WEBVTT - Climate and the Economy

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast count US Saturdays

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at one and seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Amy Morris, and this week

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 2>we are taking a look at the cost of climate

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 2>change and how it's created some volatility with what is

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>traditionally the safest of stocks. We'll also look at how

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuels are having a heartbreaking impact all the weight

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to the South Pole. But first we begin with the

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>economic cost of an increasingly warmer planet. Natural disasters like

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>deadly hurricanes and wildfires from Canada to Louisiana are tragic

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>in terms of lives lost. Louisiana Governor John Bell Edwards.

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Nobody alive in Louisiana has ever seen these conditions. It's

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 3>never been this hot, this dry, for this long.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>That is not to say we should dismiss the economic damage,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 2>which is often substantial. FEMA Administrator Diane Criswell says the

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Disaster Relief Fund can cover the wildfire disasters in Maui, Louisiana,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and the hurricane damage in Florida.

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>For now, if we continue to see more storms, we're

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>going to continuously monitor very closely the health of the

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>disaster Relief Fund to determine what more may be needed.

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>But right now, as situation stands, the supplemental request will

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>get us through the end of this fisical year.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about this with Bloomberg opinion columns Claudias som Now.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Claudia is the founder of Some Consulting and a former

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve economist. She joins me, Now, Claudia, your column

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg terminal minces no words. You actually call

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>heat the silent killer. What do you mean by that?

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>We can see on the news when there's a hurricane,

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 4>a tornado, like it's very apparent heat is another extreme

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Heat is another natural disaster another way, and yet we don't,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we don't see it, Like there's nothing on

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 4>the news where you can say, oh, there's you know,

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 4>ninety degree weather. Now this summer there was more. I mean,

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 4>this was a really hot summer. So that's what they

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 4>mean by a silent killer. You don't necessarily see it coming.

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Right because normally when we think of natural disasters, we

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>think of the hurricanes, the wildfires, the storms, the flooding.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 2>We don't usually think of triple digit temperatures m hmm.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 4>And people do suffer from them and it's hard to

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 4>get your work done. I mean, that's what the post

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 4>is talking a lot about what it means for work

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 4>and productivity in addition to the human costs like the

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 4>silent killer.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into that. How higher temperatures are actually

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>impact in the economy. And the obvious answer, of course,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>is there's a lot of damage done by the wildfires

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and the hurricanes and the flooding. But you actually dig deeper,

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 2>getting into the labor sector. Tell us about that, right well.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 4>And one reason to do this is I want to

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 4>underscore the economic impacts the damage done are not just

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 4>where the damage is done, right, So it's not just

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 4>the rebuilding. It affects all of us because it makes

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 4>workers less productive. It may, for example, farm workers that

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 4>are trying to bring in the crops like they it's

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 4>very difficult for them to do it. They have to

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 4>shift the hours when they do it. Well, that shows

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 4>up in our prices. They're higher, maybe there's less veture.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 4>So it's not just where the natural disaster happens, that

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 4>the economic damages, it's all of us. It's spread all

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 4>and again we don't see that. But that's a really

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 4>important and that's what I wanted to say, is the

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>economic cost of these disasters. We experience them too, right,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 4>they're everywhere. And again it's because in the same amount

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 4>of time, when it's really hot, workers just they can't

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 4>get as much done, or it's just or they can't

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 4>do anything right because it is just too hot.

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking beyond the localized impact that you might

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>see work folks who are like construction workers, let's say

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 2>in Houston, unable to finish their day because it was

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>dangerously hot, so they had to cut off early, or

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>they had to modify their workday or what have you.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.679
<v Speaker 2>That somehow from Houston will impact folks elsewhere beyond Houston,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>beyond Texas.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Well. It adds to a housing crisis, so it pushes

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 4>up the housing prices, maybe fewer people move there. And

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 4>they say in other areas, I mean it's you know,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 4>for some industries, it's maybe harder to tell the story

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 4>of labor productivity, but it's there. Again, we can't see it,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 4>and productivity is so important for not just economic growth,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 4>but that's really what we think of as the engine

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>of our prosperity. Right, and if the extreme weather events

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 4>are cutting into that, they are already cutting into that,

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 4>let alone the fact that with climate change they will

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 4>get worse.

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to get into that. I want to also

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>look at some of the other sectors that might be

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 2>struggling with this more than others. We've we've already mentioned agriculture.

