WEBVTT - Ep69 "Why do you see something everywhere after you've seen it once?"

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Why am I going to start today's brain science episode

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>by telling you about the beater Mainhoff group, which was

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a West German far left terrorist group in the nineteen seventies.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>This political group is fully irrelevant to any modern discussions

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and their political positions are totally irrelevant to neuroscience. So

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what do these domestic terrorists have to do with attention

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and salience and the front of your brain and synchronicity?

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And why might you soon hear about the better Minehoff group?

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Again not for political reasons, but for reasons to do

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with your own brain. Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and author at Stanford and

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in these episodes we sail deeply into our three pound

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>universe to understand the intersection between how the brain works

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and how we experience life. So let's start in nineteen

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy when a far left wing militant group called beater

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Mainhoff also known as the Red Army Faction, they took

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to the streets in Germany. Now they define themselves as

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>communist and anti imperialist, and they launched a string of

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>robberies and then bombings, and eventually assassinations, and this all

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>brought a lot of bloodshed and pain to Germany throughout

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the decade. Okay, now, who cares about the beater Minhoff Gang. Well,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>unless this touched your life in the nineteen seventies, probably nobody.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So why am I telling you about this gang? Are

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>they coming back? No, happily they are long defunct. But

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the joy of today's podcast is that I get to

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>make a prediction that you will hear about Bader Mainehoff

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>again and it probably won't be too long. And then

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll think, Wow, I just heard about that on Eagelman's podcast,

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm hearing about it again. Now, how can

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I make a prediction like that? Well, the important part

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of our story began two decades after the beater Minehoff Kang.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It began with a man named Terry Mullen in nineteen

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety four. Now, Terry, like probably most people, had never

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>heard of the batter Minehoff Gang, and then he heard

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>about them. He heard their name, and then he was

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>surprised to hear the name a second time within twenty

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>four hours, and he thought that was just sort of

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>weird and amazing that he had just learned that name

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and then he heard it a second time, so he

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>informally posted about that on the Saint Paul Pioneer Press

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>online discussion board, and others immediately chimed in that they

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>had noticed this general pattern before. There had been times

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when they had learned a new concept or name, and

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>then they began to see it everywhere, and this phenomenon

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>of learning something new and then seeing it again shortly after,

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or seeing it all over the place. Everyone started chiming

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in on the discussion board that they had noticed this

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing before. So the original poster named this

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Beaiter Meinhoff phenomenon, and it quickly blossomed into a meme,

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>first on the discussion board, then nationally, then internationally. Now

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you've probably noticed this in your own life. You see

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>some item or some new term, and then you see

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it again and again. It's not necessarily something really popular

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's talking about, but seemingly something more obscure. Once

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you've heard of something, you start noticing it everywhere, like

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you've just learned a new word when you're totally sure

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you've never heard before, and then seemingly out of nowhere,

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you hear it several times in a week where maybe

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you learn about some obscure piece of technology and suddenly

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it appears elsewhere on your news feed, or your friend

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>mentions it out of the blue. If you chew on

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this for a second, you'll definitely be able to come

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>up with examples where you learned some new piece of trivia,

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or you became interested in some new type of shoe

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly it seems like you encounter that particular

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>fact again, or you see that shoe everywhere you go.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the beatter Minehoff phenomenon. A friend recently reported

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>this to me. When his wife got pregnant, he started

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>noticing pregnant women everywhere. Suddenly the world was filled with

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>women about to give birth. Where were they all before?

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>And the better Minehoff phenomenon happens to me a lot.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It happens that I'm thinking about getting a new vehicle now,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>so I've been paying more attention to car models on

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the road around me, and I've spotted a couple of

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>makes and models where I thought, hey, I kind of

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like that I've never noticed that vehicle before, and now

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing it everywhere. It makes me feel that these

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>models that I had never seen before, that they're proliferating,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they're driving past me in the street, they're parked in

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>my neighborhood, they're featured in a movie I'm watching. The

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>impression is that the universe is echoing what I just learned. Now,

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>as you've probably guessed because this is a neuroscience podcast,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>this phenomenon isn't about the universe making things appear more frequently. Instead,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a quirk of your psychology. You are having the

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>illusion that the frequency has increased to this end. In

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, the Stanford linguist ARNOLDSWICKI gave a

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>more official name to the beter Mainhoff phenomenon. He coined

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this the frequency illusion, and that name captures the idea

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>more precisely. Even though this remains more widely known by

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>its origine meme name. I've also heard this referred to

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way as the red car illusion or the

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>blue car effect, meaning that when you start paying attention

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to red or blue cars you see them everywhere. But

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever we call it, it's all about the illusion of

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the frequency of a previously unknown thing increasing, and you

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>can see this in many guyses. For example, I've noticed

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating conflation between online ads and the beta Meinhoff effect.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It goes like this. A friend is surfing around and

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>spends a moment admiring a new band or a new

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>kitchen item, and then she's surfing around the next day

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and sees more of these ads for the same thing.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So she blames cookies and invasive adwere and yes, of

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>course this is part of why she's seeing that thing more.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But this model of big brother can quickly get stretched

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>beyond sensibility when the new item is next noticed on

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a billboard or overheard in a conversation. People will sometimes

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>make crazy arguments that there's a more devious ad network

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at play here, But this is simply the Beater Minehoff

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon in action. Now, just before we move into understanding

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>why this happens, I'll tell you a quick academic joke.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>A student says to her friend, have you ever heard

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of the beatter Minehoff phenomenon? And the other replies, that's

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>so strange. I just read about that yesterday. Okay, So

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a sense of what the phenomenon is, and

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the question we're going to ask today is why does

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it occur? Because what we notice and when tells a

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>deeper story about how we engage with the world around us.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So with the beta Minehoff phenomenon, we're always tempted to say, no,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely sure that I've never seen that before. It's

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>not that I'm having some perceptual illusion. It's that I

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>really never heard that term in my life before yesterday,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and now I've heard it twice. But that's generally not

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the case. It's simply that we don't notice those things

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that are not relevant to us. The beta Mindhoff phenomenon

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is not some trick of the universe. Instead, it is

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the love child of two psychological processes running under the hood.

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The first issue is selective attention. Now, people sometimes think

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that selective attention just means you're not listening to your

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>spouse or kids, but in fact, selective attention is our

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>brain's way of managing the enormous amount of information that

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it encounters. Remember that your brain lives in silence and darkness,

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's trying to make a model of the whole

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>world out there. But the whole world is way too

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>complex and it's overflowing with detail, almost all of which

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is meaningless to you. So your brain is selective about

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>what it looks for and what it takes in. So

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think about the last time you walked through a crowded marketplace.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The sites, the sounds, the smell. It's more details than

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you could ever encode or whatever want to encode. So

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>your attention acts like a filter. Now, let's get straight

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>what we mean by a filter. Sometimes you might think

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that what this means is that you're taking everything in

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>and then you're throwing out the stuff you don't want.

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But filtering is generally harsher than that. You don't even

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>take stuff in unless it matches a shape for you.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So think about those children's toys where you have a

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>box and you put in a square object into the

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>square hole, or a triangular object into the triangle hole,

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>or a circular object. Those are filters. And if I

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>hand you a hexagon, it doesn't even go in. It's

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>not that the box considers hexagons and then spits it

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>back out, it's that it doesn't even make it into

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the box. Now, from the brain's point of view, how

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>does it know what things to filter in and out? Well,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you pay attention to certain things because you have networks

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>housed primarily in the prefrontal cortex for deciding what information

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is relevant or salient, and this is constantly updating from

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>your experience. In other words, your brain is always asking, hey,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the important stuff that I need to pay

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>attention to? What stuff matters here? So when you encounter

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>new information, like hearing that cool new band or seeing

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the cool new shoes, this network updates and subsequently your

0:10:39.400 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>brain can take in this information. Now, let's flip this

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>notion of selective attention and look at what can happen

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're simply not paying attention to something. This is

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>called inattentional blindness, and it says though you never even

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>see the thing at all. So I'll give you an example.

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I did an episode some weeks ago about why magic

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>tricks work, and a lot pivots on exactly this issue

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>of inattentional blindness. Something can happen right in front of you,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>but if you're not watching for it. In other words,

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>your attention is elsewhere. The photons hit your eyes, but

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't see it. The magician moves his hand in

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>an arc, or pretends he's throwing something in the air,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or there's a snap of the fingers right over here,

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly the card slip happens. Right there, but it

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>says though it didn't happen, why because your attention has

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>been pulled elsewhere. Now, as an example of this that

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing most people have seen, consider the Invisible Gorilla video.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't seen this, search for it on YouTube.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But pause this podcast here because what's coming next is

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a spoiler. The way this works is you see several

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>people and half are wearing one shirt color and the

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>other half is wearing a different color. And each team

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>passes a basketball, but only two other members of their team,

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but they're all intermixed, so they're passing and moving between

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>one another, and your job is to count the number

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of times the ball is passed by one of the teams.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>So you count, Okay, there's one pass, Then that person

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>throws to another person on their team. Okay, that's two.

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Then that person throws to another team member. Okay, that's three.

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Like that, but it's challenging because to keep an accurate account,

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to ignore what the other team is doing.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So you get to the end of the video and

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you say, great, I got it. This team made twelve passes,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're told the answer, And let's say the answer

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is twelve you got it right. But then you're asked,

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but did you notice the gorilla? And then the video

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>is shown again, the exact same video, and now you're

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not counting passes. You're just looking at the big picture.

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>You're watching the video with a different context. And now

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you see something that blows your mind, which is that

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy in a gorilla suit walks right into the

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>middle of the basketball players and he turns and faces

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the camera and thumps his chest, and then he struts

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>out stage left, and all the while the basketball players

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>are just continuing to pass the balls between them. Now,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>almost everybody doesn't notice the gorilla the first time they

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>watched the video. Why It's because their attention is so

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>focused on counting the passes. So given that our visual

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>attention is limited, we miss the things that were not

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically focused on. And this is why it's known as

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>inattentional blindness. Now, this can all be seen as a downside,

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually just what a brain needs to do

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to navigate its complex environment. It focuses on certain signals

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>while ignoring others. For example, think about when you're at

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a noisy cafe. You have to selectively focus on your

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>companion's voice and not hear all the irrelevant conversations around you,

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>even though all of this hits your ear drums like.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 2>This, But what you attend to is this, Hi, can

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I get you something?

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's obviously very useful to be able to selectively

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>attend because the world is a cacophonous flood, and selective

0:14:55.800 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>attention allows us to zoom in on the signals of interest.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna take a one second tangent to give

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you a sense of something here. Some of you know

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that I spun a company out of my lab called

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Neo Sensory, And in this company, we make a wristband

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>for people who are deaf, and the wristband has a

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>microphone that picks up on the sounds around you, and

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>then it turns those sounds into patterns vibration on the skin.

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's doing what your inner ear, your cochlea is doing.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>We're just transferring that job to the skin. Now, here's

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what I wanted to touch on. Typically, when someone puts

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this on for the first time, they say, WHOA, I'm

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling so much buzzing going on around here, and it

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>takes them a little while to understand that all this

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>buzzing is part of this soundscape around them. In other words,

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the next time you're at the cafe, pay attention not

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just to your companion's conversation, but really listen to all

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the sounds that are hitting your ears. The overhead music

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and the barista and the coffee machines, and the doors

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>opening and closing, and the squeaking and every single one

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the conversations going on around you. All of that

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is hitting your ear drums. We're so good at ignoring

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>all of that that we only take in what is

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>salient to us. And it's only when you push that

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>information in through a new channel, like through your wrist,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that you realize how much noise is actually out there.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Your brain has to learn how to pay selective attention

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to the vibrations on your wrist. Okay, so that's selective attention.

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>How does this kind of thing get studied in the

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience laboratory. Well, think of something like a card game

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like the one called Set or something called the Wisconsin

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Card Sorting Task. And in games like this, each card

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has some number of shapes of a certain color. So

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this card might have three blue diamonds and this one

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>has four red squares, and that one has two green circles.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And let's say you're trying to match a certain property

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>between cards, like the blue color and the shapes and

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the number of shapes. That doesn't matter. So because you're

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>holding this rule in mind match the color, the neural

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>networks in your visual cortex are mostly responding just to

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the color you stare at the cards, but really it's

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>only your neurons involved in color that are shouting off.

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Now the rule changes and you have to pay attention

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to the number of objects. So you match a card

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with three shapes over here to a card with three

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>shapes over there. Now, what hits your eyes is exactly

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the same, but the cells in your brain that are

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>responding are those involved in numeracy and same when you're

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>concentrating on matching shapes, like you want to match squares

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>here with squares there. Your brain now plays a very

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>different game. Everything hits the eyes, but your brain only

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>really runs the algorithms involved in shape. So we can

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>see selective attention directly in the brain. So back to

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the beta Miinhoff effect. Our brains encode almost nothing around

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>us unless it somehow becomes relevant to us. Once something

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>has been flagged as important or interesting to your brain,

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you will notice it more, creating the illusion that it

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is suddenly everywhere, And that leads us to the second

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>parent of the better Minhoft love child, which is another

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>psychological process running under the hood. The first was selective attention.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The second is called confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is our

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>tendency to notice everything that confirms what we already believe.

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>We notice that we focus on it, we give greater

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>credence to it. So generally we talk about confirmation bias

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>as favoring information that confirms our pre existing beliefs and

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>disregarding evidence that contradicts our beliefs. Or we seek out

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>information that supports our existing views, or we interpret ambiguous

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence in a way that supports our existing opinions. But

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in this case of the beta Minhoff phenomenon, there's a

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>simpler aspect of this going on. We are simply more

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>likely to take the second appearance of the new word

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>or car or shoe as something meaningful. Our brains are

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>now on the lookout for it, and every time we

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>see it or hear that word or song or fact again,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that strengthens our belief our conviction that the event is

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>happening with increased frequency, and lots of research shows that

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we remember information that supports our beliefs more readily than

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>information that contradicts them. So once a new piece of

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>information is introduced to our minds, like the name of

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a band or a new gadget, confirmation bias makes us

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that the thing is now suddenly ubiquitous. Every time

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we see it, we further sum meant this belief into place.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So researchers typically talk about the beta Minhoff phenomenon in

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>terms of selective attention and confirmation bias. But because I

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about internal models all the time, I want to

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>cast what we're talking about today in terms of that.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>So as a reminder, your brain works to make a

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>model of what is going on in the world out there.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the internal model. Now, the part I want to

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>emphasize is just how that actually limits your perception of

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. So let me give you an example. Imagine

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're on a hike with friends, and as you're

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>tramping up the trails, one of your friends is a

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>mycologist who studies mushrooms, and he notices the colors and

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>unusually broad variety of the mushrooms around you. Now these

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>fung guy at the base of trees, these have been

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>hitting everyone's retinas, but this detail was invisible to the

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>rest of you. Let's say one of your other friends

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>as a pediatrist, and she notices something about the subtle

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>turn of your feet as you hike, but no one

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>else saw that. And your other friend is a climate scientist,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and he notices the erosion around the tree line, and

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that's invisible to all the rest of you, even though

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>all your eyes are pointing in that direction. The point

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>is the same, data is laid out before all of you,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but each of you knows how to look differently. Your

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>internal model is built from the raw materials of your

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>experience with the world, and each of us vacuums up

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the data from our peculiar thin trajectory in the world,

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>which builds up our models and therefore our interpretations and

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>our biases based on our experiences. And that's why when

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you're hiking, everyone is seeing a different world. So that's

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>why we notice things more once they have some relevance

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to us, because the borders of your internal model have stretched,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>so now your brain catches words or cars or shoes

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that were previously just noise. These items had no filter

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>shaped like them, and therefore they're mentioned was as good

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>as invisible. Now that the model is stretched, you catch

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that new thing all over the place. So let's summarize

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>where we are so far. Although we might swear that

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we've never heard a term mentioned before, the shoddiness of

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>human memories suggests that's generally not true. Instead, what the

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>beter Minhof phenomenon illustrates is how deeply we filter the world.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't notice those things that we have no interpretation for.

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So think of walking in a foreign country and hearing

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>people's speech simply as background noise, something you can't interpret.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>If you then learn like the word for good or

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for sorry or for thanks, then that constantly jumps out

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation to your ears. Why because you can

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>now interpret it. It's not that people are saying it

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>more often, It's that you finally figured out how to

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>listen for it. As you better model the world, the

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>more you catch. So even though you may think you

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>never heard of this nineteen seventies German domestic terrorist group before,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you presumably have, but you were busy with the other

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>things of salience in your life, and it just didn't register.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>You were counting basketball passes and missed this gorilla. If

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a model for things, you just don't

0:23:46.160 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>catch them. Now, the fascinating thing about the beter Miinhoff

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon is that it shows up in lots of ways.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Once your attention is drawn to something, some words, some car,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or some shoes, it seems to you to be everywhere.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And the linguist that I mentioned before, Arnold's Wicki points

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>out that there are several special cases of this. For example,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one is called the outgroup illusion, and this is where

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>there's some characteristic of a group who you don't like,

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and you start seeing that characteristic more often. So, for example,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine that there are two groups who live on opposite

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>sides of the track, the Augustinians and the Justinians. So

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're an Augustinian and you think the Justinians

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are very selfish. So then anytime some Justinian happens to

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>act selfishly, you're noticing that, just like you would notice

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the new word or the shoe chooser the car. Your

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>confirmation bias says, yes, I knew that was true about

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>those guys, but presumably you don't notice as diligently the

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>equivalent behaviors in your own group. And on the other

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>side of the tracks, the Justinians look at the Augustinians

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and think they are very immoral. So whenever an Augustinian

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>behaves poorly, a version of the better Meinhoff phenomenon takes

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>place here, and it seems like this is a characteristic

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that is seen a whole lot in those Augustinians. And

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of course the Justinians will tend to notice less when

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>immoral behavior happens in their own group, because their internal

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>models suggest, like everybody's internal models, that their in group

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>generally behaves well, behaves within certain moral boundaries, but that

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>outgroup they are capable of anything. Now, relatedly, there was

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a paper a couple of years ago out of Duke

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Universe where they showed that if there's some group that

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you feel is threatening to you, they seem more populous,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>as in, there seem to be more of them, presumably

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because your internal model is noticing them more. Look, there's

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one on the sidewalk, there's one in the clothing store,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there's one in that restaurant. So just like the beta

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Minhof phenomenon. Your estimates are off based on the details

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of your internal model. Why does this happen Because you're

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>not noticing the groups that you are not threatened by.

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>You're noticing those individuals who belong to the group that

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you attend to. Now, by the way, this doesn't always

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>need to be groups that you're threatened by or you dislike.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>This can generally happen with anything you notice about groups

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that are not your own. As one example is which

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>He also points out that some people who speak English

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in one country notice things about English speakers in another country.

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>One example is the double use of the word is.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, someone says the thing is is that blah

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. So speakers of different English dialects like Australian

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>or Irish or British or American will say that they

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>notice that other speakers use the double is, but that

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>their own country does not do this. But it turns

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>out that's generally not true. It's simply that you can

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>notice things more easily that you take to be features

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>of this other group that you think are unusual or

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>exotic features, and you notice them all the time, while

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact it is just as common in your own

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>group and all this is consistent with the fact that

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we as humans are pattern imposers. We try to capture

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, not by writing down every megabyte of data

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>like a computer would, but instead by summarizing situations into

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>patterns that we can recognize. And one of the ways

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we can see this is in how brains will impose

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>patterns onto random noise. I talked about this in previous episodes,

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, about faces. It's so trivially easy for us

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>to see faces all around us because faces carry enormous

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>social information and we are highly pre programmed to spot faces.

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you see a face in the electrical

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>outlet in your wall, or in the burn marks of

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a piece of toast, or on the face of the moon.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Anything that even vaguely resembles two eyes and the line

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>down and a line across will generally trigger your attention,

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because your brain thinks there is a face out there,

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and for reasons of threat or opportunity, it really cares

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about that. Now, in the visual domain, we call this paradolia,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but this is a subset of a more general phenomenon

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>called apophenia, which just refers to imposing patterns on noisy data.

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, participant in the lab will impose voices onto

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>random noise, and in other studies, investors tend to see

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>trends and patterns in stock prices that are essentially random,

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and that leads to over confidence in predicting future stock movements.

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is exactly what happens to us all the

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>time we erroneously detect patterns. One particularly egregious example of

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this is when people claim that they have good or

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>bad red light karma or parking karma. Now, I don't

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>need to tell you that there is no such thing.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The electronics underlying the city traffic department does not keep

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a light green or red for you, nor, as far

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>as we can tell, are those electronics influenced by any

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of deity to help you at the expense of

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>others to make a green light. No matter how much

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>your deity likes you, he presumably doesn't manipulate the electronics

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>lying your local city traffic department, and certainly none of

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the engineers who work there have ever noticed an anomaly.

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's the same with your parking. Your deity, although

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a fan of yours does not force a close parker

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to leave them all because he sees that you're coming. Nonetheless,

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we impose patterns, and if you have three lucky lights

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in a row or three lucky parking spots, then you

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>start to feel like there's something larger than you happening here. Okay,

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so we've been talking about the beta Mainhoff phenomenon and

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the details of our psychology, like selective attention or confirmation bias.

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So now let's zoom out to the big picture of

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>how the quirks of our psychology craft, in part, how

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.239
<v Speaker 1>we navigate our lives. And we can get into this

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>by asking how does a simple psychological phenomenon touch on

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>profound philosophical ideas an artistic expression? And this matters because

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the beta Meinhoff phenomenon isn't just about noticing something frequently

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>after first encountering it. It's about how those repeated encounters

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>feel surprising, almost like they are signaling something significant. So

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>some decades ago, the Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung proposed this

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>concept of synchronicity. When events seem meaningfully related, like you

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about an old friend that you haven't spoken

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to in a long time, and just as you're reminiscing

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about him. Your phone rings and it's that friend calling

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you out of the blue. This unexpected coincidence where the

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>inner thought and external event line up in a meaningful way.

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>This is what young meant by synchronicity. And lots of

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>people see these coinciding events or random encounters and they say, look,

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>there must be a deeper cosmic pattern here. There's something

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm meant to notice now. This is a poetic thought,

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and the notions of serendipity and coincidence often show up

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in books and poetry. For example, in Ruki Morocomi's novels,

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the characters often experience strange synchronicities that guide their actions.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>These patterns are essential threads and the tapestry of life

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that pull us towards our destinies, and poets like Charles

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Bodelaire or ts Eliot they explore these themes of fate

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and coincidence and the search for signs and the chaos

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of urban life. But while this universe we live in

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is certainly much bigger than us and still full of mysteries,

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a good example of the way that our

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>own psychological peculiarities might lead us to bark up the

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong trees. What simple psychological phenomenon like the better Meinhoff

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>effect expose for us is the way that idiosyncrasies of

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>our minds determine the way we interpret the world, both

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis and in our life literature. What

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we see in the beta Minhoft phenomenon, which is a

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>result of selective attention and confirmation bias, often convinces us

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of synchronicity in the universe when we're just seeing the

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>exhaust of our own engines. So our literature gets shaped

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>by the details of our psychology. If you can imagine

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>an alien civilization that maybe has their own quirks, but

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have inattentional blindness and cognitive biases like our own,

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>they might have a very different literature. If we're a commune,

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Baudelaire and Elliott got on a spaceship and went on

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a book toward to this other planet, they might find

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that their works aren't so popular because without the particular

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>attentional quirks that we have, the aliens would not find

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>stories about synchronicities so compelling. Like many things in science,

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding the details of our minds gives us a way

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to pull the camera back just slightly wider than our

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>parochial view of the world, so that we can see

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the ways that we so often seek and impose meaning

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>even when there is none. For the record, I'm not

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>saying life is not full of meaning it is. I'm

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>only pointing to those places where we can reliably demonstrate

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that patterns are being erroneously imposed. So what we talked

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>about today was this weird feeling of learning something new

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly noticing it everywhere. In the case of

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the beta Minhoff phenomenon, it is a bias where our

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>attention and then our subsequent recognition are heightened, which leads

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>us to believe that these newly discovered items are occurring

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>more frequently. So does the beta Minehoff effect reveal a

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>deeper spiritual reality in which everything in the universe is connected?

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Or is it merely our minds seeking patterns in the

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>randomness of existence, asking these questions and chasing down the answers.

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>This improves our understanding of reality and our place within it,

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>because we see that it is less about the objects

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>or the information themselves and more about the intricate dance

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>of attention and memory. It's a reminder that your perception

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of frequency is not a perfect mirror of reality, but

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is shaped by the interplay of new information and existing knowledge.

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>The cognitive mechanisms that we come to the table with

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>color our experience, sometimes with misleading hues. We don't see

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the world exactly as it is out there, but is

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>filtered through the lens of what we have experienced. As

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the writer on ais ninput it, we see things not

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>as they are, We see them as we are. I

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>hope today's exploration will make you more aware of your

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Try to notice instances of the better

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Minehoff phenomenon in your life. Ask why certain information suddenly

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>stands out to you. You won't always be able to

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>answer this, but sometimes something interesting will surface, turning a

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of your unconscious experience more conscious. Go to Eagleman

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast for more information and find further reading.

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Send me an email at podcasts at eagleman dot com

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>with any questions or discussions, and if this is your

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>first time hearing about the better Minehoff effect, I'm quite

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sure you'll hear about it again soon. Pop me a

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>note when you do, and check out and subscribe to

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos of each episode and

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to leave comments until next time. I'm David Eagleman, and

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining me here in the inner Cosmos.

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I hope you to part