WEBVTT - Previewing Cubs-Brewers 

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, and welcome to another episode of Brewer Territory. I'm

0:00:10.300 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>your host, Kurt Hogue. It's Corey. It's JP. And it's

0:00:14.620 --> 0:00:17.270
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. The Brewers just wrapped up a three-game series

0:00:17.290 --> 0:00:19.170
<v Speaker 1>with the Texas Rangers. They won two. They lost the

0:00:19.190 --> 0:00:23.150
<v Speaker 1>game Sunday. It was three and a half bad hours

0:00:24.370 --> 0:00:27.250
<v Speaker 1>of my life. Corey, you were just saying that's like a... No,

0:00:27.370 --> 0:00:29.690
<v Speaker 1>it's not that bad. Three and a half? That's like

0:00:29.730 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a four-hour pre-pitch clock game, but it was... It was

0:00:34.860 --> 0:00:38.090
<v Speaker 1>not the Brewers' best game of the year. All right,

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.050
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it. They're 33 games above. 500, so

0:00:42.070 --> 0:00:46.470
<v Speaker 1>let's start off with the thing that was crappy, Dustin May.

0:00:47.370 --> 0:00:51.290
<v Speaker 1>He didn't pitch great. He didn't pitch great. It was his–

0:00:53.220 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess it was his second straight poor outing. You

0:00:55.220 --> 0:00:57.380
<v Speaker 1>got to kind of disregard the one in New York

0:00:57.420 --> 0:01:00.340
<v Speaker 1>where he threw one pitch. This one a little different.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He got hit harder, I think, when he gave up

0:01:01.900 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the seven runs in two innings. he wasn't getting, he

0:01:05.260 --> 0:01:06.940
<v Speaker 1>was getting kind of dinked and dunk. And this, this

0:01:06.980 --> 0:01:10.250
<v Speaker 1>time they hit some balls off him, four doubles, a

0:01:10.310 --> 0:01:13.890
<v Speaker 1>home run. He walked three, he hit a batter. I

0:01:13.930 --> 0:01:16.669
<v Speaker 1>think we've been pretty high on Dustin Mays potential on

0:01:16.690 --> 0:01:19.230
<v Speaker 1>this show. I know I have for sure. And so

0:01:19.270 --> 0:01:22.210
<v Speaker 1>this is a bit of a reality check in that front. JP,

0:01:22.890 --> 0:01:25.250
<v Speaker 1>what are you seeing from him right now? And kind

0:01:25.270 --> 0:01:26.490
<v Speaker 1>of what do you think he needs to fix?

0:01:27.830 --> 0:01:28.010
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:28.050 --> 0:01:32.929
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just these past couple outings haven't been his best. And, um,

0:01:33.430 --> 0:01:35.890
<v Speaker 3>you know, that last one getting hit in the scap and,

0:01:36.390 --> 0:01:39.130
<v Speaker 3>and coming back and throwing, you know, you never know

0:01:39.150 --> 0:01:40.990
<v Speaker 3>what you're going to expect out of that one. So

0:01:41.850 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's just been a couple of bad

0:01:43.420 --> 0:01:46.020
<v Speaker 3>outings for him. And like we said, we're high on

0:01:46.060 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>him because we both played with him and we like

0:01:47.780 --> 0:01:51.100
<v Speaker 3>him the guy is so that that's tough for us.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I think that for him, he's just

0:01:54.340 --> 0:01:56.850
<v Speaker 3>got to get better in the zone early on in the,

0:01:57.030 --> 0:01:58.730
<v Speaker 3>in the game, it looked like he had some decent

0:01:58.770 --> 0:02:01.740
<v Speaker 3>stuff and then it kind of, went a little haywire

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:02.540
<v Speaker 3>in the end, and.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.140
<v Speaker 2>The defense didn't exactly play the best behind him either.

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>But, I mean, I think that for him he's just

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.070
<v Speaker 3>got to get the ball on the ground more, get

0:02:11.510 --> 0:02:13.990
<v Speaker 3>his double plays, and kind of that's how D-May gets

0:02:14.030 --> 0:02:17.690
<v Speaker 3>through games is, you know, guys in play with weak contacts.

0:02:17.730 --> 0:02:20.190
<v Speaker 3>So if he can get back to that and getting

0:02:20.230 --> 0:02:22.990
<v Speaker 3>away from the barrels and the doubles and the home runs,

0:02:23.030 --> 0:02:24.950
<v Speaker 3>I think that's going to be the ticket for him.

0:02:25.050 --> 0:02:28.590
<v Speaker 3>So hopefully he can start just missing barrels. That's the

0:02:28.630 --> 0:02:29.450
<v Speaker 3>goal for him right now.

0:02:30.270 --> 0:02:32.989
<v Speaker 1>Corey, what are you seeing from a stuffed perspective? Cause right.

0:02:33.010 --> 0:02:36.090
<v Speaker 1>That might be some of the concern, like actual, if

0:02:36.110 --> 0:02:38.029
<v Speaker 1>there was, if there was like long-term concern, I guess

0:02:38.090 --> 0:02:40.390
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm saying is if, is if you're seeing

0:02:40.410 --> 0:02:42.150
<v Speaker 1>the stuff like, Hmm, that doesn't look right. What do

0:02:42.169 --> 0:02:42.669
<v Speaker 1>you see in there?

0:02:43.270 --> 0:02:43.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:43.590 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, obviously it's, he was missing the ball over

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.260
<v Speaker 4>the plate a little more, which, you know, we saw, yeah.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:52.820
<v Speaker 4>Like you said, not the last outing in New York,

0:02:52.900 --> 0:02:55.260
<v Speaker 4>but the item before that, you know, even though it

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:56.700
<v Speaker 4>was a lot of blooms and.

0:02:56.660 --> 0:03:00.340
<v Speaker 5>Dunks, it's still missing the ball right over the plate. And, Tonight,

0:03:00.380 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 5>I guess, who was it?

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:03.940
<v Speaker 2>Durant.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:05.060
<v Speaker 5>Who's the guy that hit.

0:03:04.980 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>The– Durant.

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:06.540
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Durant.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Zito Durant, yeah.

0:03:08.590 --> 0:03:11.230
<v Speaker 5>Obviously, not a terrible pitch.

0:03:11.330 --> 0:03:13.790
<v Speaker 1>No, not a bad pitch. It was actually probably one

0:03:13.810 --> 0:03:17.090
<v Speaker 1>of his better executed two-strike pitches. Fastball, got it up

0:03:17.169 --> 0:03:17.750
<v Speaker 1>at the letters.

0:03:18.710 --> 0:03:23.910
<v Speaker 4>Velo, obviously, it doesn't look like it's as– it's confident

0:03:24.230 --> 0:03:28.150
<v Speaker 4>almost as– as when he first came over here in

0:03:28.250 --> 0:03:30.710
<v Speaker 4>his whole season with the Cardinals. You know, the VLOs,

0:03:31.330 --> 0:03:34.550
<v Speaker 4>it's there, but it just doesn't look as, like, confident.

0:03:34.710 --> 0:03:38.450
<v Speaker 1>So, okay, so, yeah, tell me what you mean by that. Because,

0:03:38.470 --> 0:03:40.590
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone like me will look at the VLO, right,

0:03:40.690 --> 0:03:43.300
<v Speaker 1>and will say, well, he's throwing 97. The VLO's up.

0:03:44.100 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean when you say that you're watching

0:03:46.340 --> 0:03:48.500
<v Speaker 1>him and you're like, the VLO doesn't look confident?

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:49.980
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, from some of the pitches that I saw,

0:03:53.220 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 5>in tonight's game. It just, it looks like, right.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.980
<v Speaker 6>He's trying to guide it.

0:03:58.370 --> 0:04:00.570
<v Speaker 4>Right. You could still throw hard. I mean, me and

0:04:00.610 --> 0:04:02.830
<v Speaker 4>JP have been there, right. We're trying, you can, you

0:04:02.850 --> 0:04:04.870
<v Speaker 4>can throw it hard, guiding it. But when you're just

0:04:04.930 --> 0:04:08.170
<v Speaker 4>like ripping it, there's a, a different kind of feeling

0:04:08.190 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 4>where it just, it's a very competent fastball rip, knowing

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.420
<v Speaker 4>that really, no matter where it goes, you got no

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.909
<v Speaker 4>chance rather than like, now it's, it's a, it's guiding it.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.980
<v Speaker 5>Like I, I gotta, I gotta place it here.

0:04:21.100 --> 0:04:26.370
<v Speaker 4>And, um, It's hard to describe it from how you

0:04:26.470 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 4>see it more than how you go about it mentally

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:32.140
<v Speaker 4>going in there.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a conviction, right?

0:04:34.740 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 3>That's what you're talking about. It's a conviction and feeling

0:04:38.250 --> 0:04:41.410
<v Speaker 3>good that the pitch that you're throwing is the right one.

0:04:41.890 --> 0:04:44.530
<v Speaker 3>He might be a little bit shaky after having that

0:04:44.589 --> 0:04:47.890
<v Speaker 3>last blip of an outing. The one before that being

0:04:48.150 --> 0:04:51.330
<v Speaker 3>that he didn't have his best stuff either. So, you know,

0:04:51.670 --> 0:04:53.810
<v Speaker 3>it is that part of the year too, right? I mean,

0:04:53.870 --> 0:04:55.810
<v Speaker 3>it's the dog days. We're getting at the end of August.

0:04:56.710 --> 0:04:59.299
<v Speaker 3>So guys are, you know, starting to feel the wear

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.870
<v Speaker 3>of the season. So, I mean, he's just had a couple–

0:05:03.180 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 3>getting hit in the scap is never a good time.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.070
<v Speaker 2>Not fun. No, no. I mean– 106? Yeah, yeah. And so,

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:15.979
<v Speaker 2>I mean– Hopefully he gets back on it.

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>We've already seen some good outings from him and seen

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.740
<v Speaker 3>good stuff from himself. It's not like a crazy panic.

0:05:24.020 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Just that baseball, it's a long season. You're going to

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.099
<v Speaker 3>have these struggles.

0:05:30.300 --> 0:05:34.460
<v Speaker 1>And the Brewers didn't get him to pitch in August.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:05:35.980 --> 0:05:39.450
<v Speaker 1>Not that what he does now is completely inconsequential, but

0:05:40.529 --> 0:05:42.550
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to decide if this trade was good or not.

0:05:43.220 --> 0:05:47.740
<v Speaker 1>depending on how that ball was chucked in October. With

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>where the Brewers are, you could have a CeCe Sabathia

0:05:50.620 --> 0:05:53.779
<v Speaker 1>run in the regular season and then have CeCe Sabathia's

0:05:53.779 --> 0:05:59.169
<v Speaker 1>2008 NLDS start. That's not doing anything for what the

0:05:59.190 --> 0:06:03.390
<v Speaker 1>Brewers need right now. They need production from him in October. Frankly,

0:06:03.410 --> 0:06:06.510
<v Speaker 1>he's going to need to figure some stuff out. Before then,

0:06:06.589 --> 0:06:11.430
<v Speaker 1>the execution hasn't quite been there, but there's a ton

0:06:11.450 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of reason to be. necessarily massively concerned because the stuff

0:06:15.100 --> 0:06:17.380
<v Speaker 1>is there. And what are you pitching to right now?

0:06:17.420 --> 0:06:19.460
<v Speaker 1>Game four? Is he a game four starter?

0:06:20.980 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, he's a game four guy, or he's

0:06:23.170 --> 0:06:25.150
<v Speaker 2>a long guy if you need him.

0:06:25.270 --> 0:06:27.090
<v Speaker 1>At some point in time. Yeah, if you go three.

0:06:27.110 --> 0:06:31.710
<v Speaker 1>I think you need four for the NLDS this year, though,

0:06:31.730 --> 0:06:32.750
<v Speaker 1>with the way the schedule is.

0:06:33.450 --> 0:06:33.710
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:33.950 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Last year he got away with three.

0:06:36.220 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 3>A lot of teams go bullpen day on that fourth day.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.060
<v Speaker 3>I could see us doing that too with a combo

0:06:44.660 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>of Shane and Chad and stuff like that. We have

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 3>so many options right now. We just got to get

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>there healthy. Like you said, we'll decide if this was

0:06:57.690 --> 0:07:02.049
<v Speaker 3>a winning trade come October.

0:07:04.550 --> 0:07:05.630
<v Speaker 2>Talking about Patrick too.

0:07:05.690 --> 0:07:09.610
<v Speaker 4>When's the last time His last few outings I've been seeing,

0:07:10.070 --> 0:07:13.290
<v Speaker 4>it's been one inning. He hasn't had a lot of

0:07:13.370 --> 0:07:17.790
<v Speaker 4>his multi-inning outings.

0:07:17.870 --> 0:07:22.850
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, Corey. Let's see. Let's see. His game logs

0:07:22.890 --> 0:07:26.390
<v Speaker 1>want to load. He did go two. Okay. He went

0:07:26.470 --> 0:07:29.750
<v Speaker 1>two on Saturday, two plus on Saturday to save the pen.

0:07:30.350 --> 0:07:34.330
<v Speaker 1>But before that, it had been a little bit. He

0:07:34.350 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>had gone one or fewer. He went less than one.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in some of those articles too. He had been kind

0:07:39.460 --> 0:07:41.770
<v Speaker 1>of a shorter guy. Yeah. I think honestly for the postseason,

0:07:41.830 --> 0:07:45.630
<v Speaker 1>he's more matchup. That's what I, that's the kind of

0:07:45.670 --> 0:07:48.590
<v Speaker 1>the vibe I'm getting from how they're, they're using him

0:07:48.650 --> 0:07:51.170
<v Speaker 1>right now is it's not so much fire, man. It's

0:07:51.190 --> 0:07:54.910
<v Speaker 1>not so much long bridge. It's like, here's the pocket

0:07:54.970 --> 0:07:59.700
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to want you, which that's still a pretty,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.940
<v Speaker 1>pretty versatile or pretty valuable role. Cause if you're, you know,

0:08:03.060 --> 0:08:07.780
<v Speaker 1>if you're facing the, the Cubs, the, For instance, that

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.420
<v Speaker 1>might be Seiya. Once PCA is done, it's Seiya. It's

0:08:11.540 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Ian Happ. It's the other guys. I'm having brain farts.

0:08:16.660 --> 0:08:20.300
<v Speaker 1>They've got good hitters in the middle. Bregman. Those sort

0:08:20.340 --> 0:08:27.750
<v Speaker 1>of guys. I was looking at the– I'm trying to

0:08:27.790 --> 0:08:30.030
<v Speaker 1>project the playoff roster today, and it wasn't a very

0:08:30.090 --> 0:08:31.810
<v Speaker 1>fun exercise. I had three and a half hours to

0:08:31.830 --> 0:08:33.270
<v Speaker 1>kill the game, so I was like, yeah, let's just

0:08:33.290 --> 0:08:35.250
<v Speaker 1>start doing this. And then two minutes later, I was like,

0:08:35.290 --> 0:08:36.030
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't even fun.

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 6>We know who it's going to be.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>They're healthy. There's not a lot of decision really here

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.580
<v Speaker 1>to make. We'll get into that on future shows, but

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.420
<v Speaker 1>you kind of know who your four starters are and

0:08:50.460 --> 0:08:54.850
<v Speaker 1>then your eight relievers or nine if you want to

0:08:55.050 --> 0:08:57.850
<v Speaker 1>carry 13 pitchers. I guess that's maybe their decision. Okay,

0:08:57.870 --> 0:09:02.410
<v Speaker 1>we did talk briefly not much about the Cubs, but

0:09:02.429 --> 0:09:04.969
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the Cubs some more. That guy at

0:09:05.010 --> 0:09:09.929
<v Speaker 1>the top of their order PCA, Pete Crow Armstrong, the

0:09:10.050 --> 0:09:14.050
<v Speaker 1>runaway frontrunner for most valuable player. He's having a phenomenal season.

0:09:14.090 --> 0:09:16.630
<v Speaker 1>He's flirting with 40-40. He just keeps hitting leadoff home runs.

0:09:16.750 --> 0:09:20.089
<v Speaker 1>So he had a 6th of August on Sunday after

0:09:20.130 --> 0:09:24.030
<v Speaker 1>hitting three homers in Saturday's game. He is smoking hot,

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>has turned the corner fully into superstardom. All right, pinchers,

0:09:28.620 --> 0:09:30.979
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to stop him? The floor is yours.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.020
<v Speaker 1>Take it from there. It's that easy, right?

0:09:34.660 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 6>It's that easy.

0:09:36.429 --> 0:09:39.750
<v Speaker 2>First pitch strike. First pitch strike.

0:09:39.809 --> 0:09:41.349
<v Speaker 1>What if he swings and what if he's swinging at it?

0:09:41.890 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Perfect. It's either it's a one pitch homer or it's

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:46.100
<v Speaker 2>a one pitch out.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.790
<v Speaker 3>I mean, seriously, I think that's like what they're talking

0:09:55.809 --> 0:09:58.550
<v Speaker 3>about with him right now is his plate discipline right

0:09:58.570 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 3>now compared to what it was last.

0:10:00.670 --> 0:10:02.339
<v Speaker 2>Year is swing percentages.

0:10:03.030 --> 0:10:06.660
<v Speaker 3>Like he's just a way better, more patient hitter right now.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.580
<v Speaker 3>So I think that you've got to get ahead. I mean,

0:10:10.620 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 3>that is number one ticket to getting people out as

0:10:13.420 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 3>getting ahead and puts them in a, you know, that

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 3>situation where your odds are in your favor and, From there,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.100
<v Speaker 3>start throwing some nasty stuff. You know, I mean, we've

0:10:24.380 --> 0:10:27.820
<v Speaker 3>got the arms. He hasn't been playing the Brewers all August,

0:10:27.900 --> 0:10:29.190
<v Speaker 3>so we're not worried about it.

0:10:29.300 --> 0:10:33.860
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Brewers have pitched him pretty well. I mean,

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.020
<v Speaker 1>this is a fully different version than I think the

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.980
<v Speaker 1>version the Brewers have seen. Because even when they faced off,

0:10:39.020 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they faced off early this season, he was hitting like

0:10:41.260 --> 0:10:44.020
<v Speaker 1>six or seven. Remember that blunder he made in center field?

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:45.830
<v Speaker 1>And that was kind of like indicative of where he

0:10:45.870 --> 0:10:49.610
<v Speaker 1>was at. Just really struggling. totally different player. There's still

0:10:49.650 --> 0:10:52.429
<v Speaker 1>some chase and some whiff in there. I just don't know. Like,

0:10:52.450 --> 0:10:55.070
<v Speaker 1>can you rely, like, are you, are you just, are

0:10:55.110 --> 0:10:56.030
<v Speaker 1>you just going out of the zone?

0:10:56.050 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, honestly, looking at the spray chart here and yeah,

0:11:02.660 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 4>majority of guys that you see, you're going to want

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.380
<v Speaker 4>to be able to pitch them away out of the zone,

0:11:09.500 --> 0:11:10.219
<v Speaker 4>get them to chase.

0:11:10.260 --> 0:11:12.410
<v Speaker 5>And when you've got guys that are throwing like our

0:11:12.450 --> 0:11:15.790
<v Speaker 5>guys do, man, it's going to be tough to, I

0:11:15.809 --> 0:11:16.209
<v Speaker 5>know he's.

0:11:16.110 --> 0:11:20.780
<v Speaker 4>Got great plate discipline and, Obviously, when you got Miz,

0:11:20.900 --> 0:11:22.780
<v Speaker 4>and this guy's seeing the ball really well, but when

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:23.660
<v Speaker 4>you got Miz up.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.420
<v Speaker 5>There and you got Harrison.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Left on left here, I mean, that's– dude, I'm feeling

0:11:31.350 --> 0:11:35.589
<v Speaker 4>confident with Miz, Harrison, and Henderson in there. And that's–

0:11:35.650 --> 0:11:38.070
<v Speaker 4>like JP said, you just got to have guys that

0:11:38.110 --> 0:11:40.370
<v Speaker 4>are confident enough to go in there and get ahead

0:11:40.390 --> 0:11:40.990
<v Speaker 4>of those strikes.

0:11:41.150 --> 0:11:41.410
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:41.690 --> 0:11:43.010
<v Speaker 5>And I know that's what our guys can do.

0:11:45.050 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Also, it's Wrigley. So, I mean, depending on which way

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.059
<v Speaker 2>the wind's going, you pitch him in or out. Pitch

0:11:50.340 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>him in or out, exactly. Sometimes it works that way.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.219
<v Speaker 1>Were you guys flag guys? No.

0:11:58.780 --> 0:12:03.380
<v Speaker 2>No, that was just that. You're still going to throw

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:03.819
<v Speaker 2>your pitch.

0:12:04.500 --> 0:12:07.020
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly. I think we talked about it once, right?

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.579
<v Speaker 5>When you're coming in from the hotel to the stadium.

0:12:13.210 --> 0:12:15.010
<v Speaker 4>All the hitters on the bus, they look at the

0:12:15.070 --> 0:12:17.469
<v Speaker 4>lake like, ooh, wind's blowing out today.

0:12:18.929 --> 0:12:19.610
<v Speaker 2>Whatever, man.

0:12:21.890 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 5>We'll see when we get there, but no matter what,

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 5>it's going to change.

0:12:25.059 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>It can swirl. It can have different patterns. At night,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.420
<v Speaker 1>it can get different, but in the summer, I feel

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:37.939
<v Speaker 1>like that thing's going out quite often. I think, Corey,

0:12:37.980 --> 0:12:39.420
<v Speaker 1>you were spot on with that. It feels like the

0:12:39.460 --> 0:12:43.020
<v Speaker 1>brewers are They're going to go after him. That's what

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.220
<v Speaker 1>they do. Like if this feels like this is going

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.300
<v Speaker 1>to be a challenge series, and they haven't always done

0:12:47.350 --> 0:12:49.010
<v Speaker 1>that with him. You think back to the playoff series

0:12:49.050 --> 0:12:51.410
<v Speaker 1>last year, they had a lot of success against this

0:12:51.450 --> 0:12:55.410
<v Speaker 1>guy by making him expand, not throwing him anything, him

0:12:55.429 --> 0:12:59.270
<v Speaker 1>getting himself out. Well, he's a totally, totally different player

0:12:59.490 --> 0:13:04.010
<v Speaker 1>now than he was back then. But maybe that's the

0:13:04.050 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 1>approach is challenge him. And if the first pitch homer,

0:13:08.340 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a first pitch homer, and you move on to

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.829
<v Speaker 1>the next guy. Can't let the other guys beat you?

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:14.300
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:14.910 --> 0:13:17.850
<v Speaker 4>I mean, JP's spot on, too, right, with this guy.

0:13:18.170 --> 0:13:21.790
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he's leadoff, right? So, you know, you throw

0:13:21.830 --> 0:13:24.530
<v Speaker 4>that first pitch. It's a homer, homer, or it's an out.

0:13:24.850 --> 0:13:25.580
<v Speaker 2>You know, so be it.

0:13:26.010 --> 0:13:28.390
<v Speaker 5>But I think, yeah, no matter what, man, you're going

0:13:28.429 --> 0:13:29.350
<v Speaker 5>to have to. Well, I mean, yeah.

0:13:30.490 --> 0:13:35.479
<v Speaker 2>If you locate it, you know, I'm taking our guys.

0:13:36.220 --> 0:13:36.420
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.410
<v Speaker 2>You know, as long as it's not a– right in

0:13:39.470 --> 0:13:44.570
<v Speaker 2>his bread basket. Right. Like I feel like we'll be good. Yeah. He's,

0:13:44.610 --> 0:13:47.010
<v Speaker 2>he's hot, but there's cold stretches coming.

0:13:47.910 --> 0:13:50.699
<v Speaker 1>So that's true. That does happen in baseball. That is

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:51.780
<v Speaker 1>how the game works.

0:13:52.220 --> 0:13:53.220
<v Speaker 2>It does happen.

0:13:53.340 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Claps to you on that one.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:54.900
<v Speaker 2>So, okay.

0:13:54.940 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>A question pitching philosophically strategy I have for you guys

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is you think of there's lineups, right? I think back

0:14:02.900 --> 0:14:06.380
<v Speaker 1>to the San Diego series, Murph was saying that in their, their,

0:14:06.700 --> 0:14:09.420
<v Speaker 1>their game plan, it was don't let Jackson Merrill beat us.

0:14:09.620 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the one guy here we can't let beat us.

0:14:13.070 --> 0:14:16.470
<v Speaker 1>Is there a world in which it's like we can

0:14:16.929 --> 0:14:20.550
<v Speaker 1>let PCA, like there's a guy we can let beat us?

0:14:21.990 --> 0:14:25.850
<v Speaker 1>Like I want to attack this guy and then if

0:14:25.890 --> 0:14:27.750
<v Speaker 1>the other guys happen to beat us, then congrats.

0:14:29.550 --> 0:14:31.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I think that.

0:14:32.810 --> 0:14:36.250
<v Speaker 3>Guys like, especially since he's hitting leadoff, I think that

0:14:36.490 --> 0:14:39.090
<v Speaker 3>you got to attack him and go after him and,

0:14:39.370 --> 0:14:41.490
<v Speaker 3>and be like, if he beats us with solar homers,

0:14:42.070 --> 0:14:44.410
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we got to count on our, our offense

0:14:44.450 --> 0:14:47.010
<v Speaker 3>to score more runs than a couple, you know? So that's,

0:14:47.150 --> 0:14:49.540
<v Speaker 3>that's a, I feel like the number's always three. So

0:14:49.780 --> 0:14:51.660
<v Speaker 3>if our offense can score more than three runs, I

0:14:52.420 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 3>think with our pitching, I think if we attack him,

0:14:54.660 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 3>he's not going to, I mean, yeah, he hit three homers.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.700
<v Speaker 2>I think, was it tonight or last night?

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Saturday, Saturday. Yeah. Saturday hit three.

0:15:02.380 --> 0:15:02.620
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:15:02.700 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.830
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, Rare game, but I think we'll be fine.

0:15:06.890 --> 0:15:11.890
<v Speaker 3>It's just another series against him. He's just been really,

0:15:12.050 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>really hot right now, and I'm sure that our guys

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 3>are ready to go after him.

0:15:17.300 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It should be a good series. I want to say

0:15:20.700 --> 0:15:26.450
<v Speaker 1>it's a big series, but that's the question. How big

0:15:26.530 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is this series? The Cubs... I think they're still losing

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time of recording this. I got it up here.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's seven, seven, four in the night. So

0:15:33.100 --> 0:15:36.110
<v Speaker 1>assuming they lose this, it's still an eight game lead

0:15:36.150 --> 0:15:40.310
<v Speaker 1>with 25 to play. Not a lot of teams. Where's

0:15:40.350 --> 0:15:43.010
<v Speaker 1>the wood on your wood have blown that sort of

0:15:43.050 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>lead in big league history. How big is this series?

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.820
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we got seven more games left against, against

0:15:54.860 --> 0:15:59.770
<v Speaker 4>these guys. playing them at Wrigley four game series. I mean,

0:15:59.790 --> 0:16:03.010
<v Speaker 4>this is, I wouldn't say it's like the biggest series,

0:16:03.090 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 4>but I mean, a tie, a tie goes a long

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:08.460
<v Speaker 4>way there.

0:16:09.220 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a single win goes a long way.

0:16:11.820 --> 0:16:12.380
<v Speaker 6>Two out of four.

0:16:12.420 --> 0:16:13.340
<v Speaker 5>You're, you're doing great.

0:16:13.540 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. JP. Yeah.

0:16:17.020 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think just, I, even like we said, if,

0:16:20.740 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>even if we get swept type of thing, which it's

0:16:22.740 --> 0:16:25.630
<v Speaker 3>not going to happen, we're the, We play good baseball.

0:16:25.650 --> 0:16:28.450
<v Speaker 3>We don't get swept besides maybe once this year or

0:16:28.510 --> 0:16:29.130
<v Speaker 3>twice this year.

0:16:30.930 --> 0:16:33.130
<v Speaker 2>No, we're going to be fine, and we'll play good baseball.

0:16:33.170 --> 0:16:34.410
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be a good series.

0:16:35.610 --> 0:16:38.050
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we just got to come out and play

0:16:38.110 --> 0:16:40.030
<v Speaker 3>our brand and not this brand that.

0:16:39.950 --> 0:16:42.630
<v Speaker 2>We played on Sunday. I would say that maybe it

0:16:42.650 --> 0:16:44.350
<v Speaker 2>was a good time to have an off game.

0:16:44.390 --> 0:16:45.670
<v Speaker 1>It kind of was.

0:16:46.290 --> 0:16:46.510
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:16:46.530 --> 0:16:48.980
<v Speaker 1>It kind of was because these guys don't really have

0:16:49.620 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>extended stretches of clunkers.

0:16:52.050 --> 0:16:55.090
<v Speaker 2>No, exactly. They play one bad one and then they

0:16:55.110 --> 0:16:55.870
<v Speaker 2>start playing.

0:16:55.650 --> 0:16:58.430
<v Speaker 1>Good baseball again. It kind of helps when you've got

0:16:58.450 --> 0:17:00.430
<v Speaker 1>Miz out there every fifth day.

0:17:01.030 --> 0:17:01.510
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:17:01.860 --> 0:17:04.470
<v Speaker 6>This whole series.

0:17:06.660 --> 0:17:08.740
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm going to guess it feels like a

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.420
<v Speaker 3>playoff series just because it's Brewers-Cubs and it's.

0:17:11.780 --> 0:17:13.179
<v Speaker 2>You know, and Wrigley and.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.140
<v Speaker 3>Night games, which, I mean, you play more day games

0:17:17.220 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 3>at Wrigley than more than often, so. The night game

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 3>feel will probably give it a little bit of playoff

0:17:22.820 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 3>baseball feel.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, it'll feel like a good atmosphere.

0:17:27.900 --> 0:17:28.820
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:29.300 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Which maybe is the most important thing. I'm just not sure.

0:17:31.619 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not sure that the implications for me are

0:17:36.500 --> 0:17:39.620
<v Speaker 1>really there. Like the Brewers could lose. Worst case scenario,

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you lose all seven games. Yep. Still in first place.

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:46.790
<v Speaker 6>The Cubs still need to win.

0:17:47.350 --> 0:17:49.530
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Like you're still in first place.

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.300
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, that would still be a very bad scenario.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>But even if it's a pretty rough stretch where, what

0:17:57.140 --> 0:17:59.590
<v Speaker 1>did I play in, Corey? Math Man 7 games, you said?

0:18:00.050 --> 0:18:03.790
<v Speaker 1>They go 2-5. You lose three games in the standings.

0:18:03.830 --> 0:18:06.230
<v Speaker 1>That's not even close to the end.

0:18:06.170 --> 0:18:06.550
<v Speaker 7>Of the world.

0:18:06.590 --> 0:18:09.550
<v Speaker 1>That would be the Brewers' worst stretch of baseball in

0:18:09.570 --> 0:18:12.330
<v Speaker 1>a long time if they go 2-5 in these next

0:18:12.430 --> 0:18:17.430
<v Speaker 1>two weeks against Chicago Cubs. It'll be exciting, though.

0:18:18.190 --> 0:18:20.620
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it will be. I'm excited for it. I think

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 6>the boys are going to make it a good show.

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>They love playing the Cubs. They do love playing the Cubs.

0:18:29.340 --> 0:18:32.619
<v Speaker 1>How was that for you guys? When you were coming around,

0:18:32.660 --> 0:18:36.550
<v Speaker 1>they were... Sorry, JP. You pitched in front of no fans.

0:18:38.210 --> 0:18:41.110
<v Speaker 2>No fans. I pitched in Wrigley with fans, though, as well.

0:18:41.690 --> 0:18:45.830
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Early 21? Yep.

0:18:46.190 --> 0:18:48.419
<v Speaker 2>When I was with the D-backs, which was way different, but....

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:50.190
<v Speaker 1>A little bit.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:51.340
<v Speaker 6>Which was way different?

0:18:51.900 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, than Milwaukee and the Cubs and the D-backs and

0:18:55.820 --> 0:18:56.300
<v Speaker 3>the Cubs.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, so there's no rivalry.

0:18:59.820 --> 0:19:03.500
<v Speaker 1>With the D-backs. Okay, but for your adrenaline and your feelings,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is it any different?

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 3>No, it's still the same, but I mean, the buzz

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 3>around it isn't nearly the same as what Wisconsin fans

0:19:15.540 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>and Chicago people, those are Febs down south, you know.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Undertones, we call them.

0:19:24.100 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 2>Undertones, there you go.

0:19:26.140 --> 0:19:28.950
<v Speaker 1>Corey, you were at the center of what is really

0:19:28.990 --> 0:19:32.130
<v Speaker 1>becoming a rivalry again in 2017. Yeah, right.

0:19:32.630 --> 0:19:36.550
<v Speaker 4>There were still so many Brewers fans too. That was

0:19:36.609 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 4>so cool seeing that with how many Cubs fans show

0:19:42.220 --> 0:19:46.580
<v Speaker 4>up to Miller Park and Fan Fields at those series

0:19:46.740 --> 0:19:48.940
<v Speaker 4>and then Yeah, I mean, there's still a good amount

0:19:48.980 --> 0:19:51.220
<v Speaker 4>of Brewers fans that show up. up to Wrigley, but

0:19:53.580 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we played a single game when us

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:57.860
<v Speaker 4>two faced each other.

0:19:57.940 --> 0:20:00.300
<v Speaker 6>Even whenever we.

0:19:59.859 --> 0:20:04.609
<v Speaker 4>Stank, man, in 15 and 16, it was still.

0:20:06.290 --> 0:20:08.850
<v Speaker 6>The Cubs were awesome. A unit.

0:20:09.230 --> 0:20:13.050
<v Speaker 1>My first game, I was interning for MLB.com in 2016.

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>My first game. Just finished school. The next day I

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>drive out. I'm covering it. Chase Anderson takes a no-no

0:20:21.500 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>into the eighth, I believe. I think it was seven full.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:26.620
<v Speaker 1>And then.

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.270
<v Speaker 6>I thought it was in the ninth inning when he

0:20:29.290 --> 0:20:30.350
<v Speaker 6>gave up the homer to Hayward.

0:20:30.930 --> 0:20:33.230
<v Speaker 1>He gave up a hit in the eighth, and I

0:20:33.290 --> 0:20:37.649
<v Speaker 1>believe the ninth was a homer. It was like 3-0.

0:20:37.850 --> 0:20:41.980
<v Speaker 1>The Brewers are cruising. Gives up a hit in the eighth.

0:20:42.020 --> 0:20:43.700
<v Speaker 1>Goes back out for the eighth. Homer to cut it

0:20:43.740 --> 0:20:49.500
<v Speaker 1>to one. But I was so just over my head,

0:20:49.580 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>over my depth, drowning, thinking I'm going to have a

0:20:52.220 --> 0:20:56.469
<v Speaker 1>nice day. Just do absolutely nothing. Learn the ropes. And

0:20:56.510 --> 0:20:59.530
<v Speaker 1>then the sixth inning, they're like, we're going to need you.

0:21:00.290 --> 0:21:04.869
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to write about this no-hitter. Dude.

0:21:05.420 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Zobrist got him, I think, on a baseline.

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.300
<v Speaker 4>I'm so glad you brought this up because I had

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 4>just gone on the I.L. the night before or the

0:21:12.500 --> 0:21:16.820
<v Speaker 4>day before, I think, and I'm in the dugout talking

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 4>to our strength coach at the time, and it's in

0:21:20.220 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 4>the ninth inning, and Hayward's coming up, and he.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:26.020
<v Speaker 6>Looked, and he was like, man, that's strange. Hayward hasn't

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 6>hit a home run this year.

0:21:28.980 --> 0:21:30.510
<v Speaker 5>And, dude.

0:21:30.590 --> 0:21:31.170
<v Speaker 6>Who was that?

0:21:31.250 --> 0:21:31.890
<v Speaker 1>Oh, no.

0:21:31.910 --> 0:21:32.990
<v Speaker 2>Who was that? Jason?

0:21:33.530 --> 0:21:36.310
<v Speaker 6>No, it was not Jason. This guy's not here anymore.

0:21:37.130 --> 0:21:37.530
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

0:21:39.090 --> 0:21:40.590
<v Speaker 1>Old Seligman, dude.

0:21:40.950 --> 0:21:44.170
<v Speaker 6>Josh Seligman. He says that, and I look at him like,

0:21:44.230 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 6>are you kidding me, dude?

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.300
<v Speaker 2>No feel. No feel.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 7>Two pitches later, Hayward hits a homer off Anderson. I

0:21:52.859 --> 0:21:55.530
<v Speaker 7>couldn't believe it. I just told Anderson about that at

0:21:55.550 --> 0:21:59.050
<v Speaker 7>the Legends game, too. Just all these years, man.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.290
<v Speaker 1>No feel. Dude, Chase Anderson had it for a while there.

0:22:05.310 --> 0:22:06.790
<v Speaker 1>He was good.

0:22:07.470 --> 0:22:08.410
<v Speaker 6>That was his year.

0:22:08.450 --> 0:22:13.149
<v Speaker 1>He was good. Yeah, he was good in 16. Good

0:22:13.170 --> 0:22:17.380
<v Speaker 1>in 17 as well. Let's see. May 17, 2016. Oh,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:23.420
<v Speaker 1>it was 4-2, so it wasn't like... Okay. It wasn't

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>one run like I remember. John Leucroy homered off Kyle

0:22:26.820 --> 0:22:27.900
<v Speaker 1>Hendricks in this game.

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:28.060
<v Speaker 2>Um....

0:22:30.820 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 6>That's another name, man. That guy was.

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Top eight. Zobrist leads off with a double. Chase gets

0:22:37.310 --> 0:22:41.350
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Gets the first two of the ninth. Oh,

0:22:41.410 --> 0:22:47.010
<v Speaker 1>he's one out away from a shutty. Wow. Home run,

0:22:47.050 --> 0:22:51.190
<v Speaker 1>home run. Hayward and Bryant. Home run, home run. Home run,

0:22:51.230 --> 0:22:51.690
<v Speaker 1>home run.

0:22:51.869 --> 0:22:52.169
<v Speaker 7>Wow.

0:22:53.450 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>And then JJ gets Rizzo swinging.

0:22:58.940 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>For the save.

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.460
<v Speaker 1>Corey, you're on the... You were on the I.L. that day?

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.820
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was on the I.L. That would have been

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 2>a one-out save for you. That would have been a cakewalk.

0:23:06.619 --> 0:23:08.980
<v Speaker 6>Those are the best. Was it one out? Probably one

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.450
<v Speaker 6>pitch with J.J., too, man. He got a lot of those.

0:23:12.490 --> 0:23:14.510
<v Speaker 1>No, four pitches, 0-2. Oh.

0:23:15.030 --> 0:23:17.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was going to say if it was Baez,

0:23:17.230 --> 0:23:18.369
<v Speaker 2>then it would have been one pitch.

0:23:19.090 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>God, I love this team so much. Kirk Neuenheiss. Neuenheiss, man.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 5>What a guy.

0:23:30.220 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you familiar with his home road splits that season, Corey?

0:23:34.500 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, you're going to enter degenerate levels you didn't

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:45.140
<v Speaker 1>know existed in Brewers lore right here. Kirk Neuenheiss in 2016.

0:23:45.140 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Home.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.659
<v Speaker 1>Bet at 290 with 11 homers in 47 games and

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a 953 OPS.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:49.350
<v Speaker 2>Away. Away.

0:23:57.210 --> 0:24:00.250
<v Speaker 1>Batted 127 with a 460 OPS.

0:24:01.150 --> 0:24:01.370
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:24:01.750 --> 0:24:04.210
<v Speaker 1>His OPS at home was 500 points better.

0:24:05.210 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Back in the day, they should have put him on

0:24:07.060 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the IL.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>What were the 2016 Brewers doing? Exactly.

0:24:12.220 --> 0:24:12.859
<v Speaker 6>Phantom IL.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Saturday IL.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, IL for all the road trips you're back on

0:24:18.290 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>when we get home. See you later. Have a nice day.

0:24:21.850 --> 0:24:24.990
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the 2016 Brewers were doing for Kirk Neuenhuis, why

0:24:25.010 --> 0:24:27.010
<v Speaker 1>weren't you doing it for everyone? Because that team wasn't

0:24:27.050 --> 0:24:32.810
<v Speaker 1>that good. Yeah, exactly. 500-point difference. That's crazy. I'm just

0:24:32.890 --> 0:24:34.729
<v Speaker 1>glad I could introduce you to that.

0:24:34.750 --> 0:24:37.270
<v Speaker 6>That was tough.

0:24:37.290 --> 0:24:38.430
<v Speaker 2>Deep dives on numbers.

0:24:38.990 --> 0:24:42.950
<v Speaker 1>Deep dives on the 2016 Brewers featuring Corey Knievel. Corey,

0:24:42.970 --> 0:24:43.930
<v Speaker 1>how were your numbers that year?

0:24:47.010 --> 0:24:49.930
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they were great. Not good, Cotton, but

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:55.100
<v Speaker 6>I think I got a save that year.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:56.260
<v Speaker 2>Two.

0:24:56.580 --> 0:24:58.090
<v Speaker 1>Two saves. Two saves.

0:24:58.550 --> 0:24:58.810
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:24:59.410 --> 0:25:02.310
<v Speaker 1>You had a 4.68 ERA, but don't worry, dude. Your

0:25:02.369 --> 0:25:08.130
<v Speaker 1>underlyings were better. 3.57 FIP. Those who knew ball could

0:25:08.170 --> 0:25:08.750
<v Speaker 1>see it coming.

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:25:11.300 --> 0:25:13.940
<v Speaker 6>It was coming. There was some promise in there.

0:25:14.100 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Just bad luck. You had some bad luck.

0:25:15.940 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Just bad luck.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:17.740
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:18.260
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:25:18.340 --> 0:25:19.580
<v Speaker 6>I still pitched in the windup.

0:25:20.050 --> 0:25:22.770
<v Speaker 2>You got baseballed. That's what it was. That's why.

0:25:22.790 --> 0:25:23.950
<v Speaker 1>You pitched in the wind-up?

0:25:24.250 --> 0:25:26.850
<v Speaker 6>Exactly. I was still in the wind-up that year.

0:25:27.330 --> 0:25:29.370
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man. Did you go overhead, too? I could see

0:25:29.390 --> 0:25:30.850
<v Speaker 2>you being one of those guys.

0:25:32.290 --> 0:25:36.700
<v Speaker 6>Oh, no, dude. I tried to make it perfect. Shoulders back.

0:25:39.100 --> 0:25:42.420
<v Speaker 2>The college look. I feel like that was a Texas thing.

0:25:43.780 --> 0:25:46.570
<v Speaker 4>I had to look like I stepped to the left.

0:25:46.590 --> 0:25:48.590
<v Speaker 4>I had to look, make sure my foot was in

0:25:48.630 --> 0:25:50.470
<v Speaker 4>the exact same place every time.

0:25:50.970 --> 0:25:52.540
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Way too much going on there. You got too much

0:25:57.020 --> 0:26:01.060
<v Speaker 3>arms and legs for that, Corey. Way too much arms

0:26:01.140 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 3>and legs for that.

0:26:02.820 --> 0:26:03.419
<v Speaker 5>Exactly.

0:26:03.500 --> 0:26:07.340
<v Speaker 6>Dude, way too much going on. 17, finally figured it out.

0:26:07.380 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Maybe let's just go from the stretch. Let's just stick

0:26:11.300 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>with that from now on.

0:26:13.230 --> 0:26:13.690
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:13.750 --> 0:26:16.750
<v Speaker 2>Oh, weird. Wait, why were your numbers so much better

0:26:16.770 --> 0:26:19.429
<v Speaker 2>when runners got on base? That didn't make any sense.

0:26:20.710 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Why'd you throw like two miles an hour harder?

0:26:24.380 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:26:25.100 --> 0:26:28.660
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Corey. So this is your last outing of the year.

0:26:28.740 --> 0:26:31.500
<v Speaker 1>This looks pretty stretchy to me, buddy. Is anyone on? No,

0:26:31.540 --> 0:26:31.980
<v Speaker 1>first pitch.

0:26:33.390 --> 0:26:35.889
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I switched it up.

0:26:37.050 --> 0:26:40.370
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you switched at some point during the season.

0:26:40.869 --> 0:26:42.430
<v Speaker 2>You look nasty right there, though.

0:26:42.540 --> 0:26:44.460
<v Speaker 6>Dude, that was.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:49.020
<v Speaker 2>That looked like cheese. That looked like cheese.

0:26:49.020 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 6>16, I was every bit of 240, man.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:54.780
<v Speaker 1>That boy was big.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:58.770
<v Speaker 2>That boy was dick.

0:26:59.530 --> 0:27:05.100
<v Speaker 6>That boy was dick. Man.

0:27:05.380 --> 0:27:07.980
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Okay. All right. You were not, you were not incorrect.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.660
<v Speaker 1>You were not deceiving us. You did in fact pitch.

0:27:12.260 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I got to put the sound on for this one,

0:27:14.060 --> 0:27:15.790
<v Speaker 1>just so we can, just so you can hear it.

0:27:16.150 --> 0:27:17.010
<v Speaker 2>I gotta see this.

0:27:17.450 --> 0:27:17.910
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah.

0:27:18.050 --> 0:27:18.510
<v Speaker 2>Oh no.

0:27:19.050 --> 0:27:20.070
<v Speaker 1>Look at that dude.

0:27:20.210 --> 0:27:23.130
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh.

0:27:23.490 --> 0:27:24.330
<v Speaker 6>Terrible frame.

0:27:26.430 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was supposed to get through it outside his knee. Yeah.

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:39.379
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, like these guys, they're not on one

0:27:39.420 --> 0:27:41.580
<v Speaker 2>knee back in the day. They're squatting, pull out.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 3>They actually had to frame, like use their– now guys

0:27:45.100 --> 0:27:46.139
<v Speaker 3>on catchers now.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.580
<v Speaker 2>They're just on one knee and it's easy for them

0:27:48.619 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to receive. It's crazy how much the game has evolved

0:27:52.540 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>in that category, catching. It's crazy.

0:27:58.060 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Luke was such a small target too compared to– Kratz.

0:28:03.550 --> 0:28:04.130
<v Speaker 5>I mean, yeah.

0:28:04.190 --> 0:28:09.090
<v Speaker 4>You're talking about huge target to.

0:28:08.710 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 2>The smallest target. Yeah, crats. Can't miss them.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.180
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Luke Croy was at the very front of

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.820
<v Speaker 1>being an elite framer. Do you think him being so

0:28:19.940 --> 0:28:23.810
<v Speaker 1>small helped him out in those regards? Because I remember

0:28:23.850 --> 0:28:27.290
<v Speaker 1>when framing numbers were kind of becoming a thing again.

0:28:29.230 --> 0:28:32.170
<v Speaker 1>Cubs have just lost this game. Eight game lead. When

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.179
<v Speaker 1>framing numbers are sort of public knowledge in like 11, 12, 13,

0:28:36.180 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>John Lucroy was like the guy.

0:28:40.260 --> 0:28:44.140
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we were all still pitching down in those

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 6>years too, right? Like no one was pitching up. So yeah,

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.780
<v Speaker 6>he was so small, able to get those bottom.

0:28:50.500 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 4>I would assume, that's just my guess, because no one

0:28:53.700 --> 0:28:56.270
<v Speaker 4>was really pitching up, right? Kratz was the best at

0:28:57.310 --> 0:28:59.910
<v Speaker 4>At the fastballs up because he just kind of– it

0:28:59.950 --> 0:29:02.350
<v Speaker 4>looks like he's blocking the umpire's view anyway.

0:29:03.380 --> 0:29:04.300
<v Speaker 6>That's right down the middle.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Just at his chest.

0:29:05.780 --> 0:29:08.340
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exactly. He just stands up a little bit taller.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.940
<v Speaker 1>We should get Kratz in. There's no reason for us

0:29:13.980 --> 0:29:16.530
<v Speaker 1>to not do. Let's look into it. Corey, I'm going

0:29:16.590 --> 0:29:18.710
<v Speaker 1>to put you onto that one. Eric Kratz come on

0:29:18.730 --> 0:29:20.530
<v Speaker 1>the show. You have no reason not to.

0:29:21.630 --> 0:29:21.850
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:29:22.750 --> 0:29:25.610
<v Speaker 1>I was just on them in foul territory. Was that

0:29:25.650 --> 0:29:26.710
<v Speaker 1>last week, I think, in New York? Yeah, you got

0:29:26.730 --> 0:29:29.650
<v Speaker 1>on there. Yeah, we were talking Cooper Pratt benching, but

0:29:29.750 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a thing of the past now. I love baseball.

0:29:31.900 --> 0:29:35.140
<v Speaker 1>We just move on. We move on so fast. Yes,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.450
<v Speaker 1>we do. uh we'll be talking about the cub series

0:29:37.470 --> 0:29:39.530
<v Speaker 1>in a couple days and then that'll be some past

0:29:39.550 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>history not long after that but we're excited for four

0:29:42.930 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>games at wrigley we'll be here to talk about it

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.180
<v Speaker 1>you'll be here to listen i hope like and subscribe

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and guys we will catch you on the other side

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for tuning in