WEBVTT - 2025 Top 100 MLB Dynasty Rankings (Ep. 918)

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros MLB. It is me,

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Joey p joe Pisapia with me is the Welsh in

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>our first full show of twenty twenty five. So of

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>course we're gonna look ahead to the future. We're gonna

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>talk dynasty rankings today. We're gonna go through Welsh's top

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty here, maybe some guys on the fringe, and also

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure you keep a lookout because Welsh is working

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on the top one fifty article that's gonna be on

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot com in just a few short hours from now.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It might even be up by the time this show

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>comes up, so just run over there and check it out.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Welsh Dynasty is your bread and butter.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 2>You're the prospect gurer.

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>You're the guy at the AFL who is you know,

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>kissing babies and shaking hands and doing everything you need

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to do to get on the field to make sure

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that you are getting your finger on the pulse of

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here with some of these young players,

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's also some established veterans too.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:53.959
<v Speaker 2>It's a mix here in this.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Top fifty that we're gonna break down today with the tears,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so generally speaking, you know when you are approaching dynastys,

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>especially for the first time, and these you know, clean

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>leagues that are starting in twenty twenty five, or if

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>people are just trying to evaluate some of their players

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and what their values really should be heading into another

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>year of dynasty and a league that already exists, what's

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>your best practice when you put it out there for

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the people in terms of trying to create a balance

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of prospects and win.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, Yeah, no, this is like the big thing because

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.839
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a couple encompass things in here in Dynasty.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>A I would always tell everybody, no Dynasty rank or

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>list is perfect, and I know that like that can

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 3>be like contrite like Okoyd, well rank now, but like

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>you get a redraft list, you kind of know what

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 3>it is. But in Dynasty, things can be whatever that

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 3>you want them to be. The Willy Wonka and the

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 3>Chocolate Factory of fantasy baseball because it's like you can

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 3>construct this super young team to play for the future,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>but you got to eat a couple of years. You

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>can take advantage of values where people are only wanting

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 3>young players, and you could take veterans to try to

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 3>win now. So my rank isn't necessarily going to fully

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 3>encompass what you might want to do with your specific one,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 3>So you have to understand that first and foremost. That's

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the big thing. But if you know you're in a

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 3>restart a refresh of dynasty, there are different ways to

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 3>approach it. So my rank that we're going to talk

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>about is a kind of overarching theme which you would

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 3>have to make your own adjustments. I do you know

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>redraft and dynasty and prospect stuff, And I've also done

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 3>it on my Patreon as well at in this League

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 3>dot com. And one thing I've always said is like,

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>if you are a win now team you want to

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 3>start transitioning from dynasty into redraft, you could do that

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 3>here with Fantasy pros and their ranks top one hundred.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe really make that as a hyper focus for what

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 3>you're doing in a dynasty draft, then start moving to

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 3>your redraft. On the inverse, if you are a I'm

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 3>going to play for the future, I want to get

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of the young guys, Well take that top

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and then start reverting to a prospect list.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 3>So that's how you would do that. So you have

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to come to terms with are you a win now,

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>are you a balance, or are you a play for

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>the future. So we'll talk about that in all of

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 3>these ranks, because there would be certain levels where we

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 3>would adjust to like, oh, if I'm a win now team,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 3>let's start to bump this up. I don't think that

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>exists really in the top It doesn't exist in the

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 3>top ten, get into the top twenty, kind of doesn't

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 3>top thirty a little bit, and then it's like, once

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>you get outside the top fifty, then it really is

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>important to know where you are. So this is an

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>all encompass list that is talking more about balance, but

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 3>you do have to understand if you're a refresh and

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 3>you're a new dynasty, what type of team are you

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 3>trying to construct? If you're already in a dynasty, this

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>is going to be probably more about player evaluation, or

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>at least where I value these players in a dynasty overall.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and one other note I would throw out there

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>for those starting up dynasty leagues too is take advantage

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>when when people maybe go to prospect heavy with you

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of younger guys who aren't really proven

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>even at the minor league level, yet pivot and take

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the value of some of those guys that are established veterans.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Even if they're thirty years old, there's still a lot

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of baseball left in some of these guys.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a great point. Two things I'm gonna add to that.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>My ranks, especially my prospect ranks. We're not necessarily doing

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>prospect ranks here. My prospect ranks doing compass an overarching worldview.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 3>But my dynasty ranks are kind of a three year window.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>I look at these as a three year window in value.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>So you might have some dynasty rankers that go and

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 3>put you know, a guy that is two or three

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>years away, way way way high. I might have them

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 3>a little bit down. I still value, you know, guys

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 3>that are not quite there in a high level. We'll

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 3>talk about that with some of these, but you know,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 3>I try to do three year windows, So with that,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I might even have some older guys a little bit

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>higher in dynasty. And then that comes to my personal

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 3>strategy here. I will tell you I tend to lean

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 3>in more of a win now standpoint, because if you

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>just legit, just break.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Down like a three year window, guy, like that's my thing.

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 3>And if you want to break down three basic tenets

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>of Dynasty rosters. It's what I said before, when now

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 3>balance super young playing for the future, I'm going to

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 3>be on that first one. I want to win now.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Me also like knowing that I feel like I'm very

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with being able to build a minor league system

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 3>evaluate younger players. But there are incredible values. That's the

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>biggest thing that stands out about Dynasties is the number

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 3>one value is older players are going to start to fall.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>You're going to see that in some of my ranks,

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and then it starts to go to other levels. People

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 3>don't want to value closers as much. Starting pitchers can

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>get pushed down. So there's a lot of just like

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 3>weird little intricacies of Dynasty. But when Now, to me,

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 3>has always tended to be the best approach with little

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>sprinkles of youth and future play, because at the end

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of the day, you got to hope that Dynasties are

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 3>going to stick around long enough to be able to build.

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 2>It for the future.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 3>So I do lean a little bit more into the

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 3>win now. But as we talk, this is closer to

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>three year windows stuff. When we go through at least

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>what my ranks are.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And for Welsh's full prospect write ups, to check out

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Baseball Black Book over on Amazon. Welsh, myself,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Kirby, Casey Bubbao, all the contributors. This year, it's

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>available on Amazon, and Welsh does a phenomenal job with

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>all those prospect ryoups that he does there. So let's

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the big board. Let's start with the top

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ten here. Really like, this is kind of splitting hairs

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>if anybody wants to, but this is I think a

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty dark good list. He got Schoey Otani at the

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>top obvious reasons. Is he risky because of the pitching?

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Is he something we've never seen before? Yes, he is,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's very special, so he's the one one. Then

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you have Bobby Wood junior, Gunner Henderson, Ellie de la

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Cruz aggressive at four, but as he continues to fill

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>out that frame, you have to imagine there could be

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>even more power to be added there for Ellie de

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>la Cruz. Juan Soto at five just signed the giant

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>deal with the New York Mets. I'm still on a

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>high about that. Julia Rodriguez at six, Fernando Tetis junior

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>at seven, Ronaldocunya at eight, Paul Skeens at nine, Kyle

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>Tucker at ten. I want to talk about Ronald Acunya.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>He is twenty seven years old, going on twenty eight.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Now he's got both knees done. It's funny because if

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he asked me last year, I mean, he would probably

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want one or two on this list most likely. So

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a little bit of a discount on him.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think people are starting to get a little concerned.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>He's had a bunch of injuries now before the age

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of thirty. My mindset is, well, he's got both knees done.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>That was the bigger problem, and now we should be

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>clear sailing hopefully for the rest of his career. Do

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you have that same kind of confidence. You must, he's

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a top ten player, But do you think the market

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sees Ronald acunia is still as closer to a top

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>three guy or closer to a you know, eight, nine

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>ten guy.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I've seen him outside the top ten in some dynasty rings,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 3>So I would actually say, I think there's a couple

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 3>things that are in this too. You know, I'm good

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 3>with Oughtani, You're good with Thughtani. I don't think everybody

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>would be because not only do you have the age

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>positional issue, you also have he's the old I think,

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 3>let me look at this. I believe he's the oldest

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>player on this list that I have, so that can

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 3>throw some people off, but he's a unicorn. But I

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 3>do think if you wanted, like Bobby Witt is number one,

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm totally fine with. If you wanted one soda in

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 3>a points league once a points dynasty league, one soda

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>would probably be higher. So then it comes back to ronald'

0:07:58.160 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>kunyan and what you said is you're right. I think

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 3>last year the conversation this was Otani or Akunya and

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the things that hold you back I think obviously are

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the injuries and the multiple injuries. He's not into Stanton

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>territory or Buxton territory and anything like that, but we are

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>stacking some injuries. And then he's a little bit affected

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 3>by redraft values as well. Redraft ranks. Outside the top twenty,

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 3>I think he's like hovering right around twenty. He was

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 3>outside the top thirty about a month ago. But part

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 3>of it is doesn't look like he's going to be

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 3>ready for the beginning of the season, so if you're

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>starting in a fresh new dynasty, they have to consider that.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 3>With Acunya, that you would bite a little bit of

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the season, that's a little secondary might run less. He

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 3>also mentioned maybe that's only this year. That's something to consider.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But also remember that's what we thought last time he

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>had the knee surgery.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Everyone said, uh, maybe he won't run so much.

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, seventy three slen bases. Yeah, okay, but he's even

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of talked about that potentially coming down. And then

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the other thing to potentially take a look

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 3>at us if you're looking at like massive, massive impact,

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>there were some downs from this past year. Wasn't like,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, you're dealing with some arm thing. No, his

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 3>strikeouts went way up from the year prior he hit

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 3>eleven percent strikeout rate. In twenty twenty three, it went

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 3>up to twenty three point nine, which was more career

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 3>average lost barrel rate. Obviously, there was more season to

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 3>be played, and the home run totals were way down.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I would say, my best is my best way to

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 3>associate all of this with these players. It's not necessarily

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 3>about Ocunya being this lower dynasty value as it is,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 3>it's such an incredible tier of players. You know, Hulu

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Rodriguez has a down year, one of the youngest. He's

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 3>great Tatis kind of retransform. He's always a thirty thirty play.

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 3>We talk about Gunner Henderson, we talked about Bobby we

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Elie de la Cruz as well, is a unicorn freak

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 3>who I think could be the number one overall. It's

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 3>just such a great collection of players to put in

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 3>here that I think Acunya properly fits a little bit

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 3>lower with now some injury risk, little bit power down.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe the stolen bases come down. But like if you

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 3>had the six pick in a dynasty and you got Acunya,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>that's pretty slick. But you're already playing maybe slightly behind

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the eight ball as far as your production in your

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 3>first year. But to me, he's a top ten I

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>can't put him outside the top ten.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Skeens is the only pitcher on your top ten list.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>If I had a picture on the top ten, I

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>would put schoobl Off there, despite the fact that it's

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>really one and a half glorious seasons. He's older, he's

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, he's left handed. He is about to hit

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the market soon, which we love guys coming up on

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>contract years. My problem with Skeens is not how great

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he is, and you know, the routine is incredible. Everything

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about Skeens is fantastic. My concern is learning the lesson

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>from years and years of doing this in decades now plural.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>You feel like there's going to be a Tommy John

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>at some point when anybody that throws this hard. So

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the question is when does that happen And does he

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>miss an entire season because it happens at a certain time,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but like a better time quote unquote, like early in

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a season as opposed to do in the middle of

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a season, or does he miss a year and a

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>half possibly two years because of it. It's all about

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the timing of that. And in Dynasty, that's just something.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it could happen to any picture, can happen

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to school, can happ up into you know, any of

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>these guys. But it just feels like the potential for

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it to happen to Skeins is a little higher than

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>most And when you factor in the risk versus the

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>top ten ranking, to me, I'm passing on all pictures

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten. If I had to buck for one,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be Schooble, although Zack Wheeler is a guy

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>who's been so incredibly consistent, maybe we don't give him.

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Enough credit to that's too old. Let's talk about Yeah,

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>that's the problem. It's too old.

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about schemes here in the top ten

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>and the risk that that really is out there, because

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's going to be tantalizing for a lot

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of players out there.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I'll be frank, it would be hard

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 3>for me to take schemes and take a picture. For

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 3>everything that you said, I think from again, this is dynasty,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 3>So from that perspective, you know, from a three year

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 3>window perspective, Scooble and schemes, Like, if you want to

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 3>take Scoople over him, I think that's justified if you

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 3>are thinking about the bigger scope, like there's a massive,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>massive age difference. I love schemes though as well, Like

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the talent of schemes. It's not to take

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 3>away from Schooble had one of the most ridiculous k

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 3>rates on his four seen thirty seven percent this past year.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 3>He had a one point nine to six ERA with

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 3>a two point five to three expected thirty three percent

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 3>strikeout rate was absolutely absurd, and that Splinker just became

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 3>an absolutely dominant pitch. He's elite of elite. He's young,

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 3>but the problems massive college innings. All of these big

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>velocity arms have some type of an injury. Hell, I'll

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 3>thow you this example. I love Sean McClanahan, so player.

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 3>I always loved. He was near the tippy top, probably

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 3>two or three on my list of Dynasty pitchers. Last year.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Guess what two of the three of my Dynasty pitchers injured.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Strider and him. So, to speak to your point, investment

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 3>in a picture is really tough. But from the talent perspective,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>it's Paul Skeins. The age perspective, it's not remotely closing

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the value of what you're getting on him. The three

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 3>year window maybe makes it a little bit more comfortable.

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 3>This isn't like a young pitcher who is like, oh,

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 3>he's like the fifteenth ranked guy and has upsie. This

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 3>is number one redraft pick right now. I mean everybody

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 3>expects the production of what you've seen out of him

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a lead of elite. Can I

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 3>get three years before an injury? Yeah? I do think

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a possibility, but you are taking on inherent risk.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 3>We always chase this with Chris Sale. I would just

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 3>throw out everybody year in and year out, would chase

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 3>this idea. Chris ail his arm, He's going to blow

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 3>it out and it never happen. It's kind of a

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>different world that we're in right now. So I agree

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>with you. I think this is the riskiest of all

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 3>of this because you've got these incredible hitters that are

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 3>around him. You've got some incredible hitters right behind him.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>But if you want to own the starting pitcher market,

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 3>this is what you're going to have to pay for.

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Paul Skins. Paul Skins is higher and a lot.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Of strider in your top ten last year.

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Welsh, No, but he was my number one sp for Dynasty.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, there's the cautionary tale. That's why.

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, one hundred percent.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I imagine he was top fifteen or twenty for sure.

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think it was like I want to say,

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 3>like yeah, nineteen or eighteen or something like that, right

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 3>in that range.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, let's get to the next grouping of

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>ten here eleven through twenty Corbyn Carroll with Arizona Jackson, Curio,

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>who really turned out on the second half at twelve,

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>with Milwaukee lad Junior at thirteen, Aaron Judge at fourteen,

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez at fifteen. Maybe not enough respect for Jose Ramirez.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I know he's not as young as some of the

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>other guys in this list, but man, oh man, that

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>guy just continues to have seiye.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>So you take a three year window, I mean, this

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>is huge value right there.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>But I was thinking the same thing.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at him there and I'm thinking to myself, Man,

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>do I feel better about him in a three year

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>window than Jackson Cheerio?

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Probably? Like I just do. I love Cheerio, but like.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I know what I'm getting in the next

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, and I think Cherio's is a great

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>player who's going to really be special. But three year

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>window maybe Jose Ramirez, But regardless, We'll continue on here

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to Rescooble, seventeen, Bryce Harper, and then Jordan Alvarez

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>at eighteen. We have Mookie Bets at nineteen, James Wood

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at twenty. Let's start with Corbyn Carroll a mixed bag

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>last year, very frustrating first half, prolific second half, sophomore

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>slumps happened. Adjustments get made. He made them, so obviously,

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting your Arizona Diamondbacks love aside, you know

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that Corbyn Carroll, you and I are both big fans

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of his. He did what he had to do for

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>me and clearly for you two with this ranking where okay,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the league adjusted to you. You made adjustments back second

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>half was fantastic and now it should be theoretically clear sailing. Yes,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>do you worry about frame or size with Corbyn Carroll

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of long term investment?

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, fram in size is not it's not a

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 3>big I mean, you could have had that same argument

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 3>about like hose Al Tuve his entire career and he's

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>consolutely going.

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Well and worse because he plays the infield because exactly

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and more, you know, he's a little bit thicker and

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, and you could make arguments that maybe

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the everybody on the planet was like Corbyn Carroll's shoulder.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Those two things were peanut butter and jelly for conversations

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 3>about why he wasn't producing as well, and you could

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>maybe say, like, oh, a guy with that type of frame,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>you know in the velocity you want to talk about

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 3>bat speed We have new bat speed trackers this past year,

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 3>and God has gonna be amazing being able to go

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 3>year over year bat speed. But you want to talk

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 3>about bat speed, he was like top essentially twentieth percentile

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 3>in the league, quite a bit faster than the average.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>So that type of like framing could be the issue.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 3>We never did find out if there was a shoulder

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 3>injury that was actually going on. What we did know

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 3>and I talked about all year, was there was a

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 3>hole in the swing in his rookie year that people

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't take advantage of. They saw it in the off

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 3>season and they pounded it. This past year was up

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 3>and inside. He could not figure it out until the

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 3>second half. I mean, the power surge was bad. In

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the first half. He had five homers, but in three

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty three of bats in the first half.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 3>In the second half, in two hundred and thirty six

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 3>at bats, he hit seventeen homers. He tripled his power output.

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 3>He figured it out to twelve average in the first

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 3>half two fifty eight in the second half. Stole I mean,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>the stolen base pace was higher because he was getting

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>on base more. But there's some downside. So we've now experienced.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 3>What the downside is his expected batting average was only

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 3>two forty coming off of hitting what was it to

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 3>thirty one? So that doesn't like if he had like

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 3>an expected two seventy five, we'd be like, oh my gosh,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Corbyn Carroll could be back to being a three hundred hitter.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 3>What we found out about him was he's a guy

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 3>who wants to work through it. Maybe he's not as

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 3>high contact of a player as we thought before, but

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>he proved h whatever you thought about the injuries, that

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the power was still there. He showed twenty plus power.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>He still stole thirty five bases. These paces weren't as

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 3>much as the rookie season, but he walked more, he

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 3>struck out less. This past year. He kept barreling the

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 3>ball and he was able to push through a monster

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 3>second half. All the talent in the world to be

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 3>a twenty five to fifty player year in and year out,

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 3>and he worked through some big bumps. Is out of

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 3>first round fantasy talent? I still think it is, but

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>there's risk and that's why the last thing I would

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 3>say is it is a very interesting and weird situation

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 3>when you get to like right up to Skeens. Then

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 3>you get Skeens, and then you look at all this

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 3>collection of players where there's these older guys, there's Judge,

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>there's Ramirez, and then there's the Corbyn Carrolls, and then

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 3>there's the Jackson Turios. You're now really bound and sing,

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, do I want the upside versus what I've

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>always had? And that's why, Like, if you wanted to

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 3>take Cozier Ramirez over Carol here, I think you could

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 3>last time, I'll say, to be honest, yeah, and I

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>think I know you would. I My rank isn't one

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent in a three year window. It's weighted to

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 3>a three year windows. So the three year window takes

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 3>a higher weight. So when you do the whole, like,

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 3>would I rather have Ramirez overturio? Yeah, maybe I see that,

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 3>but you still have to think about the long term.

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 3>But yes, Corbin Carrol has inherent risk. But I think

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the second half told us a really great story that

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 3>this is one of those guys that can be twenty

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>to twenty five with anywhere from thirty five to fifty

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 3>plus stolen bases in a high powered offense. So I

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>still love him, and yes I am a Homer. He's

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 3>literally right above me on the camera.

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, you got two guys named Corbin on the Diamondbacks.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>How's that going to work out?

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 3>I know all the Cordle thing.

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>We've also got Vlad Garrow Junior on this list at thirteen.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Who uncertainty next year where he's going to be? How

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>do you factor that in too, because you know a

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of I think the future of Lad Guerrero has

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with what environment is in and hopefully it's

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>a good environment for him. We've seen him struggle at

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>times with weight, We've seen him struggle at times at

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the plate. And last year was a great season for Vlad,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a big bounce back again monster a second half, that

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>big contract looming. Is Vlad Guerrero Junior for you, with

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that uncertainty of where he is next year a good investment.

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the certainty that looks like he's not

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be a blue Jay. It might be more

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 3>certain that he's not feeling to be there. Yeah, So

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the uncertainty you're talking about is the destination. I think

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 3>most of the places he's going to go, or at

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>least he's projected to, are better hitting environments. You know

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Boston is the number one right now. I'll take him

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 3>hitting in Boston over Toronto.

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So I want him in San Francisco, you know what

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean? That would be where it's like they've got money.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>They've been trying to spend it for the last three

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>years so hard.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 3>That would be one that would that would you're one

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent right, but if you were a Dodger, that

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 3>would be the best thing on the planet. Can we

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 3>not carry now we're not going on Boston? Seems like

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a likely situation. So when you talk about the uncertainty,

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the destination is probably going to be a better hitting environment.

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 3>The destination the team will probably have better players around

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 3>him for better run support. And then on top of it,

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 3>you put this twenty five year old first baseman who

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 3>was top ten percentile across the board in hitting thirteen

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 3>point seven percent barrel rate, top nine percent hard hit rate,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 3>fifty four point nine, top three percent in the league.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 3>He hit three twenty three. His expected batting average was

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 3>three twenty one. It's like the best in the league.

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>He checked every single box, doesn't strike out, walked more,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 3>barreled more. He's in a contract year right now. And

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 3>then the environment can get better. Everything is in this

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 3>beautiful scenario for Vlad. The only negatives from Dynasty is

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of like a first baseman doesn't steal bases,

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 3>but he's centered around you know, older players like I mean,

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Judge is going to hit more homers, but he's a

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>bit older. You can pair out some of the other

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 3>first basemen that have kind of lost some of the value.

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Harper is probably a good comp but he's younger.

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 3>He's still just really young. He's an incredible bat who's

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 3>shown high batting average and is a elite four category player.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>So I love Lad from the age, from the uncertainty

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 3>that is probably only going to be a plus. I

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 3>just think he's a great Dynasty buy in the second round.

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 3>But you were kind of devoid of stolen bases. There

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 3>a really great pairing if you were, if you had

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 3>the ability to Ellie and vladd would be like a

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 3>killer one two punch for stolen bass. Well.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's funny because in this ten team where you're

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>wrapping around here, Akunya in Vlad would be the the

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>actual combination there.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Love that, too shabby, Go play a ten team Dynasty,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 3>then go.

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Do that Alaska Crack the Talk twenty two.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about it is James Wood, who

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>last year at twenty one, made his debut hit two

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty four seven eighty one ops, nine homers, fourteen steals.

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Stage didn't look too big. I'm aggressive on him, and

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy you are too. I want to talk about

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>your aggression with James Wood because I think we see

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>eye to eye on this guy.

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I think James Wood is the first representation

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>of the young player where their redraft value does not

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>equate to the dynasty, because that's the thing that everybody

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 3>has to come to terms with in dynasties. You're like,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, why is this guy who's never played,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I never had a single atout in the majors.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 3>Why is this guy in the top sixty over this

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 3>other guy? James Wood is the first representation of redraft

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 3>not translating to it, but it is. You know, it's

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>all the potential, like what you're talking about. He had

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 3>two sixty four last year, which you love. Lowered his

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 3>strikeout rate at triple a, still pretty high at the majors.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 3>That's going to improve. Walk rate was good, a great

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 3>ten percent barrel rate hard hit was elite at fifty

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 3>two percent, which is bonkers, and his expected batting average

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>supported his batting average. So all these fun things. He

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 3>barrels the ball, he hits it hard, batting average is

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 3>supportive of where he was, so you can grow on it.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 3>He's got tools for days. I said this last year.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I think I said it here. I said it on

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 3>a show over on CBS that if you want a

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 3>player for the future to project that has freak likabilities

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 3>like Elie de la Cruz, it's James Wood. James woodd

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 3>be that type of player. And it's not even just

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>meant to be like physical comps of like he's six

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>foot seven or whatever.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>No, it's like this all the tools.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this dude.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't be eye test.

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 3>He's improved his back to ball skills exponentially. He could

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 3>always run, but now you're looking at a guy that

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 3>could go thirty thirty. So you got to this is

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 3>where you have to start paying up for someone whose

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 3>production doesn't quite justify the cost. He's that first representation

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 3>of it. And I think this is you know where

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 3>you maybe and here would be a good example of

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 3>something you could do. You're like Joe, and you say

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I want Jose Ramirez a little bit higher over another,

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, like you want to do it over Carol

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 3>or Jackson Curio. Take Ramirez in the first and then

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 3>come back and get James Wood and you're getting some

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 3>of that upside. Those two could be really great combinations.

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I think that's a great way to put

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it too. Uh, let's talk at Roster construction one on one, folks. Yeah,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of upside, a little bit of floor there.

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You got the best of all worlds. Next here on

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>our list twenty one through thirty. Francisco Lindora twenty one,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Rafield Dever's a twenty two look to be moving positions there,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Junior Cavanaro at twenty three, Jared Durant twenty four, White

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Langford cracking the top twenty five, Spencer Stryder, Austin Reiley,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Crochet, a bunch of pitchers there, and then you

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>have Katel Marte at twenty nine and Jackson Merrill at thirty.

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Junior Camanaro, guy I was very high on last year.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm still very high on Camanaro. However, I'm just not

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>sure if he's done enough yet to warrant the top

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, which is basically where he is. He's right

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in that twenty three range. What did you see out

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of him last year? I only hit under two fifty.

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>The OBP was a great small sample forty three games,

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but still I would like to see a little bit

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>more before we get quite to top twenty five stats

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for Cavanaro. I think it's too high. Why are you

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so aggressive on the Projectability's just because he missed so

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>much time being hurt last year.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I don't don't think you can take

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 3>it too too much out of like the rookie campaign,

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 3>he's twenty one years old. He had a two almost

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 3>it's called two to fifty batting average in the majors.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Prior to that in the miners, he had shown the

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 3>ability to lower that strikeout rate, which he also did

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 3>in the majors twenty two percent in his you know

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>first campaign of twenty twenty three, twenty one point five.

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Very good for a rookie, elite barrel, elite ish hard

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 3>hit for a rookie at forty five percent, already put

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 3>one up one sixteen on max EV. So I'm getting

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.959
<v Speaker 3>at is you got a guy that is not striking

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 3>out a bunch has always had elite, elite contact skills.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 3>You're talking thirty plus homer projection.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 3>The offense around him maybe is a bit of a question.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 3>But this, this is that battle where they waited three

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 3>year kind of moves a little bit because this is

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 3>a twenty one year old, like he has time to

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 3>work his projection of a player as long as it

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>keeps moving in the right direction, is someone that's probably

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>going to look like a Rafael Devers, if not better.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 3>So that's why you pay this price right now. And

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 3>this is a battle of that win now versus playing

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 3>for the future. But I think he's a happy medium

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 3>because you're going to get full year production out of

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 3>him this year, and I would expect the low side

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 3>is like two fifty to twenty five homers. Twenty one

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 3>years old, you're going to be sitting on him for

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 3>a long time.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Wyatt Langford last year had big xpectations. Now a terrible

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>April in March rib barely terrible. I mean he hit

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>two thirty eight, then May was only six games he missed.

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Time came back was incredible. In June eight ninety four,

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Ops hit three hundred, then May in August, I mean,

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, excuse me a July in August tailed off

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, only to be brilliant again in September

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>where we hit three hundred again with a six ten

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>slugging percentage of the nine ninety six ops, eight homers

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty RBI. That is a hell of a finish. Wyatt

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Langford could be one of these guys like if he

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>could find that consistency, would be a top ten maybe

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>next year. Do you see that jump or is it

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>more of this growing pains and finding himself in twenty

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>There's a little part of me that isn't sure that

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 3>there's like insane upside of Whyatt Langford he hit two

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>fifty three, sixteen homers, nineteen stolen bases. Now bear with

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>me just for half a second when when I say

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 3>that is I'm not sure I would look at him

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 3>and be like, oh, this is a guy that's going

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 3>to hit thirty five homers, steal forty five bases and

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 3>da da da. I think you might be like, he's

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 3>going to become a better hitter. From the two fifty three,

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>he had a two to fifty seven expected batting average,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 3>low strikeout rate, but he settled still as like a

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty five to twenty five guy. But the base dealing

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 3>looks aggressive. The plate skills look kind of elite for

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a rookie again, almost under twenty percent, almost ten percent

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>walk rate, really great overall hit skills, and just a

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 3>couple of notes I had on him, he hit two

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 3>forty plus against three different pitch types. Again this is

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 3>a rookie. He had a thirty point plus against fastballs,

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 3>so two thirty one jump of his expected batting average,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 3>so he hit two sixty five technically on the expected

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 3>side he was expected to and almost a fifty point

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 3>batting average boost he had against sliders, where he only

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 3>hit two hundred but an expected two fifty. So what

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 3>does that mean. That means a little bit more progression.

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Those balls are going to start flying. He also had

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 3>a three plus expected home run total in Baseball Savant,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 3>so just seeing that he's got a little bit more

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 3>home run upside, all of the nonsense of what I'm

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 3>saying is is like this. It looks like a really

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 3>really good hitter, someone that can be aggressive as far

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 3>as his running goes, and I think I wouldn't be surprised.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 3>If he's a two eighty five twenty five to twenty

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 3>five guy, there's a lot of upside for what the

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>floor is gonna look like. I'm just not sure he's

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna be like Ellie or like Corporn Carol.

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Garrett Crochet certainly a great season, not a

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>full season from only one hundred and forty six things.

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Now he is going to be a Boston Red Sox.

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>He's just twenty six. I gotta tell you, Welsh, he

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite values on this board here

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>at the twenty eighth spot. Overall, I feel like this

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>is where I'm about ready. If I'm gonna take a

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>plunge with a pitcher, I'm gonna take it with a

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>six to six guy who's two fifty and like just

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>throws gas and now has found himself on a significantly

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>better team with a different color pair of socks, where

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>games are gonna matter now for Garrett Crochet. Anything else

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to add on this guy too? I mean, did you

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>see I know it was on like one glorious season,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>but still I think it's a lot to like here

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with Crochet.

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I actually love your assessment too. Of like, maybe

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't take school. Maybe I don't take Skeins. You

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>come into like a third round in third crochet. Yeah,

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 3>they get some really little.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Old He's funny. He's younger than skoobl but he's older

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>than Skens. But again, the size and the frame. I

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just look at him and I'm like, man, that's a hoss.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm looking at.

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just want to agree. Three point five eight

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 3>ERA two point five expected, so a full run lower

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 3>when he was a White Sox elite thirty five point

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 3>one percent K percentage, And I love this. Every pitch

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 3>he threw had a thirty percent plus width and K percentage.

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Every pitch is elite. The only thing to worry about

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 3>is maybe Boston Boston has some home some ballpark factors

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 3>that can maybe negatively worked against him. Boston's overall the

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 3>second ballpark factor best for hitters. The Socks were the

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty first, and for right handed hitters, Boston is number two,

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Chicago was thirteen. So what I'm saying is is there,

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, for right handed hitters against him, there's a

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 3>little bit more of an advantage from a ballpark factor,

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 3>but he's an elite strikeout option and he's got plenty

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of time to go, and he's already got that injury

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 3>out of his way as well. So I love him

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 3>as a dynas you buy.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Next year thirty one through forty. Now this is the

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>round where I want to trade out. I want to

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>trade up. I want to trade back because this group,

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, is a lot of volatility. Jets Chism at

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, trade Turner at thirty two, Michael Harris at

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.479
<v Speaker 1>thirty three, Cole Reagan's at thirty four, then Jackson Holiday,

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Jason Dominguez, Logan Gilbert thirty seven, Dylan Cruz at thirty eight,

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Latch of Projectables with him in Washington and Wood we

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have O'Neil Cruz at thirty nine, and then rock excuse me,

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Roky Sazaki. He wasn't say Rocky Sazaki because that sounds fun.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 3>It's a great name, Rocky Sazaki.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Come on, you're gonna eat lightning and crap thunder. But anyway,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Roki Sazaki. We'll see where he lands at the end

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of January, hopefully in a good spot. But I want

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to sort of Michael Harris in this group because this

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is a guy I feel like I can get, you know,

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and fifteen other spots, and I'd like Michael Harris

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as a as a real player, as a fantasy player.

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's one of the most overrated guys. I

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>thought it last year. I didn't like the ADP at all.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 1>You know this, We had lots of discussions about it.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I know there were moments last year in the second

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>where it came to life. But he gets bounced all

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>over the lineup. I don't know, man. Michael Harris, to me,

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is one of these guys is really tough to gauge.

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I would rather take a shot at with the upside

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of Dylan Cruzes at thirty eight than Michael Harris at

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty three.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Joe, it's funny that you say that. You kind of

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 3>got me thinking a little bit because I do. Look,

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I love Jason Dominguez, who is a couple spots lower

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 3>you've already got. So we'll talk about the guy in

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, But there's already some other favorites for him.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I would agree for the record too. Dimingez is another

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>guy I'd rather have than Michael Harris.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I love Dimingez runs aggressively well.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I've seen him play in person a couple of times

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>yere two in Somerset and he was He's terrific, I

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>mean terrific game player.

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 3>He's not the best like the vender. And he's got

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 3>some quota offense, yeah yeah, but offensively he's got huge power.

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Stolen bases are there. I think he's going to hit better.

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Dylan Cruz kind of the same thing. I love that.

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 3>The thing that holds you with Michael Harris. Bad first half,

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 3>like kind of again last year, but second half he

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 3>hit two eighty three eleven homers, but he did stop stealing,

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.959
<v Speaker 3>so it's kind of balanced out. What we've seen from

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Michael Harris is kind of like the Langford what we're

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 3>talking about, where it's like the guy could be a

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 3>two eighty hitter twenty plus, twenty plus, especially if he

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 3>is higher in the lineup. That still doesn't happen. You

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 3>do have me thinking I might make an adjustment because

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the upside for a guy like Domingaz is

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 3>pretty higher than Michael Harris. Is just a better floor

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 3>with here. Dylan Cruz might be the prime example.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.239
<v Speaker 1>And look at Yankees. One other way to add more

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>pieces to lineup around some more veterans to that helps

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark factor is a very good one too. For

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bronx. Jackson Holiday another guy too, certainly disappointing early

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on some signs of life in the second half there too,

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like you are pretty confident here recking

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with thirty five, that this is going to be a

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>player you want to build a dynasty team around.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I think the main thing I can throw at anybody

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 3>is like I was massively, massively high on Jackson Holiday

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 3>last year. I've obviously dinged him, not a crazy amount,

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 3>but he is still twenty one years old. I still

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 3>believe in the bat he had an eight percent barrel

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 3>rate and a forty five percent hard hit rate. Those

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 3>are two grit eight tools to build off of. He's

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 3>got a lower his strikeout rate, and he has got

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 3>to make better quality of contact, and I think that's

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. So this my suggestion for Jackson Holiday,

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 3>get a better discount on him. Get a better discount

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 3>than paying inside the top forty. I think you probably

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 3>can for people that are going to look at redraft values.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 3>There isn't a lot of what he did last year

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to take with you, except there's still good quality of

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 3>contact when he makes quality of contact or there are

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 3>good bat to ball skills when he gets to it,

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's going to bounce back this year.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 3>And he's a good dynasty bibe. But try to get

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 3>a better.

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Cost on him. Now, Sazaki is interesting. You have him

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Yamamoto pitches on the Dodgers. Is that just

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>an age thing or is it all some size thing

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>too because he's a bigger pitcher.

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, absolutely an age thing. Roki Sazaki has age in

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 3>his favor. You know he is coming over and he's

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 3>susceptible to the international signing rules because he's under twenty five. Yamamoto,

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I believe he's thirty years old. There are two. There's

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 3>a couple conflicting things.

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>You got.

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Baseball America is giving an eighty grade on his splitter.

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Lance Brasdowski did an amazing breakdown of what this splitter

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 3>he throws. It's got, it's very unlike a lot.

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Just twenty six, just pointing twenty six?

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Did I say it was thirty? I think I'm making Yeah,

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 3>that's a whole one.

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It's thirty one. Now I think going into this year.

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent. But Roki Sazaki splitter compared to Yamamoto

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 3>is something that might be a big differential. And again

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 3>go look at Lance's video on it, where he kind

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 3>of describes as splitter is almost kind of like a

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 3>bullet splitter, where it has a different trajectory of a

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 3>line of sight of what we're used to on the

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 3>plane from a fastball to splitter differential. It's a it's

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 3>a disgusting splitter. Guy's also thrown triple digits, but some

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 3>of that thing has fallen off, so that there's a

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 3>question mark can a team get back to this. Roki Sazaki,

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 3>who threw for triple digits, had this big extension. Here's

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the other slight problem. Really seems like there might be

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 3>some type of UCL or Tommy John thing in the

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 3>near future. So, and I'm saying this because I think

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.760
<v Speaker 3>some people are gonna have Roky Szazaki in dynasty higher

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 3>because based on age, based on potential, the strikeout potential,

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 3>he might be seen as like, you know, a top

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 3>five dynasty starting pitcher. I do think there's some worries

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 3>this is another guy like Holiday. You might be open

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 3>to even make let him fall a little bit, but

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 3>the talent might surpass. He might not be in this

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 3>same territory in two years of Logan, Gilbert and Yamamoto.

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so interesting. Is the next guy on

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the list here at forty one as we start the

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>new board is Dylan Ceas makes every start every single year.

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>He has been so durable, he has been so locked down,

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>He's done nothing but get better in the last two

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>years to their night and day. For me, forget three

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>year window, I'll even take five year window. I want

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Cee over Sauzaki, and it's not close right now.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So that is what's fascinating, and it's I think most

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>people are prisoners of the moment, right it's the new thing.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's very exciting, get all the buzz about this. But

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>meanwhile there's Dylan CEA's just getting the job done every

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>year at thirty two starts, and that to me is

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.399
<v Speaker 1>far more impressive and far more investible long term than

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 1>what Suzaki is at this juncture, having never seen him

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>throw a pitch in the Major league.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, and let me let me add to that,

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 3>because do you remember what I said earlier in the

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 3>show where I go. I don't think there's a lot

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 3>of variants in the first round second round.

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>No, maybe as you go, third round gets greater.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Fourth round where we're You're not wrong. This is a

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 3>territory where you do start paying a tiny bit more

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 3>attention if you are a team that you're like, you

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 3>know what, I'm taking Freddy Freeman higher than he's being ranked.

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking some of these older guys. I'm gonna take

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wheeler higher. If you're in a win now perspective,

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 3>you should pay attention to a cease versus Suzaki. It

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 3>might take Sazaki two years to get right. Dylan Cees

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 3>his prime is right now. When you said five year window,

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I want Dylan Ceaz when he's

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 3>thirty five, thirty four to thirty five, But do I

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 3>want him at twenty nine, thirty and thirty one in

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the three year window? You're not wrong about that, So

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 3>paying attention dyl Sly.

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Twenty nine, I think I say take out, Yeah, he'll

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>be in his you know, five years from now he's

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>thirty three, Okay, like Sill of these guys were going

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>strong at thirty five, thirty six, thirty seven nowadays.

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Like yeah, like Wheelers, these guys.

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler's a great example, but this guy's just throwing up,

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty thirty thirty. He look thirty two, thirty two,

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty three, thirty three, last four years. I mean that's stunning.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>The best ability is availability these guys. Rokie's got some

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>risk one hundred percent. He's got some fun to watch.

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>My evaluation of him in the Black Book is really good.

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I like him as a picture, but there's definitely risk there.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Where he lands has a lot to do with his development.

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm keen to wait before I really do the

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.240
<v Speaker 1>full write up on him. Corey Seeger forty two. Corbyn

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Burns a forty three new landing spot. He's a guy

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>who's a little older too. Same as Zach Wheeler at

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>forty four even, and I'll get forty five. C J.

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Adams a forty six, George Kirby of forty seven, Yamamoto

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>at forty eight, Albe's at forty nine, and then Riley

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Green at fifteen. Other guy who could jump up this list.

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Corbyn Burns here, a guy who's now

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in his thirties. Same as Wheeler here, So you have

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Burns ahead of Wheeler. I'm curious as to why.

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's a pretty big age gap between the two.

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's three or four years. Yeah, so I

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 3>mean in a three year wind of Wheelers getting into

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven thirty eight. I think some people could look

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 3>at Burns last year and see like, oh, some things

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 3>are starting to taper down, you know. Interestingly enough, he

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 3>actually I did some velocity to his cutter, but that

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 3>thing got hit up more where his other two offerings.

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 3>I believe it was the slider, and I think the

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 3>curveball had batting averages against. It's actually three pitches here, curveball,

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 3>slider and changeup had a two hundred or lower batting

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 3>average against. That's absurd. Those pitches got better. His cutter

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 3>got hit up way more than it had in the

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 3>prior year, but three or four pitches with a two

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 3>hundred or lower batting average. I actually think there's some

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 3>subtle of unluckiness with Corbyn Burns. I think he can

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 3>bounce back. Plus you've got you know, the super fast

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.439
<v Speaker 3>offensive team ballpark might come into play. I still think

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the stuff is there for Corbyn Burns. He had a

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 3>two nine two era, he had a you know, sub

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 3>three four expected era barrels. He gave up a tiny

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 3>bit more, but it was super low, hard hit contact

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 3>with a super fast outfield. I think Corbyn Burns is

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 3>lined up pretty well. I think he's going to bounce back.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 3>I think it felt like some of the inconsistencies is

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 3>he was moving away from being elite. But I still

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 3>think he is really elite. And I thought this before

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 3>he signed with the Diamondbacks. Honestly, the Diamondbacks ballpark factor

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 3>might be a little bit of a problem. But back

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 3>to the Rokies Azaki thing. It sucks because we broke

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 3>them into tens. So it feels like Roki's in this

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 3>different tier. He's really not. He's in a tier of

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Dylan Cee's, Corbyn Burns, Zach Wheeler, Emanaga. They're all different

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 3>variants of each other. You know, do I want Zach

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Wheeler probably the best picture on this list. He's a

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 3>win now guy. You'd want to make that investment. Corbyn Burns,

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Emanaga they've got four or five year windows. Rokie's got

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 3>a ten year window. It's it's starting to be your flavor.

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 3>And I just am still very much on Corbyn Burns,

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 3>but he's in that tier with Wheeler and with Emonaga.

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 2>C J.

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Abrams. I want to talk about real quick too, because

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's another guy too, turns twenty four. Obviously, there's power

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>their speed. There's also some immaturity and some issues there

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to casinos casinos, but which we support. You know, go

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:56.919
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Betting Pros YouTube channel.

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Right. Just not a game day, just maybe not a

0:39:58.440 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 3>game day, a game day, just like a.

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Game And if you're gonna do show up and hit

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>get three hits, don't stay till six in the morning,

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like get But if you do, go out there

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the next day and get three hits like those guys

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties, you know, smoking cigarettes in the in

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the dugout and god knows what else they were doing.

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, just go out there and get your

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>hits and then nobody cares. But with Abrams too, this

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that I fear next year could be

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>top twenty on this list or outside the top one

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred on this list. That's how I feel about Abrams.

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you see him with that same risk or am

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I being a little hyperbolic?

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Nah, I got my worries with it. I'll say he

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 3>actually outperformed what I thought he was going to be

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 3>last year. I thought he was one of those guys.

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>That was like, well we loved him two years ago. Collectively,

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>if we were like go in and go in. Last

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>year the price got really high. We were like, I

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have an abidity.

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 3>For Abrams, Like and I know said this sport. I

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 3>was at his major league debut Padres, No one's in

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the stadium, rookie league ball. He hits a homer in

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 3>his like second at bat. I got it on video. No,

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 3>it's just me and Abrams and the team. Like, I've

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 3>watched this guy since the day he started as a professional,

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 3>So I have that affinity for him. But where his

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 3>skill set has started to go, I started to question, like,

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 3>this guy just learned to get the ball in the

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 3>freaking air because he doesn't hit it hard, he doesn't

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 3>barrel super great, he doesn't have pure row power, and

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 3>he just made enough of it. Well guess what. He

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 3>upped his home run total from eighteen to twenty this year.

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 3>Stole a little bit less, he hit the ball a

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 3>bit harder, but his strikeouts went up. I just think

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 3>it also the spants, like, you know, just below average

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of across the board. I think he gets away

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 3>with some stuff, and I worry that his floor is

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 3>like a twelve homer, twenty five stolen base guy, which

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:37.359
<v Speaker 3>is still pretty good. So I have him a bit

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 3>lower maybe than some others. And then the immaturity, we

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of don't know where that's going to go, Like

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 3>what's going to happen, Like is this going to keep

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 3>tapering out and become an issue? I don't know. I

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 3>just think there's some warning signs on Abrams to make

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 3>a big super commitment, But I don't know. Maybe top fifty,

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm still I'm still putting my foot down on it

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Outside of the top fifty one through one hundred, there's

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>a few names that stick out.

0:41:57.239 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 2>We've highlighted some of them.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about a few of them to I want

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Roman Anthony of the Boston Red Sox,

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I'm sure you know some people are

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>still getting familiar with. So how would you justify the

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ranking here at fifty nine.

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Overall, Well, welcome to our I believe this is our

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 3>first player that has not had a single Major League

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.439
<v Speaker 3>at bat. Well, Rookie Sazaki I would qualify technically because

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't had an inning, But this is the first

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 3>bat that has not doesn't have a single major league

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 3>at bat that is on a really high part of

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 3>this list. What do I have him at fifty nine?

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I think is honest. I think some people are going

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 3>to have him higher. Some people have him as the

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 3>number one prospect in baseball. I don't. I've got him

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 3>close in there, So he's going to be higher on

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 3>another list he is. I believe it could be Pipeline

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 3>or Baseball America have him as the favorite for AL

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 3>Rookie of the Year, and it's a possibility even if

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't break camp. We've seen guys be able to do.

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Skeins didn't break camp with it. His skill

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 3>set immense Again we use the words like back to

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 3>ball skills. It's elite, big hard hit numbers. The guy

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 3>can run, doesn't strike out, he's lowrid to strikeout rates.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.439
<v Speaker 3>He kind of doesn't little bit of everything. Boston's gonna

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 3>be a huge environment for him to hit in if

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 3>he were to break camp. I would not be surprised

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 3>if he ended up being a thirty twenty type of guy.

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 3>So this is why he ranked so high. Skill sets

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:11.959
<v Speaker 3>are kind of through the roof. I still like Cruise

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 3>and Jason Diminge is a bit more than Anthony for

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 3>some other people, but he has a chance to break camp.

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 3>There is a proximity factor into this. He has got

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 3>to go inside the top seventy five of a dynasty draft,

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.439
<v Speaker 3>a new fresh start one, and frankly, he's probably gonna

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 3>go a little bit higher than some others. I did

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 3>think redraft he has the potential to maybe disappoint this year,

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not quite as excited. But he is very,

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 3>very high, and most people probably just don't have mounts

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 3>at the top fifty like I do.

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It's funny visually he looks like Michael Rappaport had a

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>baby with Robert t.

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Niro and the picture you're talking about, you know, do

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 3>your Yeah.

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>That's my son.

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna play. It's gonna play very well for the

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 2>Red side.

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 3>I know exactly what picture.

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 2>He does have that look about him.

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But y yeah, yep, very good marks at seventy six.

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say right now, he's gonna blow past

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>this rank.

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah this year.

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 2>Love the lineup. He is young enough.

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He's already shown you. I think he's a thirty five

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>home run guy starting next year.

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I really do.

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And It's not me being exaggerating. It's certainly not me

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>being a Mets fan saying it. That's you know, I'm

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>self loathing more than any Met fan almost. But Viento's

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>is a guy. I believed in him last year. We

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 1>talked about on the show. We have talked about adding him,

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 1>We talked about spring training, what he did, and you know,

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>he showed you he was ready for the big stage

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>last year in the playoffs. Love him. Can't get enough

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 1>of Entos. There's three pitchers in a cluster too, eighty four,

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 1>eighty five, eighty six, Uri Perez, Shane McClanahan, Sandy el Contra.

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Now you're not gonna believe this Welsh in my keeper league.

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I've got all three of these guys for a collective

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.919
<v Speaker 1>five dollars combined. Wow, As I drafted them last year

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and stashed them at the end of the draft when

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>people weren't paying attention. So I got one for like

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>two bucks and the others for a buck or something

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. And they have the escalators this year. So

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 1>again you got al Contra, who was about his consistent

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a so Klann huge upside. Uri Perez certainly another guy

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>too that looks like a big time upside guy. Unfortunately,

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, bitching all these guys are in Floridas.

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Don't like, we're hoping that Altata gets out of there soon.

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And now say mcclana had also changing location too. That's

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>something we got to talk about too, because the Tampa

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay situation here, they're gonna be playing in the Yankee facility,

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>the spring trading facility, and it is not the same

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>pitching advantage that the old building was.

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, you're right, and there's a lot to unpack

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 3>on all these guys. I would say, I think these

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 3>are some of the best values for dynasty. Yuri probably

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have the best, like redraft first season return value.

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be like midway through the year.

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:46.399
<v Speaker 3>McClanahan and al Contra, coming off of their injuries, look

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 3>like they're going to be, you know, starting close to

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:50.799
<v Speaker 3>the I think Alcontra will McClanahan maybe a month or so.

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I think these are the best, These are the best values.

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Both of these.

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Guys ranked really high. McClanahan is my favorite, but had

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 3>the worst production before he got hurt. There were some

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 3>really bad declines which I didn't like, but I still

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 3>would invest in. I think these should be targets for everybody,

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 3>no matter what type of construction. Maybe not all of

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 3>them because of the injuries, but you should go after

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 3>one of them. Juri being the youngest, McClanahan, I think

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 3>having the best tools, al Contra being the floor of

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.720
<v Speaker 3>all of those players, these should be some type of target.

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 3>And I just want to mention on your Vento's thing.

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I might have Vento's too low. I do think he

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 3>has a potential to blow past this. My worry still

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.919
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent strikeout rate, expect a batting average still under

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:35.240
<v Speaker 3>two fifty, but it's elite, elite hitting skills, fourteen percent barrelery,

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 3>big hard hit. If he's a two fifty thirty home

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 3>run guy, this is probably the relative range, maybe a

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 3>little bit higher. If he becomes a two sixty five,

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 3>two seventy hitter, sty then we're under selling him in

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 3>no way.

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't drive in one hundred runs in that lineup,

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and then.

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 3>He's pet Alonzo. Then he's just younger Pete.

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Just look at I mean, Soto hitting in front of judge,

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and now you've got this young kid of

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Vento's and look we'll see what happens to Alonzo. Still

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this we don't have clarity, but I just think the

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>intos is the truth. Man, I just do guys outside

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the top one hundred, The one that stands out to

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 1>me is one thirty seven Lawrence. Butler had a terrific season,

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.240
<v Speaker 1>really came out of nowhere for a lot of people

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and carried a lot of teams through the summer. Just

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>prolific with the power. And now he's going to be

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially in a better environment. Remember Oakland's not going to

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>be playing in Oakland anymore. The Athletics are now in

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Sacramento for the next couple years, so we'll see how

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that ballpark plays. So maybe there's opportunity here for some

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>even better numbers for him and guys like Rooker two.

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's the guy on my radar. I know two

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 1>guys for you, Spencer Schwellenbach and Jordan Lawler one on

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>one and one thirty six respectively, are also on your radar.

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just so just a couple of notes. Lawrence, I

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 3>don't disagree. I know for a fact there are some

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 3>higher rankings of him in Dynasty. I think there's an

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 3>element of I would like to see him do it

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.760
<v Speaker 3>again before I make him a top fifty overall prospect.

0:47:56.800 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 3>But he did show elements of it. Elite hard hit,

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 3>elite barrel love those two stats in connection with overall

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 3>hits tools. With that expect a batting average solid. He

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 3>lowered his strikeout rate. I think the ballpar factor for

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 3>right handed hitters in this minor league park is a benefit,

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 3>but there's a lot of elements of it that are

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.720
<v Speaker 3>similar that aren't big, So it's not like an entire

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 3>minor league. It's not like playing here in Arizona in

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 3>one of the spring training facilities. I believe it's right

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:25.360
<v Speaker 3>handed hitters have like a five foot differential in favor

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:27.720
<v Speaker 3>of them hitters, so it's a little bit in that spot.

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm a little bit lower. I suppose Schwellenbach personally

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 3>is one of my favorites. I might just be too

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 3>low on him, which is crazy, but I have him

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 3>at one oh one, so he just missed this list.

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 3>I think again, from a dynasty, if I could piece

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.760
<v Speaker 3>together the perfect pitchers through top one hundred and twenty

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 3>five picks, give me like Crochet in the third round,

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 3>give me a McClanahan and the fourth or fifth, and

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.319
<v Speaker 3>then give me a Schwellenbach later. Those are good investments.

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I like a good late Sweller.

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Everybody likes a good swelling box. Swelling boches slighter.

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You can get one, it's the best. You sleep like

0:48:57.480 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a baby.

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, maybe don't get a swellingbock on like Monday Tuesday.

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:01.760
<v Speaker 3>But give me a Schwellenbach on the weekend.

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, on the weekend, on a week.

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 3>In, Schwellenbach is the best. And your dynasty team, Schwellenbach

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 3>is the best. So I really like his potential to

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 3>put us some elite strikeout numbers. So Schwellenbach is one

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 3>of my favorite. And I just threw Lawler out here

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 3>because Lawler has the potential to really skyrocket if given

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity, but we don't know that that's going to happen.

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I personally think the Diamondbacks could end up playing around

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 3>with the scenario where Lawler starts playing in the outfield,

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe similar to what Jackson Merrill did, because I don't

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 3>know if they would commit to him playing over Heraldo Perdomo.

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 3>But he just had a really really great run in

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the Dominican Winner League, starting to hit again. Homer's are

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 3>going he has twenty twenty potential. He could exponentially be

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.920
<v Speaker 3>more valuable than Lawler or than Lawrence Butler, but he's

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 3>going after so Jordan Lawler is a outside the top

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 3>one hundred to pay attention to, and I would just

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 3>throw out, there's immense values outside the top one hundred.

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 3>This is a spot where I really like to start

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 3>paying attention to older players that have fallen. I think

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 3>Jacob deGrom is one of those. He's really tough. How

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 3>long will he play? Chris I want to win now.

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not afraid to take a kem and Arro, a

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 3>James Wood, a Dylan Cruz, but when I do so, personally,

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm absolutely trying to find those values of the older

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 3>players that fell not just be like, no, they're off

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 3>my list, will never take them. You're going to find

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:18.840
<v Speaker 3>crazy values in a Dynasty draft outside the top one hundred,

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 3>So make sure your eyes are locked in. And if

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:22.879
<v Speaker 3>you guys want, I got a one to fifty that's

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be available on Fantasy Pros and I'll do

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a breakdown for it, and you

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 3>can find even more Dynasty ranks. Follow me on Twitter

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:30.799
<v Speaker 3>and you'll find out where you can find all the

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 3>rest of you like up to four hundred.

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>There we have it, everybody. That's a good look at

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the Dynasty ranks. Make sure you subscribe to the YouTube channel.

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Drop your comments below with your rankings. Guys you like,

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Guys you don't. We love to hear from all of

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you and ring the bell to that goes things for notification.

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So you're with us all off season and all in

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>season leading off, We'll be here every single day. Before

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we got a lot of content planned

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 1>here for the channel. We are going to be your

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>one stop destination for all things fantasy baseball. That'll do

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 1>it for us, but the story of the game goes

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on for the Welsh.

0:50:57.200 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:08.760
<v Speaker 1>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify, Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:17.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB