WEBVTT - Surveillance: Energy Crisis in Texas

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast with Tom Keene, Jonathan Barrow,

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa Ramowitz Dally. We bring you inside from the

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance on Apple, Podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and the

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tournament. There is a crisis from call it Winnipeg

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in the normal winter of Canada. An I'm down through

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Dakotas and to Texas. We've seen the snow at

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Alamo. It is a freeze. It is in many

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>cases of blizzard with massive hardship. We tried to go

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>out and find the guy qualified, and yes, that would

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be the Railroad Commission of Texas Commissioner Jim Right. But

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not for the reasons that you think. Jim Right grew

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>up west of Corpus Christie. He's a legitimate guy who

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>knows about the animals of Texas, the rodeo bull riding

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. He has a visceral knowledge, Jim, what people

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are putting up with right now. Jim, we want to

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about the electric grid and the rest

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of it, the energy markets. But I've got to ask

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you this morning. You're living it tell us what the

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 1>ranchers are doing across the southern Midwest. Well, I'll tell

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you from being a rancher myself. We've been out repairing pipes,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so we make sure that we have water and energy

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>uh uh to our livestock and water to our homes.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there a risk here or with modern technology, is

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>it going to be different than eight nine? I don't

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>see it being much different right now from those times

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, pipes, pipes seem to break whenever it gets cold,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and you still have to go out and fix those. Well, Jim,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that extreme temperature may become something more

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>normal or perhaps more regularly occurring, and going forward, what

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>do you expect to be necessary to fortify the electricity

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>grid as we know it? You know, I think that

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to take a stronger look at

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>uh who's allowed priority on our grid system. Right now,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we're saying that the renewable energy has that priority, which

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is discouraging our are reliable energy source, which seems to

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be more natural gas fossil fuel related from coming in

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and building the plants needed to pick up this power

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>demand in time times like these. Wait, but I just

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>really want to clarify this ship. Are you saying that

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the problem here lies with the wind turbines, some of

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the renewable energies and not with some of the pipelines

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and freezing and other issues there is that what you're saying, Well, yeah,

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way, you know, I think that as

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>we here in Texas has said that renewable energy has

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>priority on our grid. We've discouraged the people coming in

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and building car plants that run off of natural gas,

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>which is more of a reliable source than than has

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>every and knows when and uh the sun is. So

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that what we're experiencing today is the fact

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that we just don't have enough plants to keep up

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>with our demand during times like these. What does the

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Railroad Commission of Texas need to do to dovetail a

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>boom economy and the capitalism of Texas with the constraints

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the limits that you face ecologically. Yeah, I think that, uh,

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those big things is more on along the

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lines of educating people on the benefits of fossil fuel

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and the benefits of our renewable energy. You know, both

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>both have places here in Texas. I think that we

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>need to make sure that we are smart enough to

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>make those coexisting along alongside one another, but while still

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>keeping a focus on improving our environment. You know, when

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I look at the environment, I look at that in

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>two ways. It's not only what mankind's impact is our

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>planet Earth, but it's also are the impact caused by

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the debt that we're accumulating trying to trying to continue

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to protect what mankind's uh impact we seem to think

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we have on on on Earth. You know, we we've

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>had some large issues here in Texas with flaring and

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's important that we in Texas start

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>developing more of a market for our natural gas so

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that that that continues to be a good, reliable source

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and did not create any type of impact on as

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>far as the missions is concerned. Jim right, you've got

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a crisis right now in this weather. The crisis was

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>your stunning victory a year ago within this important position

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for the state of Texas. How did you pull that off?

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>How did a rancher from basically west of Corpus Christie

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>pull off the victory you pulled off? And how can

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you provide that lesson is leadership to move Texas forward? Now?

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think It shows that people in Texas are are

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at people that are putting in office today to

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>be more of a leader with a business mind. You know,

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been in business pretty much all of my life

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>with my own companies and work closely in the all

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and gas industry and all energy sectors. And the people

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that are out out in that sector and seemed to

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dominate what we have here in Texas, especially in the

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>rural areas, and they know what that means to our economy.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that is that's the key to success,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is people that know boots on the ground and how

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to get issues resolved. Jim, it's fantastic to have you

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>us on the program with us. Please come back soon,

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>stay close, and we wish to stay well. Jim, right there,

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Railroad Commissioner. I look at the Swiss twenty

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>year yield is sort of a keel of the boat

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of Europe. John, it's about ready to move to a

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>positive statistic once more. It's been a negative twenty year

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>yield in Switzerland and it's come up like a moon shot.

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I know Allen knows as well. I would go to

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>bunds as well. Tom bundyil to moving with treasury old

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as well, let's bring it down and Rusky in Deutsche

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Bank chief International strategist, and and let's just start right

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>there that line. The bottom line, the only reason to

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be barished is there is no reason to be barished.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your takeaway, Alan Well, I think the main cautionary

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>note to the bullish equity view is really that there's

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>good reasons to be bearish in terms of bonds. I

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>think the fixed income story revolves around the reflation that

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going on, but also the risks are very much

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>tilted towards access reflation um And I'm not necessarily saying

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about inflation per se, because inflation is very

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>much a lagging indicator, lags growth by about eighteen months.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of growth and the potential for overheating

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>from fiscal policy, which is flat on into if we

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>get anything close to the one point nine trillion from

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden money supply growth which is the highest ever. Financial

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>conditions is easy as we've ever had. There's something for everybody.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of inflation. You know, I look

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Ellen it this move that we've had in the idea

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've given up worried about inflation moving up. We

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have been wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. I mean you've been

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>doing this for four or five, six decades, Alan, I

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>mean we have been wrong on inflation moving higher. Why

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>won't we be wrong again? We might be wrong again,

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's it's it's a it's a tough core.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we know where all the risks currently lie.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned earlier, you know, the lags along, so

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we want to know whether we're right or wrong for

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time. But you know, when you're

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of the things that are disinflationary, part

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of it just relates to the calculation. The cyclical elements

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>will be inflationary, but we have lots of things which

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are not cyclical, things like medical care, things like education.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the services don't necessarily respond to higher growth,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so we might not see it in the statistics, but

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the cyclic or elements will almost certainly show some uptick.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Allen is the reflectionary trade dependent on central banks remaining

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this accommodative forever. I don't think so. Look, I think

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the FED clearly doesn't want to take

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>away the punch bowl in terms of their flexible average

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation targeting regime. You know, if they true to that,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be hiking rates for this year.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna be hiking rates next year, probably only

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>hike in three So you know, I think in that sense,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not huge amount of risks. I think the bigger

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>issues what the market does and what the bond market does.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So the market is going to tighten for the FED

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, and I think that's going to constrain

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the boolliants that we're seeing in risky assets. Well,

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and let's talk about the energy story as well, because Crew,

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been absolutely flying even before this deepening energy crisis

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States of America. I've had a lot

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of people in the last couple of months talking about

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.599
<v Speaker 1>at the start of another commodity supercycle. Alan, does that

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>reson it with you? I don't know about a supercycle,

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but I like oil and our oil guys, you know,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>clearly behind that call in terms of you know, favorable

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>oil trades. The good news there is that unlike a

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>lot of other markets which are being preemptive of thinking forward,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and it can price things forward aggressively at least the

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>storage costs and oil tend to mean that you don't

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>price quite far ahead, and I think that helps one

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of thinking that oil can go higher in

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the future. And now that's what's interesting I think is

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the curve today, the backwardation we

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>see in the forward's curve is quite extraordinary. So, you know,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that also hints that you can sort of

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>pick up I think deck W T I around fifty five.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>That still seems like a decent bed. Allen, you do

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>such good work on the history at all times. What

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is this like? Is there a compare and contrast to

0:09:54.360 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a previous moment or time that you can grab on here? Honestly, uh,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned four or five decades, not quite five or

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>six decades, close to the four decades of work, And

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anything like this at all in terms

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of um, you know, the the ease of policy I

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, you know, the fiscal stimulus outside wartime, extraordinary

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>money supply growth like we've never seen before. Every indicator

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>with in financial conditions, equities, credit spreads, the exchange rate,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>all are extraordinarily easy. Now we have come often in

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a particular shock at one of the you know, really

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the sharpest shock I've ever seen in terms of the virus.

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But equally, when we get the vaccine, we should be

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rebounding in the other directions. So you've got policy compounding

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that rebound. So, um, you know, we really haven't seen

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>anything like this before, and we probably are going to

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>see GDP growth rates. Um. You know, our baseline without

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>at the one point nine trillion Biden physical stimulus, just

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe something like a one trillion of physical package is

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>six percent plus GDP growth. We're looking at a eight

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>percent type number if we get the full physical package

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that Biden is promising. Alana. This is exactly why what

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about to tie this all together, this is

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly why people are saying that the old models of

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>what a bubble is, of what overheated is don't count

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>because this is a new era of central bank stimulus.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It is a new era of reflation with respect to

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus. Do you agree to the old models not

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>work anymore and we can't count on them to ring

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the alarm bell saying there is too much froth from

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the system. I think we struggle to come up with

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>accurate pricing and appropriate frameworks when interest rates is zero

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but as interest rates normalized, and if they normalize at

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the back end of the curve, and I think they'll

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>start to reevaluate in terms of, you know, what appropriate

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>p ratios are for a given bond healed, and I

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>think that will lead to, you know, some rethinking in

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of fair valuations. But absolutely, if policy is this easy,

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know, you know, how to appropriately value things.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And we're making a bet and making considerations that relates

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to whether we will see inflation eighteen months hence or not. Really, that's,

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to me is the macro question of the day. Alan,

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up, sir, and I'm Ruskin at Deutsche Bank.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Right now we're gonna switch back to what

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is a monthly visit and a required visit. Gideon Roses

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Council on Foreign her Relations are distinguished fellow

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and Guides of Foreign Affairs. Just a superb job of

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>resurrecting the magazine into immediacy. And the immediacy is the

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>decline and fall? Can America ever lead again? And you're

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>now at Gideon, were a chapter of fragmented power? How

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fragmented are we? We are humpty dumpty, and we are

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just beginning to put this slightly back together with crazy

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>glue and hoping that it doesn't fall down again before

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the glue sets getting and can give a sense of

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the import of having a global leader right now as

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we still have a pandemic very much in the forefront,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with mutating strains and the idea that this is here

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to stay. Well. The pandemic emphasized that there was a

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>real world out there that bites back, and that government

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is not just a game that Americans play with each other,

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and that politics isn't just a rhetorical blood sport. There

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>are consequences, there are policies. Most people used to think

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the government is supposed to do something to protect the

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>people from external dangers, internal dangers, and advance their interests.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And when the government really didn't do anything about the pandemic,

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>at least in the short term, uh, it seemed to

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally challenge that entire notion. And the world looked on

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and said, you guys aren't just supposed to be the

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>government of the United States. You're supposed to be de

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>facto running the world as well. And when the world

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>just basically was left to go to its own devices

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>like Lord of the flies under pressure, everybody went to

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>their own national interests, and essentially the world started to fragment,

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and the order and the team that the United States

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>had been leading for several decades ever since the end

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of World War two, fifth fully haltingly in different ways,

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>started to break up or stagnate. And the question now is, Okay,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a captain who's back in, you know, Dennis Robbins

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>come back from Las Vegas and his partying, and now

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the bulls are ready to play, and something's actually gonna happen.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>What's gonna happen? The world is watching to see if

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States can regain its consciousness as a mature,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>responsible government, both domestically and internationally. And so far they

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily like every single policy, and you're never gonna

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>find every single policy because a lot of different players

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in the world. But so far, people are breathing a

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>sigh of relief that some of the craziness seems to

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be over getting less phone in this fold in this

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation to the vaccine rollout, do you think the vaccine

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>rollout of the last site three months or so is

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>bringing countries further together or pushing them further apart. Uh. Well,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say right now it's pushing them further apart,

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>because everyone's sort of vying to get the vaccines, and

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a sort of crawling over each other to try

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and get the vaccine on the line. So it's a

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger type beg of the neighbor time situation. But over time,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as the vaccines actually kick in, as we start getting

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>something approaching her immunity down the road, as things as

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the cooperate, as the circumstances in which cooperation can take hold,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>after everybody is a little bit less scared, then you

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have a government in charge now in the United States

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that may be in a role to play the sort

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of calm uh team leader bringing people back together after

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the crisis. We're still in the depths of the crisis obviously,

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and everybody is still completely freaked, and everybody is still

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>racing to try and get an immediate advantage. But as

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:23.359
<v Speaker 1>things get better over the course of one the opportunities

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the upside rather than just getting out

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the media crisis and the down and and escaping

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the immediate downsides might become more apparent. And I think

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that and the payoffs and the Biden administration will start

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to come more apparent. Help me, here were the agenda

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of the president. The president is going to do a

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>road trip I assumed to Europe to you know, regreet

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the allies, etcetera, meet the queen or whatever. And then

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>there has to be some kind of Asia swing. Is

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Beijing on the itinerary? You know the details of that? Uh?

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the China relationship. The Biden administration understands it needs

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild its alliances first, because the United States does

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not play international politics as an individual. It plays as

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a team leader. The Bush administrator, the Trump administration failed

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to recognize that, and the rest of the team was going,

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Since you have been the leader of

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a global alliance that has essentially run the entire world,

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about this only America thing. The

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration, recognizing that it is team leader first and foremost,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>has made mending its relations with its core allies the

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>first agenda item. But dealing with China and the U. S.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>China relationship will clearly be the single greatest challenge over

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the course not just of the Biden administration for American

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>farm policy, but for at least the next decade and

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the next generation or two of American farm policy.

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And so the question is can the United States and

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>China manage their relationship which is clearly somewhat conflictual but

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>does not need to go to war? Can they manage

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it that and keep it within tracks and on rails?

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Getting no, what's great to catch up. Appreciate your time

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this morning, sir. Thank you getting roads there of CFR.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Mandy zero joining us now on this market from Credit Space,

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the chief equity derivative strategist. This market is grinding higher,

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>up another twenty one on the SNP and we've got

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>one on the US ten year Manny, just want me three.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking right now that relationship between the direction of

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ten year yields and what happens with the broad directorting market. Yeah, hey, hey,

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>John um So. I think we've gotten a lot of

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>questions around inflation from investors in recent weeks, given the

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>movements and break events, and the point that I make

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>here that it's important differentiate like what we're talking about

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to INFLATIONIP, are we talking about a

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>temporary overshoot of inflation this year due to reopening? Due

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to all this you know demand that everyone's talking about,

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or are we talking about a sustained increase sustained runaway inflationhip? Right?

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED really cares about ladder. I think

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really care about the former, and I had

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>not heard anyone makes a real credible case for the latter.

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think in this case, when it comes to inflation,

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it actually helps that Powell is not a trained economist

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>or doesn't have a formal economics training like yelling or burnanky,

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>because he's less weathered to economic theory that says, you know,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>as unemployment comes down, inflation must rise. Right. I think

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he's booking at the empirical data which shows him that

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>inflation is nowhere to be found in the developed world

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of last twenty years. And as such, you know, the

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>SEID can be much more focused on its unemployment mandate

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>without lowering about inflation. So what does that mean for markets?

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be very very patient this year.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, even if we get a big

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>core CPC overshoot at some point this year due to reopening,

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, sets able to stay very patient. And that's

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>positive for equities and positives for a lot of rotation

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>trades that we've already started to see that I think

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>ex for the room to run man help merror mortals

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>here on a Tuesday morning with the Greeks. You're the

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>derivatives said your credit sueez and the idea that you're

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>moving up. You're in play. But there are signposts where

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>enough is enough. One of the signals where you say

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in the derivative market, enough is enough. Look, I think

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>people are rightly worried about I guess you know, you know,

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the speed of the rally, how substainable it is, whether people,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, investors are too completion. So what I can

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>say is, at least on the derivatives market, positioning at

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the index level is still very cautious. And I say this,

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, with VIC still relatively elevated, even though markets

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>making all time high. And I say particularly if you

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, the demand for protection as index level,

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that is still very very ROBUSTO measures, skew measures of

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>tail risk in the SMP. You know, it's still near

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the highs that we've seen over the past year. So

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>at least in the index market is slow as that

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, We're still seeing a lot of demands will protection.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of downtime had just been put on, So

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that kind of euphoria that um, you

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>know in the index level that you know, I do

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a single stock level, which is a totally different story.

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But I would say at the index level, positioning is still,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, fairly cautious. Mandy, let's talk single stock, let's

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>talk game stop and those hearings that Congress is going

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be having later this week. What's your sense in

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>terms of whether there is something improper that occurred with

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the derivatives trading that you saw that you think they

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>will hone in on and perhaps target. Look, I think

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>takeaway here that this is much bigger than just one

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>particular stock or you know, one particular segment. The bigger

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>impact from you know, the retail trading that we've seen

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is that across broad swath of the market, we're seeing

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a complete repricing of upside risk. So you know, the

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>game stop, the A m c s, you know, those

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>are tiny, right, but within the SMP top one hundred

0:21:56.240 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>large cap stock, thirty percent are now trading with inverted skew,

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>which is just a technical term saying that the upside

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>calls are now trading at a premium to be at

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the money calls. That is very, very unusual. To put

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that percentage in perspective, over the last ten years, that

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>percentage historically has averages out six percent. Right, So now

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're thirty percent of the names trade with inverted skew

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>when traditionally has been up six percent. I think that's

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the legacy, that's the impact from the retail option trading.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Where notice the retail consumer piece, it's typically buyers of

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>upside call options. And that's how we're seeing It's upside

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>call with the higher across you know, not just small caps,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not just the highly you know, shorter names, but we're

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing it, you know, with the large cap tech names,

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>with the financials, with the energy across broad industries and inspectors. So, Mandy,

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we got thirty seconds with you, so forgive me for

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>pushing you on the time. You are much smarter than

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>put this into very simple terms for our audience this

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>morning that might not be familiar with these things. Yield up,

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the equity market is up, and the VIX is up

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Why just in very simple terms, why is

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>volatility up with the move was seeing high so I

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know, the VIX is not just a

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>measure of motility. It also incorporates demand for putting calls.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>All else equals, we're seeing more demands for obstacle that

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>could drive the VIC higher. That is one way in

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>which the VIX can go higher as the market is

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>going higher. It's driven by demands for this called Mandy.

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I appreciate that Mandy say that of credits waste.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>listen on Apple Podcasts, sound Cloud, Bloomberg dot com, or

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. You can also listen worldwide

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on Bloomberg Television.