WEBVTT - A Warning For American Democracy: How Trump Is Following Putin's Corruption Blueprint

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Happy Wednesday, Happy Day, one of the second one hundred

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>days of the Trump administration. I got a fascinating interview

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>coming up today with a woman by the name of

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Jody Vittori. She's a military veteran. She's a professor in

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>practice for global politics with a concentration on national security

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>issues at Georgetown University. But she spent a lion's share

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of her career in the military, educated at the Air

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Force Academy, and she's a specialist in kleptocracies, and actually,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know how democracies get corrupted, and she wrote a

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>pretty provocative piece for Foreign Affairs about that issue. Is

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>America creeping into a kleptocracy? You've probably heard me use

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that word. I said that in twenty twenty four, at

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a minimum, that Donald Trump had turned the Republican Party

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in some ways into a kleptocracy. I don't think we're

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there yet as a country, but when you have things

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like this inaugural fund that law firms have to pay

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>into in order to keep the government off their back,

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that would pretty much put you into that in that

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>category where you might be arguing that we are creeping

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>into that. So, look, it's a long conversation. I want

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into that, but before I get into that,

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit about the second

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred days because I think in fairness to him, you know, look,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been highly critical because I think this has been

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a disastrous start. This is not because whether I support

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>them or oppose them. This is just political incompetence how

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they've gone about this. Yes, I think it's economic incompetence too.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>But if this was the plan, they've executed the plan

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily poorly. Right, there was a way to do government

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>reform better and more secure. There was a way to

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do Tariff's better. There was probably a way to order

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>reorder his agenda, but he chose not to do it.

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.639
<v Speaker 1>And there's a fundamental part of his presidency that strikes

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>me as a bit lazy, that he is kind of

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>ailing it in. And you know, one way you can

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>see this that Donald Trump is now mailing in the presidency.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>It's his travel schedule for the first hundred days. He

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>marked the one hundred day with a trip to Michigan.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>What's shocking about his trip to Michigan is that that's

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the first essaidually, it's the first battleground state he's bothered

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to visit since the beginning of his term. He had

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>one day where he traveled to North Carolina, Nevada, in California.

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>He was checking out flood damage in North Carolina. This

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was right there. He was trying to It was something

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he had been scoring points on due to the what

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was a poor recovery effort led by FEMA in western

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina during the remnants of a hurricane that devastated

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>them with floods in western North Carolina. So he made

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a political stop there, made a political stop in Nevada,

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and then made a tour of the wildfire damage in LA.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But you take that day away, and that's three less. Basically,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the only trips he would have made are to the

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl, to the Daytona five hundred and to Bedminster

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>or mar A Lago over and over and over again.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is that it's quite the contrast from

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>his first term and his first term. In the first

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>under days, he traveled quite a bit. In fact, he

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>was a very you know, yes, he's still golfed quite

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Now he seems to be only golfing on weekends.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>He's spent at one point six days in a row

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>mar Alago, going to my friends over at NBC News

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>where some federal workers were wondering if he was qualifying

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for work for home benefits there. He was there so long.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But there is a sense that he is just either

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>not interested in traveling the country, not wanting to hold

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>his rallies, which he used to love to do in

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>his first term. And I think it's it's I actually

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think this is another bad political mistake, right, And this

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is what happens when you surround yourself with people that

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just tell you what you want to hear. He doesn't

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>want to travel, he doesn't want to work very hard,

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so he gets to go back to Marlago so he

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>can go golf, or he gets to go back to

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Bedminster and so he could go golf. He was in

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the first term surrounded people that said, you know, especially

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to win reelection, you need to be

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>communicating with the public what you're trying to do. The

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>tariff policies are extraordinarily unpopular. His inability to even communicate

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what they're supposed to do has made it even worse

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. So the fact that he waited literally to

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>his hundredth day to have his first public event outside

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of Washington to explain his tariff policy. I think that

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>just strikes me as lazy, and it is kind of

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the hallmark of how this White House has been run.

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>You know. In some ways they make it look like

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of motion going on, but in some

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>ways they're not. You know, take he signs executive orders,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't try to pass legislation. They're trying to

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of political shortcuts they're not doing If

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to cut government, you wouldn't do it the

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>way they're doing it with those because most of the

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>cuts that they make are going to get restored. Most

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of the executive order he's signing are going to get

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>thrown out by the courts. If he wanted to make

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>real change. He has a Republican Congress. It's pretty compliant,

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but guess what legislation is hard. Trying to get lawmakers

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. It's going to take time and effort, and

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we sit here and wonder, Oh,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>he's an authoritarian. In some ways, he's an authoritarian by laziness,

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning he'd prefer to just sign edicts because he doesn't

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>want to have to put in the work that it

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>takes to host members of Congress and cajole them to

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>do X, or host members of Congress and condrole them

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>to do why, or travel the country and put public

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>political pressure. He doesn't know. For a guy who prides

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>himself at being mister salesman and mister art of the deal,

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he's done a terrible job of selling his policies and

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>selling them to the country. He has spent a lot

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>more time on true social that he has talking with

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>people outside of his bubble. It is notable to me

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that this week he's at least doing interviews with media

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>entities that are not just espousing the MAGA line of thinking.

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>He interviewed with ABC News, interview with The Atlantic, and

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that is a huge difference from Trump one point oh,

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Trump one point oh talk to everybody. Trump one point

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>oh was tweeting. Trump one point oh was trying to

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>communicate with the entire country. I mean, even if let's

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>just take the example, let's say he was just so

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>lazy he only wanted a golf on weekends. Well, then

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>travel the country to different golf courses in golf on weekends,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>actually connect with the rest of the American people. Right now,

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He's conducting a presidency that is essentially sitting on Air

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Force one or one of his two clubs. He's a

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>creature of habit. He's creature comfort, and when you get older,

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens. Joe Biden spent just about every weekend

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in Delaware. Well, you know, Donald Trump wants to spend

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>every weekend at mar Lago or Bedminster. And so it

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>just struck me that to see this event, which was right.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>He gets a lot of energy from these things. So

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the question is perhaps he maybe he's just getting older,

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>getting more tired, doesn't want to you know, needs to

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>work three and a half four days a week, doesn't

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>want to have the full five day weeks. It wants

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to have extra recovery time. Whatever it is, I actually

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's harming his presidency just from a communications standpoint.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Whether you love him or hate him, he's the best

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>communicator they have, and he doesn't seem to actually want

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and communicate with the public. Right now.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>He went to Michigan. It's almost like they said, okay,

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we got to have a hundred days event, but he's

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>right back here. So anyway, it's just fascinating to me

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>how I think that as tumultuous as the first one

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred days, there's an underlying aspect of this that there's

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of a laziness to the president in his

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>lack of salesmanship, lack of doing these things. One other thing,

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's a fair question, so what would

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a you know, I've been pretty doom and gloom. I

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be pretty hard for Donald Trump to recover.

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's probably if you told me if I

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>went into a coma today and didn't wake up until

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>January twentieth, twenty twenty nine, and you said to me,

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Donald Trump's approval rating never got over forty

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>five percent for the rest of the term while you

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>were in a coma, wouldn't surprise me. And I've gone

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>through the reasonings before of why I did this. I think,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly in a second term, that's part of the you know,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the why there's probably a shorter lease

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with the public, public like sort of oh, he's going

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to be that all right, forget it right, And there

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>may be they may give up on him quicker, especially

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>since he's messing up on supposedly the issue that was

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>his core competency. But let me let me do the

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>other side. So let's say I wake up and from

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>my from my mythical coma, and it turns out he's popular.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>What would have happened, Well, I think in this next

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred days he must for that to happen, for him

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to sort of write this ship, he needs some points

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on the points on the board. Maybe he cuts in

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a Ran deal. Maybe he gets both Russian and Ukraine

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to agree to a cease fire. Maybe he's able to

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>get Israel and the Palestinians to at least cease violent interactions.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps he's able to get some trade deals with India, Australia, Japan,

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the UK. I'm skeptical of all those things, but it's

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not out of the question, right, It's not as if

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>those aren't active things he's engaged in at the moment.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's what the next Oh no, by the way,

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>how about putting some shovels in the ground for some

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>new factories. Right, there's a lot of pledges out there,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, he doesn't doesn't He doesn't even have a

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>fox con that he's been able to. Which was that

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>company that announced this big I remember Trump and Paul

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryan together they announced this big investment into Wisconsin, this

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>company called Fox Cohn and and the investment never really happened.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But he needs some shovels in the ground somewhere, some

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>ribbon cuttings to do that. So you know what would

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if day one on one to two hundred, If on

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>day two oh one his numbers are ten points better

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>than they are today. These are the things that need

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Peace steel in Ukraine, pea steel in the

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Middle East. Maybe he gets Saudi Arabia to formally go

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>public in their recognition of Israel. Trade, the individual trade

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>deals with a Japan, in India and Australia. Perhaps maybe

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>some some pullback on the tariffs in China, and positive

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>market reaction. Now again, all of those things are certainly

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>things he's trying to do, and I think all of

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>them are quite tough because here's the other problem that

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>he has, and I think I mentioned this during the

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>last one. He's I think he's given up a lot

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of leverage because guess what, everybody knows he needs a

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>deal and now the UK is teaming up with the EU.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So I guess not only has Donald Trump impacted the

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.599
<v Speaker 1>politics of Canada. But did he just unbreaks it. I

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>guess we call it Brentrance at this point, with the

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>UK and the EU essentially doing their own trade deal

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to start working together to deal with America, perhaps that

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>he can call that an international victory he brought. He's

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>helping reunite Europe economically. But these are the things that

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs to get to happen, and I

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to have a hard time doing it.

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And he's going to have an even a harder time

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>doing it if he is going to go about this

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>presidency sort of working three and a half four days

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a week and not traveling the country and not communicating

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>with all of America. Right now, he just rants to

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>his supporters. Makes him happy. Untruth social What he doesn't

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>fully appreciate is no one sees this stuff outside of

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>his filter. Bubb guess what that forty of the countries

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with him, there's another sixty percent that's not with him,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And he doesn't seem to be that interested in communicating

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>with that sixty percent anymore. Trump one point oh was

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump one point oh traveled the country? Trump one point oh,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>see seem to want to connect to the public. Perhaps

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the best evidence we have yet that Trump

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>has no interest in a third term, because if he did,

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>he'd be behaving like somebody who wanted to run for reelection.

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He's behaving like somebody who's worn out already at the

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>start of a second term. And look, he's not a

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>spring chicken. And it could very well be that the

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>job itself has become physically taxing. All right, So with that,

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to pause here. We're going to sneak in

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick break and when we come back. This is

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating conversation with Jody Vittori, and again we talk

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of countries and sort of the various

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>phases when is something a kleptocracy, when is in it?

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, can can you have sort of pieces

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of a democracy become a kleptocracy, but the democracy itself

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is still healthy enough to push back on authoritarianism. What

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I like about doctor Vittorre is that she is this

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is she is not an academic first, she is a

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>practitioner that is now in academia teaching her real life experiences.

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So with that, enjoy the interview. So what is the

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>state of the American democracy? This is a question I

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get frequently from friends, neighbors, viewers, listeners. Are we in

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional crisis? How clear things are? And my answer

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for the last six months is like, well, you know,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I'm nervous about is that, you know,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stage one of an authoritarian regime is when a democracy

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>becomes a kleptocracy. And I had been kind of saying

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it without a lot of academic rigor, and then I

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>read a terrific piece in Foreign Uh in Foreign Policy

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>by Georgetown professor doctor Jody Vittori, who is my guest today,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>who wrote about this very issue, that making the case

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that we are now in an early stage, early stages

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of what if this were happening in any other country,

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we would identify as hey, there, this appears to be

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>forming a kleptocracy. So doctor Vittori, it's appreciate you coming on.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me here today. I appreciate it.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So look, let's start with what we mean. You know,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you hear the word kliptocracy, and I'll be honest, it's like,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is this some sort of superman word or does it

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have to do with the Kremlin? Right, Like, there's a

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people kleptocracy. You know, define it and tell

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>me give me a couple of an examples around the

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>world that are that you might file under kleptocracy right now.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Sure, So, kleptocracy literally means rule by thieves, like kleptomania,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>someone who can't stop, you know, stealing, ocracy at the

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 2>end like democracy, government by the people, theocracy government by religion.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 2>So kleptocracy is just putting those two together. So government by.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Thieves and government by thieves. Let's take a step back.

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty that's it. There you go. It's not a pirate. No,

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not charming at all. There's no upside. There's never

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a positive case for a kleptocracy, is there.

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 2>No, there is, There is not. Although people will come

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>up try to come up with some crazy reasons to

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 2>justify why they should be a kleptocracy, or what they're

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>really doing is reforming things, or that's how their culture

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>is set up or whatever, but at the end of

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the day, they're very predatory on their citizens and often

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>very predatory on the world. So there's not one definition

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 2>of what kinds of things make rule by thieves or

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 2>what's thiefy enough, what's thievery enough to make it a kleptocracy.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>But there's a couple of things that we look at

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>that when we're thinking about a place that is a kleptocracy.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>One is that just the amount of money and stuff

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that is being basically stolen by these thieves, and what

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>happens to the institutions of a government. And so we

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 2>have different terms that have like if you like ven diagrams,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of overlap. Sleptocracy, grand corruption, and state

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>capture often get used interchangeably. There's some slight differences between them.

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, nationalizing an economy is that automatically a kleptocracy.

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't have to be. And I will push back

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>on one of your first senates is just a little bit.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>There are cases where you have incredibly authoritarian regimes, even

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 2>totalitarian regimes, that don't engage in large scale grand corruption. Okay,

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>so there's still hideous lot in Cambodia, lots of petty corruption,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, people paying bribes to just survive. But Poulpot

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>was not buying mansions in the south of France or

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 2>anything during this or NII in Tanzania. You know, the

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>entire population was impoverished under his regime, but you know

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't buying fancy mansion somewhere in the States or

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>something like that. So they are rare. But you can't

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>have authoritarian and even fatality and regimes that are not leptocracies. Okay,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 2>but most pleptocracies will be at least competitive authoritarianism have

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 2>significant backsliding if they've been democracies ever, because you can't

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>have rule by thieves in a functioning government democracy and

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 2>have people not protesting and voting the bumps out and

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 2>so forth. So you need to make sure you stay

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and power run your cryptocracy. So they'll at least be

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 2>very shaky on the democracy side all the way up

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to full fledge totalitarian dictatorships like Kim Jong un or

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, North Korea or something like that.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>So we would look at a So what you're describing

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to me, the immediate country that jumps out as Putin

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in Russia, because here's a guy who does have big mansions,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's a people with a bunch of oligarchs who've made

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>money off the state. It seems that this is how

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>he kind of controls the wealthy diaspora is through some

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of investments. I mean, is that the clearest example

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we have probably the world right now in a semi

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>large country.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, hiptocracies can come in a lot of different forms,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>so you asked me a couple of different types, and

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 2>they work different ways. The one we most think of

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>is probably Russia, and it's you know, think of their oligarchs.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 2>They're not quite oligarchs nowadays, but the types of oligarchs

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>is very very tiny inner grouping that controls the Russian

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 2>economy can decide to send it to war in devastating ways,

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>and you know, devastate their next door neighbor in Ukraine.

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>The lack of democracy in there. They have kind of

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>fake votes, but it's not obviously it's not a functioning

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 2>real democracy, but just the huge amount of money what

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 2>we call assets shripping and so forth that occurs there.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 2>That's one kind. You have other kleptocracies, like in Afghanistan

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 2>under the Talla Bond Part one and the United States

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 2>where it's just a free for all. In Russia's case,

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you know exactly who's the We have.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>The warlords, right, each warlord had their own it's sort

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of they kind of wanted to control their economic weather

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 2>So Sudan right now, would be a great example of that,

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 2>just total chaos sort ofcery. And then you have sort

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of the more refined sort of tech kleptocracies. Think of

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Hungary or the UAE. That can be nice places to

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>go visit. They seem to have some level of rule

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 2>of law. When you're there, you're not getting you know,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>this is not Afghanistan or Sudan, clearly, you know, there's

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of shiny, the nice downtown areas and so forth,

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>and they're a much more subtle sort of form of kleptocracy.

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, Hungary is is the classic example. Orbond calls

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 2>his country an illiberal democracy. That's his goal, of course,

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 2>is an oxymoron liberal with a small obviously not a

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 2>big l. It's an oxymoron. You can't be democratic and

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>and not be liberal with the rule of law and

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 2>in the rule of law institute. But he has made

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 2>it so that his cronies control the media. He makes

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 2>sure his friends get contracts. These are very expensive contracts,

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. The United States, if it does slip

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 2>into club totocracy, will be unique because we've never had

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a situation where a consolidated democracy with strong governing institutions

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 2>has gone to a full fledged cleptocracy before. It was

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>always theoretically possible, but it hasn't happened. There's been grand

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>corruption scandals in places, right.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I look at Teapot Dome was probably

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the closest we came to looking like a kleptocracy. That

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the taft essentially filled his cabinet with a bunch of

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>guys that were just trying to make money off the taxpayers.

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>But the United States wouldn't be considered a consolidated democracy

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 2>at that point. We don't really truly become a fully

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 2>fledged consolidated democracy until after the passing the Civil Rights

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Acted in the nineteen six So again, that's not going

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>to qualify plus plus is the country in the international system.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 2>It's it's the reserve currency, it's the largest military.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Set the rules essentially the rules.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 2>What happens when the state power in the global system

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 2>them if it becomes a kleptocracy. We don't have a

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 2>historic model for them.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So I started using the word sort of in this,

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I was trying to I have the

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>episodes to prove it. I'm trying to explain why Donald

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump was so obsessed with tariffs, and yes, he cared

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 1>about these trade deficits, and I think misunderstood them, but

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we can. I'm going to set that aside the real

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>benefit that he enjoyed in the first term with tariffs,

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that he learned about. And this is how I always

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>say Trump is very much as a rote learner, and

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he you know, you can't fool them twice. And so

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what the tariffs allow him to do is encourage people

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to have to come to him for exemptions, and that

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the exemption process is what how we can end up

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in a kleptocracy where he has full control of different

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the economy because he can decide winners and losers.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He can decide you get a tariff, you don't get

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a tariff, you get this, you don't get this, and

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is what was so dangerous about his tariff policy,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>because it wasn't about the tariffs themselves. It was about

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to have singular control of the economy.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But what you just described, I'm actually questioning whether that's

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that maybe we don't we have enough checks

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and balances that that he can create an administration that's

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a leptocracy, but he can't really change the system into

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that per se am I being naive, I think.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>A little bit. I mean, our founding fathers did an

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 2>amazing job on taking government and setting up in ways

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>with checks and balances.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm it's more remarkable all the time with the stuff

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>they thought of. When I think about the emoluments clause,

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think about you know, the only thing I can't

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out is why the heck they thought presidents should

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have pardon power? Like what was the point of getting

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>away from the king? But anyway, I could set that

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>one little thing aside, the idea that presidents couldn't be

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>put on trial very easily and that you might actually

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have to do it in a different way like the

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is remarkable to me how they understood

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what could what the public would be able to take,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and what they couldn't and well.

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 2>And they were in many ways. Some scholars make the

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 2>argument that a lot of what went into the Constitution

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 2>is actually anti corruption methods and institutions as they understood

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>them at the time. Things like the emolument's clause. They

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>had seen king's bribe with you know, chests of gold,

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>they didn't That's why they put it in there. It

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 2>was in the Articles of Confederation. There's not even really debate,

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 2>and putting it in the constitution is just like, well.

