1 00:00:00,960 --> 00:00:04,280 Speaker 1: Hi. This is Laura Vanderkam. I'm a mother of four, 2 00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:08,479 Speaker 1: an author, journalist, and speaker. And this is Sarah Hart Hunger. 3 00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:11,799 Speaker 1: I'm a mother of three, practicing physician and blogger. On 4 00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:14,640 Speaker 1: the side, we are two working parents who love our 5 00:00:14,680 --> 00:00:17,880 Speaker 1: careers and our families. Welcome to best of both worlds. 6 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 1: Here we talk about how real women manage work, family, 7 00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:25,360 Speaker 1: and time for fun, from figuring out childcare to mapping 8 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: out long term career goals. We want you to get 9 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:33,000 Speaker 1: the most out of life. Welcome to best of both worlds. 10 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:36,199 Speaker 1: This is Laura. This is episode ninety seven. We're excited 11 00:00:36,200 --> 00:00:39,639 Speaker 1: to be interviewing Emily Oster today. She is a professor 12 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:42,680 Speaker 1: at Brown, an economist, and the author of the new 13 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:46,040 Speaker 1: book Cribsheet, which is a data driven guide to better, 14 00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:49,320 Speaker 1: more relaxed parenting from birth to preschool. So lots of 15 00:00:49,360 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 1: great things we're going to be talking about with her 16 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,840 Speaker 1: later in this episode. The reason we reached out to 17 00:00:54,880 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 1: Emily is because a lot of people mentioned on my 18 00:00:57,520 --> 00:00:59,440 Speaker 1: blog that she would make a great guest, and then 19 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:04,720 Speaker 1: Sarah'll so recently heard her on Freakonomics, right, that's yeah, 20 00:01:04,840 --> 00:01:08,840 Speaker 1: it aired just recently. The episode aired in early May 21 00:01:09,040 --> 00:01:10,399 Speaker 1: if you want to go back and look back, because 22 00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 1: it's a fantastic episode if you enjoy hearing her on 23 00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:17,120 Speaker 1: this podcast, and specifically she delved into some topics that 24 00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:19,760 Speaker 1: I felt were right up our Best of Both Worlds 25 00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 1: Ali and thought she'd make a fantastic guest for us. 26 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:26,479 Speaker 1: So we were thrilled when you know, she was able 27 00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:29,400 Speaker 1: to make room in her guest speaking calendar right after 28 00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:32,280 Speaker 1: Freakonomics to hang out with us Freakonomics and Best of 29 00:01:32,280 --> 00:01:35,280 Speaker 1: Both Worlds, which you listened to both of those, Sarah, 30 00:01:35,319 --> 00:01:39,480 Speaker 1: what well else are you listening to today? Yeah? I was. 31 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:41,920 Speaker 1: I was wondering if you had any new podcasts you liked. 32 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:43,920 Speaker 1: I you know, I haven't had that many new ones. 33 00:01:43,959 --> 00:01:46,640 Speaker 1: I actually there's a finance one that I've been enjoying 34 00:01:46,680 --> 00:01:50,120 Speaker 1: called how to Money. Although it's very male perspective, I'll 35 00:01:50,120 --> 00:01:53,480 Speaker 1: have to look to see if they're any you know 36 00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,920 Speaker 1: more more, although they have a very nice family perspective. 37 00:01:56,920 --> 00:01:59,520 Speaker 1: They both have large families and they feel like spending 38 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 1: out on the families is worth it. So I really 39 00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:03,240 Speaker 1: like that. Maybe they just need to have their partners speak. 40 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 1: I am actually a guest on this show with How 41 00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 1: To Money at some point. I'm not sure if it 42 00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: will have aired by the time this is I didn't 43 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:11,960 Speaker 1: not air yet because it heard it between when we're 44 00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:14,239 Speaker 1: recording this and the But yeah, no, they're Matt and 45 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:18,600 Speaker 1: Joel are very fun and yeah, they're both big expanding families, 46 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 1: so it was good good to talk with them from 47 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 1: that perspective as well. Well. I'm also super excited to 48 00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:28,520 Speaker 1: say that Note to Self is returning. Manush has had 49 00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:32,120 Speaker 1: another podcast in the meantime, but I am just in 50 00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:35,720 Speaker 1: love with Note to selfs topics and I'm excited that 51 00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:38,079 Speaker 1: that's coming back. And I still listen to a lot 52 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:40,640 Speaker 1: of a lot of different things. I do like in 53 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:42,560 Speaker 1: the if you're looking for something sort of similar to 54 00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:45,480 Speaker 1: our kind of content, maybe less work related. I still 55 00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:48,720 Speaker 1: like the mom our a lot. Yeah, what about you? 56 00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 1: I listened to Happier. I listen to what should I 57 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:57,600 Speaker 1: read next? That's That's been great. I still love that 58 00:02:57,639 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 1: one as well. You know, I'm not in the car 59 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 1: all that much in terms of longer chunks of time, 60 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: and so I find that there's less space for listening 61 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:07,800 Speaker 1: to a lot of podcasts. But you know, I certainly 62 00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 1: like those and I've enjoyed listening to ones like how 63 00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:13,240 Speaker 1: to Money, you know, trying trying that out before I 64 00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:14,760 Speaker 1: was a guest on that. I definitely, I mean I 65 00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:17,079 Speaker 1: listened to everything that I'm on a guest that I'm 66 00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:19,399 Speaker 1: a guest on, like before I'm on the show. So 67 00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:22,280 Speaker 1: I feel like there's a wide variety of podcasts that 68 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:26,240 Speaker 1: I've tried out here and there. There's also another I've 69 00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:28,280 Speaker 1: been listening to, not Safe for Work or no, maybe 70 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:30,920 Speaker 1: it's called Safe for Work. Yeah, Safe for Work, Safe 71 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:33,840 Speaker 1: for Work. It's a good it's like a career podcast. 72 00:03:34,600 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: It's like it's similar to us without the family side. 73 00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:40,920 Speaker 1: Got so those of you who enjoy us might want 74 00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:44,000 Speaker 1: to check that out as well. That's cool. Yeah, and uh, 75 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: we we continue to record this. We've been batching a 76 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:50,440 Speaker 1: lot to get us ahead of the summer because it's 77 00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:53,000 Speaker 1: going to be a lot of back and forth of 78 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,840 Speaker 1: both of us being off at different points in the summer. 79 00:03:56,600 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 1: So yeah, that's uh some of these the timing maybe 80 00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:03,680 Speaker 1: a little bit odd, but hopefully our listeners will forgive us. 81 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:07,360 Speaker 1: As we're talking about August and it's like June, so 82 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 1: we thought ahead about that. So pretty much we try 83 00:04:11,800 --> 00:04:14,800 Speaker 1: not to do that. Yeah, yeah, all right, Well, here 84 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:18,599 Speaker 1: is Emily. I'm so excited to speak with her. So, 85 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:20,960 Speaker 1: Sarah and I are thrilled to welcome Emily Ostar to 86 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:23,200 Speaker 1: the podcast today. As we said, she's the author of 87 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:25,520 Speaker 1: the new book The Crib Sheet, which is a data 88 00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:30,440 Speaker 1: driven guide to better, more relaxed parenting from birth to preschool. So, Emily, 89 00:04:30,480 --> 00:04:34,039 Speaker 1: could you introduce yourself to our listeners. Yes, Hi, I'm Emily. 