WEBVTT - Interview With Brett Steenbarger: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Boomberg Radio.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have Dr Brett Steambarger.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>He is a clinical psychologist and a professional trading coach

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>who has worked with the likes of Paul Tutor Jones

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and Tutor Investments and a number of other firms that

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>are both storied and legendary. You know, this is one

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of those conversations where I know the person virtually. I've

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>been reading him for many, many years. We've swapped emails

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>over the years, but it was the first time we

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>actually met and had a conversation, and I found it

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>really quite fascinating. It the idea of performance coaching turns

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>out to be somewhat different than you than you might

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have imagined. It's certainly different than is depicted and shows

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>like Billions and and all the drama all the rest

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of that sort of stuff just isn't realistic. As he

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.639
<v Speaker 1>describes in the conversation, it's a lot of basic block

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and tackling and a lot of work on on fundamentals.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Enhancing the positive minimizing the negative probably doesn't make for

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating uh television show, but the proof is in

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the pudding and the firms that hire him show an

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>actual improvement not only in the process and the satisfaction

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>level of traders, but ultimately in their P and L

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and that that seems to be the bottom line. What

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he does works uh for firms that have humans who

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have discretion over deploying capital. So if you are an investor,

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a trader, or someone who's just interested in human psychology,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you will find this to be an interesting conversation. So,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, uh, my interview with Dr Brett

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>steam Barger. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. This week on the show, we have

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Dr Brett steam Barger. He is a clinical psychologist and

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a trading coach, and he has worked with such storied

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>firms as Kingstree Trading and Tutor Investments. Dr Brett stein Barger,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg. Thanks for having me, Barry. So, you

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have a really interesting background. You graduate with a b a.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>In psychology from Duke and seventy six, You get your

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>pH d from the University of Kansas two and then

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you begin what looks like a pretty typical academic career

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in clinical psychology New York City, Courtland, Cornell, Syracuse, and

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden you end up at a

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>trading shop. How did how did that shift come about? Yeah? It, actually, Barry,

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>looks more like a radical shift than it was in reality.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I began trading myself in the late nineteen seventies while

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I was in graduate school, and so it was a

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>parallel interest to the psychology and it helped keep me

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>afloat as a poor, starving graduate student. And I maintained

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that interest throughout my training and throughout my early career

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>as a psychologist. So what was the event that led

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you to start coaching traders. Well, up to that point,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I had been doing counseling with college students at Cornell

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and with medical students and residence at SUNNI Upstate in Syracuse.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So my main area of focus was working with very bright,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>very motivated students, professionals under who are under pressure and

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>helping them perform to their maximum. When I started interacting

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with trade leaders, I noticed similar dynamics to the medical

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>students and residents that I worked with. Not not a

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>big leap that it was psychologically in terms of working

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with them as a psychologist. It was not a leap

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>at all the same exact techniques that were helpful. Let's

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>say to a surgical resident who's working eighteen hour days

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and working under pressure, not different than working with a

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager, let's say at a macro hedge fund. So

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>let's um, let's talk about some of the errors that

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>traders make that are fixable coachable. I don't even know

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>what what's the right phrase to do that? What? What

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>are the typical problems that you see amongst traders, Well,

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>there are quite a few, and some of them are

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>trading problems and some of them are psychological problems. One

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things I emphasize with the traders and the

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers I work with is keeping score, keeping score

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of what they do well, keeping score of what they

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>do that needs improvement, so that they are always learning

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>from their experience, always recognizing the mistakes they can correct.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the greatest big picture mistakes that traders can

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>make is the failure to adapt to changing markets. They

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>hope that they have an edge, probabilistic edge in the markets.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>They hope that that edge will last in perpetuity, and

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in fact, markets change, and just like any business, what

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>worked at one time can become obsolete at another and

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>failing to innovate is one of the greatest problems. Failing

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to innovate. Just describe how individual traders innovate. They innovate

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:47.679
<v Speaker 1>by tracking patterns in markets, tracking what moves markets, and

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>developing new and different ways of monitoring that and taking

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that. So, for instance, an example would be

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as computers, as algorith big trading systems became more dominant

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace, we found more traders, both short term

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 1>traders and portfolio managers employing some quantitative techniques to help

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>them understand some of the forces that we're moving markets.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>That's an evolution, that's adaptation. So let's talk about when

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you shifted, Um, is it fair to call at full

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>time as a trader coach? Was it two thousand four

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Kingstreet Trading, who for people may not be familiar with them,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at one point in time they were of all the

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>futures trading at the Chicago Mark. They recruit you, Um, yes,

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the head of trader development. Is that that's right?

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So I had written my first book, The

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Psychology of Trading, and one of their traders had discovered

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the book and convinced the owner of the firm to

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>bring me in to work with the traders. That went

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>very well, and they hired me on a full time basis.

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I left the Ivory Tower and went full time to

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>working at a crazy trading firm in Chicago with people

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I loved. So I would imagine a lot of people

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>who are listening to this might be familiar with the

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of a trading coach from the showtime show Billions.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen it? Does it doesn't ring true? Or

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is it just a Hollywood dramatization of that sort of relationship.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that there's a lot less drama

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in my work, and I don't think the nuts and

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bolts of my work would make it into TV drama.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the improvements that traders make are nuances

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's the block crement, yeah, incremental, it's the blocking

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and tackling, so to speak, learning to do things better,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>identifying mistakes made, where to and how to best execute

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a trade, how to wait evidence in, deciding upon an

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>idea to invest in. Those are the kind of nuances

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that end up making a big difference in performance, but

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are not particularly traumatic to work on. You hinted something

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that I had that raises another question in my mind.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>When you evaluate how well you're doing, is it just

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a function of the trader's P and L or are

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you looking at process more than outcome? Great question, and

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at both. You know, at one level,

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what a affirm hires me. We have to look at

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>do the traders make use of the resource? That's one level.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Are are they satisfied with it? Do they feel they've

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>benefited from it? So satisfaction is one criterion. The second

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>criterion is a process one. Are they actually doing something

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>different as a result of the meetings? And then the

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>third criterion would be the profitability. Does doing something different

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>translate into better overall performance? I'm very Rihults. You're listening

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>today is Dr Steam Barger. He is a clinical psychologist

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and professional trading coach. Let's talk a little bit about

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the process of coaching traders and investors. Where does that

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>process begin. The process begins with self observation, and this

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is true of any psychological change. We have to become

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>aware of our patterns before we can make changes in

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>those patterns. So typically, I will observe a trader and

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. I will have I will give them

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>exercises to help them with self observation, and will begin

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to observe patterns and what they do, some successful patterns,

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some patterns that get them into trouble. What what's what

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>do these exercises look like? That sounds interesting? Well, the

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>most basic exercise that people associate with coaching of traders

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>would be keeping a journal, so people, day in day out,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>will track the decisions they make and how they made them,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>why they made them, and the success of those decisions.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>They may track certain things in their personal life as

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>far as their mood, their energy level, and so forth,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and we start to look at the patterns that appear

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>in the journal entries. So, what are some of the

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>bad habits you see that traders engage in. Some of

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the bad habits that traders engage in is are an

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>inability to turn it off, so to speak. Explain that

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, Yes, so they take the problems home

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with them. They really don't get a chance or give

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>themselves a chance to renew themselves. And they justify that

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>by saying they're so devoted to their trading and so

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>devoted to markets when in fact they're in the process

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of burning themselves out. Sometimes you have to take one

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>step back to go two steps forward. Well, take a

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>step back, but also a lateral step. What the psychological

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>research tells us is that people perform best when they

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have a healthy amount of positive emotional experience of their lives.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And that experience could come from relationships, it could come

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>from deeply meaningful activities, it could come from physical exercise.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And so what people become overly immersed in trading, they

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>often shut off some of these other positive avenues and

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that's part of what helps burn them out. What what

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about work satisfaction? What happens when a person's work satisfaction falls.

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Do they find themselves in a downward spiral that becomes

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>challenging to break? They can, And that kind of downward

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>spiral can become a slump, and many traders are familiar

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>with that phenomenon. When people draw down in their trading,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>as happens to all of us, it's important to have

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>other areas of positive focus. So, for instance, one of

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the things I work with the raiders on if they

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>work within a team, is how they can build their

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>team processes and how they can be more successful, more productive.

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>As a team, we work on refining their trading processes

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and learning from the draw downs so that they always

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>feel as though they're moving themselves forward, even when their

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>accounts aren't necessarily moving forward. So let me ask you

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the opposite question. I always ran into trouble as a trader,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>not when I was having trouble, but when I was

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>on a hot streak, when I felt whatever I touched

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>turned to gold, and that invariably ended badly. What do

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you do when you have somebody who's just on fire

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and you want to rein them in without you know,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>reigning on their parade. It's very easy for confidence to

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>become over confidence. Let me give you an anecdote. With

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>several traders that I worked with a few years ago,

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we took a look at their profitability as a function

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of their level of risk taking, and so when they

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>were taking relatively little risk, they were consistently profitable. Their

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 1>hit rate on trades was very good. When they were

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>taking the most risk, which is when they were most confident,

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they were actually losing money because their confidence had become

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>over confidence. So what we did we created computer arized

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>alerts that told people when their risk taking was getting

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>into the red zone as a way of monitoring possible

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>over confidence. What we were really saying to them is

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're taking this amount of risk, historically, you don't

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>make money. So the baseball analogy is the difference between

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>just getting wood on the ball and getting on base

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>versus swinging for the fences and striking out. That's right,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that's right, fair way to look at it, and and

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>my goal as a coach is to make people aware

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of those patterns, help them become mindful of those patterns,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not tell them how to trade. So how often are

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you sitting down with traders? Is this a weekly thing,

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a daily, a monthly? What what is the usual time

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>frame for someone like? It varies tremendously. When I've worked

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:17.479
<v Speaker 1>full time at trading firms, then it was not unusual

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for us to touch base to meet several times a week.

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>There are traders even now that I meet with who

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>will send me their journal entries on a daily basis

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>as a way of getting quick feedback. But others times

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a monthly process. In some cases it's as wanted

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as needed, So it really depends on the urgency that

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the trader feels in terms of need for change. So

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a related question to that, the feeling the need

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for change, which is what makes somebody coachable if that's

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the right word, And the corollary, are some traders just

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>uncoachable the coach doable? The coachability factor partly depends on

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the capacity for self observation. People who would be really

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>uncoachable probably never seek out a coach to begin with,

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But clearly if someone is more defensive than open minded

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to the things that they're doing wrong, that's going to

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>make it a difficult situation for coaching. So I one

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of the questions I had tied up, which you kind

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of answered, but I have to go back to it,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is how much do you need to know about trading

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to be an effective trading coach? And maybe a better way,

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>now that I know you've been trading for thirty plus years,

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe the better way to ask that question is what's

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the ratio between psychology and trading when you're coaching people?

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a mixed ratio because, as I mentioned before, sometimes

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>trading problems create psychological frustrations, and sometimes psychological issues can

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>interfere with good trading decisions, and a big part of

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>what I do is try to tease apart the causality.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this a trading problem that's having psychological effects, or

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is it a psychological issue that might be affecting their

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>entire life that's influencing their trading. It's very helpful as

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a coach to have familiarity with trading, with making trading decisions.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I have long contended that my greatest credential as a

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>coach is not the three letters after my name. My

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>greatest credential as a coach is that I have made

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>every mistake that all of the traders I work with

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have made. I'm Barry Hults. You're listening to Master's in

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg Radio. My guest today is Dr Brett Steambarger.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>He is a clinical psychologist and a trading coach who

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>graduated from the University of Kansas with a PhD. In

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump right into some of the things you do

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 1>coaching traders. How does a firm go about deciding we

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>want to work with the trading coach. We think there's

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>some gains to be had from that. Often the initial

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>request or demand will come from the traders or the

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers themselves. Maybe they have known someone who has

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>worked with me, maybe they've read my trader feed blog,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or they've read one of my books, and so they

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>will bring it to the attention of management. Then I'll

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>typically go into a firm and do a talk for

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the traders and talk with them about trading, talk with

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>them about psychology, talk about working on performance, and they

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>make a decision from there. So someone decides they want

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to work with you, And at that point, isn't mandate?

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Is voluntary to people? How do people start filling up

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>your calendar? How does that work? Totally voluntary? This is

0:17:56.240 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>something that is available to traders, but not required of them.

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>What I typically find is that in the beginning there

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are the early adopters, and then there are a few

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>tire kickers along the way, And as the results come

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>out and it goes well, then more people here about

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it and get interested, and so the interest can grow

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>over time. So we talked earlier about hot and cold streaks.

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But the question I have you is, Hey, sometimes you

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>flip a coin and you get ten tales in a row.

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>How challenging it is it to tell the difference between

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>someone whose process has some issues and someone who, hey,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you know the dice, just don't don't go your

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>way for a while, and eventually that will turn around

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>on its own. It's a very important distinction, and obviously, Mary,

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the reasons why risk management is one

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most important psychological tools for traders, because there

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to be random streaks of losing trades and

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to be able to survive that risk of ruin.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>What we typically look at or two things when someone

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>has a series of losers. The first is have markets

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>themselves changed? Is there something different about the market that

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to adapt to? The second is has your

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>process changed? Are you doing something differently than when you

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>were winning? And those two questions usually will help us

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether we need to take adaptive action or

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's just bad luck. So you mentioned winning and losing,

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna go off script a second ask you

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a question that I've always been fascinated by, which is

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you're looking around Wall Street and the traders that are there.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Forget the algorithms, but the actual human traders historically have

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>come from a um collegiate athletics background that seems to

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>be rifle of Wall Street any thoughts on that. I

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's common. I I think it's far from always

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the case, especially lately. People with athletic backgrounds or backgrounds

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in performance fields in general tend to be competitive, tend

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to be interested in winning and losing, and so it's

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a natural transition in that respect to trading. Uh. That

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>being said, I believe that trading is a much more

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>analytical game now than it was let's say, twenty years ago,

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and so we see people who have some of the

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>analytical background going into financial markets a little bit different

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>than when it used to be mostly the jocks. Makes sense.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk a little bit about ego. How important

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>is it to have a healthy ego and when can

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that run them up. You have to have some ego

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to believe that you can outperform all of these other motivated,

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>talented participants in the marketplace, and you have to have

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>an ego to be resilient to the inevitable periods of losing.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's when the ego becomes dominant when people feel the

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>need to make the big calls. In a sense, it's

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>about them being right rather than them following what markets

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>are doing. That traders can run into some real problems.