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>What else is out there along with because agriculture is

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 2>really the most obvious one.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, and it actually is one of these smaller

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 4>groups of workers, Like they're very affected, but agriculture workers

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 4>are not a huge part of the labor force, right,

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 4>and so, but there are other industries in heat exposed industries,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 4>and in fact, if you add them all up, they're

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 4>about twenty percent of the workforce.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 4>So these and other examples would be communication, if you're

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 4>out there putting up the telephone polls, you know, working outside.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Transportation is another one which makes sense, and in fact,

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 4>in the new union contract that UPS negotiated, part of

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 4>their deal was air conditioners in the trucks.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, That's that's exactly you at all that they know.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 4>Because this is part I mean human comfort, right, like

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 4>you're driving around a ninety degree weather, and yet that's

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 4>exactly an example of I mean, it was making them

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 4>hard and miserable to do their jobs. So an air conditioner,

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 4>well that has environmental effect like air conditioning, is not

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 4>always the solution. But that was an example to me

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 4>of AHA that they are trying to and will raise

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 4>that productivity, right, because that's an example of a heat

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 4>exposed sector. So those are communication, transportation, those are some

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 4>of the construction, like you mentioned, those are some of

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 4>the bigger industries that are heat exposed.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And we are talking with Bloomberg opinion columnists Claudius Slam

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>about how the heat is already showing up as a

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>drag on economic productivity. Let's talk about the other demographics.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Does it matter what your income is, Does it matter

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 2>where you live?

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely another aspect of heat exposure, So it's not just

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 4>when you're at work. There are there are real disparities

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 4>in who is exposed, in where they live, the neighborhoods

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 4>they're in. There was one study that estimated that in Washington,

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 4>d C. There can be a seventeen degree difference across

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 4>the city in terms of how hot it is, right,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.239
<v Speaker 4>And that's I mean, that's enormous. And where that comes

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 4>from is that that some areas of the city, particularly

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 4>lower income areas of the city, are what are called

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 4>heat islands. So the way the buildings are built, there's

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 4>not a lot of trees there is, so there's not

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 4>a way to you know, kind of absorb the energy.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 4>The heat it like bounces off and it's all in

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 4>the neighborhood where in more affluent parts neighborhoods, there are

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 4>more trees, there are solar like there are ways that

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 4>really blunt the effect of the heat. Now it's hot

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 4>there too, But again and by income, these huge differences

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 4>in heat obviously mean that when it's hot outside, it's

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 4>going to be even hotter in areas with low income.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 4>And these are areas they often don't have air conditioning,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 4>they don't have a way to really protect themselves from

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 4>adverse effects of the heat.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Like areas neighborhoods that may have more lawns, more shrubbery,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>more trees, are going to definitely see a difference in

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>temperature than areas that are all asphalt and concrete.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Right exactly, does.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 2>This also impact more social programs like education.

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Howso right, these are some of these studies are I

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 4>think some of the most depressing. I mean, we're not

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 4>just hurting labor productivity now, I mean workers' ability to

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.599
<v Speaker 4>do their jobs. Now, we are undercutting the productivity the

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 4>ability to work and be prosperous of future generations. So

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 4>there is study that shows in schools when it is

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 4>hotter in the school, students' educational outcomes are worse. So

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 4>and they measure this with you know, p s AT scores,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 4>SAT scores, So that's and and then in schools where

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 4>it's cooler or they have air conditioning or you don't,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 4>you don't see these effects. So I mean it makes

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 4>sense if you're in a hot, sticky room, being able

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 4>to concentrate and do your work is difficult. Again, this

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 4>is one where you see racial income disparities. And and

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 4>again this is showing we're we're affecting the next generation

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 4>like right now.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 2>So I want to end this on at least a

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:46.119
<v Speaker 2>hopeful note if there is one, because it is depressing

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's not going away, this isn't changing. Is there

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a solution? What do we do?

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Big picture, the solution is you know, dealing with the

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 4>rising heat, right, and these are these are problems that

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, national level. You know, we have part of

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 4>the Inflation Reduction Act was to have a climate change policy,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 4>and those kind of policies have to be at the

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 4>national level and frankly at the global levels. Right. So

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 4>a real fix to this is big picture. There are

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 4>areas of the country that have tried to put ordinances

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 4>in place, plant more trees, various things to deal with

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 4>the higher temper Like Phoenix is the hottest, hottest city

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 4>in the country. They can't lower the temperatures, but they

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 4>can take steps that will help the workers.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion columnists Claudia Som. Claudia is the founder of

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Some Consulting and a former Federal Reserve economist. She's also

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 2>the creator of the Psalm rule, which is a recession indicator.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, we're going to continue this conversation from

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 2>a different point of view, how climate change is actually

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 2>upending traditionally dependable utility stocks. That's just ahead. You're listening

0:10:58.920 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg Opinion.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast. Catch us Saturdays

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>at one and seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Amy Morris. Let's continue

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the discussion about climate change and its economic impact. Now

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about the cost of labor and the impact

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>on agriculture, construction, manufacturing, even education and other heat exposed jobs.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Now we're going to look at utilities. You know about

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 2>lawsuits against Hawaii Electric after the wildfires in Maui and

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>in Texas where a heat dome for much of the

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>summer baked the state with triple digit temperatures, the power

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 2>grid has been under considerable strain. Tom Overbye is with

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the Smart Grid Center.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.239
<v Speaker 7>We have eight urban search and Rescue team teams staged

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 7>ready to go, thirty three ambulance strike teams, fifty five

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 7>hundred National guardsmen. We also have the Coastguard on standby

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.239
<v Speaker 7>should that be necessary.

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk now with Liam Denning, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 2>who covers energy and commodities. Liam, thank you for taking

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the time with us. The conventional wisdom has been for

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 2>decades that utilities are the safe bet On Wall Street.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Climate change seems to be upending that bring us up

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 2>to speed.

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 8>Well. The short story on that is that they were

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 8>always seen as safe stocks because you know, if you

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:41.239
<v Speaker 8>think about what utilities do, they build and maintain essential

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 8>infrastructure for a service that none of us can can

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 8>do without. The reason they're peculiarly exposed to climate change

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 8>is for the same reason their infrastructure, particularly in certain

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 8>parts of the country, is very exposed to the sorts

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 8>of natural disasters that are likely to become frequent and

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 8>more intense less predictable due to climate change, And as

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 8>we've seen in the recent case with Hawaiian Electric, they

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 8>can also find themselves blamed for those natural disasters, particularly wildfires,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 8>where power lines get implicated in sparking them.

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Is there a possibility that it could forgive the terminology,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 2>but that it could somehow also help.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 8>It can up to a point if climate change demands

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 8>that you strengthen the grid hard on it, maybe you know,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 8>do something like burying power lines in the ground in

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 8>order to avoid wildfire risks, that sort of thing, then

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 8>the utility will make a return on that investment. Where,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 8>of course it can go too far. Is that if

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 8>you have a huge natural disaster that leads to extensive damage,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 8>leads to fatality and the resulting lawsuits from victims, then

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 8>obviously the utility can be confronted with costs but simply

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 8>overwhelm it. We saw this, you know, most famously with

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 8>PG and E in northern California in the wildfire that

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 8>happened there in twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen.

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Are we seeing more of that impact lately? And you've

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>cited two examples, Maui and northern California, both of them

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 2>with wildfire being the natural disaster. Are we seeing more

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>of it lately? Are you expecting to see more of

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>it lately?

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 8>We've seen similar cases. We've seen We've seen a case

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 8>involving Pacific Corp. Which is part of Berkshire Hathaway, relating

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 8>to a fire in Oregon, and also Excel, which is

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 8>a utility operating in Colorado. I think it's fair to

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 8>say that, based on the track record of the last

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 8>the five or so years, if you are a utility

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 8>in a mountainous territory in the western US, in particular

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 8>the drier parts of the US, then your risk of

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 8>wildfire is elevated but those aren't the only places where

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 8>you know climate change is likely to lead to more

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 8>intense disasters. I mean, Florida obviously is no stranger to hurricanes,

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 8>but those hurricanes are likely to get more intense over time.

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 8>We've seen extreme weather events in Texas that took down

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 8>the grid in early twenty nineteen. So my feeling would

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 8>be that as climate change leads to less predictable and

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 8>more intense weather impacts, that will have a disproportionate effect

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 8>on infrastructure, particularly power grid infrastructure that was built for

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 8>a different time. Remember most of our power grid built

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 8>during the twentieth century. It's built at a time when

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 8>we sure we had natural disasters, but we didn't really

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 8>contemplate what something like climate change might portend.

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And we are talking with Bloomberg opinion columnist Liam Denning

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>about the impact of climate change on what you know,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 2>conventional wisdom would call more stable stocks like utilities, But

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that's all changing now. Liam. You mentioned that this is

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 2>bound to keep just getting worse, with more natural disasters,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 2>more wildfires. Can green grids help with this? The push

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 2>towards smart grids green grids are they helping?

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 8>You know? The long term mitigation effort against climate change

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 8>is obviously decarbonization, so that involves using a lot more

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 8>renewable energy, electrifying a lot more of our industrial and

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 8>transportation processes over time. It's you know, that's kind of

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 8>think of that as kind of your long term insurance

0:16:54.400 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 8>plan against climate change getting much worse. In terms of

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 8>more immediate fixes, distributed energy can can help I E.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 8>Use of things like micro grids, uh, you know, home

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 8>and business cited energy systems can help you. You know,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 8>in the event that the grid goes down, you'll you'll

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 8>be able to potentially supply your own power for a bit.

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 8>Of course, a lot of those systems remain more expensive

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 8>relative to the grid, but over time you may find

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 8>communities paying that extra premium if they feel that they're

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 8>exposed to the natural disasters that might take down their

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 8>their local their local grid. To think of it as

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 8>an insurance premium.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 2>How does this impact customers versus the companies?

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, ultimately all of this cost comes back to

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 8>the customers. You know. One thing you need to think

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 8>about with regards to utilities is, you know, say you

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 8>have a utility that is found absolutely liable for a

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 8>major wildfire disaster, is confronted with a mass and bill

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 8>that would force it, you know, to go into bankruptcy,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 8>as PGNE did. Now with a normal business, what happens

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 8>is you go into bankruptcy. Generally the equity and a

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 8>lot of the debt gets wiped out. The company emerges

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 8>with a clean balance sheet, and it carries on utilities.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 8>The problem with the utilities is once you get through

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 8>the initial shock and aftermath of a wildfire or other

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 8>natural disaster, you still need to keep the lights on,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 8>which means you still need a functioning utility. The state

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 8>has an interest in making sure that maybe equity holders

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 8>and especially debt holders don't get wiped out, because once

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 8>you're through that period, that company still needs to go

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 8>back to capital markets. And so with PGNE, you had

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 8>a very weird bankruptcy where it emerged with something like

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 8>three times the debt it had going into it, and

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 8>that was because they wanted to keep bondholder whole, and

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 8>they found different ways of basically, you know, handling the

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 8>costs of that disaster. But ultimately it all flows down

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 8>into your electricity bill. It has to be paid for

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 8>and it will end up jacking up the rates. And

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 8>I think in a place like Hawaii, especially which already

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 8>pays the highest electricity rates in the country, that those

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.959
<v Speaker 8>are going to rise quite a bit further. Climate change

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 8>and the associated effort of decarbonization. These are things that

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 8>just didn't really exist in a real sense, you know,

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 8>thirty or forty years ago, certainly not in the minds

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 8>of ourselves or in the minds of economists. And so

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 8>that's effectively a new cost that's been put onto society,

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 8>and it has to be paid for. They can be

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 8>paid for broadly in two ways. One is paying for

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 8>efforts to mitigate it or paying for the cost of cleanup.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 8>I would suggest that mitigating it is probably the better investment,

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 8>but either way it has to be paid for.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 2>W Liam Denning a Bloomberg opinion columnist who covers energy

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 2>and commodities and also a former investment banker. Now don't forget,

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 2>We're available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify or your

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>favorite podcast platform. Around parts of Antarctica last year, entire

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 2>colonies of Emperor penguins lost all of the chicks that

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>they'd incubated through weeks of darkness, one hundred mile per

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 2>hour winds, and brutal sub zero temperatures. The US Fish

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 2>and Wildlife Service has listed the emperor penguin as endangered.

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 2>They depend on sea ice as a platform to breed

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and raise their chicks, but the ice is melting too

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 2>early and the flocks of chicks lost all drowned. Let's

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 2>find out what's going on. Fayflam As a Bloomberg opinion

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 2>columnist who cover science and hosts the follow the Science podcasts.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 2>She joins me now, Fae, always a pleasure. Thank you

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>for taking the time with me. Baby penguins. There's no

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 2>way anybody can see the headline about baby penguins on

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal and not go oh, I have to

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 2>read about this.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Yes, they are what people would call it charismatic species,

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, which sometimes is used in a good way

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 6>and sometimes sort of a way to say, well, people

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 6>pay too much attention to these ones that are cute,

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 6>and we should pay attention to other species. So they're

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 6>charismatic for good reason, because they're such interesting animals in

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 6>so many ways.

