WEBVTT - Tech News: Lapsus$ Hackers Identified

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Thursday, March twenty four, twenty twenty two.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to it. Following up on a story I

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>covered on Tuesday, cybersecurity researchers believe they have identified the

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>source of the hacking attacks on Octa and other companies.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Hacking group called LAPSUS, which is spelled l A P

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>S U S followed by a dollar sign, had claimed

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for those attacks, stating that the group's goal was

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>really nothing more than just financial gain, as it infiltrated

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not just Octa and as a reminder, that's a company

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that provides authentication services to other companies, but also on

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>other big names like Microsoft and The security researchers believe

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen year old boy in England is perhaps the

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>ringleader of LAPSUS. Another person identified by the group is

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a teenager in Brazil, and helping out the researchers work

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>were some rival hackers who effectively doxed this teenager and

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>shared information about him and his family online. So it's

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty brutal world out there in the the hacker community.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>As to what will happen next, that is likely a

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>matter for the authorities. Meanwhile, I suspect researchers will seek

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>out more evidence that ties this particular teenager and his

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>accomplices to those attacks. And it sounds to me like

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the group was extremely skilled and they were very very

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>fast at what they did, but perhaps they were not

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the best at, you know, avoiding consequences for their actions.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that one of the reasons they commit of

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>these attacks was for notoriety within the hacker community. I mean,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there is kind of that part of the community aspect

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh, And it might turn out that the

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>price of that notoriety is pretty darn steep once the

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>authorities get involved. But we'll have to see how this unfolds.

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Russia continues to clamp down on information as military forces

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>continued to push into Ukraine. The latest service to join

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the list of suspended platforms is Google News. Russia shut

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>off access to Google News in Russia and was saying

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that Google News was spreading quote unreliable information end quote.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Now keep in mind that Russia continues to contextualize the

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian invasion as a special military operation, which is, you know,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly whitewashing what is going on. Meanwhile, thousands of people

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>have died, including perhaps more than ten thousand Russian soldiers

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>according to some estimations. I've seen estimations as high as

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand Russian soldiers, and I imagine that's going to

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be difficult for Russian officials to explain under the label

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>special military operation. It's not like they can just cover

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>up fifteen thousand deaths, you know, across the entire nation.

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually surprised that Russia has hadn't already shut down

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Google News. I'm surprised it took as long as it

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>did because the control of information is one of the

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>key tools in the Russian government's toolbox, as is often

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the case with authoritarian regimes. SpaceX has increased the cost

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of being a starlink customer. Now, if you're not familiar

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>with that service, Starlink is a satellite based Internet service

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>provider or i s p. SO Customers purchase a satellite antenna,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a dish in other words, that can connect to and

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>track small satellites that are in low Earth orbit. The

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>plan is to launch tens of thousands of satellites to

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of provide this blanket coverage so that no matter

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what time of day it is, you've got a satellite

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that's in view. So the antenna will actually switch from

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>one satellite to another as the satellites move out of

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>sight because of course they're orbiting the Earth faster than

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Earth rotates, so they're kind of zooming overhead. The

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>dish has to switch from one to another as it

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>passes across the horizon really out of sight in general,

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>because a tree line will do it too. And UM

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Startling is in a limited rollout right now. When it

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>first premiered, the cost to purchase the starter kit was

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>four dollars and the monthly service fee to get the

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>internet service was nine bucks a month. But now those

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>prices have gone up to five hundred dollars for the

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>starter kit and one dred ten dollars per month for service.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>For those customers who have already put down a deposit

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but have not yet received a kit, now they're gonna

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have to pay a little bit more, up to nine

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars total before they will get their satellite antenna. Now

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>that's probably gonna frustrate folks who had placed in order,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>put down a deposit and we're waiting for their their

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>kit and felt that they had already paid the asking price. However,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess one saving grace is that they're still kind

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of getting a fifty dollar discount off a brand new

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Starlink package if you if you hadn't already put down

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a deposit. And apparently this is not going to impact

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>customers who really dug deep in their pockets to purchase

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Starlink Premium, which I didn't even realize was a thing

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>until today. Anyway. So one of the drawbacks of satellite

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>internet is that you're typically capped at a fairly conservative bandwidth,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's also an issue with latency because well, you know,

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>even though radio signals travel at the speed of light,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>there's still a good bit of distance between an earthbound

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>antenna that's on your property and a satellite that's in

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>orbit overhead. So the basic service for Starlink advertises download

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>speeds of fifty to two fifty megabits for second. That's

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>actually really darn impressive for satellite um and it has

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a latency of between twenty to forty milliseconds. At least

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the advertised latency. The premium service well has the

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>same latency because you know, you can't actually make light

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>go any faster than it already goes, so there's no

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>real way to cut down on that. But the bandwidth

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is advertised as a hundred fifty two up to five

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred megabits per second, which is really impressive. However, to

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>get those speeds, you really got to shell out the

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>big bucks. And I'm talking two thousand five dollars for

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the kit and then the monthly service fee would be

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars a month. Yells in, I thought my

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I s P bill was big. Now, to be fair,

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that the premium services really marketed more toward

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses rather than your average household. I mean, I'm sure

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>there are gonna be some, you know, folks who have

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of cash and happen to have a mansion out

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of nowhere where this is going to

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>be their preferred method, But most of us wouldn't probably

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sign on to the premium service. So you might wonder

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>why did Starlink increase the prices for the basic service

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to be that the main culprit here

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is inflation, which is obviously hitting a lot of stuff

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. Also, SpaceX takes a loss on those antenna

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it sells. So yeah, five hundred bucks is a lot

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of money. Uh, six d bucks is a lot of money.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's still less than what it costs SpaceX

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to build the things. According to the Verge, SpaceX spends

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about to build a single antenna, and originally when they

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>first started, that was closer to three thousand dollars. So

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX has been selling these antenna as a loss leader.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>They make money in the long run through the monthly

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>service fees. So while this new price is steep, it's

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>still less than half of what it costs SpaceX to

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>actually make the kits. So there's that. The Etisphere Institute,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>which sounds a bit to me like a sinister organization

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Fallout video game Universe, released a report naming

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the most ethical companies in various industries, and over in

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>tech we had a couple of really big names make

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that list, including Microsoft and Apple. Those are names that

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I found surprising to appear on a list of most

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ethical companies for reasons, but then I think the Atmosphere

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Institute is really taking a focused, or if you prefer,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>narrow view when it comes to what it means to

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be ethical. Certainly, the commitment to ethical sourcing of materials

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is critically important around the world. You know, I've talked

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>before about how at various points in the supply chain

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>from the point of raw material all the way to

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a finished product, there are some dark spots. Spots that

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can include forced human labor, child labor, human trafficking, and

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>more like really dark stuff. So companies that actually go

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the extra mile to seek verification that the supply chain

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>they rely upon doesn't in turn rely upon human rights

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>violations is a good thing and it should be acknowledged.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Though I would also say that we should probably consider

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>that the bare minimum right. I mean, it seems kind

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of crass to say congratulations on not violating human rights

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring us this gadget that. I mean, yeah, you

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't get an award for not causing human misery. But

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I digress. I do think that from certain points of view,

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>as ob one would say, Apple and Microsoft and some

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of the other companies named have taken great strides to

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>make certain their processes are ethical, but I happen to

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>view ethics in a more broad context. Uh. These are

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>also companies that have reputations for stuff like clamping down

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on employees, whether it's discouraging organization or forcing folks to

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sign agreements that prevent them from going public or seeking

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>external legal help after they encounter violations of workplace policies,

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>or or they they end up being the target of

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>illegal activities and that kind of thing. Now, maybe I'm

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at this from too wide a perspective, but I

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>think it's actually important for us to keep those shortcomings

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in mind, because otherwise we invite a dangerous situation where

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we let ourselves think of these companies as inherently ethical,

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and then we will overlook other transgressions we I think

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it's perfectly legitimate to say, yes, here is where they

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are doing the right thing, and still also say and

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>here is where they need to change. I think we

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>can have room for both of those. Okay, we've got

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>some more news stories to cover, but before we get

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to those, let's take a quick break. One ongoing story

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've been covering relates to companies like Apple and

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Google being pressured to allow third party payment systems within

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>apps running on iOS and Android respectively, and now we

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>have word that Google is making an allowance for Spotify.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Users will have the option to choose to pay for

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>purchases within Spotify using either Google Pay billing or they

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>can opt for Spotify's own billing method. This is a

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty big deal because we have seen Google and Apple

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>long dependent upon the fact that these companies have had

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to take a chunk out of every single in app transaction,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>usually between fifteen and thirty per pop and hand it

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>over to Google or Apple, and because there were no

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>other payment options available, that meant the developers had no

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>choice but to accept that a fairly significant of change

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>per transaction was going to go to these companies. Now

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing pushback around the world as various courts and

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>regulatory bodies argue that this practice is inherently anti competitive. Uh.

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, just on this past Tuesday episode, I talked

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>about how Apple was fined for the ninth week in

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a row for doing this in the Netherlands with dating apps,

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and whether this new deal with Spotify will market change

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that will roll out to other apps on the Android platform.

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That's too early to say, but at least it is encouraging.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So I should also add it's not clear yet if

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Google is still taking some cut of each transaction. That

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility. Again with the Apple story, we heard

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that one of its concessions to the Dutch regulators was

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to offer up a third party payment option for dating apps,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in which Apple would still take a hefty twenty seven cut. Now,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>considering that payment processing services always take a cut, I

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that's how they make money. So every transaction the

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>these the processing service that actually processes the transaction, they

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>get a percentage of that. It's the same with credit

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>card companies. Well, with a twenty cut on top of

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever the third party is charging, it would mean that

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>no matter what third party you were going with, chances

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are that option was going to be more expensive than

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just sticking in house with Apple. Needless to say, the

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Dutch regulators rejected this concession and called it out for

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>what it is, that Apple was rigging the game in

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>its own favor. Also, remember Apple was one of those

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>ethical companies we were talking about a minute ago. And

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>other Google related news, the company is preparing to sunset

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the Google Play Movies and TV store section in May. Alright,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>so Google Play has been Google's kind of all stop

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>shop for online content and apps on Google ecosystems, namely

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff like Android devices and Google Connected television services. So

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you would go to Google Play to buy all sorts

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of stuff like e books or games or apps, music, television,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and film. But then Google started to migrate some stuff

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>out of Google Play. For example, Google Play Music shut

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>down and shifted to YouTube Music. And it looks like

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>something similar is happening with Google Play TV and movies,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>where users will be prompted to go to separate apps

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>such as YouTube or Google Tv. And perhaps this is

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>an effort to streamline stuff so that people who are

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>interested in one kind of content but not necessarily other

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>kinds of content can more easily find what they're looking for.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of get that, you know, navigating through

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Google Play can be a bit clunky. Still, this also

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>feels like another example of Google introducing a feature or

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a product and then a couple of years later just

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>pulling the plug on it. Instagram has introduced a feature

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that will let users view in chronological order, which I

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mean has been long overdue. Also, they can filter their

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>feeds so that they're just looking at you know, uh,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>entries that are from their favorites, like the the accounts

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they are most interested in, But in neither case will

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>users be able to set that as their default view

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram's feed, So by default, users will still be

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>presented with the jumbled up feed that's arranged not by

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>any kind of timeliness, but by the whims of the

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>feeds algorithm. Now I don't personally use Instagram or Facebook anymore,

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but back when I did, one of the things I

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>consistently found really infuriating was the lack of ability to

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>just view stuff in reverse chronological order. I wanted to

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>see the most recent stuff posted by my friends and

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the folks that I followed, and I hated the way

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>content would actually appear in both of those products out

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of any kind of order. That made sense to me,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because I would find myself responding to something that was

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>actually several days old in some cases, and in off

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>often in those cases, it would turn out that whatever

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it was was now irrelevant, like we had all moved on.

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't know about it because the way the

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>feed was sending it to me, I was looking at

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>something that was already out of date. And anyway, for

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>those who still use Instagram. I'm glad that this is

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>now an option if that's something that really would be

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>valuable to you. I think it's still pretty irritating that

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't just set it and forget it. You will

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have to choose that view of your feed each time

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you open the app, if that's how you want to

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>see it. I guess we should be thankful for any improvements,

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>even if they're small ones. Also, we should keep in

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>mind that part of the motivation for making this change

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is that meta Instagram's parent company has been under fire

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for relying on algorithms that promote certain materials to users

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to drive engagement, and that material frequently

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>falls into dangerous categories that can become echo chambers that

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>end up promoting extremist views, or it can end up

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>serving up content that can harm someone's mental health. So

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you could make a case that the reason Meta slash

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Instagram did this was really more about trying to take

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>some of that heat off, rather than giving users what

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>they've been asking for for ages. But I guess you

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>don't look a gift horse in the Instagram feed, you

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just follow it. The United Nations has launched an ambitious

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>project that, if successful, would connect every person to early

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>weather warning systems. And by every person, I mean every

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>person on the planet. According to the u N Secretary General,

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>six of people in Africa lack an early warning weather system.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>If we look at this from a global perspective, one

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>third of all humanity lacks access to early warning weather systems,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and that is sobering, particularly when you consider due to

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>climate change, there is strong evidence to suggest that we're

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see more and more severe weather events across

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the world on the increase over the following years, and

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>early warning can mean the difference between life and death.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>As of how this is going to actually progress, that's

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>still being worked out. The u N World Meteorological Organization

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>has the ball now, and we'll need to put together

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a plan that will achieve this goal within the five

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>year time frame. The w MO is expected to share

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>an action plan at the UN Climate Conference in November. Okay,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got a couple more stories to go before we

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>get to those. Let's take another quick break al right. So,

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>one other ongoing huge story in tech has been how

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the world has tried to respond to the ongoing semiconductor shortage,

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>which has happened for numerous reasons, the big one being

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and and Intel has been working on establishing

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor fabrication facilities here in the United States, which would

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>help mitigate the necessity to depend upon Taiwan as the

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.239
<v Speaker 1>main source for semiconductor manufacturing. This is important not just

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>because of the current supply chain issues, but because Taiwan

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>has a let's call it an uneasy political relationship with China.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>That's being very delicate about things. There's a legitimate concern

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that one day mainland China forces could attempt to invade

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan or at the very least disrupt global supply chains. Now,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>setting aside the numerous other reasons why a Chinese invasion

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>would be a bad thing, because there are lots of them,

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to focus on the semiconductor side for this.

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>That's prompted Intel to invest in building facilities elsewhere, like

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. But doing that is really expensive,

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and doing that at the cost of profit. It's can

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>sometimes cheese off stakeholders. You know, people who own shares

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in your company. They expect a return on their investment.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>That in turn has in a prompted Intel CEO Pat

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Gelsinger to urge US Congress to grant subsidies to the

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>U S semiconductor industry in order to help offset those costs. So,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in other words, Intel is hoping that Congress will allot

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>some taxpayer dollars to help foot the bill for building

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>out Intel facilities here in America, not just Intel, other

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor facilities too. And while both the House and Senate

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in Congress are considering this, and each have their own

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>proposals about this, but they have to work out the

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>differences between the two. That process has been a pretty

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>slow one, and there's been some understandable resistance and concern

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about using taxpayer money to subsidize a company like Intel.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Intel has a market cap of two four point five

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars as of today's recording. Now that that

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>number that represents the total dollar value of Intel's shares,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>so it's nearly two hundred five billion dollars, So you

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 1>could argue Intel is worth two hundred five billion dollars. Now,

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, that is not indicative of how much cash

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Intel has on hand. That's a different thing. That's closer

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to probably around twenty four billion dollars at least as

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of last year, and you can see how telling taxpayers.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that you're a politician and you're voting to pass

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>legislation that would subsidize semiconductor facilities in the United States,

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you're asked by your constituents, Hey, um, why

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>did you use my tax dollars to help this two

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar company build factories. That's a hard sell, right, Like,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a hard question to answer, even if there are

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>legitimate reasons for that. Politically, you could see how this

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>would be a very difficult thing to do and end.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Intel is a publicly traded company. That means

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it does have a responsibility to its shareholders. So Intel,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, can't just spend money that it has and

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe some money it doesn't have, in an effort to

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>build this stuff out. It's not a private company. It

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>can't just shoulder that burden and hope to get out.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, it has shareholders to answer to,

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>So it is more complicated than just saying it's a

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollar company, why are we giving it money

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>or why are we giving it enormous tax breaks so

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>it can build out these facilities. Meanwhile, we do have

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to address the very real problem of the semiconductor shortage.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 1>So yes, very complex issue here. Um. I definitely get

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a little grouchy at the thought of taxpayer money helping

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>out an enormous company like Intel, but I also admit

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that the issue is far more complicated than that. So

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the subsidy is going to be a tough

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>pill should Congress actually agree upon it and pass it.

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But it might be that it's a necessity in order

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to make this come to pass. Without it, we're probably

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>going to get facilities that have less capability than what

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Intel wants to see. And it may be that whatever

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>facilities we get aren't really a solution to the issues

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that we are encountering in the industry. So yeah, um,

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could say that this was a very

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>simple matter where it's a binary thing, but it, as

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>most things in life, it's actually way more complicated than that.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Now here are a couple of other quick news bits

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to end out this episode. First, Rolls Royce, the aerospace company,

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not the motor car company, because those are two different entities. Uh.

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Rolls Royce has broken records with its electric plane. It

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is named the Spirit of Innovation, which is a cool

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>name for a plane, and as electric plane implies, it

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>has an electric motor, it does not have a combustion

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>engine or jet engine. And it broke a couple of

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>speed records. One was for top speed over three kilometers,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>which the Spirit of Innovation set at five fifty five

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>point nine kilometers per hour. For those of us in

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the US, that's about three miles per hour. And it

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>also set a record for fast speed over fifteen kilometers

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that was five thirty two point one kilometers per hour,

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>or around three per hour. That's pretty darn cool. I

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that's still that's much slower than what you see

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with like commercial jets, for example, but still really neat

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that a purely electric flying machine was able to hit

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>those speeds over those distances. Now, of course, right now

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we're still talking about demonstrating capabilities here, right we're talking

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>about like the proof of concept stage really or maybe

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>one step beyond that. But it's probably gonna be ay

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>before we see those capabilities built into more practical applications.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you gotta crawl before you walk, or

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess you gotta fly before you commercially fly. Perhaps finally,

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a sad story. Stephen Wilhei, who created the

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>g i F file format, recently passed away due to COVID.

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>The format allowed a way to create high resolution graphics

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and not require huge file sizes. Today we think of

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>g i F files as being animated image files. That

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>was not always the case. It was an alternative to

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>some other image file formats like JPEG. Really really important contribution,

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>especially in the early days of the Internet, where you know,

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we were relying on things like dial up Internet, so

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fast transmission speeds. Small files like these were really important things.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>So in honor of his memory, I am going to

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>pronounce the file format the way he said you were

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to Jeff, the Jeff file format. I will likely

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>not pronounce this this way ever again, but you know,

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I definitely respect his contributions to technology in general and

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the JEFF format in particular. Alright, that wraps up the

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>news for Thursday, March two thousand twenty two. I hope

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you are all well. If you have any suggestions for

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>topics I should cover on future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>please reach out to me. The best way to do

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that is over on Twitter. The handle for the show

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>is tech Stuff H. S W. And I'll talk to

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an I heart

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows. Eight