WEBVTT - Alex Hormozi: This Is EXACTLY How to Make Your First MILLION (Follow THIS 4-Step Framework to Turn Your Ideas into REAL Money FAST!)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You can build something very big in about five to

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>seven years, And the problem is most people spend that

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>same five to seven years reliving the same thirty days

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. You have to stay in that

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>painful place. Staying in the pain is what gives you

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the catalyst to learn how.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>To get out of the pay Please welcome a serial entrepreneur,

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>best selling author, and the mind behind a one hundred

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 2>million dollar business portfolio, Alex Hormosis.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 3>What's that number one misconception you hear when people are

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 3>thinking about building a business, and you go, that's the issue.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the conflict sequence.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people who are wanting to make money

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that you're making money comes from investing.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 2>In Vesting is the last thing you do, not the

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 2>first thing you do.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 3>How do you get over the block of I don't

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>want to work for free?

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>I actually think it's entitlement. You're not working for free,

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 2>you're learning and then you're earning.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Should you do what you love for money and love.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>What you do? I think this is big myth. Number two.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 3>People fail not because there's some magical list nobody has.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>They fail because it's an obvious list nobody does.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>It's the obvious list.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>If you were trying to get in shape, you know

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you should eat less than you should move more.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>You already know what you're supposed to do. The question

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 2>is why you aren't doing it.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>What do you think is the number one emotion that

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>people don't know how to control that leads to family fear?

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 3>The number one Health and Well Inness podcast, Jay Setty,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 3>Jay Setty set Alex Almosey. I've been looking forward to

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 3>this interview for a long long time. My friends are fans,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm a fan, and I know we were in touch,

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 3>like maybe even a couple of years ago. Now it's

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>been but I'm so happy to be at the holy

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.919
<v Speaker 3>grail of acquisition dot com. I saw the big logo

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 3>when I walked in. Congratulations and everything you've been up to,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 3>and I'm so glad to introduce you to my audience,

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>some of who I'm sure follow you already and love

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>your work. And then I'm hoping you get a ton

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of new fans and a ton of new people being

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>impacted through this as well. So thank you so much

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>for doing this.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you so much for having me, and I've

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>been I'd say a mirror right back. I've been looking

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>forward to talking because I think there's so much good

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:08.399
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I think is going to happen.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>So I'm very excited.

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I love it, Alex. I want to start with asking

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 3>you something that I've been thinking about a lot when

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking to people today, and it's when I think

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 3>about my community, my audience who's listening right now, what

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 3>are you going to unblock for them? When you if

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 3>someone read all your books, listen to your podcast, listen

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 3>to today's podcast, what are they going to unblock that's

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 3>been tripping them up, keeping them behind, or holding them back.

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they would have clarity on what actions were

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>required to get what they wanted, and then at that

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>point they would only have to just think like why

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>am I not doing it? Which is a separate conversation,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of confusion. I would say around

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>like what are the things that are required in order

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to create a business, in order to create an income?

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say that I'm an objectivist, and so I

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just look at what are the things that are observable?

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of time people spend inside

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>their heads trying to think of about manifesting and energy

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and all of this stuff. When it's like, we got

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>to let people know about the stuff we have, we

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>got to have something to sell, and we got to

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure that what we're charging costs less than it

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>costs to deliver it. And we try and do that

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>as many times as we can. And so each of

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>those pieces obviously as frameworks behind them, but they're all

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>tied to one thing, which is just what actions are required.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's been the single pervasive frame in my life

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that has made navigating reality significantly easier for me, because

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I was very confused coming up, and I was like,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what any of this is. And I

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>read all these self help books and I felt more

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>confused after the tenth book than I did in the

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>first book. And then it's just like, Okay, what do

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I have to do? And then that is kind of

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what has started this journey for me.

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>What's that number one misconception? You hear what people are

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>thinking about building a business, making money, changing their financial situation.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>What's the number one thing you hear and you go,

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 3>that's the issue.

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the conflate sequence is probably the first and

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing because a lot of people who are wanting

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to make money believe that the making money comes from investing,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and investing is the last thing you do, not the

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>first thing you do. And so one of the things

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is the look at people are at the end of

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>their careers and say, Okay, well, these guys are making

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>all these these bets. Right if I just bought this

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>mean coin or I just bought bitcoin and twenty thirteen,

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd be super rich. But it actually doesn't take into

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>consideration what a decision making process like that would create,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>which is if you took a swing at every type

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin, because you can't just say I would only

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>pick this one. You'd have to say I pick every

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>single super long shot. It's like we probably would have

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>lost them ninety nine of the other bets, and so

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>it's like we have to take it an aggregate. And

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>so I would say making active income cool again rather

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>than the passive bed and really just gambling. Is Probably

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the first thing that people mess up is that they're

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they somehow think that working or active income is not scalable,

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>when in reality, the people who have the most money

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>typically have tremendously high incomes, and it's because of the

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.559
<v Speaker 1>excess of cash flow from that income. Are they able

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>now to make big swings with riskier bets that sometimes

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>pay off and sometimes don't. But you can't take those

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>swings unless you have more cash lots coming in from

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the things you do every day.

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>You know what, no one's ever said it that well,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>like from everyone I've spoken to, And I'm so glad

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 3>you pointed it out, because I completely agree. I have

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>so many friends who, when they saw the rise of

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 3>crypto or whatever it was, jumped in with a large

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>sum of their life savings because they heard of a

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 3>friend of a friend of a friend who'd made a killing,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 3>put it all in there. A week later, it dropped

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 3>by like ten k, they pulled it all out. The

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 3>next week it went up double and it was just

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>a mess, and so many of them lost like ten

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty forty pounds dollars. And it's all because you're

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 3>thinking that's the way to get there, and it's cooler

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's smarter, and like you're a genius, and you're right. Actually,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 3>everyone I know that's made amazing money on any of

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that already had tons of money and it was play

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 3>money for them. So it just changed into this. So

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 3>what's happening there? Why is it that we've been led

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 3>down this thought process, and how do we get out

0:05:59.640 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 3>of it?

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's fundamentally something for nothing fallacy

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of like how can I get rich quick? How can

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I do it really easily? And basically, the more it

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>feels like luck is usually where you should have your

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>first red flag if you I mean, I have a

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>belief that if you control all the variables, then you

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>can predict the outcome. Now, we don't always control all

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the variables in any given situation, but the greater number

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of variables we control, the greater influence we have over

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the outcome. And if you're getting into something like this

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, I actually don't even know what the

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>variables are, then it's like you are one hundred percent gambling,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and so this is your life savings. Would you put

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>it on black at the casino? Probably not. This is

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>really not that different than that, except at thexino you

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have no nods at least.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Right here, it's like you have no idea.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>And typically by the time especially gen pop kind of

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>retail investors find out about something, it is the peak

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and it is too late, and so you have to

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>be at the very beginning of these if you want

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to be speculative, which I whoheartedly am not a big

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>fan of speculative investments in general, because it's basically the

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>greater fool theory, which is what they called in the

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>investment world, which is just like we just keep selling

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to the greater and greater fool until sometimes somebody is

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the greatest fool of all and then it drops.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I prefer to think about instead of thinking

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of investments and active income, I think of the just

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>money per unit of time, and that kind of takes

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>out this binary what I would consider a false binary

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if active and passive and think well, and I feel

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like I can prove this pretty clearly, which is we

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>live in time and we collect money in that period

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of time. And so fundamentally, all we want to do,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>if one to increase our income is just think what

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>are we earning per unit? And this is where again

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>bad piece of advice is like never sell your time.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, well, if someone give you a billion

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars for an hour, would you.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Not sell that?

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I would, right, And so it's a question of how

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>much is your time worth? And then that creates a

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>much more actionable decision making framework of is this worth

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it or not? And to ladder up to the active

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>versus passive, it's how active is it versus how passive

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is it? And it's my belief that nothing is passive

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>because there's always going to be a certain amount of

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing it right.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's say, if you want, you made one passive.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing it the right way, you probably should

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>have looked at a hundred deals and all of that

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>took time, and all of that takes diligence, and then

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>after doing all this analysis, then you decide to make

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this investment. And so to say that it's passive, it's

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like it doesn't take into account all of the research

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that goes into ahead of time, which is absolutely still

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>work now after the investment. Sure, but there's still time

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that you're trading by first breaking that idea of like

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>if we're in order for me to get rich, it

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>must be something that I don't trade my time for.

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is like big myth number one. So if

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we assume that, then we say, okay, I have to

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>trade my time for money because money comes in over time.

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>What are the things that I can trade my time

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>for that will get me more than I'm currently getting,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a much more solvable problem that also is

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>significantly less risky. And so especially when you're trading time,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we have some and so we don't we really just

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>risk the time to be like I would, I never

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>want to I don't want to sell them. I'm I'm

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>not a slave. It's like calm down, where it's a

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>voluntary exchange and if it's and here's the thing is,

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't think the price is worth it, then

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>don't make the trade. And that's one of the beauties

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism is it's two parties both saying they'll be

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>better off. And so fundamentally, I would say the focus

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of the content and stuff that I put out is

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>how can I equip people with the skills so that

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>when they trade that time think it more for it,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and then continue to trade up and up and up

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of their careers.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean, that's actually such counterintuitive advice to what

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel has been spreading on the internet for the

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 3>last two decades of every conversations around passive income. Yeah,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 3>I feel like every one of my friends is addicted

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to figuring out how they can make passive income and

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>those are the same people that are not making any

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>more money than they already were. But it's this addiction

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and obsession with if I figured this out, then I

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 3>won't have I can quit my day job and whatever

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 3>it may be.

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Ye, And I've had influence so that my neighbor is

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>he owns Panda Express and so last time I checked,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they did three point seven billion dollars in revenue and

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>they have about a twenty seven percent that March, and

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>so he took home nine hundred and thirty five million

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in personal income, not investment income. And so people

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>see his investment porfolio, which is impressive, as you can

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>imagine be doing it forty five years, and so.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 2>That starts to add up, right.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is you can only take these kind

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of bigger swings or bigger bets because he has this

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>very regular cash. So they spent forty five years building,

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that what's interesting is that you

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>can build something very big in about five to seven years.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is that I think most people spend

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that same five to seven years reliving the same thirty

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>days over and over again, jumping from thing to thing

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to thing, and never actually getting the root set so

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that they can pay down their ignorance tax of not

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>knowing enough. Basically, there's I would say there's five stages

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that most newer entrepreneurs are people who want to pursue

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>income go through. So the first is what I call

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>uninformed optimism. So your friend tells you about this thing

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they made ten grand on and you're like, that sounds amazing.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You're uninformed, but you're optimistic, right, and so then you

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>get into it, and then all of a sudden you

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>get to informed pessimism. So you get in and then

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you put your money in and then it drops and

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you're like, wow, this sucks. And then you know, people

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are like buy the dip, and so you're like, OK,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put more money in. And so then you

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>get to kind of stage three, which is the value

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to spare, where you're like, oh my god, I've lost

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so much money. I have no idea what's going on

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. And at stage three there's kind of a

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>fork and so either people then go, well, my other

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>friend told me about this other thing, and they jump

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>back to step one and go to uninformed optimism, and

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>then they just they funnel through that loop over and

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>over again. Now to break through that dip, you have

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to basically get to stage four, which is informed optimism.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So now you understand the rules of the game, you

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 1>understand the variables at play, and it's not as good

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>as you thought it was, but you at least get it,

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and so from there then you can get to achievement.

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Right is the fifth step.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is that you have to stay in

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that third painful place, because staying in the pain is

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>what gives you the catalyst.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>To learn how to get out of pain.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And so rather than trying to pull your parachute, it's like,

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to trudge through this so that it forces

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>me to learn the individual skills, the individual variables that

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>affect this outcome, and that means I might have to

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>take twenty more lashings to finally get it, and then

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>point it starts to tick up, and then that's when

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you start to.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Become more of an expert, more of a master at something.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and if you don't send that pain, you're gonna

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>keep repeating that cycle with something new. So it's crypto,

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 3>then it was nft IS and it was whatever else

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 3>just keeps going around and around around is that system

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 3>in this new book.

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 2>So this is probably for one trunk above that.

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, got it, gotta got it? No, because I was

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I love the way you break down the journey that

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 3>we go through in our mind, and you do that

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 3>with multiple things, because I think we don't even see it,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Like that pattern you just explained is a pattern you

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>could live for three decades. You've just saved people three

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>decades of pain by pointing it out and saying, well,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 3>this is what you're doing and here's how to shift that.

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think people make the mistake where we go,

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't have time to learn, so I'm going to

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 3>learn from someone who makes me feel like I can

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>learn it in an hour, and then I'm going to

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 3>do it, which still is uninformed optimism. So how do

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 3>we learn? Where do we go? How do you build

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 3>that time to say? How many hours do I need

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to even learn about this? So I'm going to put

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>money in it? How would you calculate that If someone

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 3>is like I'm going to put in a thousand I'm

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 3>going to put in a ten thousand dollars, how much

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 3>time should they put to value that amount of money?

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So great question. I would reframe the premise, which would

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be we'd still be operating under this as I'm going

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to put money into something, And so I would reject

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>the original premise and say, well, if you want to

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>get really good at something, then why don't we start

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>with the skills that generate income. And so if we

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>follow kind of the three elements of a business at

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>its most basic form is you have some element of promotion,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>so we got to let people know about our stuff.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>The second element is we got to have a way

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to convert them, so we have to be able to

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>sell some sort of exchange mechanism, and then finally have

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to deliver right. So track, convert, deliver very easy, well,

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>easy to easy to say, harder to do right. Within

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>each of those things, it's like, okay, well how do

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I let people know about my stuff? Or even before that,

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what stuff do I sell?

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And so that's where I like to think about it

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>as people trying to think, man, there's so many people

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and try to boil the ocean, like it's impossible to

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>try and think what business could I possibly start because

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to address the world when it's much easier

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, what are the problems that exists? In my life,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of think about it as the three p's, Like,

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>most businesses come out of a passion, so something that

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you're just inherently interested in.

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>They come out of a profession.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>So you currently exchange Right now, you have a job

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, and you get paid, maybe not as

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>much as you want, but you do get paid for

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>exchanging some sort of value with the business. And the

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>third is P, which is pain. Right, so there's some

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>deep pain that sometimes you went through. So maybe it's

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a mom who had to figure out how to create

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>non allergenic food for their kids, right, It's be something

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>as small as that. And so from that, those three

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of buckets is I think the best starting point

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>for most people who want to start making an income.

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, well, if you're inherently interested in this topic,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like, can we make Can we let people know

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about stuff around that topic, Can we create solutions around

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that stuff? Can we create services? Which is where I

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>prefer most people start, which, to be fair, in the

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>United States, seventy eight percent of businesses are service based businesses,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's because they're the easiest to start.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>You just trade time for money. Low risk.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You either get rich of it or you don't. But

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like your base is zero.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Have you seen any metrics in success rates between passion, profession,

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and pain.

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>No, I haven't. That would I really want to know now.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The reason why I ask it is because I've

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>been thinking about this for so long and I want

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>to go through each of those because I think they're

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 3>really I think it's really sound advice. I used to

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 3>really believe that everyone should try to do what they

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 3>love and love what they do, and I've changed my

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 3>mind about that. And I used to believe it very strongly,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>probably like ten years ago, only to then realize that

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 3>that works great for the one to ten percent, but

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 3>for the majority of people, that's going to be really,

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 3>really hard. And recently I was giving the Princeton commencement

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 3>speech for their graduation, and I was thinking about it

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot before I gave that speech, because it's like,

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, these are like the most talented, smartest

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 3>people in the country who have everything at their disposal.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And I know that even some of these people may

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 3>not get a job they love or may never ever

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 3>build something they love. But guess what, everyone needs money

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 3>to survive. So the question is, and I want to

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>hear your take on it, and I'll reflect back, is

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 3>should you do what you love for money and love

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 3>what you do?

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this is big myth number two, So if

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we have we start with, you know, passive versus active

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is big problem Number one. Number two is follow your passion.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason that this is so espoused. I'll

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>start where I think the idea comes from and then

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of break down from there. I think it's because

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>most of those commitment speeches are billionaires or very successful people,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and they say, follow your passion. But if we think through,

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>what other advice could they give that would be socially acceptable.

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>They can't say, you know, I got lucky. They can't

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>say I worked, you know, super hard, because we were

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like sure.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And so then it's like, okay, well, they're never going

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to get attacked for saying follow your passion. But the

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>problem with that is it also assumes that your passion

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>or your interests will never change. And I mean, anybody

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:06.239
<v Speaker 1>who's listening to this, just think about what you were

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>really interested in ten years ago. It's probably different than

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>it is now. And if you exrapolate that in another ten

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>years it'll probably different again. And so if we can

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>think about the hypothetical extreme of a really successful person

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as someone who sticks with the same thing for an

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>extended period of time, which is something that I believe

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>because you learn all the lessons you possibly can in

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a very narrow field, right, and that you basically try

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>and make as many mistakes as you can, and if

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>you basically pay off all the ignorance that you can,

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like you end up just succeeding by default if

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you just fail every other way. But if you try,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and if you try to do too many things, you

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>never actually get to push the road all the way,

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, trudge through the mud and get there, because

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you're only learning one or two mistakes in many fields

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and not many in one. And so the follow your

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>passion issue is that, yeah, number one, the passions will change.

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Number two is that sometimes you're passionate about things that

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>people don't value. And the thing is there's something wrong

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>with that. It's just that it will be very hard

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>to make an income that way. The third thing is

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that I think that it creates an emotionality around business

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>or income, which is at the moment it doesn't feel

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>good that you believe the mid that you should stop

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>when I think that if you and I were to

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, the business side of anything. There

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are elements that I love and there are elements that

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I hate, and I see them as both required. You know,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I would love to maximize one versus or the other,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's just the cost of doing business literally. But

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I try to reframe that pain that comes from doing

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that I don't want to do to do

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the things that I do want to do as the

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>price tag required to become the person that I want

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to become. And so if we think about the traits

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of any person, so it's like, if I want to

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>be patient, then I can't expect things to happen faster.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Right Like if we were to go to the end

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of our lives and say, hey, I want these character traits,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, if you had to play a character,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a video game and make them that way,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, what would you have to put them

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>through in order to get those traits. It's like, well,

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want patients, then you're not going to get

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>things quickly. If you want to have endurance, it's like

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to be able to tlright suffering right. If

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to be wise, it's like you're going to

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have to get burned and you're gonna have to learn

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the value of judgment, and sometimes that means you're going

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to get betrayed in order to learn that pattern. And

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's like we lament the price tag for the

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>things that we want. And I think that at least

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for me, my ultimate, you know, long term goal is

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>just to become the person the best version of me right,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think that in order for that to happen,

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I will have to go through pain. And so the

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>follow your passion, you know, moniker also creates this emotionality

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that gets you to quit when you really are on

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the right path, and it's just this is just part

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of it. And so I think those are probably the

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>big three that I think about when it comes to

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>why follow your passion doesn't serve most people. And the

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>other I would say, bonus four might be that you

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>might be really good at something and people are very

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to exchange money for that thing, and it doesn't

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that you actually have to do the thing that

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you work on that you make money on all the

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hours of the day, right, Like you can work for

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty hours a week and then have the

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>other one hundred and twenty to do whatever you want,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty to do whatever you want. And

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean, not a bad thing in my opinion.

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the reason I asked. And I think even

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the advice follow your passion doesn't mean focus on your passion, right,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Like there's this confusion with time. So even when I

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 3>think about it in my life, when I left the

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 3>monastery and went to work as a consultant because I

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 3>needed to pay the bills again, a very real decision

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 3>because I was twenty five years old living in my

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 3>loft room in my parents' house again and that couldn't

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 3>last very long. When I went into that work, I

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 3>was teaching meditation by lunch. Like in my lunch breaks

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 3>in the evenings, I would teach meditation to my colleagues.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 3>There was no demand for it. Two people would show

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 3>up twenty thirteen. This was meditation and mindfulness were not

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 3>this global movement, and I was just enjoying it because

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 3>I was following my passion. But I was making money

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 3>by being a consultant, which was trading my time for money.

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 3>As I followed that passion more, I got more confidence

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 3>in it. The market changed. We're in a very different

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 3>landscape today twelve years on, for there being business opportunities

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 3>and wellness and health that didn't exist twelve years ago.

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 3>And so now, following my passion for all of that

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 3>time meant there was a time when I could focus

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 3>on it. But let's say I had another passion that

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 3>wasn't monetizable people weren't interested in at all. I could

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 3>follow it for years and bring it into my work

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 3>and bring it into my life, and it would beautiful

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 3>and I'd be more fulfilled, But it didn't need to

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 3>be my thing, right And so I really really like

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 3>that advice, and it's something that I almost want to

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 3>propagate so hard right now because I feel just responsible

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.479
<v Speaker 3>that for so long we've been telling people to, you know,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>just do what you love and chase what you love.

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 3>And it's like, yeah, in your private time and personal time,

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>you should, but don't think that that has to be

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>the thing you make money from, especially if you have

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 3>a really obscure, oh.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, gift.

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I one hundred percent agree. I mean, I'm a utilitarian.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be very I've probably edged too much

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>on pragmatic. And maybe that's just the immigrant upper of

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>just like.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>How are you going to pay your bills? Yeah, that's

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 2>all I cared.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>All The funny thing is I had that too. Yeah, no,

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 3>for sure, immigrants too. But I think that there's a

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I think I got really lucky to figure out what

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 3>I loved really early, and I got really lucky that

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>I got to get really good at it really early.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I had this mentor really early on in my career

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>who said, never do what you love, because then it

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes work. And so just to completely countertake, and this

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>guy was a guy who just had a normal He

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>had three or four stores that he ran, and he

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>retired at age twenty eight, and not as a gazillionaire.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I think he made something in the impater, probably like

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty forty thousand dollars a month, you know, take home.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>And for twenty years he did nothing besides collect his

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>money once a month, and then he played golf five

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>days a week and he got to hang out and

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>watch and basically be there for the entirety of his kids.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And he loved that and that was that he accomplished it.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>He used to tell me He's like, I slayed the

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>dragon of life. And so what's interesting is that now

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that his girls are out of the house, he now

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is going back and he's back in door.

0:22:58.400 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>He's like, well, what am I going to do now? Right?

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I wholeheartedly agree with the not following your passion piece.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>The practical translation might be at least my third myth

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>that I would probably tack onto this as we're building

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>these is overbelief in idea and under belief in execution.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And so there's two almost of this. So one is

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that I think many people who are intimidated to start

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that they have to start the next Facebook. And

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Zuckerbergs and the basis of a world

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.479
<v Speaker 1>are so incredibly rare. The vast majority of people who

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten into business have many many failured and many many failures,

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>many many failed businesses that led them to fail into success, right.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And so one is that the idea has to be

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this big, amazing thing. And the second is that you

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't that the idea itself is the success, right, because

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>they'll share with as many people as they can, and

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they almost scratch the itch of starting when you haven't

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>done anything. I say, there's basically four steps of starting

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a business. It's like, you have to get an LLC,

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you take the LLC to a bank, and then you

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>get a bank account, and then you connect that bank

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>account to a payment processor, and then you go ask

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a stranger if you can do something in exchange for money.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 2>And if you do all four of those things, you

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>have a business.

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>That's it, right, And so a lot of people like

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>spend years being like I'm going to start a business.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Fun day, it's like, you can do it tomorrow. You

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 1>literally do all of this tomorrow, and then it's like, okay, well,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>then how do I get the person to exchange money?

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, you reach out to the people you know, right,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you open your phone, you look at the four hundred

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>contacts you have there. You open up your Facebook profile,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you have three hundred friends. You look at those friends,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you just say hey, you send a personal video,

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>send a personal text, and say hey, I am starting

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>this thing. This is what we're doing, this is what

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm solving. Do you know anybody that's it? And so

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not even like you're asking your friends to buy

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>something from you. What's interesting, though, is that ninety percent

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of the time, the person who respondses is, oh, you know,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you could do that for me if you want, But

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>that just gives you the easiest way that costs zero dollars.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And because we're all connected with the Internet and phones,

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like the bearer to entry has never been lower

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>than it is now. It's just the problem is that

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the barrier to distraction is even lower.

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 3>What stood out to me there is the personal text,

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the video and the email, and then the fact that

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 3>you're asking your friends to introduce you to people who

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 3>may want to, not asking them directly. That first part.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 3>The amount of emails I get and I'm sure you

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 3>get as well of people pitching their services to you,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 3>but none of them are personalized. Yeah, walk me through

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 3>the difference of that personal video that personally because it's

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 3>life changing, like when it's done right, So.

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are your friends or at least your

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>context that you've met at some point in your life,

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and so trying to recall when you met that person

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>literally just stating their name and asking that it's hey,

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be doing this. And I would say

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>consistency is the currency of credibility. So what people don't

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>want to do is refer a friend as somebody who's

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fly by night. But if you can actually just demonstrate that, hey,

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he's still doing that, the likely that they're going to

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>refer someone goes way up because the relational capital is

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>not nearly at risk, because if I'm going to introduce

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody to somebody else, I'm risking my social capital on

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the hope that the third party or whoever is sending

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this original text is actually going to do a good job.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So you can also include a little bit of risk

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>reversal in that, which is like, hey, I'm doing the

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>first ten for free, and the reason I'm doing it

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>is because I just want to get some testimonials, get

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>some reviews, and also just so that I can learn too.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think just being really upfront and really being

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>really honest about it makes the stakes feel a lot easier.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>And so then those first ten people, you do exactly that,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is is that you're going to be

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>better off than they will. For those who are like

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to work for free, it's like you're

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not working for free, you're earning, and then you're sorry,

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you're learning, and then you're earning. And so we got

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to go through the learn phase first, and the best

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>way to do it is people who aren't direct connections

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of yours maybe one step step removed, and then at

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that point they're going to give you very real feedback.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 2>And if you do a good job.

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Then after a certain point, my goal is to get

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>people to basically shift supply demand in their favor. Like

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I say, the two laws of business that I am

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the most moved by are supply and demand, which is

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this X ray, and then leverage. So it's a full

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>come for leverage, and so I see those are the

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>two biggest forces in business, and so I want to

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>create artificial demand for somebody who's starting out by just

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>say we'll do a lot of stuff for free. What

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>happens is when you have no more time to give,

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and if people still want you to do stuff, and

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, I can't take any more people. If

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you want, you can pay, and people are like, yeah,

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, and then boom, and then you make your

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>first sale and so and you'll have confidence because you're like, well,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I just did it twenty other times and look at

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the results from those people. And the first one you'll

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>be embarrassed about. The nineteenth one, You're like, Wow, you're

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>going to already pay down sixty seventy percent of all

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the mess ups that you were going to do, and

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>then at that point you're going to start feeling good.

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And then from there my way of doing it is

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just you just keep bumping the price by twenty percent

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>every five people until eventually people start stop saying yes,

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and then apper're like, Okay, this is the price I

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>can do for now. And that's basically a very seamless

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>transition into how do I go from nothing to making

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my first dollar?

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 3>How do you get over the block of I don't

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>want to work for free?

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's entitlement. I think it's believing that

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you deserve something for nothing. Like to flip the flip

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the roles in reverse. Imagine somebody comes to you they've

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>never done anything ever in this particular space, and they say, hey,

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>will you pay me.

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 2>To do this thing? Would you immediately?

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Now, maybe some people be like sure, then it's a

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>charity thing, which is different, But would you be like,

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I really believe that this guy is

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the best person that I can get this problem solve

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>from probably not, And so to carry some of that

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>risk for yourself. You say, I'm gonna front this, but

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to not do it for free. Thing

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>number one is that you're getting educated, so like you're

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>getting free education, which I see is absolutely valuable. The

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>second thing is that you can make terms that don't

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean that it's free. Like there's the price, and

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>then there's the terms. The terms of the agreement can be.

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>If you do this with me, you have to give

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>me feedback throughout the entire process, and at the end,

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if I do a good job, you leave a review

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>right and on three different formats, and leave me a

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>video and leave me, you know, a text version of

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it that's now absolutely like I'll say it differently a

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>business owner, they do illegally, and so therefore they are

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>very willing to pay people to leave them testimonials. And

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so if you'd be willing to pay five hundred dollars

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to get an amazing testimonial, then they're basically you're the

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 1>We've paid you that five hundred dollars, but I promise

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you those first five to ten reviews will make you

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so much more than they could ever have paid you

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and not given you a testimonial. So if we flip

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it and say, hey, would you rather get one thousand

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars from this person and have them not leave a

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>review versus free and a glowing review, I promise you

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you will make so much more from one glowing review

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>than you.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Will from the thousand dollars long term.

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're just building up the stockpile of the foundation

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to then build whatever you want to build on top

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's really strong advice. It's I hope everyone who's

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 3>listening watching right now is like going, this is what

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do right now, like ten hours for free,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 3>because that's where we're blocking ourselves. We don't have the experience,

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and therefore we don't feel comfortable selling more because we

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 3>don't even know how this service will look.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 3>So you're trying to sell a service, and maybe you

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 3>sold one, but you haven't been through the full life

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>cycle of what it feels like to deliver that service. Now,

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 3>you don't know how many website revisions or edits there's

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be, you don't know how many app updates

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be. You have no idea, and now

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 3>you're actually less likely to go sell another one because

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 3>you're scared that you don't even know if you can

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 3>do it, and I feel under that entilement is an

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 3>insecurity totally. I don't actually even know how to do this.

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 3>I've got a lot of friends who are like really talented,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 3>really skilled. They actually would do a great job, but

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 3>because they've never just done ten clients for free, they

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 3>don't know how it's going to be if they went

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and got one hundred clients tomorrow. So they're scared of

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 3>getting one hundred clients, not because they're not capable, but

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 3>because they haven't taken ten clients through the process.

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So I want to give get some super tactile for

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the audience. Please just ten by ten. So give ten

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>people ten hours and so you can say, hey, I'm

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>going to do ten hours of work for free. That

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is a really compelling offer, and you're going to do

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it one on one and ideally with them. And so

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to build the website, build it in

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>front of them for the ten hours so they can

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>give you real time feedback. If you want to write

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>email copy, you still meet with them once a week

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or not ideally multiple times a week during that so

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you can pay down that. But ten hours faster, and

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're worried, you can do you can do five

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>people for five hours.

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>That matters less.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's more that one on one, So the least

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>scalable thing possible, and it's free labor that they can track.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>The reason that such a compelling offer is that everyone,

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>even in every country, even minimum wage has value. Anybody

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>can understand that five hours of work is a material

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>amount of work that you're choosing to give away for free.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And so even if you have no expertise, labor at

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>base price is still worth something, and so if you

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>add on expertise, it becomes a very compelling offer. But

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of that setup of having five or ten

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>hours that you choose to spend is that there's basically,

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing a one on one, there's almost no

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>technical you know component to it. You don't have to

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like build all these calendaring and schedule. It's just like

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you're just going to text those five people, hey, you

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>want to do the same time tomorrow, very simple, and

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>then for each of those you know calls that you'll

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>take with them by the In the very first call,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you just say, hey, I want to just be clear,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>what's the problem. What do you want to you know,

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to solve? And do you mind

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the five hours we spend together

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>if this was good, if I can tell you about

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what I do, If you just set that that pre

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>frame up front, and then you do the hours. On

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the fifth call or the fifth hour or the tenth hour,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, remember I said at the beginning, I

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, has this been good so far? It's like, awesome.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me just recap what we've done, what we've covered

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and the progress we've made. You feel happy about that?

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Great?

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So this is what I think it would look like

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>because also you spent those five or ten hours getting

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as much information or ammunition from them all the other

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>problems that you could potentially solve, and then at that

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>point says, hey, I think that I can solve problem.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 2>One, two, and three.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It'll take me maybe six months, but this is what

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of engagement would look like.

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 2>How does that sound to you? That's all you have

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to do.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is that after you give someone five

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>or ten hours, there's so much reciprocity that's built up.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They're like, well, shoot, I mean sure, now if somebody

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on the first call says no, I don't want to.

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Then it's like you don't even need to continue. And

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so one of the big things that I'm a big

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>proponent of is absolutely give stuff away.

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 2>For free two people who are qualified. Yes, And so

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 2>we're like.

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want a lot of tire kickers. It's like,

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for sure, neither do I. But if I had a

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>room of one hundred of the most qualified people, which

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're like, what are a qualified person?

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 2>It's bent.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So IBM made this figure this alex seventy years ago

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's really never changed. So bant's budget authority need timing.

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Do they have the money to spend the ability to

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>make the decision? They need the thing right now? And

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>now is it now a priority? And so if we

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>had a room of one hundred people who met all

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>four of those criteria, wouldn't you want to do something

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and spend five or ten hours for free? I mean,

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>my god, like if you could sign Like the reason

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they sell time shares over six hour blocks of time

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is because it just takes time to build trust for

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a higher ticket sale. So if anything, it's like you're

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>choosing to say that I'm going to give you five hours,

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're giving you five hours to influence them to

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately prove that you're good at whatever you do. And

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>so I think that is the easiest way to get started.

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>You can make that your front and offer, you can

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>put that in the video, and I think the beauty

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of that specific offer is that you don't need to

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>even figure out what you're going to sell because you'll

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>figure it out during the time you spend with them,

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and so you can figure out the offer in real

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>time with them. And also because you're doing it one

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on one, you can basically you can you can permutate it,

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you can tweak it every single time you pitch it

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to somebody on the fifth or eighth call or whatever.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>That ultimately gets you so many faster iterations that are

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>low risk.

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Before we dive into the next moment, let's hear from

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 3>our sponsors. Thanks for taking a moment for that. Now

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 3>back to the discussion. You know, talking to you today

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and Alex, I watch your stuff all the time. The

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>thing that's standing out to me is you're super tactical.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 3>There's all these methods, there's all these systems, but then

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 3>when you were talking about your life, you're like it's

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 3>all about who I want to become. Is there a

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 3>number that you stop at, or is actually who you

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 3>want to become? That's your north star.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I see entrepreneurship as the single greatest path for personal

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>development because if we define you know, learning as fast

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 1>feedback loops, there are very few other professions that give

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you that much feedback that brutally, brutally on his feedback,

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>as the market will do. And so at every point

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>where I get stuck in a business, I think to myself, like,

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>what skill do I lack?

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 2>And I define everything by skill.

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So even traits, which is just you know, a colloquial term,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>which is really just a bucket of many skills, I

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 1>just think, okay, well, in order for me to appear

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>confident or be confident, it's really like thirty eight things

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that I have to learn, and all of these things,

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>if I break them down easier, I can do them.

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, Okay, when I shake hands, I make

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that I web the middle of my hand and

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I squeeze firmly and I look at the person in

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the eye. It's like that's thing one. Thing two is

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that when we're talking, like you not because you've been

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>doing this for so long. But some people who don't

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>know how to have conversations just stand like this, But

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's an active listener will not. They'll say, oh,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point whatever. And so it's like, that's

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the second thing. When I walk into a room, I'm

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>going to call people by name. It's a third thing.

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>And so when I try and think about these traits

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of who I want to become, it's like, can I

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>break these down into actions that I can actually do?

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:30.479
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that there has been a large

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the growth that I've hopefully, you know, been

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>able to achieve. But in terms of the ultimate goal

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's always just been to be useful. And

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if I think I just do that, then I like

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that as such a simplified goal because being useful has

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.479
<v Speaker 1>it actually includes multiple parties, because you cannot be useful

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>unless there's someone else you're being useful too. And so

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it gives you something controllable, which is that I have

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn skills so that I can serve someone else,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is how I can ultimately be useful. And

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>so even when we're you know, we're making content or

0:35:58.360 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is that we're putting out.

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I always try to think like is this useful? Like

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 2>can someone.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Actually well this change one's behavior. I'd be like, I

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>want to educate. It's like what is education? It just

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>means same condition, new behavior. So if someone has that there,

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>same day over and over again, then they're not learning.

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So if your day looks the same every single day,

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you have learned nothing. And so that means that if

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you listen to this podcast and then nothing changes my

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>behavior as a result, this was just entertainment, not education,

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that has been just It's a very sobering

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>point because you realize, oh, I have to change my

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>behavior in order to.

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Demonstrate that I have learned.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Now, the second component of this is like, okay, well

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what's intelligence then? So intelligence, as I define it is

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>rate of learning. So how quickly do I change my

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>behavior in the same condition based on some stimulus? And

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>so if you in a very real way, you can

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>influence your intelligence by being willing to change faster. And

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so if you've heard ten podcasts and then you eventually

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 1>change firsus somebody who listens to one and then changes,

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that person is more intelligent than you are. And so

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I see that as actually really encouraging because it means like,

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I have an active control on how

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>quickly I can learn simply by changing my behavior. And

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>so so that has been kind of my my modus

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>operator for how I how I live life.

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I want to dive into that, but as an aside,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 3>my no, no, no, the reason why you'll you'll get

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 3>in a second. As an aside, I've been really embarrassed

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 3>in my handshake lately. It's because I've got a really

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 3>bad case of tennis elbow. I've been playing a lot

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 3>of pickleball, and so my elbow is destroyed. And so

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 3>every time I've been I was on tour for the

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 3>last month, and every time I've shook someone's hand in

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 3>a meet and greet, my hand was just like just

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 3>like literally and I felt so embarrassed. But every time

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I did a proper handshake, my elbow would her anyway.

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 3>But so you just you just brought back all that trauma.

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.439
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciate that mindset because it's what you said

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.439
<v Speaker 3>earlier that it actually sets you up for long term

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 3>success even when things are not going your way, when

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.959
<v Speaker 3>the results may not go your way, when you're having

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 3>to do the things you hate. Like it's only when

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 3>that's your north star that you can do all of that,

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 3>Whereas if your north star is just a number or

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 3>just an exit or whatever it may be, it's really

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 3>really hard when you feel like that exit is just

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 3>further and further away, and that numbers further and further away.

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure that you've met, I mean, so many

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs that they have their exit, and everyone almost has

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>invariably the same story. I went into a beach, I

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>drank my ties for a month, and then realized that

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't for me. And so one of the refrains

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that I have in my head all the time is

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you are the problem, like me talking to me, but

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>like we are the problem. And so we have this

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>issue where we fundamentally just always want what we can't have.

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Single people want to get married, married people want to

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be single, and so it's more that we just want

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:35.280
<v Speaker 1>something different almost all the time. And so it's that desired.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>You're the monk here, so you know more about this

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>than I do. That's the issue. Like that's the core problem.

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And so even everyone right now who doesn't have a business,

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like, man, I would like to start a business someday,

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and then all the people who started businesses are like,

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>my god, I can't wait to get out of this thing, right,

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it's just there are pros and cons on

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>both sides. There are trade offs, and I would say

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that if there was a fourth myth that we would tackle,

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>it's that people want the benefits of multiple paths without

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the trade offs speech and so I think one of

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the reasons. So there's lots of you know, content of

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, talk to eighty year olds and they'll

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>tell you, you know, their biggest life regrets. But what

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I find really interesting is that typically what they will

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>do is they will assume all the benefits of their

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>current life and say, I also wish I had the

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>benefits of this other path, yes, without the costs of

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that other path that are unknown. And also they don't

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they forget to subtract all the benefits of their existing path.

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I like to play it out. It's like, Okay, well,

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if I were to do this other path and make

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that trade, would I be better off? And most times

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it ends up just being like I probably be not

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as happy as I am now, Like it's like, oh man,

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that the.

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 2>One that got away.

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like you probably be about just as happy as

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you are now. As soon as you play it out

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years, it's like you probably be about

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the same. And so that's actually dramatically reduced my kind

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of regret analysis from from a living perspective. But I

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>think the trade off part is so important because especially

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're starting out or even when you're more advanced

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in business, there's a what I call the fallacy of

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the perfect pick, which is that we overalize things because

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 1>we think that we have to get it just right,

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>because we think that if we pick just perfectly, we'll

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 1>find a way to get only benefits and no costs.

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't exist.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>And so instead people just stay stuck thinking that there

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>is some pick that they're not seeing, but it's just

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>not true. And so I think the faster you're willing

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to make the trade offs and actually spell them out, like,

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>these are the things I'm willing to trade, because I

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people when they want to like

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>pursue any endeavor, they immediately think, and I think it's

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more Western, is that they think about addition,

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 1>they think about how many more things can I do?

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>How many more things can I add to my calendar?

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:32.959
<v Speaker 1>But most like, right now you currently have a quote

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>fool calendar. You live twenty four hours a day and

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you do stuff, And so I think it's more valuable

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to think what am I willing to give up?

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 2>What am I going to sacrifice?

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And because we have to create space, we have to

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 1>create this vacuum so that we can put this other

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>thing in.

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And so those are the trades.

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think in the beginning, the trades are sometimes

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, more emotional, because in the beginning it's more

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, my friends will think this is weird. They

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get this text. What if someone says, oh, yeah,

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you're starting your business. I forgot or oh you're not

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>coming out with us? Are you really doing thing again? Dude,

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to I mean, hey man, I love

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you man, like I'm supporting it, right, or your mom's.

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Like, are you really going to pursue? Podcasting is a thing? Right? Right?

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I think like the you know, the first rule of

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurship is use what you got, right, It's not waiting

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>for some perfect condition, because starting is the perfect condition.

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's where the profession part comes in going back

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 3>to where you are, like going back to passion profession

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 3>pain with profession, that's use what you've got, Like you

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 3>actually understand this industry. Maybe you even worked really hard

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 3>to get a degree in it if you went to college,

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 3>or you've had work experience since you were sixteen, But

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 3>you kind of want to disregard that because you think

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 3>there's the perfect pick yeah over here and potentially the

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 3>passionate pick over here. How do you turn that profession

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 3>into a service aside us or a real businesses? What

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 3>does that look like?

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 2>So what's really nice?

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>If from the profession of the three is by far

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the fastest angle for sure, because you already have the

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that's valuable because you already do exchange it for money,

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and so the only thing you actually have to add

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at that point you're promotioningsion. So you have to say,

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>how do I let people know about this thing that

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing? And secondarily, how do I get these people

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>once they find out to give me money?

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And so from a letting people know about it, I

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>gave one of eight ways of letting people know. So

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>there's warm outrates. So that's letting people know one on

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one about your stuff. There's cold outreach, which is one

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.399
<v Speaker 1>on one to strangers. You've got paid ads right which

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you can run on any platform, or you've got posting content.

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are the only four things that one person can do.

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a great breakdown.

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 3>There's only four things because you start thinking there's a

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 3>million things I have to do.

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 1>You've got strangers and people. You know, you've got one

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>on one and one to many. That's the four box.

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Now from those core four, you then unlock four others,

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which is that I can do one on one outbound,

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or I can do or can post constant, or I

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>can run ads to get customers who then get me

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>more customers, to get affiliates or partners who get me

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.279
<v Speaker 1>more customers, to get employees who will then do these

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>things on my behalf to get me more customers, or

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to get agencies who will then do it as a

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.440
<v Speaker 1>vendor on my behalf. And so the first is the

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone must start with the for. Even if you get

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bunch of you know partners who then

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>promote on your behalf, you still started with a message

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that you sent to somebody, right, And so the core

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for is the first activity that you must do in

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>order to promote. These other things are higher leverage. That

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, but this is the core four that you

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>start with. Once you have someone who's responding to you

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and say hey, I'm interested in your stuff, which takes

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>someone from a contact to an engaged lead. Right, they've

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>shown interest, then we basically have to take them from

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>engaged to ideally somebody who's gonna buy. Right, And so

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that process, at the most basic level is going to

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>be a conversation that leads to a conversion.

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 1>And so I have a very simple framework that I

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that I encourage people who are starting out to follow,

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>which I call closer And so it's an acronym so

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's easy. So CEE stands for clarify, which you begin

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the conversation like, hey, why do you respond to my thing?

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And the nice thing is that whenever you promote, you

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>only are really going to have a conversation with someone

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 1>who engages back, right, So you always have the reason

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 1>why right.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 2>At the front.

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So what made you what made you comment on my post?

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>What made you DM me after that? What made you

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>respond to my ad? What made you even respond to

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>my original message?

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Or call? Right? So that you have that reason, so

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 2>what made you do that? Clarify?

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Then you have L, which is you label them with

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a problem. So okay, so what I'm hearing is this

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is a problem. This is we're trying to solve. Is

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not about right?

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Cool.

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Then we go to O, which is overview their past experiences.

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 1>And so here we're simply asking them more or less

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the same four questions, which is, Okay.

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>What have you done so far? How did that work

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 2>for you? What was good? What was bad?

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And then we try and tie that to our solution,

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the pieces that we can solve and say, oh, well,

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I think you might like this because we have this

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>other element. I'll get to that later, but okay, this

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is great. What else have you done? What else have

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you done? And so that's kind of a pain cycle.

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And the reason the pain cycle is important is because

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to increase motivation in the short term, we

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have to basically expand the deprivation around the thing that

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 1>they want, and so we have to we have to

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>increase its priority in the short term to get them

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to take action. And that's why that that cycle is

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>so important. The fourth is S which is we sell

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the vacation, and so we want to talk about the

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 1>outcomes of what the experience is going to be like

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 1>once the problem solved, rather than just having some long

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.359
<v Speaker 1>winded pitch. And what's very interesting about the sell portion

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>is that most people talk way too much. We try

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and get it to under three hundred and twenty words.

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So it does it like people if you can, if

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you can very accurately describe someone's existing condition to them

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and say, so it sounds like you're struggling with this,

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like you're struggling with this, and it

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you're struggling with this. And if we solve

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>this one, this is what's unlocks. We solve this one.

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>This is one locks, and we solved this at this

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one locks. Is that about right? They're like, yeah, it's

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like we can totally help you a lot of times

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>you actually don't need to sit if you nail the

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>pain part.

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 2>The pitch is very easy.

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I am a big believer in having three

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>points and whatever pitch you have, so you can always

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:34.280
<v Speaker 1>chunk it up, you know, like I have our attract

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>convert deliver, you have, Okay, how do we get people

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>find out how do we convert them and.

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 2>How do we give them the stuff? Right?

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Having three elements of whatever it is. I mean I

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>used to do sales scripts for you know, different companies

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. So it's like I had a

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.280
<v Speaker 1>mortgage lead company and they're like, okay, well the leads

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are you.

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Know, timely. You want them to be qualified and you

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:49.919
<v Speaker 2>want to be exclusive. Okay, great.

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>If you're in fitness, it's like you need you need,

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>you need to work out, you need to eat right,

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you need to have accountability. If you have all three,

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>then you can't fit right. And so there's always three.

