WEBVTT - TPG's Jim Coulter Talks the Life and Legacy of David Bonderman

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Hi, it's Jason Kelly. I'm the chief correspondent for Bloomberg

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Originals and co host of The Deal with my partner

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Alex Rodriguez. I also wrote a book about the private

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 2>equity industry called The New Tycoons. It's all about the

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 2>firms and the people at the center of this massive industry,

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and no one was bigger than David Bonderman, who died

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>on December eleventh at the age of eighty two. He

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>co founded TPG back in the early nineteen nineties and

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 2>along the way became a face for the booming deal world,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 2>engineering takeovers of everything from Continental Airlines to Burger King

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to j crwe specializing in deals few others would go near.

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>He was also an iconoclast, building his firm far from

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street, basing TPG in San Francisco and Fort Worth,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>and choosing khakis over suits, and inviting rock stars to

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>his annual investor meetings.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Few knew him.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Better than Jim Colter, his TPG co founder, who met

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Bonderman when the two men started working for the Bass

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Family in were Worth almost forty years ago. They created

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>TPG together in nineteen ninety three, Jim joined me in

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 2>New York to talk about Bonderman and his profound influence

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 2>on the investing world and beyond. Obviously a very sad day, Jim,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>for the team at TPG, for really the entire investing world. So,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>first of all, condolence is of the loss of your

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 2>longtime partner, and thank you for spending some time with

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>us here.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Jason.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>So David Bondman, it's amazing to read about his impact

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 2>on the broader investment world. He is a one of

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 2>the best known names, one of the icons. You knew

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>him better than anybody in this business. What specifically did

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>he bring to this business that was unique to him?

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 3>David really is a legend in the industry.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 4>But he's a legend for several reasons, and I think

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 4>there's three particular things. First of all, he pioneered a

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 4>type of investing. Secondly, he built a firm that had

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 4>a distinctive place in the industry. And thirty had a

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 4>really trusting personal style that I think helped evolve the style.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Of this industry.

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And so what did he do, how did that work

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in practice?

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 2>What was he doing as a deal maker that really

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>set him apart.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>David did deal making as problem solving.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 4>So if you think about some of his signature deals,

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 4>they were deals that everyone saw.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>But no one else was willing to take on.

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 4>And it wasn't that he was taking on more risk,

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 4>it was that he saw something different. Take the Continental

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Airlines deal, legendary deal in the industry, the most hated

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 4>company in America, the biggest bankruptcy in US history.

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 3>It sat there for two years.

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Dave and I put together a deal that carved out

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 4>a new Continental and took it from worse to first

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 4>in seven years. Warren Buffett said that airlines were financial sinkholes.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 4>David over and over made successful investments in airlines. When

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 4>others saw the SNL crisis, David saw the SNL opportunity unity.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 4>We created the good bank bad bank structure for American

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 4>savings when working with Bess, and then we exported that

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 4>structure around the world to do bank rescues in China,

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 4>in Korea. Again, deals that no one else did, and

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 4>that a problem solving approach really was appeared at a

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 4>moment that the industry was mostly about changing capital structures,

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>not companies.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, So you said something to me before we

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 2>came on air, which I found fascinating, which is that

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 2>David was a polymath investor. The Blueberg audience is pretty smart,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 2>but you need to break this down what that actually

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>means in practice.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Poly Math is from the Greek and it's basically a

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>person who has broad and diverse interests but uses that

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 4>knowledge and interest to solve problems. And so David really

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 4>didn't come to investing until his forties.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Think about that. He had several careers before.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 4>He was a litigator, He was argued in front of

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court. He taught law Tulane, he studied Islamic

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>law on Tunis. This was a person that ever took

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 4>a finance class, didn't know accounting, and yet was he

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 4>brought that broad experience and problem solving expertise to the

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 4>problems of investing. And his ability to use different experiences

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 4>he had to solve problems I think really created his style,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.239
<v Speaker 4>and it's a polymast style.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 3>It was not one thing.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 4>It was a unique ability to see opportunity and frankly

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 4>solve problems well.

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 2>And it translated into him being I have to say,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>one of those eclectic, maybe eccentric sort of figures in

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>an industry that didn't always Certainly the broader Wall Street doesn't.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Always sort of embrace change.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So how was he received in this broader Wall Street world?

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 3>In your estimation, David was many things, but he was

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 3>never boring.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 4>We used to laugh that David often brought like a

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 4>rock and roll backbeat into rooms that were used to

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 4>classical music. It was a very different style. He was

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 4>known for his ridiculous socks. I mean, there were just ridiculous.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 4>When others were drinking fine wine, he was drinking diet coke.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 4>He's flew one thousand hours a year to meetings anywhere.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 4>It's a very personal thing for him. And his style

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 4>was informal, it was direct. He couldn't stand obfuscation. And

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 4>that style was sort of a different, a different wind

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 4>in the industry at the time, and it opened up

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the opportunity for different types of styles to really flourish.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 4>It's an industry that had incredible talent among its founding brethren,

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 4>but David brought I think a little bit of a

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 4>different attitude and frankly, you know, a lot of fun.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Into a very serious business.

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And so how do you build to firm around that?

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean that you can be sort of a you know,

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of an iconoclast as a single person.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe as a small firm.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 2>You guys started out as three people in ninety two,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 2>ninety three, but now thousands of employees, quarter trillion dollars

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>in assets. How does that sort of grow into something

0:05:59.200 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 2>this big.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I've been doing this long time. Culture and curiosity.

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>So in some ways what we described you and I

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.679
<v Speaker 4>about David became how you describe TPG in some ways.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 4>At a time that the industry was very much about finance,

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 4>was very much focused in New York, we came out

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 4>of a family office in Texas.

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 3>We set up on the West Coast.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 4>I used to say that, and you do sports a lot, Jason,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 4>that we were playing the same game, but differently. We

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>were the West Coast offense of private equity. And to

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 4>do that you have to get a culture of curiosity

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 4>and problem solving. And I think at the first fundraise

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 4>we did for TPG, our tagline was contrarianism, complexity, and change.

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 4>At a time the industry was more focused on franchise

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 4>businesses in finance. Contrarianism, complexity, and change, and I think

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 4>those lines of problem solving and a different approach Really

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 4>were what David brought to the business in the early days.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Not afraid to take big swings.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, was that but you know part of his

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>ethos do you think, like being able to really go

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 2>big on something.

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was never about ego or size. It was

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 4>about really interesting problems and sometimes we got it wrong. Yeah,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>if you're doing this type of investing, you know five

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 4>percent of the time you'll make mistakes, and probably you

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 4>should be taking that sort of risk. But the key

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 4>is never make the same mistakes if you can help it,

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 4>and importantly learn from all of them. And David and

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 4>I think our firm has been a lifelong learner on those.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>So I think somehow.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 4>We've been able to grow with the industry but still

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>keep some of that essence of doing it a little

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 4>differently and looking at new deals. I mean even today,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 4>as you know, Jason, we've taken on impact investing, climate investing.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 4>These are new things, new problems, done in a new way,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 4>and that ethos I think was what we started with

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 4>almost forty years ago, and we've tried to very much

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 4>guard today.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>How'd you build a partnership with him?

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>You guys are not the same you showed up in Texas.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, Dartmouth undergrad Stanford Business School. He was a

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>University of Washington bankruptcy lawyer save Grand Central. How does

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>that marriage of a sort happen?

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I think there's two types of partnerships.

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 4>One are people who are very much the same, almost

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 4>can complete each other's sentences. The other type of partnership

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 4>are people who are very different but share the same values.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 4>And I think David and I brought different skill sets,

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 4>different views of the world, but values on fairness, the

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 4>idea of you can leave the last cent on the

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 4>table to create a win win, and we agreed on

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 4>the type of firm and culture we wanted to build.

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 4>So complimented each other, respected each other, but also brought

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 4>some balance to the equation.

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>How do you think he changed you as an investor

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>and as an executive?

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I think David was, as well as being a great investor,

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 4>simply a great business person.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's served on eighty different corporate boards. Who

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 3>does that? You know?

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Eighty different corporate boards, from GM to Dakati, from Behringer

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 4>to Burger King. Immensely diverse, and that viewpoint something was

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 4>often underestimated with David really helped me be.

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 3>A bit better businessman.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 4>It's about being straightforward, it's about seeing different things. It's

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 4>about patients from time to time, and even when things

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 4>go wrong, you don't step back, you step in. So

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 4>I think his polymath skills really extended into the business world.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned earlier this is a massive, massive industry at

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 2>this point that what we used to call private equity,

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>it's now alternative investing these firms, including yours, or doing

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>lots of different things.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>How do you take.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>That Bonderman ethos, you know, the sort of like you

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>know he's calling in to an investment committee, meaning from

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Timbuck to to you know, now a publicly traded company.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 2>How do you maintain that essence? Because I know that

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>culture is something it's important to you, you study it,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 2>how do you really institutionalize that culture.

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 4>Fight conformity in all ways? I think if you were

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 4>starting this business today, sometimes I think that people who

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 4>are looking at it field they have to learn finance

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 4>in their crib and have to go through internships.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 3>David came to this, as I said before, in his forties.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>He brought that wide set of experiences, and I think

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 4>the understanding that you can ask different questions, approach problems

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 4>in different ways is something the industry needs to.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Say true to today.

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 4>So that's spirit, the spirit of problem solving, curiosity, a

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 4>little bit of courage.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Put together with a broad view.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Is something the industry still needs today. And I think

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 4>the industry is delivering that men's talent in the industry.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 4>We have to just make sure that it's not delivered

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 4>in one way.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>And so as he sort of kind of moved on

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>from the firm, and we'll talk a little bit about

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 2>what he was doing in the latter years of his life.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, how did how how did you sort of

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 2>honor his legacy?

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>How did he stay involved?

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, David always had broad interests and one of the

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 4>interesting things about his career is he's mentored and spawned

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 4>many businesses and helped many businesses, from Mark Lazari to

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Tom Barrick to Mark's Stad to Wasijing Shan. There are

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 4>disciples around the industry that have picked up some of

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 4>his investing style in ethos and he continued to do

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 4>that as he continued to have TPG as a cornerstone.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 4>But he went on, as you know, to be active

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 4>in sports and yes, he had been an investor in

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 4>the Celtics, but he did a typical Bondo thing. By

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 4>the way, just the nickname Bondo was different in the industry.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 3>He did a typical Bondo.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 4>Thing, which is he took on a problem no one

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 4>else would, bringing back a team indoors in Seattle, rebuilt

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 4>an arena where he had worked as a security guard when.

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 3>He was an undergrad at University of Washington.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 4>It was a worthy outcome the Kraken, yet it was

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 4>done in a very Bondo polymath way.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting.

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about that for a second, because I

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 2>was listening to something in preparation for this from Toddler Wicki,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>who's the president of the Kraken, and he was talking

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 2>about the fact that the complexity was a feature, not

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a bug, and that seemed to be sort of a

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>reflection of the sort of bondermin ethos of deal making.

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Is that fair? That's a great way to put it.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 4>And I saw that for thirty eight years that we

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 4>worked together. Is if something hadn't been done, you start

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 4>with a question of why not and the curiosity of

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 4>whether it might be done. So there had been much

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 4>talk in Seattle about bringing back teams, but the ability

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 4>to really take it on as a hard problem is

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 4>something that I think is very.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Much David's legacy.

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 4>He did that in business, he did it for the industry,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 4>and he's done it in his life.

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And so take me all the way back.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's go all the way back to when

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you first meet this guy again.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You show up in Texas, You're like, well, a tagated guy.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 2>You're going to make your way on, you know, for

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>this this family that's doing some investing.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And you run across this kind and you're like, I'm sorry, what, okay,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's cool.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>You argue in front of the Supreme Court, what are

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 2>you going to tell me about in investing?

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And yet he did, Like I was.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 2>I was chatting with Tom Barrick earlier and he said,

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, we were the farm system for this, you know,

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>great investor.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>What was that like?

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 4>We were all fortunate to work with Bob Bess who

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of gave us the leeway to develop this type

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 4>of style. But what was interesting is that David hadn't

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 4>really done much investing.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I was coming as a junior person. We had not

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 3>much of a team.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 4>The first deal we did together was a cable TV

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 4>roll up, and we went on with a small office

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 4>to do the first reinsurance deal, something called National Reinsurance

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 4>buy out of Bell and Howell, bought Weston out of

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 4>un Airlines, sold the plosit to Donald Trump. A series

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 4>of deal after deal, and I think it was we

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 4>were kind of learning on the job.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 3>We were undaunted by that.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 4>And in some ways, not having the framework of how

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 4>it was supposed to work, we could create a different

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 4>framework of how.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 3>It would work.

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>So tell me about the decision that you guys make

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 2>in ninety two. You're going to go after Continental Bob

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Bess basically says, go with God, Like, I'm not going

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 2>to do this, You guys can go do it on

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>your own.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>What's that moment like? And do you know at that.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Point that you're creating something new and different or is

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 2>this just a deal that you're interested in doing?

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Somewhere between deeply interesting and absolutely terrifying. Again, this is

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 4>the most hated company in the country, the biggest bankruptcy

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 4>in US corporate history. No one else is showing up,

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 4>We have no money, we have to put together the money,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 4>do the deal, etc.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 3>But it was a.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Fascinating one of the most fascinating business problems I've ever seen,

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 4>So in some ways what motivated us was the problem

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 4>and the opportunity. It was like a hunk of marble

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 4>and you had to see what was inside it. So

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 4>I think for us we probably didn't know better. If

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 4>someone was starting a business today, this particular deal would

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 4>have in capitals at the bottom, don't try this at home.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 4>But we did try it at home, and that made

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 4>all the difference.

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 2>How did you know that it was going to then

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>become that there was a business to be built out

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 2>of doing this?

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>How soon did you make the decision?

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.119
<v Speaker 2>What was that decision like to create an entirely new firm.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 4>After we did the Continental deal, we had a long

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 4>discussion because at that time there were two ways we

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 4>could have gone. We could have kept doing deal by deal,

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 4>which was a Richard Rainwater model, or we could build

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 4>a firm.

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 3>We made the.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Call then that the industry was going to develop in

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 4>a way that you had to have broader resources in

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 4>a more permanent structure really to be able to not

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 4>serve us, but to serve the people that would join

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 4>the firm.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 3>We needed to have a future for them.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 4>So we brought in a third partner, Bill Price, who

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 4>was kind of our operating side of the business, And

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 4>we decided to name it not after ourselves, but a

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 4>name that was kind of low key and could be

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 4>what it was going to be beyond us. And I

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 4>think that decision to build a firm and the generosity

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 4>that that implied really.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Was part of David's legacy.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Were you sure it was going to work?

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Never sure it was going to work?

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 4>We live in a world we call constructive paranoia, which

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 4>is you always have to be constructive, but at night

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 4>you have to make sure you're not making mistakes.

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And did you think, like were there timing over those

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight years?

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've done, you know.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Tremendously successful deals, as you mentioned earlier, some deals that

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't work.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Was there ever a moment you're like.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this isn't maybe this isn't the right thing, Like

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 2>how did how much doubt comes into it? And what's

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Bondo's sort of what's his frame of mind in those moments?

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, David, if things are going wrong, you want

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 4>David with you in the foxhol So I've never seen

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 4>him daunted or I never saw him daunted or down

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 4>by problem and you also begin to get perspective. Jason,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 4>You've been around this industry for a while. We continuously

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 4>declared private equity dead in nineteen eighty nine, in nineteen

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 4>ninety seven, in two thousand and one, in two thousand

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 4>and seven, in twenty fifteen, were declaring it, you know,

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 4>dead today in some ways or diminished. But what you

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 4>learn is it's a very powerful, very powerful economic engine.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 4>It's investing with a bigger toolbox, and so stay the course.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 2>And what I find interesting about that that stay the

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 2>course idea is that as going back to this notion

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>of the industry institutionalizing, it goes public, you guys are

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>the last of the big firms to do that. Like

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>this contrarianism, like not only you know is there it

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>takes hold it as sort of a core principle. How

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 2>much was was David sort of driving that, Like what

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 2>would it bring him into that discussion?

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Jason, you've written one of the best books on this,

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 4>and I hope you will continue to work on this

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 4>because the story of this industry and how it went

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 4>from a few people doing deals to something that touches

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 4>and probably employees ten percent of the economy today there's

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 4>more than forty five hundred private equity firms. We used

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 4>to all know each other in the industry.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 3>That evolution.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Is one of the more interesting stories in business. I

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 4>went back a few years ago far threieth anniversion and

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 4>I looked at the growth of the industry over the

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 4>period TPG has been there. It's grown fifteen percent a

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 4>year compounded for thirty years.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't find another business.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Fourteen and a half percent was the growth of Chinese electronics,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 4>So that growth has been extraordinary. I think what David's

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 4>role was was shaping the fact that it could be

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 4>a different set.

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Of styles that it could grow.

0:18:55.400 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 4>He was also personally extraordinarily important in opening Asian private equity.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 4>As you know, TPG was one of the first firms

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 4>to go to Asia in nineteen ninety four, and David

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 4>was instrumental in both driving that move and frankly building

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 4>the business throughout the region.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 2>And so one of the things that I'm glad you

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>brought up Asia, because you know one of the.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Feels like it is something that couldn't be true, but

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 2>I've heard enough people say that it must be that

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 2>he would literally get on a plane to go have

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>lunch in Shanghai, like, he was very much a practitioner

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of the art.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Of showing up.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, is that a fair assessment? And why do you

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>think that?

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>What was driving him to do that?

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 4>David always viewed the business, and I think we all

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 4>should is very personal. If you're going to solve problems,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 4>it's so much easier to do it in person.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>And he was so quick on his.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 4>Feet that to actually get in the room with someone

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 4>was one of his greatest Secondly, he had always been

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 4>an internationalist.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 3>He loved traveling.

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 4>In fact, after traveling incessantly for work, when he got

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 4>a week off, he would travel. So he on average

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 4>flu for a number of top years, one thousand hours.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I want you to do the math on that, A

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 3>thousand hours and one particular story.

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I was talking to his assistant the other day who

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 4>was relating to me. In the middle of that binge

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 4>of travel, the budgeting people at TPG asked.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>For next year's budget.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 4>She gave him the hours, and they asked for the

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 4>hotel costs and she said there aren't hotels.

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 3>He said, it's only acts and they said.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I can't be x and they said there aren't hotels

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 4>because David used to fly overnight, get off the plane,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 4>shower at the FBO, and go. He didn't use hotels

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 4>because that was the way he went and for him,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 4>it was I think part hobby, part interests, but you know,

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 4>absolutely a tool for getting done what he could get done,

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 4>and frankly one of his superpowers.

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about his life outside of TPG because

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>it certainly informs it. It informs him as an investor,

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>all the things he's doing with wildlife conservation, rock and roll.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, those two alone are rich for discussion. What

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>was it about those things that ended up sort of

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 2>informing him as a business person and as an investor.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 4>David had things that appealed to him, that he loved,

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 4>and he was fiercely loyal to them.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Let me tell you one diet coke.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 4>David drank more diet coke than anyone I've ever seen.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 4>In fact, it was a problem when we bought Continental

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 4>because they had a contract with pepsi, oh boy, and

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 4>he would not drink diet pepsi. So literally, as we

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>went through airports, we would buy cans of diet coke

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 4>and take them onto the plane with us. Because he

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't drink pepsi, and so he was passionate about He's

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 4>passionate about rock and roll. Well before TPG, he would

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 4>hold rock and roll parties and at annual meetings. When

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 4>we started the business, most other firms had Margaret Thatcher

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and James Baker after dinner. We were the first firms

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 4>to have Jimmy Buffett and Elton John things that Dave

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 4>and I typically supported personally for these meetings.

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 3>And so he loved Dia Coke. He loved rock and roll,

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 3>and he really loved the wilderness of all sorts. He

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 3>loved hiking.

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 4>He went into the Himalayas many times in a Mustang

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 4>that others hadn't gone in. So if you look at

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 4>his interest, we never bought Coca Cola, but he did

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 4>support the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, he did

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 4>support the Wilderness Society, and he's been very active in

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 4>conservation activities around the world, often quietly at a scale

0:22:55.000 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 4>people don't understand, but from the Grand Canyon Trust to Mustang,

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 4>he's made a difference.

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's fair to say I'm going to

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 2>make a leap here that you know you can.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You could tell me is wrong.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 2>But I mean that sensibility makes its way into a

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of the investment decisions you guys are making and

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>the lines of business that you go into, right, I mean,

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 2>you're running a climate fund it.

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 4>This point, there's it's no accident, yeah, that these things

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 4>play through. I think we were doing ESG before it

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 4>had a name in a variety of our investment memos.

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 4>We always talked about the effect things would have, and

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 4>we took on this question of how do you scale

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 4>impact investing?

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 3>It was a really interesting question.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 4>We took it on with vigor and this idea of

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 4>defining climate not just as a problem but as an opportunity.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 4>As we were talking about before, this is a theme

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 4>that has gone through David and through TPG for years.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 2>And so I mean from a personal perspective, how do

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 2>how does it shape you to work with one person

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>for as long as long as you did for that

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>person to be your partner.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You meet him as a very young man.

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Sorry by making this too personal for you, but it's

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 2>like you meet him as a very young person. He

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 2>obviously shapes you in a way that almost no one

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 2>else could in your professional life. And I know you

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 2>must be reflecting on that a lot right now, and

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's too soon to ask you this question, but like,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>how do you how do you sort of take that

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>all in?

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 4>No, he had shaped my life in many ways. We

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 4>had a very interesting partnership for a few reasons. First

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 4>of all, the age difference were seventeen years different. I

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 4>started working for him, and we became equal control partners

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 4>when we build TPG, and so that process of becoming

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 4>partners we were colleagues for thirty eight years, partners for

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 4>thirty two.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Just doesn't happen that often.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 4>It does happen in private equity, and in some ways,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 4>one of the attributes of really strong private equity firms

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 4>is strong partnerships. The strong partnerships tend to land well

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 4>because I think private equity is not a one person sport.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 4>It is a team sport, and great teams, as you know,

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 4>often have a partnership among their leading athletes in ways

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 4>that play out over periods of time. So for me,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 4>it was a journey from a colleague to partner. I

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 4>was always learning something from David, and I think he

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 4>told me over the years he learned a few things

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 4>from me. So that kind of constant curiosity was important,

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 4>but we travel together on trips. We had lots of

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 4>mutual friends who were very different people, but that partnership

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I think really resonated not only in the business world,

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 4>but in the personal world. He was an immensely, immensely

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 4>interesting person. No dinner, no flight was without fascinating conversations

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 4>and usual deep laughter, and that certainly shaped me, shaped

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 4>their firm, and really shaped so many in the industry

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 4>that they touched.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just before we leave that, I mean, I'm

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 2>so interested in that because you know, there are a

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of people, you know, watching this and listening to

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 2>it who will think about, you know, their own careers

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 2>and the choices that they make in terms of how

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>they choose their partners and how they create winning partnerships

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and business relationships, and so I just I do wonder

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 2>even as you guys built like, how do you even

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 2>like divide responsibility? You know, how do you figure out

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>like you're good at this, you're good at that? I mean,

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you're making it up as you go along.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Presumably, Yeah, we were making up for how many years?

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 4>I think it was always division of responsibility was often

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 4>was very clear, and it's because we had different skills

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 4>and similar values. It was kind of clear that David

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 4>loved to go to Singapore for lunch and I was

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 4>coaching my kid's soccer team, right and that division kind

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 4>of worked for both of us Franks, because someone had

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 4>to keep the firm growing and the other deals happening

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 4>if he was in Singapore. So I think it was

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 4>actually very natural and David was. Many people have partnered

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 4>with David in many ways, so we probably had the

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 4>longest continuous partnership. But he's been a great partner to

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people. I think in life, if you

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 4>find great partners it's a very fortunate privilege. And even

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 4>if you look at the public investing in side, you know,

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 4>the Munger Buffet partnership went on for forty five years.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 4>These partnerships can be very powerful in our particular business.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And I want to talk a little bit about his legacy,

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and part of that, I'm going to bring it back

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 2>to an area I spent a lot of time is sports.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 2>You know, we talked a little bit about the Kraken,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and I do think it's notable that that may be

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 2>one of aside from the firm that you guys have

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>built together, that may be one of his biggest legs.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>He's in part because his daughter, Samantha Holloway is now

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the control control ownder the Kraken. It is well known that,

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, they would like to bring basketball back to

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Seattle through the SuperSonics.

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Talk to me.

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>About him getting into that.

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to unpack that because it was this it

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 2>was this sort of tricky deal, but also something that

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 2>he was very emotionally invested in.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 4>It felt like, yeah, it's something that he had been

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 4>thinking about for a long time and for a number

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 4>of years.

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 3>It was hard for us to invest.

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 4>In it because of our relationship with CIA, So David

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 4>had to do this separately from the firm and actually

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 4>be carved off from CIA to be involved in the Kraken.

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 4>And I loved how he brought the same problem solving,

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 4>just absolute brilliance and creativity to solving that problem.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 3>So it wasn't just about one thing sports. There's a

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of people who want to be sports owners.

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was about solving this problem for a city

0:28:55.800 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 4>he loved, in a place that he admired uh and

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 4>doing it in his own way. And so I think

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 4>uh TPG maybe the cornerstone of his investing legacy. But

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the Kraken is certainly right up with it

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 4>as as something that will have a longstanding impact.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>And presumably in part because you know, he brought his

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 2>daughter into it, I mean, with which.

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Sam is Sam is doing an awesome job. It's been

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 4>just brilliant to watch, uh, that evolution of her partnership

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.479
<v Speaker 4>with her father at the Kraken, and even like, I

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 4>love the name, right, I remember when we were David

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 4>was naming it, you know, he was talking over options

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 4>with me and as soon as he said crack and

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I knew he was going there.

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's so bondo and.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>A little bit contrarian. There's no other It's like that.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't going to be the Blue Sox, right, it

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 4>was going to be the Kracking.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 2>And so what's been you know, I mean that it's

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>it's early days obviously in terms of you, you know,

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of coming to grips with all this. I'm sure

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 2>you're hearing from lots of different people, like the what

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 2>are the messages that you're getting, what are the notes

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 2>you're you're hearing, the calls you're getting that may maybe

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 2>surprise you a little bit.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Actually, it doesn't surprise me because one thing that is

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 4>clear is that David has touched so many people over

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 4>the years in his inimitable style. But my phone has

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 4>been lighting up from all over the world from people

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I haven't heard from in twenty years, people reaching out

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 4>to say how much David shaped his or her career,

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 4>from you know, the CEO of Goldman to the CEO

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 4>of JP Morgan to the top investment partnerships around the world,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 4>top LP partnerships around the world, and the messages have

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 4>been not just about him as an investor or partner,

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 4>but him as a person. And I think that's one

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 4>of his legacies is not only did he do different

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 4>deals build a.

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Different firm, but he almost gave license.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 4>For different ways to interact in this industry in a

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 4>way that has opened up. He's always been interested in

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 4>people of all sorts. I mean, who else hitchhikes across

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Africa for a year. Imagine who you meet and how

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 4>that goes. So his ability to connect with people and

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 4>welcome them into the industry from all nationalities, from all backgrounds,

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 4>is I think another contribution he made to the industry.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, as we wrap up, I've been wanting to ask

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 2>you this, which is, if you had to given all

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 2>these things, that all these inputs that you've got, all

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 2>this experience you got, if you had to distill him

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 2>down into one story that you could tell, and I'm

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>sure you will tell over the coming weeks and months

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and years, what's the story?

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>What's the Bondo story?

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh, there's too many. Uh, you know, I think there's

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 4>deal stories, and there's and there's personal stories.

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 3>On the deal stories. Uh.

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 4>You know when the night there was one other bidder

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 4>for Continental that sort of showed up and in the

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 4>night before the bids were happening. Uh, that bidder was

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 4>backed by Credit Lionnaise Credit and they were, you know,

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 4>French bank owned by the French government, and uh we had,

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Uh the night before we made a deal with Air

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 4>France to join the Continental Frequent fire Mile coalition, but

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 4>only if Credit ly in A dropped out. So the

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 4>morning of the Continental bids, we walked in with our

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 4>bid and the other bidder couldn't show up because they

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 4>just had their financing pull.

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 3>So the the the chessboard of what was.

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Going on, I think we would have won anyhow, But

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 4>the chessboard of what was going on was we were

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 4>playing at a different level than maybe was understood generally,

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 4>and his ability to be playing on a different board

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 4>than others was happened kind of over and over again.

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 4>But there's many very funny quips that I can't share.

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 4>But the other moment that sticks out to me personally

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 4>was at his birthday party, much written about when the

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Rolling Stones played, which was kind of before people did

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 4>these private bands like this, And the thing I remember

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 4>is I stood in the back with David and he

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 4>was watching out the Stones, he was watching the crowd,

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 4>and he refused to have toasts at the party, and

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't really.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 3>About his birthday.

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 4>It was actually a gift from him to all the

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 4>people that he invited. And that sort of generosity misconstrued

0:33:58.000 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 4>a little bit outside.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 3>But that sort of.

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Generosity, the very bondo, very not about him but about

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 4>an experience, was something I just saw over and over again.

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for listening to this conversation with Jim Colter,

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the chairman and co founder of TPG, all about his

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>late partner David Bonderman. And if you're interested in these

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 2>types of conversations, check out my show The Deal with

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Alex Rodriguez. I'm Jason Kelly, and this is Bloomberg