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>A given, Yeah, of course we're doing that, right.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Why you have to live in your districts so you

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 2>can't just you know, have these rotten boroughs where you

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 2>know somebody's patron or whatever, just you know, you declare

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.199
<v Speaker 2>them you're MP in parliament. So a lot of the

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 2>constitutions actually corruption as they know it. But it of

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 2>course assumes famously if men were angels, we wouldn't need government.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>They in many ways it's set up to use one

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 2>person's greed against the other. It's one of the things

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I've always loved most about our founding fathers is someone

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>who reads a lot of political theory, Marxism and a

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of the Islamism under side could have been others

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>assume that you could make a perfect society, and our

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>founding fathers took people as they were, And so you know,

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 2>it's this idea that Congress should be a check on

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the present actually supposed to be the most important power,

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>which you've brought up before in other episodes, in the

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>role of the Supreme Court evolves over time, but right

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 2>now there's big concerns because of course Congress isn't acting

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 2>as a check. Indeed, Trump is not unlike in his first.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Yeah, that leadership of Congress has been captured

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean they approved takes that.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, approved Bobby Kennedy Junior.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, who in a million years would have

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 2>thought that these people are qualified to be in government.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, we have a Supreme Court that basically gave

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 2>a tremendous amount of impunity to Trump himself in the

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 2>United States versus Trump, which is extremely concerning, and a

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court that, especially since twenty ten, has really shrump

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 2>what the definition of corruption in any.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be really afraid of the voters for

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a group of people that don't have to face the

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>voters the Supreme Court, like I do think I think

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Robert's motives are are Pure's the wrong word to use here,

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>are noble, even if he's producing outcomes that I understand

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what he's trying to avoid. And I think what we

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all know is that these are lessons. You can't put

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>off these lessons, and the longer you put it off,

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the worse it's going to get. But I understand what

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he thinks he's trying to avoid how's that? But they

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>look way too captured, They look way too afraid of

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the of the people on this one and of a

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>small group of people.

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, and the concerns about you know, half million dollars

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>win of egos and so forth aren't exactly helping their

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>credibility with the people in.

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The fact at all.

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, that's that's a big part of what

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>you deal with in any sort of society, but particularly

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 2>if society really is becoming much more kleptocratic. Is the

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of every day it's another how is this okay?

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 2>That degradation of society, its values, its norms, as its

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>institutions are allowed to degrade themselves, the society at large

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>in any ways degrades itself.

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's one of the This feels like

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>one of those things, you know, like trying to figure

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>out when a recession begins. Well we sort of know

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>after we leave it, right, Like it's it's always easier

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to find out when a recession started after we're done

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>with the recession than when we're in the middle of it.

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that how you would describe trying to you know,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you know when we're in a kleptocracy, perhaps

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>we're already in it. We don't feel it right, the

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>bog we've been we're of the boiled frog and we

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't fully realize it yet or are there more

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>signs we should looking for.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>It's I mean, different scholars will some will argue that

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 2>we're already at least in an oligarchy. And this came

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 2>up quite a bit since two thousand and eight, and

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>you actually brought up one of your other shows, the

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 2>fact that nobody was actually went to jail for gross

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 2>col jail that led to two thousand and eight that

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>at least, if not a kleptocracy, these increasing concerns about

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the United States already being an oligarchy rule by the few,

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 2>were those few. It's an Aristotelian term literally from three

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty BC, that you know, these are individuals that are

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>in charge for their benefit, not for the benefits society overall.

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And you know what they would argue at the time,

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because this was the argument at the time, right, the

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>economy is too big to fail, and even though we

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>have these horrible, bad actors, we don't have time to

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>decide who was who was nefarious and who was accidental.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>We have to just use we have to bail out

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the economy so that it doesn't destroy the rest of

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the global order. Right like it was, it felt as

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>if it was like people exempted the people from punishment

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 1>because you don't understand we're in the middle of it.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't have time to arrest people in

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a hurricane.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 2>And I understand the argument, and at the time it

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:10.719
<v Speaker 2>actually makes a lot of sense. And many of those

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 2>who were in charge had been students of the Great Depression,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>but after the fact, they still didn't go to jail.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And it wasn't just that. We've seen the role that

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 2>money is playing increasingly in politics. How different. As you know,

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 2>we focus a lot on the Supreme Court and Citizens United,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of campaign finance laws and rules have

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 2>actually been degraded under the courts, in particularly the Supreme

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Court over the years to a shell of what they

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>were in the past. The amount of what constituted corruption

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 2>has shrunk, the ability of politicians to accept money. You know,

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the interesting things about the definition of a

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>conflict of interest overall is we know it's very it

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>degrades a democracy, but conflict of interest doesn't actually have

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to be illegal, unlike Briberry or something where there's illegality.

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>The concept is of a rational person and could have

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 2>questions about that civil servant or that politician and where

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 2>their interests lies. That's where the conflict of interest is.

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make it a cry, doesn't make it illegal,

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but it makes it unethical.

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 2>It makes it highly unethical. But it also just degredes

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 2>your overall democracy and your overall governing system. And that's

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the kind of things that we see with the Supreme

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Court and the expensive fishing trips and the expense of winnebagos.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Clearly I need better friends because I'm not getting free Winnebago's.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 2>The ability for large amounts of money to be bundled

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 2>and so forth and given to politicians, the weakening of

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the rules of what they can use for personal use

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 2>versus non personal use, in the role of private loans,

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>even book sales, stuff like that.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So around you know, it used to be worse, though, Jodie,

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you, like I always love to

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>tell this story to my students when I'm teaching about

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Like as bad as it seems now, it used to

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>be worse. So did you know that in nineteen ninety two.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So in nineteen ninety two, it was my first year

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>covering campaign politic, and that year we had this astronomical

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of members of Congress decided to not seek re election.

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And there was a variety of reasons for that. Number one,

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you had a check bouncing scandal where they got to

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>write checks without any money to cover it, and the

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>government just covered it. That was a weird and even

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>when you go back to this day, you're like, I

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>can't believe members of Congress just had this sort of

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>create a checkbook without money in it and it always

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>cash year less, Like that's crazy. There was also a

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>reapportionment year, and so people don't like to run a

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>new lines. But there was one other thing. They had

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>just changed the law. Prior to nineteen ninety two, a

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress could retire and keep their campaign money

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>as their own personal just like an IRA, Like here

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you go, I mean, I'm after nineteen ninety two. In theory,

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress are not allowed to personally pocket campaign

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>money once they're done running for office. But prior to

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety two, so Congress could do that like so

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I do. I take your point here, but we've actually

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>had the looser laws in the past that allowed for

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some shocking things like what I just described.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 2>In some ways yes, in some ways no, And the

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 2>laws are always changing, and when you make a law,

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 2>someone finds a loophole, you know, right, Yeah.

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>That's why I always say money finds, like, it's really

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to legislate campaign finance because money finds a way, right,

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>life finds a way. Money finds a way, like you

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>know five oh one C fours, five oh one C three's.

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we came up with the all of these

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>weird tax code things that people have found where you're like, oh, no,

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's not advocacy, you can use it.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Registering people to vote is not advocacy, so you can

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>use this dark money to do that, right, Like, we

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>keep changing, but there's definitely, there's definitely been. I think

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to legislate money out of politics.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>It will be, But when we look at the United

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 2>States compared to other countries, the ability to give un

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit amounts of dark money under many circumstances

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 2>is unique. That's their point, you're and Martial Fund did

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a really interesting study and looked at a lot of

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>countries in their campaign finance loss and everybody's got a

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 2>loophole somewhere that everybody thinks is crazy. But you know,

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>this whole Citizens United and dark money capability, that one

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 2>really stands out in the world that you don't have

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 2>another that you really don't see in other places. When

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you get a big corruption scandal with campaign finance in

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Britain or something, you're talking about a few million dollars,

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 2>not tens and tens and millions of dollars now.

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Be a million dollars these days is just a state

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>legislative race.

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>And we just kind of look at it like, oh,

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't that cute? You know, when you're complaining about their

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>coruption scandal, they're like, oh, let me, let's let's talk here.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So so, so what's the next step for us on

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this dark road to cliptocracy?

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>So the kinds of things, the rules that keep coming

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 2>out are are more and more concerning. We talked about

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 2>campaign financing, the issues with that, but given my teaching

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and my career, I started working on these issues. Actually

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 2>when I was back in the military on an anti

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 2>corruption task force. What really stands out for me is

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that as the Trump administration has come in

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>this time, they have undermined so many of the anti

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 2>corruption rules and the Department of Justice institutions that are

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 2>meant to minimize the levels of corruption coming in. So

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 2>we already had lots of issues and lots of loopholes

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 2>and questions about enforcement, like with two thousand and eight

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>and nobody going to jail, but things like we're just

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 2>not the fact that this ties with their constitutional crisis concerns,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the government said, we're just not going

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>to enforce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for the next

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 2>six months. Yeah, and we're not going to enforce the law,

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>ironical ly, which passed in Trump won that most anonymous

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 2>shell companies. Not only are we not going to enforce it,

0:33:57.840 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to make an interim final rule that is

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the exact opposite of what Congress legislated. And and you know, Congress,

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>good luck with that, and the court's good luck with that.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 2>These are very frightening issues. And then you add crypto

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 2>to it, not only the Trump family and their business

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 2>interests with crypto, but just putting crypto friendly individuals in there.

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Lots of people have different opinions on what is the

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 2>value of crypto or does it have a value outside

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>of money laundering and corruption.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>People have I'm pretty cynical about it. It feels like the

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>entire crypto industry decided to get on board Trump in

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the last six months of the campaign because they saw

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that as the fastest way to make their bitcoin investments

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>worth more than they actually are.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 2>So our prior Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, had

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 2>had noted and lots of people noted it before, that

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 2>the United States was already the easiest place in the

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>world to launder your money now with not enforcing the face.

