WEBVTT - 2020 Big 12 Conference Preview

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Hell that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 2>For I've heard so many players say, well, I want

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>to be happy, you want to be happy for.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Dake Edo State? Is that woo woom?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 2>And Dan and Tye, welcome back to the solid verbal

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Boys and girls. My name is ty hilden Brandt. That

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>fine gentleman over there, his name is Dan Rubinstein and

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>alas we are the solid verbal.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>At long last in preview mode, Dan, how are you, Ty?

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I am hydrated, I am caffeinated. I took advil just

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in case. Not a sponsor, anti inflammatory shout out to

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>all of you. And I don't know the significance of

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>this conference preview in terms of what it actually means

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>going forward for whatever happens these next few months with

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>college football and the rest of the world. But as

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has led a nomadic existence since late month March,

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking, oh, six pairs of underwear, Max, We're talking total.

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I probably left three to four pairs of socks back

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in California. We're talking my toddler, My eighteen month old

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>toddler definitely practices better hygiene at moments than I do.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>This single sliver this droplet of normalcy. Tie that we

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>get to do a conference preview on this show after

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what Earth has looked like in twenty twenty. It brings

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>me so much joy that I had to harness it

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>by listening to both ACDC and Rage against the Machine

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting for you to connect for this show. So I

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>am thrilled to be here, sir.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am fired up. I'm a little worried that

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna run and burn hot out of the gate. Yeah,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>got to pace ourselves here as we've got a Big

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>twelve preview before us. It's our first in preparation for

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>the twenty twenty football season. We are starting to see

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more about what that season might look like,

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 2>and we'll talk about that as we do a quick

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>news hit at the top here before diving into the

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Big twelve. But doesn't matter what happens the rest of

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the way. They could scrap the whole damn thing tomorrow.

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>At least we'll have one preview, Dan, and.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about it.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell you, and maybe you would echo the

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>same sentiment. How good it felt to sink your teeth

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 2>into some Kansas offense twenty twenty or West Virginia Running

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 2>Game twenty twenty. It felt surprisingly good to even look

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>at the bad spots of the Big Twelve.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some people have those trashy romance and sexy novels

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to distract them from their life or the world at

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>large and all of their problems. I suppose I have

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Malik Knowles, Andrew Parson, and Tylan Wallace while it's coming

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>back from an ACL and we've got a couple of

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>ACL injury returns, so it was a nice escape. And

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I am I am hoping for the absolute best in

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>terms of not just this Big Twelve conference preview portending

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>things that we can react to during the actual season,

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but across the board college football things, and I am

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>hopeful for improvement with everything surrounding the sport and the universe.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And we're just gonna we're gonna go from there all.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, Before we go any further, don't forget to subscribe

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 2>to the show if you haven't already. We will be

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 2>broadcasting twice a week, at least twice a week for

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the next couple weeks as we build to the twenty

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty season. You can do so on Apple, you can

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>do so on Google, on Spotify. If you like the show,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>please feel free to give us a five star review.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 2>As we've said time and again, all of that stuff

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 2>helps us grow the footprint of the Solid Verbal as

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 2>does you following along on our social media act, which

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you can do so out there on Instagram, on Twitter,

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook. And if you really like the show as

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 2>many do, there is a subreddit at solidverbal dot reddit

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>dot com, or you can continue the conversation, as I

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>like to say, long after the final bell. Also, if

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 2>you're just finding us for the first time you want

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>to find out more about the show, going out to

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>solid verbal dot com.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It's our website.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 2>You can also sign up for our newsletter there, which

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you know I've said it a bunch of times, you

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 2>probably think I'm full of it. We are going to

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 2>start using that more frequently as we get into the

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>college football season here Dan.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we don't want to spam you. You know,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to spam people.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>And frankly, there hasn't been a lot of good stuff

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to talk about. Like we try to be positive if

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be sending stuff to your inbox, and

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been a whole lot of that so far. In

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>this young or old or whatever you want to call

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it preseason that we've got so far.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you've pitched a weekly visual, a photo segment in

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the newsletter for the season. It's the race to an

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>eight pack. And I don't know if I'm fully on

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>board with that, but like a week to week progress report,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens. But we're

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pitching things to each other constantly about what the newsletter

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to look like and how we're going to

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>be adding to it and making it more. And this

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>is the favorite world of everybody who covers the sport dynamic.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Dynamic, Yeah, the eight pack's all about lighting. I would

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.679
<v Speaker 2>add just as a pro that it's all about the lighting. Yeah,

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>makeup and shading for me. Do you want to get

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>into some news?

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get into news. Let's do it

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Pricket news.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not going to really go for it today.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of information to transfer. I don't

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 2>want to ruin my voice. Okay, so we'll start here.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll follow your lead in this weird, funny form of

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 2>a preseason that we've been living through. As the season

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 2>does start to take shape, So have some conference schedules.

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 2>We saw that from what the big ten in the

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>ACC dan. Yeah, we knew the ACC schedule in terms

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>of what the home and road splits were going to

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 2>look like before, so we talked about that some of

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the bigger winners and some of the bigger losers. But

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of where bye weeks land and where you

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 2>know there could be let down, look ahead sandwiches land

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 2>and you know, tough back to backs and road stretches whatever,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 2>we didn't have a full concept of that. I'm sure

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you looked at what Notre Dame schedule look like, which

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 2>is pretty good. Not the way Notre Dame schedule works out.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 2>They have who Western Michigan is.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>They're confirmed correct non conference plus one uh Pitt big loser.

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I chance Pitt has the final first open week on

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the ACC schedule. They're the only team that I think

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>they play what what's looking like seven straight games to

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>open the season without an open date, whereas everybody else

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 1>has one within I don't know, three or four weeks.

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So there's that. Otherwise, Clemson schedule looks pretty great. It's

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting end to their year. They have pit sandwich

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>between road games at Florida State and Virginia Tech. But

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>road games are not road games in twenty twenty in

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the way that they've been, in the way that we're

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>used to. Louisville has a pretty interesting schedule. The middle

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of their schedule gets a little bit tricky, but the

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>bread part of that that schedule sandwich is fine. So

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the powers that be in the ACC, at least the

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ones that we perceive them to be, look pretty good.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We have what two open dates for each of these teams,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and the championship game will either be on December twelfth

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>or December the nineteenth.

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. And also in the scheduling department,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 2>we mentioned the big ten, you know, the first thing

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 2>that jumps out at me, and looking at this schedule

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 2>matrix here, if Ohio State does not run right through

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>this schedule, then something's wrong. Maybe half their team ops out.

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I suppose that's a possibility. We're going to talk about

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 2>some of those notable opt outs next. But starting your

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>season with Illinois, Rutgers, Perdue, Indiana, and then Abye is

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good way to go four to zero. Then

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 2>it's also a pretty good way to ramp up to

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I think your toughest game of the year in Penn

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 2>State in going from Nebraska to Michigan State, to Michigan

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>to Maryland and then Penn State. So they're like they

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 2>have a natural little ramp up there to the tougher

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 2>part of their schedule. It culminates in what they're calling

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Week ten, first week in November against Penn State.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, most teams have two consecutive tough games Minnesota out

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the shoot is Michigan State, Michigan, Iowa, Wisconsin, and then

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see about Nebraska. I know you're pretty high on

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Huskers, and three of those five are on the road.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I looked for sandwiches here Ty and the team, the

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>meat occupying the letdown look ahead sandwiches that I kept

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>coming across as Rutgers. So I don't know how profoundly

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>difficult the letdown look ahead sandwich situation is in the

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Big ten if we're to get a full season, But

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we won't really know until we have a sense after

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>three or four weeks what teams look like.

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Both.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Penn State and Ohio State get the Michigan

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>schools and consecutive weeks we'll see what mel Tucker's spartans

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>look like to sort of manage or figure out how

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>dangerous that actually is. We get Ohio State Illinois to

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>open the season on a Thursday night, that would be

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the third I believe of September. And the other big

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>notable thing is some of the classic traditional rivalry games.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And I know the Big Ten has a number of

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>those big trophy games, but the biggest of the big

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of spread out through the season. We have

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Michigan Ohio State on the twenty fourth of October instead

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of what the second or third week of November. We

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have the Acts Minnesota Wisconsin's in week four. Obviously no

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Syhawk because there's no non conference for Iowa Iowa State,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but Iowa Nebraska has been that final week game and

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that's now week four as well. So the Big Ten

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>sending a not so subtle message of we don't know

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>how long the season's going to last. We would love

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for our bigger games to enter into the eyeballs of

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>America no matter what. So, yeah, Penn State Ohio State

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is later on in the season, so I mean it's

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a giant win. If we get to that far in

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the season and we get that game, it's in Happy Valley. Correct, correct, correct.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they'll do like we'll, will the entire

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sideline just wear white as like a white out express.

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>In Michigan's schedule matrix in particular, I forget which game,

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>but one of the games was labeled as a maze out,

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 2>which we'll see.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>How that Okay, how that goes.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk more about that when we get to the

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Big Ten preview, but it is notable that we're starting

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 2>to see dates for starting to see schedules out there,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and you know, we'll talk more about that certainly as

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>we move through our previews. The other component of this

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>here is the opt outs.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 2>We talked about Caleb Farley on I Guess two of

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>our last three episodes, him opting out for his own reasons,

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and since then we've seen Rashad Bateman, notable wide receiver

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 2>from Minnesota. We've seen Micah Parsons arguably Penn State's best

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 2>player and will be the top defensive player in the country,

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>top defensive player in the country, and Gregory Rousseau from Miami,

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a red shirt freshman, opting out as well. I saw

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>our friend Adam Kramer from Bleacher Report commenting on Twitter

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>that after the Micah Parsons news broke, he was expecting

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>something of a wave that perhaps that gave clearance for

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 2>other big name, notable players to follow suit. So I

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>am bracing a bit for who may be next.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Gregor Russo had a terrific red shirt freshman year

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>last season and has already been considered to be a

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>top ten ish and maybe the best. You know, Edd

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Rusher in this upcoming NFL draft, And I don't not

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen him say anything that he's going to

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>focus on preparing for the draft, just that he was

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>opting out for safety concerns, right, So, I mean, he

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly has a lot of eligibility left, but yeah, it's

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>something to monitor. There's all sorts of context. Marvin Wilson

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at Florida State said that he very much wants to play,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think there was a headline that sort of

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>misconstrued his words that he said that opting out in

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the way that you know PAC twelve and now Big

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>ten players in their United Way and in the list

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of asks from their conferences. It was sort of misconstrued

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>because he used the phrase the easy way out, but

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it was it was more about Marvin Wilson saying he

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>decided to come back and not explore his NFL potential,

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and so the easy way out would be to not

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>play and just sit around. And so he very much

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is enthusiastic about playing with his teammates. So it's I'm

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>glad there's a conversation around it. I'm glad players are

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>just deciding what's best for them, whether that is playing

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>or not playing. And it's it's refreshing to see so

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>many players using their voices this way. So okay, yeah,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>there will be more. I keep seeing that from going

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>to be more college writers, NFL writers is going to

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>be more.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's okay, we get it, we get it, we

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 2>get it. Yeah, one d per, we get it. The

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>other interesting tidbit i'd add here before we move on

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to Yukon canceling its season for the quote unquote pandemic.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, one of the arguments against spring I'm not

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 2>like advocating for a spring move here though we've talked

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot about it, but one of the comments against

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a spring season is, oh, well, the big names are

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 2>just going to opt out. Well they're opting out anyway,

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see, we'll see where this goes, but more

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to come here.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>For sure.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned Yukon. They canceled their season, they opted out

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>of their season. It's notable here that they credited the

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 2>pandemic for it, and I do think that is obviously

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 2>the underlying and main reason why. However, Yukon's independent school

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>they lost a bunch of games on their schedule. In

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a very weird and cruel Twitter world, I saw a

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 2>lot of commentary around, oh Yukon.

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Still plays all is still?

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know, I know, I'm just I gotta

0:13:59.000 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>mention it.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Damn Orlovsky's school sucks that there's.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Not gonna be Yukon football. We love talking about Yukon

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>on the show.

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow, well, ty Le's words are important here. We love

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>talking Yukon football. Come on, we love.

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 2>It's the roots of Sexier than Edzel.

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that is true. Uh yeah, it's a bummer.

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I like football, bummer. I have no problem with the

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>state of Connecticut. I've enjoyed watching Khalid la Meine play

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>basketball way back when. Yeah. Sure, yeah. And it was

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>notable that Randy Edsel mentioned that it was a big

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation with players all deciding that this was best for them.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's also fine. Did you see the coaches poll came.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Out coaches Pole, That's where I was going. Next, we

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 2>have Clemson, Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia, LSU as you were

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>top five, Oklahoma notably is six. We're going to talk

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 2>about them in just a little bit. We will have

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>a lively discussion, I believe, over whether Texas at fourteen

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 2>deserves to be over Oklahoma State at sixteen. Of course,

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 2>none of this really matters because it's a coach's preseason poll,

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>but it is fodder for idiots like us on a

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>weird podcast like this in you know, mid August, to

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>be able to have something to talk about. So any

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>big surprises, we got to move on and talk about

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve. But any really big surprises to you.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>No, not especially good to see UCF and Cincinnati check

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in at I think it's twenty one and twenty two,

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and then seeing Tennessee, Boise and ASU on the outside

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>looking in as the I think the lead others receiving votes.

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Schools all seems to make sense a lot of the

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>schools that are on the outside looking and I'm you know,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm high on Louisville tie you know, I'm

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>high on Louisville. I think they're a top twenty five

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>caliber team and perhaps don't have as many questions as

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>these other schools that didn't make it into the top

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, even though the defense does need to improve.

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to Louisville at a certain point. But no, nothing,

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing seems dramatically off at this point because these teams

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't even play in the spring. Noice seems we'll know

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>how the fall camp. Have no idea. It's going to

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be a very different type of early season. Whatever it

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>looks like.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, well again right in sliverbe at gmail dot

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 2>com if any of these news bullets inspire you to

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>do so, or if you just want to say hi, yeah,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>we're always here. Okay, so the Big Twelve, Dan, I

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>don't you know, I don't have a sound to play

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 2>for the Big Twelve. How about this one? That's kind

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>of how I feel about the Big Twelve this year. Yeah,

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 2>it is not the deepest conference, is it. No?

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny I've mentioned in years past where it

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like, oh my god, there's so many good quarterbacks

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Big Twelve. It's so interesting that you know,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>even if a team is pretty flawed that they have

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback, like a West Virginia with Will Greer

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or whoever Brandon Whedon with Oklahoma State. I was looking

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>through some old list of Big twelve quarterbacks, and there

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>are some years where like twenty eleven was great. It

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>was like casual dress. James Franklin and Colin Klein were

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like the fifth and sixth best quarterbacks. That's a hell

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of a hell of a year in terms of quarterback depth.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But there were some years like thirteen fourteen where you're

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>talking steal Jance and Clint chellf you'll jet steal within

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>l e at the end, I believe, yeah, chance with

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a Z, I'll due respect. But there were some years

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there was like, oh, it's Bryce Petty and nobody else.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think, I don't know if it's one of

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>those type of years. I think the floor is pretty high.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of headlining quarterbacks specifically, and it's certainly

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a football team is much more than just a quarterback,

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's tricky. I don't know if spicy is how I

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>would describe it, but you know, there's some cayenne dust

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>in there to be clear.

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 2>The floor is still Kansas. It might be about an

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 2>inch or two higher than it was a year ago.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into that and much much more, but general impressions,

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 2>general questions looking aroun the Big Twelve. I don't know

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 2>if anything struck you. I know one thing that struck me.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the quarterback spot, and we'll get into that

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 2>as well. The quarterback position is a huge question mark

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>for me. We know a lot about Sam Ellinger and

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Brock Party and even Spencer Sanders, but really questions abound

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>across the board. I am, in particular very curious about

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that number two spot.

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>In the Big twelve.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, like I think we would probably agree that

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma is still the team to beat until proven otherwise.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>But definitely Oklahoma State and Texas are of particular intrigue

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to me In Iowa State. Iowa State's gotten a lot

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 2>better with regard to recruiting. Their depth is a lot better.

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 2>We know we like Brock Party and Breece Hall. Defensively,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 2>they've done a lot of cool stuff over the last

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>three years under Matt Campbell. That to me is the

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>real open question. I'm not going to throw TCU in there.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to commit the sins of the past

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 2>and dive back in head first TCU, though there is

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 2>reason be excited about their defense, but in particular that

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 2>number two spot in the conference for me is what

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm most interested in right now.

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You love talking number two, You love talking number two

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of the deuces. Yeah, last year, I mean number two

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to me is it's year two for all sorts of

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>head coaches. Right, It's year one for David at Baylor.

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So good but so good. But Matt Wells and Neil

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Less Miles and Chris climb and all entered

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>their second year. So last year it seemed like those

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of upheaval and like, what do we expect

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>from year one out of these guys, and what type

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>of continuity can we expect after you? Dania Holgerson had

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so much success, and Bill Snyder had so much success,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Texas Tech had all sorts of up

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and down situation with their coaches over these last few years.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>But Cliff Kingsbury was fun. Don't get me wrong, Cliff

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury was fun. We only have one new coach and

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>David Randas, so we I think we know what to

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>expect more and we're just more curious about the next

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>step more so than what are they going to look?

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So that to me is interesting. That is for sure interesting.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, it's another year of just a wide,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>wide open middle class of the conference. So here's the

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>way that we structured it. Last year.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 2>We got a lot of positive feedback. Yeah, when it

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 2>came to previewing conferences, but each of us went through.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I took half of the conference. You took half the conference.

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Both of us looked at all of the conference, obviously

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to be able to talk about it. But in looking through,

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 2>we formulated questions about each team, questions that we think

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 2>are a good build into just where is this thing

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 2>going to go in twenty twenty. Let's start at the

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 2>top with Oklahoma. I know you did the deep dive

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>of the Sooners, but I guess as you look at

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>this team and what they did last year under Alex Grinch,

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>there is no denying that there was improvement in the

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>first year, a much better job of creating those havoc

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 2>plays that our friend Bill Connolly calls them and likes

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 2>to talk about plays behind the line of scrimmage. It's

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of Alex Frinch's thing, right, Is there now a

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 2>legit reason to believe that the defense is going to

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>take a big enough step forward that they're going to

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>be just like a little dangerous to complement the offense.

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 2>In so doing, they'd be so much of a better team,

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 2>they'd be so much more formidable on the national stage.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Is there hope for that in twenty twenty? Yes, but

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 2>but okay, so yes there is. I mean, so the

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 2>secondary is largely intact. They have to deal with I

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know how long exactly. Ronnie Perkins is going to

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>be suspended because he was suspended if you remember before

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 2>the Peach Bowl against LSU a rush and for Oklahoma,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 2>really talented, and he was going to be suspended for

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the first five games of twenty twenty. Whether that's adjusted

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 2>now that it's a shorter schedule unclear, unclear at this moment.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 2>But upfront, they're going to be I think they're gonna

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>be fine. They're gonna be a little bit different, especially

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 2>without Ronnie Perkins. The're gonna be a little bit different.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 2>They were thinking that they're gonna get Caleb Kelly back

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of that linebacking corps, but he hurt

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>himself once again. He missed twenty nineteen with an ACL injury.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 2>I think it looks like it's the same thing for

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, so that's a pretty significant bummer. The weird

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 2>thing to me though about Oklahoma is they've struggled with

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the offense scores so quickly that they

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't necessarily have the depth to play so many snaps

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 2>on defense because they've had this crazy prolific offense all

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 2>these years, you know, be it with Baker Mayfield or

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Kyler Murray or last year with Jalen Hurts. So they

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>have built up the depth on defense, which is great

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 2>this year. Interestingly enough, the offense to me seems to

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 2>be the overhauled side of the ball, just because Spencer

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Ratler now steps in and he's had experienced former number

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 2>one overall quarterback recruit, and they're pretty beat up at receiver.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>They lose Ceede Lamb from last season, and a couple

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of guys Jaydon Hazelwood and Theo Howard go down in

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the offseason hurt. They lost a receiver named Bridges who

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>was promising, I think a former five star. He was

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 2>suspended and he's also in that that Ronnie Perkins situation

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of suspended for a few games to start the year.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>The good news for the offense is the offensive line

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 2>is in good shape and Lincoln Riley is still the

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 2>one wearing a headset and telling the offense what plays

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 2>to run. But you know, hold on on that point

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 2>there for a second, please, Spencer Rattler is a lot

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>less experienced than any quarterback that Lincoln Riley's had in

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>his time at Oklahoma. Now, I think I think we've

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>developed a level of confidence around what Lincoln Riley can do.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>But this is his fourth different quarterback starter in four years.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 2>This guy's got a lot less experience. He sure as

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>hell has not built like Jalen Hurts. He's got a

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit of Baker Mayfield in I'm not gonna lie,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 2>but he's not built like a mac truck like Jalen Hurts.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 2>And he's got the line in front of him, and

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, all that's fine and dandy, but.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He's got a huge arm, my man, huge arm.

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I am interested in what he can do. I think

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be really good. I'm most interested in

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 2>that point that you brought up about who he's throwing to.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Because we had d Lamb losing, we had the Hazelwood injury.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 2>I want to see the young guns out wide. I

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 2>want to see theo weees. I want to see Marvin Mims,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Arselston Rambo. Yeah, show me what these guys can do.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying they're not going to perform, but this

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>is a receiving core that I'm frankly just anxious to see.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know a lot about There's a lot of

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 2>potential there, but how will they all mesh especially in

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 2>recurring theme here that I'll talk a lot about a

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 2>very weird preseason and no spring.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'm with you again. The good news is Lincoln

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Riley's been there, and we have, you know, teams across

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the country with new offensive coordinators and new quarterbacks, including

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>one I happen to root for. So the fact is

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt should lie squarely on the

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>shoulders of Oklahoma's offense because of Lincoln Riley, because and

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the sort of opposite way of looking at it is

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Ratler's the first quarterback who's really had time to

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>get into the system without being counted on right away,

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like Kyler Murray and Baker Mayfield were being thrown into it.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Even though Baker Mayfield did read sure when he sat

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>out a year, he was thrust into it. Yeah. The

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>other great news on the other side of the ball

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is if you look around the conference in terms of

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what the offenses look like. Now, I know Texas has

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting talent on offense and a fourth year starting quarterback

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in Sam Ellinger, new coordinator without time to really implement

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to a detailed point like they would in a normal season.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of the same for everybody that's it's

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a step back though that that teams usually have. It's

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a step back from I guess normalcy Baylor new offensive coordinator,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>new head coach TCU, I don't think. I think Max

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Duggan's interesting, but he's not Bomber. You're not immediately super scared.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech has had injury after injury to comedy legend

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Alan Bowman. West Virginia on offense, especially at quarterback, was

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not anything scary. Last year. Kansas had moments. Iowa State

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>has rock Party, which is really promising to me. Spencer

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is not all that scary to me. With a

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>new coordinator at Oklahoma State, a promoted associate head coach,

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>receivers coach, which I never am a huge, huge fan

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of a long time position coach being promoted. So the

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>context of what Oklahoma's defense can do with regard to

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the Big twelve, it's pretty good. Yeah.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know two things that jump out at me

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 2>from last year. They gave not a banger's only conference.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>It's in terms of scary offenses.

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not to the.

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Initial point, to the initial question. They gave up a

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of big plays last year, especially on the ground.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure can they shore that up? Short, They've got depth,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 2>They've got what nine guys back, so they're going to

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>be fine on defense. I would expect that they're going

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 2>to take Yeah, eventually, I would expect they're going to

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 2>take that step forward. The other component here, we're talking

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>about Alex grianch Schreight. What's his deal. He likes havoc

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>plays and he likes turnovers.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>They didn't create as many as I'm sure he would

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 2>have liked. To his credit, they should have had more.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 2>It does not help when guys drop interceptions the way

0:26:58.440 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma did a year. Right.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>There some randomness, a lot of random.

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 2>A lot of Yeah, sure, if they can shore up

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 2>one or even both of those points to just some

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 2>marginal degree that will make them much better as a defense,

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>much more dangerous, as we asked at the top of

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 2>this little capsule here.

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't know how you feel about Oklahoma, Dan.

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I agree with most of what you said.

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 2>It is hard to see this team losing more than

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 2>like one game if they're going to lose at all

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and look like we we look at Oklahoma on their

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>old schedule, there was like a four game stretch that

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 2>might have been tricky.

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Might have been tricky.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 2>They had a game against Texas, an all time let

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 2>down look ahead spot, the following week on the road

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 2>at Iowa State before coming back home for a Bedlam game.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Have we seen the Big twelve schedule at time of recording,

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>No, it's being reworked as we speak. I think I

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>saw that Red River is supposed to stay in Dallas

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 1>as of a while ago, so we'll see if that changes.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise, no, it's just because they want to It's

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a nine plus one schedule and they want to rework

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it to work in bye weeks and different options. And

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not in a cancelations. They're not going to play

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on August and twenty ninth. Originally they had moved that

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Missouri State game. That's not going to happen now, So

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>we're waiting to find out what the Big Twelve schedule

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is at time of recording here. But my only point

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is I think the rework schedule is actually going to

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>work in their favor too. Like we already know who

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they're playing, right, like they always play all these teams.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think the way that they might rework things

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate this new reality is also something else that

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>will benefit Oklahoma. So again my view probably yours as well,

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma is a team to beat until proven otherwise in

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the Big Twelve agreed, disagree with Edlam week one. Let's

0:28:54.800 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. No, they're absolutely there is no clear obvious challenger.

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>The only one from a talent standpoint is Texas. But

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what to expect from Texas year and year out.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I leave to you now because I have a question

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for you as your transition. I am saying, here, let's

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>do it, let's do it. I'm ready. I'm going to

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>stick with the bread that you like, spreading your intellectual

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>butter on top of time. Yes, you know the the

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>undertaker clip or image or gift of him literally rising

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>from a laying down position, bolting up to ninety degree

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>from the coffin from the coffin, So from zero to

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>ninety if you could give me an undertaker angle with

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety ninety being full on, Vince Young's walking through that door.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>There he is Vince Young. He's suiting up once again

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and laying straight in the coffin being I don't know

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst of David Ash, the worst of any of

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the case McCoy, Garret Kilbert, I don't know. Give give

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>me an angle, Give me an undertaker seventy two, taken

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>up angle seven seventy two, seventy two.

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, in this analogy, I am Paul

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Bearer as the weird hype man promoting Texas's back or

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 2>not back.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I am the ref looking away at the right moments.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>What I would like to know from Texas fans is

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 2>whether or not that Texas being back thing is perpetuated

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 2>by the fan base or the boosters, or mainly just

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 2>by the national media, which is frankly a little more

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 2>disconnected from the program. My sense is that it's more

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 2>national than local. But there is no doubt, more pressure

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>on Tom Herman to more seriously contend for the conferences

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 2>here or, if not this year next. Otherwise he would

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 2>not have hit the reset button on both the offense

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and defense the way he did this offseason. So as

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>we enter twenty twenty, Texas went eight and five last year.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 2>They beat Utah in the bowl game. They beat Oklahoma

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 2>in the regular season, which was nice. It's pretty much

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 2>it still had the five losses. They were decidedly not

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>back last season.

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Correct, Agree, Yeah, I mean there were extenuating circumstances for sure,

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But yes, it was a more challenging year than I

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>think we anticipated given how they ended twenty eighteen. But

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it happens. It does happen.

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>It does happen. So I look at what he's doing here.

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>He fired both his coordinators. It does feel a little

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 2>like he's trying to build Ohio State south and I

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 2>think Texas fans would be.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Cool with that. Yeah, worst models, TI, worst models.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 2>He got rid of Tim Beck, previous offensive coordinator, who

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>replaced him with Mike Yersich, who comes over from Ohio State.

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I think we would see that as an upgrade. Also

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 2>got rid of Todd Orlando, bringing in Chris Ash to

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 2>run the defense. Chris ad formerly before his Rutgers stop,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 2>was the defensive coordinator at Ohio State. Yep, it was

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the right move. I think, the right move at the

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>right time on both fronts. He just got really unlucky

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 2>with the pandemic. It's just hard to start over like

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>this amid all this without the spring, with the in

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 2>person stuff being so different. Don't be surprised if this

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 2>does not click right away again, recurring theme, do not

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>be surprised, Dan, if this does not click right away right? Okay,

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that said, I really like this team. I know you're

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be shocked to hear that, but I said

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>it a couple episodes ago. I think Sam Ellinger is

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 2>still underrated. I think the running game is going to

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 2>be better. I think Friend of the Show herb Hand

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 2>did an awesome job with the line last year.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Rebuilt the line, Man built the line. Run in a dark place.

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they were in a perfect world where you know,

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Mike yoursicch could maybe more prop or more comfortably install

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the offense. He would build off that line because the

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 2>foundation is there. What was really missing last year was

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the creativity. And we knew that because it was Tim Beck.

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 2>You got to sound somewhere. I should find it.

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I should have been prepared here, But we've got the

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bech Meyer syndrome. Sound is it you're sitch or you're sick.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I was always an impression of it's you're sick. I

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>believe it's your sich. But he did something he was

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>at he was at Shippensburg.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Right by the way here it is can't live arm

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 2>or speak at normal, right, that's the bech Meyer syndrome.

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Sound whatever, whether it's you're sitch or you're sick.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>He knows the.

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Conference from his time in Oklahoma State. He did a

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 2>hell of a job with Justin Fields last year. He

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 2>wants this offense to be more vertical, no more of

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the five yard dink and dunk stuff that we saw.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 2>I am most interested in what he does this passing game,

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 2>how it looks differently, how he uses j Smith, how

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 2>he used Brendan Eagles. Also, treege Black came down from

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Michigan as a grad transfer, and Jordan Whittingham is now

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a converted wide receiver from the running back position. Josh

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Moore has a ton of upside and just I'm really

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 2>intrigued in what he can do with this offense, how

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 2>he can implement some degree of creativity that simply was

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 2>not there under Tim Back. I think he has the

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 2>personnel to do it. He's got the best quarterback in

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve to do it with. I am excited

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 2>about this offense.

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think the big name too is Kyanta Ingram.

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he took the step forward for the

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Texas running game last year will only open things up

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>for the passing game. We saw how much success Justin

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Fields had with play action. I think that that becomes

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>such a major threat now because that was and Texas

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>has had running backs. Certainly, they went into last season

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>unsure of what they had at running back like they

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>did the last couple of years. But Keanta Ingram being

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a I think one of the best, probably eight or

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>nine running backs in the country should should be a

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 1>huge boost for what this offense can do creatively. And yeah,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to see it. The problem is, it seems

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>like Sam Ellinger and maybe it won't really derail what

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>their season can be if we get a full season.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>He always seems to have that stinker in him. He

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>does have you look up. He does you'll look up

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>at at you know, six forty four Eastern and he's

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>got three picks in the first half, and you're like, oh,

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not wrong, You're wrong. There's always a not Sam

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Ellinger's week week, and I wonder if that once again

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to fruition.

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.959
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the Texas defense because that's a new

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 2>installation as well. Chris Ash comes in. Job one has

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to be back to the basics. Focus on tackling, all right,

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 2>that will be hard again. Weird off season, no spring.

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 2>They led the nation in miss tackles a year ago.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 2>If they want to get better, that's where they got

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to start.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Tackle guys.

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 2>That is the point of defense. The other thing that

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Chris Ash needs to do, Like Todd Orlando was so

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 2>aggressive last year, kind of like the guy in video

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 2>games just blitzes the house every play in Madden and

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 2>that's coot.

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have anything, didn't have anything behind it.

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 2>It's great when it works and it's fun to do,

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 2>but it just didn't work last year. Ninety fourth in

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 2>the country in yards allowed per attempt, ninetieth in quarterback

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 2>rating allowed one hundredth and completion percentage allowed. Chris Ash

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 2>needs to just like pull back on that throat a

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 2>little bit, pull it back. I think that's an instant improvement. Otherwise,

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 2>what he's switching to a four? It's hard to keep

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 2>track of all these guys switching. He does like a

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of four three four to five quarters. Look, Yeah,

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a four to three four two five quarters. Look,

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Joseph Osai could have gone pro. He's going to play

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the jack position this year, which is kind of like

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 2>a stand up defensive lineman. Hopefully he can help generate

0:36:56.239 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 2>more of a pass rush otherwise, you know, I I'm

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 2>in love with Caden Stearns. We talked about that at

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the back end of the secondary. No disrespect to b

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 2>J Foster and Chris Brown, they're also very good. But

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Cayden Stern's my boy. Hurt, ye know, I know everybody's hurt.

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 2>They had a terrible time with injuries. But I just

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 2>think focusing on the basics, throttling back that aggressiveness is

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 2>going to put Texas in a much better place defensively.

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what Chris ash is going to do. Yeah,

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all reasonable. I'm I am high on Texas.

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how high but they've recruited so well,

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and they have the experience of Sam Ellinger, and I'm

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>worried about new coordinators on both sides in terms of

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just the ability to teach and learn and get reps,

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 1>mental reps, physical reps and spring camp and all those things.

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're going to be relatively simplified, and

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that works when you can out talent just about everybody

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you play. So that's right. If Texas can get out

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of their own way, they'll be fine.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Why is Oklahoma State's offense suddenly a question? Is it

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 2>fair to say that the offense is a question because

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 2>for like the last decade, it has been a powerhouse offense.

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Mike Gundy has continually done more with less in the

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 2>talent space. It has really been his calling card for

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 2>so long. And I look at this team and I

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 2>actually have more questions about the offense than I do.

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the defense, Yeah, it's weird. I mean, they're

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.399
<v Speaker 1>returning a lot on defense, which is why I think

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the questions are on offense. And they lost Tylan Wallace

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>last year to the season ending injury. I think in

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>late October he's back and practicing, which is great news.

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>And so it is good news. I mean, obviously Chewba

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Hubbard is fantastic news for any team that has him

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in their backfield, which Oklahoma State does. I think the

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>problem is, and it has been the majority of the

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>decade because of how long Mason Rudolphin you had the

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>year of your guy, the corn Dog, Taylor Cornelias, Sure

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>College are just running the offense for Oklahoma State. The

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>problem now is Spencer Sanders had a red shirt ear

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he had time to pick up some sort of offense

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>because this will now be his third coordinator in three years.

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So going from you're sick, to Sean Gleeson who moved

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on to Rutgers, came in from Princeton, and now to

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Casey Dunn who and I mentioned this at the top,

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm never crazy, and it's because I've been hurt before. Ty, Yeah,

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm never crazy about the ten year position coach finally

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>getting a call up to coordinator, where usually if you're

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>somewhere for a long time, and maybe he loves stillwater,

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's got tremendous roots there. It loves, you know,

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 1>coaching at Oklahoma State. And obviously he has developed great

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver after great receiver in stillwater. But the Don Pelham

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>thing really warped my brainwiring, is it not? It is?

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It very much is. So that's a little bit troubling

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to me because obviously I think he's had overtures to

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>be hired as a receiver's coach everywhere because he's done

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>such a good job there. So that's a little bit

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>worrisome just for Spencer Sanders because he does miss the

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>last two or three games of the year, I think

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>with a thumb injury. But he had the highest interception

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 1>rate of any quarterback in the country as a red

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 1>shirt freshman. And I understand you can say, okay was

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>his first year starting. He was just a red shirt freshman.

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But usually for the sake of optimism in a conference

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>without a ton of lockdown defenses everywhere, you want to

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>see something, and especially with the thread of Chewba Hobbard

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>running wild on every single snap and receivers that are

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>very good. I think I expected more from a quarterback

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at Oklahoma State, and that I didn't see it, I

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>think tells me right now that Spencer Sanders' ceiling is

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>modest interesting. That's the nice thing I can say that

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think quarterback recruitment development, offensive coordinator hiring, and continuity

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think has really pumped some breaks at Oklahoma State,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So that that has me worried. I like the receivers,

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I like the skill talent around Spencer Sanders. I like

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the recruiting of the skill talent around Spencer Sanders. The

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>line should be fine, I'm I'm just worried that there's

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>no traditional bomber to him in the way that we

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>had with Mason Rudolph going to Junkyard Jim Washington downfield

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting and that that reduces them to maybe an eight

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and four type ceiling to me, when if they had

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Brock Purty, then they're at nine and three, ten and

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>two type team to me.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if they go eight and four this year,

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Bob Bowlsby's he's working miracles to get twelve games in.

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But I sorry, Tak, you know what I'm saying, Give

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 1>me the winning percentage of eight and four or nine whatever.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I take your plant though, it's yeah, it's but the

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>defense does return a ton, and they return their coordinator

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Jim Knowles, who had them. I think moving in the

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>right direction, they and whatever their schedule looks like, they're

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at Oklahoma for Bedlum. They're at Baylor and this is

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>new look Baylor for sure, and they host Texas, so

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's okay.

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 2>This is a really big year for Oklahoma stake because

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 2>they got nineteen guys back, including Chewba Hubbard, who led

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the nation with almost what twenty one hundred rushing yards

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 2>something like that, Tyland Wallace coming back from that acl

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Both of those guys, by the way, could have declared

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 2>for the draft, but they didn't. And it's like it's

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of an unsung fact about the Gundy era. But

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 2>he's really good at keeping guys from leaving early, and

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 2>he's done it again here. He's retained that three headed

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 2>whatever you want to call it. In Spencer Sanders, Chewba Hubbard,

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 2>and Tyland Wallace. There is some depth this year behind Cuba. Likewise,

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 2>there is some depth out wide with the likes of

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Stoner and Braden Johnson, both of whom had you know,

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 2>good years last year in Wallace's absence. I share your

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 2>skep decism though about Spencer Sanders. He was Big twelve

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Freshman of the year, so clearly he did something right.

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and can run. He can run.

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 2>He showed improvement before missing the final two games with

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 2>that thumb injury. I'm always a little hesitant though, what

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.439
<v Speaker 2>it does feel like so much comes down to one guy,

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and that is partially inherent to the quarterback position. I

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:27.399
<v Speaker 2>get it, but the interception rate was high year ago,

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 2>and there was plenty of reason too, I think be

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 2>skeptical of what he might be just from a ceiling standpoint.

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So I'm very mixed here. I think I share your

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of just uneasiness around the offense and what it

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.720
<v Speaker 2>can be. Weirdly that the defense isn't such a good spot,

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, like it's loaded, there's a good line, it's

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 2>good secondary.

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be fine.

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 2>You have a good defense in the Big twelve. That's

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 2>that's a competitive advantage, no doubt, but just a little

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 2>a little uneasy about so much being on the arm

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 2>of a young guy like Spencer Sanders.

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the way I see it in I mean, this

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is really any conference, but if we're talking about the

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Big twelve today, you either have to do something really great.

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You have to be twenty nineteen Baylor, where the offense

0:44:16.680 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is inconsistent and pretty sluggish, but the defense you got

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of killers, and they're so well coached. You

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>know how I feel about Phil Snow. You run an

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>air raid, that's just you can't guard receivers. You run

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the hell out of the ball. Even Texas, Texas, with

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>all of their struggles, they've lined up some killers at

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver these past few years. They've absolutely you know, their

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 1>killer ability was getting the ball to some speed in

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>space and really making teams pay. That was the best

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of Texas. And what does Iowa State do great? Well?

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>They really improved their defense and they had a wild

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>card quarterback in brock Purty that really excited you. And

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia had Will Greer and a ton of speed

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and a really creative offense under Holgo. Right now at

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>home of State, you either have to do everything competently

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>or you have to do something great. And I don't

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>see the Pokes doing either one of those things to

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>be that weekly threat to anybody in the conference. Open

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to being wrong for sure. The one thing that they

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do great is run the ball, and it didn't make

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge, huge difference last year. And so that's what

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:25.280
<v Speaker 1>concerns me that Chuba Hubbard, for his runaway ability, unlike

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>any other probably maybe other than Travis etn running back

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in the country isn't quite enough given where football is

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, with how wide open and how important

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>passing is, That's what concerns me.

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I think we are like minded on Oklahoma State. Let

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 2>me stick with the top tier or upper CRUSTA will

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:50.320
<v Speaker 2>call it of the Big Twelve and ask about Iowa

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 2>State because they really are that. I think, oh, just

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 2>skipping over differendas Baylor Bears in the Big Twelve championship

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 2>game last year. We'll come back to Baylor in a second.

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, WHOA Okay?

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Is twenty twenty the year that Iowa State finally goes

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 2>from like being this scrappy team that scares the crap

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 2>out of you to a true substantial competitor given brock Purty,

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 2>given all the close losses they had last season, is

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 2>this the year for Matt Campbell where that transition occurs?

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>When when the tough got going late in twenty nineteen,

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State lost close. That's sort of what happened with

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the Clothes.

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 2>They were seven points away from ten to two and

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 2>fourteen points away from an eleven to one record and

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 2>making it into that Big Twelve title game.

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Man, Yeah, I mean the Baylor game, the Oklahoma comeback

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that almost was Oklahoma State Iowa they lose by a point.

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>You're not wrong, So Iowa State they're dealing with and

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>reason twenty nineteen. Most notably, I think it was a

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>shoulder injury to Greg Eysworth, one of the absolute best

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>safeties in the country, and rock Party. The end of

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and we've talked about this already, but the end of

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that Oklahoma State game last year, we just kept throwing interceptions.

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Felt like his Tin Cup moment. Just he's refusing to

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:21.399
<v Speaker 1>lay up and it was a rough watch. And that's

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>all correctable. That's the good news. That's all correctable. They

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have a promising young running back in Bresee Hall. They

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have the same I guess level weapons on the outside,

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>but they're really strong at tight end. They're strong on

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the line. So in terms of the big humans on offense,

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel good about the clones. They lose a good amount,

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:43.760
<v Speaker 1>especially upfront on defense, but even still they're in good shape.

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>They've recruited well, there's a lot more depth than there

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was ever before. It's just like you mentioned, it's playing

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>four full quarters. It's not disappearing for a quarter and

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.959
<v Speaker 1>a half early and then having to furiously come back.

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:58.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not coming back, and then blowing it repeatedly. It's okay,

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you're now at the stage where you're now on the

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>stage essentially, now it's time to perform well. And I

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>actually feel really good about it. And it's more about

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the context of what I talked about with the conference

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, where there's not a lot of obvious

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>killing units whatever, that Iowa State has the benefit of experience,

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of coaching, of continuity. I mean, it's their coordinators are

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>both there. I really like, was it John Haycock who's

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:28.879
<v Speaker 1>been there, you know, for a couple of years now

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and had that sort of defense that a lot of

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>people have been copying that, you know, jamming the middle

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and the three two six and you know, having speed

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>all over the field. So it's he has been copied

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>because of how effective that defense has been in that

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>conference against the air raids. So there's a lot to

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like about Iowa State, and I'm just going to be

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those people liking it, especially since I think

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they get both Oklahoma and Baylor at home. They're in

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Austin and we're just we're working under this assumption once

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:57.760
<v Speaker 1>again that the home road splits are going to remain

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for the big twelves nine conference games for each team.

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But just we don't know the order. So I think

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that the continuity thing, the experience thing, the walk before

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you run, maybe they were walking, power walking and jogging.

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think finally in brock Parties third year as a starter,

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're ready to run if they can find

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a problem on the outside on offense in a good way.

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, and they've figured out ways to create that problem

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 2>on the outside.

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they've had them. Each of the years that Matt

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Campbell's been there.

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 2>They've had to replace Alan Lazard or a team Butler like,

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 2>they've had to do this, and they've continuously found ways

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to get production out wide. I'm just going to come

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 2>back to a point that you mentioned. I think we're

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 2>really going to see it pay dividends this year. Recruiting

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 2>has been better, a lot better. Depth is one of

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 2>those topics. It never gets mentioned. It's one of the

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 2>biggest differences between the top rung teams and everybody else.

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Ioway State was not there at all when Matt Campbell

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 2>took over. They are not there yet, but they are

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 2>going in the right direction.

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I love their tight end Charlie Cohler, He's Charlie.

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Kohler and Chase Allen, who's also very good at tight

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 2>end position, so he's he's really bolstered that position group.

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Cohler led the team in receptions last year. Mm hm.

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think this is going to be a good

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:19.879
<v Speaker 2>team on offense. I have questions about the line. Defensively,

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 2>they've got a lot coming back, one of the better

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:26.479
<v Speaker 2>defenses in the conference. If we had a rank two

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 2>through four.

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>In the Big Twelve, where do you come down on that?

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I would go Texas to Iowa State three,

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Baylor four. Baylor loses so much on defense though there's

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 1>so much new about Baylor.

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I just I have I'm not in on Baylor at

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 2>all this year.

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I was in last year. I'm not this year.

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I just I saw bad Max doug in a little too.

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I go, I go Texas, Oklahoma State, and Iowa State

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 2>in that order.

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>You like the Pokes over the clones, I think so. Okay,

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I think so all right?

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just because of that, because of that Chuba Hubbard,

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Tylan Wallace Combo.

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think that's pretty close to me. Yeah, what

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a brutal history between those two. I love it. Okay,

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to talk about?

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell me what questions do you have about Baylor?

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:24.319
<v Speaker 2>What am I not answering for you? That I need

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 2>to answer to prove my case here that they should

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 2>not be in that top tier.

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so they obviously they're the example we talked at

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the top about how do you take that next step?

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Baylor was mister next step these past couple of years

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>under Matt Ruhle. Who damn, you did a great job

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>in Waco. So Dave r Anna gets his first big

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 1>head coaching job. Everybody sort of thought he was waiting

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for an NFL job, you know, an NFL coordinator job, whatever,

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and he ends up going to Baylor. I think his

0:51:50.520 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 1>daughter ended up attending Baylor, so he in a way

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>followed her. I saw that story. What given Baylor and

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what they return because I know they lose a ton

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on defense, which is really what led that team to

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the Big Twelve championship game in a New Year six game,

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>what is realistic to say? Okay, this is how Dave A.

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Randa has built on the success of Matt Rules Bear squad.

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, biggest issue for Baylor, and another recurring theme

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 2>is I bring this up every year. I have a

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 2>hard time when teams are in the situation where they

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 2>reboot their coaching staff. Yeah, snow advisory tie, No, snow

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:39.320
<v Speaker 2>advisory coaching staff rebooted. They're often eleven wins season. A

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit of pixie dust on that eleven wins. If

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 2>you close wins in there, they got the job done. Okay,

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 2>don't pay no attention to the West Virginia game. Pay

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 2>no attention.

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a plucky team.

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 2>They hung in there twice with Oklahoma, there's a good

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 2>football team. Matt Rule really instilled that culture that I

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 2>think we've come to know and love about him. But

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the installation process for Dave Randa is just going to

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 2>be harder because of the pandemic. Yeah, because they lose

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Denzel Mims out wide. He's a huge bright spot for

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the last season. He made Charlie Brewer better. Then they

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 2>lose nine guys on defense, so he's he's dealing with

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:19.919
<v Speaker 2>a lot here. I think it is a step back

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 2>year for Baylor, even though Randa is a great hire.

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>One time.

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 2>You need to.

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Prepare me for that daily progress. He's a great hire.

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's going to get things working, especially on defense.

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 2>But it's it's too soon to expect too much here

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 2>in year one.

0:53:44.320 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean though, I mean you're returning a quarterback.

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>This is a team that even they lose starters, but

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>rotation guys played. They won some games comfortably. There is

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt rule DNA to this team where before you can

0:53:58.320 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>win close, you gotta lose close. Then you know, win close,

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>win big in some instances. So this is this is

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a program that has winning infrastruture, have winning infrastructure. I okay,

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>let's start at the top. Year. We'll go offense. Defense.

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Chuck Brewer. Chuck Brewer, Chuck Brewer. Yeah, before we get

0:54:16.000 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 2>to Charlie Brewer, let's talk about the line. Okay, their

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 2>line stank last year.

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It did it did?

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 2>They allowed thirty eight sacks. That was the worst in

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve. They've got a lot of turnover up

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 2>front this year. You had guys last year bouncing around

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 2>playing different positions game in and game out. The results

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 2>were not great. The good news is that it gets

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 2>seven guys back along the line. I hope it helps

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 2>it needs to help because Charlie Brewer really felt the

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 2>brunt of things. He was the engine for this offense,

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 2>There's no way around it. He led the team in

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:52.359
<v Speaker 2>rushing attempts and in touchdowns in twenty nineteen. Now he's

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:55.840
<v Speaker 2>got Larry Fedora taking over the offense, and the track

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:58.399
<v Speaker 2>record is he's going to get more carries this year.

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Larry Fedora does that to his quarterbacks, so.

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what. He can't take that many more hits.

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Ty, The line needs to protect Chuck Brewer, Chas Brewer. Yeah,

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 2>it needs to. I am concerned about the receiver situation.

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I said Denzel Mims made Charlie Brewer better.

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>He really did. Did you mention Tae Kwon Thornton? Am

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I going out of my mind?

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, He's really good.

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 2>He's very good.

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm just making sure you mention his name because

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:30.280
<v Speaker 1>he's I think the number one receiver for Baylor. Yeah.

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm on board with you. But Charlie Brewer

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>is man. Some of those hits he was taking last year,

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and I know there's some depth and interesting depth behind him,

0:55:43.840 --> 0:55:47.840
<v Speaker 1>but it felt like, should this dude still be playing football?

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>You know? The concussions. I don't know that that is

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just troubling from a human level to me. But I think, yes,

0:55:56.280 --> 0:56:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the the Baylor offense should be interesting, Baylor did defense

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>should be good to very good, even with a lot

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of new dudes in there, because I imagine Matt Rule

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>was really good at identifying talent and developing talent, and

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Dave Randa has done nothing to make me think he

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>can't continue that. So I mean, I think Baylor is

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>going to win more often than they lose, and they're

0:56:19.080 --> 0:56:21.879
<v Speaker 1>going to take a step back, but they are one

0:56:21.920 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of the probably two or three more intriguing teams in

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this conference to me.

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Defensively, nine starters gone from a year ago. Ron Roberts

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 2>comes over from Louisiana.

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Lafayette. They don't like you saying Lafayette. They just like Louisiana.

0:56:35.640 --> 0:56:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Louisiana. I'll let you know. Yeah, Louisiana. Excuse me. Yeah,

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that's okay.

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 2>But Roberts got a little bit of David rand Adam

0:56:44.160 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 2>because he's sort of Dave Randa's mentor.

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he is a really good reputation.

0:56:49.719 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Defensively, Yeah, defense is going to look very similar to

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Dave Randa's and if you're a Baylor fan, you should

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 2>be excited about that. These are awesome defenses to watch.

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.400
<v Speaker 2>They use a lot of versatility. You're gonna see like

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:04.320
<v Speaker 2>three down linemen and eight guys who might blitz or

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:06.720
<v Speaker 2>might drop back or play a different spot on each play.

0:57:07.560 --> 0:57:09.359
<v Speaker 2>And if you're a Baylor fan, if you're coming off

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 2>a year with the Phil Snow defense, which really started

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 2>to click last season, you know, turnover limits how good

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 2>it can be. But I do think it's gonna be

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a fun watch and probably a lot better next season.

0:57:22.040 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Wait, you think the defense is going to be a

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:24.000
<v Speaker 1>lot better.

0:57:24.480 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying I think it's a step back this year.

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, and next year. Okay, step back this year

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is still fun to watch. Next year is where you

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>see the real gains on defense. Interesting, Okay, I'm good

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with that.

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not high on Baylor.

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Do they win more often? Do they win six games?

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they're like a six and four team. Yeah,

0:57:44.160 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I think he got it, six and four, five and five.

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's that kind of season for Baylor.

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to a team that we're used to discussing.

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Although I guess there's two of them left on your

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>side that we're used to discussing earlier on and that's

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia. Oh no, We've been used to discussing West

0:57:59.000 --> 0:58:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Virginia as not necessarily a perennial winning contender, but a

0:58:04.000 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>threat that any given week they could hang fifty And

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I know last year and they were I think a

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>good example last year of first eight nine weeks like ooh,

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>some there are some low moments that the stinker potential

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is a high stinker ceiling tie, very high stinker ceiling. Yeah,

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but I thought Neil Brown did a good enough job

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 1>keeping players focused that they were fighting late in the season.

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>They did see some results from that fight. And even

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 1>though it's been a pretty turbulent offseason for West Virginia,

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>there have to be pieces there. There have to be

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>pieces in Morgantown that after twenty nineteen, which was a

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a mess after Holgo left, that the fact

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is year two is going to be more promising. There's

0:58:51.080 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>more to be optimistic about in year two. What is

0:58:53.680 --> 0:58:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that first thing to increase the number of optimistic items?

0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do they say, Okay, this is where we need

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to go. Yeah, to really get things humming it's a

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 1>good question. It's a good question, and it was a

0:59:05.760 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 1>tough spot for Neil Brown. Year one. That offense was

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a rough watch at times.

0:59:09.600 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 2>It was they scored forty points per game in twenty

0:59:13.240 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 2>eighteen and something like twenty point six in twenty nineteen

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and year one under Neil Brown. And look, that's what

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 2>happens when you tweet the scheme, when you stink at quarterback,

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 2>when you have receivers dropping balls, a line that can't block.

0:59:27.760 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I think I saw what one hundredth something like one

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:34.919
<v Speaker 2>hundredth in the sp plus. The offense was not good,

0:59:35.280 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and that's not a formula for success in the Big twelve.

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's an improvement from where it was two thirds

0:59:41.160 --> 0:59:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of you know, late October whatever, exactly exactly.

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 2>So I almost view year two as year one and

0:59:46.480 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 2>a half. I think job one is building on the

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 2>experience that you built up in year one, find a

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 2>way to get more fundamentally sound. Because it's still a

0:59:56.560 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 2>young team, Dan, They're still learning a new system. Sure,

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it helps that Jared Deegy built some momentum

1:00:02.200 --> 1:00:05.560
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the season last year. This was

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:08.320
<v Speaker 2>a young wide receiver corps. A lot of those guys

1:00:08.360 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>are back, including Sam James, who had a crazy one

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eleven targets as a freshman, which is saying sile,

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>yeah he's back.

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>That'll help.

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Job two is figuring out how to get more out

1:00:20.840 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>of the running game, because on a per play basis,

1:00:24.640 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>this is like the worst ground game in America. It

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the worst, at least not in every metric, but

1:00:30.200 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 2>they were really bad on a per play basis. From

1:00:33.040 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>an efficiency standpoint, they stunk as a rushing unit. They

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>got to get more there because this is not a

1:00:41.360 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>situation where your quarterback is going to be good enough

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to power the whole offense. He's going to need some

1:00:45.680 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 2>help in the in the in the ground game. Right,

1:00:49.160 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 2>So Jared Deggy had moments, He had moments. I like

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:56.479
<v Speaker 2>Jared Dagy, but he just he needs more help, needs

1:00:56.520 --> 1:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>more help.

1:00:57.560 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Glad they found him.

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Austin Kendall still there, by the way, can still reclaim

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the job, but I digg he's got to be the guy.

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that helps.

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Defensively, we talked about the Vic Canning thing, no longer

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>defensive coordinator, dismissed after some insensitive actions, particularly around racial injustice.

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>How that affects the defense remains to be seen. I

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 2>think this is again going to be the better side

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:29.680
<v Speaker 2>of the football for the Mountaineers. I like Darius and

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Dante Stills, the brothers Stills in the middle. Yeah, it's

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>still the strength of this defense. Linebacking core looks okay

1:01:37.000 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to me. Josh Chandler had a really good year as

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:42.280
<v Speaker 2>a sophomore, second in the team, and tackles secondary kind

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>of a mess. I don't know if we see a

1:01:45.680 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>ton of improvement from West Virginia. I think they build

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on their experience from a year ago. I think another

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>year under Neil Brown is going to help. I'm looking

1:01:54.040 --> 1:01:56.440
<v Speaker 2>for gains next year. I think next year is a

1:01:56.480 --> 1:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>year where we start to see a little bit more

1:01:58.880 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>movement forward. Dumb you're saying twenty twenty one, twenty twenty one, Yeah,

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>just not enough here for me, Not enough meat on

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>this bone. Yet to get too excited about seeing a

1:02:10.120 --> 1:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>big jump in year two.

1:02:12.840 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Home road splits look pretty good, though, right they get

1:02:15.000 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma and Baylor and yeah, it's not bad.

1:02:17.360 --> 1:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not bad.

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well that's that's something. I mean. You promise a

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback defense being ahead of the offense I generally like

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>because that shows efforts. It's hard to you know, if

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>your defense is a nightmareage generally means there's almost no

1:02:32.920 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>buy and no efforts. So I like that element of

1:02:35.360 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>things for West Virginia. And you know it's going to

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be a strange year, whatever it looks like. And perhaps

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>because this is what it was, Kansas State beats Oklahoma

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that immediately goes and loses to West Virginia. So maybe

1:02:46.520 --> 1:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's an opportunistic fall for the Ears. They seem to

1:02:50.200 --> 1:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>be at the center of weirdness a lot. That's that's

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>my hope.

1:02:53.560 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And look, there were some games here for West Virginia.

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:58.800
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk about buy in an effort, it was.

1:02:59.000 --> 1:03:00.919
<v Speaker 2>It was there for this team.

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Last year.

1:03:01.840 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>It really was Baylor very close loss. We alluded to

1:03:05.600 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it in the beginning. Baylor was an eleven win team.

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>UH beat k State, Case State was a bowl team. Yes,

1:03:12.280 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>they were within one score of Oklahoma State. They beat

1:03:15.720 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>TCU to close out the year, So it was it

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 2>was not close as well. It was not for lack

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:23.439
<v Speaker 2>of trying. It's just he's trying to build something new.

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we both have a lot of faith in

1:03:25.240 --> 1:03:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Neil Brown did great things at Troy. I think he's

1:03:28.920 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>going to do good things at West Virginia, but it's

1:03:30.600 --> 1:03:31.920
<v Speaker 2>going to take some time to get there, and I

1:03:32.440 --> 1:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>hope they give him along enoughleesh.

1:03:33.840 --> 1:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they will. Yeah, they have. It's a dude

1:03:37.600 --> 1:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>drought right now at West Virginia. Speaking of dude droughts,

1:03:42.680 --> 1:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready. I don't. I don't know where you're going

1:03:45.040 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with this segue, but I hope it's some very uncomfortable

1:03:47.360 --> 1:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>sponsorship or just you're changing the subject away from college

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>football entirely.

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, hit me Kansas. We can't even talk Kansas

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 2>State before Kansas Kansas because Kansas State also kind of

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>has a dude drop. But okay, we can talk Kansas.

1:04:01.400 --> 1:04:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Where is where is the opportunity for realistic growth from

1:04:06.040 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 2>a Kansas standpoint.

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>They've got to win shootouts. If they're able to win shootouts,

1:04:12.600 --> 1:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>which is something we say about a lot of teams

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>when we preview them come July August, and it's not

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a really it's a backhanded compliment because it says, well,

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, if things get really weird and it's

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight to fifty four, maybe you're the fifty eight

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not a great thing. But the fact is, I

1:04:28.800 --> 1:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like their offensive coordinator. They made the switch to Brent

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Deerman early on or I guess midway through this way through. Yeah,

1:04:33.680 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and it worked. It worked until it didn't at times.

1:04:37.600 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, they I mean now they're replacing Carter Stanley

1:04:40.800 --> 1:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's I think it's Miles Kendrick and Thomas m

1:04:43.080 --> 1:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mcvittie battling it out for the starting job. The skill

1:04:47.040 --> 1:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>talent's good. The skill talent is good. I really like

1:04:49.560 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Parschmidt the receiver. I think behind Tylan Wallace, he's

1:04:53.400 --> 1:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the leading receiver, so he's the second receiving, second leading

1:04:57.480 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>returning receiver. My english is all askew that so there

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is on offense, there's some prominent off offensive line that's

1:05:06.040 --> 1:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great. But if they're able to with Brent

1:05:09.920 --> 1:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Deherman's RPO like they were able to do, especially against Texas,

1:05:14.520 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was eye opening. He was fifty

1:05:18.360 --> 1:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to forty eight in a loss, in a losing effort.

1:05:21.520 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>But all the same, if Kansas can channel that, they

1:05:24.760 --> 1:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a real coaching staff. They are, you know, less

1:05:27.760 --> 1:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Miles is trying, He's trying. There it's gonna take a

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>while still, just because things are so backward in Lawrence.

1:05:37.000 --> 1:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. If one of these quarterbacks works out,

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it's something. Can they win, Can they go three and seven?

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Just I don't know. They're gonna have

1:05:46.960 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to win those shootouts. They're gonna have to hope for

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>an injured quarterback or two, making the schedule more interesting

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>than it looks right now. But I think that's what

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think if it's going to be an

1:05:58.160 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting RPO based offense for Kansas, and that's at least

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>something that is at least something that we can say, Okay,

1:06:06.880 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Kansas has gone from embarrassing to more often than not, entertaining.

1:06:11.960 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the step forward I can see happening.

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>One interesting name that you did not mention is Jalen Daniels, Okay.

1:06:20.800 --> 1:06:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Daniels is their freshman quarterback recruit. Okay, as of

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a couple weeks ago, he was still kind of quasi

1:06:30.760 --> 1:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a contender for that starting quarterback position this fall, and

1:06:35.360 --> 1:06:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Brent Dierman, who has a bit of a history with

1:06:38.040 --> 1:06:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Gus Malson, compared him to Nick Marshall. I saw athlon

1:06:42.640 --> 1:06:44.920
<v Speaker 2>compared to he said he's the hand picked quarterback of

1:06:44.960 --> 1:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the future. I don't know what that means for Kansas,

1:06:47.000 --> 1:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>but I am interested to see if they decide to

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>play the true freshmen at any point in time, take

1:06:53.840 --> 1:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>their lumps now to build for more of a promising future.

1:06:58.480 --> 1:07:00.040
<v Speaker 2>That that's kind.

1:06:59.920 --> 1:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Of the question here.

1:07:01.200 --> 1:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>It appears like Les Miles is playing long con.

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Ty, I have I have breaking news for you that

1:07:07.000 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna take their lumps either way.

1:07:08.520 --> 1:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're gonna take their lumps either way, but but

1:07:11.360 --> 1:07:15.320
<v Speaker 2>you know less Miles is open to giving the younger

1:07:15.320 --> 1:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>guys time. You got Pooka Williams, which is a bright spot.

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>But I'm I'm most interested in seeing are they going

1:07:21.600 --> 1:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to play a true freshman at quarterback. He may be

1:07:23.960 --> 1:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the best fit for that scheme than anyone else on

1:07:26.120 --> 1:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the roster.

1:07:29.160 --> 1:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Just entertain me, That's all I want, all right. I'll

1:07:33.400 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>let you fill in your your love Tye sell me

1:07:36.760 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>on tcuh. Okay, but let's don't. Let's let's not bring

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>emotion into it, ty Let's see rational though, Let's be pragmatic.

1:07:46.200 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why you're so in love with TCU

1:07:47.920 --> 1:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>every I honestly don't get it. I don't know why

1:07:49.520 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you keep falling for the Frogs. I mean, Fort Worth

1:07:51.880 --> 1:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is great. In Fort Worths, I like the color propowle

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is fine. I like that there's the murder frog and

1:07:59.640 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you have like the frog had the rose in the

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>mouth for the Rose Bowl. That's all good. What has

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>gone wrong? It just seemed like they were they were

1:08:11.720 --> 1:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there and now they're not. What is what has gone wrong?

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they hit five hundred last year. Not

1:08:17.479 --> 1:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a bowl team. I feel like Garry Patterson has recruited

1:08:23.160 --> 1:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty well to Fort Worth. He's developed guys. We see

1:08:25.960 --> 1:08:28.439
<v Speaker 1>them drafted first, second, third round from that team, especially

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:33.879
<v Speaker 1>that defense every year, but sometimes offense. What is what happened?

1:08:34.080 --> 1:08:39.000
<v Speaker 2>It's it's such a good question. I'm never inclined to

1:08:39.000 --> 1:08:41.880
<v Speaker 2>say it's a talent thing with Gary Patterson because.

1:08:41.640 --> 1:08:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Why doesn't anybody in the Big twelve have a friggin

1:08:43.680 --> 1:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback other than Oklahoma. I don't know what happened?

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but you know, like the talent thing

1:08:51.200 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>with Gary Patterson, his calling card has always been developing talent.

1:08:55.360 --> 1:08:57.559
<v Speaker 2>He turns through the stars into five stars. That's his

1:08:57.720 --> 1:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>that's his thing. So I I think the talent is there.

1:09:05.439 --> 1:09:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's it was a combination of scheme and experience.

1:09:09.640 --> 1:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Last year, TCU was sort of the anti Baylor in

1:09:14.840 --> 1:09:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a sense because Baylor won a bunch of one score games.

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:22.519
<v Speaker 2>TCU lost six of them, including one against Baylor. They

1:09:22.520 --> 1:09:24.559
<v Speaker 2>were good enough to be in the close games against

1:09:24.600 --> 1:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>better teams, they just couldn't close. And you could point

1:09:27.880 --> 1:09:29.559
<v Speaker 2>to a bunch of reasons for that. For one, it

1:09:29.640 --> 1:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>took them about a month to figure out that Max

1:09:31.880 --> 1:09:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Duggan should be their quarterback, and he played the back

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:37.519
<v Speaker 2>half of the season as the primary quarterback against the

1:09:37.520 --> 1:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>better teams in the Big twelve. And it was rocky

1:09:40.479 --> 1:09:43.080
<v Speaker 2>right because he was a freshman. But he just gave

1:09:43.160 --> 1:09:46.759
<v Speaker 2>him more and that was good. That's a building block.

1:09:48.080 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>The combination, though, of the musical quarterbacks and whatever scheme

1:09:52.320 --> 1:09:55.479
<v Speaker 2>they tried that affected Jalen riger He was their best

1:09:55.479 --> 1:09:58.519
<v Speaker 2>offensive weapon. They couldn't get him the ball eighty eight targets,

1:09:58.520 --> 1:10:01.719
<v Speaker 2>a catch rate under fifty percent. Some of that's on him,

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 2>mind you, but he just you wanted to see more

1:10:04.600 --> 1:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>out of Jalen Reger. So sure, while the offense was

1:10:08.640 --> 1:10:12.559
<v Speaker 2>inconsistent and the defense was pretty good, again, they just

1:10:12.600 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 2>gave up a ton of big plays. That's like some

1:10:16.920 --> 1:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>combination of all those things really did him in. And

1:10:19.800 --> 1:10:21.840
<v Speaker 2>especially in a conference like the Big Twelve, you got

1:10:21.880 --> 1:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>big plays like you just if they were going to

1:10:24.760 --> 1:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>rely mostly on their defense, they couldn't give up those

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:29.559
<v Speaker 2>big plays. They couldn't be felled by the big play,

1:10:30.280 --> 1:10:34.879
<v Speaker 2>and all too often they were. So Now, moving forward,

1:10:36.320 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Patterson's philosophy is to go back to the well. I'm

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:43.040
<v Speaker 2>always mixed on this. I don't know how I feel.

1:10:43.080 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>They're bringing Doug Meechim back, they're pairing him back up

1:10:46.280 --> 1:10:49.559
<v Speaker 2>with Sonny Cumby. They're also adding Jerry Kill to the

1:10:49.600 --> 1:10:51.639
<v Speaker 2>mixes like this awkward third wheel.

1:10:52.320 --> 1:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't mind it. Good coach.

1:10:54.400 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>The one point zero version of the Meechum Comby combo

1:10:58.360 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>had really good results. We'll see how it goes as

1:11:01.120 --> 1:11:03.599
<v Speaker 2>time around. It hurts to lose your top two running

1:11:03.600 --> 1:11:05.880
<v Speaker 2>backs from a year ago. But I feel like there's

1:11:06.000 --> 1:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>a really good quarterback back then. By the way, they're

1:11:07.880 --> 1:11:10.599
<v Speaker 2>a really good quarterback. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. I'm

1:11:10.640 --> 1:11:13.479
<v Speaker 2>just I'm a little leery on this. Yeah, it hurts

1:11:13.520 --> 1:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>when you lose your top two running backs from a

1:11:15.200 --> 1:11:17.720
<v Speaker 2>year ago. There's probably enough talent to make it work.

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:21.640
<v Speaker 2>The running back room is crowded with Darwin, Barlow and

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:25.559
<v Speaker 2>Foster and de Mercado and Richardson and Miller like they

1:11:25.640 --> 1:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>got guys and it's the same deal out why they

1:11:28.080 --> 1:11:30.639
<v Speaker 2>got a bunch of rising juniors with speed. Tay Barber

1:11:30.680 --> 1:11:32.600
<v Speaker 2>is a guy to watch. They're going to stretch the

1:11:32.600 --> 1:11:35.639
<v Speaker 2>field more like they just weren't explosive last year.

1:11:36.560 --> 1:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The caveat is.

1:11:37.320 --> 1:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>That the line has to hold for Max Duggan. They

1:11:39.960 --> 1:11:43.080
<v Speaker 2>lose four guys up front. That's the biggest question on

1:11:43.080 --> 1:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>this offense. You can ask whatever you want about the

1:11:44.960 --> 1:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>scheme and how the three ring circus is going to

1:11:47.080 --> 1:11:50.559
<v Speaker 2>work with offensive coaches, but the biggest question for me

1:11:50.720 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 2>is what are they going to do about that line?

1:11:53.400 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It all starts up front for TCU this year. Are

1:11:56.920 --> 1:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you worried that they're becoming sort of lone star who

1:12:00.280 --> 1:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're becoming like the Virginia era of you know,

1:12:03.760 --> 1:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they win six or seven games and now this is

1:12:05.360 --> 1:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a ten game season. They win five six, seven games

1:12:08.080 --> 1:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and they have three you know, top two round picks

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like they had. It was what Jalen Reger and Jeff

1:12:13.360 --> 1:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Gladney last year. They have two first round picks last year,

1:12:16.040 --> 1:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>where Virginia randomly it's to brickishaff Ferguson or Chris Long

1:12:19.200 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. They don't translate having, you know, developing individual

1:12:23.479 --> 1:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>pockets of their team into really top level players into wins.

1:12:27.560 --> 1:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that a concern? It feels like year over year

1:12:31.000 --> 1:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they're just keep first round pick TCU, second round pick

1:12:34.080 --> 1:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>TC and they're not turning those pockets of talent into anything.

1:12:39.280 --> 1:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you ever watched Top Chef, but

1:12:40.760 --> 1:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time they're like, yeah, steak was okay, Like

1:12:43.160 --> 1:12:46.519
<v Speaker 1>these girled peaches are transcendent, where it's like, why couldn't

1:12:46.520 --> 1:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you turn the whole plate into this magic? So that

1:12:50.360 --> 1:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that to me feel like year over year just doesn't

1:12:52.400 --> 1:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like it was. That team in the Big twelve

1:12:53.960 --> 1:12:54.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel.

1:12:54.439 --> 1:12:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Like they've had that quarterback. And you know, when they

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>had the quarterback they were really good.

1:13:00.600 --> 1:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Well Kenny Trill it was only okay, but yeah he's okay.

1:13:03.720 --> 1:13:05.639
<v Speaker 2>But when they've had the quarterback, they've been fine. It's

1:13:05.720 --> 1:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>just getting that quarterback has been an issue.

1:13:08.080 --> 1:13:10.799
<v Speaker 1>You can say about everybody, but everybody, Yeah.

1:13:10.760 --> 1:13:13.639
<v Speaker 2>No, that's fair but in TCUs case, I just feel

1:13:13.640 --> 1:13:15.880
<v Speaker 2>like we've constantly been waiting for that quarterback, and the

1:13:15.920 --> 1:13:21.719
<v Speaker 2>defense has been continually pretty good. Four two five defense,

1:13:23.200 --> 1:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>A lot of defensive backs out there flying around. He's

1:13:26.160 --> 1:13:30.120
<v Speaker 2>got two good ones, and Trevin morrig Are, Darius Washington,

1:13:30.240 --> 1:13:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Wallow one of the better linebackers in college football.

1:13:34.320 --> 1:13:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Just a lot of ammo, a lot of versatility in

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>that back seven.

1:13:36.800 --> 1:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It's going to make them really good again.

1:13:39.120 --> 1:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>They lose Ross Blacklock to the NFL, They're going to

1:13:42.439 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 2>need more pass rush this year out of guys like

1:13:44.280 --> 1:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>O'shawn Mathis. And they're not the deepest along the line,

1:13:47.400 --> 1:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>but they should be. They should be fine. You mentioned,

1:13:50.720 --> 1:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, some other losses in the defensive backfield, but

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they'll be fine across the board. I just,

1:13:56.120 --> 1:13:58.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's a mental exercise to not get too

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>excited about TCU this year and every year. I love

1:14:02.600 --> 1:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the defense, I like Max dug In. I have questions

1:14:05.880 --> 1:14:09.280
<v Speaker 2>about pretty much everything else. The only thing that I

1:14:09.320 --> 1:14:12.080
<v Speaker 2>am certain of with this team, okay, is that they're

1:14:12.120 --> 1:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna be better than last year. They're gonna be better

1:14:15.040 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 2>than last year.

1:14:15.560 --> 1:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>They have to. I don't know what it is? I man,

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:21.559
<v Speaker 1>They're just such a sometimes team. They're just like, how

1:14:21.680 --> 1:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is tenu? Sometimes their defense is good, I know, sometimes

1:14:26.040 --> 1:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Darius Anderson goes off and has an amazing game and

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:31.439
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty good. They're just a sometimes team, Like they

1:14:31.479 --> 1:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>all start and end dating somebody on Friday nights and

1:14:34.880 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 1>it totally affects them week to week.

1:14:36.600 --> 1:14:39.519
<v Speaker 2>They're like seven and three this year their seven and

1:14:39.560 --> 1:14:42.920
<v Speaker 2>three team, seven and three, six and four.

1:14:43.439 --> 1:14:45.599
<v Speaker 1>What is so appreciably different from a team that didn't

1:14:45.600 --> 1:14:46.479
<v Speaker 1>make a Bowl last year?

1:14:46.600 --> 1:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>A lot of close losses a year ago. I think

1:14:48.439 --> 1:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that has to turn around. Okay, the defense is still

1:14:51.240 --> 1:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be very good, and it's another year under

1:14:52.840 --> 1:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Max Duggin. Okay, did Max Duggin really get you going?

1:14:58.320 --> 1:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>There were flashes with Max dugg Okay there.

1:15:02.439 --> 1:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I just when when players are described as gutty or

1:15:06.880 --> 1:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>gamers without actually taking it to somebody for four quarters,

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:18.559
<v Speaker 1>the sort of positioning of how we describe players is

1:15:18.880 --> 1:15:21.679
<v Speaker 1>worrysome When it's not oh yeah, that dude went off.

1:15:21.880 --> 1:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>That dude just absolutely obliterated that team. If they don't

1:15:25.400 --> 1:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have a game like that and it's just Max Duggan,

1:15:28.120 --> 1:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just seems like a guy. I hope he's more than

1:15:30.040 --> 1:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that this season, but that's what he appeared to be.

1:15:32.720 --> 1:15:35.599
<v Speaker 1>As you know, if as a freshman you're not, you're

1:15:35.640 --> 1:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>generally by the end of your freshman year when there's

1:15:37.840 --> 1:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>some talent around you, which TCU had talent around him.

1:15:40.520 --> 1:15:44.519
<v Speaker 1>If if it's just flash air flash there, I just

1:15:44.640 --> 1:15:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I want I want a flash light, Tye flashlight show

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>me the way. Yeah, all right, let's talk about k State. Okay,

1:15:53.360 --> 1:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I would love to I have k State thoughts.

1:15:55.720 --> 1:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>K State beat Oklahoma and then they scored more than

1:16:01.360 --> 1:16:07.559
<v Speaker 2>thirty points only against Kansas Yes, including twenty in a

1:16:07.600 --> 1:16:12.880
<v Speaker 2>losing effort to West Virginia at home. What are the

1:16:12.960 --> 1:16:17.479
<v Speaker 2>tea leaves for this twenty twenty offense? A lot of

1:16:17.520 --> 1:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>new faces. Will they have more pop? How do you

1:16:21.760 --> 1:16:23.960
<v Speaker 2>feel about year two under Chris Climbing.

1:16:25.200 --> 1:16:27.599
<v Speaker 1>A little worried? A little worried. I'm not worried about

1:16:27.600 --> 1:16:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the defense. Even though they replaced Scottie Hazelton, the coordinator

1:16:30.640 --> 1:16:33.479
<v Speaker 1>who left follow Meltalker to Michigan State. They promoted from within.

1:16:33.600 --> 1:16:35.439
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of continuity at Kansas State, and I

1:16:35.600 --> 1:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>was really encouraged by year one the results that they

1:16:38.800 --> 1:16:41.519
<v Speaker 1>were able to It was like they were hitting corners

1:16:41.560 --> 1:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>tie baseball analogy. They weren't throwing ninety nine. They didn't

1:16:45.160 --> 1:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have a crazy hooking curve or a diving slider. A

1:16:48.240 --> 1:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of Greg Maddocks out there, Yeah, a lot of

1:16:51.240 --> 1:16:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Greg maddocks. The Oklahoma game was obviously terrific. They took

1:16:55.479 --> 1:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>advantage of Oklahoma mistakes like good teams do. They were

1:16:58.120 --> 1:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>able to make plays in big moments. Skylar to timeson

1:17:00.680 --> 1:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, picking up you know, first downs with his

1:17:02.840 --> 1:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>legs whatever. It was encouraging. They lose a lot on

1:17:06.439 --> 1:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>offense everywhere, and in the specific context of twenty twenty

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and not having that much time to get in reps

1:17:14.080 --> 1:17:16.519
<v Speaker 1>with new receivers. You know, Josh young Blood had the

1:17:16.560 --> 1:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>kick return against Texas. He is he is a top

1:17:19.000 --> 1:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>end speed dude. Is he is encouraging. I did see

1:17:21.960 --> 1:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a story that he actually lived with Chris Climban during

1:17:24.360 --> 1:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the spring after surgery and had a fantastic time. I'm

1:17:29.640 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>really hopeful that dudes emerge. But I use that phrase

1:17:33.320 --> 1:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>problem problem a few weeks ago on a show, and

1:17:35.760 --> 1:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, that is a team that has a

1:17:38.360 --> 1:17:41.599
<v Speaker 1>problem because they don't have enough problems on their roster

1:17:41.680 --> 1:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for other teams. I screwed that up, didn't I It's okay,

1:17:43.920 --> 1:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's okay. We're past it. We're past it. Josh young

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Blood could be smaller dude, but that's okay. He has

1:17:49.560 --> 1:17:51.519
<v Speaker 1>that high end speed. He could be a problem. I

1:17:51.600 --> 1:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't see guys on this offense where a defensive coordinator,

1:17:55.400 --> 1:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jim Knowles at Oklahoma State or John Haycock

1:17:59.280 --> 1:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>at Iowa State, are like, oh man, what do we

1:18:01.320 --> 1:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>do with this guy? What do we do with this guy?

1:18:03.720 --> 1:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And Skyler Thompson's fine, but dangerous is not necessarily an

1:18:08.120 --> 1:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>adjective I would associate with him. So it's a new line.

1:18:12.280 --> 1:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just a new offense in general, and I'm worried now. Defensively,

1:18:16.720 --> 1:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the back end of their defense is largely intact. They've

1:18:19.400 --> 1:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>got a really good rush end in White Hubert, one

1:18:21.479 --> 1:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of the best in the country. The defensively upfront, though

1:18:25.000 --> 1:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they do make some changes on the line, just in

1:18:27.160 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of new starters. They were a little loosey goosey

1:18:30.240 --> 1:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>against the run. That concerns me somewhat about Kansas State,

1:18:34.040 --> 1:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of continuity in a weird year, there

1:18:37.360 --> 1:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is a lot to like about Kansas State still, that

1:18:39.800 --> 1:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they were so good on defense on third down that

1:18:42.200 --> 1:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they were just able to get off the field. They

1:18:44.080 --> 1:18:46.799
<v Speaker 1>won a lot of interesting moments, as we saw, especially

1:18:46.800 --> 1:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in that Oklahoma game. But if they had that problem

1:18:49.840 --> 1:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>putting points on the board, keeping drives going, finding mismatches

1:18:53.840 --> 1:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on offense those last four or five six games, I

1:18:57.040 --> 1:18:59.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I necessarily see that improving in an

1:18:59.560 --> 1:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>obvious way in twenty twenty. So I think it's probably

1:19:03.439 --> 1:19:05.799
<v Speaker 1>more of the same or a step back, but still

1:19:06.200 --> 1:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in every game because they're so well coached and so disciplined.

1:19:09.840 --> 1:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, six and four season feels about right, and

1:19:13.760 --> 1:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to get blown out of the water

1:19:15.439 --> 1:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>by anybody.

1:19:16.520 --> 1:19:20.080
<v Speaker 2>It almost feels like year two could be the transition year.

1:19:20.800 --> 1:19:23.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, you expect it in year one. Year two

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:28.799
<v Speaker 2>could be that year for Chris Climban. Really inexperienced on offense.

1:19:28.880 --> 1:19:31.320
<v Speaker 2>This is a team that definitely would have benefited from

1:19:31.360 --> 1:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>a spring from a more traditional preseason where you weren't

1:19:35.240 --> 1:19:39.080
<v Speaker 2>afraid to go near people. Yeah, they really have gotten

1:19:39.080 --> 1:19:43.879
<v Speaker 2>some benefit from that. The line has to replace almost everybody,

1:19:43.920 --> 1:19:48.200
<v Speaker 2>interestingly enough, one factoid that mainly interests. Tom Hammond, I'm

1:19:48.240 --> 1:19:51.559
<v Speaker 2>ready even more interesting than my Josh young Blood lived

1:19:51.560 --> 1:19:54.559
<v Speaker 2>with the Climban family this spring. We'll stick with Josh Reevis.

1:19:54.760 --> 1:19:58.040
<v Speaker 2>He was an all big twelver along the line despite

1:19:58.400 --> 1:20:00.160
<v Speaker 2>not starting a single game.

1:20:01.320 --> 1:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>They moved him around to enjoy that.

1:20:03.600 --> 1:20:05.880
<v Speaker 2>And he's going to be obviously starting this year, but

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>they got to find the other four guys around him

1:20:08.640 --> 1:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>up front. Just a lot of turnover here. I see

1:20:11.360 --> 1:20:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the step back year as well. I think Chris Clime

1:20:13.920 --> 1:20:16.080
<v Speaker 2>is a really good coach really.

1:20:17.200 --> 1:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>At Iowa State, at Oklahoma and at Baylor, just in

1:20:20.400 --> 1:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of how the road home splits work out.

1:20:23.040 --> 1:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just as like an experiment goes, I think

1:20:26.280 --> 1:20:28.559
<v Speaker 2>he was able to prove out that his North Dakota

1:20:28.600 --> 1:20:31.000
<v Speaker 2>States system can translate to the FBS level.

1:20:31.640 --> 1:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he brought he brought coaches with him.

1:20:34.360 --> 1:20:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I feel optimistic about this program longer term.

1:20:39.680 --> 1:20:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a good guy for this program.

1:20:41.800 --> 1:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>But if they develop a quarterback, if they develop a quarterback,

1:20:45.720 --> 1:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be in such And this is again,

1:20:47.400 --> 1:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like I said before, anybody can say this, but I

1:20:49.880 --> 1:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think the infrastructure in Manhattan is particularly interesting. So I

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>think there are really intriguing things to come for the Cats. Yeah,

1:20:56.880 --> 1:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're upgrading facilities, They're trying to build something around him. Yeah.

1:21:00.040 --> 1:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I do like it. Great same page, TI,

1:21:04.080 --> 1:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to talk about Texas Tech? I would

1:21:08.120 --> 1:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>love to. So the Alan Bowman thing, there's no more

1:21:12.960 --> 1:21:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Jet Duffy. We know this that he just Alan Bowman

1:21:15.840 --> 1:21:21.599
<v Speaker 1>has just been just flat out unlucky injury wise. Are

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>their pieces? Are their stretches? Are their units? Are their groups?

1:21:26.640 --> 1:21:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Is there something about twenty nineteen that tells you twenty twenty?

1:21:31.320 --> 1:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have these a ton of weird games

1:21:33.920 --> 1:21:36.519
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. So is it like a bounce back

1:21:36.600 --> 1:21:38.519
<v Speaker 1>thing where it's just going to the universe is going

1:21:38.560 --> 1:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to even out for the Red Raiders and finally Alan

1:21:41.080 --> 1:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Bohm's gonna be healthy? What is give me some optimism

1:21:45.439 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for people in Lubbock? Four and eight a year ago? God,

1:21:48.280 --> 1:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that Kansas loss.

1:21:51.200 --> 1:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I understand the pessimism. They bring Matt Wells over from

1:21:54.160 --> 1:21:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Utah State. They did lose four games by a field

1:21:58.920 --> 1:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>goal or less, and that includes loss at Baylor and

1:22:02.080 --> 1:22:05.000
<v Speaker 2>at home against k State again a bowl team. They

1:22:05.000 --> 1:22:07.599
<v Speaker 2>were not as bad as their four and eight record,

1:22:08.280 --> 1:22:13.400
<v Speaker 2>which I take as a positive. And when British comedy

1:22:13.479 --> 1:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>legend Alan Bowman is not injured, especially pairing him up

1:22:18.760 --> 1:22:22.120
<v Speaker 2>with TJ. Vasher out wide, I feel really optimistic about

1:22:22.160 --> 1:22:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the passing game.

1:22:23.760 --> 1:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>They're full on good, they're full on all the Bowman

1:22:26.120 --> 1:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is a full on good quarterback and.

1:22:28.000 --> 1:22:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I like the transition to more of a balanced offense.

1:22:31.840 --> 1:22:34.439
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a welcome change because tech has almost

1:22:34.439 --> 1:22:37.120
<v Speaker 2>become a caricature of itself over these last I don't know,

1:22:37.160 --> 1:22:39.800
<v Speaker 2>however many years that we've seen air raid after air

1:22:39.880 --> 1:22:41.559
<v Speaker 2>raid after air raid. I'm not saying this is not

1:22:41.720 --> 1:22:43.960
<v Speaker 2>air raid, but it's a little bit more on the

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:49.559
<v Speaker 2>balance side of the equation, all right. Plus, look David Yost,

1:22:49.560 --> 1:22:50.800
<v Speaker 2>their offensive coordinator.

1:22:51.160 --> 1:22:53.599
<v Speaker 1>He has top right haber hair.

1:22:54.400 --> 1:22:57.120
<v Speaker 2>He's like a mix between Boris Johnson and Harry Dunn

1:22:57.120 --> 1:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>and maybe somebody else. But it's hard not to be

1:23:00.800 --> 1:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about that.

1:23:03.280 --> 1:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So I am.

1:23:04.240 --> 1:23:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I am optimistic because it's year two of that system.

1:23:08.720 --> 1:23:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Alan Bowman is presumably healthy and their ability has not

1:23:12.400 --> 1:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>been his things so far, but he's got a ton

1:23:14.840 --> 1:23:17.559
<v Speaker 2>of talent. I think he can have a lot of

1:23:17.560 --> 1:23:20.640
<v Speaker 2>success in this system. Definitely more balanced than the one

1:23:20.640 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 2>they ran a year ago.

1:23:21.880 --> 1:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>TJ.

1:23:22.360 --> 1:23:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Vasher is one of those, one of those dudes. He's

1:23:24.439 --> 1:23:26.679
<v Speaker 2>a target. He six six, He's a mountain of a man.

1:23:27.560 --> 1:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he can be a walking highlight reel. So

1:23:31.240 --> 1:23:37.519
<v Speaker 2>I'm optimistic about that. Okay, defensively, I they led the

1:23:37.600 --> 1:23:41.880
<v Speaker 2>nation in takeaways per game. They play a hyper aggressive

1:23:41.880 --> 1:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>system under Keith Patterson and that people.

1:23:45.560 --> 1:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Have mixed thoughts about him. But yeah, I know, but

1:23:47.840 --> 1:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's fun.

1:23:48.439 --> 1:23:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Just that mentality is fun, that attacking, aggressive mentality that

1:23:51.560 --> 1:23:53.519
<v Speaker 2>we often like to make fun of.

1:23:53.600 --> 1:23:56.599
<v Speaker 1>That's fun. Yeah, and it worked at Utah State really

1:23:56.600 --> 1:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>really well in that final season. Huge results there.

1:24:00.000 --> 1:24:02.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of returning production on defense as well.

1:24:04.240 --> 1:24:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Eli Howard up front, he was All Conference last year.

1:24:07.479 --> 1:24:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Not great that they lose Jordan Brooks to the NFL.

1:24:10.880 --> 1:24:13.559
<v Speaker 2>They're linebacker, but the cupboard at linebacker is not bear.

1:24:13.640 --> 1:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be okay there.

1:24:15.840 --> 1:24:20.679
<v Speaker 2>So you know, combined with what is it, three defensive backs, Yeah,

1:24:20.760 --> 1:24:24.880
<v Speaker 2>three defensive backs who are returning on defense, I feel

1:24:25.520 --> 1:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>optimistic that the defense can take another step forward. But

1:24:31.320 --> 1:24:34.799
<v Speaker 2>reason for optimism if only because it's year two under

1:24:35.760 --> 1:24:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Matt Wells, and I.

1:24:36.479 --> 1:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Think he's a good coach for pessimism.

1:24:40.040 --> 1:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Everything else is a reason for pessimism, But everything else

1:24:44.080 --> 1:24:47.160
<v Speaker 2>is a reason for pessimism.

1:24:47.320 --> 1:24:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was rough, I mean, yeah, the inability to

1:24:50.560 --> 1:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>close out games. And it's Jet Duffy, so they didn't

1:24:53.240 --> 1:24:56.479
<v Speaker 1>want to start him over Alan Bowman obviously, So whatever

1:24:56.920 --> 1:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Texas Tech looked like wasn't fully And Jet Duffy had

1:24:59.400 --> 1:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>incredible moment at the same time. So you hope with health,

1:25:03.320 --> 1:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you hope, with universe balancing out, that they could go

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:09.519
<v Speaker 1>five and five something like that, where they're just an

1:25:09.640 --> 1:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>entertaining team in games as much as they are on top,

1:25:13.200 --> 1:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as as much as I are, I guess just coming

1:25:15.280 --> 1:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>up short something like that.

1:25:18.400 --> 1:25:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know, Okay, I want to I want

1:25:22.720 --> 1:25:24.200
<v Speaker 2>to be more optimistic about Tech.

1:25:25.360 --> 1:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I really do, so be more optimistic.

1:25:27.880 --> 1:25:30.439
<v Speaker 2>And I still think that this is probably an above

1:25:30.520 --> 1:25:33.280
<v Speaker 2>average team. Like I think if we were in a

1:25:33.360 --> 1:25:39.400
<v Speaker 2>normal year where bull eligibility was you know, six wins,

1:25:39.840 --> 1:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they would get to Bowl eligibility. So I

1:25:42.280 --> 1:25:46.559
<v Speaker 2>think in that sense, they take a step forward, but

1:25:46.720 --> 1:25:48.240
<v Speaker 2>it's it's still a long way to go here.

1:25:49.240 --> 1:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, needs to go on. Their defense was

1:25:52.920 --> 1:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a full on nightmare a few years ago, and now

1:25:55.080 --> 1:25:59.559
<v Speaker 1>they're simply average ish, maybe below average, and so and.

1:25:59.520 --> 1:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>They take they take the ball away.

1:26:01.080 --> 1:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>That's fun. They take the ball away, which is if

1:26:03.960 --> 1:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't tackle in the open field consistently, if you

1:26:07.439 --> 1:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>can't figure out coverages consistently, that's a good consolation tie.

1:26:11.840 --> 1:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>No argument from me. The town level needs to be

1:26:14.800 --> 1:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher. And I if they're healthy on offense.

1:26:19.280 --> 1:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, nobody ever mentions TJ. Basher without

1:26:22.439 --> 1:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioning his height, so fall into that group of people. Yeah,

1:26:26.479 --> 1:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I've heard six seven sometimes during broadcasts. But yeah, I

1:26:32.160 --> 1:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think Texas TeX's in a pretty good place just because

1:26:36.200 --> 1:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Alan Bowman, healthy and at his best, is one of

1:26:40.640 --> 1:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the three best quarterbacks in this conference. Four Yeah, yeah,

1:26:44.240 --> 1:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's a good starting point. I like it's

1:26:47.320 --> 1:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be a white We saw the success Jordan

1:26:49.720 --> 1:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Love had at Utah State in this system. David Yost.

1:26:52.640 --> 1:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the reason we called James Franklin casual address

1:26:56.360 --> 1:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>James Franklin is because of that David Yost offense or

1:27:00.960 --> 1:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>partial David Yost offense. So I am. I'm optimistic. There's entertainment.

1:27:05.960 --> 1:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be optimistic and turnovers are random. They're not

1:27:08.120 --> 1:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave the country and takeaways again. But you know,

1:27:11.240 --> 1:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I like that aggression and I think they're going to

1:27:13.600 --> 1:27:16.479
<v Speaker 1>be in most of their games, which will have me watching.

1:27:16.920 --> 1:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>And if Alan Bowman should get hurt again, which we're

1:27:19.080 --> 1:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>not rooting for. No, his backup is a red shirt

1:27:22.320 --> 1:27:24.120
<v Speaker 2>freshman by the name of Maverick mckiver.

1:27:24.720 --> 1:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I did see that year over here. The Texas at

1:27:27.720 --> 1:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback names are just incredible, truly incredible. Yeah, so we'll see.

1:27:33.760 --> 1:27:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, give me your top five to close it out

1:27:37.920 --> 1:27:38.799
<v Speaker 2>here in the Big twelve.

1:27:39.200 --> 1:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Rank your top five tist Oklahoma, Texas, Iowa State. I

1:27:45.040 --> 1:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>don't remember what I said before. I think Baylor, Oklahoma State. Wow,

1:27:52.439 --> 1:27:55.479
<v Speaker 1>you're high on Baylor. Yeah, I mean I'm I think

1:27:55.479 --> 1:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there's just gonna be a lot of six and four,

1:27:56.880 --> 1:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>five and five, four and six in there, with a

1:27:58.840 --> 1:28:01.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of tiebreaker types stuff. Ugh, I could I could

1:28:01.520 --> 1:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>also throw Kansas State in there. Yeah, I think I

1:28:06.320 --> 1:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna have a lot of middle class.

1:28:09.240 --> 1:28:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go Oklahoma, Texas, Oklahoma State, Iowa State, and

1:28:15.400 --> 1:28:19.160
<v Speaker 2>oh god, TCU.

1:28:21.600 --> 1:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow, would it be full on strange if Oklahoma did

1:28:23.840 --> 1:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>not win the conference. No, oh, okay, I think it

1:28:28.520 --> 1:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>will be.

1:28:29.560 --> 1:28:32.560
<v Speaker 2>It would feel awkward. I still think they've got the

1:28:32.640 --> 1:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>highest level of talent of any team in the conference.

1:28:35.920 --> 1:28:41.200
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the the quarterback thing is an open question. Yeah,

1:28:41.400 --> 1:28:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's I think I think it's possible. I

1:28:43.760 --> 1:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>think teams like like Texas have enough talent that they

1:28:47.400 --> 1:28:51.560
<v Speaker 2>could contend. I don't think they are nearly as reliable

1:28:51.600 --> 1:28:53.680
<v Speaker 2>at this point, but it helps to have the best

1:28:53.760 --> 1:28:54.839
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in the conference.

1:28:55.200 --> 1:28:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Sure. Wait, you think Sam Allener is the best quarterback

1:28:58.800 --> 1:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in the conference.

1:28:59.360 --> 1:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:29:01.040 --> 1:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Interesting? Okay? Oh, I hope the Sam stinker does not

1:29:04.760 --> 1:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>hold Texas back from your your potential hope here? Okay? Great?

1:29:09.840 --> 1:29:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Cool?

1:29:10.320 --> 1:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Can I can I finish the show with one more question? Please?

1:29:14.040 --> 1:29:16.679
<v Speaker 1>On Instagram? You should be following Solverble on Instagram today,

1:29:16.680 --> 1:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I posted if you are eating takeout this fall on

1:29:20.000 --> 1:29:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Saturdays and have to choose three apps from the following

1:29:22.720 --> 1:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>apps tie. This is an encouragement for everybody to follow

1:29:25.880 --> 1:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>our Instagram just because you're missing just dope content like this.

1:29:29.800 --> 1:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Choose three of these appetizers tie. Now you have to

1:29:33.360 --> 1:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>consider how well they'll travel picking up going into the

1:29:37.000 --> 1:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>car opening up at home, styrofoam, whatever plastic container they

1:29:40.000 --> 1:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>come in, fried pickles, wings, guacamole, onion rings, devilled eggs,

1:29:47.600 --> 1:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>mazzarella sticks, Queso, nachos, Tots, quesadilla, chick Intendo. What you

1:29:54.400 --> 1:29:59.839
<v Speaker 1>expect me to pull up our Instagram right now? Tie Instagram,

1:29:59.840 --> 1:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>dot comp slash, solid ruble. You should be following. I

1:30:01.920 --> 1:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>hope you're following, TI, I am, I really really do,

1:30:05.600 --> 1:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, So let's see what Pick three of them?

1:30:08.720 --> 1:30:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Pick three of these? Okay, well, I am always partial

1:30:11.280 --> 1:30:14.360
<v Speaker 2>to nachos. You have many o's here in the nachos.

1:30:14.479 --> 1:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Do they travel? Do they travel?

1:30:16.479 --> 1:30:18.679
<v Speaker 2>They don't travel, but they don't travel.

1:30:18.800 --> 1:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>No, we're not going to be watching games in bars

1:30:21.160 --> 1:30:21.599
<v Speaker 1>this fall.

1:30:22.120 --> 1:30:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I would say Casey d is one in that sense,

1:30:26.200 --> 1:30:32.520
<v Speaker 2>is a good picks is one, probably Tots two and

1:30:33.040 --> 1:30:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Devil Eggs that does not travel. I just love Devil Leggs.

1:30:37.960 --> 1:30:40.639
<v Speaker 2>That's why I do like Deviled Eggs. They don't travel. Yeah,

1:30:40.720 --> 1:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>they don't travel. Correct, Like the Miami fan based.

1:30:44.600 --> 1:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Whoa, we'll go.

1:30:46.720 --> 1:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm still going to go nachos three. Still going to

1:30:50.360 --> 1:30:54.479
<v Speaker 2>go nachos three? Yeah, case is Tots nachos three.

1:30:55.560 --> 1:30:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I would probably put mazzarella sticks because of structural integrity

1:30:58.479 --> 1:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and crunch. Yeah, I'm putting monzarella sticks in there, but

1:31:02.160 --> 1:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm gonna go Frickles tots and season frove. No,

1:31:06.360 --> 1:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I already have the tot for potato. I'm gonna go

1:31:08.439 --> 1:31:10.719
<v Speaker 1>wings frickles tots.

1:31:12.160 --> 1:31:15.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, covered a lot of ground on this show.

1:31:16.040 --> 1:31:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad we did a longer episode than usual. We

1:31:18.760 --> 1:31:20.320
<v Speaker 2>hope you all enjoyed it. We hope you all have

1:31:20.360 --> 1:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>a great weekend. Next week, we will be making some

1:31:24.880 --> 1:31:30.559
<v Speaker 2>announcements about our Fantasy Things show, which typically we do live.

1:31:30.600 --> 1:31:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Typically you can buy a ticket, you can see it live.

1:31:33.720 --> 1:31:35.759
<v Speaker 2>We're going to do our best to try and capture

1:31:35.800 --> 1:31:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the flare of that, but obviously circumstances are a bit

1:31:39.880 --> 1:31:42.080
<v Speaker 2>different for the moment, so we would urge everybody to

1:31:42.120 --> 1:31:45.559
<v Speaker 2>stay tuned to all of our social channels as well

1:31:45.600 --> 1:31:50.120
<v Speaker 2>as our obvious podcast here at soliverbo dot com. Subscribe

1:31:50.240 --> 1:31:53.439
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, on Google, on Spotify, anywhere you get a podcast.

1:31:53.840 --> 1:31:56.160
<v Speaker 2>You can not only subscribe, but give us a review.

1:31:56.200 --> 1:32:00.080
<v Speaker 2>All that stuff helps. We look forward to still doing

1:32:00.080 --> 1:32:03.080
<v Speaker 2>our Fantasy Things in twenty twenty, albeit in a very

1:32:03.160 --> 1:32:05.040
<v Speaker 2>very weird and off season.

1:32:04.760 --> 1:32:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Dan, especially if you live on the island of Capri.

1:32:12.360 --> 1:32:15.680
<v Speaker 2>For that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein,

1:32:15.840 --> 1:32:18.920
<v Speaker 2>For myself, Tie Hildebrand, thanks for hanging with us as

1:32:18.920 --> 1:32:19.400
<v Speaker 2>we talk.

1:32:19.320 --> 1:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>All things Big twelve. We'll be back next week.

1:32:21.840 --> 1:32:24.280
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, enjoy your weekend, stay safe, and be

1:32:24.439 --> 1:32:25.479
<v Speaker 2>side peace.