WEBVTT - Bank Earnings and Inside the New Fight for Equality

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanobek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world's of business and finance,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. So earning season, as we

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>know kicking off with the batch of big bank earning

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>shpmorgan Chase making more money in the fourth quarter than

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it ever has. It also signal more optimism about burs

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>being able to repay their loans. The biggest US bank

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>posted a jump in trading and investment banking fees. Wells Fargo, meantime,

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>posted worse than expected expenses in the fourth quarter, took

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>some charges and more than a billion for restructuring and

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a few other things, some of those old account scandals,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and then city groups fixed in come traders who propped

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>up the banks earnings throughout much of the pandemic. They

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>missed endless estimates for the final amounts of There is

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot to get to, so let's bring in, first

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, our Michelle Davis Financial port at Bloomberg News.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>She covers JP Morgan specifically, and tim safe to say,

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>as the biggest US bank, we care what's going on

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with them, in particular, we care what they're CEO Jamie

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Diamond has to say he is one of the long

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>running CEOs on Wall Street. So Michelle, good to have

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you here. First of all, cap recap for me what

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we got from JP Morgan, if you would so. JP

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Morgan's earnings were definitely the standout. They generated a record

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>amount of revenue and profit in the fourth quarter twelve

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>point two billion, and that capped off a year in

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>which they made billion, which is more than any other

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>major bank has ever earned in a year. UM. Not

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>more than they have ever earned in a year. They

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>had the most profitable year in banking history in nineteen

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>UM but still a time, especially given that we're in

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. Jump and tree eating helped that. But they

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>also released nearly three billion dollars in reserves, which is uh,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it came as a surprise. You know, analysts were expecting

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>them to to maybe released two million, So three billion

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is a lot and signals that you know, they feel

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that they are well prepared to kind of withstand whatever

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is coming, and it means that maybe the outlook for

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for low losses isn't as bad as they were expecting

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 1>or thinking earlier on. That's a lot, man, three billion,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to say, yeah, it feels like a lot. Well,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what was the commentary that we heard from the bank

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>about uncertainty about customers being able to pay their credit

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>card bills, about when fiscal stimulus will actually hit customers,

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of things. So, you know, they struck a

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more of an upbeat tone than they have in

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>past quarters, but they did mention multiple times that you know,

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they're still uncertainty. There are a few things that are

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are leading some of this optimism. You know, one is

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously that there's a vaccine that you know, according to

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO Jamie Diamond, could mean that you know, people are

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>going back to work as early as a September, you know,

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like enforced um. And also the fact that there's you know,

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps certainty on the change in administration and the fact

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that stimulus has been fast and there could be more coming.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>These are all things that are led to the optimism

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer side. The one area of I guess

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty that they really called out was on the credit

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>card side. Um. They didn't release any reserves there, and

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>they pointed to a possibility of a payment shock coming

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>if and when uh, you know, benefits expire. Um. But

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so far, you know, there haven't been any delinquencies, Like

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>there have some delinquencies, but nothing that you'd expect from

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, millions of people unemployed. Uh, the their net

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>charge jobs actually went down from the crisis quarter and

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from from last year. So they're saying that, you know,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they they could start to see losses starting in the

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>second half of this year or even later. So well

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>knit NT listen you know this, Michelle, We go to Jamie.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>We like to hear what he has to say because he's,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of one of those elder sorry Jamie elder,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but you know, in good shape from what I understand. Um,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you know statesman out there that has seen a lot

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of crises, you know, was really you know key through

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis. This is a different crisis. Fair to say, um,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>but we care what he has to say about the bigger,

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>broader picture. Was he more optimistic or was he more cautious?

