WEBVTT - This Is What Sanctions Can Do to the Russian Economy

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. So, Tracy, our

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>last episode was of course with a Saltan postar, and

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we talked quite a bit about the sanctions, the sort

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of the economic pressure that the US and Europe are

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>putting on Russia over the war. However, it really seems

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like there's a lot more to dive into with respect

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to the mechanics and power of the sanctions themselves. Oh

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, I'm getting I'm getting flashbacks to doing international

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>relations stuff at university. But yes, there's a lot to

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>do and say when it comes to sanctions, And of course,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the the overarching question has always been do they actually

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>make much of a difference. And on the one hand,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in the past, um I guess week

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>or so is that they can be very dramatic and clearly,

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the space of a few days, the

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>US and its allies has basically created a financial crisis

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in Russia. But on the other hand, Russia is still

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>invading Ukraine, and there's the question of what happens next

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>now that you've ratcheted up this kind of financial pressure, right,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And there's the fact that even with the sanctions, Russia

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>is getting tons of cash every single day, largely from

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a Germany and other Central European players who are deeply

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>reliant on Russian energy, in particular natural gas, but also

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>call which of course raises the question of ken European

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>countries can the U S impose effective sanctions that accomplish

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>something against Russia when at the same time particular Europe

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is so dependent on Russian exports. Absolutely, I think having

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a big commodities exporter involved here obviously complicates everything, especially

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>at a time when people are worried about inflation. But

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I will say, and I think I

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this on the episode with Sultan, but the other

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing here is people have been reacting preemptively to

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the threat of sanctions, so sort of voluntarily self sanctioning themselves.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, on on the day after the invasion

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>officially began, we saw a lot of people in the

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>market just step away from Russian assets altogether simply because

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know what was and wasn't going to be impacted.

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And to some extent that's continued today. So yes, we

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>still have Europe in particular Germany importing a lot of energy.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>But we've seen some other players, you know, some commodities

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>traders in Singapore for instance, voluntarily step away from the market. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And then there's another element which is also sort of

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>volunteer wish is just not necessarily fear sanctions, but companies

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>just deciding, you know what, we're going to wash our

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hands of anything to do with Russia. And yeah, it's

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty striking, this sort of like domino or cascading effect

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>of companies saying we just don't want to have any involvement,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>we want to completely walk away. You know, I don't

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>think the Russian economy has boomed in recent years, so

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not as though, you know, perhaps this is not

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge source of revenue and profits for a lot

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of these companies. But it is really striking to see

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>so many corporate interests abandoning the Russian economy right now,

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>even apart from like formal sanctions related activity. Absolutely, so

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>many different threads to pull here, that's key. And as

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>long as uh, the US and the rest of the

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of NATO does not want to get involved directly

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 1>militarily for obvious reasons, then of course sanctions and other

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>related things become the primary means of putting pressure on Russia,

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So we have to dive into the sanctions, how they work,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and what they accomplish. Further, we're going to be speaking

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>with a sanctions researcher a lot of background in this area.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be speaking to Eduardo se Eduardo, thank you

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us, Thank you so much for

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>having So why don't we start off big picture? You know, what,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in your view are the key elements. There have been

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>tons of announcements really over the last week. What are

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the key most important things in your view that have

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>been announced so far. I'd say there are a few

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of them. I think the big one to start is

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the action against the Russian Central Bank that was initially

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>discussed as kind of a final escalatory move, and the

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that it came so early in the escalation is

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a sign of how serious governments on both sides of

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic were about sanctioning Russia. But I think the

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>other big ones, the other biggest one, i'd say, are

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the banking sanctions. Those are the ones that have the

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>most defeat immediate effect, and they have been quite aggressive,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's still room for escalation there, but the spur

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Bank can VTB where the two biggest targets there, and

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>they were the kind of most extreme type of especially

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in the VTP side, the most extreme type of sanction

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that the United States can impose. I'd say there are

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>other ones that are very notable, but their effect is

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in kind of the overnight panic that we're seeing, so

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not the kind of em causing ones. But I

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>think there's other notable steps which are remarkable in terms

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of how the United States thinks about sanctions. So, for example,

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>things like the United States is currently leading this global

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>export control initiative basically meant to cripple the arrival of

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>inputs for the Russian industry. Each country is doing them

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>slightly differently, but it's kind of a remarkable thing because

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we tend to think of US sanctions as primarily focused

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>on financial mechanisms, but here from the start they've targeted

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of physical inputs and supply chains as well. So

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this actually brings me to the question that I want

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, and I think it's kind of a

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>basic question, but one of those basic questions that probably

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>has an extremely long answer, But how does sanctions policy

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>making actually happen. So you know, someone sits in a room,

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>presumably there's a committee or something, and they look at

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the available suite of previous sanctions actions that they've done

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on regimes like Iran or Hong Kong or whatever, and

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>try to decide about what would be most effective or

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>most applicable to the Russian situation. How exactly does it work? Yeah,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's accurate description. In the United States sanctions

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the kind of two offices that the two agencies that

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>handle sanctions are the Treasury Department and the State Department.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>The Treasury Department, i'd say, is the more in the

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>weeds technical department. So you probably heard in these days about,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>oh fact, the Office of Foreign Asset Control that is

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>within the Treasury Department, whereas the State Department handles a

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>as sanctions, it's specifically handles So for example, the decision

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to sanction ords from the other day, it was actually

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>taken by the State Department rather than Treasury Department. But

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a quirk of u S sanctions long

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'd say it's a kind of trial and error

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and discovery process. So people are describing the sanctions these

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>days as unprecedented. I wouldn't say they're unprecedented in the

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>sense that they have never done before. What's unprecedented, it's

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of the speed and impact and kind of how

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>cooes together they've been and how much they've shaken the

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Russian economy. There are precedents for what the United States

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>has done. So for example, the bank, the Central Bank

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of Iran has previously been sanctioned, so this is the

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>first time a central bank is sanctions. So there are

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, there are I would say there is

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a sense of escalatory measures you can take.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>If you think of sanctions, the most traditional kind of

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>basic form of sanction is the individual, especially the so

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>called STN sanctions, So it's against an individual, and so

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that basically means they don't have access to their assets.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Their assets are frozen. So in the basic sense, your

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>bank accounts are frozen and you probably can't come to

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And that's for example, what they did

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 1>against the putin the other day. That's kind of the

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>most basic building block. Usually that's what you see when

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you hear in the news sanctions are being posed in

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>response to a crisis. That's more likely than not what

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about because they're pretty easy to impose

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and they don't have massive macroeconomic effects, and then from

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>there you can kind of move up. You can put

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>these so called blocking sanctions where you block the assets

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on corporations, and that can have a significant effect. So

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, that kind of depends on the target. So

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're sanctioning VTB, which is a major Russian bank,

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>it will clearly have a massive effect. If you're sanctioning

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the around case, it was often sanctioned small kind

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of satellite entities that we're doing something in the nuclear

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>program that doesn't necessarily have a macroeconomicist location, and then

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>from there you can kind of move bond and people.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot of innovation in sanctions from program

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to programs. So for example, the Russian sanctions that had

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>been imposed were an attempt to break out of the

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>normal escalation ladder. So the sense there was these blocking

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctions were would be too too blunt and would have

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>too much of a backlash. And the idea there, for example,

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>as they impost sectoral sanctions, so rather than targeting an

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>entire company, they just imposed limitations on what those companies

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>could do. Americans couldn't buy certain forms of debt and

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>equity from those companies, or couldn't provide certain services, and

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>so that's just the way you can refine it. But

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say more generally, there is a sense of

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>depending on the seriousness of the situation, you can kind

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of move up the ladder and i'd say Central Bank,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the swift measure that has been in the

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>news would be towards the upper end, at least in

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the financial sanctions side. So you know, obviously there perhaps

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it was some whole that sanctions or the threat of

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>sanctions at least would have some sort of deterrent effect

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>against this war. It hasn't happened. The war has happened.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>In general, it feels that those sanctions often get placed

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and stay for a long time and often don't seem

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to it's not obvious what the effect is, but what

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is the theory of what the sanctions are supposed to

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>accomplish and how so The basic theory, especially now that

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the deterrent theory is off the table, is

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>that sanctions are a bargaining tool. You impose certain costs

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>and say, if you acceed to our demand, we will

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>stop imposing these costs. So it's the basic theory is

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple, but it gets very complicated very fast because

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the ask is not always clear, and I think the

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>off ramp is not always clear, so people will kind

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of make up new new goals and new ass says

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they go. So it's very hard, especially in kind of

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a live conflict, to know what you're asking for. Some

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Russia case, now, one of the big challenges

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>will be what would we consider enough for us to

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>impose the sanctions, And as of now, I truly don't know.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there isn't a unified transatlantic view on

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>what what would be enough for lifting the sanctions. And

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the other thing which is sometimes ignored is that you

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have to hold up your own end of the bargain.

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So say say we said in order to lift sanctions

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>or you would need Russia would need to return to

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the situation we had on Jan one, then the United

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>States and Europe will need to actually deliver the relief

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>from sanctions effectively and basically try to restore Russia's economy

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>to one. And that that that is very challenging because

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>sanctions the United States issues these regulations. But then it's

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the businesses that decide how to react with them. So,

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, BP has decided to exit Russia, the United

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>States can't necessarily make BP return to Russia if Russia complies,

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's often can be very challenging. The private sector

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is hyper challenging to do the carrot side of the sanctions,

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>whereas the stick is kind of is very quick. Companies

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are much more responsive to the threat of US punishment

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>than they are too kind of requests by the United

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>States to rekindle relations during the Irround deal. When the

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Around deal was passed, then Secretary of State carry would

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>actually go around Europe and speak to banks and say,

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we've lifted the sanctions, please rekindle your business in Irun,

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and the bank's kind of bulked at it for all

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>sorts of reasons, because it's very difficult to convince the

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>other side that you're doing your best, and then they

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like they kind of got a raw deal because

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they complied that they didn't necessarily get all the bend

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>as they were promised. So this is exactly what I

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you, because again, even before a lot

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of these sanctions were formally announced, we did see various

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>companies financial institutions start to step away from the market,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, suddenly you have Russian companies, um you know,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>whether they're logistics networks or commodities exporters, things like that,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>unable to get credit from their banks even though technically

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing has happened yet. How much of that friction is

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess, beneficial to sanctions actually being implemented and enforced

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>versus how much of it is unhelpful in the sense

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that it it sort of accidentally escalates the situation and may,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>as you just pointed out, be difficult to reverse if

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the deal is actually reached. I think it's a very

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>much a double edged sword. It's it's definitely helpful because

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to fully calibrate ones actions and in that

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sense you can kind of maximize the shock and all

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, and in that sense it's it's a

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>positive I guess. I mean, it's it's nice to know

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that the United States doesn't necessary if everyone imposed the

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sanctions followed the exact letter of the law of sanctions,

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sanctions would be kind of an unwieldy measure because you

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>would actually have to think through every single thing you're

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to block. So in that sense, it would be

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>impossible to administer a program where you did that. There

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>have been cases where companies are extremely forward leaning in

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of interpreting things exactly, and that can be counterproductive.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I think it's a it's a

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>big concern the overcompliance concerned, as you said, first of all,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>because things can very quickly spin out of control. I mean,

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, it feels if there was all this

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of excitement about how much was happening in Russia,

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>but and Russia kind of I would say, in this

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>situation made it warranted because it continued with it's uh,

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's advance. But in a situation where Russia had paused

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and the bank runs had continued, you would have had

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a difficult, difficult situation. And I think it's very hard

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on the back end to incredibly deliver the relief. So

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very difficult. I think the current situation

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a unique one because at least not

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>for now, everyone is hoping that this confrontation will be

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>fairly short. People don't see this as necessarily an attrition

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>along like multi year Iran type situation, So I think

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>people are there is a concern over compliance can be

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a good way to very quickly dial up and then

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>dial down. But if you're trying to be more calibrated

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and negotiate, I think you would be concerned. So I

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's a huge problem. And it's always easy to

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome over compliance at the front and then forget that

0:15:50.880 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to deal with on the back. So at

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this point, because we discussed, obviously the deterrent element didn't work,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and so in theory, you know, you continue to apply

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>stress and continue to offer out the chance of okay.

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully in theory this this gets reversed if Russia reverses

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>its actions. What about just the uh, the persistent damage.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, the Russia is going to continue to

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have at least for now cash coming in through the

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>energy market. Could it be that the sanctions just imposed

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>such weakness that it has to it has to backtrack

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in some way because the damage compounds to its economy,

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>compounds to its banking system and so forth. Could it

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be that the penalty the sanctions weapon is so harsh

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that it essentially forces Russia is forced into some sort

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of reversal. It definitely could. I mean, I think that's

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the hope that it forces some sort of reversal, And

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>as far as everything that's happened up to now, I'd say,

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to impose pain to force a reversal,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this you're getting what you wanted. And I mean, there's

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>still more one can do, but it has been very

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>successful the sanctions. I feels if it's kind of like

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>people talk about kind of the economy in general. Bad

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>things happened to economies all the time, but they don't

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>just stop existing. They kind of address and moddel along.

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Like Russia defaulted, it kind of picked up the pieces

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it was bad, and they keep going. So sometimes I

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think during sanctions conversations, but in general there's the sense

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's like a final blow you're gonna deal, or

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>some moments some point of no return. I read recently

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>some really interesting comparisons of the Russia sanctions to the

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Iran and the Venezuela sanctions, and in that sense that

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>those are concerning precedents because in those cases the country

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is kind of muddled along. So for example, Iran lost

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>access to its reserves and it's still kind of had

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 1>to consolidate. There was the economy shrank, but it kind

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of muddled along. It really energy became a smaller part

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of its economy, manufacturing mostly domestic focus became a bigger one,

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was able to kind of build some semblance

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of an economy that could work. In the Venezuela case,

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there were aggressive oil sanctions and really harmed the Venezula

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>oil sector, but eventually the oil sector kind of came back.

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, it's hard to imagine a situation

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>where you kind of deal some final blow, in which

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>case you have the country has no chance or no

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>option but to negotiate. But at the same time you

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>can inflict a lot of pain, and at least in

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the Iran case, the country has been willing to negotiate

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to get outside of sanctions. So in that sense you

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>can define only use sanctions to get to do I

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>would just say that the economic pain itself is not

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the only factor. That it ultimately comes down to politics.

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So what are the kind of internal constituencies that are

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>willing to bargain and what can you Are you willing

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to accept what they have to offer, and can you

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>give them what they want? So just on this note,

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the idea of the US actually targeting specific

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>sectors while trying to leave others, you know, relatively untouched,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>such as energy or commodities. How does that change I

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 1>guess the efficacy of sanctions and what kind of impact

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>would you expect that to have on the Russian economy.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Would that be something like what we saw in Iran,

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>where energy starts to become well, I guess in this

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>case energy would become an even more important factor in

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy, or would you start to see Russia try

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to I don't know, offset some of the the impacts

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of the sanctions. First of all, the United It's true

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that the US and Europe stayed away from directly targeting energy,

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and they've kind of they've tried to be pretty explicit

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>about it. So for example, in the United States case,

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they've added licenses which are basically exceptions the sanctions saying

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>certain transactions are allowed. And for example, within the Russian

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank sanctions, within VTB and spur Bank they've allowed

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>energy transactions. But I think in terms of kind of

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the over compliance and all that, I think it's very

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to say that the current sanctions aren't hitting energy.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I was just seeing right before the show

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that Russian oil is trading at a discount. Financial institutions

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>deals with commodities aren't as a forthcoming with letters of credit,

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and there was an announcement from shipping companies to that

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not they might be peeling away from energy. So

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, I think there will be an effect directly,

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, compared to Iran, Russia's about thirty or so

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of it of its government budget comes from energy,

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the around case that was in the six

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>piece of The interesting thing about thinking about the reliance

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>on energy is that I mentioned kind of the big,

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>big ticket sanctions, but some of the other ones that

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have been imposed are meant to target long term energy production. Uh.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of these started actually, and the idea there was exactly,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>let's not target energy right now because we would be

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>able to withstand it, but let's make it so Russia

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>has more trouble getting the technology it needs, getting the

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>funding it needs for its kind of frontier project. So

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, Russia might struggle with replacing its reserves,

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and in that sense energy might decline as a part

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of its economy just because it's not able to put

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>put in the investment. In that context, the departure of

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it's part of companies like Shell and Equino or n

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>VP might be potentially further law of kind of human

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>capital or expertise that could harm the energy prospects of

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Russian economy over the medium to long term. So

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit more about that

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because the introduction, you said, one of the things that

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>you found striking. It's like, Okay, we all expect the

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>financial sanctions, but this sort of export controls limiting Russia's

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>access to factors of production, perhaps some intermediate stage goods

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>that would really undermine Russian industry. What specifically has been

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>announced in that respect, What are the areas of sort

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of our Russian economy, maybe be the energy or elsewhere

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they will really be affected by some of these new limitations.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>There's some differences between the US and the EU here.

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>The United States said it's mostly focused on defense and aerospace,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's specifically it mentioned so far that it planned

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of limit inputs like semi conductors and lasers

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and other parts to the defense and aerospace. The European

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and seems more focused on a broader variety of of

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>components targeting the energy sector as well. We've been coming

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at this very much from I guess the sort of

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>external side, like from the perspective of the US and Europe.

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But what can Russia actually do here to offset sanctions impact?

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's been a lot of talk about

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what role China could play, um if any, in all

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of this, and the idea that maybe Russia can look

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to China for for some type of credit. So what

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of response might we expect here. The short term

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>response is kind of what we saw the other day

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with the rays of raids and kind of the capital controls.

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Over time, I think it will be primarily about turning inward,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of finding domestic sources of demand, and I mean

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the energy aside of it may change, but kind of

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>encouraging capital to stay in. I think other sanctions we've

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>seen in these days has been the targeting of the

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>oligarchs and people close to Putin. The one potential scenario

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of a full repatriation to the extent

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're able to of their assets and kind of

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 1>like new sources of capital within the Russian economy, all

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>looking inward in terms of relationships with China. I think

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>something that was interesting in the context of the comparison

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>with Iran. That I saw was that Russia right now

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is much less exposed to China, and then say Iran

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was just because Russia, Russia historically has been very tied

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to the West compared to Iran. So and that's that

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>there is like an opportunity to kind of reorient the

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>entire economy east rather than West, and so that could

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>be one way to kind of break the connection with Europe.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I think, well two things.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, these things are take time, and right

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>now we're still in the adjustment phase. It seems like

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia will have ways to stabilize as the rouble in

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the short term. It seems difficult to me from a

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>sanctions perspective, what you don't want is the so called

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Cuba scenario where sanctions stay in place wherever you kind

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of you don't have right now. The United States has

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>been admirable in the fact that it's been able to

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>be extremely multilateral and so bring on the countries like

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland that are historically neutral, for example. The risk is

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the longer this goes on, the less multilateralism there is,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and more kind of countries start to break away, start

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to re engage with Russia, and then you kind of

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have this situation where there's a complete blockade against Russia

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>from one part of the world, but it's not enough

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to completely undo kind of unmake Russia's economy bringing to

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the bargaining table, and the economy kind of readjust like

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Europeans go to Cuba all the time, it kind of

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>readjusts towards these So that's I think the thing everyone

0:25:56.200 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is really wants to avoid. So my sense of the

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>goal right now is to try to impose so much

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>pain that there is in the ability to remake oneself

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and kind of adjust, because otherwise the adjustment you could

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of end up in this worst of both worlds

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>where you don't necessarily achieve your goal, you don't achieve

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>your goals, you're cutting off a major part of the economy,

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're kind of re orienting a major part of

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>the economy away from you. So for me, I struggle

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to imagine anyone wanting the current situation to be long term,

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think the hope is to reach a deal.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So how as of right now, and we're you know,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we're barely a week into this war and the announcement

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>of sanctions. How surprised are you by the level of

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>unity and the completeness of the I mean, as you

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned even Switzerland neutral Switzerland is involved by this sort

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of the unanimity on the part of European powers in

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the US in the sanctions. And how does that compared

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to other ones in terms of unanimity versus say when

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>a dealing with Iron and others. I think it's extremely impressive.

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was unexpected. I mean both the Switzer

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and then Singapore's joining, which has kind of been kind

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of unique cases. But in general, if you think about

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the way sanctions work within the European Union is that

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you need unonumity of all twenty seven countries. It's not

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a majority decision. So even with getting the European on

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>board for anything really requires getting twenty seven members on board.

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And you saw it over this weekend where it would

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be kind of one off reports Italy okay with Swift

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>cut off. Hungary not opposed to Swift cut off. So

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, it's a really challenging diplomatic struggle. And

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been amazing to see how much that

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States was able to get everyone on board

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of kind of looking at in precedent. First

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of all, I would say there are small differences between

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>think everyone does minor adjustments or my carve outs, I

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>think in some cases, and some of this is just

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the way kind of the way these work is that

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>every country sits it in a room and kind of

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>writes out there the same press release and then releases it.

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Everyone does it a bit at the same time, a

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>bit differently. The United States, say, released its central Bank sanctions,

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they agreed to them over the weekend, but then the

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>United States rules came out before the European world, So

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>for temple of the the United States have a carve out

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that Europe doesn't have, and I think that's to be expected.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's kind of a it's kind of a funny

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>process in that sense that it kind of all comes

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>together on the fly, and even more so now where

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not multi month or multi year escalation process, but

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a matter of hours everything changes. So in that sense,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been pretty amazing. I think it's kind

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of a speed run of the Iran sanctions in that sense.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So the classic dynamic during the Iran sanctions tended to

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 1>be that someone wanted to escalate, some party within the

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>United States wanted to escalate Iran sanctions, that they would

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>push it, and usually it was something at that point unprecedented,

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and so then the administration, which tended to be more

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>concerned about things like Dallar dominant or getting along with allies,

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would push back. But eventually there would be enough momentum

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for the kind of hawkish next step, so targeting the

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>around Central Bank or trying to target Iranian oil exports,

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and so eventually the United States would kind of get

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>on board with it, and then it would there be

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of friction with the EU that you would complain

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>about overreach by the United States or lack of engagement

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with EU equities, etcetera. And then eventually the EU would

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of either fully join or kind of make itself

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with it, and so that's kind of how it

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>would go. And then the kind of final step was

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the working with China. So China would not necessarily fully

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>agree with the sanctions, that definitely wouldn't say it was complying,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but China would maybe make some adjust mints and kind

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of conform or not too overtly go against US schools.

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Now you're kind of seeing this extremely fast. So someone

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>floats an idea with the Russia thing last week, So

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>before the invasion fully started, you had all these ideas

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>central Bank and the correspondent banking targeting olive arts, and

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they were kind of floating in the either and then

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States does something. Europe bulks, but then it

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>moves faster than in the central Bank sanctions. Actually, initially

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like the United States was going to take

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a soft through approach, and in that case it was

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>actually vonder Ley and speech that seemed to be a

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more forward leaning. So that sense, you're seeing everything

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>move very quickly. And I think the current, like the

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>final decision on Swift is kind of an example, this

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>gradual campaign all building up to kind of a big decision.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's been admirable. It's kind of interesting

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you see how much diplomacy matters, but you also see

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>how much the technical questions matter because so much of

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of getting it's making the details compatible

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but also ensuring that domestic politics are feasible by carving

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>out what you need to come. You used a phrase

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>just then for the sake of dollar dominance. And this

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is something that has come up in our episode with

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Salton Poser, and I've also seen some comments from other

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>commentators about it. But on the one hand, you have

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the US using its position in the global financial system

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to heap enormous amounts of pressure on Russia to try

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to get it to do something that it wants. On

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, it seems to have given rise, I guess,

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to a question of whether or not people are going

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to want to either do business with the US or

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>maintain assets in dollars if they know that, you know,

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>if they get into a situation of tensions with the US,

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that they could actually lose control or access to those

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>various assets. So I guess my question is what does

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>all of this mean for the long term position of

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States and the dollar in the financial system.

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of the million dollar question that has

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been kind of one of the ongoing questions in sanctions

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>among sancts and practitioners. Two of the current people in

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>government working on the sanctions actually wrote a report on

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.959
<v Speaker 1>will sanctions threatened the result of the dollar? So everyone

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the government is very much thinking about this issue.

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be very skeptical about the sanctions threat

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to dollar dominance. I mean, first of all, I will say,

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like the way dollar dominance usually comes up in these

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>conversations isn't because of some empirical threat to the dollar,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's more of a way of kind of arguing

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>against the sanctions without arguing against the sanctions. So you're

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not saying, I think this this measure is bad because

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it won't achieve its goal. You kind of have this

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>banking shot argument where you say, actually, we shouldn't do

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this measure because of dollar dominance. So that's kind of that.

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I tend to kind of be skeptical of the argument

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just because that's it's not often like very informed. I

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think by it's most informed by kind of policy differences

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>within the sanctions community. I mean, it's been something people

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>have been worrying about for a long time. Like Jack

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.239
<v Speaker 1>lou when he was secretary, gave a speech saying, if

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we keep using this, it will be a threat. And

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean the United States keeps it does keep

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>escalating and its use of it. I mean there have

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>been kind of all these things. There was one point

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in the kind of tens they were all these massive

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>fines against foreign banks, and people would complain. At one point,

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>President Holland asked President Obama not define B and P

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Perry BA too much. So like, in a sense like

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it is like a big liability in a sense that

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like the United States has this control and it almost

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what to do with it day to day. So,

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the afghan you recently saw the United

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>States made that decision about the Afghanians assets held at

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the New York FED. In a sense like dollar dominance

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>itself is kind of a huge imposition in the United

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>States because it needs to make these decisions that it's

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily it might not want to make. So for example,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the buying administration having to choose between sending money aid

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to Afghanistan and keeping in the United States because technically

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the money is in the United States, and so nine

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>eleven victims families could sue and take the money from

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the New York FED. I guess we're generally I would

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>say that dollar dominance has been people have been worrying

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about it for a long time. I'd say the last

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>biggest worry was during the U s unilateral exit from

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the Iran Deal, and that to me at the time,

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>there was all sorts of fears because the Iran Deal sanctions.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>The Iran sanctions really leverage it. Like the biggest thing

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they do is they force they don't allow Iran to

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>export oil, and so you really have to lean on

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar dominance to pressure like third party countries not to

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 1>import Iranian oil. And so there was a sense that

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that might be the breaking point, and it really wasn't

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in that case. Swift Swift is like the Belgian payment

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.959
<v Speaker 1>messaging service. They even complied with U S sanctions during

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>this whole escalation. People keep saying it's up to the

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>EU to decide on Swift, not to the United States.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>In that case that you very much did not want

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the Swift Swift to cut off during your banks but

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they did it anyway. So in the short term, the

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>sanctions do not pose a threat to daughter dominants, I

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>would say, mostly because well, sanctions are a huge deal

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and they can really remake economies as we're seeing right now.

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>That's not what dollar dominance means day today. It seems

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it feels to me like the most important aspect of

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>daughter dominance isn't the fact that the United States can

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of turn off the spigots of certain capital flows

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>when it's sanctions countries, the biggest thing is that the

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>FED can provide liquidity in a crisis. And in that sense,

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think of that, there's this historic kind of

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>caused sanctions that geopolitical side of the dollar system, and

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like the normal day to day side is coronavirus crisis

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, doing swaplants or things like that.

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>And so a country that might not be interested in

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or might want alternatives to sanctions also would need to

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>create a parallel world where there is one entity that

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in a crisis can step up and keep the entire

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>financial system afloat. And so from that angle, it just

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like the kind of benefits, or at least the

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of security provided by a world of daughter dominance

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and kind of the United States being able to singularly

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>prop up the global financial system outweigh for most countries.

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 1>The negatives. Yeah, I mean, I think like we've definitely

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>seen in the wake of the financial crisis, and then

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>more cutely, starting in March, the sort of benefits to

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>being in the club or being under the relat that

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>can get the benefit of fed liquidity is pretty powerful.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to Swift for a second.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, you know, on Twitter, Swift gets talked

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about in harsh tones like this should be this should

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>be like this is the thing that they can't touch,

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and then of course they sort of did it, not entirely,

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but it has been employed. How powerful is that? What

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 1>are the sort of misconceptions? What do people get wrong

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about what it means to lose access to Swift? Yeah,

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I definitely agree about the hushtones. I feel like on

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Thursday or Friday, after a present by the game conference

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>called he was asked something like, are you really unwilling

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to do the two most destructive things for the Russian

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>economy sanctioned potent and disconnects Swift and kind of both

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of them were kind of beside the point, as has

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>been proven by the fact that all the damage hasn't

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>been caused by those two Swift the base is this

0:37:56.080 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>payment messaging service has eleven thousand banks. It's based in Belgium,

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>so technically it's not responsive to US US requests, although

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in practice it tends to very much be responsive. In

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>part of it is responsive because it's board member banks

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>are they have extreme exposure to US jurisdictions. Its board

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>member banks would tend to kind of align themselves with

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>US goals. I mean, ultimately, the thing is Swift is

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a messaging service. I mean, it's very well networked, it's

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 1>uh is secure, so in that end, it's standardized. So

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in that sense it has the perks really good messaging service.

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But if someone shut down WhatsApp, you could use something

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>else if you really wanted to communicate with people, And

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of the same with Swift. There's nothing that

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Swift does that itself couldn't be replicated. But I think

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason Swift is such an appealing kind of example

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is that it's kind of the embodiment. So much of

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>sanctions depend on kind of the concept of like inter

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the end, and so like there's these few choke points

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>or places in the global economy that if you can,

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if you can exert your pressure on them, you'll be

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>able to control all sorts of other things. So and

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, Swift release is like a good symbol

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of that, because it's like this, what if there were

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>one messaging service and every bank depends on them, and

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>with one stroke you could cut off these banks, and

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they would lose their connection to the global economy. In practice,

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not now what would happen. But I think in

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that sense it's very symbolic, I think so. I think

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that's why it became such a symbol, and there was

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>there was this talk about Europe can only be a

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>global player if it's willing to cut off Russia from swift.

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I think more generally, though, it's the kind of infrastructures

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that's makes swift possible. You swift that are more important,

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So swift you're sending the messages. But what matters is

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of because if there's been a bunch of analogies

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>people of use, the one I think of is like

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what matters the train tracks between towns. You don't necessarily

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>need like a telegraph system communicating that the train arrives,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 1>but without the communications and stuff, trains will probably have

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to go a bit slower because you don't know who

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>else is on the track. So ultimately, what the United

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 1>States did with the spur Bank when it basic denied

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the correspondent bank accounts, it just uprooted the chain tracks.

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So no messaging service can make up for that. Just

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the oligarch. So we do have

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctions in place now, you know, possibly belatedly when it

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to the UK, and you pointed out earlier that

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to some extent extensions on individuals are you know, almost

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the the original like clean vanilla sanctions. So you say,

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>these people can't go to the US, they can't access

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>their US bank accounts and things like that. But what

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly is it supposed to accomplish here, because there does

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>seem to be a thought process that, well, we're going

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to sanction the oligarchs and then they're going to call

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it Putin and complain about everything that's happening. But like,

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>how realistic is that? Like what is the thought process

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>behind this? I think that is the thought process in

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a sense, like the basic one, which is these are

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia is not kind of a fully traditional responsive electoral democracy,

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and so what matters is convincing the elites who might

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>have access to Putin and that might change things that

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel that that is the basic theory of the case.

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think necessarily it would work that way just

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>because these are oligarchs depend more on Putin that Putin

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>depends on them. These are some of the ones that

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>have recently been hit and the you are people who

0:41:55.600 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>were putin KGB mates in Germany, so they're not they're

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 1>not successful businessmen who placed put in an office. So

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so in that sense, it might just drive them closer

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to the government. In one sense, I read an interesting

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>comparison of the to the Venezuela sanctions, and in the

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela sanctions going after Venezuelan corruption, especially given they have

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all these kind of state owned businesses that pavesa There's

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things the United States did was really

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>target uh, these high profile corrupt individuals and for example

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>or say, take over their assets in the United States,

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>and that tended to push them closer to Maduro. So

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, it could cut the other way. I mean,

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I think there is sanctions. We

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.760
<v Speaker 1>think of them. Before the invasion, there was the whole

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking of sanctions as deterrents, and then now we're talking

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>about sanctions as bargaining. But there's another theory, which is

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>sanctions as kind of a signaling message, and so you

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do sanctions to say we disapprove of this in some cases,

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>so for example, the United States will sanction people who

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have no assets to the United States never planned to

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>come to the United States, but the United States so

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>does it as a way of saying this won't fly

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>for us. And I mean, I think there is some

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 1>value in kind of signaling disapproval, so I will say that.

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>One thing I would note though, is that these oligarchs

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 1>do control often very large businesses, and different sanctions do

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>things differently, but sometimes it depending on how you do it.

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes sanctioning the head of an individual can lead to

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the sanctioning of a firm he owns or controls, and

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sense it can have very large ripples. Just recently,

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>uh that you just released its own sanctions. It's on

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>oligar sanctions and those could lead to dislocations because it

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>has I mean, we'll see how it plays out, but

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>it seems to have a capacious definition of control, which

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>could mean major Russian companies get sanctioned as well companies

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that haven't been sanctioned so far, So I could be

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a thing. And sometimes they can have kind of crazy

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>knock on effects. And twenty Team the United States sanctioned

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ole deir Pasca Big Medals Magnate. He could he controls

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the top producers aluminum in the world, and

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>then that that was sanctioned, and then the London Medals

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Exchange freaked out because that was a big player there,

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and so they haulted trading and overnight the price of

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>aluminum went up. So even the individual ones can have

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>crazy knock on effects, but kind of the day to

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>day sanctioning, like the sun they sanctioned the son of

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rose and f CEO that I would say is

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 1>primarily a way of seeing a hope that he might

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>intercede with Putin, but also more simply a signal that

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>this won't fly. And especially in the UK, but also

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, there's the sense that the United

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 1>States has been turning a blind eye to Russian dirty

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>money that flows in, and so this is also a

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 1>way to kind of eliminate charges of hypocrisy, I would say,

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.240
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of a signaling thing, but there's value

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to it. So this next question is actually going to

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>be a subject of an entire It has, you know,

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure multiple episodes, and certainly one imminently. But you know,

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked about, Okay, the one area that's not going

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to really be touched, at least directly, although maybe implicitly

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is the energy sector, and of course we all know

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that Europe, particularly Germany, highly dependent on Russian natural gas

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and to some extent, call how did you know? What's

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the short version of how in your view, Europe got

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>into this situation where it became so dependent. You know,

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>even after with the annexation of Crimea, which is sort

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of well sort of telegraphed, what thought of Aprutin was

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>willing to do? How did it let itself get so

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable on this front? Search that, at least with energy,

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it has very little leverage. First of all, energy imports

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.919
<v Speaker 1>in Europe have been kind of a long term source

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of friction. Even in the eighties there was tension between

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Reagan administration and Europe because of a European pipeline

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to Russia. So this has been very long I think,

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, Anthony B. Lincoln wrote a book

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about this in n So this is kind of a

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>long term sorts of friction, and there's differences between gas

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and oil. But the political economy of Europe and energy

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is very challenging in terms of unwillingness to invest, has

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 1>made it very hard for Europe to diversify. I think

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of was one of the big things. Then

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have the freak events like Fukushima and

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>harming getting rid of German nuclear in the German energy mix.

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think the biggest thing I would say is,

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think this kind of is goes to the

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:52.359
<v Speaker 1>shortcoming of sanctions more generally, is that sanctions can only

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>shut off certain economic activity. They can do the opposite

0:46:57.080 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and like foster it. So the United States they impose

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>these sanctions and there was a sense of geopolitical risk

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>attached to Russian gas, but it wasn't enough to creates

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a an alternative to Norse stream, you know. So I

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of a big problem. You need more

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>active measures. Sanctions are relatively cheap in terms of imposing them.

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>They can have their costs, but they're not whereas building

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>interconnections in Europe, so gas from Spain can get to Germany,

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 1>which seems to be one of the concerns in terms

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of like the geography of the gas interconnection in Europe.

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't enough. So in that sense, I just don't

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think there was enough forethought, and I think unwillingness to

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>invest in kind of think long term was able to diversify.

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we'll see what happens now. I think there's

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of enthusiasm about potentially the changing political economy

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of Germany, or at least the greater willingness to invest

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in spend. I mean, there's been talking about nuclear and

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>L and G, but those are long term thing. I

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>think in the short term without kind of an impetus

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to invest and instead kind of I guess chronic consolidation,

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and that's how you end up without other options. And

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if people in fifteen, if they've been

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>told been in the most effective measure against Russia, would

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>have been off the table because we hadn't build the infrastructure.

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to imagine that they would actually

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 1>have followed through and build the infrastructure, just because there's

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of other domestic problems that have halted it.

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very aware of the time, and it feels

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like we could probably we could easily go on for

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 1>another hour. So I'm just gonna I'm gonna try to

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 1>squeeze in two very important questions in one, which is

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the big criticisms of sanctions is obviously the

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>impact on the general population, who may not themselves have

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:57.240
<v Speaker 1>decided or supported the invasion of Ukraine, So so what's

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the impact there. And then secondly, you mentioned escalation earlier

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation. How much more could the US and

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Europe do on this front When it comes to sanctions

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>on the humanitarian front, I think it's a it's a

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge problem. In the late nineties there was

0:49:13.800 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a complete revulsion at sanctions uh and there was a

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 1>sense that it didn't work. They didn't work and the

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>main damage was inflicted on the population. Since then, there

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of was this evolution in thinking of the creation

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of smart sanctions and the idea there was like more targeting,

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>so for example, going off after the other guards and

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 1>other measures that type of measure and other ways to

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of limit the humanitarian impact. Right now, I think

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this conversation has continued. I think, for example, there was

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>frustration with say the way Iran sanctions limited the access

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to healthcare in Iran during coronavirus, and so I think

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of willingness to think more about

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the humanitarian impact. The Treasury Department uh in at the

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.879
<v Speaker 1>end of last year actually issue this kind of comprehensive

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 1>sanctions reviews. So when by the administration came in, they said,

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to rethink how we do sanctions, and one

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they did was much more focused

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on limiting mean humanitarian impact, and I think you've seen

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it in some way with a measure so far, they

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>could have carve outs, say related to COVID. At the

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>same time, ultimately, when you're causing these massive slides in

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the country's currency, or targeting its biggest banks or even

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>as central bank and resulting in massive capital controls and

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates going off, there's no way to contain the

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian impact. My hope is that these sanctions are short

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:45.799
<v Speaker 1>enough that the humanitarian impact doesn't kind of ripple through

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>or set in it on. Doubted, they leave long term

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 1>scars on the Russian economy, which I think is very troubling.

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even something like you can't undo these things overnight.

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>If there's there was some administration officials I've talked about

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>how one of the goals of the sanctions is to

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:04.919
<v Speaker 1>is causing inflation, and so these things really do have

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>long term effects, and there's I guess it's kind of

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 1>like hystorys hystoricist or something where like it's it's very

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to undo. So for example, if you cut off

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the bank's corresponding bank accounts, the banks will cut them off,

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>but then re establishing them is like a one by

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one resigning the deal. And so these things will have

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>long term effects and so people will feel them. Your

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>question un escalating, So I hope there will. There'd be

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>ways one could mitigate them, but unfortunately, especially I think

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>those have with the speed of escalation, so far, those

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:42.399
<v Speaker 1>haven't been as top of mind. But we'll see it.

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot that could be done. So far, the

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 1>United States has targeted banks, but it hasn't the banks

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it has targeted, it hasn't necessary targeted with the fullest extent.

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So for a kind of burbank, the biggest bank, it's

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:58.800
<v Speaker 1>only that correspondent bank account hasn't done the full blocking sanctions,

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and other banks just hasn't targeted. So for example, gas

0:52:02.000 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>from bank hasn't been targeted with any measures so far,

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, you can target those more banks,

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's potentially space for on the Central Bank, they

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>actually haven't done the full blocking sanctions, so potentially they

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>could do a full blocking sanction, but on the market,

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>so that could be a way to kind of tighten

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the screws. And there's the energy sanctions as we talked about,

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>so those like you could just say you can't buy

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Russian oil and practice, you probably couldn't do that and practice.

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 1>What they did there their on deal is they kind

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of said they required every country to gradually decrease its

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>purchases in Iran, you know, in Iranian oil. So you

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>would probably have to do something like that because otherwise

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it would be kind of I don't think any economy

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.320
<v Speaker 1>or kind of the global oil market could necessarily react

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that easily to a complete cut off. There's also other

0:52:53.920 --> 0:52:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sectors you could target or other companies right now, because

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>finance is so pervasive, you kind of like you can

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hit that you're hitting out the targets. So for example,

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I so the swift cut off and some of these

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 1>finance kind of are making it harder for Russian airlines

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay for the leases of their aircraft. But so

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that's harming the Russian Russian airlines. But I'm not necessarily

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>advocating a target in Russian airlines. But you could also

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:21.720
<v Speaker 1>just target Russian airlines directly, you know, like there's like ways,

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>right now because of the effect of the financial sanctions,

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense that the entire Russian economies in turmoil.

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But you could also just target direct sectors, and there's

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>other sectors that kind of have this ripple effect through

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy. For example, insurance is one of them. So

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>as for example, targeting Russian insurance companies could make it

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 1>harder for companies that need insurance to carry on their business.

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>For example, like in the around case, the United States

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>made it harder for oil tankers to get insured. But

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you need insurance to kind of dock in places in

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>case something happens, and so then the Iranian government had

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to insure its own boats, and so you kind of

0:53:57.040 --> 0:53:59.760
<v Speaker 1>there are ways you can kind of escalate by targeting

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 1>more and more subsectors of the economy. So I'd say

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 1>those are some of the main areas that you could

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>talk well, Uh, Eduardo is Tracy noted. I feel like

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that went by the blink of an eye and we

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:15.839
<v Speaker 1>could talk for hours. But that was fantastic. I learned

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I really really appreciate you coming out on

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Thank you so much for having that was fantastic.

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks good, Thanks that was really good. Yeah, thank you.

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.880
<v Speaker 1>That was extremely informative, and you know, we just said it.

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we could have talked like two more

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:46.839
<v Speaker 1>hours very easily on this topic. Absolutely. I mean there

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.799
<v Speaker 1>are a number of things to pick out there, but

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean one, I thought it was really interesting what

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Edwardos said about the idea that even if you throw

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff at an economy, you can't you can't

0:54:58.880 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>just turn it off. And of course, I mean there's

0:55:02.160 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the original sanctions question when it comes to dictators, which is,

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>if they're not answering to a population which is actually

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling the economic pain, do they even care? And will

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 1>sanctions have any policy impact? Um, that's there as well.

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:19.439
<v Speaker 1>And then the other thing was this idea that it's

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:23.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult to turn these things off once you get them going.

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was really interesting. I think that is

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a really important dimension to all of this because you know,

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously what we've seen over the last week. Like in theory,

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the hope is that okay, this imposes significant pain in

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it UH, that at some point Putin decides to turn around,

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Goes removes forces from Ukraine. That's the hope that there's

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:49.839
<v Speaker 1>some sort of peace and end of UH fighting, even

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're start to turn these off. However, we've seen

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>such a dramatic move over the last several days. If

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>companies just saying, you know we talked about in the beginning,

0:55:57.200 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>washing their hands, not wanting to do business, it seems

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>very hard to imagine what restoring the status, you know,

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>getting back to ten days ago, not just of the

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>legal regime, but of the various corporate activity that was

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>taking place in Russia. It seems essentially unfathomable almost at

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:16.839
<v Speaker 1>this point to go back. So then the question is like, well,

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:19.240
<v Speaker 1>how much of a carrot is there still to offer

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:21.799
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to be such a long haul just

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to get back to you know what the middle of

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 1>February look like. Absolutely, And I mean we haven't even

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:32.360
<v Speaker 1>touched on E s G considerations, but it does feel like, Okay,

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't necessarily turn sanctions on and off with the

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:38.399
<v Speaker 1>switch of a button because people have compliance departments, and

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know they tend the people who work in compliance

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to be cautious people. Uh. And then secondly, what

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:46.879
<v Speaker 1>does this actually mean for E s G? Because even

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>if you remove sanctions, there could be plenty of investors

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and companies out there who still don't want to invest

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in Russia because of previous behavior, and we're already seeing

0:56:57.000 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 1>some inklings of that in the market. Yeah, companies have

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 1>plants departments, they also have PR departments, and I think

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be now for real. That's going to

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>be another big factor of like, well, do we want

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to go back in after this for PR reasons alone,

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or is it better to just not have anything to

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>do with the country. Number of companies maybe having tasked

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:19.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves that question. I also thought it was interesting like

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 1>even on like um, this sort of like the technical

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>aspects of financial sanctions, the loss of correspondent banking for

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>spur Bank, as you know that it's like easy to

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>turn them off, but then you need to write new

0:57:32.560 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>deals to bring them back on. And so to the

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 1>extent that the sanctions the removal of sanctions is hopefully

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 1>carrot to end the war in a short period of time,

0:57:45.280 --> 0:57:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be something that you know, can realistically be

0:57:49.080 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 1>regained for them to have that effect. Yeah, exactly. Um well,

0:57:53.440 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean either way, I feel like we're going to

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more episodes on this topic. Um yeah,

0:57:58.920 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it definitely feels like, Okay, shall we leave it there.

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there, all right. This has been another

0:58:04.800 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 1>episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm

0:58:11.080 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Why Isn't All? You can follow me on Twitter

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>at The Stalwart. Follow our guests on Twitter at Ward

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Sara Vale He's at E s V. Follow our producer

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast Francesco Levi at Francesca Today, and check

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 1>out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle

0:58:30.840 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Thanks for listening, O