90 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:37,320 Speaker 1: I am a professor of economics at Brown University in 91 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 1: my day job, and I am the author of this book, Cribsheet, 92 00:04:40,839 --> 00:04:43,760 Speaker 1: which is about using data to parent. And I also 93 00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:46,240 Speaker 1: have an earlier book called Expecting Better, which is about 94 00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:49,800 Speaker 1: using data to be a better pregnant person. And I'm 95 00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 1: really excited to be here with you guys. Yeah, and 96 00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:55,120 Speaker 1: you have two children who have been the subject of 97 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,920 Speaker 1: much of this research as well. Right, yes, sorry, I 98 00:04:57,960 --> 00:04:59,760 Speaker 1: should have mentioned the most important thing. I have a 99 00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:02,719 Speaker 1: four year old son and an eight year old daughter 100 00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:06,560 Speaker 1: at home. Excellent. Well, one of the things that intrigued 101 00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 1: us and intrigues me in general, is that economists are 102 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:11,480 Speaker 1: kind of special. They have a different way of thinking 103 00:05:11,480 --> 00:05:15,400 Speaker 1: about the world. I know, I enjoy listening to Freakonomics 104 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:17,960 Speaker 1: is one example of a podcast that explores that kind 105 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:19,840 Speaker 1: of thinking. Can you tell our listeners like, what does 106 00:05:19,839 --> 00:05:21,320 Speaker 1: it mean to be an economists? How do you see 107 00:05:21,360 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 1: things a little bit differently? Yeah, So I think there's 108 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:28,280 Speaker 1: many kinds of economists, and we run the range from 109 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:29,800 Speaker 1: what I think a lot of people would think about, 110 00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 1: which are like people who study the Federal Reserve and 111 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:35,279 Speaker 1: think about interest rates and think about stocks, which not 112 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:37,640 Speaker 1: really the kind of economics I do. But I think 113 00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:41,800 Speaker 1: that there's a large pool of economists now who are 114 00:05:41,839 --> 00:05:45,240 Speaker 1: kind of really into analyzing data and trying to get 115 00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:48,359 Speaker 1: cause or relationships out of data, in many cases around 116 00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:54,720 Speaker 1: issues that are maybe less traditionally associated with economics, like parenting, 117 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:59,040 Speaker 1: but more like health or behavior, behavior, behavior, and so 118 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:01,280 Speaker 1: you know, for me, I think of economics as kind 119 00:06:01,279 --> 00:06:05,440 Speaker 1: of being partly about about data and evidence and trying 120 00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:08,600 Speaker 1: to get causality out of out of data, and partly 121 00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:12,320 Speaker 1: about decision making and thinking about how people should make 122 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:15,360 Speaker 1: decisions and what is the right way to make choices. 123 00:06:15,400 --> 00:06:17,360 Speaker 1: And so I think that that for me, those two 124 00:06:17,360 --> 00:06:19,720 Speaker 1: things kind of come together and you can apply them 125 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:21,680 Speaker 1: to in a lot of different areas, some of which 126 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:25,200 Speaker 1: are more traditional than others for economists. Yeah, and so 127 00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:28,960 Speaker 1: your book takes this approach of looking at data and 128 00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:32,520 Speaker 1: looking at how people should make decisions and turns it 129 00:06:32,600 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: on this topic of you know, first pregnancy for the 130 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:38,599 Speaker 1: first book, and now parenting, especially during the early years. 131 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:40,839 Speaker 1: And you know, one of the reasons we're very excited 132 00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:42,920 Speaker 1: to have you on. It's one of my personal biggest 133 00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 1: pet peeves that suddenly somebody will get very authoritative and say, well, 134 00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:49,640 Speaker 1: all the research says kids turn out best if you 135 00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:53,159 Speaker 1: do X. Now what maybe you could explain to people 136 00:06:53,360 --> 00:06:56,760 Speaker 1: what are the inherent problems of a statement like that. 137 00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:00,640 Speaker 1: So there is almost nothing about which all the research 138 00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:02,880 Speaker 1: says the same thing. And I think this is one 139 00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:05,839 Speaker 1: of the things that frustrates me also so much, is 140 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 1: that this sort of phrase US studies show like studies show, 141 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:13,200 Speaker 1: studies show everything. Okay, there's always the studies show everything, 142 00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 1: And the challenge is to say, you know, what is it? 143 00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:19,560 Speaker 1: What are all the studies show all the studies show 144 00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:21,840 Speaker 1: When you look at them all together and you try 145 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 1: to understand which are the best studies and which are 146 00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:26,240 Speaker 1: the are the least good studies, and you know which 147 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:28,600 Speaker 1: ones should we should we rely on. And I think 148 00:07:28,640 --> 00:07:32,520 Speaker 1: in some sense, saying all the research shows just betrays 149 00:07:32,560 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 1: like a lack of understanding in some ways of how 150 00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:37,640 Speaker 1: this works. Because even for something where it's very clear 151 00:07:38,160 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 1: that it's it's sort of the data is in one 152 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:42,160 Speaker 1: way or the other, you will still often find a 153 00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:45,320 Speaker 1: study that shows the opposite, because you know, studies are 154 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 1: not perfect, and sometimes there are some good studies and 155 00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:49,640 Speaker 1: less good studies, and some studies are wrong. And so 156 00:07:49,720 --> 00:07:52,560 Speaker 1: I think we need to take a more holistic view, 157 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 1: but it is very hard to do that in the 158 00:07:55,560 --> 00:08:00,280 Speaker 1: face of so many pieces of information that come at you. Yeah. Well, 159 00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:03,800 Speaker 1: also the question of how kids turn out. I mean 160 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:07,200 Speaker 1: this is also a problem because any study needs a 161 00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 1: measurable endpoint, and I'm just not sure how turning out 162 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 1: translates into a measurable endpoint. Yeah, no, it's it's right. 163 00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:17,800 Speaker 1: And I think even you know, even in the book, 164 00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:20,239 Speaker 1: there's this sort of there's all the limitations I talk about, 165 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:22,400 Speaker 1: and then there's the on top of that, the limitation 166 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:25,280 Speaker 1: that like, in our best case scenario, the outcomes we're 167 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:29,880 Speaker 1: looking at are like test scores, right, or you know, behavior, 168 00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:32,120 Speaker 1: like some measure of behavior, right, And those are the 169 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:35,199 Speaker 1: things we can measure. But of course, as a parent, like, yeah, 170 00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:37,080 Speaker 1: maybe those are things that you care about, but they're 171 00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 1: certainly not the limit of the things you care about. 172 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:41,840 Speaker 1: You know, I want my kids to be like happy 173 00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:45,200 Speaker 1: and nice and and there's no nice, like forget about 174 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,640 Speaker 1: like a nice. They will measure nice. Nobody's like, hey, 175 00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:51,080 Speaker 1: is your kid like kind to other children? That's not 176 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:54,360 Speaker 1: the thing. You know, there's externalizing behavior, there's like pieces 177 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:57,080 Speaker 1: of that, but there isn't there. We're sort of missing 178 00:08:57,120 --> 00:08:59,600 Speaker 1: some of these more holistic things because they're hard to measure. 179 00:08:59,600 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 1: And I think that you know, that's an inherent limitation, 180 00:09:02,320 --> 00:09:06,280 Speaker 1: but it does mean that that these these conversations end 181 00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:08,320 Speaker 1: up sounding sort of like, oh, my goal is to 182 00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:13,440 Speaker 1: like optimize my kid on IQ and behavior outcomes, And 183 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:16,680 Speaker 1: I don't think there's anybody's actual goal. And the funny thing, 184 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:19,240 Speaker 1: like you talk about, everything tends to have two sides. 185 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:23,320 Speaker 1: So even if you did manage to use data to 186 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:26,360 Speaker 1: create the smartest kid, that could backfire anyway, because you 187 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 1: may have sacrificed something else equally valuable, like being nice 188 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:34,080 Speaker 1: or creative or not having a psychiatric disease or right 189 00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:38,120 Speaker 1: or whatever. It is just like, for example, all bad 190 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:41,240 Speaker 1: things you know, yes, yes, exactly. So you know you're 191 00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:43,800 Speaker 1: building your career as an economist, and then you know, 192 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:46,840 Speaker 1: you and your husband start a family, and you know, 193 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:51,160 Speaker 1: you decide to take this approach to pregnancy and childcare. 