1 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley. 2 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:27,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Julian 5 00:00:27,640 --> 00:00:30,880 Speaker 1: Emmanuel with us right now with bt I g of 6 00:00:30,880 --> 00:00:33,720 Speaker 1: course expert in equities and derivatives. Julian, what does the 7 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:36,760 Speaker 1: derivative markets say to you right now? What are the 8 00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:41,839 Speaker 1: indicators and derivatives that gives you direction in regular common stock? 9 00:00:42,920 --> 00:00:46,320 Speaker 1: Sure so, so yesterday was was critical in our view 10 00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:50,920 Speaker 1: because as you made lower low in the SMP five 11 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 1: hundred and all the major indexes, you didn't make a 12 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:57,560 Speaker 1: higher high in the VIX. And when you put that 13 00:00:57,680 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 1: in the context of the fact that between limit down 14 00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:04,960 Speaker 1: Sunday night, then massive rally on the back of the 15 00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:09,120 Speaker 1: FED and then a collapse, a total movement of almost 16 00:01:10,440 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 1: of the value of the s and P five from 17 00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:16,679 Speaker 1: low to high to low um, it basically tells you 18 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:20,160 Speaker 1: that for the most part, sellers are exhausted. They may 19 00:01:20,200 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: not be finished, but they are exhausted at the moment, 20 00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:25,680 Speaker 1: and so that's the start of a bottoming process and 21 00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 1: our view, Judy, I'm realty hot to make the argument 22 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: that things of bottom in an equity when we haven't 23 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:33,960 Speaker 1: seen that happening credit yet, how it spreads out to 24 00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:37,800 Speaker 1: about eleven hundred basis points, the non energy component getting 25 00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:40,760 Speaker 1: out to near a thousand now and the direction of 26 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,440 Speaker 1: travel is still concerning. Can you construct an argument the 27 00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:47,960 Speaker 1: equities of bottoming opposite of a bottoming gall in credit? Uh? Well, 28 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 1: I think basically, you know you you spoke about it 29 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:54,640 Speaker 1: a little while ago, in that you know, the government 30 00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:58,560 Speaker 1: is now uh in the business of picking winners and 31 00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:02,160 Speaker 1: losers more than perhaps in two thousand and eight, I 32 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:05,280 Speaker 1: would argue, well more than than two thousand and eight. 33 00:02:05,400 --> 00:02:10,880 Speaker 1: And clearly the priority is on the employers, the you know, 34 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:15,360 Speaker 1: the larger companies. UM. This will be a process that 35 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:19,760 Speaker 1: will get managed. Ultimately, the FED will oversee the high 36 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:23,640 Speaker 1: yield market. Um. And as you said, there will be bankruptcies. 37 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 1: But the fact is that you know, the for the 38 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:30,080 Speaker 1: most part, you tend to look through these types of things. 39 00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:32,320 Speaker 1: And I would suggest that when you look at the 40 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:36,280 Speaker 1: first quarter of two thousand and sixteen, and obviously the 41 00:02:36,600 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 1: bankruptcies in high yield will be you know, far in 42 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:46,600 Speaker 1: excess of that that you know down thirty could be 43 00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:50,800 Speaker 1: the beginning of of discounting in the equity market. So, Julian, 44 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:53,360 Speaker 1: there is a question about the fiscal response. We're talking 45 00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:56,240 Speaker 1: about the government and support for some of these companies. 46 00:02:56,639 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 1: But I want to go back to the FED and 47 00:02:58,320 --> 00:03:00,960 Speaker 1: trying to support market function and I'm trying to pass 48 00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 1: through market functioning versus credit risk. And I'm looking, for example, 49 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:07,520 Speaker 1: at some mortgage funds that are unable to meet margin calls. 50 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:12,120 Speaker 1: Investal Mortgage Capital the latest one crossing the Bloomberg earlier today. 51 00:03:12,120 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: You're seeing a lot of distress fire sales over the weekend, 52 00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:17,280 Speaker 1: trying to get rid of some of the assets to 53 00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:21,519 Speaker 1: meet redemptions and margin calls. At what point is this 54 00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:25,280 Speaker 1: going to be an ongoing problem for the system versus 55 00:03:25,320 --> 00:03:29,840 Speaker 1: just idiosyncratic potholes that are blowing up amid the volatility. Well, 56 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:34,160 Speaker 1: I think it actually has been a systemic problem, which 57 00:03:34,240 --> 00:03:37,600 Speaker 1: is why you've seen the said do what what it's doing. 58 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 1: From our point of view, you really want to look 59 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:42,880 Speaker 1: at commercial paper um and you want to look at 60 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 1: you know, frankly, training and clearing volume in in all 61 00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:51,080 Speaker 1: of the fixed income markets because to us, one of 62 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 1: the interesting things about this environment is that if you 63 00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 1: look at it, the equity market to function much much, 64 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:01,080 Speaker 1: you know, far superior in terms of liquidity than the 65 00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:04,920 Speaker 1: fixed income markets. We will be watching commercial paper very 66 00:04:05,040 --> 00:04:08,040 Speaker 1: very carefully. Julian, what have you? This may be an 67 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:10,640 Speaker 1: unfair question, but I'm gonna go that it's unfair. Tuesday, 68 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 1: what have you learned about active versus passive in this creator? 