1 00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:07,400 Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Surveillance. China has again and again reacted 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:12,280 Speaker 1: to hawkish talk from the FETE by allowing more currency depreciation. 3 00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:15,640 Speaker 1: Cashes a legitimate asset class. It insulates you from the 4 00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 1: clients m capital markets, both bonds and stock. China is 5 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:21,400 Speaker 1: not just a commodity power hies driving commodity prices. It's 6 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 1: a manufacturing power hives and has been putting in manufacturers 7 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:26,439 Speaker 1: all through its supply chains in a Southeast Age or 8 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 1: in East Asia. Bloomberg Surveillance your link to the world 9 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:34,600 Speaker 1: of economics, finance, and investment on Bloomberg Radio. Good morning everyone, 10 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:36,879 Speaker 1: Michael McKee and Tom keene Berry Rid Holts in this 11 00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:40,000 Speaker 1: week coming up, I'm really thrilled to bring you uh 12 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:44,840 Speaker 1: someone who with Paul Wilmot change quantitative finance. Emmanuel Derman 13 00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:46,800 Speaker 1: will join us in this hour. There's gonna be a 14 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:50,120 Speaker 1: geeky physics. Our two hands on the steering wheel for 15 00:00:50,120 --> 00:00:52,920 Speaker 1: those of you driving. If you're at your desk, children 16 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 1: must leave the office as we speak to Derman of Columbia. 17 00:00:57,720 --> 00:01:00,400 Speaker 1: We will do that here in a big David Wilson's 18 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:03,840 Speaker 1: shaking his head, going Tom calm down the four X 19 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,800 Speaker 1: break this morning, but you by Interactive Brokers, winner of 20 00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 1: f X Weeks two thousand fifteen award for the best 21 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:13,000 Speaker 1: Retail for X trading platform visit ib at I b 22 00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:16,920 Speaker 1: k R dot Com slash four x. The last number 23 00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:20,840 Speaker 1: of days, I was going, nothing's happening, nothing sleepy, it's quiet, 24 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 1: cherry yell and changed that yesterday week or dollar d 25 00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:27,400 Speaker 1: X Y that blended index ninet six down to a 26 00:01:27,520 --> 00:01:31,280 Speaker 1: ninety four hand nine point nine nine yen stronger one 27 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:35,440 Speaker 1: nine uh, the euro one thirteen o nine all sorts 28 00:01:35,480 --> 00:01:38,960 Speaker 1: of movement. I mentioned dollar when men be the Chinese, 29 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:44,160 Speaker 1: Uh you want uh strengthening? Uh here substantially off that 30 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 1: move six point four seven seven seven. On currency, we 31 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:51,160 Speaker 1: can talk for an hour in currency. But always interesting 32 00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:53,960 Speaker 1: stuff in the equity markets. David Wilson's what do you 33 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:56,880 Speaker 1: have morning, Tom? I mean we have energy prices U 34 00:01:57,240 --> 00:02:00,680 Speaker 1: up and lots of dollar dynamics right, and ergy stocks 35 00:02:00,720 --> 00:02:03,800 Speaker 1: going along with them. Exxon Mobiles up half a percent 36 00:02:03,800 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 1: in early trading, Chevron and Conical Phillips with one percent 37 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:11,280 Speaker 1: gained so far, Valiant Pharmaceuticals up four percent. The drug 38 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:14,280 Speaker 1: maker asked lenders for an extension to file last year's 39 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:18,519 Speaker 1: results until May thirty one. Now Valiant went into technical 40 00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 1: default on some loans last month after failing to file 41 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:24,640 Speaker 1: by March fifteen, and more defaults may follow if the 42 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:27,799 Speaker 1: company doesn't deliver by April twenty nine, so that they're 43 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:31,320 Speaker 1: looking to get out from under uh that pressure. Lulu 44 00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 1: m Athletic of six percent. The yoga ware maker and 45 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:36,760 Speaker 1: retailer posted fiscal fourth quarter earnings to beat the average, 46 00:02:36,760 --> 00:02:40,280 Speaker 1: anlessestment in the Bloomberg survey. Lulu Lemon benefited from cost 47 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:44,360 Speaker 1: cuts and new products. Op Co Health, though down nine percent. 48 00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 1: The drug maker said another company that manufactured its proposed 49 00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:52,680 Speaker 1: kidney treatment, Royaldi, was cited for deficiencies. Op Co has 50 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,519 Speaker 1: filed for US approval of Royalty and said the production 51 00:02:55,560 --> 00:03:00,520 Speaker 1: issues don't directly affect that drug. Now Variant System down 52 00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:04,560 Speaker 1: fourteen percent. The data analysis software maker report of fiscal 53 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 1: fourth quarter property and revenue that were far below estimates. 54 00:03:07,320 --> 00:03:10,520 Speaker 1: Various forecast for this year showed it expects little or 55 00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:13,680 Speaker 1: no growth in its top and bottom lines. Land Star 56 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 1: System down five percent. The truck and company cut forecast 57 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 1: for first quarter earnings and sales to reflect falling revenue 58 00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:23,120 Speaker 1: per load. The drop amounts to about ten percent from 59 00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:27,320 Speaker 1: a year earlier. At Katia Pharmaceuticals up A US advisory 60 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:30,840 Speaker 1: committee voted to support at katie is proposed treatment for 61 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:35,640 Speaker 1: psychosis associated with Parkinson's disease. All Scripts Healthcare up four percent. 62 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:38,080 Speaker 1: The medical software maker was raised. Equivalent can buy from 63 00:03:38,080 --> 00:03:41,560 Speaker 1: Hold Morgan Stanley Sonic up six and a half percent. 64 00:03:41,640 --> 00:03:44,280 Speaker 1: The drive in restaurant chains earnings and sales for the 65 00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: fiscal second quarter receated projections UH Terraform power well, this 66 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 1: is it. This is the power plant owner created by 67 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,200 Speaker 1: son Edison was cut. The equivalent of news from by 68 00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:59,000 Speaker 1: JP Morrigans and Shares sank fifty five percent yesterday after 69 00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:01,400 Speaker 1: its Terraform glow bull units start up filing that as 70 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:04,520 Speaker 1: Parents faces substantial risk of bankruptcy. And I'll point out 71 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:08,760 Speaker 1: Terraform Global down six Doing a value is what we call. 72 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 1: David Wilson, thank you so much, okay, folks, this is 73 00:04:11,920 --> 00:04:15,520 Speaker 1: a real pleasure. UM I will be direct. Paul Wilmot 74 00:04:15,640 --> 00:04:20,120 Speaker 1: changed the accessibility of quantitative finance, along with a lot 75 00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:23,479 Speaker 1: of other people. Bruno Dapierre, who were honored to say 76 00:04:23,480 --> 00:04:27,080 Speaker 1: works at Bloomberg LP. A guy named Taleb i'd throw 77 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:30,160 Speaker 1: in their kent Osben who had a classic book. And 78 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:34,520 Speaker 1: our next guest, Professor Dermot, Immanuel Dermot, Columbia University. Here's 79 00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:37,080 Speaker 1: what you need to remember. I will remember that I 80 00:04:37,120 --> 00:04:39,640 Speaker 1: didn't make the world, and it doesn't and it doesn't 81 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:43,560 Speaker 1: satisfy my equations. Though I will use models boldly to 82 00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:48,640 Speaker 1: estimate value, I will not be overly impressed by mathematics. 83 00:04:48,880 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 1: And with that we welcome Emmanuel Dermant, professor. Wonderful to 84 00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:55,320 Speaker 1: have you on good morning, Good morning. I'm very glad 85 00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:59,080 Speaker 1: to be a I I look at Modelers of all Markets. 