a situation, but or describe what has happened

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly since he came into office. But was that Ukrainian

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 1>government trying to help Hillary win the election? Did the

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Democrats invite that help and did they know about it?

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you yet the answer is one hundred

0:50:57.560 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>percent yes, But I can tell you it certainly looks

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more than likely that would be the case. And if

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that is the case, all of this stuff that they

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we would have to go back and look

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:10.800
<v Speaker 1>again and everything that they have said about Russia collusion

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of it. And ultimately it would

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that Trump's request to look into twenty sixteen and

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>corruption and Barisma and the bidens, because that was all

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 1>swirling around at this time in twenty sixteen, that would

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have been one hundred percent acceptable, legitimate, and beyond any

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>reasonable doubt, the exercise of presidential power in a way

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that is of benefit not just to the President, but

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to the United States as a whole. So they're going

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to have to do everything they can to suppress this.

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have to do everything they can to

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:53.839
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we can't even investigate where all these

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:55.759
<v Speaker 1>data points I show you, we think that they're not

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>going to find out anything. I think that what are

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats things going to happen? The way won the

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Senate can call witnesses, can subpoena people. When they put

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Alexandra Chaloupa under oath, when they put Hunter Biden under oath,

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you reap what you sew. Democrats, it doesn't matter because

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.800
<v Speaker 1>right now you have a kangaroo court headed by little

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 1>shifty chef where we don't have lawyers, we don't have witnesses,

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't have anything. And yet I just got to

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 1>watch and the Republicans are absolutely killing it. They are

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>doing so well because it's a scam. It's a big scam.

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 1>They're doing something that the founders never thought possible, and

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the founders didn't want, and they're using this impeachment hoax

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for their own political gain to try and damage the

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party and damage the president. But it's had the

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>opposite effect, because you've seen the polls and we're now

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the highest. I'm the highest I've ever been in the polls.

0:52:56.800 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't hear that on television because the news that

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are the same. But that's the story. I

0:53:03.760 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly think the President is right that it's a scam.

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>But I want to bring in my friend David Harsani.

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>He is a senior writer at National Review. Has got

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>great takes on this short form and long form. David,

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you coming back on the program. Always a pleasure,

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I think for having all. I mean, what are your takeaway?

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Salmon today, everyone on the left, all the

0:53:22.160 --> 0:53:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Democrats making a huge deal about this, which I want

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>your your overall. So what of where we are right

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 1>now in this impeachment mess? Well, I mean, I guess

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm of two minds. One is that it's very hard

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>for me to get excited about anything that's going on

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:44.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think everyone understands that Trump asked the Ukrainian

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>president to look into Biden's son. And if you think

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's an impeachable offense, you're for it. If if

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't, you're not. I don't think anything we're gonna

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:57.880
<v Speaker 1>hear is gonna change that basic story, right. The thing is,

0:53:57.920 --> 0:54:00.280
<v Speaker 1>people ask me, do you think it's impeachable offense, and answer,

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of course is yes. Anything that the House wants to

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>impeach for is an impeachable fence if they feel like

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>it didn't have the votes. The thing is a thing.

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Republicans feel like there are two sets

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of rules that we're living by, one for Democrats and

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one for them, and that Democrats have been trying to

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 1>impeach this president from day one, so they're trying to

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>overturn the election. I don't like the word coup, but

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what people feel rightly so in many ways, so

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of this is just political trying

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to weaken the president for twenty twenties not going to

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be removed, and it's kind of like we're just spinning

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 1>our wheels of wasting our time. And yet there are

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so many people that I see over at some of

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the cable that works, for example, who like to invoke

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the Founding Fathers. Nancy Pelosi is practically in tears when

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>she talks about how Solomon occasion this is. Do you

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>think that for most of the Democrat audience that all

0:54:56.120 --> 0:55:00.080
<v Speaker 1>this theater is intended for. Are they just happy and

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of eating the popcorn while they watch people skewer

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump on TV? Or do you think that they really

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 1>believe that this is a fair process. I mean, I

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>know I'm asking to kind of like assess mass opinion

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in a way, but but I'm just I'm just curious

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:16.439
<v Speaker 1>myself because I see this and I'm like, I don't

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's possible to be an intelligent person

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and hear about how the president should be impeached starting

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 1>right after the election, and then have all these different

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons why he should be impeached all along. But now

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this time around with Adam Schiff running this ridiculous like

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, make it up as you go along political process.

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Now this is all solemn and serious. All that other

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff was supposed to be forgotten. I just don't think

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:42.399
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. Fuck. I will speak for the people. I

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:46.760
<v Speaker 1>think that anyone with two praint cells does not believe

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is some sort of defense of a constitution.

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:54.839
<v Speaker 1>There is no constitutional imperative to impeache someone. Sure you

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can do it, but you know you have the same

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are who are doing everything, the counter to

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:03.719
<v Speaker 1>corrode the First Amendment, the Second, the fourth, the fifth

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to tenth telling me that they're protecting the Constitution by

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:10.320
<v Speaker 1>by impeaching Donald Trump. I hate to break this to everyone.

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big Donald Trump fan, but he has

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:15.759
<v Speaker 1>done He's not done anything worse, and he's probably been

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:19.640
<v Speaker 1>far better in protecting the Constitution than the presidents that

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have come before him. Whether he did it on purpose

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>or not, I don't really care that much, you know.

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 1>So you know, an Adam Schiff I think is the

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:31.720
<v Speaker 1>president's greatest friend. I mean, yeah, sometimes it's a criminal

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:34.720
<v Speaker 1>proceeding and sometimes you know, it's not a criminal proceeding,

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 1>depending on what they want to do and when they

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:39.799
<v Speaker 1>want to do it. It's all just so arbitrary that

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it just looks ridiculous. I mean, you watch I'm embarrassed

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to watch it, but not for the reasons Democrats think,

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and just embarrassed by the entire process. Just does seem

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 1>like a sham. I mean, I you know, you've got

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>these people who still cling to and you know, you

0:56:54.640 --> 0:56:56.880
<v Speaker 1>know my feelings about Jake Tapper, her Sani. I mean,

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>people like that. Though Don Lemon went on TV last

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>night and said that, you know, he's not a liberal

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>partisan democrat. I actually laughed. I mean, I don't mean

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was amusing. I laughed out loud as

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the funniest thing I've seen in a long time, you know,

0:57:09.440 --> 0:57:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Jake Tapper, Oh, this is the process and the I mean,

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are these people do they realize how clownish this is

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and how absurd they are, or or you know, I

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of wonder they think the audience expects them

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to go through this. Why not just say, well, yeah,

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't like Trump, but we don't want

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of him. I mean, everybody knows, right, No,

0:57:26.680 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>no one thinks that this is about anything other than

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>attacking Trump. Yeah, I mean, listen, the corruption of the media.

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And I don't say that as as a means of saying, oh,

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>oh look they're biased. I mean it's corrupt because it's

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not biased, it's just half truth or non truth.

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And CNN yesterday I saw the media guy with his

0:57:46.200 --> 0:57:50.320
<v Speaker 1>name Brian skeltering about finding the truth and digging for

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the truth. And you know, CNN, I can, off the

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:56.480
<v Speaker 1>top of my head come up with ten mistakes they

0:57:56.560 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>made during this Russia conspiracy hoax stuff that was like brutal,

0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and it all skewed in the same direction, and it

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>changed and had a huge effect and changed the way

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:08.320
<v Speaker 1>people thought about the presidency, especially on their left. They

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's all legitimate. Still, that's a that's a serious

0:58:11.800 --> 0:58:16.800
<v Speaker 1>corruption I think of of media. And you know, sometimes

0:58:16.800 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to write listen, I don't want to when

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm tweeting. I want to write lol over stuff, but

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:23.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'm literally laughing out loud at what they're saying.

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, that's a bit of a cliche these days.

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, but I think that that is really

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the rational response to a lot of a lot of

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what we were seeing right now. It's just I mean,

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know Adam Schiff saying, for example, he doesn't know

0:58:36.160 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the identity of the whistleblower. I mean that is that

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is just this absolutely this I uh, you know, I

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:47.880
<v Speaker 1>worked in a newspaper, you know, the reported things. If

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we would always want there is zero reason for journalists

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not to mention the name of the whistle blower. It's zero.

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 1>They should be searching for that name. If the if

0:58:56.680 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the if this was a democratic uh administer stration, and

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Obama there was a whistle that they would be at,

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that name would be all over the place all the time.

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Everything he'd done since the second grade would be known.

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, I've seen. I've seen some you know, conservative

0:59:10.400 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>leading journalists, by the way, and some outlets too, who

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 1>all of a suddenly we can't say, you know, Eric

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Sharamella is reportedly the whistleblower. I look at them, I'm like,

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the anonymity thing for the whistleblower is

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:23.919
<v Speaker 1>is a fiction that's not even true. Even I believe

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post gave three pinocchios to shift on this thing.

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 1>There is no statutory anonymity that has to be enforced

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:34.120
<v Speaker 1>by everybody. Maybe if people say that you could go

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to maybe you'll go to prison for outing the whistleblower.

