WEBVTT - Stock Buying Opportunity Isn't Here Yet: Hugh Johnson

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, in days like today, when

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a big sell off in the equity markets,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it's good to speak to a season grizzled veteran, and

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we have that in Hugh Johnson, Chairman and chief investment

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>officer of Hugh Johnson Associates with about a billion and

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a half dollars under management. Hugh, it's great to chat

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with you today. Help us just to put what we're

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing today on the tape into some context for us. Well,

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all, nobody knows, including myself, what's going to

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be the outcome out comfort the economy of China, the

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>economy of the US, and of course the financial markets.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>We have some things that can reasonably serve as as

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a guide. We of course had the stars epidemic or

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>problem that we had in two thousands three. In two

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen, we had a bowl of notes. We've had

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing before, and it's told us to

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, don't get caught up in the panic.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's always a mistake. So I think, don't

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get caught up in the panic. Maybe step back from

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going on and let them dost settle or let

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the markets settle down before you start making any investment decisions.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>There is a somewhat bright side of this, if you

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.839
<v Speaker 1>can see anything bright in this, and that is we've

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>gone from a level at least as I do the

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>numbers of being meaningfully overvalued, to being let's say a

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit overvalued but not as much overvalued. In other words,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this could have an opportunity, but it's it's not here yet.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So the main thing is don't get caught up in it,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and don't panic. It's not here yet. When do you

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>decide to buy the dip? That's really a good question.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I I think you buy the dip when the valuations

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>look a little bit better. You know, we started the

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>day to put some numbers on a Lisa. As I

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>do the numbers five percent overvalued or above the level

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we should average in the current quarter. You know, this

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is kind of fun with numbers. We've come down to

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>where we're still a little bit over value three point

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>six percent. Um I think you wait a couple more days.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>If we got down to our level of say even

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>being fairly valued or one percent one percent overvalued, I

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>start to buy, start to buy, maybe buy some some things.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Keep in mind, little just just how much further do

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to go to get to that point? Well,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and as I say, you've got to go

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>down another three three to five percent in my view,

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>three to five in in the either you can measure

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it by the SMP or the down. If you went

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>down that much, I think then you could probably start

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 1>to start to buy. Well, what are some areas that

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you would be buying? Uh, you know, when this market

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>does set it out, or if we do get that pullback,

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you're suggesting, well, that's great, that that's a great question.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Because um, I haven't been very constructive or positive on

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the markets. I've been saying, you know, the markets are

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a particularly good year, especially after

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>what we had in two thousand and nineteen. So I've

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>been trying to tell investors of what we've been doing

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is to add a little defense to portfolios and doing

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>things like making sure you buy large capitalization stocks, add

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>some defense by buying utilities and and consumer staples. Make

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>sure you buy some value stocks. I'm not saying load up.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying reduce your allocation to equities. But I'm

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>saying in two thousand twenties going to be a lot

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>more difficult a year. You can see that very clearly

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>than two thousand nineteen. So I'm saying, add a little

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>defense to portfolios. Remember, this has been an extraordinarily long cycle,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the longest ball market in history, the longest expansion in history.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Common sense alone says, look at trees, don't grow to

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the sky. You might add a little defense to portfolios.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it's not time to go into the bunkers. It's

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not not time to take too much risk off the table.

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But you have to watch very closely when when you're

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you're a record, When you've got these records staring you

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in the face. On the flip side, what would you

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have to see with respect to the spread of the

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus and the subsequence slow down on the Chinese and

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>other related economies To change your view and become even

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>more pessimistic. Yeah, that's a great question. I'm not sure

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>what it would take, but I think it would probably

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be you have to watch the news, and it's gonna

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>be it's not going to be something you can easily quantify,

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>and the news that you really want to watch is

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going on to China. You know, the Chinese economy

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to slow this year six point one percent

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>down to five point eight percent. If we've got numbers

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>or forecasts, shall we say from sensible plate people, that

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like five and a half percent. Uh, then we're

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about the impact of this, uh, the coronavirus being

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot more significant than we had previously estimated our forecasts.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And then we've got to reduce our forecast for the

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>global economy or forecasts or not only China, our forecast

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for the US. Remember China's an important export desition, that

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>destination for the U S. And and then we're gonna

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>bring earnings estimates for the SMP down, and that's when

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's when we're gonna have some real problems I think

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>in the markets. I'm hoping that doesn't happen, but nevertheless,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what you gotta watch. You gotta watch what's going

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the impact on China, an important export destination

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>for the U S. You you mentioned earnings were maybe

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>a third of the way through this earning season. Any

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>takeaways for you so far. Yeah, it's a puzzling thing.

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's been puzzling for every earning season we've seen

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>for the last four or five earning season. And that

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is companies are coming in with better than expected earnings

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not as good as we sail for the third

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter that we saw in the fourth quarter, were still

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have seventy percent of the companies of giving US earnings

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that are above expectations. But at the same time that

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we're getting that for the fourth quarter of two thousand

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen, earnings expectations are forecasts by myself and others

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.559
<v Speaker 1>for two thousand and twenty keep coming down. We worried

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>about ten percent at the start of the fourth quarter.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>We're now down pretty close to eight percent eight point three.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So estimates for two thousand twenty keep coming down. And

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm happy about what we saw for to

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to the fourth quarter. I'm not really happy about what

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing lying ahead for two thousand and twenty, and

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that makes my concerns are worries about valuation even deeper.

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Johnson, thank you so much for being with us.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Johnson, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of Hugh Johnson Advisors,

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>over say one and a half billion dollars from Albany,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>New York. Of course, what's driving the risk off field

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>as the coronavirus which has been spreading and some of

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the measures that China has taken to prevent further spread.

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Joining us who has been weighing in all more day

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and all week last week, Drew Armstrong, team leader for

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>you as healthcare Bloomberg. Drew, can you just bring us

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>up to date? What is the latest in terms of

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the spread and the efforts to contain the virus at

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this point? Well, I mean, I think the biggest things

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>we're watching right now are kind of looking out for

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>new global cases. We do know CDC is going to

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>brief reporters a little bit later this morning, and we

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>may get some updates on exactly what the situation is

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in the U S where we have five confirmed cases

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but several dozen people who have been under observation or

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in isolation. You know, approaching three thousand cases in China.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Accounts there continue to rise. I mean, we've seen several

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred more cases at it each day. And I think

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing everybody is looking at is do things

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in China accelerate, um and continue to grow in a

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way. Meaning you've got kind of sustained ongoing transmission

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the lockdowns that they've been doing

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>there aren't working, which is a possibility. Um. And do

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we see kind of ongoing or sorry, do we see

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>new transmission happening outside of China which would really put

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this in a new phase. So Drew, just give us

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>some sense of context maybe relative to say the stars

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of virus that of many years of several years ago, um,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>where we in scope related to that? You know, I

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of similarities, and people do make

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that comparison. I mean, there's similar types of viruses. Both

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are coronaviruses. They appear to come from some kind of

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>animal reservoir um in China, and both are respiratory illnesses

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that can be deadly in the wrong type of patient.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at people who are maybe a little bit older,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit sicker, Uh, those folks are in

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>general more vulnerable to to any type of illness, whether

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it be the flu um or one of these more

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>novel novel pathogens that we've been seeing. And so you know,

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the same types of restrictions on trade, the

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>same same types of economic worries that we're having here.

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Stars was a lot bigger than this was, but it's

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>very early days. I mean, that was a long running epidemic.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things you've seen that is

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>different from Stars is that public health authorities around the

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>globe are increasingly sophisticated about how they respond as China

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in particulars increasingly sophisticated. China is a very different place

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand two, two thousand three from where it

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is now. Some of the same practices, um, you know,

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about these wet markets and things like that,

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or you know, it's coming from an animal reservoir, maybe

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in baths or something. Those are still the type of

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>things you you worry about. The doocey is similar, but

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>China is a really different country than you know, fifteen

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>or twenty years ago. Yeah, although there are issues in

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of not having the right hospital beds, enough hospitals.

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>They're building hospitals currently as we speak to try to

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>meet the demand. Also just some basic supplies, the idea

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of gowns and protective equipment for the medical workers to

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>take care of the patients. How is that kind of

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess illuminating issues within China that are going to

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>make this harder to to sort of stave off, even

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>with the quarantine that's currently in place. Yeah, anytime you

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have a widespread outbreak, one of the big things that

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you worry about is isolation and containment. This is something

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that public health or experts are going to talk. If

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you have people who are contagious, you don't want them

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>around other people, And especially when you've got a virus

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that is this new and has some of these scary

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>potential uh consequences to it, you need the hospital beds

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and you need isolation units. When you're dealing with thousands

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of new cases, No city around the globe is going

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to have the capacity to say, hey, we need to

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>put three thousand people in isolation, and we need to

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 1>do it tomorrow. So you've got to build. And that's

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>why they're putting together a hospital to deal with this.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>They did the same thing with Stars during that outbreak.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So some of this is saying we just need to

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>get the facilities in place where we can do the

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 1>basic fundamental public health medical work to get these cases

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the population and stop them from potentially transmitting.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That is going to be made tricky by this thing

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>because it has a long incubation period. We don't know

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are people with really mild symptoms spreading it around without

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily knowing they get sick. There's some complicating factors here

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that I think the experts dealing with that are really

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>still trying to get their hands on it real quickly.

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>How did the Stars issue kind of take care of

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>itself or how did that play out? Every almost every

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>single outbreak like this, it comes down to good public

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>health practices. I mean, you get like a vaccine that

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>came out for Stars. Vaccines tend to take you know

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>when when when you talk about drugs you need months

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>or years. Often they get developed well after an outbreak

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>has ended. You know, we have a we have a

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>bowl of vaccine now, but we also started developing it

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>um in the beginning of the first outbreak in the

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand tents, and we only just now have it Okay,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Drew Armstrong, thanks so much for that update. We'll look

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>for the CDC briefing the reporters eleven thirty Wall Street Time,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Drew Armstrong, team leader for US Healthcare busy reporter as

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Healthcare team is as a track this coronavirus. Drew Armstrong,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Joinings here on a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio.

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>But we often hear the phrase think outside the box.

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But how about thinking outside the building. That's what our

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>next guest suggests that we do. Roosevelt Moss Cantor. She's

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the R. Bacal Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Business School, also Chair and director of Harvard's Advanced Leadership Initiative.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.599
<v Speaker 1>She joins us here on our bloom Interactive broker studios.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>But thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate you

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>coming here. Talk to us about your book, Think Outside

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the Building. How advanced leaders can change the world one

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>smart innovation at a time. That's the title of your book.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you what's the key takeaway there? So, if

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>you want innovation, you can't stay stuck within today's structures,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>today's assumptions, today's thinking. And if you think about it.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here we are, we're in a highly digital

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>radio program. Um how I mean the news is no

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>longer the newspaper. Education isn't the school of the classroom.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Health is not the hospital. It's a lot of stuff

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that goes on outside and around it. And we're fixing

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>health by fixing nutrition for example. UM. So, if you're

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>constrained by your job, the particular company you work for,

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're constrained by conventional thinking, you never can do

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>anything novel or innovative. So have to get out. Can

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>you give us an example of somebody who did this

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and took a risk and became incredibly successful in in

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>their sort of innovations. Well, in many ways, many most

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs do some of that. I mean they see that

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there's something totally different possible because they see the gaps

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they um so Uber, even though it had a very

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>checkered history in the beginning in terms of of regulators

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and lots of other things. I mean, that was seeing

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that the conventional taxi industry was not meeting all the

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>needs of people. You you're out there watching on the streets,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>it's not hard to see. But if you're stuck within um,

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>an existing corporation, you might not see that. And in

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>my book, I tell the example the former president of

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Trader Joe's who has an entirely new retail concept now

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to feed people in food deserts and inner cities by

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>um using food that would otherwise be wasted. And that

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't his first idea. Took him a long time to

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>get out of thinking traditional grocery store UM supply chains,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and now he has something that's doing very well in

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Boston and is going to spread around the country. I'm

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>struck by the timing of your book. It comes at

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a time of incredible money going into venture capital funds,

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>incredible amounts of money going into Silicon Valley, in particular,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with unicorns being created with their valuations above a billion

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars regularly. I'm wondering, when companies get big quick, does

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that stifle innovation because people have to stay within the

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>building and keep it going and try to generate profits

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than foresee the next sort of disruptive trend to

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>innovate around it. Certainly makes it easier for people to

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>get stuck. If you're growing fast with one formula, and

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>if you depart from it, you might undercut that formula.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But then look at Amazon, which started out with books

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and has managed to expand to practically everything else, including

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>selling its own computer system. That's amazing that Amazon Web

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Services is the biggest deal going on the cloud. What

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>does that have to do with selling books online? How

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about some more traditional industries, whether it's automni automobiles, are

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just manufacturing or you know kind of how are some

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of those companies doing as it relates to innovation. Well, so,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I had there was a very interesting

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>comment at a conference UM that I had pulled together

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago and had invited Mary Barra from

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>General Motors to talk, and we were talking about the

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>future of transportation and she said, you know, when she

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>was starting out in marketing that UM, the cell phone

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>was first called the car phone because that was the

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>only place people had carverone. She said, boy, did they

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>miss a bet. And now the car itself is a computer.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The metal is the least value added part of the car.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's interesting. We don't even know yet how all

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of that's going to play out, and how that car

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to talk to other cars, to the billboards,

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to the streets. Amazon, I want to go back to

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what you were saying, this idea that they've managed to

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>innovate repeatedly to dominate a whole host of different industries.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>How does a company create a culture of innovation? I

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think in the Amazon case, there are two different kinds

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of cultures of innovation. One is you have a founder

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that wants to dominate the world. And there was a

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>time in Silicon Value where they all said total world domination.

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos said Amazon meant it because he was he

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was always envisioning things bigger um. And so partly the

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>culture of innovation comes from a founder who has a

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>big dream and is not going to let go of

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that big dream for the trivia of operations and turn

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>operations over to other people. Ellen Musk is much the

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>same way. UM. So there's another kind of culture of innovation,

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and I talked more about that in my book, which

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is a bottom's up culture of innovation, where you give

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>people the sense of importance, the freedom to actually leave

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the building and come back with ideas. I mean, I

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>have an example of a law firm where there was

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a young man in the law firm who got the

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>law firm to take seats in a tech incubator a

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>law firm, and they weren't there to sell legal services.

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>They were there to soak up a culture of innovation,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and that law firm is one of the first with

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>digital wills and other ways to use technology on routine services.

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that if you empower the workforce and

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>also again get them outside of the conventional, there's only

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>one answer, Rosabeth, what's the role of government in terms

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of fostering innovation? You could say Silicon Valley, the U. S.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech business has been so successful because the government has

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.479
<v Speaker 1>taken a very light hand to regulation. That was after

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>they were successful. I mean, you know, they like to

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>say government had nothing to do with it, They shouldn't

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.479
<v Speaker 1>have anything to do with it. Go away, And that

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was the uberstance for a long time that got them

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>banned in many countries around the world. But in fact

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>government has a big role because Silicon Valley was the

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>result of the defense industry and defense spending, and so

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was um Boston's High Tech Corridor in Austin, Texas. Defense.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>That's government. Then there is healthcare, which has so much

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>government spending. Boston is now the one the healthcare life

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>science as capital of the world. A lot of that

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>was federal brands, So we don't write off government. It's

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the regulation later I think we might worry about, But

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>initially government is a great seed fund. Professor, thank you

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>so much, really really interesting insights and terrific book. Think

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Outside the Building, How Advanced leaders Can change the world,

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one smart innovation at a time. Professor Roosabet Moss Cantor

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of Harvard, the Artbical Professor of Business Administration at Harvard

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Business School and also the Chair and director of Harvard's

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Advanced Leadership Initiative. Joining us here in our interactive Broker

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>studio is a really important discussion at a time of

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented amount of money going into venture capital, and a

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>question about how to sort of get to the next

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>level when it comes to tech advancement, when it comes

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to countering UH climate change, a whole host of other things.

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you set the stage to even understand what

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>might be the needed things going forward. Paul, we've talked

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the Everything rally and how that just

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>has been a melt up. Well, there hasn't been a

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>melt up when it comes to the shares of Wells,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Fargo and Boeing Boeing in particular, absolutely slammed the past

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, shares down more than ten percent, kind of shocking.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not more. Wells Fargo shares a completely little twelve

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>month trailing period at two point four percent of a

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>decline including dividends. And the question that's emerging is how

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>much is this a failure of corporate governance and what

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>does that say going forward about what will it take

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to change both some of the issues and these companies

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as others that might be facing similar issues.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Richard Chambers joining us now President chief executive Officer of

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the Institute for Internal Auditors the I I A uh,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and really I want to give a sense how much

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>was a failure and corporate governance the main driver behind

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>both of the scandals that we saw at Boeing and

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fargo. Well, first of all, thank you for having me,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's great to be back. Uh. You know, corporate

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>governance is is an ongoing challenge we have. The i A,

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the Insued Internal Auditors has been surveying around this and

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>doing a good bit of analysis over the last few months.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And the issues that we see oath that Wells Fargo

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and it Boeing are not surprising given the kind of

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>results that our analysis has has disclosed. In fact, the

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>eight guiding principles of corporate governance that we have identified

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>jointly with our with our partner at the Neil Center

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of Corporate Governance at Tennessee University of Tennessee. Those eight

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>guiding principles we surveyed around those and and corporate governance

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>overall came out in this country at a at a

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>barely a passing grade at a C plus um. We

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>think there is so much yet to be done. But

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>when you start to look at these two companies in particular,

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>there there's certainly are a lot of questions about culture

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in the companies, and yet boards have on an overly

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>optimistic assessment of the culture and their organizations. Another survey

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we did said that boards think that the company is

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>better managing that risk culture than any other risk. So

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>boards are often uh surprised when these things happened because

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>they just haven't been focused on them. It's interesting at

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Davos last week we were Bloomberg News was reporting a

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of discussion and commentary around sustainability governance, some of

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these issues taking you know, more Center stage. We even

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>had the Business Roundtable talk a little bit. I guess

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the announced last year the companies should focus more on

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sustainability than stock price, and as an old Wall Street guy,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it just sounded silly to me. I mean, where do

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you think corporate America is in terms of balancing you know,

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>shareholder returns, which have always been kind of the responsibility

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of boards and management to maybe some of the you know,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>e s G type metrics as well. Well. I can

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you that our study that we did, the American

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and Corporate Governance Index study that are referred to a

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>minute ago, sustainability was the lowest grade of all areas

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>as far as board oversight, UH mirror mirror C as

0:22:55.880 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>an overall grade. UM. I think boards are are maybe

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>appropriately reacting to shareholder expectation. Shareholders are anxious to see

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>immediate returns. There's some you know, instant gratification if you're

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>trading in the market by a lot of people, and

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>so boards try to be responsive to that. But I

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>think they fail their shareholders by not doing anything long

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>term about taking any kind of view and sustainability. The

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>implication in your results that basically there were some serious

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>problems with corporate governance both at Boeing and Wells Fargo

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>that should have left some of the issues as not

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge surprise. Leads to another question, which is are

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we going to see more surprises like this? Based on

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that on average, companies in the US are

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>barely a passing grade and there probably are others that

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have severe failures and corporate governance out there, I think

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>it's inevitable. I think it's inevitable unless unless boards began

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate risks that aren't clearly on the radar, risks

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like culture. Unless they begin to anticipate it, I think

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we're in for a lot more than okay. So give

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>us a specific example of something that a corporate board

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>should be doing that you often see a failure to

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>do well. I think the corporate board at a minimum

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>should be looking and having conversations with more than just

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the CEO and the C suite. Corporate boards should be

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>talking to the head of internal audit, the head of

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>HRU too, corporate compliance executives to get a sense of

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>what lies beneath the surface. Because what we often see

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is when these culture debacles explode, is the boards are

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are completely amazed they're surprised because in many cases they

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>either hired the CEO or the CEO got them appointed,

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and so there's this natural level of trust there and

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they just can't anticipate or don't don't foresee the kind

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of problems that the company finally gets itself into. Well

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know it's interesting. Black Rock recently said that

0:24:56.040 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sustainabilities can become a much bigger part of their investment process. Um,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>do you think that might kick start some boards to say, hey,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:05.439
<v Speaker 1>if I want to support of a black Rock or

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>some of these other big investors, I gotta take this

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>thing more seriously. I think it's a good, good indication

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of maybe a trend that will emerge. Black Rock I think,

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, said uh that even where they

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have indexed funds, they intend to get more activists or

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>more active in uh in voting their shares around these

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>issues of sustainability and and kind of the strength and

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness of corporate governance. So I do think it's a

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>good start, but I think we have a ways to go.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>There's sort of a popular belief that during times of

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>froth or rallies, and I don't know if you will

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>define this is a time of froth. But certainly there's

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>been a very long standing rally that shareholders overlook problems

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>more easily because they just want the gains. Do you

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like corporate governance has deteriorated and that just in

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:02.239
<v Speaker 1>general internal auditing standards have to perated as shareholder has

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>become more forgiving in light of the gains that we've seen.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I do think that when everything is going well, there's

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a tendency not to look below the surface. You see

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the water is calm, but you may not see the

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>currents underneath um. And unfortunately a lot of these things

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to build up over time. I think I saw

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>where somebody observed recently. It was Hemingway who said, um,

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>everything is calm until it isn't um. And no, I

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>think it was everything is is subtle until it becomes

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>very jumps out absolutely right. So just real quickly, external

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>auditors what how much responsibility should they bear for some

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of these issues? Well, the external auditors have a have

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a tough job to do. I think they're doing probably

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot better job than they were twenty years ago.

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>In the wake of uh in Ron world calm and

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>all the accounting reforms I think they're doing a better job. Again,

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look, many of the of the big corporate

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>scandals we're talking about, even the ones you referred to

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier today, weren't financial reporting frauds. They're not uh, misstatements

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that the external auditors overlooked and until external auditing regulations

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>or standards require them to look beneath the surface at

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>things like culture, at what kind of compliance culture, for example,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a company has. Until those are required, I don't think

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be the ones who identify these things.

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>These are the things that the internal uditors can find.

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Richard Chambers, thanks so much for joining us. Richard Chambers,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>President and chief executive Officer of the Institute of Internal Auditors,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>based down in Altamont Springs, Florida. Thanks for listening to

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. Paul Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa Abram Woyd's I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Woyds One. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio