WEBVTT - Lakers vs Nuggets, Wemby to Spurs & Wright or Wrong

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first. Like you know to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one, What's Right with Nick Right live

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>from Trinadge in Harlem, New York's premier women's boutique, alongside

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>my lovely daughter Diora, fresh off a trip to see

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 2>couple universities and California. Just spell it all, my big Well,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>that's where we were this week, and that's why you

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>were not here on Tuesday. I have to tell the

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>audience why you were not here Tuesday. Not here today

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 2>in Los Angeles is our Concieri of the show. Second

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>in command, Matt Ford. Matt is out either on personal

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 2>business or on business business. But I do have to

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>say one thing before we get in today. Show me

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the huge show the Heat beat the Celtics last night,

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 2>as predicted by me, once again just rolling in correct predictions.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I've gotten two things wrong these NBA playoffs. The Warriors

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>beating the Kings I got wrong, and the Celtics beating

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 2>the Sixers I got wrong, Which is interesting because both

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of those series I picked them to go seven games.

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And the reason it for me to be wrong this

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 2>postseason it took literally the two highest scoring game seven

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>performances in NBA history, Steph's fifty against the Kings and

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>then Tatum's fifty one against the Sixers. But that's neither

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>here nor there. What I was trying to get to

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>is we're gonna get into that Game two of Nuggets

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Lakers tonight, the absolutely bananas expectations for Victor win. Minyamo

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 2>all that, But first a note on Matt Ford. So

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 2>here's a text I get from Matt Ford a few

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>days ago, yesterday, actually nine thirty in the morning. Just fyi,

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Rafa meaning Rafa Nadal is plus six point fifty to

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 2>win the French on fan duel. Right now, here's the

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>breaking news alert I get from the New York Times.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Ten minutes ago, Rafa Nadal said he would withdraw from

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the French Open because of a core muscle injury. Thanks

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 2>for that betting tip, Matt Ford. He gave me an

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 2>injured player the first piece of gambling advice Matt's ever

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>tried to give me, to try to pay me back

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>for all the great picks I've given him, and the

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>guy withdraws due to injury. However, that is not the

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 2>story today. The stories, of course the NBA playoffs. But

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>before we get to that, here's what missed the cut.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 2>The PGA Championship already underway, Deora, the battle for the

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Wanamaker Trophy. The probably the least.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 3>It's like a character in like a Star Wars movie.

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Well it's not. It's the four. It's the least prestigious

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 2>of all the majors, in all the golf majors. But

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>it's still one of the four majors. Aaron Judge accused

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>of cheating. He was not cheating, and d Loo knocking

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 2>down shots with ladders in his way seemed a little dangerous. Also,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>whatever his pregame routine for well, and I don't know

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>if we can roll this video or not, because right

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>now it's just a still shit there it is, there's

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the latter. The problem is Delo. Whatever he did in

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the pregame, he shouldn't do before Game two because he

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 2>was probably the worst laker in Game one. But we

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 2>don't want to start out west. We want to start

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>out east with the Heat Celtics game diora go right ahead, okay?

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Playoff Jimmy Wrin circles around the Celtics last night, and

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 3>he had more He has more than earned his spot

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>in Club Superstar. You followed a few incredible Heat playoff runs.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Is this the most impressive one?

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the most improbable. And so here's the deal

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 2>I had been. If you watch the TV show or

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>this show, you know that with a couple weeks left

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 2>in the season, I was making the case that the

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Celtics were potentially in trouble as the two seed because

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Miami had not caught Brooklyn to get up to the

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 2>sixth line. They were the seventh seed. They were gonna

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>be playing Boston and around, and I thought the Heat

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 2>had legitimate potential to beat Boston in Round one of

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. That there is a massive difference between playoff

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy and regular season Jimmy and I didn't care that

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 2>they looked like a mediocre team all year. They could

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 2>be dangerous. But then they lost their first play in

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 2>game to the Hawks. Fell to the do or die

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 2>part of the play in almost lost that one. And

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 2>then they're playing Milwaukee and even iyes someone that respects

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Heat culture and playoff. Jimmy did not think they could

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>beat Giannis for the second time in four postseasons, but

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 2>then Giannis got hurt, and then even when he came back,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Butler was absolutely sensational and they beat them. Since then,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.679
<v Speaker 2>I've picked them in every round. Now. An eight seed

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 2>getting to the NBA Finals, we've only seen it once.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 2>That was in the ninety nine to fifty game season

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 2>with the New York Knicks, who actually beat the one

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 2>seeded Heat to get there. This would be the most

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>improbable of the Heat Finals runs. But we have to

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>recognize that Jimmy Butler is one of the most unique

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>players in NBA history because we have seen the bizarro

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 2>version of Butler a ton of times in our lives.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 2>The guys who are unbelievable regular season performers and then

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>fall off significantly come the postseason. We are used to

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>those players, and in fact, the Celtics in the previous

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 2>round played the poster child of that in James Harden

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 2>and a guy who unfortunately is starting to build that

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 2>resume up himself as well in Joel Embiid. Guys that

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 2>are Harden at his apex was a consensus top three

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 2>player in the league in the regular season and then

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>was not a top ten guy come the postseason. Embeed

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>in back to back to back years has been first

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 2>or second in MVP voting, and in none of those

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>years has been a top ten playoff guy. Jimmy Butler,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, was not even an All Star

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>this year and has been the best player in the

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Eastern Conference side of the bracket the entirety of the postseason,

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>so that should not be surprising. Here's the other thing

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 2>that should not be surprising. Man Joe Missoula is not

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>ready for this. Okay, he just isn't. Maybe he will be,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>but he's thirty four years old and he was not

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>being groomed to be the head coach. The Celtics last

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>year had Emi Udoka, who had stepped in for Brad Stevens.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Udoka was a rookie head coach. He actually did an

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 2>awesome job, and they had a deep bench of coaches

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 2>in Damon Stottemeyer and will Hardy. Well Stottameyer's gone. Hardy

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 2>gets poached to go be the head coach of the

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Jazz and then Udoka has to you know, get suspended

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>and then has to essentially resign Slashby fired due to scandal.

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 2>So the Celtics are left scrambling. It would be as

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>if don't take this the wrong way, baby, as if

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>we're doing this show and all of a sudden, Demanse,

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 2>who had been doing it with me for a year,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 2>gets hired by the ringer to go host his own show,

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.119
<v Speaker 2>and then out of nowhere, I have to resign in disgrace.

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And they're like, uh, Diora, I guess you're doing it

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>one day, maybe you'd be ready. Maybe well, it's just

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 2>it would be too much, too soon, it would not

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And you were like, okay, so I need to just

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>do this thing solo for an hour every you would

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 2>you would not have gotten the training or the experience

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>to be good at it. And that's the and now

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 2>what you have is Missoula up against the best coach

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>in the sport. He's varied his postgame press conference yesterday.

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 2>It was detached from reality. Yes, the third quarter flipped

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 2>the game, but the idea that the Celtics that the

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter was not a huge prime to them as

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>well is not true to fact. He kept not on

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>think he was meaning to, but he was by default

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 2>blaming his players. He's like, we were well prepared, we

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 2>had a plan. We've sid next few. That's putting it

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>on your players. During the forty six point third quarter

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>by Miami, he called no timeouts. He's not ready for this.

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the Celtic superstar Jason Tatum, who's coming

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 2>off the best game of his life, the fifty one

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 2>in Game seven, who takes zero shots in the fourth

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>quarter and has three horrible crunch time turnovers, a pass

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>right to Jimmy Butler and then back to back traveling violation.

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 3>We're definitely going over time today.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that we are.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 3>And I would just like to point out you said

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 3>that you said that Jimmy is the most unique, huh,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 3>And you know you usually like to correct me on

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 3>my grammar, but unique isn't something that you're the most

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 3>at you're the unique or you're not.

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>So are you sure about that? Or is this the

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>setting you up?

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm completely sure being you're not the most unique. Being

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>unique is being different from others. You're not the most

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 3>different from others. That's not really it doesn't really work.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Now you could admit you're wrong.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, if I'm wrong, I will admit I'm wrong.

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 3>No, you won't.

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 2>No, hold on a second, here, you so hold on?

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>I just can you be the most unique? So let

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 2>me uh. The word unique means unlike any other, the

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 2>only one of its kind. It is an absolute condition,

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 2>There is no comparative form, and takes no adjectives. Thus

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 2>you are wrong. Can't not be so unique, the most unique,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 2>or any other kind of unique? Okay, I am wrong.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 2>That is a great job by you. Also, that means

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the word is used incorrectly all the time. Really no, no,

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 2>because I don't think people use it to mean one

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 2>of a kind.

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>No, you can say someone's very unique. You can't say that.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I can't. That's no. No.

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 3>But you can say you're very like No.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 2>You can't. It literally says takes no adjectives.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 3>No, your name it your name is very unique.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Like that. But oh my gosh, you were right for

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Now we have to move on. But you

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 2>were right for a moment, and now you're you're going

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>against exactly what you just taught me. That's the point

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm making, which is, evidently you can't be very unique

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 2>or so unique, you're just unique. That's weird. Okay, let's

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>keep it moving. As I was saying, I'm not ready

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>to move on yet, I'm still talking about things you're

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 2>over here trying to.

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 3>I think I think you can be I think we

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 3>can go on to the next one.

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>No, we actually can't. And so Bruce Sard and I

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>on the TV show got into not a heated argument,

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 2>but uh real back and forth about who would you

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 2>rather have for this series, Tatum or Butler? And if

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>you are ranking NBA players at large, Tatum of course

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>would be ranked ahead of Butler because of what he

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 2>does over the course of an entire season, But come

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the postseason, I don't. And it's not because Jimmy or

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Tatum's not a good postseason performer. I don't know how

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you could argue there's almost any wing in the league

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 2>right now you'd rather have than Jimmy Butler in the playoffs.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>He's a great defender. He plays forty four minutes. He's

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>tough as nails, and he gets buckets, and he's a

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 2>terrible three point shooter that come the playoffs finds a

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>way to hit him. In the last four years, he's

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>tied with Luca for the most forty point postseason games,

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>with eight of them. He had zero in the regular season.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Last night he had thirty five points was it, six assists,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>seven rebound, six steals. He is He joins Iverson and

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>MJ as the only guys in playoff history with multiple

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>thirty five, five, five and five games in the postseason.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 2>His other one was in the finals against Lebron and

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 2>then Dior. Lastly, before we do move on, there is

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 2>there is the issue of your brother here. He's gonna

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>be very, very upset.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 3>We should start cheering him up now.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Then I don't know how we do.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Send them money.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 2>You want to know something, Oh, he's gonna be mad

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>at me about this. I don't care. I'm gonna tell him.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I text him Tuesday before the POD. I was like,

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I got a surprise for you, buddy. He's like, what's that? Oh, No,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I said, I think I'm gonna I said, I think

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to buy you a ticket to Lakers Nuggets

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Game three, and he texts back, He's like, oh my god,

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. That would be really I'm like, yeah,

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 2>He's like, that would be so amazing because it's on

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>a Saturday. He could go and be perfect. You know.

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>He text me back, He's gonna be mad at me here, sorry, pal,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>text me back like thirty minutes later, He's like, I

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate the offer, and I'd love to go. But

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>if you just want to send me the money that

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>that ticket caught would cost instead, that'd be cool too. Like, no, man,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not offering you cash, I'm offering you an experience.

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, I think he's he was very very confident,

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 2>as most Celtics fans were going into this series. The

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 2>problem is that Heat have the best player in Jimmy Butler,

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and it's a one versus thirty coaching matchup. All right,

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>now we can move on what's next.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>So, despite losing, you say you've never felt more confident

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>about the Lakers. Yeah. Jokic ended with a triple double

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>and then stole the ball from Lebron to close it out. Yeah,

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe you saw a different game than we did. But

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>how did losing actually how was losing actually winning in

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 3>your mind?

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the deal. I thought the Lakers would win

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Game one, so I was I was wrong about that.

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 2>That's the first Laker game I've gotten wrong this postseason.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 2>The streak is over. It's very sad after getting twelve

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>correct in a row. But and people were because I

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>tweeted something similar to this, and people were like, oh,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 2>moral vicctories. Here's what I think some people don't understand

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 2>about the postseason. No, there are not moral victories, but

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 2>there are also not actual victories except for winning the series.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>It is first to four, and each slice of that

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 2>pie is harder to acquire than the previous and so

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 2>early in a series. Yes, of course you want to

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 2>stack win steel, home court, all of that, But what

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you really want to do, at least what I like

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to do, is someone that's going to evaluate and look

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>at it is, say, okay, who has advantages? Where what

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 2>adjustments can be made and what is sustainable? What the

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Lakers succeeded at to me, almost all of it except

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>for shooting fifty percent from three, But they only made

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 2>eleven was sustainable. They got easy shot after easy shot

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 2>after easy shot. Lebron didn't have to sweat to get

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>nearly a thirty point triple double ad at the quietest forty. Now,

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 2>He's not gonna score forty every night that I can remember,

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's because the Nuggets do not have the personnel

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to guard the Lakers. Conversely, is what the Nuggets did sustainable,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>some of it, but not all of it. Jamal Murray

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>is a very good player. He is not going to

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>shoot sixty percent in this series. He is, on the

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 2>other hand, going to be forced to defend, and I

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 2>don't think he can. Jokic is great, undeniable. However, through

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 2>three quarters he had that what Mark Jackson called or

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Van Gundy one of the two one of the greatest

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 2>playoff games he has ever seen. That level of play

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 2>is not going to sustain over the next four games.

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't even able to sustain over the fourth quarter,

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 2>where he was essentially shut out. Turn the ball over.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>It didn't make a basket. Jokic. And this is where

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the broadcast was like, Oh, if you haven't watched jokicic,

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>this is what he does. No, it's not I have

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 2>watched Jokic and he's excellent, but some context. Game one,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>first game of his playoff career. He took multiple threes

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 2>without a miss career, second most rebounds of his playoff career,

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 2>second most assists of his playoff career, the highest kind

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>of catch all stat game score, the highest game score

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in victory of his entire playoff career. So, even by

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 2>his lofty standards, that was arguably one of, if not

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the greatest postseason game of his career, and he did

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 2>it all through three quarters. What else is not sustainable?

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 2>The Jokics three at the end of the third quarter

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>and the Murray long two from the same spot at

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the end of the shot clock. Those are one in

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 2>fifteen shots, and they made them both. Now you can

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 2>say Austin Reeves banked in a three, but also Michael

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Porter Junior hit a stupid one from the corner. Those

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>two cancel each other out. The Jokich Murray those two

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 2>shots not sustainable. The Lakers had their worst defensive half

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>of the playoffs, and despite that, had the ball with

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>forty five seconds left, down three, with the ball in

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Lebron's hands, and he missed. Listen, Lebron at the end

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 2>of the game, missed about a twelve footer, missed that

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 2>three and two, the ball over, and so the Lakers

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>could have stolen that game. But I see some replicable

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>things the Lakers can build off of. And the fact

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>that down eleven with a second left in the third

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and Jokic hits that stupid shot to put the Lakers

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 2>down fourteen, the fact that they didn't just say okay,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 2>not our night and fold their hand to me is

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>indicative of a team that truly believes we have real

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 2>edges here. We are going to be able to score

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 2>at will in this series. And that is not what

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers' strength is is scoring. The strength is defense.

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 2>So all of that is to me reason for real

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 2>optimism going into tonight's game and going into the rest

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of the series.

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, go ahead, No, just like losing is winning is

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 3>like a very unique, very very unique take.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, it's not that losing is winning, oh.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>And very it's an adverb. I feel like it could

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 3>go in between.

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, again, you're now contradicting your own correction of me.

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 2>But that's fine. The pardon me. The point that I

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>am not saying it was better for them to lose

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>than to win. What I am saying is there are

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 2>certain times that in a long playoff series, you feel

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>like in the very beginning, oh, we have figured things out.

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>The example I used on the TV show that I'll

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>use again is the twenty fifteen Finals Warriors Calves Game

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>three that the Calves and Lebron won. At the end

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 2>of that game, the Warriors figured some stuff out with

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Iguadala on the court that led to the winning the

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:07.719
<v Speaker 2>next three games. And while I don't think that putting

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Rui on Jokic is this catch all cure all like

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>some of the media does, I do think that is

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>an interesting wrinkle. I think they will put Lebron on

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Jokic occasionally to let ad roam. And I think the

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Lakers can throw a lot of different looks at the

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Nuggets defensively to try to cause some problems. I do

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 2>not think the Nuggets have the personnel to slow down

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers offensively, and I don't think the Nuggets are

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna score one thirty three more times in the series.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, Okay.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Draymond said that the Warriors will still be in the

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 3>playoffs if he didn't If he didn't punch pull Pool

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 3>in October. Sorry, I don't know what just happened to him.

0:23:59.640 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Steve Kerr also said there was some trust loss, but

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 3>he confirmed Thanksgiving.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 2>No, that that's that. That is not your fault. That

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 2>was a Ron Burgundy moment. That was the script auto

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 2>corrected that to Thanksgiving, and you were just reading what

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 2>was in front of you, So don't worry about that.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 2>He confirmed that the team needs to Draymond to win titles.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 2>That's what he confirmed.

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, now, bottom line, do the Warriors need to

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>need to out need to put up with Draymond our script?

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, listen that. By the way, I don't know who

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 2>in the in the back did that, but thank you.

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 2>This is bad. This is what you get for trying

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to correct my grammar. Is all of a sudden, the

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 2>script goes hey wire on you. Also, I asked you

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 2>right before the show if we need to go over anything,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 2>and you were like, no, Gabe, and I did that.

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>We're just fine. I probably could have caught that for you,

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>but don't worry about it. Actually, as we're going, here's

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 2>the deal. The Warriors are stuck. They're stuck for a

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 2>bunch of different reasons. And we are going along today

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 2>and we've talked a lot about the Warriors, but one

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons is this. They do need Draymond back,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 2>but they need him back at a discount. But there

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>is no chance they can ask Draymond to take less

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>than what they're paying Jordan Poole, who was unplayable in

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the postseason, and they can't pay him more than Jordan

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Poole at thirty two million a year, So they probably

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 2>have to trade Jordan Poole, and they will be trading

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 2>him at his absolute idea when it comes to his

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 2>trade value. None of that is a recipe for an

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 2>aging team coming off a bad season to get back

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to contention. So listen, all year long, I said the

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Draymond punch and the fact that he wasn't actually punched,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 2>it was as big of a story as one could imagine,

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and people thought people thought that I was making too

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>big of a deal of it. He and Kerr acknowledged

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>that of course, knocking out your teammate, having the entire

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>world see it, and having the team then say we

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 2>can't punish the guy because that would mean he misses

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>ring Knight was going to have real impact on a

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 2>team's ability to compete for a championship. All right, last.

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the Spurs won the draft lottery, their prize Wimby.

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Now that we know where he's going, it's time to

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 3>plant your flag on the Frenchman. Is he the next

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 3>can't miss number one pick? Or is he just another

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 3>over hype foreign born player.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I don't think he's an you know, I

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 2>don't think he's Frederick Weiss. I don't think he's an

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 2>over hyped, you know, foreign born player. I understand why

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 2>there's this hype surrounding him. He's seventy five. He's a

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 2>seven to five guard. Essentially, the health is an obvious

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 2>concern for anyone in NBA history taller than seven to three.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about it. Injuries have been a huge part

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of their career, so that's a concern. But set that aside,

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Set the health stuff aside. The hype, though, has now

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>gotten to an insane place. And this is not me

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 2>being anti Victor Winbinyama. But when woj comes on TV

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and says multiple league executives believe by his third year

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 2>he could be the league's best offensive and the league's

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 2>best defensive player, what you're saying is there's only one

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 2>player in league history that that's been true of Kareem.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 2>And Kareem played four years of college basketball at UCLA

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and was an adult by then. Wimby is nineteen coming

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 2>from a league in Europe. The idea that they believe

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be Kareem that is too much, flatly,

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 2>And I did this thought exercise on the t Sorry

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 2>you were I know, I don't mean I didn't like

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 2>on the show yesterday and I said, okay, let's just

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 2>go the last thirty years, number the best number one picks.

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Here's how you would rank them. I'm not going to

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 2>do all thirty, but the top six Lebron Won, Duncan, two,

0:28:53.640 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Shack three a d four Iverson, five, Dwight. Six of

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 2>those guys right now, who do you think he'll have

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a better career than? And Brussard said, forget Ad, Dwight

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and Iverson. If Win Binyama doesn't have a better career

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 2>than a Keem Elajuan, he's a disappointment. Well, that's unfair.

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 2>If the expectations are If he does not become one

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of the eight greatest players in the history of basketball,

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 2>he's a disappointment. It's unfair, and people have said, well,

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 2>that's what we did. The expectations were of Lebron and

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.959
<v Speaker 2>that has haunted him. The fact that he has lived

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 2>up to them does not mean it hasn't been an

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 2>anvil around his the entirety of his career. Lebron is

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 2>still twenty years in held to an impossible standard. So yes,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 2>of course I would take wimby number one. I do

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 2>think he profiles as the best prospect since Lebron. Not

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the best prospect ever, but the best prospect since Lebron.

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 2>But if we are saying if Victor Winbinyama wins three

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>rings and two MVPs, we're gonna say that's a disappointing career.

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Brew on the show yesterday said, if he's Kevin Durant,

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a disappointment. That's crazy. That just strikes me as unfair.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, No, it strikes me as just an unfair expectation.

0:30:54.200 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>And I know I said we'll leave the injury stuff aside.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 2>That tall. The injury concern is not a well, yeah,

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 2>anybody can get hurt type of concern. It is a real,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 2>omnipresent concern. Note from producer Matt Ford, who says he

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 2>was refunded his bet when Rafa withdrew. So while I

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 2>now withdraw my defamatory comments, I won't, Matt. And here's

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 2>why you, lovable dufas you thought ostensibly that plus six

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 2>point fifty was good value for Rafa, instead of thinking, Wow,

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>why is he plus six fifty? Is it possibly because

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>he's dealing with a significant injury, And the fact that

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 2>he ended up having to withdraw due to the injury

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 2>just means we're lucky it was as significant as it

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>was because it was five percent better and he tried

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 2>to fight through it and gets knocked out in round

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 2>three because he's hurt. We're out a lot of Come on, Matt,

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>be better, quick break right back? What's right?

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 4>inspiring true story about Anthony Robliss, who defined every expectation

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 4>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 4>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 4>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 4>including Jirel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back.

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 3>No, that's a lie.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Job. I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. I figured you were

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 2>still busy reading about Thanksgiving in the middle of the

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Warriors question.

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I was not funny. That was not my fault.

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you know, I mean, listen, you gotta adjust on

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the fly. You're about what this professional stage performer? Well exactly,

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>That's why I'm saying. You're about to be a professional

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 2>stage performer. Sometimes there's gonna be lighting miscues, there's the

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 2>director's gonna.

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Get you your face.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you want to welcome us in, Yeah, I will go.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Ahead, Welcome back episode. Now, we're going to start with

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the Jaw update.

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Jow release the statement that, in my opinion,

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 2>was either four hundred words too short or forty words

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 2>too long. And we'll get into the statement Jaw released

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>in a moment. But this job update is actually going

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to be something of a media critique. First, I I

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 2>gotta say I am constantly impressed by some of my

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 2>colleagues ability to se shamelessly create content that I do

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 2>not think they actually believe because they know it will

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 2>get them Internet applause. And here's what I'm talking about.

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And because there there is, there is this whole genre

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of discourse that is just catnip for what I can

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 2>what I would call at people are gonna get mad

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 2>whatever what I would call the either the dumbest smart

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 2>people or the smartest dumb people. I'm not sure which

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 2>group it is, but they're they're very similar. That, which

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 2>is things that sound really smart at absolute surface level,

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 2>but the moment you do, I'll give you a non

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 2>jaw example, it's it's the same genre of well, why

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 2>is it offensive to say all lives matter? Don't they?

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Of course they do. Are you saying when you say

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 2>black lives matter? That what if I said white lives matter?

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Why are they not the same? Why is there a

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>black entertainment television? What if there were a white entertainment television?

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Like those things, at the very surface level, you might

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.280
<v Speaker 2>be able to get some and be like, hmm, raises

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 2>some interesting points. Hadn't thought of it? And then the

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 2>moment you did one percent deeper, it's like, oh, the

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 2>reason we're saying, like black lives matter instead of all

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>lives matter. Is because there is right now a crisis

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 2>of violence perpetrated by the state against a specific community.

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Much like if there was a giant uptick in breast cancer,

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 2>we might, I don't know, have breast cancer Awareness Month

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 2>and do marches. And that's not us saying, hey, anybody

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 2>with colon cancer go to hell. It's like, oh, okay, yeah,

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that makes more sense. Uh. And the jaw commentary that

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:52.720
<v Speaker 2>is folks just out saying what law did he break? Huh?

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 2>You tell me why he should be in any trouble

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 2>at all. That's an open carry state. He's broken no rules. Yeah,

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 2>you are correct that John Moran should not be arrested

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 2>for what he did. And you are correct that we

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of political figures in this country that

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 2>flaunt guns as a way to appeal to their constituency,

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 2>put them on Christmas cards with their kids holding them.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 2>And yes, of course you are correct. And we all

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 2>know that there is a massive hypocrisy in how the

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 2>general public reacts to people carrying guns depending on if

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 2>that person is white or black. Everybody knows that that

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 2>is a real issue that deserves significant discussion and remedy.

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 2>But None of it applies to this situation.

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 3>None of it.

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Jah is in trouble because he has allegedly, over the

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 2>last year done the following, gotten in a fight with

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 2>a seventeen year old, hit the seventeen year old, and

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 2>then allegedly came outside to confront the seventeen year old

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 2>with a pistol in his waistband gone to the mall

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:54.760
<v Speaker 2>because his mother was being allegedly disrespected by a foot

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>by a foot action or foot locker employee and told

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the security guard, I will wait till you get off work.

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Went to a volleyball game where his mother allegedly was

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 2>disrespected by a high school girl and allegedly threatened her,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 2>got in a car with his buddy Deontay Pack and

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 2>others where allegedly a laser sighted pistol was pointed at

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Indiana Pacers players, and then most recently, waved a gun

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 2>at a strip club and apologized for it and said

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.919
<v Speaker 2>he would not do it again, And then fifty two

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 2>days later waved a gun in his car both on

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Instagram Live and seemingly apologized for that. There are plenty

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of jobs that would not want the face of their

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 2>company doing that. Are there jobs where that would get

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you a promotion is one of those jobs insanely seemingly

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>certain districts of the United States House of Representatives. Yes,

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 2>does job work in one of those jobs? No, it's

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 2>not complicated, Go.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Ahead, No, I think I think the main problem here

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 3>isn't the fact that he owns a gun, is that

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 3>he uses it like a toy to show and flaunt around.

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 3>And of course, and like you're saying, like, like, the

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 3>NBA is not a job that you just need a

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 3>gun for.

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 2>No, Like, well no, but it's also there's also different

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 2>responsibilities for it. And I use this example for I

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 2>will use it again. If John Morant two months ago

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 2>posted on Instagram a homemade sex tape with him and

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 2>his girlfriend and the NBA and the Grizzlies were like buddy, no,

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 2>and then he was like, I'm sorry, I won't do

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 2>it again, And then last week posted a new one.

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you know how ridiculous you would look if you

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>went on TV and be like, huh, Pornography's all over

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 2>the internet. There's billions of views on porn Hub. And

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you're telling me John did something wrong. What law did

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>he break? You don't have to break a law.

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 3>For it to be wrong, for to piss.

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Off your employer, is it? Everybody knows this.

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 3>That's also like it's gonna be with freedom of freedom

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 3>of speech. You say something stupid, you can still get filed.

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh of course, you just can't get arrested for it. Yeah,

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the the the, And this is what's so frustrating. Everybody

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 2>knows what I'm saying is correct, but they also know that, Man,

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I will go viral if I say, tell me, why

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 2>would Joe? That is wrong? Even though in your own

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 2>brain you're like, well, obviously if this were my brother,

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 2>or my son or my daughter, I would say, what

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the hell are you doing? You have a Can you imagine?

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 2>I'll use demands as an example again. Can you imagine?

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Demanse does not make fifty million dollars a year as

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the face of the Memphis Grizzlies. Demonse has a good

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 2>job at Box and is like a partial face of

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>this podcast. Can you imagine if on social media he

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 2>was riding around in a car playing with a gun,

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 2>what I would say to him, like, I'm beside myself

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and everybody knows that. And the reason it bothers me

0:42:54.719 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 2>is because I feel like it is folks taking the

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 2>easiest road possible on what could be a fascinating conversation

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 2>if you want to talk about gun control in this

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 2>country and you want to talk about the fact that

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the NRA and a lot of the conservative right in

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 2>this country defend at your right to carry an AR

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 2>fifteen into a Chipotle, yet doesn't seem to ever ever

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 2>stand up for the armed black citizen who is killed

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.240
<v Speaker 2>by a cop, not because they were pointing their firearm,

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 2>not because they were wrong place, wrong time cop saw

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a black guy with a gun and killed him. You

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 2>want to have that conversation about why those people aren't

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:00.839
<v Speaker 2>supported or listen to it. You want to have the

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 2>actual historical conversation that so many of these dopes don't

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 2>even aren't even aware of. Do you know who and

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>why initially passed? Like how why does California to this

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 2>day have strict gun laws? What got that ball rolling

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Governor Ronald Reagan with the support of the NRA in

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty seven? Why because the Black panthers armed themselves

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and marched on the Capitol and all of a sudden,

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:40.879
<v Speaker 2>a conservative governor and the NRA helped pass the Mulford Act,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 2>significant gun control legislation. It was scary black guys with guns.

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 2>We can have those conversations if you want to have them.

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>They're interesting to me. I ain't. They are important ones

0:44:55.120 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 2>to have, but to do it, to not do it,

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 2>But instead he futs around with it, acting like John

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Morant is a victim here instead of having a the

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 2>tougher conversation is ridiculous. Now, last point on this. When

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I said his say was either forty words too long

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 2>or foreigner words too short, Here's what I mean. Jah

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 2>continues to make bad choices in how he's handling this

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:42.919
<v Speaker 2>because he is apologizing for his behavior, seemingly with no

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 2>intent to stop the behavior. And this is this is

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 2>something oddly like in not stuff like this obviously, But

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you and I have kind we've talked about similar, which is, hey,

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 2>if you've decided I am going I am okay with

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 2>the consequences of X. So I am going to do it.

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 2>So you're eighteen now, I've had this conversation with your brother.

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 2>It's every when you're a little kid, so be it.

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Go with God. But if you have decided I am

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 2>going to do X, because I am going to say

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.359
<v Speaker 2>I did why and I don't think I'm ever gonna

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 2>have to deal with the consequences of it. Then it's

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 2>a terrible decision. Then that means you know you're making

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:39.879
<v Speaker 2>the wrong decision, but you just think I won't ever

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 2>be held accountable for it. That, to me is what

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 2>If joh thought what he was doing was fine, he

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have apologized to Adam Silver, and he wouldn't have

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 2>gone to seventy two hour rehab whatever the hell it was.

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what type of rehab it is,

0:46:55.520 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 2>like decision making rehab. I don't know the so Jock

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:05.800
<v Speaker 2>could have and I guess before he released this statement,

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Jock could have gone this route. I've done nothing wrong.

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm a legal gun owner. I can have it in

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 2>my car. You guys are only bothered because it's rap

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:24.959
<v Speaker 2>music on in the background. I've never been arrested, I've

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 2>never been in trouble. I dare you to suspend me.

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 2>I will see you in court. Show me what law

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I broke, Show me what I violated. He could have

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 2>gone that tact. I would I personally wouldn't support it,

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 2>but I know a lot of two A folks who would.

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:53.879
<v Speaker 2>I think he would get significant like conservative media, favorable coverage.

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Who doesn't like the woke NBA anyway? And he could

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 2>just say lying in the sand doing it. That's an option.

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 2>The other option is to cut this stupid shit out. Instead,

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 2>he chose the worst path. I'm very sorry I let

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 2>my teammates down. I've got to get better with decision

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 2>making on and off the court. I've got to mature.

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And thirteen days later, he's on Instagram live first second

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 2>time playing with a pistol. It's ridiculous. It's ridiculous again.

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna use a parenting analogy here. You're eighteen. You

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 2>and I have different feelings on tattoos. Yeah, and I

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:46.720
<v Speaker 2>have a few tattoos. Your mom's got a giant, beautiful

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 2>tattoo on her shoulder. Your brother's got a few tattoos

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 2>that a couple of them I think are fine. One

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 2>of them I think's dumb, but doesn't matter. I'm anti

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 2>young people getting tattoos because I know when I was

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 2>eighteen the tattoo I wanted to get, and I'm so

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 2>glad I'm not. Okay, Well, we all think we're not

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 2>dumb when we're eighteen, but then we look back. But

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter. Point I'm making is this. You now could

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 2>go get a tattoo and there is nothing I could

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 2>do about it. If you were to do that, with

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the plan being I'll just make sure I'm always covered

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 2>up wherever this is when I'm around my dad. Then

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a terrible decision. If you were to do it

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 2>then and say I'm doing it, I'm eighteen, believe I

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 2>want it. I'll deal with the consequences. Maybe I think

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a terrible decision, but at least you are doing

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 2>it planning to be able to stand by it. Ja

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 2>apologizing for things that he never intends to stop doing

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 2>shows to me such an overwhelming lack of maturity. It's stunning.

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:20.280
<v Speaker 2>It's just absolutely stunning. Uh So that's it. That was long.

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 2>They just put overtime on the screen. There. We haven't

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 2>even gotten to the game. All right, let's do the

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 2>game real quick. To you are I'm gonna do the

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 2>game in less than three minutes. We're gonna do thirty

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 2>seconds of question. Yeah, I'm gonna do the game in

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 2>less than three minutes. I don't know if we still

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 2>can do it, Gabe, you can tell me in my

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 2>ear if we have to pivot off it. If not,

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll do it real quick to you, or just start

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 2>reading and we'll go go ahead.

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, AD has followed up all of his big playoff

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 3>games with absolute duds. He had forty and ten in

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Game one. Things aren't looking good tonight, right or wrong,

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:49.439
<v Speaker 3>AD will show up in game two.

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, he'll show up. I don't think he's followed up

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 2>all his playoff games with duds. He's followed some big

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 2>offensive games with bad offensive games. What they need from

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Ad tonight is defense and rebounding. The points will be

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a bonus. I think he'll be really good tonight next.

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Davante Adams says that he proved he didn't need Rogers

0:51:04.600 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 3>to be Gate great after one hundred catches, fifteen hundred

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:12.399
<v Speaker 3>yards and fourteen touchdowns on your boy, Derek Carr. Now

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 3>he'll have a chance to prove it again with Jimmy

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 3>G as his quarterback. Right or wrong, Adams will still

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 3>feel QB proof with Jimmy G.

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's right. I think Davante Adams will great,

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and I think Jimmy will target him a ton I

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 2>think the Raiders will stink, but I think Davante will

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 2>have it demand a great player, and I think he'll

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 2>have a monster season.

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Next, reports are that Joe Burrow is considering his other

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:38.399
<v Speaker 3>big name teammates when negotiating his contract. If he takes

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 3>a discount to keep Chase and Higgins will they will

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 3>be perennial AFC phase Right or wrong, Burrow's generosity should

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 3>worry the Chiefs.

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Wrong for twofold one is I think Burrow's about to

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 2>become the highest paid player in the history of the league.

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.279
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. Listen, Burrow takes thirty million a year, Yeah,

0:51:56.320 --> 0:51:58.280
<v Speaker 2>but he's not going to He's gonna probably get closer

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 2>to fifty five and nothing should work. The Chiefs the

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 2>best team by a mile. Next, We're sorry, we're all

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Bronni Okay, that's right.

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Thought. USC hoops coach said that Lebron isn't being overbearing

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 3>with Bronnie at all. Maybe he's sort of busy right

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 3>now with all the things that he's doing, you know,

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 3>right or wrong, USC fans should want the Goat more involved.

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:21.799
<v Speaker 2>Wrong and listen, I don't think that's Bronnie's style or

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 2>lebron style. I also don't think uh his wife would

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 2>allow it. I think Savannah. There's a great clip of

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:35.280
<v Speaker 2>from a couple of years ago of Savannah and Lebron

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 2>being interviewed about Bronni and I forget if it's sixty minutes,

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, and Savannah is asked, They're asked, what

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 2>do you want for Bronni? And Savannah is like, I

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 2>really just want him to be happy and be a

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 2>good person, and you know, chase his dreams and to

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 2>just have a happy life and Lebron just do As

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 2>a matter of factly, I want him PLAYBA like Lebron's

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.799
<v Speaker 2>But I think Savannah has done a really good job,

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:08.280
<v Speaker 2>and I think Lebron is doing his best on making

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:16.359
<v Speaker 2>sure that Lebron's wants don't trump what's best for Bronni here.

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.320
<v Speaker 2>And Bronni's not gonna be the best player on that team,

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think Lebron's gonna be the type to

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 2>be the helicopter parent. All right? Last one?

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Fox Sports NFL asked chat GBT to rate the

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 3>top ten teams since two thousand. Yeah, here's the list.

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:36.959
<v Speaker 3>Most notably, You're twenty nineteen. Chiefs come in at number ten,

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:41.359
<v Speaker 3>behind some very suspect teams. Right or wrong, Your job

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 3>is safe from the robots.

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Why listen. I think it's right that my job's safe

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 2>inm the robots for now, It's not even because of

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:49.879
<v Speaker 2>this ranking. They also had chat GBT ranked the top

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 2>ten Chiefs ever, and Travis Kelce wasn't on there. I

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:55.120
<v Speaker 2>do think chat GBT got it right that the O

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Semn Patriots is the best team of the last twenty years,

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 2>even though they didn't win the suit Super Bowl. But

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:03.879
<v Speaker 2>that twenty nineteen Chiefs team wasn't even the best Chiefs team.

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Twenty eighteen Chiefs run in the twenty nineteen Chiefs. Twenty

0:54:06.760 --> 0:54:09.439
<v Speaker 2>eighteen Chiefs just doing the Super Bowl, twenty twenty Chiefs

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 2>are read in the twenty nineteen Chiefs. They just didn't

0:54:11.600 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 2>win the Super Bowl. So yeah, I don't think. I

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 2>think the robots will come for all of us at

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 2>some point, but no time soon. Quick break right back,

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:20.560
<v Speaker 2>answer your questions in the chat What's right?

0:54:26.960 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back, episode one fifty two. Now we're gonna read

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 3>your fan questions. First question, Brandon Lacey asked, will Wemby

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 3>win an NBA title in his first five years?

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I would be shocked, Guys. Guys typically don't win rings

0:54:44.239 --> 0:54:48.880
<v Speaker 2>till they're twenty seven. He's nineteen. His body's got to develop.

0:54:48.960 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 2>There's again, he's the clearcut number one pick. He's almost

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 2>assuredly the best prospects since Lebron. But we are putting

0:54:57.040 --> 0:55:00.479
<v Speaker 2>too much on this kid. If he's if he comes

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:03.840
<v Speaker 2>out and changes the league and stays healthy and is

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:06.399
<v Speaker 2>what all these guys say to him, more power to him.

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not gonna be part of the crowd that

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 2>if this guy is twenty points and six rebounds as

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a rookie, which is about what I think, which would

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 2>be unbelievable, that we're gonna say he's disappointing. All right.

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 3>Next, Okay, Oscar Marshall asks, do you think that the

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 3>final part of the prince that was promised ARC is

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:27.880
<v Speaker 3>for the is for the Jags to be permanently based

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 3>in London. Seems like the NFL is slowly leaning towards

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 3>making it happen.

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about permanently being placed in London, but

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 2>I could see like a half schedule in London. I could,

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and that is unbelievable that that fits with my royalty

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:44.880
<v Speaker 2>princes that was promised up Next.

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, negative foreign too asked if Jay Buckets and the

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Heat want to ring this year, would it be the

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:52.479
<v Speaker 3>toughest ring of all time?

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it'd be the toughest ring of all

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.799
<v Speaker 2>time because a Round two matchup with the Knicks throws

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:01.759
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a wrench into that, and there is

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 2>no juggernaut out west. I mean, the Lakers are the

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 2>seventh seed. The Nuggets are really good, but they're not

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a juggernaut. It would be the most surprising and unlikely

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 2>ring of all time. These guys were fifteen to one

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 2>to win the title twelve hours ago, fourteen hours ago,

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 2>and so, and there were only four teams left. All right, next?

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay? Nick Adams asked, when Lebron retires, who do you

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 3>think You're root for? Team or a person?

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, because I don't have a team, I root

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:40.520
<v Speaker 2>for whatever team Lebron's on because Kansas City didn't have

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.120
<v Speaker 2>a team. And when I was a little kid, I

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 2>was a Knicks fan. And then my high school basketball

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 2>teammates and I were the same high school class as Lebron,

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and we would watch his games on ESPN, and I

0:56:57.239 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 2>just decided, when I was a high school senior, whatever

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 2>team drafts him That's why I'm gonna go with and

0:57:01.239 --> 0:57:03.720
<v Speaker 2>then I so I was with the Calves, Heat Calves

0:57:03.719 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 2>again Lakers now, uh, which is not the greatest, you know,

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:11.160
<v Speaker 2>mark on my sports fandom. But because kansasity never had

0:57:11.200 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 2>a team and I didn't have a team growing up,

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's okay. I mean, I'll roll with Luca.

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna I like the Kings because of the family connection.

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I like this. You know, I like Darryl Mory a lot,

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:26.360
<v Speaker 2>so I like the Sixers. But yeah, I think it's

0:57:26.360 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 2>hard if you don't have a hometown team to just

0:57:29.040 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 2>have one team that's your die hard team. So I

0:57:32.280 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 2>have the Chiefs, I have the Royals. I mean, I

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Jokic is fine, but I'm not exactly known as a

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Jokic fan, so I don't think I'll be a Nuggets guy.

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 2>But Luca. I probably roll with Luca once Lebron's done,

0:57:45.120 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Next, Scott Fraser asked who got the best breaks with

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 3>the NFL schedule and who got screwed. I e Rams

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:57.800
<v Speaker 3>get it, get four teams off the buy.

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 2>So I think the Rams are probably the highest on

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the list. I'll be honest with you. I know Warren

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Sharp's done a ton on this. I haven't dug into

0:58:06.360 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the intricacies of it. I know the Chiefs are at

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 2>a big rest disadvantage, but a lot of that listen,

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 2>if you're a great team, they're gonna sket They're gonna

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 2>be more worried about putting you on National TV and

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 2>making giving you big prime slots than they are about

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the fairness of rest. And I'm actually okay with it.

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 2>It is an entertainment product, after all. This is an

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:32.439
<v Speaker 2>unbelievable fact. Though the Chiefs obviously have seventeen games this year,

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I bet this will blow Gabe's mind. Of all the

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 2>people listening, Producer Gabs the one that I think will

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 2>be most interested in this seventeen games for the Chiefs.

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:46.880
<v Speaker 2>How many do you think are in the traditional one

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 2>o'clock on Sunday window, the one o'clock or you know what,

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 2>one o'clock or four o'clock, meaning, how many of their

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:58.280
<v Speaker 2>games are not either a night game on National TV

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 2>or the four point thirty prime spot on Fox or CBS.

0:59:04.000 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 2>The answer to that question is one. The Chiefs have

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 2>one game all year that is not either Monday night,

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Sunday Night, Thursday night, a stant like a standalone Saturday

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 2>holiday game or the four point thirty on Fox or

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 2>CBS game one game all year, all right, last, okay,

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:33.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's a tough name. Anastasios Markopolos, go ahead.

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Ask if the Nuggets versus Celtics in the NBA Finals,

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 3>who are you be rooting for?

0:59:38.760 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's tough. I'd like for demands to be happy,

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and that would mean the Celtics. But I don't have

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 2>an Emmy to root for the Celtics, never like the Celtics,

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 2>so probably the Nuggets and Jokis will have earned it.

0:59:49.560 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't have anything against Jokics. I had against the

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 2>fact that I thought he was treated in a way

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 2>we've never treated a superstar before they won anything. But

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 2>if he wins, he wins. All right, last one, go ahead?

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay. So Christian Lazzo asked what I would change about

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 3>how you dress?

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know.

1:00:08.560 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Just slight more coordination, but not too much coordination, because

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 3>sometimes you're too matchy matchy, and sometimes it's a little

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 3>bit everywhere.

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think what the guy's getting at is because

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you feel this way. I think they're

1:00:22.840 --> 1:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>wondering if you would prefer if I dressed more like

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>the other dads, like at your at your school. So suits,

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>well I wear suits on TV. But yeah, like or

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>like polos and khakis and like boat shoes.

1:00:36.640 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah no, no, I couldn't.

1:00:38.200 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not me. Listen, do you or and I?

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Despite the fact she corrects my grammar and you know,

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>comes at me a bit on the pot occasionally, Uh,

1:00:47.160 --> 1:00:50.560
<v Speaker 2>do you or and I have a great relationship. And

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I think she likes she likes a lot of things

1:00:52.920 --> 1:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>about my personality, even though she thinks I'm a weirdo.

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Not a weirdo, but no, I think you're weird fair enough,

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>all right, See you guys on Tuesday. Enjoy the game tonight.

1:01:09.160 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Mhm.