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, how dire is this? And to be clear, your

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>column isn't just about fossil fuels and baby penguins. That's

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 2>just the hook. What you're talking about is the impact

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.719
<v Speaker 2>of climate change in global warming and man's role in

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>that on species? Penguins just happen to be what's going

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 2>on now?

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that was just in the news, and it just

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 6>made me think about this bigger philosophical question. You know,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 6>so often when we talk about endangered species, we talk

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 6>about the potential use for humans. You know, maybe some

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 6>rainforest plant have the cure for cancer, or disappearing frogs

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 6>might have a chemical that's useful for medicine in their bloodstream.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 6>And you know, it sort of got me thinking, well,

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 6>what about animals that may or may not be useful

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 6>to humans? You know, should we care about them? And why?

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 6>And I think that often is just something people feel

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 6>intuitively but don't really think about that. Many of us

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 6>are just singnituative. Of course we should care because they

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 6>make the world a better place. So I thought it

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 6>would be interesting to kind of open that discussion up.

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 6>And I think even though a lot of people argued

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 6>about the role of global warming, you know, there are

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 6>lots of natural fluctuations that can affect penguin colonies, but

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 6>there is you know, a huge scientific consensus that there

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 6>is an overall trend warming trend that is caused by

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 6>human activities, and that is causing the biggest changes at

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 6>the polar regions of the planet.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>So how dire is this? Are penguins going extinct? Are

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 2>other animals at risk?

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean a lot of animals are going to

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 6>go extinct in the next few decades if global warming

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 6>sort of continues at the pace it's continuing, and some

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 6>even if we, you know, change things, we'll go extinct.

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 6>Emperor penguins. Actually, there are quite a few colonies that

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 6>are still doing okay, that are in more stable regions

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 6>of Antarctica, but if the trend continues unabated, they would

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 6>eventually go extinct because they I mean, they're sort of contradictory.

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 6>They're like the toughest animals you can imagine when you

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 6>think about them spending this time, you know, and minus

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 6>fifty degrees and the wind and they sit on they're

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.239
<v Speaker 6>out there incubating these eggs. But they're also delicate in

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 6>a way because they depend on conditions being just so.

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 6>They have to have the sea ice last through the winter.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 6>If it gets too warm and they lose the ice,

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 6>then the chicks can get wet, and that's just deadly.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 6>Then you know, as one of the scientists that they

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 6>turn to little ice cubes and hundreds of them can die.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 2>So how is this linked to the use of fossil fuels?

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Going to push back against you a little bit because.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 6>I mean it's all yes, that is the main you

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 6>know main I when you talk about human activities and

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 6>climate change, you know, that's the big one. There's also deforestation,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, there there's methane, you know, there's the the

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 6>cattle industry. But fossil fuels, that's the you know, that's

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 6>the big one. That's the one that is putting the

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 6>the you know, that's changed the amount of CO two

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 6>in our atmosphere, and that uh is has been long

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 6>predicted to cause global warming, and now we're really seeing

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 6>the consequences in a way that people had predicted decades ago.

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 2>What else are scientists noticing, Well.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the the the polar regions have the biggest

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 6>you know, are are showing the biggest changes. And you know,

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 6>years ago people talked about polar bears and that was

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 6>sort of the iconic species. And because the sea ice

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 6>is melting in the Arctic and now you know that

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 6>they're seeing some of the same kinds of changes in

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 6>Antarctica that the polar regions, you know, are are warming,

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 6>and there's this sea ice that is melting much earlier

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 6>or not even ever forming. So that's you know, and

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 6>that's a big consequence. There's also apparently the sea ice

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 6>in the Antarctic region is important for the growth of krill,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 6>which are the you know, the little plankton at the

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 6>bottom of the food chain, and if we lose a

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 6>lot of those, that could actually cause a collapse in

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 6>the populations of fish that people depend on for food.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Now we're talking with Bloomberg opinion columnist Faith Lamb about

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 2>how global warming may be exacerbating the elimination of baby

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>penguins among other species. Now, Fay, Antarctica is definitely a

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 2>brutal place, but it also seems like a unique gauge

