WEBVTT - College Football Week 11 Preview

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Solid Verbo. I'll that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for day Edith State?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Whoo whoom and Dan and Tie, Welcome back to the

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Solid Burbo boys and girls. My name is Ty Hildebrand,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 3>joining me as always over there in beautiful New York City,

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 3>the one, the only, the man who unfortunately has the

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 3>Twitter past word, Dan Robitstein.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 4>So how are you.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty good. I am preparing for solo Dad Saturday

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>aka Sleepless Saturday aka what we're about to find out

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>your pitch is and then I will give you my

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pitch Saturday. But otherwise, Ty no complaints. Life is all right.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>It is week eleven. Welcome back to the show. Can't

0:00:55.400 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>believe we're already here in November, November, bert Tyvember, whatever

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 3>you'd like to call it.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>We're aboard all those people clamoring for the month being

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>called Tivevember.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Subscribe to the show out on our website at soliverble

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 3>dot com. You can find all the icons there or

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcasts, so if it's Google, Spotify, stitch.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 4>You're tuned in overcast.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Podcast addict, pocket casts, Himalaya, you name it, wherever you

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>may be, Oh Himalaya, subscribe to the show or the

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Himalaya checking it out.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Have you used it? Okay, we'll report back, don't forget.

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 3>You can also follow us out there on all the

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>social channels at Facebook, Twitter, Instagram. There's also a subreddit

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>at reddit dot com slash ur slash solid verbal. I

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 3>have been made aware of this in recent months. That

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>is actually just soliverble dot reddit dot com. So one

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of two ways that you can get there. And last,

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>but certainly not least, if you want to call in

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 3>on this coming Saturday, on this coming Friday, as you're

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>watching college.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Football games, you can do so one of two ways.

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Either four weight verbal one which is four eight eight

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>three seven two two five one. Or you can use

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>a little voice recorder, the app that every phone has nowadays, yep,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 3>make a recording, a concise recording. I plead with you

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 3>a concise recording and then send it to us via

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 3>email at the reverb line at gmail dot com. That's

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the reverb line all one word at gmail dot com.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 3>We got a couple last week, so you can get

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 3>a couple more in week eleven.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Ten and if you want to contact tied directly six

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>one oh two, can I keep going? Okay, sorry scoundrel.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 3>So what is your pitch for a week? Okay, because

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 3>there are some big games this week.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are some big games. This is where for

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of teams, it's not necessarily season defining. I

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>would say, I think there are some bigger matchups. Certainly

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the biggest one in the SEC this season, but

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily season life time. I'm defining Penn State Minnesota.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, Minnesota can still have a good season if

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't take down the Nitney Lions at home, and

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>same for Penn State. They can still have a successful one.

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>They're same for Baylor or Wisconsin against Iowa Oklahoma, Iowa State.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>It's been a thorn, but it is where the rubber

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>meets the road. There is something about the ball not lying.

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And initially my mind went to SAT Saturday a significant test.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not bad, that is not bad, but not end

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>all be all, but Sat Saturday, because Saturday starts with SAT.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>It was too mushy for me, and so I'm going

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with something that is a little bit more fun to say,

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>flows a little bit better where it's a significant test.

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Results don't lie. Everything's you know. You win, you win,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you lose, you lose, especially looking at you Wake Forest,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech. I have it Scantron Saturday. That is not

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>bad scan Tron's, especially with it being voting day this

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>past week. It's voting week, and yeah, you fill in.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You either get it right or you get it wrong,

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's much room for error. That

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is very good, Thank you very much, very good. I

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>am partial to scan Tron's Saturday.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 3>My suggestion was going to be because it's a striking

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 3>week and it looks like it's got a lot of bark.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not striking week. Striking.

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 3>You just look at the slate before us, and it's okay,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>here's some striking matchups.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was a Union reference of some kind.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>No no, no, no, no, no, no, nothing like that. But

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's striking Chicago teachers by the way. Hell yeah, it looks.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Like it's got a lot of bark, maybe not a

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of bite. It's very family friendly if you look

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 3>at when these games are being played. I'm a little

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>partial to my puppy I was going to say samoids

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Saturday type.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>People don't even know how to spell that. This is

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>about branding. I had a winner last week. It's tough

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to top what I had. It's true. Okay, Welcome to

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Scantrons Saturday, number two pencils only, yes, and keep your

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>eyes on your own paper. And you know you've been

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You've been prepping all these things, been prepping for months

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for this, so you've had time to get ready for

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>these big matchups. Now sit at your desk. And it's

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>also kind of collegiate, right Scantron's.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yeah, oh yeah, yeah.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Scantron Saturday.

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Scantrons Saturday. But before we get there, I'm

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 3>not gonna yell the breaking news. My voice is ready

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 3>on its last legs. It's week eleven.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Doo doo doo, doot doot.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Trying to suckle down some of that wild sweet orange tea,

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of honey key things going here.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Nice, good for you.

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 3>Playoff rankings. We had the first playoff rankings that were released.

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 3>We did not have a chance to talk about them because,

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>like all big things in the podcast world, that happens

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 3>seemingly right after we hit stop correct sort.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Of right, wasn't it last night? Tuesday night we record

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's peel back this onion. We record the tues crews

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on Mondays. We do it's up at six am on Tuesdays.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're pulling one over anybody. Sail early

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday morning. Here's your first four. We've got Ohio State one,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>LSU two, Alabama three, and Penn State four. So to

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>big ten teams to SEC teams. You know, these are

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like deck chairs in the Titanic at this point, they're

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>going to get all sorts of boggled around by the

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>time we get to the end of the season. Certainly

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>some teams in that top four are going to lose.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We know at least two of them will between now

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and the end of the football season.

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>To round out the top ten, though, we have Clemson

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 3>at five, Georgia at six, Oregon your Oregon Ducks defending

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 3>Great box Ball champion Oregon Ducks ye at number seven,

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 3>followed by Utah, fill by Oklahoma, and followed by Florida.

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Any surprises you think Penn State's the fourth best team

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>in the country, It's okay if you do.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't make a case against it at this point.

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I believe it in my bones

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 3>at this point, but I certainly understand why the committee

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>would go there because their strength of resumes so far

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>has been really, really formidable.

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, the Michigan win is obviously doing the work

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>here because that's what separates them from Clemson. Through no

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>full fault of Clemson's own, their best win is A

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and M, so I understand it. I don't know if

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you have your your spreadsheet, your your mock up line

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of like what a Penn State Clemson matchup would look

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>like on a neutral field, but it figured out. Yeah,

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>even with this year's results and not looking at last year,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not looking at talent level in general, I think I

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have Clemson ahead of Penn State in my mind, right.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Neutral field Clemson by about ten.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So once you get into that double digit area

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and I understand the Michigan win is, it looks more

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>impressive than ever. They held on to beat the Wolverines,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but otherwise it's been The Iowa win is I think

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. They held on. They held Iowa without out

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone right for three and a half corners,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>so or at least maybe even more than three and

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a half, So I can't really hold that much against

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Penn State. It's just more of an eye test thing

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's harder to quantify. So I guess I'm okay

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>with Penn State at four. It's the first release of

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the playoff rankings to make Clemson's higher quality right now.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But Penn State blows the doors off of Minnesota. I

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's a pretty emphatic scantro on Saturday for them.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Clemson's likely going to move into the top four next

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 3>week after the Lsubama game, depending on how that game goes.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 3>But I would say I have a pretty high level

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>of confidence that Clemson will be in the top four

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>next week. Georgia's probably blocked by the loser of that

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>LSU Bama game, at least for the time being. Your

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Orga Ducts are uniquely positioned. If they can run the table,

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 3>if they can beat Utah whoever in the Pac twelve game, they.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Are in the top ten playoff team correct.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>They are uniquely positioned here to maybe throw their hat

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 3>in the ring. Oklahoma all the way down at nine,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>really needs a case State win over Texas this week.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 3>They really need that. The way I see it, about

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 3>nine teams real shot at this.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the thing going against Oregon right now is probably

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what's out of their control and that the Arizona schools

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in Oregon State are not going to come across and

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they have a bye week this week as crazy impressive

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to finish out the year. Whereas Alabama from this point

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>forward can beat LSU and Auburn, LSU can beat A

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and M and Alabama, Ohio State has Penn State and

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you know whoever comes out of the Big Ten West,

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Minnesota, so they'll have more quality wins.