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He was definitely more optimistic. They spent a ton of

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>time on on the analyst and the media called talking

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>about investments that they're going to be making. And actually,

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, their shares last time I look, we're down.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And one of the reasons that you know, could have

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they could have been done it because they announced this

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>big twelve point four billion investment initiative, which is it's

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of billion more than they normally spend on,

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, new things. And and Jamie, you know, he

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was just talking about how they had so much capital,

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more capital than they can do anything with. Yeah, they're

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna buyback stock, but also he wants to do some

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>M and A. So he was optimistic. Yeah, I mean

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he said, yeah, like they're still uncertainty, and we have

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to get through this pandemic first. And there's gonna be

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a ton of questions later on about how we fix

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know that the US deficit. But for now, let's

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>get through this. And like I'm gonna do some deals

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime hopefully. Right Capital Interesting stacks down about

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>one point two percent, but let me remind everybody it's

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>still up almost ten percent so far this year, and

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that's after our gain actually was down a little bit

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in a UM. Anton Switz is also with US president

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer at Mandon Capital Visors on the phone

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in Florida. Anton, Good to have you here, Happy new year.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you here with Tim and myself and Michelle.

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Michelle has been kind of running down JP Morgan's quarter

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and what Jamie Diamond had to say, What do you

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>make of JP Morgan's results specifically? I think the numbers

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>were pretty strong across the Ford. You know clearly the

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>KAPA markets were great. UM reserve releases you have really

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>become formulaic. I mean, there's there's a new accounting system

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that went into place UM last year called CECIL, and

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the reserves depend upon the modeling, and

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of consultants come in and model. I know

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Moody is much is much more optimistic. Got it, got it?

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Got it? Hey, Michelle, I know you're going to leave

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>us in Anton's going to come back. UM just thirty

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seconds here. The key takeaway then from JP Morgan, because

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna still get a few more bank big bank

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>earnings next week, just quickly. Yeah, key takeaway would be

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 1>UH most profitable quarter ever UH reserve releases. There, there's optims.

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're optimistic, and actually all the banks are optimistic,

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic than they have been. So it's probably good

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>well for next week. All right, we'll see what I'll happen. Michelle,

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Appreciate the breakdown of a good weekend.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Davis Financial report at Bloomberg News with us on

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Vermont. Anton Schitz is going to come

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>back with US President and chief investment officer at MEN

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and Capital Advisors. His MEN and Financial Services fun up

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>more than nine percent so far this year, putting it

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in the eightie percentile at least according to Bloomberg data.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>He's very much into regional, so we'll get into that.

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good. Also, nice time with optimism. This is Bloomberg

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. This story definitely caught our attention.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 1>It's in Bloomberg Business Week magazine This week, it's about

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>something we hear a lot from our medical guest him

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to COVID nineteen. We know vaccines are important,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but so too is more testing. Test, test, test, That's

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>what it's about. That's what's one of the things that's

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>going to get us out of this pandemic exactly. And

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>forgottence on that, just look to Minnesota. Let's get into

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that story. Susan Burfield, she has Projects and Investigations report

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News. She's reporting with Bloomberg's Michelle Cortez, who's

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone from Brooklyn, and also with

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>us is Bloomberg Business wee get it or Joe Webber

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on the remote access from Brooklyn as well. Joel. We're

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>also consumed by the vaccine, getting it out, rolling it out,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>but let's not forget we've got to continue testing as well. Yeah,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and you undersold ay a key cell of this story,

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which was Minnesota, and the Minnesota part of the story

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is is really an interesting one because this is the

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>state that actually had a budget surplus and was able

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of you know, so this is in praise

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal responsibility. They were able to basically take that

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>budget and just immediately pour it into testing. And as

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Susan UM will tell us more about, the state has

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>basically made it its mission to test everyone in the state.

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>UM Man, woman child, do it relentlessly, make it free

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and so simple that all you have to do is

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>spit in the tube and put it in the mail. Um, Susan,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't everyone following Minnesota's lead here? Yeah? Thanks everybody. So,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you mentioned Joelic, Minnesota had a few

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>advantages UM, it had a budget surplus, but it also

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>did direct a lot of the money it received from

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the federal government to testing. Just early on made UM

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the decision, you know, informed both by its relationships with

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Mayo Clinic UM and the University of Minnesota, great

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>research institution, that testing was going to be crucial UM.

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as the summer went on, it became

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>obvious that it didn't just have to be you know,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>easy and convenient, It had to be free and wildely available,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and they had to use you know, the version of

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>testing that UM is the easiest for everybody really, which

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>is as you mentioned that the saliva test UM. And

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know what Minnesota did is actually a UH

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>work with UM the company that oversees the Salibery test

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>and the lab that processes those samples to build its

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>own lab. And I think that was really crucial because

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that lab is dedicated to Minnesota residents and it can

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>process up to thirty thousand tests a day, jeez, Louise,

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>which you know begs the question like if if you

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>were doing thirty those swabs, Like, I think that gets

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of kind of tiring. But the fact that it's

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're able to spit in the tube UM

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>takes so much of the workout. And as I understand,

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the test is exactly the same effectively in terms of

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>its results. So so what about like why was the

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>spit quotient so so useful in Minnesota and why why

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't more people able to use it? Yeah? So UM, yeah,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so you're right, it's it's UM. It is the same

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>test you know as nasal slobs UM that some of

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>us have had, which are pretty uncomfortable, UM also have

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to be done, you know, with a medical professional right

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there with you. So one advantage of the saliva test,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of course is that you UM can do it at home. UM.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>So that means fewer medical professionals. That means less of

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the protective equipment is required. Um, the tests can be

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>processed as quickly. UM. And I guess what's holding back

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.599
<v Speaker 1>other states from being able to do this is in

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>part you know, the tests are more expensive, and so

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota decided that you know, it was going to pay

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for the test when it couldn't get reimbursed by insurance companies.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>So the state made a pretty big commitment to make

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>those tests in particular free to everybody. And so you know,

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>anyone in Minnesota can sign up UM and receive a

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>kit at home, I mean more than one UM and

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know take the has to get the results um

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>within uh, within seventy two hours. So UM. You know

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>there's there's um only a couple of these labs around

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the country. UM the company and the company has been

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>talking to other states, but UM, you know it, you know,

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>as everyone knows, it's really every state for itself, or

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at least it has been. You know, if you want

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>a lab, you have to build it and you have

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it. Susan, I gotta say, I wish

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I had read this story like months ago, because I've

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>done the SPIT test and it's kind kind of easy,

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually it wasn't so easy, kind of working

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>up all the spit to be quite honest. And you

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>have actually a piece of advice that or that you

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>learned about and how to do that. That's right. The secret.

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>The secret apparently is um to smell, not eat, because

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't eat for thirty minutes before you take the test. Right,

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you smell pickles or even lemon, apparently that

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>helps you produce UM more surviva than normal. And then

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess afterwards, if you consider it a treat, you

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>could eat either of them. Who. Well, we do know

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that the testing is key to getting us out of

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. So so where does the States stand with

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>getting things under control? How how is the testing actually

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>manifested when it comes to positivity rates and in the

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>status of of how people are faring? Yeah, so you know, Joel, Um,

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Joel joked but not really joking, m jokingly, you know,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>asked like why Minnesota, and um, you know, one of

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons I think that made Minnesota up

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly compelling case study, if you will, is that, uh,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we know, over the summer in the fall,

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>most every state that surrounded Minnesota, the Dakota, Dakota is

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin were having a terrible time of it, you know,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the worst worst case rates in the country.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And so Minnesota of course is not um you know,

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot separate itself from its neighbors. UM. But when the

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Dakotas were the first and second basically were you know,

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>had the highest positivity rates in the nation, UM, Minnesota's

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>never rose above one. So, you know, as even the

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>governor said, like it was a very effective program, UM.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But the sheer magnitude of the cases in the country,

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course, you know, works against any state's efforts.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, what one state can only do so much,

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and yet every state has been asked to fend for itself. Well,

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this is where we've seen, certainly the problem, and we'll

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>see what happens under a new administration where we start,

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether or not, Susan we start to see

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>some cord coordination. This is a great deep dive into

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what Minnesota is going and as Joel said, Minnesota knew. Susan.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much of a great week in Susan Burfield.

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>She's projects and investigations are port at Bloomberg Busines this

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>week on the phone from Brooklyn. If you got some

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>time over the weekend, check out our book to the

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Hour of Fate Theodore Roosevelt, JP Morgan and the Battle

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to Transform American Capitalism. Jill Weber, thank you as well,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Business Week. Bloomberg Business Week, by the way,

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on newsstands, online at Bloomberg dot com and also always

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovy on Bloomberg Radio.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So you are listening to Bloomberg Business Week Carol Master

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>along with Tim Stanovic. Let's get right to it because

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with us back with us in our Friday check when

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to COVID nineteen. Is Dr Ian las Bader,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Clinical Associate Professor Medicine at n y U Lango Medical Center.

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>This on a day where we've seen deaths from COVID

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen globally top two million. We've got approaching about four

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand deaths in the US alone. A lot going

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on right now. Uh. I so good to have you here.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>How are you? Dooan Weill? Carol? Thanks, I head and

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>tim Happy Friday. I did have my second shot earlier

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this week, so I'm I'm certainly feeling safer. The second

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>shot definitely hip pecs a little more punch, and some

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>people do have a little fatigue a little aches, which

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I experienced, but I was able to keep working through.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So we definitely want to encourage everyone to do it.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh, there is some vaccine hesitancy, which I'm sure

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about, but uh, it does feel good to

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>get both shots, and I know a lot of people

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>want them and are trying to figure out how to

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>get that. We were curious because we had a story

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>yesterday that yu Len Going was telling its doctors it

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>may not get new vaccines next week and that they

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>were I think running out of supply. So that's not

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the case. That is exactly the case. Ye know. We

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>had a conference call today and the conference call really

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>illustrates the number of, you know, the issues of getting

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine into people's arms. One is the good news

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we can do at our multiple sites somewhere

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>between five and seven thousand vaccines a day. We're getting

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>about five thousand vaccine doses per week, so really there

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>is a big gap between what we could administer and

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>what's being delivered from the state. I just want to

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>get these numbers right. You're getting fewer in one week

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>than you could actually be able to deliver in one day.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>That is correct, That is correct. What is the what

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>are you hearing about that increasing? Well, you know, we

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>really rely on the state and as of the Friday

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>conference call by one of our you know leaders, um,

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they will not know until I think Sunday night whether

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or not the number and when they will be delivery

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of vaccine for next week. So many patients are frustrated.

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're calling when can I come in? Uh,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>those are the ones without vaccine hesitancy. But a number

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>of patients are calling. They may have underlying littal immune

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>disease or other issues, and they may not fit the

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>exact criteria and they want to know can I get

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>it sooner? Um? But we are not being booked until

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine is president president. So that's been the at

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>least the ny U policy, which is you don't want

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to give people dates unless you really know that you

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have vaccine to give them. So in part the hold

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>up is certainly getting it from New York State, and

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I assume New York State is having some problem getting

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it delivered as well. So when does this get better?

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are you telling patients and what you

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can tell our listeners about when these bumps could be

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ironed out? Well, I wish I knew, uh, you know,

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I I think we did not. Um, this should have

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>been better anticipated. Really you know this, We're we're do

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty well with the flu shot and that's really given

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>out over several months. We do that to a hundred

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty million people. But this mass vaccination really, in my opinion,

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>should have been handled by central authorities, the military, you know,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>drive through There should be vaccine that's available at you know, pharmacies.

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>We really should have, I think, had a better execution

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of not only delivery of the vaccines, but exactly you know,

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>down to the patient, how it would be administered. So

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we're coping as best as we can. We're

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to give it out as best as we can,

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but the supplies are limited, and of course, um every center,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, the local doctor's office don't have this because

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at least for the visor and really for the maderna,

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>which is are the most widely available at this point,

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they do need special refrigeration, much more so for viser

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of course, So you're literally waiting for a styrofoam box

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of frozen vaccine to be brought into the UH Vaccine

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Center to be given out to people. Uh, it could

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>be more efficient, Let's put it that way. Are there

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>any hopes, any signs that you're seeing that once we

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>get a new administration place it's just around the corner

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>next week, that things will change. I'm just curious if

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>if your team there at n y U and go

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to is hearing anything about that. You know, I think

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lag. I think everyone wants to do the

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>right thing. I think a new administrat ration needs a

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>ramp up time to kind of get a feel for exactly,

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, the distribution that's present and perhaps how it

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can be improved. I'm very confident that there are a

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>number of vaccines, you know, the astra zeneca and J

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and J, which is one shot which will make life easier.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That a game changer potentially in I think, so you

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>know that the data is that you really have to

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>wait like six to eight weeks to really get full efficacy,

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but not having to bring people back is really that's

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>really part of the other problem that you give people

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the shot and you have to get them in the

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>computer to schedule. From maximum efficacy, you know, you need

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to book the second shot really at the time of

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the first shot ideally. So I think that J and

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>J will make it a lot easier to do more

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>widespread vaccination, which I think is the only hope really

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>bend the curve here with the you know, with the

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>deaths and disability. I feel sad for I've had a

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of patients UM die who literally are probably just

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks away from if they were able to get the vaccine.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's very sad, it is. And we're getting sort

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of conflicting news today. Right on the one hand, we're

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing COVID hospitalizations drop in in thirties six states, But

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at the same time we're hearing this new report UM

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>from the CDC about a faster spreading variant that could

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>overwhelm the US just like it has in the UK.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you sort of bring those two things together?

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>So all viruses mutate is sort of selection pressure, and

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>UM viruses do better the easier they spread UM and

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the less lethal they are is typically what happens. So

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>UM so The bad news is it it spreads more easily.

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>It appears that it's less lethal or comparably lethal. But

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the vaccines, because they're polyclonal, meaning multiple antibodies

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to the spike protein, I do think the vaccines will

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be very helpful in reducing all of the variants we've

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>seen so far. So I think that's encouraging. I think

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we can expect further mutation. Will really have to see. Hopefully.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>What won't happen is that the virus will mutate so sufficiently,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>say by next fall, that the vaccines will become ineffective.

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>That would really be terrible because then you need another

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>mass vaccination program. I don't think that's going to happen.

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't, how come no really quickly, because that spike

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>protein is really how the virus attaches to ourselves. Uh,

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that is preserved, and the antibodies hit various parts of it.

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think even if one part mutates, probably the

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>antibodies will work on the other part. All right, here's

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>such a gem. Alright, Ian, have a good weekend. Dr

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Ian last bid Our, Clinical Associate Professor Medicine at n

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>y U Landgown Medical Center. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Well, this story's headlined, Tim says it all

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fed wakes up to race. The mighty Federal Reserve

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to level the playing field. Is it up to

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the task. That's the big question. It is a big question,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's really topical. So let's get into this story. Uh,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a deep dive by Bloomberg's top notch economic team.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Federal Reserve and economics reporter Katarina Surviva is

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with us. She's on the phone in Houston. Katarina, Um,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a must read for everyone, So I highly

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>recommend people go to Bloomberg dot com or pick it

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>up on the Bloomberg terminal. Tell us what you guys

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>set out to do? Yeah, thank you. Um. So, I mean,

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we really felt like was kind of a civital year

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>for the said. I mean in terms of, um, people's

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>awareness of wealth and equality and just the racial disparities

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>in our economy. It really was a pivotal year for

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.919
<v Speaker 1>all of us. I think it's fair to say, but um,

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the said, uh, you know, really started being quite vocal

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about this. We saw quite a few said presidents coming

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>out to talk about it. Indeed, Share Powell talk to

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>about it UM several times throughout the year. And then

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of course they had this big change to their UH,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to their policy strategy. UM, so they are now really

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>focusing on UM, you know, making sure uh they're correcting

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>for employment shortfalls. And it was just kind of like

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger expansion of how they look at UM

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>their one of their goals, which is maximum employment. So

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to really you know, take a look at

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that and kind of kind of do a big, you know,

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>big step back look at what this year meant for

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve. I'm really glad you brought up the

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>dual mandate already, right, this idea of maximum employment and

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>stable prices, and the maximum employment element of this, What

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is the power that the FED actually has. What are

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the tools that FED has at their disposal to sort

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of target monetary policy in a way that that can

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>affect the racial disparities? Yeah, So, I mean, you know,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I think lot of people in the past have argued

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that the sens tools are blunt UM in this case,

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>and and to you know, in some cases they are.

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they can't um do things that Congress can,

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like with actual fiscal policy, right like targeted programs, But

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>they can, um you know, they can adjust their interest

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rates and and decide when they're going to do that.

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>So you know, one of the big lessons kind of

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that they will tell you that they learned from the

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>last five years is that if they keep interest rates

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>low for long and let the economy you know what

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they call run hot, which means that they let the

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate get a lot lower than they previously thought

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>would be good for the economy, that brings a lot

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of marginalized workers into the labor market and that really

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>helps people that in the past were excluded from full employment.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Based on some of the comments that that is made,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and particularly J Powell, how is he of balancing this?

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>As we know, the Fed always tries to be like,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, a political or you know, and stay out

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of politics. So what are we hearing from J Powell

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and team? Yeah? I mean I think you know, um,

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we certainly saw Janet Yellen when she was FED chair

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>um talk a bit about inequality on this was you know,

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>five six years ago, and she got criticized for it.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean by politicians. She got called out by leaders

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in Congress for being you know, getting into a political debate. Um.

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But I really think that they now feel that this

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't really political anymore, or rather it's you know, perhaps bipartisan. Right,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It's something that we can all agree on is a

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>problem in our economy, you know, in equality along racial lines, um,

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and is something that you know, talking about that shouldn't

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>be seen as political. It's it's part of their economic mandate. Well,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and I do wonder ify having I largely white fed um,

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, at various levels too, but obviously at the

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>top positions, and it's not completely but you know, you

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just don't have diverse views there or diversity of thought

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and how that might hold it back. Yeah, exactly, And

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this continues to be a problem, especially at the top

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>levels and especially within their economists cohort um. It is

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>not very diverse. I think only about a quarter of

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the economists are women and only a quarter are um

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>people of color. Um. So they definitely have a lot

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of ground to make up there, um And And yeah,

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that can contribute to you know what economists

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like the called group think, right, Like it's this kind

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of creates this echo chamber where you don't take into

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>account um, different views and you are more likely to

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of UM have blinders on. And you know, I

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>think we've seen evidence of this. UM. We we have.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked to um Seth Carpenter, who's an

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>economist at UBS. He was at the Fete for many

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>years and he is black, and he talked about his

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>experience with this. You know, he in the early two

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>thousands who was looking at how defense policies impacted different

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>race groups and UM, you know, he found that there

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>were disparate impacts on unemployment. UM. And he you know,

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>as he told us, like no one would really showed

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>much interest except for Roger Ferguson, who was at the

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>time the only um set black governor at the at

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a board of governors. So you know, you you see

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of the limitations that this imposes. So we only

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>have about fifteen seconds left. But the question that you

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>ask in this piece is is the FED up to

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the task? Based on your reporting? Can they pull it off? Well,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the proof will be in the pudding, right,

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see what happened. I think it is

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>far too early to say that we have any victories,

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but um, we'll see. It's safe to say it seems

0:28:59.920 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like gets more on their radar than ever before, which

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes is the first big step, right, Yeah, I mean

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the recognition of it is a big deal. Yeah. Katerina Survivah,

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>she has Federal Reserve and economics reporter at Bloomberg News

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Houston, and you can find her

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>story at Bloomberg dot com if you're listening to Bloomberg

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Karl Master along with Tim Stanovich at Bloomberg

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Quick Take, my co host in our interactive broker studio.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We do have about nineteen minutes left at today's trading session.

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>We do want to bring in j. J. Kinahan's chief

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>market strategist over at t D and Marriage Trade, joining

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>us once again on the phone from Chicago. JJ, nice

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to have you back with us. We're a little I'm

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely exhausted. Tim's doing really great, but I'm like off

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>my game. It's just been you know, it's already been

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a one. Um, how do you see it? First of all,

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>take me back to last week. Where were you when

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>everything was unfolding? And how do you see it? How

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>does it make you kind of think about what might

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>be to come this year. You know, last week obviously

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>was a black eye for the nation. Um it's and

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>any impeachment proceedings, etcetera. It's just it's just bad for

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the country in general. Hopefully with next weekend going forward

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>forward from there, we you know, come together. I think

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes people forget that almost half the country voted for

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the losing candidates, so hopefully what you know, you let's

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>put it this way. There are crazy people everywhere, but

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately most people are very centrist and very reasonable people. Unfortunately,

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the reasonable people aren't as exciting stories the crazy people.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So crazy people tend to make the news. Well wait

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a minute, well they had to make I was just

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna say they had to make the news last week. Wrong,

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they had to. It's not a criticism of covering that,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, I'm just saying in general, you know, and

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>really it's not a statement against I didn't mean that

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe as it came off. All I'm saying is I

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>think most of us are reasonable people. Win or lose,

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you you know, it is what it is, and your

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>march on and you figure a way to go forward. Unfortunately,

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>throughout the last you know, a few years, and because

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of social media, I think often crazy people are hugging

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the news cycle. How and and thank you, But and

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>what I will say to your point is that and

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we Tim and I have talked about this a lot,

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is that we had a great story on and I

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>keep going back to it on the terminal about the

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Capital rioter. You know, one of our reporters talked to

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>one of them who went there, you know, in you know,

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in supportive Donald Trump, just planned to protest and then

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden was in the capital, you know,

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and kind of understanding his story. And I do think

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it is important, as you said, a lot of Americans

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>voted for the current president, to kind of understand what

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is on the minds of these voters, and even those

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that got pretty angry and stormed the capital, to understand

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>what's on their minds because they're Americans too. We've got

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of understand where that anger is coming from,

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 1>or where maybe that displacement is coming from. There. Yeah,

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you said it much more eloquently than I think.

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>The good news is if you look at what's going

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on in the market, not only with that, but with COVID,

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>with everything the way things are being priced as we

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are looking forward and out, you know, a few months

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>past some of the problems. So uh yeah, we're you know,

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we're selling off a bit today. We've come back, of course,

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit from the lows, and I think a

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of that has to do with the fact that

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we are heading into this three day weekend where we

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>come out of it to Inauguration Day, and we've all

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>seen the warnings about capitol buildings around you know, in

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>every state, so not necessarily a big surprise that after

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this nice grown up people are like, why don't I

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think maybe some profits or take some risk off the

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>table as we head into or buy some risk through

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>options or whatever as we head into this weekend. So

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>today's trading cycle makes a little bit of sense to

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>see that we did bounce off the lows pretty well,

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>just for those reasons that it's not an overwhelming sense

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of fear, if you will, and I think certainly as

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>reflected in the mix, you're not seeing a crazy amount

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of fear out there either. Well, I should I should

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>note that we are awaiting President elect Biden, who is

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>planning to deliver marks soon on his plan to deliver

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen vaccines will bring those to you live when

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we get them. But I'm wondering if you think back

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to last night about the one point nine trillion dollar

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>stimulus plan that Biden unveiled and the details that that

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we got, Um, what do you make of it and

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>how it could affect the trade? Yeah, you know, it's interesting, Tim.

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I understand why rates are a little bit lower today,

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously because when we're down, people go towards fixed income.

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm watching uh is going to be when

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>when that money is money starts to continue to hit

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the system. At some point, you would think there would

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>be some inflation. And so I'm not saying it's happening tomorrow,

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know you have to hide that, hide behind

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>that or anything like that. It was interesting that Mr

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Kashtarian today came out and said no inflation. You know,

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it much more than two percent. But

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think that with so much money in the

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>system would certainly lead you to believe that that Russure

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen more and more. Maybe it will

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>take until the second half of the year when things

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:32.919
<v Speaker 1>are back. And I'm using air quotes when I say

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this to normal in terms of people, you know, traveling

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>people back at their offices and having an opportunity to

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>go out and spend money a little bit more than

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>we do is in many states. I know New York

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.720
<v Speaker 1>is similar to Illinois. We're still in a state of lockdown.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>So even your opportunity to go out and spend money

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit well, and I don't know, JJ,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>do you have any clues from what we got from

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the big banks so far? Well's far ago City and

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan in terms of especially Jamie Diamond talked a

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>lot about kind of bigger macro issues, but did you

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>get any kind of clue about maybe where we are

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, the outlook, and how the rest of

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the year mate might play out. I thought Mr Diamond said,

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>actually is kind of what the market wanted to hear,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 1>even though you know, those banks have had a little

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.879
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tougher day and that the next few

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>months continue to look rocky, but much more optimistic as

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>we get to the second half of the year. And

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's been a viewpoint, uh many of

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>us have had. And you know, as we just got

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>done talking about the logistics around the vaccines, is still

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I think something that's a bit more concerning. We all

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>know we're a little bit behind plan etcetera. So that's

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.959
<v Speaker 1>I think where the volatility continues, because if we don't

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to get people vacimated, Uh, it just prolongs our

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to get back on a more normalized schedule. Which

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>so interesting that you say that, because we did get

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a slew of bad news this this afternoon

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't see a major action in the markets

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that. UM, we learned that New

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>York City is close to running out of vaccine. We

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 1>learned that two million people globally had had died from

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>this UM. What is it going to take for a

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 1>headline to actually move markets when it comes to COVID, Well,

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's still so much hope that the

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is going to be good that maybe people are

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at it as a little bit of a blip

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>in the road, if you will time I agree on

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and I hope that's the case. Yeah, I hope so too.

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised that we didn't get that. But at

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the other end of it is you look around where

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna put your money right now, it's still the

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>best place in town, so to speak. There's nothing else

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that's really competing with the security and particularly the returns

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the last seven eight weeks. It's been outstanding,

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in some ways you scratch your head,

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like how can we possibly be going up today? But

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter is there is lot of

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>money still coming after these stocks because they're just an't

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>many great alternatives right now. Hey, so I think and

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>refresh my memory, but I think you've liked Maderna in

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the past, and I'm just curious if so, if that's

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>still the case, or are you starting to look at

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>something like a J and J, which you know, if

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a one shot vaccine that could be a game change,

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as we heard from Dr Ian lost paid or earlier

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>over at n y U land Gown. UM, that could

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be a game changer in terms of demand for vaccines

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>and kind of making the whole process easier. How do

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you see that? Is there a play there? Well? I

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, if I had to look at

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>those one versus the other. The one thing I think

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that gives Johnson Johnson a little bit more of an

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>advantage is this um. If something happens with the MODERNA vaccine, etcetera.

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Or if for some you know, God forbid reason, we've

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>realized over time things aren't as successful, or logistics take longer.

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and Johnson has a whole lot of other products

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that still give revenue. And I just think that if

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at again MODERNA maybe at a shorter time frame.

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>If you have that, you want to take a little

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a shop. But I think if you're

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a longer term investor, you know Johnson and Johnson just

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because it J J. We need to run. Have a

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>good weekend. J J. Kinnahan. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News.