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 2>for the health of the planet.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean, yeah, it's and over time, you know,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Antarctica has been it's been warm there, it's changed over long, long,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 6>long periods of time. But we're seeing changes that are

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 6>really fast, and so animals that are adapted to that area,

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 6>you know, these penguins have become adapted to it, and

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 6>it's the things are changing. They're so fast that they

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 6>just can't They're not going to be able to hold on,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 6>and they're seeing you know that these whole colonies depend

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 6>on they to replace themselves. They have to raise a

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 6>chick every year, and a lot of them die, and

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 6>if they go too many seasons without producing enough offspring,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 6>then the whole colonies will disappear. So yeah, in some

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.719
<v Speaker 6>ways it is, you know, we're seeing the most extreme

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 6>effects there, but we're seeing you know, we're seeing these

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 6>effects all over the planet.

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Who cares if we lose a species? Why is that important?

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? That was something I just felt like wasn't a

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 6>philosophical problem that we should all talk about because I

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 6>think people sort of take for granted that, you know,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 6>people that think it's important just think that that species

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 6>have a right to exist and make the planet a

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 6>better place sort of take for granted that everybody feels

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 6>that way, and some people don't. So I think that's

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 6>a philosophical question that we should start talking about. And

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 6>one of the books I think that was really influential

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 6>that touched on that with Silent Spring by Rachel Carson,

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 6>and she talks about how the world is just a

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 6>lesser place without these wonderful sounds of birds in the spring,

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 6>and that it's not trivial, it's not silly, it's not

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 6>something that only silly people worry about. You know, this

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 6>is and these changes can be permanent.

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Is their hope to reverse this? Can we slow it down?

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Where's the break? How do we put a brake on this?

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's still a lot of room. You know, there's

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 6>still time to there's there's still you know, people look

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 6>at these models and they're not perfect, but they can

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 6>see the trajectory if we do nothing. They can see

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 6>a different trajectory where it doesn't get as warm if

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 6>we start to cut back. So there's certainly are ways

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 6>if we made big changes in the next couple of decades,

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 6>that we could see much less global warming. So there's

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.479
<v Speaker 6>a huge amount of room to make changes. I mean,

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 6>there are a lot of complications there, but there is

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.719
<v Speaker 6>definitely it's not too late, it's not all in. A

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 6>certain amount of warming is, as they say, baked into

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 6>the system. But there's still a huge range of what

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 6>could happen over the coming decades depending on how humans

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 6>make changes in our sources of energy.

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Are you surprised at all, just on a personal level,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the amount of data and information that you put out

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 2>there in your columns on the Bloomberg terminal, and sometimes

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 2>there are people who will not be swayed when it

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>comes to global warming, and there's that pushback.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, which is part of the reason I wanted to

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 6>open up some of these deeper issues about why people

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 6>care and why people should care, because I believe in understanding.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 6>I don't believe in demonizing people who disagree with you.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 6>I think that the only way we're going to move

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 6>forward is to talk it out, not to have people

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 6>screaming at each other and calling each other names, but

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, to acknowledge and try to find out why

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 6>people feel so strongly that we shouldn't make changes, and

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 6>that are you know, we're so polarized in this country

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 6>and people are sometimes just picking that side because that's

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 6>where their political tribe lies. But I think it's it's

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 6>such an important issue that we should all be talking

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 6>about why we care about it. And science can only

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 6>tell you know so much. It can't it can't tell

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 6>you what to care about, where to put your priorities.

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 6>In some ways, that is a human decision.

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Faith Lamb is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. She covers science

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and she is the host of the follow of the

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 2>science podcast. Bloomberg Opinion continues as we wrap up our

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 2>look at extreme weather and climate change and what we

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>it might be facing in our own hometowns. This is Bloomberg.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion Podcast. Catch us Saturdays

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at one and seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Amy Morris. Extreme weather

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 2>is coming to your town too. It's not just a

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>question of if, but when and whether your property, your

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 2>power grid, and your politicians are going to be ready

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 2>for it. We welcome Bloomberg Opinion columnist Jessica Carl, author

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Bloomberg Opinion Today newsletter. She's got a whole

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 2>chunk of the newsletter devoted to this. Now, Jessica tell

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>us about the newsletter itself.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Of course, it's called Bloomberg Opinion Today. It's a daily

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 5>flagship newsletter for the opinion team. Has opinions on everything

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 5>from business, economics, to politics, Technology, and it's delivered to

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 5>your inbox every afternoon. I write it Monday through Thursday,

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 5>and then we have a weekend edition as well. You

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 5>can subscribe by going to Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 5>and you'll see a sign up bar on the right

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 5>hand side.

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 2>In the newsletter, you include information from the different columns

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 2>that we've been talking about regarding climate change. You know,

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles just saw its first tropical storm in eighty

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 2>four years. Florida, Georgia, the Carolina is hammered by Hurricane Nadalia, Louisiana, Hawaii,

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Canada dealing with wildfires. There was that massive heat dome

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>over more of the country than not. But there are

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>still those folks who are completely unfazed, in part because

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 2>they're not feeling the impact yet. What do you say, yes.

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean in a state like California where we saw

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Hillary it was a once in a lifetime type of

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 5>tropical storm. Only two percent of homes in that state

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 5>have flood insurance. So there are like huge lots of

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 5>the country that just aren't accounting for these risks, which

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 5>are becoming more veried. You don't know where these storms

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 5>are going to hit you don't know, you know if

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be a snowstorm or wildfire or a flood,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 5>and it's just there are a lot of households that

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 5>are ditching home insurance because it's becoming more expensive because

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 5>of that risk. So it's just kind of snowballing and

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 5>getting worse and worse in Florida. And only one in

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 5>five Floridians has flood protection, which kind of gives you

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 5>an idea. In a state where you're expecting floods, only

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 5>one in five of them are covered.

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>And you make the point in the newsletter that part

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of the problem is the flood map by FEMA is

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>out of date. This is not good, this is critical.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And that flood map is insure. It hinges on everything.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 5>So lots of businesses it helps dictate their building standards,

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 5>It helps dictate what, when and where people can build homes.

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 5>And those flood maps are not forward looking at all.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 5>They're very much backward looking. And that's what insurans are realizing.

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 5>They're playing this game of catch up. They're contacting their

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 5>reinsurance to help them, which is why people are seeing

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.719
<v Speaker 5>their premiums rise in the double digits. Because you know,

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 5>they're realizing that, oh, shoot, the maps that we've been

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 5>using are not you know, accounting fully for the risk.

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 5>They're actually undercounting it.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>So what's the government's role in this? The National Flood

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Insurance Program is part of this. Tell me about that.

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so it's a five decades old program, so it's

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 5>existed for quite some time. Managed by FEMA, it's called

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 5>the National Flood Insurance Program, and it's the primary source

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 5>of flood insurance for over five million Americans and it

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 5>expires actually on September thirtieth, which would be a great

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 5>time for them to kind of reinvigorate this program and

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 5>make it stronger. But what Congress has been doing ever

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 5>since twenty seventeen is just reauthorizing it. They're not really

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 5>improving it by much. So our colonist Jonathan Livin, which

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 5>is one of the people that covers climate and insurance

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 5>for US at Boomberg Opinion, he says that the government

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 5>should stop with those short term things that actually strengthen

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 5>it to make it better for homeowners, which part of

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 5>that would be updating those flood maps and allowing homeowners

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 5>and insurers to account for the risks which you know,

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 5>would just the insurance fees wouldn't come all at once,

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 5>they would be more gradual over time, which would allow

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 5>that program to actually be sustainable, which it currently is not.

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 5>And if they further build up their debt, that's just

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 5>it's gonna all tumble down eventually, and it's not going

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 5>to be good for the government or its coffers.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 2>So what is the guidance at this point? What do

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 2>we do?

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 5>I think the biggest thing homeowners are feeling the crunch

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 5>of inflation all around them. But they shouldn't look at

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 5>their insurance premium and go, oh, this is the time

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 5>for me to just stop, you know, paying it and

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 5>just ditch insurance, home insurance altogether, flood insurance. At least,

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:30.919
<v Speaker 5>they need to get used to those fees and build

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 5>it into their budgets. I know that, you know, putting

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 5>it on the consumer is not ideal, but and insurers

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 5>are realizing that as well. And it's just an unfortunate

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 5>price that we're gonna have to pay as the weather

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 5>gets more extreme.

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion columnist Jessica Carl is author of the Bloomberg

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Opinion Today newsletter. And that does it For this week's

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion. We are produced by Eric mollow and you

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 2>can find all of these columns on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 2>We're also available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify, or

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>your favorite podcast platform. Stay with us. Today's top stories

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 2>and global business headlines are just ahead. I'm Amy Morris.

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg