1 00:00:09,560 --> 00:00:11,680 Speaker 1: What is up, Mets fans, Welcome back to another episode 2 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:14,160 Speaker 1: of the Mets Stuff podcast. Today we were joined with 3 00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:17,480 Speaker 1: Will Salmon again to talk about the Mets offseason. There 4 00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:19,600 Speaker 1: hasn't been a ton going on, but if there's anybody 5 00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 1: who's had his finger on the pulse, it's been Will 6 00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:23,560 Speaker 1: all off season. Will thank you so much for joining us. 7 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:24,239 Speaker 2: Appreciate it. 8 00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:26,799 Speaker 3: Yeah, any time, guys. Always got the Chat Mets with 9 00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:27,200 Speaker 3: you guys. 10 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:29,400 Speaker 4: Yeah, happy to have you on Chat Mets too, because, 11 00:00:29,440 --> 00:00:32,400 Speaker 4: first of all, just commends on what's been a banner 12 00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:34,239 Speaker 4: off season for you so far. You've been You've been 13 00:00:34,560 --> 00:00:37,000 Speaker 4: on the nose on basically every single move, every transaction, 14 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:39,640 Speaker 4: every single inkling that's happened in the Mets world. And 15 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:42,680 Speaker 4: if anybody's not subscribe to the Athletic Reading what Will's 16 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:45,000 Speaker 4: writing on practically a daily basis at this point because 17 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:46,680 Speaker 4: the guy's dynamo. You got to get on there and 18 00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 4: check these out, because that's, let's say, a step ahead 19 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:50,760 Speaker 4: of the Mets News. But a couple of articles you 20 00:00:50,760 --> 00:00:53,120 Speaker 4: put out in the last few days, namely two with 21 00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:56,920 Speaker 4: Ken Rosenthal where there were some links in it between 22 00:00:57,240 --> 00:00:59,279 Speaker 4: relative links again links is you know we're using links 23 00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:02,760 Speaker 4: as a pretty general here between likelihood the Framber Valdes 24 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:04,000 Speaker 4: to the Mets. I think a lot of the Mets 25 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:06,640 Speaker 4: fans are still very concerned with the team's rotation at 26 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,040 Speaker 4: this moment, and Framber seems like the most obvious fit. 27 00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:12,160 Speaker 4: There is there any connection, there is there any relative 28 00:01:12,280 --> 00:01:15,160 Speaker 4: likelihood to a contract be made there with your feelings 29 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:15,959 Speaker 4: on Framber. 30 00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:18,920 Speaker 5: Yeah, So with Framberveldez and the Mets, I think there's 31 00:01:18,920 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 5: a decent chance that that could be a connection down 32 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 5: the road. I think at first, like something that I 33 00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:27,039 Speaker 5: reported is they're exploring the trade market. 34 00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:29,120 Speaker 3: I don't know how long that will last, and I 35 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:31,280 Speaker 3: don't know to what end. Of course, I can't predict 36 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 3: whether or. 37 00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 5: Not they actually pull somebody off from another team that 38 00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 5: works for their rotation. But I do know that they're 39 00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:38,960 Speaker 5: looking for, or they're at least open to the idea 40 00:01:38,959 --> 00:01:41,880 Speaker 5: of the rental pitcher, i e. Somebody who is going 41 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:44,319 Speaker 5: to be a free agent after the season, or somebody 42 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:47,040 Speaker 5: with a little bit more club control. And you have 43 00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:50,760 Speaker 5: other segments within those two as well. You have guys 44 00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:53,600 Speaker 5: who are more of like a front line number one types, 45 00:01:54,360 --> 00:01:56,360 Speaker 5: and you have other guys who are more like inning 46 00:01:56,440 --> 00:01:59,680 Speaker 5: zero types as well, So like it definitely varies, and 47 00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 5: I think think either probably helps the Mets rotation. I 48 00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 5: would argue that frankly, they may need somebody of higher quality, 49 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:10,080 Speaker 5: like somebody who's like a number one or number two. 50 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:12,639 Speaker 5: But as long as I feel like you could put 51 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:15,760 Speaker 5: that person, whoever it ends up being somewhere in the 52 00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:18,240 Speaker 5: front half of the rotation, whether it's one, two, or three, 53 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:22,800 Speaker 5: you're definitely better off and you're probably probably something that 54 00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 5: you should do. Even if it's somebody who maybe a 55 00:02:26,360 --> 00:02:28,480 Speaker 5: less glamorous name, who could be a number three, as 56 00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:30,600 Speaker 5: long as he's maybe dependable, as long as he's somebody 57 00:02:30,600 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 5: who could log innings for you, I think that there 58 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:35,320 Speaker 5: is something to that for this club, especially. 59 00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 3: So in regards to Framberville. 60 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 5: Does he fits that description of course right, Like he's 61 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 5: somebody who has had a long history of success, and 62 00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 5: he not only performs well when he pitches for the 63 00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:50,520 Speaker 5: most part, he's also somebody that logs innings as well, 64 00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:53,160 Speaker 5: and so he's pretty durable, or at least he has 65 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 5: demonstrated as much. 66 00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 3: I think with Framberg though, is that there's. 67 00:02:56,840 --> 00:02:59,160 Speaker 5: An age component to this, Like he's on the older side, 68 00:02:59,200 --> 00:03:03,040 Speaker 5: even for free age. And so there's reluctance there, not 69 00:03:03,160 --> 00:03:05,160 Speaker 5: just the Mets, but perhaps some other teams as well 70 00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:08,280 Speaker 5: to maybe go to a long term deal on Framber Valdez. 71 00:03:08,360 --> 00:03:11,120 Speaker 5: So if the Mets don't end up pulling off a 72 00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:15,119 Speaker 5: trade here, I could see them going to Framburgh and saying, look, 73 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 5: you know, we have a short term offer for you. 74 00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:20,520 Speaker 5: Not to say that they have one right now, but 75 00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:22,920 Speaker 5: just if we go down this path, that's something I 76 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:25,080 Speaker 5: can see them doing and saying, hey, this is what 77 00:03:25,080 --> 00:03:28,239 Speaker 5: we could do, A high annual average value for you, 78 00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:30,799 Speaker 5: maybe even like you could opt out, maybe do something creative. 79 00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:33,440 Speaker 5: I could see those types of things being part of 80 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 5: some things that are in play for the Mets and pitching. 81 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:37,840 Speaker 5: So yeah, I would say that there is a connection there. 82 00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 5: It's just not as developed quite yet as I understand it. 83 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:44,520 Speaker 1: I know you mentioned the trade market. Right now, we've 84 00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 1: got rumors going around about Edward Cabrera possibly being trade 85 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 1: to the Cubs waiting for those deals to finalize. Were 86 00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 1: the Mets involved at all? We saw the Yankees were 87 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 1: not particularly close. Were the Mets even involved. 88 00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:57,400 Speaker 5: Well, we did hear that the Yankees were in the 89 00:03:57,760 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 5: mix for at the very least. I think it could 90 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:03,960 Speaker 5: be not exactly semantics, but it kind of varies as 91 00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:06,320 Speaker 5: far as what the person, which person you're talking to 92 00:04:06,400 --> 00:04:08,680 Speaker 5: in like their definition of maybe close and that kind 93 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:10,760 Speaker 5: of thing, which is probably not worth getting into. 94 00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:14,760 Speaker 3: But yeah, I think that the Mets they should have 95 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 3: been involved. 96 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:17,800 Speaker 5: I don't know to what extent that they actually were, 97 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:19,640 Speaker 5: because again, this is somebody that's going to probably we 98 00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:21,599 Speaker 5: don't know exactly what the Cubs are paying for this 99 00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 5: in terms of prospect capital or however else, but it 100 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:27,840 Speaker 5: should cost them a good amount because Cabrera is on 101 00:04:27,880 --> 00:04:30,440 Speaker 5: the cusp of I feel like at least really breaking 102 00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 5: out if he hasn't already. I thought he had a 103 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:34,880 Speaker 5: good season last year, but there were still some ups 104 00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:37,880 Speaker 5: and downs to it. And I think that the Miami 105 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 5: Marlins do not get enough credit for the way that 106 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,440 Speaker 5: they're developing their pictures. Lately, they've been doing a really 107 00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 5: good job of that. So he's somebody that's really on 108 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:47,240 Speaker 5: the cusp of it. And for me, as far as 109 00:04:47,240 --> 00:04:49,440 Speaker 5: the Mets go, I don't know this definitively, but I 110 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 5: would look at it as it's a high price to 111 00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:55,280 Speaker 5: pay when you don't have that much in the form 112 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:59,080 Speaker 5: of reliability within your rotation already, and again I'll to 113 00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:02,440 Speaker 5: say that isn't reliable. It's shows he's got some injury 114 00:05:02,520 --> 00:05:04,920 Speaker 5: history and he's yet to kind of put it all 115 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:08,400 Speaker 5: together for like, say, thirty two starts, and at least 116 00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 5: for that for one season, let alone do it consecutive, 117 00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:14,400 Speaker 5: consecutively and demonstrate that he could be somebody that does 118 00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:16,480 Speaker 5: that for the rest of the rest of the time 119 00:05:16,480 --> 00:05:17,600 Speaker 5: that you have him. 120 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:20,360 Speaker 4: Yeah, just to give people a sense of Edward Cabrera's career, 121 00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:22,599 Speaker 4: this was the first time he'd crossed one hundred inning 122 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:24,480 Speaker 4: plateau and he still only got to one hundred and 123 00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:26,799 Speaker 4: thirty seven and missed him Simeon with injury well hitting 124 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:28,760 Speaker 4: new heights he hasn't hit yet in his career. With 125 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:31,520 Speaker 4: the Mets being involved in some of these trade discussions, 126 00:05:31,560 --> 00:05:34,160 Speaker 4: will do you ever get a sense of the types 127 00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 4: of prospects the Mets are willing to part with, the 128 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:38,440 Speaker 4: types are definitely not willing to part with. We think 129 00:05:38,440 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 4: at this point it seems fairly certain of course not 130 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:44,000 Speaker 4: Nolan McClane, er Carson Bench, but also probably not Joonahtong, 131 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:46,720 Speaker 4: but was there as the mid tier of the Mets 132 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:50,120 Speaker 4: system grows stronger and stronger. Is there any kind of 133 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:52,280 Speaker 4: way you think the Mets types of guys they would 134 00:05:52,279 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 4: part ways with. 135 00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:56,920 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think that they're open to different things that 136 00:05:56,960 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 5: like the guys that you mentioned are probably close to 137 00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:01,920 Speaker 5: off limits, if not pretty much off limits. 138 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:02,880 Speaker 3: Especially McLain. 139 00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:06,279 Speaker 5: I think that he's in a bracket on his own actually, 140 00:06:06,600 --> 00:06:08,680 Speaker 5: and then it's the everybody else and you can kind 141 00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:11,039 Speaker 5: of go with a different bracket for maybe Bench and Tong, 142 00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:14,359 Speaker 5: But I just feel like McLain is like alone in 143 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:18,240 Speaker 5: a class of his own, so roughly so, but yeah, 144 00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:20,400 Speaker 5: I think that they could that they're probably open to 145 00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:22,919 Speaker 5: different thing It depends on who was out there or 146 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:25,920 Speaker 5: who they've had discussions on. For instance, like a a 147 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 5: Joe Ryan type, who I guess isn't as out there 148 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:30,880 Speaker 5: as maybe he people thought he would be at the 149 00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:33,120 Speaker 5: beginning of the off season. For him you would have 150 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:35,320 Speaker 5: had to pay a huge price for. And so it's 151 00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 5: a different conversation with for somebody like him than you're 152 00:06:37,839 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 5: having with say somebody like a Brady Singer from the 153 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,240 Speaker 5: Cincinnati Reads of course, right obviously. 154 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 3: So yeah, I think that they're that it kind of 155 00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 3: depends on that. 156 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:48,920 Speaker 5: And the way that I've put it is like they 157 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:53,839 Speaker 5: they've been pretty open and probably a bit stingy though 158 00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 5: on you know, who they are willing to give up 159 00:06:56,839 --> 00:06:59,760 Speaker 5: otherwise like there would have been a trade already probably right, yeah, yeah, 160 00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:04,520 Speaker 5: So like we could kind of deduce that they've been 161 00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 5: valuing their prospects pretty highly, and that's probably fine because look, 162 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:14,000 Speaker 5: they have one of the best classes in baseball, so 163 00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:15,560 Speaker 5: like clearly, like those guys. 164 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:16,800 Speaker 3: Are supposed to be pretty talented. 165 00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:19,000 Speaker 5: So I don't want to say that like they're doing 166 00:07:19,080 --> 00:07:23,160 Speaker 5: it and it's like, Okay, this is crazy and it's misplaced. 167 00:07:23,400 --> 00:07:24,080 Speaker 3: There's probably something. 168 00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:28,119 Speaker 5: There's probably something to like being careful about it. That said, 169 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:31,680 Speaker 5: I think that they're reaching a point, whether it's this 170 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 5: week or next week, it's going to be pretty soon 171 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:35,960 Speaker 5: where they have to really decide, like are we going 172 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:38,440 Speaker 5: to make this kind of move or are we better 173 00:07:38,480 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 5: suited for somebody like a framdburg. 174 00:07:40,120 --> 00:07:42,400 Speaker 3: Valdez or a Ranger Suarez or somebody like that. 175 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 5: And that's even saying that, like maybe you can't even 176 00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:48,000 Speaker 5: get those guys on a short term contract, like I 177 00:07:48,040 --> 00:07:50,160 Speaker 5: suggested that would be the approach, but maybe their markets 178 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:50,840 Speaker 5: get better. 179 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:53,520 Speaker 3: Than that, so as other teams that make those decisions. 180 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 5: But I feel like these next two weeks, even maybe 181 00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:00,080 Speaker 5: just this week, it's a critical for a decision making 182 00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:03,040 Speaker 5: for the Mets in terms of the prospects that they're 183 00:08:03,040 --> 00:08:05,720 Speaker 5: willing to give up and which pitchers that they want 184 00:08:05,760 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 5: to acquire, because after that group of like BENJ McClain, 185 00:08:09,640 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 5: I think you have a group of like Check Williams. 186 00:08:12,520 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 3: There's some other guys go down the list. 187 00:08:15,400 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 5: That they probably should consider dealing in addition to those 188 00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:21,600 Speaker 5: infielders who are already on the major league part of 189 00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 5: the major league group, like a Ronnie Mauricio Luis Anhilocunya, 190 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:28,120 Speaker 5: those guys who are no longer prospects who are trade candidates. 191 00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:31,080 Speaker 5: Obviously Mark Fientos is part of that group as well, 192 00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:34,320 Speaker 5: who they would probably be open on moving. 193 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:36,560 Speaker 3: Or listening to as far as offers go. 194 00:08:36,760 --> 00:08:40,000 Speaker 5: So yeah, that's kind of the group, and from where 195 00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:41,880 Speaker 5: it goes, who knows, But they definitely have to make 196 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:43,720 Speaker 5: a decision on that sooner rather than later. 197 00:08:43,840 --> 00:08:45,400 Speaker 1: If you were to ask Mets fans, I feel like 198 00:08:45,559 --> 00:08:47,880 Speaker 1: most of them are saying how badly this team needs 199 00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:50,200 Speaker 1: started pitching help We've talked about it too, that the 200 00:08:50,240 --> 00:08:52,520 Speaker 1: outfield is very incomplete for this team right now. Don't 201 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:54,440 Speaker 1: have a center fielder, don't have a left fielder. We 202 00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 1: hope Carson benj can fill in at some point, but 203 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:59,040 Speaker 1: as you put in your article on the Athletic, the 204 00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:01,960 Speaker 1: Mets don't necessarily want him to have to be the guy. 205 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:03,880 Speaker 1: They want him to earn that position, they want him 206 00:09:03,880 --> 00:09:06,960 Speaker 1: to grow into it. Do the Mets seem more interested 207 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:09,559 Speaker 1: in finding guys to fill outfield or starting pitching right now? 208 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:13,840 Speaker 5: In your opinion, My impression was the rotation was the 209 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:16,640 Speaker 5: seemingly like the priority, like the trade market and just 210 00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:19,920 Speaker 5: exploring that for right now though you could only do 211 00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:23,720 Speaker 5: multiple things at the same time, And also like it's 212 00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:25,800 Speaker 5: still pretty high up there in their list of things 213 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:28,160 Speaker 5: to do, Like they know that they need at least 214 00:09:28,200 --> 00:09:30,559 Speaker 5: a left fielder, right Like, that's wide open and you 215 00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:33,600 Speaker 5: just traded not just but you traded Jack McNeil fairly 216 00:09:33,679 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 5: recently and made the decision that he is not going 217 00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:39,960 Speaker 5: to be your left fielder, so that's wide open as possible. 218 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:41,480 Speaker 3: And then in center I feel like you mentioned like 219 00:09:41,480 --> 00:09:42,559 Speaker 3: with Benj like. 220 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 5: Sure like in theory, I think the question that was 221 00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:47,400 Speaker 5: asked me in that article that you reference was like, 222 00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,280 Speaker 5: how much faith does David Stearns has? 223 00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, some faith in him. 224 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:53,320 Speaker 5: I mean the guy's supposed to be pretty good, so yeah, Like, 225 00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:56,160 Speaker 5: but that doesn't mean that they're going to hand him 226 00:09:56,200 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 5: the job. Like, this guy has not really proven capable 227 00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:04,400 Speaker 5: of triple A quite yet. I mean capable is probably 228 00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:06,239 Speaker 5: the wrong way to put it, but like, he hasn't performed, 229 00:10:07,160 --> 00:10:09,840 Speaker 5: and he hasn't mastered that level yet. And he hasn't 230 00:10:10,160 --> 00:10:12,360 Speaker 5: he hadn't been there that long, and when he was, 231 00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 5: it was at the end of the season and the 232 00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:15,839 Speaker 5: numbers weren't that good. So he's got some proving to do. 233 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:18,199 Speaker 5: So it's gonna be a big spring training for him. 234 00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:20,280 Speaker 5: But I think that the Mets are probably best suited 235 00:10:20,720 --> 00:10:25,000 Speaker 5: getting two outfielders and somebody preferably who could handle center field. 236 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:27,320 Speaker 5: I think that's probably a little bit more important than 237 00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 5: people are giving or making it out to be, actually, 238 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,200 Speaker 5: because it was a problem last year and it never 239 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 5: got solved, and now you added to that with that 240 00:10:36,000 --> 00:10:38,520 Speaker 5: gaping hole in the left field, so there's plenty of 241 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:40,360 Speaker 5: work to do in that lineup. I'd also say that 242 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:43,360 Speaker 5: depending on who those outfielders or outfielder is that you 243 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:44,040 Speaker 5: are that. 244 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:45,199 Speaker 3: You are acquiring. 245 00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:47,800 Speaker 5: You need some right handed help out as well, and 246 00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:49,800 Speaker 5: I think that could come in the form of maybe 247 00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:52,319 Speaker 5: somebody who is a bad first guy who could DH 248 00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:53,880 Speaker 5: a little bit be part of that mix. 249 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:58,160 Speaker 3: But they need some thump behind. 250 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,120 Speaker 5: Juan Soto and those other, you know, first two or 251 00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 5: three guys in that lineup, because you no longer have 252 00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:05,480 Speaker 5: Pete Alonso doing that. 253 00:11:05,679 --> 00:11:09,320 Speaker 3: So that to me is definitely high on the priority list. 254 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:10,760 Speaker 2: Yeah. 255 00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:13,320 Speaker 4: Funny enough, the outfielders that seem to be available the 256 00:11:13,320 --> 00:11:16,000 Speaker 4: Mets have at least been mildly connected to being Kyle 257 00:11:16,040 --> 00:11:18,080 Speaker 4: Tucker at the top, Cody Bellinger in the middle, than 258 00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:18,720 Speaker 4: large new Bark. 259 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:19,960 Speaker 2: Kind of more is the budget options. 260 00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:22,559 Speaker 4: Those are all left handed bats, so it is kind 261 00:11:22,559 --> 00:11:25,200 Speaker 4: of getting more difficult to see how the Mets find 262 00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:27,560 Speaker 4: that right handed power bet. But Tucker's the name that 263 00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:31,079 Speaker 4: flies around a lot. There's been some reports, especially out 264 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:33,400 Speaker 4: of North Bendix and Smith, that Toronto thinks the Mets 265 00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:35,200 Speaker 4: are more of a player for that. I know in 266 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:37,560 Speaker 4: the articles with you and Ken, you've still kind of 267 00:11:37,760 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 4: pushed that it's more likely to be the Dodgers in 268 00:11:39,520 --> 00:11:42,600 Speaker 4: the Blue Jays, has there been contact made? And also 269 00:11:43,160 --> 00:11:45,079 Speaker 4: how long do you think the Mets would actually be 270 00:11:45,160 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 4: willing to go from what you've heard in the deal 271 00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:48,160 Speaker 4: for Kyle Tucker. 272 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,480 Speaker 5: Yeah, so I think Jim Ducat actually a former long 273 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:54,480 Speaker 5: time executive who networks serious this mess and why stuff 274 00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:56,559 Speaker 5: as well, he put out a tweet out or a 275 00:11:56,640 --> 00:11:59,439 Speaker 5: post saying that the Mets, the Dodgers, and the Blue 276 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:03,319 Speaker 5: Jays were three of the most aggressive teams and those 277 00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:06,040 Speaker 5: those are contenders for Kylin Tucker. I don't know if 278 00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:08,280 Speaker 5: it's limited to that group, but those are among the 279 00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:10,800 Speaker 5: teams that are options for him. 280 00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:12,080 Speaker 3: As far as the Mets go. 281 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:15,440 Speaker 5: I've been pretty consistent about this throughout the off season 282 00:12:15,600 --> 00:12:19,679 Speaker 5: of saying that like Bellinger, Kyle Tucker, those guys are 283 00:12:19,720 --> 00:12:20,840 Speaker 5: options for the Mets. 284 00:12:21,040 --> 00:12:22,200 Speaker 3: But I don't see. 285 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:25,960 Speaker 5: Them giving either of those players like a long term deal. 286 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:27,440 Speaker 3: I think that it's more of a short. 287 00:12:27,280 --> 00:12:29,760 Speaker 5: Term thing, where like if their markets are if those 288 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:32,440 Speaker 5: guys are not getting those big numbers that they expected 289 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:34,480 Speaker 5: or that people expected for them at the beginning of 290 00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:37,480 Speaker 5: the off season, Klin Tucker, for instance, like three hundred 291 00:12:37,480 --> 00:12:41,040 Speaker 5: million forms like for like if they're not getting those numbers, 292 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:43,160 Speaker 5: then I think like a three year deal or with 293 00:12:43,240 --> 00:12:45,960 Speaker 5: like opt outs or something creative like that could be 294 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:49,600 Speaker 5: the Mets play. I don't know if really his market 295 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 5: has materialized enough yet or developed enough yet for it 296 00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:56,280 Speaker 5: to even get to that point where like those types of. 297 00:12:56,200 --> 00:12:57,560 Speaker 3: Offers have been extended or not. 298 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:00,400 Speaker 5: I wouldn't be surprised if it's still too early for that, 299 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:05,160 Speaker 5: but I would expect that to be probably the Mets play. 300 00:13:05,160 --> 00:13:08,720 Speaker 5: There is the three year type of deal and high 301 00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:13,320 Speaker 5: annual average value and the pitch of like, hey, you 302 00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:16,600 Speaker 5: join Juan Soto and Francisco Lindor and all of a sudden, 303 00:13:16,760 --> 00:13:18,199 Speaker 5: like the Mets. 304 00:13:18,040 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 3: Are a World Series, like a serious world serious. 305 00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:24,160 Speaker 5: Contender, big time, I would argue, because you think that 306 00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:26,920 Speaker 5: they're going to add pitching as well of course, So yeah, 307 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:28,439 Speaker 5: I think we kind of get into like whether or 308 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:31,560 Speaker 5: not the Mets are actually good with that with or 309 00:13:31,559 --> 00:13:34,240 Speaker 5: without him, that's a different kind of conversation, but certainly 310 00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:37,160 Speaker 5: with him they'd be a they'd definitely be boosting their 311 00:13:37,400 --> 00:13:38,280 Speaker 5: World Series odds. 312 00:13:38,320 --> 00:13:39,000 Speaker 3: To say the least. 313 00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:41,720 Speaker 1: Is there surprise across the industry of how slow the 314 00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 1: off season has been over the last couple of weeks or. 315 00:13:44,720 --> 00:13:46,960 Speaker 3: So, there's been frustration. 316 00:13:47,080 --> 00:13:51,719 Speaker 5: Of course, I don't know about expectations go, but it's 317 00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:54,080 Speaker 5: been a weird offseason. I think at the forefront of it, 318 00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:57,760 Speaker 5: you have a free agent class that wasn't viewed as 319 00:13:57,800 --> 00:14:01,400 Speaker 5: all that deep and for a lot of teams, a 320 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:04,680 Speaker 5: lot of these players are not great fits for and 321 00:14:05,400 --> 00:14:07,360 Speaker 5: even in say like kle Talker's market, the teams that 322 00:14:07,360 --> 00:14:10,440 Speaker 5: we just mentioned there, they're all like big market teams, right, 323 00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:12,920 Speaker 5: like those three teams, and like the Yankees were loosely 324 00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:13,440 Speaker 5: connected to. 325 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:15,760 Speaker 3: Them for a little while, and whoever else, but like. 326 00:14:15,679 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 5: They're all like these big market teams, and so once 327 00:14:19,280 --> 00:14:22,560 Speaker 5: like Colleg Schwarber and Pete Alonzo got wrapped up during 328 00:14:22,560 --> 00:14:25,040 Speaker 5: the winter meetings. It doesn't really it doesn't surprise me 329 00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:28,400 Speaker 5: that like it has lagged just because it was a 330 00:14:28,400 --> 00:14:31,600 Speaker 5: class that I've had some executives describe it to me 331 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:36,240 Speaker 5: as mediocre after like those top names. 332 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 3: Like there's just not a whole lot of depth to it. 333 00:14:37,800 --> 00:14:41,680 Speaker 5: So if you look at the list, I understand, like 334 00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:44,400 Speaker 5: I understand like it compared to other classes, like where 335 00:14:44,400 --> 00:14:46,520 Speaker 5: it ranks. And there's also a bunch of teams that 336 00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:49,479 Speaker 5: are in the trade market, and the trade market involves 337 00:14:50,520 --> 00:14:52,840 Speaker 5: multiple teams that want to get better and they're not 338 00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 5: looking to like mail in the twenty twenty sixth season, 339 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:58,320 Speaker 5: and so that's made it slow because you're not trading 340 00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 5: prospects for players, trading like major league talent for major 341 00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:05,960 Speaker 5: league talent, and those deals are hard to hard to make. 342 00:15:06,880 --> 00:15:09,280 Speaker 5: So it's fun when they line up, but it takes 343 00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:11,800 Speaker 5: a lot for that to happen. It's not as I 344 00:15:11,840 --> 00:15:14,480 Speaker 5: guess smooth as that prospect hall for like that one 345 00:15:15,480 --> 00:15:17,800 Speaker 5: superstar type player, so like we don't have that as much. 346 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:20,840 Speaker 5: And the market overall was kind of strange because you 347 00:15:20,920 --> 00:15:24,800 Speaker 5: had more closers and like high leverage relievers who are 348 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:27,720 Speaker 5: of interest this year, and usually that's something that gets 349 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:31,680 Speaker 5: done like around now and bleeds into February. Even for 350 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:35,040 Speaker 5: the most part, like ninety five percent of the high 351 00:15:35,120 --> 00:15:39,040 Speaker 5: leverage relievers are all scooped up already. So it's been 352 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:41,320 Speaker 5: a very strange and very different offseason. 353 00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:44,360 Speaker 4: It's funny today when we're recording this. On January seventh 354 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:46,600 Speaker 4: is the anniversary of the Francisco Indoor a bunch of 355 00:15:46,640 --> 00:15:48,720 Speaker 4: prospects for super star trade by the mess which you 356 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:50,920 Speaker 4: kind of wish something like that come up right now. 357 00:15:50,960 --> 00:15:53,000 Speaker 4: Also with just the slowness of the winter. It feels 358 00:15:53,000 --> 00:15:55,600 Speaker 4: like the one time the Mets have acted with any 359 00:15:55,640 --> 00:15:59,080 Speaker 4: sense of urgency, be it relative urgency, was signing Jorge 360 00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:02,200 Speaker 4: Polanco after the flurry of Edward Diaz and p Alonzo 361 00:16:02,280 --> 00:16:05,040 Speaker 4: left almost a month after that deal. How does that 362 00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:07,400 Speaker 4: one look in hindsight again, because it felt like that 363 00:16:07,480 --> 00:16:08,880 Speaker 4: happened kind of out of clear blue sky. 364 00:16:08,960 --> 00:16:10,560 Speaker 2: You were the only one who had Polanco connect to. 365 00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:12,360 Speaker 4: The Mets, like twelve hours before that deal was made, 366 00:16:12,400 --> 00:16:14,840 Speaker 4: But that was Is it a surprise? That was the 367 00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:16,800 Speaker 4: one time the Mets kind of jumped out of the 368 00:16:16,920 --> 00:16:18,160 Speaker 4: seat and made something happen. 369 00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 5: Well we know about the Mets, or that we should 370 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:22,920 Speaker 5: know about the Mets is like they're going to be aggressive, 371 00:16:22,960 --> 00:16:24,640 Speaker 5: like when they read the market and the market is 372 00:16:24,680 --> 00:16:27,520 Speaker 5: telling them like, Okay, the light's gone on, like let's 373 00:16:27,520 --> 00:16:29,360 Speaker 5: outbid for this type of player if this is the 374 00:16:29,360 --> 00:16:30,960 Speaker 5: guy that we want. And it just so happened that 375 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:34,360 Speaker 5: Jorge Polanco was somebody that they really really liked and 376 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 5: his market was thriving, like he had a pretty solid market, 377 00:16:37,640 --> 00:16:39,960 Speaker 5: like he had teams that were interested in him, whether 378 00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:42,440 Speaker 5: it was the Mariners or the Pirates or whoever else, 379 00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:45,560 Speaker 5: and like he was ready to go, and that's what 380 00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:47,240 Speaker 5: you need, Like you need the player who's willing to 381 00:16:47,240 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 5: be like, Okay, I'm these are the offers I'm getting, 382 00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:52,360 Speaker 5: or at least this is the way that teams are 383 00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:52,960 Speaker 5: perceiving me. 384 00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:56,680 Speaker 3: So I don't foresee that changing for whatever reason. I'm 385 00:16:56,720 --> 00:16:58,800 Speaker 3: ready to go with whatever it gets extended that I 386 00:16:58,800 --> 00:16:59,920 Speaker 3: think is the best offer. 387 00:17:00,360 --> 00:17:02,920 Speaker 5: And so the Mets did that, and you know, like 388 00:17:03,840 --> 00:17:07,880 Speaker 5: after that, like guys like Ron O'Hearn did get picked up, right, 389 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 5: so like it wasn't that as if it was like 390 00:17:10,400 --> 00:17:12,400 Speaker 5: in a vacuum, like they just got plunker like there 391 00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:14,240 Speaker 5: were some other there were a couple of guys that 392 00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:18,360 Speaker 5: did go afterward, and if he was the one guy 393 00:17:18,400 --> 00:17:21,360 Speaker 5: that you were circling in that tier, then it made 394 00:17:21,440 --> 00:17:24,760 Speaker 5: sense to go do it. So And frankly, there aren't 395 00:17:24,760 --> 00:17:26,520 Speaker 5: a whole lot of guys who are like him in 396 00:17:26,560 --> 00:17:29,560 Speaker 5: the market actually, like he doesn't really have that many peers. 397 00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:31,680 Speaker 3: I think like O'Hearn is kind of similar. 398 00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:36,040 Speaker 5: They do some different things, but there's some aspects of 399 00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:37,760 Speaker 5: versatility to each of those players. 400 00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 3: So I get why they would do it. 401 00:17:41,840 --> 00:17:43,440 Speaker 5: You could quipple with the idea of whether or not 402 00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:45,399 Speaker 5: he's going to be a decent first baseman or not. 403 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:47,359 Speaker 5: That remains to be seen, right, Like, we don't know 404 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:51,080 Speaker 5: that they're banking on the athleticism aspect of that, But 405 00:17:52,240 --> 00:17:54,119 Speaker 5: as far as just like the overall player and like 406 00:17:54,160 --> 00:17:56,439 Speaker 5: liking his offensive profile, I could see like why they 407 00:17:56,480 --> 00:17:58,160 Speaker 5: would have swooped. 408 00:17:57,800 --> 00:18:00,840 Speaker 1: In the way that they did with Mauricia and Vientos 409 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:03,880 Speaker 1: and Acunya. They kind of are all fighting for similar 410 00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:06,399 Speaker 1: ish spots. Obviously they do different things. And you mentioned 411 00:18:06,400 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 1: in one of your articles too that these guys could 412 00:18:08,520 --> 00:18:11,119 Speaker 1: be on the block. Is that from the Mets wanting 413 00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:13,680 Speaker 1: to move these guys or listening to offers more. 414 00:18:13,520 --> 00:18:17,320 Speaker 5: So, well, I think that they're at a place where 415 00:18:17,320 --> 00:18:20,000 Speaker 5: they realize there's just not a whole lot of playing 416 00:18:20,040 --> 00:18:23,080 Speaker 5: time for these guys after the Marcus Simon acquisition. 417 00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:25,560 Speaker 3: And actually like the way that Brett Batty. 418 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:28,800 Speaker 5: Performed in the second half or whether it was around 419 00:18:28,840 --> 00:18:30,960 Speaker 5: June or whatever, it was, where he picked things up 420 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 5: and became fairly consistent both defensively and offensively, and he 421 00:18:36,600 --> 00:18:39,160 Speaker 5: deserves the runway for third days. So if you're looking 422 00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:42,639 Speaker 5: at third base being Brett Bady spot right now, second 423 00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:46,440 Speaker 5: base being Marcus Simiam. Obviously they're not gonna be playing 424 00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:50,040 Speaker 5: short stop for the Mets, and they're not first baseman. 425 00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:52,560 Speaker 3: Well, I guess Biento's is. 426 00:18:52,640 --> 00:18:56,720 Speaker 5: But that's really the one decision point, right, Like, that's 427 00:18:56,760 --> 00:18:59,720 Speaker 5: where I pause, because it's Viano's is the guy where 428 00:18:59,720 --> 00:19:02,080 Speaker 5: they have to make the call on what I referenced 429 00:19:02,080 --> 00:19:05,080 Speaker 5: earlier about a right handed bat who could maybe be 430 00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:08,000 Speaker 5: a bad first guy. The bar that they have to 431 00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:11,000 Speaker 5: clear is like, could Mark Viento's be this guy? And 432 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:14,600 Speaker 5: if this guy whoever it is, is going to offer 433 00:19:14,760 --> 00:19:18,000 Speaker 5: more consistency or more of a prove it type of thing, 434 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:20,400 Speaker 5: then they probably have to go get that guy. Because 435 00:19:20,440 --> 00:19:22,560 Speaker 5: Mark Vento showed you that there's still some ups and 436 00:19:22,640 --> 00:19:26,520 Speaker 5: downs to his game last year unfortunately. So whether or 437 00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:31,120 Speaker 5: not like they trade those guys, I'm not sure because 438 00:19:31,119 --> 00:19:33,600 Speaker 5: that's the decision again, like they have to make, and 439 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:35,800 Speaker 5: I'm not sure where they're at with it. But we're 440 00:19:35,800 --> 00:19:38,720 Speaker 5: also talking about players who are out of options, a 441 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:41,080 Speaker 5: couple of them, right, So, like there's not a whole 442 00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:43,119 Speaker 5: lot of things that they could do with these with 443 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:45,280 Speaker 5: a couple of these guys like Mauricio, you could still 444 00:19:45,320 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 5: start in TRIPLEA. 445 00:19:46,800 --> 00:19:48,480 Speaker 3: They preserve that option there. 446 00:19:48,520 --> 00:19:51,000 Speaker 5: But I go back to Brett Baidy in just the way, 447 00:19:51,200 --> 00:19:54,040 Speaker 5: the way that he played in the second half of 448 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:54,600 Speaker 5: last year. 449 00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:56,120 Speaker 3: He just deserves to shot. 450 00:19:56,280 --> 00:19:59,280 Speaker 5: And I'm with the fans who have kind of gone 451 00:19:59,320 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 5: back and forth with like they all can't be getting 452 00:20:02,080 --> 00:20:03,760 Speaker 5: like a third of the playing time, like you got, 453 00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:06,240 Speaker 5: you got to give the keys to somebody here, and 454 00:20:06,440 --> 00:20:10,040 Speaker 5: Brett Baty deserves them, so I expect them to roll 455 00:20:10,080 --> 00:20:13,440 Speaker 5: with him at third base, and therefore they should be 456 00:20:13,480 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 5: looking for trade partners for the other guys. 457 00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:19,000 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's just a question probably now of how much 458 00:20:19,040 --> 00:20:21,200 Speaker 4: of those guys can be worth in a trade, especially, 459 00:20:21,280 --> 00:20:22,600 Speaker 4: I mean, you got like Mauricio is the one that's 460 00:20:22,600 --> 00:20:25,000 Speaker 4: always I always find interesting because it feels he has 461 00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:26,800 Speaker 4: really played baseball in three years, Like the way the 462 00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:29,240 Speaker 4: Mets manipulated his option last year, he kind of lost 463 00:20:29,520 --> 00:20:32,280 Speaker 4: a full year after missing a full year after missing 464 00:20:32,280 --> 00:20:35,080 Speaker 4: most of the year, and you wish that happens also to. 465 00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:36,560 Speaker 2: The right handed first base point. 466 00:20:36,640 --> 00:20:39,200 Speaker 4: It felt like that bar of Mark Fiento's is something 467 00:20:39,200 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 4: the Mets didn't see someone like Kazumo Kamoto, clearing as 468 00:20:42,880 --> 00:20:44,920 Speaker 4: right handed first base option who signed a bit of 469 00:20:45,000 --> 00:20:48,280 Speaker 4: a larger deal than expect at least committed years wise 470 00:20:48,359 --> 00:20:50,879 Speaker 4: with the Blue Jays over the weekend. And then similarly, 471 00:20:50,960 --> 00:20:53,920 Speaker 4: tatsuim the starting pitcher coming from the NPB, signed a 472 00:20:54,000 --> 00:20:56,440 Speaker 4: much smaller deal than a lot of people expected, basically 473 00:20:56,840 --> 00:20:58,840 Speaker 4: a one year, twenty one million dollar proved deal with 474 00:20:58,840 --> 00:21:02,800 Speaker 4: the Astros. The Mets involved in negotiations with these two 475 00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 4: guys at all, they mostly kind of stay out of them. 476 00:21:05,560 --> 00:21:09,040 Speaker 5: Yeah, negotiations not not that I know of. For those, 477 00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:11,760 Speaker 5: I'm not even sure like what their levels of moderate 478 00:21:11,840 --> 00:21:12,919 Speaker 5: interest in was. 479 00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:16,639 Speaker 3: Frankly with im, you know, they're not alone there. 480 00:21:17,040 --> 00:21:20,360 Speaker 5: Like there were a bunch of teams that looked at 481 00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:23,360 Speaker 5: his profile and said, okay, we have questions about how 482 00:21:23,400 --> 00:21:26,439 Speaker 5: his fastball is going to play, even though he throws hard, Like, 483 00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:28,400 Speaker 5: is that going to be a pitch that he has 484 00:21:28,480 --> 00:21:33,040 Speaker 5: to throw a lot and maybe hitters wise up to it, 485 00:21:33,359 --> 00:21:35,720 Speaker 5: And all of a sudden, he's only given us three 486 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:39,320 Speaker 5: four or five innings max. And I think that's reflected 487 00:21:39,359 --> 00:21:41,440 Speaker 5: in the contract that he signed, because like, not only 488 00:21:41,480 --> 00:21:43,400 Speaker 5: was it a short term deal, but like the incentives 489 00:21:43,480 --> 00:21:46,760 Speaker 5: the player bonuses kick in at eighty innings for him, 490 00:21:47,000 --> 00:21:49,320 Speaker 5: which is a fairly low number for a starting pitcher, 491 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:52,359 Speaker 5: like usually we see those over one hundred, maybe one twenty, 492 00:21:52,440 --> 00:21:54,119 Speaker 5: like that kind of thing. For it to be at 493 00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:56,960 Speaker 5: eighty kind of tells you, like people have some questions 494 00:21:57,000 --> 00:22:01,160 Speaker 5: about this, and so I don't I get it. But again, 495 00:22:01,359 --> 00:22:05,440 Speaker 5: like going back to the context surrounding Edward Carrera, it's 496 00:22:05,480 --> 00:22:07,119 Speaker 5: hard for me to see the Mets bring in an 497 00:22:07,280 --> 00:22:10,600 Speaker 5: unknown like that, even though he does have that potential 498 00:22:11,119 --> 00:22:13,359 Speaker 5: when you have other guys who are unknowns in your 499 00:22:13,440 --> 00:22:16,399 Speaker 5: rotation already, and like you desperately need some reliability, So 500 00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:19,360 Speaker 5: I get the one with you my completely, actually, even 501 00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:21,280 Speaker 5: though I think that there's a decent chance that he 502 00:22:21,359 --> 00:22:24,240 Speaker 5: does fairly well, especially his first year here. We've seen 503 00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:27,600 Speaker 5: that with other pictures from Japan, particularly with Minaga with 504 00:22:27,640 --> 00:22:30,680 Speaker 5: the Cubs who had done well early on, and some 505 00:22:30,720 --> 00:22:33,600 Speaker 5: others as well. But Okamoda is the guy who actually 506 00:22:33,680 --> 00:22:36,240 Speaker 5: thought they could have had some more interest in, or 507 00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:38,000 Speaker 5: should have had some more interest in, just because it's 508 00:22:38,040 --> 00:22:39,280 Speaker 5: on paper a decent fit. 509 00:22:40,119 --> 00:22:42,399 Speaker 3: But again, like they weren't alone. 510 00:22:42,119 --> 00:22:45,240 Speaker 5: With like maybe being a little bit lukewarm about it 511 00:22:45,280 --> 00:22:48,880 Speaker 5: at best. His market was fairly good from what I understand, 512 00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:51,160 Speaker 5: Like he had some teams and that part of it 513 00:22:51,240 --> 00:22:53,640 Speaker 5: was reflected like he's got what was a four year deal, 514 00:22:53,720 --> 00:22:55,960 Speaker 5: So that's pretty good for a guy coming. 515 00:22:57,320 --> 00:23:02,159 Speaker 3: Yeah, so but the teams has some questions about his defense. 516 00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:04,080 Speaker 5: I know, like a lot of people are quick to say, like, Okay, 517 00:23:04,080 --> 00:23:06,480 Speaker 5: he's better than mir or COMI like, okay, sure, but 518 00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:08,960 Speaker 5: like how good is he though? Like like that should 519 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:11,119 Speaker 5: not be the bar the bar that everybody's trying to 520 00:23:11,119 --> 00:23:14,600 Speaker 5: clear here, like to compare, Yeah, if you want to 521 00:23:14,600 --> 00:23:16,960 Speaker 5: compare the two players, like, yeah, he's the better defender, 522 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:19,439 Speaker 5: but like, do we think that he's going to be 523 00:23:19,520 --> 00:23:24,880 Speaker 5: a good defender? Some team said no. So, like that's 524 00:23:24,920 --> 00:23:27,120 Speaker 5: the feedback that I got from clubs around the league. 525 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:29,960 Speaker 5: Was like when I asked, like, well, why why wouldn't 526 00:23:29,960 --> 00:23:31,120 Speaker 5: a team be in on him? 527 00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:33,080 Speaker 3: That was like the one thing that kind of came up. 528 00:23:33,119 --> 00:23:36,240 Speaker 5: But you know, we started the conversation by talking about 529 00:23:36,240 --> 00:23:38,880 Speaker 5: a bad first profile, right, So like yeah, that's why 530 00:23:38,880 --> 00:23:40,880 Speaker 5: I say, like, Okay, he's the one guy who I'm 531 00:23:40,920 --> 00:23:43,280 Speaker 5: like very curious about how he performs and that I'll 532 00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:45,560 Speaker 5: be monitoring, and he's like a guy that you could 533 00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:47,280 Speaker 5: look back on in a couple of months and be like, 534 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:48,879 Speaker 5: should they have done this or not? 535 00:23:50,240 --> 00:23:53,000 Speaker 1: Do you think that the Mets are inclined to trade 536 00:23:53,040 --> 00:23:55,439 Speaker 1: any of their pitchers? I know we need pitching, but 537 00:23:55,520 --> 00:23:57,560 Speaker 1: the fact that there is and this is like the 538 00:23:57,560 --> 00:23:59,560 Speaker 1: worst thing you could ever say. There's so many starting 539 00:23:59,560 --> 00:24:02,960 Speaker 1: pitchers in this organization right now, Like what's the feel 540 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:05,119 Speaker 1: on maybe not even moving like a prospect, maybe somebody 541 00:24:05,119 --> 00:24:06,880 Speaker 1: who's in the rotation already right now. 542 00:24:07,720 --> 00:24:08,479 Speaker 3: I could see it. 543 00:24:08,560 --> 00:24:11,280 Speaker 5: Yeah, they've gotten calls on that for sure, Like David 544 00:24:11,320 --> 00:24:14,800 Speaker 5: Peterson is somebody that they've gotten calls on. Sangle Obviously 545 00:24:15,119 --> 00:24:17,840 Speaker 5: we've reported and talked about that here even so yeah, 546 00:24:17,880 --> 00:24:20,360 Speaker 5: I could see it, especially because like if you're talking 547 00:24:20,400 --> 00:24:23,000 Speaker 5: about like even adding like more than one, you get 548 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:24,679 Speaker 5: to a point with the Mets where like you have 549 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:26,840 Speaker 5: to subtract then like if we're going to add two, 550 00:24:26,840 --> 00:24:29,639 Speaker 5: you have to subtract somebody because there just aren't enough spots. 551 00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:32,760 Speaker 5: Because I actually, and this is reflected in like fangraps 552 00:24:32,840 --> 00:24:35,800 Speaker 5: is like war projections, and like betting odds, the over 553 00:24:35,920 --> 00:24:37,479 Speaker 5: under on the Mets this year, like it' is at 554 00:24:37,520 --> 00:24:39,320 Speaker 5: like what eighty six or something like that, six and 555 00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:42,680 Speaker 5: a half, and the fangraps war is putting them at 556 00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:45,680 Speaker 5: like fifth place right now, like you know, number five 557 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:48,000 Speaker 5: in the ranking. So it's better than like what people 558 00:24:48,119 --> 00:24:50,879 Speaker 5: give them credit for. But the rotation itself kind of 559 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:53,520 Speaker 5: lacks that number down. But I will say that, like 560 00:24:53,800 --> 00:24:55,920 Speaker 5: from the Mets perspective, there's some upside in the idea 561 00:24:55,960 --> 00:24:58,199 Speaker 5: of like, Okay, we're gonna get a second season out 562 00:24:58,240 --> 00:25:00,959 Speaker 5: of Clay Holmes as a starting pitcher. We think that 563 00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 5: Manaia is healthy. Now, really there's only up for quote 564 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:07,359 Speaker 5: I sega, right, that's the only direction you can go 565 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 5: at this point, and they're looking at a full season 566 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:13,639 Speaker 5: of Nolan McLain. So you kind of talk yourself into like, okay, 567 00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 5: like this may not be like a sky's falling type 568 00:25:15,720 --> 00:25:18,680 Speaker 5: of thing. And even so, like you have I just 569 00:25:18,760 --> 00:25:21,800 Speaker 5: named a few guys like you have a rotation in place. 570 00:25:22,280 --> 00:25:24,520 Speaker 5: It's just a matter of like getting somebody else to 571 00:25:24,560 --> 00:25:26,520 Speaker 5: sort of be that anchor to it in addition to 572 00:25:26,520 --> 00:25:30,120 Speaker 5: Nolan McLain, because Manaia is that question mark right now. 573 00:25:30,160 --> 00:25:33,360 Speaker 5: So yeah, I think that like you could see it, 574 00:25:33,359 --> 00:25:34,600 Speaker 5: it would be more of a question. I think like 575 00:25:34,640 --> 00:25:39,280 Speaker 5: once they add somebody, because then that really forces them 576 00:25:39,320 --> 00:25:41,240 Speaker 5: to look at their rotation and say who's in and 577 00:25:41,280 --> 00:25:44,240 Speaker 5: who's out, and something that will get decided in the spring. 578 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:44,640 Speaker 3: Training as well. 579 00:25:44,680 --> 00:25:47,720 Speaker 5: Like I wouldn't be surprised if like this bleeds, especially 580 00:25:47,760 --> 00:25:50,160 Speaker 5: concidering how slow this officerason has been. Like it may 581 00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:52,600 Speaker 5: be one of those things where like just because the 582 00:25:52,600 --> 00:25:55,080 Speaker 5: calendar says spring training has started, it doesn't necessarily mean 583 00:25:55,080 --> 00:25:56,200 Speaker 5: the off season has ended. 584 00:25:56,480 --> 00:25:57,920 Speaker 3: Like as far as like moves. 585 00:25:57,640 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 5: Go, they'll see like a whole lot of like, yeah, 586 00:26:00,640 --> 00:26:02,520 Speaker 5: it can be pretty dreadful in that sense where like 587 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:04,400 Speaker 5: we're kind of like mentally ready for it to be over, 588 00:26:04,760 --> 00:26:07,239 Speaker 5: but like there's still so much left unresolved that we 589 00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:09,320 Speaker 5: could see a lot of teams still be making moves 590 00:26:09,640 --> 00:26:13,520 Speaker 5: and making making deals even uh laid into late into 591 00:26:13,560 --> 00:26:17,520 Speaker 5: the days of the off season early into spring spring training. 592 00:26:17,920 --> 00:26:21,080 Speaker 4: With that pitching depth of mets do do do truly have? 593 00:26:21,200 --> 00:26:22,440 Speaker 4: While it's a lot of like you know, kind of 594 00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:24,400 Speaker 4: four is five, some six is maybe halful of threes 595 00:26:24,440 --> 00:26:26,840 Speaker 4: at the moment, Plus McLain, we have seen the last 596 00:26:26,840 --> 00:26:30,760 Speaker 4: few years that attrition sometimes is the thing that knocks 597 00:26:30,760 --> 00:26:32,800 Speaker 4: teams down the most. The way the Mets season kind 598 00:26:32,800 --> 00:26:34,200 Speaker 4: of went off the rails last year is the fact 599 00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:35,480 Speaker 4: a lot of these guys got hurt at the same 600 00:26:35,520 --> 00:26:38,440 Speaker 4: time and they didn't necessarily have the six, seven, eight 601 00:26:38,480 --> 00:26:41,320 Speaker 4: guys ready to go and step in. With that being said, 602 00:26:41,320 --> 00:26:43,280 Speaker 4: and the way the reliever market has dried up, this 603 00:26:43,359 --> 00:26:46,320 Speaker 4: is still a very incomplete bullpen. I'm gonna pull some 604 00:26:46,400 --> 00:26:48,240 Speaker 4: questions from the Met Stuff discord, which link will be 605 00:26:48,240 --> 00:26:50,000 Speaker 4: in description of this show down below, So shout out 606 00:26:50,040 --> 00:26:53,320 Speaker 4: Mets believe it and KU's besides guys like Michael Kopec's 607 00:26:53,359 --> 00:26:57,679 Speaker 4: Ranthy Domingez, Like, do we really finally see maybe guys 608 00:26:57,720 --> 00:27:01,240 Speaker 4: like sprot and Tongue into this bullpen by mid season 609 00:27:01,280 --> 00:27:03,640 Speaker 4: to kind of get their feet more wet and major league. 610 00:27:03,440 --> 00:27:04,800 Speaker 2: Guy or even past them? 611 00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:08,520 Speaker 4: Is someone like Zach Thornton or possibly even Will Watson's 612 00:27:08,520 --> 00:27:10,480 Speaker 4: going to get Triple A reps this year? Are any 613 00:27:10,520 --> 00:27:13,200 Speaker 4: of these guys that either just debuted last year besides 614 00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:17,160 Speaker 4: McLean or yet to debut in position to possibly pitch 615 00:27:17,200 --> 00:27:19,240 Speaker 4: and relief if the rotation depth holds up? 616 00:27:19,320 --> 00:27:20,200 Speaker 2: Four part question. 617 00:27:20,080 --> 00:27:26,040 Speaker 5: There, Yeah, I'll try to knock out here hopefully, But 618 00:27:27,000 --> 00:27:29,000 Speaker 5: Sprot's a guy that comes to mind as somebody capable 619 00:27:29,040 --> 00:27:31,040 Speaker 5: of doing that. And like David Sartins has done that 620 00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:32,919 Speaker 5: in the past with the Milwaukee Brewers. And I know 621 00:27:32,960 --> 00:27:35,480 Speaker 5: people shudder when I say Brewers because it's like they 622 00:27:35,520 --> 00:27:37,120 Speaker 5: don't want to do the things. 623 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:37,560 Speaker 3: That the Brewers do. 624 00:27:37,880 --> 00:27:41,160 Speaker 5: But word, yeah, but like he had success with this 625 00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:45,480 Speaker 5: and like and by what I mean by that is 626 00:27:45,480 --> 00:27:47,800 Speaker 5: like Brendan Woodrup did it, Freddy Parulta did it, Corbyn 627 00:27:47,840 --> 00:27:50,760 Speaker 5: Burns did it. There were other guys as well, where 628 00:27:50,800 --> 00:27:53,760 Speaker 5: you break in the pitcher and he's a multi inning 629 00:27:53,800 --> 00:27:55,919 Speaker 5: type of guy for you, who's going two three innings 630 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:59,679 Speaker 5: out of the bullpen and bridging that gap, and like, 631 00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:01,679 Speaker 5: look like the Met's gonna use somebody like that. Actually, 632 00:28:01,760 --> 00:28:04,160 Speaker 5: last year they could used a lot of things last year. 633 00:28:05,440 --> 00:28:08,160 Speaker 5: Maybe if their pictures through more than five innings that 634 00:28:08,160 --> 00:28:11,639 Speaker 5: that wouldn't be a needy either. But you know, you 635 00:28:11,720 --> 00:28:15,800 Speaker 5: digress there, and yeah, looking ahead with their bullpen, sure 636 00:28:15,880 --> 00:28:17,760 Speaker 5: that could be a spot for them out of spring training. 637 00:28:17,760 --> 00:28:20,239 Speaker 3: I'm I'm not sure if like that's the decision right now. 638 00:28:20,280 --> 00:28:22,800 Speaker 5: I think there's still some things left to be unresolved 639 00:28:22,800 --> 00:28:24,560 Speaker 5: there as far as like who they're trading from their 640 00:28:24,600 --> 00:28:27,639 Speaker 5: rotation and what people that they bring into their rotation. 641 00:28:27,800 --> 00:28:31,200 Speaker 3: But it could flow that way where. 642 00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:33,680 Speaker 5: Like a spot is given to somebody like a Sproute 643 00:28:34,840 --> 00:28:36,440 Speaker 5: who has shown that he could pitch in the major 644 00:28:36,480 --> 00:28:40,000 Speaker 5: leagues a little bit and probably has mastered Triple A 645 00:28:40,000 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 5: at this point. 646 00:28:41,280 --> 00:28:43,640 Speaker 3: So yeah, that that could be a thing. 647 00:28:45,080 --> 00:28:46,880 Speaker 5: But I still argue that they need some like guys 648 00:28:47,040 --> 00:28:50,160 Speaker 5: who are like high leverage guys though beyond that, because 649 00:28:50,240 --> 00:28:54,400 Speaker 5: right now you have Weaver and getting ball to Devin Williams, Like, 650 00:28:55,000 --> 00:28:57,320 Speaker 5: I don't know, I feel like there's there's room for 651 00:28:57,320 --> 00:28:58,400 Speaker 5: another ad there for sure. 652 00:28:58,640 --> 00:29:00,400 Speaker 1: Is there anything funny about how the Mets have just 653 00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:03,760 Speaker 1: casually been signing Yankey's players left and right, Like obviously, 654 00:29:03,800 --> 00:29:06,760 Speaker 1: like the Mets fans, that drives them absolutely insane, But like, 655 00:29:07,240 --> 00:29:10,080 Speaker 1: is there something too that or like James even mentioned 656 00:29:10,080 --> 00:29:11,880 Speaker 1: it before on the podcast that like probably for some 657 00:29:11,920 --> 00:29:13,680 Speaker 1: of these guys like I like New York and I 658 00:29:13,720 --> 00:29:15,480 Speaker 1: can play for the Mets, like that's another great fit. 659 00:29:16,360 --> 00:29:18,720 Speaker 5: Well, it's not easy to play here either though, So 660 00:29:18,800 --> 00:29:20,680 Speaker 5: like when you look at it from like the team perspective, 661 00:29:20,720 --> 00:29:23,920 Speaker 5: it's like you already know that they've done it before here, 662 00:29:24,360 --> 00:29:26,360 Speaker 5: and so I think that does that is part of it. 663 00:29:26,400 --> 00:29:28,120 Speaker 5: Like it has to be part of the calculus there 664 00:29:28,320 --> 00:29:31,800 Speaker 5: to see and look. And it's a question that doesn't 665 00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:34,080 Speaker 5: have to be asked right like, and in every other 666 00:29:34,120 --> 00:29:36,520 Speaker 5: conversation that you're having with a free agent, that comes 667 00:29:36,520 --> 00:29:38,640 Speaker 5: across your mind as to how is he going to 668 00:29:38,720 --> 00:29:39,800 Speaker 5: perform in this market? 669 00:29:40,400 --> 00:29:43,200 Speaker 3: And people will say, well, Devin Williams wasn't good in 670 00:29:43,240 --> 00:29:43,600 Speaker 3: this market. 671 00:29:43,600 --> 00:29:45,240 Speaker 5: Well, I'd actually pushed back on that and say that 672 00:29:45,240 --> 00:29:48,200 Speaker 5: he was actually pretty good in this market because he 673 00:29:48,320 --> 00:29:54,080 Speaker 5: had the experience of being awful at and actually overcoming 674 00:29:54,120 --> 00:29:57,080 Speaker 5: that and being pretty damn good. And so like I 675 00:29:57,120 --> 00:29:58,600 Speaker 5: give the guy a lot of credit for that, and 676 00:29:58,640 --> 00:30:00,960 Speaker 5: the idea that he actually chose to come back yeah, 677 00:30:01,040 --> 00:30:03,400 Speaker 5: New York after that, I think a lot about him. 678 00:30:03,440 --> 00:30:07,280 Speaker 5: So like, yeah, that's part of that. I think it's funny, yes, 679 00:30:07,320 --> 00:30:09,680 Speaker 5: but like there's also like when you look back and 680 00:30:09,720 --> 00:30:11,920 Speaker 5: analyze it, it makes all the sense in the world 681 00:30:11,960 --> 00:30:15,360 Speaker 5: to me because it's a question that gets answered right away. 682 00:30:15,880 --> 00:30:19,000 Speaker 4: Yeah it Sarn's mentioned that in the now infamous postseason 683 00:30:19,400 --> 00:30:22,800 Speaker 4: press conference about not maybe not adhering enough to that 684 00:30:22,880 --> 00:30:27,000 Speaker 4: with guys like Hellsy and Mullins not really anticipating possible. 685 00:30:26,600 --> 00:30:27,880 Speaker 2: Struggles with the market enough. 686 00:30:27,880 --> 00:30:30,040 Speaker 4: But will I got one more funny questions you for 687 00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:32,160 Speaker 4: you from the discord again, Thanksgi for coming on. You've 688 00:30:32,200 --> 00:30:34,640 Speaker 4: been probably one of the busiest men in baseball media 689 00:30:34,680 --> 00:30:36,160 Speaker 4: this offseason, so you're finding the time. 690 00:30:36,400 --> 00:30:37,760 Speaker 2: We and all the listeners appreciate it. 691 00:30:37,800 --> 00:30:40,719 Speaker 4: But when you're kind of taking in rumors to compile 692 00:30:40,800 --> 00:30:43,200 Speaker 4: one of these articles or some media availability, like you're 693 00:30:43,200 --> 00:30:46,080 Speaker 4: giving us right now, how do you kind of parse 694 00:30:46,160 --> 00:30:47,960 Speaker 4: through what could be real, what could be fake? 695 00:30:48,040 --> 00:30:49,560 Speaker 2: What's your method of corroboration? 696 00:30:49,800 --> 00:30:52,440 Speaker 4: Like how is it kind of like national intelligence where 697 00:30:52,440 --> 00:30:54,240 Speaker 4: you hear a million things a day then you have 698 00:30:54,320 --> 00:30:56,560 Speaker 4: to kind of decide what can be real and which 699 00:30:56,560 --> 00:30:57,400 Speaker 4: ones do you have to chase? 700 00:30:57,480 --> 00:30:59,480 Speaker 2: Just give us a sense of that process for you. 701 00:30:59,800 --> 00:31:00,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a great question. 702 00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:03,560 Speaker 5: It's a hard one to answer without like giving away 703 00:31:03,640 --> 00:31:10,800 Speaker 5: like who I talk to ye, But yeah, it's tricky because, 704 00:31:10,880 --> 00:31:15,600 Speaker 5: like you, there is an element of I think wanting 705 00:31:15,640 --> 00:31:21,560 Speaker 5: to first share something that's new and revealing and helps. 706 00:31:21,280 --> 00:31:22,880 Speaker 3: Shed some light on a topic. 707 00:31:22,960 --> 00:31:25,040 Speaker 5: But like I take a lot of pride in like 708 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:28,200 Speaker 5: being very careful about it as well, like I want 709 00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:30,280 Speaker 5: people to know that, like, if it's coming from me, 710 00:31:30,680 --> 00:31:33,640 Speaker 5: it's not just because somebody decided to message me and 711 00:31:33,640 --> 00:31:34,560 Speaker 5: I'm running with it. 712 00:31:34,960 --> 00:31:35,560 Speaker 3: Like it's been. 713 00:31:35,560 --> 00:31:39,440 Speaker 5: Vetted, it's been to the best of my ability, uh, 714 00:31:39,680 --> 00:31:41,400 Speaker 5: something that I feel. 715 00:31:41,560 --> 00:31:43,000 Speaker 3: Good about being true. 716 00:31:43,240 --> 00:31:47,760 Speaker 5: Right, Like a lot of this stuff, there's some agendas, 717 00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:51,400 Speaker 5: there's some I don't know, like there's reasons why people 718 00:31:51,440 --> 00:31:53,600 Speaker 5: are sharing this information for you, right that like you 719 00:31:53,680 --> 00:31:56,680 Speaker 5: have to mentally sort it through and double check. But 720 00:31:57,480 --> 00:31:58,880 Speaker 5: I think that's part of the job. And I think 721 00:31:59,400 --> 00:32:01,560 Speaker 5: not to go like too much into the weeds on this. 722 00:32:01,680 --> 00:32:05,160 Speaker 5: But like with baseball media and sports media, sometimes like 723 00:32:05,760 --> 00:32:08,800 Speaker 5: with like the transactions and like that type of news, 724 00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:11,360 Speaker 5: we lose the idea that this is supposed to be 725 00:32:11,440 --> 00:32:14,480 Speaker 5: like journalism, like this is supposed to be like a 726 00:32:14,560 --> 00:32:17,640 Speaker 5: journalistic integrity to it. That like we should like not 727 00:32:17,760 --> 00:32:20,280 Speaker 5: just care about the amount of like retweets and likes 728 00:32:20,280 --> 00:32:22,800 Speaker 5: we're getting out of a transaction post and actually make 729 00:32:22,840 --> 00:32:26,080 Speaker 5: sure that like no, like this interest is actually real. 730 00:32:26,320 --> 00:32:28,640 Speaker 5: And not only that, but here are the consequences to 731 00:32:28,720 --> 00:32:33,000 Speaker 5: the move. Here's what's at stake. Here's like the viewpoint 732 00:32:33,080 --> 00:32:35,240 Speaker 5: from like both sides A bit as to why it 733 00:32:35,280 --> 00:32:37,840 Speaker 5: may or may not happen. I think those things are important, 734 00:32:37,840 --> 00:32:39,760 Speaker 5: and like, those are the things that I try to 735 00:32:39,760 --> 00:32:43,200 Speaker 5: go after in my reporting because I feel like there's 736 00:32:43,320 --> 00:32:45,760 Speaker 5: some value to that, especially for people who are reading 737 00:32:45,840 --> 00:32:48,000 Speaker 5: it to better understand like the club that they root for, 738 00:32:48,480 --> 00:32:50,920 Speaker 5: as to like okay, like why are they taking this approach? 739 00:32:51,000 --> 00:32:54,000 Speaker 5: Why weren't they doing this or why are they doing that? 740 00:32:54,640 --> 00:32:58,200 Speaker 5: And to me, that's just it's more interesting and it's 741 00:32:58,200 --> 00:33:04,000 Speaker 5: more rewarding frankly than chasing, Like Okay, Joe Reliever has 742 00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:05,640 Speaker 5: six teams interested in him. 743 00:33:05,480 --> 00:33:07,160 Speaker 3: And there's definitely a place for that type of thing. 744 00:33:07,200 --> 00:33:09,600 Speaker 5: And like I'm not I do the same thing if right, 745 00:33:09,720 --> 00:33:11,880 Speaker 5: Like you've referenced an article this. 746 00:33:11,840 --> 00:33:13,840 Speaker 3: Morning that came out. It had a line like that 747 00:33:14,000 --> 00:33:14,600 Speaker 3: for somebody. 748 00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:16,880 Speaker 5: So like I'm not saying anything out of turn or 749 00:33:16,920 --> 00:33:20,600 Speaker 5: against anybody else, but like I just love when I'm 750 00:33:20,600 --> 00:33:22,520 Speaker 5: able to go a step further with things. 751 00:33:22,240 --> 00:33:24,040 Speaker 3: And the only way to do that is. 752 00:33:23,960 --> 00:33:26,800 Speaker 5: To make sure that the reporting is strong, so that 753 00:33:26,920 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 5: to me is of high priority all the time. 754 00:33:29,760 --> 00:33:31,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I don't think we can speak for 755 00:33:31,360 --> 00:33:33,800 Speaker 1: all Mets fans, but I think we all appreciate what 756 00:33:33,840 --> 00:33:36,200 Speaker 1: you do and it's nice in a world where, like 757 00:33:36,240 --> 00:33:38,440 Speaker 1: you said, sometimes there could be alter your motives that 758 00:33:38,480 --> 00:33:40,640 Speaker 1: we just we get good journalistic stuff from you, so 759 00:33:40,680 --> 00:33:42,400 Speaker 1: will thank you so much again. Let the people know 760 00:33:42,600 --> 00:33:44,600 Speaker 1: where they can find all your work. And thanks for 761 00:33:44,640 --> 00:33:45,560 Speaker 1: coming on mets up again. 762 00:33:46,000 --> 00:33:46,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, I appreciate it. 763 00:33:46,680 --> 00:33:46,880 Speaker 1: Guys. 764 00:33:46,920 --> 00:33:48,000 Speaker 3: Always going to chat with you. 765 00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:50,520 Speaker 5: We'll always have some stuff on the mets on the 766 00:33:50,560 --> 00:33:53,479 Speaker 5: Athletic dot com as well as natural reporting like your 767 00:33:53,520 --> 00:33:56,760 Speaker 5: reference with Ken Rosenthal and I'm on x at Will 768 00:33:56,840 --> 00:33:59,600 Speaker 5: Salmon and most other social media accounts as well is 769 00:33:59,640 --> 00:33:59,880 Speaker 5: the same. 770 00:34:00,680 --> 00:34:03,120 Speaker 1: Awesome. That's it, guys. Thank you us so much for watching. 771 00:34:03,160 --> 00:34:05,320 Speaker 1: Make sure subscribe to mets up on YouTube. If you're 772 00:34:05,320 --> 00:34:07,760 Speaker 1: listening to us, Apple podcast, Spotify, Google drops the RNE 773 00:34:07,800 --> 00:34:10,239 Speaker 1: drops a review, download and subscribe. We'll catch you all 774 00:34:10,239 --> 00:34:10,799 Speaker 1: in the next one. 775 00:34:10,880 --> 00:35:10,799 Speaker 4: Peace out peace houck guys, thanks again, well that sa