1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,360 Speaker 1: Welcome to today's edition of the Clay Travis and Buck 2 00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:04,720 Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. 3 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:08,879 Speaker 2: Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all 4 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:11,600 Speaker 2: of you hanging out with us. Encourage you to go 5 00:00:11,720 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 2: subscribe on the podcast. Tens of millions of monthly downloads 6 00:00:17,079 --> 00:00:21,920 Speaker 2: as a result of you, guys, go subscribe to that podcast. 7 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:25,360 Speaker 2: You can also listen certainly on the five hundred plus 8 00:00:25,400 --> 00:00:27,800 Speaker 2: AMFM stations all over the country, as many of you 9 00:00:27,880 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 2: are doing right now, and i'd encourage you to go 10 00:00:30,760 --> 00:00:35,600 Speaker 2: subscribe to our YouTube page where you can get video 11 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:38,839 Speaker 2: versions of some of these radio segments. We want to 12 00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:41,000 Speaker 2: be everywhere that you are. You can find Buck and 13 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:44,920 Speaker 2: myself on pretty much every social media platform. Clay Travis 14 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:47,959 Speaker 2: Buck Sexton. Okay, we bring in now friend of mine, 15 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:52,720 Speaker 2: Dan Wetzel at Yahoo Sports, who has done a really 16 00:00:52,760 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 2: great job over the years of covering court related legal 17 00:00:57,480 --> 00:01:01,600 Speaker 2: proceedings that involve sports. You may have seen Dan in 18 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:06,240 Speaker 2: an excellent Netflix documentary that dealt with the Aaron Hernandez 19 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:10,480 Speaker 2: murder trials. And Dan, you wrote a story yesterday. Thanks 20 00:01:10,520 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 2: for coming on this show. You wrote a story yesterday 21 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:17,800 Speaker 2: that I read in the afternoon and immediately wanted to 22 00:01:17,840 --> 00:01:20,600 Speaker 2: share with everyone, And I'm just gonna give a little 23 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:21,920 Speaker 2: bit of a background and then I want you to 24 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:23,880 Speaker 2: kind of lagh out for everybody who may not be 25 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,600 Speaker 2: familiar with this case. There's a great punter who punted 26 00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:30,000 Speaker 2: at San Diego State. They called him the punt God. 27 00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:34,360 Speaker 2: His name Matt Areza. He was drafted by the Buffalo Bills. 28 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:38,880 Speaker 2: He was considered to be an elite kicking talent. Story 29 00:01:38,959 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 2: comes out during what would have been his rookie year. 30 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:45,880 Speaker 2: I believe before the season even began, that a girl 31 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:50,720 Speaker 2: had accused him of gang rape, really violent conduct. The 32 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:54,960 Speaker 2: Bills saw this story. It was a civil lawsuit. There 33 00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:58,920 Speaker 2: was an investigation that had been ongoing. Criminally, Bill saw 34 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:01,320 Speaker 2: this story, cut him from the team, said he could 35 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:05,240 Speaker 2: not be a member of the team. And now as 36 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 2: we come up on nine some odd months after that, 37 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:13,520 Speaker 2: you have written about the investigation and basically all of 38 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:16,840 Speaker 2: the claims that the girl made are one hundred percent 39 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:21,359 Speaker 2: untrue based on what the San Diego Police Department discovered. 40 00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:24,680 Speaker 2: I want you to lay out if I roughly synopsize 41 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:28,040 Speaker 2: that correctly, and where are we How did you come 42 00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:30,120 Speaker 2: to see this story, and what do you think it 43 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:33,679 Speaker 2: says in a larger context about the lack of coverage 44 00:02:34,080 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 2: that the vindication is getting compared to the accusation. 45 00:02:39,720 --> 00:02:44,919 Speaker 3: Yeah, so thanks for having me on the cases. This so, 46 00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 3: a civil lawsuit comes out. The police in San Diego 47 00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:53,600 Speaker 3: had spent ten month investigating the criminal charges. Was there 48 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 3: a gang rate? This is a seventeen year old girl 49 00:02:56,360 --> 00:03:00,280 Speaker 3: who went to a party at San Diego State just 50 00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:03,120 Speaker 3: off the campus, a lot of football players there, and 51 00:03:03,160 --> 00:03:07,560 Speaker 3: then reported she had been raped by multiple people, and 52 00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:12,519 Speaker 3: there was an investigation, had no criminal chargemen filed, so 53 00:03:12,880 --> 00:03:14,800 Speaker 3: a reason had kind of moved on with his life, 54 00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:17,560 Speaker 3: and then the civil suit comes out and includes just, 55 00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:22,360 Speaker 3: you know, ghastly allegations, including him throwing her down on 56 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:25,240 Speaker 3: a bed, and then we're in a room with three 57 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 3: other men and a violent, you know, ninety minute gang 58 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 3: rape goes on, and she's seventeen and she's intoxicated and 59 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 3: all that stuff. What was always interesting was that the 60 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:41,120 Speaker 3: police hadn't charged him right, and the San Diego police 61 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 3: put in a recommendation of no charges after a ten 62 00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:47,320 Speaker 3: month investigation. The Prosecutor's office in San Diego County launched 63 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:51,040 Speaker 3: their own investigation into this one hundred and twenty four 64 00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 3: days totally. There were thirty five people interviewed that had 65 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 3: been at this party. They did search warrants to get 66 00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:03,520 Speaker 3: video footage, for phones, pictures, texts, anything that they could 67 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 3: possibly get. There are two exhaustive things, and on December seventh, 68 00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:11,720 Speaker 3: the San Diego County Police prosecutors said no criminal charges 69 00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:14,320 Speaker 3: on matter reason or anybody else. But they did not 70 00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:19,039 Speaker 3: elaborate other than there's no criminal charges, and so you 71 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:21,240 Speaker 3: still had this civil suit out there and you had 72 00:04:21,240 --> 00:04:24,520 Speaker 3: no criminal charges. But that could often be well, something 73 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 3: might have happened, but we just can't prove it, or 74 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 3: we're just not taken on this case for whatever reason. 75 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:33,279 Speaker 3: It doesn't totally exonerate someone. And if you're an NFL team, 76 00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:35,480 Speaker 3: you're a little nervous about the whole deal. This is 77 00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:40,880 Speaker 3: a punter, not a quarterback, So nobody knew quite the details, 78 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 3: including a raza, until very recently when what was unsealed 79 00:04:45,960 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 3: in court or was unsealed was a transcript of the 80 00:04:49,400 --> 00:04:54,520 Speaker 3: meeting between the San Diego County prosecutors and the girl 81 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:57,919 Speaker 3: and her attorney, and they, over an hour and forty minutes, 82 00:04:58,040 --> 00:05:00,599 Speaker 3: laid out the case on why they could in charge, 83 00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:03,919 Speaker 3: and they went through a great deal of the evidence, 84 00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 3: including the exculpatory evidence, the videos of what they saw 85 00:05:07,920 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 3: on all the different stuff, and that got unsealed, and 86 00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:13,159 Speaker 3: by being able to read this, it's over two hundred 87 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:17,480 Speaker 3: pages of a transcript, the prosecutors are basically laying out 88 00:05:17,560 --> 00:05:21,080 Speaker 3: all of the stuff that makes it clear that Mattairesa 89 00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 3: could never be prosecuted this. And you know, I think 90 00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:28,839 Speaker 3: many reasonable people would say it's completely innocent. Here. There's 91 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:30,800 Speaker 3: still a civil suit going and you could have a 92 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 3: trial where he's found with a preponderance of evidence. But 93 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:37,919 Speaker 3: I think anyone that reads this will certainly take and 94 00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:42,320 Speaker 3: you know, it's very interesting reading for you. The most 95 00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:46,040 Speaker 3: important part is the worst allegation is that he had 96 00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:47,880 Speaker 3: thrown the girl down on that bed and led to 97 00:05:47,920 --> 00:05:52,479 Speaker 3: the gang rate. In fact, through the timestamps of videos 98 00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:57,160 Speaker 3: that were taken, photos, witness testimony, and everything else, Matta 99 00:05:57,279 --> 00:06:00,240 Speaker 3: rays that had left the party forty five minuts to 100 00:06:00,320 --> 00:06:05,480 Speaker 3: an hour before that alleged gang rape, which the prosecutors 101 00:06:05,520 --> 00:06:08,880 Speaker 3: don't actually believe they could ever prosecute anyone for and 102 00:06:08,920 --> 00:06:12,839 Speaker 3: are cast an enormous amount of doubt ever occurred, as 103 00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 3: a rape. But regardless of what happened or didn't happen 104 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 3: in that bedroom, Mada Rasa left that party an hour before. 105 00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:24,920 Speaker 3: Now there's additional did have an encounter with her that evening? 106 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:28,839 Speaker 3: He says it was consensual, she does not. There's a 107 00:06:28,880 --> 00:06:32,680 Speaker 3: ton of witnesses, Uh, there is. Uh, there's a whole 108 00:06:32,680 --> 00:06:35,880 Speaker 3: bunch of evidence that suggests certainly in the in the mind, 109 00:06:36,040 --> 00:06:38,440 Speaker 3: you know. So take my word for it. The San 110 00:06:38,480 --> 00:06:42,160 Speaker 3: Diego County prosecutors that that was a consensual deal and 111 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:44,320 Speaker 3: there's no way to ever prosecute him on this. So 112 00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:48,000 Speaker 3: if you read this this transcript, and this is now 113 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:51,880 Speaker 3: available to any NFL team to read, you would you 114 00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:54,240 Speaker 3: would certainly look at this case in a very different 115 00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:58,480 Speaker 3: light because there's a tremendous amount of exculpatory evidence, uh 116 00:06:58,920 --> 00:07:02,280 Speaker 3: provided by the the district attorney and the police for 117 00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:03,400 Speaker 3: Matta Raise's case. 118 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:07,800 Speaker 1: Look, I appreciate you joining us, Dan, It's buck. I 119 00:07:07,839 --> 00:07:10,920 Speaker 1: just want to know the NFL side of this and 120 00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:15,080 Speaker 1: the team that released him, what was their process. Just 121 00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:17,840 Speaker 1: we don't want even the possibility of there being any 122 00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 1: issue here. And do you think there's any legal remedy 123 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:23,240 Speaker 1: that Matta Raysa may have. 124 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:27,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, So the Bills had said they were aware that 125 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:31,120 Speaker 3: something had gone on. They have these teams have private investigators. 126 00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:34,600 Speaker 3: They investigate uh, you know, virtually every every player and 127 00:07:34,640 --> 00:07:37,320 Speaker 3: their team, all sorts of people they might possibly draft. 128 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:39,200 Speaker 3: They go to try to find stuff out to play, 129 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:42,600 Speaker 3: you know, get ahead of these things. So they they 130 00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:45,000 Speaker 3: were aware that there was this allegation out there, but 131 00:07:45,040 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 3: they employed him anyway. So originally they did not think 132 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 3: it was a problem. I think both the the gravity 133 00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 3: and the how graphic the allegations was, and then the 134 00:07:57,400 --> 00:08:01,560 Speaker 3: public firestorm and media firestorm after the civil lawsuit came 135 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 3: out is what the Bills just said. Look, we can't 136 00:08:04,840 --> 00:08:06,640 Speaker 3: We're just not going to deal with this. Matt needs 137 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:09,680 Speaker 3: to handle this on its own. This is a punter. Again, 138 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 3: if he was a quarterback, they might deal with it. 139 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 3: But as good of a punter as he is, you 140 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:15,600 Speaker 3: can get you can get a punter. Uh, It's just 141 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:19,000 Speaker 3: a matter of are you worth that that headache? So 142 00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 3: I don't know. My guess is they have the right 143 00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:24,400 Speaker 3: to cut anybody they want on those teams. The NFL 144 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:27,840 Speaker 3: is very smart with their their contracts, So I don't 145 00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:29,160 Speaker 3: know that he could sit there and say I was 146 00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:32,520 Speaker 3: wrongly fired for this, And I don't know how much 147 00:08:32,520 --> 00:08:34,360 Speaker 3: blame he can really throw on the bills. They could 148 00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:37,319 Speaker 3: have they could have fought and kept them, but there 149 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:40,599 Speaker 3: was there was a lot that nobody knew, including a 150 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:43,800 Speaker 3: Raz's defense team until recently. 151 00:08:44,520 --> 00:08:47,400 Speaker 2: Okay, so I'd encourage you to go read Dan Wetzel's 152 00:08:47,400 --> 00:08:50,400 Speaker 2: story at Yahoo's Sports. It'll be up linked at clayanbuck 153 00:08:50,440 --> 00:08:52,360 Speaker 2: dot com. You can also find it linked in my 154 00:08:52,440 --> 00:08:54,600 Speaker 2: twitter feed at and you can find it certainly in 155 00:08:54,720 --> 00:08:57,000 Speaker 2: dan we twitter feed at Dan Wetzel. 156 00:08:57,640 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 3: Uh. 157 00:08:58,120 --> 00:09:02,000 Speaker 2: Last question for you, Dan, when you compare the amount 158 00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:06,679 Speaker 2: of coverage that the accusation of the gag rate got 159 00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:10,200 Speaker 2: and the fact that this cost matter raise his job 160 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:14,200 Speaker 2: with the Buffalo Bills, his good name, and you compare 161 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:17,960 Speaker 2: the amount of coverage that I would say, pretty clearly 162 00:09:18,080 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 2: the vindication that is the fact that he did not 163 00:09:21,400 --> 00:09:25,359 Speaker 2: do this has gotten. How would you compare the discrepancy 164 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:27,679 Speaker 2: between the two and what do you attribute that to? 165 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 3: Well, I'm not spend a lot of time worrying about 166 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:39,640 Speaker 3: anyone else's writing, but I guess it's much less. 167 00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:40,480 Speaker 1: You know, the accusation. 168 00:09:40,600 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 2: It might be saying let's say there was one hundred 169 00:09:42,679 --> 00:09:46,920 Speaker 2: articles written about the accusation the vindication. Would you say 170 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:49,559 Speaker 2: there's been four, like, I mean, it's almost one hundred 171 00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:49,920 Speaker 2: to one. 172 00:09:50,120 --> 00:09:50,679 Speaker 1: I bet. 173 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:54,720 Speaker 3: It may be. It may be, but we're still covering 174 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:56,560 Speaker 3: it and we're still writing about it, and we're not 175 00:09:56,600 --> 00:10:03,000 Speaker 3: done with it. But yeah, I'm sure that the sensationalism, 176 00:10:03,200 --> 00:10:08,080 Speaker 3: the sensational nature of the the uh of the allegation 177 00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:13,079 Speaker 3: and the way it was covered was was significant and 178 00:10:13,080 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 3: and it certainly hasn't been quite that level, uh, I 179 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:19,120 Speaker 3: would guess, But again I'm not. We'll see what happens. 180 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:21,199 Speaker 3: I understand what your your point is, and it may 181 00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:24,480 Speaker 3: at the app may prove to be correct, and I 182 00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:27,080 Speaker 3: guess it probably will, but it is still early in 183 00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:30,079 Speaker 3: the story. So all I can do is my job, 184 00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:33,320 Speaker 3: and I worry about the other people's. But you know, 185 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 3: it's it's he is hoping that the ability to get 186 00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 3: back in the NFL camp and compete for a job 187 00:10:41,559 --> 00:10:46,520 Speaker 3: rests on the American public and the fans knowing that 188 00:10:46,679 --> 00:10:49,880 Speaker 3: he's the facts that are out there, and then they 189 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:51,760 Speaker 3: can make up their mind and it's no longer a 190 00:10:51,800 --> 00:10:54,920 Speaker 3: public It's not just a public relations battle of how 191 00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:56,920 Speaker 3: could you, why would you ever have a punter that 192 00:10:56,960 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 3: has been accused of raping a seventeen year old girl? 193 00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:02,079 Speaker 3: Right well, now, if you maybe know all the details, 194 00:11:02,120 --> 00:11:05,160 Speaker 3: you say, ah, we want that guy. And so that's 195 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:08,360 Speaker 3: what they're throwing out there. So he's certainly welcoming as 196 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:10,840 Speaker 3: much media coverage as he can possibly get for the story. 197 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:14,920 Speaker 2: He's Dan Wetzel at Dan Wetzel on Twitter. Go follow 198 00:11:14,920 --> 00:11:16,760 Speaker 2: in there. You can go read this article yourself. 199 00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:17,040 Speaker 3: Dan. 200 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:17,960 Speaker 1: We appreciate the time. 201 00:11:18,440 --> 00:11:19,720 Speaker 3: Thanks by thanks Bucky. 202 00:11:20,080 --> 00:11:23,360 Speaker 2: Thank you all right, Buck, and we come back. I 203 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 2: just want to ask this question of our listeners, and 204 00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 2: I got some strong opinions, and I bet you do too, Buck. 205 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:33,200 Speaker 2: What happens when someone makes up a story like this, 206 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:38,360 Speaker 2: a vile story alleging that you were gang raping her, 207 00:11:38,640 --> 00:11:42,600 Speaker 2: that you ripped all of her piercings out. It cost 208 00:11:42,679 --> 00:11:47,800 Speaker 2: you a job, everyone judges you, drags you through the mud, 209 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,600 Speaker 2: and then it turns out that you're one hundred percent innocent. 210 00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 2: This girl's name is still protected under rape shield laws. 211 00:11:56,679 --> 00:12:00,760 Speaker 2: She bears almost no consequences. Can't it be the case? 212 00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:03,800 Speaker 2: Just want to ask this question, if you are proven 213 00:12:03,920 --> 00:12:08,400 Speaker 2: to have made false criminal allegations that could put someone 214 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:11,800 Speaker 2: behind bars, and it is one hundred percent proven that 215 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:17,840 Speaker 2: your allegations are false. Shouldn't you face criminal accusations and 216 00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:25,400 Speaker 2: punishment yourself. Isn't that fair? Because otherwise what kind of 217 00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:28,640 Speaker 2: vindication do we have? This is not a two way street. 218 00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:33,280 Speaker 2: I want to float this idea. You should. I believe 219 00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:37,800 Speaker 2: if you make a false rape accusation, you should face 220 00:12:38,280 --> 00:12:42,200 Speaker 2: the same amount of time in prison that the person 221 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:46,559 Speaker 2: would have faced if he had been found guilty of 222 00:12:46,559 --> 00:12:47,160 Speaker 2: that crime. 223 00:12:47,720 --> 00:12:48,960 Speaker 1: You should be prosecuted. 224 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:51,040 Speaker 2: In my mind, maybe we need some new state laws 225 00:12:51,040 --> 00:12:53,600 Speaker 2: to be drafted in order for that to occur. I 226 00:12:53,600 --> 00:12:57,000 Speaker 2: know there are malicious prosecution statutes things like that, but 227 00:12:57,040 --> 00:12:59,199 Speaker 2: there should be consequences when you make up a lie 228 00:12:59,240 --> 00:13:03,280 Speaker 2: about someone like this. In my opinion, we'll talk about 229 00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:05,040 Speaker 2: it eight hundred and two eight two to two eight 230 00:13:05,120 --> 00:13:07,320 Speaker 2: eight two. Some of you may disagree, some of you 231 00:13:07,360 --> 00:13:09,240 Speaker 2: may agree. You can weigh in. Thanks to Dan Wetsall, 232 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 2: I thought that was fantastic, and you should also ask yourself, 233 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:17,240 Speaker 2: why in the world is the vindication receiving a fraction 234 00:13:17,840 --> 00:13:22,440 Speaker 2: of the attention that the accusation got. ESPN's not covering 235 00:13:22,440 --> 00:13:25,439 Speaker 2: this at all, they dragged this guy through the mud 236 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:30,880 Speaker 2: when the accusation was made. They aren't sharing his vindication 237 00:13:31,040 --> 00:13:34,240 Speaker 2: at all. Sheriff's department in California got the attention of 238 00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:37,240 Speaker 2: a cyber hacker last month. Hacker got into their computer 239 00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:41,440 Speaker 2: systems deposited ransomware. The cops were then locked out of 240 00:13:41,480 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 2: nearly all their info and they didn't have backup. The 241 00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:48,160 Speaker 2: only way to get it back pay a ransom of 242 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:53,000 Speaker 2: one point one million dollars. The sheriff's department paid half 243 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:55,640 Speaker 2: of it. The insurance company kicked in the other half. 244 00:13:55,960 --> 00:13:58,600 Speaker 2: It didn't have to be that way, though, they should 245 00:13:58,600 --> 00:14:02,319 Speaker 2: have used eye drive. I drive protects your computer data 246 00:14:02,400 --> 00:14:06,800 Speaker 2: with safe and secure data backups on their own servers, 247 00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:09,440 Speaker 2: so you can access it at any time. This is 248 00:14:09,520 --> 00:14:12,960 Speaker 2: crucial if you rely on your computer, which the majority 249 00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:16,120 Speaker 2: of us do, you need a backup of the backup. 250 00:14:16,520 --> 00:14:19,200 Speaker 2: That's why we recommend you learn about I drive. Look, guys, 251 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:22,640 Speaker 2: I recently wrote a book. My computer crashed halfway through it. 252 00:14:22,680 --> 00:14:24,920 Speaker 2: I was able to find the rest of my book, 253 00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:28,240 Speaker 2: but if I hadn't been, I would have lost my mind. 254 00:14:28,320 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 2: I can't even tell you how sick I felt in 255 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:33,400 Speaker 2: the pit of my stomach about the idea of all 256 00:14:33,480 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 2: the work I had done on that book, much of 257 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:39,920 Speaker 2: it being lost. I Drive as PC Magazine's Editor's Choice 258 00:14:39,960 --> 00:14:42,760 Speaker 2: Award winner eight years in a row for the best 259 00:14:42,840 --> 00:14:47,120 Speaker 2: cloud backup solution for consumers and businesses that tells you 260 00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:48,960 Speaker 2: all you need to know about how good they are. 261 00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:52,080 Speaker 2: You can get hooked up right now. Protect yourself by 262 00:14:52,120 --> 00:14:56,080 Speaker 2: going online to iDrive dot com for the easiest secure 263 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:59,960 Speaker 2: cloud backup solution. Plans start at less than seven dollars 264 00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 2: a month. Use our names Clay and Buck as the 265 00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 2: promo code at checkout for ninety percent off your first 266 00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:12,920 Speaker 2: year I drive dot Com ninety percent off iDrive dot Com. 267 00:15:13,200 --> 00:15:13,840 Speaker 1: Check them out. 268 00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:19,000 Speaker 2: Protect yourself from all of the awfulness that can happen 269 00:15:19,160 --> 00:15:23,360 Speaker 2: if your information is lost online. Get the best backup 270 00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 2: imaginable peace of mind for seven bucks a month at 271 00:15:26,800 --> 00:15:29,120 Speaker 2: I drive dot com. 272 00:15:28,520 --> 00:15:33,520 Speaker 1: Helping you separate truth from fiction every single weekday the 273 00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:36,880 Speaker 1: Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show Welcome back to Clay 274 00:15:36,880 --> 00:15:39,520 Speaker 1: and Bucks. So Clay put out a question a moment ago. 275 00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:43,000 Speaker 1: He was talking about the case of Matt Aresa, who 276 00:15:43,080 --> 00:15:46,560 Speaker 1: was let go from his NFL team for a sexual 277 00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:53,520 Speaker 1: assault allegation that, now based on extensive investigation by law 278 00:15:53,560 --> 00:15:58,760 Speaker 1: enforcement authority, seems to be not only incapable of being proven, 279 00:15:58,880 --> 00:16:04,080 Speaker 1: but actually capable of being proven absolutely false, which reminds 280 00:16:04,120 --> 00:16:09,120 Speaker 1: me of the Duke Lacrosse case, which was also a 281 00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:13,200 Speaker 1: moment of somebody falsely a number of individuals falsely accused horrendously. 282 00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:15,400 Speaker 1: One of them was at an ATM machine a mile 283 00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:19,080 Speaker 1: or two away when this supposed gang rape occurred. You know, Clay. 284 00:16:19,080 --> 00:16:23,880 Speaker 1: They didn't bring charges against that woman for lying under oath, 285 00:16:24,400 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: and she later went on to murderer Man Stabin in 286 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:28,440 Speaker 1: the heart stab and the death. So she went on 287 00:16:28,480 --> 00:16:31,000 Speaker 1: to be a murderer unpunished for her lying about the 288 00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 1: gang rape. You have thoughts on what should happen to 289 00:16:35,240 --> 00:16:37,560 Speaker 1: I mean, I agree there should be if it is 290 00:16:37,880 --> 00:16:41,040 Speaker 1: beyond a reasonable doubt that somebody lied about something that 291 00:16:41,080 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 1: would send someone to prison, they should serve a prison term. 292 00:16:44,320 --> 00:16:46,080 Speaker 1: I think that's I think that is justice. 293 00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:50,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, because right now, people say, okay, what's his recourse, Well, 294 00:16:50,080 --> 00:16:53,600 Speaker 2: he could sue her civilly right and say, oh, you're 295 00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:53,880 Speaker 2: going to. 296 00:16:53,880 --> 00:16:55,080 Speaker 1: Have to pay me damages. 297 00:16:55,760 --> 00:16:59,320 Speaker 2: The reality is most people don't have that much money, 298 00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:04,159 Speaker 2: so this guy has lost his good name, millions of 299 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:09,320 Speaker 2: dollars potentially and lost income. The odds of most young 300 00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:12,320 Speaker 2: women being able to have that kind of money to 301 00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:16,159 Speaker 2: recover from virtually zero. But I think we have to 302 00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:20,600 Speaker 2: even the playing field here. We have created this world 303 00:17:20,640 --> 00:17:24,760 Speaker 2: where hashtag Believe All Women exists, and it's fundamentally the 304 00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:28,000 Speaker 2: antithesis of everything that the Justice Department is supposed to represent. 305 00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:31,280 Speaker 2: Lady Justice is blind. The idea that you would believe 306 00:17:31,480 --> 00:17:34,520 Speaker 2: every man, or every woman, or every person of a 307 00:17:34,560 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 2: certain race just based off in immutable characteristic is just 308 00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:41,640 Speaker 2: let out wrong. And I think we need laws passed 309 00:17:42,200 --> 00:17:46,440 Speaker 2: that protect people from false accusations, and if false accusations 310 00:17:46,480 --> 00:17:49,680 Speaker 2: are proven, we need consequences, Like I think this girl 311 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:52,920 Speaker 2: should face jail time, just like the guy that she 312 00:17:53,080 --> 00:17:56,200 Speaker 2: accused would have faced jail time, and I think it 313 00:17:56,280 --> 00:17:58,760 Speaker 2: should be a mirror impage in many ways of what 314 00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:02,040 Speaker 2: he would have faced. That to me is what justice 315 00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:05,600 Speaker 2: should and would look like. You know, one of the 316 00:18:05,600 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 2: big challenges going on right now is we're dealing with 317 00:18:09,080 --> 00:18:13,520 Speaker 2: just no masculinity, no testosterone. It's totally vanished in the 318 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 2: world today. You know, testosterone levels down fifty percent compared 319 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:20,800 Speaker 2: to the where they were in the nineteen seventies. Your grandfather, 320 00:18:21,160 --> 00:18:25,240 Speaker 2: your father, their generation probably had way more testosterone than 321 00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:28,480 Speaker 2: the present one does, and that's not good. Testosterone is 322 00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:31,200 Speaker 2: actually fantastic. Gives a lot of men out there the 323 00:18:31,280 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 2: vim vigor, vitality to go about their day. That's what 324 00:18:34,080 --> 00:18:36,879 Speaker 2: Chalk's taken care of. They have a male vitality stack. 325 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:41,960 Speaker 2: Leading ingredient replenishes deficient levels of testosterone. Just start this 326 00:18:42,040 --> 00:18:44,800 Speaker 2: daily regiment. Twenty percent of your t levels will be 327 00:18:44,840 --> 00:18:46,400 Speaker 2: restored in three months time. 328 00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:46,960 Speaker 1: It's easy. 329 00:18:47,440 --> 00:18:50,280 Speaker 2: Check it out cchoq dot com. You get thirty five 330 00:18:50,320 --> 00:18:53,280 Speaker 2: percent off any Chalk subscription for life when you use 331 00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:59,040 Speaker 2: my name Clay cchoq dot com. My name Clay for 332 00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:03,480 Speaker 2: thirty five percent off lines of well walk back in Clay. 333 00:19:03,560 --> 00:19:07,560 Speaker 2: Travis buck Sexton show a lot of reaction rolling in 334 00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:11,919 Speaker 2: as we continue to have the fallout from the interview 335 00:19:11,920 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 2: we had with Dan Wetzel about the fake allegations of 336 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:19,560 Speaker 2: sexual assault and the fact that there is no real 337 00:19:19,640 --> 00:19:24,080 Speaker 2: recourse right if you get accused of sexual assault and 338 00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:28,000 Speaker 2: you are one hundred percent innocent, your name as the 339 00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:33,000 Speaker 2: guy gets dragged through the mud. The accuser never has 340 00:19:33,080 --> 00:19:37,080 Speaker 2: her name published at all. If you're later vindicated, what 341 00:19:37,200 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 2: options do you have. I guess you can sue civilly, 342 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:43,840 Speaker 2: but a lot of the time you would never be 343 00:19:43,880 --> 00:19:46,240 Speaker 2: able to get money back in that way, and it 344 00:19:46,359 --> 00:19:49,200 Speaker 2: just prolongs the process too. By the way, then you're 345 00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:51,080 Speaker 2: dealing with court systems ongoing. 346 00:19:52,520 --> 00:19:54,720 Speaker 1: It's broken. I think it's a broken system. 347 00:19:54,760 --> 00:19:56,399 Speaker 2: And you know, we talked about this with Betsy de 348 00:19:56,440 --> 00:20:00,840 Speaker 2: Vos on the show Buck in many ways, yeah, I. 349 00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:03,240 Speaker 1: Mean, it's true on the college campuses. I'd also just 350 00:20:03,280 --> 00:20:08,320 Speaker 1: say this did not get very much attention. But you know, 351 00:20:08,359 --> 00:20:13,399 Speaker 1: we've mentioned the Epstein situation and on people who in 352 00:20:13,480 --> 00:20:16,040 Speaker 1: any way were associated with him, and then there were 353 00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:18,960 Speaker 1: some specific allegations that were made. You know that. I mean, 354 00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:21,280 Speaker 1: this is from CNN. I don't think people talked about this. 355 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:28,280 Speaker 1: The accuser against Alan Dershowitz. Virginia Guffrey, who is the accuser, 356 00:20:28,800 --> 00:20:33,040 Speaker 1: has recanted, has said that she said she made it up. 357 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,880 Speaker 1: I didn't made it up. Oh yeah, well she said 358 00:20:35,880 --> 00:20:41,040 Speaker 1: she made a mistake. I mean, it's a great. 359 00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:43,320 Speaker 2: Point that you just made. We've had Alan Dershowitz on 360 00:20:43,359 --> 00:20:46,400 Speaker 2: this program. I knew that allegation had been made against him. 361 00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:50,240 Speaker 2: I bet this is similar in that the allegation gets 362 00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:54,800 Speaker 2: ten twenty thirty times as much of the attention as 363 00:20:54,840 --> 00:20:56,800 Speaker 2: the vindication, right, because I didn't even. 364 00:20:56,640 --> 00:20:59,159 Speaker 1: Know that that had been removed, that allegation. Again, this 365 00:20:59,240 --> 00:21:02,080 Speaker 1: was actually late late last year. She she has said 366 00:21:02,119 --> 00:21:05,200 Speaker 1: she made a mistake, she was traumatized, and he did 367 00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:09,159 Speaker 1: not do anything wrong to her. I mean that's you know, 368 00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:11,240 Speaker 1: the quote is she may have made a mistake, but 369 00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:15,920 Speaker 1: it's effectively recanted. You can imagine, you know, You'rehwitz. Now, look, 370 00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:17,840 Speaker 1: he went, he went. 371 00:21:17,800 --> 00:21:21,359 Speaker 2: All in all his name with every action. He's a 372 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:24,800 Speaker 2: Harvard lawyer. His ability to defend himself is different than 373 00:21:24,840 --> 00:21:25,639 Speaker 2: a college punter. 374 00:21:25,880 --> 00:21:27,720 Speaker 1: But I just think it's interesting how many people even 375 00:21:27,760 --> 00:21:31,080 Speaker 1: know that the allegation didn't the named allegation against Alan 376 00:21:31,080 --> 00:21:36,480 Speaker 1: Dershowitz recanted, dropped. He's an innocent man, I know. I mean, 377 00:21:36,800 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 1: this stuff happens. This stuff happens. 378 00:21:40,040 --> 00:21:42,640 Speaker 2: And we got a caller who says it happened to him, 379 00:21:43,280 --> 00:21:48,159 Speaker 2: Josh in Wisconsin. Uh, you say you were falsely accused 380 00:21:48,560 --> 00:21:50,240 Speaker 2: in college? 381 00:21:51,200 --> 00:21:52,200 Speaker 4: Yes, that's correct. 382 00:21:52,640 --> 00:21:53,919 Speaker 1: What happened to take him roughly? 383 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:57,040 Speaker 2: And yeah, I appreciate you listening roughly in your story, 384 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:01,040 Speaker 2: what happened and what was the procedure like as a 385 00:22:01,240 --> 00:22:05,840 Speaker 2: college kid accused of sexual assault in Wisconsin, what was 386 00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:07,240 Speaker 2: that process? 387 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:12,280 Speaker 4: Yeah, so claim Buck, there actually wasn't even any evidence 388 00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:15,719 Speaker 4: that could have been brought. There was an allegation that 389 00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:20,440 Speaker 4: I threatened to sexually assault so he said, she said 390 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:20,960 Speaker 4: type of thing. 391 00:22:22,760 --> 00:22:25,960 Speaker 2: So you were just accused of having threatened sexual assault, 392 00:22:26,040 --> 00:22:29,399 Speaker 2: not even actually having done any sexual assault. So what 393 00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:33,200 Speaker 2: happens when that accusation against you is made? 394 00:22:33,560 --> 00:22:37,280 Speaker 4: Yeah, so there was actually repercussions at my campus job 395 00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:40,080 Speaker 4: and I got evicted from my my housing. 396 00:22:41,359 --> 00:22:45,160 Speaker 1: Just based on the allegation. Correct. You know there are 397 00:22:45,160 --> 00:22:47,399 Speaker 1: some places thank you, look, thank you for calling in 398 00:22:47,440 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 1: and sorry that happened to you. By sorry that happened 399 00:22:50,040 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 1: to you, and you know, look it's happened to it's 400 00:22:52,560 --> 00:22:55,600 Speaker 1: happened to other Yeah. We mentioned the Duke Lacrosse case. 401 00:22:55,600 --> 00:22:59,080 Speaker 1: I mean, think about Rolling Stone will never be the 402 00:22:59,119 --> 00:23:03,000 Speaker 1: same after the Rolling Stone Uva gang rape hookes and 403 00:23:03,080 --> 00:23:05,960 Speaker 1: I'm still to this day, and I was doing a 404 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:09,040 Speaker 1: solo radio show at the time. I remember when I 405 00:23:09,080 --> 00:23:13,080 Speaker 1: was speaking to some some friends about that case because 406 00:23:13,080 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 1: I hadn't they told me about it, and they started 407 00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:17,600 Speaker 1: to tell me the details, and I said, that just 408 00:23:17,640 --> 00:23:20,359 Speaker 1: doesn't I said to them. I was like, I don't 409 00:23:20,400 --> 00:23:23,399 Speaker 1: that doesn't sound right, not that it couldn't happen, but 410 00:23:23,440 --> 00:23:27,680 Speaker 1: the story where it involved, you know, her running through 411 00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:31,600 Speaker 1: a fraternity party with glass in her back, screaming and 412 00:23:31,640 --> 00:23:33,439 Speaker 1: no one called the police. I was like, that's just 413 00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:35,879 Speaker 1: I've been to some I've been to a lot of 414 00:23:35,880 --> 00:23:38,760 Speaker 1: fraternity parties. That's there are ways these things go down 415 00:23:38,760 --> 00:23:41,439 Speaker 1: in ways that they do not, and that you know, 416 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:43,560 Speaker 1: if you have someone run through a party naked with 417 00:23:43,560 --> 00:23:46,560 Speaker 1: glass in her back, screaming that she's been attacked, people 418 00:23:46,560 --> 00:23:50,439 Speaker 1: are calling the police at UVA, at any of these universities, Okay, 419 00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:52,920 Speaker 1: and apparently they were this this store. Do you remember 420 00:23:52,960 --> 00:23:57,119 Speaker 1: that the line was, well, people didn't want it to 421 00:23:57,160 --> 00:24:00,479 Speaker 1: affect their social life or something, which was so like 422 00:24:00,520 --> 00:24:03,040 Speaker 1: it does Anyway. I'm annoying myself because I wanted to 423 00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:04,880 Speaker 1: come out against it right away. And actually, to his credit, 424 00:24:04,960 --> 00:24:07,439 Speaker 1: I think Joanah Goldberg was one of the few people 425 00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:09,640 Speaker 1: of now I forget where he writes now. He wasn't 426 00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:11,520 Speaker 1: Nash Review at the time, who said this story just 427 00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:14,440 Speaker 1: doesn't add up, and it was a total hoax. I mean, 428 00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:18,159 Speaker 1: the people didn't even exist, and Rolling Stone wrote an 429 00:24:18,359 --> 00:24:23,080 Speaker 1: entire story about a total hoax gang rape. So this is, 430 00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:26,320 Speaker 1: you know, this is something that can happen in our society. Unfortunately, 431 00:24:26,320 --> 00:24:28,159 Speaker 1: this is something that and it's one of those areas 432 00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:31,680 Speaker 1: too where you see in in areas, particularly on campus, 433 00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:36,200 Speaker 1: of sexual assault law and also in family law, there 434 00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:38,840 Speaker 1: is a gender there is a gender disparity, and it 435 00:24:39,520 --> 00:24:41,840 Speaker 1: goes against guys one hundred percent. 436 00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:45,640 Speaker 2: And look, this can be a well intentioned idea. For instance, 437 00:24:46,400 --> 00:24:50,919 Speaker 2: rape shield laws exist because there is the idea that 438 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:54,159 Speaker 2: there is shame in being the victim of a rape, 439 00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:56,840 Speaker 2: and so you may not be willing to come forward. 440 00:24:56,920 --> 00:25:00,880 Speaker 2: So I understand the basis for the exis distance of 441 00:25:01,400 --> 00:25:05,119 Speaker 2: the system in place, but I also think you have 442 00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:09,160 Speaker 2: to contemplate the way it's being applied. And for anybody 443 00:25:09,160 --> 00:25:12,280 Speaker 2: out there who has sons or grandsons, and by the way, 444 00:25:12,280 --> 00:25:16,800 Speaker 2: I would say for granddaughters or daughters as well, these 445 00:25:16,840 --> 00:25:20,520 Speaker 2: processes are kangaroo courts as they are associated you just 446 00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:24,919 Speaker 2: heard from that caller, as they're applied in college campuses. 447 00:25:25,760 --> 00:25:28,240 Speaker 2: We don't do a good job with these cases on 448 00:25:28,359 --> 00:25:31,960 Speaker 2: a national level and criminal cases. We certainly don't do 449 00:25:32,000 --> 00:25:33,520 Speaker 2: a good job with him in college. But what I 450 00:25:33,560 --> 00:25:36,120 Speaker 2: would just ask for everybody out there is this matter 451 00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:40,000 Speaker 2: raise a case now is emblematic of something that may 452 00:25:40,040 --> 00:25:42,240 Speaker 2: not happen very often, but if it happens at all, 453 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:43,840 Speaker 2: I think it deserves to be addressed. 454 00:25:43,880 --> 00:25:46,399 Speaker 1: And that is what happens when you are. 455 00:25:46,320 --> 00:25:52,879 Speaker 2: Accused of rape, which, other than buck murderer or maybe 456 00:25:52,880 --> 00:25:56,439 Speaker 2: being accused of being a pedophile, is probably the worst 457 00:25:56,480 --> 00:25:59,439 Speaker 2: thing you can say about a guy, right he raped me, 458 00:26:00,280 --> 00:26:01,680 Speaker 2: other than pedophile or murder. 459 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:04,359 Speaker 1: And can I just point out Clay as we're discussing this, 460 00:26:04,640 --> 00:26:09,880 Speaker 1: I'm gonna cut you off right now. I mean, Joe 461 00:26:09,920 --> 00:26:14,840 Speaker 1: Biden has been credibly accused of sexual assault, and there's 462 00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:17,160 Speaker 1: a there's a trial that is going at civil trial 463 00:26:17,200 --> 00:26:22,280 Speaker 1: of Donald Trump accusing him of sexual assault thirty years ago. 464 00:26:23,200 --> 00:26:26,600 Speaker 1: Clearly you know something is something is going on here 465 00:26:26,680 --> 00:26:31,119 Speaker 1: where I think this is increasingly in the post Cavanaugh, 466 00:26:31,320 --> 00:26:34,800 Speaker 1: in the Kavanaugh going forward, this is now used as 467 00:26:34,800 --> 00:26:38,040 Speaker 1: a political weapon where you accuse people of now in 468 00:26:38,040 --> 00:26:41,159 Speaker 1: the Biden case, Look, I'm a Republican, I don't like Biden. 469 00:26:41,840 --> 00:26:46,040 Speaker 1: I have never heard an explanation of the situation that 470 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:48,760 Speaker 1: would just dismiss this woman's allegation against Joe Biden, and 471 00:26:48,760 --> 00:26:52,240 Speaker 1: somehow she's just also disappeared from the conversation. But with 472 00:26:52,320 --> 00:26:55,080 Speaker 1: Donald Trump, they have all they remember they were talking 473 00:26:55,080 --> 00:26:58,280 Speaker 1: about like thirty women came out or something, and then 474 00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:00,920 Speaker 1: you talked about it. It's like, well, what did he 475 00:27:01,000 --> 00:27:02,760 Speaker 1: do when we're at a party and he grabbed me 476 00:27:02,800 --> 00:27:05,640 Speaker 1: and kissed me? And it's like, well, did you want 477 00:27:05,680 --> 00:27:07,480 Speaker 1: him to and did you fight? And did you know, 478 00:27:07,840 --> 00:27:09,560 Speaker 1: was that it was just kissing. I mean, you actually 479 00:27:09,640 --> 00:27:12,919 Speaker 1: see all this stuff now being used as I mean 480 00:27:13,040 --> 00:27:17,280 Speaker 1: clearly with Kavanaugh, didn't he I mean, the allegation was 481 00:27:17,320 --> 00:27:19,520 Speaker 1: that he even tried to do something, and of course 482 00:27:19,640 --> 00:27:23,080 Speaker 1: that was a Kavanaugh was Duke Lacrosse case esque and 483 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:25,920 Speaker 1: there was no basis for this whatsoever. Couldn't even prove 484 00:27:26,000 --> 00:27:27,760 Speaker 1: that this woman had ever met him, ever been in 485 00:27:27,800 --> 00:27:29,840 Speaker 1: the same place as him. And there were a lot 486 00:27:29,880 --> 00:27:33,360 Speaker 1: of rape allegations made against Kavanaugh that they never even 487 00:27:33,440 --> 00:27:35,840 Speaker 1: brought forward. Remember there were three different women they did 488 00:27:35,840 --> 00:27:38,959 Speaker 1: bring forward, all lying one of them though or not 489 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:40,520 Speaker 1: one of them. A number of them they didn't even 490 00:27:40,560 --> 00:27:44,240 Speaker 1: introduce because claim nobody was going to believe them. 491 00:27:44,000 --> 00:27:47,800 Speaker 2: And I think it goes to shouldn't there be laws 492 00:27:47,840 --> 00:27:52,639 Speaker 2: in place? To me, it makes perfect sense. If you 493 00:27:52,960 --> 00:27:56,560 Speaker 2: make up a rape allegation and it's one hundred percent untrue, 494 00:27:57,400 --> 00:28:00,000 Speaker 2: why should the woman and by the way, it could 495 00:28:00,119 --> 00:28:01,879 Speaker 2: a man because it could be a same sex rape 496 00:28:02,200 --> 00:28:06,400 Speaker 2: accusation that's not true. But why should the accuser not 497 00:28:06,600 --> 00:28:12,119 Speaker 2: face criminally the same potential charges in terms of time 498 00:28:12,200 --> 00:28:15,520 Speaker 2: behind bars that the person they tried to put behind 499 00:28:15,560 --> 00:28:19,080 Speaker 2: bars faces? Like why should you be able to levy? 500 00:28:19,200 --> 00:28:21,600 Speaker 2: Just for everybody out there thinking, why should you be 501 00:28:21,680 --> 00:28:26,199 Speaker 2: able to levy an awful accusation against someone? And if 502 00:28:26,240 --> 00:28:28,680 Speaker 2: it's proven that you one hundred percent made it up, 503 00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:32,400 Speaker 2: why should there be no criminal consequences for you? 504 00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:35,240 Speaker 1: Like this? Can I point out that the face something 505 00:28:35,600 --> 00:28:40,120 Speaker 1: I brought up the Duke Lacrosse accuser because she should 506 00:28:40,160 --> 00:28:43,000 Speaker 1: have been charged with perjury? That that is there she 507 00:28:43,160 --> 00:28:45,440 Speaker 1: swore under oath that these men you know there are 508 00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:48,680 Speaker 1: perjury charges, they just never charged them. Yeah, if you're 509 00:28:48,680 --> 00:28:51,600 Speaker 1: talking about it, even an escalation of for something even 510 00:28:51,600 --> 00:28:53,360 Speaker 1: more because a perjury charge, you know you're gonna go 511 00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:54,040 Speaker 1: to prison. Flight. 512 00:28:54,120 --> 00:28:57,240 Speaker 2: It's also tough to prove perjury because under oath what 513 00:28:57,360 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 2: exactly that's a technicality. But for people there who have 514 00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:04,040 Speaker 2: ever tried to get involved in a perjury case, proving 515 00:29:04,160 --> 00:29:08,400 Speaker 2: what someone knew can be challenging. But again, when it's 516 00:29:08,400 --> 00:29:11,320 Speaker 2: one hundred percent clear that what you alleged did not happen, 517 00:29:12,480 --> 00:29:15,000 Speaker 2: why should there be no consequences? And again you point 518 00:29:15,040 --> 00:29:17,160 Speaker 2: out in the Duke la Crosse case, while they filed 519 00:29:17,160 --> 00:29:21,040 Speaker 2: a lawsuit, they got money civil damages. That's fine, but 520 00:29:21,160 --> 00:29:22,880 Speaker 2: you just used I think a great example there that 521 00:29:22,960 --> 00:29:26,800 Speaker 2: Alan Dershowitz case. I'm pretty plugged in on stories. I 522 00:29:26,880 --> 00:29:29,200 Speaker 2: somehow missed that he had been one hundred percent vindicated. 523 00:29:29,200 --> 00:29:31,560 Speaker 2: I saw his denial, but I didn't know that she 524 00:29:31,640 --> 00:29:35,800 Speaker 2: had basically retracted and recanted the allegation of sexual assault. 525 00:29:35,960 --> 00:29:37,680 Speaker 2: How does it for him for getting out there and 526 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:41,200 Speaker 2: you know, defending himself every step The fraction of the 527 00:29:41,240 --> 00:29:44,520 Speaker 2: attention comes for the vindication as comes for the accusation. Yeah, 528 00:29:45,240 --> 00:29:46,880 Speaker 2: or close up shop here in a few moments, friends, 529 00:29:46,880 --> 00:29:48,520 Speaker 2: eight hundred and two A two two eight A two, 530 00:29:48,520 --> 00:29:50,120 Speaker 2: what do you think of this conversation or anything we 531 00:29:50,160 --> 00:29:53,000 Speaker 2: talked about today on the show you know, it's always 532 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:56,120 Speaker 2: heartwarming to hear of someone or an organization out there 533 00:29:56,200 --> 00:29:59,920 Speaker 2: who's doing God's work. Preborn's Network of Clinics is one 534 00:30:00,120 --> 00:30:02,880 Speaker 2: those organizations. They put one hundred percent of their focus 535 00:30:02,920 --> 00:30:07,360 Speaker 2: as a nonprofit on pregnant women and unborn babies. Most often, 536 00:30:07,360 --> 00:30:09,560 Speaker 2: they seek out opportunities to help pregnant women who are 537 00:30:09,600 --> 00:30:12,280 Speaker 2: feeling alone and being pressured to make the ultimate choice, 538 00:30:12,520 --> 00:30:15,360 Speaker 2: a choice between life or abortion for their unborn child. 539 00:30:15,680 --> 00:30:18,360 Speaker 2: When a distressed mother comes to Preborn, she is welcomed 540 00:30:18,360 --> 00:30:20,680 Speaker 2: with open arms and offered a free ultrasound to hear 541 00:30:20,720 --> 00:30:23,400 Speaker 2: and see the precious life inside of her. From those 542 00:30:23,440 --> 00:30:26,720 Speaker 2: special moments, most of the time, she will choose life. 543 00:30:26,880 --> 00:30:29,480 Speaker 2: This Mother's Day, you can help bring life to both 544 00:30:29,560 --> 00:30:32,280 Speaker 2: a mother in need and an at risk baby. One 545 00:30:32,360 --> 00:30:35,040 Speaker 2: ultrasound costs only twenty eight dollars to save a life. 546 00:30:35,240 --> 00:30:38,320 Speaker 2: Five ultrasounds are one hundred and forty dollars. Every penny 547 00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:42,040 Speaker 2: goes toward loving mothers and babies, and when you become 548 00:30:42,080 --> 00:30:45,040 Speaker 2: a monthly sponsor, you'll receive pictures and stories of lives 549 00:30:45,040 --> 00:30:47,240 Speaker 2: you help to save. It doesn't get more real than that. 550 00:30:47,600 --> 00:30:51,200 Speaker 2: To get involved, simply dial pound two fifty and say 551 00:30:51,240 --> 00:30:55,320 Speaker 2: the keyword baby. That's pound two five zero say baby. 552 00:30:55,400 --> 00:31:00,120 Speaker 2: Or visit Preborn dot com slash buck that's preborn dot 553 00:31:00,160 --> 00:31:04,640 Speaker 2: com slash b u c K sponsored by Preborn. Seek 554 00:31:04,720 --> 00:31:07,600 Speaker 2: out with the guys on the Sunday Hang with Clay 555 00:31:07,640 --> 00:31:09,239 Speaker 2: and Buck Podcast. 556 00:31:08,840 --> 00:31:10,720 Speaker 1: A new episode of every Sunday. 557 00:31:10,880 --> 00:31:13,280 Speaker 2: Find it on the iHeart app or wherever you get 558 00:31:13,320 --> 00:31:14,200 Speaker 2: your podcasts. 559 00:31:14,360 --> 00:31:16,800 Speaker 1: Closing up shop here on Clay and Buck. Thanks for 560 00:31:16,880 --> 00:31:20,160 Speaker 1: rolling with us. Want to tell you to please check 561 00:31:20,200 --> 00:31:23,400 Speaker 1: out our first of all VIP Clayanbuck dot com. Become 562 00:31:23,400 --> 00:31:26,000 Speaker 1: a VIP subscriber. You can email us. Also the Clay 563 00:31:26,360 --> 00:31:33,480 Speaker 1: and Buck podcast. It's a phenomenal stream of different content 564 00:31:33,520 --> 00:31:35,720 Speaker 1: you can listen to there. The Sunday Han goes up there. 565 00:31:36,600 --> 00:31:40,680 Speaker 1: I spoke to Gosh Ryan Gerdusky last week Roma Deavi 566 00:31:40,840 --> 00:31:44,200 Speaker 1: from the Trump white House. Really interesting. Ryan says Trump 567 00:31:44,240 --> 00:31:46,480 Speaker 1: has no chance of winning. I'm just I'm just reporting 568 00:31:46,480 --> 00:31:48,920 Speaker 1: the facts that Trump has no chance of winning based 569 00:31:48,920 --> 00:31:51,480 Speaker 1: on the numbers right now. Then fast forward a day later, 570 00:31:51,520 --> 00:31:53,440 Speaker 1: I talked to Roma, who was working in the Trump 571 00:31:53,480 --> 00:31:55,760 Speaker 1: White House. She says Trump's the only one who can win, 572 00:31:56,080 --> 00:31:58,960 Speaker 1: and she has complete confidence. And you know the data 573 00:31:59,040 --> 00:32:01,800 Speaker 1: this week, I mean the pole. So I'm just you know, 574 00:32:01,840 --> 00:32:04,840 Speaker 1: we're putting all kinds of you right now. Where are 575 00:32:04,880 --> 00:32:09,320 Speaker 1: you on those two arguments. I'm I'm the it all. 576 00:32:09,480 --> 00:32:12,560 Speaker 1: It all matters what happens between I think that here's 577 00:32:12,560 --> 00:32:16,520 Speaker 1: what I would say, being set in what is best 578 00:32:16,560 --> 00:32:20,760 Speaker 1: than what's going to happen politically now ignores what's going 579 00:32:20,800 --> 00:32:24,400 Speaker 1: to happen in the world between now and when we decide. Right, 580 00:32:24,520 --> 00:32:27,200 Speaker 1: So we've already said we'll crawl over broken glass to 581 00:32:27,280 --> 00:32:30,600 Speaker 1: make sure Trump beats Joe Biden, But we also have 582 00:32:30,640 --> 00:32:32,640 Speaker 1: to take into account. You know, your you think Biden 583 00:32:32,680 --> 00:32:34,880 Speaker 1: may not even be the nominee. We'd still have Trump obviously, 584 00:32:34,960 --> 00:32:37,120 Speaker 1: But I'm just saying there's there are a number of 585 00:32:37,200 --> 00:32:41,320 Speaker 1: things that are going to change dramatically between now and then. 586 00:32:41,920 --> 00:32:46,840 Speaker 1: I think a Trump campaign that is focused and a 587 00:32:47,400 --> 00:32:50,320 Speaker 1: and a Trump campaign that goes back to the core 588 00:32:50,400 --> 00:32:53,680 Speaker 1: message of twenty sixteen. I think that Trump campaign can 589 00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:57,960 Speaker 1: beat Joe Biden. Now is it Joe Biden and what 590 00:32:58,040 --> 00:32:59,800 Speaker 1: the economy look like in a year and everything else. 591 00:32:59,840 --> 00:33:02,719 Speaker 1: But so that's why it's a snapshot in time, and 592 00:33:02,760 --> 00:33:05,640 Speaker 1: we have to just keep evolving with the facts as 593 00:33:05,640 --> 00:33:08,960 Speaker 1: they evolve as to how you know this border thing, Clay. 594 00:33:09,120 --> 00:33:11,360 Speaker 1: I mean, this could be a real nightmare for Democrats, 595 00:33:11,400 --> 00:33:14,600 Speaker 1: and it could be the primary mode of attack, I think, 596 00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:17,880 Speaker 1: at least on policy against Biden, depending on how this 597 00:33:17,920 --> 00:33:19,280 Speaker 1: shakes out, because I don't think they have a way 598 00:33:19,280 --> 00:33:20,880 Speaker 1: of I don't think they can turn off the faucet. 599 00:33:20,920 --> 00:33:22,360 Speaker 1: They won't be able to do it. 600 00:33:22,720 --> 00:33:25,280 Speaker 2: If Biden is the nominee, and people who listen to 601 00:33:25,320 --> 00:33:29,000 Speaker 2: this show know today I laid out why I'm increasingly 602 00:33:29,160 --> 00:33:33,400 Speaker 2: of the opinion that the relief pitcher may be in 603 00:33:33,440 --> 00:33:36,320 Speaker 2: the bullpen for Biden, and that this is the time 604 00:33:36,360 --> 00:33:38,800 Speaker 2: when they would yank him out of the proverbial game, 605 00:33:38,920 --> 00:33:39,680 Speaker 2: not allow him. 606 00:33:39,600 --> 00:33:40,200 Speaker 1: To run again. 607 00:33:41,320 --> 00:33:44,720 Speaker 2: If Biden, however, is the nominee. If I'm wrong and 608 00:33:44,760 --> 00:33:47,600 Speaker 2: they ride Biden all the way twenty twenty four, I 609 00:33:47,640 --> 00:33:52,520 Speaker 2: think any Republican nominee can beat him, because I just 610 00:33:52,640 --> 00:33:55,320 Speaker 2: come back to I think he's going to be so 611 00:33:55,480 --> 00:33:59,400 Speaker 2: much worse buck by November of twenty twenty four. And 612 00:33:59,440 --> 00:34:03,240 Speaker 2: I understand the Feedterman argument of his health doesn't ultimately matter, 613 00:34:03,960 --> 00:34:06,600 Speaker 2: but I think the difference with Fetterman a couple of things. 614 00:34:06,720 --> 00:34:10,200 Speaker 2: One fifty percent of the vote for Fetterman was already 615 00:34:10,320 --> 00:34:13,600 Speaker 2: in before that debate even happened, so a lot of 616 00:34:13,640 --> 00:34:16,240 Speaker 2: people had already made their mind up, they had already voted. 617 00:34:16,960 --> 00:34:19,600 Speaker 2: And then the second part of this is I think 618 00:34:20,520 --> 00:34:24,000 Speaker 2: Biden that the idea with Fetterman that they sold was 619 00:34:24,080 --> 00:34:27,080 Speaker 2: he could get better, and that is at least. 620 00:34:27,280 --> 00:34:31,360 Speaker 1: Biden is only decline in. Biden is going to be hidened, 621 00:34:31,600 --> 00:34:33,920 Speaker 1: Like we all know what's happening here, No way that 622 00:34:34,040 --> 00:34:36,640 Speaker 1: he's possibly going to get better in any way, and 623 00:34:36,680 --> 00:34:39,560 Speaker 1: everyone knows that. There's another consideration I think as well 624 00:34:39,600 --> 00:34:42,720 Speaker 1: for Fetterman that doesn't apply to Biden. A senator doesn't 625 00:34:42,719 --> 00:34:46,080 Speaker 1: really lead. I'm not you know, I'm just gonna say this, right, 626 00:34:46,120 --> 00:34:48,160 Speaker 1: I mean, we've got some great Republican centers who listen. 627 00:34:48,280 --> 00:34:52,440 Speaker 1: But a senator's job can be done by just voting 628 00:34:52,480 --> 00:34:55,080 Speaker 1: the way the constituents want effectively. Right. 629 00:34:55,160 --> 00:34:57,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, there's or the party wants. The constituents might not 630 00:34:57,800 --> 00:34:59,520 Speaker 2: want it at all. Well, but that's what that's what 631 00:34:59,560 --> 00:34:59,799 Speaker 2: I mean. 632 00:34:59,880 --> 00:35:02,279 Speaker 1: Right, So you can make an argument that as long 633 00:35:02,320 --> 00:35:05,759 Speaker 1: as Federman checks the box for whatever the Democrat agenda is, 634 00:35:06,200 --> 00:35:08,960 Speaker 1: doesn't really matter, Like you know, can anyone off the 635 00:35:09,000 --> 00:35:11,600 Speaker 1: top of their head who doesn't live in South Dakota 636 00:35:11,600 --> 00:35:13,920 Speaker 1: and name both senators from South Dakota right now? I mean, 637 00:35:14,000 --> 00:35:17,200 Speaker 1: you know, you start to go down this and you 638 00:35:17,239 --> 00:35:19,759 Speaker 1: see that it's a but the president's different, right. The 639 00:35:19,800 --> 00:35:24,160 Speaker 1: president has the not only responsibility of executive orders, signing 640 00:35:24,200 --> 00:35:27,160 Speaker 1: bills and all that. This is who if things were 641 00:35:27,200 --> 00:35:29,799 Speaker 1: to get really ugly, let's say in Ukraine and all 642 00:35:29,800 --> 00:35:31,640 Speaker 1: of a sudden the Russians. You know, what does Joe 643 00:35:31,680 --> 00:35:36,560 Speaker 1: Biden do if the Russians attack into into Poland and 644 00:35:36,640 --> 00:35:38,719 Speaker 1: hit US facilities there that assisting in the Ukraine. It's 645 00:35:38,760 --> 00:35:41,520 Speaker 1: just theoretically, does anyone want Joe Biden to be answering 646 00:35:41,600 --> 00:35:43,760 Speaker 1: that phone call? That matters when you're president. 647 00:35:44,320 --> 00:35:47,000 Speaker 2: That's one thing Hillary got right, right, that three am 648 00:35:47,080 --> 00:35:50,040 Speaker 2: phone call that she talked about. The president is the 649 00:35:50,160 --> 00:35:53,680 Speaker 2: ultimate decider, and I think most people have made the decision. 650 00:35:53,719 --> 00:35:56,239 Speaker 2: According to that Washington Post poll, over sixty percent of 651 00:35:56,239 --> 00:35:58,560 Speaker 2: people don't think that Joe Biden has the mental or 652 00:35:58,600 --> 00:36:01,640 Speaker 2: physical fitness to be president. If I'm the Democrat Party 653 00:36:01,680 --> 00:36:05,160 Speaker 2: and I'm looking at those numbers, you can argue for Federman, Okay, 654 00:36:05,160 --> 00:36:06,640 Speaker 2: he's going to get better. And to your point, you 655 00:36:06,680 --> 00:36:08,839 Speaker 2: can argue he's just one of fifty one or whatever. 656 00:36:08,920 --> 00:36:12,359 Speaker 2: He's not really a unitary executive. We're not getting better. 657 00:36:12,719 --> 00:36:15,200 Speaker 1: And I left this out of the whole Biden equation 658 00:36:15,480 --> 00:36:17,640 Speaker 1: for where we're heading here politically and as a nation. 659 00:36:19,080 --> 00:36:21,560 Speaker 1: I now think, remember our friend Julie Kelly said, one 660 00:36:21,640 --> 00:36:24,680 Speaker 1: hundred and ten percent. I think that they're going to 661 00:36:24,719 --> 00:36:29,240 Speaker 1: bring a serious federal charge incitementto insurrection against Donald Trump. 662 00:36:29,239 --> 00:36:30,799 Speaker 1: I think the Special Counsel is going to do it, 663 00:36:31,360 --> 00:36:34,040 Speaker 1: which which just means I don't know what that means 664 00:36:34,080 --> 00:36:36,480 Speaker 1: other than, oh my god, the world's going to get crazy. 665 00:36:36,680 --> 00:36:37,560 Speaker 1: I think they're going to do it. 666 00:36:37,560 --> 00:36:40,120 Speaker 2: Though I wanted to get we won't get to her 667 00:36:40,200 --> 00:36:42,959 Speaker 2: right now, but Jennifer and Fort Bragg called in North 668 00:36:43,000 --> 00:36:45,319 Speaker 2: Carolina and she had a really good point. She said, 669 00:36:45,360 --> 00:36:47,319 Speaker 2: we're right about this story and the way we've been 670 00:36:47,320 --> 00:36:50,520 Speaker 2: talking about it with Matta Raisa. She also said, lying 671 00:36:50,600 --> 00:36:52,520 Speaker 2: women hurt real victims. 672 00:36:52,880 --> 00:36:53,400 Speaker 1: I think that's a 673 00:36:53,520 --> 00:36:57,240 Speaker 2: Very important point, because when you don't trust somebody they lied, 674 00:36:57,560 --> 00:36:59,520 Speaker 2: you don't trust somebody sometimes when they're honest,