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:38.360
<v Speaker 1>They've got. These are the people that used to used

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to want to publish the Pentagon papers, published the Wiki

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:45.160
<v Speaker 1>League's trove of classified documents. I mean, I mean, I

0:59:45.200 --> 0:59:47.440
<v Speaker 1>look around. I mean, I really think I think that

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:51.560
<v Speaker 1>CNN and ABC News, for reasons that are even outside

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of this discussion we could talk about and Emison, I

0:59:53.840 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 1>think these places are an absurdity. Now, I really do.

0:59:56.360 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing if you think is a publication that

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not sure that that's the whistleblower, right, that's one thing.

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're not publishing it because you don't want to

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>out a whistle blower, that's ridiculous. As you just lay

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it out. It's not illegal because you know, Busfeed just

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>put the whole dossier online for people to read. It's

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not you know, it's ridiculous. More information, something that's positive

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and something we want in a democracy, and that's what

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the media is supposed to be giving us. Now. I

1:00:25.680 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>want everyone to go read your stuff, because I read

1:00:27.400 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>your stuff, which is why I have you on the show,

1:00:28.880 --> 1:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not just because I like you. Nancy Pelosi is already

1:00:31.600 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>attacking the legitimacy of the twenty twenty election. That's up

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:38.439
<v Speaker 1>on nationalview dot com right now. Tell me about this one. Well,

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean she said yesterday, you know, Donald Trump tweeted something,

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but he had put you know, he didn't quote her exactly,

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so everyone dismissed what he said. But what Nancy Pelosi

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>said was we need to impeach Donald Trump. And I said,

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess remove him or the twenty twenty election is

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in danger. The integrity of the election is in danger.

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>She's already preemptively told us that Donald Trump runs and

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>way that the election will be, you know, not legitimate,

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>so legitimate. So every present election they loses a legitimate

1:01:07.640 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in some way, of course, but now we're preemptively saying

1:01:10.120 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be illegitimate. And I still don't understand

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>why it's corroding public trust and elections, which is what

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have been doing for a pretty long time in

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>various ways. And I think it's it's it's a dangerous

1:01:23.840 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, though not not that they'll care, But

1:01:27.280 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's what it's about. I mean, I mean a

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>few things. First of all, we all know the name

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the whistleblower, and we know the Democrats are playing

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>games by clinging to the fig leaf that we don't know,

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and the journals are running around playing dumb and it

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>does just prove what a dishonest sham this whole thing

1:01:41.840 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't also what a joke I think mainstream journalism is.

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>But but I gotta tell you, David, I think it's

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be kind of hilarious when this Ukraine impeachment

1:01:50.360 --> 1:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>thing kind of fizzles and then the House Democrats just

1:01:53.960 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and impeach Donald Trump anyway, based on a

1:01:57.840 --> 1:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>laundry list of like we just really don't like him,

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what's gonna happen. Yeah, you can have the obstruction

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of justice is that you can put whatever you want.

1:02:04.960 --> 1:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Did nothing that really makes me laugh out loud. Yeah, man,

1:02:07.520 --> 1:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that's great. These congressmen talk about the Ukraine and like

1:02:11.880 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>their voice cracks with emotion about how we're leaving our

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>friends and allies, you know, stranded, and the Russians are

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>coming and all of that stuff. They could not care

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>less about Ukraine. They didn't care about Ukraine when Obama

1:02:25.160 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't giving them lethal weaponry, when Obama was allowing them

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Russians to shoot down airplanes at you know,

1:02:31.360 --> 1:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Crimea and all of that stuff. It's an

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely it's an absolute joke. It doesn't make anything right

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>or wrong that's happening now, but it does show that

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>just the massive double standard and hypocrisy that's at work here. Well. Also,

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fascinating we have to keep hearing about

1:02:46.240 --> 1:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the risk that Trump ran by delaying the aid that

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was delivered, because man, those Ukrainians really need those javelin

1:02:55.160 --> 1:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>missiles and I sit here, I just want to bang

1:02:56.680 --> 1:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>my head against wall. I'm like, right, the things that

1:02:58.240 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Obama wouldn't give them and took away from Poland and

1:03:02.880 --> 1:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>check Republic and things like that, Right, I mean this

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that Obama was tougher on Russia. I listen. I

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think that it's a complicated issue. But the idea that

1:03:11.680 --> 1:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Obama was somehow tough on Russia and that Trump has

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>given Putin away, you know, given Europe to Putin is

1:03:17.680 --> 1:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is just only someone who's very silly or very you know,

1:03:21.560 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous would say something I mean in Russia as well,

1:03:23.960 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like maybe a trillion dollar economy. I mean, this is

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>not this is not the Soviet Union all over again too.

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that Russia looms so large in the minds

1:03:32.720 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of so many people now as this threat that's you know,

1:03:35.800 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>check your closet and look under your bed before you

1:03:37.640 --> 1:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>go to sleep at night. I think Putin's a bad guy.

1:03:40.600 --> 1:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about, reading about and involved in, and

1:03:43.240 --> 1:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>going back to even my days in the government, like,

1:03:45.000 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been very aware of the bad stuff that a

1:03:47.880 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>former KGB thug has been doing, stretching back to the

1:03:51.480 --> 1:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>fighting in Czechia. I mean, there's a lot of stuff,

1:03:54.000 --> 1:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like Russia's about to invade us tomorrow

1:03:57.560 --> 1:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and overturn our elections. Of all these things we hear

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I just think that they do

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the public a disservice by creating what is a true hysteria. Now,

1:04:04.720 --> 1:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean they really democrats now really believe that Russia

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is a mortal adversary United States. That's actually not true. No,

1:04:13.400 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean we have different geopolitical Yeah, of course we

1:04:15.880 --> 1:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have oppositional stuff with them, but right aims and stuff like,

1:04:18.720 --> 1:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no one, no, no, no serious person wants

1:04:21.280 --> 1:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to go to war with Russia over anything right now, right.

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's kind of a dangerous rhetoric

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that even when a Democrat becomes president is never going

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to follow through on. It's just it's just not reality.

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And I do love the history that created where I

1:04:37.400 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, my my parents you know, defected to run

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>away from the Soviet Union. But I get called like

1:04:42.600 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a Russian mole all the time, uh, you know, simply

1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>because I don't, you know, I defend Donald Trump. It's

1:04:49.400 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>just such a ridiculous position to put people in and

1:04:52.520 --> 1:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole debate has been sort of co opted by

1:04:55.680 --> 1:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous people like Max Boot or whatever, you know, who

1:04:58.200 --> 1:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are just so over the top and so silly. We're

1:05:01.000 --> 1:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep talking to to David. David Hole on one sec.

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Will come right back. All right, team, We've got David Harsani.

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Check out his piece. Nancy Pelosi is already attacking the

1:05:08.040 --> 1:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>legitimacy of the twenty twenty election. It's up on National

1:05:10.880 --> 1:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>view dot com. Now, m David, where where do you think?

1:05:16.040 --> 1:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I also, I want to ask you about the the

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrat election. I'm sorry, the democrat um? What do you

1:05:21.320 --> 1:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>call it? When they argue with each other? Debate? Thank you?

1:05:23.800 --> 1:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's happening tonight. That's not getting much attention. But first,

1:05:26.680 --> 1:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>just this impeachment thing. Where where do you see it

1:05:30.360 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>heading at this point? Because I really just believe, I mean,

1:05:32.880 --> 1:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the president I would bet a large sum

1:05:34.600 --> 1:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of money and I should find a place where I

1:05:36.000 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>could probably do that. They're gonna peach the president, doesn't

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>matter what anyone says. Yeah, I mean I can't. I

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine them backing out of that now and what

1:05:46.040 --> 1:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that would cause within their you know, the ranks of

1:05:48.880 --> 1:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>democratic activists and party activists and stuff. So I just

1:05:52.440 --> 1:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>don't see how they don't move forward on that. So

1:05:54.920 --> 1:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll impeach and I'm almost one hundred percent

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sure he won't be moved, and it's going to run

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for president and nothing really will change, and there might

1:06:05.040 --> 1:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be a slight I think there might be a slight

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>backlash to all of this, and we'll see about that.

1:06:10.800 --> 1:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But unless there's some new big piece of evidence that

1:06:14.560 --> 1:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>shows some kind of criminal wrongdoing, I just don't think

1:06:17.600 --> 1:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this change as much at all. I meanwhile, we have gridlock,

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which is my favorite form of government, so I'm pretty

1:06:23.400 --> 1:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>good with that. Yeah, it's amazing, isn't that while we're

1:06:26.120 --> 1:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>fighting about a phone call, an action that was not taken,

1:06:30.040 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that did not result in anything because there was no

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>action in a country I don't eat what five thousand

1:06:35.120 --> 1:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>miles away or something. I don't even I don't even

1:06:36.760 --> 1:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>know what as the crow flies, tistancy Ukraine is, and meanwhile,

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the country is at a time of relative peace, an

1:06:43.880 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>economy that is booming, on employment is super low. It's

1:06:46.840 --> 1:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing. What do you think about it? In that way?