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And then with each of those three, I have kind

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>of in the back pocket a little anecdote that to

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>give an example of that. So that way it makes

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it more real for the person. Rather than explaining all

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the sets and reps and all that stuff, no one cares.

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's selling the vacation, not the plane flight.

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna sell how we're gonna ge there. We're

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>gona tell where're gona go. And so once we do

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>S then we go to E. So at that point

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>we ask for the sale. If they say no, then

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>E and are coming to play. E is explaining to

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>with their concerns. There's only five. Right, They're going to

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have a timing issue. I've got a lot going on

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. They have a money issue. I don't think

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's worth it. They have a decision maker problem, which

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is I don't have the authority to make the decision.

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I need someone else's permission. They're going to have a

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>stall issue, which is let me think about it. And

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 1>then there's fifth is preferences. So I don't like this

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 1>particular thing about your product or solution, which is just

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that they want your results a different way. And

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>so basically, once you understand how to overcome each of

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 1>those five issues, which they are all actually just fallacies

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in decision making. So if it's timing issue, it's not

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>really a time thing. It's a priorities thing. If it's

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a money thing, it's not really a money thing.

0:46:57.440 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a value thing.

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 1>If it's a decision maker thing, it's really that they

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>need support, not permission. And then we rely on past

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>agreements in order to say, hey, well, your husband knows

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're overweight, right, do you think he wants you

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to stay overweight?

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Then why would it be against you doing something to

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 1>change that, right, So just walking through those and.

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I go through all of them, but that's enough.

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is it.

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And then from installing perspective, it's actually helping someone make

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a decision because a lot of people don't know how

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to decide. Because you will have this conversation far more

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>than every person you talk to. People maybe only have

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 1>five ten sales conversations a year. If you are selling

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>it for a business, you'll have four or five a day.

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And so you should absolutely always be more equipped than

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they are to solve the problem. The one that I

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>skipped with preferences, which is you know, I like, hey,

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I really want you know, my friend Charlotte, she lost

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty pounds doing your thing, But.

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Can I just keep eating the food that I'm currently eating?

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>And so they want their results your way, And so

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the easiest way to explain around that is if you

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 1>change the variables to change the outcome, do you like

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the outcome? Yeah, well, then don't change the variables. And

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 1>this is the only thing that I can give you

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 1>confidence in. And the question is is you eating the

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>food you want more important than you look in the

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>way you want to look? And that's a real question

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and if the person says yes it is, and it's

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like okay, well then nothing's going to change if you

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>don't change, and so then you get to have a

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>real conversation. But each of those those are the fundamental

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of ways of getting over them. And so once

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you explain away the concerns, after each explanation, you always

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>ask again, so does like does that?

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Does that help that? Does that? Does that? Does that?

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:21.959
<v Speaker 2>All that for you? Great?

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>So ready to move forward, You're ready to do whatever

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the next thing is. And then finally it is our

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And the R actually happens after the sale and is

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>something that I added years later in my career.

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It used to just be close. But the R is

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:35.240
<v Speaker 2>reinforce the decision.

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So in the twenty four hours post purchase is when

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority be either have you know, cold feet

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 1>or they regret or you can reinforce it and becomes

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 1>a super positive right and so people believe it or not.

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>There's tons of research that supports this is that they

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 1>will make a decision about your business based on the

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:51.320
<v Speaker 1>first twenty four.

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Hours post purchase.

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's this huge moment where you can make a

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>first impression that preframes the remainder of the of the

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:00.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship that you have with them and so being incredibly

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:02.759
<v Speaker 1>died of Like, hey, so you bought. Let me tell

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you what the next steps are going to be. We're

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going to take these steps and we're going to tie

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that to goal. Right, so you said you wanted these

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>three things. The way that we're going to solve these

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>three things is these three steps. These are the actions

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you take. We're gonna meet tomorrow at this time, I'll

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>see you there, or if you have a you know,

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>onboarding rep, then you'd go from there. But that fundamentally

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is how you'd have the conversion conversation. And so to

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>loop back to if I'm a professional, how do I

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>do this, It's like, well, you're gonna.

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Use the core four. You're gonna reach out to people.

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Once they respond, you'll initiate the conversation where you go

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>through the closer framework and then you make them an

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>offer to do your stuff, which will be either moonlighting

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>or you know, in the morning. And what's really interesting

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:36.279
<v Speaker 1>is that people think that they're nine to five is

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>getting in the way of their dreams, when it's really

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they're five to nine, and so five am to nine

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>am it's like your's four prime hours, and then five

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>pm to nine pm it's another four prime hours. So

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:48.399
<v Speaker 1>it's like you've got eight You've got a full work

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>day that you can work, which I strongly recommend. I

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people are big on the burn

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the boat's thing, and I think there's a time and

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a place for that. But if you have a family

0:49:56.400 --> 0:49:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and you've got a mortgage, I would recommend you keep

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>your job and then supplement your income. And then at

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the point where your supplemental income in your off time

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:09.359
<v Speaker 1>surpasses your full time income, that is when I say

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>make the jump. And for me, because I actually believe it,

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be relatively risk averse person. I would say,

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if you do that for six months, because there's going

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to be volatility in the business, and I'll also just

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 1>play out the next.

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Problem they're going to have. If that's all right, I.

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Go for it. So so much value, so much value.

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So volatility is a symptom of insufficient volume. And so

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like you're like, man, you know, I

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of customers and then you know the

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>lead stop coming in, it's like, well, you're doing insufficient volume.

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not doing enough of the core four. We have

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to post more content, we have to post more ads,

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to do more reach outs, right, That's what

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we have to do. And so if you think, okay,

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>well I've been doing these reach outs and you know

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>no one's responding or things like that.

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:48.359
<v Speaker 2>One we need to make.

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Sure that the offer that we have is good, which

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we started with the five hour thing. I

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great first offer. But you know, under

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that assumption, if we do this, I have a rule

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred, which is that you do one hundred

0:50:57.480 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>per day. So that means you're doing either one hundred.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It's that you're putting into posting content and you post,

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and you post it to be very clear, and you post.

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You spend one hundred dollars a day on ads, or

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you do one hundred reachouts and if you want to

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>be crazy, you can do all three. And so those

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in those in those scenarios, the key is that you

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have to keep going. And so if you get let's

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:18.719
<v Speaker 1>say you do the rule of one hundred and you

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>get one sale a week, okay, then if you want

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to that would give you four sales a month. Roughly,

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 1>if you're like, man, I want to go from four

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>sales a month to sixteen sales a month. The nice

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is that you actually have a clear input output equation,

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:35.320
<v Speaker 1>which is that, Okay, it cost me seven hundred primary

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:40.400
<v Speaker 1>efforts to get one sale, and so that volatility feels

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like it's only one, but it's because you're not doing enough.

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>If I take that seven hundred and do seven hundred

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 1>per day, then all of a sudden, I'll be making

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 1>one sale a day. And fundamentally, that little compression process

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is the only thing that separates very small businesses from

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>very large businesses. Most small business owners have no idea

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:58.960
<v Speaker 1>how much more volume the guys who are ahead of

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>them put out. I'm ride a conversation at the very

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of me deciding to make content after I sold

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the company where I said, hey, you know, I really

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 1>want to learn this Instagram game and content game. And

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so I talked to somebody who's a big, big influencer,

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you know, can you can you analyze

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:15.279
<v Speaker 1>my stuff and tell me what I'm doing wrong? And

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he said, dude, you're not doing anything wrong. You're just

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>doing too little. And so he said, he said, pull

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 1>up your Instagram and I pulled it up and I

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think I was doing like a post every other day

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, and.

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 2>He's like, dude, I got four posts a day. And

0:52:28.320 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I was like, whoa.

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And then he said, pull up your LinkedIn and I

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've posted on LinkedIn. And he's like, I

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 1>got ten posts a day. And he's like, pull pull

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>up your Twitter. At the time, now X is like

0:52:36.640 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I had nothing right. So he went side by side.

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I'm putting out seventy eighty a day and

0:52:40.760 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you're putting out one every other and you're complaining. And

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I was like, got it. And so the most people

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>dramatically underestimate the amount of volume that is required. And

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that volume has a great feedback loop for skill because

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you do these iterations and you will suck. And that

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is okay, and as long as you like. The process

0:52:57.840 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that I have for improving any part of any system

0:52:59.880 --> 0:53:02.799
<v Speaker 1>is just do a tremendous amount of volume. Let's say

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>we do one hundred whatevers. We look at the top

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of the ones that got the highest response rated,

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the ones that got the most views, or the ad

0:53:08.520 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they got the most clicks. We say Okay, what was

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:12.319
<v Speaker 1>different about these top ten percent compared to the other

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>ninety And so the next hundred we do, we say,

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:15.839
<v Speaker 1>let's just try and just do the thing we did

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten percent, we do it again. And

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that continual refinement process has been the key to all

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that we've done.

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 2>It's just look at what worked, do more of that.

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And so if you were in the professional bucket, that

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is more or less kind of the approach that I

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:28.959
<v Speaker 1>would take to get that first dollar.

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Everyone needs to listen to that fifteen minutes every day.

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:34.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm not kidding. That was the most amount of value

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 3>I think has ever been back and at fifteen minutes

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 3>that I've ever heard in my entire life. And I'm

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 3>not kidding. That is such brilliant, brilliant advice, totally broken

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 3>down step by step. I mean you could, I mean

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 3>you can make like seventy posts off of just the

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.759
<v Speaker 3>last fifteen minutes. It was so no And I mean

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 3>that I'm not just saying that because right now as

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 3>you're speaking, I've got so many friends that I've got

0:53:56.120 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 3>in my head that are exactly at that point, and

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 3>it's the volume that's messing them up. It's either not

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 3>having the plan to how do you pitch and convert

0:54:05.040 --> 0:54:09.560
<v Speaker 3>two questions? The first is how do you stop being

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 3>scared of sucking? Because a lot of my friends are

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 3>scared of sucking? And the second one is why are

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:22.879
<v Speaker 3>we so uncomfortable selling and promoting and showing our work?

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So the first one, what's really interesting about the question

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is that I think that most people are actually very

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>okay with sucking. I think they're very not okay with

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:34.319
<v Speaker 1>being judged for sucking. And so I think that at

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the at the onset, we have to redefine success as

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:41.439
<v Speaker 1>trying and not as succeeding or at least getting whatever

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>desired outcome there is, because failure and success are salt

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and pepper.

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 2>They're married.

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>One leads to the next, and so the idea is

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to get as many failures out of the

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:52.719
<v Speaker 1>way as fast as possible, and so it's like we

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>want to pay down that failure that again as soon

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as we can. And so the very tactical thing that

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I would advise is think about there's we think, don't

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want people to think that I'm a failure.

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's actually not people. There's like two people that you

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hear their voice in your head. And so when you

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>actually get really clear on whose voice is that, because

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, I'll tell you a real world example. So

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for me, when I say this just sounds ridiculous, but

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>just but just to show you, hopefully how ridiculous whatever

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>you think sounds, I'll share one of mine. So when

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about selling my company, the offer was

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for forty six point two million, and I was afraid

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't enough to impress the people that I

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to impress, and so and I had to figure

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that out. I was like, I don't know, I mean

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it's worth it. Maybe I should hold on to a

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:40.359
<v Speaker 1>longer and grow more and I want, you know, back

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and forth. And when I thought more about it, I

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was like, actually, there's only one person whose opinion I'm

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>concerned about.

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And then when I named it, when I was like, oh,

0:55:50.200 --> 0:55:51.320
<v Speaker 2>it's Tom.

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Tom's the and like I'm not even that close with Tom,

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but tom my envisionment of Tom judging my my my

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 1>egg it is not good enough for their approval. I

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:05.760
<v Speaker 1>was like, wait, I'm letting Tom have this much influence

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 1>over my life.

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:07.840
<v Speaker 2>That's absurd.

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:10.759
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the big reframes that I have

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>in my head is that if you don't know why

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you believe what you believe, it's not your belief.

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Ats someone else's.

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And so if you can't explain, like why am I

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 1>not doing this, If you can't actually explain it, it's

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>because there's someone else's voice that is influencing you that

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not aware of. And so I try and name it. Yeah,

0:56:23.440 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the naming is the key part, because as soon as

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you see that, you're like Tom, You're like screw Toom.

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 1>We're like I want to do say it's like, is

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Tom's approval worth more than the dream that you want

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to pursue?

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 2>And as soon as you get that, you're like, well,

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 2>hell no. And then you move forward.

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And I can tell you just from the other side

0:56:40.360 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, and I want to unders want to be

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:41.919
<v Speaker 1>really clear.

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I understand how scary it is.

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It took me six months to quit my job, and

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I talk to my friend every single day saying this

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is the day, this is the day, this day. And

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:51.360
<v Speaker 1>when I did finally quit my job, I drove across

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the country and I only called people from home when

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I was already halfway across. I didn't tell anyone I

0:56:56.960 --> 0:56:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was leaving because I was so afraid of what they

0:56:59.000 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would say.

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 2>So I say, this is somebody.

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Who absolutely gets it, but I just want to see

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you from the other side of it. It's you know,

0:57:06.360 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>this is a Layla quote, not me, but you know,

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 1>fear is a mile wide and an inch deep, and

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:13.319
<v Speaker 1>so it looks like this vast ocean of like I'm

0:57:13.320 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 1>going to drown. But as soon as you take the

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>first step, you're like, oh, this is a puddle. And

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a quote from Jocko Willick that I love. That's

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:21.240
<v Speaker 1>recent that's been top of mind for me, which is,

0:57:22.080 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 1>besides death, all failure is psychological. And it's just when

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you the longer you think about it, the where you're like, wait,

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 1>all failure is just me drawing an arbitrary line in

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the sand that I say anything that does not meet

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the standard or force me to be upset. And so

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like, okay, well, if I don't die, then I

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>can keep going. And if I don't die, then it

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 1>means I can stand it.

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think a big part of it when

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm listening to you is because it's psychological. Let me

0:57:49.320 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 3>know that it will happen.

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 3>So I remember when I put out my first video,

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 3>which I didn't tell anyone I was going to do.

0:57:54.760 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 3>I spent two years watching videos before I made one

0:57:59.280 --> 0:58:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and put one out. And when I put out my

0:58:01.360 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 3>first video, I remember my friends saying to me, you

0:58:04.440 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 3>talk too fast, the music is too loud, it's edited

0:58:07.720 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 3>badly cool like, it wasn't received with praise. Now, I

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 3>didn't think about that too much. And now if I

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 3>go back to advise someone, I'd say, anticipate that, because

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 3>if you anticipate it, then it's okay. Then it's in steep, right,

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.320
<v Speaker 3>You're like, oh, okay, Well, yeah, they're probably going to

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 3>tell me that the editing wasn't great or whatever. But

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:31.720
<v Speaker 3>if I followed Alex's advice, maybe I have sent it

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 3>to a couple of people, you know, not friends, but

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:36.640
<v Speaker 3>people who actually know what they're doing. I've got some insight.

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I've studied it well enough, and maybe I'll avoid some

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 3>of them. But guess what, I won't avoid all of them.

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:43.560
<v Speaker 3>There will still be someone who criticizes the tone, what

0:58:43.600 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm wearing, how I look, whatever it is. And as

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:49.160
<v Speaker 3>soon as you know that, you go, oh, that's all

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 3>it is someone's going to look at it and be like, yeah,

0:58:51.400 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure, and it's like, oh wait, their reaction

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't change my reality, Like their reaction will always be.

0:58:57.840 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Then I think what we're trying to do going to

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:02.480
<v Speaker 3>you earlier as well, is we're trying to avoid the reaction.

0:59:03.000 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 3>We want to create something that has no negative reaction.

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 3>And there is not a single class on planet Earth

0:59:10.840 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 3>that has created a song, a movie, podcast, or whatever

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:16.440
<v Speaker 3>it may be that has had no negative reaction.

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So I have so many quick thoughts on this, yea.

0:59:19.400 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So number one is that if you do nothing, people

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>will criticize you. If you do something, people will criticize you.

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So criticism is a fixed cost period. Number two, it

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:32.560
<v Speaker 1>takes about twenty hours to become proficient in just about anything.

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 1>You want to play guitar, like proficient in just about anything.

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It just takes people ten years to get the first

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty hours, and that's a huge issue. The third is

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that when you're thinking about feedback is one not all

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>feedback is created equal. You don't want to listen to

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the people who are closest to you. You want to

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to people who are closest to your goals, and

0:59:52.600 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 1>so listen to people who already at your goals, who

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>already achieve those goals, and listen to their feedback. Because

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, for example, for me, like if I if I,

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I rarely do, but if I post anything

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of me at the gym, the only people who comment are.

1:00:03.880 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 2>People who are smaller than me.

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:08.439
<v Speaker 1>No guy who is bigger than me ever has talked

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit about you know about my you know my

1:00:10.560 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>fitness stuff. And so to the same degree, anybody who's

1:00:13.200 --> 1:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>an entre who's a real entrepreneur is going to be like, hell, yeah, man,

1:00:15.920 --> 1:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you got out there.

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh of course you failed. Obviously you failed.

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's okay, right, everyone falls the first time, right

1:00:21.040 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>from the matrix, and so expect failure. And I think

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that if you can play it out, there's a there's

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a really wonderful stock frame around this, which is the

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>frame of the veteran, which is, if you were to

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine whatever bad experience occurs happening a thousand times more

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in a row, how would you feel in the thousandth time.

1:00:39.440 --> 1:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And if that's how you're gonna feel in a thousandth

1:00:41.440 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>time with the exact same condition, you might as well

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>feel that way today, and it's just been a really

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>like a like if you're like, man, I hate traffic,

1:00:47.240 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It's okay. Let's assume traffic is a constant and it

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>happens for the next thousand days. You'll probably be like, well,

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just how it is, right, and.

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>So this is just how it is.

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the feedback that you're gonna get from videos, and

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to keep happening, and it's okay.

1:00:57.400 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, your point just now of the problem is it

1:01:00.800 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>takes us ten years to get the first twenty hours.

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Is so true. I know something that I've biggest people

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>are off something like that to me, Like, Jay, how

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 3>do you solve a problem? I'm like, if I think

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>something's a big problem to solve or a skill to learn,

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I will cancel every evening planned this week and I

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>will cancel my entire weekend. And all I'm doing this

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 3>weekend is figuring out that skill. I'll get a coach,

1:01:22.320 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll commit to the time, and I'll be around that

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:28.200
<v Speaker 3>community of people. Those are my three practices or things

1:01:28.240 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>to develop a skill. And then this weekend is dedicated

1:01:32.040 --> 1:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>to getting good at X. And it's like, if I

1:01:34.920 --> 1:01:37.919
<v Speaker 3>don't get enough hours in this weekend, the next four

1:01:37.960 --> 1:01:41.000
<v Speaker 3>weekends are dedicated to that thing, and all of a sudden,

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>in a month, I've solved a problem that could have

1:01:43.200 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>taken me six years. And so I love that piece

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>of advice because I think it's the same advice when

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:50.120
<v Speaker 3>you give people like, hey, just try three things out,

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and then they're like, okay, I'll try three things out

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 3>one a year. And also when you give it twelve

1:01:55.440 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>months to try one thing out, you actually never know

1:01:58.360 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>whereas if you did something for a whole day. Like

1:02:01.160 --> 1:02:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I remember when me and my wife were in Hawaii.

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>We both grew up in London. We never went surfing,

1:02:06.960 --> 1:02:09.600
<v Speaker 3>more skiing and things like this. Right we're in Hawaii,

1:02:09.640 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>we try surfing, we do it the whole day. I

1:02:12.040 --> 1:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>knew I was never going to be a surfer and

1:02:14.080 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 3>it's the last thing I want to do. And I

1:02:15.720 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 3>don't care at all about surfing. It looks good, but

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:20.919
<v Speaker 3>it is not fun to do, Like I didn't enjoy

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the process, And I'm like, but if I went like

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:26.160
<v Speaker 3>for thirty minutes one day, then I'd be like, oh, well,

1:02:26.160 --> 1:02:28.640
<v Speaker 3>maybe I just didn't do it right. And then you're like, Okay,

1:02:28.680 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll go thirty minutes next year, I'll do an hour

1:02:30.680 --> 1:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>next year, And so we just keep elongating the kind

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:37.920
<v Speaker 3>of failure rate or knowing how quickly something's important or not.

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's getting completely immersed and just soaked in

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever the thing that you're trying to pursue. So I'll

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you a comparable story. So when I was when

1:02:48.000 --> 1:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I had my first business, I was I've never been

1:02:50.520 --> 1:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a tech oriented person. Now I try not to speak

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that over myself, but like, I'm working on it, and

1:02:54.720 --> 1:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so I was like, I have to learn how to

1:02:56.600 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>build by pages. I hate relying on these it guys.

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>They're slow, they don't build it the right way. And

1:03:00.800 --> 1:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so this is right as some of the early kind

1:03:02.400 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of software say come out. And I had put it

1:03:05.200 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>off and then I finally said, both days this weekend,

1:03:08.000 --> 1:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm locking the doors, I'm closing the frames, I'm turning

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>off my phone. And I just had a simple page.

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'm just gonna copy this page. I just

1:03:14.440 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>want to see if I can figure it out. And

1:03:16.040 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I set two full days aside and I finished it

1:03:18.640 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>by noon. Yeah, but I had put it off for weeks,

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and so most times it's almost like fears them all

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>wide and an inch deep. So is ignorance. It's like

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's more than you expect, less than you think. Right,

1:03:29.600 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you get in and then you're like, oh, there's only

1:03:30.920 --> 1:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>four parts to this, Okay, I think, okay, now you

1:03:33.680 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>want to wrap your arms around it. And I think

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that's why having these kind of longer inten sessions you

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of drink all of it up, because if you

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>did multiple thirty minute sessions, for example, it's like it'll

1:03:41.680 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>take you the first fifteen minutes to get back into

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what did I just learn last time? And then it

1:03:46.000 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>just it's very hard to get make progress. And so

1:03:48.600 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a massive advocate of full shutdown days. I mean,

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>drink your coffee, get your good night's sleep, and then

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>put your your plugs in and then like lock in.

1:03:56.640 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, before we dive into the next moment, let's

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>hear from our sponsors and back to our episode. Absolutely.

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:07.480
<v Speaker 3>And then the second question was why are we so

1:04:07.680 --> 1:04:12.720
<v Speaker 3>uncomfortable with selling, promoting ourselves, putting ourselves out there?

1:04:13.040 --> 1:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>So I would put this two separate buckets.

1:04:15.560 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So one is the promotion, which is kind of public

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of embarrassment, public harass, you know, that's not right.

1:04:19.640 --> 1:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>The second one is why am I scared to ask

1:04:23.240 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this person for money?

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I think on some level it comes down

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to some people feel like impostors. They're like, you know,

1:04:29.600 --> 1:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't deserve this, and things like that. But I

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a there's a very tactical way to

1:04:34.320 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>overcome that, which is you outwork yourself doubt. And so

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if you if you've done those twenty and I think

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's people who haven't done the twenty who feel like impostors.

1:04:45.120 --> 1:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you've done it twenty times, and you're like,

1:04:46.680 --> 1:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I know what's going to happen next, and I know

1:04:48.680 --> 1:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what your problem is, and I also know I can

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>solve it, and so your conviction goes up because you're

1:04:53.360 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not you're not exaggerating anything, you're not puffing your chest.

1:04:55.720 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You're just one of my big rules of persuasion to

1:04:58.040 --> 1:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>state the facts and tell the truth. And so you're like, listen,

1:05:00.240 --> 1:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I've done twenty of these. You have the same issues

1:05:02.720 --> 1:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>as these people. This is what I did for them.

1:05:04.600 --> 1:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I can do the same thing for you.

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not exaggerating, we're not claiming anything. We're just saying,

1:05:08.320 --> 1:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like this is, this is what's happened, and so I

1:05:10.520 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>think that that will dramatically decrease the anxiety around the conversation.

1:05:14.120 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>The second piece is the fear of like rejection in

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the micro and so.

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:20.400
<v Speaker 2>It's it's always.

1:05:20.160 --> 1:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Overstated because the worst thing they can say is no,

1:05:23.560 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you say, okay, fine, no worries, like, not

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, I'll just ask somebody else, right, like

1:05:28.760 --> 1:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>if anything, the sales is like dating, it's a numbers game,

1:05:31.560 --> 1:05:33.959
<v Speaker 1>like you have to be willing to say I would.

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is why I like rule of one hundred

1:05:35.360 --> 1:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot is have a hundred conversations, and I promise

1:05:38.240 --> 1:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you your anxiety will go down because you'll just habituate. And

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>so everyone like, and this is the psychological way of

1:05:43.280 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>actually curing phobia. Is if you're afraid of spiders, the

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fastest way to cure spiders is locking in a room

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>with spiders.

1:05:48.480 --> 1:05:49.640
<v Speaker 2>You'll have a couple of panic attacks.

1:05:49.680 --> 1:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You'll you'll you'll pass out, you'll wake back up, the

1:05:51.840 --> 1:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>spider's still there. You wait, pass out, wake back up,

1:05:53.640 --> 1:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and eventually you're just like, all right, I'm used to it.

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And so that's also one of the telltale signs of

1:05:57.840 --> 1:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an experienced salesman is that in the clone, when the

1:06:00.480 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>stakes are high, their pulse.

1:06:02.160 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Is the same.

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's because they've done this before, and so we just

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have to get you to that we've done this before

1:06:06.520 --> 1:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>part as fast.

1:06:07.320 --> 1:06:07.720
<v Speaker 2>As we can.

1:06:07.960 --> 1:06:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what about people who feel like the approach is

1:06:11.240 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>are manipulative? Okay, well, these tactics are like you're preying

1:06:15.360 --> 1:06:19.720
<v Speaker 3>on someone's vulnerabilities and insecurities, and of course that person

1:06:20.080 --> 1:06:22.800
<v Speaker 3>wants to lose weight for their partner, and you're playing

1:06:22.840 --> 1:06:24.720
<v Speaker 3>to that. Like what about someone who feels that way

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>and that's what gets in their head like, Oh, I

1:06:27.040 --> 1:06:28.840
<v Speaker 3>know I have a valuable service. I know I want

1:06:28.840 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 3>to help people, but actually, like they should want to

1:06:31.680 --> 1:06:33.560
<v Speaker 3>do it themselves. I'm not going to convince.

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Them, So I'm going to I'll define two things. So one,

1:06:36.120 --> 1:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I see the process of selling as arranging the variables

1:06:38.680 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to increase the likely at a sale occurs. That is

1:06:40.720 --> 1:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a selling process, and so we want to use all

1:06:42.600 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the variables we can because if we can control the variables,

1:06:44.400 --> 1:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we control the outcome. And so I see then underneath

1:06:47.240 --> 1:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, the difference between help manipulation is intention, and

1:06:50.640 --> 1:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>so you use the exact same variables to influence someone's

1:06:54.280 --> 1:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>purchasing decision. But if your intention is to scam the

1:06:57.520 --> 1:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of money and not help them, then for sure

1:06:59.240 --> 1:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you should. I hope you feel all the feelings that

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you have right now. But on the flip side, if

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that you're going to do your absolute best

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and you have not misrepresented something, and I think this

1:07:07.240 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is the key part where people feel the imposter syndrome

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is because they misrepresent.

1:07:10.760 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>If you state the facts and tell the truth, most

1:07:12.800 --> 1:07:13.840
<v Speaker 2>of your anxiety goes away.

1:07:13.840 --> 1:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And I have this conversation sometimes with entrepreneurs, even at

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars year, five million dollars year, and they're like,

1:07:18.280 --> 1:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I just feel this imposter syndrome with my business. And

1:07:20.680 --> 1:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I was say, are you stating anything that's not true?

1:07:23.440 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And then they'll kind of look at me and they're like, well,

1:07:25.320 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I teach agencies how to grow their customer base.

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, okay, and why do you feel like

1:07:31.160 --> 1:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>an imposter? They're like, well, you know I had an

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>agency and it just really wasn't that successful. And I'm like, okay,

1:07:36.600 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>are your client successful? They're like, no, the clients are successful.

1:07:38.760 --> 1:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like okay, so what do you teach them that

1:07:41.480 --> 1:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you were not able to do for yourself? And they're like, well,

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I was actually really good at the sales side. I

1:07:44.480 --> 1:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was really bad at the delivery side. I said, if

1:07:46.600 --> 1:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you just say, hey, I had an agency, I was

1:07:49.440 --> 1:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>really good at selling customers, really bad at delivering on them.

1:07:51.840 --> 1:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you're good at delivering on them and you

1:07:53.280 --> 1:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>need a sales process, I can help you. I was like,

1:07:54.920 --> 1:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>would you feel like you're being an imposter? And he's

1:07:56.520 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>like no, I was like, and believe it or not,

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that's actually more compelling because you have a damaging commission,

1:08:01.320 --> 1:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>which actually makes you It's one of the components of persuasion, right,

1:08:03.320 --> 1:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Like you just just tell people all the things that

1:08:05.960 --> 1:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>are not good, because when you tell them the good things,

1:08:08.440 --> 1:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll actually.

1:08:08.960 --> 1:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Believe them more.

1:08:09.840 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I would tell you know, I was in

1:08:11.480 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the gym space for a while, and so you know,

1:08:13.200 --> 1:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a gym owner would have, you know, a bad location

1:08:15.680 --> 1:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and bad parking and they're like, you know, I don't,

1:08:18.120 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. It's it's embarrassing, And I say, included in

1:08:20.960 --> 1:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the ad. Just say hey, by the way, we have

1:08:23.479 --> 1:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the we don't have the newst equipment. Our parking is terrible.

1:08:26.360 --> 1:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>We have a tiny location, but we have the best

1:08:28.840 --> 1:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>workouts on this side of the Mississippi.

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:08:31.000 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you say that, then it's like people are like,

1:08:32.320 --> 1:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that guy, right because he told the truth,

1:08:34.400 --> 1:08:37.519
<v Speaker 1>and so you'll be significantly more persuasive and have less anxiety.

1:08:37.560 --> 1:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I just stayed in the facts and tell the truth,

1:08:39.040 --> 1:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>and if the facts aren't compelling enough, do the free work.

1:08:41.760 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>So the facts are compelling.

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oh, I love that so much because I'm thinking

1:08:45.080 --> 1:08:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of Rents right now, who has a service offers and

1:08:48.200 --> 1:08:50.840
<v Speaker 3>he's always scared that he's a one man band and

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>he's scared that company is going to ask for a service,

1:08:53.280 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and he's almost embarrassed of saying, well, I'm just one guy,

1:08:56.560 --> 1:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>and he wants to present himself as a company yes,

1:08:59.400 --> 1:09:02.479
<v Speaker 3>And I'm always well, no, tell them. Because you're one guy,

1:09:02.960 --> 1:09:05.080
<v Speaker 3>you can actually be there. You're present, you're doing all

1:09:05.120 --> 1:09:07.679
<v Speaker 3>the work yourself. You're committed, You're not just rolling out

1:09:07.720 --> 1:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>something that everyone else is doing.

1:09:09.520 --> 1:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>So I have an awesome frame for this.

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So when we had our software company, Allen, which we

1:09:13.680 --> 1:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sold in twenty one, it was a software that helped

1:09:16.600 --> 1:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>agencies kind of made his schedules. It did automated texting

1:09:19.160 --> 1:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff back before all the new stuff, right, And so

1:09:23.120 --> 1:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually had agencies that's sold to gym owners. And

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I also owned gym Launch at the time too, which

1:09:28.320 --> 1:09:30.519
<v Speaker 1>is which is the category you know, king in that space, right,

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 1>It's the biggest company there. And so they're like, how

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:34.759
<v Speaker 1>do we how do we compete against you? And I said,

1:09:34.880 --> 1:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>every position has an advantage. And so you are going

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to say, man, Alex, Alex isn't gonna be the one

1:09:41.439 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>take you know, he's not the one taking your calls.

1:09:43.120 --> 1:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>He's just gonna you're gonna be client number seventy seven.

1:09:45.240 --> 1:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna know your name. You're gonna be assigned

1:09:47.040 --> 1:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to some account rep that he pays you know, nothing

1:09:49.560 --> 1:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to And of course we paid well, but like I've like,

1:09:51.920 --> 1:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, he just pays way less

1:09:54.320 --> 1:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that he onboarded in two days, and like that's the

1:09:57.439 --> 1:10:00.519
<v Speaker 1>level of service you're gonna get, whereas with me, you

1:10:00.560 --> 1:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>get the highest person, you get the CEO, and you

1:10:02.880 --> 1:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>call me, I'll respond immediately. I'm the one working on

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>your account. So don't compare the size of gym wants

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the size of my company. Compare the person you're actually

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna work with, and am I gonna be better than

1:10:11.120 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 1>his Rep?

1:10:11.560 --> 1:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Number seven? Yes, that's a compelling pitch.

1:10:14.760 --> 1:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, if I'm flipping the table, I'm gonna say, listen,

1:10:16.960 --> 1:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy is in his mom's basement. He hasn't proven

1:10:19.200 --> 1:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>any track record. We've been here for ten years. And

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason we've been here for ten years and we've

1:10:22.840 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten so big as because we're actually good at what

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we do, and if we work at it what we do,

1:10:25.960 --> 1:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't be this big and we wouldn't been doing

1:10:27.400 --> 1:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it for this long. This guy has no process. He

1:10:29.160 --> 1:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>might be gone tomorrow. We both have advantages that we

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>can cater so there's no position on the board that

1:10:33.720 --> 1:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't advantage.

1:10:34.439 --> 1:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>She got to play what you got again? All number one? Right?

1:10:37.520 --> 1:10:40.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And the idea of pointing it out, yeah, is

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:43.720
<v Speaker 3>just so masterful because that's what's blocking us. It takes

1:10:43.760 --> 1:10:46.360
<v Speaker 3>away We're all trying to be everything to everyone, right,

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and we want to portray that we've thought about every

1:10:49.080 --> 1:10:51.439
<v Speaker 3>part of the puzzle and we're the one stop shop.

1:10:51.760 --> 1:10:53.680
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like whenever anyone says they're the one

1:10:53.720 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>stop shop, there's nothing there right, because it's like, well,

1:10:57.920 --> 1:11:00.320
<v Speaker 3>wait a minute, there's no way you could have figured

1:11:00.360 --> 1:11:03.519
<v Speaker 3>out this and this and this and this and this

1:11:03.760 --> 1:11:05.400
<v Speaker 3>just you, with just you, and you've been in the

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:09.040
<v Speaker 3>business for two years, right, Like it's it's just not possible.

1:11:09.080 --> 1:11:12.160
<v Speaker 3>And so and that's so freeing, Like I'm hoping people

1:11:12.160 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 3>hear that and just feel so much lighter and go

1:11:14.040 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 3>tell the truth, state the facts and that's it, you know,

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:17.960
<v Speaker 3>And if.

1:11:17.840 --> 1:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>They say no, that's okay because honestly, if they say no,

1:11:21.240 --> 1:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>then they weren't going to be a fit. Yeah, And

1:11:23.720 --> 1:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so I can promise you some of the best deals

1:11:25.280 --> 1:11:27.639
<v Speaker 1>are the ones you never do because right now, any

1:11:27.640 --> 1:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>business are I can tell you this, like there are

1:11:29.000 --> 1:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>customers that you're like, I wish we did not ever

1:11:31.479 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to this person, right, and so like you're just

1:11:34.000 --> 1:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>avoiding some of these things that are going to be

1:11:35.400 --> 1:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>calamities later, so you might as well just get it

1:11:37.400 --> 1:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>up front. And the thing is that when you set

1:11:39.000 --> 1:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>those expectations, it just it creates such a clean relationship

1:11:42.080 --> 1:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>from there on. It's like, these are the expectations you

1:11:43.960 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>can set. This is what I will do. Anything outside

1:11:46.080 --> 1:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>of that, I'm not going to pretend like I have

1:11:47.560 --> 1:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>done it. Now if we want to figure this out,

1:11:49.160 --> 1:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll be figuring it out with you. And if you

1:11:50.800 --> 1:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if you like the stuff, if hear I can apply

1:11:52.360 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>some of those principles. But I haven't done it. I

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:56.479
<v Speaker 1>want to be upfront about that. And so where's the

1:11:56.520 --> 1:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>imposter syndrome? Where's the fear? It's like there shouldn't be

1:11:58.920 --> 1:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>any and it's all about this option piece, and I

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's where that's where people get in trouble.

1:12:02.680 --> 1:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I've learned about that is that I

1:12:04.280 --> 1:12:08.559
<v Speaker 3>feel like people who win watch winners, and people who

1:12:08.840 --> 1:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>fail watch losers. And so when I look online or

1:12:11.920 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 3>even if I talk to people that I get a

1:12:14.320 --> 1:12:16.160
<v Speaker 3>lot of this where people will be like, I can't

1:12:16.160 --> 1:12:18.320
<v Speaker 3>believe this guy is like one hundred thousand followers. Have

1:12:18.360 --> 1:12:20.760
<v Speaker 3>you seen his stuff? Like it just sucks, Like, oh,

1:12:20.800 --> 1:12:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe that this guy like has a business

1:12:23.320 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 3>making a million dollars, Like I mean, he hasn't even

1:12:25.680 --> 1:12:27.479
<v Speaker 3>got you know. And so there's a lot of this

1:12:27.680 --> 1:12:30.959
<v Speaker 3>where you find people who are not winning are constantly

1:12:30.960 --> 1:12:33.160
<v Speaker 3>whereas like I'm sure if me and you were talking

1:12:33.160 --> 1:12:35.160
<v Speaker 3>about something, so people be like, dude, did you see

1:12:35.200 --> 1:12:37.200
<v Speaker 3>what this guy is amazing, like do you see what

1:12:37.320 --> 1:12:39.639
<v Speaker 3>you know? Whatever? And and so I feel like there's

1:12:39.680 --> 1:12:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that ideology that we get stuck in where we're like,

1:12:42.320 --> 1:12:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I know I'm better than that guy or whoever, that girl,

1:12:45.439 --> 1:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>whatever it is. I know I'm better, but I'm not

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:50.400
<v Speaker 3>doing anything about it, and that hurts me even more.

1:12:50.800 --> 1:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Can tell you a story about this?

1:12:51.920 --> 1:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I know I think you've had Kylie Jenner

1:12:56.560 --> 1:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on this. I kend that's different. Well, then I'll I'll

1:13:01.920 --> 1:13:02.639
<v Speaker 1>tell you the story.

1:13:02.720 --> 1:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>So oh I know the Kylie story from you?

1:13:04.080 --> 1:13:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, very right?

1:13:05.320 --> 1:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>When she give a billionaire Yeah, yeah, I've bought the

1:13:07.439 --> 1:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>video at.

1:13:10.600 --> 1:13:12.200
<v Speaker 2>So Kylie became a billionaire.

1:13:12.200 --> 1:13:15.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm twenty seven ish at the time, and I'm making

1:13:15.600 --> 1:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>i would say, very good money.

1:13:17.120 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>And I thought I was.

1:13:19.080 --> 1:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, the man, right, and then the

1:13:22.200 --> 1:13:25.519
<v Speaker 1>care comes this girl who's seven eight years younger than me.

1:13:26.120 --> 1:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>And she's crushing you know, she crushed it and she

1:13:28.320 --> 1:13:28.639
<v Speaker 2>was better.

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>She was better than I was and I and you know,

1:13:30.880 --> 1:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>my first response was ego being like, hey, Christians, her mom.

1:13:34.800 --> 1:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>She's had her life set up since day one. She's

1:13:36.479 --> 1:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>been on reality TV for you know, I had all that,

1:13:38.240 --> 1:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>all that narrative, and then underneath it that I was.

1:13:41.240 --> 1:13:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Like, chill, what can I learn from her? Right?

1:13:44.360 --> 1:13:46.519
<v Speaker 1>And so I have the fundamental belief that if someone

1:13:46.680 --> 1:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>makes more money than you, they know something that you

1:13:49.360 --> 1:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and in that you can learn of them.

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that allows every single person in

1:13:54.040 --> 1:13:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the world's success to serve you.

1:13:55.720 --> 1:13:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:13:56.320 --> 1:13:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Literally, you just flip the world into like, these are

1:13:58.520 --> 1:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>all the different lessons I can learn from all these people.

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think one am I it's the sort of gryffindor,

1:14:04.040 --> 1:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But I love this quote that was on it.

1:14:06.120 --> 1:14:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but it was.

1:14:07.600 --> 1:14:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Made of you know, the goblin steel or dwarve of steel,

1:14:09.920 --> 1:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was it only took you in that which

1:14:11.280 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>made it stronger. And so you you know, hating on

1:14:14.920 --> 1:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody in no way makes you stronger. And you're trying

1:14:16.760 --> 1:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to point out all the deficiencies. It's like you're you

1:14:19.080 --> 1:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are the thing that you are afraid of for yourself,

1:14:22.680 --> 1:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you're you're gonna pointut all this person's efficiencies, and

1:14:24.840 --> 1:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>your big fear is about the fact that other people

1:14:26.360 --> 1:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>want to do that to you. So first start by

1:14:27.960 --> 1:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>stop doing it to other people and start trying to

1:14:29.800 --> 1:14:31.519
<v Speaker 1>find what are the things that they're because the thing

1:14:31.560 --> 1:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is it is a fact they are better than you

1:14:33.200 --> 1:14:34.679
<v Speaker 1>at something. And I think like you have to accept

1:14:34.720 --> 1:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that as much as you're like that guy's got one

1:14:36.400 --> 1:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand follers, well and he only had one viral video.

1:14:39.160 --> 1:14:40.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well he's got one more than you do.

1:14:41.000 --> 1:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>What was it about that video? Now, let's start tackling that.

1:14:43.960 --> 1:14:45.719
<v Speaker 1>And so like from Kylie, the thing that I learned

1:14:45.760 --> 1:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was brand. I was like, she's got a big brand.

1:14:47.320 --> 1:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And then that was like, okay, I need to start

1:14:48.960 --> 1:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at that. And that's what That's what kicked off

1:14:50.840 --> 1:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this entire journey for me, even making all this content stuff.

1:14:53.280 --> 1:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Was that Forbes cover. That was like that was the

1:14:56.400 --> 1:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>thing for me. And so you know, Kylie, if you

1:14:58.640 --> 1:15:00.479
<v Speaker 1>ever watched this, like you're a huge in flo my life.

1:15:01.000 --> 1:15:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I love that. We'll get it, We'll get it, We'll

1:15:02.800 --> 1:15:03.479
<v Speaker 3>get it.

1:15:03.520 --> 1:15:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

1:15:04.320 --> 1:15:07.559
<v Speaker 3>And what I like about that is that criticism doesn't

1:15:07.600 --> 1:15:12.040
<v Speaker 3>cure envy. And also success doesn't kill envy. It's only

1:15:12.120 --> 1:15:15.720
<v Speaker 3>study that kills envy. Like that appreciation, that admiration, that's

1:15:15.720 --> 1:15:18.799
<v Speaker 3>the only thing. And envy is that thing that when

1:15:18.840 --> 1:15:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I coach people, and I've been fortunate enough to coach

1:15:21.320 --> 1:15:24.280
<v Speaker 3>musicians and access and whatever. And the two questions I

1:15:24.280 --> 1:15:25.960
<v Speaker 3>always ask people is the first thing is who do

1:15:26.000 --> 1:15:29.280
<v Speaker 3>you envy? And there is no person on the planet,

1:15:29.760 --> 1:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>even in the zero point zero zero one percent, who

1:15:31.640 --> 1:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>doesn't envy someone that I've met at least. And then

1:15:34.840 --> 1:15:36.479
<v Speaker 3>the second one is who's your God or what is

1:15:36.520 --> 1:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>your god? Whether it's money, time, energy, whatever it is.

1:15:39.560 --> 1:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>And those two questions sum it up for people. And

1:15:42.120 --> 1:15:45.200
<v Speaker 3>what I've found is that success just doesn't take away envy.

1:15:45.360 --> 1:15:48.760
<v Speaker 3>So even if you had become a billionaire in the

1:15:48.840 --> 1:15:52.519
<v Speaker 3>next twelve months, that still wouldn't have taken it away,

1:15:52.520 --> 1:15:56.680
<v Speaker 3>because she did it twenty one and exactly. And so

1:15:56.760 --> 1:15:59.519
<v Speaker 3>it's like that, that's what's so fascinating about it, is

1:15:59.520 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 3>that we you become successful by what you get, but

1:16:03.040 --> 1:16:06.439
<v Speaker 3>you become fulfilled by what you lose, and losing envy

1:16:06.920 --> 1:16:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and losing comparison and losing criticism leads to happiness. So

1:16:10.600 --> 1:16:13.320
<v Speaker 3>when people say money doesn't buy happiness, it's not that

1:16:13.360 --> 1:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>money's not portant. Money makes you successful and it's great

1:16:15.320 --> 1:16:18.400
<v Speaker 3>you should get it. Happiness was never in the equation

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:20.800
<v Speaker 3>with money. That wasn't the point of it. Like, I

1:16:20.840 --> 1:16:23.240
<v Speaker 3>love having awards and accolades, but they were never in

1:16:23.280 --> 1:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the equation of happiness. They were in an equation of success,

1:16:26.320 --> 1:16:30.759
<v Speaker 3>and the equation of happiness was envy, ego, illusion, lust, anger,

1:16:30.880 --> 1:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>all of this stuff. And so it's funny how the

1:16:33.120 --> 1:16:35.040
<v Speaker 3>equations get like, you know, crossed over.

1:16:35.240 --> 1:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just I loved everything that you No.

1:16:38.439 --> 1:16:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I just it really resonates hearing about it from your

1:16:40.920 --> 1:16:43.240
<v Speaker 3>story and also just like breaking it down for people

1:16:43.240 --> 1:16:45.599
<v Speaker 3>and making it really simple and going like, let's stop

1:16:45.760 --> 1:16:48.920
<v Speaker 3>demonizing people are selling well or making money and doing

1:16:48.920 --> 1:16:51.080
<v Speaker 3>this thing, because it leads to a certain part of

1:16:51.120 --> 1:16:54.639
<v Speaker 3>the puzzle. But then let's also remember that you wouldn't

1:16:54.640 --> 1:16:56.639
<v Speaker 3>be who you are today if you hadn't got over

1:16:56.680 --> 1:16:58.439
<v Speaker 3>that envy right at the beginning.

1:16:58.560 --> 1:17:00.719
<v Speaker 1>So let me toss this in that I think be helpful.

1:17:01.160 --> 1:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So one of the quotes that I don't like is

1:17:04.240 --> 1:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>comparison is the thief of joy. And I'll explain why,

1:17:07.360 --> 1:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>because so I think comparison is an incredibly valuable feedback tool. Now,

1:17:12.080 --> 1:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what we want to be clear is the differentiation being

1:17:14.240 --> 1:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>criticism and insults, and so insults are attacking someone's character saying,

1:17:19.080 --> 1:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'll give you an example, and a criticism is

1:17:20.760 --> 1:17:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a difference between expected and reality or desired and actual.

1:17:25.120 --> 1:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So I expect you to be on time and you

1:17:29.200 --> 1:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>are five minutes late. Okay, cool. So I say, hey,

1:17:32.479 --> 1:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you were five minutes late. This is the expectation, this

1:17:34.320 --> 1:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is what happened. That is criticism, right, insult and you're lazy.

1:17:38.840 --> 1:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And so if we can pull those things apart, we

1:17:41.760 --> 1:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>can take the good of because I think our brains

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>are comparison brains, Like it's how we orient ourselves in

1:17:47.400 --> 1:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the world.

1:17:47.680 --> 1:17:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Where am I and very tough.

1:17:49.920 --> 1:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe years and years of monks study can maybe get

1:17:52.320 --> 1:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you out of it, but I think for the vast

1:17:53.360 --> 1:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>majority of people, comparison is going to be fixed in

1:17:55.360 --> 1:17:55.719
<v Speaker 1>their brain.

1:17:56.000 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 2>And so it's like we want to use that.

1:17:57.600 --> 1:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We want to use that skill of learning to point

1:18:00.360 --> 1:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>out the discrepancy between where they are and where I am,

1:18:03.520 --> 1:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>so that I can create steps so that I can

1:18:05.840 --> 1:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>get better. I want to completely eliminate in a race

1:18:09.479 --> 1:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>insults and also on the flip side, if someone insults me.

1:18:14.240 --> 1:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a side note, but like if the big

1:18:16.960 --> 1:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>fear that many people have on promoting or selling is

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that someone's gonna say something bad about them and so

1:18:21.320 --> 1:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna get insulted. And the biggest reframe that's

1:18:24.360 --> 1:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>been helpful for me is simply translating all hate or

1:18:27.680 --> 1:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>insults into he lives his life in.

1:18:29.600 --> 1:18:30.679
<v Speaker 2>A way that I would not prefer.

1:18:31.640 --> 1:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>And it just comes down to that I can't believe

1:18:33.760 --> 1:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>he's married to this person he makes his kind of

1:18:35.320 --> 1:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>why does he think? He like he lives his life

1:18:37.320 --> 1:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in a way that I would not prefer, And that

1:18:38.800 --> 1:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>is just it has really boiled a lot of the

1:18:41.720 --> 1:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>hatred down to like, oh, well, I mean you live

1:18:43.520 --> 1:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>your life in the way that I would not prefer.

1:18:44.680 --> 1:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's fine. That's why you've your life and I

1:18:45.840 --> 1:18:47.960
<v Speaker 2>have my life, and hey, more power to you, man.

1:18:48.520 --> 1:18:50.559
<v Speaker 1>And that is just like really quelled a lot of

1:18:50.560 --> 1:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the concern because I'm sure, like you, I get an

1:18:54.439 --> 1:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>unending you know, the deluge of hate commish just because

1:18:57.880 --> 1:19:00.120
<v Speaker 1>if you put yourself out there, like if again, if

1:19:00.160 --> 1:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you do nothing, you will get criticized for doing nothing,

1:19:01.960 --> 1:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and if you do something, you'll get criticized. So criticisms

1:19:03.960 --> 1:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>fact is a fixed cost.

1:19:05.360 --> 1:19:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then yeah, and that's why I like, I

1:19:07.640 --> 1:19:09.320
<v Speaker 3>agree with you on the comparison point. And that's why

1:19:09.320 --> 1:19:13.439
<v Speaker 3>I look at comparison has two kind of brothers, study

1:19:13.560 --> 1:19:16.400
<v Speaker 3>and envy. And so that's that's the choice you have,

1:19:16.479 --> 1:19:19.000
<v Speaker 3>like we have to compare. Comparison is a fixed like

1:19:19.160 --> 1:19:20.960
<v Speaker 3>you're going to compare because the brain is wired that

1:19:21.000 --> 1:19:24.280
<v Speaker 3>way and it's either I compare myself with envy or study,

1:19:24.400 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 3>and those are my two choices I'm going to compare.

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:29.400
<v Speaker 3>And so this idea of never comparing yourself to anyone

1:19:29.760 --> 1:19:31.759
<v Speaker 3>is actually a lie, a myth in and of itself,

1:19:32.160 --> 1:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>because if you never compared yourself to anyone, you would

1:19:35.000 --> 1:19:38.040
<v Speaker 3>have goals, you would aspire for anything. You wouldn't become better.

1:19:38.240 --> 1:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no feedback because you can't say, well, this is

1:19:40.680 --> 1:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>where I was and this is what happened, Like that

1:19:42.560 --> 1:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is a comparison. And so I would I say that

1:19:44.920 --> 1:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because one of the things we have is feedback is fuel, right,

1:19:47.160 --> 1:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and so it's like I want as much fuel as

1:19:48.400 --> 1:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I can.

1:19:48.920 --> 1:19:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, exactly, And that's that's such a you know,

1:19:52.439 --> 1:19:54.320
<v Speaker 3>you've said the word feedback has come up so many

1:19:54.400 --> 1:19:56.640
<v Speaker 3>times today where you've mentioned it so many times, and

1:19:56.720 --> 1:20:00.160
<v Speaker 3>to see feedback as fuel is the only way to

1:20:00.160 --> 1:20:04.760
<v Speaker 3>have an iterative, constantly evolving process, and I find that.

1:20:05.120 --> 1:20:07.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's the famous quote from Albert Einstein where

1:20:07.040 --> 1:20:09.559
<v Speaker 3>he said insanity is doing the same thing over and

1:20:09.600 --> 1:20:13.559
<v Speaker 3>over again expecting a different result. And feedback is the

1:20:13.560 --> 1:20:15.719
<v Speaker 3>way you don't do the same thing over and over again.

1:20:15.760 --> 1:20:19.640
<v Speaker 3>You can change it every time. But so many of

1:20:19.720 --> 1:20:23.519
<v Speaker 3>us keep doing something even when it doesn't work, hoping

1:20:23.600 --> 1:20:30.160
<v Speaker 3>for that different outcome. Why we don't change the email copy,

1:20:30.200 --> 1:20:32.559
<v Speaker 3>we don't post it a different cadence, we don't up

1:20:32.600 --> 1:20:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the volume. It's just like we're just you know, I've

1:20:35.840 --> 1:20:37.439
<v Speaker 3>got so many friends who upload a video, delete a

1:20:37.479 --> 1:20:39.720
<v Speaker 3>video uploaded. You know, it's like, we don't change that,

1:20:39.760 --> 1:20:41.320
<v Speaker 3>and then we're still going, wait a minute, what's going

1:20:41.320 --> 1:20:41.719
<v Speaker 3>on here?

1:20:42.800 --> 1:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So my worldview on why anyone does anything is that

1:20:47.200 --> 1:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they've been rewarded for doing that in the past. And so,

1:20:51.280 --> 1:20:53.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the really difficult things with language

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in general is that there's descriptive and explanatory language. And

1:20:56.800 --> 1:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>so for example, I'll give the simplist example. You know

1:20:58.880 --> 1:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Timmy stall a bike because he is dishonest. Okay, Well,

1:21:03.120 --> 1:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>if we define dishonest, we would say, well, dishonest people

1:21:05.840 --> 1:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>steal things, But that's a circular definition doesn't actually help

1:21:09.280 --> 1:21:11.519
<v Speaker 1>the explanation of why did he actually steal?

1:21:11.560 --> 1:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>It is because he's been rewarded for.

1:21:12.720 --> 1:21:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Stealing in the past, and so he repeated that that

1:21:14.560 --> 1:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>action because it got him something good. And same thing

1:21:17.240 --> 1:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>goes for lying, same thing goes for cheating. All of

1:21:18.920 --> 1:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>these things like why does someone do it? It's like

1:21:20.400 --> 1:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>because they've been rewarded for doing so in the past.

1:21:22.400 --> 1:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>They've been reinforced, and so why do people Yeah, why

1:21:26.400 --> 1:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>do people do anything? That is and and you know,

1:21:30.720 --> 1:21:32.559
<v Speaker 1>my world views somewhat different than I think of many

1:21:32.560 --> 1:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>people's because I come from everything from a behavior's perspective,

1:21:35.080 --> 1:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>but it has made me significently better at business because

1:21:36.840 --> 1:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I get better at predicting behavior. And so I'll give

1:21:39.920 --> 1:21:42.759
<v Speaker 1>you a simple example. So, you know, there was an executive,

1:21:42.880 --> 1:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the companies, and I was talking

1:21:44.680 --> 1:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to one of the other owners and they were like, hey,

1:21:46.200 --> 1:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, this guy said that he would leave if

1:21:49.280 --> 1:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we changed his title or whatever. And I said, okay, well,

1:21:53.320 --> 1:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>how many times have you changed his title historically?

1:21:55.960 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And he said plenty of times? And I said, okay,

1:21:57.400 --> 1:21:58.040
<v Speaker 2>has he ever left?

1:21:58.120 --> 1:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And the answer was no, and I said so based

1:22:00.360 --> 1:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on his history of behavior, I would say that he

1:22:02.160 --> 1:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>says these things to decrease likely that you do it

1:22:04.040 --> 1:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's his preference, but so likely that he quits

1:22:06.040 --> 1:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as a result is low. And so it's like those

1:22:07.880 --> 1:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of deconstructions. Some people just take things at face value.

1:22:10.439 --> 1:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well if we look, if we actually try

1:22:12.040 --> 1:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and find the explanation rather than the description of the event,

1:22:14.439 --> 1:22:16.559
<v Speaker 1>we can get way better predicting behavior, including our own.

1:22:16.640 --> 1:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's where like people like I want

1:22:18.840 --> 1:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the trauma of whatever. It's like, maybe, like,

1:22:23.560 --> 1:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>can I go to this because I think this this

1:22:25.120 --> 1:22:25.799
<v Speaker 1>might be helpful.

1:22:26.160 --> 1:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>So I love the direction you go.

1:22:28.160 --> 1:22:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So many people will use trauma or some event

1:22:33.880 --> 1:22:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and they will create a narrative around why why haven't

1:22:36.760 --> 1:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I started? It's because my dad didn't hug me en

1:22:39.280 --> 1:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>off as a kid, and I don't have this confidence.

1:22:40.960 --> 1:22:43.519
<v Speaker 1>So they just create this big story and then they're like,

1:22:43.560 --> 1:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I need to go see a therapist so that I can,

1:22:45.280 --> 1:22:47.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, untangle all of this. But if I were

1:22:47.479 --> 1:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, I'm going to teach you how to

1:22:50.040 --> 1:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>how to serve in pickleball, right, we wouldn't have the

1:22:53.320 --> 1:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>first session be hey, do a serve, and then you

1:22:56.400 --> 1:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>would serve not ideally if I'm a pickleball coach, right,

1:22:58.960 --> 1:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and then I'd say okay, So for the next few weeks,

1:23:01.320 --> 1:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna do is we're gonna try and go

1:23:02.640 --> 1:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>back in the past. We're gonna try and figure out

1:23:04.320 --> 1:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>why your serve is so bad. And no, we're just

1:23:08.439 --> 1:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna say change your risk like this, this is how

1:23:10.520 --> 1:23:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you do it. And so it's so much more productive

1:23:12.920 --> 1:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to just focus on what do we need to do

1:23:14.479 --> 1:23:17.519
<v Speaker 1>instead rather than trying to figure out why you did it,

1:23:17.560 --> 1:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>because the reality.

1:23:18.200 --> 1:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Is you're never gonna know.

1:23:19.360 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a convenient narrative and it might make sense, but

1:23:21.479 --> 1:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, it could just be that you're

1:23:22.760 --> 1:23:24.599
<v Speaker 1>rewarded for doing something like this in the past period.

1:23:24.720 --> 1:23:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Now there might have been conditions that created that reward,

1:23:27.040 --> 1:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can lament the person, but at the end

1:23:28.400 --> 1:23:29.599
<v Speaker 1>of the day, the only thing you can do about

1:23:29.640 --> 1:23:33.599
<v Speaker 1>is change behavior. And so trauma, which is tossed around

1:23:33.600 --> 1:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot, I define as a permanent change in behavior

1:23:38.160 --> 1:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>from an aversive stimulants some I'm a bad thing, so

1:23:40.000 --> 1:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you permanently change how you act because of something bad

1:23:42.080 --> 1:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that happened. Now the question is is trauma bad? Well,

1:23:45.640 --> 1:23:47.759
<v Speaker 1>did the change in behavior result in increase or decrease

1:23:47.760 --> 1:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and likely to achieving whatever goal we have. And so

1:23:49.960 --> 1:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>if a kid touches hot stove and they say ouch,

1:23:52.400 --> 1:23:54.559
<v Speaker 1>and then they never touch hot stoves again, then that

1:23:54.640 --> 1:23:57.599
<v Speaker 1>was a traumatic event by that definition, and it's probably

1:23:57.600 --> 1:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>good trauma because they never touch hot stoves again, increase.

1:24:00.280 --> 1:24:01.679
<v Speaker 2>The likely they die in a fire. Great.

1:24:02.120 --> 1:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And so sometimes it's like, well, then maybe we can

1:24:04.400 --> 1:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be grateful for some of the quote traumas that we've

1:24:05.960 --> 1:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>had because it permanently changed my behavior in a good way. Now,

1:24:08.439 --> 1:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>if we have quote trauma that that primally changed my

1:24:11.320 --> 1:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>behavior in a negative way. So I had, you know,

1:24:13.120 --> 1:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>bombs and saw someone die in front of me, and

1:24:14.400 --> 1:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the next time I hear loud noise, I you know,

1:24:16.160 --> 1:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I freak out and I can't perform my job, then

1:24:18.400 --> 1:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that would be something that decreases likely it. But then

1:24:20.360 --> 1:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at that point, rather than trying to figure out the

1:24:23.120 --> 1:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>triggering event in the past, we just think, Okay, how

1:24:25.360 --> 1:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can recondition this person under similar conditions so that they

1:24:28.400 --> 1:24:31.479
<v Speaker 1>can act this way instead? And so trauma, what ends

1:24:31.520 --> 1:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>up happening is it becomes an accelerated learning event. And

1:24:34.040 --> 1:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>so something bad happens, your brain's like pay attention because

1:24:36.760 --> 1:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like I'm going to learn and I'm going to

1:24:39.080 --> 1:24:41.479
<v Speaker 1>permanently change our behavior to make sure this doesn't happen again.

1:24:41.720 --> 1:24:42.559
<v Speaker 2>And so it's not this.

1:24:42.800 --> 1:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And I hear this because a lot of people will

1:24:44.680 --> 1:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>answer promorphize, you know, make human, or you know, try

1:24:48.000 --> 1:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and biologize. That's a word, go for it. Something that occurs,

1:24:54.280 --> 1:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's stored in your body. And I was like,

1:24:56.479 --> 1:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not computers, right, It's just that you have a

1:24:59.000 --> 1:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>behavior set. All we have to do is change these

1:25:00.960 --> 1:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>behaviors and then it eliminates. And so the reason so

1:25:04.360 --> 1:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this all started with feedback, and so the reason feedback

1:25:07.200 --> 1:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is fuel. And what makes feedback good versus bad, or

1:25:09.320 --> 1:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>rather useful versus non useful is the latency of the feedback.

1:25:12.200 --> 1:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>How quickly do you get it and how specific is it.

1:25:15.000 --> 1:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And so if you say, hey, that sucked in the moment,

1:25:18.240 --> 1:25:20.479
<v Speaker 1>not helpful, I will be less What it will do

1:25:20.560 --> 1:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is make me less likely to do the thing in

1:25:21.680 --> 1:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>front of you. Right, if you said that, on the

1:25:23.840 --> 1:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>flip side, if you were to say immediately, hey, real quick,

1:25:27.840 --> 1:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>when you do your intro, raise your tone a little

1:25:29.720 --> 1:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>bit at the end, because I think it'll actually create

1:25:31.240 --> 1:25:31.799
<v Speaker 1>more curiosity.

1:25:31.840 --> 1:25:34.519
<v Speaker 2>People want to stay longer. Okay, do the intro again. There.

1:25:34.560 --> 1:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I have a very specific piece of feedback, and I

1:25:36.200 --> 1:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>did it immediately, so that the likely that you change

1:25:38.040 --> 1:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>behavior is really high and maybe that it sticks. And

1:25:40.280 --> 1:25:42.519
<v Speaker 1>so the reason feedback is full and ideally, if you're

1:25:42.520 --> 1:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to change someone else's behavior or even your own,

1:25:44.280 --> 1:25:46.559
<v Speaker 1>it's like, I want to seek out very fast feedback

1:25:46.600 --> 1:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that's as specific.

1:25:47.360 --> 1:25:48.880
<v Speaker 2>As possible to the behaviors.

1:25:49.200 --> 1:25:51.519
<v Speaker 1>And so I tell the story a lot because it's

1:25:51.560 --> 1:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a story that we tell inside of our companies.

1:25:53.160 --> 1:25:53.960
<v Speaker 2>It's almost become lower.

1:25:54.240 --> 1:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But we had a director, super proficient, very competent in

1:25:58.120 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>his role, really high performer. The problem was that everyone

1:26:00.400 --> 1:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>said he's such a dick. And the thing is is

1:26:02.600 --> 1:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that I really like I liked his performance, and I

1:26:05.200 --> 1:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want to decrease the likely that I get complained to

1:26:07.439 --> 1:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>about him. And so he had four different people in

1:26:10.479 --> 1:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the company have like one on ones with him, being like, hey,

1:26:12.240 --> 1:26:13.519
<v Speaker 1>I need to stop being a dick. And the thing is,

1:26:13.520 --> 1:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this behavior didn't change. And so I was supposed to

1:26:16.360 --> 1:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be like final boss in this situation and be like,

1:26:17.960 --> 1:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's let's let's have the sit down. And

1:26:20.320 --> 1:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so I said, hey, I don't care if you are

1:26:22.960 --> 1:26:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a dick on the inside. I would like to decrease

1:26:24.760 --> 1:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the likely that other people describe you as one. And

1:26:27.000 --> 1:26:28.799
<v Speaker 1>so I want to be clear, I have no judgment.

1:26:29.080 --> 1:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to change this likely of this outcome.

1:26:31.080 --> 1:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And so that kind of took the personal tax out

1:26:33.280 --> 1:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation. And then it was like, okay, so

1:26:35.920 --> 1:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what are the behaviors you do skill wise as minutely

1:26:38.320 --> 1:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>as possible that get people to say this about you?

1:26:40.479 --> 1:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>So it turned out it was you interrupt people on calls,

1:26:43.000 --> 1:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you tell people how to do their jobs, and it

1:26:45.000 --> 1:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>was two other things, whatever it was. And so I said, so,

1:26:47.240 --> 1:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>next time you have the you know, desire to tell

1:26:50.040 --> 1:26:52.719
<v Speaker 1>someone what to do about their job, you have two options.

1:26:52.800 --> 1:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Either say nothing or say, hey, I heard this thing

1:26:56.439 --> 1:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that might help. Do you mind if I share it?

1:26:58.280 --> 1:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>If you just say that first, and if they say no,

1:27:00.360 --> 1:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>then just be like okay, no worries. Or they say yes,

1:27:03.320 --> 1:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>then now you've permissioned to share it. And when you

1:27:05.160 --> 1:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>share it, shared in terms of behaviors, criticism, not insult.

1:27:08.600 --> 1:27:10.240
<v Speaker 2>And so I just had to change a couple.

1:27:10.040 --> 1:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Of those things, and then within a week people are like,

1:27:11.760 --> 1:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, he's aid night and day, he's a

1:27:14.240 --> 1:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>different person.

1:27:14.800 --> 1:27:15.879
<v Speaker 2>They create all these narratives.

1:27:15.960 --> 1:27:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was because his mom did hug him, she

1:27:17.560 --> 1:27:19.799
<v Speaker 1>called him, or because we told him what to do instead.

1:27:20.120 --> 1:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I bring this up because I think many

1:27:22.960 --> 1:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>people do not take action around pursuing their dreams because

1:27:26.680 --> 1:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of narratives that they create about their past. But the

1:27:29.120 --> 1:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>reality is that none of that matters, because all we

1:27:31.960 --> 1:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>have to do is just say what do we need

1:27:33.360 --> 1:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to do instead under these conditions? And if we take

1:27:36.920 --> 1:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>that premise, then you need to learn, and learning means

1:27:41.200 --> 1:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>same condition, new behavior. And so if every day is

1:27:44.080 --> 1:27:46.519
<v Speaker 1>the same for you to your point of insanity, then

1:27:46.600 --> 1:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you have the same conditions. And if your behavior has

1:27:48.439 --> 1:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>not changed, then maybe you are insane or at least

1:27:51.080 --> 1:27:53.559
<v Speaker 1>for at least for expecting a different outcome. And so

1:27:53.720 --> 1:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that I think makes it significantly more palatable of like,

1:27:56.320 --> 1:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just change this one thing and then run it again.

1:27:58.400 --> 1:28:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how does someone who's taking that feedback trying to

1:28:01.080 --> 1:28:05.080
<v Speaker 3>get better and the results just not changing, they're not

1:28:05.120 --> 1:28:08.439
<v Speaker 3>getting closer to the outcome. Yeah, two questions. The first

1:28:08.520 --> 1:28:11.479
<v Speaker 3>is how do you know when it's time to give up?

1:28:12.760 --> 1:28:16.839
<v Speaker 3>And how do you keep going when things are not working?

1:28:17.240 --> 1:28:19.719
<v Speaker 1>So this is so there's a like there's a handful

1:28:19.760 --> 1:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of what I call like eternal questions that can I

1:28:22.400 --> 1:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think they are more decoatives that be managed than

1:28:25.040 --> 1:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>problems to solve. And so how much should I consume

1:28:28.160 --> 1:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>today versus invest into tomorrow? How much risk am I

1:28:32.439 --> 1:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>willing to take? Which is the classic should I push

1:28:34.880 --> 1:28:35.559
<v Speaker 1>or should I pivot?

1:28:35.560 --> 1:28:36.240
<v Speaker 2>For an entrepreneur?

1:28:36.640 --> 1:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And the answer that no one's going to like is

1:28:38.360 --> 1:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually up to you. So there's kind of

1:28:40.320 --> 1:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like good failure and bad failure. So good failure is

1:28:43.320 --> 1:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like I tried something and I saw that it didn't work,

1:28:47.080 --> 1:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and I realized what I need to do instead, and

1:28:48.960 --> 1:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to iterate continuously.

1:28:50.720 --> 1:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Bad failure is where I have.

