WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: US PCE, London Climate

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program, we

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>look to the Fed's preferred gauge of inflation how it

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>could affect policy going forward. I'm Nathan Hager in Washington.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm callin kit here in London, where we're looking ahead

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 2>to London Climate Action Week.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm Derek Prisner looking ahead to the latest reading on

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 3>consumer inflation for Australia.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 4>eleventh three year, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Syria

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 4>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 4>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. I'm Nathan Hager. We begin today's

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>program with some key economic data in the US, and

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we are getting a lot of it this week. The

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserves prefer Gage of Inflation comes out this Thursday,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>along with an updated reading on economic growth at the

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>start of the year, along with a slew of other

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>readings to help us get set for the flood of data.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We're joined by Stuart paul Us, economists for Bloomberg Economics,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'd have to think Stuart, after what we heard

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>from the new Fed cherk Kevin Warsh last week about

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the commitment to price stability, the PCEE has got to

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>be really top of mind. Is that how you see

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>things right now?

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 5>The pce will be top of mind. What's good though,

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 5>is that CPI and PPI are used as the primary

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 5>input for pce inflation. So even going into last week's

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 5>FOMC meeting, central bankers had a pretty good feel for

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 5>what we're likely to see in this upcoming personal income

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 5>and outlays and PCEE inflation report. And frankly, all the

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 5>data that are going to be included in this report,

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 5>which covers everything from income to spending to consumer price

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 5>inflation based on the person consumption expenditures basket, all of

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 5>that data is basically going to affirm the relatively hawkish

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 5>stance that we heard from Kevin Walsh and that we

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 5>saw in the dot plot released by the broader FOMC.

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So for those who might not be closely keeping

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>score on what's fed into PCE. I think from the

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>CPI and PPI data you alluded to, we are still

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>well above target when it comes to the fed's two

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>percent rate that it's shooting for.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Right absolutely, so we're expecting to see about zero point

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 5>five percent monthly headline PCEE inflation. That's going to boost

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 5>the annual PCE inflation rate to about four point one percent. Now,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 5>core inflation is a little bit more tame, about zero

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 5>point four percent core inflation on the month, and that'll

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 5>boost the year on year rates about three point four percent.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 5>So still a significant overshoot even by the FED preferred measures.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so how are we looking then at the trajectory

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for inflame right now? Now that we have something of

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a resolution in the Middle East, the oil is starting

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to flow through the strait of horror moves, does that

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>affect how you as an economist are thinking about the

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>overall trajectory of inflation at this point.

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 5>I actually think that the May inflation readings and the

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 5>PC inflation rating is the last real inflation reading for

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 5>the month of May. I think that those May numbers

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 5>are basically going to be the local peak that we

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 5>see for inflation I'm expecting to see some disinflation coming

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 5>in June and thereafter. And as you mentioned, you know,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 5>the Memorandum of Understanding, the reopening of the Straight of

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Horror moves both help. It should reduce the energy price

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 5>pressures that have been boosting headline inflation and even bleeding

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 5>into the core a little bit. But beyond that, it

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 5>looks like we're past peak tariff passed through. If you

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 5>rewind the clock a year, it feels like a lifetime ago. Yeah,

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 5>But we were thinking about Liberation Day, we were thinking

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 5>about the implementation of tariffs. We saw a major spike

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 5>in the average effective tariff rate, which had been boosting

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 5>core goods prices over the last year. But now it

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 5>seems like that's starting to fall out of the year

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 5>on year inflation measures. We're starting to see some moderation

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 5>in core goods prices. We're also seeing firms face a

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>little bit of pushback when they try to pass through

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 5>higher core goods prices to consumers. So all told, we

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 5>have those two factors in play, mostly on the good side,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 5>where falling energy prices in June and favorable base effects

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 5>as we pass through peak tariff pass through are going

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 5>to result in a little bit of disinflation in starting

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 5>in June and then probably continuing throughout the second half

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 5>of the year. That's so, with course, barring any sort

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 5>of escalation or re escalation of the war in Iran.

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Certainly, I mean that's a key wild card. But with

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>all that said, Stewart, I think one of the last

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>times we spoke, you were thinking that the FED could

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty significant room to stay on pause, if

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not cut, in the months to come. After what we

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>heard from the Chairman last week. Is that still your view?

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think that the FED is going to do

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 5>their best to sit on their hands. We definitely saw

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 5>from the dots we saw from the forecasts included in

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 5>the summary of economic projections. We also heard it in

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 5>the Chairman's voice and his near singular focus on price

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 5>stability rather than employment. All of those looked at a

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 5>little bit hawkish. That's certainly the case. I'll have to

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 5>concede that point. But one thing that I want everybody

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 5>to be aware of, to really fully understand that it's

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 5>not clear to us, and it's certainly not clear to

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 5>policymakers whether we're seeing a lot of cyclical strength driving

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 5>economic activity or where it's mostly just structural transformation. So

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 5>if we're looking at the totality of the data, layoffs

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 5>and unemployment are low, but hiring is really concentrated in

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 5>industries that structural tailwinds, like healthcare for example. Investment is hot,

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 5>but that's mostly in industries that are focused on on

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 5>shoring and participating in the AI buildout. Residential construction for example,

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 5>is really crummy. We saw that just last week with

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 5>housing starts. Inflation pressures, as I mentioned, mostly downstream of

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Tariff's chips, shortages of the Iran war, and so the

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>disinflation that we're getting there again, it's mostly because of

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 5>shifts in the landscape more so than any sort of

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 5>like cyclical factors. So all of those more structural factors

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 5>that are affecting the dynamics of the economy rather than

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 5>extraordinary cyclical strength, actually do keep the door open for

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, a cut. I would not be surprised to

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 5>see a cut next year. And it all really depends

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 5>on the trajectory of the labor market in twenty twenty

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 5>seven when that's the.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Case thanks to this Stuart, as always, that's Stuart paul

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Us economist with Bloomberg Economics. Let's take a look now,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>add some stocks making news the week ahead. I'm Nathan

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Hager here with Bloomberg Equities reporter Avalon Purnell, a head

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of a few pretty interesting earning stories in the coming week.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna hear from Carnival cruise lines on Tuesday. It's

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really interesting to hear from them, especially with

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so many of the headlines around the Middle East driving

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>cruise stocks over the last several months.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 6>Avalon absolutely, I mean, the potential end of the Iran

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 6>war and fuel costs will definitely be top of mind

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 6>for investors as Carnival heads into its second quarter earnings

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 6>on Tuesday. Carnival shares have been on a roller coaster

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 6>ride alongside other traveling cruise names, to say the least,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 6>since the war started in February. But now with the

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 6>US and Iran saying that they've reached an interim agreement

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 6>to reopen the Strait of her Moves, sentiment is again

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 6>rising in this hard hit sector. Worth mentioning that Wall

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 6>Street still remains cautiously optimistic about the stock Schiefel may

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 6>have put it best at analyst saying that trading cruise

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 6>stocks is beyond difficult because you're trading your view of

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 6>whether the Middle East war will end or not. But

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 6>they remain buyers of Carnival into their earnings because they

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 6>believe the come But he hasn't witnessed any deterioration in

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 6>customer spending Bloomberg Intelligence highlighting that investors will look for

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 6>insight on booking since March, when Carnival reported that eighty

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 6>five percent of capacity had been sold.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, like you said, the stock has kind of been

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>all over the map since the start of the year.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>What are we expecting from the options market when it

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to how the stock could trade off the back

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of earnings.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 6>Yes, option data that we are seeing at the moment

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 6>is currently implying about a six percent move after those results.

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we'll be keeping an eye on Carnival Cruise

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Line on Tuesday, along with FedEx. Obviously a pretty strong

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>bell weather for the economy as a whole. But I mean,

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this stock has been through quite a few changes lately.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So how's that affecting investor sentiment?

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I mean FedEx, to say the least, we'll be

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 6>entering a new era when it reports fourth quarter earnings.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 6>On Tuesday, Justice Mond FedEx completed the spinoff of its

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 6>freight division, and it will also be the first earnings

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 6>call for Claude Russ, who became interim CFO after John

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 6>Dietrich surprise investors by now that he was stepping down

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 6>at the start of this month. Investors expect FedEx to

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 6>continue executing despite inflationary pressures and rising fuel costs tied

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 6>to that war in Iran. Barclay's analysts are expecting solid

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 6>retail performance and also industrial expansion this quarter given strong

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 6>macro transportation indicators, though it is worth noting that Bloomberg

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 6>Intelligence highlighting with the spinoff in the rear view mirror,

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 6>FedEx can potentially begin to focus on its longer term

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 6>financial targets, like pushing its higher margin businesses and also

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 6>improving European results to lift earnings above its twenty twenty

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 6>nine target.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, so it'll be interesting to see how that goes.

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, this stock in particular has been on

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty solid run since even before the start of

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the year. When you have the FedEx freight business in

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the rear view, how is that expected to affect the

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>performance going forward?

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 6>Well, going forward, They're hoping that this will allow FedEx

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 6>to hone in on the really quality areas of its

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 6>business and help to expand margin. And also worth noting

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 6>that options data at the moment is currently implying a

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 6>nearly seven percent move after those results, although we will

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 6>also hear from that spinoff later that week as well,

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 6>so we'll see how the two go head to head.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, So even more reason to keep an eye

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on FedEx and FedEx Freight. Not only that, on Thursday,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hear from Darden Restaurants. I mean, every

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>time I think about Darden, I think about all of Garden,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I'm always surprised by how many restaurants

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are under the Darden umbrella, not just for casual dining,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but fine dining as well.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you're absolutely right. Darden is the parent company behind

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 6>popular chains like Rufe, Chris Longhorn Steakhouse, and my dad's

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 6>personal favorite Cheddar Scratch Kitchen.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>But nice.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 6>We will be gaining some more visibility on the American

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 6>consumer Thursday when Darden reports for quarter earnings, Worth noting

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 6>that they do continue to outperform the S and P

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 6>five hundred consumer discretionary sector and investors are expecting the

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 6>print to keep that trend going. City Analysts writing that

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 6>they expect another solid quarter marked by comparative girl continuing

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 6>to outpaced industry. Raymond Jane's expecting a strong fourth quarter,

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 6>noting that solid casual dining segment trends in recent months,

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 6>and also worth noting that options data at the moment

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 6>is currently implying about a four percent move after those results.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so maybe a little bit of a pop there.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But you have to wonder, when you know, there's so

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>much talk about a K shaped economy, whether consumers are

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about pulling back some on some of the more

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>discretionary sides of the economy, whether a company like Darden

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>could see a hit from something like that if people

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are thinking, well, you know, maybe I would rather stay

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and home and cook for myself rather than go out

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for a nice meal for a change.

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, and I mean it's also not just that. We're

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 6>also thinking about the impact of GLP ones on various restaurants. Obviously,

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 6>fast dining fast food is going to be very impacted

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 6>by GLP ones, especially as they continue to grow in

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 6>popularity in the US, But for companies like a Darden, restaurants.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 6>Analysts have said they're really looking for some of these

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 6>chains to launch more smaller plates, more chicken options for

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 6>customers who are looking for a healthier option on the

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 6>menu and are really conscious about protein, and so that

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 6>will also be something to be interesting to keep an

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 6>eye on as we see the report later this week.

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>That's Bloomberg Equities reporter Avalon Pernell coming up on Bloomberg

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>day Break weekend. We'll look ahead to London Climate Action Week.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nathan Hager, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak weekend, our global look ahead at the top stories

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the coming week. I'm Nathan Hager in Washington.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Later in the program will get you set for some

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>important economic data coming out in Australia this week. But first,

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the world's facing an uptick in extreme weather events, and

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Europe is no exception. While one of the hottest World

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Cups on record is underway on this side of the Atlantic,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Europe is enduring a fresh wave of weather warnings and

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it's having an impact on climate, resilience, energy security, man

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>everyday life. For more. Let's go to London and bring

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg Daybreak you're a banker, Caroline hepger.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 2>Nathan, would you believe it's the UK, which is rarely

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 2>known for hot weather, now faces its second heat wave

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 2>in a matter of weeks. Yellow weather warnings have been

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>issued across Europe and here in London. It's spurring a

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>national debate about renewable energy, housing policy and even the

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 2>role of air conditioning. While the Iraan War has already

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 2>spurred inflation across the continent and focus minds on our

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>collective dependence on fossil fuels, Europe and the world must

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>now grapple with another cost, the twenty trillion dollars which

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence estimates will have to be spent on extreme

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 2>weather over the next decade. Initiatives like the upcoming London

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Climate Action Week will look to harness the power of

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>London for global and local climate action. Sherry Hickock is

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of Climate Impact Partners and says that the

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of engagement from local government and the business world

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>is needed more now than ever before. Despite some political

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 2>backlash to the idea from opposition political parties, she says

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 2>there's actually been a surge in corporate climate investing.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 7>I think what we see in the continued growth in

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 7>the commitments is that it isn't a short term gain. So,

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 7>as you said, corporate commitments are up seventy two percent.

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 7>We have now seventy two percent of the global fortune

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 7>five hundred with at least one climate goal. That's three

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 7>times since twenty nineteen.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>That was Sherry Hiccock, the CEO of Climate Impact Partners

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>there speaking to Bloomberg. But will that be enough to

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>combat the panoply of looming threats from heat waves to drought,

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>to flood risks and food shortages. Tooting me now to

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>discuss is Bloomberg's weather and climate reporter Joe Wurtz and

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Green reporter Olivia Rudgar. Welcome to both of you,

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and thanks for taking the time to speak to us. Joe,

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 2>let's start by thinking about the heat wave looming in

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Europe right now. What does it mean for the environment

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>and for the economy?

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 8>Right So, that heat wave is building right now in

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 8>France really is kind of where things are really starting

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 8>to cook over there. And this is a one of

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 8>these high pressure systems that we saw earlier in late May,

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 8>so a very similar setup and they are looking at

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 8>some really scorching temperatures, and also day after day after

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 8>day of really warm nights too. They call these tropical nights.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 8>These are when temperatures don't dipple of twenty degrees at night.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 8>We could be in for days of that in France

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 8>and in Paris there, and you know, we're already seeing

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 8>some market ripples from this. You know, the rivers in

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 8>France are starting to get warm. They use those rivers

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 8>to cool nuclear plants, and when those river temperatures get hot,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 8>they can't produce as much nuclear energy and they have

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 8>to limit outputs. So EDF and France has already said

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 8>they might have to start limiting power at these plants,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 8>and so the effects of this heat are already starting

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 8>to trickle in.

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, gosh, that is surprising, isn't it that the impact

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>is so significant. I mean, we know that productivity drops,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>for example, when it gets very hot. There's also the

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>risk of fire of wildfires in Europe, which we often

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 2>see over the summer, and then deaths, you know, increase

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>as well because of the heats. There are lots of consequences,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 2>aren't there for people. There's also there've been quite a

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of talk about the al Ninia effect. Now that

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 2>is actually not very familiar to a lot of people

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>in Europe. It's something that affects other parts of the

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>world more. That could shave trillions of you know, very

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 2>fragile global economy. It's expected to be really really strong

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 2>this year. Why and what is it?

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this is a lot of people aren't familiar, really

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 8>thin because it's actually pretty far away geographically from Europe.

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 8>This is an area of the Pacific Ocean that is

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 8>warming up. It warms up on these kind of seasonal cycles,

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 8>and we're in for one of these seasonal cycles. But

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 8>it's happening on top of warming that has already occurred

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 8>as the climate's getting warmer and through climate change. And

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 8>the projections are that this only could be you know,

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 8>potentially unprecedented. This we're looking at a potential record breaking heat.

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 8>And this weather pattern, even though it's cyclical, you know,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 8>it has global ramifications. It affects weather patterns all over

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 8>the world. It shifts rainfall, increases heat in some areas,

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 8>makes it less rainy in some areas and more rainy

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 8>in others. But this is happening on top of inflation

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 8>that's already occurring largely due to the war in the

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 8>Middle East, and you know, big impacts especially in food

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 8>systems and agriculture, drought, wildfire, severe flooding in some areas.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, the last one, the one in the last

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 8>big one in twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen was like

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 8>seven point six trillion dollars you know to the economy here.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, we're approaching that now and it's officially on

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 8>and one peak for months to come.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>So this is the backdrop then to London Climate Action Week.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 2>I'll also add that the backdrop of course is the

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>World Cup as well, and there's expected to be very

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 2>very high heat at many of those matches. Again that's

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>difficult for some European football playing nations, and a lot

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 2>of weather warnings there too. But I wanted to pick

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 2>up with the Olivia on what Joe was saying there.

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not just about heat, it's also about water and

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 2>it's about flooding. And we've been writing a lot about

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the unseasonable weather that we've been having here in the UK,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 2>but it's kind of an example of what is happening

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>in many countries. We've had this record setting May in

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 2>terms of the temperatures, but now very very wet June.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 2>It's not just kind of heat waves and air conditioning

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 2>we're thinking about. It's also the flood risks too.

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, And I think the thing that you see in

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 9>the UK is what was historically a sort of very

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 9>temperate climate that moved within you know, specific parameters most

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 9>of the time, to something that's a little bit more dramatic.

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 9>So we see these much bigger swings from you know,

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 9>we had over thirty degree temperature heat waves I'm sorry,

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 9>I'm in Celsius rather than fary high.

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 5>We'll forgive you.

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, in May, which is very unseasonally hot, and then

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 9>you know, it swings away again and we get really

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 9>really heavy rainfall. And that is climate driven because you know,

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 9>for every degree of extra warming in the atmosphere, it

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 9>means that it can hold that much more moisture. And

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 9>so when we do get those summer downpours, they are

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 9>heavier than they historically would have been. And the other

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 9>thing I think that's interesting in the UK and also

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 9>you know other places that we're not used to this

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 9>type of dramatic climatic shift, is that our infrastructure and

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 9>our buildings are not well adapted to this level of

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 9>heavy rainfall. So you see the risk of surface water

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.239
<v Speaker 9>flooding is rising really significantly at the same time as

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 9>we're paving over a lot more land, and that increases

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 9>that risk on top of the extra rainfall, and this

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 9>is something that insurers increasingly are very concerned about. You know,

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 9>it comes down to even a garden level, thinking about

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 9>how people are managing their own garden space. Increasing the

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 9>people are paving over, you see more astroturfh around, putting

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 9>in driveways, which maybe makes their life easier, but insurers

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 9>are actually very concerned about that as a risk. That

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 9>accentuates the impact of surface water flooding and can cause

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, really significant property damage and really traumatic experiences

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 9>as well for people affected by it.

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've been very interested to read your climate change newsletter,

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the content that you put out regularly on those issues.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 2>The paving over of front gardens in London. I mean,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 2>it's down to the micro level, but this is where

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 2>you see kind of a climate change really large.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 10>Joe.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Another area that has been fascinating when we're talking about

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>how unusual it used to be to have air conditioning

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 2>in London, but now it's becoming much more common, and

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe this is also something that in many more cities

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 2>is becoming more common. I mean, AC in the United

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>States takes up a huge chunk of energy consumption. It's

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 2>become much more common across Europe and elsewhere.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, it is becoming more common here, It's becoming

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 8>more common across Europe. We've seen installation rates across Europe.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 8>Adoption of AC installed in homes and businesses is low

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 8>in the UK, but people's interest in cooling down when

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 8>these heat waves hit is very high. We saw a

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 8>huge jump in purchases of these portable air conditioning units

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 8>and fans, you know, at retailers here in the UK,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 8>you know, at Curryes saw like a twenty seven hundred

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 8>percent increase in portable air conditioning sales year over year

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 8>during that that May heat wave that we just had.

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 8>John Lewis saw an eight hundred percent surge. While their

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 8>adoption rate installation rate of these air conditionings is pretty

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 8>low in buildings when that heat hits, people will spend

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 8>money to stay cool.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 2>But surely that's massively inefficient Olivia. I mean, and there

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 2>is the push pulls in there between climate change policy

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and then what people actually do when they heat.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so part of the problem in the UK is

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 9>that we just haven't designed our buildings really in any era,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 9>including the modern era, to cope well with heat, and

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 9>so you know, it doesn't actually take a huge amount

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 9>of heat for people to start to get really uncomfortable

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 9>sometimes in homes and other buildings as well, things like

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 9>care homes and hospitals. That's one of the things the

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 9>Climate Change Committee really highlighted, and you know, the current

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 9>building policies, especially in London, really try and dissuade people

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 9>from getting their conditioning. You have to in a lot

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 9>of places, you have to jump through hoops, you have

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 9>to get planning permission, if you're a leaseholder you're own

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 9>a flat. It can also be quite complex, and so

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 9>what people are actually doing is going out and buying

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 9>these portable systems, which the types of ones that Joe

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 9>references that you can buy from Curries or John Lewis,

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 9>which are, as you say, much less efficient than a

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 9>real kind of fixed system. So in some ways we

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 9>sort of currently have the worst of both worlds because

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 9>people are still they need to be cool and their

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 9>home or whatever building they're living in is not well

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 9>adapted so they're having to do something, but doing something

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 9>that's more sort of fixed and permanent is quite difficult.

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Just tell us a little bit about the politics in

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the UK. I mean, climate change is a reality in

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 2>countries around the world, including in Britain, but there is

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>still climate denialism, isn't there. How have you seen that, Olivia?

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, I think a lot of people thought that

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 9>we'd sort of vanquished climate denialism in the UK, and

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 9>that's not currently the case because, you know, like a

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 9>lot of places, there's been the rise of more populist politics,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 9>and here that is particularly expressed in the Reform Party

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 9>and you know their policy around climate change. We interviewed

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 9>Richard Tice on the Zero podcast. My colleague Akshat Rathi

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 9>interviewed him a few weeks ago, and you know, he

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 9>is very dismissive of the human impact on the climate.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 9>And his argument is really, well, we should just adapt

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 9>to it. You know, we should forget trying to cut emissions.

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's too expensive, it's waste of time. We

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 9>should just spend loads of money on adapting to it.

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 9>The problem with that is that if we kind of

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 9>allow climate change to run away, and you know, we

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 9>get temperature rises. We're already on course for way over

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 9>one point five degrees of temperature rises by mid century,

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, even more than that. Adapting to that, it's

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 9>like sort of trying to fill up a bucket that's

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 9>got holes in it. You're really trying to keep up

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 9>with something that is happening on a scale that we're

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 9>just not used to as human beings. And the cost

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 9>of that, you know, he says, it's fairly kind of minimal,

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 9>and it's sort of as much more cost effective than

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 9>mitigating I think there are a lot of experts in

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 9>the climate space that would disagree with that.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>My thanks there to Bloomberg's Joe Worth and Olivia Rodguard

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 2>well with former US Sector of State John Kerry and

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 2>former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, both scheduled to speak

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 2>at London Climate Action Week in the next few days.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 2>We will have full coverage of the convergence of climate

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>and finance across Bloomberg platforms. I'm Caroline Hepge here in London.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 2>You can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you at beginning at six am in London. That's one

0:24:58.440 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 2>am on Wall Street.

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Nathan, Thanks Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll look ahead to price pressures down Under. I'm Nathan Hager,

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>global look ahead, the top stories for investors in the

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>coming week. I'm Nathan Hager in Washington. It's not just

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve getting ready for inflation data. This week,

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 1>we also get a fresh look at how much price

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is arising in Australia. For more, let's get to Doug Prisner,

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>host of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Nathan. Last week, the Reserve Bank of Australia warned

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 3>that inflation is still too high. OURBA Governor Michelle Bullock

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>said inflation is likely to remain high for some time

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 3>as higher fuel prices feed through to prices of other

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>goods and services. Now this week we'll get the report

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 3>on Australian consumer prices and to help us preview the numbers,

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 3>let's bring in Bloomberg Economy for Australia and New Zealand

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 3>James McIntyre. James joins from our studio in Sydney. Thank

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 3>you for being here. So last week, the RBA left

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 3>its official cash rate unchanged at four point three five

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 3>percent now to be fair, the central Bank has raised

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 3>rates three times already this year to try to get

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>inflation back to target, and yet price stability is still

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.479
<v Speaker 3>a problem. Does it all come down to higher energy

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>costs as the result of the war in Iran.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.479
<v Speaker 11>Well, what the RBA has been worried about there is

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 11>that there was a lot of strength in the economy

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 11>at the end of the year, and it looked like

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 11>in the beginning of the year before the outbreak of

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 11>conflict with Iran, things were going quite strong, and they

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 11>were worried that inflation was going to take off a

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 11>bit from the other side of the economy when you

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 11>throw an energy shock onto that. That was when they

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 11>decided to pull the trigger and act, and they did

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 11>that three times. So it's unsurprising that they did take

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 11>a chance to take a little bit of a breather

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 11>after three rate hikes in a row. But they are

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 11>still concerned and really want to talk tough, and they

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 11>have done that. They've continued to talk tough to try

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 11>and make sure they get inflation expectations staying on a lock.

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 11>As the energy in inflation shock works its way through

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 11>the system over the course of coming months.

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>So from what I understand, James, it's not just the

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 3>headline reading that's a problem. It's underlying inflation. I think

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 3>that's a little more concerning. Do I have that right?

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 11>You do?

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 12>You do?

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 11>That's right? And so what we've got with the headline

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 11>is actually we've had some retreat. We've got a little

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 11>bit of a pullback. It was surprisingly weaker at the

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 11>headline number in April, and that was because of government

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 11>initiatives to have fuel excise tax, so it really helped

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 11>to mute and damp some of that energy shock at

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 11>the bowser, at the at the petrol pump for consumers.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 11>We'll see a little bit more of that in the

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 11>May data. But what we've got on the underlying inflation

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 11>is that's remaining a little bit stickier. Three point three percent,

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 11>probably up to three point four on our numbers for

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 11>the month of May, and that's above the RBAS two

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 11>to three percent band. It has come off a little,

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 11>but there's a long way to go, and that's what

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 11>we think the Central Bank is concerned about and why

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 11>even though they're on hold now and could be on

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 11>hold for quite some time. They're going to continue to

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 11>articulate a very concerned and tough stance and keep that

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 11>threat of further hikes alive.

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 3>So what are you expecting to see in the upcoming

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 3>data this week when it relates to consumer prices.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so we're expecting to see on a month on

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 11>month outcome, a decline in prices. A pullback in those

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 11>gasoline or we call it petrol prices at the pump

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 11>is a big part of that story. There are usually

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.239
<v Speaker 11>some seasonal things that are a little bit damper, but

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 11>on a year on year we're expecting the inflation at

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 11>the headline level to fall from four point two in

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 11>April down to four for May, but at the trim

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 11>mean level that's likely to stay elevated at moving in

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 11>the other direction from three to three to three four.

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 11>These are the monthly da data though that is a

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 11>new development for Australia. We've had a monthly CPI now

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 11>for a little while. The RBA is still focusing in

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 11>on the quarterly numbers and so we've got another month,

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 11>the June data, which will then be the Q two,

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 11>the second quarter CPI. That's going to be the big

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 11>key one that the RBA is really going to be

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 11>focused on.

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 3>So what is the market right now expecting in terms

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 3>of further tightening from the Reserve Bank.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 11>Well, market expectations have pulled back a little. If we

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 11>were to circle back, probably a month ago, we were

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 11>seeing further hikes being priced in by the market, but

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 11>that has really dialed back, and it's dialed back for well,

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 11>one particularly important reason. Not just what's happened with the

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 11>reopening of the rate of Hall moves and that news

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 11>that we should see some easing of the energy supply

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 11>shock that's come there. What we have seen domestically is

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 11>actually quite important, and we've seen the Economic Surprise Index

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 11>for Australia, that Citybank Economic Surprise Index really fall into

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 11>deeply negative territory. It wasn't just the April CPI surprising

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 11>on the downside, but the labor market data surprised on

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 11>the downside as well, showing that we actually had a

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 11>fall in jobs and a spike up in the unemployment rate.

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 11>If we get some more signs of that weakening in

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 11>the labor market, that's really going to cause a bit

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 11>of tension for the RBA with their dual mandate.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>So I understand that there is a bit of softening

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 3>in the labor market, and I guess you could make

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the case that that's to be expected given the tightening

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that the RBA is already executed, if I can use

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 3>that term. But I'm curious about how well wages are

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 3>holding up right now.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so wages at the private sector level are okay,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 11>they're in the zone in terms of the RBA's zone

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 11>of comfort. There. We did have a minimum wage decision,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 11>so there is a portion of the labor market. There's

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 11>a federal or a national minimum wage for Australia and

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 11>around about twenty percent of wages across the economy are

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 11>influenced by an annual decision on that wage or match it.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 11>And what we had there was we had that minimum

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 11>wage increase come through at four point seventy five percent,

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 11>and that's a little bit higher than we might have

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 11>been expecting. What the Wage Tribunal opted to do was

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 11>to protect low wage workers from the impacts of inflation

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 11>that they experienced last year. Now, unfortunately, what that means

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 11>is it pushes up those costs for that section of

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 11>the labor market, and as a result, that means it's

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 11>a little bit more difficult and makes inflation a little

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 11>bit stickier to come down, especially if other workers in

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 11>the other eighty percent of the labor market have a

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 11>look at that what those low wage workers are getting

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 11>and say, you know, to their employers, I want the same,

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 11>Please that that is a little bit of a challenge.

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 11>So there's a little bit of I guess weakness in

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 11>the labor market that helps the RBA keep a little

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 11>bit of a lid on the risk of that fairly

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 11>solid wage game that came through proliferating more broadly across

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 11>the overall wage complex and keeping inflation pressures lingering or

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 11>sticky in the system.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>So, given everything that we're talking about here, I'm wondering

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 3>how well household spending is holding up. Are things okay?

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.719
<v Speaker 3>Are they stable? Are they beginning to soften a bit?

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 3>What's happening when it comes to household spending.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, we've had the household spending data for April show

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 11>that there was a little a substantive dip month on

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 11>month of about one percent, but compared to a year,

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 11>it's running just under five percent. And that's in norminal terms.

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 11>That's an okay outcome. But what we should be seeing

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 11>is we should be expecting that to fall. It's not

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 11>just the petrol prices or those gasoline prices coming back

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 11>thanks to initiatives by the government to deliver some price

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 11>relief and tax relief on those. We've got rate cuts

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 11>being a factor here, but we've also got a negative

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 11>wealth effect coming through. Australia's house prices have finally shown

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 11>signs of cracking. There's a two speed market at play.

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 11>Smaller capital cities and the mining and resource states of

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 11>Western Australia and Queensland house prices continue to be quite

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 11>deliver quite strong and robust gains there. But in the

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 11>two major capital cities which are the big key anchors

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 11>for the economy, Sydney and Melbourne, we've seen prices weakening

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 11>since November last year, before the RBA started hiking rates,

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 11>and those rate hikes have exacerbated, especially at the top

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 11>end of the market, have exacerbated that slide in those

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 11>house prices, and so we could be seeing in those

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 11>two major economies, two major markets Sydney and Melbourn, big

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 11>anchors for the economy, a bit of a negative wealth

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 11>effect coming through and weighing on the consumer side there

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 11>as well. So there's a lot of headwinds on the

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 11>consumer story right now, and that should be something that well,

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 11>the RBA is going to be keeping a close eye

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 11>on and making sure that it isn't something that tips

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 11>over into too much of a downward spiral for demand,

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 11>which could mean that that labor market story goes from

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 11>one of softness that helps keep wage pressures in check

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 11>to one that actually is heading more towards a downturn

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 11>that could spill into a recession.

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 3>James, thank you so very much for helping us understand

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the nuances of what is happening right now in the

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Australian economy as we look ahead to this week's inflation data.

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 3>James McIntyre here is Bloomberg Economist for Australia and New Zealand.

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Staying in Australia, Prime Minister and Thanny Albanizi has resisted

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 3>calls from making deeper cuts to immigration. That's even though

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 3>Australia is facing demographic pressures. The fertility rate is at

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 3>a record low. To get some perspective, my colleague Heidi

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Straudwat spoke with professorial fellow Roger Wilkins from the University

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 3>of Melbourne.

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 10>You kind of need one if you don't have the other. Right,

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 10>we know the replacement rate has been below target for decades.

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 10>Now are there options other than migration, given it continues

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 10>to be a political flashpoint?

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Not a lot of options.

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 12>I mean, it's declining fertility is not unique to Australia,

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 12>but it does pose a very difficult policy problem. I

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 12>think it's going to be something that's very hard to

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 12>turn around. I mean, policy can have some impact in

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 12>reversing it, but I think Australia's longer term economic interests

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 12>are in maintaining a healthy immigration program.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 10>You're completely correct, of course, to point out that this is

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 10>not a proper that's unique to Australia. You only have

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 10>to look to the likes of Japan to see what

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 10>that aging population future might look like. But I do

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 10>wonder have there been any successful policies when it comes

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 10>to encouraging and getting the birth rate back up, because

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 10>we know that things like you know, baby bonus haven't

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 10>exactly been effective in the longer term.

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 12>No, although of course that was a short lived policy,

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 12>particularly so in the early two thousands when Australia had

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 12>quite large cash payments made to new parents. It reached

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 12>a peak of around seven thousand dollars Australian per child,

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 12>but that only lasted for a very short period and

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 12>we did see a bump up infertility rates at the time.

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 12>So I think there is some merit in programs like that,

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 12>where large cash payments at around the time of birth,

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 12>they have a salience that perhaps works better than things

0:36:56.080 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 12>like childcare subsidies, which can be somewhat called for people

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 12>to understand and really fully appreciate in terms of the

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 12>fact factoring in whether to have a child or.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 10>Not, the factor of a falling birth rate, of potential

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 10>limitations on migration of an aging population. What's the overall

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 10>impact on the labor market.

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 12>Well, I mean it's certainly in the broader context, Australia

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 12>is an aging population, not aging as fast as many

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 12>other OECD countries, but nonetheless aging, and so you have

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 12>a smaller proportion of your population of prime working age,

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 12>and so that certainly raises challenges for longer term living standards.

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 12>And it also that changing structure of the population also

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 12>has implications for the structure of the labor market.

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 3>That was Roger Wilkins, Professorial Fellow from the University of Melbourne,

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 3>speaking with Bloomberg's Heidi Stroud Watts. I'm Doug Prisner. You

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 3>can catch us weekdays for the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 3>available wherever you get your podcast.

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Nathan, Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 1>five am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nathan Hager. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>business headlines are coming up right now.