Speaker 1: Yahoo announced yet another data breach, compromising one billion user
Speaker 1: accounts from two thousand and thirteen. That's one billion. That's
Speaker 1: the largest data breach in history. Stolen info included email addresses,
Speaker 1: phone numbers, birth dates, and passwords, all of which can
Speaker 1: be used for identity theft. Passwords can be used to
Speaker 1: access other accounts, and the information in your email account
Speaker 1: could include sensitive personal information and a thief can use
Speaker 1: to piece together your identity. But once you are a
Speaker 1: LifeLock member, if you become a victim of identity theft,
Speaker 1: their US based team will work to resolve your case
Speaker 1: and put you all back together. Now, Folks, no one
Speaker 1: can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions at
Speaker 1: all businesses. But nobody's better than LifeLock. Join now you'll
Speaker 1: get a special fifteen percent discount. Just call or visit
Speaker 1: LifeLock dot com and use promo code Rush fifteen. It's
Speaker 1: Rush fifteen fifteen percent discount. You can call them eight
Speaker 1: hundred four thirty three Until December thirty one, A lawsuit
Speaker 1: filed on behalf of illegal immigrants could change fair housing
Speaker 1: laws and could change private property laws. Now. It all
Speaker 1: started at a trailer park in Fairfax County, Virginia, the
Speaker 1: property managers started requiring residents to show a valid I D.
Speaker 1: In order to renew their leases. Every household member had
Speaker 1: to present social Security numbers, passports, or visas. Tennants say
Speaker 1: they were told this was for criminal background checks. For
Speaker 1: families who failed to comply and were evicted are now
Speaker 1: suing in federal court. Their warriors argue that the requirements
Speaker 1: discriminatory because it disproportionately affects Latinos. For years, counties and
Speaker 1: cities have tried to require residents to establish that they
Speaker 1: are in the country legally, but federal courts have ruled
Speaker 1: against them. This time. However, even the attorneys for these
Speaker 1: evicted families admit the law is unclear when it comes
Speaker 1: to landlords renting their private property. Now, the lawyers say
Speaker 1: that they hope the federal court will expand the law
Speaker 1: take it one step further. They want to prohibit private
Speaker 1: landlords from requiring people to prove that they're here legally.
Speaker 1: These lawyers must know that courts are not supposed to
Speaker 1: take the law one step further. They must know only
Speaker 1: Congress has the power to take it one step further
Speaker 1: to writer change laws. But they don't care. You see,
Speaker 1: the regime has thrown the constitution out the window, especially
Speaker 1: when it comes to immigration law, so they think that
Speaker 1: they can push it one step further regardless of the consequence.
Speaker 1: They don't think there will be any consequences. M