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>That's funny you say that. A few weeks ago in

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a column I referenced a Ned Davis book whose cover

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I love. The title I loved, which was being right

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>or making money? And it's just well, you can choose

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>you Is it the ego or is it the P

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and L that matters? Yes. The way I sometimes have

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>put it is that if you're engaged in a dance

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>with the market, you have to let the market lead.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I like that a lot. So what

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is more to follow up on the athletic theme. What's

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>more important? Offense or defense? Well, clearly both are important. Um,

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have good defense, you simply don't stay

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>in the game. And so what we typically find is

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>beginning traders often their greatest problem is overtrading, becoming too

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>eager and trading way too much and not managing their risk. Well,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ridhults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Dr Brett steam Barger.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>He is a clinical psychologist and trading coach who has

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>worked with some legendary firms and traders out there. Let's

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the modern era of trading, we've seen

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a number of traders replaced with effectively software. High frequency

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>trading has made it much more challenging. How much more

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult is it to be a trader today then when

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I began twenty five years ago, Well, when you began

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>over thirty years ago, it is more difficult and more

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>complex in a number of ways. And I'll mention too.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>The first is the respect that you are talking about.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>There are an increasing number of market participants, particularly algorithmic

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that are making decisions upon high frequency data. What's being bought,

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what's being sold each transaction, is it occurring nearer to

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a bid price, nearer to an offer price, and it's

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly aggregating all this information to tell them our buyer's dominant,

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>seller's dominant, and making rapid decisions. And so a lot

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>of the market movement is not occurring because of quote

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>unquote fundamental reasons. Traders of old would look at the world.

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>They would look at a company and its earnings and

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>predicate their decisions on that basis. An increasing amount of

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>market movement is coming from other directions. So that's the

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>first way in which trading is challenging in the modern era.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>The second way, as you and I know, the world

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is a much more global place, and it's no longer

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the case that the major influences on markets occur only

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>during New York hours. So much is happening in Asia,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so much is happening in Europe. Headlines from over there,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>events from over there, um, global economic conditions from over

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>there really affect how assets in the US behave, and

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>so that's created a complexity that traders have had to

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>adapt to. That's that's interesting. Let's let's talk about something

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't changed, and that's human emotions. How can you

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>teach people to keep their emotions in check? What I

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>work with traders on is not simply controlling their emotions,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>which is helpful, but using a emotions as information, becoming

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>more mindful, more aware of one's emotional reactions, because many

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>times there can be information in what we process emotionally.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The old joke about George Soros's back there you go,

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>acting up when he was in a position. As soon

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>as he got out of a bad position, the back

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>ache went away. There's information in that back ache, and

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's true for many people. They experience emotions and

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's information about what's happening in markets and what's

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.239
<v Speaker 1>happening to your portfolio. There's one portfolio manager I work with,

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, who uses his emotional reactions to gauge the

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>likely emotional reactions of other participants, and so expand on that.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So how does how does one's own emotional reactions help

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you gauge other people's emotionally? If the market sells off

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and he starts to feel some panicky emotions, the first

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thing he thinks about is, that's interesting, maybe other participants

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in the market are feeling this kind of panic and

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? And how has that market behaved

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>when we've gotten into panic times. So he's aware of

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>his emotions, but he's not being reactive relative to those emotions.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That that that's quite fascinating. Here's another example. Sometimes when

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in my own trading, I'll have a series of winning trades,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the way you described when you're on fire,

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'll have the thought I've got this figured out.

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>How you laugh because you know what happens? Okay, Well,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I become aware of that overconfident thought, and I realize

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's a warning signal. So the mindfulness, the awareness

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of your emotional reaction can help you trade better. It's

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>funny when I started on a trading desk, the head

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>trader who was a former Marine jungle combat instructor, so

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a guy to mess around with. Occasionally, would

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>someone would have their ego get a little unchecked and

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and his responses, Hey, you don't want to piss off

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the trading gods, and it was it was a good

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>way to say, all right, to take it, take it

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>down a notch a little bit. I read a nice

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>quote recently that said, for proper perspective, every person should

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>have a dog that adores them and a cat that

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>ignores them. That puts confidence in humility in the right perspective. Absolutely,

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>so that raises a really interesting question, how do you

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>prevent people or repair it when it happens from learning

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the wrong lesson from a positive experience or theoretically from

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a negative experience. One of the things we emphasize and

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>working with traders is the idea of this too shall pass.

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Trees don't grow to the sky and losses don't continue forever,

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and so we try to approach markets with fresh eyes,

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>fresh thoughts from day to day, week to week. Markets

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>have no memory is that the thinking or well the

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>thinking is that a risk reward the opportunity set typically

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>changes over the course of time, and we want to

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>recalibrate ourselves with respect to that altered risk reward. So,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>for instance, we're investing in a stock of the stock

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>moves our way, Well, it's not necessarily the same value

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that it was when we first put on the position.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Is the risk reward compelling here? And now? If this

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>were January one and I had no position in this name,

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>would I be taking along position right here? That really,

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>those kind of questions recalibrate us so that we don't

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>allow the past, either the gains of the past or

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the losses of the past, to unduly color our current judgment.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>What about superstitions, I recall a number of I want

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to spreak out the myths from the superstitions. We we

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>keep referencing sports, but uh, certain people would not change

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>their socks or wear the same hat, or you still

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>encounter that sort of stuff. Where have we moved past that? Now?

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Every so often you definitely encounter that where people feel

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like certain things are lucky and certain things are unlucky. Um,

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's still a common practice as it

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>was years ago. If you come up behind a trader

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who's made money and you packed them on the back

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and say you're doing great, they will look at you

0:29:56.160 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>as if you're trying to jinx them and and get

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>away from me, Get away from it. So I think

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that touches on some superstitions. How do you force people

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to be rational and evidence based? Do you ever bump

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>up against the situation where the data is overwhelming but

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the trader just doesn't want to pay any mind to it.

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We all have blind spots, myself included, and you can't

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>force anyone to make a change. But what you can

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>do is process the information as thoroughly as possible and

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to look at the information with fresh eyes

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>from different perspectives. So it's not an uncommon, for instance,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in a conversation with a trader, that they'll mention to

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>me they're along the dollar, and so I'll mention positioning

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and sentiment data that suggests that lots of moody managers

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are along the dollar. Out of trade, it's a crowded trade.

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you still like it? What? What? What makes you

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think that it's going to continue? Now? I'm playing Devil's

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>advocate as a way of getting people to look at

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>new information and make sure that they're making decisions for

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the right reasons. I always love the argument of inversion.

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Make the case for me for the other side of

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the trade, because it's a two sided trade. What is

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the other person thinking and what might they know that

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you're unaware of or or what is what is coloring

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>their views that you might not have considered a great point.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very helpful to do what if scenario

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>planning and what if news comes out this way? What

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>if the stock moves against us in that way? What

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would how would you respond? What would that mean to you?

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>What would tell you your idea is wrong? Criteria A, B, C, D.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And mapping that out in advance so that if those

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:03.959
<v Speaker 1>things should unfold, you're prepared psychologically to take property. We've

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.479
<v Speaker 1>always discussed what is the line in the sand you

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have to have any time I've had a conversation with somebody,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and this tends to be true with the gold bugs

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and the fed haters, and there's a whole ideology behind

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the trade where you say what would make you wrong

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and they say nothing. I know there's a person whose

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>career in trading is soon to come to an end.

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right. If nothing can make you wrong, then you're

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>not basing this. Would you really want to entrust your

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.479
<v Speaker 1>capital with that person? Right? For sure? And the question

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that pops up every now and then, we've been talking

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>about process. But something that's a little related is and

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you hinted it this earlier, is a routine. You mentioned

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the trading diary or a trading lock. What sort of

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>routines are healthy for traders or investors for that matter.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the important routines that successful traders engaging and

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are routines of preparation. When markets are open, they need

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to be prepared for the different possibilities that may unfold.

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We've been speaking with Dr Brett Steambarger discussing all things

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>coaching and psychology regarding traders. If you enjoy the conversation,

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be sure and check out the podcast extras, where we

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>continue chatting about all such things related to trading. Check

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>out my daily column on Bloomberg View dot com or

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at rid Halts. I'm Barry rid Halts.

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast. Um Brett, thank you so much

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for doing this. I have been reading you for a

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>long time, and you and I have been swapping emails

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>over the years, but this is really the first time

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we've ever met. That's right, so thank thank you for

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>doing this. I find this stuff endlessly fascinating, and I

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>was taking notes, which I normally don't do, because so

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>many of the things you said touched on just just

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>jo memories from my own personal experience when I started

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on a trading desk, and I just have to go

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>through some of them. Um, you said, one of the

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers you work with, UM monitors his own reaction

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to the market in order to anticipate other people's restrections.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I started to take note of.

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, sometimes the patterns are evident after they

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>beat you over the head a hundred times. I noticed

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>if when I was on the cell side, if I

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>would bring up a stock that was wildly out of

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>favor and for whatever reasons, I thought was really attractive,

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and the general reaction of anybody I showed the name

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to was that's just, oh, what a piece of junk.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Why would I want to that is now a giant flag.

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you you see that, right, like back in

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the days when Apple was fifteen with thirteen cash, when

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that new fangled iPod came out, Oh they're going out

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of business. That toast. Why would I everyone to own that?

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I wish I was more sensitive to what a great

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>contrarian indicator that that is. You are so right, Barry.

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And once in a while I'll write a blog posts

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>or tweet something and it may have a bullush or

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:24.959
<v Speaker 1>a bearish tinge to it, and immediately the haters come out.

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And the more defensive the reaction, the more I developed

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 1>confidence in that view, because people don't get defensive if

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they are secure with their view, right. It's when they're

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 1>nervous and it's starting to go against them and they

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>become the wishful thinking pops up. There's there's no doubt

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about that. By the way, I kept coming back to

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the athletes on trading desks. I have a pet theory.

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to I'm gonna get on your couch and

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you could you could psychoanalyze some of my own foibles.

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>But the pet theory with that has been, you know,

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're a college athlete and you're playing Division one

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>or Division two or even Division three. Pick a sport, baseball, football, Um,

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 1>basketball almost doesn't matter. The skill level is high enough

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>that other than whoever won this year and whoever was

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in the pits last year, pretty much any team on

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>any given Saturday can beat any other team. Um. It's

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>only the real powerhouses that go fourteen and one or

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever that are that are almost unbeatable. And even them, uh,

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>someone eventually comes along and beats them. Uh what. I

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can't help but notice that very often it's a lucky bounce,

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a surprise call that went the wrong way the officiating,

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>where the outcome is somewhat random, and despite having a

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>work you off all season all week, you lose on

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, and then Monday you gotta get up and

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.919
<v Speaker 1>start all over again, fresh and put the loss out

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>of your mind and look forward. That seems to be

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty parallel to trading, and sports have that similarity, although

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I certainly could just be making something up after the fact. Well,

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>there are definitely random and lucky influences in any of

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>these endeavors. So, for instance, with trading, one trader may

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hit their best ideas relatively early in the year, during January,

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>another trader will go through a draw down during the

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>first weeks of the year. The first trader, now has

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>banked some profits, has some cushion, feels more confident in

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>taking risk. Later on, the second one is afraid of

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>digging too deep a hole because they don't want to

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>be fired, so they restrain their risk taking. So that

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>random period of January performance ends up potentially shaping a

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>year's worth of performance. I had a conversation with a

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>friend who runs a hedge fund who had three or

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 1>four pretty mediocre years, flat years, I want to say,

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>July or August. Last year, he's up high, double digits,

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>almost triple digit returns. And I sent him, why you

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>still here? Why don't you close up shop? You know?

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>And and which, by the way, I don't know if

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that would have been good advice or bad advice. His

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>portfolio looks very different than mine. But you're up nineties

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>something per cent ring the bell. Call it a year,

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and and right, and and take the next four how

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>much more do you think you're you're gonna have to

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>to gain? And his thoughts were, listen, I've had these

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>positions on for three years. They're finally paying off. I'm not.

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to see this to its end. And I

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>was kind of surprised by that. What so, So, what

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 1>would you say to somebody who's like, Nope, uh, I

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>died bond it last year, I'm living on it this year,

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm going to run it out. Well. I

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>would applaud the staying power, that's for sure. But the

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>question I would ask that trader is, Okay, you're up

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>N how much of that N do you want to

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>put at risk right here, right now to make how

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>much more? What is the risk reward right here, right now?

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And how much do you want to make sure you

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>go home with at the end of the year. So

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I would encourage them to think of risk taking fresh,

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>not keeping it all on, not taking it all off,

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>but recalibrating that that makes perfect, perfect sense. And and

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you referenced keeping Score. I'm moving some pages. You referenced

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Keeping Score. I was at a sell side firm that had, um,

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a thousand plus employees, and I think it

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>was something like six or eight hundred bro ers and

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I was the market strategist and I used to have

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 1>brokers come to my office and say to me constantly,

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have all these winners, but I can't

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>figure out why my portfolios are down. Well, you know,

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a simple spreadsheet analysis. What do you mean you

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>have all these winners, Well, I have X y Z,

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 1>and I have ABC, and I have one to three

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I would get a print out of their

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>entire book and I would say, well, you have these winners,

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but your ABC is your biggest winner, and it's your

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth position. You know, X y Z is your second

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest winner, and it's your nineteenth position. You have a

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of stuff that's flat or maybe up marginally,

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and look at position number two and number seven and

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>number nine. These are big losers. So I was always

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>astonished that people didn't do a And again, you know,

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>as a trader, you get a you get a daily

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>P and L. So you know exactly by the way,

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when I be and it was sneaker net, you would

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>download your it would export the trading program to the spreadsheet.

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You downloadload that to a three point five floppy and

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you would have to walk it into the head traders office.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And so you can engage in fraud for three days,

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but eventually the trade wouldn't clear. It would kick out.

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I always thought that was like a really deeply flawed methodology,

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.839
<v Speaker 1>but I think that I guess the thought process was, hey,

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we have three days for you know, before the trade bounces,

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>how much havoc? And can anybody anybody reek um? But

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that keeping score side, I'm astonished that more people don't

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>do that. It really is astonishing, and it's astonishing how

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>much can be learned by keeping score and tracking the

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>various elements of your trades and your decision making. But

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the patterns I think you're referencing is that

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>many times people will be profitable on a majority of

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>their trades, but the losers go too far, and so

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the average size of their losing trades becomes much larger

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>than the average size of the winners, and that drags

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>them down. So it seems like they're winning, they have

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>more winning trades and losing trades, but in fact the

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>pan l is not winning. That conversation is what led

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>me to the world of selective retention, selective perception, and

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and just the wait, how do you not recall you

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 1>have this giant, flaming whole in your portfolio because they're

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>conscious or subconscious has suppressed it and they don't even

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>want to. It's too painful to think about amazing people

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>only only remember the winners. Which leads me to an

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. Have you ever worked with any individuals who

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>were not professionals with just UH investors or or private

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>UH I don't want to say private traders, but family all.

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.479
<v Speaker 1>It's just things like that where it's essentially a non

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 1>professional managing their own assets. How have you done much

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of that? I haven't done much of that, And many

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>times with the non professional, the ratio of what's a

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>trading problem and what's the psychological problem becomes skewed, and

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they make many more trading problems precisely because they're not professionals.

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>And so what they really need, in my view, typically

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is mentoring. They need someone to teach them the ropes

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:37.240
<v Speaker 1>about financial markets and decision making rather than a psychological coach.

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That that's really interesting. I gave a presentation at this point,

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's now years ago, called Romancing Alpha and Forsaking Beta.

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I won't mention the organization, but they're not. They claim

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a huge wealthy base of clients, but they're

0:43:55.560 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 1>notoriously cheap about um about paying outsiders to come in

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and present. They like they dangle. Look, here are billions

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. Come give a speech, um, But was what

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was fascinating was the beforehand. I did some research about

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 1>all these people with thirty million dollars minimum massets. What

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are they investing in and how well have they done?

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And everybody could tell me we have this much private equity,

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we have this much hedge funds, we have this much

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 1>venture capital, and none of these people could give me

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>an actual forget audited, how have you done relative to

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>your benchmark? Not a single person can answer that question.

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's where where the phrase romancing alpha forsaking beta

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 1>came from. If you are so busy chasing out performance

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>but you have no idea what your actual benchmark is,

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's astonishing. And to me, that's an individual era. I

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine any institution could tolerate that sort of basic

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>flaw for very long and and business true. And as

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the professional world of finance, we look

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at risk adjusted return. How much are you making per

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>unit of risk that you're taking? And it says something

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>about professionalism when someone can't can't answer that question. Answer

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the question right if if if you are unaware of

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>forget risk adjusted returns. If you're unaware of your relative performance,

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? And and that's before you get

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>into and what are you paying in fees for this

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>relative performance or under performance? It's really um, it's really fascinating.

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So do you you reference mentoring? That's one of the

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>standard questions. Um, we talk talk about what why don't

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>we jump right into that? Did you have any early mentors,

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>either on the trading side or on the psychology side. Well,

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely on the psychology side. In graduate school, give us

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:03.439
<v Speaker 1>an uh. One of the clinical supervisors I worked with

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 1>who has since passed on was Dr Thomas Riley, and

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>he taught an approach that was not common at the

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>time but has become more so recently. That looks at

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>how the different approaches to psychology and psychotherapy are doing

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>things in common rather than being different for each other.

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 1>On the surface of what a Freudian does and what

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>a behaviorist does quite different, But in fact he was

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at the common elements and helping mentor graduate students

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>by making the most of the common effective ingredients of psychology.

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 1>You can tell me they're still Freudians. There still are Freudians. Absolutely.

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I was unaware that that's right there, there definitely are

0:46:57.360 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and um, that was a big influence on me. So

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in other words, fine, what what the common ground is

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that works, regardless of the ideological silo it may have

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>come from. Yes, So, for instance, a common effective ingredient

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>across different approaches to therapy would be the quality of

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the helping relationship. We find that what what is the

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 1>helping relationship? Helping relationship is as a psychologist, your relationship

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>with the client and how you engage and how you

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>interact with them, and whether you're using a behavioral approach

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>or a cognitive approach or a psychoanalytics approach, the quality

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of that relationship ends up being the best predictor of outcome.

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>And so by focusing on those common ingredients, we can

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>become more effective whether we're using approach A approach, B approach, c.

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So that was a big influence on me. In graduate

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>school of psychology. In terms of markets and trading, a

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>big influence on me was around the year two thousand

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>when I began inter acting with the UM fund manager

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Victor Niederhoffer and education of a speculator there you go, yes,

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and he really introduced me to a more quantitative and

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>scientific approach to markets. And it was as a result

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of interacting with him that I began conducting my own

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:29.319
<v Speaker 1>studies and supplementing the discretionary decision making that I had

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>done with more quantitative information. So what's fascinating about him

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>is he's a guy who who amasses a fortune and

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>then blows up regular every cycle, like regularly. I don't

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>know how he manages to do it. Um. There was

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a very infamous Malcolm Gladwell column in The New Yorker

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that he was the I think, I'm sure I'm missing

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>remembering this, but he is the um, the foil on

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the trade from not seem to

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:08.359
<v Speaker 1>lab if if if I am, I'm remembering that correctly. Yeah,

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I do recall something sort yes, So two totally different styles.

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>One is taking very little risk other than the insurance

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>premium for the outside black swan performance, and the other

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:26.439
<v Speaker 1>is capturing the rent and hoping the house doesn't burn down. UM.

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>So when one's losing the others, they very much a

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:33.000
<v Speaker 1>mirror images of each other's um trades, or at least

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 1>way back when they are exactly exactly uh. And it's

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a shame that he's become known for those blow ups,

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's been wildly successful. I mean, he's a squash champion.

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>I believe he was a chess prodigy, and maybe he

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>has multiple talents. He's a renaissance sort of guy, isn't he? Yes? Yes,

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And I was just going to mention that that one

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>of the things I learned from him was that you

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 1>can learn a lot about markets by studying areas that

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with market. So he would look

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>at ecology, he would look at, you know, the world politically,

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and he would be able to derive patterns and of

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>human behavior that he could apply to markets. And and

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>so it broadens my thinking in many ways that that

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>makes perfect sense. Um, is he still trading? Is he's

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>still active? I believe his own capital. I'm not familiar

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:32.919
<v Speaker 1>with what he's doing commercially. Um. I think you're right

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>from from what I've heard through the grapevine, but always

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>been fascinated by him. I think he's one of these

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:45.319
<v Speaker 1>guys that are just so multifaceted. I find that intriguing. Yes, Um,

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:50.879
<v Speaker 1>all right, so we we discussed your psychology and trading. Uh, mentors,

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>what investors influenced your approach to trading and what investors

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have impacted the way you look at the world psychologically.

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Probably the greatest impact on my practice has not been

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>from an investor. It's been from philosophy. Um Early in

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>my college career, I read the novel The fountain Head

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:32.240
<v Speaker 1>by Iron Rand, and what struck me about the novel

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was the portrayal of a character as an ideal who

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:45.840
<v Speaker 1>was doing something unique and special with integrity and making

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the most of who he was. And my immediate thought

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:57.240
<v Speaker 1>when I read that novel was what if psychology could

0:51:57.239 --> 0:52:02.440
<v Speaker 1>help people not just deal with mental illnesses and problems,

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:06.879
<v Speaker 1>but what if psychology could help people become what they're

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:15.719
<v Speaker 1>capable of becoming. And that influence ended up steering my

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:19.840
<v Speaker 1>work with medical students and residents when I did counsel

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 1>with them, and then subsequently with traders and portfolio managers.

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>The fountain Head, well, yes, and and the not is why,

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I asked, because that's the one that comes up so frequently,

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and I fountain Head was yeah. The fountain Head was

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the first book of hers I read it. I did

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>read Atlas Shrugged and others, but what really inspired me

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was the portrayal of an ideal, and I sometimes refer

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to my work now as therapy for the mentally well,

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to help sense help normal people, people

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like you, like me, who may not have diagnosable mental disorders,

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>but who are capable of becoming much more than they are.

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:10.879
<v Speaker 1>And so that was a major influence on me. That's interesting. Yeah,

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I read un Ran backwards. I started with Atlas Shrugged.

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Hated it. It's like a nineties seven page speech in

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle that's long and tedious and pedantic. And I

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>should have, in hindsight, if I go back in time,

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I would have started with fountain Head, and maybe I'd

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have a different perspective. Most of my criticism of her

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is from Atlas Shrugged, and I know people love that book.

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I just like, oh my god, this is Warren Peace,

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>only not as interesting. But but you know, I respect

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.799
<v Speaker 1>people who have of a totally different take on it,

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe, uh maybe maybe I have to revisit it

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>when I have time. For eleven I believe it was

0:53:56.960 --> 0:54:01.359
<v Speaker 1>like eleven pages memories. It's a huge book. And one

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of the takeaways the positive takeaways for me about that

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>book is outlining the philosophy in terms of the importance

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of respecting objective, reality, objectivity, self reliance. I mean I

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I certainly recall there's a lot of positive positive don't

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:22.840
<v Speaker 1>wait for the government to rescue you, don't wait for

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the community to save you. There are a lot of

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>things in there that certainly are applicable to traders. Hey,

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're waiting for a bailout, unless you're you know,

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>City bank, it's coming. So so that was certainly an

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing. Since since we um any other investors we

0:54:40.680 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about as as being influences or we

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>want to jump right into the book segments of a book,

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:51.359
<v Speaker 1>portion of art. Well, well, I'll mention one of the investors.

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I have worked for a number of years at Tutor

0:54:56.880 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Investment for Tutor Jones, Yes, who founded the firm famous

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for calling the seven crash and trading. There's a video

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhere out there of him. Actually I don't recall if

0:55:09.960 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it was the day of Black Monday, it was basically

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 1>him all right, this has gone far enough, let's start

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:19.839
<v Speaker 1>buying him here. And I think people look at him

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:22.480
<v Speaker 1>like he has two heads with that, but really really

0:55:22.520 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting guy, really interesting background, and he certainly has evolved

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:29.839
<v Speaker 1>over that time period. But has been an inspiration for

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>many traders. But one of the things he said to

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>me early on during my time at Tutor that really

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:42.799
<v Speaker 1>resonated was if it's not in your calendar, it's not

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:49.280
<v Speaker 1>part of your process, meaning meaning meaning that if something

0:55:49.480 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>truly is part of your process and what you do,

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:58.440
<v Speaker 1>then it has a place in your calendar, in your life,

0:55:58.520 --> 0:56:03.479
<v Speaker 1>in your daily skin. Yes, that our processes, when they're

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:07.840
<v Speaker 1>developed to the fullest, really are positive habit patterns. There

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are things we do repeatedly in the same way with fidelity,

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and so by putting something in the calendar, you're cementing

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it as part of your process. And that resonated with

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 1>me because many times people have good intentions, they set

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a goal, they write in their journal New Year's resolution, yes,

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but they never get down to the specifics of implementing

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:36.359
<v Speaker 1>it on a day to day basis. And so that

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:39.480
<v Speaker 1>was a piece of advice and a perspective that I've

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:42.399
<v Speaker 1>found very helpful at working with traders. So so let's

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:45.279
<v Speaker 1>talk about books a little bit. You mentioned on Rand's

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>fountain Head as a book that positively influenced you. What

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>other books do you enjoy, be them fiction, nonfiction, market

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:58.920
<v Speaker 1>related or or anything else. Well, certainly, like many traders,

0:56:59.320 --> 0:57:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I've found UH influence and inspiration from Jack Schweger's Market

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Wizard's Books. First first book I was ever given as

0:57:08.320 --> 0:57:11.279
<v Speaker 1>a trader, and I reread it every five years. YEA,

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>love it, love it. And what it really cemented for

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 1>me was that there was no one formula for success.

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 1>That many of these very successful traders were successful because

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they had unique, distinctive skills and they found a way

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to implement those skills in financial markets. And so that

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:41.960
<v Speaker 1>led me to a strengths based approach where I tried

0:57:42.000 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what are the trader's greatest strengths and

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 1>how could they make the greatest use of those strengths

0:57:48.640 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in the trading they're doing. Interesting? What what else? Tell me?

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:57.240
<v Speaker 1>What else? You've really enjoyed reading UH books in general

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in the field of what's called positive psychology, and of course,

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the the first researcher, the first writer who started all

0:58:07.320 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that was Abraham Maslow, whose sty of Needs studied what

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>he called self actualization. But in recent i'd say in

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the last ten fifteen years particularly, there's been an emphasis

0:58:24.920 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on studying mental health, on studying the positive aspects of

0:58:31.240 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 1>human behavior and performance understanding strengths, and there have been

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:45.440
<v Speaker 1>some very thought provoking pieces of research that have been

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>conducted under this rubric of positive psychology. Martin Seligman is

0:58:52.680 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a key resort, key researcher in that area who has

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 1>looked at strength and how those impact physical health, how

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>those impact emotional well being. Uh So, those are some

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the directions that I've found from recent reading. Has

0:59:13.520 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Seligman put out a book or is it most as

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a number of them? Yes, he give us the one

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that you think people might find accessible. Um, I would

0:59:22.640 --> 0:59:27.440
<v Speaker 1>say there is probably the most accessible is there's a

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:32.480
<v Speaker 1>website on positive psychology and if you google positive psychology

0:59:32.480 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll find it and it summarizes his works in addition

0:59:37.200 --> 0:59:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to the works of other psychology researchers, and that's a

0:59:42.200 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>great way of finding an introduction to the field. Any

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the books you want to mention before we move

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on to the to the next few questions, No, I

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>think I'm ready for the next question. Um. So, since

0:59:55.920 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you've joined the industry as a trading coach, what what's changed?

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the most significant changes? Um?

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Since you became a coach, one of the biggest changes,

1:00:10.400 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the hedge fund world, has been altered risk

1:00:16.440 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>tolerance among investors in the post two thousand eight world,

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning decreased risk, much decreased risk tolerance. If you read

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the market Wizard's books, it was not unusual for people

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to have double digit losses and then they have double

1:00:31.360 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>digit and triple digit returns. No One, no one, no

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>one talks in those terms anymore. The focus is much

1:00:40.240 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more on risk adjusted returns than absolute returns. And if

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>someone is risking only a few percent and can make

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>five to ten percent, they're happy with that, particularly in

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a zero interest rate world. So the demands of investors

1:00:57.200 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have changed, and that has altered the risk mandates for traders,

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and that has affected coaching because it's no longer about

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>making as much as you can. It's as much as

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as you were saying before, it's as much about the

1:01:12.280 --> 1:01:15.919
<v Speaker 1>defense as the offense. That that that's really uh, that's

1:01:15.920 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>really quite interesting. I I have a friend, a different

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>friends from the one who was you know, up um,

1:01:24.840 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>who every time he gets a major clients redemption or

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a series of inquiries and questions, and you know, like

1:01:34.200 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hedge funds, they're gated. He says, typically

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>when a position I've had on that has been making

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>money or has been losing money, Um, but is still

1:01:44.400 --> 1:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sound when there's like a crescendo of redemption, he says.

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Back to the response from other people, he goes, invariably,

1:01:53.640 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the nature of the trade and it's all upside

1:01:56.080 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from there, he goes, I've had redemptions every few years.

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Is I'll hit a streak like this and I'll send

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>money back. And so my answer is always questioned him,

1:02:05.760 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is always, well do you let them know, hey, by

1:02:07.640 --> 1:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, you missed an extra note. Once they redeem

1:02:10.640 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gone and there's no reason for me to rub um,

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, add insult to injury. Not only did they

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>not make money, but they missed the upside. That's right,

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's pretty fascinating. UM. So we talked about the changes,

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the risk of justed changes. What do you see as

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the next shifts that are coming along. I think the

1:02:31.680 --> 1:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>next shifts are going to be a continuation of what

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen recently in UH longer term investing investing through

1:02:46.720 --> 1:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>UH maximizing returns from different factors as opposed to active

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>timing of markets. So you're talking more factor investing in

1:02:57.640 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>smart beta than management as opposed to the active trading.

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there will always be a niche for active

1:03:07.040 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>traders and for people who are talented at active trading.

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But as you alluded earlier, it's difficult to justify the

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>fees when the performance is not exceeding the average performance

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of the more passive asset management approaches. So you keep

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>referencing the algorithmic side of it, and software is eating

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the world? Are our traders are endangered species? Is Are

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we going to ever get to a point where it's

1:03:37.520 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>just computers trading or or is there always going to

1:03:40.200 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be a slot for for humans exercising judgment to try

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and figure out a way to to capture some profits. Yes,

1:03:47.800 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think already we've seen, particularly with respect to

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>market making, that the lions share of that business has

1:03:56.720 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>gone to the machines. They're simply able to process more

1:04:01.120 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>information quit more quickly than human participants. Now, as we

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>widen the time frame and we go from higher frequency

1:04:09.640 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>trading to investment, then I believe there will continue to

1:04:15.920 --> 1:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be a role for human judgment algorithmic trading. At the

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>root of it is science. It is studying the historical

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>patterns and financial markets that recur and profiting when those

1:04:33.480 --> 1:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>occur in in the present. At certain junctures, the future

1:04:39.600 --> 1:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>becomes unlike what it's been in the past, and the algorithms,

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>by definition, only know the past and the patterns from

1:04:48.560 --> 1:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the past. I think there is a role for human

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>judgment in determining when a unique future is occurring, but

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that's becoming a more specialized world and

1:05:03.840 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and the issue is machine learning. Theoretically, these machines can

1:05:07.840 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>identify when when the market structure or the conditions change,

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that's right. What I'm finding is that many of the

1:05:16.880 --> 1:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>most successful discretionary portfolio managers are ones that have quantitative

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>aspects to what they do. So it's not all machine

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's not all subjective judgment. It's using the machine

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for enhanced information and then making better decisions based on

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the information provided by the machine. My analogy for that

1:05:43.480 --> 1:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>would be a fighter pilot who has all sorts of

1:05:46.640 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>computerized equipment on board and is able to gauge very

1:05:51.360 --> 1:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>quickly weather conditions and where the enemy is located. But

1:05:55.960 --> 1:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it's the pilot who

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>ends up making a decision about attacking not attacking. So

1:06:02.760 --> 1:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you do to keep mentally fit as a

1:06:08.040 --> 1:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>traitor and as a psychology what do you do outside

1:06:11.320 --> 1:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of the office for relaxation. How do you you referenced

1:06:14.520 --> 1:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>earlier the balance that's needed. How do you personally make

1:06:18.520 --> 1:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that, uh, you don't become overly um either burnt

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:28.959
<v Speaker 1>out or overexposed to anyone aspect of your job. Well,

1:06:29.160 --> 1:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And to get back to what I was mentioning earlier,

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the psychological research on positive emotional experience, uh,

1:06:36.120 --> 1:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>those four areas of positive experience. Happiness doing things that

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you have fun with, Satisfaction doing things that are deeply

1:06:47.120 --> 1:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>meaningful to you, Energy doing things that are stimulating, maybe intellectually,

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe physically. And affection doing things that bring you closer

1:06:56.720 --> 1:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to the people that matter. Give me those four again, Happiness, happy, satisfaction, energy,

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and affection, and those are the four big drivers of

1:07:07.760 --> 1:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>positive emotional experience. And so I want to be firing

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:14.959
<v Speaker 1>on all those cylinders every week out of the year.

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And I want the traders I work with to be

1:07:17.000 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>firing on those cylinders, to be doing some activities that

1:07:20.280 --> 1:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>bring them happiness, to be doing some activities that bring

1:07:23.040 --> 1:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>them fulfillment, to do some energizing activities, to do some

1:07:26.760 --> 1:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>activities that bring them closer to people that they want

1:07:30.400 --> 1:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to be close to, and that keeps people fresh, It

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>keeps them alive and energized, even when the profits aren't coming.

1:07:39.400 --> 1:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go off script from my my usual ten

1:07:42.960 --> 1:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions to to bring something up. The past year,

1:07:46.920 --> 1:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I've read a million articles about meditation and traders meditation

1:07:52.480 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. How much of that is hype and

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>how much of that is is real? Do you do

1:07:57.200 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of traders meditating. Yes, you do, Yes,

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you and you find it valuable. Yeah, I've seen it

1:08:05.400 --> 1:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>be very helpful to traders. And the way in which

1:08:08.800 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's helpful is that it induces a state of calm focus.

1:08:16.600 --> 1:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's a way of gaining self control, and in

1:08:23.040 --> 1:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a meditative state, people are able, for instance, to mentally

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>rehearse different what if scenarios to prepare for the day ahead.

1:08:36.760 --> 1:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>When you've meditated day after day, week after week, you

1:08:40.720 --> 1:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>become very good at those skills. And so during the

1:08:43.760 --> 1:08:47.639
<v Speaker 1>trading day you can take some deep breaths, get yourself

1:08:47.760 --> 1:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>very centered, very focused, and it helps with making more

1:08:51.760 --> 1:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>dispassionate decisions. I reference the jungle combat instructor I worked with.

1:08:57.640 --> 1:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>There was another former Army range year I worked with.

1:09:01.040 --> 1:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I found fascinating because I

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was always curious, Hey, tell us about some missions, tell

1:09:06.320 --> 1:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>us what I was always fascinated about the prep work

1:09:08.720 --> 1:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they did. And one of the things that I learned

1:09:11.439 --> 1:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>from them was it wasn't just UM, what's planned, B,

1:09:16.880 --> 1:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what's plans? CE, what's planned D? There was there was

1:09:19.240 --> 1:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>always that. It was the process of envisioning your emotional

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>response to when things go wrong. What happens when we

1:09:29.080 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>were going through the door A, but the egress is blocked,

1:09:32.600 --> 1:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Not just what does my plan be to get out?

1:09:35.360 --> 1:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But how am I going to feel about that? If

1:09:37.800 --> 1:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>you can anticipate your emotional response, you can manage it

1:09:41.600 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>when it actually comes. I thought that was fascinating. And

1:09:44.760 --> 1:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the meditation is sounds somewhat similar to it's a tool

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>for mindfulness to be more self aware, and so it

1:09:53.120 --> 1:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>can be very helpful for traitors in that respect. Interesting

1:09:56.720 --> 1:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and and now we're down to our two favored questions.

1:10:00.439 --> 1:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So if if some millennial came to you and said,

1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in a career as a trading coach or

1:10:08.040 --> 1:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as a psychologist. What sort of advice would you would

1:10:11.360 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you give them? Well, Uh, if they were interested in

1:10:14.400 --> 1:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>working as a performance coach, whether it's with traders or

1:10:17.640 --> 1:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>other performance professionals, I would encourage them to get the

1:10:20.800 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>best grounding in psychology possible and start with that and

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>then apply to the populations of interest. And I would

1:10:29.160 --> 1:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>encourage them, in particular to to develop a grounding in

1:10:33.360 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 1>that positive psychology that I referenced earlier and the research

1:10:37.800 --> 1:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>there and as well as traditional approaches to psychology. And

1:10:42.960 --> 1:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and our final question, um, what is it I'm gonna

1:10:46.200 --> 1:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>say that again, And our final question, what is it

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 1>that you know about performance coaching today you wish you

1:10:53.600 --> 1:10:58.759
<v Speaker 1>knew when you began all those years ago. Probably the

1:10:58.840 --> 1:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>greatest le uson that I've learned is that performance is

1:11:05.439 --> 1:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>every bit as much a function of maximizing your strengths

1:11:10.760 --> 1:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>as addressing your weaknesses. And there certainly is a role

1:11:15.439 --> 1:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for correcting our weaknesses, for identifying what we do wrong

1:11:20.120 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and and learning from that. But at the end of

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the day, what makes people distinctive are their strengths, what

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they do superlatively well. And it's surprising how people are

1:11:32.360 --> 1:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>often unaware of their greatest strengths and they don't tap

1:11:37.640 --> 1:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>those regularly in their personal lives or in their decision

1:11:42.280 --> 1:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>making in financial markets. And so by focusing on who

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this person is and what they're really good at, it

1:11:53.080 --> 1:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>allows me to help them leverage those talents in their

1:11:58.600 --> 1:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>financial decision making. Brett, this has been really quite fascinating.

1:12:03.280 --> 1:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I know it's a subject that people don't get to

1:12:06.160 --> 1:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hear about a lot, and I suspect people are really

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna enjoy listening to this. And for those of you,

1:12:13.520 --> 1:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who are still with us here

1:12:16.160 --> 1:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end, UM, be sure and check out the

1:12:19.200 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of the other hundred plus podcasts we've done over

1:12:22.280 --> 1:12:24.519
<v Speaker 1>the past few years. Look up an Inch or down

1:12:24.520 --> 1:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in Inch on Apple iTunes and you'll see all the

1:12:27.400 --> 1:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of the conversations we've had. Uh, be sure and

1:12:30.840 --> 1:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>check out Dr steam Barger's blog at trader feed dot

1:12:34.880 --> 1:12:38.479
<v Speaker 1>blogspot dot com. Is that UM, I would be remiss

1:12:38.479 --> 1:12:40.799
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank Michael bat Nick, our ahead

1:12:40.880 --> 1:12:45.519
<v Speaker 1>of research, Taylor rigs are booker, and Charlie Volmer, our producer.

1:12:46.479 --> 1:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Be we love your I forgot to say this during

1:12:48.760 --> 1:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast portion, so I'll say it now. We love

1:12:52.080 --> 1:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>your comments, feedback and email. Be sure and write to

1:12:55.840 --> 1:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I'm

1:13:01.160 --> 1:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridolts. You've been listening to Masters in Business on

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio