1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,760
Speaker 1: When The New York Times reported Saturday that during last

2
00:00:02,840 --> 00:00:06,000
Speaker 1: year's presidential campaign, Donald Trump Junior had met with a

3
00:00:06,080 --> 00:00:10,240
Speaker 1: Russian lawyer. Donald Trump Junior first said that the meeting

4
00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:13,800
Speaker 1: was about a Russian adoption program, but he subsequently has

5
00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:16,000
Speaker 1: said that, in fact, he met with the lawyer because

6
00:00:16,079 --> 00:00:19,000
Speaker 1: she said she had information that would be damaging to

7
00:00:19,560 --> 00:00:23,360
Speaker 1: his father's opponent, Hillary Clinton. He's also said that she

8
00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:25,720
Speaker 1: did not, in fact have any information that was useful

9
00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:29,160
Speaker 1: to the campaign, and the meeting I did fairly quickly.

10
00:00:29,720 --> 00:00:32,000
Speaker 1: We'll be talking about the significance of this meeting in

11
00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:37,199
Speaker 1: the ongoing investigations into possible Trump campaign collisions with Russia.

12
00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:40,360
Speaker 1: Our guest today on Bloomberg Law is Bradley Moss, a

13
00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:44,520
Speaker 1: partner at Mark Zad who specializes in national security law.

14
00:00:45,159 --> 00:00:49,960
Speaker 1: Mark Um, let's start with what we actually know about

15
00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:54,400
Speaker 1: this meeting that Donald Trump Junior had with a Russian lawyer. Sure,

16
00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:57,160
Speaker 1: absolutely so. What we have found out that these two

17
00:00:57,160 --> 00:00:59,480
Speaker 1: different reports over the weekend from the New York Times

18
00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:03,600
Speaker 1: is that an acquaintance of Donald Trump Junior, who had

19
00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:07,319
Speaker 1: known the Trump family through the Moscow um this America

20
00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:11,720
Speaker 1: Pastors Universe pageant, their team had recommended that Trump Junior

21
00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:14,720
Speaker 1: meet with this particular Russian lawyer that appears to be

22
00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:17,160
Speaker 1: at least as far as Trump Junior is said, that

23
00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:19,200
Speaker 1: appears to be all they knew, and that the the

24
00:01:19,240 --> 00:01:23,600
Speaker 1: individual allegedly had some damaging information on Hillary Clinton that

25
00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:27,960
Speaker 1: would be abused to the Trump campaign alter improve their prospects.

26
00:01:28,120 --> 00:01:31,760
Speaker 1: We also know that Donald Trump Junior brought Jared Kushner,

27
00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:33,880
Speaker 1: his brother in law and a trusted senior aide to

28
00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,600
Speaker 1: the then candidate now president, as well as Paul Manaford,

29
00:01:37,640 --> 00:01:40,480
Speaker 1: who was the campaign chairman. They all showed up and

30
00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:44,800
Speaker 1: as per Donald Trump Junior's official statement, under the pretext

31
00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:47,680
Speaker 1: that this would this meeting would provide some useful information

32
00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:50,000
Speaker 1: on the using and tillery Clinton. We then know that

33
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:53,680
Speaker 1: it turned out to be nothing burger in terms of information.

34
00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:56,640
Speaker 1: No good information came out of it. The individual was

35
00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:59,880
Speaker 1: really there trying to talk about adoption programs and then

36
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:03,760
Speaker 1: Acnitsky Act and sanctions. Nothing more came of it. That's

37
00:02:03,800 --> 00:02:06,640
Speaker 1: what we now know. What is of concerning is that

38
00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:08,880
Speaker 1: the campaign was willing to have the meeting in the

39
00:02:08,919 --> 00:02:13,040
Speaker 1: first place. So Brad Common Cause has filed a complaint

40
00:02:13,160 --> 00:02:19,040
Speaker 1: with the Justice Department, alleging that Trump's role with the

41
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:23,400
Speaker 1: Trump campaign illegally solicited a political contribution from a foreign

42
00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:27,239
Speaker 1: national in the form of oppositional research information he believed

43
00:02:27,240 --> 00:02:31,079
Speaker 1: would be damaging to the Hillary Clinton campaign. Is that

44
00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:34,519
Speaker 1: a good cause of action? I mean, would you look

45
00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:38,799
Speaker 1: at this and say this is illegal what they did? Well?

46
00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:41,679
Speaker 1: I saw the complaint to come comes up to whatever

47
00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:46,240
Speaker 1: the organization's name is, common cause. Excuse me, yes, I

48
00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:49,079
Speaker 1: saw that. It's an interesting theory. I don't know what

49
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:52,000
Speaker 1: it will hold up under scrutiny. I'm not aware of

50
00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:56,440
Speaker 1: there ever being any precedents for the idea that simply

51
00:02:56,480 --> 00:03:00,880
Speaker 1: receiving APO research, even from a foreign government, would qualify

52
00:03:00,960 --> 00:03:04,000
Speaker 1: as a political contribution under the statute. It would be

53
00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:07,120
Speaker 1: an interesting legal argument to play out. I don't know

54
00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:09,360
Speaker 1: where it would go there, but it does speak to

55
00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:12,080
Speaker 1: quite possibly the need for Congress to address this in

56
00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:16,240
Speaker 1: subsequent amendments to existing campaign finance laws to clarify that

57
00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:20,160
Speaker 1: that if you are receiving this type of opposition research

58
00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:22,959
Speaker 1: from any foreign government, that it would qualify as a

59
00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:27,519
Speaker 1: contribution and be illegal under Agist incredible law. Well, Brad,

60
00:03:27,639 --> 00:03:30,600
Speaker 1: there's a there are these investigations going on. You have

61
00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:34,720
Speaker 1: the Special Counsel UH Robert Mueller looking at whether there

62
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:37,000
Speaker 1: was collusion between the trund campaign and Russia. You have

63
00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:40,640
Speaker 1: the House and Senate intelligence committees. What is the significance

64
00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:42,520
Speaker 1: of this meeting? You said it was troubling that they

65
00:03:42,520 --> 00:03:44,200
Speaker 1: had the meeting at all. What what are this the

66
00:03:44,240 --> 00:03:49,120
Speaker 1: significance of this meeting for those investigations. Sure, so, what

67
00:03:49,280 --> 00:03:52,080
Speaker 1: we have here is the first indication, despite all of

68
00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:55,200
Speaker 1: the denials we've had over the last ten, twelve months,

69
00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,000
Speaker 1: whatever it's been, that they were even willing to try

70
00:03:58,040 --> 00:04:02,160
Speaker 1: to meet with individuals connect did to Russian anyway, Russian nationals,

71
00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:08,280
Speaker 1: Russian Kremlin affiliated individuals, to get information to harm Hillary Clinton.

72
00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:12,080
Speaker 1: There's you know, the line that was always coming out

73
00:04:12,080 --> 00:04:14,400
Speaker 1: of the Trump campaign was we've had no contact with Russia.

74
00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:16,960
Speaker 1: We've had no contacts with Russia. And every time one

75
00:04:16,960 --> 00:04:20,280
Speaker 1: of these stories comes out, they have to revise their explanation.

76
00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:24,200
Speaker 1: First it was Flynn never talked about sensions. Okay, he did,

77
00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:26,400
Speaker 1: and that's why he's now been fired. Then we had

78
00:04:26,480 --> 00:04:29,159
Speaker 1: Kushner never had any meetings. Oh he did, because he

79
00:04:29,600 --> 00:04:32,320
Speaker 1: kept him all off his security clearance. Paperwork. Here's the

80
00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,039
Speaker 1: meetings he had. They were a minor. Trump Junior said,

81
00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:37,520
Speaker 1: we've never had contacts with Russian officials to try to

82
00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:40,440
Speaker 1: get information. Well, now we have information that he at

83
00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:42,160
Speaker 1: least tried to have a meeting to get it. He

84
00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:43,880
Speaker 1: didn't get anything out of it, but he was even

85
00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:47,640
Speaker 1: willing to quote unquote colluded here in order to get

86
00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:51,840
Speaker 1: damaging information from a Russian the fit Russian national which again, Brad,

87
00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,480
Speaker 1: we don't really know, I mean, we don't really know

88
00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:57,279
Speaker 1: what he what any of them got. There's no there's

89
00:04:57,320 --> 00:04:59,760
Speaker 1: no proof of what they got in that meeting. Well,

90
00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:02,720
Speaker 1: you just had their word for it. Correct. And even

91
00:05:02,760 --> 00:05:04,960
Speaker 1: even if we assume for the sake of argument that

92
00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:07,599
Speaker 1: what Trump Junior, that Donald Trump Junior saying is true,

93
00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,400
Speaker 1: that they are nothing came out of the meeting. This

94
00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:12,960
Speaker 1: is only one particular piece. We don't know everything that

95
00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:15,800
Speaker 1: Bob Mueller is finding and that the Congressional community are finding,

96
00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:18,640
Speaker 1: but we do have now from a public standpoint, and

97
00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:22,360
Speaker 1: what's already in the public uh realm is an indication that,

98
00:05:22,440 --> 00:05:26,479
Speaker 1: despite all the denials, they were actually willing to meet

99
00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:31,000
Speaker 1: with individuals from Russia who ties to the Kremlin. Who

100
00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:33,080
Speaker 1: were going to be able to or at least reclaiming

101
00:05:33,400 --> 00:05:35,800
Speaker 1: they were gonna be able to give them damaging information. So,

102
00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:41,880
Speaker 1: despite all the professions professing protestations of innocence, every time

103
00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:43,680
Speaker 1: we get one of these we find there was something

104
00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:46,719
Speaker 1: more to it. Despite their claims of no collusion, no collusion,

105
00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:50,440
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Junior met with a Russian lawyer because he

106
00:05:50,520 --> 00:05:53,520
Speaker 1: was told that she had damaging information on Hillary Clinton

107
00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:57,040
Speaker 1: during last year's presidential campaign. He says it turned out

108
00:05:57,080 --> 00:06:00,640
Speaker 1: to be nothing but campaign manager Paul Manaph and Trump's

109
00:06:00,640 --> 00:06:03,400
Speaker 1: son in law Jared Kushner, who is now working for

110
00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:05,320
Speaker 1: the president in the White House. We're at the meeting,

111
00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:09,400
Speaker 1: and now Common Causes file the complaint claiming that Trump

112
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:12,400
Speaker 1: Junior violated federal law by having the meeting in the

113
00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:17,120
Speaker 1: first place. Additionally, it's expected that investigators such as the

114
00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:22,560
Speaker 1: special the Special Investigator Robert Mueller, and congressional investigators at

115
00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:25,479
Speaker 1: the House and State Intelligence committees will be looking at

116
00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:29,600
Speaker 1: the meeting. We are talking about Donald Trump Juniors meeting

117
00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:33,240
Speaker 1: with this Russian lawyer with Bradley Moss, a partner at

118
00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:39,880
Speaker 1: Mark Z who specializes the national security law. Brad Donald

119
00:06:39,920 --> 00:06:42,880
Speaker 1: Trump Junior says that this is a normal thing for

120
00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:46,120
Speaker 1: campaign officials to do to try to get information on

121
00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:50,120
Speaker 1: the other candidate. Is is this true? Is this an

122
00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:54,279
Speaker 1: appropriate thing for him to have done to take this meeting? Okay,

123
00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:57,080
Speaker 1: so yeah, I saw that comment, and the simple answer is,

124
00:06:57,120 --> 00:07:00,000
Speaker 1: you know, here's the distinction between what Donald Trump Junior

125
00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:03,359
Speaker 1: is trying to reference and what actually occurred. It is,

126
00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:06,360
Speaker 1: of course comment that campaigns will try to get opposition

127
00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:11,040
Speaker 1: research on their political opponent. What is not normal, and

128
00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:14,280
Speaker 1: what is very controversial here is that it was coming

129
00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:18,680
Speaker 1: from foreign nationals, and particularly here foreign nationals who had

130
00:07:18,920 --> 00:07:23,520
Speaker 1: alleged ties to the Russian government. So if this, you know,

131
00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:25,280
Speaker 1: and there's there's been a lot of talk about, well

132
00:07:25,320 --> 00:07:28,840
Speaker 1: that something happened similar two thousand, when um a copy

133
00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:33,080
Speaker 1: of George W. Bush's briefing tapes and memos for the

134
00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:36,960
Speaker 1: upcoming presidential debates back then was inadvertently sent to uh

135
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:40,680
Speaker 1: an Al Gore staffer, the Gore campaign did properly what

136
00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:43,160
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign did not do here. The Gore campaign

137
00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:46,880
Speaker 1: immediately gave the documentation to the lawyers, and the lawyers

138
00:07:46,880 --> 00:07:50,320
Speaker 1: gave it to the FBI. If Donald Trump Jr. Got

139
00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:54,040
Speaker 1: this meeting request through this acquaintance, saying we've got damaging

140
00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:58,600
Speaker 1: information that indicates Hillary Clinton is getting illegal contributions from

141
00:07:58,600 --> 00:08:01,960
Speaker 1: the Russian government. A proper course of action would have

142
00:08:02,400 --> 00:08:05,800
Speaker 1: been to notify the FBI and the FEC, or to

143
00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:09,680
Speaker 1: simply decline the meeting entirely and tell Mr Goldstone, who

144
00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:11,720
Speaker 1: was setting up the meeting, tell your client to go

145
00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:14,360
Speaker 1: to the FBI. We don't want to be anywhere near this.

146
00:08:14,640 --> 00:08:16,520
Speaker 1: The fact that he was willing to even take that

147
00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:20,480
Speaker 1: meeting speaks to the naivety and the incompetence of how

148
00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:23,400
Speaker 1: that campaign was run. And we have some breaking news

149
00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:27,120
Speaker 1: NBC reporting that the Senate Intelligence Committee has said that

150
00:08:27,160 --> 00:08:30,520
Speaker 1: they will be meeting with Trump campaign officials this week

151
00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:34,440
Speaker 1: in the Russia investigation. Of course, US Senator Susan Collins

152
00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:38,000
Speaker 1: of Maine had mentioned just this morning that they wanted

153
00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:40,200
Speaker 1: to meet with them, and it's going to happen. Brat.

154
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:44,120
Speaker 1: I want to talk about the security clearance question for

155
00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:48,560
Speaker 1: a moment. Jared Kushner had not disclosed any foreign contexts

156
00:08:48,640 --> 00:08:52,320
Speaker 1: in the confidential form required once it was discovered, like

157
00:08:52,400 --> 00:08:55,440
Speaker 1: a g Sessions and MANA Ford and Flynn. He says

158
00:08:55,480 --> 00:09:00,079
Speaker 1: it's a mistake and revises it should he or it

159
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:04,640
Speaker 1: he under normal circumstances, and another administration lose his access

160
00:09:04,760 --> 00:09:08,040
Speaker 1: to classified information. Because of this, everyone just seems to

161
00:09:08,040 --> 00:09:12,560
Speaker 1: be forgetting and it's okay, it's fine, yeah, it's it's

162
00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:14,920
Speaker 1: good to be the King's son. When it comes to

163
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:18,280
Speaker 1: Jared Kushner, what what what he did here? In terms

164
00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:21,000
Speaker 1: of submitting a standard form eighties six, which is a

165
00:09:21,080 --> 00:09:24,400
Speaker 1: questionnaire that everywhere anyone who gets security clearance has to submit.

166
00:09:24,640 --> 00:09:28,319
Speaker 1: It's a very lengthy, hundred plus page document, and you

167
00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:32,240
Speaker 1: submit it under penalty of what's called eighteen USC one

168
00:09:32,280 --> 00:09:35,480
Speaker 1: thousand one, which is a federal offense, a felony of

169
00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:39,880
Speaker 1: a felony offense if you have knowingly provided false and

170
00:09:39,960 --> 00:09:43,480
Speaker 1: material information. To have given that informent, to have submitted

171
00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:46,760
Speaker 1: that form, signed it, and then come back and said, oh, whoop, sorry,

172
00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:50,959
Speaker 1: I completely forgot to provide any information about foreign contacts

173
00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:53,040
Speaker 1: would get laughed out of the room. If there was

174
00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:55,679
Speaker 1: a rank and file person, it would never work like that.

175
00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:59,400
Speaker 1: They'd never be allowed to just resubmit documentation and no

176
00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:03,360
Speaker 1: one else can questions. But when it comes to politically

177
00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:06,760
Speaker 1: connected individuals and someone his senior level as Mr Kushner,

178
00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:09,960
Speaker 1: who obviously has the political ties to the President himself.

179
00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:13,200
Speaker 1: You find that the rules are whatever the President wants

180
00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:17,520
Speaker 1: them to be. Well, some people have called Bradford, Jared

181
00:10:17,559 --> 00:10:20,640
Speaker 1: Kushner's security clearance to be revoked, even before we knew

182
00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,560
Speaker 1: that he was in this meeting, or at least it

183
00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:28,280
Speaker 1: appeared that he was in this meeting. Should it be revoked? Well,

184
00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:30,960
Speaker 1: it's a discretionary call. I mean, there would be certainly

185
00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:32,880
Speaker 1: something if if you were one of my clients, I

186
00:10:32,880 --> 00:10:35,880
Speaker 1: would be I wouldn't be surprised if the clearance was

187
00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:39,600
Speaker 1: put under review and possibly revoked going through the normal

188
00:10:40,320 --> 00:10:43,800
Speaker 1: investigatory and appeals process. I actually handled lots of those cases,

189
00:10:43,800 --> 00:10:46,960
Speaker 1: included people who made mistakes fart less severe than what

190
00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:49,840
Speaker 1: Mr Kushner did. But in this context, all them, all

191
00:10:49,880 --> 00:10:52,120
Speaker 1: the members of Congress, can make all the calls they

192
00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:55,400
Speaker 1: want for Jared Kushner's clearance to be revoked. Nothing's going

193
00:10:55,440 --> 00:10:58,240
Speaker 1: to happen. As long as the President says he wants

194
00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,079
Speaker 1: Jared Kushner to have access, there was nothing anyone can

195
00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:04,400
Speaker 1: do to override the president in that contact. Brad if

196
00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:07,200
Speaker 1: you were in the Senate Intel Committee meeting, what would

197
00:11:07,200 --> 00:11:10,520
Speaker 1: be the first question that you would ask of the

198
00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:14,800
Speaker 1: participants in this UH, the in this meeting with the

199
00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:20,040
Speaker 1: Russian lawyer, why on earth did you ever agree to

200
00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:24,079
Speaker 1: have that meeting in the first place. I mean, it's

201
00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:26,240
Speaker 1: it's a simple that it's not as a meeting. You

202
00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:28,920
Speaker 1: never take when you know that the person who is

203
00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:33,480
Speaker 1: allegedly allegedly has damaging information is a foreign national. You

204
00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:36,000
Speaker 1: don't come across. You don't walk up to that gray line.

205
00:11:36,080 --> 00:11:38,680
Speaker 1: You don't play games with it. You refer them, say

206
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:41,079
Speaker 1: to the FBI, say take it to the FBI, take

207
00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:43,640
Speaker 1: it to the FBC. We don't want to be anywhere

208
00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:45,960
Speaker 1: near at this. If it's you know, if it's a

209
00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:49,240
Speaker 1: U S nationals for corporation who says we've got something now, okay,

210
00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:52,400
Speaker 1: then maybe you've got something. You don't play games with

211
00:11:52,679 --> 00:11:58,480
Speaker 1: campaigns and elections and foreign nationals. You're begging for trouble. Well,

212
00:11:58,520 --> 00:12:01,480
Speaker 1: our thanks to Bradley us, a partner at Mark Zaid,

213
00:12:01,840 --> 00:12:05,679
Speaker 1: for being with us today to talk about this meeting

214
00:12:05,679 --> 00:12:08,000
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump Junior had with Russian nationals and the

215
00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:12,680
Speaker 1: implications for UH. The investigations into the Trump camp canes,

216
00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:16,080
Speaker 1: possible collusion and whether This was appropriate, Thanks very much.

217
00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:18,920
Speaker 1: Coming up on Bloomberg Law, we're gonna be talking about

218
00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:23,200
Speaker 1: an interesting settlement by the Canadian government. Interesting being an

219
00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:27,400
Speaker 1: an understated word. The Canadian government has paid a large

220
00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:30,200
Speaker 1: sum of money to a Canadian citizen who is held

221
00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:33,720
Speaker 1: at Guantanamo Bay and said that he because they say

222
00:12:33,840 --> 00:12:37,400
Speaker 1: they violated his rights when they questioned him. That's coming

223
00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:42,120
Speaker 1: up on Bloomberg Law. Straight ahead with Michael Best in June. Grasso, Grasso,

224
00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:43,439
Speaker 1: this is Bloomberg