86 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:01,600 Speaker 1: It's a classic. He's on the linkage of physics in 87 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:05,560 Speaker 1: the finance. With great respect, I say, what did you 88 00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:10,359 Speaker 1: learn out of the crisis? The amplitudes that were mis 89 00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,919 Speaker 1: guests that you that you use every day, Now, what's 90 00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:18,919 Speaker 1: the new new for you? Seven years on? That's so 91 00:05:19,080 --> 00:05:21,880 Speaker 1: little has been learned in a way. I mean there 92 00:05:21,960 --> 00:05:24,920 Speaker 1: was a mass of failure, both of them. I think 93 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 1: of government and the FED after the after the crisis. Um, 94 00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: you know, the crisis for me was was characterized by 95 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:36,040 Speaker 1: several things. First of all, that piece you were reading 96 00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:39,600 Speaker 1: that Paul Wilmont and I wrote was called the modelers 97 00:05:39,680 --> 00:05:42,080 Speaker 1: and the financial modelers manifest that we were trying to 98 00:05:42,120 --> 00:05:46,719 Speaker 1: explain to people that social sciences and financial markets are 99 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:50,040 Speaker 1: involved with people and not like physics systems, even though 100 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:53,600 Speaker 1: the mathematics is similar, and people have to remember that, um, 101 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:56,400 Speaker 1: that other people don't satisfy equations, even though you may 102 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:58,680 Speaker 1: try to use equations to model them. In the end, 103 00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:02,120 Speaker 1: that's not the way they work. So um, that was 104 00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:04,279 Speaker 1: a good lesson, one that I actually learned ten years 105 00:06:04,279 --> 00:06:06,760 Speaker 1: before that, and nothing Paul Wood learned before that too. 106 00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:10,080 Speaker 1: But for me, the crisis has been so disappointing because 107 00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:15,480 Speaker 1: I'm we're sort of back in the same situation within 108 00:06:15,560 --> 00:06:18,040 Speaker 1: this is debate, and I want to stay away folks 109 00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:21,960 Speaker 1: from the mathiness and cross moments and blinding physics debates. 110 00:06:23,160 --> 00:06:25,960 Speaker 1: Token geek No, well, no, that rid Holes, very rid 111 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:28,200 Speaker 1: Holes is here so he can be the token geek. 112 00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:31,839 Speaker 1: Are we have? We moved on from the simplicity of 113 00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:35,839 Speaker 1: the Gaussian or Bell curve distribution. It has been the 114 00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:40,400 Speaker 1: convenient model, going back to Fisher Black, even back to 115 00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:45,160 Speaker 1: bas Uh to mental block. But we've been doing the 116 00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:49,000 Speaker 1: Bell curve for years and we moved beyond the certitude 117 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:54,560 Speaker 1: of that distribution. Yes, I think we have um The 118 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:58,760 Speaker 1: trouble is there's nothing that replaces it was. What was 119 00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:01,520 Speaker 1: nice about the belt of was that it's a very 120 00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 1: beautiful description of near what people call neoclassical finance, and 121 00:07:06,240 --> 00:07:08,080 Speaker 1: it would be great if the world worked that way. 122 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,640 Speaker 1: It would be a beautiful system. But the world doesn't 123 00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:14,080 Speaker 1: work that way, and we've I think everybody knows that 124 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 1: the world doesn't work that way, but never really knows 125 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:19,840 Speaker 1: what to replace it with. Professor tell Him has some 126 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:24,120 Speaker 1: arguments about using fat tail distributions, but I think the 127 00:07:24,160 --> 00:07:27,640 Speaker 1: truth is people don't satisfy such simple there's no simple 128 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:30,000 Speaker 1: model to replace it. So people have a hard time 129 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 1: mathematically with that. So when we're looking at models that 130 00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:39,840 Speaker 1: either depict the economy or an investment portfolio or any 131 00:07:39,880 --> 00:07:44,480 Speaker 1: specific asset class, how important is it for us not 132 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 1: to start out with assumptions that ultimately end up being disproven. Yes, 133 00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 1: it's incredibly important all of those assumptions. A lot of 134 00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:59,400 Speaker 1: the models that the models that people make work for 135 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:01,920 Speaker 1: a short time in a short regime when the markets 136 00:08:01,960 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 1: in a certain state, but as soon as things change, 137 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 1: it's driven by people. Obviously, that's almost the toutology, and 138 00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 1: then all bets are off and there isn't some I mean, 139 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:16,520 Speaker 1: part of what we were saying that exerved you read 140 00:08:16,680 --> 00:08:20,480 Speaker 1: was that there isn't a mathematics that describes people accurately, 141 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:22,520 Speaker 1: and so you can't take solace in that. You have 142 00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 1: to keep thinking, you have to stay aware. It's a 143 00:08:25,560 --> 00:08:28,360 Speaker 1: sort of human wish to find a formula that will 144 00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:30,640 Speaker 1: explain the market or explain what it's going to do, 145 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 1: but there isn't one, is my belief. Well, we certainly 146 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:37,920 Speaker 1: can do worse than thinking about just basic mean reversion 147 00:08:38,520 --> 00:08:42,200 Speaker 1: as a way to think about different asset classes and 148 00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:50,120 Speaker 1: whether stocks, for example, are expensive or or inexpensive. Yes, 149 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:53,360 Speaker 1: that's that's um. I think I think the right way 150 00:08:53,400 --> 00:08:54,800 Speaker 1: I agree with you, and I think the right way 151 00:08:54,840 --> 00:08:58,679 Speaker 1: to behave is is to use a mix of qualitative 152 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:03,000 Speaker 1: and quantitative, not to be sort of blindingly quantitative. But 153 00:09:03,160 --> 00:09:04,680 Speaker 1: I don't think there's any I don't think there are 154 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:07,000 Speaker 1: any permanent rules you look at the risk parity people. 155 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:08,920 Speaker 1: I don't know if you're if your readers or your 156 00:09:08,960 --> 00:09:11,520 Speaker 1: listeners are familiar with rosparity. But that worked for a 157 00:09:11,559 --> 00:09:16,040 Speaker 1: long time. But that's not a solution either. Things. The 158 00:09:16,160 --> 00:09:19,160 Speaker 1: rule has change all the time within this and kent 159 00:09:19,360 --> 00:09:22,520 Speaker 1: osbin Folks has a fabulous book called Iceberg Risk. It 160 00:09:22,559 --> 00:09:25,320 Speaker 1: opens with two statisticians out at the tip of the 161 00:09:25,360 --> 00:09:30,400 Speaker 1: Titanic doing the Leonardo DiCaprio Kate Winslet act and the 162 00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:34,840 Speaker 1: Iceberg gets to cut to the chase. But Emmanuel Derman 163 00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:41,240 Speaker 1: the whole idea of binomial or conventional mathematics versus not 164 00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:43,320 Speaker 1: a chaos. I don't want to go to cast theory, 165 00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:47,080 Speaker 1: but a more disjoint mathematics. Which is right or do 166 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 1: we have to learn to use both? I think you 167 00:09:50,200 --> 00:09:52,520 Speaker 1: have to be I think you have to be disjoint. 168 00:09:52,559 --> 00:09:55,239 Speaker 1: I used to like to say, you know, quoting mau 169 00:09:55,600 --> 00:10:00,720 Speaker 1: Little thousand models bloom you know, or perverting mau Um 170 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:03,560 Speaker 1: you have to do. It's good to think about as 171 00:10:03,559 --> 00:10:05,960 Speaker 1: many different models as you can that are consistent with 172 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,199 Speaker 1: what you know, but have different futures, and be skeptical 173 00:10:09,200 --> 00:10:11,600 Speaker 1: of them all, but try to see which one works 174 00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:14,640 Speaker 1: best for now. So you know, prices over earnings models 175 00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:19,920 Speaker 1: or more complicated, you know, neoclassical binomial models. They all 176 00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:23,160 Speaker 1: have their fifteen minutes of fame, but they don't last forever. 177 00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:25,560 Speaker 1: We have fifteen minutes with you, which is a good thing. 178 00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 1: Emmanuel Derman, please stay with us. Will continue with Professor 179 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:31,719 Speaker 1: Derman of Columbia University his book of course, My Life 180 00:10:31,800 --> 00:10:35,600 Speaker 1: is a quant reflections on physics and finance. Coming back, 181 00:10:35,640 --> 00:10:38,480 Speaker 1: we'll talk to new Tonian mechanics Barry. I will not 182 00:10:38,679 --> 00:10:42,160 Speaker 1: mention s equals VOT plus one f GT squared. We're 183 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 1: not going there. We're not doing acceleration. Just did we 184 00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:51,840 Speaker 1: just did right? Futures up eleven and now for the 185 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:55,080 Speaker 1: news Quatch free in New York. Here's Michael barn Thank 186 00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:57,440 Speaker 1: you very much, Tom Barry. The US is trying to 187 00:10:57,480 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 1: ease the concerns of its allies in Eastern Europe over 188 00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:03,719 Speaker 1: any increasingly aggressive Russia. Depending On announced today that it 189 00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:07,240 Speaker 1: will deploy an armored brigade combat team to Eastern Europe 190 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:10,199 Speaker 1: along with a full set of equipment. There are about 191 00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:14,840 Speaker 1: soldiers in an armored brigade, along with dozens of heavy vehicles, tanks, 192 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:18,320 Speaker 1: and other equipment. Donald Trump is defending his campaign manager, 193 00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:21,440 Speaker 1: who has been charged with simple battery after an incident 194 00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:25,560 Speaker 1: involving a female reporter. Trump says that campaign manager Curry 195 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 1: Lewandowski was just protecting him. It is a major blow 196 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:33,319 Speaker 1: to Brazilian President Dilma Roussef, the country's biggest political party, 197 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:37,080 Speaker 1: the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party, has left the governing coalition. 198 00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:40,320 Speaker 1: Russef has lost her key ally, just weeks before she 199 00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:43,959 Speaker 1: faces an impeachment vote in Congress. Global News twenty four 200 00:11:43,960 --> 00:11:46,800 Speaker 1: hours a day, powered by our twenty four in journalists. 201 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:50,120 Speaker 1: I'm Michael Barr, Tom and Michael Thinks. So what's coming up? 202 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:54,120 Speaker 1: We're going to talk about an interesting word within our investment. 203 00:11:54,120 --> 00:11:57,880 Speaker 1: Whether you're a sophisticate or not, the pain trade is 204 00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:01,439 Speaker 1: sometimes painful. With a manual Derman of Columbia. This is 205 00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:07,520 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveillance worldwide, counting down to the opening built brought 206 00:12:07,520 --> 00:12:09,280 Speaker 1: to you by the Jeep, the Grand Cherokee, the most 207 00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:12,719 Speaker 1: awarded suv ever. The Grand Cherokee continues to raise the 208 00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:16,320 Speaker 1: bar with its luxurious interior, legendary four by four capability. 209 00:12:16,600 --> 00:12:23,280 Speaker 1: Trible it at your local jeep dealer Today, Global Business 210 00:12:23,280 --> 00:12:26,280 Speaker 1: News twenty four hours a day at Bloomberg dot Com, 211 00:12:26,480 --> 00:12:29,360 Speaker 1: the Radio plus Mobile Act and on your radio. This 212 00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:33,000 Speaker 1: is a Bloomberg Business Flash and I'm Karen Moscow, the 213 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:35,959 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Futures Report brought to you by Interactive Brokers and 214 00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:38,880 Speaker 1: CIMI Group. If you're looking for global futures contracts at 215 00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:42,040 Speaker 1: low trading costs, look no further. Interactive Brokers as the 216 00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:45,280 Speaker 1: industry leader. Learn more at Interactive Brokers dot com, slash, 217 00:12:45,360 --> 00:12:48,840 Speaker 1: c m E Group US dot Indix Future is higher 218 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:51,440 Speaker 1: amid optimism, interest rates will rise at a slow pace. 219 00:12:51,960 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 1: Snp E mini futures are up eleven points, DOWI mini 220 00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:58,240 Speaker 1: futures up one hundred nine, and now's documented futures up 221 00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:00,400 Speaker 1: twenty eight. The acts in Germany's up one point eight 222 00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:03,439 Speaker 1: percent ten, Your treasury down six thirty seconds, the at 223 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:06,160 Speaker 1: one two percent. Nine X screw oil up two point 224 00:13:06,200 --> 00:13:08,080 Speaker 1: two per cent, or eighty two cents to thirty nine 225 00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:10,640 Speaker 1: O nine. A barrel COMEX gold is down two tenths 226 00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 1: per cent or two dollars fifty cents at twelve thirty 227 00:13:12,960 --> 00:13:15,400 Speaker 1: five an ounce. The euro and dollar thirteen O eight. 228 00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:18,840 Speaker 1: The end one twelve point six five. US Treasury Secretary 229 00:13:18,960 --> 00:13:22,440 Speaker 1: Jack lou is speaking in Washington this morning right now, 230 00:13:22,520 --> 00:13:26,360 Speaker 1: actually saying on justified sanctions may hurt business in the US, 231 00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:29,480 Speaker 1: and that's a bloomberg business flash. Tom and Barry Karen, 232 00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:33,320 Speaker 1: thank you so much, greatly appreciated. Bloomberg Surveillance, Berry, Ridholtz 233 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 1: and Tom Keane with the Sammanuel Derman of Columbia University 234 00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 1: re having a spirited discussion on humility and quantitative finance, folks. 235 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:46,760 Speaker 1: One of the great entry books on this for those 236 00:13:46,800 --> 00:13:50,080 Speaker 1: of you that don't know the Newtonian mechanics that gets 237 00:13:50,160 --> 00:13:55,040 Speaker 1: you to the conversation is Frequently Asked Questions in Quantitative 238 00:13:55,080 --> 00:14:00,360 Speaker 1: Finance by Paul Wilmot. It is short, sweet, beautifully clear, 239 00:14:00,920 --> 00:14:05,319 Speaker 1: page by page, frequently ask questions and quantitative funance. It 240 00:14:05,400 --> 00:14:08,680 Speaker 1: also happens to be a fun book as well. Emmanuel Dermott, 241 00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:11,000 Speaker 1: I want to talk about what we learned from failure 242 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:15,000 Speaker 1: not seem to Leb wrote the brilliant Anti Fragile about 243 00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 1: learning from our disorder, learning from when things break, how 244 00:14:19,240 --> 00:14:22,560 Speaker 1: to move on and do better. Explain to us from 245 00:14:22,600 --> 00:14:26,960 Speaker 1: the Emmanuel Derman world, how we get wiser from our 246 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:34,120 Speaker 1: quantitative mistakes. You know how sort of take us off 247 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:35,640 Speaker 1: to a point of view to it, and that is 248 00:14:35,720 --> 00:14:40,240 Speaker 1: that people are people are. Nutrition and finance are kind 249 00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:42,600 Speaker 1: of very simple and are very similar, and that people 250 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 1: are always looking for some little bit of data that 251 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:49,120 Speaker 1: they can use to predict the future. So for yours, 252 00:14:49,320 --> 00:14:52,640 Speaker 1: if you look at nutrition, um, people thought you needed 253 00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:54,680 Speaker 1: a lower amount of vitamin D, and then I think 254 00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:57,600 Speaker 1: you need the U s D. A keeps changing the 255 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:02,400 Speaker 1: bitimum recommended requirements or vitamins and for various kinds of food, 256 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:05,360 Speaker 1: and ten years later they change everything. And that's because 257 00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 1: people have the terrible need, which is understandable, to be 258 00:15:08,000 --> 00:15:10,760 Speaker 1: told what to do when there isn't always a clear answer. 259 00:15:10,880 --> 00:15:14,600 Speaker 1: And I think finance is very similar. People glom onto 260 00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 1: some kind of quantitative model and they use it for 261 00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:19,640 Speaker 1: a while. You see this a lot in statistical arbitragety. 262 00:15:19,680 --> 00:15:21,440 Speaker 1: It may work for a while, but then it fails. 263 00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:24,800 Speaker 1: And I think the lesson is kind of a philosophical 264 00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:27,400 Speaker 1: one that you sort of shouldn't be an idolator. An 265 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:29,440 Speaker 1: idolator in the sense that you think you can make 266 00:15:29,480 --> 00:15:33,480 Speaker 1: an image of society, of human the human mind with 267 00:15:33,680 --> 00:15:36,040 Speaker 1: a formula or a prescription, and that it's always going 268 00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:42,840 Speaker 1: to work. So given that constantly skeptical, constantly skeptical, constantly 269 00:15:42,880 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 1: trying out new models, but don't don't make the transision 270 00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:49,560 Speaker 1: into hubris where you think you found the permanent solution. 271 00:15:50,080 --> 00:15:53,520 Speaker 1: So so, given that, does that mean investors have to 272 00:15:53,800 --> 00:15:59,040 Speaker 1: constantly be rethinking their philosophy in light of how humans 273 00:15:59,200 --> 00:16:02,120 Speaker 1: behave and miss behave in the market or can we 274 00:16:02,280 --> 00:16:06,160 Speaker 1: come up with the belief system that recognizes both the 275 00:16:06,280 --> 00:16:10,120 Speaker 1: math half and the psychology half of what takes place 276 00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:14,800 Speaker 1: in capital markets? Yeah, I think that psychology is dominant 277 00:16:14,920 --> 00:16:17,600 Speaker 1: and the math is an attempt to describe the psychology 278 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:23,200 Speaker 1: and to formalize it in mathematical terms. And there isn't 279 00:16:23,240 --> 00:16:26,120 Speaker 1: going to be a permanent answer because when when regimes 280 00:16:26,160 --> 00:16:29,720 Speaker 1: in the market change, things change. And um, I look 281 00:16:29,720 --> 00:16:33,080 Speaker 1: a lot of option pricing and the nature of options 282 00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:35,480 Speaker 1: on for example, on the S and P changed after 283 00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:37,880 Speaker 1: the seven crash, and it's never been the same sense. 284 00:16:37,920 --> 00:16:42,000 Speaker 1: I'm writing a book called the Volatility Smile excuse me, 285 00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:45,320 Speaker 1: which is all about that phenomenon. And then gold similar 286 00:16:45,400 --> 00:16:48,200 Speaker 1: the options on gold suddenly changed in the late nineties 287 00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: when the Swiss Central Bank did something different. And so yeah, 288 00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:55,240 Speaker 1: you've got to constantly understand how people psychology is changing 289 00:16:55,280 --> 00:16:57,800 Speaker 1: and then use the relevant math for a while. The 290 00:16:57,920 --> 00:17:02,000 Speaker 1: relevant math has an anchor. It may be a philosophical 291 00:17:02,080 --> 00:17:04,760 Speaker 1: anchor which is too deep for our radio. We wouldn't 292 00:17:04,800 --> 00:17:06,760 Speaker 1: even do that on TV. I mean, that's something you do. 293 00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:10,680 Speaker 1: You know with that fancy bookstore by Columbia Universities around 294 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:13,160 Speaker 1: having a cup of coffee. It is a great bookstore, 295 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:15,639 Speaker 1: and I think it's a hundred and twelve street. Uh uh, 296 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:20,760 Speaker 1: Professor Dermot. Everybody wants to know where Bill Sharp's risk 297 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:25,359 Speaker 1: free rate is. Every sophisticated global Wall Street or listening worldwide. 298 00:17:25,840 --> 00:17:30,280 Speaker 1: Those less sophisticated, they foundationally know there's a thing called 299 00:17:30,320 --> 00:17:32,600 Speaker 1: the risk free rate? Do you know where it is 300 00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:35,520 Speaker 1: right now? Or have we so distorted the system We 301 00:17:35,600 --> 00:17:39,200 Speaker 1: don't have a clue where our anchor is a little 302 00:17:39,240 --> 00:17:41,159 Speaker 1: bit on the side of what you just said that 303 00:17:41,320 --> 00:17:45,439 Speaker 1: I'm as distorted the system totally. The risk free rate 304 00:17:45,560 --> 00:17:48,560 Speaker 1: is low because some people are very risk averse, but 305 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:52,359 Speaker 1: it's being set by the Fed in some very artificial 306 00:17:52,440 --> 00:17:55,240 Speaker 1: way that we've all gotten used to. And um um, 307 00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:58,200 Speaker 1: I think nobody really knows is it negative? Is it 308 00:17:58,600 --> 00:18:02,080 Speaker 1: going to get more negative? It's become It's it's very 309 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:04,440 Speaker 1: strange for me. I mean, interest rates on the price 310 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:09,360 Speaker 1: of money, and we're always against manipulating, manipulating the price 311 00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:11,320 Speaker 1: of things, and yet we all live with the fit 312 00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:15,600 Speaker 1: manipulating the price of money. That is the standard background. 313 00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:19,760 Speaker 1: There's always going to be some force out there impacting 314 00:18:19,840 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 1: what takes place in the market. It's our job to 315 00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:27,240 Speaker 1: figure out how to navigate those waters, isn't it. Yes? 316 00:18:27,440 --> 00:18:29,879 Speaker 1: And these days, for the last five years, it's all 317 00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:33,359 Speaker 1: a risk on risk off situation where people either punge 318 00:18:33,440 --> 00:18:35,399 Speaker 1: in and think everything is going to be good because 319 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:39,119 Speaker 1: the fit is in is doing something good, or um 320 00:18:39,560 --> 00:18:42,520 Speaker 1: risk off and everything's in trouble. Did you have a 321 00:18:42,640 --> 00:18:46,040 Speaker 1: cue full and as or slide rule? Excuse me? Did 322 00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:48,840 Speaker 1: you have a slide role when you were in school? Oh? Yes, 323 00:18:49,280 --> 00:18:51,640 Speaker 1: once treated a picture of one a few years ago. Yeah, 324 00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:54,200 Speaker 1: I've got this old fabric castell slide rule from the 325 00:18:54,320 --> 00:18:57,680 Speaker 1: seventies of the sixties. Am I right? In that we 326 00:18:57,760 --> 00:19:01,840 Speaker 1: sort of lost something without the physical feeling of logarithms 327 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:04,800 Speaker 1: off a slide rule versus everybody today. All your kids 328 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:08,360 Speaker 1: at school today are all wis bang. You know, that's 329 00:19:08,400 --> 00:19:10,240 Speaker 1: a that's a I never thought of that, but that's 330 00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:14,960 Speaker 1: a that's a great, great insight in that calculation used 331 00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:17,560 Speaker 1: to be a physical thing with the slide rule. Yeah, well, 332 00:19:17,600 --> 00:19:20,520 Speaker 1: you used to look up logarithmic tables before that. Exactly 333 00:19:20,560 --> 00:19:23,040 Speaker 1: high school, Yeah, exactly. I mean this has been wonderful. 334 00:19:23,080 --> 00:19:25,480 Speaker 1: Emmanuel Dermot. I hope we can do this again. He 335 00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 1: is a Columbia University, which barely describes his contribution to 336 00:19:30,359 --> 00:19:34,119 Speaker 1: the underpinnings of finance. Things branted every day, ran the 337 00:19:34,280 --> 00:19:38,960 Speaker 1: infamous quantitative Strategies group at Dolman SATs yes, and had 338 00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:42,399 Speaker 1: a number of other um efforts, of course, out of 339 00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:45,359 Speaker 1: the University of Cape Town originally, and of course his 340 00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:50,119 Speaker 1: truly his Columbia University. It's a very Columbia university. It is. 341 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:52,320 Speaker 1: Let me do a shameless plug for the masters in 342 00:19:52,400 --> 00:19:56,760 Speaker 1: business we did with him. It was phenomenal. Quantz still 343 00:19:56,840 --> 00:19:59,280 Speaker 1: up on iTunes, Still up on iTunes. Emmanuel Derman was 344 00:19:59,359 --> 00:20:06,159 Speaker 1: very Ridles and Tom Key. This is Bloomberg's surveillance. Counting 345 00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:07,600 Speaker 1: down to the opening ball, brought to you by the 346 00:20:07,680 --> 00:20:10,080 Speaker 1: Jeep Grand Cherokee, the most awarded asked you, the ever 347 00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:13,960 Speaker 1: Grand Cherokee continues to raise the bar with its luxurious interior, 348 00:20:14,080 --> 00:20:17,399 Speaker 1: legendary four by four capability. Drive on at your local 349 00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:18,600 Speaker 1: jeep dealer today,