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Clemson is going to struggle in that department, and Georgia

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>can can lay low. But yeah, they're they're blocked for

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the time being. And I still think they have a

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty good shot here after their win against Florida. So yeah,

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Utah's lurking as well, and they could have a really

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>impressive win over Oregon in the Pac twelve championship game.

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, Oklahoma needs help. And beyond that, I don't

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>think we're talking about playoff caliber teams. I don't think

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so either. I think there's a there's a line, and

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Auburn has a playoff caliber defense. I just

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>there's there's too many flaws beyond that line to me,

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, Dan, time.

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 3>It is scan tron Saturday. Get those number two pencils ready.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Fill in your dots. Make sure you fill them in

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 3>completely so the scantron does not get confused. This is

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 3>all very important information.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That's true. And if you're going to a race, be

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>thorough What do they recommend white out? White out? Really

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't. I don't know if they recommend white out?

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>What I know? You just have to really, really thoroughly

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>go for it, right, you can't. You can't be hazy

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with your erasers. No, no, you gotta. You really got

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to go for it, which is a good life lesson

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>to me. Don't be hazy with your erasing. Scandro on

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Saturday week, what are we twelve eleveven eleven? I don't know, ty,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I got very little sleep last night.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's do this.

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's do.

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 4>This. May be the easiest.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Window of opportunity that we've had. I need, I need

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to know this because it's childcare Saturday.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Exclose, single day, single dad Saturday. Excuse me, Yeah, solo dad,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>solidad Saturday, not sad, different thing.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>M h.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 3>It's easy. It's a family friendly Saturday. I look at

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the slate before us here there are a couple notable

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 3>night games. I guess I always state Oklahoma could be fun,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 3>It's been fun in the past. I guess Missouri Georgia

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 3>has some intrigue for us here, at least as a

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>podcast goes, because we've been talking it up for months

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>on end and Notre Dame dude.

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, even app state South.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 3>Carolina some intrigue there. Lower points spread than maybe people

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 3>might expect. But I think the bulk of your big

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 3>games are in the early half of the day before

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 3>dinner on the East Coast, and good for me, doesn't

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 3>help me much well little one people that then aren't

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>named Dan Rubinstein. I think your window of opportunity is

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 3>some time after LSU Bama go out and have a

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 3>date night.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Actually it works out well for I'm going to

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>be selfish air and talking about me some more. It

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>works out. This is what I have to study and

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>everything I didn't see normally. I'm able to get up

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>early on Sunday mornings before the podcast and do you know,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>catch up on everything I need to before we record,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So it'll just be more of a late night. So

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that the action isn't always pertinent across the

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>board during primetime in late night, So that's good. Let's

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>start at high noon. It is on ABC.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 3>It is the Penn State Nitney Lions, again number four

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>in the first college Football Playoff rankings this season, on

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the road at the Minnesota Golden Gophers. This point spread

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 3>is at a brown six and a half seven points,

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 3>depending where you look. Of note here is that PJ.

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Fleck got a new seven year deal just in time

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 3>for this game.

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Dan about thirty three, mel I saw. I don't know

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>how the structure works out and how incentives work into that,

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but yes he did. He started out really well. There's

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to be interested in PJ. Fleck as jobs open up.

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>His enthusiasm, his passion. You know, we'll see if there

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is more to PJ. Fleck than just enthusiasm and passion

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>against some of the lower teams in the Big Ten

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>as the schedule gets harder. But yeah, it was good

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>for Fleck and the Fleck family.

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 3>That is that is correct, and you know, to his credit,

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot to like about Minnesota this year. They

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>might not be the flash last team, but thus far

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 3>they've been crazy efficient on both sides of the football,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 3>and certainly in terms of raw atmospherics. They work to

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota's advantage. Here. They're at home, it's an earlier game,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>so it's a body clock situation.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, people are.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 4>Gonna be fired up for this.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd be glad if I were a Penn State fan

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's an eleven am kick actually, rather than a

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, local six pm prime time. Whole place has

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>been drinking all days, used for the big event kind

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 3>My problem is the matchup. Yeah, the matchup is what

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 3>bothers me because for starters, you look at Minnesota's resume,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>you could make a case and I'm not making it,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 3>but I'm saying hypothetically, somebody out.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>There, do you want me to make a case.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:04.599
<v Speaker 3>You could make a case that their best win is

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 3>over South Dakota State.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Whoa to all the haters who said that Minnesota couldn't

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>take down the jack Rabbits scoreboard.

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 3>They're number four in the FCS. Correct, you could make

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 3>that case. I'm not making it here, but you could

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 3>if you really tried. I do think they've gotten better

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 3>as the season's gone on, so it's not advisable to

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 3>take them lightly. There's just some degree of credibility missing

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 3>from their resume, and frankly, that's why they're eight to

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 3>zeroe ranked number seventeen in the first set of rankings.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Is that all fair?

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? And I left out Minnesota and talking about, you know,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>tiers of playoff caliber teams. Minnesota wins all of their games.

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>It can be in the playoff. That's you know, I

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>would be surprised, but pleasantly surprised. Walk me through all

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Big Ten starting quarterbacks Minnesota has faced this

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>year because it's none of them, Because it's Purdue, Illinois, Nebraska, Rutgers, Maryland,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>all I believe started backup quarterbacks against Minnesota. Gopher's fault

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not proper Gopher data, not necessarily. That's all the

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>point is behind that sort of snarky comment. They'll be

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>playing Penn State starting quarterback. They'll be playing a Penn

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>State offense that generally relies on explosion, bigger plays. Whether

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's kJ Hamler, Pat Fryermuth, do they call him baby gronk?

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that a thing there? I've seen it. Yes, most

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>good tight ends are now known as baby gronk for

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason. That is correct. So it's hard to fully

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>know what we have in Minnesota. They started the season

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>off slowly in terms of separating themselves from teams. They've

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>taken care of business out seeing the Purdue game wasn't

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>great for them, especially on defense. But you take care

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of business, you win your clunkers. You're formidable. And so

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to Penn State, I think the Knits

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Ninny Lions have an edge. I think part of

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it is special teams. I think in order to beat

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Penn State you have to do it repeatedly, putting together

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>drives down the field, which will become increasingly difficult over

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the game. Over the course of the game, I like

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's offense, but this is a couple of tiers up

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from what they've seen. I like the early kicktime for

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Penn State. I think it's back and forth for a bit,

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately it's the big plays from Penn State and

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>just the overall talent level of the backups, the threes, whatever,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they have to see action throughout a game. I have

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at thirty one to twenty Penn State.

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, I've got it at thirty one seventeen Penn State. Okay,

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 3>So three things that jump out at me and you're

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 3>all right. Everything you said is all right. In my book,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Penn State plays the run really well and that poses

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 3>a challenge for a Minnesota team that has relied on

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 3>the run to a great degree this year. I also

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>think Minnesota has a hard time keeping tan or Morgan

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 3>upright when they do have to pass.

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they've been more successful passing it Minnesota than

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>running it, even though they've been some big numbers. I

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>think they've been a better passing team in terms of efficiency. Yes, okay,

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but they've had plenty of games where they've relied on

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that rushing attack as well. Correct.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So it's not to say that they're a one

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 3>trick pony, but I could see them trying to utilize

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 3>that run game to open things up, maybe try to

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 3>throw it downfield. I just don't think they're going to

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 3>have much success doing that. And I worry for Tanner

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Morgan because this line has not been great at keeping

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 3>him upright. And we know it's a Penn State line

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>that's got a lot of bite to it. So that

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 3>that's number two. And the third thing is I don't

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 3>know if you saw, but James Franklin essentially made it

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Facebook official naming Noah Kane his number one running.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Back is that? Is that a real real thing?

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 4>It is a real real thing.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 4>It won't change next week.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 3>It could change next week, but at least for this week,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 3>he's number one on the depth chart.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>That's good to see because that's actually been a place

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>where Penn State has struggled. If they need a four

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>minute drive and to really grind it out on the ground,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't always been there.

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 3>So I'm hoping now that they've kind of made this

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 3>commitment that it means more work for Noah King, And

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 3>if it does, it could could be a big game

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 3>for him on the ground.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I see that in his near future.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 3>I like Penn State pretty comfortably thirty one seventeen, could

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>see it being close for half.

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm with you.

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 3>I think Penn State's a couple rungs better than Minnesota

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 3>at this point. You know, if I put my personal

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>biases aside, would love to see it be an awesome

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 3>story if Minnesota could pull the upset here at home, And.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>What does that look like? What does that that Minnesota

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>upset look like? How do you beat Penn State if

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you are Minnesota with their talent, their their strengths on

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>defense and offense.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 3>They've got to figure out some way to rattle Sean Clifford. Okay,

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 3>they got to stop the run in rattle Shan Clifford

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>and hope that their offense can win the battle field position,

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 3>control the clock, and I think keep it relatively low scoring.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they can outscore Penn State.

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're gonna need to if you want to win. Well,

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying. Not in a shootout, right

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>right right, So it'll be it would be like a

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty to seventeen win. Yeah for Minnesota if they're able

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to pull it off, get a couple of big plays

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>from their big play receivers against a pretty good Penn

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>State secondary.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.239
<v Speaker 4>We're moving on.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Also at high noon on FS one, we've got the

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Baylor Bears on the road at TCU. Okay, the revivalry,

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:27.239
<v Speaker 3>as they say, yeah, two and a half points. I

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 3>hate this game so much. I hate I've heard great

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 3>things about Fort Worth. We had an undefeated Baylor coming in.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>There's no love lost between these two teams. Got to

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 3>throw out the records and the revivalry.

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I get in a revivalry. Yeah.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Yeah, I've been high on Baylor all preseason, all

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 3>regular season. I think this is a really good football team.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 3>They've consistently gotten more consistent under Matt Rule. Sure it's

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 3>a thing, Okay, so good for them in terms of efficiency.

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 3>The defense has been better than the offense, which our

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 3>not really used to saying about Baylor.

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 4>But okay.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I like Charlie Brewer, I like the skill talent a lot.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Not crazy about their line play, but.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>You get my point. I like Baylor a great deal here.

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I like so much about Baylor, Yet I still feel

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 3>like TCU is going to win the game, and I

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 3>don't know how to emotionally deal with that.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>What why? How score walk me through? Baylor's got Oklahoma

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and Texas in the next two weeks of the season.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>You think they're looking past the Frogs.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a potential here.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>For a look now, Oh, get out of tech. I

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>think there's potential for a look ahead spot. No way, Madden,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a matchup that has a lot of teeth

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to it.

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Ty is it or is it not?

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 3>TCU's spot their brand to completely muck up the Big

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 3>twelve race here?

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh? It for sure? Is Here's my general concern about

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the Frogs right now. They might not have a quarterback.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Max Duggan hurt his I want to say his the

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>middle finger on his throwing hand as one does yep,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>which if he plays, that's probably not the best way

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to throw a football with twenty percent of the necessary

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>digits being broken. And you say to yourself, well, there's

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>other quarterbacks on the TCU roster. You look at and

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the reddit CFB subreddit, the college

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>football subreddit on Reddit. They went through the quarterback room

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for TCU, and it's like next guy transferred, next guy rickets,

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>next guy, next guy undisclosed SCD, next guy transfer portal,

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it's like all the way down to possible

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>walk on if he gets the grades or something like.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not great. So when a position like quarterback is

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>hanging in the balance to that degree, I'm happy to

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>just go with the other team that happens to have

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a snow advisory defense.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 4>Why is hold on?

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Then I'll play the snow advisory.

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 3>But why why is the line only two and a

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 3>half in favorite Baylor's at TCU?

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>TCU has I mean, they have good players, their defense

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is fine. They they're in games. They got blown out

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>by what Iowa State, and otherwise they've they've been competitive,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>so mean, they're coached. Well, they gave up a ton

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on the ground last week, which wasn't great. I have

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Baylor twenty three to fourteen. I think the Bears got

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of big plays through the air. TCU has

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>one four straight in this last year. They beat them

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>by a touchdown in Waco. So I get your concern,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but no, the Ricketts factor of the of the tc quarterback.

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Round emotionally mentally conflicted.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 3>You know my stance on TCU one night stand. Come on,

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 3>you know my stance on TCU. You know where I

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 3>stand on Baylor. I do like this snow advance, but

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I like.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Coming up to Waitco Waco Rato games in Fort Worth,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but all the same game is in Fort Worth.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 3>I think Baylor is the better team I have all year.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna stick with that. I think it's twenty four

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 3>to twenty one Baylor wins, but it's close. Okay, So

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 3>you have Baylor sneaking out the cover. I do, Yeah, okay,

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 3>I do. Maybe a little bit of a front door

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 3>cover here. Up.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>You just scared some dogs. Sorry A lot of samoid's

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>out there. It's gone to a big Tomali Dan.

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Three thirty.

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't even raise your voice for that one.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Three thirty CBS NBR LSU at Alabama the Crimson Tide,

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 3>a six and a half point home favorite. Is this

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 3>one game of the century?

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Has it achieved game of the century labeling?

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the biggest LSU Alabama matchup since twenty eleven.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean we probably say that most ears, but yeah,

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it feels true enough this year, two playoff teams playing number.

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Two versus number three, if you want to get technical

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 3>about it, talking about the College Trooble playoff rankings, Dan, Yeah,

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 3>big match up here. Alabama's won the last eight, which

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 3>is wild. The last eight have gone to Alabama. They've

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 3>had a dominant run, obviously, not just in this game,

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 3>but throughout all of college football. What's meaningful to me, though,

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 3>is that, for the first time in what feels like forever,

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe all the way back to twenty eleven, I had

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 3>a hard time picking a winner here.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and I know there are.

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 3>No moral victories in it's football and man ball and

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 3>sports ball and whatever else, but that in and of

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 3>itself stands for something in my book, because for as

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 3>long as I can remember now, BAMA has been so dominant.

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember having that dilemma before me when looking

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 3>at this game. And I think college football is more

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>interesting when this game is interesting. So I'm excited. Just

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this game is always interesting, It's always interesting,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 3>but in a modern era. Yeah, I just haven't felt

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 3>in so long like this was a close, almost coin

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.479
<v Speaker 3>flippy kind of game, and that's meaningful to me as

0:24:59.480 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a college FOT.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I like LS was averaging three point three points these

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>last three years in this matchup, over under LSU scoring

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>more than three points, I'll go over. Yeah.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay, did you know that only three times in

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the last fifteen meetings has the winning team scored thirty

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 3>or more points in this matchup.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that exact stat, but yes, I do

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>know that it's been relatively low scoring. Where do you

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>come down here? So, first off, you didn't mention Tua's

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 1>right ankle.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 4>I did not. I was building to that, Dan, But continue.

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well you asked me a question, so to I

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>had a procedure. He I believe had the tightrope procedure.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>The tightrope system anchoring. And I look this up. Obviously,

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the tibia and fibula together with a braided polyethylene chord

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>sure tie to help stimulate recovery. Okay, that sounds awkward. Yeah, well,

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>so that brings up a question to me, is a

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>hobbled to a tough better than a healthy bon Knicks? Oh?

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, really?

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, I'm just asking the question because LSU took

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>on an Auburn team with an excellent defense and an

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>offense that was pretty inconsistent that day, and it was close.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It was tight. And so if Tua isn't as good

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>as a healthy bone Knicks, and Ta certainly is not

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as good as Mac Jones. If he can't move, it's

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem. It's a definite problem. So how I come

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>down in this game is the worries are obviously to

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>his ankle, and to a lesser degree, Bama's rush defense.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they're a good enough big game team. LSU

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>has a very efficient ground attack. We've seen Clyde Edwards

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Laire really thrive this season. He's just he's patient. He

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>hits the lane really hard. So he's been a pleasure

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to watch. And on the other side, LSU's pass rush.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just generally an assumption that LSU, with

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>how well they recruit, especially on defense, and the speed

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 1>on defense that they get after everybody, they haven't been

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really getting home this season. They haven't been getting to quarterbacks,

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have been putting a ton of pressure, at least relative

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to where they've been in previous years, and even stopping

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the ground game of teams you've been able to run.

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>We saw some big runs from Florida from Auburn, not

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>all game long, but we saw some cracks in this

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>LSU rush defense that certainly Alabama can exploit. LSU certainly

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is built to beat Alabama. I still like Alabama's secondary

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a good deal. LSU is going to We've talked about this.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a broken record, the fearlessness, the talent at receiver,

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the size at receiver for LSU, all of that is there.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But but and I did see I don't know if

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you saw that Joe Burrow played in this game last

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>year with a separated shoulder. I saw that. Yeah. Yeah,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So that at least is further context perhaps for why

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 1>LSU struggled. But they were not the offense that they

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are this year. Last year I have at thirty to

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>seventeen Bama. Wow, that's a pretty big margin. I'm gambling

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>onto A being passibly healthy. But I think it's it's

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in Tuscaloosa under those weird, stupid lights that they have

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in that stadium. Now I don't like them. Sorry, I'm

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not a fun police officer, but it's not my favorite.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And I just think those receivers for Alabama going against

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the secondary at LSU, who's so good. There's so much

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>talent on that secondary. But over the course of four quarters,

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit worried about this LSU offense against

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Alabama's defense comparable to Auburn's defense. I don't think Alabama

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>has quite the talent they did last year. Quinn Williams

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>did so much to disrupt LSU last year, and they

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have a Quinn Williams upfront this year Alabama. But

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>over those four quarters, I think Alabama and that speed

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and at least a seventy five percent to this is

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>my pick is built around a seventy five percent healthy

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>TOA because you got to pick a percentage if you're

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna preview this game and make a you know, plant

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>your flag. Thirty to seventeen Bama, So I do think

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they get to thirty exactly.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 3>My pick is also contingent on a seventy five to

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent to A. Okay, I think we're looking at

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 3>a fun thirty five to thirty one game.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so shootout by relative terms for this matchup, correct.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to see if Bama can run against LSU,

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 3>because if they can, if they can establish Nase Harris,

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 3>that makes their what four headed receiver.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Monster even more dangerous? Yeah, and Elsie's got a three

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>headed receiver monster. They do be fair, yeah, they do.

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 3>But I'm really excited about those Bama receivers this year.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you cover all four of them. Okay,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I've got Alabama winning thirty five thirty one, but I'm

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 3>taking points here.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you a follow up? Please? So you're

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>taking points because the spread is about a touchdown? Yep.

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>If to A starts rolls out, rolls as ankle, which

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to happen, it's like, well, it's mac

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>joone this time. How does that alter your prediction? Receivers

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>are still there, defense is still there, Najah Harra is

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>still there. How does a mac Jones let out, how

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>does the mac Jones show alter? Your prediction is an automatic? LSU?

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 4>It's not automatic?

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's not automatic because if Nick Saban's proven anything,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 3>it's that he can adjust. Yeah, and he's adjusted to

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 3>coaching staffs turning over year after year. He's adjusted to

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot in his tenure at Alabama. So I don't

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 3>think it necessarily means instant death for Alabama, but it

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 3>definitely means a more conservative game plan, and certainly in

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 3>that instance, the ability to establish Naji Harris or some

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 3>sort of rushing attack would be key.

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have twenty seven to twenty four LSU. In

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that situation, I think they adde them.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I tell you what the move would be, actually, Okay,

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 3>the move would be if Alabama goes up early, if

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 3>you got some sort of live betting app jump on

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 3>LSU and maybe go counter to our seventy five a

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:07.719
<v Speaker 3>little contingency.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you think there's gonna be an overreaction. Alabama goes

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>up ten to three with still the two of possibility at.

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 3>More points, and then there's a chance that it tightens up.

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 3>If two, it gets hurt because.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Two has been locked up. Yeah, he has those ankles.

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>The other thing was the left ankle and the right

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the right foot, the right ankle, and injury in that

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>area generally stepping forward, that's accuracy being able to step

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>into your throws, you know, planting his power hips and

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>shoulder whatever his power. But it's the accuracy stepping into

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>your throws and really staying on balance and on platform.

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So if accuracy goes, could be a long day.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 3>And also, if you are one of those individuals that

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 3>wants to bet on a game after kickoff, if by

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the second half it looks like your BET's gonna lose,

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 3>you could always take the other side that whole thing.

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Check out my bookie dot ag.

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh great call.

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the premier place to bet on all your

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 3>favorite sports action, especially NFL and college football every weekend.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.719
<v Speaker 3>You can join now. They'll double your first deposit. All

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 3>you gotta do is use the promo code solid to

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:12.719
<v Speaker 3>activate the offer. So it's MyBookie dot ag. Your promo

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 3>code is solid Dan. I wouldn't be telling folks to

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 3>use it if I didn't think it was good. Good,

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 3>but don't think it was the best, So do the

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 3>smart thing. If you're going to bet on football, bet

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 3>with my bookie. It's MyBookie. Dot ag promo code is solid.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 3>You play, you win, you get paid. Let's move on.

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the four pm slot on Fox. It

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 3>is Iowa, it is Wisconsin. It is the game every

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 3>year that causes us to dig out of the archives.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>The old YouTube video you put together. Uh yeah, the

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>nature film, the Iowa Wisconsin nature film for what it is,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the Heartland Trophy. Yes, I believe, so that is correct.

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a Brass Bowl involved.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:55.479
<v Speaker 5>Ty.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin's won three in a row, three in a row.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that affects how you pick this game,

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but this might Iowa. For as crazy good as their

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>defense has looked basically all year long, their offense is

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>averaged less than excuse me, fewer then fewer then one

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game against the good teams that they've played

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan, Penn State, and Iowa State.

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 3>So what that tells me is as at the point spread,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 3>which is nine and a half, that tells me that.

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Go Wisconsin here. Yeah, so we know what it takes

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to beat Wisconsin at this point, week eleven. It takes

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>speed and downfield passing or just being the Illinois fighting alive.

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what it takes. Iowa is neither fast or great

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>downfield in the passing game. For as much as I

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>think we both admire Nate Stanley and the best of

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Nate Stanley, that's not them. That's not how they win games.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I think even though we have downgraded Wisconsin

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit since that early start where people were freaking out,

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like they're shutting out everybody, Oh my god, history, I

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>have a twenty one ten Wisconsin.

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I've got it, twenty eight thirteen Wisconsin twenty eight thirteen.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of points score against his Iowa defense.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a very and not only is the Iowa

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>defense good and your your prediction is valid, but Iowa's

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>defense is particularly good at stopping longer run plays by

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Honky are run plays they are? And not that Wisconsin

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 1>relies on that.

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 3>No, but that's that's a and butter thing for sure.

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, I just I was parkening back to

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the old game that we played probably last week. I

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 3>know we played every week, but how many points does

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 3>iowould need to score to win here against Wisconsin? And

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 3>I think we agree that the answer is probably twenty

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 3>to twenty four.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>They got to score more than twenty. Yeah. Yeah, the

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>weather's going to be fine. It'll be a little chilly

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about thirty eight forty, But we're not. That's big ten

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>poor stuff. Yeah, No, So can Iowa get there? I

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think so.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 3>I think the Wisconsin defense is too much. I think

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 3>they win, I think they cover. I think it's something

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 3>like twenty eight thirteen. Jack Cohn's been good enough as

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 3>a passer here to give Wisconsin enough balance. And I'm

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 3>sticking to my guns. Twenty eight thirteen Wisconsin wins at home.

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 3>They covered the nine and a half.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>You don't have faith in big game Brian Farrens's offense, No,

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Okay, all right, so we agree. We're

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>were agreeing a lot today, which I don't like this.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this at all.

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 3>And finally, in terms of our headliners here, we've got

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of other games to get through. But eight

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 3>pm on Fox the Nightcap, it is Iowa State on

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 3>the road in Norman, Oklahoma against the Sooners. Oklahoma is

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a fourteen and a half point favorite. DAN of note

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 3>here since Matt Campbell arrived in Ames. The biggest margin

0:35:55.040 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 3>of victory in this game ten points, only ten points

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 3>by Oklahoma back in twenty sixteen and last year again

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen. But you might remember two years ago

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the big upset in Norman. Iowa State went on the

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 3>road in twenty seventeen, they won thirty eight thirty one.

