WEBVTT - Scattering Ashes, Circular Airport Runways, and the TSA's Power Over Electronics

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How Stuff Works Now. I'm your host, Lauren Vogelbaum,

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a researcher and writer, here at How Stuff Works every

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>week and bringing you three stories from our team about

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the weird and wondrous advances we've seen in science, technology,

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and culture. This week, we look for answers to three questions,

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>might circular airport runways provide the best way to fly?

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And unrelated, when you scatter someone's ashes? Are you actually littering?

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But first, our senior editor Katherine Whitburne, along with freelance

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>writer Patrick Jake Tiger, explore one that ties into the

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>enhanced security being practiced at airports these days. If you

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>check your electronic devices on a flight, will your data

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be searched? When you check your luggage in a US airport,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you're technically allowing the Transportation Security Administration to search your bags. Yes,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they can do that. But here's the other privacy question.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Can the t S A search the data inside an

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>electronic device they find in your suitcase? Back in March,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Homeland Security announced what it called an

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>aviation security enhancement for travelers coming to the US from

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>ten airports in eight Muslim majority countries. People on these

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>flights can no longer bring electronic devices bigger than a

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>smartphone as carry on items in the plane's main cabin.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That means laptop, computers, tablets, and other devices have to

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be checked as baggage. Homeland Security hasn't said exactly what

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>terrorist threat led to the change in policy, but some

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>travelers warned that the laptop rule might have a hidden

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>purpose to separate travelers from their devices so that someone

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>can access them or even install tracking software or malware

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>in them. A spokesperson for the t s A says

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Homeland Security is not using this new

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>measure to look at anyone's data. She also points out

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that neither Homeland Security nor the t s A has

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>staff screening baggage in foreign airports. Even so, there's something

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>else to consider once travelers arrive on US, so all

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the devices they bring along, including their laptops, smartphones,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and tablets, are subject to search by officials from u

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>S Customs and Border Protection, which is a branch of

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Homeland Security. The American Civil Liberties Union looked into the issue,

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and they say customs agents can ask travelers for their

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>passwords and tours from other countries must comply, or else

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>they can't come into the US. American citizens don't face

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that risk, but they can still be temporarily detained, and

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>agents can take away their devices and hold them for months.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a growing problem. According to Homeland Security, the

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>number of cell phone searches by border agents has mushroomed

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>from five thousand and twenty fifteen to twenty five thousand

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and twenty sixteen, and it looks like twenty seventeen will

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>break that record easily. Five thousand devices were searched in

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>February alone, more than in all of so far, federal

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>courts have found that government searches at ports of entry

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>don't violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>but the courts have imposed a fuel limitation. In twenty thirteen,

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rule that agents can

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>give your phone or laptop a brief look without having

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to justify themselves, but they need to have reasonable suspicion

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that you've committed a crime to conduct a heavy duty

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>forensic search, which might include searching meta data for files

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or restoring files that have been deleted. But the A. C. L.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>You argues that those powers will still give agents too

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>much leeway because even a quick search can turn up

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sensitive information. To combat that, Democratic Senator

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Ron Widen and Republican Senator Round Paul are introducing a

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>law that would require agents to get a warrant before

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>looking through the contents of American citizens electronic devices. In

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, the a c L YOU advise the travelers

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to take us few devices and as little personal data

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>with them as possible when they're coming to the US. Also,

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're curious about how anyone can best protect their

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>devices and data while flying, search for the Electronic Frontier

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Foundations Guide for Travelers. They are another privacy advocacy group,

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's a good guide. Next Step Stuff editor Christopher

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Hasiotis and our freelancer Jescelyn Shields dig into Oh No,

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that's terrible. They explore the emotionally and legally complex burial

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>tradition of scattering ashes. Somebody you love dies and it's awful.

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>What's worse, sometimes you're even put in charge of figuring

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>out how to deal with their remains. It's sad, it's stressful,

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge responsibility, and it's unfortunately complicated. Case in point,

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>even if you're departed chose to have their remains cremated

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and scattered in a special place they loved in life,

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>there are laws regulating where you can dump out and

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>urn full of human ashes. Of course, most people don't

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>know this or even consider the laws when dealing with

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>something so personal, because the popularity of cremation is relatively

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>new and the laws aren't often enforced. The laws about

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of ashes aren't as widely known and respected as, say,

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>traffic laws, but more people are choosing cremation all the time.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>According to the Cremation Association of North America, in nineteen

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight, fewer than four percent of Americans chose to

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>be cremated, but that number is expected to be around

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>fifty by the year two thousand eighteen. For centuries, cremation

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really done in Western countries because many churches believe

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it conflicted with religious doctrine. The Catholic Church, for instance,

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>prohibited cremation until nineteen sixty three. These days, the Vatican

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>allows it under most circumstances, but still insists the ashes

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be buried, not scattered. But many people ask that their

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>ashes be scattered in a place they loved after death.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And while there's a greater amount of human bone ash

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>being scattered around than ever before, it doesn't occur to

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>most of us that pouring Grandpa's ashes in his favorite

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fishing river could be illegal, which it is. Although no

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>enforcement agency exists in the United States to ride around

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>busting people, most states do have their own scattering laws,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the particulars of which can vary wildly, and some federal

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>laws take press sentence over those state laws. For instance,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>even though the state of Texas says you can scatter

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>ashes in a public waterway, the Federal Clean Water Act

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>prohibits scattering human ashes into freshwater bodies like lakes, rivers,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and streams, though in most cases it's possible to obtain

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>permits from both the federal and state agency. And although

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you can get a permit from the U. S Environmental

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Protection Agency for a burial at sea, you still have

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to scatter the ashes at least three in nautical miles,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>which is three point five miles or five point six

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>kilometers from the shore. Federal law also prohibits tossing an

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>urn full of ashes out of an airplane or helicopter,

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>but that's because it could hurt someone on the ground.

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You also can't trespass onto anyone's property in order to

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>scatter ashes there unless you have written permission from the landowner,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>although that's a trespassing violation that would apply regardless of

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>why you're on that property. And if you're looking to

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>unload your loved one's ashes on public land a national park,

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>say for someone who loved the Grand Canyon or Point

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Doom State Park in Malibu, California, as in an iconic

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>scene from the ninete classic The Big Lebowski, you have

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to obtain permission from the park beforehand. These days, though,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>reducing a person into a jar full of ashes to

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be disposed of doesn't have to be the end of

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the line. For instance, the Neptune Society, the largest cremation

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>provider in the US, owns a reef off the coast

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of Florida that they've turned into an underwater mausoleum. There,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>people's cremated remains have been turned into concrete sculptures that

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>provide habitat for sea life. Jeff stab president of Cremation Solutions,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a Vermont based company that sells memorial earns and creates

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>keepsakes and jewelry out of Ashes. Started his company in

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six to provide people with information about scattering

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and options for crafting ashes into meaningful objects. Stab says,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so many people are afraid to scatter because they don't

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>know what the laws are and their loved one ends

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>up in an urn in the closet or in the attic.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>People aren't sure how to do it, and it interferes

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with the healing process. Other companies are getting creative too,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and will transform cremines into coffee cups. For instance, Stobs

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>firm cells, biodegradable earns that dissolving water, earns that can

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be converted into bird houses after the ashes are scattered

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>urns that can be planted with a tree, and even

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the popular loved One launcher, a handheld ash scattering cannon,

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>says Stob. People just load one of these things up

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with the ashes, confetti and streamers, and we'll even do

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it at an event with people toasting champagne. They'll blast

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the ashes off a cliff or even right over the

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>whole crowd and everybody gets anointed. Well, there's another thing

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to remember to inquire about at a memorial service. On

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>top of donations, flowers and dress code. What's the polight

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>way to ask? Uh? Just wondering are the cremated remains

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of the deceased going to be launched into the crowd? Finally,

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, our video producer Ramsey Youunt and freelance writer

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Jake Higer again have a lighter one for us

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>about the future of air trap. Will circular airport runways

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>ever take off? We're accustomed to the idea of airplanes

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>taking off from and landing on long, flat strips of pavement,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but a consortium of European aviation researchers who are behind

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the Endless Brundaway project wants to change that. The group

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>envisions the airport of the future as having a terminal

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the middle and spokes leading to a circular runway

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that is two point two miles or three and a

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>half kilometers in diameter and has a bank surface, sort

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of like a racetrack. Proponents of circular runways argue that

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as such a space saving configuration would reduce the amount

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of land needed for aviation, which potentially might free up

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>valuable real estate for other uses. They say it would

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>be more efficient since up to three aircraft could take

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>off or land on a circular runway at any time,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and that it can handle overall four times in the

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>traffic of a regular runway. Hank Hatlink, a researcher for

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the Netherlands Aerospace Center, also proposed that would be safer

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in a recent BBC News interview. He said that because

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>aircraft could take off and land from any point in

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the circle, that could avoid tricky cross winds and capitalize

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on headwinds. Additionally, circular runways could eliminate those rough roller

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>coaster like takeoffs. Histlink told the BBC that passengers would

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>experience a sensation similar to when the aircraft makes a

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>turn in the air. Because of centrifugical force, the aircraft

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>would move at a slower speed during takeoff. So far,

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the endless runway has only been tested in simulations, but

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea has prompted a lot of debate. Other experts

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 1>have weighed in opposing the idea, citing reasons from traction

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to visibility issues and shifting winds. Also, a curved runway

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>will add extra steps and landing, so season pilots will

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have to be trained to land tilted to ensure safety

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of their passengers. That's our show for this week. Thank

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much for tuning in. Further thanks to our

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>audio producer Dylan Fagan and our editorial Liaison's Christopher Hasiotis

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and Alison louder Milk. Subscribe to now Now for more

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of the latest science news and send us links to

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>anything you'd like to hear us cover. Plus, Hey, do

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you have any toys from childhood that you've hung onto

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or even repurchased? I'm staring at an action figure of

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Egon Spangler as I type this. You can send us

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an email at now Podcast pas stuff works dot com,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course, for lots more stories like these, head

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on over to our home planet now Not how Stuff

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com