WEBVTT - Rep. Byron Donalds Talks US Shutdown, ACA Subsidies

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. We're all keeping our

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>eyes on Capitol Hill today for good reason. The Senate

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>passed the legislation last evening that would reopen the government.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Once the House does the same, the President pulls out

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the sharpie and we're back in business. Of course, knowing

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that it could take some time for airlines to get

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>back together, for airports and air traffic control towers to

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be fully staffed, snap benefits to be funded, and of

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>course the hundreds of thousands of furloughed federal workers to

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get back to work get a paycheck in the bank account. So, Tyler,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what we have here is a rules committee hearing. It's

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be an important one that's set to start

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>a few hours from now, and they'll start hashing out

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the rules that will bring the bill to the floor,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and by four pm, we're told, don't necessarily bet on that,

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but around four pm we'll have a vote in the

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>House that could actually end this shutout.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, if we've learned anything, things could change quickly the

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>goose of Representatives. But this is what we're tracked as

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of now. How Speaker Mike Johnson can only afford to

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 2>lose two Republican votes, but it appears that his hand

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>has been bolstered by the fact that President Trump has

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>thrown his weight behind this deal, saying that he wants

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 2>to sign it into law. Now, we're going to talk

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 2>to one of the members who is going to cast

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>his vote when this comes up tomorrow, and that's Congressman

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Byron Donalds. He's a Republican representing Florida's nineteenth district. Congressman,

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us here on Bloomberg Television

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and Radio. I think I probably know the answer, but

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>just to get you on the record and to confirm,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>how are you going to vote when this package comes

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 2>up tomorrow?

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm voting yes. Tomorrow.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 4>It's time for the government to be reopened and this

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 4>shutdown created by Chuck Schumer and the Democrats to be blunt.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 4>We're still not even sure what they shut the government

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 4>down for in the first place, but we're excited to

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 4>get back to work and get this to the President's

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 4>desk as quickly as possible.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Congressman, I want to ask you about one of the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>provisions that we're seeing included, which is a rollback, a

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>reversal of the mass federal firings that started on October

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>first also puts a block on any future firings until

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 2>January thirtieth. Do you have any concern with this policy

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>since we know it's something that this White House had

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>been advigating for.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 3>No, we don't.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 4>There's been a lot of work in this regard the

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 4>entire year.

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 3>That's number one.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Number two, everybody knows at this point that one of

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 4>the ways we're going to be able to get our

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 4>spending under control, which is a major concern for the

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 4>bond markets and our credit rating agencies, is we're going

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 4>to have to streamline the federal government across the board.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Part of that has been giving workers an opportunity to

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 4>leave the federal workforce. Some of them have been provided

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 4>bonuses on their way out the door, and so I

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 4>think this is going to continue. Well, you know, we

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 4>have a temporary measure that we have to get through here,

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 4>and we're going to do that and get the government reopened.

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Congress.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's good to see you, and you said something

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in your first answer that was important.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 5>What was this all for?

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Because it seems to me that this could have been

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>something that took place weeks ago, knowing that Democrats were

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>offered an up or down vote on extending Obamacare subsidies.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Many told us here on the air that that was

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>simply not good enough. And I know a lot of

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>them still feel that way, who are going to vote

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>no because they wanted an actual deal on paper. John

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Thune has promised that vote. Now, should Speaker Johnson do

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>the same.

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>No, I think that's something that John Thune and the Senate.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Has to go through.

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk real quickly about these Obamacare subsidies that were

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 4>part of one of the things that Democrats were talking about.

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's first be clear.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Democrats who are arguing for like five different things over

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the last forty days, and that's how you know that

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 4>their negotiations weren't serious. This was much more about politics

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 4>from the Democratic left and politics from Chuck Schumer trying

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 4>to save his job as Senate Minority leader. But to

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 4>the specific issue about Obamacare subsidies. What the Democrats have

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 4>been telling the American people consistently is that they need

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>more subsidies to cover up the true cost of health care.

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>And these subsidies are on top of the existing structure

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 4>of subsidies built into the law of the Affordable Care Act. So,

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 4>in short, more subsidies is not going to fix Obamacare.

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 4>What it's going to do is mask the true costs

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 4>and the true damage to families everywhere. I've talked to

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 4>people where their premiums for a bronze plan are now

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 4>two thousand dollars a month. That's rent, that's a mortgage

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>in some parts of the country. The deductibles twelve to

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 4>fourteen thousand dollars a year. So if you're making one

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred and twenty five thousand dollars a year as a family,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 4>you don't have two thousand dollars a month in disposable

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 4>income to pay premiums, let alone the fourteen thousand dollars

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 4>to pay the deductible before you even start accessing the

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 4>health insurance policy. This is what's wrong with Obamacare. The

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Democrats want to cover it up using subsidies, as opposed

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 4>to fixing the problem that they created fifteen years ago.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>So then what is the plan, Congressman, are we talking

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 2>about replacing? President Trump has said that he'd be willing

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 2>to negotiate when it comes to this very issue. So

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>what's feasible, what's going to get through your chamber that

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>would get your vote?

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 4>I think what's feasible are some of the reforms that

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 4>we try to get through back in twenty seventeen. I

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 4>will tell you by the way Democrats refuse to lift

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 4>a finger and work with us to avoid the calamity

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 4>that we see today. But that centered around health care

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 4>policies that are patients centered. It's about health care policies

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>that do not have overburden some requirements on all the

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 4>things that are covered that really create a bureaucratic bloats

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 4>and makes the premiums more expensive. It's about making sure

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 4>there's more catastrophic insurance policies in the marketplace.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you have young workers.

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 4>They don't need a full gold plated healthcare policy. What

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 4>they need is catastrophic health care coverage and ability to

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>go get regular visits and checkups. That's a key part

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 4>of this. There's a study being done. It was one

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 4>I think Senator Ron Johnson released these findings actually, and

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 4>it's demonstrated that employer provided coverage and most of the

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 4>country has had just marginally risen over inflation. But when

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 4>you look at health insurance policies in the Obamacare exchanges,

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 4>they are up to three four hundred in some respects

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 4>five hundred percent over inflation.

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 4>We've created a two tier system in healthcare. So I

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 4>would tell the American people this is not simply about

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 4>subsidies for Obamacare. It is about providing real solutions that

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 4>put patients first. So we have a healthcare system and

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 4>a healthcare insurance marketplace that people can afford and be

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>able to access health care readily in their communities.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I love that we're having this conversation, Congressman, and

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I wonder your thoughts on what the President said to

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Laura Ingram last evening, because he's been on truth Social

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>about this as well. Give the money directly to people

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and let them negotiate with health insurance is essentially what

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>he said. The quote was the insurance will be better,

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it'll cost less. They're going to feel like entrepreneurs, he said,

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>They'll actually be able to go out and negotiate their

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>own health insurance. Would that still require a pool of patients, though,

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Congressman to create leverage or am I calling up United

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Healthcare and trying to get my own rates at the

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>same time that you are?

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think there's parts of what you're saying or true,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 4>some that will have to be worked on. I think

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>the premise of the president laying out is the correct one.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Look at any industry in our economy, the ones where

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 4>people have direct purchasing power to go to companies and

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 4>buy the product they're looking for, those prices are actually

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 4>increasing lower than the rate of inflation. But when you

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 4>bring in these other issues, these other areas where the

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 4>government is doing direct subsidies, that's where the prices are

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 4>completely out of control. And so for me, the situation

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 4>is clear. The situation is clear. You have to put

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 4>people at the front of the line. They got to

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>be able to make those purchasing decisions. If it's doing

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 4>if it's giving those dollars directly to the individual, that

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 4>will work. Now to your question around risk pools, this

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 4>is essential in all insurance. We could look at setting

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 4>up geographic risk pools as an idea so that people

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 4>in that community or in that state can actually be

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 4>dealing with the insurance companies, but the insurance companies actually

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 4>have a defined risk pool. This is one of the

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 4>reasons why large companies have cheaper insurance than when people

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 4>are just going into the marketplace by themselves, because they're

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 4>using the risk profile of working for that company to

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>set up the risk pool to with. Then the actuaries

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of decide how much is the cost to ensure

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 4>each person in that pool. There's ways to do this,

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 4>but the Obamacare way has been a disaster. It is

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 4>now proven and the costs are out of control.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about next steps here, and I also want

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the next steps for fully funding the

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>government because this stock gap measure goes until January thirtieth.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>How are we going to avoid another shutdown? Are we

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>going to be having this conversation again when we know

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>that the Senate has been proposing some spending levels that

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>are higher than many House Republicans want to see.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, we're going to get back to the negotiating

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 4>table in short order. I know Speaker Johnson has told

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 4>the members that we can expect some very long days

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 4>when we get back to Capitol Hill.

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 3>And that's fine. That's our job, and we're more than

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 3>happy to do that.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 4>I think it's important for my Senate colleagues, both Republicans

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 4>and Democrats, to understand one very important thing.

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>We are borrowing a lot of money.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 4>The bond market is looking at us to curtail spending,

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 4>and this is the core position of House Republicans. We

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 4>can still have a federal government that does its job,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 4>but we don't have to be so obscene in how

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 4>we are spending other people's money. And I think that

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 4>if we come back to the situation again in January,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>I think, whether it's healthcare or spending, it's important for

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 4>myself and my colleagues to communicate clearly to the American

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 4>people of what's truly at stake. Everybody wants to talk

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 4>about the economy, affordability. These are major issues for the

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 4>American people. The core of our affordability problems is massive

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 4>government overspending deep It diminishes the purchasing.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Power of the American dollar.

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 4>It does not help American families be able to make

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 4>ends meet.

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 3>In Washington, for once, we've got to do the right thing.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Let's cut our spending, get that down, and let's pass

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 4>bills so we're not doing this sprinksmanship, which, by the way,

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats are the ones want to do it. People

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 4>should know the Democrats half of them, most of them

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 4>are mad about this deal to reopen the government. They

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 4>want the government to continue to be shut down. That's

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 4>not an appropriate way to get the business done for

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 4>the American people.

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, we have talked to a number of Democratic lawmakers

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>who were not happy with the AID who crossed the

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>aisle on this because there wasn't a deal there that

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they were hoping for.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 5>Certainly, Congressman, I.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Want to mention to our viewers on Bloomberg TV, if

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you're watching this on YouTube right now, that the Congressman

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>does not have a new job.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 5>He's not working at Cantor.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>He's actually down in Miami right now at an important

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>AI energy infrastructure conference. And I've got to ask you

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>because we typically get to this because of your committee

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>assignments and your areas of interest. An important bipartisan bill

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>came out of the Senate last evening, the AD Committee

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on a crypto market structure bill, and I'm wondering where

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this stands in the House. We've talked so much about

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the Clarity Act and whether there's going to be some

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>reconciliation between these two pieces of legislation or a different path.

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I think we're probably going to end up sitting down

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 4>and get coming to an agreement between the two chambers

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 4>on this. The one thing that's very clear, I'm happy

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 4>that my Senate colleagues are.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Taking this seriously.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 4>AI quantum computing, the future of energy for our country.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 4>These are critical components to our economic future.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 3>If we don't actually.

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Create the frameworks for this, we fall further behind to China,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 4>to Europe and some of our rivals on the globe,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 4>on the world stage. So this is actually important stuff

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 4>that we can get done. I'm very happy that AI

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 4>and quantum is not a partisan issue because it's really

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 4>about the future of our economy.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 3>And so let's see what they have.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 4>We'll work together with them and try to get something

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 4>done that's going to put the American people first and

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 4>that should be in the best interest of our country.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Could you give us any timeline that we should be

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 2>watching out for any chance that this is going to

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>get done by the end of the year.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Listen, I don't put any timelines on Washington. You've been

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 4>around long enough. You know you just what you do

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 4>is you go in there, you work hard, you try

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 4>not to set artificial deadlines. I do believe that you

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 4>have members of the Senate, members of the House, myself included,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 4>who want to see a regulatory framework in AI at

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 4>crypto and quantum.

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>It is important.

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 4>We have to be able to get this job done

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 4>because we have many other public policy issues that we

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 4>have to address as well.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 3>One of them is energy.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm a major proponent for small modular nuclear reactors to

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 4>be commercially deployed throughout the United States. Every state needs

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 4>to double their amount of power on their grid. The

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 4>United States needs to do that, and this is something

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 4>where my colleagues on Capitol Hill. This is common sense

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.359
<v Speaker 4>stuff that actually provides energy at a lower per kilowatt

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 4>hour than any other generation source. We need to get

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 4>in the game and get that done as well.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, Congressman, a few stories are more important

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to our audience, So let's talk about that. Let's have

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that conversation when you're back in town with our eyes

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of course on the AI space. Congressman Byron Donald's, I

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>hope you get the flight back to DC.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 5>All right. That's easier said than done.