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Do we think that Matt Campbell has a little bit

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:19.879
<v Speaker 3>of Lincoln Riley's number here?

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, put Joel Lanning's name on this matchup.

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Please put his name on this matchup fair after his

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>performance a little ways ago. I think Matt Campbell gets

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>his team up for big games. I think there's almost

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit of Tom Herman too, maybe played

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>down when you shouldn't play up when you should. So

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I always say it's good enough to hang around in

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>this game. This is not I agree with that it's

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>not a bulletproof Oklahoma defense, especially on the ground, where

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State has been inconsistent, But the best of Iowa

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>State on the ground has pretty impressive more recently. Anyway,

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>My problem is I don't know if the Clones have

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>enough firepower to keep up in a shootout. And you

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>could have said that about k State. That game was

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Little Apple, though, So there is a little

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>bit a little more juice there, and this one's in Norman.

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Ioways stayed in the red zone is good

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>enough on defense to turn Oklahoma sixes into threes to

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>generate some field goals or field goal attempts. Ultimately, though,

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Oklahoma is good enough and they sort of

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>go as their running backs go. When we saw in

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that K State game, it was sort of Jalen Hurts

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit of beck Meyer syndrome having to

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 1>do it all himself, and I don't love that idea.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I have this as a front door cover for Oklahoma,

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of cover. Sorry dog, sorry doggies forty

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>one twenty four Oklahoma, but perhaps it's twenty eight to

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, you know, thirty one, twenty four deep into

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the game, and then ultimately it's just maybe some sort

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>of explosion play at the end. Oklahoma coming off of

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>bye week at home. I believe oklhoem is coming off

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>a bye week, right, yep, yep, Yeah, I'm gonna go

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>boomer sooner here, but I think it's gonna be a

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>fun one for a healthy chunk of it.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma is ninth in the playoff rankings, and I think

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 3>they are smart enough to know that they can't take

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 3>any weeks off. I think Lincoln Riley looks at this

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 3>game and says, if I can score one hundred, I'll try.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 3>They did have the week off to recover from the

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 3>k State loss.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Oklahoma's gonna win this game.

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 3>My problem with it as it relates to the point spread, though,

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 3>is that they're gonna win this game by either fourteen

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 3>or twenty one points and it's one hundred percent the

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of situation where the point spread comes down to

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the wire and there's a garbage time touchdown that may

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 3>or may not screw the whole thing up. So I

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.959
<v Speaker 3>want the points here. I'll take fourteen with the little

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 3>hook at the end. I think Oklahoma wins thirty eight

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 3>to twenty four. But I don't like that point spread,

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 3>so I'm gonna go iwa stay in that respect.

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Here's my problem. Even though we celebrated him for an

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>entire month, that would be bro October. Yeah, the end

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Oklahoma State game where Brock Party in a

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 1>close game down seven through seventeen interceptions. Do you treat

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a performance like that like, well, everybody has a bad day,

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and like we've said, before. Don't judge somebody on their worst.

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't judge somebody on their best. Everything in between is

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>what matters. That was his worst day. Did happen relatively

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>recently against a team that's probably not as good as Oklahoma?

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Does that color your opinion of him winning a close

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>game on the road. No, because we've seen it before. No,

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>well we haven't really seen it from brock Party against Oklahoma.

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not, but no, I think he's a good enough

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 3>player that it doesn't It doesn't worry me too much.

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think we agree, but I guess we agree

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>on the outcome of the game.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 4>All Right.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Some other quick notables that we do need to mention here.

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 3>If we could travel back in time, Dan, if you

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 3>could give me the sound for a second ten thirty

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 3>on Friday night on FS one, it's Washington at Oregon State.

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Washington's a ten point road favorite. Now of note here,

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.760
<v Speaker 3>and I do want to mention this. In our initial

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 3>document I did forget to label this game as being

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 3>on a Friday night, So I appreciate you doing the

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 3>responsible thing and attaching the movie art from Ice Cubes

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Friday as well as the Rebecca Black headshot. It's my

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 3>privilege and honor, just to give it a nice little

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 3>touch there and remind me. Also, Dan, this game starts

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:32.959
<v Speaker 3>at three point thirty am one time. Are you gonna

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 3>stay up for this one?

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, no, absolutely not. It's soloed out Saturday.

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll be in bed by eight. I need everything I

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>can get. So, as it relates to this specific game,

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a short week road hangover spot for Washington

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>losing the way they did to Utah going on the road,

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a long flight to Corvallis from Seattle.

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty sure. I've actually done Eugenis Seattle and it's

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty scary. And the small plans that Alaska has

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>there is an opportunity for an all time great kung

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>fu cliche and student becoming the master Jonathan Smith and

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Peterson. And certainly Washington's offense has not been the

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>same since Jonathan Smith left. The Oregon State's defense is

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>by far the worst thing in this game. But I

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>cannot ignore the short week road and the hangover factor

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I have this as a field goal

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>game for Washington. Yeah, I have this as like thirty

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>four to thirty one. I don't think Washington's as bad

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>as they've been against the better teams on their schedule

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and Gallen Stanford, and I don't think Oregon State is

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>quite there defensively to beat at least an okay Washington team.

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>So they'll run a little bit on Washington because that's

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>what you're able to do. They have two good running

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>backs and Artavis Pierce and Jamar Jefferson. I hope everybody's healthy.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I did not look up Oregon State's current health, but

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I think they're healthy. Yeah, Oregon States, wait for thirty

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one Washington Shamar Smith, Nashan Wright and Kolby Taylor per

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Don Best. I assume the master the master.

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I uh, they're my home dog of the week.

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Actually, Oregon State, will you watch this game? You don't

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>sleep hoom dog of the week.

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm not watching this game, but short week, weird

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 3>spot in Corvallis. The Beaver defense is capital be bad.

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know they score points. So I don't

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 3>think Washington's all that great. I've been saying that for

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks now. I don't think they win outright,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 3>that's a bridge too far. But can they cover ten

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 3>at home.

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they can. One of the weirder things that happens

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at Oregon State games. I assume you have not been

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to Corvallis No okay. On big third down plays or

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>big they need a stop plays on defense, they pipe

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sound of a chainsaw, which almost doesn't make sense.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand how it's congruent to a beaver in you know,

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>cutting wood, eating wood, whatever, but I feel like the

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 1>chainsaw has replaced the beaver. So they're celebrating the technological

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>advancement that's putting beavers out of work and creating dams.

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're familiar with that. That's a

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit just a local trib for you.

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 3>It's a little that's a little bit of a deep

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 3>cut for me. Dan, not gonna lie, no problem. What

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 3>is your order from Yakos? By the way, my order

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 3>from Yakos?

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you're going in there, you want a quick dog,

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your order?

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I will usually get two to three Yaco dog, depending

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 3>how hungry I am toppings. It's usually just the Yaco dog,

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the hot dog with the special sauce on.

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>What is the special sauce? That's sort of like a

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>chili sauce interesting like a thinner or a sledgeier. And

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I say that lovingly. I love a good sludgie chili.

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Uh, it's sort of in between, actually, okay, a little

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 3>bit of a little bit of a little bit of

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 3>bee is it?

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it like a squiggle to it? Or is it

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 1>a squiggle? Yeah, like a mustard or ketchup squiggle like

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>thin enough for a squiggle. No squiggle. It is like

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a top, Yes it is. Okay, two or three

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>yacos dogs, So I assume they're not super No, they're

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>not gigantic, right, Okay, okay.

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Next game three thirty ABC USC at Arizona State. Arizona

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 3>State a two point favorite once a year, Dan we

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:22.439
<v Speaker 3>gather to reflect upon Lin Kiffin getting fired on the tarmac. Yes,

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 3>at almost what six years now?

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>This one's a coin flip to me. This game.

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with ASU for two reasons. First Off,

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 3>the defense is pretty good. I don't think good enough

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to fully stop USC, but good enough to force turnovers

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 3>and get Jayde and Daniels a few more bites at

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the apple. And secondly, I think there's an opportunity here

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 3>for Ineno Benjamin to run the football and control some

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 3>of that time of possession for ASU. I think it's ugly.

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go twenty one to twenty Asu. I'll take

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 3>the points even though there's only two of them.

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Okay, who's favored? So it's Asu? Excuse me. ASU's favored

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>by two, right, So you think they'll win by one?

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to take You think it's a one

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>point game. You feel confidently enough in USC winning or

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>losing by a hair? Sure? Okay, it's reasonable enough. USC

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 1>still beat up and they're definitely in letdown, if not

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>body blow mode. You can play the sound. And also

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's possible. I don't know if I'm fully there,

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:28.720
<v Speaker 1>but there's a potential bottom falling out of this USC

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>season in play? Right? Yeah? All we hear about is

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>will the new USC ad have permission to hire urban Meyer?

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Will USC make a move sooner rather than later? Who

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is James Franklin on the table? We saw James Franklin rumors?

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Is he a potential candidate for USC? I saw I

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think it was Pete Thamil from Yahoo said he is

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.279
<v Speaker 1>who some people at USC If it's not gonna be

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.240
<v Speaker 1>urban Meyer? Who makes a lot of sense interesting. Okay,

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:58.959
<v Speaker 1>USC struggled with a similar Colorado team. I would say

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on the road that they have the potential for offense,

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but there are definitely some deficiencies all over the field.

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>That was just a couple weeks ago, and that's a

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>beat up USC. With that struggle ASU weathered. They didn't

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>do a great job, but they weathered the Wazoo air

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 1>raid and came away with a win. I was more

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>because of Wazoo's defense than anything, but still they weathered

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it enough. I have ASU by six thirty one, twenty five.

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bad situational spot for the Trojans.

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 4>I do agree with that.

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have ASU covering here all right, rapid fire

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 3>through five other games. Yeah, three thirty ACC Network wake

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Forest at Virginia Tech.

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Wake Forest a two and a half point road favorite.

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>DAN. Last time they played, Frank Beemer raised his hands

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in glory about going to an overtime period at zero zero.

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe that was a six to three double overtime thriller.

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>The last time they played, that's it was twenty fourteen,

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen, twenty thirteen. It's been years, plural years since

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>these two teams have played. I think it takes an

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>offense to take down Wake. Sort of takes a village,

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think from what I saw from Virginia

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Tech last week, even though they're at home, even though

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's in Lane Stadium. The thing that I am worried

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>about though I thought this line would be a little bigger.

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It surprised me too. Worry some lines you're supposed to

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>steer into. But I can't justify a Virginia Tech offensive

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>explosion because I think Wake's gonna get there. So I

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have waked by a touchdown after Virginia Tech last week

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 1>let their potential signature season win slip away. We agree

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>also at three point thirty ESPN two Louisville Louisville at Miami.

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Miami is a six point favorite.

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 3>This is another one where I thought the line was

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 3>gonna be different, okay, and I think I like the

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Miami defense too much. I really like this line for

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the Caynes. I thought it was gonna be higher. So

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking Miami.

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm gonna go with Miami as well. So for

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>similar reasons, it's a bit of a letdown spot after

0:47:56.680 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Florida State win that got Florida State's coach fired,

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:03.760
<v Speaker 1>or at least was the final nail. Louisville just allows

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>too much through the air. And I know Miami has

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>been up and down offensively, relying on big plays, but

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:10.839
<v Speaker 1>they got him last week and they've gone the past

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>couple weeks, and so I think the Miami offensive line

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 1>has improved. So I think just maybe that passing attack alone,

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>because Louisville's defense is improved, but it's still all that good.

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, your daughter has an awful, awful boyfriend,

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they break up and she starts dating somebody new and

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>not great, but it's better than the old guy. So

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Louisville has a ways to go. They're fun on offense,

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>but give me Miami.

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Here three point thirty ESPN. We've got ky State on

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 3>the road at Texas. Texas is about a touchdown favorite here, Dan.

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 3>That feels like a lot to me. Why feels like

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 3>a lot to me because I think k State does

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the fundamentals quite well and they've been pretty dept at

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 3>controlling the clock. Still not entirely sure that they're balanced

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 3>enough on offense, but I feel like Chris Kleiman has

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 3>been working all week in his fantasy fact after the

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma win two weeks ago, to try and come up

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 3>with a game plan here for this Texas game. So

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I think Texas may win the game outright, but maybe

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 3>like thirty four thirty.

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it could be close. Okay, so let's not

0:49:16.160 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>judge Texas on their worst day, and they aren't getting healthier.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly how healthier they'll be in the secondary,

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but this is not exactly a Kansas State team who

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>should be able to throw a ton. But I guess

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we could have said that about Kansas. I have Texas close.

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:32.919
<v Speaker 1>It's they're coming off a bye week, they're at home.

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the second straight road game for Kansas State. However

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 1>much you believe in that being an obstacle, Kansas State

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>probably needs to win on the ground, and at least

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the ground is a place where Texas is not a disaster.

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not bad, right, it's fine. They're fine up front.

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>The secondary has been just a mess. You can pick

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 1>on them all day. So I'm going to go with Texas.

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the points, though, So I think

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we agree. I have Texas like thirty three to thirty. Yeah,

0:49:58.680 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we agree.

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:06.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay, seven PESPN Miszoo at Georgia. Georgia a seventeen point favorite. Here, Dan,

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 3>we've had this one circled for a long time.

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I've again thoroughly erased the circle on Scandal on Saturday.

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a game that we had highlighted a

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 3>while back. It's always been a bit of an intriguing

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 3>matchup for me. I think George is way better than Miszoo,

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 3>let's get that out there. But this does feel like

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 3>a weird game where somehow Miszoo covers the spread, keeps

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 3>it close even though Georgia wins. It sort of is

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 3>like a little bit damaging to the dogs.

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Thirty seven thirty one Wyoming twenty one to fourteen, Vanderbilt

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine to seven Kentucky. There is your road slate.

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I know Zoo, I know in twenty ninety.

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 3>But yet a couple of weeks ago you said, yeah,

0:50:57.640 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 3>this is the game that they're going to play him tight.

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a different guy a couple of weeks ago. Okay, okay,

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:11.800
<v Speaker 1>so potential letdown spot for Georgia Miszoo though again nightmare

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on the road. And this is a quote I hate

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>to see it was. I think it was Bury oed

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and at least it was an Amazoo coach said if

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we had to play tonight, it would not be Kelly

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Bryant out there. He's not ready. That's a subversion of that.

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>That was a day and a half ago, and this

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is Miszoo on the road. I don't see it. I

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think even with it being a letdown spot, maybe Georgia

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>starts slow like they're prone to do. I have it

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty four to thirteen Dogs.

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:45.479
<v Speaker 3>And finally seven pm ESPN two app State. App State

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:48.160
<v Speaker 3>lost a week ago. They are on the road at

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:52.239
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina. The line is only five in favor of

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 3>South Carolina.

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Dan. Yeah, this is an interesting matchup, isn't it? A

0:51:56.520 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>team that gave up forty one to Tennessee m HM.

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 1>App State plays a tough brand of football. App State

0:52:04.760 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 1>does play a tough brand of football. Their defense isn't

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.919
<v Speaker 1>necessarily was it where it was? Excuse me under Scott

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Sadderfield and his staff, But still fine, still pretty good.

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:18.799
<v Speaker 1>If South Carolina wins this game, it'll be on the ground.

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I think happens here. App State coming

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>off of a loss, going back out on the Road. Yeah,

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take South Carolina. I get South Carolina by

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a field goal. Oh, so you have You're gonna take

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:33.239
<v Speaker 1>those points, taking the points, getting South Carolina wins by

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>seven late. All right, That is all I have in

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>my list, Dan, you got anything else? H Wyoming at

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Boise State. I know you like to ignore the Mountain

0:52:40.920 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>West because you have an East coast bias, but that

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>should be quite fun. I think I have Boise here,

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 1>even after there's slow start in surviving a shootout against

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:51.799
<v Speaker 1>San Jose State. Just a tough place to win. A

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>telemarketer from Wichita, Kansas is calling me right now. Otherwise, Ty,

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I have Duquine, Bob Morris fighting Bobbies both four and

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>o in the Northeastern Conference, Kennesaw State, the Owls against

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the Campbell Camels, ow Wools, ow Wwolves, Big Big South matchup,

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire four and one in the Colonial against James

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Madison five and oh in the Colonial the Underrated not underrated,

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but I have ignored this logo for far too long,

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and they also happen to be good. But the the

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Ut Martin Skyhawks. Have you ever seen the Skyhawk logo?

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing, It's an eagle, but the eagle has like

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>those aviator goggles resting on its head with the cool

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>wing situation on either side. Great logo they're taking on

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Austin p They're four and one in the Ohio Valley

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:45.240
<v Speaker 1>ut Martin five and one and now tie your week eleven, Yes,

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>headliner forget LSU Alabama Yankee Stadium tie. You know this

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 1>game is in Yankee Stadium, right, I know. I know

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Princeton at seven and oh, Dartmouth at seven and oh,

0:53:56.920 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and there is a line. I did find a site

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>five dimes. I believe FCS lines the mouthis.

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I regret that weird, We'd already regret it. Three and

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites in what I'm calling because Dartmouth

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is a New Hampshire and Princeton is in New Jersey,

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling it the Uper Bowl. I work shot that

0:54:16.680 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 1>name a little clunky. I work shop. First of all,

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's brilliant, and I spent more time on that on

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:27.279
<v Speaker 1>any game preview fair. I'm gonna take there's something in

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the air in Dartmouth. There is something in the air,

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and they win on a hail Mary last week. I

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:35.880
<v Speaker 1>love Princeton. I love that offense. But the Dartmouth defense

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>allowing ten a game. Give me the mouth these. I

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:39.880
<v Speaker 1>stand by it. Let's go mouth these. I'll do it

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 1>double mouth. Ye a, God, regret that even more. On

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:50.439
<v Speaker 1>that note, please drop that pulsating pounding, pure bliss, big

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 1>stanky drum. Five.

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:56.279
<v Speaker 3>All right, we got three games on the docket here,

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 3>starting lines for these, by the way, Oh okay, starting

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 3>at High New Go ahead, you read them off then.

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 1>All right? Holy Cross the Crossaders at three and h

0:55:03.880 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Pat League, favored by nearly two touchdowns, thirteen

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:09.080
<v Speaker 1>points over the Eddies of Lafayette at noon.

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 4>I go Yettes, I go big, John Burke. You know

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 4>where I stand.

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:16.239
<v Speaker 1>As well, the true big noon Saturday game. Lee High

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:20.360
<v Speaker 1>at three and one at Bucknell one and two in

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Pat League. But it looks I think Lehigh's is

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the Lee High. They're given four.

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm gonna go Lee High minus the points. I

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 3>don't usually like to take the road spot here, but

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Lee High has been playing pretty well last couple of weeks,

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.399
<v Speaker 3>So let's go Tyler. Monica had a big week last week.

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's go Mountain Hawks.

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're gonna go Mountain Hawks. Engineers, whatever, you gotta

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:46.840
<v Speaker 1>call him Fordham one and two at Colgate one three Colgate.

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it's one two in a row. Mm hmmm,

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:52.320
<v Speaker 4>two in a row since.

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Not winning any at all for a good chunk of

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:56.839
<v Speaker 1>the season. Well, they're one in three in the pat League,

0:55:56.880 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>so one.

0:55:57.120 --> 0:55:57.959
<v Speaker 4>And three in the pat League.

0:55:57.960 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 3>But I think I think two wins overall, and I

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:02.880
<v Speaker 3>could be wrong about that. Okay, I'm gonna go Colgate

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:04.479
<v Speaker 3>here to shock the world at home.

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:08.760
<v Speaker 1>The Bronx is the center of the college football universe,

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously with Yankee Stadium hosting the Nuper Bowl. And I

0:56:11.480 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you noticed I did put a Nuper

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Bowl sound You know I did not see the sound files.

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, we can we can play it another week

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 1>or play it in the recap. There's something, there's something

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:24.319
<v Speaker 1>about the Bronx. I'm gonna take Fordham here. I'm gonna

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>take the for the Fordham Rams. And by the way,

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 1>if you are going to the Nuper Bowl, La Morada

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for Mexican food. La Morada m O r A d

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a La Morada really good. Wa Hawkan food Wahawcken Wahaka

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is an area. It's a state in Mexico. It's a

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 1>very specific style if you like Molais, like we've talked about,

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>No I do any ingredients, sure, yeah, okay Claudas oh man,

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I wish that in an old blue Apron spot you

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 1>had to read off that you could make Claudas t

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 1>l a I udat.

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going in that direction also, Ty, before we stop,

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Before we hit stop on the show, I'm actually going

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:15.479
<v Speaker 1>on The Lead, which is a terrific show that Wondery does.

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a daily sports show. They partnered with the Athletic,

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 1>interviewing different writers based on the story of the day.

0:57:22.440 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So if it's a big it's a big day for

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers, they talk to the whoever's covering the Lakers

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Athletic. If it's a big day for the

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos for whatever reason, they talk to the person

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>covering the Broncos. And so I'm going on the show

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to talk about LSU Alabama. So I figured let's let's

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 1>get to know the Lead a little bit more before

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we go, since they do a terrific job doing a

0:57:44.680 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>daily sports show. Up stuff every morning of the week

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for your commute. Have a listen, and now before we

0:57:51.080 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>go on very excited to take a take a nice look,

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 1>take a dip into the pool of our friends at

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 1>another Wondery show, and it's Kavitha Davidson and Alters. I said,

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Alters Honders kelto because what I did was I combined

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:11.480
<v Speaker 1>your names. But they host the Lead for both Wondery

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and The Athletic, and if you have not listened to

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the lead, First of all, shame on you. You are

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:18.680
<v Speaker 1>doing a poor job with your digital audio consumption. Second

0:58:18.720 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of all, as you probably know, they do a daily

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 1>sports show with The Athletic and Wondery, So every morning

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:25.959
<v Speaker 1>you wake up, you get on your way to work

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and boom, there is an episode of the Lead. They're

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:31.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about the biggest sports stories and talking to experts

0:58:31.480 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Athletic. Not that they're not smart, but how

0:58:34.040 --> 0:58:36.280
<v Speaker 1>can you know about everything in every single sport? You

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 1>might as well lean on the experts. So whether it's

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers, the Broncos, or Florida State or maybe the

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Wild, I don't know. I don't know, and I

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>would like to know. So Kavitha Onders, thank you for

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 1>joining me.

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for having us.

0:58:50.880 --> 0:58:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Dan, what an intro. Oh my gosh, I've been working

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on that all day, so I think I did the

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 1>concept justice. And part of the reason that I'm having

0:59:00.640 --> 0:59:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you on besides that I'm just fans of the show,

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 1>is also I'm appearing on the show to talk about

0:59:05.760 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 1>LSU Alabama, so I figured we'd make this official. Go

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>both ways. Tell me about how the lead works, how

0:59:14.320 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it operates.

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, it is as a heavy lift, but it's a

0:59:20.040 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 5>lot of fun and essentially we just dive into the

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 5>sort of the biggest and the most fascinating sports stories

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:28.440
<v Speaker 5>of the day, and like you mentioned, we're hitting all

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 5>sports and all kinds of stories. We tend to do

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:36.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of profiles of really interesting athletes or people

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 5>of note in the world of sports, but we're really

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 5>just kind of curious about what's happening out there and

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 5>trying to find surprising and compelling stories and then to

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 5>find the best people and the best sports reporters to

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 5>help us tell them.

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that that's you know, if you

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:56.440
<v Speaker 2>follow what we do over at the Athletic, you know,

0:59:56.440 --> 0:59:59.640
<v Speaker 2>and I came over to the podcast from being a

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:02.160
<v Speaker 2>sports business reporter for the Athletic. You know, we've got

1:00:02.200 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 2>so many reporters who have just been covering these teams

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 2>for years, who are on the ground there, and you know,

1:00:08.360 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 2>if something happens in New Orleans, we've got like four

1:00:10.880 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>people that we can call on in New Orleans to

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 2>come on and talk about that. And that's that's really

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>cool to us.

1:00:16.360 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So it actually does bring up a question, how do

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you I know you're leaning on the experts, but you

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to ask smart questions. You have

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to no context to bring information out of these experts

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in various cities. How are you able to download content

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like I have to know about dozens, if not like

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred college football teams, and that's already a

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>heavy lift. How do you jump across sports to fully

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>understand context to bring good information out of your interviewees.

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'll answer that because the answer often is Kavitha.

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:52.640
<v Speaker 5>She is an encyclopedia of sports information, and we do

1:00:52.760 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 5>lean on her quite a bit. But you know, it's

1:00:54.040 --> 1:00:56.520
<v Speaker 5>also very much a team effort. We've got a team

1:00:56.560 --> 1:01:00.800
<v Speaker 5>of producers who are amazing researchers who create prep sheets

1:01:00.800 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 5>and outlines for us and prep us for interviews and

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:06.640
<v Speaker 5>talk through story ideas with us, and you know, research

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 5>is a big part of what we do.

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I'm just gonna jump in and say and

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that, Ondrews, thank you. You know, like I've

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>covered sports for six years now, and I'm a generalist, right,

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Like I've covered all sports, so I have a pretty

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>good baseline knowledge of, you know, anything that we could

1:01:24.760 --> 1:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about, but you know, without going as deep as

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>these experts go. You know, that's kind that kind of

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>sets the foundation for you know, when we do these

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>deep dives, and that also kind of helps for us

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that you know, we do have this incredible staff of

1:01:38.760 --> 1:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>people who not all of them are sports fans, so

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>they can kind of filter out, you know, the stuff

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>when I get way too much into my heads and

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, wait, you remember when this happened in nineteen

1:01:47.640 --> 1:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven. Nobody else remembers that. I don't either because

1:01:50.600 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't born.

1:01:52.520 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 5>And I would also just add real quickly that you know,

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 5>we are both we both love sports. We're both very

1:01:57.840 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 5>curious about sports, but we try to get out of

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 5>the way of the story as much as possible. Like

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:04.920
<v Speaker 5>the show isn't about us, it's about the storytellers that

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:07.480
<v Speaker 5>we bring on and it's about the stories themselves. So

1:02:07.520 --> 1:02:09.520
<v Speaker 5>we're not out there to try and impress anyone or

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 5>like validate ourselves with how much we know about sports.

1:02:12.040 --> 1:02:14.480
<v Speaker 5>We're just there to try and help tell these really

1:02:14.520 --> 1:02:15.360
<v Speaker 5>powerful stories.

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh we have completely different ideologies then, because I love

1:02:20.320 --> 1:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>no one myself and taking some credit for everything I know, Well,

1:02:23.800 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe we do a little core of my being. Yeah.

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>My final question is, and I know, Kavitha, this is

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>probably more appropriate to you. I think you're a bigger

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>college football fan, but do you have strong LSU Alabama thoughts?

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>You know going into the game? Is there a part

1:02:39.000 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of the narrative, the storyline of the game that you're

1:02:41.760 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly interested? Do you have a pick? Do you have

1:02:43.600 --> 1:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a hot take? How are you landing with this matchup

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of the century?

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I think that we've bandied about

1:02:50.280 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the idea of the game of the century and how

1:02:52.320 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 2>many times we have had the game of the century

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in the last tenth of a century. It's the best

1:02:59.720 --> 1:03:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited to see. First of all, is too a

1:03:01.640 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>playing do we have Do we have that confirmation.

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>He is supposed to play? He is going He had

1:03:07.000 --> 1:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a little procedure done the tightrope procedure on his ankle

1:03:10.400 --> 1:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly will play what percentage of fully healthy tou h,

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>he'll be nobody knows which.

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:20.040
<v Speaker 5>By the way, have you guys watched online videos of

1:03:20.120 --> 1:03:21.080
<v Speaker 5>the tightrope procedure?

1:03:21.320 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't.

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if I want to recommend that you

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:27.439
<v Speaker 5>do it or not, but you will not be able

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 5>to unsee it or unfeel it.

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys have a pick? Do you have any

1:03:30.480 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>strong thoughts?

1:03:31.760 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 5>I think it's gonna be LSU's year, man. I mean,

1:03:34.160 --> 1:03:37.520
<v Speaker 5>they've lost, they've lost for eight straight years. They finally

1:03:37.560 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 5>have the team that they've been working towards for a

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 5>number of seasons. Now they've got the quarterback that they

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 5>need to finally break the Nick Saban curse. And even

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:50.160
<v Speaker 5>though they're on the road, I don't know, I just

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 5>think this is their year.

1:03:51.200 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Didn't we do the calculation at some point in preparing

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 2>for your the two of your episode that we're running

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>that like, Nick Saban in the course of this rivalry

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>is like fourteen and four which team he's coaching?

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 5>That's right? Yeah, Yeah, you'd be silly to bet against

1:04:03.800 --> 1:04:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Nick Saban if you go by the odds, but I'm

1:04:06.040 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 5>going to go against the odds.

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Nick Saban and Math get along quite well. That is

1:04:10.840 --> 1:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the lesson near All right, Kavifa Anders, thank you very

1:04:13.480 --> 1:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>much for your time and again anywhere where podcasts can

1:04:17.080 --> 1:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>be downloaded and subscribed to do that. For the lead

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>from Wondery and the Athletic. Thanks again, you guys, thank you,

1:04:24.600 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much.

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Dan all right, Dan Cool, I like it. Thank you,

1:04:28.600 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 3>good stuff. Check out the lead another great Wondery show.

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:34.760
<v Speaker 3>We're happy to be part of the Wondery family and

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:37.840
<v Speaker 3>happy to have the lead in our feed every morning.

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. Yeah, it's I mean, I love a good

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast as service. We're just like, oh, it's always up

1:04:44.040 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>there for my commute. I love having that. It's part

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of the reason we do the Twoes crews up at

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday six am Eastern and every you know Thursday six

1:04:51.200 --> 1:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern previews. So really like podcasting as a utility

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for your commute. So all in favor for sure.

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, don't forget to check that out, and don't forget

1:05:00.760 --> 1:05:04.360
<v Speaker 3>to check out our week eleven recap show that'll be

1:05:04.440 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 3>up on Sunday afternoon. After all the action As you

1:05:08.200 --> 1:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>are watching week eleven on this scan tron Saturday.

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You're okay with this? I like it? I like it? Okay, yeah,

1:05:16.040 --> 1:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>four oh eight verbal one.

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>That's four eight eight three seven two two five one.

1:05:19.480 --> 1:05:22.479
<v Speaker 3>That's the reverb line. You can also record your own

1:05:22.560 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 3>voice on your own phone and send it via your

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:30.320
<v Speaker 3>own email to the reverb line at gmail dot com.

1:05:30.320 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 3>We're still piloting our little voice memo system with a

1:05:33.400 --> 1:05:37.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of fun last week, hoping to get more concise messages.

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a signal line. Is that a thing do

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we have? Is there a soliverbal signal for encrypted privacy?

1:05:43.840 --> 1:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Like if you want to be like I just have

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a super huge cround.

1:05:46.200 --> 1:05:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if people have any scoops that they want

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>to send us, Oh okay, we can start a signal.

1:05:52.440 --> 1:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>No, I was saying, a signal for people just to

1:05:55.240 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>share their secrets, but in an untraceable way. I mean we,

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>oh god, we can do that. I don't just like

1:06:04.240 --> 1:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a Late March show, we reveal verbaler's secrets.

1:06:08.480 --> 1:06:11.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'll do it. I just learned that signal

1:06:11.880 --> 1:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>existed pretty recently. I will start a signal account for us. Yes,

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:17.600
<v Speaker 3>this is gonna get weird.

1:06:17.680 --> 1:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why we'll use it, but we'll use it.

1:06:19.520 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 4>We'll figure something out.

1:06:20.480 --> 1:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure, why not?

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:22.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'll do it. I'll do it as soon

1:06:22.880 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>as we get off here. Done for that guy there,

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>my good friend Dan Rubenstein, for myself Tied Hill the brand.

1:06:27.960 --> 1:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for downloading the show. We will

1:06:29.840 --> 1:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>catch you all in a few days.

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Peace,