WEBVTT - Macri Frittered Away His Time To Make Reforms: Rhodes (Podcast)

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul Swinge. You,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor, find a Bloomberg penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, global trade and global finance

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>continue to be in the headlines and continue to impact

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>financial markets. To get the latest on some of the

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>key global issues, we turn once again to Bill Rhodes.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill as President CEO of William R. Rhodes Global Advisors.

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>He's also author of the book Banker to the World,

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Leadership Lessons from the front Lines of Global Global Finance.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill joins us live here in the Bloomberg and Ractor

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio. So Bill, let's turn our attention to Latin America.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Argentina in the news. This you know, kind of blew

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>up yesterday with yields on government bonds rising to the

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>highest level since the country was last in the fall

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks and the pay so we're in free fall. What's

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the latest from Argentina? Length. The problem in in Argentina,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as we were discussing in the break, is that when

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Macari came in, everyone had great expectations. I actually did

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a piece for Bloomberg the first week he was in office.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>What happened, though, is he fritted away his time. So

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of implementing tough economic reforms up front, like Fernando

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and Rick Carloso did with the Real Plan and Uh,

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Belsarovitch did UH with Poland when Poland broke away from

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union. He fritted it away and he called

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it gradualismo, the Spanish term for do it gradually. UH.

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>And the reason he did that was because he thought

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it would help him politically. But if you don't take

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the tough measures up front, it blows up in your face. UH.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>And last year when I was there, they had just

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>they were just firing ahead of the Central Bank, blaming

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>him for it. Uh. They put in the Minister of

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Finance UH, and he lasted two or three months Caputo,

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and then he resigned or was fired because they did

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>not want to take the tough steps. Now the I

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>m F has got their next out there, just like

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they did on Greece, because they've given him the largest

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>program efforts over fifty billion dollars, and they can't be

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>very happy now because inflation is over fifty the country's

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>deep into recession. Elections are in October and all of

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the polls show believe it or not. Uh. Christina Kirshner,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>who people thought would be in jail by now, says

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>she's gonna run, and she's running ahead of Macari. And

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and now he slapped on price controls and having restarted

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that country more than anybody else in history five times.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Every time they get into price controls, it doesn't work. Uh.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And you remember you had a bad ending of Alfonsin,

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you had a bad ending of day lar Ua. The

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>press in Argentina is full of that. I hope it

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen because I think Macari has the right intentions,

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but uh, time may have run out, and so he's

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>got to use the rest of his time to implement

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>these reforms, and maybe too late. So I remember all

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the way back, maybe two years ago, when Argentina was

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>selling hundred year bonds and investors were piling in and

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest institutions were saying Argentina is a recovery story.

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Never mind the fact that it's defaulted five some odd

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>times in the past hundred years. Here we are the

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>chances of potential to faull to being priced into the

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>market of Argentinian debt over six currently up from a

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>year ago. In your perspective, what are the chances that

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we see yet another Argentinian default? Well, I certainly hope

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we will not, but there's still time to take some

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of these tough measures. But it's not like putting on

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>price controls. And the economic team down there was very

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>slow to recognize the problems, and those who did recognize it,

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately Mauricio got rid of UH. And so it's like

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>my father taught me when I was a young man, said, Bill,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the road to Hell is paved with good intentions, and

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Macary has all the good intentions, but if you don't

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>take the proper steps, you could have more problems. And

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so the markets are now fixated on Argentina. How people

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>people would have bought a hundred year bonds? And when

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you asked me that earlier, UH in the break, I said,

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's too much liquidity. UH still slashing around with

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with all UH, the emphasis on central banks providing liquidity,

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the reach ree yield and people are desperate for that,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>so they went into all sorts of things, including those bonds. Uh.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know it's not just Argentina. Let's take a

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on in Turkey. Look at the

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate in Turkey. They're in recession. UH. And I

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>don't see the economic reforms happening there. So I think

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of problems the emerging markets. Korea just

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>came out uh and surprised people with their negative growth. Uh.

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of weakness in Asia. Europe is very weak. Uh.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>When you look at Germany, the industrial figures, you look

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>at Italy uh, and of course brexits unsettled. So the

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>one part of the world which is booming for the

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>moment is US, the US, But you know, we can't

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>be the locomotive for the rest of the world forever.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>How about going back to Latin America Venezuela. What's your

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>current view there? That was is such a difficult situation.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your current view there? Well, I lived there thirteen years,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>my daughter was born there, so I have a very

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>strong feeling for what's going on there. The three things

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have got to happen to turn that country around. First

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 1>has to be some sort of political change that uh,

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration thought would happen a month ago,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>six weeks ago. They were too optimistic when they put

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 1>on sanctions. So far, the sanctions haven't worked very well. Um.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So that is one point. And of course Maduro is

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>being backed up not only by the Cubans but also

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>by the Russians. The Chinese, I think, are more realistic.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>They will deal with who's ever in because they have

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>too much of an investment there. Uh. And I think

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the second point, which is what disturbs me so much

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm spending a lot of time on, is to

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>try and help on the humanitarian situation. Here's a country.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>When I lived there, which is the wealthiest country in

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, had the best medical system. Malaria didn't exist,

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>it had been stamped out years before. Now you have

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a malaria outbreaking parts of the country. Uh. You have

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>uh what the u N says a three and a

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>half million out of third thirty million population refugees, but

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's more like four or four and a half million,

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's growing all the time because there's no plasma

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the hospitals. Uh, there's no antibiotics in the in

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the hospitals, people are dying. Uh. And you see some

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of these people that go across the border to Brazil

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>uh in Roraima state, or go across the go across

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to Columbia or elsewhere, and it's tragic because the malnutrition.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I just talked to a friend of mine from Argentina

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>before the show, and here Argentina, so far away from Venezuela,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they already have five hundred thousand refugees there. I'll be

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>going down and talking with the President of Ecuador about, uh,

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what can be done with the Venezuelan refugees in Ecuador.

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm working with a very well trained, experienced epidemologist

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>who's a standout person in this field, to see if

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we can do something. Uh. We're talking to the American

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Development Bank to see if we can do something for

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the refugees outside. But what's really needed in the country.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>They've got to allow in aid, humanitarian aid, and they

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>now say they'll allow in some Red Cross aide, but

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>really not clear. And of course the last thing before

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you asked me is what's going to happen with the

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>economy and the debt, Because this is going to be

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the mother of all debt restructions. We've never seen it

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>quite like it, because you have paids of the oil

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>company has all this money out as well as a

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sovereign and they're tied together. And the Russians have half

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of Sitko, the oil refiner and the West coast. So

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a country that I think is a disaster

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>case and the question is what's the outcome going to be.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Rhodes, thank you so much. You're involved in so

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>many incredible things and have been throughout your life. Bill Rhodes,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>President and CEO of William R. Rhodes Global Advisor, is

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>author of Banker to the World, Leadership Lessons from the

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>front Lines of Global Finance and when you talk about

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>all of the concern for humanitarian issues. Bill Rhodes also

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just established the new Road Center for Globlastoma at New

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>York Presbyterian Hospital. His wife passed away from glioblastoma, which

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually the fastest growing at cancer, particularly among younger people.

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to check out more, just google

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the Roads Center for gleob Blastoma. Intel reports after the

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>close today on a Shrinivasan uh covers all things on

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the tech chip side for us. He's a senior semiconductor

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and hardware analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us here

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in a Bloomberg Interactor broker studio. So on it and

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>get a big rally in chip stocks. What's driving it?

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Semi Connectors are certainly the tip of the speer. We

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>tend to be or the chip stocks tend to be

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>incredibly forward looking, and they are prognosticating an incredible, incredible

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>second half. Now, if you listen to what t I

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>said on the call, that is likely slower to materialize,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially lower in magnitude. But if you look at Skienix,

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>which reported earnings last night, They're optimism is actually magnifying.

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>So they're starting to see strength potentially as early a

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>second to second quarter and in the second half. My

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>problem with the chip rally that we have seen so

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>far from December to day is the magnitude of the

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rally and how quickly it's come by. Right, So if

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the earnings per share growth for the

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>next two months in the socks um the Philadelphia Semi

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Connector Index, it's projected to be about seven percent um.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the price earning stratio of

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that same index over the using the EPs of the

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>denominator there, it's eighteen times my my problem. And when

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you break down the components of that right, So, if

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at in Video, for example, which has had

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>some um structural issues in the last three months, earnings

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>for twenty nineteen or its fiscal twenty twenty have come down.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>If you look at m D one of the better ones,

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it's earnings have only gone up eight percent. If you

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>look at n XP three three month earnings for down

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven percent. So you've had a whole host of these

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>companies where the shares have rallied dramatically, so thirty at least,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and the earnings for caunty or nineteen has gone down

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the vicinity of five to so. So this

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is exactly this is fascinating, fantastic numbers to put to this. Basically,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the performance is not matching the optimism. So what could

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the chips sector be looking at? Fundamentals better catch up.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the bottom line. Fundamental is better catch up, and

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>if they don't, we're going to see some adjustment. It's

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, blow the blow the bottom out

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>from under them and just watch them, watch them fall

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>or I mean, the big part that has been missing

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>in semiconductor demand is one is the handset cycle is

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>waning a little bit. We all know that the magnitude

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of the handset cycle weakness is something to be considered

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in the second half. Offsetting this is the impending strength

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, where the CEO went to

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>my alma mater engineering school. But that's a separate issue. Um,

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So this cloud company's server strength, that these cloud companies

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>server strength is the has been the missing piece of

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the demand puzzle. Everybody's expecting that to come back in

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the second half. It's a substantial portion of CPU consumption,

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>memory consumption, um, solid state drive consumption. It better come back,

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and better come back in space, right, So, Dave, I

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think what I'm hearing from on it is maybe these

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor stocks may have gotten a little bit ahead of themselves,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>but the tech earnings so far have been pretty darn good.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Well they have, and you have an interesting contrast within

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>the group today. I mean, I mentioned Zylenks, the way

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the shares are taken a beating. On the other hand,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you had numbers out late yesterday from LAMB Research which

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is in the chip equipment business. They went over well,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the stocks up almost six percent. It's going back and

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>forth with Facebook for the biggest game on the day

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in the S and P five hundreds. So you know,

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting kind of contrast that's showing up within

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the group on and on twenty seconds here, we didn't

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>really hit on Intel. How important is Intel with respect

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of their earnings? You know, Intel's is a little bit

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of a sleeper here between Intel, aim Ding and Video.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We like all three companies, but for completely different reasons.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Intel expectations are relatively low. Um we actually

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>think they could really do well with PCs and the

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>data center in the second half of the year. And

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on Street of Us and Senior Analystic covering the semi

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>conductors in tech hardware space for Bloomberg Intelligence, Staviles and

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Stox editor joining us all here in our Bloomberg

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven three oh studios. The question is in how good

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>were Tesla's reported earnings yesterday? It was how terrible were they?

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>And to answer that question is David Coodlag CEO and

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Chief Investment strategistic Mainstake Capital Management, overseeing about two and

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a half billion dollars from Michigan. David, thank you so

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Tesla reported earnings that were

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>below already very low expectations and talked about raising capital

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>even after Ellen Musk has said that he wouldn't need

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to raise capital. Shares down two point and that's it.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>What was your take on these earnings, Poles? Yeah, I

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was surprised even at at how big a loss it

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>was going to be. We had consensus estiments at about

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine cents a share for share, and uh facts

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that had a little bit of a dollar. But when

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it came in, it, uh, here's three dollars per share loss,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>even more than we thought it would be. Worse than

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>consensus estimates. It was really a miserable quarter all the

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>way around. When you consider the news we got on

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>deliveries earlier in the um, earlier in the month, and

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>now what we thought would would adversely impact earnings. Uh

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we this is this is definitely a very bad quarter

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for Tesla. So, David, it seems like Elon Musk is

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of on the earnings call opened the door just

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit as it relates to an equity capital raise.

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is the outlook that does this

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>company need to raise money? How much did they need

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to raise when did they need to raise it? Well,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they do need to uh to raise capital. And they

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about having about two point two billion cash on hand,

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but if you take away customer deposits, that falls below

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a billion and a half dollars. Uh, they are burning cash.

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, they went from cash generation in the latter

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, the latter part of the year

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>back to a burn rate near a billion dollars in

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this first quarter. And uh, you know, they thought they

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>would have cash coming in from uh this you know,

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>increasing sales of the Model three along with the stained

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>sales of models and Model X. That hasn't happened. He's

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>calling for uh eighty or nine to a hundred thousand

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>deliveries in the next quarter. I think he's dreaming when

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at what the deliveries were in the first quarter.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So the cash isn't going to come from sales. They're

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have to raise cash. It's an inevitability. So

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>here's my question. One analyst and I have over what

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Bush said that Tesla's quarter was a top debacle, one

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the top debacles ever seen in its two twenty

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>years covering tech stocks on the street. I'm just wondering,

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>given how scathing people have been in their assessment of

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>these quarterly reports, why are the shares down only two?

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Um there? I mean there are some there's a following

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for Tesla that I think some real believers in the stock.

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a you know, we've seen this floor around

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that two from a technician standpoint, quintuple bottom, whatever it

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>may be. Uh, we've seen of Florence Florence stock price

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>around this level. But you know that was uh in

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>after market trading yesterday. Today we're seeing the shares down

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit further. You know, we also didn't see

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the shares change much on Tesla autonomy day earlier this week,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>our share price change much. So I think we've got

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>some things unfold here. He did come out, you know,

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in the earnings call with some guidance that was very positive.

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And remember how this goes, and this is how we

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>play the stock. You know, when whether we're whether we're

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>buying puts or outright shorting the stock and then covering later,

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Elon can bid up the stock on these claims and

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>these promises of what he's gonna do he made some

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>bold claims in this earnings announcement about that all the

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>hardware is on the cars today for full autonomy, uh

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in a year from now, but for level five autonomy.

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>He's made bold claims about the deliveries that they're going

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to make for the remainder of the year. UH, that

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be a small loss in Q two

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and then profitable in Q three and Q four. I

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think they'll have a profitable quarter this year, but

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>if you believe the claims that he's making, there's hope.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's hope in the in the stock price,

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and it is trading near its low. So there are

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>those that think it it might have a chance to

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>rally from here, uh, if not right away, later in

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the year, so they Let's switch gears a little bit

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to Ford Motor Company. The reporting coming up, and I

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>know you've mentioned in the past, I think this first

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>quarter announcement and guidance are arguably the most important in

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the past five years. Why is that, Well, you know,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>let's compare and contrast. Now we switched to you know,

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a company that's really doing a lot of UH has

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>had a very good first quarter. UH. You know, Ford

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>has their their suv and truck sales really did the

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>best among their competition when you look at Toyota, GM, Ford, Uh,

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>they really trounce the competition in terms of those sales,

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which are the high margin vehicles. The other thing that

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that Ford suffered from over the past year really since

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Jim Hackett has been there in leadership position, is is

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that messaging, that communication, that articulation of the vision of

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was the restructuring plan there, multibillion dollar

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>restructuring plan. What is the detail. We've seen some of

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that more recently with what they're doing globally, what they're

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>doing domestically, also their vision for Auto two point out

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or what we call the future of mobility. And you

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>know we now know the flat Rock plant where they're

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>investing eight hundred million for autonomous vehicles, and the hiring

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of Tim Stone as the CFO, who comes from the

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>digital community, that signed that they're moving to a new

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>age company. There's just a lot of things, you know,

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>very good performance and what we refer to as the

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>legacy business trucks and SUVs that the high margin vehicles.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They're the best stock performance among the Detroit three. If

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you will in the first quarter in and beating the

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundreds performance as good as it was.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>And then you look at the detail we want to

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>see on their restructuring plan and the detail on the

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>future mobility that's coming together. We're seeing what we want

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>to see. Wall Street investors seeing what they want to

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>see out of Board. Now. If they maintain the momentum,

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a very good year for Ford in

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a in a real turnaround compared to kind of a

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>tough and past couple of years. Got it, David Couldla

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. David's the CEO

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment strategists for Mainstay Capital, joining us on

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Michigan. Well, right now, traders are pricing

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>in the high increasing likelihood of a FED rate cut

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in the near future, perhaps even later this year. And

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>as they do so, our Bloomberg opinion called noists are

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what the FED should do in

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the next downturn because they don't really have that much ammunition.

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>One proposal by municipal bonds, and that comes from Brian Chapatta,

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>who is a Bloomberg Opinion calumnists. So, Brian, why was

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that the solution that you see is something that is

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>potentially attractive for the Federal Reserve. Yeah, so, I guess

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of feedback on this. So at

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the caveat is that if it's another

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>recession and the and the FED uses all of its

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>ammunition as it has in the past, it's done the

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts, it's done the typical kiwi and there's still issues,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? And my idea was turned to

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the muni market, because you know, states don't have the

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>ability to print money. You know, they have to implement

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>austerity measures during recessions, and that can really slow down

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. You don't fund infrastructure, you miss payroll, you

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>underfund your pensions. Those are all really bad things that

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>affect main street. And so potentially using the FED as

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a tool to extend a lifeline to these states, give

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>them a little influx of cash that they'll eventually pay

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>back when times are better, could be a reasonable way

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to jump start the economy, uh, during a recession. So historically,

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>just give us some history here, the federal government generally

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>has not done this. Correct. Yeah, well, that's part of

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that the Federal Reserve Act prohibits purchasing

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>communies that are longer than six months, so they could

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in theory do some real short term uh purchases immunis.

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you wanted to actually do something that would

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more sustainable and do a little

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more than just you know, a really brief thing,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they'd have to unbend the Federal reserve at This would

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat challenging though also from a who's your favorite

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>child kind of point of view, right, I mean it

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>basically ahead of the decide which municipal bonds to buy,

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>which projects to finance. Given the fact that there are

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>thousands of que SIPs, this is a very a using

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>credit market, uh, you know a lot of small issuances,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and you basically have an active portfolio manager buying munis

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>at the federal reserve. Yeah. Well, my idea was sort of,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep it at the state level. And as

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>far as precedent goes, you do have the European Central

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Bank going out and purchasing debt of various sovereign countries

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>within everything and anything, yeah, right within it, with it

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>within its purview. So I mean there is precedent for

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, effectively you know, setting ah, you know, a

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>standard and going out and doing it across variety of

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>credit ratings, uh and sort of credit worthiness. So uh,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the idea. And obviously, um, you know, the

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>muni markets on fire right now, so there's no reason

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to to do it yet. But this is again sort

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of talking about hypothetical down the road if we face

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of uh, you know, problematic recession that that

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>typical Kiwi buying treasuries won't get us out of. So

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is there any support in Washington or the other any

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>folks in Washington or at the FED thinking about this

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of move? You know, you hear about this every

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, because I did go back and

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>see if this was proposed before, if I was, if

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I was the very first person, and sure enough, you know,

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you go back to you know, things like that. You know,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there was the Build America bonds program, which was more

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of a of a federal stimulus um. But I think

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the question is sort of is there a political appetite?

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, the joke about Infrastructure Week is that you

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>know it never comes because there's never this push to

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>actually fund infrastructure, even though presumably it's a bipartisan issue,

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so uh means to be seen exactly what the appetite

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is in Washington. You mentioned real quick that muni's were

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>on fire. We have seen record inflows into many funds. Why.

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's pretty clear that right now

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the cap on state and local tax deductions is really

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>making people realize that if you want to lower your

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>state income tax rate, there's a really easy way to

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>do it, and it's buying muni bonds within your state. Uh.

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>This has always been an option to everyone, but before

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>if you had a large state and local tax bill,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you could deduct it obviously from your your federal taxes,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>which means that you know, it wasn't so onerous, um,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but now you're effectively, uh, you know, getting getting penalized

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for that. And so munis are an easy way to

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to reap some income. And I mean the rates are

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so low, especially relative to treasuries on munis, it's it's

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a real question of how long this can keep going on.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And but so far, so good, right, very good. Branch

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of Petta from Debt Markets Commas for Bloomberg Opinion. He

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in Bloomberg. Gonnactor Broker Studio Brian Thanks

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for that not whole idea. Thanks for listening

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa abram Woyit's I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>woits one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on'm Bloomberg Radio