1:06:48.720 --> 1:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>When you think about economic growth from twenty ten till now,

1:06:51.600 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been pretty great right on almost every way you

1:06:54.360 --> 1:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can measure. It's not perfect, obviously, and that those are

1:06:57.760 --> 1:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the years of gridlock. Nothing is getting done in Washington

1:07:01.000 --> 1:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>except for some good Trump stuff like rolling back regulations

1:07:04.160 --> 1:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and cutting some taxes, which I think helped this economy

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>despite what liberals tell you, and is is something that

1:07:13.960 --> 1:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that does you know, Trump has a Trump has less

1:07:17.640 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, headspace to make the economy growing, yet he's

1:07:19.880 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>still done and gets no credit for it, and that

1:07:21.440 --> 1:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>presidents get too much credit for the economy. But I

1:07:23.760 --> 1:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think Trump has been relatively good. Imagine if he didn't

1:07:26.640 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, engage in trade wars and stuff. But I

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to argue about that right now. Yeah, No,

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I look, I think that by the way, my theory

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is that Trump maybe, if he needs to do in

1:07:35.760 --> 1:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the election year, he said, let's just put this whole

1:07:37.920 --> 1:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>trade war thing on hold for a while. I think

1:07:40.120 --> 1:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that whether that's you know, short term long term, I

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>think that that would actually have a stimulative effect on

1:07:45.440 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy. I agree with that, though I do think

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that the whole standing up to China thing is something

1:07:52.480 --> 1:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that really endears him to many of his most you know,

1:07:55.040 --> 1:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>passionate supporters, But then again, most people will be there

1:07:57.240 --> 1:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>from no matter what he does. That's a good point.

1:07:59.360 --> 1:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But I will say that, you know, we had Gordon

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Chang on and what was it yesterday and he says

1:08:03.080 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's amazing how the consensus has flipped now, at least,

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>not not on whether the trade war is the right

1:08:07.480 --> 1:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thing or not, or good for the economy or not,

1:08:09.080 --> 1:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>but the consensus about China is a problem. Everybody now

1:08:12.240 --> 1:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is saying, oh, yeah, China actually was doing really bad

1:08:14.400 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff at administrations before Trump weren't doing anything about it. Yeah,

1:08:18.400 --> 1:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean, I think I can agree that

1:08:20.160 --> 1:08:22.479
<v Speaker 1>China was doing bad stuff, but I'm generally, you know,

1:08:22.640 --> 1:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>very I know you're a free trade but you're a

1:08:25.320 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>consistent fellow. But I will admit that, you know, it

1:08:29.360 --> 1:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really had the negative effect. It seems to me,

1:08:31.439 --> 1:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at least that I thought it would. So I think

1:08:32.880 --> 1:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that's that's something I need to concede. Um, we we

1:08:35.280 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have to, we gotta. I know, David, you probably have

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a life you have to leave. We're gonna keep you

1:08:38.479 --> 1:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to ask you about the elect I

1:08:40.520 --> 1:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>keep saying election. I'm sorry about the debate, the debate

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that is going to happen tonight, and also a little

1:08:47.400 --> 1:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>bit of what you see coming up in conservative circles

1:08:50.600 --> 1:08:53.599
<v Speaker 1>about capitalism. I don't know if it's if it's a

1:08:53.640 --> 1:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>capitalism or a heart that we're talking about here, or

1:08:55.800 --> 1:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a capitalism that that brings out the best in people,

1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but there would be some There's been some interesting discussions

1:09:01.400 --> 1:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>going on there. We're talking to David Harsani. Everybody National

1:09:03.600 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Review dot com check out his piece. Nancy Pelosi is

1:09:06.439 --> 1:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>already attacking the legitimacy of the twenty twenty election. And

1:09:11.400 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we're back in just a second here, all right, So

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of Harsagny pelooza today all the buck Sextit show.

1:09:16.160 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't talked to David Harsani in awhile he's

1:09:18.160 --> 1:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>National Review senior writer. I want to get your take,

1:09:20.640 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll just tell the audience what I'm what

1:09:22.560 --> 1:09:24.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking after we let you go and enjoy your

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>coffee and hang out the rest of the day. What

1:09:26.439 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are you expecting here for the Democrat debate tonight? I mean,

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the big story as I see it right now, is

1:09:32.400 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, Buddha Judge is like, it's like

1:09:34.360 --> 1:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Bouddha Judge is actually getting some traction in

1:09:36.439 --> 1:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>places where people have to pay attention. Yeah, I think so.

1:09:40.280 --> 1:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that that's also because a manifestation of

1:09:43.040 --> 1:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>concern within the Democratic Party about their candidates. They're looking

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>for someone a little more moderate. Who isn't you know

1:09:49.479 --> 1:09:51.759
<v Speaker 1>over seventy I guess, or isn't you know? It doesn't

1:09:51.760 --> 1:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>have all the faults of a long history. But the

1:09:54.560 --> 1:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is, no one really knows Mayor Pete very well.

1:09:56.840 --> 1:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think once you start pointing out his problems,

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>his city is not in great shape. His city, you know,

1:10:03.680 --> 1:10:05.519
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of problems there with race

1:10:05.560 --> 1:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and other stuff. So a really high murder rate. But

1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have a we're on a great station

1:10:10.800 --> 1:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>out in Indiana, and I talked to some folks when

1:10:16.040 --> 1:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I was out there recently for a visit, and I

1:10:19.280 --> 1:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, I was like shocked to hear that

1:10:21.280 --> 1:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>South Bend, Indiana has a really high murder rate per capita,

1:10:24.680 --> 1:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>right right, and the Pats some shootings where you know,

1:10:27.960 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>police shootings that are problematic, et cetera, et cetera. Now,

1:10:30.880 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>those are things Democrat Democratic voters care about. So I'm

1:10:35.160 --> 1:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure that this kind of popularity will last. But

1:10:37.439 --> 1:10:39.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe he will withstand it and be wonderful and move forward.

1:10:39.840 --> 1:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We'll see about that. I tend to

1:10:42.439 --> 1:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>think he's overrated. I find him to be a sanctimonious

1:10:45.439 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and annoying but you know, I don't really have my

1:10:47.400 --> 1:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>pulse on me. Well, I think you're right about the

1:10:49.160 --> 1:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctimonious thing. Especially when he's lecturing people on theology. I

1:10:51.880 --> 1:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>find that that really can't take it. I can't, I

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>can't take any handle it. He is really smug on

1:10:57.479 --> 1:10:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, and a lot of time, no, he's getting

1:10:59.760 --> 1:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>way beyond is knowledge based on that stuff. But I

1:11:02.600 --> 1:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sort of touch on how it seems that

1:11:06.000 --> 1:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party now more than ever, and this is

1:11:09.280 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 1>mostly through the prism of Warren and Berney's candidacies, but

1:11:13.640 --> 1:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there's just not just an open embrace

1:11:16.280 --> 1:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of socialism, but trashing capitalism in the most cynical and

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ignorant way is really popular among the Democrats these days.

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>It is, and unfortunately, I think it's getting to be

1:11:29.520 --> 1:11:32.479
<v Speaker 1>popular among some conservatives as well. I think what you

1:11:32.600 --> 1:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have is you know, so much success people have been afforded,

1:11:37.160 --> 1:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>so many freedoms and so many great things, that maybe

1:11:39.680 --> 1:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>new generations don't put that success into the context it's

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be in. And so I worry about that.

1:11:46.160 --> 1:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Though I have to say I'm slightly heartened that the

1:11:48.680 --> 1:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party sort of moved away from a Warren pretty

1:11:51.479 --> 1:11:55.479
<v Speaker 1>quick quickly once she embraced, you know, really big socialistic plans.

1:11:55.520 --> 1:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's still, I hope, at least a

1:11:58.080 --> 1:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>moderate center that doesn't want to fully you know, embrace

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:06.599
<v Speaker 1>that those sorts of ideas collectivist ideas or socialistic ideas, um.

1:12:06.640 --> 1:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, I think when you look at polling, young

1:12:08.840 --> 1:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>people are always more open to those ideas, and that's

1:12:11.280 --> 1:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's you know. I think there are a bunch

1:12:12.760 --> 1:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>of reasons I won't get into, but I think that

1:12:14.560 --> 1:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that's incredibly dangerous for us moving forward. Maybe the most

1:12:17.800 --> 1:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>dangerous I've been saying. And you know, of course, you

1:12:19.680 --> 1:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>should always be what one should always be careful with

1:12:23.680 --> 1:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>predictions that rely the predictions of a political nature where

1:12:28.200 --> 1:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you're certain. But I've just I just cannot fathom a

1:12:31.800 --> 1:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>future in which Joe Biden is actually the audience is

1:12:35.400 --> 1:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sick of me saying is I'm like, it's not going

1:12:36.800 --> 1:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to be Biden again? Are you do you do you

1:12:39.240 --> 1:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>really do you think it could be Biden? I mean,

1:12:40.760 --> 1:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>am I am? I am? I talking crazy talk. Let

1:12:43.800 --> 1:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>me ask you this. When Donald Trump was writing initially,

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>did you think he could win? No? No, absolutely not.

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I was sure he would not win. I mean, I've

1:12:54.160 --> 1:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>had to admit that many times. So me too, until

1:12:57.320 --> 1:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the last moment, until I saw that, until I saw

1:13:00.040 --> 1:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>at New York Times page with the little you know,

1:13:02.920 --> 1:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>lever going up. But when he won Florida, it was

1:13:05.600 --> 1:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like the entire world all of a sudden change. But yeah,

1:13:08.160 --> 1:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>everything changed forever. But um, but here's the thing that

1:13:12.240 --> 1:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a similar thing can happen here where you

1:13:14.280 --> 1:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of you have a right left divide

1:13:16.840 --> 1:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and people are sort of knocking each other out and

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if no one else sort of an outside or candidate,

1:13:22.400 --> 1:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And I doubt there's anything like that available Michael Bloomberg whatever.