69 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:16,680 Speaker 1: I mean, act has been waiting for a creator for 70 00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 1: years to say actives better than pass Have you had 71 00:04:19,520 --> 00:04:24,479 Speaker 1: any wisdom on that? Well, what we're learning is is 72 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:28,479 Speaker 1: that the combination of of of the government intervening is 73 00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:32,200 Speaker 1: causing active versus passive to look a little different than 74 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:36,520 Speaker 1: perhaps we might have expected. Um And you know, typically 75 00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:39,960 Speaker 1: you might see some more of the value type areas 76 00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:44,479 Speaker 1: start to emerge and stabilize first. But again when you 77 00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:46,680 Speaker 1: look at it and you think about the waiting in 78 00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:50,120 Speaker 1: the index, uh, you really you know, you look at 79 00:04:50,200 --> 00:04:54,800 Speaker 1: at the value of technology, financials, health care, and communication 80 00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:58,760 Speaker 1: services and they dominate uh the index as a whole, 81 00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:01,880 Speaker 1: and those to be the area is that the government 82 00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:05,359 Speaker 1: is likely to put you winners over losers. John Pharaoh, 83 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 1: is Apple looking for a bail out. I don't think 84 00:05:07,720 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 1: Apples looking from a bailout. I think that's a silver 85 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:12,880 Speaker 1: lining on a morning like this, sitting down the couch. 86 00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:15,760 Speaker 1: You know, John, underneath my culture's probably three pair of 87 00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 1: airs been lost. You're supporting the company is still unpleased 88 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:24,120 Speaker 1: to keep on. Julie, and I want to transition to 89 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 1: a really complex question right now that it's got a 90 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:28,320 Speaker 1: whole lot more fuel in the last twenty four hours, 91 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:30,719 Speaker 1: and it's something investors increasingly might have to think about. 92 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,359 Speaker 1: I don't want you space to speak directly to the 93 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:35,080 Speaker 1: health issue, and I know that's difficult at a moment 94 00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: like this, but just explore the following with me. The 95 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:40,520 Speaker 1: President is making it pretty clear that he's thinking about 96 00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:44,840 Speaker 1: the cost benefit analysis, and it's a tragic store and 97 00:05:44,880 --> 00:05:48,760 Speaker 1: it's an ugly process of remaining shut down, and whether 98 00:05:48,839 --> 00:05:52,839 Speaker 1: the cure is worse than the illness. And the reason 99 00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:55,680 Speaker 1: I think investors need to start thinking about this is 100 00:05:55,720 --> 00:05:58,440 Speaker 1: if they pulled back on the mitigation efforts too early, 101 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:01,159 Speaker 1: and then we have to think about bringing them back 102 00:06:01,200 --> 00:06:03,880 Speaker 1: in in the summer and bringing back in in the full. 103 00:06:04,320 --> 00:06:06,440 Speaker 1: I just wonder how chopping, how messy this could get 104 00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:09,320 Speaker 1: if we don't shut it down, what it wants for markets, 105 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:11,680 Speaker 1: that is, from a market's perspective, from what you hear 106 00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 1: from the President at the moment, Judi. And how complex 107 00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:17,360 Speaker 1: is this issue. So if you look at the evolution 108 00:06:17,520 --> 00:06:20,360 Speaker 1: of the last sixteen hours or so, it's very clear 109 00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:23,679 Speaker 1: that part of the reason that the market started rallying 110 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:28,160 Speaker 1: overnight is because there was an expectation that the President 111 00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:33,280 Speaker 1: intends to bring the economy back sooner than expect You know, 112 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:37,479 Speaker 1: you can openine on on what the health implications of 113 00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:41,200 Speaker 1: that are, um, but there's no question about that from 114 00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 1: the market point of view that that is how we reacted. Look, 115 00:06:46,360 --> 00:06:50,840 Speaker 1: it's an incredibly difficult trade off, and and what we 116 00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:54,159 Speaker 1: we're thinking is that the actions that the Fed took 117 00:06:54,320 --> 00:06:59,000 Speaker 1: yesterday UM in concert with what we certainly hope and 118 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:02,239 Speaker 1: and honestly, if we don't get a bill today or tomorrow, 119 00:07:02,360 --> 00:07:06,000 Speaker 1: the level of your responsibility in Washington will just be 120 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:10,600 Speaker 1: you know, off the charts. Um that the combination of 121 00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:14,200 Speaker 1: those things can get us, you know, to manage the 122 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:17,920 Speaker 1: economic trough into the summer. But the real question is, 123 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 1: you know, in mitigation, you know, do people want to 124 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:24,000 Speaker 1: get on airplanes and eat out come the fall? We 125 00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:27,360 Speaker 1: need to get to that point, Jude mny Well, great 126 00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 1: to catch you out with you without question, folks. The 127 00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveillance interview of the day on this crisis. She 128 00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:42,960 Speaker 1: is out of Northampton, Massachusetts and Smith College, where she 129 00:07:43,040 --> 00:07:45,800 Speaker 1: took a liking to the creb cycle and then had 130 00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 1: a sterling academic career in microbiology, including uh time at 131 00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:56,040 Speaker 1: Columbia University, her Columbia University, and the University of Washington program, 132 00:07:56,080 --> 00:08:01,559 Speaker 1: which is world class. Angela Rasmussen choice. Now, Angela, help 133 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 1: me with the density of population, whether it is Italy 134 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:11,880 Speaker 1: or Wuhan or Brooklyn, New York, the density of population 135 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:17,640 Speaker 1: seems to be a determining factor. Yeah, so viruses have 136 00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:22,040 Speaker 1: to spread between people. Um Viruses can be picked up 137 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: from the environment, but they generally don't last long on 138 00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:29,600 Speaker 1: say surfaces, for example. Um So, in general, when the 139 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:33,480 Speaker 1: population is more dense, you're more risk of coming across 140 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:36,360 Speaker 1: somebody who is also infected, who could possibly transmit a 141 00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:40,199 Speaker 1: virus to you. So, Angelo, what have we learned from 142 00:08:40,520 --> 00:08:46,160 Speaker 1: Wuhan and from northern Italy about the timeline here? Flattening 143 00:08:46,240 --> 00:08:48,840 Speaker 1: that curve. Where are we kind of here in the 144 00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 1: US on that curve. Well, it's very difficult to say, 145 00:08:52,360 --> 00:08:55,400 Speaker 1: because our testing capacity is not at the point where 146 00:08:55,400 --> 00:08:59,800 Speaker 1: we can truly accurately determine the prevalence of Star's coronavirus 147 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:04,520 Speaker 1: to in our population. However, um, and I'm cautioning this pison. 148 00:09:04,600 --> 00:09:08,520 Speaker 1: I'm not an epidemiologist, but all the current epidemiological models 149 00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:11,160 Speaker 1: that I've seen suggestion that we're still on the uptick. 150 00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:15,800 Speaker 1: You can expect more cases. I mean, this is so important. 151 00:09:15,800 --> 00:09:18,079 Speaker 1: Folks and the Ft and the New York Times have 152 00:09:18,160 --> 00:09:21,680 Speaker 1: done great charts on this, and Angela their log charts. 153 00:09:22,120 --> 00:09:24,560 Speaker 1: And the answer is you want to bend the curve over, 154 00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:28,400 Speaker 1: as Paul Sweeney says, the Asians have successfully done this 155 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:32,720 Speaker 1: period and in Europe it's a struggle. What's so important 156 00:09:32,840 --> 00:09:38,640 Speaker 1: is the slope of those trajectories. Our slope Angela is frightening. 157 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:43,679 Speaker 1: How do we bring that slope down? Unfortunately, because we 158 00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:48,200 Speaker 1: don't know the prevalence in our population very accurately right now, 159 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 1: the only way to do that is by these large scale, 160 00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:54,959 Speaker 1: very very strict social distancing. How do you respond, I 161 00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:57,920 Speaker 1: don't mean to interrupt it, just because of time. Dr Rasmussen, 162 00:09:58,160 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 1: how do you respond to the president's an hour and 163 00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:04,640 Speaker 1: forty eight minute briefing yesterday, which is to get America 164 00:10:04,720 --> 00:10:07,000 Speaker 1: back to work? How do you, as a grizzled pro 165 00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:11,080 Speaker 1: respond that. I was very concerned about that statement. I 166 00:10:11,120 --> 00:10:13,440 Speaker 1: don't think that we're anywhere near the point where we 167 00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:16,280 Speaker 1: can begin to say that. UM. I think that it 168 00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:20,320 Speaker 1: does need to be evaluated uh as we go along. UM. 169 00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:22,360 Speaker 1: I don't think though, that it saves to say that 170 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:25,040 Speaker 1: people can go back to work unless we can determine 171 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:29,839 Speaker 1: if they have been infected before and may have protective immunity. So, 172 00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:33,840 Speaker 1: Dr the what is the sense of the treatment? How 173 00:10:33,880 --> 00:10:36,360 Speaker 1: do you think the treatment will evolve over the next 174 00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:40,800 Speaker 1: several months. Obviously there's not a COVID nineteen treatment flu shot, 175 00:10:40,840 --> 00:10:42,800 Speaker 1: for example, But how do you think the treatment will evolve? 176 00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:46,480 Speaker 1: I think if there is a treatment, and certainly some 177 00:10:46,559 --> 00:10:50,199 Speaker 1: of the treatments that have been discussed hydroxychlor quinn rum 178 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:53,319 Speaker 1: does a view, for example, are in clinical trials. Now 179 00:10:53,960 --> 00:10:57,360 Speaker 1: it's incumbent on us to to complete those clinical trials 180 00:10:57,400 --> 00:11:00,680 Speaker 1: as quickly as possible, because having in a ailable treatment 181 00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 1: that's effective could really dramatically change this for all of us. 182 00:11:05,880 --> 00:11:07,719 Speaker 1: So a sense of timing on that, I know it's 183 00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:10,720 Speaker 1: you know, we usually kind of measure these things in years. 184 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:17,040 Speaker 1: Is there a possibility to compress that to months? Yes, certainly. 185 00:11:17,320 --> 00:11:21,240 Speaker 1: UM for chloroquine, M hydroxy chloroquine and super mycen and 186 00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:24,200 Speaker 1: ram doeser here. Those trials I believe are already ongoing. 187 00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:28,000 Speaker 1: A trial has already been completed in China um on 188 00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:31,640 Speaker 1: to HIV drugs that unfortunately did not turn out to work. 189 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:35,480 Speaker 1: But um, since the remdesivie and chloroquine trials have also 190 00:11:35,559 --> 00:11:37,920 Speaker 1: been going on, I think we can expect it to 191 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:41,720 Speaker 1: be a matter of weeks. Um eight to twelve weeks 192 00:11:41,880 --> 00:11:47,280 Speaker 1: is what I've heard versus six months to a year. Doctor. 193 00:11:47,360 --> 00:11:49,839 Speaker 1: It's interesting, Tom, you know, it's uh, it's just kind 194 00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:52,440 Speaker 1: of we're still in that upward part of the curve 195 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 1: here in the United States, certainly New York City. Dr. Yeah, yeah, 196 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:00,319 Speaker 1: I don't mean to interrupt, but thank you John Tucker 197 00:12:00,400 --> 00:12:03,840 Speaker 1: for sending in this headline. Mr Cudlow at the White House, 198 00:12:03,880 --> 00:12:07,559 Speaker 1: as quote, may try to reopen parts of the economy 199 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:11,079 Speaker 1: around months end. Dr rasmuson what's that part of the 200 00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:13,560 Speaker 1: economy gonna be. Is it going to be that famous 201 00:12:13,679 --> 00:12:16,439 Speaker 1: coffee house up in Northampton? Are they going to try 202 00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:19,199 Speaker 1: to open the Iron Horse Cafe just to keep the 203 00:12:19,280 --> 00:12:23,360 Speaker 1: economy going? I mean, what do they open? That is 204 00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:26,160 Speaker 1: an excellent question, and I have no idea. UM. I 205 00:12:26,320 --> 00:12:29,640 Speaker 1: do think that in many places some of those service 206 00:12:29,840 --> 00:12:34,199 Speaker 1: businesses UM and retail are still open. I know that 207 00:12:34,400 --> 00:12:36,640 Speaker 1: not in New York, cannot in Seattle, where I'm calling 208 00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:40,400 Speaker 1: from right now. UM, But I really don't know what 209 00:12:40,840 --> 00:12:45,080 Speaker 1: parts of the economy Mr Cudlo is speaking of. UM. 210 00:12:45,160 --> 00:12:47,959 Speaker 1: I think though, that indiscriminately opening up parts of the 211 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 1: economy is a bad idea without further testing. Thank you 212 00:12:52,640 --> 00:12:55,120 Speaker 1: so much for being with los Angele Rasmuson of Columbia 213 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:58,560 Speaker 1: University and in Seattle, of course, the University of Washington. 214 00:12:58,679 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for being with. That's what we've 215 00:13:03,960 --> 00:13:06,079 Speaker 1: been trying to do is go to experts in the field. 216 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:10,000 Speaker 1: Whether it's Peter Styre we talked to at Mount Sinai, 217 00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:14,400 Speaker 1: Brooklyn yesterday, Robert Crandall joining us, the emeritus chairman of 218 00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:18,800 Speaker 1: American Airlines earlier now Randall Crossinger, the former governor of 219 00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:23,360 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve System, Randy Crossinger Joints from the Boost School, Chicago. 220 00:13:24,040 --> 00:13:27,000 Speaker 1: Professor Krasser, wonderful to have you with us. I want 221 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:29,400 Speaker 1: to go to the mathiness. There is a point in 222 00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:33,560 Speaker 1: physics where you forget about the fanciness of the equation 223 00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 1: and you just look at the magnitude or what's called 224 00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:44,400 Speaker 1: the amplitude. Do we have any understanding of the amplitudes 225 00:13:44,760 --> 00:13:48,880 Speaker 1: of this shock, the size of the shock we're confronting. 226 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:54,199 Speaker 1: We really haven't seen something like this before, because this 227 00:13:55,000 --> 00:13:59,439 Speaker 1: is both a natural disaster and one that in order 228 00:13:59,480 --> 00:14:03,400 Speaker 1: to respond into the finatural disaster, we're taking policy actions 229 00:14:03,760 --> 00:14:06,719 Speaker 1: that are significantly slow in the economy. And I don't 230 00:14:06,760 --> 00:14:11,199 Speaker 1: think we've ever seen that specific combination before. We have 231 00:14:11,360 --> 00:14:14,520 Speaker 1: not seen it before, but we have to sort our 232 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:18,600 Speaker 1: way through it. Do the formulas in the theories work here? 233 00:14:19,480 --> 00:14:21,600 Speaker 1: Or is it just just to throw a lot of 234 00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:25,880 Speaker 1: money at the wall. No, No, I think they still uh, 235 00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:28,120 Speaker 1: you know, we don't have you know, we don't know 236 00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:30,680 Speaker 1: for sure, but I think we still have guidance from 237 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:33,400 Speaker 1: from other examples of the past, whether it's from the 238 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:37,200 Speaker 1: pandemic in the early part of the twentieth century or 239 00:14:37,400 --> 00:14:40,800 Speaker 1: other challenges that have occurred. I think it's really clear 240 00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:44,760 Speaker 1: that the lessons from the financial crisis and two thousand eight, 241 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:47,800 Speaker 1: two thousand nine are that a fundamental is that you 242 00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:51,280 Speaker 1: need to keep the financial system operating, and I think 243 00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:54,080 Speaker 1: that's what the FED is trying to do. Obviously, the 244 00:14:54,200 --> 00:14:58,720 Speaker 1: shock is coming from something very different than the mortgage market, um. 245 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:00,960 Speaker 1: But I think the less since have been learned there 246 00:15:01,200 --> 00:15:02,880 Speaker 1: and they stood up a lot of the programs that 247 00:15:03,040 --> 00:15:05,800 Speaker 1: we did back when I was there a decade ago, 248 00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:08,240 Speaker 1: and they're doing new things, which I think is great. 249 00:15:09,000 --> 00:15:11,320 Speaker 1: Professor Krauster, you so I want to talk a little 250 00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:13,440 Speaker 1: bit about those new things that that you talk about. 251 00:15:13,680 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 1: Do they have anything left based on your experience in 252 00:15:16,560 --> 00:15:19,960 Speaker 1: the crisis era at the Fedure Reserve and based on 253 00:15:20,040 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 1: what we're seeing right now, well, they've done a lot 254 00:15:23,880 --> 00:15:26,520 Speaker 1: and a lot of this is still being implemented. We'll 255 00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:30,720 Speaker 1: see the exact magnitude um and and you see they're 256 00:15:30,720 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 1: able to revive some of these They originally buying uh 257 00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:37,640 Speaker 1: billion dollars worth of treasuries billion dollars worth of mortgage 258 00:15:37,640 --> 00:15:40,400 Speaker 1: backed securities, and now that will be unlimited, and so 259 00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:44,280 Speaker 1: they may and they are starting to enter other markets 260 00:15:44,480 --> 00:15:48,800 Speaker 1: and they can increase their firepower in purchasing assets in 261 00:15:48,920 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 1: those those other markets. Uh, they are introducing or talked 262 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:57,680 Speaker 1: about introducing a main street lending program. I think that 263 00:15:57,760 --> 00:16:00,520 Speaker 1: could be helpful for small and medium sized business and 264 00:16:00,720 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 1: for for consumers. So I think they've done a lot. 265 00:16:04,120 --> 00:16:07,080 Speaker 1: I think there's still more ammunition left, both in terms 266 00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 1: of the magnitude of programs that really and now as 267 00:16:09,800 --> 00:16:12,400 Speaker 1: well as some specific programs like a main street lending program. 268 00:16:12,560 --> 00:16:14,240 Speaker 1: And Professor, we've talked a lot about what they've done, 269 00:16:14,280 --> 00:16:16,320 Speaker 1: and they've done a lot. Let's talk about what they've achieved. 