WEBVTT - SHARP NFL BETS Week 12: Eagles-Cowboys, Bucs-Rams, Vikings-Packers, Colts-Chiefs, Giants-Lions and more

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square, presented by hard Rock bet. We

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are part of the Volume podcast network. This is the

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 1>show that makes the square. Sharper makes the wise guys

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>pay attention. I am Chadmoman. I am joined by my bff,

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>my companion, my compadre, my co host, Professional Better, Simon

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Ellos.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Simon Chad. How we doing, brother, my brother?

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>As you know, on Tuesday, I was recording the show

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>from my hotel in the city of Brotherly Love. Today

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm recording from a different hotel on the outskirts, the

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>very very far outskirts of Pittsburgh, PA. On Tuesday, I

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>had a beautiful view of City Hall, that magnificent building

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>right in the center of Philadelphia in center City. Today

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I have a view of the waffle House across a

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>five lane highway. That is the journey that I am

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on during this book. This is our Thursday, Week twelve episode.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going to narrow down the options on our quest

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to find our five favorite picks. We're inching our way closer. Reminder,

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Sharper Square on YouTube, Apple Pots, Spotify, wherever

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your pods. Listen before we get going. We

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>love Mike Tomlin on this show. We just think he's

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing and has done so much and provided so much

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>entertainment over the years. He did it again this week

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>when he was asked about how he would talk to

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey and his response of going after Jamar Chase

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>after Jamar Chase spit in Jalen Ramsey's face, Mike Tomlin

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>had a classic Mike Tomlin answer. Let's roll it.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Matt Mitchell, I'd have no message of someone spits in

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>your face. Google comes natural.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Hey, everybody, producer, Matt Mitchell here, I'm sorry to jump in.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to call out this episode might sound

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 3>a little bit off from an audio standpoint. Chad is traveling,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>apparently in some flophouse outside of Pittsburgh, and there were

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 3>guys blowing the lead thieves in Simon Hunter's yard for

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>over seventy five minutes, So shout out for those guys.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Definitely getting paid by the hour in the interest of

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 3>cleaning up that episode, so it didn't sound like you

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 3>were enjoying it. From inside a seven forty seven engine,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 3>it'll sound a little bit strange, but at least you

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>can hear everything just fine, and everything looks okay, so

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.839
<v Speaker 3>again I want to apologize. We'll get ched back into

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>his house and had this ready to go on Sunday.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 3>So thank you for joining us and for bearing with us.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into this thing. Every week, we

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.679
<v Speaker 1>give out our picks. Every week, Simon's fellow program Gambler's

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>call to yell at him about those picks. He's going

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to summarize those opinions for us. Right now, it's time

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for sharp calls.

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 4>I have to answer this phone, all right, Rain, Rain,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 4>telephone ring.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Somebody say it maybe what to do?

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Man?

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for a game. I totally disagree on it. I'm

0:02:59.360 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>on the bills.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 4>I love Houston tonight, So I know we're not really

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 4>going to talk much about that one. Haven't flipped me,

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 4>but I just I'm just not gonna put as much

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 4>money in the buffalo. I just know a lot of

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 4>really smart groups that I've had Houston at plus six,

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 4>they just really like this number in the spot for them.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 4>I just I can't get there. I can't trust Davis

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Mills my money again. So I don't know where you're

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>at with that one, but I just.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely going to be on Houston at plus six

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I just I love this defense so much. I can't

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>quit this defense. And I feel like I'm looking at

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a Bills team that just had a miracle game, and

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the Bucks in a little bit.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>A miracle game against the Bucks. So they went from

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>one down to winning by twelve and Josh Allen, you know,

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>played Superman on a short week. I like the Texans

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in this spot. I think the number's gotten too big,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, So that's Houston and Buffalo. You're on Buffalo,

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Houston. The wise guys are with me.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>What else?

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 4>We got another game they're against me the Giants. Shockingly.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 4>A lot of love for the Giants, but I think

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 4>they're just missing a unique spot here, and they really

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 4>are playing Russian Roulette con James two weeks in a row.

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 4>So I just that's a game we can talk about

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 4>some more.

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>But we're going to get on Detroit. Good.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I am too.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Games that, you know, I think it's split both sides.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 4>I know tons of pros on the Chiefs. I'm on

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 4>the Colts. I know tons of pros that really really

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 4>like Minnesota. I'm on Green Bay. Another game, pretty split

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 4>on Atlanta, New Orleans pros are really split on that

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 4>one this week, and you know, we've talked a little

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 4>bit about it the primetime games. La Bucks very split

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 4>between the pros, and so is Carolina in Tampa.

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 2>What I feel like a lot of people agree on

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 2>is the love for Dallas. That's a game.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure we're gonna dive more into all the pros.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 4>I feel like we're all over Dallas. I think the

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>public shocking is joining them as well.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Since the game we talked a little bit about.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 4>None of us knew Joe Burrow is gonna play, so

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 4>that numbers moved, but the pros love that. For what

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I talked about, that was a huge spot to back

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 4>since as long as we need that, we either Joe

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Burrow or Joe Flack, so that numbers really moved off

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 4>professional money and you know, last but not least, Pittsburgh,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>we knew the program though we talked a little bit

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 4>about it. You knew the three was going to last,

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 4>so not too shocking. Tons of pros love for that one.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 4>So there are a lot of split games where there

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 4>are just some sides where I feel like all the

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 4>professionals all lined up.

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>But take a lot of these dogs all right, Look,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these games are games that we had

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about on Tuesday. We kind of had a feeling

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that they would play out and be in sharp calls

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and b games that we want to review today. One

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of the games you didn't mention, which we both liked

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot Seattle, which is now a thirteen and a

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.799
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite at Tennessee. We talked about it on Tuesday.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We better on Tuesday. We bettered at twelve and a

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>half on Tuesday. It's obviously moved up. To me, we

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can say that the perceived value is lost in this game.

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>What is value when it's a twelve and a half

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>point favorite and you like the favorite and that favorite

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>is on the road. That's the reality is we're betting

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge favorite on the road against a team that

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>has backdoor to the past two weeks. And I think

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>my philosophy on this and why I like the Seahawks,

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and we both liked it from the second we saw

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the numbers on Sunday night, our Sunday night postgame show

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>is the Chargers have fatal flaws. They got back door.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>The Texans have fatal flaws, especially offensively. They couldn't close

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>out no matter how many opportunities they had, they couldn't

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>close out that win and the cover on Sunday against

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. The Seahawks don't have those fatal flaws. And

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk more about the Seahawks and the

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams and the Rams and the Bucks and sort of

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>how to play these games later in the show. The

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks had their disastrous game and still almost won. They're

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just a dominant team. I can't see this defense giving

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>up more than seven points. So I'm still gonna like

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the number at twelve and a half.

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, really good team, really well coached, and you know,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 4>there are some pros on the Titans. I just don't

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 4>think it's like the other games where they're putting big,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 4>big money down on certain positions. Titans, they're better because

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 4>they feel like they have to write. Like you said,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 4>they've been good to them. They've been back doing especially

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>since the coaching changed. They've they've really covered a lot

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 4>of spreads, which you know, we should have tooken advantage.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 4>He was that terrible of coach. I didn't realize he

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 4>was that bad that he affected the number that much.

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, hard Rock here in Jersey's back to thirteen.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So hard rock.

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 4>They've taken obviously some professional money here. Hit it back

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 4>down to thirteen. But like you said, I'm in on

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Seahawks at thirteen. I'm in on the twelve and a half.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 4>I just like the number, like the spot, and even

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 4>in minus thirteen eight, if I had to take it

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 4>under fourteen, I still would.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 2>But you talk all the time.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 4>We just don't take big spreads like this because you

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 4>need a lot of things that go your way, right.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>You need to play really well and not to have.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Bad bounces that just happens in football. So shocking that

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 4>this is probably the number one and number two.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Biggest bet of the week by the public, right by

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 2>spread money line teasers. Everyone's just lined up with sholks.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Everyone agrees with us.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 4>It's just like, this is a really well coached team

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 4>does really well.

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>In the ruin the cover a lot.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 4>So if you're scared off on this, I mean you're

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 4>scared of the number, just put it on an our

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 4>money line around Robin with the favorites, get it down

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 4>to six and a half or five and a half

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 4>if you need to the Seahawks. But I'm not too

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 4>scared off of this number. I bet at this big number, uh.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants at the Detroit Lions. You just mentioned

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>this in sharp calls. This line has moved from ten

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half to ten. This was Simon says on

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday when it was at ten and a half. It's

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>now gone the other direction. The Wise guys are like

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Giants. I don't get it, to be honest,

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this feels like the exact smash spot that you want

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to get in on the Lions. The Lions at home

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this year have been destroying bad competition, and you laid

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it out on Tuesday all the reasons why you want

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to back Dan Campbell and Jared Goff off of a loss,

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>off of a bad loss, off of a bad loss

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>on the road when they are getting back home. I

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>loved betting Jamis on Sunday when we got back on

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the roller coaster. I don't like betting Jamis his second

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>game where he's going into a much more challenging environment.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. Even though the Wise guys be

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in sharp calls they said they're betting on the Giants.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You and I are aligned, my friend, we are on

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah and everyone. So if there's a little murmur in

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 4>the background. Am getting my leaves done? I know there

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 4>might be a little bit of noise.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But you're so bougie.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 4>It is late fall here in the Northeast. Yeah, I

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 4>just I get it. It's fun betting Jamis and the Giants.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 4>You expect them to able to pass the ball downfield

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 4>against this banged up secondary that you know, the lines

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 4>have been pretty suspect this season, but like you just said,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 4>we've seen time and time again the lines beat up

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 4>on bad teams, especially teams if there's a coaching advantage,

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 4>And this feels like a great matchment, just offensively.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not gonna go through all the trends again.

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 4>I people want to hear all the trends that read

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 4>out check out Tuesday show, but it's not only is

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 4>a great match up on paper and through the numbers,

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 4>but there's tons of data and trends that show this

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 4>spot is unique to this Lion's team with Golf and Campbell,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 4>and they usually win and cover.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>The one I will bring up again is when they're.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Above a four favorite and after a loss at home

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 4>eight to no against the spread in this exact spot,

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 4>So play the number here we'll take the lines. And

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 4>like I said, it's a rare spot. I usually don't

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 4>give out double digit favorites. Is my favorite bet of

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 4>the week, But I thought I was gonna keep going up.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 4>Like you just said, Chat, it's down to ten out

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>of hard rock, So I'm gonna take that value and

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 4>bet the number again.

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm a little surprised, to be honest, that people

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>would be investing in the Giants in their second game

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with a with a interim replacement head coach and truly

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>defense that they cannot stop the run. And they just

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>had you know, Abdua Carter have to sit out a

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>series because he missed a practice because he just didn't attend.

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It sounded like he missed the practice because he was injured,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>missed the practice because he overslept. So this is not

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a team that is defensively in its best place right now.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And they're going against the Lions team. You know, they

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to try to run the ball as much

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>as they possibly can. That is their advantage. And the

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Ryans are the kind of team that when they run

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball, they find ways to score in bunches. They

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>have enough talent that they can get down the field quickly,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as anyone else can with the passing game.

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. I like the Lions here. I'm

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>not afraid of it. Pittsburgh and Chicago. This one has

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>moved in the Steelers direction, which we expected. We talked

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>about it on Tuesday. It was at three. It's now

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>at two and a half. Aaron Rodgers, we don't know

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>if he's going to play. It's not a surgething. It's

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>just about can he be safe with his particular injury

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday against the Bears. We will have to see

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>about that, but it hasn't really mattered. The Bears are

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not the team that the wise guys want to back

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this week.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 2>I guess we're on the same boat. It's about the number.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 4>If I'm going to make a bet on this game,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to be on the three.

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna let two and a half scare me off.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>If that's what it is. Come Sunday and Rodgers is cleared. Great.

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 4>If it moves a ton because Rodgers is out and

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 4>it goes up to three and a half, four, all right, great.

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 4>I just I can't lose here, so to me, just

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 4>be patient. Let the number move if it needs to,

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 4>but you've seen it this week. A ton of games aremoved.

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, it's weird, it isn't it isn't it? It

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 4>seems like the books kind of put up numbers and

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 4>they're letting the pros dictate it rather than staying just

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, holding a line on a certain number. So

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 4>I would say the most shocking part is just so

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 4>many games the dogs have moved down. That's been because

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 4>we've talked about this year been really good for the favorite.

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, there is another game where Rogers game out

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 4>news he might play, he might toughen it out, and

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 4>the number did dips, So a couple three still out there,

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 4>But all the main books I'm seeing is two and

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 4>a half. So yeah, I just look at the matchup wise.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 4>I kind of like this matchup for the Bears in

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of ways, but it's we go back to it.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 4>It's how long can they keep getting away with this?

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 4>They're just not that good of a team that has

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 4>a ton of wins. But if this drops some more

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 4>and it is Rogers back, I'm gonna end up on

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the Bear's chat. But at two and a half, I'll

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 4>still be on Pittsburgh. Once the tips flow too, it's

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 4>like this becomes a Bears line. This is a pretty

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 4>eavily matched team and Bears do have somewhat of home

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 4>field advantage.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 2>So I just if it moves too much off the

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Rogers News, I'll take a position on the Bears if

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I need to.

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, you said it the other day that the

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Bears have had a horseshoe up their ass all season.

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And my buddy Andy, who've talked about on the show,

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>just texted me that line because he loved it so much,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because it kind of captures everything that every Bears fan

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about this team right now. There's sort of

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>this foreboding sense of dread about the Bears and how

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>good they are.

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 4>That way I would go, it's got to be the

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 4>opposite way. It's like, man, this is this is the dream.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 4>You're winning, You're stealing a winning game you shouldn't because

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 4>you have a good coach.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's which.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Is great, But we also have to ask ourselves. We

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.359
<v Speaker 1>keep winning games against bad teams in the final seconds.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So are we a good team that is learning how

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to win? Are we a mediocre team that is just

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>getting the right bounces at the right times against other

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bad to mediocre teams. Those are the questions that as

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Bears fans, obviously we're enjoying it, we love it, but

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't help but be ready to be snake bitten

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>by a team that still has seven games left and

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>could just as easily, by the way, be three and

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>seven or four and six right now as they are

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and three. So this next seven games, there's still

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a wide variance in how good this team can actually perform.

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I agree, New.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>England at Cincinnati. Cincinnati is now a six and a

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>half point dog. Crazy crazy swings in this game on

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>six and a half at hard Rock bats, seven other places.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>This game, it was seven and a half on Tuesday.

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>We thought it was going to be Joe Flacco. We

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>knew there would be no Jamar Chase at some point.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I know in my notes, I saw this game go

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to eight and a half, and now it's down to

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. We're talking about Joe Burrow. We're

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>still getting seventy percent of the bets coming in on

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>New England. But obviously news about who's going to be

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>playing quarterback for the Bengals is changing a lot of

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the market in this game.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's kind of crazy that I was not

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>expecting Joe Brow. I don't know about you.

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I had heard he might be back Thanksgiving, yeah, or

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 4>after Thanksgiving, like Thanksgiven? Was me pushing it because it's

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.359
<v Speaker 4>a Thursday game out see against that Ravens.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>But incredible.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 4>We talk all the time just how far health, medicine,

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 4>all of it has come for these athletes, and like

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the fact that he is backed potentially starting this week

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 4>is pretty incredible.

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>So Joe Flacco is a point better than Joe Burrow.

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>That was the most shocking part to me. It only

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 2>moved the point.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 4>It only moved the most books of seven and a

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 4>half to six and a half. So yeah, I don't know,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 4>or I guess a couple of books did touch eight

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 4>and a half. But yeah, I was just shocked it

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 4>only moved that much. Still, like Cincy, if it is

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Joe Joe Burrow, you know a little worrisome because he

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 4>is coming in cold. I guess you could say, right,

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 4>he hasn't had the reps.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 2>He's coming in in a weird spot, and you know

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not ideal. But I still think you're getting a

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>great number.

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I just can't get over the fact that this Patriots team,

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 4>Like I gave out that stat, it's just never a

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 4>good stat.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Or good spot.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 4>I should say to be in an h eight game

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 4>win streak on the road as a big favorite, and

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 4>the number has moved from maybe I'm overreading if there

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 4>is value on the Patriots now, but I still think

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 4>this is the Bengal's number. Like to me, Joe Burrow

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 4>if he was healthy mid season playing, even if the

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 4>record is what it is, this line would not be

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 4>above three and a half four. So are we getting

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 4>an extra two and a half points becuz it's Joe

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Burrow coming a little cold and the books don't really

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.479
<v Speaker 4>know how to price it and there's no chase, like

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's just.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I see why the public is still going to be

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>on this Patriots team.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 4>So I went from liking the Bengals team to like

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of loving this spot now, where it's like, this

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 4>is the exact situation you want to be and it's

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 4>just it depending on the number. I people don't feel

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 4>comfortable now that it's moved off to seven. I get it,

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 4>but every book is six and a half. You're just

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 4>that's what it is. So once again. Like I said

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 4>on Tuesday, I wasn't rushed making people rush to bed

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 4>it because I didn't knowho the quarterback was going to be.

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea it was gonna be Joe Burrow.

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 4>So I hope people grabbed it. I said, I bet

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 4>it on Tuesday at the seven. At this point, I'm

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 4>gonna bet it again just in case it keeps dropping

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 4>with In fact, if it's Joe Brow gets clear, does

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 4>move the four four and a half.

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So I like this number. But again it's hard for

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 2>me to tell.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 4>People to bet it because if he's out and is

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Joe Flacco right up to seven and a half, eight,

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 4>this would go.

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 2>So it's a unique spot betting this number right.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So we should be clear. Joe Burrow practice on Wednesday,

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>full participant. We are recording this on Thursday midday. The

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Bengals have not had a practice yet, or at least

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>not have indicated if Joe Burrow is going to be

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a full participant participant on Thursday. Zach Taylor has not

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>said Joe Burrow was starting on Sunday, but the hope

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is that he can play on Sunday. They wanted to

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>see how he did the rest of this week in practice.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So the line is based on speculation of the move

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and anticipation of the move, not on actual news that

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>has broken about Joe Burrow starting. That's why the Lion

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>has moved thus far.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Again, everything I've read is he is it's Joe Brow's team.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 4>He is pushing beyond you, like even if he's ninety percent,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 4>he's basically like made it known he's going to play.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's why I do think the line reflects that.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>New England at I'm sorry, India, Kansas City, India is

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>now a three point underdog. You want to make this

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Simon says, when the game was at three, it did

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>get up to three and a half, and I've seen

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>three and a half's out there, and it went back

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to three and a half in Kansas City's direction, even

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>though the majority of the bets are coming in on Indianapolis.

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So Indianapolis is a bit of a public play here

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you were on Indy. It's so interesting, like the talk

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL Geekaraate this season has been that the

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs at what is it five and five now actually

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have better underlying metrics this year than they did last

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>year when they went into the last game of the

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>season with Scrubs at fifteen and one. But last year

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they were winning those one score games, and this year

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they're losing those one scores games. So did we buy

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>into and improving better performing Chiefs team that is just

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>getting unlucky? Are we buying into the Colts team that

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>has can you continue to be very good in these

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>close games and could be having the same kind of

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>season that the Chiefs had last year.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm just gonna keep saying.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 4>I said, I just feel like the Cults are the safer,

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 4>more logical bet here on this number because of what

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 4>you just talked about. Last year, I think they might

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 4>have been ten to one the Chiefs in one score games.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 4>It was insane, and we kept saying there will be regression,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 4>but because Mahomes, it's hard to know how much regression

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 2>No one saw oh and five coming this season.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 4>That is again just like the ten and one was

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 4>way too far one way, the five is too far

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 4>the other ways. So you should start winning and stealing

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 4>these one score games. Like we just said, hard Rocks

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 4>are sharp book, they're at three. Every other book I'm

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>looking at right now is three and a half. So

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 4>we don't care if Mahomes went to one score game.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna be in that number most of the time

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 4>with a three and a half with a Colts that

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 4>it's fair to say they're just the better team. They're

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 4>playing like a better team right now. And I mean

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 4>with game we just moves all the Bears. You're doing

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 4>exactly what the Chiefs team can't do. They're closing out

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 4>games and stealing them at the end. Whatever it is.

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 4>The Chiefs just have not been able to do it

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 4>this year, and either in situationally just Mahomes.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Like you feel what I feel.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Anytime you see him get the ball back with time

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 4>on that clock, you expect them to drive the field

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 4>and score, and this year it's just not happened that way.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>He just either goes threes an hour, they punt, or you.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 4>Know, they don't get the whistles at a lot of

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 4>their games. It feels like they've been carried by the

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 4>whistle and the reugh right like they've had drives. They're

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 4>deader than dead. The reps give them a little bit

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 4>of life and then then Mahomes kicks it up at

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 4>a gear and they drive the field and get touchdown,

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 4>So you know that's another part of it. I just

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 4>think they've been in consistent. So you know, I read

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 4>some trends. There's somethings that really favorite this Colts team here,

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>especially at that three and a half number.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a unique spot, right, it's a Chiefs team.

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I think I have an amazing stat about this chief team.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Basically a team that's below or at five hundred favored

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 4>against a team like the Colts who's you know, above

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 4>a seventy percent win percentage. This unique spot for the Chiefs. Historically,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 4>this team in the spot is twelve to zero against

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 4>the spread. So I know there are guys who'd like

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 4>the Chiefs here. They're saying the books are telling you something.

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 4>They're taking a stand with the books, the fact that

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 4>they are stupig favorite. And you know, Joe Public's gonna

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 4>look at this like I am looking at which like,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I just don't get this. The Culture are a much

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.239
<v Speaker 4>better team. They've played better this season. Just throw out

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 4>the records, just on the field stuff. You think the

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.959
<v Speaker 4>Culture are a better team. So I knew the Public

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 4>doll would be the Colts. It's nice to see it

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 4>has moved because that shows that professional money is coming

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 4>on this Colts team.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Like I told you, I.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 4>Know plenty of professionals are staying with the books and they're

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 4>taking the Chiefs here. So like I've said, I just

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 4>think it's they're betting in line from the Chiefs of yesteryear,

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 4>not the Chiefs this year, which is a team that

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 4>just has not been great in one score games. I

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 4>still can't believe else that Broncos game, Like, I really

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 4>can't like it lined up so many ways you thought

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 4>they were gonna win and steal it and they just

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 4>can never get over that hump.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, the I get it.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Like the Chiefs, you want to bet their money line

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 4>because you just can't see them losing. That's safer to

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 4>me than take of them at the three or the

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 4>minus three and a half. So I just think we're

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 4>playing the number strictly three and a half. That's where

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 4>I got to be with this Colts team.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs on the money line is going to be part

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of our money line parlay for sure. Cleveland at the

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas Raiders. Look, I nearly made this Chad's choice

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday on Tuesday when it was Raiders at minus three.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>It's now moved to three and a half. Should Door

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is officially the starting quarterback for the Cleveland Browns.

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>You can give should or Sanders the benefit of the doubt,

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be incredibly generous, right you can

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>say okay, you can say, okay, he's getting a full

0:23:55.920 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>week of practice, he's with the starters, all those opportunity unities.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>But here's I think the problem with Shore Sanders, and

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that isn't going to change because it was the same

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thing in college. We saw the same thing in training camp.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>We saw the same thing last week. The dude holds

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball forever in the pocket, and he's not a

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>big scrambler, and they've got a lot of injuries on

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, and on the other side is Max Crosby.

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>So I think there are just incredible advantages for this

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Raiders team. Forget about the fact you're getting the Browns

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on the road versus at home. I've gone through all

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the numbers. They give up ten more points per game

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on the road that they do at home. They give

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>up i think more rushing yards on the road than

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they do at home. So it's not a great spot

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for a Browns defense that just had a rock fight

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of a game and didn't come out on top against

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens Miles Garrett four sacks last week. But like

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, we're afraid to bet on Gino, but we're betting.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Nothing in betting is perfect, right, you got to play

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all of it, and I think that when you went,

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>when you stack up all the positives and all the negatives,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it's still a better game spot for the Raiders than

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it is for the Browns.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm just scared off by the number. It's just.

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm betting in but it feels unnatural because it does

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 4>feel way too easy and as bad as you know is,

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 4>I just I still can't leave this open at two

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 4>and a half.

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 2>And like you said, we bet at two and a

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>half better at the three.

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 4>But I said them to the show, you have to

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 4>talk about it minus three and a half because that's

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 4>that's where it's going to be out for everybody. Yeah,

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 4>sure enough, that's I mean a little by the time

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 4>we post the show, that's where it was at. So

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I Vegas, Like you said, it's the

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 4>right side, We'll be on it, but I just see

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 4>a million different ways that we get burned by Gino.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 4>But like you said, how does seniors move the ball

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 4>push it downfield? So like my way here would just

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 4>be what we see with Cleveland, right. They have a

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 4>really good run game that can mitigate bad quarterback play.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 4>But if we can somehow get a lead and forced

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>Shador to have to pass, I think that's where they

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 4>could steal this game. So I'm backing with you, which

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 4>is of all my bets this week, I'm more so

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 4>like I've said, I'm heavy on the money line for

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 4>this Raiders team. I just I'm very aware of this

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 4>number at mines three and a half. It's just I'm

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 4>glad to see it's gone up to four, which shows

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 4>a professional money and the public are still betting three

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 4>and a half. But yeah, if we get to Sunday

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 4>and it's just still stuck here and mines three and

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 4>a half, I don't know if I can let us

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 4>put it in one over five.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm super excited about this game. I love it,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Love love the Raiders here. The other game that I

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>love Jacksonville at Arizona. This was Chad's choice. I was

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>really and I gave it out. Chad's choices two and

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a half, but I said on the show, be patient,

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to get to three. It just hadn't gotten

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there yet. It is now a three, thank god. So

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>hopefully people who are paying attention they saw the line

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>move at to three middle of the day yesterday. I'm

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 1>really glad that it did. Marvin Harrison Junior is missing

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the game with Jacoby Brissett, who just threw for forty

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>seven completions and Mike Wilson had one hundred and eighty

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>five yards. I don't think Jacoby Brissett cares that much

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>if Marvin Harrison is not playing Marvin Harrison Junior in

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the same way that Kyler Murray would need to have

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>someone like Marvin Harrison Junior playing. But the truth is,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just fading the Jags here, and I'm betting. That's

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>much more what I'm doing than betting on the cards.

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I know you love it when I geek out on

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, so I'm sure you're familiar with Pythagorean wins,

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>which essentially like the number of wins a team is

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have based on all of their underlying advanced

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>metrics that shows the true performance. It kind of takes

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the luck out of the game. It

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>just shows you, all right, if everything was equal, this

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 1>is how this team would be. This is what this

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>team's record would be. And of course when I look

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at this, the Jags should have about one fewer win

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals should have one more win. So instead

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>of being a team that is like, what are the

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>cards three and seven, they should probably be closer to

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>four and six or five and five, And the Jags,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of being six and four, should probably be closer

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to five and five. That's not how this game is lined.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>This game is lined is that the Jags are a

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>much much better team. I don't see it that way.

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Cards plus three.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think it did move a little bit

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 4>because of the injuries that this Cardinals team has had

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 4>this week, where like you just said, their number one

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 4>receiver is not going to miss.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 2>This game, and you know, it's once again a rotation

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>at their running back.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 4>They might begain trade Benson back, which doesn't sound like

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 4>a big deal, but I like him.

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he's an upgrade to the running back position

0:28:58.600 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 2>for them.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 4>So you know, this Cardinals team, our biggest rate in

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 4>the day is can their defense get some stop, because

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 4>that's what I talked about, that.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Their defense has been getting worse every single week.

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Every week. Yeah, it's just been brutal. So that's like

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 2>my only real fear here.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 4>But offensively, I love this match of Arizona. I just

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 4>think the Jags defense as great as they looked against

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 4>that Chargers team. I think that was all, you know,

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 4>just basically based on Herbert not adjusting to his offensive

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 4>line love injuries.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 2>He just holds on. In my opinion, Herbert holds all

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the ball too long.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 4>So I think Brissette in this matchup Bill take advantage

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 4>of this bad secondary of this Jacks team because be

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 4>about to remember, you know, even if Brian Toomps juniors

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 4>would come back in this game, he's not one hundred rights.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 4>He's been banged up and he's been fight through Injews

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 4>all season. He's just not been that good. Mitch Trevor

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Lawrence relationship this year has just not been good. And

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 4>I joked last year he had agree relationship with Mac Jones.

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he really shined with it. So it's not

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 4>it's not great with them. And we already know Travis

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Hunters out for this one, so everything. If I get

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Jacks took advantage of in that Chargers game, doesn't feel

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 4>like they'll be able to in this game. And we've

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 4>seen time and time again this Jags team on the

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 4>road as favorites, they've struggled this season. So you know,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 4>like you said, yeah, we're playing the number here, there's

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 4>probably closer to a pick. We're taking the Cardinals at

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 4>a good number at plus three. But in this match

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 4>of it really is about fading Trevor Lawrence against this

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Cardinals defense.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it's a better matchup for them.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 4>They've had the last two weeks against really good, high

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 4>powered offenses.

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You and I one hundred percent aligned on the Arizona Cardinals.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It always works out when we love a game this much,

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Inevitably we get burned. So I can't wait to see

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>how he gets screwed on Sunday. And I know it's

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be the game that we're waiting for it

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to end before we go on the air, And I'm

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>going to take that long, dark, cold walk up to

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>my third floor and I'm just gonna have to answer

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for this, and I'm already miserable about it, but I

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>don't care. I don't care. I'm ready.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I love the.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals this week, all right, it's a little tricky

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta at New Orleans. The New Orleans Saints or one

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites right now. Simon took us

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a minute, but our brass ball got to do a

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>quasim in a hotel. Brass Balls Bet of the Week

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>presented by Hard Rock Bet. It's gonna be the New

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints minus one and a half.

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>You know what it takes. It takes brass balls.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's how I finally came to it. No Drake London,

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of their entire offense. No Michael Pennix, who

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>heartbreaking that he's got a torn acl and needs to

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have that repaired. Kirk Cousins like this game is ugly.

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not because we all of a sudden are going

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>back to our Oh the Saints are competitive. It's not

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because we think Tyler Shock is all of a sudden

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the good quarterback. It's not of any of those things.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 2>To me.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It's only a bet against Kirk Cousins, a bet against

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact they don't have Drake London, and I think

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be really hard for them to move

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball.

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and hopefully people can get this before it moves

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 4>to too A hard rock in Jersey here just moves

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 4>to to while we're doing this live, honestly, and a

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of them, so two real public books out there

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 4>are still at the one and a half, which I

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 4>hope people can get.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 2>But talk a little bit about it, like this is

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 2>a split game.

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 4>I know some pros who every time it touches too

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 4>they're going to take Atlanta, And on the flip side

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 4>of the Saints, every time it's at this number minus

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 4>one and a half, every probably know he's gonna take

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the Saints. So it's been really fun where it's a

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of back and forth and it's really about what

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 4>you just said. Atlanta, they're not that bad of a team,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Like if you go through all out of their games,

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they could have beat the Patriots, they could

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 4>have beat the Colts right like those are would have

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 4>had huge, massive wins that could have really flipped their season.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 4>But they've struggled in those close one score games. And

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I do put that on the coaching. So I don't

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 4>think Kirk is an upgrade the penix and he said

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the number one weapon on that team is going to

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 4>be out as well.

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Drake London, So I can't believe.

0:32:59.920 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 4>We talked a little bit on Tuesday about and I

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 4>gave out all this Kirk stats, how horrible he's been

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 4>once you really dive into it though, and the injuries

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 4>this this team has had, Atlanta, how do you not

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 4>love the Saints heres? So I'm glad to see it's

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 4>moving it to at least it shows me that real

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 4>money is coming in heavily finally on the Saints team,

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 4>which to me makes sense. So I hope, I hope

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 4>people can get the one and a half here when

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 4>they hear it, because we talked all the time about

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 4>key number two is this is also a game where

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 4>I might throw a little bit on the adjusted line.

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Like again, Kirk Cousins might be done, done, done, and

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 4>this could be a really good match for them where

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 4>they just know all if you do is take away

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 4>the run and just put it all on the Kirk's

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 4>arm and see if you can beat you that way,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 4>which again we've talked to Saints our veteran defense, they

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 4>have the guys that probably can do that in the

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 4>middle take away their run. So yeah, it's it's a

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 4>game that we tried to find a game we both

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 4>agreed on it. I feel like it's the one we

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 4>really agreed on together that we both love.

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Yep, totally. Uh, Philadelphia Dallas. Dallas is now a three

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>point dog. It was four and a half early in

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the week. You were hammering it at foreign and a half.

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>By Tuesday it was down to three. There are places

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>where it moved back up to three and a half,

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and I wondered how you felt about that, because when

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it on Tuesday, you were anxious that

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it was going to keep moving and then all of

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you'd have to be betting on the Eagles

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>at under three. It's gone back up. I think there's

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sentiment out there that whatever is plaguing

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles offense is going to be a challenge for them.

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And even if they think the Eagles are going to win,

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and we'll probably end up having the Eagles in our

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>moneyline parlay, it's going to be hard for them to

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>cover a big number against this Dallas offense.

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I think we might have to skip it. No Monylam

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 2>parlay chat. It's really Yeah. The Cowboys approached the end

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 2>zone like a team.

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Attending a buffet supper sampling a wide range of delights

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 3>before finishing the media.

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 4>I told you for the show, a group I really respect,

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 4>it's really respected in the industry, has put north of

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 4>seven figures into this Cowboys team at the three and

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 4>a half and at the four at the four and

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 4>a half. So, like you just said, there's tons of

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 4>three and a half's out there if you want to

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 4>join a really smart group. And you know, I thought

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 4>I was gonna be on Dallas. It was like, Okay,

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll bet Dallas this week. It's a good number, divisional

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 4>matchup home dog. We talked, you know, game one of

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 4>the year, the biggest strength of the Dallas team was

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 4>going to be the number two receiver and pickings against

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 4>a bad corner on the Eagles. Little do we know,

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 4>pickens are gonna be like what the number one receiver

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 4>this year, a number two stat wise behind the guy

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 4>up in Seattle. So you know, I can't get over

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 4>this matchup as an Eagles fan. I just don't get

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 4>what they're Seenior. I can't believe as an Eagles fan

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 4>they're saying We're gonna lose this game to the Cowboys.

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe it. I really can't.

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 4>So I have zero dollars invest in this Egles money line.

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 4>I've taken a position on the Cowboys money line here,

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 4>and just I guess I'll trust the number. And these

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 4>really smart professionals here, they're telling me this is an

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 4>incredible spot for this Cowboys team. And you know, again,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:05.439
<v Speaker 4>Kevin petulu O see of this Eagles team. I still

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 4>a report that he's getting looks at being a head

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 4>coach candidate next year, and it makes me want to

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 4>rip my head out. It's like, what am I missing here?

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I just everything feels so dysfunctional, these Egos offense. This

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 4>is where I feel like this Cowboys team can maybe

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 4>taking advantage of the fact that their offense is clicking.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 4>On the flip side, this Eagles offense just seems so congested.

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 4>And you know, we've seen the upgrades THATX Cowboys made

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 4>to their defense between trading and getting guys back healthy.

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, obviously this is not the Raiders offense, but

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 4>it feels like they can stop a the functional Eagles

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 4>team right now, which I think the Eagles need.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 2>They need it. They it feels like they need.

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 4>To lose a game to correct some of their woes

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.439
<v Speaker 4>right now, because as likely it's been to keep winning,

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 4>and as much hate as I want to give this

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 4>guy Kevin, his offense doesn't turn the bull over and

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 4>they keep winning.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's it's a weird spot where I just it.

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Feels like the public and the professionals are aligning on

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 4>this Cowboys team because of all the outside noise, and

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 4>it's like, is this not moved too much?

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 2>So, like I said, if it gets a two and

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 4>On the Eagles, I'm not going to take it now

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 4>because I respect this group so much, but I feel

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 4>like this is such an overreaction.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 2>This numbers move so much.

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 4>So once again, get to three and a half the three,

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to tell people to take the Cowboys here,

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 4>but at three and a half, I do think that's

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 4>a really strong number where really swarm money's back.

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 2>In that number.

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised to hear you say that that is new

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>news since the Tuesday show, so obviously you've gotten some

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>intel on this, this syndicate that's betting pig money on

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. I think if the Eagles off, it truly

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>pains me.

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe they're going to lose this game to

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys. But that's what guys are telling me. They're like, dude,

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 2>this is a trap, a bad spot for this Eagles team.

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 2>They're walking right into it.

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, if the Eagles offensive Cornator is all of

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, there's news about him getting looks as head.

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Coach, I thinktrolling me.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I swear that's just his agent who's really good planting, planting,

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:56.720
<v Speaker 1>planting with some friendlies.

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's true.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:37:59.959
<v Speaker 1>That's all. That's all that is. There's no one who's

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 1>really serious about that Tampa Bay at the Los Angeles Rams,

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>this one is moving towards seven. It's at six and

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a half. I just can't not like the Bucks here.

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know we're on opposite sides because I think

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Baker started scrambling. I think Sean Tucker has taken on

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the responsibilities that came with Bucky Irving. So

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's taken the pressure and the load off of Rashad White.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at Seattle, I said this earlier in

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the show, they still almost won that game against the Rams,

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>even after four Sam Darnold interceptions. What does that tell

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you about either the Rams' ability to be effective offensively,

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>What does it tell you about the play calling, what

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>does it tell you about their defense? And maybe there

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>are some holes that you can take advantage of, Like

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks also nearly covered against the Bills. They were

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>five minutes away from winning that game until Josh Allen

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>went into superhuman mode. So I know we've been burned

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>with the Bucks. I'm still having better. I'm waiting for

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it to get to seven. I think it's going to

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>get there, and when it does, I'm gonna have to

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>bet the Bucks.

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I know, I get what you're coming from. By just

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't think this Bucks team is

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 2>good the public.

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Like I went back and rewatched that game, and you're

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:40.479
<v Speaker 4>you're honestly making a bet strictly on Baker having magic

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 4>and keeping this game close. But these injuries have caught

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 4>up to them offensively, like him not having all of

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 4>his guys.

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a real issue. As great as a Mecca.

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Buka has been, you've seen teams be able to adjust

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 4>to him because it's again a first year player. There's

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 4>only so many good things he's gonna be able to do.

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 4>He's very raw, right, So say he's incredible running these

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 4>They've literally just been dropping a linebacker every time under

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 4>coverage into his routes. So now he's had to really

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 4>go downfield more, which again Bakers in mind pushing the

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 4>ball downfield, but they're just gonna have a safety or

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 4>top of them the whole time. Like you just know

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 4>you have to double with Mecha, Buca, everyone else you're

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 4>gonna be able to do one on ones with. Right,

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 4>You're getting guys off the street here for this Bucks team,

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 4>which you know Baker can make magic. Like you said,

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 4>there is a world where he can make this the

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 4>game and cover this number, because we've seen that with Baker,

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:30.240
<v Speaker 4>like he just never gives.

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Up that Bills game. Like we said that three and out,

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that's why you lost that cover at the end of

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 2>the game. If Baker doesn't go three and out there

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 2>and does what he had been doing, Drave if at

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 2>least gets you a field goal there, it's a totally

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 2>different situation. You probably do cover that number.

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 4>But three and out Josh Allen was on a mission,

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 4>gets the ball back, went right down the field scored again.

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 4>So looking here, Chad, I think the professionals view it

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 4>as why this number is going up to seven. It's

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 4>just that I don't think they're gonna get Bucky back.

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 4>To me, that's a big deal. This Rams team, as

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 4>bad as they looked last week. This this has to

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 4>be an exactly exactly get right spot for this Rams

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 4>offense against a bad Bucks defense. Right, Seattle's defense kind

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 4>of not put Stafford in his place. But we were saying,

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 4>I think he still is an MVP favorite, but he

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 4>did not play at MVP level there. We talked about

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 4>he had fifty completions. He totally burned us in a

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.319
<v Speaker 4>game his team gets four picks. We should have covered

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 4>that number of a million different ways. He couldn't get

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 4>his team in field goal range. I mean, like you said,

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 4>they scored that fourteen in the first quarter with five

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 4>minutes to go. He only scored seven the rest of

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 4>the game. So for a Stafford, this offensive feels get

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 4>get right spot. And yeah, we're just on opposite side.

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 4>You like the Bucks, But I don't think he'll take

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 4>the Bucks here a minus six and a half, I

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 4>think you'll just or plus six and a half, you'll

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 4>just wait grab the seven where on the Rams. If

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 4>you're getting this now, I would take the six and

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 4>a half now, because I only think this goes up.

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I just don't see it coming down, just because I

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 4>think Bucky will be out. We'll have God went out,

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 4>and we'll see who they get back to the offensive

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 4>line for this Bucks team.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 2>But just so many injuries to this team. Baker go

0:41:57.440 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 2>only handles so much.

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, Caroline plus seven at San Francisco. Why

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't we betting Carolina here? You know, Bryce Young against

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this defense. I know that everybody wants to say that

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the Niners are back with Brock Purty. Seven just feels

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>like a huge, huge, huge, huge number us for a

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Panthers team that continues to find ways to not just

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 1>cover and win. They're doing the same things they did

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>last year. They're building momentum in the second half. They're

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>taking big chances. I know you hated the chances they

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>took on Sunday and Dave canalyis was your shame? Shame, shame,

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 1>But it just feels like this Panthers team is too

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>competitive and this number is too big, and everyone is

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>forgetting that this Niners defense is just not very good.

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>They're wide open and vulnerable to what Bryce Young likes

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to do and how Dave Canalis likes to call plays.

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 4>I know, but like I keep saying, there has to

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 4>be something we are missing here because this line does

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.919
<v Speaker 4>not make sense at all. No sense in the books

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 4>are telling us that Bryce Shung is going to lay

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 4>in the here, that's what they're saying to us. But

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 4>we have all this data that shows this Niners team

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 4>just they have letdown games after big wins, and they've

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 4>done so the last year and a half with whether

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.399
<v Speaker 4>it's been Brock pretty Er, mac Jones, it doesn't matter

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 4>who the quarterback has been. That that's been consistent. They

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 4>are one in fourteen against the spread after or win.

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:28.839
<v Speaker 4>You know, I just don't get this line at all.

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 4>Like you've said, this Carolina team, they have the guys

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 4>that keep up with this offense. You know, we know

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 4>their defense is going to struggle in the forty nine

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 4>is going to get this, but we expect the Panthers

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 4>to keep up.

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:41.439
<v Speaker 2>And this is seven and a half of two different

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>books here in Jersey Jet.

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous.

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 4>It's minus one twenty five and minus one twenty at

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 4>both of them. But I mean, I'm very tempted to

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 4>put a large wager on this Panthers team.

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe it.

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm just trying to be cautious here because there's just

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 4>something I'm missing. My model's totally off and I'm totally off.

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 4>I just do not get the number at all. So, yeah,

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 4>this every every book I've talked to has said the

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 4>majority of the money they've taken so far he has

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 4>been Panthers, which to me makes sense, Like the public

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 4>is with us.

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 2>They've seen Bryce Young what he's done.

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 4>And you know, Atlanta, like we just said they're potentially

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 4>a really bad team and we've overvalued them. And you know,

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 4>any defense that just gave up four hundred fifty yards

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 4>or Bryce Young, we can say is a bad defense.

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know, like we said this for and

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:29.839
<v Speaker 4>Ers team with their injuries, they're not that much better,

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Like they really aren't.

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So I don't get it. Chat, I just do not

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 2>get this line at all. And I'm with you. I

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 2>am all over this Panthers one.

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 4>But I'm trying to be cautious because it feels way

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 4>too easy and I'm missing something Like again, it.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Feels a couple a couple of lines this week feel really.

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Interesting where they've they've moved and this is one of

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 4>those games where this was six and a half, it's

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 4>gone to seven, and now it's trending towards seven and

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 4>a half, so be careful. We'll talk more about it Sunday,

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 4>where once I get more from because it is the

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 4>money night game.

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, as we say here right now, I really

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 2>really like the Panthers number.

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I do too. The games that we know we'll be

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about on Sunday either because of Liones, because games

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we like now because of injury news. We're going to

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Lions. We're going to talk about the

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Steelers because we're waiting to find out about Aaron Rodgers.

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about Seattle. We'll probably talk about Cincy. Yeah,

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.240
<v Speaker 1>because of Joe Burrow. We're going to talk about the Raiders.

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about the Cardinals, the Saints, Geez Dallas.

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Like, it's going to be hard to narrow these

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>things down on Sunday.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, it's a fun week for sure.

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick word from hard rock and we'll

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 1>come back with some big bets and Square versus Sharp

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and all that good stuff. Today's show is brought to

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.879
<v Speaker 1>you by our new presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. It's

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that time of year when every day feels like a

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:57.640
<v Speaker 1>big game day. You've got Pro football, college football, NBA,

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>college twos hockey, it's all happen and on hard Rock Bet,

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>there's always something to bet on. If you haven't tried

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.359
<v Speaker 1>your first bet on hard Rock Bet yet, there's still

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>time for you to get one hundred and fifty dollars

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets if you win. Just place a five

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet and if it hits, you get not only

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 1>your winnings, but one hundred and fifty dollars in extra

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 1>bonus bets. And if you're not sure what to place

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>your first bet on, check out the hard Rock Bet

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>stats Hub. It's loaded with trends, streaks, and stats to

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>help god your picks. Numbers don't lie, and neither does

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the data in there. Here's one that stood out to

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>me again. Green Bay's Josh Jacobs has now scored a

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in fourteen straight games versus NFC opponents. Check out

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the stats hub now, get the edge and bet with confidence.

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>The hard Rock Bet sportsbook app is the only legal

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sports book anytime you're in Florida, and it's also live

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, and Colorado.

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Coming soon to more states too. Plus, hard Rock Bet

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:02.280
<v Speaker 1>offers new promos every single day, so whenever you're listening,

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>just open the app and check out what you've got

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>any day of the week. Download the hard rock Bet

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>app and make your first deposits payable in bonus bets,

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.720
<v Speaker 1>not a cash offer offered by the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>In Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital, LLC. In

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all other states. Must be twenty one and over and

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one eight three three play wise.

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:37.320
<v Speaker 1>In Indiana, if you were something you know as a

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem and wants help, call one eight hundred and

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>nine with it gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, and Virginia.

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, simon, biggest bets, pull up bost pants and

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>be a man h.

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's it's all depend on the number.

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Like again, I'm pretty heavy on Detroit obviously, people know

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.839
<v Speaker 4>that minus ten and a half minus ten, I've really

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:09.799
<v Speaker 4>taken a big position on that one since I'm getting there, people,

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 4>So I've taken big positions in seven six and a half,

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Colts plus three and a half and you know, probably

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 4>not that shock any people. Cowboys plus three and a half,

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I've taken a pretty big position. So I'm being patient

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 4>on the Rams and the Panthers and see where that

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 4>number goes. But those could end up being pretty big

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:29.839
<v Speaker 4>bets of mine as well.

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It worries me that my biggest bets so far this

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>week are not on your list, the Raiders and the Cardinals.

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm invested heavily in the Raiders' money line, but yeah,

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm just I don't know.

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Something about that number just scares me a little bit.

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, now I'm scared that you're not aligned

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>with what I'm doing. Let's talk about some parlays here.

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's choose three underdog parlay is because I know we've

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>got probably five parlays that we really like for the

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 1>favorites underdogs.

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 2>My dog blocks your dog. Your dog blocks my dog.

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I could see Cincy, you know, if it's Joe Burrow, like,

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't doesn't terribly scare.

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:31.399
<v Speaker 2>Me, all right, do Cincy? Dallas? Yeah, Pittsburgh plus one

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. Yeah, it's not terrible, dude. Cardinals, Cardinals, all right.

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 2>I compan that they're they're plus one forty.

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Arizona, all right, the favorites. We're definitely gonna go

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:49.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Raiders. Oh yeah, we're gonna go with the Saints.

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>What about Kansas City?

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we can do it.

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City.

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think I think them being five and

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:56.439
<v Speaker 2>six is very real.

0:49:57.280 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Raiders Saints, Kansas City.

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 4>I want to do se Yeah, well yeah, do some

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 4>adjusted lines do uh, Seattle minus five and a half?

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Seattle minus five and a half.

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's do one. How can we not take Packers?

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, take the Packers.

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean they if I get it's it's a divisional game,

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 4>things do happen. But my god, they've they've lost so

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 4>many bad games this yere. They can't drop another one

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 4>at home in the spot.

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, sharp versus square, give me your thoughts here.

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>You can go first. Since you were at Carolina last

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>week and I did not.

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean I would do Dallas plus three and a

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 4>half Hard Rocks unfortunately three.

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll do uh Colts plus three and a half Cold

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 2>plus three. Leaking confidence. As I said, you are a

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:49.439
<v Speaker 2>leaking a little. I feel much shafe for doing Dallas

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:50.200
<v Speaker 2>plus three and a half.

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'll give you Dallas three and a half. It's

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of been there all week.

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And you can get Dallas. Yeah, it's had a bunch

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 2>of main books.

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can get Dallas three and a half pretty

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>much anywhere. I'm down to Sinci in Vegas.

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Do Vegas? You love it?

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I do love Vegas. I'll take minus three trying to

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get you off of it. You love it, I love

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the I love the Raiders. I love it all right.

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 4>And then survivor just real quick, as people always ask,

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 4>you can't go wrong with these still with digitalgs people,

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.360
<v Speaker 4>if you still have Seahawks, you still have lines, you

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:24.319
<v Speaker 4>still have Ravens, just use them. If not, if you're

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 4>really stuck, if you still somehow still have Green Bay,

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 4>use them. If you still somehow have the Rams, I

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:33.320
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't waste them on the books. Your books are easily

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:35.360
<v Speaker 4>win that game. So there's a bunch of options there.

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:37.800
<v Speaker 4>I just wouldn't force in big favorites of the Rams

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 4>or or the forty nine ers. The four Niners could

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 4>lose that game as well.

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 1>All Right, this has been Sharper Square, part of the

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Volume podcast network. We will be back on Shrepper Square

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>YouTube on Sunday morning. Simon and I are going to

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:55.440
<v Speaker 1>make utterly human, challenging decisions that we will regret the

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of the day. Will be back on Sharper Square

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube later that day seven point thirty pm Eastern. To

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 1>review how we did. Watch or listen on YouTube at

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sharp or Square. Like this video, subscribe to the channel.

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>You can also download it from Spotify, Apple Pods, wherever

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you get your pods. Rate review, subscribe, leave us five stars,

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 1>say whatever you want. Feedback is a gift until next time.

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Love you.

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Right now, it's time to take a step forward.

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We gotta put something together. Back to back.

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's go