WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Clearing the Air

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Clubs. Are you ready for

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a Break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, Am bar Garcia, and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It is Wednesday, February tenth, twenty twenty one, Season sixteen,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>episode number ninety seven. Welcome to the latest edition of

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The Break. I'm live from that s WBC Mortgage studios

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at the start, and we are presented by Geico got

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick here with me in studio. We got David amber

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on remotely. We're gonna talk offense today. We've been talking

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>offense to the last couple of shows, but we're going

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to finish up that offensive review today, talking a little

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>bit about the offensive line and the tight end position.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>You'll also get to some fan questions. My hope is

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that we will be able to spend at least at

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>least an entire segment of the show on fan questions,

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because I know you guys always give me a hard

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>time because I usually don't get to questions. But hopefully

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll get a chance to do that here and get

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your questions out there and answer some

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of those questions before we get started today. I quickly

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to say something. I'm sure those of you

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>who are out there listening have seen all the stuff

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>about the hype video, and there's been a bunch of

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff out there, and I just wanted to say to

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys that are listening, and this is specifically for

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys, because the way I look at it is,

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're sitting on this podcast in February, you're the

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>people I'm most concerned about, Like you are our core customer,

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and you expect greatness from us. And I just wanted

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to say to you, guys, we've felled you in this instance.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>We will be better. We apologize, but we certainly will

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be better. And I want you guys to know, because

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I care about what you guys think, that we're going

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to be better. We're going to fix some things and

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll be better than this. And that's where I want

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to leave that. I did want to say, though, Nick,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>after last week's show, we had actually an interesting conversation

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>on DAK in last week's show. It probably took a

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more of the show than we even expected, because

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>you had a question that you wanted to throw out there,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and I think after the show, at least what you said,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw you put it on Twitter two that you

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>think people didn't really quite understand or get the full

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>brunt of what you were trying to say in your

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>question and what you were saying after that. I wanted

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to give you an opportunity to talk about that, and

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure I didn't understood what I was

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to say until later, until some of the Twitter

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say arguments, but just kind of the back

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and forth. So a lot of times on this show,

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>when when we say certain things, if you don't agree

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>with everyone, you get put in a different corner of like,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>well this is this is where your take is. There's

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>people that think that I hate Dak, or I'm a

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>dad hater or whatever. What I said was is is

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that that Dak has room to grow,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and we all think that way. So I'll just tell

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you right now where I stand, if there's any clarity,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this is where I stand about Dak Prescott. I think

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he is a really good quarterback. I think the Cowboys

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>should resign him. I think for sure that's what they

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>need to do. That's their best option for them to win.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>You were at you asked me where a lot of

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>people thought was funny. Who's the top five? But who's better?

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>That's irrelevant to me. I think he's somewhere between six

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and ten. But it doesn't matter. That's irrelevant. What's irrelevant

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is can the Cowboys? This is my biggest issue more

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>than with Dak. Can the Cowboys field a team around

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>him with a forty million a year contract? Because when

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he was making two they made one round of the

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and that was it. Last year thirty one million

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>they had where depth was a terrible issue for this team.

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Now he's got to make forty million a year. Can

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the pieces around him be better? Can the Cowboys constructed?

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Is he good enough to elevate this team? I only

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's three or four people ever that can do that.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So I have my concern if Dak Prescott is good

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 1>enough to elevate this franchise at forty million a year,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>because I haven't seen that they can draft consistently on fans,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that they can actually do anything in free agency to

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>help him. So that is my good concern. Is he

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>good enough to take this team up and be even

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>more elite? And that's my concern where I want him

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>on my team. Yes, I think he's a really good quarterback.

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a fantastic leader, and he's perfect for

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the face of the franchise. But for this particular franchise,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I do have my doubts that they can build a

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>team around him. I will say this real quick. The

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>only thing I have to say about that is I

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>do think that in spite of all that you just said,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he is their only hope. Like right now, when I

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>look at this team and you know, this game comes back.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I had a conversation with someone about this whole hype

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>video thing, and you know, again, I get it. I

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>understand how people are looking at this like how could

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this happen? Because quite frankly, I look at it and

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying the same thing. I'm looking at like how

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>did we get here? Because you look at it, and

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to me, there are three things. If you're a Cowboys

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>fan and you went through twenty twenty, there are three

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>things that could get you potentially excited about twenty twenty. One.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Number one, Lyle Collins number two, Tyren Smith number three,

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>and I probably should have done him in inverse order

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>because he would be number one is Dak Prescott. If

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>you get those three pieces back, that is where Cowboys

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>fans probably look at this and they're like, that's the hope,

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the hope that twenty twenty one can be better.

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So whatever the thoughts are about what you gotta pay

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>him and all that, look, they got to figure that out.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm talking about the Cowboys exactly. They gotta figure

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>out how much they can pay him to make it

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>all work. At the end of the day, I look

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>at it and say, he is necessary if they want

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to win, and win now, dave you everything you want.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Throwing on that a few things, I mean, you know,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and I don't. I don't want to let us off

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the hook for that mistake completely. I mean, he should

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have been in the video. I think we would all

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. But I just think it speaks to

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the contentious nature of this whole thing that it blew

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>up the way that it did. You know, I told

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Nick yesterday, just me and him having a conversation. It

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>finds me of political discourse in the sense that like

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not allowed to have a middle of the road

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>or nuanced take, Like if Dak's not in the video,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it means we hate Dak and they're trying to move

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>on from Dak and YadA YadA, or if Dak is

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the face of the video, that means something too, like

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you can only you can only be a Dak homer

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or a Dak hater. There's no room for anything in between.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So I would just love for him to get signed

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so we can kind of put that phase of this

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>behind us, because it's I think everybody's tired of it

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other, but it just is what

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it is. And then I kind of laughed because I

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily disagree with what Nick just said, but I'm

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just kind of at a point where I'm like, well,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't put together a great team when they weren't

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>paying Dak anything, so like, I mean, they already tried that,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>They already tried building a team with a cheap quarterback

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't do it. So at least in investing

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>with Dak, I know what I'm getting, which is a

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>really good quarterback. So I'm a lot like I'm like, Wow,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, because they couldn't do anything with the savings

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the last four years, so why not pay them a

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. It's fine by me, all right, Amber.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I know from your reaction on Twitter when Nick put

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that up there that you don't really have any much

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to say about this anymore. You're tired of this conversation,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think you probably you're probably like most people

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>out there, like just get a deal done so we

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>can move on to other topics, because there are other

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>topics around this team that we probably need to address.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's jump right in. We're gonna talk a little

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>bit about the offensive line and the tight end position

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>today in our offense review. We're gonna start first with

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, and I mentioned Tyren Smith and Lyle Collins.

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>My question for you guys to start this conversation is,

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>assuming Tyrn and Lyle return at full strength, do you

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>expect Dallas's offense to be among the best in the NFL?

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Do they make that much of a difference. Let's start

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>first with you, Amber. Yeah, yes, but that's just so

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult to say, because yes, talent wise, we've seen it

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>with these guys, they have been among the best in

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL if not the best in my books in

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>my book, but again it comes down to how long

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>can they stay on the field, how long can you

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>use them for and rely on them. The whole injury

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>thing is so unpredictable. But the one thing we've noticed

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is that is a there's a pattern here. It has

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>been happening every single year there's an online guy that

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>gets injured. Mainly, you know, we say it with Lyle,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we say it definitely with urn Smith and in Sack Martin,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the best in the league. Even him,

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he has had trouble in the past couple of years

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>of staying on the field. So does it really help

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you to have the best guys on your team if

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't really have them on the field? I don't

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>think so. But yes, if they are healthy and they

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are back to their football shape and they're out there,

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely I do think that they would be among the

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>best in the NFL. Dave, I'm about to do my

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>best Mickey Spagnola impression and say, why don't you go

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>turn on the tape of the Super Bowl and tell

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>me of having your starting tackles makes a difference. And

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, I guess I'm a Bucks hater now again,

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like there's no room for nuance, Like everybody thinks I

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>hate the Bucks. The Bucks deserve all the credit in

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the world for getting the job done. But go back

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to last year and equally fearsome pass rush could not

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>make the difference against Pat Mahomes when he had time

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball. So miss me with that defense

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>wins championships. Crap, give Pat Mahomes as tackles in that game.

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the Chiefs don't win, but it's definitely not a beatdown.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So yes, yes, Lyle Collins and Tyron Smith can make

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that much of a difference. The problem is you just

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>can't completely trust that at this point, specifically with Tyron

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>more so than Lyell. This is his fifth year of

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>having to deal with this. So I hope to hell

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that this surgery really kind of course correct, and I

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>won't be surprised at all if Tyrn can play another

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>four to six years of healthy football, if this surgery

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>did what it's supposed to. But I can't sit here

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one and be like, yes, he's definitely

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna play sixteen games, um, but if he can, hell yeah,

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it'll make a world of difference. And if Dak, Lyle

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and Tyrn are all healthy and playing for this team,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they will have one of the best offenses in the

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>NFL next year. Yes, Nick, Yeah, of course, without a doubt.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they will. I think the continuity of Kellen Moore,

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and Dak and then in that offensive line. I

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that when you when you start to see,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dak started had he had to figure out

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>how to win games without having you know, the Tyron

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Smith all the time or even Lyell and had to

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>play some of the games last year. It was tough,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Terrence Steal, Brandon and I and all

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. So you get those guys back, and I

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, Das had to learn and to

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>play that way and to be better. Uh yeah. And

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll help Zeke too. And if Zeke is better,

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they can get out to some leads,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the key, that's the way they want to play.

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>If they can play like that, then I think Zeke

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>will be better. And I think the Cowboys will be

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>better because they're they're playing a different style of football.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So here's the million dollar question, how likely in your opinions,

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and I know you may not. Obviously, you guys probably

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked to the doctors or anybody else. But how

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>likely do you think it is that you're going to

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>get both those guys back at full strength this year?

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Stark, I do think it's likely. I think what

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Amber said, though, it'll be someone else. I mean, it'll

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be something you know, you have to you have to

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be ready for that. You have to have seven or

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>eight linemen that you that you feel I can start

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a football game for you, and they should have that

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>because of what they went through this last year. So

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's likely though that Tyrant I think he's

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>needed this surgery for two or three years. So you know,

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just like I wrote this week, Glass half you know,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>glass half empty or half full, half full says, Wow,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>he'll be back because he had surgery and he's healthy.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Glass half empty says, well, he had surgery, you know,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>like he's got to come back from that, so I

0:11:55.880 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>think he will. Okay, Dave, I mean I would I

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>would never bet against Tyrant Smith. He's one of the

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>toughest guys I've ever been around. I have a pretty

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>good relationship with him and have just I know him

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>well enough to know would not bet against that dude, especially,

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like I said, if this is a surgery that kind

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of corrects these lingering issues that he's had. At the

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>same time, it's your job as a football team to

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>protect yourself from these things. So I'm I'm optimistic and

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>confident that both of them will be back, but you

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>just can't completely trust to that. Does that mean they

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 1>need to draft to tackle in the top ten? Not necessarily,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>but they need to invest significant capital in backing that up,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>probably a draft pick, because a free agent would be

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. So whether it's the first round, second round,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>third round, maybe the fourth round, but they need a

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>talented guy who can come in here and be their

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>number three and be better than Brandon Knight and Terrence Deal,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, or at least that's what I think they

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>should do to properly mitigate that risk. Well, I mean,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously I hope they can. But the thing is every year,

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like every year we go into the off

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>season and then get to start in training camp thinking

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and expecting that, oh, this is the year we're gonna

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have the old lineman back and put together, and it

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't really happen. And I know that the turgeries

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are different and all that, but if it's not one thing,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's not the neck, it's the back or the

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>leg or the knee, it's always something. And as great

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>as Tyren Smith is and Lill Collins is another big guy,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Zack Martin as well, at some point your body kind

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of starts giving up. And again, I am not in

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>their body. I am not in their position. I am

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not a medical doctor or anything, but that's just how

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I see it. It's been years back to back, and

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I do have confidence that they can be out there

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>on the field, but my biggest concern is for how long?

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And how long is that going to help you for?

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the Cowboys need to go in

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with a really really good backup plan, a lot better

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>than what they did last year. That's an interesting part

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually why I was gonna go next. Nick,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you the question because I think Amber and

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>David kind of hit it. Do you think the Cowboys

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>need to have a much stronger backup plan than what

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>they had this year? And Terrence Still and Brandon Knight

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and Cam Irving Because the one thing I will say,

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is as the season we're on, I think you started

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to see maybe a little bit of improvement from Terrence. Still,

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it was to the level that

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be, But did you see enough there

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>where it made you think maybe he's developing enough where

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>he could be your backup option. Cam Irving is a veteran.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Is he a good or now he was hurt for

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that time too. Is he a guy

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that could be a backup option? Or do you think

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you really got to go as Day said and think

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about first, second, third round to give yourself a backup plan. Yeah?

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that in their mind they had

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a really nice backup plan last year because they got

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a first round pick who hadn't played like a first

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>round pick. But he's going to be a good swing

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>tackle in cam Irving, and it took a while for

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>him to finally get it going there. They thought Brandon

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Knight could also be a good fourth tackle and he

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he was. I mean, and Terrence Steele was just a

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>guy that that kept developing. I guess, and um, well,

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean he did. I just didn't even in fact,

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't even in their plans. He wasn't in their

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>plans and so he just jumped in in the mix

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and he was better than some of the other guys,

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>which didn't say much. Um, I agree with Dave. Yeah,

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm drafting a guy. He's the only he is the

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>This offensive lineman is the only offensive player I'm taking

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>before the fourth round. I mean, it would be the

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>only thing I would consider. And I want to take

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>two of them in one player. I want to get

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a guard and tackle. Give me his bio that said

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he played guard his first two years, he got moved

0:15:56.080 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to tackle his senior year, something like that, because as

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I need him in this because I want him to play.

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>If he's good enough to play right now and all

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>my other guys are good, well, then play mc guard.

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>If he's not good enough and he needs to be

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a swing tackle, that's fine. So let me give me

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the guy that's had four years of experience and he's

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a guard. And I don't think that's a first round guy.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more second and third, but I want

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>some of that experience across the board. Got it all right,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's watch to another topic on the offensive work.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I know what yah go to go to you know

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they've mentioned the Super Bowl, and as I was watching

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl game, which I hated, but I was

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>watching the game and thinking this would be us. That's

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly what would happen to the Cowboys with the old line,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>especially because that's the thing is again, how long can

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they last during the season? Can they make it all

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the way to a post season to playoff games? If

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we ever get there. So it's like, okay, with the

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>old nine, what was happening with my homes and that

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that is just I just saw the Cowboys happening to that.

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And then the refs that's another whole story. But and

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>again another thing that would happen to the Cowboys is

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>how the revs, you know, referee that game. But that's

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>just another thing that you do have to look at.

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like, Okay, if we do make it that far,

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>can you count on these guys to be there, Because

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>if you're dealing with backup guys, how much is that

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>really gonna help you? How far is that gonna get

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you passed that first playoff game or any further than that.

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's just that's a huge concern that the Cowboys

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they really really need to tackle this year. Dude. I

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to our friend Brian brought us during

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the game, and I was like, can you imagine can

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>you imagine if you got healthy seasons out of Lyell

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and Tyring and made it that far and then they

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>couldn't play in the Super Bowl, Like neither one of

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>them could play in this. I think I would throw

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>myself from the press box. I wouldn't even I wouldn't

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>even want to watch. I wouldn't watch that game. It

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>would have you ever seen a quarterback that didn't that

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>lost a big game like that? Obviously Super Bowl didn't

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdown and he was awesome. Yeah, I know

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he had some you know, they didn't they didn't win,

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and hey, I'm the first guy to say, you know

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you can. Team doesn't win. You got to judge him

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for that. I get that. And they didn't play the

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>great but like just the arm strength that he's got

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on some of these plays, the awareness it was he

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>was running for his life. But yeah, but it was

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.959
<v Speaker 1>he He's gonna be I mean I think he I

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>think this was like Michael Jordan playing Lebron James when

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James like third year, you know, like if they

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>ever would have played. I think it was it was

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's probably the way it would have gone

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>down too. You know, just to this, this could be

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>two of the greatest quarterbacks to ever play. I know

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's early on my homes, but it could be. Yeah,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>and some of them, I mean, honestly, some of the

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of uh, good day. I'm sorry, it just

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>it reminded me of the O seven Finals when the

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>forty year old Spurs full of Hall of famers just

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kicked Lebron's ass when he was like twenty two and

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>just he didn't have any help on his team. Yeah,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and he and I think that was the issue for

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Mahome Sunny. He's eat any help because he made some

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>throws that should have been plays. They should have been

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>touched it. There were a couple that would drop. There

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>were touchdowns that literally hit guys in the hands or

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in the face, and and they just didn't catch them right,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. You know. And another thing we got to

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>throw in there for talking Super Bowl, but that you know,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all about Brady and Gronk and all that. But

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Bruce arians you know, I'm happy for him too, and

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, he's got a granddaughter on our staff,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and then that's great. You know Pressley, but um, and

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>she's excited for him. But like what he's able to

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>do as a trailblazer. Look at his staff and the

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>makeup of his staff and who and who he won with.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this hopefully opens the doors for a lot

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>of you know, a lot of teams, a lot of

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>people U that haven't necessarily gotten opportunities and to win

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this way. I mean, it all goes to Brady, and

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, but I hope it's not lost on

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the staff that Bruce arians put together and how they won. Yeah,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I really wish a year like this is when I

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>really wish the NFL didn't allow teams to make their

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>head coaching hires until after the Super Bowl, because can

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you imagine the opportunities that you would think. You would

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>think that a guy like Todd Bowls probably deserves after

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a game like that, and by the way, he's been

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>calling good, good games throughout his career. He's a really

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>good defensive guy, and I think this would I think

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the kind of moment that certainly could have

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>given him a lot of opportunities as a head coach.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see how that goes next year and if

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll be a part of the mix, because it's not

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a guarantee that next year teams will look at him

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and don't and don't say that, well he's been been

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>there and done that. Like, yeah, we got a few

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that have that have done that. We know that there

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>are other coaches that get opportunities that even after they

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>have second an you know, a second time around, it helps. YEA. Right,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take our first break. When we come back,

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a little bit more about the offensive line.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna geto that center position because I think that's

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>an area that we haven't talked a lot about, but

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it sare's an interesting decision the Cowboys have

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to make there. We'll also talk a little bit about

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position when we come back. This is

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. There's nothing as unique as

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>our eyes, which is why Selor pioneers ways to make

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>lenses as unique as you. Verilux for super sharp vision,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Essential Blue for protection, and Crisolve for freedom from glare,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>three cutting up solutions in a single unique lens. So

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever your needs, insist on selor visit your local slor

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>experts and find a perfect lens for you to see more,

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>do more slore. Since eighteen sixty five, Stetson hats are

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>American made with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and team pride too, You

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own Stetson. You look just like

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>how the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Stetson hats the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today at shop

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com.

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys.

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Back in the day. I was the guy who always

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>got the tough yards and that's why I run with

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>John Deer today. In fact, I have a John Deer

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>three zero twenty five E tractor that can handle any

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>yard work I need to do, even the tough yards

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>way out back. So if you have one acre or

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a thousand, John Deer has the equipment that's just right

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for you. Visit a John Deer dealer today and run

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>with us. We are the official tractor provider of your

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Here it's nineteen oh eight. Don't you think

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we should get electricity and stop using candles to see

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>at night? It's just electricity lights up the room fast,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's more reliable than candles blowing out, and people seem

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to love it nationwide. Well, dear, did you just run

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>into the wall? I have a new candle. Historically, switching

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's AT

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and T five G fast, reliable, secure and nationwide. Switch

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to AT and T five G. It's not complicated. Five

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>get requires compatible plan may not be in your area.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>See att dot com Slash five G for you for details.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break. Get the ultimate fan experience for

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate Cowboys fan. If you joined Dallas Cowboys United

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>presented by Globe Life starting at just twenty dollars, you

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>can join now and get your exclusive fan pack and

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>remember benefits. Visit Dallas Cowboys dot com Slash United for details.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back. It is the second segment of The Break,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>presented by Geico Live from the s WBC Mortgage studios

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>at the Star Wars doing our offensive review. We did

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>that for the last two shows. We're wrapping it up

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>today talking about the offensive line and the tight end position.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's move to the center position. Joe Looney and Tyler

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Battish were the two players that played at that position

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. I obviously Tyler was the rookie coming in

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>that they spent a fifth round draft pick on. And

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>then you had a who's been here for a while,

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>been a backup most of that time, but has had

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>some time as a starter going into next season. Who

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>should be the starting center for the Dallas Cowboys To

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>start with, you, Dave, I absolutely love Joe Looney. If

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you follow the team by now, you know all about

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>his personality and all of that. He's obviously he has

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>more than delivered on what the Cowboys signed him to do.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, they signed him as their like jumbo flex

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>extra interior alignment and he's started multiple seasons and done

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>so well. All of that said, they drafted Tyler Biadas.

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>He was impressive early. He's got higher potential than Joe

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Looney in my opinion. He was one of the best

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive linemen in college football. The big question with him

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the draft was whether he could stay healthy.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I know he had injury issues last year, but those

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with the hip problems that bothered

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>him in college. So all of that said, he's younger,

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he's cheaper, he's got higher upside. I'd love to bring

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Looney back, but I absolutely think be honest should

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be your you know, prohibitive starter heading into it. Amber

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I agree with all that. I would think that Tyler

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is ready to just take over. I mean, we saw

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>him do it last year for a period of time.

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely love Joe Looney. I would absolutely try to

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>maintain to keep him here, give him possibly another one

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>year deal. I think he's a guy that gives you

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that position flex, you know, with all these injuries that

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we keep talking about, He's a guy that can play

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different positions in case you need it.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>And again, you I mean, it's just like, what do

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you call that game? I can't think of the name,

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but basically, you're you know, you know that at one

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>point or another, you're gonna need all your guys and

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see all these guys on the field. So

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see Joe Looney if he stays here at

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>one point or another and he has all the experience needed.

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So I absolutely trust him. I do hope that the

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are able to get a good deal from him

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for another year. Nick, I thank you. I think they

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>bring Looney back. But yeah, I think the uh idea

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>would be to try to see if you know, be honest,

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.239
<v Speaker 1>could win the job. And you know, we'll see if

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the draft brings anybody else that that that's got that

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, position flex or maybe you know, maybe Connor McGovern,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that's been talked about, Connor McGovern, even Connor

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Williams to do some some center uh you know situations.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So but I think be honest, you know, a year,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>he needs a year in the weight room and really

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna you know, get get get stronger, get better. But

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, his error was pointed up. I

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>was a little surprised though that he didn't get the

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>job back, or didn't get the job at the end

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year. So I kind of thought he might.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But did you read anything into that that maybe they

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>thought that Looney is still a better player and they

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>felt like offensive line, a line needed the better player. Yeah,

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought I thought it was going to the to

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the course of like we really want to play the

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>oddish year, and so when Looney gets hurt and he

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>comes back, it's gonna still be be odist. And then

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>he beyondest got hurt, and I thought when they both

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>got healthy again it would be but they didn't. So maybe,

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if that's if that's the way it was,

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>then then I do agree with both of them that

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they you know, you resigned Joe and just see see

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens. They'd you read something into that. Oh no,

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>if I read I mean I guess. I mean, if

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna read something into it, it's that the coaches

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't think Tyler was as good as we did. Because yeah,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't thought about it in a while, but I

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>remember thinking it was weird because like, like they had sucked.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I know that they were technically in the playoff race,

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but like play your younger players and let them get

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the experience. I did. I did think that was weird,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't make too too much of it. Like

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if if Joe Looney doesn't resign, I don't think that

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be in a panic about not having a

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>starting caliber center, you know what I mean? Yeah, Amber,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the way I saw it, the way I saw it,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was that around that time was when the Cowboys were

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>finally able to start seeing some consistency on the old line,

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And it was around that point where we talked about it.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you want to try to keep your five

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>guys and just keep them together, because it does get

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>tricky when you have so many moving peace and I

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like that was around the time where they were

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>starting to kind of click a little bit, just starting

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to play a little bit better than what we had seen.

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So maybe they just wanted to keep the same pieces

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as as soon as they started seeing some improvement. But

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was necessarily anything against be Hodest,

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's just how I saw it. Yeah, I kind

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of agree with you, but I kind of think it

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>was a thing that was more about the circumstances than

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it was about either one of the players, because I think,

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you, I think there wasn't an

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciable difference, in my opinion between the way the two

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>guys played. I just think that they were starting to

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>as a unit. They looked like they were a bit

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>better at the time when Beast was coming back, So

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they probably just opted to stick with what

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they were already doing, you know. And another part of

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that too is that you know, without Zach Martin there,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it's with with Looney, you need some

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>veteran presence. So I think if Martin would have been there,

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>especially been there playing right guard next to be honest,

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it probably would be a better situation that

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>he could keep going and growing. But but you know

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he wasn't there. You know, you have

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Steel over there. Brandon Knights played you know, twenty, you know,

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve games or so. Connor Williams has played like thirty games,

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's like the old veteran of the group. So yeah,

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>having Looney there I do think was important for you know,

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>established veteran. You mentioned Connor Williams. He was the only

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>player that was projected to be a starter going into

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>last season. They played all sixteen games. How would you

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>assess his play from last year? Nick, We'll start with you. Um,

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was the most consistent player on the team.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he played the most stop the team. I'm sorry,

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>let me finish. Sorry, okay, sorry, he was out well,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he was out there the most. Okay, his his availability

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was the most. He played the snap more than any

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>player on the team. Um, but he was. He was

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's up and down. I mean, he's he

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>want to get a little better there. At times you

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's not strong enough. Sometimes it feels like

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he's out of position. Um. You know, it's gonna be

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting next year. I do think Connor is going to

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>start at left guard, but I don't know which one.

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think that. I do think there will be

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a Connor. I mean, I just I think McGovern might

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be better. Honestly, Okay, we're gonna have that conversation. Hold

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, but what do you think? Sorry? What was

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the question? How would you evaluate Connor Williams play last season?

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Very simple? He was the least of my worries when

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he came down to the l line. I mean, he was,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like Nick just mentioned, he was the most Uh, he

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>got the most consistency out of him because he wasn't injured.

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, he did get banged up at one point

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in the season, but it wasn't anything major. So he

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was the only player that you got the most out

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of from the old lineman. So that it's hard to

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>criticize someone that was able to give you that when

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you got so many other issues around the whole old line.

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that, yeah, you're looking for improvement there,

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>but right now it's just I'm hoping to see some competition.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping to see that we are able to get

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a preseason this year and get good use of like

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>really utilize those games to put those guys out there

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>on both sides. Put them both Connors on both sides,

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and see how they both perform, and just make it

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a good training camp competition. There's nothing wrong with that,

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and just see who's better, and then you make the

0:31:52.600 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>decision from there. Dave, I think the biggest did we

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lose you the biggest? What? Tell you what we'll do.

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna come back to Dave. We'll go back, go

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on to the next question a half you guys and

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they will hit Dave. There he is, You're back, You're

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest. What the biggest? I don't know what happened.

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>We heard you say the biggest. The biggest problem with

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Connor is I know that he's gotten stronger over the

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>course of his NFL career, but he still hasn't developed

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>into that super strong, anchored offensive guard that you just

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>can't move. And so you know he gets pushed into

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the backfield by good defensive tackles from time to time,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and it stands out. Like you know, you always say,

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if nobody notices you, you're doing your job well. When

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you get bullied into the quarterbacks lap, sometimes people notice it. Um,

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean he had a bad season, but I

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>guess that's probably his deficiency. I think he was fine,

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>especially when you consider that he didn't have Tyron next

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to him and didn't have you know, he had a

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>rookie playing center for a lot of the season as well. Yeah,

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I you know, if Connor McGovern can take that job

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in training camp, that's totally fine with me if you

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>really want to, if you really want to dig deep.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, Nick kind of mentioned it. If you were

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to draft a guy like Rashaan Slater number ten overall,

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and Tyrant Smith is healthy, Actually think he could play

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a guard for a year if you wanted him too.

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know that's getting way ahead of ourselves, but

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy with the job Connor Williams has done, but

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>not to the point that I think his job is

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>completely secure. You know, it's going to be interesting when

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at draft day here that you know here's

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy at the end of his contract one year left.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they'll do this with him, but those

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of guys that maybe have a little

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of trade value if you wanted a pick, if

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you wanted a third round fourth rounder maybe you know,

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and another team's like, okay, we can we get this guy,

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and now we still have to sign him. But he's

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a starting, capable guy. And that's just if the Cowboys

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>know that that McGovern, you know, can compete or be better,

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or they've already drafted someone in the draft or whatever.

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>But if they draft, like like Dave said, draft a

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>guy like that, like a Slater from Northwestern, then I

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're looking at draft day and you might maybe

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>try to move Connor. This is a contract year for him,

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, you know, he probably wants to start.

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a big deal. He doesn't want

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to move to tackle and be a swing tackle in

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>his contract year. You know, so unless unless one of

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>those guys gets hurt and then he goes in there

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and plays and then he shows what kind of value

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got, and then you know he might actually want that,

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, Yeah, I mean as I looked

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at Connor last year, I actually thought he was better

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>than he was the year before, which is what you want.

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You want guys to develop and be better. I thought

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>he was better. Is he where you want to be?

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think so, but also think that's also

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a function of who he had around him as well.

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you got to remember, through much of his career

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>so far, he's had all pros around him, and last

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>year he did not. He had he was the veteran.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>He was the grizzled veteran that was telling guys. You know,

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that was probably the one that was having to tell guys, hey,

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we need pay us attention to this, we need to

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>do this. Hey you might not want to do that, right,

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And so it kind of flipped a little bit. But

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I do think he was better than he's been. I

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>will say this though, and it's just as a big

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>overall thing about the Cowboys, I do think they have to,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, invest one of their top three picks

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on an offensive lineman, because the way I look at

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>it is it's even it's not necessarily about this year,

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>although the depth is something that you absolutely need. It's

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that this team, if it's going to

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be offense driven, which it looks like it's going to be.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think when this offense functions best, and probably any

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>offense in the league, is when your offensive line is strong.

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>You look at some really great quarterbacks around the league,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and Russell Wilson think about what's going on right now

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 1>down in in Seattle, like you got a really great

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that just says it throughout his career, has had

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>issues with his offensive line being able to protect him.

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if you want to get the maximum value

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of your quarterback, you gotta put the offensive line in

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>place first and foremost. And when the Cowboys have been

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>successful here in the last few years, it's been because

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line was the epicenter of everything that happened

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for them. So I think they got to start rebuilding that.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that starts with this draft and every

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 1>year from here for the next couple of years, three years,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I would probably be investing one those top three picks

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in an offensive lineman. Trying to prepare for the future.

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I did have one more question I have for you

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>guys on the offensive line before we move on to

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>tight end. You mentioned Connor McGovern, did you think Connor

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>McGovern showed enough to be able to possibly compete for

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the starting left guard spot over Connor Williams. We'll start

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>with you Amber. Well, like I said earlier, I think

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that you just swave it up to training camp and

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hopefully some preseason games. I definitely think he showed enough

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and deserve a chance to compete

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the first starting job. But it's it's just a tough

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>one because we keep talking about all these guys coming

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>back and being healthy, but you don't. It's hard to

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>have a clear image of what you're actually gonna have

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on the field. So that's what I would like to see.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Just see them out there and competing. Just have a

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>legit competition during training camp and see who wins the job.

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely think that he has the ability to

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 1>compete for that job and possibly even get it. Dave,

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry if this is boring. I just don't feel

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>particularly strongly one way or the other. Yeah, I mean,

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>let him go to training camp and sort it out.

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I would be I think Connor McGovern was good enough

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>last year that I wouldn't you know. I think he

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>deserves a shot at a starting job and if he

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>can take it, that's great. But I also think Connor

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams is just fine too, So go get after it,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>big guys. The only thing else I add to that is,

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's hard to have an old line competition,

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Amber said, because you want that continuity.

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you want to build them, especially if you're

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to play like the oddest. You want them to

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of have all that again, you got to keep

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>rotating guys in and there. Or you could say I'm

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>going to prepare you for the season because it's exactly

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened last year. You don't know who was playing

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, you know, gained the game. But if if

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they think that it's not they're not gonna sign Connor

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Williams next year, you know, and maybe McGovern's got more upside,

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>then I could see where it's like, if it's kind

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of either or, then I would probably go with McGovern

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and and say, all right, well he's gonna be here

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>for the for the future a little bit. But I

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know that about Connor Williams. I mean, maybe they're

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to work on a deal. I don't I don't know. Yeah,

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I would think there's another deal they could work on though,

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but Nicky's good to happen if they signed Connor Williams

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>to a deal, Oh my god, right now, I don't

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>even go there. All right, Yeah, but what're you boys saying?

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say you, I mean me personally, I

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>don't really need to see much from Sike Martin. I

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just needed him healthy. He can work on the sideline,

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>work on the fans and all that. Both corners leete

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and there we go. I love that idea. That's it.

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 1>If anything, you're training the other guy to be a backup,

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and all pros don't need to play, especially when the

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sidelines until we get back from training camp, especially when

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they could just move him to tackle, and he's he

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like an all pro in there, so you know,

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like if he could do that, and then that means

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he could just sit there for a while in Oxnard.

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>If that's where we're going, and um, you know so, yeah,

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I miss it Martin. In the hyper field, we're gonna

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>go to break. We're gonna have our final break here

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna nick might not come back. We'll see

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>how that goes. We'll take our final break. We'll come

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>back we'll talk a little bit about the tight end position.

0:39:57.680 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, no, we we'll talk about tight end position

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll get some questions that when we come

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. We're

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>back in a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds.

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>It's new Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen,

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda. Is he a new comboe?

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>That's music to my ears? Okay, Doctor Pepper time, music

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to my ears and mouth. New Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>A delicious do. There's nothing as unique as our eyes,

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 1>which is why SLOR pioneers ways to make lenses as

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>unique as you. Varilux for super sharp vision, Essential Blue

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for protection, and Crisol for freedom from glare. Three cutting

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>edge solutions in a single unique lens. So whatever your needs,

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>insist on Selor visit your local sl OR experts and

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>find a perfect lens for you. See more, Do more.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Bess Alred The Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and five championships shows us what success looks like, Where

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Turkey is always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day,

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Where we are all defined by one single thing, the star,

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>where we as fans know it's our job to keep

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the quest of living life the Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty Bank of America Corporation. Dear, it's nineteen oh eight.

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think we should get electricity and stop using

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>candles to see it night? It's just electricity lights up

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the room fast, It's more reliable than candles blowing out,

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>and people seem to love it nationwide. Well, candles, dare

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>did you just run into the wall? We have a

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>new candle please. Historically, switching to new technology is a

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. Today it's AT and T five G fast, reliable,

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>secure and nationwide. Switch to AT and T five G.

0:41:57.440 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not complicated. Five G requires compatible plant may be

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in your area. See at dot com slash big for

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you for details. Back to the break experience the most

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>competitive and highest profile off road motorcycle racing championship in

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. When Monster Energy AMA Supercross returns to a

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 1>T and T Stadium March thirteenth, sixteenth, and twentieth tickets

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>are on sale now get cheers before they sell out

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>at SeatGeek dot com. A Supercross Welcome Back final segment

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of The Break Life from the s WBC Mortgage Studios

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>at the Star, presented by Geico. We allowed Nick to

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>come back for another segment, So Nick, make it good.

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's make sure you got some good opinions and question

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and let's jump in and let's talk a lot about

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position, because I think this is probably

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the most fascinating positions going into training camp

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and then coming out of training camp and going into

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the season, mainly because the Cowboys got a pleasant surprise

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>from Dalton Schultz this year. I don't think any of

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>us expected him to play to the level that he did,

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and he played to such a level that the question becomes,

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think he has done enough to possibly even

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>earn the starting job ahead of Blake Jarwood, who will

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>be coming back from injury. Nicko, Let's star would even

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>make you good? Um? I I don't know if if

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I expect I can answer, let me finish. I don't

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>know if I expected that kind of season out of Jarwin.

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I really didn't. What did you know if you if

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you would sign him and you say, Okay, he's gonna

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 1>catch sixty passes and he's gonna get four or five touchdowns,

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna not make the Pro Bowl, but you're

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna wonder if maybe he should have. And you're like, oh, well,

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>that's a good year. And that's pretty much what Chultz said.

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And what that tells me is that when this thing's

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>really cooking and the offensive the receivers are going and

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:46.879
<v Speaker 1>running back and all that, that that tight end's gonna

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to make some places. I do think Jarwin

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>gives you more down the field stuff. I mean, Schulta

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>average is five or six yards to catch. I mean

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not much, but he was he was there, he

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>caught the ball. Well, he has surprised me, for sure.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think he. I wasn't sure he's gonna be

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 1>on the team, so he surprised me. But I do

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>think Jarwin gives you a little bit more explosiveness down

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the field. So you would still go back to Jarwin

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 1>as you're projected starter. Who blocks better? That's my question?

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Did not you have any answer for that? That's when

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>training camp? Who blocks better? And I think it would

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>be Jarwin. He should be taller and should give you

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:26.959
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more leverage. I don't know, Okay, Amber, Well,

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin husband my guy, So I would go back to

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>him if he's healthy and back in his shape that

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he was before he got injured. And it was very

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate because I was really excited. And the tricky part is,

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we know how tricky training camp is. I mean, we

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 1>see some things at training camp and then the season

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>starts and then he just disappears. Yeah, I don't I

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>don't understand why that happens, but it happens, so to me, hopefully,

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't blinded by what I was seeing last year's

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>serious training camp, but I remember being very very impressed

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>with what Blake Jarwin was doing. I was very very

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 1>excited about what he could do last year, but then

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt. So I'm hoping that he gets back

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in there. I do think, yeah, Dalton, I mean, because

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>he did it last year, he definitely has a chance

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 1>to compete for the starting job. But at the end

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of the day, my own preference would be to just

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>go back to Blake Jarwin because I've seen so much

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>more out of him that I've liked rather than what

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I've seen from Dalton Schultz, although he was impressive last year,

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not expect Schultz to do what he was able to

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>do at all, Dave, I didn't ride the Jarwin bandwagon

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.919
<v Speaker 1>this long to hop off now. I expected a better

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>season from Jarwin than what they got from Schultz. You know,

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin had or I'm sorry, Schultz had what sixty three

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:00.879
<v Speaker 1>catches for six fifteen. He averaged just under nine yards

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>per catch. I know it's a much smaller sample size,

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>but Blake Jarwin has flirted with twelve yards per catch

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>over the course of his career. To Nick's point, he's

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a better downfield, explosive athlete. We've seen what he can

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>do in the seam. I think he would have had

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an even better season than Schultz did if he had

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>stayed healthy. So I'm riding with him all day. And

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, they ran two hundred and twenty

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>snaps of twelve personnel last year, like there is room

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>enough for both of these guys in the offense. I

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>don't care who is on the field for the first

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>snap of the game, it doesn't matter. But I think

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that they could be a really good one two punch

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But Jarwin's a big part of that. That's the part

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about. On that one two punch. I

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's a one three punch, honestly, because my number

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>two guys got to block someone, and I don't know

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>if both those guys out there can really block, you know,

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, I think it's unfair to be able.

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we could judge that this year because

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there was so many problems at tackle that

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't really tell all the time if if if

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the tight end was a problem as much as the

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>tackle was the problem. Signing Blake Bell, I'm tell you that,

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But that was actually be my next question. Yeah, what

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>what did you see from Blake Bell this year? Because

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we all expected coming in he was going

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a real, a sure black blocker for you.

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>And and my question is did you think you got

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what you expected? Um? Maybe not as much, but but

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that he needs to be on the field more,

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and I would I'm sorry, I'm using him more. How

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>are you going to do that? You got all these

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>guys that are playmakers at the wide receiver position, Who

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>are you taking off the field? I don't know, he

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.359
<v Speaker 1>needs to block, but he needs to block more though

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't need all those playmakers. I wanted Zeke to

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>run the ball and I want him to block, and

0:47:44.080 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I want him to have a few Gadget plays and

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I want him to to make I mean, that doesn't

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>seem to be this offense. This offense seems to be

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>an eleven personnel offense, right, changing just do something different,

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:58.919
<v Speaker 1>change offense. You disagree with that? He agrees he wants

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to see more out of Blake Bell. He said it

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>several times. No, I absolutely, I mean, I want Blake

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Bell to be yardage and I if they want to

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:11.879
<v Speaker 1>resign him, that's absolutely fine. But like, I don't want

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 1>to be part of conversations about blocking tight ends. Get

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>no way. I'm no, I'm here to throw them. I'm

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.879
<v Speaker 1>here to wing it around the yard, score forty points

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a game. I want two tight ends to have fifty

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>catches and five touchdowns each. I want eleven personnel like

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent of the time. Kind of like talk

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>about that. No, I'm with you on that. I actually

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:35.919
<v Speaker 1>agree with calling that day. I'm yeah, oh no, why

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because the past interference penalties call in the end zone

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that puts you on the one, winging it around the yard.

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It sounds really good, but sometimes there's nut cutting time

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to push someone back up the one

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>yard line and these tight ends, and this offensive line

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do it. So just give me the ability to

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit of both. I get it, that's

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>not the bread and butter of what they do. But

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at times, don't tell me they can block because it's

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a te on their name. That doesn't mean that they're

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.399
<v Speaker 1>tough and they can block. I want to. I want

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 1>somebody that can do that. No, I get that, But

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I also think if your offensive line is doing their jobs,

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>then when you get on the one yard line, run

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>behind Tyren Smith, run behind Zack Marden like you don't

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily need to run like out there by that tight end.

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, there's a lot of creative things

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>you can do where you don't necessarily have to run

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the ball, but you can have safer plays that still

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:28.479
<v Speaker 1>can get you into the end zone. All I'm saying

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is I'm a lot less worried about that about what

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they do on the one yard line. If this offensive

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>line can do its job, which again we've already talked

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>about it, that's all the matter of them staying healthy.

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>If they're healthy, I think they can do it. If

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not healthy, then you gotta crap you. And you

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.320
<v Speaker 1>know what, if you're not going to get a blocking

0:49:44.360 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end, it's fine, But can we act like it's

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty six and can we get a fullback again?

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You need one of them, is what you're saying. He

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>needs something, Give me one somebody to block amber. What

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on this? Well, I'm no coach and

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I certainly have never played football, but is this so

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:03.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to train a tight end to learn how to

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>blog better? I mean, why can't you just get a

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of both out of them? Like? Why does

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it have to be one way or the other? Do

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you guys have an answer for that? Because I don't know.

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the short answer is college football programs don't

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 1>play that style of football, and the vast majority of

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>tight ends just don't really learn how to do it.

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And for that matter, you know, to get downfield the

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>way that a lot of passing offenses want you to,

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you need to be slimmer than the two hundred and

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 1>sixty pound tight ends of your So, I mean that's

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the short answer, this is tricky. I guess I don't.

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a huge problem with the tight end

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>position overall last year. I don't think it would be.

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:48.879
<v Speaker 1>It's not really a concern of mind going into this year.

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with Blake Bell, but I saw it last year.

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean there were times where they were using Tony

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Polar to block poor Polor was just getting thrown away

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:02.319
<v Speaker 1>like up in the air, also Zeke at times. I mean,

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it happens with also a lot of these guys. So

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna happen at times and you just gotta

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>deal with it. But overall, I think that the least

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of my problems or concerns is the tight end position.

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping with Blake Jarwin back, everything's it's gonna be better.

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 1>But just overall, I think that I'm okay with what

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bell did. And it's just kind of pick your weapons,

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick your weapons on how you're gonna play,

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can't win. You can have all your weapons

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>out there at once, so it just depends on how

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you're wanting to play football, all right. I would just

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like Dave I as a closing thought, and Derek, I

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think You're absolutely right, Like, if the offensive line is

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>healthy and available, that should be all that I need.

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'm also paying the battering ram running back fifteen

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:00.479
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year if the if the offense line

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is healthy and doing its job, Zeke, go bully somebody

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>into the end zone. Like, we're not scoring touchdowns with

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen million dollars running back because the third tight

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>ends not blocking? Right? Gross? Yes, no, go run somebody

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 1>over and score or else? What are we paying you for?

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair, right, I mean, yeah, yeah, that's fair.

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:27.759
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. If we're talking about running back. What day

0:52:27.800 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about running back? Because yeah, that's fair. I

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>thought we were talking about tight end. No, I get

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you need a whole show for them. No, well, I

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>mean we did, and we talked about running back, and

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we all agreed that all though Zeke is

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:42.399
<v Speaker 1>still a premier running back, Zeke's got to be better,

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>right for what the funny he's baking, He's gotta be bad.

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 1>He's gotta be better. And I think that's a that's

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:48.319
<v Speaker 1>a completely different starting with holding on with the ball,

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 1>holding on to the ball. But what I'm just saying

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is is that if I've got three tight ends out here,

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and and they're they're Dalton Schultz, and they're Sean McEwan,

0:52:57.440 --> 0:53:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and there Blake Jarwin, I don't think anybody anybody's blocking anybody.

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So a thirteen personnel or a twelve personnel, I mean, like,

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 1>give me some more creativity than that. Figure out a way.

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>If if Kellen Moore's the boy genius, then figure out

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a way. Give me Antoine Woods, give me the deefense,

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>give me something else that can go some beefier packages.

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Figure out a way somehow to do. And to be honest,

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of how I think about it is. I'm

0:53:23.000 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not so concerned about them making sure that the third

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>tight end is there for you to block. Find somebody though,

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>whether you go to full beck, whether you take a

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>defensive player, whether you take an additional offensive lineman. When

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you get in those situations, whatever it is, you seem

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out something to give you that kind of

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>beef when you need to pound the ball for yard.

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But when they draft Kyle Pitts at number ten, what

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>happens then? Can we score fifty points a game? All right?

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But let's get to some questions we got about seven

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in the show. Let's get some questions here.

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They're doing this well. You mentioned the draft, and I

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>got this guy asking a question about what position group

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for the defense do you think will have the most

0:54:03.280 --> 0:54:11.280
<v Speaker 1>immediate impact through the draft. I mean, the easy, obvious

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>answer is probably cornerback because right now, and I mean

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to change when free agency starts, but you

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:20.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have any and it's a very good if I

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 1>had to lay money on who they were going to

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>draft at ten, the overwhelming favorite should be cornerback because

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there's two very good ones. One of them will definitely

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:32.720
<v Speaker 1>be there and he should be a day one starter.

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's the easy answer. And I love the idea

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of pairing him up with Diggs. I think you might

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to hit on something where you got yourself

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a pair of cornerbacks that you can just ride for

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the next four or five years and just see where

0:54:45.520 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it goes. Like that might be the beginning of you

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:50.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of rebuilding your defense. Yeah, I mean, I think

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know they're both both the two he's talking about

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Farley and certain I mean, they're both good. But you

0:54:57.680 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>know I know this that there's no a bunch of

0:55:00.680 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 1>five stars guys at Virginia Tech on the defensive line,

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so that's what I wonder. I wonder

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:09.040
<v Speaker 1>about maybe Farley, I mean, maybe he might be even

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 1>better just because you know, he's playing the number one

0:55:12.040 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver every time out and he's not getting you know,

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the path rush and all that. But if that didn't

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>play fifteen years in the league either, So I don't know,

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe that matters, maybe it doesn't, but they help. Yeah,

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>either way, I think it's going to be better than

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Brown. I'm sorry. I meant Anthony Brown and Jordan

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Lewis and you know, Cheeto or who actually hope they

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:33.479
<v Speaker 1>bring Jordan back though I think it. Jordan still fits,

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think you'd be a nice compliment if you had.

0:55:35.880 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, you got that draft pick and you put

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 1>him with Digs and Jordan is your your nickel guy.

0:55:40.920 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I like that a lot. As your

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:45.439
<v Speaker 1>three cornerbacks that you're running out day one, I like, yeah,

0:55:45.600 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>me too. So your QB four or I mean, your

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:50.359
<v Speaker 1>your fourth cornerback's gonna be making five million a year

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or were cutting Anthony Brown. I don't know, you know,

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time really understanding what I think

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of Anthony Brown, because I don't think he's a bad cornerback.

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's kind of just a guy. If

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, if that's okay, and and and by

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the way, you need some of those guys on your team.

0:56:07.000 --> 0:56:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can't be a high draft pick. Everybody can't be

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a high price free agent. I get that. Yeah, you're right,

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, No, go ahead. I was just laughing because

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if Jordan Lewis's agent is watching this, you know, or

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:21.840
<v Speaker 1>why or other you know, people talk about it, like

0:56:22.239 --> 0:56:24.320
<v Speaker 1>think about what Jordan and Cheetoh are gonna get in

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the open market, because Jordan might get more, might get

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that contracted Anthony Brown gott and Cheeto's definitely gonna try

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to get that either way more than that. So I

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if they did come back. I mean,

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you think you think Cheeto can really command that kind

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of money Anthony Brown money, Well, yeah, I guess that should. Yeah,

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he can't. I think I think I think

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get cheetouous money. You do, I think you're

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:50.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of laugh, but like, yeah, I think he's

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:52.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some money. What makes you think that just

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 1>because it's cornerback. Yeah, and he's made some plays in

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five mile an hour running and all that kind

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. I think it all come back. And then

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:04.920
<v Speaker 1>they got the size. Sorry, Nick, now go ahead. He's

0:57:04.920 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>got the size that people He's got the size that

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.359
<v Speaker 1>people covet. He's athletic as hell. He's started many many

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:14.319
<v Speaker 1>games in the NFL, and that's all he needs. Yeah.

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Nick, and I mean, you know not.

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we all think the world of Anthony Hitchins.

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:21.040
<v Speaker 1>He was a good player here. Anthony Hitchins was a

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>good player. But you when you saw the deal Kansas

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>City gave him, you were like, WHOA, Okay, Kansas City

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 1>have fun. And that's I think something similar might happen

0:57:29.640 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 1>with Cheeto. But he was a better player, not a

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:33.680
<v Speaker 1>bad player. He was a better player here though than

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Cheeto has been. Right. Yeah, but Cheeto plays a more

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:40.600
<v Speaker 1>important position. True. I'm not saying he's I'm not saying

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get a Hitchins contract, I think, but I

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>think he will get it. I will not be surprised

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>if he signs a deal that kind of makes you

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:49.840
<v Speaker 1>raise your eye propose, Okay, So let me throw this

0:57:49.960 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 1>question back to you. If you just ran down all

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the things of why a team would want to pay

0:57:54.040 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Cheeto that money, should the Cowboys be considering maybe they

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:01.040
<v Speaker 1>should pay a d an amount of money for him

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>because of all those things you just mentioned. No, no,

0:58:04.360 --> 0:58:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But Derek, we see this all every year. We see

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this happen where we see a guy differently and then

0:58:10.320 --> 0:58:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they go out in the open market and they get

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money, a lot more money than what

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys could have offered them. And the thing is

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think, oh, my coach, my staff

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can make this player better. So when you're looking at

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>videos and these players you always have as a coach

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and recruiting staff, I feel like you always have that

0:58:29.640 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 1>mentality that you see the talent and you just have

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that itch that you think that if they come work

0:58:35.680 --> 0:58:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with you, you're gonna be able to make that player better.

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>In at times, we've seen that happen with a lot

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of players that have left the Cowboys, that they go

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and hine at other teams. So I think that's just

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that you have to look at

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>why another team would see them more valuable than what

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys see them. I think I think he needs

0:58:55.600 --> 0:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a fresh start, and I think, you know, not to

0:58:58.000 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>steal online from a former co worker, but you know,

0:59:01.440 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you could argue that he had a foot

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the parking lot anyways. Yeah, I mean he was

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:09.000
<v Speaker 1>already kind of thinking about contract looking in that way,

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this is a big year for him.

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:14.040
<v Speaker 1>The second contract is a big year for every NFL player,

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's gonna get it. I think he's

0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:17.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna go, and I think he probably needs to go

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to another team and he might be really good. I

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he'll be really good, but I think

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 1>he'll be serviceable. I'll throughout Damien Wilson as an example.

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Damian Wilson has been a good player for Kansas City.

0:59:27.680 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he was that with the Cowboys, and

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Cowboys like when he signed somewhere else.

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Cowboys are really heartbroken about it.

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But he's been a good player. He's been a better

0:59:35.640 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>player there than he was or so it happens. It

0:59:37.320 --> 0:59:41.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely happens. Scheme, which I actually I thought about that

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this morning while I was out on a run, because

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody somebody tweeted me this morning, Thank you, Dare. Somebody

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 1>tweeted me this morning talking about, you know, they need

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of Will because his last few drafts

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>have been like super bad, and I was kind of

0:59:58.040 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that. I'm like, well, first of all, that's

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that's just not true, right, But then you know, the

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, the twenty seventeen draft, I think you probably

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have you you absolutely have to chalk it up as

1:00:07.920 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a as a disappointment at this point, Taco was a

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>bust um, you know you you like most of those

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>guys are not going to be here long term, but

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's room for nuance there. Like was Cheeto

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a woozier. Let's just assume he doesn't come back like

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>was he a bust No, Probably like a slight disappointment,

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>but not everybody's gonna be a bonanza pick that you

1:00:32.000 --> 1:00:34.439
<v Speaker 1>pay a second contract too. It's just it's too hard.

1:00:34.480 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work that way. So if you get four

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>years of service out of Cheeto, like I said, it's

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>disappointing he didn't do more in the four years he

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was here. But I don't consider him a bust y'all.

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't consider that a bust of a pick. No,

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>don't mean a guy that starts and plays. And no,

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt some and you know, he wasn't as

1:00:55.920 --> 1:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>good as you wanted him to. Want he didn't get

1:00:57.400 --> 1:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>as many interceptions as you wanted him to. But no,

1:01:00.240 --> 1:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't like we said like when we started the show,

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not one way or the other. I mean, it's

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not like he was an all world or the worst.

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's in between. And by the way, you

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>got to be real careful, real careful, all caution fans,

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>real careful with assigning too much praise or too much

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>blame to Will or anybody else in the front office

1:01:20.280 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with regards to draft picks, because what you don't know

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is who is really behind that pick. You know, some

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things we've heard, there have been times that

1:01:26.840 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>picks have been made because a coach was really, really

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>pushing hard and that was the voice that really convinced

1:01:33.240 --> 1:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the powers that be to make a decision. And so

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you got to be really careful. It's not

1:01:37.720 --> 1:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>like a typical A typical team kind of runs their

1:01:43.240 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>thing like when you have the GM, and ultimately the

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>GM is the one that makes decision, and by the way,

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that probably is the case here, but the GM ain't

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>will right, Will's not making the final decision, So I

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think you have to be real careful with that when

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you start kind of figuring out who to places blame

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, who also to give credit. You

1:01:57.360 --> 1:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to do it as a team and

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>either as a team they did well or as a

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>team they didn't do well. Yep. I just think it's

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and I know, I know we gotta go, but I

1:02:05.960 --> 1:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>just I'm that's an interesting thing. And Anthony Hitchins and

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Damian Wilson are great examples, Like not everybody's gonna be

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a bust of a bad player, and not everybody's gonna

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>be a cornerstone that you can pay big money to.

1:02:18.200 --> 1:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Some guys you just draft, thank you for your service,

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and move on and we hope the best for you.

1:02:23.440 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And like, I don't think the Cowboys are dumb for

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not resigning Anthony Hitchins or Damian Wilson. Honestly, like that,

1:02:30.160 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think those would have been good free like

1:02:32.800 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>money allocations and if Cheeto a Woozier can get ten

1:02:37.440 --> 1:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year on the open market, I don't

1:02:39.560 --> 1:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think it would be smart for the Cowboys to try

1:02:41.320 --> 1:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to match that either. And sometimes you just gotta say

1:02:45.440 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for your time and we'll have the good memories

1:02:48.160 --> 1:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and draft the next guy. Yep, all right, we appreciate

1:02:51.920 --> 1:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Dennis. We'll be back on next Wednesday. We'll

1:02:54.000 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about the defense. We're gonna flip this conversation over

1:02:56.080 --> 1:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side of the ball. There are are so

1:02:57.600 --> 1:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>many topics to hit on that side of the ball,

1:02:59.680 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so we'll do that next week. Till then. For Nick Eatman,

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia, I am Derek Eagleton. This has

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>been The Break live on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio.

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.