WEBVTT - How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Investing

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, it's really a

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>joy to speak to our next guest, Michael sanin Felt.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>He's the chairman and founder of Tiger twenty one. Tiger

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one is a peer membership organization for high net

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>worth wealth creators and preservers, helping them to navigate the

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>challenges and opportunity to that success creates. Tiger twenty one

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>has nine members with more than eighty eight billion dollars

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in assets, so are really unique perspective and some from

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the group of ultrawealthy UH individuals business owners that have

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>monetized their businesses. Uh. Michael, thanks so much for joining us.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I love to get your thoughts on what your members

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are telling you now that at least in the US,

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>there are clear signs that we're coming out on the

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>other side of this pandemic. How are they viewing the

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>world and investment opportunities. Well, thanks for having me, Um.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's an interesting time. In one sense. If

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you were ripped rand Winkle and you went to sleep

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half ago and you woke up today,

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't be all that shock. You might not even

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have known there was a pandemic looking at the financial numbers.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>But at this particular moment, I think our members are

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>digesting some incredibly mixed signals. On the one hand, uh,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of concern about inflation, uh, and mixed

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>messages about areas of the economy where there is inflation.

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>And on the other hand, as you've just talked about

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the you know, there's some question about whether that we're

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in a bubble and whether we're at the top of

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a market and how do you protect yourself? Uh. And

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>yet there are these long term businesses that have incredible potential.

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's a lot of mixed signals that feels a

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>little different than we've had in the past. It's pretty

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>much a spring back effect coming out of the pandemic.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, Michael, how are your clients preparing for the

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>changes that can emerge when it comes to taxes. Sure,

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>First of all, they're not clients their members UM because

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>these are all people who joined the organization and we're

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>not an advisor, but we do get a sense of

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. We had a UM we had a

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>poll which was really interesting that showed with members that

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>when taxes grow more than five percent, differential behavior starts changing.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things we talked about in our

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>groups we have seventy five groups across the globe UM

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is you know what happens when taxes really rise quickly?

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>Capital gains is the one we talk about a lot.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>There's some evidence when you raise capital gains above thirty

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you may not actually increase revenue to the government because

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>people's behavior change and they don't realize as many gains

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes counterproductive. So depending on where the changes

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>occur will impact behavior. Obviously, you have tremendous migration out

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of New York into Florida and out of Silicon Valley

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>into Austin, just to use as an example, because when

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you had the elimination of the deductibility of state and

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>local taxes, it made the high tax states really expensive

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and for some people they want to change their lifestyle

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.559
<v Speaker 1>as a result of it, again that five percent differential

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>start showing behavioral changes. Michael, I'd love to get a

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of what your members think about cryptocurrencies.

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of investors just across the spectrum or are

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a trying to understand what the whole world of crypto

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and then be if I do have a working understanding

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of it, how do I invest in it? So how

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>are your folks, again, the ultry wealthy folks thinking about

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this space? Sure, so we tend to separate. First of all,

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>our members are not only interested in crypto, but some

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of them are running some of the new crypto funds

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and have really extraordinary expertise. That's one of the advantages

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>about being in our groups. But generally the first order

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a substitute for gold. Some attributes of

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly bitcoin superior to gold, the most being that you

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>have a capped amount of bitcoin, so that you have scarcity. Uh.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And historically gold was a one to three percent asset

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>across the average of our members, and today my guess

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is that bitcoin is approaching perhaps a one percent number.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, with a scale of our organization that's still

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>approaching a billion dollars of bitcoin potentially UM, but the

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>bigger story is the blockchain story. The blockchain story many

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>members think could be as big as the Internet itself

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>because of the disruptive nature UH that it will have

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>on trade, commerce and finance. So in the bitcoin and

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in the cryptocurrencies, in the public area, you have things

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>like UH, I think it's great scale bitcoin trust and

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they have some other publicly traded trusts, so

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you can buy it like a stock, and it reflects

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the rise and fall of the price of bitcoin. But

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested in the broader and of course coin

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Base having gone public is the largest infrastructure play for

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency and in the in the broader blockchain area, UM.

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Probably the number one UH company involved in blockchain because

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of commerce is Amazon. Of course, if you buy Amazon,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you're buying a lot of other themes as well. But

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>over the long term, they, they and some of the

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>other tech giants really are looking at how blockchain will

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>change the world. I'd love to switch gears just a

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>little bit to another hot button area, which is real estate.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>With prices so high, are your members buying, are they

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>waiting or what are they doing in regard to their

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>real estate purchases right now. So so you know, our

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>members um joined Tiger when they have liquidity events and

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>have built a large, successful company. And the number one

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>asset among our members has been real estate for over

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a decade, followed by private equity and then public equity

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 1>or today it's been reversed with public equity. Going forward,

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>real estate is king and the reason is that's where

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>our members have expertise. But um, you know when they

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>say like still water runs deep. Um, if you say

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the word real estate, it sounds like it's a single market,

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's no market more in transition. If you look

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>at the retail space, there's just uh, endless negativity going

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>forward because those Internet sales have changed the way people

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>buy forever. And if that's hurt the retail space, the

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>industrial space that serves those internet sales, the last mile

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>delivery and some of the telecommunications industrial real estate has

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been on fire. That's been amazing. And in the middle,

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have the big question about residential, which

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is just the perennial favorite. It's income producing an office.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's gonna wonder what's happening with office. That's that's the

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>big question. Hey, Michael, Thanks so much for joining us again.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We always love getting your perspective. It is a unique perspective.

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Son and Felt, chairman and founder of a tiger

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars assets. This is Bloomberg. Well, we did

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>get the I s M Services Index data this morning.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess for the month of June it fell to

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty point one versus the record sixty four May. So

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not so good. The expectation was for sixty three

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>point five, so came in a little bit below expectations.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not so good. But heck, are reading a sixty

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>point one in and of itself is very good. So

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>how to really pass through this? We welcome Steve you

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>should oh he's a chief economist for Miszoo ho Security. Steve,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what was your takeaway this i SM data this morning? Well,

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean you kind of hit the nail on the

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>head a moment ago PUB when you talked about the

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know it's down relative to expectations, but

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the headline number is still in that expansion every phase.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Now this is for the service component of the economy.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>The manufacturing number are disappointed as well relative to expectations,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>but again still at a healthy level. But what's most

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>important about the data in here is the details of

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the report, you know, the details of the report getting

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>at what was actually happening in terms of orders and

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>employment and things of that nature. Whereas where we saw

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the weakness and the biggest negative surprise was in that

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>employment component, which came in at minus four. It came

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in at forty nine point three versus fifty five point three,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's really a fairly large drop. That's a six

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>index point drop in the employment component. And considering that

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what's really being the factors that people are

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at in driving monetary policy, especially after that solid

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>payroll employment number yesterday, I'll ask Friday in terms of

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the headline number coming into eight hundred and fifty, this

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>disappointment tells you that perhaps the fifty numbers more an

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>anomaly than it is going to be the new norm. Well,

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the more complicated aspects of this, right?

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You know? I S M had said material shortages, inflation, logistics,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and employment resources continue to be a problem. Right, And

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>so it looks like you hit a snag and one

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the economy and then it impacts another part

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, and it looks like, um, there's a

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tangled web of issues here. So how

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>do how does this number kind of stand when you

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think about broader economic recoveries here? Well, I mean, look,

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the reality as the economy is going to put in

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a very very good growth rate number this year. Okay,

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>second quarter g DP our number seven and a half percent.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a really solid number. But it doesn't compare to

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the nine percent numbers people have been talking about. And

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this data again doesn't fit with the numbers that have

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>people and being discussed in some areas. It consistent with

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a million workers being added every month between

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>now and the end of the year. In terms of

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the employment numbers, these numbers are telling you that a

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the incentive to the economy that was provided

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>by the by the two point eight trillion in stimulus

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that we were given UM earlier this year, between the

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump program and the Biden program, the nine hundred billion

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and the and the one point nine trillion program, that

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is largely run its course, and you're starting to see

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy come back slowly to a more realistic growth level.

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>It's still going to be robust and solid relative to

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.719
<v Speaker 1>our historical norms for the next couple of quarters. But

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the upside momentum is kind of over and done with.

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the peak in the economy and now we're

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>rolling down the other side of that. Do you think, so,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you think the FED kind of looks at

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at that Steve that Does the FED feel like I can,

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact stay on the sidelines or do we think

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the last FED meeting where the dot plots

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>got some people's attention about potentially tightening you know, again,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>when the Fed changes its dots in three which, to

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest, it's a year and a half out um,

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, and people pay attention to that. That I

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>think is the mistake, you know, talking about going from

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>one dot to two dots in terms of one hike

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to two hikes in twenty the end of twenty three,

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in an environment where the unemployment rate actually moved up

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to five point nine percent from five point eight percent

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>when everyone's expecting it to drop. The five point six

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a problem for those more hawkish

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>members of the committee because even though the employment number

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was good at fifty thousand, the more political aspect of

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the jobless rate and the household employment numbers

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>weren't particularly robust. So I think when you look at

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all this, it's a really good economy. It's just not

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>as strong as people want to see to fit with

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what we have seen in terms of the Hawks discussions

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and the optimistic scenarios as to where this economy is

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>going to go. Essentially, members of the Committee and I

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.599
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people in the financial community have

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>written checked this economy can't cash into great economy, but

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not as strong as they would like. I like

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a little top Gun reference there, Stevens Judeo, chief economist

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>for Missoo Securities USA. I'm sure he's getting ready for

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>top Gun two, which I think is coming in the

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fall from power Amount Stevens Judo. Good to have him

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>on here talking about this. I S M data still

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong. Don't freak out. The bond market definitely paying

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>attention here with the ten uere you know, below two um,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>but still a good number overall. Looking at w t

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I crude oil here seventy four hours thirty three cents

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>announced off about eighties cents, but it had been as

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 1>high as seventies six dollars and cents earlier Today so

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this is uh, just moving higher. We've seen oil really

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>over the last several weeks, and all I know about

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that is it's a commodity, so it's supply, it's demand.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm guessing demand ising, you know, more than supply

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>right here. So that's basically my analysis. Fortunately, we have

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody much much smarter on this to explain it to us,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Valier. He's an oil and gas analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Fernando,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>let's start with OPEC here. Um, they didn't get it

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>done this weekend, So tell us what's going on with OPEK,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>what happened over the weekend, and kind of how you

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think it might play out. Sure, both, First, thanks for

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>being for let me participate today. Um, there's a major

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>disagreement between OPEC plus in putting Russia UH and the

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>u A, the United Arab Emirates, And the big dispute

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>is really about when you set the baseline for the

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>OPEC plus cards their stock of extending the cuts beyond

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>A two. The EE doesn't want to extend this early ahead,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but they are okay to complain with the cuts, but

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>their baseline for production is set in October, and they

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>added to tacity UH just after that. So currently the

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>EE has about a third of its capacity that's been

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>idled since the cuts in UM and so they want

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring back. They want to reset the baseline to

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be their production production production capacity as it stands as

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>opposed to October and as opposed to the Saudi Arabian economy,

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the EE is a lot more depending on oil revenue.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So even though they're benefiting from the rise in oil prices,

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>they're still struggling a little bit with the fiscal balance

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>without that additional production. Can you draw out what's at

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>stake here, because really it looks like it's the stability

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of the global economic recovery. Oil is already at a

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>six year I what are the ramifications of a lot

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of these delays and the volatility that's arising from them. Well,

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>currently the biggest issue is just higher oil prices for

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the short term, although right now they're trading down a

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But without resetting that baseline UH and getting

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>additional volume, we would be and in the current status

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>grow of the mint recovery in O E C D,

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we would expect this UH in balance to continue and

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>drive oil prices higher. And there's actually pressure from the

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden administrations for OPEX to increase some of that production

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>back so we don't see a disparate impact on inflation

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as we're seeing with other commodities. So that's really what's

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the balance now. And ultimately UH energy is really

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>um hinges on GDP growth in in gasoline and jet

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on disposal income growth. So higher oil prices are actually

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a long term issue for oil demand. So there is

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an interest for OPEC to not get back to the

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred hunder dollar oil prices that we saw in two

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten to two thousand fourteen, because really that's

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>what gave Ryan's to shale, that's what gave rise to

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the UH improvements in my legion that

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that really have curtailed oil and man. So Fernando generally speaking,

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>where would OPEC like oil to trade in an ideal world.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I know different countries, I guess have different break evens,

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and just give us a sense of how that works. Yeah, exactly.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So the break even is opposed to a company is

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>not what it takes for you to cover your operating

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>expenses and everything else. It's because these these countries are

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially almost at dependent on oil is how much what

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>oil prices they require in order to cover their fiscal costs,

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and that will vary from Pennezuela, which is into two

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hundreds UH, society which is probably closer to fifty five

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to sixty depending on their production levels and UM. So

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi and Russia can can make do in the

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>six to seventy dollar range UM, but they probably prefer

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between seventy to eighty dollars. I think that tends

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a price where you can start to see

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>an impact on global demand. We have a heuristic that

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>when at total energy costs are over seven percent of

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>global UH the domestic product, it starts to be detrimental

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to overall growth. So I think that gets you anywhere

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>between six to seventy five. I think that's probably their

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Goldilock scenario where they're making a lot of money UM,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time they're not damaging a long

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>term reman. Can you give us a roadmap here of

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>what the next couple of days should look like and

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>what the conflicts might be in the interim, Well, I

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's everybody's cats. Now. THEE has said the

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>meeting has been postponed, while SARDI and Russia said the

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>meeting was canceled. UM. So I think for now, at

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>least in the short term, we're going to continue having

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>these dually narratives. I think talks of the U E

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>leaving OPEC are probably not unfounded, but I think we'll

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll get more pressure to at least get a temporary,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at least a small increasing in production over the next

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of days UH, and that could be coupled with

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>extending the deal beyond the current expiry. Hey, Fernando, you

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier the U S shale producers. They have not

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>been the most disciplined lot historically. Do we expect them

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to just start drilling again? Well, so far we haven't

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>seen that, except for the private operators. The public operators

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>have stuck to their capital discipline, and part of that

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>is because they have to, because they took on too

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>much debt during the pandemic and the focus now is

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to reduce that debt rather than continue to grow. Um.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>You've seen anywhere one from chronical Phillips, who has always

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>been disciplined increasing share by backs UH to OXY that

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>UH hasn't always been the most discipline but focusing instead

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of on debt reduction. So right now, when you look

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at the track spread count UM, which is how many

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>walls are completed, UH, only the permian is up significantly

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>from the loads of April, but even that there we

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a return to twenty nineteen levels. So we're

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing that discipline. Most of the growth has been from

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>private operators that don't have the same pressures as the

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>public ones, and the public ones have outlined more plans

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to return capital as opposed to continue English to grow.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>What can we see coming out of Washington, UM, real

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>quick here, really in thirty seconds or so. What can

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we expect from Joe Biden in terms of guidance? I

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think mostly diplomacy as opposed to outward comments. The administrations

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in a tough spot where they have to promote higher

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>oil production, which is really against their overall UH stated goals,

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but in order to prevent higher inflation that could be

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>damaging to the to the U S and global economy,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they have to pressure OPEC plus to raise production a

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but they can't be seen out the lead

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to be doing that. So so so Setst. Fernando, thank

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We appreciate it as

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>always your go to person for global oil. Fernando val

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas analysts for Bloomberg in intelligence, looking at

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.239
<v Speaker 1>w t I crude here, it's been a really volatile day.

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Trader as high as seventy seven dollars for barrel, now

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>down trading down to seventy four dollars. So volatility continues

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in the global energy markets. Will pay attention to OPEC.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. All right. Let's talk plastic waste. It's

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a big, big issue for a lot of consumer products

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>companies as they try to combat this issue. There's different

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>technologies out there for doing that, and we as consumers

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>try to do our part by recycling. Let's check in

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with marking staff and he's a deputy CEO of Carbios.

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Carbios is a company that trades on the UNEXT under

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the ticker symbol a l c RB, based in France. Martin,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Talk to us,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just frame out for us the global problem that is

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>plastics waste. Yes, thank you for inviting me. Uh. You know,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>three and fifty million metric tons of plastics are produced

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>every year, of which ten million metric tones end up

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.959
<v Speaker 1>in the environment every year, So it's a big issue

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and the issue is not plastics. The issue is plastic

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>waste because we have been producing plastics for more than

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty years and we have not taken enough care of

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the end of life of plastics and carbios. We are

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the first and only company to develop biological technologies for

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of life of plastics and fibers. Martin, maybe

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you could speak a little to how large global corporations

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like Laureale or Pepsi are able to be a part

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the solution better than the problem. They are part

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of the solution, Yes, and they really feel responsible for that.

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a co responsibility, you know, to tackle this plastic

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.719
<v Speaker 1>pollution issue. Nobody will be able to put an end

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to plastic pollution by itself, so it's really a global play.

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And our partners, you know, laur Real Nicely, PepsiCo Century,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>they are very aware that it's by collaborating with a

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>startup like us, with governance, with NGOs that we will

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>develop solutions to really tackle this plastic solution issue, which

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is not acceptable. Talk to us, Martin about kind of

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>what your technology is, what it does and in kind

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of how it's being used. Yes, so we use a

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>biological tool, which is an enzyme. You know, we have

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of enzymes in our body. An enzyme is

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst which triggers a reaction. Normally, it triggers a

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>biological reaction, but our scientists had the idea to use

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>this biological tool to trigger not a biological reaction, but

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a chemical reaction. And this chemical reaction is to break

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>down plastics into its monomaiers, which are the common building

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>blocks of plastics. So instead of putting together the same

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>molecule sudden of times to make a plastic or a fiber,

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>our enzyme breaks down this long chain of molecule into

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>single molecules which are called monomers. Then we isolate the monomaers,

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we purify them, and we recombine them again to make

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>new plastic with the same quality as plastics which are

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>made from petrochemicals. So it's a real a solution for

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of life. It is not a reused solution.

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a pure recycling. It's a virtuous loop which we

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have made possible. Are there certain types of plastics that

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>don't work to go through these technologies? You know, I

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think even as an ordinary recycler people have to think

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>twice before they they do throw out or or recycled

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>certain types of plastics. And it's interesting to see what's

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>happening across different cities when it comes to you know,

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>really the city is cracking down on certain companies using

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and distributing certain types of plastics to the consumers. Yes,

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>so today our technology works for polyesters, which is mostly ety,

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the plastics for bottles, but also a food

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>trace for example, or textile. When you see poliest on

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the garment, it is exactly the same material than the

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>material which is used to make transparent bottles. So our

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>technology work for any kind of peg transparent bottle, but

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>also colored bottle or opeque or foot trace or polyester

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>T shirts. We can be polymerize or deconstruct all kinds

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of petty waste to make any kind of petty product.

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So we can make a bottle from the bottle, but

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>we can also make a T shirt from a bottle,

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or a bottle from a T shirt. It is exactly

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the same for us. In the future, we have the

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>intention and the goal to develop this technology for other polymaires.

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So our technology must be seen really as a platform

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>two to recycle any kind of plastics in the future.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a fascinating technology, fascinating story for a huge global problem.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Just think about all the plastic bottles we see on

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the side of the road or worse yet, in the waterways.

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Martin Stefan, Deputy CEO of Carbios coming to us from France,

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate and again, you know that really is a

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>global issue, uh Sonali, and it's just begging out for

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>technological solutions in addition to more recycling, because only four

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>of plastics actually are recycled. Paul, I know people who

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have given up shopping with plastics for days in a row,

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's possible. It's hard to do. Thanks for listening

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Put

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.