1:13:25.280 --> 1:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that he has that kind of appeal.

1:13:27.520 --> 1:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I just don't see why the Democrats wouldn't

1:13:30.400 --> 1:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>land on what they think is the surest bet to

1:13:32.840 --> 1:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>win which would be Joe Biden. I think they overrate

1:13:36.120 --> 1:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>him as a politician because before Obama saved him, I mean,

1:13:38.800 --> 1:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>he was the Delaware senator. He wasn't He's lost time.

1:13:42.400 --> 1:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>How many times says he run for president two or

1:13:43.920 --> 1:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>three times. He's never been successful. I think he got

1:13:46.200 --> 1:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>like like two or three percent of the voting when

1:13:50.000 --> 1:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>he ran before. I mean he was I remember going

1:13:52.000 --> 1:13:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to see him speak in DC maybe in two thousand

1:13:54.520 --> 1:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and seven or two thousand and eight, you know, and

1:13:57.040 --> 1:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and that, and he was the he was there with

1:14:01.160 --> 1:14:03.599
<v Speaker 1>like cous he was like in Cucinach territory. It was like, oh,

1:14:03.640 --> 1:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the kind of also ran joke presidential candidates, right.

1:14:07.600 --> 1:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean he Obama picked him too, because he has

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>been around for a long time, and you know, he

1:14:13.040 --> 1:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>has a sort of are of white working you know

1:14:14.920 --> 1:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that he appeals to the white working class, regular normal

1:14:17.840 --> 1:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe and all of that stuff. But he's not a

1:14:20.240 --> 1:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>particular He's never been a particularly good politicians. He said

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:26.519
<v Speaker 1>a politician, he said crazy things throughout his entire career.

1:14:26.880 --> 1:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And no, we might not care about that anymore. But

1:14:29.000 --> 1:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's it's a fact. So um, I

1:14:32.280 --> 1:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think that he might win, but I

1:14:35.280 --> 1:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know that. I don't know that he's a shoe in.

1:14:37.400 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people think, you know, the

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are just going to roll over Trump. I just don't.

1:14:41.760 --> 1:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't say that. After the last election, I just

1:14:44.280 --> 1:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that it's true anymore. But I don't know why.

1:14:46.800 --> 1:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Who do you think? Who do you think could win?

1:14:48.240 --> 1:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Other than Biden. I feel like I still think that

1:14:51.439 --> 1:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna they'll go with Warren. I think that they'll

1:14:54.640 --> 1:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>excuse her ridiculous lack of policy math, and I think

1:14:59.800 --> 1:15:02.519
<v Speaker 1>that Elizabeth Warren gives them. They feel like it's a

1:15:02.560 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>cross between. You get a little bit of Biden, a

1:15:05.080 --> 1:15:06.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit of Burnie, and a little bit of Hillary

1:15:06.840 --> 1:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>all in one package. She really really hurt herself, right,

1:15:10.880 --> 1:15:13.479
<v Speaker 1>just fully jumping all in on the Medicare for all

1:15:13.560 --> 1:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>with a plan and everything else. It's like Obama. I

1:15:16.120 --> 1:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if people remember, but he was he was

1:15:18.200 --> 1:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in for he was in for socialized medicine right initially, right,

1:15:22.840 --> 1:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, and then he you know, he was able

1:15:24.280 --> 1:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to you know, massage those things and change his mind

1:15:27.160 --> 1:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and this and that. But once you have plans on

1:15:28.960 --> 1:15:31.559
<v Speaker 1>the book, and once you've taken this stand and you've

1:15:31.560 --> 1:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>even explained how you're gonna pay for it, et cetera.

1:15:33.760 --> 1:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Just seems like a really hard position to to sort

1:15:36.280 --> 1:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of moderate yourself on. And do you are you gonna

1:15:39.800 --> 1:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>watch the whole thing, by the way, And also do

1:15:41.120 --> 1:15:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you think that the debate at this stage even doesn't matter?

1:15:44.160 --> 1:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I am one hundred percent not going to watch the

1:15:46.120 --> 1:15:48.639
<v Speaker 1>debate at all. I would at all. I'm done. I've

1:15:48.640 --> 1:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>seen how many debates have they had her? I mean,

1:15:50.160 --> 1:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they still have ten candidates up there. It's a waste

1:15:52.120 --> 1:15:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of time, isn't it. I think it's too much. I

1:15:54.439 --> 1:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>mean I have to because I got to do the show,

1:15:56.000 --> 1:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I watch it so that my audience

1:15:58.160 --> 1:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to. But like if I were to my

1:16:00.240 --> 1:16:02.439
<v Speaker 1>own devices, no, I already know what all these people

1:16:02.439 --> 1:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>think about everything, because I've seen them for hours and

1:16:04.320 --> 1:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>hours and hours, and I've read the transcripts after I've

1:16:06.320 --> 1:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>watched it. It's annoying. Since the second debate, I'm like,

1:16:09.040 --> 1:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm never watching and them sitting here and I will

1:16:11.040 --> 1:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>probably end up watching some of it. But here's the thing,

1:16:13.080 --> 1:16:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think these debates matter that much. The last

1:16:16.720 --> 1:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>big moment of the only really big moment was Tulsi

1:16:19.120 --> 1:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>taking out Kamala Harris, right, and I don't know that

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:25.559
<v Speaker 1>there'll be another moment like that. So why do you

1:16:25.560 --> 1:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>think they hate Tulsa so much? By the way, because

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know she has some she's very left wing, but

1:16:30.040 --> 1:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>conservatives like myself are kind of like I kind of

1:16:33.240 --> 1:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like Tulsie. Even though I think she's bad on a

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of policy issues. She doesn't strike me as a

1:16:37.280 --> 1:16:40.719
<v Speaker 1>as an odious person. Why the why does the liberal

1:16:40.840 --> 1:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>establishment really, even not just the farm, Why do they

1:16:43.360 --> 1:16:45.559
<v Speaker 1>hate her so much? That's a good question. I mean,

1:16:45.560 --> 1:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that she is compelling in a way, and

1:16:48.800 --> 1:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, her foreign policy views seemed not far removed

1:16:52.360 --> 1:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>from what they used to be during the Bush administration

1:16:55.120 --> 1:16:56.639
<v Speaker 1>on the left and so on. So I don't really

1:16:56.680 --> 1:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>understand why they're so you know, so the I hate

1:17:01.800 --> 1:17:03.559
<v Speaker 1>her so much? My only thought is that they don't

1:17:03.560 --> 1:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>think she has a chance, and they feel like she's

1:17:05.479 --> 1:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>hurt people's chances. Who whoever it is that she's just

1:17:08.400 --> 1:17:11.599
<v Speaker 1>playing spoiler maybe yeah, yeah, she's just not mean enough.

1:17:11.880 --> 1:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>She's a Russian asset, so yeah, I really think it's

1:17:15.479 --> 1:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that she doesn't She doesn't view her her role in

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>politics as trying to find I like to storm the

1:17:21.680 --> 1:17:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Republican castle overrun it in Bayonett all the survivors like

1:17:24.560 --> 1:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that's That's another thing. She doesn't have orthodox views, right,

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>she was a little more socially conservative. She's willing to

1:17:30.240 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>say maybe we should impeach the president initially. She's willing

1:17:33.320 --> 1:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to say things I think that the great against the

1:17:35.760 --> 1:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>orthodoxy of the Democratic Party. So maybe it's something like that.

1:17:39.439 --> 1:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I find her appealing in many ways.

1:17:41.320 --> 1:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>She's smart and telegenic and you know, and I think

1:17:45.320 --> 1:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that she thinks through her beliefs and all of that.

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>She's a I mean, you know, she serves everything. It

1:17:50.960 --> 1:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>seems to me like she would be the kind of

1:17:52.439 --> 1:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>candidate that I that you should be excited about if

1:17:55.320 --> 1:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they're in your party. I would think so too. But

1:17:57.200 --> 1:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>every time I defend Tulsi, people say that, you know,

1:18:00.320 --> 1:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I just like Tulsi because I remember her visiting a

1:18:03.080 --> 1:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>side and stuff like that, and to me, you know,

1:18:05.400 --> 1:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get over that stuff, no matter what

1:18:08.040 --> 1:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>her excuses were. So so for that reason, I don't

1:18:11.720 --> 1:18:14.519
<v Speaker 1>really like her, but I think her realist torn policy

1:18:14.560 --> 1:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that is actually pretty popular these days,

1:18:16.720 --> 1:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really get it. Yep, all right, everybody,

1:18:19.400 --> 1:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>David Harsany, David, thanks for giving us so much time. Man.

1:18:21.760 --> 1:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Check out his latest National Review dot com and we'll

1:18:24.240 --> 1:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to you soon anytime. Thank you for The House

1:18:26.520 --> 1:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to do what the House is going to do,

1:18:28.240 --> 1:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and when they get through, as you all know, it

1:18:32.080 --> 1:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>comes over here, displaces all the business and we'll be

1:18:35.920 --> 1:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on it until her senators decide it's time to reach

1:18:40.040 --> 1:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>a conclusion. I will repeat what I've said in the past.

1:18:44.120 --> 1:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>It's inconceivable to me that it'd be sixty seven votes

1:18:47.920 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to remove the president from office. Inconceivable to me too.

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But Cocaine Mitch, don't plays, you know, Cocaine Mitch is

1:18:55.400 --> 1:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the one that oversees that whole thing. I

1:18:58.439 --> 1:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>am a little bit frustrated though, and some others have

1:19:01.200 --> 1:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>started to point this out as well. Why is it

1:19:05.120 --> 1:19:12.519
<v Speaker 1>the case that the Senate Republicans aren't you know, Senate

1:19:12.600 --> 1:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Republican of a majority that for example, runs the uh,

1:19:18.120 --> 1:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, senatece Luck Committee on Intelligence. Why aren't they

1:19:20.520 --> 1:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>calling witnesses. You know, you gotta if the Democrats are

1:19:24.840 --> 1:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>going to abuse the process, you have to use the

1:19:28.920 --> 1:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>process to beat them back. You know, you gotta fight

1:19:31.479 --> 1:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>fire with fire here, and you know, having Devin Nunez say, oh,

1:19:36.479 --> 1:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we want to enter into the record

1:19:37.960 --> 1:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that these are the witnesses we'd want to have. I

1:19:39.479 --> 1:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>get it. I mean, I'm not saying he shouldn't do that,

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's not sufficient. Obviously, where's the Senate on this?

1:19:45.880 --> 1:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Where are the where's the testimony under oath from Chloopa

1:19:50.200 --> 1:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and Hunter Biden and other DNC tied officials, other people

1:19:56.320 --> 1:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that might have some interesting things to say about all

1:19:58.920 --> 1:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Just just wondering when that's going to happen.

1:20:03.439 --> 1:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Republicans, unfortunately, still don't really fully comprehend. A

1:20:09.120 --> 1:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of elected Republicans don't really fully comprehend the nature

1:20:12.439 --> 1:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of the left and what they're willing to do. I

1:20:15.200 --> 1:20:17.559
<v Speaker 1>think they see it, but they haven't really absorbed. They

1:20:17.600 --> 1:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't really internalized the lengths that the Democrat left will

1:20:21.760 --> 1:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>go to to destroy them and the games that they

1:20:25.479 --> 1:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>are willing to play in that whole process. But we

1:20:29.640 --> 1:20:33.559
<v Speaker 1>shall have to see. By the way Trump had some

1:20:33.600 --> 1:20:38.599
<v Speaker 1>things to say about Ambassador Kent that I wanted to play.

1:20:38.640 --> 1:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Would you, producer, Bark, would you play fourteen please? I

1:20:41.880 --> 1:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know Vinman. I never heard of him. I don't

1:20:44.960 --> 1:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>know any of these people other than I have seen

1:20:49.600 --> 1:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>one or two a couple of times. They're ambassadors. But

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>these are names that are taught, like Taylor, like Kent

1:20:56.240 --> 1:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with a nice boat tie, wonderful boat time. Maybe I'll

1:20:58.439 --> 1:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>get work for myself someday. I don't know who Kent is.

1:21:01.920 --> 1:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who Taylor is yet. Yesterday Vinman said

1:21:07.240 --> 1:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that he was the President's senior. We didn't do much

1:21:10.120 --> 1:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Vinman today because that was yesterday, and we had Sonlon

1:21:12.560 --> 1:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning, and you know, this is the you know,

1:21:15.080 --> 1:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>impeachment marathon that we're stuck in the middle of. But

1:21:18.120 --> 1:21:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Vinman had some Vinman did not do well yesterday. I didn't.

1:21:21.560 --> 1:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to just return to this for a moment

1:21:23.360 --> 1:21:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to give you my sense of what happened here. Vinman

1:21:26.920 --> 1:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>was not a strong witness for the Democrat, cause he

1:21:30.560 --> 1:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>was trying to be. He's clearly a partisan. But when

1:21:33.760 --> 1:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Vinman was up there there were some moments that did

1:21:38.880 --> 1:21:40.719
<v Speaker 1>not look good for him. And one of the most

1:21:40.760 --> 1:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>important had to do with Well, first of all, there's

1:21:45.160 --> 1:21:50.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sanctimonious stuff, like here is Colonel Vinman

1:21:51.200 --> 1:21:54.479
<v Speaker 1>claiming that he is not a never Trump or play sixteen.

1:21:54.520 --> 1:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Colonel. By the way, the day after you appeared

1:21:57.240 --> 1:22:00.519
<v Speaker 1>for your deposition, Lieutenant Colonel President I called you a

1:22:00.560 --> 1:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>never trumper. Colonel Vinman, would you call yourself a never

1:22:03.320 --> 1:22:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Trumper representative? I'd call myself never partisan, never partisan. Interesting,

1:22:09.800 --> 1:22:11.559
<v Speaker 1>he's a registered Democrat, by the way, Is that a

1:22:11.600 --> 1:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>surprise to you public records guys? A registered Democrat? That

1:22:17.040 --> 1:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to anybody? Oh no, you mean you kind

1:22:22.280 --> 1:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>of knew this guy's a Democrat all along? Oh wow,

1:22:25.479 --> 1:22:30.719
<v Speaker 1>isn't that crazy? Not just just crazy? Some other stuff

1:22:30.720 --> 1:22:33.599
<v Speaker 1>that came up about mister Vinman. Jim Jordan, for example,

1:22:34.400 --> 1:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that there were people, some very squared away,

1:22:38.320 --> 1:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>very seasoned national security experts, who felt, like this Vinman guy,

1:22:45.439 --> 1:22:50.519
<v Speaker 1>there were some issues there. Fifteen. Please, your boss had

1:22:50.560 --> 1:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>concerns about your judgment. Your former boss, doctor Hill had

1:22:53.000 --> 1:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>concerns about your judgment. Your colleagues had concerns about your judgment.

1:22:56.240 --> 1:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And your colleagues felt that there were times when you

1:22:58.479 --> 1:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>leaked information. Any idea why they have those impressions, Colonel Denman, Yes,

1:23:04.920 --> 1:23:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Representative Jordan. I guess I'll start by reading doctor Hill's

1:23:10.600 --> 1:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>own words, as she she attested to in my last

1:23:15.000 --> 1:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>evaluation that was dated middle of July, right before she left.

1:23:18.640 --> 1:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Alex is a top one percent military officer and the

1:23:21.200 --> 1:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>best army officer I've worked with in my fifteen years

1:23:23.680 --> 1:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of government service. It's like, I'm amazing, I'm a never

1:23:27.479 --> 1:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>part I'm never part of in call me lieutenant, colonel

1:23:30.760 --> 1:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>or else. This guy MM did not did not do

1:23:34.200 --> 1:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>himself a lot, a lot of favors in the in

1:23:37.240 --> 1:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the presentation that the Democrats were trying to put on yesterday,

1:23:41.960 --> 1:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and the worst part for him was actually, I don't

1:23:44.120 --> 1:23:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if we have this clip. I'll

1:23:45.600 --> 1:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>just tell you what happened. When he was asked about

1:23:49.600 --> 1:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>who he talked to who he talked to after the

1:23:55.200 --> 1:24:00.519
<v Speaker 1>phone call between Trump and Zelenski, he said, oh, well,

1:24:00.560 --> 1:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't tell my EMI. I didn't tell my superior

1:24:04.040 --> 1:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>because I was so busy. And then Jim Jordan pushed

1:24:06.479 --> 1:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>him more and got him to admit, well, you didn't

1:24:09.160 --> 1:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to your superior officer. But you did go to

1:24:13.720 --> 1:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>see a lawyer, and I see lawyer who believes it brother,

1:24:17.560 --> 1:24:20.519
<v Speaker 1>And you also did go to see a person that

1:24:20.560 --> 1:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats claim we can't know who it is because

1:24:23.560 --> 1:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>we're all supposed to pretend we're a bunch of idiots

1:24:26.200 --> 1:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and don't know that. The other person he told is

1:24:29.479 --> 1:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the whistleblower, and the whistleblower's name, from what we are

1:24:33.280 --> 1:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>told is Eric Charamela, who was working at the NSC

1:24:36.680 --> 1:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and who loves Biden and is a leftist and hates Trump.

1:24:40.640 --> 1:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>This is like the reality of the world that we're in.

1:24:43.439 --> 1:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But it is to be denied, it is to be obscure,

1:24:46.280 --> 1:24:53.559
<v Speaker 1>to be pushed aside in favor of this nonsense. It's

1:24:53.640 --> 1:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>just bizarro crazy town stuff that we were supposed just

1:25:00.240 --> 1:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>pretend we don't know what we know. I'm sorry, I

1:25:03.680 --> 1:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't want to do that. I'm not okay

1:25:08.280 --> 1:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>with that. So that's why I tell you about the

1:25:10.200 --> 1:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>things that I do. I though there's some very strong

1:25:13.960 --> 1:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>witnesses that appeared for Trump and this whole thing, like

1:25:16.560 --> 1:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador Vulker, for example. Just would you please play clip

1:25:23.360 --> 1:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>two here. At no time was I aware of or

1:25:26.880 --> 1:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>knowingly took part in an effort to urge Ukraine to

1:25:29.680 --> 1:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>investigate former Vice President Biden. I was not on the

1:25:32.760 --> 1:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>July twenty fifth phone call between President Trump and President Zelinski.

1:25:37.160 --> 1:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I was not made aware of any reference to Vice

1:25:39.280 --> 1:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>President Biden or his son by President Trump until the

1:25:43.040 --> 1:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>transcript of that call was released on September twenty fifth.

1:25:47.720 --> 1:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So here you have a guy who is what the

1:25:50.439 --> 1:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>envoy for Ukraine or special envoard for Ukraine, some form

1:25:53.840 --> 1:25:57.519
<v Speaker 1>of an ambassador, a lot of ambassadorial titles floating around

1:25:57.560 --> 1:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>these days. He is not he is not aware of

1:26:03.520 --> 1:26:07.799
<v Speaker 1>this situation. How is it possible that this guy's working

1:26:07.840 --> 1:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>so closely on this and it's so clear, and Solomon

1:26:10.720 --> 1:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>saying today everybody was in the loop. Apparently Vulker wasn't

1:26:13.040 --> 1:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in the loop. And how seriously can we take the

1:26:18.000 --> 1:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>demand that supposedly exists from the president to do a

1:26:21.080 --> 1:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>thing if people that would have had to know about

1:26:23.680 --> 1:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the demand to help push it didn't even know about it.

1:26:26.240 --> 1:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just all a big circle, folks. It's just nonsense.

1:26:30.439 --> 1:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>This Democrat impeachment thing is a self looking ice cream cone.

1:26:33.600 --> 1:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And make all these accusations, Oh, they're got all spun up,

1:26:35.960 --> 1:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and then it kind of falls apart. The media goes,

1:26:37.640 --> 1:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, look at this thing. It's a sham.

1:26:41.360 --> 1:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a scam, and really it's a travesty because we

1:26:44.000 --> 1:26:47.599
<v Speaker 1>all have the whole country has to waste so much

1:26:47.760 --> 1:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>time on this one, and I just wish there were

1:26:49.800 --> 1:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>other things were the discussion. Oh well, I haven't even

1:26:52.439 --> 1:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>talked to you about what I think about the Democrats tonight.

1:26:55.080 --> 1:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>What I think is going to happen with the Democrat debate.

1:26:58.760 --> 1:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Although Harsani and I on to trash the whole notion

1:27:01.280 --> 1:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the need to watch it, I'll watch it. I'll

1:27:04.320 --> 1:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>watch it so you don't have to. That's one of

1:27:07.080 --> 1:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the promises that I make here for you in the

1:27:08.880 --> 1:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Freedom Hunt. You don't have to waste your time. So

1:27:10.800 --> 1:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what happened, all right, So the Democrat

1:27:12.479 --> 1:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>debate tonight, buck style telling you about what I think

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>is really going on here, because the buck never stops.

1:27:19.840 --> 1:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Here's what we got. You had to qualify for this one.

1:27:23.439 --> 1:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Candidates had to receive at least three percent in four

1:27:26.520 --> 1:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>DNC approved poles donations from at least one hundred and

1:27:30.640 --> 1:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty five thousand supporters. BLAHBLI blah blah blah. All right,

1:27:33.439 --> 1:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>here's what we got for the candidates. Klobashar Booker, Buddha Judge, Sanders, Biden, Warren, Harris, Yang,

1:27:42.000 --> 1:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Gabbert Stier. Castro didn't get the required numbers that as

1:27:48.439 --> 1:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we know, Petro o'rourks like totally is not running for

1:27:53.439 --> 1:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>president anymore. He was born to do it. So I

1:27:56.439 --> 1:28:00.160
<v Speaker 1>guess he's been unborned because he is not going to

1:28:00.240 --> 1:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>be president. And I just don't know. Uh, let's see

1:28:03.800 --> 1:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>who we have here. Uh, you're gonna have to be

1:28:06.960 --> 1:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a big night, I think, or rather they're going to

1:28:09.680 --> 1:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>try to make this a big night the media to

1:28:12.600 --> 1:28:15.719
<v Speaker 1>make this an interesting story. Um, they want to push

1:28:15.760 --> 1:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for Buddha Judge. A lot of them want to push

1:28:18.280 --> 1:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for Booda Judge, Um, Andrew Yang. I gotta say, you know,

1:28:23.960 --> 1:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I like Yang, I like Gabbert. You all know that

1:28:25.720 --> 1:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm honest with you about it. I tell you who

1:28:27.720 --> 1:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>my if I had to hear producer Mark. Actually, let's

1:28:30.800 --> 1:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>get you onto this one. If you if you have

1:28:34.120 --> 1:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to vote forget about I ask you who the worst was.

1:28:36.120 --> 1:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And you're good on that because you said to Blasio,

1:28:37.680 --> 1:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>which might have even better than my answer, which was

1:28:39.320 --> 1:28:41.599
<v Speaker 1>better because I think the Blasio is the worst, still

1:28:41.600 --> 1:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the worst, not even the race. Still totally agree. But

1:28:45.360 --> 1:28:47.639
<v Speaker 1>if you had to vote for one of these candidates

1:28:47.640 --> 1:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that I named, if you have to, I'm making sure

1:28:50.280 --> 1:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>gun into your head, who is it, I'd say Andrew Yang.

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I want to. I want to say

1:28:55.160 --> 1:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a member of the Yang gang. You know, he's interesting.

1:28:58.200 --> 1:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I would probably, I probably, at the end of the

1:29:00.920 --> 1:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>day say say Gabbert, but I want Yang to be

1:29:03.200 --> 1:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>his veep. Again, I'm not voting for a Democrat. I'm

1:29:06.280 --> 1:29:08.439
<v Speaker 1>just saying, if we, if we, if we had to,

1:29:09.360 --> 1:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and on this list, I think the worst. For me,

1:29:14.560 --> 1:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we do best and worst here, I think the worst.

1:29:20.120 --> 1:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's actually not easy. I go the worst is um

1:29:27.200 --> 1:29:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris. I think Kamala Harris is the worst because

1:29:30.760 --> 1:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the media tried so hard to just make Kamala Harris

1:29:33.280 --> 1:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a big political thing and it's just not happening. Whore

1:29:36.400 --> 1:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>do you go? See? I want to say Bernie Sanders

1:29:39.080 --> 1:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>just because you and Larry David has ruined him. For me,

1:29:42.120 --> 1:29:44.519
<v Speaker 1>I can't take him seriously at all. True. Yeah, like

1:29:45.000 --> 1:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>he could just say I love puppies, and I can't

1:29:46.880 --> 1:29:51.519
<v Speaker 1>take him seriously because a free puppy program, everybody's gonna

1:29:51.520 --> 1:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>get a puppy, and you know what's gonna happen. They're

1:29:54.240 --> 1:29:56.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the puppies and they're gonna share them with

1:29:56.520 --> 1:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>other people. It's gonna be communal puppies. You know what.

1:29:58.880 --> 1:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I take it back. If he does that, well, actually

1:30:01.000 --> 1:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a great plan. That's a platform that I

1:30:03.320 --> 1:30:05.439
<v Speaker 1>could get be here too, because I want a puppy.

1:30:05.479 --> 1:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to have to take care of

1:30:06.439 --> 1:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it all the time. So if it was a communal puppy,

1:30:08.320 --> 1:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be. But you're getting married soon, you know

1:30:11.000 --> 1:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what happens, baby or puppy. Gotta make your pick, dude, puppy, Yeah,

1:30:15.720 --> 1:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>puppy can't talk back to me. Yeah, that's true, Kloba

1:30:19.320 --> 1:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>shar I gotta say. I think, is you know, just

1:30:22.280 --> 1:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>an interesting candidate for the Democrats because she's from the

1:30:26.160 --> 1:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Midwest and female. And Booker he's just in this still

1:30:31.000 --> 1:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>because the media likes him. I mean, he just the

1:30:33.040 --> 1:30:35.439
<v Speaker 1>media likes Corey Booker, and so Corey Booker gets to

1:30:35.479 --> 1:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to be running for president even though I don't

1:30:38.200 --> 1:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>think anybody believes he's gonna win anything, including the primary.

1:30:42.760 --> 1:30:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden still still in the mix here, former Vice

1:30:47.479 --> 1:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>President Joe Biden. Wouldn't we call him Senator Joe Biden?

1:30:50.800 --> 1:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Former Vice President Joe Biden. I list him here and

1:30:53.040 --> 1:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>well anyway, So I don't think it's gonna be a

1:30:55.600 --> 1:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of change tonight from what you're used to seeing.

1:30:57.960 --> 1:30:59.559
<v Speaker 1>I'll have a bunch of Democrats who come out and

1:30:59.600 --> 1:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>say blah blah blah, socialism, more spending, big government, free stuff,

1:31:03.240 --> 1:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>free stuff, free college, free healthcare. Trump is hitler. Country

1:31:07.280 --> 1:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go to hell. Climate change is gonna kill

1:31:09.200 --> 1:31:13.519
<v Speaker 1>all of us unless you vote for Democrats. That's it, really,

1:31:13.600 --> 1:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I now I feel like you don't even

1:31:16.880 --> 1:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do I even have to watch the debate. We've established

1:31:19.160 --> 1:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>already what the main thrust will be. I do think

1:31:21.960 --> 1:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that the most damaging politically, the most damaging position the

1:31:26.320 --> 1:31:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Democrats hold now for general election purposes. And we'll see

1:31:30.479 --> 1:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>how much this gets attention to the people. Don't talk

1:31:32.320 --> 1:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about immigration as much right now as they had been.

1:31:34.640 --> 1:31:36.599
<v Speaker 1>The border crisis has died down a little bit, oh

1:31:36.720 --> 1:31:39.439
<v Speaker 1>some a fascinating thing happened. I think it was in

1:31:39.600 --> 1:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>AFP as Jan's France Press or agents France Press. I

1:31:44.080 --> 1:31:46.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know. However, you were supposed to say that AFP

1:31:47.000 --> 1:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>did this story on a UN analysis of all the

1:31:49.680 --> 1:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>children that were in custody at our southern border. And

1:31:54.800 --> 1:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a horrifying moment, right because, oh my gosh, Trump,

1:31:58.320 --> 1:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>kids in cages, all this really bad stuff. And it

1:32:04.280 --> 1:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>turned out that the analysis the UN did was from

1:32:07.040 --> 1:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the kids quote in cages from the Obama administration twenty fifteen. Whoops.

1:32:14.760 --> 1:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But you would think, hold on a second, why is

1:32:16.920 --> 1:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that now no longer a story? It's an analysis of

1:32:20.160 --> 1:32:24.639
<v Speaker 1>what had happened because AFP pulled it. So they put

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>out a story based on an analysis, you an analysis

1:32:27.479 --> 1:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of children being held to the southern border in detention

1:32:31.080 --> 1:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as they're being processed to be let into this country

1:32:34.000 --> 1:32:37.599
<v Speaker 1>by the way which they all were let into the country.

1:32:38.320 --> 1:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And because it turns out that it didn't happen while

1:32:41.400 --> 1:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump was president, it's no longer a story. It would

1:32:45.280 --> 1:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be hard to find in some ways a more pure

1:32:49.240 --> 1:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>distillation of mainstream media bias. Bad thing happens under Trump story,

1:32:56.680 --> 1:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>run with it? Oh, same bad thing happened, but happen

1:33:00.160 --> 1:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>under Obama before Trump is president. Pull the story deleted,

1:33:04.479 --> 1:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Pretend it never happened on the internet. It's it was

1:33:08.640 --> 1:33:17.479
<v Speaker 1>a stunning a stunning situation. Honestly, anyway, it is. It

1:33:17.760 --> 1:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is what it is, My friends, here we go study

1:33:20.120 --> 1:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in un child attention. Let's see if I make sure

1:33:23.479 --> 1:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I got the right. I hate I hate

1:33:26.439 --> 1:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>being wrong. I'm so rarely wrong, though. Let's see what

1:33:28.920 --> 1:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we get here. Oh it was it was Reuters. I'm sorry,

1:33:32.280 --> 1:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a Router's story. I think I said AFP.

1:33:33.960 --> 1:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Reuters. My bad. November eighteen story headline, US has

1:33:38.080 --> 1:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>world's highest rate of children in detention. UN study is withdrawn.

1:33:42.920 --> 1:33:45.479
<v Speaker 1>The United Nations issued a statement on November nineteenth thing

1:33:45.560 --> 1:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the number was not current, but was for the year

1:33:47.120 --> 1:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. No replacement story will be issued. Router's one

1:33:51.320 --> 1:33:54.519
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest news organizations in the world. Oh, it's not.

1:33:54.720 --> 1:33:56.759
<v Speaker 1>It's not a story anymore because it happened when Obama

1:33:56.800 --> 1:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was president. That pretty much describes for you the way

1:34:00.400 --> 1:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the media approaches everything. It's only a story. A bad

1:34:04.520 --> 1:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>thing happens. If it's while Trump is president, it's a story.

1:34:08.360 --> 1:34:10.639
<v Speaker 1>If while Obama, if it was while Obama is president,

1:34:10.720 --> 1:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is no longer a story, and they wonder why we

1:34:14.160 --> 1:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>all cheer and laugh when they call it fake when

1:34:16.960 --> 1:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump calls it fake news, because they are a bunch

1:34:20.120 --> 1:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of fakers, a bunch of frauds hacks. I will I

1:34:24.040 --> 1:34:26.639
<v Speaker 1>will continue on this. I will continue beating this drum

1:34:26.680 --> 1:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>until the day I die. If I, you know, stop

1:34:30.439 --> 1:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>doing media tomorrow and I was just running a hot

1:34:32.880 --> 1:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>dog stand somewhere, probably leading a very nice life of

1:34:36.880 --> 1:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a humble but striving capitalist and enjoying myself, I would

1:34:40.880 --> 1:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>still anybody who would listen to be ranting and raving

1:34:43.400 --> 1:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about how fraudulent the news media has become and what

1:34:47.280 --> 1:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of totally partisan hacks they are. And the

1:34:50.920 --> 1:34:54.599
<v Speaker 1>worst part is they run around, you know, strutting about

1:34:55.160 --> 1:34:57.519
<v Speaker 1>and acting like they're so brave when they speak truth

1:34:57.560 --> 1:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to power. It's complete nonsense. Yes, indeed, you know it's

1:35:01.200 --> 1:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>not nonsense, though, Roll call, for which it is now.

1:35:05.439 --> 1:35:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Time ain't no party like a Team buck party, because

1:35:08.479 --> 1:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a Team buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got buck

1:35:17.960 --> 1:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call, Roll Call,

1:35:35.360 --> 1:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com or Facebook dot com slash

1:35:38.880 --> 1:35:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton. Let's get to emails because we've been new

1:35:42.479 --> 1:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>emails yesterday. Gary, Gary kicks off a noise. Buck and

1:35:48.280 --> 1:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>producer Mark, you are absolutely the best. Thank you so

1:35:52.320 --> 1:35:54.240
<v Speaker 1>much for adding email. I'm one of the twelve people

1:35:54.240 --> 1:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that have never used Facebook. Regarding President Swallwell's gastric indiscri

1:36:00.040 --> 1:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Russian Micro has an excellent short ten minute podcast episode

1:36:04.800 --> 1:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that is one percent related and reveals the source of

1:36:09.560 --> 1:36:13.559
<v Speaker 1>the name of a popular host on the view. Huh okay,

1:36:13.600 --> 1:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that's all about, but thank you

1:36:15.160 --> 1:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>my friend for writing again and saying nice things about

1:36:17.200 --> 1:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>me and producer Mark Gina. Hey Buck, somebody needs to

1:36:21.120 --> 1:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>take a picture of both Fox News and CNN just

1:36:23.240 --> 1:36:28.639
<v Speaker 1>how CNN words and captions breaking news Sonlan ties Trump, Pence,

1:36:28.680 --> 1:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Pompeo to Ukraine pressure campaign totally false. Yeah, Look, there's

1:36:34.080 --> 1:36:36.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of headline writing that goes on that is

1:36:37.400 --> 1:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>not objective. Headlines are tough because you got to grab somebody,

1:36:40.280 --> 1:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and so to write purely objective headlines is never going

1:36:42.920 --> 1:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to be really something that happens. But there are I

1:36:45.200 --> 1:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>think there are limits of it, and yeah, but yeah,

1:36:49.360 --> 1:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll see the headlines. All you have to do anytime

1:36:51.000 --> 1:36:53.479
<v Speaker 1>you want. It's just if you have on your computer.

1:36:53.600 --> 1:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Just go to the Fox News dot com site and

1:36:55.120 --> 1:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>go to CNN dot com and just see the way

1:36:57.320 --> 1:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that CNN talks about the way Fox talks about it.

1:37:01.200 --> 1:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean the different different points of view watching the

1:37:04.439 --> 1:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Steve Hey Bucks Shields High from the Live,

1:37:08.960 --> 1:37:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Free or Die State of New Hampshire. I'm a real

1:37:12.800 --> 1:37:16.479
<v Speaker 1>news longtime supporter of Team Buck. I just posted to

1:37:16.920 --> 1:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Jack Ryan TV series the post below you ask I

1:37:19.800 --> 1:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>delivered see the post below season two. Really, that's your narrative.

1:37:26.240 --> 1:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to sell to the fans that social justice

1:37:28.400 --> 1:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>winers are going to save a country like Venezuela. Who

1:37:30.880 --> 1:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>does your research? Maybe if you want season three to

1:37:34.439 --> 1:37:37.599
<v Speaker 1>be something appealing to your true fans rather than appealing

1:37:37.640 --> 1:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to woke snowflakes, you might want to get advice from

1:37:41.120 --> 1:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>former CI analyst Buck Sex and provide more sound direction.

1:37:45.479 --> 1:37:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I love Krasinski in the role, but season two was

1:37:47.560 --> 1:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>tough to watch. All right, man, Shields, Hi, thank you

1:37:51.840 --> 1:37:53.559
<v Speaker 1>so much, Steve. I don't know if that's gonna get

1:37:54.400 --> 1:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Netflix or whatever to or Amazon rather to put me

1:37:58.240 --> 1:38:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in the role, but I'm sorry, not in the role

1:38:01.080 --> 1:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to take Krasinski. That guy's very tall, very handsome, but

1:38:04.400 --> 1:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to help with the writing behind the scenes would be good. Steve. Wait, no,

1:38:11.120 --> 1:38:16.439
<v Speaker 1>we already did, Steve Robert Um Okay, nope, that was

1:38:16.479 --> 1:38:19.679
<v Speaker 1>a link. And hey, Buck, I just want to tell

1:38:19.680 --> 1:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you how much I enjoy your podcast, which I started

1:38:22.400 --> 1:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>downloading years ago when I first saw your commentary on

1:38:25.080 --> 1:38:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Fox News. You are so knowledgeable for one so young, insightful,

1:38:28.600 --> 1:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and have a soothing voice. Your impressions are hilarious. I

1:38:31.840 --> 1:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>will miss your Betto and your Bernie is perfect. Your

1:38:34.080 --> 1:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Warren is rapidly improving. But I wish you would do

1:38:36.840 --> 1:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Amy klobischar who should be easy to do with her

1:38:39.240 --> 1:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>nasally voice. Regarding impressions, have you seen Tom Shalou play

1:38:45.960 --> 1:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Shifty Shift on Greg Gutfeld Show on Saturday Night. Shalu

1:38:49.200 --> 1:38:51.519
<v Speaker 1>is perfect for that part. I like to watch the

1:38:51.560 --> 1:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>star Millennial on our side. At least Stephanick stand up

1:38:54.880 --> 1:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to Shifty at the idiotic impeachment inquisitions. I've been impressed

1:38:58.800 --> 1:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with Stephanick ever since he was the one who got

1:39:00.920 --> 1:39:02.720
<v Speaker 1>sanctioned and sank to comy to admit he did not

1:39:02.760 --> 1:39:06.679
<v Speaker 1>advise Congress of the existing Trump investigation, et cetera. Et Finally,

1:39:06.720 --> 1:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about the debate over the tech issues with your podcast. Yes,

1:39:09.200 --> 1:39:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the problem was really bad a few months ago. Keep

1:39:12.520 --> 1:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>up the high quality program and I'd be thrilled to

1:39:16.080 --> 1:39:17.720
<v Speaker 1>hear Shields High again. What was the name of the

1:39:17.760 --> 1:39:20.559
<v Speaker 1>history show? And I can't forget producer Mark. I like

1:39:20.640 --> 1:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>to hear the banner between you guys. Thanks for providing

1:39:23.760 --> 1:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your email. Thanks for the feedback, best regards, Annam. All right, well,

1:39:30.080 --> 1:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, appreciate it. James, hold on, it's

1:39:37.000 --> 1:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>got a load. Why is the internet here so slow?

1:39:41.920 --> 1:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's a very long email. Enough time for

1:39:44.200 --> 1:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that one right now, kent On Vinman, He started to

1:39:48.920 --> 1:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>say office of before he was cut off. There's only

1:39:55.080 --> 1:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>so many in the IC Office of what. Thanks Shields

1:39:59.200 --> 1:40:01.479
<v Speaker 1>High On, Vinman. Yeah, I don't know. I guess that

1:40:02.320 --> 1:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're telling me that happened, then I believe that

1:40:04.240 --> 1:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that could have that could have happened. All right, now

1:40:06.160 --> 1:40:12.559
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna switch to switch to the Facebook in box,

1:40:12.640 --> 1:40:19.280
<v Speaker 1>which is always fun. And Edward right, Men at Work

1:40:20.280 --> 1:40:23.679
<v Speaker 1>is much better as a movie than Young Guns. Oh,

1:40:24.800 --> 1:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I see Edward taking producer Mark's part in this dispute. Oh,

1:40:29.520 --> 1:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that will be remembered, blocked, and reported. Sir. Let's see

1:40:37.080 --> 1:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>who else we got in here. TJ. Buck. I'm not

1:40:40.439 --> 1:40:42.800
<v Speaker 1>making excuses for Trump. There's no doubt he needs to

1:40:42.800 --> 1:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do what he can to get this spending under control.

1:40:45.720 --> 1:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But how much of this out of control spending is

1:40:47.600 --> 1:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>bureaucratic protest against him? Do you think? I don't mean

1:40:51.040 --> 1:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to be conspiratorial, but I can't help but think that

1:40:53.439 --> 1:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>an overwhelming majority of the federal government workers are Democrats

1:40:56.080 --> 1:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>who are taking their own liberties to maximize their allowable

1:40:58.720 --> 1:41:03.439
<v Speaker 1>spending every month. And unfortunately, short of shutting down the government,

1:41:03.760 --> 1:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>there's not much Trump cant to cut this deep state spending. Huh. Interesting.

1:41:14.680 --> 1:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, presidents can only do so much with the

1:41:18.040 --> 1:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>budget and with spending. That's true. How much are we

1:41:22.000 --> 1:41:23.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna blame Trump for this one? I don't know, but

1:41:23.680 --> 1:41:26.240
<v Speaker 1>let's be careful about never blaming Trump for anything, right.

1:41:26.280 --> 1:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, that's why I think sometimes I just have

1:41:28.200 --> 1:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to remind you guys he picks really bad people, because

1:41:30.760 --> 1:41:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important for us to establish it. There

1:41:32.760 --> 1:41:34.559
<v Speaker 1>are some things that we just need to be honest

1:41:34.560 --> 1:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is failing on or that he's not doing

1:41:36.800 --> 1:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a good job of We can't always say, well it's

1:41:40.240 --> 1:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>really hard. Yeah, well he took the job that was

1:41:42.160 --> 1:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a really hard job. You know. He

1:41:44.400 --> 1:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>did say they were going to build a wall, which

1:41:46.000 --> 1:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they are now gearing up. It seems in this last

1:41:48.720 --> 1:41:51.519
<v Speaker 1>year of his first term to really build wall, hundreds

1:41:51.520 --> 1:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of miles of wall, so that would be very interesting.

1:41:55.400 --> 1:41:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And by the way he builds, he builds hundreds of

1:41:57.240 --> 1:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>miles of wall, he wins re election, no question in

1:41:58.920 --> 1:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>my mind, no question, not even not even close. Carl

1:42:04.280 --> 1:42:07.840
<v Speaker 1>shields high as always excellent work on the show. I

1:42:07.960 --> 1:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>recommended the show to a friend recently and now he's

1:42:10.040 --> 1:42:12.559
<v Speaker 1>a daily listener. Thank you, Carl. I think of people.

1:42:12.600 --> 1:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>The more people that hear about the show and give

1:42:15.160 --> 1:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it a listen to them, or people are going to

1:42:16.720 --> 1:42:19.679
<v Speaker 1>keep listening every day to the show. We're very confident

1:42:19.720 --> 1:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. A critique I'm surprised has not been aimed

1:42:23.320 --> 1:42:26.519
<v Speaker 1>at Bernie is must have been nice not waiting for

1:42:26.560 --> 1:42:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the necessary diagnosis treatment of his recent heart attack. No lines,

1:42:29.720 --> 1:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>no delays, no waiting list, top notch congressional care, and

1:42:33.439 --> 1:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he thinks when we add three hundred million more Americans.

1:42:36.479 --> 1:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>This is going to improve quality and access. That's nuts. Well,

1:42:40.960 --> 1:42:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you're right about if we do medicare for all of

1:42:43.800 --> 1:42:47.559
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, everybody is put into the same system.

1:42:48.360 --> 1:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it will never be everybody in the

1:42:49.880 --> 1:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>same system, because there'll always be people that have enough

1:42:52.040 --> 1:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>resources to pay for a private, private sector or a

1:42:55.680 --> 1:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>private market healthcare. And that's that's the case in can

1:43:00.240 --> 1:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the case in the UK. We're always here. But oh,

1:43:01.840 --> 1:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>government healthcare, government healthcare. You had a lot of the

1:43:04.200 --> 1:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>people who can afford it pay for private healthcare outside

1:43:07.000 --> 1:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the government sector. Why do we think they do that

1:43:09.479 --> 1:43:12.320
<v Speaker 1>because they like throwing away money or because the government

1:43:12.320 --> 1:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>healthcare is crappy? Huh. I don't know. That's a real thinker.

1:43:17.200 --> 1:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I gotta think on that one a little bit. Let's

1:43:20.800 --> 1:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>see here, Rick Buck, listen to a podcast here in

1:43:24.200 --> 1:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Idaho near the Canadian border. As a FedEx corrier wanted

1:43:27.960 --> 1:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>away in on recent arcle in the Times, I received

1:43:30.439 --> 1:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a raise as soon as the Trump TAC cut went

1:43:32.640 --> 1:43:35.280
<v Speaker 1>into effect and over a billion was added to fund

1:43:35.360 --> 1:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>our pension. Aircraft and trucks were replaced with more efficient ones,

1:43:39.280 --> 1:43:44.439
<v Speaker 1>free efficient ones all public knowledge hashtag fake news. Also,

1:43:44.520 --> 1:43:46.479
<v Speaker 1>men at work come from a landown under where women

1:43:46.479 --> 1:43:50.439
<v Speaker 1>glow and men plunder. Love the show, don't take calls.

1:43:50.560 --> 1:43:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Told my daughter about you. She says, you look like

1:43:53.240 --> 1:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Eric Foreman from that seventies show. Just watched Load of

1:43:56.320 --> 1:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Weapon with Emilio Estevez better than the Ducks. Oh yeah,

1:43:59.040 --> 1:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Boomer sooner, watch Far and Away, okay history, Shield's I

1:44:04.920 --> 1:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>blocked and reported, there we go. That's gonna be for

1:44:08.920 --> 1:44:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the show today. Team always always an honor of privilege,

1:44:12.439 --> 1:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Shield's high