194 00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:55,440 Speaker 1: What were some of your biggest surprises as you looked 195 00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:57,840 Speaker 1: into this. Was there anything that you were surprised to 196 00:09:58,120 --> 00:09:59,760 Speaker 1: find or like, WHOA, I didn't think that would be 197 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:03,240 Speaker 1: there in the data, So I think there was more 198 00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:05,920 Speaker 1: of that in the case of pregnancy. And so when 199 00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:08,199 Speaker 1: I sort of think about the two books, you know, 200 00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 1: there's a lot of things in the in the first 201 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:11,640 Speaker 1: book about pregnancy that are kind of like, you know, 202 00:10:11,840 --> 00:10:14,080 Speaker 1: people tell you you can't have any sushi, but actually 203 00:10:14,120 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 1: like it's fine to have sushi. And so there were 204 00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:18,480 Speaker 1: sort of many many more things like that or like 205 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:20,800 Speaker 1: the one there that I was super surprised by that 206 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 1: remain very surprised by is about bed rest. So a 207 00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 1: lot of people are told to go on bed rest, 208 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:28,200 Speaker 1: and it turns out like there is like almost there's 209 00:10:28,240 --> 00:10:31,080 Speaker 1: basically nothing for which bed rest is a good idea, 210 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:32,600 Speaker 1: and there are a lot of reasons it's not a 211 00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:34,640 Speaker 1: good idea. And yet it is still prescribed all the time. 212 00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:37,559 Speaker 1: So there were there were many things like that in pregnancy, 213 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:40,400 Speaker 1: I think in the parenting stuff, you know, there's there's 214 00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:43,400 Speaker 1: a few things that kind of I think people find 215 00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:47,480 Speaker 1: somewhat surprising, but a lot of I guess a lot 216 00:10:47,480 --> 00:10:50,520 Speaker 1: of what's surprising about this about the book is that 217 00:10:50,559 --> 00:10:53,160 Speaker 1: there are many good choices, and so we are sort 218 00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:55,720 Speaker 1: of coming in always with like the idea that like 219 00:10:55,720 --> 00:10:57,480 Speaker 1: there's there's like a right choice, like there's like a 220 00:10:57,559 --> 00:10:58,960 Speaker 1: right way to sleep with your kind of a right 221 00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:01,680 Speaker 1: way to feed them, and and you know, in most 222 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:06,400 Speaker 1: of these or many of the decisions there, there isn't 223 00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:09,160 Speaker 1: really a right way. And so that means that there 224 00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:11,400 Speaker 1: isn't a fact that is surprising. There is an approach 225 00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,200 Speaker 1: that is surprising. But I will I will highlight one 226 00:11:14,280 --> 00:11:16,959 Speaker 1: thing that I think that we that I didn't didn't 227 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:19,679 Speaker 1: realize until I did the book, which is about the 228 00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: way that you introduce food. So there when you I 229 00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:25,000 Speaker 1: don't know if you guys have you muys have little 230 00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:29,079 Speaker 1: kids or big kids. And I'm actually a pediatric ercnologist, 231 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:31,840 Speaker 1: so I am like gonna listen with ears open. But actually, 232 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:35,200 Speaker 1: so when I was thinking about feeding our dog, like 233 00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:39,959 Speaker 1: introducing solid food. You got this like very specific list 234 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:42,280 Speaker 1: of like first you give them ry cereal and then 235 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:44,720 Speaker 1: you know, every three days you give them a new vegetable, 236 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 1: and first it's vegetables and then it's fruit, and like 237 00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:50,000 Speaker 1: there's there's a more of like very very very specific instructions. 238 00:11:50,679 --> 00:11:53,840 Speaker 1: And I was like, Okay, there must be a reason 239 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:56,480 Speaker 1: that it is exactly like this, Like there must be 240 00:11:56,480 --> 00:11:58,080 Speaker 1: a reason that you have to start with this and 241 00:11:58,120 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 1: then you have to do this, and then you have 242 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:02,160 Speaker 1: to do this, because why would it be so specific 243 00:12:02,520 --> 00:12:05,040 Speaker 1: if there wasn't a reason. And then the answer was 244 00:12:05,080 --> 00:12:07,000 Speaker 1: like this is a fine way. There's really wrong with 245 00:12:07,040 --> 00:12:09,839 Speaker 1: this way I'm doing. It's like perfectly fine, but there 246 00:12:09,880 --> 00:12:12,920 Speaker 1: isn't anything wrong with like giving them oatmeal first, or 247 00:12:13,559 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 1: you know, like giving them some fruit before that. I mean, 248 00:12:16,800 --> 00:12:18,440 Speaker 1: there's like it was sort of like there's a logic, 249 00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:20,920 Speaker 1: but there didn't. It didn't feel like there was a 250 00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:23,440 Speaker 1: deep underlying evidence base for like why you had to 251 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:26,280 Speaker 1: start and do it exactly this this way. And I 252 00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:29,800 Speaker 1: was surprised. I think that's so funny. And my gut 253 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 1: feeling is that people made a list because it was 254 00:12:32,040 --> 00:12:35,480 Speaker 1: like an easier answer, Like parents wanted a prescription and 255 00:12:35,480 --> 00:12:37,400 Speaker 1: they're let someone wrote it down and they're like, oh, 256 00:12:37,559 --> 00:12:39,640 Speaker 1: that looks good, and then that's the new handout and 257 00:12:39,960 --> 00:12:41,840 Speaker 1: you can sound all good saying it. And it wasn't 258 00:12:41,880 --> 00:12:45,920 Speaker 1: hurting anyone. It isn't like unlike something's like bed rest. 259 00:12:46,040 --> 00:12:48,280 Speaker 1: This isn't like a problem, Like this is totally fine 260 00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:50,160 Speaker 1: way to do it. It's just it's like if you 261 00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:52,839 Speaker 1: didn't want to, you know, I remember my son didn't 262 00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:55,200 Speaker 1: like rice cereal. He just like hated it. And he 263 00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:58,120 Speaker 1: was and my husband's like, why, like but what, we're family, 264 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:00,880 Speaker 1: why does he like this? And it was like and 265 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:04,120 Speaker 1: then he was like, maybe he'll like, you know, like kanji, 266 00:13:04,400 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 1: and then he did. And then it was like, I 267 00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:07,840 Speaker 1: guess we're gonna give him. This's this kid. Number two, Yeah, 268 00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:10,240 Speaker 1: number two. But also the risk that people are like, 269 00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:12,680 Speaker 1: oh I did something terribly wrong. If they introduced yellow 270 00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 1: vegetables before red vegetables or whatever the order was right, 271 00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:18,320 Speaker 1: because yeah, I remember it's very yellow and then the 272 00:13:18,440 --> 00:13:22,280 Speaker 1: orange is you know, it turns out it doesn't matter. 273 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:26,679 Speaker 1: It's okay. All the vegetables are going yeah. Well, and 274 00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:29,760 Speaker 1: the funny chicks out. You know, people make life altering 275 00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:32,880 Speaker 1: decisions based on things. I mean probably you know, what 276 00:13:33,040 --> 00:13:35,120 Speaker 1: order you feed your kid is not terribly life altering, 277 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:38,960 Speaker 1: but things like parental employment are a lot more life altering. 278 00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:42,240 Speaker 1: And you know, you looked into the data on this, 279 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:44,600 Speaker 1: you know, and how how people wind up being very 280 00:13:44,679 --> 00:13:49,640 Speaker 1: judgmental in both directions without particularly great evidence. So what 281 00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:52,520 Speaker 1: did you find in terms of the data on parental 282 00:13:52,600 --> 00:13:55,040 Speaker 1: implement And I'm not saying here whether mom stays home 283 00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:56,640 Speaker 1: or not, because I love the way you put it, 284 00:13:56,679 --> 00:13:59,560 Speaker 1: What is the optimal configuration of adult work hours for 285 00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:06,000 Speaker 1: your house? Yes, yes, it's very catchy. Yeah you won't 286 00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:07,960 Speaker 1: see that in the headline anytime, but I'm not going 287 00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:09,840 Speaker 1: to tell you don't think so it's too many words. 288 00:14:10,360 --> 00:14:12,040 Speaker 1: So you know, first of all, I think this is 289 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:14,360 Speaker 1: this is a place where it's very it's this is 290 00:14:14,400 --> 00:14:17,000 Speaker 1: a place where the data is somewhat limited, or you know, 291 00:14:17,080 --> 00:14:21,520 Speaker 1: the approaches are somewhat limited because this choice is really 292 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:24,160 Speaker 1: wrapped up in other things about the family, and so 293 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:26,880 Speaker 1: it's just it's a hard question to answer. So the 294 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:28,600 Speaker 1: best we can do is we can say, Okay, what 295 00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:32,280 Speaker 1: is the data to say of the data that we have. 296 00:14:32,400 --> 00:14:36,080 Speaker 1: What does it say? And so these studies compare the 297 00:14:36,160 --> 00:14:37,920 Speaker 1: kids of moms who stay home to the kids of 298 00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:41,200 Speaker 1: moms who who work, and or parents where both parents 299 00:14:41,240 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 1: work versus one parent staying home. It's usually the mom, 300 00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:45,920 Speaker 1: although not not always of course. And you know, what 301 00:14:45,960 --> 00:14:48,520 Speaker 1: they show is that the outcomes are very similar. That 302 00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 1: there isn't any particular reason to think that. And again 303 00:14:51,960 --> 00:14:55,480 Speaker 1: here we're in outcomes like IQ or behavior, things you 304 00:14:55,520 --> 00:14:59,240 Speaker 1: can measure in test scores and in schools, and the 305 00:14:59,320 --> 00:15:02,000 Speaker 1: kids look look the same. There. You know, maybe is 306 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:04,400 Speaker 1: a little bit of a hint that kids where one 307 00:15:04,440 --> 00:15:06,720 Speaker 1: parent works part time and one parent works full time 308 00:15:06,760 --> 00:15:09,120 Speaker 1: maybe do a little bit better. But it seems like 309 00:15:09,160 --> 00:15:12,440 Speaker 1: that is probably because that's like a very unusual family configuration, 310 00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:16,120 Speaker 1: which only happens in particular you're kind of heavily selected, 311 00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:20,440 Speaker 1: uh selected families. So I think that that what this means, 312 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:22,800 Speaker 1: and you know what I'm what I took from this 313 00:15:23,040 --> 00:15:25,840 Speaker 1: is that the choice of you know, how to organize 314 00:15:25,840 --> 00:15:29,560 Speaker 1: your adult work hours should be mostly about what is 315 00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:31,840 Speaker 1: going to work for the family overall. And I think 316 00:15:31,880 --> 00:15:35,080 Speaker 1: we have this sense that we like start this conversation 317 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:37,160 Speaker 1: with what is the best for the baby, Like, let 318 00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:38,520 Speaker 1: me do the thing that's the best for the kid, 319 00:15:38,560 --> 00:15:40,760 Speaker 1: the best for the kid. And they said, well, there's 320 00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:43,400 Speaker 1: just like there's no best for the kid. They're like this, 321 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:46,120 Speaker 1: anything is fine. And so you need to figure out 322 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 1: what's best for your for your family, and one part 323 00:15:48,280 --> 00:15:49,880 Speaker 1: of that is budgeting. But one part of that is 324 00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:52,640 Speaker 1: what you want to do. So when I talk about this, 325 00:15:52,800 --> 00:15:55,600 Speaker 1: I say, you should think each person the family should 326 00:15:55,600 --> 00:15:57,400 Speaker 1: think about what do you want to do? Do you 327 00:15:57,440 --> 00:15:59,640 Speaker 1: want to work? Do not? Do not want to work? 328 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:03,000 Speaker 1: And as I've talked about this book with women, there 329 00:16:03,040 --> 00:16:05,600 Speaker 1: are a number of women who have told me it 330 00:16:05,760 --> 00:16:08,720 Speaker 1: never even occurred to me to ask that question. Like 331 00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:11,240 Speaker 1: when I was making a decision about whether to work 332 00:16:11,280 --> 00:16:12,840 Speaker 1: after I had a kid, it never occurred to me 333 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:14,920 Speaker 1: to think about whether I wanted to. But why is 334 00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:19,560 Speaker 1: parental preference view it as not relevant variable in so 335 00:16:19,680 --> 00:16:22,800 Speaker 1: much of this? I mean, I think it it's because 336 00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:27,280 Speaker 1: this has gotten wrapped up in this general you know, 337 00:16:27,960 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 1: modern approach to parenting. Their culture. Yeah, I trying to 338 00:16:32,520 --> 00:16:36,400 Speaker 1: like optimize, try our kids enjoy our lives. That's not 339 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:38,200 Speaker 1: what we're here for right now, right, I mean here 340 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:40,800 Speaker 1: for a podcast that serves to hopefully go against that. 341 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:43,640 Speaker 1: And I love that you're actually bringing numbers into that. 342 00:16:43,640 --> 00:16:46,560 Speaker 1: That's fascinating. Yeah. Yeah, And I personally enjoyed that you 343 00:16:46,600 --> 00:16:48,840 Speaker 1: looked at the marginal value of each extra hour with 344 00:16:48,920 --> 00:16:53,400 Speaker 1: your kids versus the marginal utility of like the sixth 345 00:16:53,440 --> 00:16:56,560 Speaker 1: hour with your kids is probably lower than the no. 346 00:16:56,600 --> 00:16:59,240 Speaker 1: But I mean, I think there is this this resistance 347 00:16:59,280 --> 00:17:01,960 Speaker 1: in their culture to to saying that, as particularly as 348 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:03,880 Speaker 1: a mom, but as a parent in general. Like people 349 00:17:03,960 --> 00:17:07,120 Speaker 1: don't somehow saying like, yeah, I have a job because 350 00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:09,080 Speaker 1: I like to have my job. I like it. I 351 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:11,239 Speaker 1: like to go to work. It's fun, I enjoy it. It 352 00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 1: It gives me fulfillment that is different from the fulfillment 353 00:17:13,640 --> 00:17:15,240 Speaker 1: I get from my kids. And I don't like my kids. 354 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:17,320 Speaker 1: I like my kids, they're great, they're the best. But 355 00:17:17,480 --> 00:17:19,800 Speaker 1: I also like my job. And I think we are 356 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:21,960 Speaker 1: we have become kind of resistant to saying that, and 357 00:17:21,960 --> 00:17:24,200 Speaker 1: we're kind of resistant to saying in the other direction too. 358 00:17:24,520 --> 00:17:26,399 Speaker 1: I think people who stay at home there's also a 359 00:17:26,440 --> 00:17:29,399 Speaker 1: resistance to saying, you know, I'm staying at home because 360 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:32,000 Speaker 1: I like that that's the thing that I enjoy doing, right, 361 00:17:32,040 --> 00:17:34,760 Speaker 1: now because there's so much resistance to saying that, it 362 00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:38,240 Speaker 1: ends up being much more fraud than it would be 363 00:17:38,280 --> 00:17:40,879 Speaker 1: in much more conflict driven than if everyone could just 364 00:17:40,880 --> 00:17:42,399 Speaker 1: be like, Yeah, I'm doing the thing that I want 365 00:17:42,760 --> 00:17:45,040 Speaker 1: that works for me. So of course maybe it isn't 366 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:46,840 Speaker 1: the thing that works for you because we're not the 367 00:17:46,840 --> 00:17:49,399 Speaker 1: same person, and that's fine. We could still be friends 368 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:53,119 Speaker 1: and not in the two tribes people, yeah, or the 369 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:57,359 Speaker 1: tribes split their the tribe tribes. So if you you know, 370 00:17:57,400 --> 00:18:00,840 Speaker 1: obviously if both parents are employed outside the home, then 371 00:18:00,920 --> 00:18:02,920 Speaker 1: childcare comes into this. There's probably going to need to 372 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:05,120 Speaker 1: be some sort of paid childcare. And you looked at 373 00:18:05,160 --> 00:18:08,119 Speaker 1: this too, so you know both the question of like 374 00:18:08,320 --> 00:18:11,639 Speaker 1: nanny and daycare and what makes good care for that? 375 00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:14,399 Speaker 1: Is there any negative outcomes for having done this? Are 376 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:17,240 Speaker 1: there positive outcomes for you know, putting your child in daycare? 377 00:18:17,320 --> 00:18:18,560 Speaker 1: So I wonder if you could talk a little bit 378 00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:22,560 Speaker 1: about that. Yeah, So I think again, like I'll say, 379 00:18:22,640 --> 00:18:24,520 Speaker 1: this is a hard thing to study because the kinds 380 00:18:24,560 --> 00:18:27,399 Speaker 1: of choices that people make about childcare are wrapped up 381 00:18:27,440 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 1: in other things that they that they do. But to 382 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:31,879 Speaker 1: the extent we have data, you know, I think what 383 00:18:31,920 --> 00:18:35,880 Speaker 1: it suggests is that there are maybe you know, daycare 384 00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:39,960 Speaker 1: very early on maybe has some small impacts on behavior, 385 00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:43,800 Speaker 1: and daycare later on has some those are small negative impacts, 386 00:18:43,880 --> 00:18:46,159 Speaker 1: and daycare later on has some small positive impacts on 387 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:49,080 Speaker 1: test scores. But all of these effects are small. When 388 00:18:49,080 --> 00:18:51,479 Speaker 1: you say early on, like in the first two it's 389 00:18:51,520 --> 00:18:53,520 Speaker 1: sort of in the first like eighteen months versus like 390 00:18:53,560 --> 00:18:57,280 Speaker 1: eighteen months to four and a half, okay, so so 391 00:18:57,440 --> 00:18:59,359 Speaker 1: sort of like yeah, the first year, year and a 392 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:02,600 Speaker 1: half versus the like slightly later period, but all of 393 00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:05,880 Speaker 1: those effects are really little. So like relative to other 394 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:09,199 Speaker 1: kinds of variation across kids, they're they're just not that 395 00:19:09,600 --> 00:19:14,080 Speaker 1: important in terms of size, and they're totally swamped by 396 00:19:14,160 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: home environment. So things like you know, how what is 397 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:20,640 Speaker 1: happening in your house is way, way, way, way more 398 00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:25,000 Speaker 1: important than the differences in childcare that you are having. 399 00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:27,520 Speaker 1: And so in some sense, you know that's again like boy, 400 00:19:27,560 --> 00:19:29,960 Speaker 1: it's really important to be a good parent. So maybe 401 00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:33,040 Speaker 1: that's more stressful, but there is a sort of less 402 00:19:33,040 --> 00:19:36,880 Speaker 1: stressful aspect of it that says that you're making these 403 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:40,040 Speaker 1: choices is not this is not the choice that is 404 00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:42,879 Speaker 1: going to make your kid smart. Or not smart or 405 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:45,240 Speaker 1: badly behaved or better behaved than So a lot of 406 00:19:45,280 --> 00:19:46,919 Speaker 1: it should be about again sort of what is going 407 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:49,399 Speaker 1: to work for your for your family. And then I 408 00:19:49,440 --> 00:19:51,480 Speaker 1: took a little bit about, you know, particularly in the 409 00:19:51,480 --> 00:19:53,320 Speaker 1: case of daycare, like how do you choose a good 410 00:19:54,080 --> 00:19:56,320 Speaker 1: like a good daycare? Like what is what does it 411 00:19:56,400 --> 00:19:58,879 Speaker 1: mean for a daycare to be to be good? Because 412 00:19:58,920 --> 00:20:02,240 Speaker 1: we do know that daycare quality or nanny quality as 413 00:20:02,280 --> 00:20:06,239 Speaker 1: measured and these studies, is associated with better outcomes. And 414 00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:11,919 Speaker 1: I try to be clear that quality is not like 415 00:20:12,119 --> 00:20:15,639 Speaker 1: organic snacks. And I think that's sometimes it's easy to 416 00:20:15,680 --> 00:20:17,520 Speaker 1: slip into the idea that like I should go to 417 00:20:17,640 --> 00:20:21,200 Speaker 1: the daycare with the fanciest stuff and the like. That's 418 00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:24,679 Speaker 1: probably correlated. But then ultimately, really what matters is like 419 00:20:24,720 --> 00:20:27,600 Speaker 1: an engaged caregiver who's paying attention to their kids and 420 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:31,280 Speaker 1: not you know, whether the I don't know whether there's 421 00:20:31,320 --> 00:20:35,359 Speaker 1: like a particular kind of blocks or something like that. Yeah, 422 00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:38,040 Speaker 1: any kind of blocks or any kind of blocks are fine, Yeah, exactly. 423 00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:41,960 Speaker 1: And so you mentioned these tiny effects, and that's looking 424 00:20:42,040 --> 00:20:46,560 Speaker 1: at daycare versus home with parent. What about home with nanny? No, 425 00:20:46,640 --> 00:20:49,240 Speaker 1: So that's looking at daycare versus home. So these these 426 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:52,120 Speaker 1: studies are are kind of limited, but that that statement 427 00:20:52,160 --> 00:20:57,159 Speaker 1: is looking at daycare versus home with caregiver, not the mom. Oh, 428 00:20:57,200 --> 00:20:59,160 Speaker 1: so that's daycare. So I try to sort of pull 429 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:01,320 Speaker 1: out this study that's looks at like so that could 430 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:03,119 Speaker 1: be a family member. So it's like a little tricky, 431 00:21:03,160 --> 00:21:05,720 Speaker 1: so it's not nanny's, but it could be a grandparent. 432 00:21:05,760 --> 00:21:08,280 Speaker 1: But I think it's it's distinctly not stay at home parent. 433 00:21:08,800 --> 00:21:12,280 Speaker 1: Got it interesting? Well, Sarah is particularly interested in your 434 00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 1: research on screen time. This This is something she brings 435 00:21:16,640 --> 00:21:19,159 Speaker 1: up a lot here. And you know your husband is 436 00:21:19,160 --> 00:21:20,920 Speaker 1: also an economist, and I know one of the studies 437 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:25,080 Speaker 1: you looked at in your book is one that he did. Correct. Yes, 438 00:21:25,280 --> 00:21:27,440 Speaker 1: it is a study. It is a study a television 439 00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:31,200 Speaker 1: exposure and kids, and so in that study, you know, 440 00:21:31,280 --> 00:21:33,640 Speaker 1: I think that the challenge in looking at things about 441 00:21:33,680 --> 00:21:35,080 Speaker 1: screen time. We can talk about how I think the 442 00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:37,199 Speaker 1: data in general is very poor, but you know, the 443 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:40,399 Speaker 1: challenge in looking even at something like TV exposure and 444 00:21:40,760 --> 00:21:44,440 Speaker 1: kids outcomes is that the kinds of kids who watch 445 00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:46,600 Speaker 1: more TV are from families that are different from the 446 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:48,600 Speaker 1: kinds of kids who watch less TV. And so it's 447 00:21:48,600 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 1: hard to know if it's the TV. So Jesse's paper 448 00:21:52,520 --> 00:21:54,399 Speaker 1: so if you want to study this and get some 449 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:58,480 Speaker 1: causal impact, you need to actually find some sort of 450 00:21:58,560 --> 00:22:01,240 Speaker 1: random or plausibly random variation and the amount of TV 451 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:03,120 Speaker 1: the kids watch. So what Jesse does is they look 452 00:22:03,320 --> 00:22:05,760 Speaker 1: at he and his co author look at when TV 453 00:22:05,920 --> 00:22:11,200 Speaker 1: was introduced in the nineteen fifties, and some places got 454 00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:13,360 Speaker 1: TV earlier than others. So there were some kids who 455 00:22:13,359 --> 00:22:16,280 Speaker 1: were exposed to TV for more of their like young childhood, 456 00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:18,240 Speaker 1: and some kids who are exposed for less. And when 457 00:22:18,280 --> 00:22:21,199 Speaker 1: they compare those those groups, it doesn't look like the 458 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:25,439 Speaker 1: TV is having negative impacts. Now, I think that's like 459 00:22:25,440 --> 00:22:28,119 Speaker 1: a very compelling argument. Their paper is very compelling on 460 00:22:28,160 --> 00:22:30,919 Speaker 1: the topic of TV in the nineteen fifties, which is 461 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:35,400 Speaker 1: maybe some has some relevance. Actually people watch more TV 462 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:37,760 Speaker 1: than you might expect given that there were like three channels, 463 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:41,960 Speaker 1: but it is it is probably not the answer to 464 00:22:42,080 --> 00:22:45,240 Speaker 1: like can my kids play iPad apps? Which I think 465 00:22:45,240 --> 00:22:47,840 Speaker 1: we don't have an answer too. That's fascinating. Yeah, it's 466 00:22:47,880 --> 00:22:49,960 Speaker 1: I mean even in the short time. So yeah, you 467 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:51,880 Speaker 1: asked of Lauren, I had kids, We've got kids, ranging 468 00:22:51,960 --> 00:22:55,000 Speaker 1: from how many kids we have between us seven, ranging 469 00:22:55,080 --> 00:22:58,560 Speaker 1: between eighteen months and twelve and even in the time 470 00:22:58,680 --> 00:23:01,600 Speaker 1: since my oldest who's now seven, was a baby, and 471 00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:04,240 Speaker 1: now I feel like the quote unquote rules have changed, 472 00:23:04,280 --> 00:23:05,880 Speaker 1: and then kind of knowing that there's not a lot 473 00:23:05,920 --> 00:23:08,920 Speaker 1: of substance behind those rules in the first place, Like again, 474 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:12,040 Speaker 1: being a pediatrician, sometimes I turn to AAP, but you know, 475 00:23:12,400 --> 00:23:14,640 Speaker 1: you have to also look at what's behind that, right, 476 00:23:14,640 --> 00:23:17,800 Speaker 1: because that's still just somebody's opinion summing up the quote 477 00:23:17,840 --> 00:23:21,399 Speaker 1: unquote data. Yea, and that's being looked at properly is 478 00:23:21,640 --> 00:23:23,840 Speaker 1: sometimes in question, Yeah, And I think in this case 479 00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:27,800 Speaker 1: it's not. It goes beyond like maybe their understanding of 480 00:23:28,160 --> 00:23:30,119 Speaker 1: the data isn't isn't that good, but just that there 481 00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:32,280 Speaker 1: isn't a lot of data. So if you want to know, 482 00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:35,560 Speaker 1: like what's the impact of these kind of frequent screen phones, 483 00:23:35,640 --> 00:23:38,959 Speaker 1: iPads whatever on like high school graduation, well, there's like 484 00:23:39,280 --> 00:23:41,120 Speaker 1: no way we could ever know that because the kids 485 00:23:41,119 --> 00:23:43,760 Speaker 1: who are graduating from high school now are are We're 486 00:23:43,800 --> 00:23:46,640 Speaker 1: not exposed to screens as little kids, and so we're 487 00:23:46,680 --> 00:23:52,480 Speaker 1: sort of relying on an expert opinion about these topics, 488 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:56,199 Speaker 1: which has some value, and I think that is it 489 00:23:56,320 --> 00:23:58,719 Speaker 1: sort of has to be the case that having your 490 00:23:58,760 --> 00:24:02,400 Speaker 1: kid watch nine hours TV a day is bad because 491 00:24:02,560 --> 00:24:05,320 Speaker 1: there wouldn't be any other time to do stuff. And 492 00:24:05,480 --> 00:24:07,760 Speaker 1: you know, similarly, having your three year old stay up 493 00:24:07,800 --> 00:24:10,080 Speaker 1: late at night playing Xbox games instead of sleeping, we 494 00:24:10,119 --> 00:24:14,000 Speaker 1: can that's also not good. On the other hand, I 495 00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:16,399 Speaker 1: think the guidelines make it seem like if you have 496 00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:18,600 Speaker 1: your kid, your two year old watch a half an 497 00:24:18,640 --> 00:24:21,680 Speaker 1: hour of Kayu while you take a shower and make dinner, 498 00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:25,600 Speaker 1: that that's like, oh so terrible, And it seems much 499 00:24:25,720 --> 00:24:29,439 Speaker 1: less likely that the data supports that conclusion. Yeah. I 500 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:32,480 Speaker 1: actually the moment that I finally was like I'm no 501 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:34,760 Speaker 1: longer listening to this was when Well suggested that parents 502 00:24:34,800 --> 00:24:37,679 Speaker 1: need to watch along with theirs. I'm not watching is 503 00:24:37,880 --> 00:24:40,119 Speaker 1: one time you get a break, like I'm not gonna 504 00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:42,600 Speaker 1: sit there and watch Bears Seem Bears or Kayu or 505 00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:45,600 Speaker 1: whatever like that is no. No, I will say. My 506 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:48,639 Speaker 1: husband is actually this is like his dream because there 507 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:50,760 Speaker 1: are so many My kids are now old enough that 508 00:24:50,800 --> 00:24:55,760 Speaker 1: they both like to watch like animated shows like made 509 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:58,440 Speaker 1: for you know, seven year olds. But that's like that's 510 00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:02,080 Speaker 1: his thing. So they've been watching like Shira. There's like 511 00:25:02,119 --> 00:25:05,359 Speaker 1: a Shia reboot on Netflix, and so he just like 512 00:25:05,400 --> 00:25:07,480 Speaker 1: sits like for TV time, Like I'm like, I'm gonna 513 00:25:07,480 --> 00:25:09,400 Speaker 1: go upstairs the hand glass of wine. I'm gonna make dinner, 514 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:10,720 Speaker 1: like it's gonna be read. But you like, he's like, 515 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:12,600 Speaker 1: he's like, this is so creticve to like stay with 516 00:25:12,600 --> 00:25:14,480 Speaker 1: the kids on the couch and watch her. So it's great, 517 00:25:14,720 --> 00:25:16,359 Speaker 1: but it's not because he if you told them to it, 518 00:25:17,160 --> 00:25:19,199 Speaker 1: because he loves Shira. And then they ran out of 519 00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:21,200 Speaker 1: Shara and the kids started watching a show called p 520 00:25:21,400 --> 00:25:24,000 Speaker 1: J Mask. Oh my kids love that. Yeah, and Jesse 521 00:25:24,200 --> 00:25:26,639 Speaker 1: was like, no, I'm not going to work. What was 522 00:25:26,680 --> 00:25:29,080 Speaker 1: the station? Check out power? Rightow? I bet they'd like 523 00:25:29,119 --> 00:25:35,000 Speaker 1: it's like the Netron. We're onto Vultron. Also, yeah, I know. 524 00:25:35,520 --> 00:25:39,440 Speaker 1: So what happens when you have two parents who are economists? 525 00:25:39,920 --> 00:25:42,240 Speaker 1: I think I was. I laughed so hard when I 526 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:46,000 Speaker 1: saw that you too communicate via task management software of 527 00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:51,199 Speaker 1: the asana whatever it is. So, how did we actually 528 00:25:51,359 --> 00:25:53,280 Speaker 1: tell us how it came to be and also actually 529 00:25:53,359 --> 00:25:56,520 Speaker 1: give our listeners a flavor of those exact logistics because 530 00:25:56,760 --> 00:26:00,080 Speaker 1: people always tell us they want those details right. So 531 00:26:00,080 --> 00:26:03,000 Speaker 1: so a sauna is a task management tool that I 532 00:26:03,119 --> 00:26:05,400 Speaker 1: use at work. Also I think it's sort of commonly 533 00:26:05,680 --> 00:26:07,960 Speaker 1: used it at work. And the idea is that, you know, 534 00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:12,320 Speaker 1: if there's a task so like buy new summer clothes 535 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:15,320 Speaker 1: for the children, one way you could approach that is, 536 00:26:15,359 --> 00:26:17,800 Speaker 1: you know, you could just say, like send an email like, hey, 537 00:26:17,840 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 1: you have to buy new summer clothes. Somebody has to 538 00:26:19,560 --> 00:26:21,800 Speaker 1: buy new summer clothes for the kids. And in a 539 00:26:21,880 --> 00:26:23,760 Speaker 1: task like that, it might be okay to send an email, 540 00:26:23,840 --> 00:26:25,680 Speaker 1: but you know what if there's a lot of discussion 541 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:28,640 Speaker 1: like well, which you know, what do they need and 542 00:26:28,680 --> 00:26:30,440 Speaker 1: like did you talk to them about it? And did 543 00:26:30,440 --> 00:26:32,359 Speaker 1: you do the review of the existing clothes and do 544 00:26:32,400 --> 00:26:34,400 Speaker 1: we have any leftover clothes or in Penelope they still 545 00:26:34,440 --> 00:26:37,639 Speaker 1: fit thin. You know, like there's some topics and it 546 00:26:38,080 --> 00:26:41,080 Speaker 1: fills up your inbox and you also then maybe you 547 00:26:41,119 --> 00:26:43,080 Speaker 1: can't find it. What if the person starts a new 548 00:26:43,160 --> 00:26:45,680 Speaker 1: thread with like links to the things that they bought, 549 00:26:45,760 --> 00:26:47,720 Speaker 1: that's not very helpful. Then you're like trying to get 550 00:26:47,720 --> 00:26:50,000 Speaker 1: your emails altogether. This is the reason people use task 551 00:26:50,040 --> 00:26:53,960 Speaker 1: management products at work, and so we we use them 552 00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:55,680 Speaker 1: at our house. So we have so we like log 553 00:26:55,720 --> 00:26:57,440 Speaker 1: onto a Sana and you open a task it says 554 00:26:57,480 --> 00:27:00,760 Speaker 1: like review, you know, review summer clothing, and then people 555 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:02,800 Speaker 1: can comment like I looked it through the clothes and 556 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:04,720 Speaker 1: she only has two pairs of shorts and you know, 557 00:27:04,800 --> 00:27:07,760 Speaker 1: I'm going to order these shorts and I'm ordering these things. 558 00:27:07,800 --> 00:27:09,760 Speaker 1: And then the other person say, well, what about like 559 00:27:09,880 --> 00:27:11,720 Speaker 1: what about the shorts that I left in the closet 560 00:27:11,760 --> 00:27:14,400 Speaker 1: from last year? And you know, you can like you've 561 00:27:14,440 --> 00:27:16,400 Speaker 1: thread and then when you're done, you can click complete 562 00:27:16,440 --> 00:27:18,359 Speaker 1: and then you feel like you've gotten something done. I 563 00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:21,879 Speaker 1: think I'd really like the complete button. That's a complete comment. 564 00:27:21,960 --> 00:27:23,719 Speaker 1: But I mean, I think this is this is like 565 00:27:23,800 --> 00:27:26,199 Speaker 1: part of the general thing where I think that we 566 00:27:26,240 --> 00:27:29,359 Speaker 1: don't always take the lessons from our work into our house, 567 00:27:29,480 --> 00:27:31,879 Speaker 1: even though sometimes we even though there is like an 568 00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:35,199 Speaker 1: element of management in parenting that is not dissimilar from 569 00:27:35,240 --> 00:27:37,080 Speaker 1: the element of management that you have at work. And 570 00:27:37,119 --> 00:27:40,320 Speaker 1: you guys are actual colleagues though, right, I mean you're yeah, 571 00:27:41,640 --> 00:27:45,080 Speaker 1: we are actual colleagues in the same department. Well, many 572 00:27:45,160 --> 00:27:47,959 Speaker 1: questions about that. I mean, one sort of we do 573 00:27:48,040 --> 00:27:51,040 Speaker 1: have definitely academic listeners and the question of going on 574 00:27:51,080 --> 00:27:54,280 Speaker 1: the job market to gather what that was like, because 575 00:27:54,280 --> 00:27:56,439 Speaker 1: I'm sure that the search was with then you know, 576 00:27:56,600 --> 00:27:58,960 Speaker 1: very sort of different than if it's you know, one 577 00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:02,040 Speaker 1: party doing that. But also then what that leads to 578 00:28:02,040 --> 00:28:04,240 Speaker 1: in terms of how you guys split things in terms 579 00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:06,320 Speaker 1: of parenting. I mean, given that you have again the 580 00:28:06,400 --> 00:28:10,719 Speaker 1: exact same job, that probably changes the discussion versus in 581 00:28:10,760 --> 00:28:14,439 Speaker 1: many couples. Yeah, so I think, you know, in the 582 00:28:14,560 --> 00:28:16,600 Speaker 1: job market case, I think we're sort of lucky to 583 00:28:16,600 --> 00:28:18,719 Speaker 1: be in a field where it is not there are 584 00:28:18,760 --> 00:28:21,240 Speaker 1: a lot of jobs, so I think if you you know, 585 00:28:21,320 --> 00:28:25,840 Speaker 1: and is not uncommon for universities or departments to be 586 00:28:25,920 --> 00:28:29,199 Speaker 1: hiring more than one person in the same hiring cycle. 587 00:28:29,640 --> 00:28:32,119 Speaker 1: And so we did go on the job market together twice, 588 00:28:32,160 --> 00:28:35,240 Speaker 1: once for junior jobs and once for senior jobs. And 589 00:28:35,640 --> 00:28:38,080 Speaker 1: you know it like getting a job is stressful, getting 590 00:28:38,080 --> 00:28:40,320 Speaker 1: two jobs is more stressful. And I think there are 591 00:28:40,360 --> 00:28:43,239 Speaker 1: a lot of particularly in the senior job search, there 592 00:28:43,240 --> 00:28:46,720 Speaker 1: were some you know, trade offs between what was best 593 00:28:46,760 --> 00:28:48,600 Speaker 1: for each person, but I think in the end they 594 00:28:48,640 --> 00:28:51,000 Speaker 1: worked out it worked at good and we're lucky to 595 00:28:51,000 --> 00:28:52,120 Speaker 1: be in the same place and in a place that 596 00:28:52,160 --> 00:28:54,600 Speaker 1: we really that we really like. It's been super supportive. 597 00:28:55,120 --> 00:28:58,680 Speaker 1: I think splitting stuff in your house is is tricky. 598 00:28:59,320 --> 00:29:03,000 Speaker 1: I do more more parenting than my husband does, and 599 00:29:03,400 --> 00:29:07,240 Speaker 1: I think that is mostly taste. Actually, so I think 600 00:29:07,280 --> 00:29:09,920 Speaker 1: that that is mostly that I like it, not that 601 00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:11,560 Speaker 1: I like it more that it's not the way I 602 00:29:11,600 --> 00:29:13,440 Speaker 1: would put it, but that I have a higher taste 603 00:29:13,480 --> 00:29:16,520 Speaker 1: for time with the kids, like more hours of the day. 604 00:29:17,080 --> 00:29:19,440 Speaker 1: And then you know, so, but I think that we 605 00:29:19,440 --> 00:29:24,360 Speaker 1: we try to split things, like you know, who's responsible 606 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:27,200 Speaker 1: if somebody is if the childcare is sick. We try 607 00:29:27,240 --> 00:29:29,880 Speaker 1: to we try to balance that a little bit. And 608 00:29:30,040 --> 00:29:31,920 Speaker 1: you know, the other thing that happens is that like 609 00:29:31,960 --> 00:29:35,200 Speaker 1: sometimes one person is really is more busy than the other. 610 00:29:35,440 --> 00:29:37,600 Speaker 1: So the last several weeks, as I have been promoting 611 00:29:37,600 --> 00:29:39,720 Speaker 1: this book, I have been super busy and I have 612 00:29:39,800 --> 00:29:41,440 Speaker 1: been away a lot, and he has been doing a 613 00:29:41,440 --> 00:29:44,320 Speaker 1: lot of additional additional parenting. And he learned to make 614 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:49,320 Speaker 1: the lunches, which is not been that successful, but everyone 615 00:29:49,360 --> 00:29:55,640 Speaker 1: has been eating, so it's good. I want to ask 616 00:29:55,640 --> 00:29:58,320 Speaker 1: for details, but I'm going to restrain exactly what I 617 00:29:58,600 --> 00:30:02,240 Speaker 1: want to It's not that complicated to make the lunches. 618 00:30:02,280 --> 00:30:05,200 Speaker 1: But my kids I have my kids are unfortunately very 619 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:08,520 Speaker 1: very specific about what they want. And so the first 620 00:30:08,520 --> 00:30:10,160 Speaker 1: time I would just tell you, like the first time 621 00:30:10,160 --> 00:30:11,720 Speaker 1: I did it, he spent forty five minutes in the 622 00:30:11,760 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 1: morning making the lunches. Okay, I just it's not like 623 00:30:13,880 --> 00:30:16,440 Speaker 1: a displayed Vento box. Okay, it's a small amount of 624 00:30:16,480 --> 00:30:20,040 Speaker 1: like frozen vegetables and a bagel. And and my daughter 625 00:30:20,120 --> 00:30:23,000 Speaker 1: came home and she was like, Mom, he put way 626 00:30:23,040 --> 00:30:25,000 Speaker 1: too much jam. Didn't you tell him not to put 627 00:30:25,040 --> 00:30:26,280 Speaker 1: a lot of jam on the bil? I was like, yeah, 628 00:30:26,280 --> 00:30:27,840 Speaker 1: I actually did. I put in the notes don't put 629 00:30:27,880 --> 00:30:29,880 Speaker 1: a lot of jam on the bagel. And then she's like, 630 00:30:30,200 --> 00:30:31,400 Speaker 1: you have to look at this. You have to look 631 00:30:31,440 --> 00:30:32,800 Speaker 1: at this. And she like takes out her thing and 632 00:30:32,840 --> 00:30:36,000 Speaker 1: she's like wiped off the jam with her with her napkin. 633 00:30:36,040 --> 00:30:38,120 Speaker 1: And then she's like saved the nag. But she can 634 00:30:38,280 --> 00:30:42,800 Speaker 1: tell me it was like too much jam, too much jam, 635 00:30:42,880 --> 00:30:45,960 Speaker 1: you know, too much jam. He didn't read the notes. 636 00:30:47,320 --> 00:30:50,960 Speaker 1: He did read? Was that an enough? No? No, just 637 00:30:51,000 --> 00:30:53,160 Speaker 1: that I just that was just and and I had 638 00:30:53,160 --> 00:30:56,880 Speaker 1: written I emailed him that clearly in the task management software. 639 00:30:56,960 --> 00:30:58,320 Speaker 1: Yeah it needed to be No, he needed to be 640 00:30:58,320 --> 00:31:02,280 Speaker 1: able to provide feedback. It's totally right, exactly well and 641 00:31:02,920 --> 00:31:04,959 Speaker 1: just to I mean, one of the things that I 642 00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:06,680 Speaker 1: loved it the last chapter you talk about some of 643 00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:09,320 Speaker 1: the best parenting advice you ever got, which was from 644 00:31:09,800 --> 00:31:13,240 Speaker 1: your pediatrician when you guys were in Chicago. Maybe you 645 00:31:13,240 --> 00:31:15,560 Speaker 1: could tell listeners that story. You were you were very 646 00:31:15,560 --> 00:31:17,680 Speaker 1: worked up about, you know, a trip to France you 647 00:31:17,680 --> 00:31:20,719 Speaker 1: were taking with with your daughter. Yeah, so we uh 648 00:31:21,040 --> 00:31:24,200 Speaker 1: so we were we were going to France and my 649 00:31:24,280 --> 00:31:26,440 Speaker 1: daughter was almost two and we had come. We used 650 00:31:26,440 --> 00:31:28,760 Speaker 1: to come to our pediatrician visits with these like long 651 00:31:28,800 --> 00:31:30,719 Speaker 1: lists of questions that we would have. I don't think 652 00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:32,479 Speaker 1: with my second kid, I never have any questions. Can 653 00:31:32,680 --> 00:31:35,200 Speaker 1: be all these questions, And in this one it was like, Okay, 654 00:31:35,440 --> 00:31:37,760 Speaker 1: we're going to France and this place that we're going 655 00:31:37,800 --> 00:31:40,400 Speaker 1: and has a lot of bees, and I'm she's never 656 00:31:40,440 --> 00:31:42,440 Speaker 1: been sung, and I'm afraid that she's gonna get stung 657 00:31:42,760 --> 00:31:44,640 Speaker 1: and if she gets stung, we're kind of far. It's 658 00:31:44,680 --> 00:31:46,960 Speaker 1: really isolated, and like what are we going to do? 659 00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:49,120 Speaker 1: And like what you know, like should I take an EpiPen? 660 00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:51,160 Speaker 1: Should we test her in advance? I had this whole 661 00:31:51,160 --> 00:31:53,400 Speaker 1: like series of different plans that we like, different levels 662 00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:55,680 Speaker 1: of planning that we could engage in to deal with 663 00:31:55,720 --> 00:31:58,640 Speaker 1: this major problem. And I sort of finished my like 664 00:31:58,720 --> 00:32:02,040 Speaker 1: hyped up story and doctor Lee is like a very 665 00:32:02,040 --> 00:32:05,200 Speaker 1: calm person. She just looks at me and she sort 666 00:32:05,200 --> 00:32:08,280 Speaker 1: of nods her head and she's like, yeah, I would 667 00:32:08,320 --> 00:32:11,080 Speaker 1: just try not to think about that, And it was 668 00:32:11,160 --> 00:32:13,840 Speaker 1: like it was it's sort of that moment where you realize, 669 00:32:13,880 --> 00:32:17,400 Speaker 1: like I am being insane, like this is you know, 670 00:32:17,440 --> 00:32:19,800 Speaker 1: and she's edited in like a super nice way. She 671 00:32:19,840 --> 00:32:21,640 Speaker 1: doesn't like, get out of my office. You're weird, though, 672 00:32:21,920 --> 00:32:24,320 Speaker 1: But I think it did highlight and I think about 673 00:32:24,360 --> 00:32:27,800 Speaker 1: that all the time in these points of parenting where 674 00:32:28,080 --> 00:32:31,840 Speaker 1: you're just you get really worked off about some little 675 00:32:32,160 --> 00:32:36,240 Speaker 1: tiny thing and it's not important and there's there's nothing 676 00:32:36,280 --> 00:32:38,680 Speaker 1: you can do about it, Like you can't you can't 677 00:32:38,720 --> 00:32:41,680 Speaker 1: control that. There are so many things in your parenting 678 00:32:41,720 --> 00:32:43,840 Speaker 1: that you wish you could control, but you can't, and 679 00:32:43,880 --> 00:32:45,239 Speaker 1: you have to just let it go a little bit. 680 00:32:45,240 --> 00:32:47,560 Speaker 1: And I think that that's I try to think about 681 00:32:47,720 --> 00:32:49,600 Speaker 1: just you know, okay, just try not to think about that, 682 00:32:49,640 --> 00:32:51,240 Speaker 1: and it's probably going to be fine. And if there's 683 00:32:51,280 --> 00:32:53,080 Speaker 1: something bad happens, we'll you know, we'll work on it 684 00:32:53,320 --> 00:32:56,520 Speaker 1: when it happens. That's great advice. Well, I think this 685 00:32:56,520 --> 00:32:59,000 Speaker 1: brings us to our Love of the Week segment where 686 00:32:59,200 --> 00:33:01,680 Speaker 1: we talk about something that's really working out well for 687 00:33:01,800 --> 00:33:04,040 Speaker 1: us this week or that we're enjoying. So Sarah and 688 00:33:04,120 --> 00:33:05,800 Speaker 1: I can go first to Emily so to give you 689 00:33:05,840 --> 00:33:08,360 Speaker 1: time to think about it. So, Sarah, what do you 690 00:33:08,440 --> 00:33:11,440 Speaker 1: have for us this week? Mind sort of a strategy 691 00:33:11,520 --> 00:33:13,400 Speaker 1: which is that if you have an item that you 692 00:33:13,480 --> 00:33:16,400 Speaker 1: need you can, and it's not a terribly expensive item, 693 00:33:16,440 --> 00:33:18,880 Speaker 1: but you need it in different places, should just buy 694 00:33:19,080 --> 00:33:21,840 Speaker 1: multiple of that item. Because I bought my headphones the 695 00:33:21,840 --> 00:33:24,280 Speaker 1: ones i'm wearing now. They're like fifteen bucks, and I 696 00:33:24,320 --> 00:33:26,040 Speaker 1: would always scramble for them when we had to record 697 00:33:26,080 --> 00:33:27,760 Speaker 1: our podcast, and I was like, why don't I just 698 00:33:27,840 --> 00:33:31,040 Speaker 1: buy one and keep it with my microphone? So yes, 699 00:33:31,120 --> 00:33:36,400 Speaker 1: I'm in love with the convenient headphones. Mine is a 700 00:33:36,440 --> 00:33:39,320 Speaker 1: statistical one, which was I was reminded of with reading 701 00:33:39,400 --> 00:33:41,760 Speaker 1: Emily's book when you talk about so you know, we 702 00:33:41,760 --> 00:33:43,960 Speaker 1: always get wrapped up in these studies where like you know, 703 00:33:44,000 --> 00:33:46,640 Speaker 1: it doubles your risk of whatever to do this and 704 00:33:46,680 --> 00:33:49,280 Speaker 1: you're looking at it, it's often extremely small numbers, like 705 00:33:49,320 --> 00:33:52,400 Speaker 1: it goes from you know, point oh one in one 706 00:33:52,480 --> 00:33:55,320 Speaker 1: thousand to point oh two in one thousand. So yes, 707 00:33:55,360 --> 00:34:00,000 Speaker 1: it did double, but you know we're still talking relatively small. Absolutely, 708 00:34:00,440 --> 00:34:02,640 Speaker 1: So there was this fascinating number I saw in terms 709 00:34:02,640 --> 00:34:07,880 Speaker 1: of health economics, the number needed to treat I love that, yeah, 710 00:34:08,040 --> 00:34:11,800 Speaker 1: because how many people would have to do this intervention 711 00:34:11,880 --> 00:34:15,400 Speaker 1: in order to prevent one adverse event? And so you 712 00:34:15,440 --> 00:34:17,040 Speaker 1: looked at it in terms of, like, you know, how 713 00:34:17,080 --> 00:34:19,279 Speaker 1: many families would have to co sleep for there to 714 00:34:19,320 --> 00:34:23,160 Speaker 1: be one additional adverse event. It was something like ten thousand. 715 00:34:23,360 --> 00:34:26,360 Speaker 1: I mean it's not a small number, and you know, 716 00:34:26,440 --> 00:34:29,560 Speaker 1: same as like various drug interventions, like you know, okay, 717 00:34:29,920 --> 00:34:32,960 Speaker 1: fifty thousand people have to take this drug over and 718 00:34:33,000 --> 00:34:36,520 Speaker 1: over again and we will prevent one incidence of this. 719 00:34:36,640 --> 00:34:40,879 Speaker 1: And it's just a totally different statistic and makes it 720 00:34:41,080 --> 00:34:43,880 Speaker 1: so much less likely that you will go with whatever 721 00:34:43,960 --> 00:34:46,640 Speaker 1: that is versus saying, oh, it doubles your risk. So 722 00:34:47,160 --> 00:34:50,440 Speaker 1: I enjoy looking at it from that side as well. 723 00:34:50,680 --> 00:34:53,799 Speaker 1: So I will tell you the sort of fun thing 724 00:34:53,840 --> 00:34:56,720 Speaker 1: that is happening, a fun, nice thing that made me happy, 725 00:34:56,760 --> 00:34:59,400 Speaker 1: which is that my daughter has been asking for a dog, 726 00:35:00,200 --> 00:35:04,160 Speaker 1: which I don't want right now because there's a lot 727 00:35:04,160 --> 00:35:05,799 Speaker 1: of other things, and she asks for it every day 728 00:35:05,840 --> 00:35:09,480 Speaker 1: and I find it, you know, annoying, and so I've 729 00:35:09,480 --> 00:35:11,520 Speaker 1: told her to ask my husband, and so she started 730 00:35:11,520 --> 00:35:15,879 Speaker 1: asking him r every day, and then yesterday he told 731 00:35:15,920 --> 00:35:18,960 Speaker 1: the kids that instead we could get venus fly traps, 732 00:35:19,520 --> 00:35:23,480 Speaker 1: and they were incredibly excited. And it's like taken on, 733 00:35:23,640 --> 00:35:26,080 Speaker 1: I would say, it's it's about as exciting as a 734 00:35:26,120 --> 00:35:28,840 Speaker 1: dog would be. And they're making plans for their venus 735 00:35:28,840 --> 00:35:30,760 Speaker 1: fly traps, and a venus fly traps just a plant. 736 00:35:30,880 --> 00:35:33,120 Speaker 1: It's just a plant, and so you know, it's gonna 737 00:35:33,160 --> 00:35:35,160 Speaker 1: we're just gonna have it. And it's not a dog, 738 00:35:35,239 --> 00:35:36,640 Speaker 1: and I'm not gonna have to do anything to it. 739 00:35:37,040 --> 00:35:38,839 Speaker 1: And I'm just really pleased that my kids are still 740 00:35:38,880 --> 00:35:42,040 Speaker 1: young enough that they can be dissuaded from their desire 741 00:35:42,120 --> 00:35:45,480 Speaker 1: for a dog by a plant. That's awesome. And yes, 742 00:35:45,560 --> 00:35:47,160 Speaker 1: that to me, I would definitely go for the venus 743 00:35:47,160 --> 00:35:50,160 Speaker 1: fly trap over the dog. We've had one before. They 744 00:35:50,200 --> 00:35:52,200 Speaker 1: actually they keep, you know, they catch. That's good and 745 00:35:52,200 --> 00:35:54,520 Speaker 1: that's a good thing to help. Yeah, amazing, Well, Emily, 746 00:35:54,560 --> 00:35:56,319 Speaker 1: thanks so much for coming on the program. We were 747 00:35:56,320 --> 00:35:59,120 Speaker 1: so glad you could make the time to do this. Yeah, 748 00:35:59,160 --> 00:36:01,480 Speaker 1: thank you guys so much for there and so for 749 00:36:01,560 --> 00:36:04,920 Speaker 1: our listeners again. Her book is Cribsheet, a data driven 750 00:36:04,960 --> 00:36:08,400 Speaker 1: guide to better more relaxed parenting from Birth to Preschool, 751 00:36:08,400 --> 00:36:13,440 Speaker 1: So please check that out well. Today's question comes from 752 00:36:13,680 --> 00:36:17,080 Speaker 1: somebody who says she worked as a research scientist for 753 00:36:17,120 --> 00:36:19,360 Speaker 1: a decade and then moved into the tech field for 754 00:36:19,440 --> 00:36:22,799 Speaker 1: data analytics about two years ago, and she's asking about 755 00:36:22,800 --> 00:36:26,319 Speaker 1: the transition between academia and industry and how this has 756 00:36:26,360 --> 00:36:28,359 Speaker 1: played out in how she uses her time. She says, 757 00:36:28,400 --> 00:36:31,919 Speaker 1: in academia, years are spent gathering information, then a few 758 00:36:31,960 --> 00:36:35,040 Speaker 1: months summarizing culminating in a paper or grant. As I 759 00:36:35,080 --> 00:36:37,600 Speaker 1: switched into working at tech companies, most of the deliverables 760 00:36:37,640 --> 00:36:39,840 Speaker 1: are based on a four to six week work cycle, 761 00:36:40,200 --> 00:36:43,680 Speaker 1: and she's found that she over researches and over prepares, 762 00:36:44,000 --> 00:36:46,480 Speaker 1: so once, for instance, she put together a technical report, 763 00:36:46,520 --> 00:36:49,320 Speaker 1: then spent days making an hour long presentation to present 764 00:36:49,360 --> 00:36:51,480 Speaker 1: to the team, only to find out I'd only have 765 00:36:51,560 --> 00:36:53,640 Speaker 1: the floor for the first fifteen minutes of a meeting. 766 00:36:54,160 --> 00:36:56,719 Speaker 1: Nobody speaks for an hour straight. Ever, I was used 767 00:36:56,760 --> 00:36:58,919 Speaker 1: to filling an hour usually by preparing for one hundred 768 00:36:58,960 --> 00:37:01,040 Speaker 1: and twenty five percent of that seminar then cutting down 769 00:37:01,080 --> 00:37:04,360 Speaker 1: to size. She says, aside from asking questions about the 770 00:37:04,400 --> 00:37:07,160 Speaker 1: size of deliberals, which she figured out on her own, 771 00:37:07,320 --> 00:37:09,319 Speaker 1: as would be a good thing to ask, how do 772 00:37:09,360 --> 00:37:12,839 Speaker 1: I avoid exhaustively exploring many branches, even if I can 773 00:37:12,880 --> 00:37:17,040 Speaker 1: sometimes make an exciting paradigm changing finding. She mentioned that 774 00:37:17,160 --> 00:37:19,480 Speaker 1: something I had written in the past. She mentioned that 775 00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:21,440 Speaker 1: as you progressed as a writer, you learn to scale 776 00:37:21,480 --> 00:37:23,720 Speaker 1: your research and work to the size of the article. 777 00:37:23,760 --> 00:37:26,160 Speaker 1: So if somebody assigns me a four thousand word article, 778 00:37:26,480 --> 00:37:28,520 Speaker 1: I do a different amount of research than if they 779 00:37:28,560 --> 00:37:30,799 Speaker 1: assign me an eight hundred word article, and that you 780 00:37:30,840 --> 00:37:33,520 Speaker 1: sort of learn how much fits this space. She says, well, 781 00:37:33,560 --> 00:37:39,080 Speaker 1: what helped you learn that skill? So time, trial and error. 782 00:37:39,120 --> 00:37:42,680 Speaker 1: I don't know that there's any better answer to that. 783 00:37:43,120 --> 00:37:45,840 Speaker 1: Time estimation is hard and general. I mean, this is 784 00:37:45,880 --> 00:37:48,160 Speaker 1: not just a challenge for people who switch careers, though 785 00:37:48,200 --> 00:37:50,759 Speaker 1: it's definitely a challenge for people who switch careers. But 786 00:37:50,800 --> 00:37:53,759 Speaker 1: there are people who drive to work every single day, 787 00:37:53,840 --> 00:37:55,680 Speaker 1: and in their mind it takes thirty minutes, and it 788 00:37:55,719 --> 00:37:58,520 Speaker 1: doesn't it takes forty five, because in their mind it's like, well, 789 00:37:58,600 --> 00:38:01,200 Speaker 1: once it took thirty, Like I guess when you drove 790 00:38:01,239 --> 00:38:03,680 Speaker 1: to work at five am or something, But every other 791 00:38:03,760 --> 00:38:06,000 Speaker 1: time you're driving at eight when there's more people on 792 00:38:06,040 --> 00:38:08,200 Speaker 1: the road, and it actually takes forty five minutes, and 793 00:38:08,480 --> 00:38:11,680 Speaker 1: you'd be amazed how many people haven't quite figured this out. So, 794 00:38:11,880 --> 00:38:13,480 Speaker 1: I mean, one of the reasons I do tell people 795 00:38:13,560 --> 00:38:16,200 Speaker 1: to track time is that it gives you a better 796 00:38:16,239 --> 00:38:18,759 Speaker 1: sense of how long things actually take. Like it's very 797 00:38:18,800 --> 00:38:21,360 Speaker 1: difficult to look at a spreadsheet where every day it 798 00:38:21,360 --> 00:38:22,960 Speaker 1: takes you forty five minutes, see it's to work, and 799 00:38:23,000 --> 00:38:25,200 Speaker 1: continue to tell yourself that it takes thirty. I mean, 800 00:38:25,200 --> 00:38:27,239 Speaker 1: you could try, but it's a lot more challenging to 801 00:38:27,280 --> 00:38:30,360 Speaker 1: have that cognitive dissonance there. So first, just you know, 802 00:38:30,400 --> 00:38:33,040 Speaker 1: paying attention to all these things that you'll learn, like 803 00:38:33,080 --> 00:38:35,040 Speaker 1: how much time do things take? Like how much time 804 00:38:35,040 --> 00:38:37,120 Speaker 1: does it take me to do a fifteen minute presentation 805 00:38:37,280 --> 00:38:40,920 Speaker 1: versus an hour presentation? How much time does it take 806 00:38:41,000 --> 00:38:45,200 Speaker 1: me to get you know, the amount of research that 807 00:38:45,239 --> 00:38:48,279 Speaker 1: would fit in this amount of space. But there's also 808 00:38:48,360 --> 00:38:50,840 Speaker 1: just a difference between being well prepared and over prepared. 809 00:38:50,840 --> 00:38:53,200 Speaker 1: And well prepared is great, like everybody loves people who 810 00:38:53,239 --> 00:38:55,799 Speaker 1: are well prepared. But since she's a scientist, I think 811 00:38:55,840 --> 00:38:57,960 Speaker 1: it might help to think in terms of probability. So 812 00:38:58,040 --> 00:39:01,000 Speaker 1: well prepared is probably thinking about in the ten to 813 00:39:01,120 --> 00:39:04,680 Speaker 1: ninetieth percentile of what might come up, right, So think 814 00:39:04,719 --> 00:39:08,520 Speaker 1: about you know, you know, maybe probably the guy will 815 00:39:08,560 --> 00:39:10,920 Speaker 1: ask me this. He probably won't, but there's a reasonable 816 00:39:10,960 --> 00:39:13,279 Speaker 1: likelihood he will ask me this. Let me come up 817 00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:15,319 Speaker 1: with that. But then you don't need to go out 818 00:39:15,360 --> 00:39:18,799 Speaker 1: to the point one percent probability of like, you know, well, 819 00:39:18,800 --> 00:39:21,960 Speaker 1: what if we, you know, launch a mission to Mars, 820 00:39:22,040 --> 00:39:24,520 Speaker 1: like how will our thing look? Then you know, that's 821 00:39:24,520 --> 00:39:26,799 Speaker 1: that's just not something you really need to concern yourself with. 822 00:39:27,400 --> 00:39:29,520 Speaker 1: So it's just part of part of the learning curve. 823 00:39:29,560 --> 00:39:32,719 Speaker 1: And then recognizing that you don't have to do everything. 824 00:39:33,000 --> 00:39:34,880 Speaker 1: Think about you know, ten to ninety percent. What do 825 00:39:34,880 --> 00:39:38,320 Speaker 1: you think, Sarah? Yeah, you know, I know this person 826 00:39:38,360 --> 00:39:40,760 Speaker 1: who wrote in kind of attributed to a job change, 827 00:39:40,840 --> 00:39:42,719 Speaker 1: and you gave her that grace. But I have a 828 00:39:42,960 --> 00:39:45,600 Speaker 1: feeling just from the way she writes this, then it 829 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:49,120 Speaker 1: may be just her nature to do a little more 830 00:39:49,480 --> 00:39:52,920 Speaker 1: than she needs to be doing, and we actually this 831 00:39:53,080 --> 00:39:54,480 Speaker 1: is giving around in time a bit. But we did 832 00:39:54,520 --> 00:39:56,719 Speaker 1: have a recent guest talk about how you know, over 833 00:39:56,760 --> 00:40:00,520 Speaker 1: conscientiousness can be a problem with women and as opposed 834 00:40:00,520 --> 00:40:03,120 Speaker 1: to men, Like there are actually studies that show that, like, 835 00:40:03,600 --> 00:40:07,200 Speaker 1: particularly in school, like, there's a tendency towards putting a 836 00:40:07,239 --> 00:40:11,080 Speaker 1: lot more in for incremental gains. You have more girls 837 00:40:11,120 --> 00:40:13,719 Speaker 1: trying to get like the ninety nine percent, where as 838 00:40:13,719 --> 00:40:15,439 Speaker 1: a boy might get a ninety five. I'd be like, great, 839 00:40:15,480 --> 00:40:18,960 Speaker 1: onto the next thing. So I guess I would caution 840 00:40:19,120 --> 00:40:22,480 Speaker 1: this person to try to challenge herself if she really 841 00:40:22,600 --> 00:40:26,120 Speaker 1: tends to fit in that overdoing it place, which again 842 00:40:26,160 --> 00:40:27,799 Speaker 1: I don't know for sure, but I sort of get 843 00:40:27,840 --> 00:40:30,440 Speaker 1: that sense. Even in the way she writes this email, 844 00:40:30,440 --> 00:40:33,000 Speaker 1: like there are so many specifics in it, it was 845 00:40:33,080 --> 00:40:36,799 Speaker 1: like like like I probably would have not spend as 846 00:40:36,880 --> 00:40:40,000 Speaker 1: much time writing the email as she did. Then figure 847 00:40:40,000 --> 00:40:42,680 Speaker 1: out how good the job needs to be, and maybe 848 00:40:42,680 --> 00:40:44,920 Speaker 1: go a little beyond that if that feels helps her 849 00:40:44,920 --> 00:40:46,799 Speaker 1: feel like she meets her standard. But try to make 850 00:40:46,840 --> 00:40:49,400 Speaker 1: sure that she's not going far far beyond that, because 851 00:40:49,400 --> 00:40:52,040 Speaker 1: that could be crippling and that could be inefficient and 852 00:40:52,120 --> 00:40:55,359 Speaker 1: nobody really gains anything. So I guess I think as 853 00:40:55,400 --> 00:40:57,560 Speaker 1: women and as people in general, if that's your tendency, 854 00:40:57,600 --> 00:41:00,160 Speaker 1: you probably need to be aware of it. Yeah, you 855 00:41:00,239 --> 00:41:02,640 Speaker 1: might look at what your colleagues are doing too to 856 00:41:02,719 --> 00:41:04,680 Speaker 1: pay attention to that, and you can decide to be 857 00:41:04,800 --> 00:41:06,960 Speaker 1: a little better than that in terms of preparation, but 858 00:41:07,000 --> 00:41:09,799 Speaker 1: not you know, in an entirely different realm, because then 859 00:41:09,840 --> 00:41:12,360 Speaker 1: it's just you know, wasting your time. And you know, 860 00:41:12,400 --> 00:41:14,239 Speaker 1: when you spend too much time on one thing, there 861 00:41:14,239 --> 00:41:17,080 Speaker 1: won't be time available to do something else because again, 862 00:41:17,120 --> 00:41:19,120 Speaker 1: there are only twenty four hours in a day. So 863 00:41:19,280 --> 00:41:22,440 Speaker 1: when you've massively over prepared for the hour long presentation 864 00:41:22,520 --> 00:41:25,440 Speaker 1: that's only fifteen minutes anyway, well, that means you weren't 865 00:41:25,480 --> 00:41:28,200 Speaker 1: doing something else. No, maybe it was sleeping, maybe it 866 00:41:28,239 --> 00:41:29,920 Speaker 1: was hanging out with your family and relaxing, but it's 867 00:41:29,920 --> 00:41:33,000 Speaker 1: also probably something work related you weren't getting to as well. 868 00:41:33,480 --> 00:41:35,080 Speaker 1: So you kind of got to keep your eyes on 869 00:41:35,120 --> 00:41:39,040 Speaker 1: the big prize and recognize that everything has a limit. 870 00:41:39,560 --> 00:41:42,320 Speaker 1: In general, as we say, done is better than perfect, 871 00:41:42,400 --> 00:41:45,640 Speaker 1: because there is no perfect without being done, and better 872 00:41:45,680 --> 00:41:48,759 Speaker 1: is the enemy of good. Better, Yes, exactly all right, Well, 873 00:41:48,800 --> 00:41:50,720 Speaker 1: this has been best of both worlds. We've been talking 874 00:41:50,719 --> 00:41:55,440 Speaker 1: with Emily Auster about data driven approaches to raising children. 875 00:41:55,719 --> 00:41:57,680 Speaker 1: We'll be back next week with more on making work 876 00:41:57,680 --> 00:42:03,520 Speaker 1: in life fit together. Thanks for listening. You can find 877 00:42:03,560 --> 00:42:06,960 Speaker 1: me Sarah at the shoebox dot com or at the 878 00:42:07,200 --> 00:42:11,200 Speaker 1: Underscore Shoebox on Instagram, and you can find me Laura 879 00:42:11,600 --> 00:42:14,920 Speaker 1: at Laura vandercam dot com. This has been the best 880 00:42:14,960 --> 00:42:18,480 Speaker 1: of both worlds podcasts. Please join us next time for 881 00:42:18,600 --> 00:42:20,960 Speaker 1: more on making work and life work together.