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I watched Ozark. We saw that, like you know, right,

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Ozark really taught everybody how to do Oh okay, you

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>treat that in the Americans. I look at every travel

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 1>agency now with skepticism thanks to the Americans. And you're

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>just sitting there going, yeah, casinos makes sense to me.

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's throw some crypto in there. What could go wrong?

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 2>And let's let it go and more and more, and yeah,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.439
<v Speaker 2>let's let normal people get involved. What could go wrong?

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 2>So you've already got as a place where we have

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 2>lots of dirty money flowing around. We don't actually know

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 2>how much because we have we have more secrecy rules

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 2>than about ninety different countries in the world. The standard

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 2>is not anonymous shell companies. For example, the United States

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 2>on January one, twenty twenty one, past the Transparency Act

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 2>as part of the National Defense Authorisation Act. They did

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>have to override Trump's feto for it, not because of

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the act that ended this anonymous disability to anonymous shell companies.

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So if you have anonymous shell companies, we have anonymous trust.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 2>We have all sorts of anonymity that we treat as

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:01.280
<v Speaker 2>basically the getaway car for all sorts of illicit money

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 2>coming by with the United States. But if you think

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 2>of a society with so much dirty money coming in

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 2>into its politics, into its economics, sectors, into we've often

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 2>focused in the federal government, but state and local governments

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 2>are particularly susceptible to corruption and what that does to

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 2>your larger country, what it does to your democracy. So

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 2>we were already the easiest place to launder money, and

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we basically put out a giant welcome sign that says,

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 2>bring it here, bring it on, and here's if you

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 2>have five million dollars, you can buy some citizenship too.

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the Yeah, that's right, and we're not asking

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's no character test with that. That's whether

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>your check claars, yes, are there. It's interesting you brought

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>up state legislatures. I mean, I just you know it is.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I always say that the least corrupt legislature in America's

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Congress because we have more eyeballs on it. The fewer

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs you have on the state level and the local level,

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>that's where you're usually you know, shoot city councils. To

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>me of the most corrupt corrupt a ball. I'm not

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>saying they're all corrupt corruptible, because you know, developers, we

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>all know. You know that that stories as old as time.

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But since you brought up states, are there certain states

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that are worse than others that stand out to you?

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 2>So states don't get evaluated the same way as countries do.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the issues for the United States.

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Were such a big country and we kind of have

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 2>fifty plus you know, we had DC and Puerto Rico

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and all that, different qualities, different local governments, different civil societies.

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 2>So you know, when we think of what place is

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.479
<v Speaker 2>the most corrupt in the world or whatever. There's there's

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the corruption Barometer that Transparencion National does. There's the Corruption

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Perceptions Index, there's the World Bank Governance Index. There's all

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 2>these indexes, but none of the states. There's only been

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 2>a couple attempts to even look at how corrupt states are,

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of issues in even trying to

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 2>measure a couple of different ones. One of them looked

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>at what were some of the worst states when it

0:37:55.920 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 2>came to their actual laws. For those who live in Rjimia,

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 2>it actually comes out as one of the worst ones

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 2>because they have some of the worst laws and you know, well.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Their campaign finance laws are garbage. I mean, just anybody

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 1>can write a check.

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you can, you can have you can have business

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 2>in front of the state legislature and write a check

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and no problem.

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Right, which is that means no investigation, nothing right, No,

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>And there's huge loopholes in it. South Dakota, I know,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>has a crazy trust law that allows people to hide

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>money they've they've I know they were They changed their

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>law on purpose in order to attract people to do this.

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Jorida recently did that as well. Florida made it easier

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 2>to hide money. It was interesting too, because they were

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:44.879
<v Speaker 2>as far as you could tell, it was actually changed

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to the Walmart family, or at least that was the

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 2>main lobbyist behind it, but it was, you know, as

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 2>far as local media reports. You know, hey, if Wyoming

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 2>can do that, why can't we make it easier to

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 2>do anonymous trust which are.

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Made it a competition thing. Don't you want this big

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>money in this state? It's be good for the state,

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's Wyoming. It's been good for a tiny number

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 2>of you know, five or six key individuals. Actually it's

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 2>not helped the typical population at all. And it's become

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the scam one of the scam capitals of the world.

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 2>And strangely enough, like North Korean's, North Korean government was

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 2>using those the ability to form these anonymous companies and

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 2>trusts and so forth in Wyoming, particularly to undermine US

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>national security, to be able to get into companies and

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 2>so forth and make these fake LinkedIn profiles and so forth,

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 2>and get their people embedded in companies, secrets and so forth,

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and money. So it's undermining US national security with no

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 2>real benefit to the state of Wyoming itself. And so

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 2>other ways we measure states is just an attempt to

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 2>look at do their laws actually meet the needs of

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 2>their citizens and stuff. Not surprisingly, Southern states do particularly

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 2>poorly by that. A recent book that literally just came

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 2>out in the last month by Michael Johnston and Osgan

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Dincer tries to tries to do different assessments of states

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.280
<v Speaker 2>and try to figure out looking at things like police

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>violence and its links to racial politics and the environment

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 2>within those states.

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>So one of the ways that I try to make

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.760
<v Speaker 1>myself feel better about this current era is is how

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>similar to me it looks to the early twentieth century.

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I look at the early twentieth century

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and we can sit here and we can talk about

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the Robert Barons, and there was a lot of those issues,

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 1>but it also was a massive period of reform, political reform,

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>economic reform. Clearly, the public wasn't happy, and you saw movements.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>We had direct election of senators, we got women the

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>right to vote, We've got the trustbusters, and you know

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you know, maybe the government ought to

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>be involved in regulating business. What let's assume we are

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we are going to enter a period of reform, and

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that the fact to the matter is the

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>most likely scenario. If we don't like how things turn

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>out in this administration as a public, we're probably going

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>to correct in that direction, Like we're going to be

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for, you know, ways to make sure we don't

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have this happen again, right that whatever we decide that is, So,

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what is some reform legislation that, you know, assuming we

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>do head in that direction, what makes sense? What would

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you like to see or is this stuff that's already

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on the books and we just need better enforcement of

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the laws on the books and a Justice department focused

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on it.

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 2>So a couple of things are going to have to happen.

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of these have been put out by

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Lewitzky ways Eyeblatt. I mean, there's lots of these out.

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Some of these are going to be a surprise. A

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of it is just making politics so that people

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 2>have a greater input into the politics themselves. And so

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that's going to include anti Jerry Mandarin, so that people

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 2>choose their politicians more thanians choosing their ob.

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want to double the side of Congress. I

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that would be a huge way of trying

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>to get Congress closer to the people, and you would

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>minimize jerry mannering anyway, go ahead.

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And the size of Congress, but you're still going to

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 2>have to make it anti jerry mandering rules. Both parties

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 2>have played with jerry mandering. The Republicans took it to

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.439
<v Speaker 2>a new level, but both sides have played with it.

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 2>So jerrymandering, you're going to have to do some sort

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 2>of anti citizens united. You're going to have to do

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 2>an amendment to.

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Over the going to need to be a constitualment, right.

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So there are probably some constitutional amendments or some

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 2>creative ways to get around them. Popular elections would help

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 2>a great deal so that you no longer have that

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 2>imbalance between rural and less populated areas versus Well.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>If you double the side, I will I will make this.

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm making this argument. If you double the sides of

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the House and there's no constitutional mement needed, then all

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the electoral college isn't a problem anymore,

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, because you change the math. Yeah, you

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>do change the math, you know. I But and the

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm like obsessed with that is anything that it's

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional amendment, I'm always looking for because we know

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>how difficult it is, Yeah, but they're non possible.

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean think at the sixteenth Amendment was the income

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 2>tax Amendment, and that was all about corruption and the

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 2>fact that you had Robert parents and they weren't paying

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 2>their taxes. Wow, that sounds really familiar lately. Obviously they

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 2>immediately found loopholes, et cetera. But this was supposed to

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 2>be one of the means that you limited corruption, you

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 2>limited oligarchy in whatever year past nineteen twenty whatever this was.

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 2>This was one of the major reforms and it was

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 2>it was amendment that passed incredibly rapidly. So it's hard,

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not impossible. But with some of the Supreme Court

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 2>decisions that have come down, Trump versus the United States

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 2>is probably the most frightening one. And then you know

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 2>movements to reform the Supreme Court itself. You know who

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:50.919
<v Speaker 2>gets to pick the judges, maybe having a certain term

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 2>limits on the court. You know, people so many years

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and then go back to their old courts, for example,

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 2>so you have a concerant rotation or giving every present

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 2>two you know, two justices that come in so that

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 2>you're not always having this makes your fight. So these

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 2>are some of the standard things that really stand out,

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of the just the campaign finance reforms

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of things that were there in the past, sort

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 2>of getting back to the original founders limiting lobbying. The

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, lobbying was not an enforceable contract in the

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 2>United States and the eighteen seventies, per the Supreme Court,

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't criminal, but if you got double crossed by

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you paid a lobbyist and then the

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 2>lobbyists felt like they didn't get paid enough, they couldn't

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 2>take you to court because it wasn't considered a enforceable

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 2>contract because you were monifiing your citizenship.

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So when did that change?

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:44.720
<v Speaker 2>It starts to change it. It's it's part it's affirmed

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>by the Supreme Court up to the eighteen seventies, and

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 2>then starting in the nineteen thirties is really where this starts,

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of like bit by bit sort of getting taken apart,

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and then it really hits gangbusters after twenty ten.

