WEBVTT - The Highest Priority.  Peter Boghosshian Talks To Armstrong & Getty

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the counterpoint that the male penis

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is a construct and the penis is responsible for global warming.

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It's Armstrong and Getty extra large because four hours simply enough.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Armstrong and Getty extra large. You know, I

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>gotta say that was not the highbrow tone I was

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>hoping to take in today's discussion. I'm disappointed in you

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that argument was good enough to get published and a

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>university uh publication that that can't possibly be. You wouldn't

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>think so. Perhaps you've heard us on The Armstrong and

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Getty Show discussing the experiences of Peter begin who taught

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>philosophy at Portland State University in Portland, Oregon for a

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>decade and has recently resigned for reasons that we will

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>let him describe. It's always great to talk Peter. Welcome.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>How are you, sir? I have never been better, truly,

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I am a I am so happy right now. That's awesome.

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>How are you, guys? We're terrific. We won't still of

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>thunder though. Why do you feel that way? Well, because

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to compromise my integrity because I was

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>working in a job in which I was hired to

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>teach critical thinking and ethics, and then the conditions at

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the university made that impossible. Uh. And and I've just

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>been really touched. I you know, I wrote a letter

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of resignation and I published it on very was the

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>sub Stack, and I detailed what happens to people when

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they question or challenge the orthodoxy. And I have been

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>flabbergasted by the literally worldwide reaction, the publication of the

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>letter into multiple languages, the unbelievable amount of support that

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>people contacted me just to say thank you or we

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate what you did. I mean, it's just it's so touching.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You know. I was tearing up last night just reading

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>all these emails and support. I mean, it's truly amazing.

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there is an aspect of this, uh that

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about that is is kind of

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>nice and warm feeling in that we and you and

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Matt Taiebe and and all sorts of thinkers who might

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>disagree about everything have realized, oh my gosh, these sacred

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>principles are are actually at stake. And we're not prone

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to hyperbole around here, which probably makes us bad talk

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>show hosts, but we actually believe what's happening in our

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>elementary high schools and university campuses is actually dangerous to civilization.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, it feels good to be working with people

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we generally disagree with to do what we feel is right.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>It does and appreciate you having me on. And what's

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting is, you know the local paper here, I want

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation. I want to have a sincere

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation about what's happening in our university system. I want

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation about the president of Potland State

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>University said that basically racial justice is his highest priority,

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>highest priority of the institution. And you know, I want

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation with the left about as you know,

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a liberal atheist. I want to have a conversation

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with Matt matt Ow, with CNN, with MSNBC, with the

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>local paper here, the oregon Ian, with op B, Oregon Public, Nobody,

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole left media media ecosystem is having none of it.

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>They just don't want to have that conversation. And I

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>find that that is fascinating. Do you think that's because

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>they agree with the radical walk left, or because they're

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>afraid of them, or they're afraid I think it's part

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of it is the same problem you see within the

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>university is mirrored outside the university, and that is, don't

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to people with different views. There's even a word

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for that, it's called platform, and don't give the Nazia platform.

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Don't And it's not even that the problem is that

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody would give me a platform. The psychologist Stephen Pinker

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>says that he calls it the left pole. In other words,

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're on the far left, anything even slightly to

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the right of that looks like you're all right or

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a Nazi. And so I think it's guilt by association.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that they view themselves and I'm at

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>least in partial agreement with this, that we really are

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in a cultural war and they don't want to. Well, actually,

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll just put it on you. So, why do

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you think that the left wing, anybody's center of left

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is refuge? You guys will have me on. Glenn Beck

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>had me on, Tucker Carlson had me on, and not

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>only to talk about this, to talk about a wide

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>range of issues, to challenge and question in probe, why

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>don't we see that on the left. I blame the internet.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I certainly blame social media. The social media tends to

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>be left, particularly Twitter, and because it tends to be left,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 1>the the outspoken voices of the fringe left, the crazy

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>people that we're talking about, they their importance is being

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>elevated to a level that is not you know, doesn't

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. But the regular left is so scared

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>of that vocal Twitter left that I think that's what

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>drives all of this stuff. I'm gonna I'm gonna, well,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm gonna I'm gonna throw out something that

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>may seem crazy, But here's my this is the next

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>level of thinking about this. Our Lord vote a famous

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>has a famous line of title, The Master's tools cannot

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>disable the Master's house. The master's tools cannot dissemble, take

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>apart the master's house. What is the master's house patriarchy, sexism, racism, oppression?

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>What are the Master's tools? Reason, science, dialogue, discourse, etcetera.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe part of the rot that's happening now that

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is because there is a deep seated belief

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that the master's tools, that conversation, discourse, etcetera. Are enabling racism, xenophobia,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the patriarchy, etcetera. So to have a conversation with someone

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like that is you don't want to give them a voice.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that you will do, and there's a

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>whole line of academic literature on this, the only thing

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that conversation will do is it will reinforce the patriarchy,

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 1>it will reinforce bigotry, and it will demean the lived

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>experiences of people who listen to that conversation and be hurtful.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there is a moral infrastructure in

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>place in which many on the left. And I don't

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>think that this is in any way native to the left,

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Like you don't see this with known Chomsky or the

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of old school economic leftist. You see this exclusively

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with woke people. This is like, like my friend Dad

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>said said, it's like a parasticization. It's a parasitic value

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>system that's latched onto traditional leftism. So that's why I

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>think that the the anybody left of center won't talk

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>to me or anybody else. Well, there are a bunch

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of big ideas there. I wish I jutted them all down,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's starting with the the expression about the master's house.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I just reject at premise outright, and and at the

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>heart of this, the idea that their ideas are irrefutable

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're sincerely held is one of the craziest things

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard in my life. Can you imagine Peter

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>walking into a symposium or whatever and saying, first of all,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like it to be made clear that my ideas

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are unimpeachable, every single one. And of course you get

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a big belly laugh from scholars. But then you say, no, no,

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm perfectly serious. You can't use logic, you can't use data,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>because those are the tools of the oppressor. I mean,

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's it's it's so obviously a con it's hilarious to

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>those of us with skeptical minds. Well, that's the other

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thing about this. I mean, that's the thing that I

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>just marvel at. It's so insane, Like people are ripping

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>down statues, people are assaulting the police, they're des drowing

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>storefront windows of mom and pop businesses, you know, working

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>class and for what do they do. It's so stupid,

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for Chad, for for a for an anarchist zone in

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>which people are raping and murdering each I mean, for what,

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is the goal of this whole thing.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's so much easier to rip down and destroy than

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it is to create. And that's also I think part

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of the problem of why the left wing media ecosystem

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>won't have people on, and it's because I not only

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>do they not value conversation and they think that conversation

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is actually bad, but I think that's a convenient excuse

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to not do intellectual work to understand the other side

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of the argument. Now that's not to say that the

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>right wing doesn't have a lot of crazies. I mean,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of course it does, but it has a different kind

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>of problem. And I would argue that the problem of

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>free speech and free inquiry is absolutely rudimentary to human progress.

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you make a lot of good arguments,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and Ian Joe are talking about some very intellectual stuff there.

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But I can tell you just from being in this

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>business at a very base level, I don't think Rachel

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Mattow on MSNBC or Jake Tapper on CNN agree with

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>any of this woke stuff. But if their bosses get

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>a hundred emails or tweets from the woke left complaining

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>about having you on, that's enough to frighten them off.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's not for ideological reasons. It's just advertisers and ratings. Okay,

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So so then so if that's true, then they have

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>no integrity, correct. Yeah, yeah, that's a good so. Right,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're either we're either in a position that these

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>folks believe it but won't say it. And if that's

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the case, why would you listen to them because what

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 1>they're saying is not what they're believing. So there's a

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of inauthenticity built into the mechanism. Yeah, these go ahead.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say, I think I think it's

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>somewhat like Trump and some people on the right plane

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>foot see with you and on or whatever. They think

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just a fringe group of crazies and better to

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>have them on our side than not, and they're not

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>enough to do any damage. Well, turns out they are.

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the Rachel Maddows and Jake Tapper's

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and that crowd is going to find that out about

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the woke crowd too. That kind of just playing footsie

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>with him because it's easier and keep advertisers is going

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to turn out to be a bad idea. Well, in

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the same way that for instance, Ted Wheeler is the

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Mayor of Portland found out in a very painful way

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that no, you can't control that whirlwind or that pack

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>of pit bulls, and just because they're you know, nominally

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on your side, they'll get out of control eventually. Yeah.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>That that's another conversation. Ted Rulers is a public disgrace

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>and he should immediately be impeached and held accountable for

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>what he's done to the City of Portland when he

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>personally his negligence. The homicide rates are astronomical. He I mean,

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>this is another conversation, but he we can. I'd love

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation, but I want to stick it on.

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to keep it to The

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>university is just now. This is not a ininge bunch

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of nut jobs like Q and on. These are people

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>who control major academic in most academic institutions in English

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking world, and they have positioned they're paid for in

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>my case apportency. The university is paid for by taxpayer funds.

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Many of these people, if not most of them, have

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>jobs for life. They're looking at the university as an

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>indoctrination mill. They're teaching people and um training people to

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>be activists based upon scholarship. That's totally, totally bogus. Again,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the parallel to Q and on doesn't hold up. Yet.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Does the right have crazies? Have, no question about. Everybody

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>has crazies, but these crazies, the woke crazies, control academic institutions,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>our knowledge, our engines of knowledge production right and it's

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and the messages are grievance filled. The West is awful,

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Capitalism is awful. I'm not saying capitalism is perfect by

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>any means, but I'm saying they have a very specific

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>message that they're pumping out and nobody benefits from They

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>don't even benefit from that. That's the other crazy thing

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. Nobody benefits from racial hatred, from division, from

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the universities, you know, racial justice being the highest part.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Nobody is benefiting from these things. It is an ideology

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that is killing us all well. As a person who

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>has worked with young people of all races for most

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of my adult life, I believe that to my core,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that the very worst thing you could possibly do to

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a little child of colors to tell them they can't

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly achieve what they dream of because the white man

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is keeping them down. I think I think you are

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>doing work so unholy and evil. The clan at its

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>height couldn't dream of being that affected as effective. Hey,

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to go. I want to make one point

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's a prism through which I think the rest

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation could flow. One of the things you

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>said in your letter of resignation, which I've read several times,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is that. And this hit me like, I mean, like

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those fundamental principles you learn when you're a

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>little kid, something Thomas Jefferson said. It just it fills

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>your soul with excitement because you've realized the great truth.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>And what you said was the freedom to question is

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>our fundamental right. And I thought that was one of

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the truest things I've ever heard. That's at the basis

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of everything right. The freedom to question is our fundamental

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>right and the role. And I think the next line

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in that letter was talked about what our duty is.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We we continue to forget that, and the university's goal

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is to remind us that that's not only our right,

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's our duty. But Portland's state is practically forbidden

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>questioning correct only about certain things, though only about things

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that contradict the more orthodox. You can question other things

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, like what's the best way to plant plant

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a tree? You know, how far down should it go?

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But only questioning certain things. So I guess I want

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to put out a call. I want to say two things.

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really important when you're talking about racial justice, Like,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>if you actually want racial justice, the first order of

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>business is to give every American an education of public education,

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly AK through twelve, education of the first rate, independent

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of skin color or socio economic status. And we have,

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>my opinion is that we have let down an awful

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of people. And the solution to that is

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not equity, in other words, trying to gerry read outcomes delution.

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>The solution to that is the quality of opportunity. And

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think what I would like to see conservatives

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the space that they move in is well, many spaces,

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but in the context of this conversation, I'd like to

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>see them move into honest and sincere attempts to fix

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>school systems in the worst neighborhoods for the worst people,

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>independent of their skin color. That's the first thing. The

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>second thing that I would like to see is for

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all this talk about diversity, diversity is a code word

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>for intellectual homogeneity. Right, if diversity really meant diversity, then

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, you wouldn't see the excuse me, the vile

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and bitriol spewed that Larry Elder particularly, and all the

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>horrible names that he's been called because he's a black

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>man who doesn't toe the party line. Right. So the

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>other thing that I would like to see, and I

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>just on Glenn Beck and I asked him this. So

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>here's my question to you. Um. One of the things

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that we see in this in our university system is

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>culling of voices. They came for the right, then they

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>came for the concertors, and they came from the moderates,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then they came for the liberals, and and now they're

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in their own little chamber of derangement. So my my

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>question to you is do you think we should have

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a Mark A Marxists in an economics department at a university. Wow?

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting and I absolutely believe Marxism ought to

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>be studied and known and understood. I love the phrase

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>chamber of derangement. By the way, So that's gonna be

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>my new band. That's a good one. That's a good

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>album title to um. Yeah, that's a really interesting question.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I if there is the free of exchange of ideas,

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>if there's the marketplace of ideas functioning, I don't mind

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>some guy saying no, no, no, Marxism is correct, because

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>any rational examination of the evidence will render that opinion.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, silly, um. So I'm not particularly threatened by it.

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it, but that's fine. So so I

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do love it, and I'll tell you why. So I

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>love the best proponents, people who actually believe what they teach.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm an atheist. I teach an atheist class, and

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I have Christians, many very very prominent Christians and apologists

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>come in and teach the best arguments to the existence

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of God. And the reason is because I don't believe

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>those things. And so I would be doing my my

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>students and injustice if I taught them without having You know,

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>um um, I was crazy to see this. Let let's

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>say this way. Students need to learn from people who

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>believe things in the most diverse ways possible. So I

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>love the idea of their being a Marxist, even though

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I hate Marxism, because I think our students need to

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>see our freedom night. They need to see people with

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>psychology and behaviors. They need to see, they need to

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>see people who have um a wide range of beliefs,

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>and we need to give them the tools to figure

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>out for themselves what the answer is. I just might

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>be I was gonna say, I was gonna say, my

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>my discomfort is with the hundreds of millions who have

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>died at the hands of communism, And I mean, would

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>you would you likewise be infused about somebody teaching actual fascism,

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>not antifa's view of fascism, actual fascism and trying to

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>convince the kids, look, this is a better system. Yeah.

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's less about convincing and more about framing

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>an argument in the most charitable way possible. So yeah,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I have no problem with that, even though I disagree.

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is not only so that

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the kids can get the best representatives of the of

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the ideas, but they can make the decisions for themselves.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Like that, the moment that you say, oh, we can't

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have this person here or we can't have this person

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>speak out, you you were in very serious danger of

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>becoming the things that we hate. That's a very good

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So we have to allow a system that has the

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>free exchange of ideas. Now, somebody recently, I don't have

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it in front of me, but put out a tweet

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>about nine eleven being the white, hetero capitalist patriarchy professor

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 1>from Syracuse University. Yeah, and the university did exactly what

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he should do and what it should have done, and said,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>look this this academic So freedom of speech in an

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>academic context is even more privileged, even a higher value.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>It's like we need people like that too, you know, whatever,

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>rock the boat, say anything they want to speak. That's

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of protection from tenure. And the university

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>issued a wonderful statement that I wish my university would

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>have issued for me, that we may or may not agree,

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but this person has the right to speak openly and honestly.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And then the students. That was a statement. But I

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>would like to see the kind of intellectual change um

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>wrestling with ideas and the type of academy in which, look,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you can disagree with people, you can agree with people,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But here are the people who have they believe this,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>those are publishing it, they have researched it. We've given

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you the tools to make an analysis and the examination.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Now go forward. You do that and our democracy will flourish. Right,

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you teach people not to attack other people on the

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>basis of the mutable characteristics, but to engage their ideas,

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and we were all better off. Peter, Maybe we can compromise.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's keep the Marxist chained in a cage and just

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>bring them out for lectures. Would that be fair? No,

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to give everybody, you know, and that's why

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I said a Marxist not. But the problem comes when

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you stack a whole department with people who have the

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>same beliefs, and then the kids will go into that

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and they're saying, well, everybody, my economics professor believe this.

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>He's written all these books. This is true. No, that's

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>why you need intellectual diversity. And the other thing is

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody will trust the bodies of literature and the quote

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>unquote scholarship coming from you know, about really important things

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>like global climate change, because they'll say, well, why should

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I try? People have actually said this to me, why

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>should I trust that? Everybody here is a leftist? And

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they're right, right, right, But if if you had a

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 1>mix of people, right, if you in a climate science

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you pee Christians and everybody different views

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and they came to a convergence of opinion, they came

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to a consensus. Now that would be something that people

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>would then look at that and say, Okay, wow, these

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>people like me, they represent my voice, they agree with

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>other people like you and I are agreeing about this stuff. Yeah.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the fundamental principle upon which our

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>democracy has to be based. We have to have open inquiry,

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to have free speech, and we also have

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to teach people. You know what, if somebody doesn't agree

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>with you, that's okay. You can still hang out with them.

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>They can still be your friend, you can still go

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>drinking with them, you can still marry them. It's okay.

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's probably good if they don't agree with

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you about everything, because then you can have some fun

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and good conversations. But we're strayed from that because we're

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>not allowing people to have different that's my book, how

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to have impossible conversations. We're straight aid from that because

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>those conversations don't take place in the university. And it's

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>not only that they don't take place. It said. If

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody has a view that doesn't conform to what's morally fashionable,

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like they're wrong, but it's like they're

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a bad person. And that's the narrative. People are pointing out.

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>If you don't agree with this, you're a racist, you're

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a bigot, you're a homeleful. Well how about this? How

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>about maybe I don't agree because I don't see the

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>evidence for how about how about that? Well? Yeah, amen

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to that, And that's the speaking of the fraud we

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>were talking about before. The idea that I'm a racist

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>for disagreeing with you is literally, you know, begging the

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>question in the classical sense. I mean, well, what am

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I supposed to do? Just stand here and get punched?

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess ideologically, but I know Jackie had something just

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to make things easier. What what's the name you like

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to put on this, this whole thing is woke ism?

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>What you like best? Or or you know? It's nice

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that when we throw on the term Marxist we all

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>know what we mean. I think it it helped combat

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>this if we have an agreed upon term that everybody's using. Yeah,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think you could have an agreed

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>upon term. The people who participate in woke ideology don't

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like woke Helen pluck Rose, author of Cynical Theories, which

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is the v book on the subject, called the Critical

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Social Justice Yes but genius book. She calls it critical

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>social justice. Whenever I write it, I write it social

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>justice uppercase S and upper case J. So there is

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>no consensus on this, but I like to term it

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>either social justice, social justice ideology, or woke ideology. Sometimes

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people call it a worldview too, which is true. It

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is actually a worldview. It's a worldview which bases itself

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that the West is inherently racist, sexist, etcetera.

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And we have to destroy the institutions that leads to

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>those things. And I just want to throw this in

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>so I don't forget to say it. Um, you mentioned

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>integrity earlier when we're talking about I mean, I mean,

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the most interesting things that's come out of

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this is you. I think you needed this that. Um.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Everybody that's reached out to you for an interview is

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>on the right, and no one, no liberals have I mean,

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned earlier, that's amazing. But you brought up

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the term integrity, and I can't imagine more integrity than

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what you've done. I assume you're not an independently wealthy man,

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and you quit your job because, um, because you believe

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in this stuff too much. And I mean, I'm not kidding.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I will remember what you did for the rest of

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>my life whenever I come to a crossroads like this. Yeah,

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I I I appreciate that. I never wanted any of this, um,

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>and I did. I just could not stay at the

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>place where I had to compromise my integrity anymore. I

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't do it. I couldn't do it. So, you know,

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I think I can tell you about what led up

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to that, or I can. I mean, we can go

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>from many places. Yeah, actually, you know, it's funny. I

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was about to go there. You mentioned Helen pluck Rose

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and her co author James Lindsay's Cynical Theories, and the

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>paper you wrote, the Conceptual Penis as a Social constra

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the work you did with James and Helen

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite things that's ever happened. Can

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you tell us about the conceptual penis as a Social

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>construct and then the other papers and what what we

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>were trying, what were you trying to prove or or

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>or you know, exposed, and then what was the reaction

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.479
<v Speaker 1>to it. Sure, happy to tell you about that. So

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the conceptual penis was a hoax paper, and Alan's social

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>there are actually penises. Um, it's really I'm glad you

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>actually read the paper because I think that the papers

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>is really funny. That's the other thing about ideologs. They

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>have no sense of humor. That so one of the

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>things that we were trying to do is to show

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that these bodies of scholarship they're not rigorous, they're not

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>based on evidence, and they are ideological. And so we

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 1>wrote the conceptual penis is a social construct and we

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>published it in a in a low ranked It wasn't

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a great journal. It was a new journal as well,

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and we received a tremendous amount of criticism, and much

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of that criticism was justified. And that criticism was you

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't prove what you thought you proved about these disciplines.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>If you want to prove it, you need to do

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the following things one, two, three, four, five, etcetera. And

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so I said to to to Jim, to James lindsay, dude,

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this is awesome. They told us exactly what we need

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to do, so let's do it. He's like, all right,

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so then we wrote twenty papers and we forwarded absolutely insane,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>totally deranged thecs. I probably can't say because many of

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>them are sexual on the air right now. Oh no,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a podcast. If we have to, we'll believe it.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, Okay about you know, penetrative anal sex and

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>transphobia and you know, putting people in matt white males

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and chains as a whole of experience of reparations in

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the classroom. And that one did not get public. We

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>we got called by the Wall Street Journal before we

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>published it. But the goal was to say so we

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>we did exactly what people wanted us to do, like

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they wanted to do. So but instead of saying, wow,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's a problem here, like maybe this is something

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we need to think about or be more reflected on

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because this is informing public policy. Instead of doing that,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>they came after me. They tried to take my job.

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>That's their response to this. So I want to make

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sure it's it's it's clear what you were trying to prove.

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>You were trying to prove that these fields that masquerade

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>as science aren't science. It's not just that they're not science,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's that they're the musings of ideologues. There's

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>no evidence for these. So so the background piece that

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you need to know is, as a general rule, there

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are maybe a few exceptions to this, but this is

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>almost a rule. Seven papers in seven years his tenure. Right,

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a job for life. I had no background in

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Jim had no background. Hell and had no background.

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Gym's a mathematician. And we delved into the literature. We

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>did a deep dive in the literature. We really read

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the journals, we read the articles, we did our homework

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>plus plus and the point was to show that the

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>policies that we're shaping our institutions, first the university or

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the university system as an institution, and then the policies

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>as they were seeping out, these are not not only

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>are they not scientific, they're not anything. They're just a

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.719
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people get together. We call it a term

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Brett Weinstein uses for when we went over his house,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he's the former Evergreen professor, and we were explaining the

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>grievance studies thing. Early on he said, oh, it's like

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>idea laundering. So a bunch of idea loogs get together

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and they have Um, they have an idea and they're

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they're in academia, and they published that idea. They discharge

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the moral impulse in a journal and then comes out

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>as the other side, as knowledge. So then they go

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>around pointing when you say, well, how do you know,

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they point to the bogus scholarship that they themselves meet up.

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's not based on evidence. And not only that,

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't publish anything in there that went against what

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>what was morally fashionable, Like the whole ecosystem exists to

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>prop up certain moral conclusions and they teach that to people,

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>credential themselves, get tenure, and then hire other people who

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>believe the same things. That's how that's why you have

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>ideological capture of the university institutions. That's the mechanism. That's

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>how they've done it. Boy, I love that image of

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>idea laundering. That's a great metaphor. And and by the way,

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you've ruined the dog park for me, uh you with

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>your rape culture at the dog park paper, which was

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>hilariously brilliant. Well here here's something that we don't talk

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>about because it's just too complicated. Um So everybody loves

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the dog park and and you know p traditions, can

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I rape culture and looking at it through the lens

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of black feminist criminology. I mean, it's just and that

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the total Well, yeah, I chose I chose that. I

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>chose that because I had to find something that they

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>could not criticize, like what was the thing? And they

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.239
<v Speaker 1>could never criticize black feminist criminology because that would be

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>both misogynists and racist. So I choose to look at

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>dog dog humping incidents. And the other thing is there

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>was some utterly insane number of dogs and talk comping

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>incidents that that I uh, that we alleged to have reported,

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people stopping their dog rage by doing

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>jumping Jackson just I mean these crazy ship dog humping

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>incidents or d h I s if you will. Yeah. Yeah.

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So so the thing we never talked about that that

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>goes on along the lines of the conceptual penis because

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a very complicated idea. But we got in the

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>number one gender studies journal in the world, there are

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>two of them. Um, we we got in this paper

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that argued that was against us, we specifically named us,

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about the conceptual penis in this paper

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and we said that basically, we're terrible people. Uh. We

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>titled the paper when the Joke's on You, as if

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the joke were on Jim and I for writing the

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>conceptual penis. But the fact that we published a paper

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the joke about us that was bogus and said things

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that were absurd was when the joke was on them.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So the joke was actually on them when they're thinking

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that the joke is on us. So we know, was

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that clear? Yes, that is incredible Hall of Mars. It's

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>very complicated to what we don't talk about it. But

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>so so that's the part of the problem is that

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people are basing their conceptions of reality on these journals.

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And what you have is not only are they grievance filled,

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.719
<v Speaker 1>but they're racially divisive. They teach people. Look, I know

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I right now he's become a friend of mine, young

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>kid who's at Oregon Health Science University. I can actually

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>read you what it said, um the screenshot he sent me.

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But they've asked students to self segregate on the basis

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of race. I mean that's crazy. Yeah, that is just amazing. Now,

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>who were the liberals here and who are the conservatives?

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's why those terms don't really mean anything. You're

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right, Well, conservatives at this point, good ones, I think,

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are conserving liberalism. But anyway, exactly that, Dave Rubens made

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that point, and I think that's absolutely true. I don't

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>even know what those terms mean anymore. And so people

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>will say, well, you're liberally conserved. Well what do you mean, Like,

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>give me a specific policy and then I'll tell you

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>my answer. But you know, people like you know, rubrics,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>umbrella terms like oh, I'm this, I'm this. But the

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>fact is that in this cultural moment, the political reality

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is more complicated than that, it's more nuanced, and you

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>all so seeing I publish a piece about this in

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the American mind, I call it the Great realignment. There's

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a realignment now if there's a political and ideological realignment

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>based upon things like rules of engagement. So while you

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and I may have different I don't know what you

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>guys think about abortion, but I'm pro choice. Well, we

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we may have differences of opinion about that, we agree

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>how to solve those differences of opinion, right, We debate,

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we converse, you can even protest if you want. Um.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>But but the new, the new threat to cognitive liberty

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>are you know, the are the woke. Are the woke,

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and they don't play by those rules of engagement. So

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if if you publish something or you say something they

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like, they go after your family, they try to

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>get your job taken away from you, they file complaint,

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they weaponize offices of diversity, equity, and inclusion. So you're

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about people who do not abide by traditional rules

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of engagement. So that's one thing in the in this

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>great realignment that we're experiencing. I mean there are other

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>factors as well, you know, like there's a truth that

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>can be known, there are more philosophical things, but I

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>think it Behoovese people. You have to be willing to

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>step If you're a liberal and you're against woke stuff,

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to be willing to step across the line

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>when Ted Cruise, for example, says something and agree and

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you will agree with him because it's true. Not because

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to agree with every single thing Ted Cruz says,

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but you have to look when when someone says something

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that's true that corresponds to evidence and facts, you have

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 1>to stand up to it, even if it's against your

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>own tribe. In spite of the consequences. That's what intellectual

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 1>integrity means. Well, the you know, the the intellectual mainstreams

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>running in the other direction. Though, this is something we've

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about a fair amount. Is that to to signal

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>your allegiance to your tribe, you bellow opinions that you

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>don't even think are are real, but you know it's

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a tribal indicator. And the more ridiculous, the more clear

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>your indication of tribal loyalty is. So the counter fact

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that the counter factual I would love to be able

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to run or in a parallel universe, is if Trump

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>had won the presidency, who would be avoiding getting the

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccine at that point, because not because of any the

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>science being any different, just because who was behind pushing

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it at the time. I think that would perfectly prove

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>your point. Yeah, that that would I don't want to

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>go down this rabbit hole, but the utter, unmitigated and

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty five years of my life, I think this is

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst catastrophe of this country and is signaling a

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>new error from US. The unmitigated to call it a

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 1>call Afghanistan and catastrophe is actually not even remotely doing

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>it justice. But you know that's the thing, like, well,

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what if Trump were in or could you take the

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>words of the sentence and you can when they say black,

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>can you put white in there? Can you put white

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in it? But even in those cases, um that these

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>folks have had many years, like an incubation chamber to

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>incubate ideas. So they've changed the meanings of words. So,

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, racism is now has a power component instead

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>of the traditional definition of discriminating me against an individual

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in the basis of a racial stereotype. Right, So they

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>changed the meanings of words, and it makes it really difficult. Look,

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>life is difficult enough, fake news, Russian bots, we have

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff we have to contend with, and on

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 1>top of that, we have people running around who changed

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the meanings of basic words. I'm telling you, like, you know,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I get all these emails from my kids school. They

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>go to p punctions, equity, equity, equity, equity. How many

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people do you think actually know what the word equity means. Yeah,

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about the fair amount. That's one of the

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the ways they line up so many

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>well meaning, suburban, college educated white gals and guys as well,

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>as they've redefined these words, and I hear anti racist,

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and if I didn't know what Abram x Kendy has

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>written and what that really means, I think, well, of

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>course you've got to be anti racist, but it's come

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>something completely different, right, and those sorts of things, and

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that's by design, by the way, of course, that's not

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a bug of the system. That's a feature of the system.

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And so look, so one of the things people say, well,

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was there a final straw for you? Like, what was

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing that finally? So I tried to I'm going

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to relate this to our conversation. So I tried to

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>get a meeting with the president of Portland State University. Right,

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of things I didn't put in the letter,

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 1>like the faculty Senate passed a resolution and the National

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Association of Scholars Oregon chapter has an amazing video that

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they took from the Faculty Senate meeting when they passed

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>an actual resolution about criticism of ideas being harassment and

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>specifically criticism of critical race theory. Right. Can you imagine

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the people in the engineering school saying, hey, criticism of

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>this bridge design is the engine is harassment or philosopher saying, hey,

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>criticism of my ideas of free will or ans free

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>will or whatever. It's that. No, that's insane. The the

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the more ideological you are. To keep your ideology in place,

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to have things like political correctness, You have

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to have things like blasphemy laws. So the university passes

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>faculty resolution. And then one of my colleagues wrote a

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>hit piece on me and the Chronicle of Higher Education,

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and I responded to that, Uh, well, let me not

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>hit piece. Let me rephrase that by saying, uh, she

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote an article about me, and and uh and and

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>basically the idea was that criticism of ideas is harassment.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And I responded in that And if you guys have

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a moment, it would be to read that, because it

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>would give you context for for this whole thing that's

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>happening in the academy. Criticism of ideas is not harassment.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Criticizing and immutable property of a person is a no

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>no because that person can't change it, so it doesn't

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>do them any good. For example, to criticize someone in

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>a wheelchair, or to criticize me because I'm fifty five.

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't change the color. I could change the cold,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>my hair, I can't change my age. So so I

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was in the dean's office. So I asked the president

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>for a five minute meeting repeatedly, and his staff told

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>me repeatedly, he's too busy. He's too busy for a

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>five minute meeting. Okay, Finally I managed to have like

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a three minute meeting with a dean. And this individual

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>told me, you know, I really did my best to

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>watch my tone. I was extraordinarily respectful. And I actually

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>had known this this person, so it's not like they're

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>total stranger to me. We live in Portland, we know

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>each other. So I said to this individual, you know

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that Portland's State university made the list of the talk

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Education. It's Greg

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Glukyanas book. He's the guy who wrote the Caddling of

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the American Violence. Yeah. Yeah, So I said, you know

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that I would urge your viewership to your listeners to

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fact check me when I say this, fact check every

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't believe anything I say, fact check everything. Poland State

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>University of worst colleges for free speech. And he turned

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to me with total sincerity and said, it's a good

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>thing to be on those lists, and I was so

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>utterly blown away, like because in other words, this wasn't

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a bug of the woke ideology. This is a feature

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>like this is actually baked into the educational system. This

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is a feature. And it was in that moment I

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>realized I had to quit, and then the pandemic hit

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of through through things for a loop.

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But um, I mean that is a month. That is

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a grown task. I mean think about that, like, that's

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>not a symposium. You know. In the Greeks, they get together,

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 1>they talk, they dispute, they argue, they laugh, they drink,

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and said, no, this is a church. These are yeah,

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm reminded of I'm reminded the final sceniversally,

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the final scene in Brave New World where the you know,

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the all powerful leader essentially says to the dissident, um no,

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't take it personally. I'm not angry at you

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>or anything. Here's what we're doing, here's why we're doing it.

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't fit in, so you need to go away.

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And the cool rationality of it is always, you know,

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>has always chilled me. And for that guy to say,

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>oh no, no, that's a good thing. I mean that's

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 1>like finding out he's a pod person or something. I mean, right,

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and and that's the other thing. So so that's when

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you really just let that idea percolate and then detonate,

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like when you really think about what that means. Here,

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.919
<v Speaker 1>individuals who are positive they have the truth, they want

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to look at the system as an indoctrination. It's kind

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of a factory where people come in and they put

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ideas about specifically race, gender, and sexuales, etcetera. But whatever is,

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the moral orthodoxy. They put that in your head.

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>They no longer have the north Star's truth. And when

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you do that, the natural consequences there can't be free

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.879
<v Speaker 1>inquiry and open expression. I mean, there can't be think

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about it like this, think about it like this. So

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if the president again, I want everybody to fact check

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>every single thing I'm saying. Do not take my word

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for it. I don't have the exact quotation, but it's

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:37.240
<v Speaker 1>something like the highest priority of the university is racial justice, right, Okay,

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's just think about that. If the it doesn't

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>even matter if it's racial justice, it doesn't matter what

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is If the highest priority of a football team is winning,

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>which is what the highest priority of a football team

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>should be right that any other priority that cons that

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>conflicts with that would by definition be a or priority, right, right.

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's why they don't, for example, have diversity requirements

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>on professional sports teams, because any other priority would have

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to be d prioritized or lowered. So, if your highest

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>priority is racial justice and free speech or free inquiry

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>or open expression of ideas can flis with that, you

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have to always side with your highest priority by definition,

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>because it's your highest priority. Well, right, And we're in

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a situation here where what has long practically forever been

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the highest priority of a university, seeking of the truth,

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the exchange of ideas is now seen as detrimental to

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the new orthodoxy. So it's not just not as higher priority,

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's specifically as it's a sin, it's a point, it's right,

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it's not above, it's a feature. And to avoid that,

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why you have to have intellectual, political, uh an

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.839
<v Speaker 1>ideological diversity. You have to have that Marxist in there,

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a Marxist. You have to have that um Keynsian, you know,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to have someone teaching Hiak, you have to

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to have that intellectual diversity, so that the

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>highest priority, so that the institution doesn't become something other

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>than a means to enable people to understand the world

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and to figure out what's true. And if they're wrong,

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, that's okay too. But nobody was forced

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>feeding them that idea. They made the best. They did

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the best they could to come up to to be

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>sincere and ask honest questions to try to figure out

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>what's true. And they kept the value in mind of

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>being willing to revise their beliefs. And that's another characteristic

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that ideologues don't have. They're not willing to change their minds.

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's a fundamental feature of what it is that

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>makes someone rational. And we have we are not teaching that.

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>We have lost that and what have we bartered it for.

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>We've bartered it for an ideology that separates and divides us.

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>If you try to get the if you try to

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>get the universities down to one Marxist, there's gonna be

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Marxists on the street corners saying will

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>share for food or something. But um my, my final

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.959
<v Speaker 1>question for you would be I used to read about

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the cultural revolution in China that happened through what the

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 1>late sixties, early seventies, and I would read that stuff

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think, I don't I just don't get it.

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, how how could this ever happen? It

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't quite make sense to me. I now get it completely,

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's starting to make sense to me in a

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in a very scary way. Do you think, um, do

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you think we could get there? Do you feel you

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like do you feel like it's getting worse or

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 1>better or enough people waking up to it? Where where

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are we on the continuum there? That's that's a that's

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a great question. I don't know the answer to that.

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that this is not sustainable. I don't know

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what the expiration data is. People don't like living like this. Um.

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And again, like you said before, the whole thing is

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>so stupid. You know, it's not like that they're offering.

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's the end result of any of this stuff?

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:18.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's the other thing. It's so idiotic. Just think

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 1>about white fragility. It doesn't work with anything else. Why

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>should it work with whiteness? I mean, it doesn't work

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with witches. You're a witch? No, I'm not. That's proof

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>that you're a witch like you're denialist groups of the thing.

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't work with literally anything else. Why would

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it work with I mean, the whole thing is so stupid.

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like what the junior high school people do to

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.280
<v Speaker 1>each other. But yet it's who doing an unbelievable number

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of our of our intelligentia, and it's captured the institutions.

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that this is sustainable. I think

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that this will do unbelievable damage to our institutions. I

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think it already has done damage to the institutions. Who

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is Ah, no, you go. I was just gonna say,

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're right about the cultural revolution thing, because

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I see some of the the earmarks of it in

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the kids are being urged to either ignore their parents

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or turn them in or tell their teachers about them,

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing. And the idea of dragging

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>your own parents into the street to see them beating

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is so horrific most of us can't imagine it. I

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 1>think you had to have a communist system for that

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to catch fire like it did. Um. You know, Hitler

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>send into power through the ballot box famously. Um. But

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, one more aspect of the cultural revolution, totalitarian systems.

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The rest of it are show trials, And I wondered

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:37.840
<v Speaker 1>if you could just spend a couple of minutes on

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>your experience with the Title nine investigation. Yeah. Well I

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 1>had to sign paperwork saying I couldn't talk about it,

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>so I can't really talk about it. Wow. Yeah, well,

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:52.479
<v Speaker 1>now it was there just out of curiosity. I don't Peter,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't know this about me, Joe Getty. I

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:57.800
<v Speaker 1>almost went to law school, so I'm the show's legal expert.

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Um Was there was this a contract? Was there consideration

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>in exchange? You you you gave up the right to

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about this in exchange for what it was an

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>exchange for I? I am. You know, we're represented by

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a union. And and that's the other thing that I've

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>changed my mind on, probably a conversation for another show.

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I do not like teachers unions one iota, but I

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>can tell you in no uncertain terms, like, as a fact,

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have lost my job long ago if not

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for my teachers union in general and not for the

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>guy who heads the teacher's union. I was seeing this

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 1>guy literally like every day from complain. In fact, he

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 1>went up for renewal and I asked you to write

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 1>um a letter like I don't know, two or three

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 1>years in the row because he was seeing me. So

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of had a change of change of mind

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on the importance of teachers unions. But yeah, I know,

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's uh, it's interesting. So the title

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>line investigations, there's no due process in that, so you

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have access to what you're being infused if you

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have to infer that from the invest the gator. And now, look,

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it is often said that we are not um that

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>people who consider us their enemies, we do not say

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>kind things about. So I'm gonna tell you something unbelievably

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>truthful about the title line investigator in the Office of Diversity.

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You could accuse these people of many things, but the

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thing you cannot accuse them of is not being thorough.

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>These people are the most thorough people. I mean, they

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>had a gustopo like thoroughness and compliment. They were calling

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in form of students, colleagues, t s, people I did

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, independent studies with people I had known like

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 1>years ago. They went back like years and they were

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>summoning them to the Office of Diversity. They were I

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:57.479
<v Speaker 1>mean I was walking around campus and people were coming

0:49:57.600 --> 0:49:59.719
<v Speaker 1>up to me, that's what the whole beating your wife

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and family, and then like other people would come up

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with this I hear about you didn't want I was just,

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the particularly um insidious part about that is,

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, my daughter is adopted from China,

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:19.399
<v Speaker 1>so like there's another level of hideousness that's going on there,

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's really nothing you can do. I mean, you

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 1>can quit, but you can't say you know, you can't

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>even see that, you forget anything. You can't even see

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the charges, right, And then I love the outcome of it.

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Loved it in quotes and that it is so bizarre

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it's actually it reminds me of one of Iron Rand's

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>most famous quotes about you know, we don't expect you

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to follow these laws. We expect you to break them,

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 1>because once you're a lawbreaker, then we own you. And

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end of your title nine things you mentioned

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 1>in your letter of resignation, they essentially said, you're not

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>guilty of these bizarre charges, but as long as we've

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 1>got you in our clutches, you're not allowed to do this.

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You have to do this, and we think you ought

0:50:56.960 --> 0:51:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to get counseling, and and it's like, wait what, so I, UM,

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So I requested a meeting. After that meeting,

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and then I read a very long statement UM to

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the chair of the department and the Chief Diversity Opics,

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and my union guys, Phil phil Lesh, who was again

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:24.719
<v Speaker 1>unbelievably phenomenal, um, and and among those, why am I

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to render my opinion or teach in such

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a way that my opinion about protected classes can be known?

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>When there were entire wings of university architecture dedicated to activism.

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, at the time I think alignment that was

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the Women's the Gender Studies Department of Women's Studies or

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever it's called. The p s U had the word

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>activists or some variant there of seven times on the

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 1>web page. So you have a whole you have entire

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>departments basically anything with the word studies in it. You

0:51:55.719 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 1>had entire departments that are geared towards activism. Explicit we

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>not only rendering their opinion, but actually geared to make activists.

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But I can't render my opinion about a protective class

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of teaching such a way that it's known and that's

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the other thing. Think about how crazy that is. So

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>if someone comes to me and says, hey, do you

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think this minority should be enslaved and in chained? I

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 1>have to say I cannot render my opinion. I mean,

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it's so crazy on so many levels. You know. I

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>picture you and Copernicus and Galileo sitting at a bar

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and just staring at your bears and saying, I hear

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:35.719
<v Speaker 1>your brother, I hear you as you ran into rather

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>similar orthodoxes and results. Um, hey, Peter, I hope we

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 1>can stay in touch. We're absolutely hoping to support you

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and people who think like you as much as we

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>can for as long as they keep us on the

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:51.799
<v Speaker 1>air before some woke group gets us fired. But it's

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>great to talk to you and and and chin up.

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:55.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we really admire the hell out of it. Yeah,

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:58.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I appreciate that you guys have always been

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:01.320
<v Speaker 1>terrific supporters and I'm I'm very grateful for that. You

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 1>can find me on Twitter at Peter burgosand g H O,

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 1>S S I N. And I just started a nonprofit

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that's going to fight back about this. It's called UM

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>National Progress Alliance, and we're at National Progress Alliance dot org.

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So I appreciate you guys have always been been supportive,

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a great way to remember that

0:53:23.040 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 1>we are Americans and we and our disagreements actually make

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>us stronger. And you know, I would love to go

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:32.080
<v Speaker 1>out and have beers with you guys and hang out

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, have spirited conversations to the early morning.

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll see if Galileo is available. All right, thanks many,

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>good to talk, all right, thank you. All right. See

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that's principle, man. You don't see that that much these days, no,

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, Um, we've all had situations like this in

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>our lives where uh, we don't want to do a

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 1>certain thing, but we end up in a situation where

0:54:02.640 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the realized there's no choice. This is not what I

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>want to do, but I've got no choice. And that's

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:09.920
<v Speaker 1>where he was. Yeah, I I absolutely admire his character

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and I know he would have done this in a

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 1>variety of circumstances. In his letter resignation is brilliant and

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:17.399
<v Speaker 1>persuasive in the rest of it, but in a weird way,

0:54:17.520 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Portland's state made it easy for him in that they

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>were so patently crazy and unfair and oppressive and unwilling

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to listen to reason. I mean, he really had no

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>choice unless he was just gonna drink himself to death

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and pretend that it wasn't happening. Well, when one of

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the deans says, no, it's a good thing we're on

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that list of being the worst university for free speech

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to America, You're done. I mean what there's unless you

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think you can reform them from the inside. You obviously can.

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You're done, you know. He mentions he was sworn at

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and spit on walking across campus on more than one occasion.

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 1>He's obviously a man of the mind and a man

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of peace. I had a punched people in their heads.

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's why Peter Gashian is a better fellow than

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I am. I find a quad with a pool cue

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or a sack by Nichols. Amen to that, brother. Extra

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:08.760
<v Speaker 1>large