1:28:52.479 --> 1:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>An assumption that the world of the conditions were going

1:28:56.960 --> 1:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to be this way and my assumption was false. And

1:28:59.680 --> 1:29:02.479
<v Speaker 1>so if I believed that people really wanted to have

1:29:02.960 --> 1:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>dog zoom calls or whatever right zoom zoom made for dogs,

1:29:06.040 --> 1:29:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's just take a ridiculous example. Well, then I would

1:29:08.479 --> 1:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>have to take a couple of need to believes. If like,

1:29:10.240 --> 1:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in order for this to be successful, these four things

1:29:12.200 --> 1:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>would have to be true. If I find out after

1:29:14.920 --> 1:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>starting submiterations that one of my three or four assumptions

1:29:17.280 --> 1:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that underpin this being successful long term is not true,

1:29:20.439 --> 1:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>then I should not keep trying to pursue this. And

1:29:22.960 --> 1:29:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that is where I would say, we need to pivot.

1:29:25.200 --> 1:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>In a situation where none of the conditions that I are,

1:29:27.800 --> 1:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>none of the need to believes have changed, All of

1:29:29.920 --> 1:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>those conditions are still the same, and it's a it's

1:29:32.080 --> 1:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a it's a deficiency and skill, then.

1:29:34.000 --> 1:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>That is where I would push.

1:29:35.560 --> 1:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, how long will it take is going to be

1:29:37.320 --> 1:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>completely predicated on how quickly you can learn and the

1:29:40.439 --> 1:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>quality of that feedback. And so to your point, I

1:29:42.200 --> 1:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think you said coach community.

1:29:43.400 --> 1:29:45.120
<v Speaker 2>And what was the other one commitment? Commitment?

1:29:46.360 --> 1:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and so the commitment part if you want to

1:29:49.880 --> 1:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>increase your commitment anything, So I define commitment by the

1:29:52.120 --> 1:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>elimination of alternatives, right, So marriage is the ultimate commitment.

1:29:54.840 --> 1:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You eliminate all alternatives, right, And so it's like, we

1:29:57.120 --> 1:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get married to this opportunity. We get married

1:29:58.960 --> 1:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to this business. We have to liminate alternatives, which means

1:30:00.880 --> 1:30:02.479
<v Speaker 1>when your friend says, hey, I'm a ten grand dow

1:30:02.560 --> 1:30:04.639
<v Speaker 1>this thing, you say, that's amazing. I don't know anything

1:30:04.640 --> 1:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>about that. And I know I know two months of

1:30:06.560 --> 1:30:08.439
<v Speaker 1>suffering from this one, and I'm going to start at

1:30:08.479 --> 1:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>zero there, so I'd rather be two months in on

1:30:10.000 --> 1:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this one. But with that push or pivot, we have

1:30:15.479 --> 1:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to just take things to the natural extreme, which is

1:30:17.080 --> 1:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>how I like to do it, which is okay, Well,

1:30:18.360 --> 1:30:19.479
<v Speaker 1>if I do this for ten years and I keep

1:30:19.479 --> 1:30:20.519
<v Speaker 1>getting better, do I think it's.

1:30:20.400 --> 1:30:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Likely that I'll succeed?

1:30:21.120 --> 1:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is usually yes, And so it's like, well,

1:30:22.800 --> 1:30:24.799
<v Speaker 1>then I just need to keep paying down those iterations.

1:30:24.840 --> 1:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think Navall said it's not ten thousand hours,

1:30:26.840 --> 1:30:27.919
<v Speaker 1>it's ten thousand iterations.

1:30:27.960 --> 1:30:28.800
<v Speaker 2>And I tend to believe that.

1:30:29.920 --> 1:30:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Your new books quote one hundred million dollar money models. Yeah,

1:30:34.280 --> 1:30:37.120
<v Speaker 3>it's like, you know, I think there'll be people listening

1:30:37.160 --> 1:30:39.439
<v Speaker 3>who like, I just want to make one hundred k. Yeah,

1:30:39.600 --> 1:30:41.360
<v Speaker 3>there'll be people saying I want to make one hundred

1:30:41.400 --> 1:30:43.760
<v Speaker 3>k a month, and then there'll be people saying, we

1:30:43.840 --> 1:30:47.320
<v Speaker 3>want to make one hundred million dollar business. What's the

1:30:47.400 --> 1:30:50.640
<v Speaker 3>difference at each of those levels, and what do you

1:30:50.640 --> 1:30:52.400
<v Speaker 3>share in here that you haven't shared in the hundred

1:30:52.400 --> 1:30:53.479
<v Speaker 3>million dollar series before.

1:30:54.439 --> 1:30:56.680
<v Speaker 2>So I'll take those questions one at a time.

1:30:56.760 --> 1:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I'll start with the second question, which is

1:30:58.840 --> 1:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>what's different about this book? So offers answered the question

1:31:02.200 --> 1:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what do I sell? And so as an offer so

1:31:04.080 --> 1:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>good people feel stood saying no. So basically broke down

1:31:06.000 --> 1:31:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the components of an offer. So we give a little

1:31:07.800 --> 1:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>example of one five hours for free. That's a very

1:31:09.920 --> 1:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>simple offer, right, But there are offers that you can

1:31:12.160 --> 1:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>include guarantees, you include scarcity, you can include urgency, you

1:31:14.439 --> 1:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can include bonuses, and then the actual core value of itself.

1:31:17.160 --> 1:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>There's a way to increase the value of anything.

1:31:19.280 --> 1:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So we use something called the value equation, which is

1:31:21.240 --> 1:31:23.719
<v Speaker 1>probably the most known framework I have, which is therefore

1:31:23.960 --> 1:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>people say like, create value, But when you say, how

1:31:26.240 --> 1:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>do I operationalize that? If I say to a five

1:31:27.920 --> 1:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>year old, create value, They're like, I don't know what

1:31:29.240 --> 1:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that means, And so how do we break that down

1:31:31.160 --> 1:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in behaviors? So one is that some dream outcomes are

1:31:33.760 --> 1:31:35.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be more valuable to somebody than something else.

1:31:35.840 --> 1:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So if I go to a guide and say hey,

1:31:37.200 --> 1:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I can make you rich or some or I say hey,

1:31:38.800 --> 1:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I can make you good looking. Most men in general

1:31:41.120 --> 1:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll say i'd rather be rich if you go to

1:31:43.040 --> 1:31:45.559
<v Speaker 1>women and flips the other way. But for them that

1:31:45.640 --> 1:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>means that the outcome itself is going to be some

1:31:47.720 --> 1:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>outcomes are worth more than others. That's one element of value.

1:31:49.960 --> 1:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>The second element of value is perceive likely of achievement.

1:31:52.400 --> 1:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>How risky is it, how likely is it to occur?

1:31:54.439 --> 1:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So if I said, hey, I can make you rich

1:31:55.880 --> 1:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's guaranteed, it's going to be significantly more valuable,

1:31:58.120 --> 1:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>then if it's you have to take age amount of rest.

1:32:00.520 --> 1:32:03.479
<v Speaker 1>The third variable is going to be speed. So from

1:32:03.520 --> 1:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the time you make the decision to the time you

1:32:04.800 --> 1:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>get what you want, Hey, I can guarantee that you're

1:32:06.439 --> 1:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get rich, but it's going to take twenty years.

1:32:08.200 --> 1:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of people make that, but a lot of people

1:32:10.000 --> 1:32:11.479
<v Speaker 1>are like, wellw but now that's twenty years. I want

1:32:11.479 --> 1:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to get rich tomorrow, right. So time is going to

1:32:13.240 --> 1:32:15.559
<v Speaker 1>be component of it. And then the fourth component is

1:32:15.560 --> 1:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is effort and sacrifice, which is two sides of the

1:32:17.320 --> 1:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>same coin. Effort is all the things that you must

1:32:19.400 --> 1:32:21.519
<v Speaker 1>do that you don't want to do as a result

1:32:21.560 --> 1:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of this decision. And on the flip side, sacrifice is

1:32:23.560 --> 1:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>all the things you have to give up that you

1:32:24.560 --> 1:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>would prefer to do but you can no longer do

1:32:26.160 --> 1:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the decision. And so if we

1:32:27.720 --> 1:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>want to make the most valuable offer, then we want

1:32:30.320 --> 1:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to create something that is a huge treem outcome that

1:32:33.120 --> 1:32:36.519
<v Speaker 1>happens guaranteed, that is immediate, and that they don't have

1:32:36.600 --> 1:32:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to do anything for now. No offer is that good,

1:32:39.960 --> 1:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But those are the hypothetical extremes the ideals that we

1:32:42.200 --> 1:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>strive towards. And I think that's a beautiful thing for

1:32:43.800 --> 1:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs is that all we try to do is just

1:32:45.320 --> 1:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>get closer and closer to all four of those pillars.

1:32:47.880 --> 1:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So that is the core of the offer's book. The

1:32:49.479 --> 1:32:51.759
<v Speaker 1>leads book is the core four. So we went over earlier,

1:32:51.800 --> 1:32:53.439
<v Speaker 1>So how do you promote anything? And so that book

1:32:53.640 --> 1:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>takes all eight of the component's core four you do,

1:32:56.040 --> 1:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and then the core for the other people do on

1:32:58.040 --> 1:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>your behalf and breaks down in nittigrity totals by step

1:33:00.400 --> 1:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>how to do them. This book answers the question how

1:33:04.040 --> 1:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>do I make money right? And so it's like, Okay,

1:33:06.240 --> 1:33:07.519
<v Speaker 1>well I know what to sell and I know how

1:33:07.560 --> 1:33:09.959
<v Speaker 1>to advertise it, but how do I turn that process

1:33:10.040 --> 1:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>into making money?

1:33:11.479 --> 1:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>And so most people like.

1:33:13.280 --> 1:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>The thing that separates when I look back on all

1:33:14.760 --> 1:33:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the companies that I've owned advice sold, the thing that

1:33:17.479 --> 1:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>separated the businesses that were moderately successful from the ones

1:33:19.720 --> 1:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that were exceptionally successful is that they had a better

1:33:21.400 --> 1:33:23.639
<v Speaker 1>money model. And a money model is the core economic

1:33:23.720 --> 1:33:26.599
<v Speaker 1>unit of the business. So it's a deliberate sequence of

1:33:26.600 --> 1:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>offers that is ideally tailored to do one financial outcome,

1:33:31.120 --> 1:33:34.519
<v Speaker 1>which is you collect enough cash from one customer in

1:33:34.560 --> 1:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the first thirty days to get and service two more customers.

1:33:39.560 --> 1:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And so when you have that amount of cash up front,

1:33:42.200 --> 1:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>then it unlocks cash flow for the business to grow

1:33:45.400 --> 1:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>as much as it wants or a least until the

1:33:46.840 --> 1:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>next you can train of the business. And so when

1:33:49.120 --> 1:33:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I looked at all the money models that I created

1:33:50.640 --> 1:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is there's basically four different objectives to make that happen.

1:33:54.520 --> 1:33:56.559
<v Speaker 1>So one is how do I get more people interested?

1:33:56.760 --> 1:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to be the nature of the offer.

1:33:58.120 --> 1:34:00.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, bui X, gety free giveaway, things like that

1:34:01.320 --> 1:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>like Okay, I can structure this thing in a way

1:34:02.840 --> 1:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes way more petrol interested than just saying hey,

1:34:04.880 --> 1:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>by my thing. The second element is, okay, how do

1:34:07.320 --> 1:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I get those people to spend more money than they

1:34:09.040 --> 1:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would, So there's different money models around that. The

1:34:11.920 --> 1:34:13.439
<v Speaker 1>third is going to be how do I make them

1:34:13.479 --> 1:34:15.320
<v Speaker 1>spend their money faster? How do I pull that cash

1:34:15.320 --> 1:34:17.479
<v Speaker 1>flow forward? And then the fourth element of good money

1:34:17.520 --> 1:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is a money model is how do I get them

1:34:19.320 --> 1:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it again and again and again, which can either.

1:34:20.960 --> 1:34:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Be recurring in a membership or reoccurring.

1:34:22.640 --> 1:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Coca Cola, you still buy it again and again,

1:34:24.360 --> 1:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just not on subscription. And so if you have

1:34:26.720 --> 1:34:28.559
<v Speaker 1>all four of those things, then you have a business

1:34:28.560 --> 1:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that can create tons and tons of demand, get lots

1:34:31.040 --> 1:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and lots of money up front, and get people to

1:34:33.680 --> 1:34:35.439
<v Speaker 1>buy again and again, which then creates its ability and

1:34:35.439 --> 1:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>cash off the business long term. And so that is

1:34:37.760 --> 1:34:39.519
<v Speaker 1>basically the four pillars of the book, and it's broken

1:34:39.560 --> 1:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>down in those four steps. Of these are the front

1:34:42.000 --> 1:34:44.519
<v Speaker 1>and offers that do this. These are the transition points

1:34:44.560 --> 1:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to how do I get something to take the next

1:34:45.800 --> 1:34:47.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that's going to be more expensive, or how it

1:34:47.280 --> 1:34:48.800
<v Speaker 1>gets to take the bottom thing, or how to create

1:34:48.840 --> 1:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>pain points, how to create down cells, all of those

1:34:50.880 --> 1:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>components which ultimately make businesses significantly more successful. And I

1:34:55.000 --> 1:34:57.360
<v Speaker 1>started writing this in twenty nineteen. It was the first

1:34:57.360 --> 1:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>book that I started. So it was actually called lead Life,

1:35:00.000 --> 1:35:03.559
<v Speaker 1>The Generation of Monetization Structures, which you know, very very

1:35:03.600 --> 1:35:06.280
<v Speaker 1>sexy name, but this was I had a mentor where

1:35:06.280 --> 1:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it told me, hey, you're in the sale process right now.

1:35:08.160 --> 1:35:11.559
<v Speaker 1>You should document all the artifacts kind of crystallized knowledge

1:35:12.120 --> 1:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>at that point.

1:35:12.840 --> 1:35:15.800
<v Speaker 2>And so that is what started that book. Now, offers and.

1:35:15.840 --> 1:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Leads were basically that book was like this thick, and

1:35:18.160 --> 1:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this is I can't So I actually

1:35:19.920 --> 1:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>peeled off offers and then finished that first, and then

1:35:22.880 --> 1:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>peeled off leads and finished that second, and then finally

1:35:25.600 --> 1:35:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I can get to the money models, which.

1:35:27.320 --> 1:35:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Is actually what I started six years ago.

1:35:29.280 --> 1:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I have not publicly talked about any of

1:35:32.640 --> 1:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the structures in this book. And I feel like I'm

1:35:35.080 --> 1:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>giving birth. I've been I've been pregnant for six years,

1:35:38.920 --> 1:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>conceptually pregnant, and I want to give birth to this

1:35:41.080 --> 1:35:43.519
<v Speaker 1>thing because I think that this will make the largest

1:35:43.520 --> 1:35:46.519
<v Speaker 1>impact on business owner's bottom line of anything that I've

1:35:46.560 --> 1:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ever made, and it's been the source of the vast

1:35:49.080 --> 1:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>majority of my material success is being able to do

1:35:51.760 --> 1:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this because when you have a superior money model, it

1:35:54.720 --> 1:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>gives you padding to be bad at everything else because

1:35:57.360 --> 1:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you finally make more money per customer than anyone else

1:35:59.200 --> 1:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>does in your space, which means your advertising doesn't have

1:36:00.920 --> 1:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to be as good.

1:36:01.280 --> 1:36:02.519
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to be as good at sales.

1:36:02.720 --> 1:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You're like, the offer itself might not necessarily be as good.

1:36:06.360 --> 1:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But when you sequence these things together properly the right way,

1:36:09.160 --> 1:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>then you can unlock skill on the business and then

1:36:10.920 --> 1:36:13.439
<v Speaker 1>with that cash flow, buy down that ignorance stet and

1:36:13.439 --> 1:36:15.519
<v Speaker 1>then give yourself time to get good at all the

1:36:15.520 --> 1:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>other stuff.

1:36:16.000 --> 1:36:18.200
<v Speaker 3>And what starting point would you say this book's aimed at,

1:36:18.240 --> 1:36:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Like where is someone at in the gene You.

1:36:19.640 --> 1:36:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Can start at zero because you could start it.

1:36:21.400 --> 1:36:23.479
<v Speaker 1>So what essentially about those four things is that you

1:36:23.479 --> 1:36:26.479
<v Speaker 1>don't need all four, You just need one and over time.

1:36:26.520 --> 1:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Because if you were trying to do a business that

1:36:28.120 --> 1:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>had all for it, you had a recurring you have upfront, like,

1:36:30.240 --> 1:36:32.559
<v Speaker 1>you would be completely inundated. So we would start with

1:36:32.560 --> 1:36:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the first thing, which is some sort of attraction offer.

1:36:34.280 --> 1:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>How do we get something that's that's more designed to

1:36:37.160 --> 1:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>get more customers or more people to engage in your

1:36:39.680 --> 1:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>original reach out, your paid ad, your content, whatever it is.

1:36:42.600 --> 1:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I have the five most successful structures that

1:36:45.360 --> 1:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I have used and detailed stuff by step exactly how

1:36:48.200 --> 1:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to excute them. And what's interesting is that this is

1:36:50.640 --> 1:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that so the Offer's book when it came out,

1:36:53.720 --> 1:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't a single other book about offers, which is interesting,

1:36:56.000 --> 1:36:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it became kind of a household name, which

1:36:57.800 --> 1:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>is it was this massive gap in the space. But

1:36:59.479 --> 1:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you you're like this is everything, you know,

1:37:02.160 --> 1:37:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like this is how all of it works. I think

1:37:04.760 --> 1:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that money models will be that same thing where there's

1:37:07.160 --> 1:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>not a single book that ties those concepts together. And

1:37:10.400 --> 1:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>as soon as it I think it will, it will

1:37:12.360 --> 1:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>exist in that huge gap that once you see it,

1:37:15.240 --> 1:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you can analyze any business in that same way, and

1:37:17.400 --> 1:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>specifically your own.

1:37:18.560 --> 1:37:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love it, honestly listening to you today, and

1:37:22.720 --> 1:37:25.839
<v Speaker 3>I've consumed your content for a long time now, listening

1:37:25.840 --> 1:37:28.640
<v Speaker 3>to you in person consistently for this long around. The

1:37:28.640 --> 1:37:31.519
<v Speaker 3>models that you've built is a real treat man. It's

1:37:32.280 --> 1:37:34.519
<v Speaker 3>it's so well thought through it's so systematic. I love

1:37:34.560 --> 1:37:36.360
<v Speaker 3>the way you think, the way you've been able to

1:37:36.360 --> 1:37:40.000
<v Speaker 3>train yourself to realize that everything's built on behaviors, and

1:37:40.040 --> 1:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>the ability to even something that you said to me,

1:37:42.240 --> 1:37:43.880
<v Speaker 3>that's really going to stay with me because I think

1:37:43.920 --> 1:37:47.040
<v Speaker 3>about it in such a similar way. But it's so obscure,

1:37:47.479 --> 1:37:49.839
<v Speaker 3>Like we have a lot of similarities in our beliefs,

1:37:50.120 --> 1:37:51.439
<v Speaker 3>but some of them are a bit more.

1:37:51.240 --> 1:37:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Different angles, which I love.

1:37:52.920 --> 1:37:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, from different angles, but some of them are a

1:37:54.880 --> 1:37:57.840
<v Speaker 3>bit more They're from different angles, but some of them

1:37:57.840 --> 1:38:01.000
<v Speaker 3>are a bit more widespread held. But you're one thing

1:38:01.080 --> 1:38:03.559
<v Speaker 3>you talked about today about how when you watch people

1:38:03.600 --> 1:38:07.559
<v Speaker 3>say what they regret, and I think about that all

1:38:07.600 --> 1:38:09.559
<v Speaker 3>the time. I'm like, of course you regret you didn't

1:38:09.600 --> 1:38:12.439
<v Speaker 3>spend enough time with your family, but you're totally taking

1:38:12.479 --> 1:38:15.479
<v Speaker 3>away from all the benefits you just got right now.

1:38:15.520 --> 1:38:17.439
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not saying people shouldn't spend time with their family.

1:38:17.880 --> 1:38:20.240
<v Speaker 3>It's just when you said that today, that was one

1:38:20.280 --> 1:38:22.920
<v Speaker 3>thing that I was like, I can't be like to

1:38:23.000 --> 1:38:25.519
<v Speaker 3>have the ability to think it through to that level,

1:38:25.920 --> 1:38:28.360
<v Speaker 3>to not just take something at face value. And I

1:38:28.360 --> 1:38:31.479
<v Speaker 3>think that's that's the skill I see you have, Like,

1:38:31.560 --> 1:38:33.280
<v Speaker 3>that's the expert you're at is that you don't take

1:38:33.320 --> 1:38:38.000
<v Speaker 3>anything at face value. And that's hard because it requires

1:38:38.000 --> 1:38:41.519
<v Speaker 3>you to dig deep to figure out, well, what is

1:38:41.560 --> 1:38:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the behavioral science here?

1:38:43.040 --> 1:38:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Is?

1:38:43.520 --> 1:38:44.800
<v Speaker 3>What is the exchange here?

1:38:44.920 --> 1:38:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1:38:45.280 --> 1:38:47.640
<v Speaker 3>What emotions are we talking about? I picked out some

1:38:47.680 --> 1:38:53.040
<v Speaker 3>of my favorite alex Monmose quotes because so many. But first,

1:38:53.360 --> 1:38:56.400
<v Speaker 3>here's a quick word from the brands that support the show.

1:38:57.400 --> 1:39:00.720
<v Speaker 3>All Right, thank you to our sponsors. Now let's back in.

1:39:01.040 --> 1:39:02.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, you've touched on some of this, but it'd

1:39:02.760 --> 1:39:04.639
<v Speaker 3>be good to get your reaction to them again. All Right,

1:39:04.680 --> 1:39:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So this one I love because I think it's so true.

1:39:08.680 --> 1:39:11.479
<v Speaker 3>Most people want to become millionaires because of what being

1:39:11.479 --> 1:39:14.760
<v Speaker 3>a millionaire allows you to do, not because of what

1:39:14.800 --> 1:39:18.439
<v Speaker 3>you have to do to become a millionaire. What do

1:39:18.479 --> 1:39:19.800
<v Speaker 3>we do about that mindset?

1:39:20.640 --> 1:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>It's wanting the view without the climbs. Jimmy Carr has

1:39:23.640 --> 1:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a great quote on this. It's everyone wants what you have,

1:39:27.000 --> 1:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but not what you did to get it. I think

1:39:28.960 --> 1:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that if we make who we become the goal rather

1:39:34.840 --> 1:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>than the thing we achieve, instead of winning once a decade,

1:39:38.200 --> 1:39:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we can win every day because you can continually get

1:39:40.800 --> 1:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>better at being who you are, and then the achievement

1:39:43.080 --> 1:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is just one milestone along the path. But at least

1:39:46.840 --> 1:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in my experiences, as I've actually approached milestones, when it

1:39:49.920 --> 1:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>becomes increasingly likely that I'm going to achieve it, it matters

1:39:52.400 --> 1:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>less and less. When I was in the lifting world,

1:39:54.520 --> 1:39:56.479
<v Speaker 1>if I thought whatever my lift was and added one

1:39:56.520 --> 1:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred pounds, I'd be like, oh my god, man, if

1:39:58.400 --> 1:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I lifted that, that would be insane. The time you

1:40:00.400 --> 1:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>actually do lift that, you also lifted five pounds less

1:40:03.160 --> 1:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>than that before, and you'll lift to ten pounds less

1:40:04.880 --> 1:40:06.439
<v Speaker 1>than that before, so you're like, well, it's really not

1:40:06.479 --> 1:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that big of a stretch anymore. And so it actually,

1:40:08.439 --> 1:40:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in some ways it's it's not even nearly as fulfilling

1:40:11.280 --> 1:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>as you think it is, because by the time it happens,

1:40:12.800 --> 1:40:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you're so close to it it seems obvious, and so

1:40:16.720 --> 1:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>shifting from who I become rather than what I achieve

1:40:19.400 --> 1:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>or who I become as the achievement has been a

1:40:22.400 --> 1:40:25.479
<v Speaker 1>wonderful reframe for like, sure, you want to be a millionaire,

1:40:25.479 --> 1:40:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but we really want to do is become the person

1:40:26.760 --> 1:40:28.599
<v Speaker 1>who can become a millionaire, and that you can win

1:40:28.640 --> 1:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>every day, and then that takes away the I don't

1:40:31.360 --> 1:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do the things that.

1:40:33.479 --> 1:40:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that comes to one of the things you

1:40:35.439 --> 1:40:37.520
<v Speaker 3>talk about a lot that I love is sense control

1:40:38.000 --> 1:40:39.400
<v Speaker 3>like that that to me. I think one of the

1:40:39.479 --> 1:40:42.439
<v Speaker 3>earliest clips I saw of yours was someone had asked

1:40:42.439 --> 1:40:45.800
<v Speaker 3>you something like, you know, what's a trait you see

1:40:45.800 --> 1:40:49.000
<v Speaker 3>in successful people? And I think you said three things,

1:40:49.000 --> 1:40:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and I loved hearing that that third one. The first

1:40:52.080 --> 1:40:54.880
<v Speaker 3>one was, I think you said something like, you know,

1:40:54.920 --> 1:40:57.679
<v Speaker 3>they're all people who who have high standards, so they

1:40:57.760 --> 1:41:00.400
<v Speaker 3>want to they expect a lot from themselves. Yeah, second

1:41:00.640 --> 1:41:03.840
<v Speaker 3>was but at the same time, they're good at not

1:41:03.960 --> 1:41:05.400
<v Speaker 3>being that hard on themselves when.

1:41:05.280 --> 1:41:06.679
<v Speaker 2>They don't get the emotional control.

1:41:06.880 --> 1:41:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And then the third thing was like sense control,

1:41:08.640 --> 1:41:09.080
<v Speaker 3>if I'm.

1:41:08.920 --> 1:41:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Not wrong, yeah, yeah. The other one was, so it's

1:41:11.680 --> 1:41:12.040
<v Speaker 2>this one.

1:41:12.080 --> 1:41:12.599
<v Speaker 3>Did I get wrong?

1:41:12.680 --> 1:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>No, No, You're it's like you have this inflated sense

1:41:15.920 --> 1:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of self, so you believe you can achieve great thing.

1:41:17.479 --> 1:41:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's it.

1:41:18.120 --> 1:41:21.439
<v Speaker 1>You have this crippling insecurity that pushes you away.

1:41:21.560 --> 1:41:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And then the third is that you can control

1:41:23.439 --> 1:41:24.000
<v Speaker 2>your emotions.

1:41:24.080 --> 1:41:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And that that and I've always thought it's the

1:41:26.880 --> 1:41:30.439
<v Speaker 3>high standards, high grace. That's been my language around it.

1:41:30.800 --> 1:41:34.840
<v Speaker 3>But the third one of that self mastery. What do

1:41:34.880 --> 1:41:39.280
<v Speaker 3>you think is the number one emotion that people don't

1:41:39.320 --> 1:41:42.839
<v Speaker 3>know how to control that leads to failure.

1:41:43.000 --> 1:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>That is such a good question, fear, because I think

1:41:48.920 --> 1:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the most one of the

1:41:51.439 --> 1:41:54.360
<v Speaker 1>wildest questions that I read that you know, kind of

1:41:54.360 --> 1:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>stuck with me, was like, what would you do if

1:41:57.840 --> 1:42:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you weren't afraid? And I think that it's just such

1:42:00.640 --> 1:42:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a such a powerful question to ask, because every person

1:42:03.720 --> 1:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>has the fear is the thing that gives you the

1:42:06.120 --> 1:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred reasons. And what's really interesting about this is that

1:42:09.920 --> 1:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we are our brains are exceptionally good at finding problems,

1:42:12.920 --> 1:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>which is why I'm a big fan of inverted thinking.

1:42:15.120 --> 1:42:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So how can I think of it all the ways

1:42:16.280 --> 1:42:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to kill my business and then do the opposite. You'll

1:42:18.280 --> 1:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>your brain is so much better at spotting problems than

1:42:19.920 --> 1:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>spotting opportunities, and so it's like use that problem, that

1:42:22.680 --> 1:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>problem finding thing, and then just flip it. And it

1:42:24.920 --> 1:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds like, oh, well, I would just think of the

1:42:26.080 --> 1:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that way. It's like it doesn't actually work. You

1:42:27.720 --> 1:42:30.599
<v Speaker 1>actually have to think for the threats and then flip them.

1:42:30.840 --> 1:42:33.559
<v Speaker 1>But I love that it's Charlie Mongerus, that's you know,

1:42:33.680 --> 1:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, rest in peace. But from a from a

1:42:36.680 --> 1:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fear perspective, it's I think it's playing it out. It's

1:42:39.840 --> 1:42:42.479
<v Speaker 1>like what am I actually most afraid of? And so

1:42:42.600 --> 1:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>fear typically only lives in the vague, not in the specific.

1:42:46.240 --> 1:42:47.840
<v Speaker 2>We tend to catastrophize to death.

1:42:48.120 --> 1:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So if I make this post and people laugh at me,

1:42:50.720 --> 1:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll get shunned and then I'll eventually go alone and

1:42:52.400 --> 1:42:54.360
<v Speaker 1>then die right, So it's like everything just goes to

1:42:54.400 --> 1:42:56.320
<v Speaker 1>like death right, And so playing it out into the

1:42:56.320 --> 1:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>specific is like, Okay, well I make this post.

1:42:58.479 --> 1:42:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Some people will like.

1:42:59.240 --> 1:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It and some people and maybe I'll get some negative comments.

1:43:01.400 --> 1:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>If I get naked hommuts, I'll get more reached, so

1:43:02.680 --> 1:43:04.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not a terrible thing. And then and then

1:43:04.640 --> 1:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that night I will have dinner right, and that night

1:43:08.320 --> 1:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I will go to bed right, and so making making

1:43:11.760 --> 1:43:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it really really specific. And then just to add one

1:43:13.800 --> 1:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>more thing on that, the other really big downside of

1:43:17.080 --> 1:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>being human from an opportunity of money making perspective is

1:43:19.880 --> 1:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that we underestimate the upside and we overestimate the downside,

1:43:24.920 --> 1:43:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and that has been incredibly valuable for us to stay

1:43:27.280 --> 1:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>alive and not very valuable for us to make money.

1:43:31.600 --> 1:43:33.960
<v Speaker 2>And so when you if you're in the developed world,

1:43:34.280 --> 1:43:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the absolute worst.

1:43:36.000 --> 1:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Case scenario is that you still have a say, fortress,

1:43:40.800 --> 1:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you still have a cover, and you still have food,

1:43:43.000 --> 1:43:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and you still have air, and you still have water,

1:43:44.600 --> 1:43:46.879
<v Speaker 1>because in the developed world all those things are available

1:43:46.920 --> 1:43:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to anyone, and so it's like, okay, so the worst

1:43:48.880 --> 1:43:50.519
<v Speaker 1>case scenario is that I live and I'm completely free

1:43:50.520 --> 1:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and no one bothers me. It's like, you know, that

1:43:51.680 --> 1:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>actually sounds not so bad when you actually play it

1:43:54.400 --> 1:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way out. And so I think playing it

1:43:57.080 --> 1:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>out and actually really thinking what would I then do.

1:43:59.000 --> 1:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I probably reach out to say and she would let

1:44:01.360 --> 1:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>me sleep on her couch, okay, so, and I would

1:44:03.400 --> 1:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>ask her.

1:44:03.800 --> 1:44:04.640
<v Speaker 2>If you complain it.

1:44:04.640 --> 1:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, hey, Sarah, if I were to do

1:44:05.960 --> 1:44:07.720
<v Speaker 1>something and I were to fail, how long would you

1:44:07.800 --> 1:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>let me sleep on your couch. You're like, I'd give

1:44:09.120 --> 1:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you six months, and you're like okay. So it all

1:44:11.640 --> 1:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden it becomes concrete, and I think that

1:44:14.120 --> 1:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that starts to really evaporate fear rather than like oh,

1:44:16.880 --> 1:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I will die totally.

1:44:18.080 --> 1:44:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:44:18.280 --> 1:44:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I remember that when I when I made the leap,

1:44:20.360 --> 1:44:22.559
<v Speaker 3>I was like, and of course I was in a

1:44:22.560 --> 1:44:24.360
<v Speaker 3>position to be able to say this, but I was like, Okay, well,

1:44:24.360 --> 1:44:26.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll just go back to what I was doing and

1:44:26.360 --> 1:44:28.400
<v Speaker 3>if this didn't work, I would just go back, like

1:44:28.400 --> 1:44:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll figure out a way get the job back, and

1:44:30.080 --> 1:44:32.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll get the job back and I'll go back to

1:44:32.240 --> 1:44:34.920
<v Speaker 3>do it. And that was the reality. And of course

1:44:34.960 --> 1:44:36.360
<v Speaker 3>it was still at the time when I felt this

1:44:36.479 --> 1:44:38.960
<v Speaker 3>was taking up all of that. All right, another one

1:44:38.960 --> 1:44:41.840
<v Speaker 3>that I love. This, This one really really hit me

1:44:42.240 --> 1:44:43.840
<v Speaker 3>and I feel it's going to resonate with a lot

1:44:43.840 --> 1:44:46.479
<v Speaker 3>of people if you haven't heard it yet. People fail

1:44:46.600 --> 1:44:50.479
<v Speaker 3>not because there's some magical list nobody has. They fail

1:44:50.640 --> 1:44:53.200
<v Speaker 3>because it's an obvious list nobody does.

1:44:53.640 --> 1:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm so happy you like that one.

1:44:55.200 --> 1:44:58.320
<v Speaker 1>It didn't like I just just just to give kudos

1:44:58.320 --> 1:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to Jay here. You picked out tweets that were not

1:45:00.760 --> 1:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like super Bang or high performers, but like I wrote

1:45:03.000 --> 1:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>these and I was like, this is like, this is

1:45:04.720 --> 1:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a thing.

1:45:05.040 --> 1:45:08.760
<v Speaker 3>I didn't pick them based on performance. I picked them

1:45:08.760 --> 1:45:10.559
<v Speaker 3>based on like I was like, I read this, I

1:45:10.600 --> 1:45:11.360
<v Speaker 3>was like, yes.

1:45:11.240 --> 1:45:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Like, I like that, So just kudos to you for

1:45:14.479 --> 1:45:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that because it makes me feel good. But yeah, so,

1:45:18.000 --> 1:45:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is a super known one, but like

1:45:19.479 --> 1:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the magic isn't the work that we're not doing, right,

1:45:21.320 --> 1:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the obvious list. If you were trying to get

1:45:23.960 --> 1:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in shape, you know, you should eat less and you

1:45:26.000 --> 1:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>should move more.

1:45:26.800 --> 1:45:27.320
<v Speaker 2>You know that.

1:45:27.680 --> 1:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I used to even do these with when

1:45:29.160 --> 1:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have a weight loss customer who come in

1:45:30.600 --> 1:45:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the door and they'd be like, so, tell me more

1:45:32.479 --> 1:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>about the and I would just say, like, do we

1:45:35.000 --> 1:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>really need to get into it? Like you already know

1:45:37.240 --> 1:45:38.760
<v Speaker 1>what you're supposed to do. The question is why you

1:45:38.760 --> 1:45:40.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing it. That's what I'm here for. And so

1:45:41.120 --> 1:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of these situations, like you probably know

1:45:43.120 --> 1:45:45.519
<v Speaker 1>that if you're going to invest, you should, yeah, you know,

1:45:45.720 --> 1:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>wait ten years. And if you're not willing to wait

1:45:47.360 --> 1:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years, then you shouldn't buy it, which means that

1:45:49.080 --> 1:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're like, well I don't have the time to

1:45:50.000 --> 1:45:53.320
<v Speaker 1>do that research, then don't invest. Increase your active income, right,

1:45:54.080 --> 1:45:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and so and all these things like okay, well how

1:45:55.479 --> 1:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>do I increase my activit? Well, I know I need

1:45:57.000 --> 1:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to do more than I currently am I know I

1:45:58.320 --> 1:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>need to put my stuff out there. And so one

1:46:00.160 --> 1:46:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite frames around this is it's the Solomon paradox, right,

1:46:04.320 --> 1:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And so for theose W don't know. In the Bible,

1:46:06.160 --> 1:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Solomon wise man, they called Solomon paradox because he gave

1:46:10.080 --> 1:46:13.519
<v Speaker 1>amazing advice, but his life was in shambles. And so

1:46:13.720 --> 1:46:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the thing is that we're exceptionally good at giving advice

1:46:15.800 --> 1:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and very good and very bad at following it for ourselves.

1:46:18.640 --> 1:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And so what's interesting is that they actually did studies

1:46:21.080 --> 1:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>on this where they had people they whitewash someone's existing

1:46:24.000 --> 1:46:27.120
<v Speaker 1>circumstances and their conditions and had the same people, not

1:46:27.200 --> 1:46:30.240
<v Speaker 1>knowing they were criticizing themselves, give critiques to this person

1:46:30.360 --> 1:46:32.280
<v Speaker 1>what to do to improve their lives. And the thing

1:46:32.320 --> 1:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is is that none of the people are doing it.

1:46:34.000 --> 1:46:36.479
<v Speaker 1>And so the thing is, I like that frame because

1:46:36.680 --> 1:46:39.679
<v Speaker 1>if you parachute your sorry, protect yourself in the future

1:46:39.680 --> 1:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and look back and say, Okay, what would eighty years

1:46:41.520 --> 1:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>old version of me tell me to do?

1:46:43.320 --> 1:46:44.240
<v Speaker 2>For some reason, it kind of like.

1:46:44.240 --> 1:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Disembodies yourself a little bit, and you can get back

1:46:46.360 --> 1:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, I would tell myself to do this,

1:46:48.000 --> 1:46:49.280
<v Speaker 1>this and this, and the thing is is that you

1:46:49.360 --> 1:46:52.720
<v Speaker 1>have complete context on your situation, and so sometimes it's

1:46:52.720 --> 1:46:54.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the best advice you can get. And I

1:46:54.479 --> 1:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>know this is kind of like the inverted thing where

1:46:55.880 --> 1:46:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, oh, well, I just actually go through

1:46:58.240 --> 1:47:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the process and say, I'm going to write down a

1:47:00.360 --> 1:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation with myself that's eighty years old.

1:47:02.560 --> 1:47:04.160
<v Speaker 2>What would he or she tell me to do?

1:47:05.320 --> 1:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And it probably is that obvious list that no one does,

1:47:08.640 --> 1:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not the magical list that no one knows. Because the

1:47:11.360 --> 1:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is is that like the clues of success are

1:47:13.640 --> 1:47:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in plain sight, it's just that the sweat that's required,

1:47:16.479 --> 1:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the price tag associated with them is the one that

1:47:18.200 --> 1:47:20.599
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to pay. So people don't really give

1:47:20.680 --> 1:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>up on their dreams. They give up they see what

1:47:24.160 --> 1:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it takes to get their dreams and then decide it's

1:47:26.360 --> 1:47:29.280
<v Speaker 1>too expensive. And I think that's the big thing is

1:47:29.280 --> 1:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is they think it's mispriced. And maybe it is, and

1:47:31.640 --> 1:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's okay. But my preference would be that

1:47:34.439 --> 1:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>many people say, you know what, that's not worth it

1:47:37.120 --> 1:47:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to me, and then be like, great, you've won. Like

1:47:40.520 --> 1:47:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you've won, you don't need to get anywhere you've already won.

1:47:42.479 --> 1:47:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Where you're at So that's at least my thought on it.

1:47:45.360 --> 1:47:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love that. How does someone who listens to

1:47:50.240 --> 1:47:54.200
<v Speaker 3>this episode versus someone who applies this episode live differently

1:47:54.240 --> 1:47:55.000
<v Speaker 3>today or tomorrow.

1:47:56.479 --> 1:47:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, if someone just listens to the episode, tomorrow will

1:47:58.840 --> 1:48:01.479
<v Speaker 1>be the same for you. So that's an easy one.

1:48:01.520 --> 1:48:04.519
<v Speaker 1>This was just entertainment for you. Just define in terms

1:48:04.560 --> 1:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of actions what you were going to do. I mean,

1:48:07.000 --> 1:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that is really it. And so like you can prove

1:48:09.080 --> 1:48:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to yourself that you learned something from this podcast rather

1:48:11.840 --> 1:48:15.439
<v Speaker 1>than just being entertained by this podcast, by simply doing

1:48:15.560 --> 1:48:18.479
<v Speaker 1>something different, taking and action. And so maybe it is

1:48:18.520 --> 1:48:20.280
<v Speaker 1>just recording that self a video and texting it to

1:48:20.320 --> 1:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred people.

1:48:21.320 --> 1:48:21.680
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

1:48:21.720 --> 1:48:23.639
<v Speaker 1>You could just do that and you would have I mean,

1:48:23.640 --> 1:48:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you would be so much further ahead than you were yesterday.

1:48:26.960 --> 1:48:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And what's crazy is that the amount of progress that

1:48:29.320 --> 1:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you make in that first twenty hours is greater than

1:48:32.200 --> 1:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>any amount of progress that you will likely make over

1:48:33.920 --> 1:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of your career, because going from absolutely terrible

1:48:37.240 --> 1:48:39.280
<v Speaker 1>too proficient happens so fast.

1:48:39.520 --> 1:48:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1:48:39.720 --> 1:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, all of the gains come from going

1:48:42.120 --> 1:48:44.439
<v Speaker 1>from proficient to master, which take a huge amount of time,

1:48:44.680 --> 1:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but It's one of the most exciting times because like,

1:48:47.120 --> 1:48:48.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, look I can build an app. Now, oh

1:48:48.400 --> 1:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>look I can build a web page, or look, I

1:48:50.240 --> 1:48:51.920
<v Speaker 1>can show the people out of self stup, whatever it is.

1:48:52.160 --> 1:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think I would just want to get to that,

1:48:54.439 --> 1:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like get to that fast learning curve as fast as

1:48:56.160 --> 1:48:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you can.

1:48:56.360 --> 1:48:58.400
<v Speaker 2>And the only we can do that at starting. I

1:48:58.520 --> 1:48:59.080
<v Speaker 2>love it. All right.

1:48:59.120 --> 1:49:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Here's another one. I don't know if it's a popular

1:49:01.000 --> 1:49:03.840
<v Speaker 3>one or not, but deleting work life balance for a

1:49:03.880 --> 1:49:07.080
<v Speaker 3>season nets you more work life balance over a lifetime.

1:49:07.960 --> 1:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So I love this frame shift, which is everyone talks

1:49:12.080 --> 1:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about work life balance, but no one talks about it

1:49:14.000 --> 1:49:17.240
<v Speaker 1>over what timeline. Paul Graham said this from my Combinator.

1:49:17.240 --> 1:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>He said, in order to make a million dollars, you

1:49:19.640 --> 1:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have to endure million dollars worth of pain. And so

1:49:22.439 --> 1:49:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to endure a million dollars with

1:49:23.840 --> 1:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a pain over forty years, or you can crunch it

1:49:26.280 --> 1:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>into four crazy years and then after that you can

1:49:29.680 --> 1:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>have whatever you want to have afterwards. And so I

1:49:32.439 --> 1:49:37.080
<v Speaker 1>think about life in seasons rather than on microcosms days

1:49:37.280 --> 1:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and even weeks, and I think that shifting that perspective

1:49:40.160 --> 1:49:42.720
<v Speaker 1>will really only solve one core problem for people, which

1:49:42.760 --> 1:49:44.519
<v Speaker 1>is that they feel like they are doing something wrong

1:49:44.720 --> 1:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>by making a sacrifice today, and there's always going and

1:49:47.600 --> 1:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>again it's an eternal question how much do I risk?

1:49:51.439 --> 1:49:53.839
<v Speaker 1>How much do I consume versus invest? These are classic

1:49:53.920 --> 1:49:56.320
<v Speaker 1>human problems that will never have a correct answer, And

1:49:56.360 --> 1:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's more what's the correct answer for you in your

1:49:57.840 --> 1:50:00.080
<v Speaker 1>season right now, based on the goals you have? And

1:50:00.120 --> 1:50:02.639
<v Speaker 1>so I think, if anything, I would want that quote

1:50:02.640 --> 1:50:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to give some people permission.

1:50:04.439 --> 1:50:06.280
<v Speaker 2>To work a weekend every once in a while, to.

1:50:06.600 --> 1:50:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Take the five to nine on both sides of the

1:50:08.280 --> 1:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>day and say, you know what, I Am going to

1:50:10.240 --> 1:50:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be unbalanced. And that's okay because at least in my

1:50:13.320 --> 1:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>observation and probably yours, I have yet to see a

1:50:15.960 --> 1:50:18.679
<v Speaker 1>hyper successful person who doesn't have a wildly unbalanced life,

1:50:18.720 --> 1:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>or at least for a significant period of time. And

1:50:21.240 --> 1:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to just make sure that we're not looking

1:50:23.000 --> 1:50:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at someone once they are a billionaire and saying what

1:50:24.720 --> 1:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are they doing now? Because they might be in a

1:50:26.600 --> 1:50:28.640
<v Speaker 1>different season now, and so don't look at what you

1:50:28.640 --> 1:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>know Warren Buffet's doing now when he says I have

1:50:30.040 --> 1:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I make two good decisions a year I've had a

1:50:31.680 --> 1:50:32.080
<v Speaker 1>good year.

1:50:32.240 --> 1:50:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you make two good decisions a year, you're.

1:50:34.200 --> 1:50:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Still probably not gonna You're not gonna be warm Buffett, right,

1:50:37.560 --> 1:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I think about that as my as my frame.

1:50:40.439 --> 1:50:43.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, don't read someone's chapter twenty when you're writing your

1:50:43.600 --> 1:50:46.720
<v Speaker 3>chapter one. It doesn't make any sense. I remember growing up,

1:50:47.000 --> 1:50:49.400
<v Speaker 3>not growing up. I remember a few years ago when

1:50:49.920 --> 1:50:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Gary Gary's version that I loved, which is like in

1:50:52.880 --> 1:50:54.760
<v Speaker 3>his words and so I'll say each ship for two

1:50:54.840 --> 1:50:57.599
<v Speaker 3>years and then eat cavia for the rest of your life. Yeah,

1:50:57.640 --> 1:50:59.479
<v Speaker 3>And it was so interesting to me how much you

1:50:59.479 --> 1:51:02.280
<v Speaker 3>could do in two years if you just went all

1:51:02.320 --> 1:51:05.760
<v Speaker 3>in as opposed to this idea of like I'm gonna

1:51:05.760 --> 1:51:07.200
<v Speaker 3>be really balanced for ten years. And I was thinking

1:51:07.200 --> 1:51:09.320
<v Speaker 3>about the other day and you said seasons. And I

1:51:09.360 --> 1:51:10.640
<v Speaker 3>was saying this the other day when I was on

1:51:10.680 --> 1:51:13.280
<v Speaker 3>tour storing to Jesse. It'sler and I said this to Jesse.

1:51:13.320 --> 1:51:15.120
<v Speaker 3>We were talking about something similar, and I was just like,

1:51:15.840 --> 1:51:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I would never want a day. A perfect day is

1:51:18.760 --> 1:51:23.640
<v Speaker 3>not a day where it rains, snows, sun and fall, right, Like,

1:51:23.680 --> 1:51:25.960
<v Speaker 3>that's not a perfect day. Like you wouldn't say that,

1:51:25.960 --> 1:51:27.599
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't say I hope it rains today. I hope

1:51:27.600 --> 1:51:29.639
<v Speaker 3>it snows today. I hope it's sunny, and I hope

1:51:29.640 --> 1:51:32.120
<v Speaker 3>the leaves shed. Like that's not a perfect day, but

1:51:32.160 --> 1:51:35.080
<v Speaker 3>that's what you want every day. And Nature's already showing

1:51:35.080 --> 1:51:37.720
<v Speaker 3>you the cycles that work. But we're trying to go

1:51:37.760 --> 1:51:41.040
<v Speaker 3>against nature by saying I want everything to happen today.

1:51:40.840 --> 1:51:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And I want all my days to be over the

1:51:42.840 --> 1:51:43.559
<v Speaker 1>halfway line.

1:51:43.640 --> 1:51:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:51:44.080 --> 1:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I think about this from a law of

1:51:45.880 --> 1:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>large numbers perspective, which is, let's say you have three

1:51:47.760 --> 1:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five days in a year, and there's

1:51:51.160 --> 1:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be if you change nothing the bottom ten

1:51:53.720 --> 1:51:55.280
<v Speaker 1>percent of days, you're gonna have thirty six days in

1:51:55.280 --> 1:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the year that are bottom ten percent days. That there's

1:51:58.120 --> 1:52:00.479
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with the day, it's just that this happens

1:52:00.520 --> 1:52:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to be a bottom ten percent day. And so I

1:52:02.439 --> 1:52:04.599
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of suffering comes from just the normal

1:52:04.680 --> 1:52:07.879
<v Speaker 1>volatility or variation that exists in life and then somehow

1:52:07.920 --> 1:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ascribing meaning to it and saying, oh, and because this

1:52:11.040 --> 1:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is the bottom ten percent, it is bad. Rather than

1:52:13.680 --> 1:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it is sunny, it is rainy, and I need rain

1:52:15.960 --> 1:52:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to appreciate sun, right, And so it's like

1:52:18.280 --> 1:52:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we can't have just upside. It's the trade offs, Like

1:52:20.520 --> 1:52:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I want all the good without the bad.

1:52:22.560 --> 1:52:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But the bad is what makes the good good.

1:52:24.439 --> 1:52:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, and the bad is what sometimes what keeps

1:52:27.360 --> 1:52:29.639
<v Speaker 3>you going. Yeah, because if it's just good, maybe you'd stop,

1:52:29.720 --> 1:52:32.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe you'd yeah. Well, last one of these that I

1:52:32.240 --> 1:52:33.479
<v Speaker 3>wanted to pick out, which I think is going to

1:52:33.479 --> 1:52:35.360
<v Speaker 3>help a lot of people because I've been doing it

1:52:35.360 --> 1:52:36.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot. I'm writing my third book right now, and

1:52:37.000 --> 1:52:39.479
<v Speaker 3>this has changed my life. It's amazing how much you

1:52:39.479 --> 1:52:41.840
<v Speaker 3>can get done if you work for twelve hours without

1:52:41.840 --> 1:52:46.879
<v Speaker 3>your phone. So, I mean, it was simple yet so profound.

1:52:47.080 --> 1:52:50.519
<v Speaker 1>So I defined so that here's the number one the

1:52:51.240 --> 1:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>highest value productivity hack that I can give anyone. So

1:52:54.120 --> 1:52:58.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the hack of productivity. Do nothing except for

1:52:58.439 --> 1:52:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the task you set out to achieve.

1:53:00.479 --> 1:53:00.880
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

1:53:01.360 --> 1:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So everything that people do in order to increase productivity

1:53:04.040 --> 1:53:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that is not working on the task at hand is

1:53:05.840 --> 1:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>by very definition.

1:53:06.760 --> 1:53:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Making them less productive.

1:53:08.200 --> 1:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Like period. And so I think people have these very

1:53:10.200 --> 1:53:11.599
<v Speaker 1>long routines. I think they have these like I got

1:53:11.640 --> 1:53:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to get in the mood.

1:53:12.160 --> 1:53:12.559
<v Speaker 2>I got in this.

1:53:12.560 --> 1:53:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, what if you could start taking action

1:53:15.439 --> 1:53:17.880
<v Speaker 1>despite your mood and then get into the mood faster

1:53:18.040 --> 1:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>through taking the action. And so all of the things

1:53:20.880 --> 1:53:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that have made me more productive in life have been

1:53:22.320 --> 1:53:25.479
<v Speaker 1>through elimination, not addition. And so it is eliminating outside

1:53:25.520 --> 1:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>stimulus besides the one task that I'm working on. And

1:53:28.000 --> 1:53:30.840
<v Speaker 1>so if we think the hypothetical ideal, our hypothetical extream

1:53:30.840 --> 1:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of the most focused person in the world is that

1:53:32.680 --> 1:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that person would do literally nothing besides that one thing,

1:53:34.640 --> 1:53:36.519
<v Speaker 1>which means the wouldn't eat, they wouldn't sleep. Now at

1:53:36.560 --> 1:53:38.200
<v Speaker 1>some point they're like, okay, well, in order for it,

1:53:38.439 --> 1:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he has to eat and he has to sleep. Okay,

1:53:40.160 --> 1:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So every other hour is just this one thing. And

1:53:42.360 --> 1:53:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so if we take that as the hypothetical extreme, we

1:53:44.200 --> 1:53:46.320
<v Speaker 1>want to approximate there or get as close as possible

1:53:46.360 --> 1:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to that extreme as humanly possible. And so for me,

1:53:48.720 --> 1:53:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it's good night's sleep knowing what I'm going to start

1:53:50.680 --> 1:53:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on the day before. Caffeinate ear plugs, I double earplug.

1:53:54.240 --> 1:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I put the plugs, and then I put the things on,

1:53:55.880 --> 1:53:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and I work in a room that has no windows.

1:53:57.439 --> 1:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Now some people are like, that's depressing for me, But

1:53:59.080 --> 1:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, it'll laws me to lose myself in my

1:54:01.160 --> 1:54:03.439
<v Speaker 1>work not get distracted by something that's going on outside.

1:54:03.479 --> 1:54:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was just about to say, I'm glad you

1:54:04.960 --> 1:54:07.880
<v Speaker 3>brought up environment because everyone has an environment they thrive in.

1:54:07.920 --> 1:54:10.200
<v Speaker 3>So I'm the same. I need I need instrumental music.

1:54:10.200 --> 1:54:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't can't have music with lyrics when I'm thinking that,

1:54:12.240 --> 1:54:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I just can't do it. So I have some artists

1:54:14.880 --> 1:54:16.880
<v Speaker 3>that I'm happy to listen to instrumentals of. It also

1:54:16.880 --> 1:54:18.920
<v Speaker 3>can't be songs that I know. Trust me in music

1:54:18.960 --> 1:54:21.320
<v Speaker 3>that's totally unpredictable and totally random because it helps me

1:54:21.320 --> 1:54:21.960
<v Speaker 3>with creativity.

1:54:21.960 --> 1:54:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Interesting.

1:54:22.479 --> 1:54:25.439
<v Speaker 3>Then I do need windows, any natural light, but I

1:54:25.560 --> 1:54:28.679
<v Speaker 3>need to not see anything real happening. It's like sky

1:54:28.960 --> 1:54:33.760
<v Speaker 3>treat It's like it's nondescript and there's not like yeah,

1:54:33.840 --> 1:54:38.000
<v Speaker 3>not people exactly. And I can't work in noisy coffee

1:54:38.000 --> 1:54:40.160
<v Speaker 3>shop like I can't work in environments like that. And

1:54:40.200 --> 1:54:43.440
<v Speaker 3>to me, the environment is more important than this whole

1:54:43.480 --> 1:54:47.560
<v Speaker 3>mood builder thing because that's like deep work, like you're

1:54:47.560 --> 1:54:48.760
<v Speaker 3>in the cave doing the thing.

1:54:49.280 --> 1:54:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Can I tell a wild example?

1:54:50.480 --> 1:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I believe you if you control the conditions,

1:54:54.000 --> 1:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you can control the outcome, right, if you know all

1:54:55.600 --> 1:54:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the variables and so if we want to be productive,

1:54:57.440 --> 1:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we want to control as many of those conditions as possible.

1:54:59.320 --> 1:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And so to take up hypothetical extreme power to say, hey,

1:55:01.720 --> 1:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee that everybody who's listening to this, if we

1:55:04.480 --> 1:55:06.400
<v Speaker 1>were all in one room, I could get everyone naked

1:55:06.400 --> 1:55:08.120
<v Speaker 1>without saying a word. He would hear that and be like,

1:55:08.160 --> 1:55:10.080
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, that's insane. What I would do is

1:55:10.080 --> 1:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I would lock all the doors, and I would turn

1:55:11.680 --> 1:55:13.840
<v Speaker 1>up the heat to two hundred and then just wait

1:55:13.960 --> 1:55:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and eventually everyone would get naked. And the point to

1:55:16.040 --> 1:55:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that is that we can reconstruct the environment to get

1:55:19.120 --> 1:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the desired outcome if we control as many of those

1:55:21.200 --> 1:55:24.360
<v Speaker 1>variables as possible. And so if you don't feel as

1:55:24.360 --> 1:55:26.400
<v Speaker 1>productive as you want, you get distracted easily. You might

1:55:26.400 --> 1:55:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not have even given yourself a shot. Right if you're

1:55:28.920 --> 1:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to work while having your notifications on, while letting

1:55:32.400 --> 1:55:35.280
<v Speaker 1>people text you and call you, and you're at you know,

1:55:35.600 --> 1:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in an area where people are coming by and like

1:55:38.440 --> 1:55:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is this chair free? Is this table free? And you're

1:55:40.360 --> 1:55:42.840
<v Speaker 1>constantly getting pulled. It's like you haven't even gotten a chance.

1:55:42.840 --> 1:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And maybe you have a roommate who walks in and

1:55:44.640 --> 1:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>out and maybe they listen to music. And the thing

1:55:46.600 --> 1:55:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is that many people are in those conditions and they're like, man,

1:55:48.920 --> 1:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I have a medical condition. I

1:55:50.640 --> 1:55:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think I need to get medicated. It's like, dude, you

1:55:52.640 --> 1:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>give your self a shot. Like Jerry Soindfeld talks about

1:55:55.640 --> 1:55:57.960
<v Speaker 1>how his writing condition is he has a desk in

1:55:58.000 --> 1:55:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a room that has nothing else, and he's got a

1:55:59.720 --> 1:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>pad and he's got a pen, and he's he doesn't

1:56:03.560 --> 1:56:06.440
<v Speaker 1>have to write, but he can't do anything else. And

1:56:06.480 --> 1:56:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so if we define commitment as the elimination of alternatives,

1:56:09.280 --> 1:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>then we need to commit to the work. Right it

1:56:11.200 --> 1:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>focuses anything that is not the work, is not the work,

1:56:14.800 --> 1:56:17.320
<v Speaker 1>then that's it. And so I think that we get

1:56:17.360 --> 1:56:18.720
<v Speaker 1>there through elimination, not thro adition.

1:56:19.120 --> 1:56:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I felt that. I think it's going to help

1:56:21.320 --> 1:56:24.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people. And you're so right, Like even

1:56:24.560 --> 1:56:27.560
<v Speaker 3>it's so funny you say that. Up until six months ago,

1:56:27.600 --> 1:56:29.760
<v Speaker 3>I started to think. I was like, that's my brain

1:56:29.880 --> 1:56:32.560
<v Speaker 3>just been rewired by TikTok, Like I was like, have

1:56:32.680 --> 1:56:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I really lost my ability for deep work? And I

1:56:36.640 --> 1:56:39.000
<v Speaker 3>was having this thought probably like six maybe twelve months ago,

1:56:39.320 --> 1:56:41.320
<v Speaker 3>because I was racking my brain about a new brook

1:56:41.480 --> 1:56:43.160
<v Speaker 3>and it wasn't as clear as it used to be

1:56:43.240 --> 1:56:46.240
<v Speaker 3>and whatever, and I just started to do what I

1:56:46.320 --> 1:56:48.640
<v Speaker 3>always used to do, and all of a sudden, it's

1:56:48.680 --> 1:56:50.640
<v Speaker 3>all gone away. And I was like, I'm writing, like

1:56:50.760 --> 1:56:52.800
<v Speaker 3>for eight hours a day Saturday and Sunday, or a

1:56:52.880 --> 1:56:55.680
<v Speaker 3>new book every week because I loved it in the zone.

1:56:55.720 --> 1:56:57.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the room that I write in, and I

1:56:57.800 --> 1:57:00.920
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, it's right there. I didn't give myself

1:57:01.000 --> 1:57:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity because I was trying to do it with

1:57:03.720 --> 1:57:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the other discission.

1:57:04.760 --> 1:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Trying to squeeze it in. So you can't squeeze in focus.

1:57:07.480 --> 1:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's say it's a jealous mistress. It requires all your.

1:57:10.000 --> 1:57:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Attention, Alex. We end every episode with a final five.

1:57:14.040 --> 1:57:17.480
<v Speaker 3>These questions get asked to everyone and so these are

1:57:17.480 --> 1:57:19.400
<v Speaker 3>your final five. They have to be answered in one word,

1:57:19.920 --> 1:57:24.640
<v Speaker 3>one sentence maximum. So question number one, Alex, what is

1:57:24.680 --> 1:57:27.040
<v Speaker 3>the best advice you've ever heard or received?

1:57:27.920 --> 1:57:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Do so much work it would be unreasonable for you

1:57:30.600 --> 1:57:31.520
<v Speaker 2>not to be successful.

1:57:32.080 --> 1:57:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Second question, what is the worst advice you've ever heard

1:57:34.640 --> 1:57:35.440
<v Speaker 3>or received?

1:57:36.200 --> 1:57:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Follow your passion?

1:57:37.480 --> 1:57:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Question number three a piece of advice you wish you

1:57:41.120 --> 1:57:42.200
<v Speaker 3>received sooner?

1:57:43.760 --> 1:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Find people better than you and do whatever you can

1:57:46.800 --> 1:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to get them to help you, including helping them first

1:57:49.160 --> 1:57:49.959
<v Speaker 1>without expectation.

1:57:51.040 --> 1:57:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Question number four A lesson that took you far too

1:57:54.000 --> 1:57:55.000
<v Speaker 3>many times to learn.

1:57:55.960 --> 1:57:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Focus one thing all in and.

1:57:59.000 --> 1:58:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Fifth and final questions, And we asked this every guest

1:58:01.000 --> 1:58:03.000
<v Speaker 3>has ever been on the show. If you could create

1:58:03.040 --> 1:58:05.800
<v Speaker 3>one law that everyone had to follow, what would it be?

1:58:06.560 --> 1:58:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Everyone has to give all their wealth away at the

1:58:08.040 --> 1:58:08.600
<v Speaker 2>end of their life.

1:58:09.080 --> 1:58:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I love that one.

1:58:11.160 --> 1:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Not to your kids, but it has to be yeah, exactly,

1:58:14.040 --> 1:58:14.320
<v Speaker 1>has to be.

1:58:14.280 --> 1:58:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Given away to kids or ever or it doesn't matter. Yeah,

1:58:17.760 --> 1:58:20.240
<v Speaker 3>not to your kids, Like yeah, yeah, are you saying

1:58:20.240 --> 1:58:20.960
<v Speaker 3>beyond your kids?

1:58:21.160 --> 1:58:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:58:21.400 --> 1:58:22.760
<v Speaker 3>My friend just told me the other day that his

1:58:22.840 --> 1:58:25.680
<v Speaker 3>dad just took him out the will and his dad's

1:58:25.680 --> 1:58:28.000
<v Speaker 3>given all his money away to charity and all the

1:58:28.040 --> 1:58:30.840
<v Speaker 3>kids are our gayet anything. He was hot broke. He

1:58:30.920 --> 1:58:32.440
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh God, I thought I was gonna pass

1:58:32.440 --> 1:58:33.800
<v Speaker 3>them wunny.

1:58:34.000 --> 1:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's a sanscrit saying around that, which is, if

1:58:38.640 --> 1:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you have a good son, there's no need to accumulate wealth.

1:58:42.480 --> 1:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>If you have a bad son, there's no point to

1:58:44.320 --> 1:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>accumulate wealth. And so at the end of the day,

1:58:47.400 --> 1:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean, that's my worldview, which is the reason

1:58:49.800 --> 1:58:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that I want the reason that I would want the

1:58:51.680 --> 1:58:54.280
<v Speaker 1>game to be structured so that everybody has to give

1:58:54.280 --> 1:58:55.840
<v Speaker 1>all their stuff away at the end is because if

1:58:55.840 --> 1:58:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at second and third order consequences of that,

1:58:58.280 --> 1:59:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who are the best allocating earth aggregating capital,

1:59:01.120 --> 1:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the people are the best at making money would be

1:59:03.120 --> 1:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are also the best at allocating it.

1:59:05.000 --> 1:59:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And so you would actually have the best tools and

1:59:07.400 --> 1:59:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the people who are best skilled to use them. And

1:59:09.760 --> 1:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so if you know you have to give it away,

1:59:11.320 --> 1:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>then at some point near the later part of your life,

1:59:13.560 --> 1:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you would stop trying to amass and start trying to

1:59:17.040 --> 1:59:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd focus on giving. And I think most people who

1:59:19.040 --> 1:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do give get addicted to giving because they realized that

1:59:22.000 --> 1:59:24.640
<v Speaker 1>actually it fills a hole that the wealth never did right.

1:59:24.960 --> 1:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And so what ends up happening, though, is that from

1:59:26.680 --> 1:59:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a societal perspective, is that if all the best allocators

1:59:29.160 --> 1:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of capital then try to solve all the world's problems

1:59:31.400 --> 1:59:34.200
<v Speaker 1>with the capital they had, so many fewer problems would exist.

1:59:34.280 --> 1:59:36.360
<v Speaker 2>That would the whole world would get better.

1:59:36.600 --> 1:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The other downstream effect of that is that it would

1:59:38.880 --> 1:59:40.120
<v Speaker 1>get rid of a huge amount of the kind of

1:59:40.160 --> 1:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the cronyism, the nepotism, the things where you know, these

1:59:43.280 --> 1:59:47.160
<v Speaker 1>these seventh generation massive you know, wealth trust fund, you

1:59:47.160 --> 1:59:49.280
<v Speaker 1>know kids who like it doesn't serve the kids either.

1:59:49.360 --> 1:59:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You look at those families, they're a mess.

1:59:52.480 --> 1:59:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, on on so many reasons.

1:59:55.400 --> 1:59:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm a big believer in equal opportunity, not

1:59:57.680 --> 2:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>equal outcomes. And so if everybody's slate was clean day one,

2:00:01.240 --> 2:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because no one got daddy's inheritance, then everyone starts at

2:00:04.720 --> 2:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>zero as close as possible. Obviously genetics, you know, can

2:00:08.040 --> 2:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>play a factor there, but I think that' says as

2:00:10.800 --> 2:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>equal of a start as we can get, and then

2:00:14.280 --> 2:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone starts as zero, and and the ones you super

2:00:16.680 --> 2:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>win then turn into super givers.

2:00:18.960 --> 2:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>And I like that.

2:00:20.480 --> 2:00:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And if you don't One thing I've learned about

2:00:22.560 --> 2:00:24.320
<v Speaker 3>that as well is if you don't give now, you

2:00:24.360 --> 2:00:27.360
<v Speaker 3>won't give later. This feeling of like when I get

2:00:27.400 --> 2:00:31.080
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars, i'll give more, it doesn't work that way.

2:00:31.520 --> 2:00:33.920
<v Speaker 3>It's a purport, Like it will hurt ten percent at

2:00:33.920 --> 2:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars, it will hurt ten percent at one

2:00:35.640 --> 2:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred k. Like it's not that's not going to change.

2:00:38.040 --> 2:00:40.520
<v Speaker 3>And another phrase that we'd always hear in the monastery

2:00:40.600 --> 2:00:42.840
<v Speaker 3>was God doesn't see how much you give, God sees

2:00:42.880 --> 2:00:45.480
<v Speaker 3>how much you hold back. And so that's why I

2:00:45.560 --> 2:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>like your law a lot, because it's that feeling of like, hey,

2:00:48.920 --> 2:00:51.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, at the end of it, I gave it all.

2:00:51.840 --> 2:00:55.240
<v Speaker 3>The book is called one hundred Million Dollar Money Models,

2:00:55.400 --> 2:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>part of the one hundred Million Dollar Series, Alex I

2:00:57.640 --> 2:01:00.200
<v Speaker 3>hope this is the first of many many conversations we

2:01:00.200 --> 2:01:04.360
<v Speaker 3>have online and Offlan truly loved our time together and honestly,

2:01:04.400 --> 2:01:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I've become a bigger fan of spending this time with

2:01:06.160 --> 2:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>you and this This was a masterclass for so many

2:01:08.800 --> 2:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be sending this to a lot of

2:01:10.440 --> 2:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>people I know who need to. There's some podcasts that

2:01:13.400 --> 2:01:15.040
<v Speaker 3>you do and you're just like, yeah, I'm going to

2:01:15.120 --> 2:01:18.720
<v Speaker 3>send this personally to people in my life who I

2:01:18.720 --> 2:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>think this is going to change for us.

2:01:20.000 --> 2:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so much, man, I'm super humbled and

2:01:22.240 --> 2:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>very honored. So thank you so much for having me.

2:01:23.840 --> 2:01:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

2:01:24.120 --> 2:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Man.

2:01:24.560 --> 2:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>If this is the year that you're trying to get creative,

2:01:27.360 --> 2:01:29.920
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to build more, I need you to listen

2:01:29.960 --> 2:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>to this episode with Rick Rubin on how to break

2:01:32.920 --> 2:01:37.080
<v Speaker 3>into your most creative self, how to use unconventional methods

2:01:37.120 --> 2:01:40.960
<v Speaker 3>that lead to success, and the secret to genuinely loving

2:01:41.000 --> 2:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>what you do. If you're trying to find your passion

2:01:43.600 --> 2:01:47.040
<v Speaker 3>and your lane, Rick Rubin's episode is the one for you?

2:01:47.480 --> 2:01:49.839
<v Speaker 3>Just because I like it, that doesn't give it any value,

2:01:50.080 --> 2:01:52.480
<v Speaker 3>like as an artist, if you like it, that's all

2:01:52.520 --> 2:01:56.200
<v Speaker 3>of the value. That's the success comes when you say

2:01:56.520 --> 2:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I like this enough for other people to see it.