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a you know, it's amazing. My friend Brodie Mellins

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and his brother a terrific book on the lobbying that's

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>out right now called The Wolves of k Street, and

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the basic point is sort of like the world of

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.399
<v Speaker 1>lobbying has gotten so perverted now. It used to be

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it was corporate interests versus the public interest. Right There'd

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be some advocacy group making one case and corporations would

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:21.240
<v Speaker 1>make their own case, and ultimately the politician attitudes between

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the citizens group or the corporate group. Now you have

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>two companies in the say, the same sector, who are

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:30.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially trying to put the other company out of business,

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>and they each use a lobbyist, and it's sort of like,

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not involved as citizens. It's just two companies arguing

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>who can weaponize government regulation in their favor, And like,

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we've really perverted lobbying really down to that, and it

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:50.399
<v Speaker 1>is it is. The concept of lobbying makes a lot

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of sense to me, as by the way, the federalist

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>papers point out they expected some form of this citizens

0:45:55.920 --> 0:46:00.040
<v Speaker 1>groups things like that to various factions, But how it

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>works right now in Washington, I don't know where citizens

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:03.800
<v Speaker 1>go to lobby.

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Put it that way, and that's where we really start

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 2>getting back to our original discussion of the concerns about cleptocracy.

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 2>We're in a kleptocracy. The institution of the state are

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 2>morphed in a way that the national interests the interests

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 2>of the citizens at best or secondary. They're definitely not

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the primary. And that goes for domestic politics, foreign politics.

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>They're definitely not secondary, maybe tertiary. In some states like

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Republic of Congo or something, they don't even show up.

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 2>They're not you know, they're not even there. And so

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 2>your discussion about different lobbyists for different industry arguing with

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 2>each other, where does this where does the citizen go

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 2>to have their interests brought forward? There are some controversial

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 2>studies that say citizens actually have very little influence on government.

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Those are controversial there, and there's a lot of legitimate

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:54.320
<v Speaker 2>arguments that the methodology was flawed in those particular studies.

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 2>But certainly we've seen the realm where money seems to

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 2>at least buy more influence work for civil society. We

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:05.320
<v Speaker 2>would often go work with the staffers for various members

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 2>of Congress. They were wonderful staffers, they were great to

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.800
<v Speaker 2>work with. But I live in or outside of Washington,

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 2>d C. My lobbyist friends would meet with the senator,

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 2>not the staffers, just that access. I mean the advocacy groups,

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and these included religious groups and so forth.

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Everybody rationalizes it. Now. I mean, I love how you

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 1>know all these groups that Trump's trying to target, they're

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>hiring Trump's favorite lobbyist, Pride Palace. You know, basically, you're right.

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 1>You know it's sort of and again to me, that's

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>how you know you're in a kleptocracy when when somebody

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>who wants to play by the rules decides, well, that's

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>what the rules are, so I got to play by

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 1>those rules. I'm not going to play by the rules.

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing by his rules.

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things you also see in a

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 2>kleptocracy is where the institutions it make it easier to

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 2>engage in kleptocracy, and you start getting on a vicious cycle.

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So when you say things like you're not in forcing

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the Foreign for a Practices Act, you're not enforcing anti

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:06.880
<v Speaker 2>anonymous shell company things, you're going to gut the I

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 2>R S's ability to go after major taxpayers. Doesn't mean

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 2>you're in one, but it's a very concerning set of

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 2>red flags that you're making it easier to engage in

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 2>significant corruption.

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm going to be a bit cynical here,

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but we've essentially put out a welcome that for anybody

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that wants to hide money in the world.

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we yeah, absolutely.

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And forget forgetting us, forget Switzerland anymore, forget the Caymans.

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Are we as good as anybody.

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 2>As I mentioned before, former Secretary the Treasury Yellen's were

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the easiest place to lounder money and to Tax Justice

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Network and plenty of other groups that have agreed with her,

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's gotten muchy.

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 1>This is over and above the Caymans, right, who is

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>notorious back in the day.

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, The Tax Justice Network tries to assess these and

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the top ones are always the Cayman Islands, usually Switzerland,

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 2>British Virgin Islands, and US somewhere in the top ones.

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 2>I haven't looked at this year's, but we're always in

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 2>like the top three, which is not a top three

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 2>you want to be in, but that was those Those

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 2>are even before we get into the changes since January twentieth,

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 2>with you know, enabling further enabling crypto, saying you're not

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 2>going to enforce anti coruption laws, gutting various asset finance,

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:26.399
<v Speaker 2>asset forfeiture, and other task forces that have have now

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 2>been dissolved by the Attorney General. The Golden passport thing

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 2>is not really helping the situation in that regard because

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, hey, pay me off and you can have

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 2>US citizenship and all the rights and protections that are

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 2>actually that go with it. But even before that, there

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 2>were concerns. The reasons the United States was already at

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 2>the top. It was the easiest place to form anonymous

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 2>shell companies, anonymous trusts, et cetera. It was the loopholes

0:49:50.480 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 2>for being able to evade tax and stuff are already

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 2>incredibly high those shell companies and through other means, but

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 2>also things like tax sharing information share. So when you

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:02.920
<v Speaker 2>filed your taxes, assuming you did it since we just

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 2>passed tax day, yep, you had to file whether you

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 2>had any overseas bank accounts. Right, United States with Switzerland

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 2>in particlar was something called Swiss Leaks in twenty sixteen

0:50:12.239 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 2>where they found out all these Americans are hiding their

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 2>money in Switzerland. They require countries, they've had a lot

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 2>of pressure and companies to send their the information on

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 2>bank accounts of American citizens to the US, but the

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 2>United States doesn't share that information with other countries in return.

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 2>So what that did is become well, open all your

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 2>bank accounts in the States and get an anonymous shell company,

0:50:34.920 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 2>get an anonymous druss. You can't just directly open anonymous

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 2>shell company into a US banks, It's not quite that

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 2>easy because banks have rules under the bank secrecy on

0:50:41.719 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. But you can use that as an

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 2>ability to put money hedge funds or other areas to

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 2>laander your money. And so if you're a Swiss citizen,

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you know that information isn't going to be shared back

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to Switzerland. If you're American citizen with a bank account

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 2>in Switzerland, that information is going to come to the

0:50:56.320 --> 0:50:58.439
<v Speaker 2>US government. If you're a Swiss citizen hiding your money

0:50:58.440 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, that's not going to go to

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 2>this was government. So that started bringing in that made

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the United States an even better place to launder their money.

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 1>So to close the loop, then, is it the Trump

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 1>administration that is brought upon a kleptocracy or we already

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>had all of the elements of it and whoever's president

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>could essentially lean in or lean out, depending on what

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they choose.

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I would put it if the United States is going

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:27.399
<v Speaker 2>into a kleptocracy, and the obviously the warning signs were there.

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 2>The old sun also rises quote from Hemingway that everybody uses.

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, how did you go bankrupt slowly and then

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 2>quickly or something like that. I would say the same

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 2>thing with with kleptocracy, and that is how did the

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 2>United States become a cleptocracy? Well, you know, there's this

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 2>chiseling away of laws, campaign finance, United.

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Sentensen United blah blah blah, thirty years of this reality to.

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Avoider taxes, the fact that IRS was already underfunded and

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 2>unable to go after tax avoidance, tax avoidance and money laundering,

0:51:57.440 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 2>even though they're not taxing the same use the exact

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:03.280
<v Speaker 2>same processes. So whether you're hiding or fentanyl, you're hiding

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 2>money from your wife, you're about to divorce, you don't

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 2>pay ali money, they're the same processes, not from the

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:12.520
<v Speaker 2>same organizations in the same places. So that sort of

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 2>stuff was already there. But then you know, whatever duct

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 2>tape was kind of holding the system together and things

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 2>were actually starting to improve a little bit in the

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 2>United States with these new laws, with the new regulations

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:25.439
<v Speaker 2>that were going in, Like that's just sort of that's

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 2>rapidly marg as we speak.

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Let me get you out of here on this. How

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>did you become an expert in this? What brought you

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to You know, when you're in college, You're like, I'm

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be a specialist on understanding clip you know

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens when a government becomes corrupt and how corrupt

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>government's happened. But I'm guessing that is in how you

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 1>got into this. How'd you end up give me your

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of your origin story here before we got.

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, anti eruption of specials was definitely not on my

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 2>BINGO card. Actually, I didn't go to university. I went

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:59.319
<v Speaker 2>to military academy, okay, and I studied engineering and.

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Which which academy?

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Of course academy, and so I was you know, I

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 2>went into the intelligence career field. I ended up working

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 2>on issues with terrorism, finance, the.

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Tax payer, so you saw how money was moved very corruptly.

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I got very interested when I was on peacekeeping in

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the Balkans, I worked on some terrorism finance related issues.

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Ended up getting pulled into NATO's only anti corruption task

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 2>force ever, which was in Afghanistan, which you know you

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 2>really start to under at the time, Afghanistan was the

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 2>second most corrupt country in the world or new the

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Transparency International. When I left, it was the most corrupt.

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:41.919
<v Speaker 2>So there we go those who can't do teach. Yeah,

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:45.439
<v Speaker 2>But and it kept working on it, and I come

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:48.320
<v Speaker 2>from corruption from a different perspective than a lot of others.

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Most come into it from law enforcement or human rights perspective.

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I come from it from a hard military perspective because I.

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Feel like a national security perspective, really.

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Very national security, very hard power. What does it do

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you know? I served in a Rock, I served in Afghanistan.

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Both were mission failures in many ways because of corruption.

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Corruption, right, Yeah, Well, when.

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 2>You talk about why did Afghanistan fall to the Taliban,

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 2>ultimately it's either Pakistan or corruption. Always one of those.

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say. And some might argue

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Pakistan and corruption go hand in hand.

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Yeah, and they're they're definitely overlapping, overlapping circles there.

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 2>So I kept working on it and realized that not

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 2>many people from a military background were writing on it

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and had had that academic background to like, what is corruption?

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 2>What is cliptocers? You define it? Why do we get mission?

0:54:37.520 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Phillyre out of these things? And just kept working on it.

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, your students are pretty lucky. That's a good back.

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a different background. You're not somebody who's just been

0:54:45.239 --> 0:54:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world of hypotheticals, the world of you know,

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:51.920
<v Speaker 1>London School of Economics, No disrespect to them, but sort

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of a different you know, more of a real world.

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a very combat boot sort of on the

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 2>ground and you know, babble and Iraq in the Balkans

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:02.319
<v Speaker 2>sort of.

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You saw political theory get implemented rather than just read it.

0:55:05.760 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not we're not implemented, but either way, you.

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Know, I had my PhD and I landed on the

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:12.400
<v Speaker 2>ground and I'm like, you know, some some things that

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the theory worked, and some were like boy, that was prep.

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it was the school. I'm sure it's like that.

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:21.879
<v Speaker 1>That's where the Mike Tyson quotes comes in, right, quote

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 1>comes in. Everybody's got a plan until they get punched

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:29.760
<v Speaker 1>in the face. Absolutely sounds similar. Hey, uh, doctor Jody Vittori.

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot. It was a very provocative piece,

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 1>but I thought a necessary one. And it's like, you know,

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just about throwing around names, right, throwing around

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this is this These are this is late stage democracy.

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:47.279
<v Speaker 1>When you start to lose it, and I think we

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>need to be a little more aware of it.

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 2>So thank you now, I thank you for having me

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 2>here today. I really appreciate it.

0:55:52.360 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You got it. So i'd love your comments about this

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>interview with Jody Battori here, what you think of whether

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we are at a kleptocracy and what we can do

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. You know, I do think that the issue

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of money in politics, which is I've kind of been

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 1>hitting on that theme a little bit with with with

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the variety of my guests here. You know, the ease

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with which money circulates in the political system does make

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this the opportunity to pay to play, pay to survive,

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it, it is it is.

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It is just it is more likely to happen, and

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it is a problem. And we're going to need more

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>politicians willing to essentially not be tempted by the opportunity

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that is out there for pay to play and instead

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 1>try to find some laws that perhaps protect the democracy

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 1>from that. But voters are going to have to care

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about it enough to scare these politicians into doing it.

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a few questions. Let's dig in

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to the file what we call around here, they ask

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Chuck File, ask Chuck, there it is. You got the music?

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So that helps get me in the mood. All right,

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to plow forward here with four questions

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to kind of keep my answers tight

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and we'll go from there. In a society this one

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:29.400
<v Speaker 1>comes from Dave in Alexandria, Virginia, in a society that

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is granted personhood to corporations, I assume he's kind of

0:57:32.840 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>referring to citizens United. Has it come time to grant

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the same protection to the state and it's populous in

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 1>preventing them from reckless and false statements? Is it time

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to make false, active and malicious statements by the government

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or actively filed political candidates illegal. So I think what

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to get at is intent, right. It is

0:57:53.160 --> 0:57:57.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody making a false statement because they believe in that falsehood,

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>or they're making the false statement because they know it's false, right,

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's you know, motive when it comes to speech,

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is a very difficult thing to prove. And I'll be

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:11.160
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, I read this question about three or

0:58:11.160 --> 0:58:13.880
<v Speaker 1>four different times, and I was thinking about not bothering

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 1>with it and not answering it. Because I was worried

0:58:16.760 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it would come across the wrong way to folks and stuff.

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to address it because I understand where

0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you're coming from, right, which is like when you know,

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 1>should and I think I'd go deeper than that. You know,

0:58:27.800 --> 0:58:31.120
<v Speaker 1>could a could it almost like voters file a class

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 1>class action suit against a Maybe it's a sitting governor,

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:39.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a sitting president, Maybe it's the HHS. Right,

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, does a group of Texans decide to file

0:58:43.880 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a class action suit against HHS and Secretary Kennedy for

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 1>misleading people on the measles vaccine? Now, look, there's obviously

0:58:56.520 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 1>indemnity and government government officials are supposed to be indemnified,

0:58:59.440 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's very hard to sue them on a personal basis.

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You could get to defamation and things like that, but

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would, You know, I was trying to

0:59:08.560 --> 0:59:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think of what would be an example of a suit

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that might get standing. Right, did did did a government

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 1>official provide essentially mislead the public and it led to deaths? Right?

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 1>This would be the measles Right? Is there is there

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>some standing there? So I guess my answer to this

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 1>question is I think this would be difficult to make happen.

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a you know, elected officials have, particularly

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, have protection the Speech and Debate Clause the

0:59:40.960 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment does does sort of protect. You know, you

0:59:44.600 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have a right to lie. You know you have a

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:51.680
<v Speaker 1>right to mislead. The question is maliciously intent. There's defamation.

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Did your you know, did you do your misstatements to

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 1>purposely cause harm? Right, there's there's sort of you do

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have to can acted the motive there. But in coming

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>up with an example, the one that would perhaps could

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>have standing, and I'd be fascinated to see if there

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was a federal court that would take this, and what

1:00:14.000 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court would say is if a group of

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>citizens in Texas sued the sued Kennedy and HHS essentially

1:00:21.520 --> 1:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>by saying that they they helped they helped enhance the

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>measles outbreak which have then caused this damaged loss of life,

1:00:29.880 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. So it would be on I think health

1:00:34.200 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>statements that I think perhaps the government would be the

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerable on in something like that, especially if you

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>can scientifically prove that they were just wrong on the facts.

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have a there's the Surgeon General of

1:00:45.120 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Florida is a massive misinformer on so many things on health.

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the one that's been trying to convince people to

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>take floride out of water, misleading people about the damaged

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>floride could do like anything, if you just injected fluoride

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>into your body at you know, a whole tube of

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>toothpaste of it immediately or whatever it is, yeah, it

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>could poison you. But that is not the amount of

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>fluoride in water that is taking place. So I would

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>love to see a class action suit about health advisories

1:01:22.320 --> 1:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>from the government that that possibly, possibly could be something

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that would put them at risk. Certainly would be an

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting and interesting thing to watch unfold in the courts.

1:01:35.760 --> 1:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>All right. Next question here comes from James E. Are

1:01:38.520 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>there any realistic possibilities to stop jerrymandering? It gets tricky

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>because this comes down to a state and county law

1:01:45.200 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>thing correct. For example, if Congress makes a law banning it,

1:01:47.560 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the states don't have to adhere to that. I feel

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that this problem could fix a lot of Washington by

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>promoting more moderate candidates and more competitive races. Curious about

1:01:55.000 --> 1:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts of what it would take to ban jerrymandering.

1:01:57.240 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So here's the problem. If you start banning. You know,

1:01:59.720 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one person's jerry mander is another person's attempt at creating

1:02:02.600 --> 1:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a competitive district. You know, one of the one of

1:02:06.240 --> 1:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the hallmarks of our society over the last twenty years.

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, jerry mandering was a gigantic problem in the nineties,

1:02:11.840 --> 1:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first decade of the odds, and then we

1:02:14.360 --> 1:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>started self sorting. Meaning you know, when I was growing up,

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea. Nobody had any idea whether you

1:02:21.720 --> 1:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lived in a Republican neighborhood or a Democratic neighborhood, and

1:02:24.200 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>especially if you lived in sort of a mixed neighborhood

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:27.479
<v Speaker 1>like I did. It was sort of a middle class

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood in what I call East Kendall. There's no East Kendall,

1:02:31.360 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>but it was east of the Turnpike for those of

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you keeping track of Miami geography. And you know, I

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think our block. You know, I have no idea. You know,

1:02:42.480 --> 1:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>my father was a bumper sticker guy, so he had

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a bob Old bumper sticker for the eighty eight race.

1:02:46.880 --> 1:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure that sort of I marked our house,

1:02:49.360 --> 1:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but I don't, you know, I don't really have a

1:02:51.280 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>strong memory of anybody on either side, and people weren't

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:59.479
<v Speaker 1>sure what people's politics were on different things. Now there's

1:02:59.560 --> 1:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this bit of cultural self sorting where people want to live,

1:03:02.600 --> 1:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in a similar ethnic group or with similar

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>cultural ties. And so if you're trying to create, you know,

1:03:15.480 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>congressional districts that are competitive, you actually might need to

1:03:18.240 --> 1:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>gerrymander in order to create the competitive nature. So I'm

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not sure gerry mandering itself is something you want to ban. Now.

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I do think you could create guard rails on gerrymandering, right,

1:03:28.400 --> 1:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think I've brought this up before, where you know,

1:03:30.840 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there's always been this idea that the courts could come

1:03:33.880 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>up with a formula. So, for instance, let me give

1:03:36.520 --> 1:03:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you a formula that I've wanted to test out, which

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is you take, you know, in any decade, at the

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the decade, when you're trying to figure out

1:03:45.520 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>how you're starting your apportionment, you take the last two

1:03:47.960 --> 1:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>gubernatorial elections and the last two presidential elections, and you

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>basically you put all four of those votes together and

1:03:56.320 --> 1:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you split the dn R and whatever it is, whatever

1:03:59.320 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that spacing is. If the party that has an advantage

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is at fifty two percent, then no district can be

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>ten points greater than fifty two, you know, for for

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>said party. You know that you can't make a district

1:04:13.440 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger than sixty two percent advantage for Party X. And

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's fifty five, then that number would expand to

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty five. Right. You sort of create some sort of

1:04:23.200 --> 1:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, no more than ten points in one direction

1:04:26.320 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or the other based on the statewide partisan split over

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the last four statewide elections for the two executive offices

1:04:34.120 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in the state, governor and the presidency. That's a way

1:04:37.560 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to create a formula. I'm a data guy. I would

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>love to just have rules that you would follow. It's

1:04:43.120 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>math and you go from there. The other idea, of course,

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is what I floated in my ted talk, which is

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to if you want to limit the damage

1:04:52.360 --> 1:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that jerrymandering can do and the fact that political leaders

1:04:55.160 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in a state can essentially, you know, put the finger

1:04:57.600 --> 1:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on the scale for one party or the other. I mean,

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matters Republicans have an advantage, you know,

1:05:02.320 --> 1:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have the majority in Congress, not because of the voters

1:05:05.320 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that voted, but because of congressional districts that were redrawn

1:05:08.200 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina and Florida. That's the margin for the Republicans.

1:05:11.480 --> 1:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>If they don't get those corridorder redraws that go their way,

1:05:18.440 --> 1:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats probably control the House and we have a much

1:05:21.040 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>different situation here with Trump and his attempt to govern.

1:05:26.120 --> 1:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that that gerry mandering as it

1:05:32.880 --> 1:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>stands now, and I think we have two we don't have.

1:05:35.480 --> 1:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We have too many people in per congressional district, eight

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:40.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand per congressional districts too many. There are only

1:05:41.680 --> 1:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>thirteen cities that have a population of greater than eight

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand, Okay, so that means we have four hundred

1:05:47.480 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five congressional districts that are the that would

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be individually, you know, bigger or as big as just

1:05:56.520 --> 1:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>about every major city in America. But for the top thirteen, Austin,

1:06:00.440 --> 1:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas has just under eight hundred thousand. So that is

1:06:03.920 --> 1:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not a community of interest and that and when you

1:06:06.400 --> 1:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>have districts that big, it actually becomes easier to jerrymander.

1:06:10.040 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know nobody wants to put more members of

1:06:12.120 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress and more politicians in Washington, but I believe it

1:06:14.720 --> 1:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or not, more democracy is better for the democracy, not

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>less democracy. And if you want to get rid of

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>jerrymandering or limit the damage jerry mandering is do, then

1:06:24.360 --> 1:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we should expand the House. You don't need a constitutional

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>amendment for this. This is just an Act of Congress.

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Expand the House. We're at one per four hundred thousand.

1:06:33.960 --> 1:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have more communities of interest. By the way,

1:06:36.000 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>four hundred thousand, it's a population of America's fiftieth largest city,

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>which is Arlington, Texas. That's a suburb of Dallas. That

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is a community of interests. I expect there to be

1:06:44.600 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a member of Congress for Arlington, Texas. You know that

1:06:48.360 --> 1:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me. In the likelihood, if you have

1:06:52.520 --> 1:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and eighty one districts rather than four hundred

1:06:54.720 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five, it's just harder to slice and dice them.

1:06:57.840 --> 1:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>You're actually going to have more of everything. And it

1:07:00.840 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>should create more diversity, a bit more small d democracy

1:07:04.440 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in the House. And yes, you're going to have a

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>different class of people finally have an opportunity to run

1:07:10.480 --> 1:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>for Congress. It isn't going to be somebody you know

1:07:13.200 --> 1:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>or some ideology that you share with. Just enough people

1:07:17.720 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to break through with an interest group to

1:07:20.120 --> 1:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>get the nomination in a congressional district that only the

1:07:23.680 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>primary would decide things. So, if you're looking to get

1:07:27.280 --> 1:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>rid of jerrymandering, I don't think it is by doing

1:07:30.880 --> 1:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a law as you're describing, because people move around and

1:07:33.800 --> 1:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you never know when you're going to need to create

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>jerrymander in order to create competition, Right, So I do

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>think the better answer is double the size of the house.

1:07:45.360 --> 1:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me move on to the next question here,

1:07:48.080 --> 1:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and this one comes from it's unsigned, long time listener,

1:07:53.480 --> 1:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>first time caller. I love that you always like to

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about finding people in the middle, and I've always

1:07:58.000 --> 1:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>liked your description that most Americans live between the thirty

1:08:00.360 --> 1:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>yard lines referring to a football field. But my question

1:08:02.920 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>for you is, could you explain what you're measuring with

1:08:05.000 --> 1:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that metaphorical football field when you're talking about moderates. Is

1:08:07.920 --> 1:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it a question about tone, not being a bomb thrower,

1:08:11.040 --> 1:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>deference to process, policy, incrementalism, people who try to triangulate

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:17.599
<v Speaker 1>some position that seems to appeal to some imaginary swing voter,

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:20.439
<v Speaker 1>or is it really just about being pragmatic as opposed

1:08:20.439 --> 1:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to seeming like a doctrinaire partisan dialog. Yes, okay. The

1:08:24.240 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>answer is that he goes on which version are the

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>people you think politicians need to speak to when you're

1:08:28.960 --> 1:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about moderates, and which of these voices should the

1:08:31.360 --> 1:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>media try to find. Look, I am a one of

1:08:33.600 --> 1:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>those who believes that I always say that I, you know,

1:08:38.720 --> 1:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't share my I have Depending on the issue,

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>some people might say my views are radically left or

1:08:44.960 --> 1:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they're radically right or whatever. Right they don't. But what

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I always say is you can't sort of make progress

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>without incrementally in the middle. It doesn't mean, you know,

1:08:54.479 --> 1:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's two types of moderates. I think

1:08:57.600 --> 1:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there's moderate in temperament and then there's sort of moderate

1:08:59.880 --> 1:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>in and that they have a mixed constituency and they're

1:09:02.560 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 1>trying to represent maybe a business community on one part

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of their district, and maybe they're trying to represent a

1:09:10.160 --> 1:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>religious community and another part of their district. And maybe

1:09:12.360 --> 1:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there's sometimes some things go together. But I'm mostly in

1:09:16.960 --> 1:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>for tone or tenor. I mean, I think that you know,

1:09:20.760 --> 1:09:24.519
<v Speaker 1>there there used to be Republicans try to get the

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>most electable conservative. I've heard someone the left describes themselves

1:09:28.880 --> 1:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as a pragmatic progressive, meaning they're always looking to make progress,

1:09:32.120 --> 1:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>but they're not trying to you know, they're not trying

1:09:34.600 --> 1:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to solve the problem. And one fell sloop swoop. You

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:39.719
<v Speaker 1>know that in a country of three hundred and fifty

1:09:39.760 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>million people with a lot of diverse opinions, you got

1:09:43.160 --> 1:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to bring them along one step at a time. So

1:09:45.439 --> 1:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>when I speak about the thirties, it's not that people

1:09:48.600 --> 1:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have some things that they may be further to

1:09:51.360 --> 1:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the left than somebody and further to the right. It's

1:09:54.880 --> 1:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>just that they accept the fact that, hey, their point

1:09:57.360 --> 1:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of view is out of that mainstream and isn't going

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to get a dress. But maybe there's something in between.

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you believe that all abortions should be banned,

1:10:05.520 --> 1:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's a that's not a seventy percent

1:10:08.920 --> 1:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>issue that in fact, there's a seventy percent issue against

1:10:11.400 --> 1:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>your point of view. So instead you may be for

1:10:14.880 --> 1:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>parental notification, or you may be for you know, trying

1:10:18.240 --> 1:10:22.519
<v Speaker 1>to limit the number of weeks somebody has access to abortion,

1:10:23.000 --> 1:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>because then you find yourself sharing the views of people

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:30.479
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the in the in this larger middle. So

1:10:31.479 --> 1:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>when I refer to that I do refer to. I

1:10:34.160 --> 1:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>think of it as that way because I don't think anybody.

1:10:36.840 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody per se. I think people define

1:10:40.439 --> 1:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>themselves as centrist based on the caricatures of the two

1:10:42.920 --> 1:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>parties that are out there. But I actually think that

1:10:45.439 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 1>isn't the issue. It really is more I see it

1:10:48.479 --> 1:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>as more temperament. Right. You know, you have people that

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to take a sledgehammer to government, right. I mean,

1:10:55.080 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's no moderate here, even though he actually has

1:10:58.120 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>positions that might not you know, that might not put

1:11:02.920 --> 1:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>him as an ideologue traditional conservative on X or Y

1:11:06.240 --> 1:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>or Z right. He's actually a protectionist, which in the

1:11:08.920 --> 1:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>eighties was considered a left wing position. But it you know,

1:11:13.320 --> 1:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he is not conservative at all in his in his

1:11:18.080 --> 1:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in his mindset of trying to hurry up and change things, right,

1:11:21.439 --> 1:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that is not you know, the first part of conservative

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is conserve right, which means you you you don't do

1:11:27.439 --> 1:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>anything too rashly, if anything, you don't you know you incrementalism,

1:11:32.000 --> 1:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>but even even smaller right on that front. So look,

1:11:38.080 --> 1:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you you outlined it well. But that is usually what

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm referring to. It's not necessarily an ideological It's more

1:11:46.160 --> 1:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>about temperament and whether and whether you believe that, hey,

1:11:51.000 --> 1:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the goals should be to give something, you know, get

1:11:53.280 --> 1:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a little something for everybody. A seventy thirty win if

1:11:56.240 --> 1:11:59.519
<v Speaker 1>you're the party in majority, that's a win versus this

1:11:59.600 --> 1:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>idea that the other side doesn't get any say at all.

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's either ninety five to five. You know, you know,

1:12:05.160 --> 1:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's either my way or the highway. You know that

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to me is not a moderate position, even if you

1:12:11.400 --> 1:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you have no interest in engaging with

1:12:14.520 --> 1:12:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the other side. All Right, The final question I'll take

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>today is this comes from a guy named Rocky. Gotta

1:12:22.640 --> 1:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>love that. I always appreciate when you insert some sports

1:12:25.360 --> 1:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>knowledge into a political conversation. Based on your experiences, what

1:12:27.800 --> 1:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>elected official was is the most knowledgeable sports and you've

1:12:30.840 --> 1:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>interacted with disclaimer former athletes or coaches like Jim Bunny,

1:12:33.880 --> 1:12:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Steve Large, and Tom Osborne. They don't count extra points

1:12:36.520 --> 1:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>if you want to break it down. Baseball, college football, NFL,

1:12:38.760 --> 1:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>college hoops, NBA, NHLPGA. Enjoying the podcast Rocky, So, I look,

1:12:44.439 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I got a couple of quick answers on this. I'll

1:12:48.200 --> 1:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>tell you the person that Tom Davis. He's a former

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Republican member of Congress from Northern Virginia. He basically came

1:12:56.680 --> 1:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to Congress when I got to the hotline. I think

1:12:58.680 --> 1:13:03.879
<v Speaker 1>he won in ninety two and then ninety four. Anyway,

1:13:04.479 --> 1:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who didn't just know every presidential

1:13:08.640 --> 1:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>result going back to the forty eight presidential election by county.

1:13:13.800 --> 1:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he could name every World Series lineup that

1:13:16.520 --> 1:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>goes back to nineteen forty eight. Davis was a baseball savant,

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>is a baseball savant. I've enjoyed going to Nats games

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>with him in the past. If he's listening now, he

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>might be. He's an old friend, easily the most knowledgeable

1:13:31.400 --> 1:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>baseball fan of any elected official I've met. But you

1:13:34.960 --> 1:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>have these sort of specialists like Shared Brown. He's got this.

1:13:37.720 --> 1:13:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give away his email address, but

1:13:39.520 --> 1:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>his email address is a tribute to the tribe. To

1:13:43.439 --> 1:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians now, I guess we refer to them. Massive

1:13:46.760 --> 1:13:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland baseball fan and knows can go deep on Cleveland baseball.

1:13:52.720 --> 1:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Not sure about the other sports. Steve Israel, a former

1:13:56.280 --> 1:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Long Island congressman, goes deep on the Mets just his

1:14:00.520 --> 1:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>mats can go super deep. Then there's a lot of

1:14:02.960 --> 1:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I've always had some pretty good Haley Barber. Boy does

1:14:06.880 --> 1:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he love Old Miss football, And that is somebody you

1:14:09.800 --> 1:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>can have a deep and long conversation on Old Miss football.

1:14:13.320 --> 1:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Marco Rubio can go He's a guy

1:14:17.720 --> 1:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that will go deep on the backup cornerbacks of the Dolphins.

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:23.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's a super fan of the Dolphins in

1:14:23.520 --> 1:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a way. And I you know, I'm not sure where

1:14:26.120 --> 1:14:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I think his son's a Gator so and he went

1:14:28.680 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to so I'm not quite sure of his college football

1:14:32.080 --> 1:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>how obsessed with college football he is. But I know

1:14:36.280 --> 1:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>he's a he's a massive Dolphins fan and can go

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>deep on the Dolphins on that front. So you know,

1:14:42.760 --> 1:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>there's quite look, there's This has been one of the

1:14:46.400 --> 1:14:49.559
<v Speaker 1>more helpful ways as a reporter. I've always said, you know,

1:14:50.800 --> 1:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>being a sports fan, there's always a way to connect.

1:14:53.160 --> 1:14:56.599
<v Speaker 1>And I'm an eclectic sports fan. I like, you know,

1:14:56.840 --> 1:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>baseball and college football are probably my two first loves.

1:14:59.400 --> 1:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But boy, the NFL's right there. I love the NBA.

1:15:02.520 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>My son loves it more, so I've gotten into it

1:15:05.320 --> 1:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. By the way, Barack Obama, he

1:15:08.000 --> 1:15:11.559
<v Speaker 1>goes that guy watches a ton of basketball. I remember

1:15:11.600 --> 1:15:14.519
<v Speaker 1>I busted him. He wasn't a huge baseball guy claimed

1:15:14.520 --> 1:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a White Sox fan. And I remember one

1:15:16.760 --> 1:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>day there's some big trade the White Sox have. I

1:15:18.840 --> 1:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was doing small talk. He wasn't paying attention to a

1:15:22.080 --> 1:15:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Jake PV trade at the Chicago White Sox. But like,

1:15:25.760 --> 1:15:27.439
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy that was going. Did you see the

1:15:27.520 --> 1:15:30.679
<v Speaker 1>backup guard that played the other night in the Bulls game?

1:15:30.720 --> 1:15:32.439
<v Speaker 1>That guy, you know, he played it. I watched him

1:15:32.439 --> 1:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>at Marquette. Like he goes deep both on college basketball

1:15:37.680 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and the NFL. You know, ironically, Donald Trump's not, as

1:15:41.680 --> 1:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, where he goes deep as golf. He weirdly

1:15:47.160 --> 1:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go that deep on some of these other sports.

1:15:50.600 --> 1:15:53.559
<v Speaker 1>He knows culturally he needs to connect. But as he

1:15:53.640 --> 1:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>will say, he's friendly with a lot of sports owners.

1:15:58.160 --> 1:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I know he loves boxing, he loves wrestling.

1:16:01.080 --> 1:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Wrestling's been a good, good thing for his businesses in

1:16:04.800 --> 1:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic City. He was the one guy that was willing

1:16:08.160 --> 1:16:10.479
<v Speaker 1>to host the WWE back in the days, and that

1:16:10.560 --> 1:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was an important you know, the snobs of Madison Square

1:16:14.040 --> 1:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Garden weren't so into it back in the day, and

1:16:16.160 --> 1:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it gave him a tenant when he needed a tenant.

1:16:20.479 --> 1:16:22.519
<v Speaker 1>But he doesn't go as deep on the players on

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>some of this stuff unless he is a personal relationship.

1:16:25.400 --> 1:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>But on golf, and I tell you there's a reason

1:16:27.960 --> 1:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>golfers are so loyal to him. They will tell you.

1:16:31.479 --> 1:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And I've had this conversation with golfers, even those that

1:16:34.080 --> 1:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like his politics. They say, you don't understand he

1:16:37.120 --> 1:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>really cares about making great golf courses. They've always felt very,

1:16:43.479 --> 1:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>very well treated by any Trump course. So you know,

1:16:49.960 --> 1:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the golfing community isn't just formed of before him. He

1:16:53.439 --> 1:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>has treated the golfing community quite well over the years

1:16:57.280 --> 1:16:59.799
<v Speaker 1>because he wants more of these tournaments, right he does.

1:17:00.120 --> 1:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>The guy loves his golf and he does and he

1:17:03.840 --> 1:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>does go deep on that. So I will say this,

1:17:09.280 --> 1:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it is whether you're whether you're into sports or not.

1:17:12.080 --> 1:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to get into politics as an elected official,

1:17:14.720 --> 1:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as a reporter, or as a staffer, you're going to

1:17:17.479 --> 1:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>have to learn how to speak that language. It is

1:17:20.800 --> 1:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the It is the best way to connect with communities.

1:17:23.760 --> 1:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a frankly, it is a way to bring

1:17:27.320 --> 1:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>communities together without you know, and especially you know, I

1:17:31.360 --> 1:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>wish Donald Trump didn't make this so difficult for people politically,

1:17:35.200 --> 1:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of almost being negative if somebody doesn't come. Really

1:17:39.960 --> 1:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to separate out the politics of the presidency

1:17:42.760 --> 1:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so that plenty of teams can just feel good about

1:17:44.800 --> 1:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>showing up at the White House. You know, I'm sorry

1:17:48.360 --> 1:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that that it is treated so politically these days. You know,

1:17:52.439 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>there were plenty of players at boycotted showing up at

1:17:57.760 --> 1:18:01.519
<v Speaker 1>at showing up for the events when Obama was president,

1:18:02.320 --> 1:18:04.599
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't get you know, it's not like Obama

1:18:04.720 --> 1:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>got angry about it and said something and tweeted or whatever. Right,

1:18:08.240 --> 1:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's why it never seemed like it

1:18:10.760 --> 1:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was as big of a deal as it comes across

1:18:14.360 --> 1:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>now because the president himself, it personalizes everything and to assume,

1:18:21.439 --> 1:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, he whether it's about him or not, as

1:18:23.880 --> 1:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we know, in some ways he loves it if he

1:18:26.960 --> 1:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>can make something about him on that. But look, that's

1:18:31.680 --> 1:18:33.519
<v Speaker 1>my rundown of sports fans. You know, my friend Chris E.

1:18:33.520 --> 1:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Lizza wrote a whole book about presidents and sports. It's

1:18:37.200 --> 1:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>really good. I highly recommend it. It's a good way

1:18:40.160 --> 1:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to sort of get you get you acclimated with which

1:18:43.880 --> 1:18:47.599
<v Speaker 1>politicians truly like sports, and which politicians simply use sports

1:18:48.720 --> 1:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>as a way to try to connect to the everyday voter.

1:18:51.200 --> 1:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, well that does it for that group of

1:18:54.200 --> 1:18:56.479
<v Speaker 1>We've got four questions in for Ask Chuck again a lot.

1:18:56.640 --> 1:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Be sure you can send me an email at ask

1:18:59.040 --> 1:19:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Chuck at the Chuck com. You can put a comment

1:19:02.560 --> 1:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on the YouTube with a question. You can do it

1:19:04.200 --> 1:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on our Instagram feed. You can send us questions wherever

1:19:07.200 --> 1:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>you want to send us questions Instagram feed, Twitter, YouTube. Yes,

1:19:13.640 --> 1:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a TikTok feed too for the podcast. Don't

1:19:16.360 --> 1:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>tell anybody at TikTok no, actually please do so the

1:19:19.800 --> 1:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>algorithm can get better. So anyway, I would love to

1:19:23.880 --> 1:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>get your questions from that. And with that I will

1:19:27.720 --> 1:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>take a break for at least twenty four hours until

1:19:30.200 --> 1:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we upload again.