270 00:16:16,400 --> 00:16:17,960 Speaker 1: What have they achieved in the last couple of weeks 271 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:21,000 Speaker 1: with this whole range of tools that they've basically deployed 272 00:16:21,040 --> 00:16:23,200 Speaker 1: to really get at the functioning of the market and 273 00:16:23,360 --> 00:16:27,480 Speaker 1: the financial conditions as well. So I think the markets 274 00:16:27,680 --> 00:16:31,800 Speaker 1: are still functioning, not perfectly, but much better than if 275 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:34,840 Speaker 1: the FIT had and other central banks hadn't undertaken the 276 00:16:34,880 --> 00:16:39,400 Speaker 1: actions that that they had. But when the shot comes 277 00:16:39,440 --> 00:16:44,280 Speaker 1: from something like a virus, the FED can do what's necessary, 278 00:16:44,640 --> 00:16:47,560 Speaker 1: but it's not sufficient. And I think UM, the reason 279 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:52,560 Speaker 1: that we haven't seen um the markets stopped that stopping 280 00:16:52,560 --> 00:16:54,760 Speaker 1: the tunnels in the markets. It is because it's now 281 00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:57,720 Speaker 1: with the health authorities and fiscal authorities, and they've been 282 00:16:57,800 --> 00:17:01,960 Speaker 1: mixed messages. Some countries doing more, some trunter is doing less. UM. 283 00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:06,000 Speaker 1: It's obviously the debates in Congress over you know, what 284 00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:09,200 Speaker 1: kind of package, whether the package will be passed and when. 285 00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:12,320 Speaker 1: That's creating a lot of a lot of uncertainty and 286 00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:15,200 Speaker 1: tumult a lot of division in Washington, d C. So 287 00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:18,800 Speaker 1: let's talk about how the effort in Washington could complement 288 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:20,520 Speaker 1: what we've seen on the montery policy side. What do 289 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:23,280 Speaker 1: you need to say literally yesterday as soon as possible 290 00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:28,080 Speaker 1: from Washington. On the political side of things, I think 291 00:17:28,480 --> 00:17:31,720 Speaker 1: getting an agreement that in and of itself will be 292 00:17:31,880 --> 00:17:34,000 Speaker 1: very valuable to the market to see that, I guess 293 00:17:34,359 --> 00:17:37,359 Speaker 1: they can get something together and they can act against 294 00:17:37,480 --> 00:17:43,119 Speaker 1: this um uh this uh this pandemic. Then, in particular, 295 00:17:43,400 --> 00:17:45,359 Speaker 1: I think would be really valuable to make sure that 296 00:17:45,480 --> 00:17:49,520 Speaker 1: it's very well focused on what are the issues. The First, 297 00:17:49,720 --> 00:17:54,760 Speaker 1: making sure that there's sufficient funding for healthcare and uh 298 00:17:54,920 --> 00:17:58,560 Speaker 1: that um giving incentives for healthcare workers in retirement to 299 00:17:58,640 --> 00:18:02,399 Speaker 1: come come back in that's I think something very important. Second, 300 00:18:02,560 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 1: making sure that vulnerable people continue to be able to 301 00:18:06,880 --> 00:18:10,280 Speaker 1: get income, and in particular that their incentive is not 302 00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:13,480 Speaker 1: to go into work but to stay home during this 303 00:18:13,640 --> 00:18:16,959 Speaker 1: period but still be able to receive income. You can 304 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:19,040 Speaker 1: do that through sending checks to people. You can do 305 00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 1: that through various support to small and medium sized business 306 00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:26,480 Speaker 1: to get them to continue to pay the wages of 307 00:18:26,600 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 1: people who would be happy staying at home. UM. Those 308 00:18:30,600 --> 00:18:32,760 Speaker 1: those are some of the first things that I would 309 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:36,360 Speaker 1: I would focus on Professor Krausner. Last week and even 310 00:18:36,359 --> 00:18:39,440 Speaker 1: the week before, we were really talking about a financial 311 00:18:39,560 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 1: crisis in addition to the economic crisis unfolding. Has the 312 00:18:43,200 --> 00:18:47,720 Speaker 1: FED effectively stopped that? Have we avoided a financial crisis 313 00:18:47,800 --> 00:18:51,680 Speaker 1: at this point or is it too early to say? Well, 314 00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:54,679 Speaker 1: given my experiences back in two two nine, I never 315 00:18:54,720 --> 00:18:57,680 Speaker 1: say never about anything, but I think that the FED 316 00:18:57,760 --> 00:19:02,120 Speaker 1: actions have been crucial in avoiding financial crisis so far. 317 00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:05,679 Speaker 1: And I think if the fiscal and health authorities act 318 00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:10,240 Speaker 1: in um expeditiously and effectively, then I think we will 319 00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:13,320 Speaker 1: have will have been able to get through that. But 320 00:19:13,560 --> 00:19:16,520 Speaker 1: it really will depend on the size of the economic shock, 321 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:21,280 Speaker 1: and and that's now on the court of the fiscal 322 00:19:21,320 --> 00:19:24,359 Speaker 1: and monetary and fiscal health authorities, and now as we 323 00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:29,400 Speaker 1: do for for surveillance. It's Math Tuesday with Randall Croster 324 00:19:29,520 --> 00:19:34,320 Speaker 1: of Chicago, Grandy Paul Wilmot, the giant of Imperial College, 325 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:37,919 Speaker 1: and a guy named Todd. Ab gave a rave review 326 00:19:38,080 --> 00:19:43,080 Speaker 1: years ago to Kent Osmond's masterpiece Iceberg Risk, which was 327 00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:48,440 Speaker 1: basically a complete refusentation of the central limit theorem. Are 328 00:19:48,480 --> 00:19:51,240 Speaker 1: we are we doing that again? Are we so fancy 329 00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:56,360 Speaker 1: at our crosser like math certitude that once again we've 330 00:19:56,480 --> 00:20:00,720 Speaker 1: learned the once in a lifetime event come along every 331 00:20:00,800 --> 00:20:07,200 Speaker 1: twelve years? Well? Yeah, Well, I think if you we've 332 00:20:07,240 --> 00:20:09,640 Speaker 1: talked about this before. I think on on your program 333 00:20:09,960 --> 00:20:12,800 Speaker 1: that I get worried when other people aren't worried. So 334 00:20:13,040 --> 00:20:17,159 Speaker 1: I focus a lot on um uh, doing scenario planning, 335 00:20:17,480 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 1: doing stress tests, and risk analysis for things where you're 336 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:23,960 Speaker 1: just not sure you don't have the data. Fork it 337 00:20:24,040 --> 00:20:27,760 Speaker 1: hasn't happened, but let's see what if? Can you? Can 338 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:30,560 Speaker 1: you withstand anything like that? And so these are the 339 00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:32,720 Speaker 1: things that you have to to think about. Can you 340 00:20:32,800 --> 00:20:36,040 Speaker 1: perfectly plans for them? Of course not. Can you have 341 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:39,720 Speaker 1: better readiness for them? Yes? And I think in some 342 00:20:39,880 --> 00:20:43,359 Speaker 1: sense we've learned a number of lessons from two thousand 343 00:20:43,520 --> 00:20:45,800 Speaker 1: two thousand nine, and it helped to allow the FED 344 00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:48,600 Speaker 1: to respond much more rapidly. Because they didn't have to 345 00:20:48,680 --> 00:20:52,520 Speaker 1: create programs like the commercial paper Facility and the money 346 00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:57,000 Speaker 1: market Facility and so many of the others whole cloth 347 00:20:57,160 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 1: like we didn't, they could stand them up quickly, and 348 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:03,760 Speaker 1: that gives opportunity to ramp them up, move them to scale, 349 00:21:03,960 --> 00:21:07,400 Speaker 1: and do some new thing. To borrow phrase from Nicholas 350 00:21:07,480 --> 00:21:11,200 Speaker 1: tell Ub, and that would be just simply skin in 351 00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:13,240 Speaker 1: the game. I guess we've all got skin in the 352 00:21:13,320 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: game now with this horrific crisis. I don't mean to 353 00:21:15,840 --> 00:21:19,880 Speaker 1: make a joke about it, folks, but Randy, the recovery rate, 354 00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:23,720 Speaker 1: the glide path to recovery. We forget out of the depression. 355 00:21:23,840 --> 00:21:26,520 Speaker 1: It took a war and stimulus of a war to 356 00:21:26,600 --> 00:21:28,720 Speaker 1: get equities to lift back to where they were in 357 00:21:28,880 --> 00:21:33,399 Speaker 1: nine after nineteen thirty seven. How do you envision a 358 00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:39,360 Speaker 1: recovery here to Dow twenty nine thousand. So I think 359 00:21:39,440 --> 00:21:44,240 Speaker 1: that ultimately will be related to the underlying economics, and 360 00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:48,360 Speaker 1: can we make sure as best as possible to try 361 00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:51,040 Speaker 1: to make this a v shape recovery rather than the 362 00:21:51,119 --> 00:21:54,040 Speaker 1: U shape or an L shape sort of sort of 363 00:21:54,119 --> 00:21:58,560 Speaker 1: thing that is out of the hands of the FIT. UM. 364 00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:02,200 Speaker 1: The FIT had very important role in making sure we 365 00:22:02,640 --> 00:22:07,080 Speaker 1: we had a recovery in over the last decade. Here 366 00:22:07,280 --> 00:22:09,479 Speaker 1: they can make sure we can avoid a financial crisis, 367 00:22:09,960 --> 00:22:12,240 Speaker 1: but the recovery pieces will have to come on the 368 00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:14,960 Speaker 1: health side and on that metiscal side. If we can 369 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:17,920 Speaker 1: get agreements, if we can get some movement forward, I 370 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:20,280 Speaker 1: think we can get there and hopefully make it much 371 00:22:20,320 --> 00:22:23,680 Speaker 1: more rapid than in uh in a great depression. Professor Krauser, 372 00:22:23,800 --> 00:22:27,000 Speaker 1: thank you so much, greatly greatly appreciated that. Too much 373 00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:36,040 Speaker 1: math just enough. Robert Crandell with us now, who was 374 00:22:36,119 --> 00:22:40,000 Speaker 1: identified with the airline business starting with t W a 375 00:22:40,119 --> 00:22:43,600 Speaker 1: years ago and then his leadership at American Airlines single 376 00:22:43,760 --> 00:22:47,159 Speaker 1: handedly inventing frequent flyer miles and the rest of it, 377 00:22:47,680 --> 00:22:50,200 Speaker 1: and now a well preserved eighty five year and he 378 00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:53,080 Speaker 1: joins us this morning. Bob Crandell, were so honored to 379 00:22:53,119 --> 00:22:55,760 Speaker 1: have you with us. You have seen the ups and 380 00:22:55,920 --> 00:22:59,840 Speaker 1: downs of airline bankruptcy and bailout. Does the a via 381 00:23:00,040 --> 00:23:05,040 Speaker 1: an industry need another bailout or nationalization this morning? Well, 382 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:07,119 Speaker 1: I do think it needs help, Tom. I mean the 383 00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:11,560 Speaker 1: keep in mind, you know, we've only got one big 384 00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:16,480 Speaker 1: intercity transportation system, that's the airline business. The airline business 385 00:23:16,600 --> 00:23:20,920 Speaker 1: and associated travel businesses are you know, they've they account 386 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:23,960 Speaker 1: from millions of jobs. So we've got to keep the 387 00:23:24,040 --> 00:23:28,160 Speaker 1: ail in and it's the functional And I do think 388 00:23:28,240 --> 00:23:29,960 Speaker 1: at the moment that what we're going to have to 389 00:23:30,040 --> 00:23:33,720 Speaker 1: do is make a public investment in the airline industry 390 00:23:33,800 --> 00:23:36,200 Speaker 1: to sort of sustained it during a period of time 391 00:23:36,240 --> 00:23:38,360 Speaker 1: when cash is just running out the door in the river. 392 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:41,720 Speaker 1: So I think, and I think the Trade Office, this 393 00:23:42,240 --> 00:23:44,879 Speaker 1: is probably a good public investment. It needs to be 394 00:23:45,040 --> 00:23:48,160 Speaker 1: off with some controls. I mean, we can't we can't 395 00:23:48,200 --> 00:23:51,120 Speaker 1: have the al in business taking public money and then 396 00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:53,720 Speaker 1: turning around and using its free cash phot to buy 397 00:23:53,760 --> 00:23:56,760 Speaker 1: back shares, which is what it's done over the last 398 00:23:56,800 --> 00:24:00,240 Speaker 1: six years. And we need to be sure that if 399 00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:04,040 Speaker 1: if we're going to help the airline industry, okay, but 400 00:24:04,280 --> 00:24:07,040 Speaker 1: that people don't get laid off and we were not 401 00:24:07,240 --> 00:24:11,760 Speaker 1: outsourcing maintenance to other countries. How do you envision what 402 00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:14,240 Speaker 1: would be a new regulation? I mean, folks, this is 403 00:24:14,240 --> 00:24:18,000 Speaker 1: ancient history now, but the gentleman from Cornell decided we 404 00:24:18,040 --> 00:24:20,800 Speaker 1: should be regulated, and Bob Crandell fought it for years 405 00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:23,800 Speaker 1: along with everybody else. And look what we wrought. I 406 00:24:23,880 --> 00:24:26,680 Speaker 1: mean the quality air service today. I'll be blunt, folks, 407 00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:30,760 Speaker 1: I fly international carriers as often as I can. Bob Crandell, 408 00:24:30,840 --> 00:24:33,439 Speaker 1: what does the new regulation look like? No? Not, Well, 409 00:24:33,600 --> 00:24:35,960 Speaker 1: you keep in mind, Tom, I was a guy that 410 00:24:36,080 --> 00:24:39,840 Speaker 1: said we should not deregulate. I always thought we should 411 00:24:39,880 --> 00:24:42,600 Speaker 1: have some version of regulation. I think we should now. 412 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:46,320 Speaker 1: I mean, look, we invested in the airline industry after 413 00:24:46,440 --> 00:24:48,240 Speaker 1: nine one one. We're going to invest in the air 414 00:24:48,320 --> 00:24:51,520 Speaker 1: and industry now. I don't think we ought to regulate 415 00:24:51,600 --> 00:24:53,960 Speaker 1: it the way we used to. But I do think 416 00:24:54,119 --> 00:24:56,080 Speaker 1: that if the public is going to make an investment 417 00:24:56,119 --> 00:24:59,040 Speaker 1: in the airline industry, that it is entitled to know 418 00:24:59,280 --> 00:25:01,320 Speaker 1: that the airline industry isn't going to turn around and 419 00:25:01,440 --> 00:25:04,719 Speaker 1: layoff a lot of people while it's taking money from 420 00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:07,320 Speaker 1: the public. The airline industry isn't going to turn around 421 00:25:07,880 --> 00:25:11,680 Speaker 1: and abandoned cities that don't meet the profit metric. It 422 00:25:11,800 --> 00:25:14,400 Speaker 1: isn't going to turn around and take its own free 423 00:25:14,440 --> 00:25:17,960 Speaker 1: cash flow and buy back shares. So it's so there's 424 00:25:18,040 --> 00:25:22,600 Speaker 1: that there are some don't use the word regulation, let's 425 00:25:22,720 --> 00:25:24,639 Speaker 1: use the word constraint. There are going to be some 426 00:25:24,800 --> 00:25:28,440 Speaker 1: constraints on a business that needs to be regarded, in 427 00:25:28,600 --> 00:25:32,520 Speaker 1: my view, as something of a public utility. And actually 428 00:25:32,640 --> 00:25:35,560 Speaker 1: that's sort of some of those provisions are being included 429 00:25:35,640 --> 00:25:39,160 Speaker 1: currently in a House bill being circulated to prevent share 430 00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:41,639 Speaker 1: buy backs in certain executive compensation when it comes to 431 00:25:41,640 --> 00:25:43,439 Speaker 1: the airline industry. But Robert, I'd love to get your 432 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:46,640 Speaker 1: sense who's to blame for the nine of free cash 433 00:25:46,680 --> 00:25:48,760 Speaker 1: flow that went to buying back shares of the airlines 434 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:51,440 Speaker 1: for the past ten years. Well, who's to blame for it? 435 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:54,800 Speaker 1: Obviously the folks, the folks that are running the airlines 436 00:25:54,840 --> 00:25:57,639 Speaker 1: and other folks that decided to do that. And I 437 00:25:57,920 --> 00:26:00,080 Speaker 1: you know, the boards of directors as well as the 438 00:26:00,560 --> 00:26:04,440 Speaker 1: executives are actually running the business. And and that's just 439 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:07,000 Speaker 1: a foolish thing to do. In an industry like the 440 00:26:07,080 --> 00:26:11,320 Speaker 1: airline industry, you always know there's there's a black swan 441 00:26:11,480 --> 00:26:14,960 Speaker 1: waiting around the corner. And back in the day when 442 00:26:15,040 --> 00:26:18,960 Speaker 1: airlines weren't as consolidated as they are today and therefore 443 00:26:19,040 --> 00:26:21,560 Speaker 1: we're not as profitable. One of the rules of the 444 00:26:21,680 --> 00:26:26,080 Speaker 1: road is. You never bought back stock, You didn't pay dividends, 445 00:26:26,080 --> 00:26:29,320 Speaker 1: you didn't and you didn't buy back stock because you 446 00:26:29,400 --> 00:26:33,200 Speaker 1: needed you needed a well of cash to go to 447 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:37,240 Speaker 1: when something bad happened to you. Something bad always happens 448 00:26:37,280 --> 00:26:41,000 Speaker 1: to the airline industry. But forgive me for playing devil's advocate, 449 00:26:41,119 --> 00:26:44,560 Speaker 1: But why should we give money to an industry that's very, 450 00:26:44,800 --> 00:26:47,600 Speaker 1: very difficult to be in, you know as a former CEO, 451 00:26:47,960 --> 00:26:50,760 Speaker 1: to run an airline, it's incredibly complex, really quite difficult. 452 00:26:51,119 --> 00:26:53,680 Speaker 1: What does the government want any part of that whatsoever? No, 453 00:26:53,800 --> 00:26:55,560 Speaker 1: it doesn't want any part of it. I don't want to. 454 00:26:55,720 --> 00:26:57,760 Speaker 1: I don't want the government to take over the airline. 455 00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:00,399 Speaker 1: There's this good lord. But I do think that the 456 00:27:00,480 --> 00:27:03,320 Speaker 1: government and the interests of employment and the interests of 457 00:27:03,359 --> 00:27:07,720 Speaker 1: the economy. Look, the travel business, including the airline industry, 458 00:27:07,760 --> 00:27:10,879 Speaker 1: accounts for millions and millions of jobs, I mean all over. 459 00:27:10,960 --> 00:27:14,960 Speaker 1: This country is probably the world's largest employer in terms 460 00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:18,960 Speaker 1: of and so every country, including the United States, needs 461 00:27:19,480 --> 00:27:22,600 Speaker 1: a vibrant, healthy, traveling tourism industry, and that needs to 462 00:27:22,760 --> 00:27:26,159 Speaker 1: keep the airlines going. Now, apparently France is talking about 463 00:27:26,320 --> 00:27:29,280 Speaker 1: nationalizing trance. I don't I don't think we want to 464 00:27:29,400 --> 00:27:32,920 Speaker 1: nationalize our airlines. I do think we need to make 465 00:27:33,000 --> 00:27:36,840 Speaker 1: available long term, very low interest loans. And while those 466 00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:40,639 Speaker 1: loans are outstanding, we need to impost some constraints on 467 00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:44,359 Speaker 1: the business. Bloomberg eleven three oh New York, good morning. 468 00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:47,439 Speaker 1: Let me ask this private question here, Bob, Why are 469 00:27:47,560 --> 00:27:50,600 Speaker 1: airports so lousy? What do we need to do to 470 00:27:50,880 --> 00:27:55,359 Speaker 1: speed up the rebirth and rekindling of our airports. We 471 00:27:55,480 --> 00:27:59,680 Speaker 1: need to invest more money, and I'm tom luckily are 472 00:27:59,760 --> 00:28:03,440 Speaker 1: you ports? There's been a continuing battle for years and 473 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:07,320 Speaker 1: years and years and years that that the airports, the 474 00:28:07,400 --> 00:28:11,320 Speaker 1: airports as a group, would like to impose higher individual 475 00:28:11,560 --> 00:28:15,240 Speaker 1: travel charges on the public. So how do you finance 476 00:28:15,280 --> 00:28:18,440 Speaker 1: airports today in this country. We don't finance them publicly 477 00:28:18,600 --> 00:28:22,719 Speaker 1: using taxes. We we finance them by by transaction charges 478 00:28:22,800 --> 00:28:26,560 Speaker 1: on individual passiers. The airports would like to raise those charges. 479 00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:31,560 Speaker 1: The air the airlines recognizing that as prices go up, 480 00:28:32,440 --> 00:28:36,399 Speaker 1: the the desirability of travel goes down, and resisted that effort. 481 00:28:36,760 --> 00:28:40,200 Speaker 1: But we have lousy airports because we don't invest enough money. Animal, 482 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 1: Bob Crandell has been great, Thank you so much, greatly 483 00:28:43,400 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 1: appreciated Mr Crandell of American Aerologs without question the interview 484 00:28:53,000 --> 00:28:55,960 Speaker 1: of the day, and not with someone with medicine, but 485 00:28:56,200 --> 00:29:00,640 Speaker 1: someone with a deep knowledge of how China reports data. 486 00:29:00,920 --> 00:29:04,840 Speaker 1: Leland Miller is with China Beige Book, and we're thrilled 487 00:29:04,880 --> 00:29:07,840 Speaker 1: that he could join us right now, just immensely qualified 488 00:29:07,920 --> 00:29:12,120 Speaker 1: on the veracity of their data. Leland Miller or Daniel 489 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:15,640 Speaker 1: Moss has written, uh, maybe not. And I've seen a 490 00:29:15,680 --> 00:29:19,200 Speaker 1: lot of other pros like Carl Weinberg say maybe not. 491 00:29:19,760 --> 00:29:22,360 Speaker 1: Do you believe the statistics out of China right now 492 00:29:22,840 --> 00:29:28,200 Speaker 1: on their better news on virus? You know, I believe 493 00:29:28,320 --> 00:29:32,520 Speaker 1: the virus news is getting better. There's definitely there's definitely 494 00:29:32,560 --> 00:29:35,560 Speaker 1: a slowdown the rate of infections. The problem is you 495 00:29:35,680 --> 00:29:39,120 Speaker 1: can't believe the actual numbers because right now there's a 496 00:29:39,200 --> 00:29:42,440 Speaker 1: political narrative that the party has swooped in which Dad 497 00:29:42,560 --> 00:29:46,320 Speaker 1: everybody and is responsible for this wonderful virus clean up. 498 00:29:46,440 --> 00:29:49,120 Speaker 1: And so as long as there is a big political 499 00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:53,800 Speaker 1: push to make this an issue of a politics and 500 00:29:54,160 --> 00:29:57,760 Speaker 1: not uh not strictly the medical area, then you never 501 00:29:57,880 --> 00:30:00,200 Speaker 1: know what numbers to believe. I think things are getting better, 502 00:30:00,320 --> 00:30:02,400 Speaker 1: but the exact numbers, I think it would be very 503 00:30:02,480 --> 00:30:05,040 Speaker 1: dangerous to take them seriously. And Leland, the one reason 504 00:30:05,120 --> 00:30:07,000 Speaker 1: why it's always great to get you on is because 505 00:30:07,080 --> 00:30:10,960 Speaker 1: you look at nonofficial data to gauge the actual economic 506 00:30:11,000 --> 00:30:13,480 Speaker 1: activity in the entire region. And I'd love to get 507 00:30:13,600 --> 00:30:16,479 Speaker 1: your sense of what you've observed as far as how 508 00:30:16,560 --> 00:30:19,560 Speaker 1: quickly they've brought business back online. We have heard from 509 00:30:19,600 --> 00:30:22,520 Speaker 1: the party that things are going very quickly and very well, 510 00:30:22,600 --> 00:30:25,760 Speaker 1: and they're expecting a full recovery very quickly. Are you 511 00:30:25,880 --> 00:30:29,200 Speaker 1: seeing that born out in sort of the anecdotal evidence 512 00:30:29,240 --> 00:30:32,240 Speaker 1: that you look at. Yeah, the idea of a full 513 00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:36,120 Speaker 1: recovery is nonsense anytime soon. Uh, firms are going back 514 00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:40,040 Speaker 1: to work now. We are seeing workforces back and people 515 00:30:40,080 --> 00:30:42,720 Speaker 1: are outside and factories are starting to run again and 516 00:30:42,880 --> 00:30:45,560 Speaker 1: lights are on. But you're not seeing a resumption in 517 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:47,480 Speaker 1: any of the growth metrics. So one of the many 518 00:30:47,560 --> 00:30:50,520 Speaker 1: disappointing things we saw is that even in the first 519 00:30:50,600 --> 00:30:52,560 Speaker 1: half of March when we were getting our dad and 520 00:30:52,960 --> 00:30:56,120 Speaker 1: firms were going back to work, I mean, the shriff closures, 521 00:30:56,160 --> 00:30:59,840 Speaker 1: the firms reporting closures was way down as we extended 522 00:30:59,880 --> 00:31:02,200 Speaker 1: in to March. But the data we're not getting better. 523 00:31:02,680 --> 00:31:05,240 Speaker 1: And the problem with this is that that China is 524 00:31:05,400 --> 00:31:08,320 Speaker 1: very anxious to have a recovery narrative. They announced their 525 00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:11,080 Speaker 1: bad data for January in February and now they want 526 00:31:11,080 --> 00:31:13,360 Speaker 1: to get on with your recovery. But the recovery is 527 00:31:13,400 --> 00:31:16,760 Speaker 1: not so fast. You're actually seeing the worst data we've 528 00:31:16,840 --> 00:31:20,280 Speaker 1: ever seen, without question right now, and Q one is 529 00:31:20,360 --> 00:31:23,680 Speaker 1: likely you know, around and had negative eleven contraction. It 530 00:31:23,760 --> 00:31:28,040 Speaker 1: gives us a Leland Miller example of wacko data that matters, 531 00:31:28,160 --> 00:31:30,920 Speaker 1: like is it the number of you know, crew members 532 00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:33,920 Speaker 1: on iron ore ships or is it you know, counting 533 00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:36,400 Speaker 1: containers a simple out of Shanghai as you I mean, 534 00:31:36,760 --> 00:31:39,120 Speaker 1: what's a what's the data point that matters to you 535 00:31:39,240 --> 00:31:44,080 Speaker 1: to gauge that? Well, you know, it's it's very different 536 00:31:44,400 --> 00:31:47,360 Speaker 1: this quarter than any other quarter we've ever tracked, but 537 00:31:47,400 --> 00:31:49,400 Speaker 1: it is typically what we do is we go through 538 00:31:49,440 --> 00:31:51,960 Speaker 1: the weeds and we try to find the areas of 539 00:31:52,040 --> 00:31:55,480 Speaker 1: strength but also the real areas of weakness that others 540 00:31:55,560 --> 00:31:59,680 Speaker 1: haven't identified. And when we looked across the spectrum this quarter, 541 00:32:00,240 --> 00:32:04,240 Speaker 1: everything was weaker. Every sector was weaker, every region was weaker. 542 00:32:04,320 --> 00:32:06,840 Speaker 1: Every headline metric is weaker, and not just weakly, but 543 00:32:06,960 --> 00:32:09,520 Speaker 1: the weakest numbers we've ever seen, all of them in 544 00:32:10,400 --> 00:32:15,520 Speaker 1: severe contraction. Lel this different, different, different ball game, discorre Leland. 545 00:32:15,560 --> 00:32:16,840 Speaker 1: I want to go back to what you said that 546 00:32:16,920 --> 00:32:21,000 Speaker 1: tend to eleven percent contraction in the first quarter. Can 547 00:32:21,040 --> 00:32:24,360 Speaker 1: you extrapolate that out based on what you're seeing in 548 00:32:24,520 --> 00:32:27,480 Speaker 1: terms of a pickup or or not in in recovery 549 00:32:27,640 --> 00:32:30,320 Speaker 1: in the second quarter and beyond, what are you looking 550 00:32:30,360 --> 00:32:34,280 Speaker 1: at for the full annualized GDP for China right now? 551 00:32:35,440 --> 00:32:39,200 Speaker 1: Right well, the outlooks getting a big gloomier for China, 552 00:32:39,320 --> 00:32:41,720 Speaker 1: even though their economy is getting better. And what I 553 00:32:41,840 --> 00:32:44,680 Speaker 1: mean by that is this is no longer just a 554 00:32:44,760 --> 00:32:48,720 Speaker 1: domestic China story, even if there is an enormous level 555 00:32:48,760 --> 00:32:51,520 Speaker 1: of domestic resilience and the Party pushes everyone back to 556 00:32:51,600 --> 00:32:56,960 Speaker 1: work and output and consumption and demand are all back 557 00:32:57,120 --> 00:33:01,880 Speaker 1: faster than anyone could possibly uh, you know, assume would 558 00:33:01,920 --> 00:33:03,920 Speaker 1: be the case. You have a problem with the rest 559 00:33:03,960 --> 00:33:06,600 Speaker 1: of globes shutting down. So Q two was supposed to 560 00:33:06,600 --> 00:33:08,680 Speaker 1: be the time in which Chinese factories were back up 561 00:33:08,720 --> 00:33:11,480 Speaker 1: and running, and then you would have global demand take over. 562 00:33:11,840 --> 00:33:14,800 Speaker 1: Now your US factories are down, Europe's down, demand is 563 00:33:14,880 --> 00:33:17,680 Speaker 1: creating worldwide. So the idea that Chinese will have a 564 00:33:17,760 --> 00:33:21,520 Speaker 1: recovering Q two from an inlet of a contraction, if 565 00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:23,360 Speaker 1: it's not going to be back to normal levels of growth, 566 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:26,680 Speaker 1: what would happen to China if the president came out 567 00:33:27,400 --> 00:33:30,960 Speaker 1: and lifted the various trade initiatives he's put in place. 568 00:33:31,160 --> 00:33:33,640 Speaker 1: I mean, is that beneficial to China? Is that a 569 00:33:33,800 --> 00:33:37,600 Speaker 1: US story? Well, look if you had, if you had 570 00:33:37,760 --> 00:33:40,440 Speaker 1: an end to the supply shock and the demand shock, 571 00:33:40,840 --> 00:33:43,239 Speaker 1: and you pulled back all these trade initiatives, I think 572 00:33:43,280 --> 00:33:45,960 Speaker 1: you'd see, uh, quite a quite a juice to growth. 573 00:33:46,520 --> 00:33:48,440 Speaker 1: The problem is is right now there's no demand. There's 574 00:33:48,480 --> 00:33:51,160 Speaker 1: no global demand. So you know, having a resumption of 575 00:33:51,360 --> 00:33:53,640 Speaker 1: of business as usual in China over the next couple 576 00:33:53,680 --> 00:33:57,600 Speaker 1: of months, but there's no demand, no demand internationally, uh 577 00:33:57,680 --> 00:34:00,240 Speaker 1: from the major trading partner. So right now you have 578 00:34:00,360 --> 00:34:04,120 Speaker 1: no effect or very little effective any Okay, Lela Miller. 579 00:34:04,200 --> 00:34:06,280 Speaker 1: This has been wonderful, Thank you so much with China 580 00:34:06,360 --> 00:34:10,040 Speaker 1: page book, just very very informative this morning. Thanks for 581 00:34:10,160 --> 00:34:14,520 Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to 582 00:34:14,719 --> 00:34:20,400 Speaker 1: interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. 583 00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:24,279 Speaker 1: I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane Before the podcast, you 584 00:34:24,360 --> 00:34:27,760 Speaker 1: can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio