WEBVTT - From the Vault: Social Media is a B.U.M.M.E.R.

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Tabnico into the Vault for an older episode of the show.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>This one originally aired on August six, nineteen, and it

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was called Social Media Is a Bummer. This is where

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Jarn Lanier's book, which was highly critical

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of social media. That's right, Ten arguments for deleting your

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts right now. I think it's an excellent

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>food for thought as we continue through. Welcome to Stuff

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind, a production of I Heart Radios

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Work. Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're back to a subject that may be familiar

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to you if you've been listening to the show for

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit. It's the next battle in the war against

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the Machines. That's right, you know, as we've already got

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>us in the show, and I think it's obvious to

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>most of our listeners the wonders of interconnectedness that the

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>web have have have given us have also unleashed some

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>less than satisfying realities. You know, we we worry about

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>smartphone addiction and the degree to which the these devices

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and the many apps they have on them have been

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>engineered to gain our attention. And then there's been growing

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>attention given to the role social media has in in

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing into you know, corporate and state manipulation

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and endangering democracy, our personal freedom, and our happiness. We've

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>we've recorded a few different notable episodes on these topics. Right, So,

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you and Christian a while back did an episode.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Now this was years ago now, so that the research

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>has come a long way since then, I think, but

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you did an episode on what the measurable psychological effects

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of social media were, Uh, and there's still I think

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>this is still a developing field. Like I notice a

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of conflicting findings when I read upon this, Like

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is social media making us more lonely, more depressed? Whatever?

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the answer to that question is it's complicated, right,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>And and I think we'll discuss a little bit this

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>later on too. That you know, it also depends on

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>how you're using social media, what your role is, or

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>using social media is part of your job, etcetera. Yeah, Uh,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>then we also you and I. Robert did a couple

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of episodes within the past couple of years called the

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Great Eyeball Wars that were primarily about the attention economy,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that our our devices, and specifically especially

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>like social media platforms on those devices, but other platforms

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>also are because they make their money by getting you

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to use them and pay attention through you know, advertiser dollars.

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you are the product on these platforms. You're not

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the customer. Uh, and your attention is what is being

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sold to the advertisers. They're addicting us, and they're addicting

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>us on purpose pretty much right. Like one of the

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the handiest metaphors is that a social media

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>app on your smartphone turns your smartphone into a tiny machine. Yes,

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's but while a Vegas slot machine is is

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>programmed to steal all of your money. Uh, this slot machine,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this tiny slot machine, is programmed to steal all of

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>your time, your time and your attention. Yeah, it wants

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you using it as much as possible. And the numbers

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on this are kind of freaky, Like when when you

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>actually measure how much time people spend on their smartphones,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>especially looking at apps like Facebook or you know, other

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>social media apps, they don't usually like what they find

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>out when those numbers come in, right. And certainly we

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>do have tools on a lot of our smartphones now

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to track our screen time and to keep tabs on

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and even set up little barriers to excessive use. But

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, like most of that stuff

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is still very voluntary. And then we're not doing this

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the default settings on a phone. Um or certainly when

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you get a new phone, you didn't tend to bring

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>over your your sort of legacy settings from the former phone.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, I think there's a there's a

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>huge argument to be made that that these companies are

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>not really you know, going in head first in the

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>battle to reduce your screen time, right. Uh. And then

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>also we did a more recent episode called The Doppelganger

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Network where we talked about the jumping off point for

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that was an article that we read by Robert Zapolski,

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the neuro endo chronologist I think at Stanford and he

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>uh then he made a comparison between the effects of

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>social media use and and digital media more generally, and uh,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the psychological conditions like cap craw delusion that caused this

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>rift between recognition and familiarity in the brain. So it

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>creates a kind of a kind of strange, alienated world

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>where where normally you'd pair these experiences of cognitive recognition,

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, knowing that you recognize something you see, and

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the feeling of familiarity with it, but that is kind

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of torn asunder by the dynamics of social media. Yeah,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and and so, I I don't think you know, the idea,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>this argument that, oh, so the social media is potentially dangerous,

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's that it has you know, ill effects. This

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>is probably not new. I think everyone's heard somebody argue

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it to some extent, and we've even seen people make

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>fun of the argument, like, for instance, one image that

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it frequently makes the round is uh is an old,

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>old timey photograph of like a subway car or a

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>train full of individuals, everybody reading a newspaper, everybody's face

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>hidden in a newspaper, and then using this to make

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>fun of the argument that you know, everybody's just plugged

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>into their phones and they're not connecting with each other,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as if to say, well, this was exactly the same thing,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. I think it's it's definitely worth driving

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>home that the type of uh, psychological involvement that's going

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on with the social media platform on a mobile device

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is entirely different than what you would find by just

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>sticking your head into a book or a newspaper. A

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>book or a newspaper is not a real time feedback

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to advice. Yeah, I mean, I think one thing that

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that that that kind of like poking fun at this

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>argument does reveal is that you can take the argument

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.119
<v Speaker 1>too far and be kind of totalizing about it, because

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it's important to recognize that the reason people use these

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>services are because they do provide something that people want.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, people through social media are able to keep

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>up with friendships that might have fallen by the wayside otherwise,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe long distance friendships. Uh. You know, these

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>these these platforms and these devices do enable all kinds

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>of things in people's lives that are valuable and good righting.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And you can certainly go overboard and kind of a

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>luddyite response to it and say, well, the internet is

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>bad or technology is bad, uh, And I feel like

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna have varying opinions, Like to one extreme, you

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>may be convinced that social media is uh, you know,

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's leaning more and more towards the self

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>digestion of human civilization. Or you may see nothing wrong

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with social media, though you may say, look, Robert and Joe,

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I know I use my Instagram, I use my Facebook,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>I keep with up with a few friends, uh, you know,

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a few celebrities or a few bands or what have you.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I get the news through it, and that's it. And

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't, you know, you know, greatly improve or harm

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>my psychic experience of reality. Yeah, and if and if

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what you believe, our goal is not to convince

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you that, no, you don't understand it's actually ruining your life.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you may very well have a perfectly healthy,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>limited relationship with social media, and you may be one

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the people who's getting more out of it than

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 1>it's getting out of you. But for a lot of people,

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we do want to make the case that

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that is not what's going on. Right I would say

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that most of us. Even if you you can say,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, honestly that you have a healthy relationship with

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>social media, you can probably not say the same for

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone in your circle. There there there's probably somebody or

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>several people that the display signs of unhealthy usage. So

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, you know, we're gonna we're gonna look

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>at some arguments against social media. Specifically, we're going to

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>be discussing UH an author by the name of Jarren

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Lanier and his two thousand eighteen book Ten Arguments for

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Deleting Your Social Media Accounts right Now. It's a great title.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>It gets right to the point it does, and and

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a fabulous little book that Joe and I

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>both both read for this episode. It's um it's short,

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>It's something on the order of what hundred and forty

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>six pages long. It's extremely accessible, Like he did not

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>make this a you know, a high high level computer

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>science intellectual argument. It is written so that I think

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anybody could understand it. It's very accessible, it's

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>very ground level, and I think it makes a pretty

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>compelling case that at least well he his argument is

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that social media in the business model that exists today

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is doing more harm than good, and our best way

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of fighting that harm is to have everybody get off

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of these platforms, because this will force the company is

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>involved to actually implement changes, right and and so his

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>His argument is not one against technology, and it's not

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>even necessarily against one one against um, a certain form

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of social media. It's against a particular business model that

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>powers social media. And that business model, I think is

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>what he ends up calling the bummer business model. It's

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a business model that is paid for by behavioral modification. Yes,

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>bummer be you in any R, which Linear says stands

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for behaviors of users modified and made into an empire

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for rent. It's clever having an acronym because sticks with

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you and uh and yeah, it's clever and it's a

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit funny. And and that can be said for

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire book, despite being a fairly serious topic with

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some potentially serious ramifications for humanity at large and for

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>into the dual um you know, self worth, it is

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a humorous read at times, and it is it is

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>fun to read, So I can't recommend it highly enough.

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a book you can read on the train and

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the plane, on a toilet. Uh, you know it just

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it makes for a great but important casual read. Yeah,

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and we we've talked about maybe getting him on the

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast sometime soon, and that would be great to have

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with him, But today we just wanted to

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about maybe a couple of the arguments that he

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>brings up in the book and and our thoughts about them. Yeah,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna attempt to regurgitate the entire book because

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>the book uh is already already speaks for itself. So

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.599
<v Speaker 1>we'll start though, by just talking about Jarren Lanier himself.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You might be familiar with him already, perhaps you're not.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps you've just read his name and thought it was

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>pronounced Jared Lantier, which is how I've been pronouncing in

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>my mind. That's how I've said it on the show

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But anyway, he is a scientist, a musician,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and a writer. He is a major figure in the

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>realm of virtual reality, having founded the VR company VPL

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Research in the nineteen eighties, and while he didn't coin

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the term virtual reality, this is generally attributed to French

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>playwright Anton and R. Toad In, he did popularize it.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>He helped create the first commercial VR products and introduced avatars,

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:25.239
<v Speaker 1>multiperson virtual world experiences, and prototypes of major VR applications

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>such as surgical simulation. He was involved in the creation

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Nintendo Power Glove. Yeah, now you're playing with

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>power which you know, which I have to say, the

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>power glove. I never had one as a kid, but

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw people with them, I knew people who had them,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and it it was this this instrument of wonder. I

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think it was all that practical as a gaming device,

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think it inspired a lot of people. And

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I also love seeing, especially nineteen nineties science fiction where

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they have reused a power glove as part of like

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a cybernetic you know, outfit for somebody. Anyway, he was

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>also involved in the with the creation of the headset,

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>apparently for the film The lawnmower Man. So you're really

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bringing out the hits here. Yeah, And I think this

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably not the stuff that usually gets highlighted about

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>his career, but it's this, you know, some of the

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I think some of our listeners might be

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. Exactly. I should point out that he's not

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>credited on lawnmower Man, but he does get a thanks

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on the far Superior Sci Fi Work Minority Report. Okay,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>uh he But more to the point, though he's an

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>author of several books, such as The two thousand six

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Information is an Alienated Experience you are not a gadget

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of Manifesto from two thousand ten, who owns the Future

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>from and Dawn of the New Everything from seventeen. I

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>tend to think of him kind of as a technology philosopher,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and I really like a lot of his approach because

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's got a healthy skepticism about over hyping technology and

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>what it can do. And at the same time, he's

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not anti technology. He's clearly somebody who loves digital technology,

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>loves computers. You know, he's worked with them his whole career,

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and so he doesn't end up saying, through your smartphone

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in the fire, flush it down the toilet, smash it

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>with a hammer. It's not an anti technology message. He

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>actually has a very specifically tailored message trying to identify

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is about the social media platforms specifically

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as they exist today that's causing problems for us and

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for our society and how could they be changed. Yeah,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately he is he's an optimist. Like he's he's presenting

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>an optimistic view of the future, like certainly highlighting problems,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>but discussing how we can address them, which I love.

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I I feel like I've spent too much of my life, um,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at more pessimistic views of reality and

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>dystopian views of reality, and I've gotten to the point

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>where those just don't serve me anymore. So I far

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>prefer reading an author like uh, like Jerry Lynn here.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So the booking question, I have to talk about the

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>cover of it, because the cover is is very simple,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, just a black and red text on a

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>white background and a silhouette of a cat walking off

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the cover of the book. And the cat is a

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>central metaphor in the book, right because, as he points out,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much as we love dogs, I love dogs,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you do, you do love dogs, and I love dogs too,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>just as I don't own one. But as much as

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we love dogs, we domesticated the dog. The cat arguably

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>domesticated itself. Uh you know, it interacts in our lives

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>more on its terms. You you were at great pains

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to attempt to train the cat, as anyone who's ever

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly you know, tried to to you know, shoot a

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>film about cats can attest to um. So, Lanier argues

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that social media is essentially turning us into well trained dogs,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>but we should really strive to be cats able to

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>dictate our involvement in the relationship at hand, to scratch

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the hand that feeds us, if we so wish, to

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>sleep wherever we choose, refuse food, walk on all the furniture. Ultimately,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we should we should want to be cats. We don't

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>want to be social media's dog. Yeah. And also, I mean,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>while he's advising people to quit social media, he's making

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>an argument and he's not it's not a totalizing argument.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean he realizes that different people are in different circumstances, uh,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's not a choice that will work for everybody, right, Like,

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>he's very clear on the on the fact that quitting

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>social media is a privilege and not everybody is able

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to do it. A lot of people, uh you know,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>own a business or or or part of their job

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>entails them using social media. I know some people like that,

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're just they're trapped in they're trapped in it,

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>like you just can't walk away from it, or you

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>might be shackled to it. More socially, like, well, if

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I stop using uh, you know, Facebook, how am I

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna connect connect with my friends who all live in

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>another city. And I just moved to a place where

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anybody, Um, you know, they're all these

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>arguments to be made, and so he's not. He's not,

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, drawing this firm line in the sand and saying,

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the winners over here, users over there, or

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>anything of the of the sword. And he's certainly not

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>arguing that, you know, we should we should all go

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and make a big dramatic to do about quitting social

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>media either because I think I think we all see

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that occasionally on our feet to oh, that's the most

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing thing when you see somebody post a lot about

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>how they're quitting, and then they quit for a week

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they're back. Yeah. Yeah. And in fact, I

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>actually I shared I shared something about this book on

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>my private social media feed, and immediately like somebody was

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like calling me out for having posted about quitting social

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>media on social media. But of course I think what's

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that? I mean, where are we going to

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about leaving social media but social media to a

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>certain extent um. And and also well, I mean this

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>episode where we're discussing his arguments again, you know, we're

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily saying everybody's got to get off social media.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But I do think these are some interesting arguments, very

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>worth considering. Um, we're discussing these on an episode that

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>will be promoted on social media because that is part

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of the distribution business model of this podcast exactly. It's like,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this is how, you know, one way that we reach listeners,

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and if we don't do this, it won't reach as

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.239
<v Speaker 1>many listeners. So I don't know, how do you how

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>do you balance That's like, are you actually doing better

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>if you say, well, let's not post the episode on

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>social media so fewer people will hear it. Yeah, thus

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is the world? Thus have we made it? But at

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>any rate, Linear also ultimately says like, hey, I'm not

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>even saying quit social media forever. Um, you know, because

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately he's hope, he's hopeful that social media can be corrected,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can come back to a version of social

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>media media that is not harmful to us in so

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>many ways. And then also he's saying, like, you know,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>quit for a while and come back. That's the only

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>way you'll you'll have any kind of like insight on

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing to you, Like this will help give

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you the uh, you know, the vantage point by which

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to to understand the interaction between your life and these

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>bummer systems. All right, well, maybe we should take a

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>quick break and then when we come back we can

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>discuss a couple of the arguments from the book and

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>our thoughts about them. Than all right, we're back. So again,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the book that we're discussing is uh Journalinears ten arguments

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>for deleting your Social media accounts. Right now, you're probably

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>wondering what are those ten arguments. We're not going to

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>regurgitate all ten arguments here. If you want to know

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what they are, you should pick up a copy of

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it because without even opening the book, all ten are

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 1>listed on the back right, which is which is prob

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was handy. You know, you can just you can instantly

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>see what you're in for. We're gonna be talking about

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>i think basically four of the arguments, and uh In

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>discussing them a bit here for you, yeah, someone more

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>depth than others. Now, one thing that we should talk

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>about upfront, because it's sort of a foundational argument that

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>feeds into all the others, is this point that, in

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Lanear's words, due to social media, you are partially losing

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>your free will. Uh So, one of his core arguments

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>on which many of the others rest is that social

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>media is at heart a mass program of behavior modification

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>for rent. That is how these companies make money. So

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if your Facebook, the way that you make money is

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that people pay you to have some kind of influence

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>on users of Facebook, and that influence could be a

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>very traditional, normal style of advertising, the kind of thing

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know that happens everywhere, and most people aren't

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>bothered by, right, because it's clear what's happening. You're just

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing an ad for a product that somebody thinks you

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>might want, and you know, there's the ad and you

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>might go by it. That's you know, we're not generally

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>very bothered by that. Right. Always reminds me of the

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>moment in Futurama where a fry encounters in the future

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and advertisement in his dream. That's a little creepier. We

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>find it intrusive. And he says, you know, we didn't

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>have that in my time. We just had advertisements, you know,

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all over the place and in the sky and on

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the billboard. I mean, certainly we do even without social media.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>We live in an age of you just ubiquitous advertising. Yeah,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know that is this is one thing that

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he does sort of attack is the problem that the

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>web arose on an advertising pay for model. Uh. You know,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the early days of the web, there was

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this idea that everything needed to be free to access.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't charge people to get stuff on the web.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>But then how do you pay for producing that stuff.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's got to make it, you know that they've got

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to get paid somehow. So what happens, Well, you'd pay

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for it by showing advertising along with the thing, and

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the advertisers would pay for what you're seeing. Right And

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, again coming back to podcasting, we're not blind

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that that's essentially what you have with

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. This podcast is provided to you for free,

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>but you have to put up with advertisements. Right now,

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't really mind that from an advertiser, from a

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>from a podcast point of view, because when I listen

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts and when I make a podcast, I generally

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>think the advertising that's happening there is fairly straightforward. It's

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear what's going on. Somebody's pitching you a product.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, likewise, on television, of course, television start off

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>with the same model and he discusses this. You know,

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>it's like, here's the signal. Here's some programming, but here

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>are also some advertisements. But generally speaking, without getting into

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the you know, the trickier forms of television

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>advertising and product integration and so forth, you're you're still

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the situation where it's like I'm watching a show. Okay,

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>now I'm watching an ad. Now I'm watching the show again. Right.

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But even when even with other things, you know, like uh,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sponsored content and stuff like that, I mean, I think

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a big difference between what's clear and what's sneaky.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think generally people tend to be okay with advertising

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>when it's clear what's going on. When you know, they're

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>told who's paying for what they're seeing, and it's clear

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>what the person who's paying for what they're seeing wants

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>them to do. Usually it's like buy my product or

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>become a member of my service or something like that.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>That that that's the kind of thing that I usually

0:21:57.800 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>feel fine about that. Most people tend to feel fine

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>abou out what's going on with social media, According to

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Tullneier's argument is that there is a much sneakier, more subtle,

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps more sinister thing happening which is that our

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>behavior is being modified in ways that are not clear,

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that are not that are not obvious to us, ways

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're not aware of, and we oftentimes, in fact,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, don't know who's doing it right.

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think we all have those moments using a

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>product like Facebook where something an advertisement will pop up

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>or predict or perhaps a post even made by a

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>friend will pop up, and you'll stop for a second

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and wonder, why was that served to me? Why am

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I seeing this? Yeah? What is what have I done?

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>What sort of interactions on my part or you know,

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>demographic information on my part has led to this being

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>put in my face? But there's a good chance that

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's either serving the like the supply model

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook, which is trying to keep you engaged on

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the platform for as long as possible, so that that's

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>one thing that they just want to keep you on

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>there so they can modify your behavior more, gather more

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>data about you, show you more ads. Uh, So that's

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing they might be just showing you it to

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you because their vast collection of data shows that when

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you see stuff like this, you use Facebook for a

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>longer period of time, or you log back on more

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>often later in the day. So that might be one thing,

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but the other thing might be that you're seeing that

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>thing because somebody has targeted you for some kind of effect.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 1>They want to generate some kind of effect. And this

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>could be like become my customer kind of effect, or

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it could be something else. It could be in effect

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like we want to make people stay home instead of

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>go out and vote today. Now at this point, I

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>do want to drive home as well. That one thing

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that Lanier is very clear on is that he is

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>making no argument that there is like a broom at

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or Twitter or wherever where like evil operations go on,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that there's like a sinister cabal uh in any of

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>these organizations that are sitting down and saying what can

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>we do to destroy the human soul or anything like that. Right,

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>there's not a m wahahaha committee, right there is. Instead,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>there is well, well, I mean, there are decisions being

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:19.239
<v Speaker 1>made by people about what types of incentives will be

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>algorithmically optimized and so so that is something where it's

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>not like the humans who operate in these companies don't

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>bear responsibility. They do, but they're not they're they're generally

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>not trying to ruin the human race. They're they're not

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, what's the worst thing we can do

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to our users, right, that would that would just be

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a simplification of something that is a lot more complicated,

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's taking place not on the scale of even

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of an individual or individuals, but taking place in the

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>scale of a corporation. What Linear argues is that bad

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>business incentives which prioritize behavior modification are leading to the

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>creation of algorithms that sort of automatically commit these these

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>behavior your modification schemes, and so behavior modification can be

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>linked to traditions and the behaviorist school of psychology, which

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>flourished in the twentieth century. We've talked on other episodes

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the show about like b F. Skinner and behaviorism.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Behaviorism sometimes gets demonized, and they're definitely really good reasons

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to be historically critical of the behaviorist trend in the

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>history of psychology, but it also wasn't entirely wrong. Like behaviorism,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think could be credited with trying to make psychology

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>a more objective science. But it also you know, a

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>common criticism is that it sort of treats the human

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>brain like a black box. You know, conditioning goes in,

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>behavior comes out, and whatever happens inside just isn't really important.

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that it did show is that if

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you treat the human brain like this kind of like

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>mystery machine where you just kind of like put conditioning

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in and keep calibrating until you get the output behavior

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you want, you can actually change behavior in an extremely

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>effective way like that, like you know, be behavioral conditioning

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>can be very powerful. And Laniers Linears argument is that

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>modern social media is sort of almost a perfect vehicle

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>for refining behavioral conditioning because it can collect extremely minute

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>data about you, and lots of it because of course

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it has you know, this connection like it it records

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>everything you do and all the stuff you do on

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>social media. There's actually a lot of things you do

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on social media that they can learn a lot about,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>from your brain states to where you are through location tagging,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to what you spend money on you know, your linked accounts,

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to the words you use reflecting your moods. Like they can,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>they know a lot about you and about how what

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>they show you affects what you do. Right, you know,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I would be loath perhaps to say that they know

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>us better than we know ourselves. But there, but I

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>feel like they often, these platforms often know us better

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>than we are perhaps prepared to admit to ourselves. Yeah, well,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they know things about you that are different from the

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>way you think about yourselves. They know about you from

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a behavioral conditioning standpoint, where they can track in a

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>really minute way what conditioning goes in and what behavior

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>comes out. We tend not to think of ourselves that way.

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We tend to think of ourselves from the inside out.

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>We think about our own mind states. You know, we

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>tell a narrative about our behaviors in which everything is

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>rationalized to make sense. So it's often we feel kind

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of demeaned when it's suggested that we are vulnerable to

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>behavioral conditioning. It's like, no, no, no, I'm not. You know.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like how people think advertising doesn't work on them,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, no, I'm not more likely to buy

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a product because I saw a commercial for it, but

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know you probably are. I mean, we just tend

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to think we're more mentally independent of the effects of

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>stimuli that we actually are, or we will will criticize

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and say it doesn't affect us on one platform and

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>then on another will celebrate it without naming any names.

0:27:56.359 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>One might use a particularly popular music streaming service and

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you might go, wow, I really love the algorithm on

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this thing. It really knows what I'm into it. Yes, me,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it keeps giving me musical suggestions that are they're totally

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on point. Yeah, and you need you have to stop

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes like, well, I guess that's a good thing, but

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 1>is it really Yeah. So social media platforms they can

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>gather all this data about you, but also they have

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>extreme psychological power over you. I mean, especially the big

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>one to think about his Facebook just like it's this

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>almost perfect machine for maximizing potential and behavior modification. It

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>can make you feel and think what it wants with

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>astonishing effectiveness just by showing you certain things that it

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>has figured out that when it shows these things two

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>people like you, you tend to react by behaving a

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>certain way. And then of course it can just keep

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>calibrating those those efforts more finally, and finally, finally with

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely high quality feedback based on the way it tracks

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>your behavior and all the ways we mentioned earlier. So

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this this is basic argument, and you can see that

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>companies like Facebook are interested in in always getting tighter

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and tighter control of the data and feedback about you

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in these sorts of ways. I was just reading a

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>story the other day, uh, in the m I T.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Tech Review about Facebook being involved in funding research on

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a wearable headband that could supposedly read your thoughts. Now.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should get overly alarmed about like

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this one particular news story, because this kind of technology

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is probably very crude at this point. You know, it

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't tell you a lot today. We're not going to

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>go from like zero to black mirror in a year

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>on this particular front, right, But I do think the

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that Facebook is funding this kind of research should

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>tell us something. They want to get deeper, They want

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to go further. They want to get closer and closer

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to your brain to know exactly how you're reacting to

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>things in real time all the time. They want they

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>want sort of like infinitely precise and finally calibrated data

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>about you. And why would they want that. It's because

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it gives them better control over what you do, and

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that control can be rented out to sponsors and again,

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and those sponsors could be fairly straightforward. They could be

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.479
<v Speaker 1>somebody trying to get you to buy their brand of shoes,

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>or it could be a government trying to control what

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you do on a certain day, or or control how

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel about a political movement. Absolutely, and and that

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly they did. The involvement of of of other states

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>or operatives acting on the part of on the behalf

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of other states has has certainly been in the news

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a great deal recently. Well, yeah, it's very strange that

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. I don't know if people would have predicted

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago. Maybe they did, and I wasn't aware

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of it that social media would start to become a

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>major um statecraft and national security concern. Yeah. I mean,

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>well I think we were all probably you know, in

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the in the same boat. You know, for the most

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>part when social media started up, it just seemed like

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a thing that was a fun way to connect with

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a few other people that you knew and maybe meet

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>some new people. It's cool. Yeah, And it was you know,

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, you know, it was just you

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and friends and potential new friends on there. And your

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>parents weren't on it yet. Major politicians were not on

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it yet. Um, major governments were seemingly not involved yet. Well,

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the I don't want to be overly.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to demonize it too much, but I

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.239
<v Speaker 1>mean it's kind of the addiction model, right. It's like,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, your first your first dose of this drug

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 1>is free, maybe your first free, uh, several doses you

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>get hooked. And then what Linear talks about a big

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>issue going on with these companies is that there is

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>this problem of network effects, right. Network effects are the

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens in digital media businesses where people tend

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to get locked into a service. And once people are

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>locked into a service, it's very hard for there to

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>be an effective competitor and get people to move over there.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>People are already on Facebook. If you tried to start

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a better Facebook today, and people have tried to start

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>like nonprofit facebooks, nobody goes over there, right new. I've

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>joined those before and it lasts like an afternoon. Yeah,

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you're you're already. People are on Facebook because that's where

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>their friends are and that's where all that's where everything

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is happening. It's network effects that keep people locked in

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.959
<v Speaker 1>once they're already there, and once everybody's there, you can

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like lock the doors and then start doing

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want inside, and you can check out any

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>time you like, right, but you can never leave you alright,

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're skipping and skipping around a bit. But another argument,

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>basically the fifth argument that Linear makes, is that social

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>media is making what you say meaningless, and the core

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>argument here comes down to context. Now, entering into this argument,

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I personally thought about the rather simple example that I'm

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>sure many of you are thinking of right now, and

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>an ambiguous text message or email has taken out of

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>context because there are limitations to what we can typically

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>convey in these you know, limited generally short form communication formats. Uh.

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, an emoji can only do so much to

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>provide context to what you're saying. You ever, notice how

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to a friend of yours talk about something,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it sounds normal and fine, But if you listen to

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a snippet of a stranger's conversation, they sound like a

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>complete moron and it's like embarrassing or or at best,

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like a cryptic alien where you're just like, what what what?

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>What was that? I'll never know? But you know what

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean? And it's not like strangers happen to be like,

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong with people you don't know as opposed

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to people you do know is that when you know somebody,

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you have context based in their personality and your relationship

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>with them. What they're saying makes sense to you because

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know them and you know how they generally think

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about things and all that. If you were if you

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this person, you just happen to over or

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hear them, is you know, you walk by on the

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sidewalk and they were saying the same thing that would

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>normally say that would sound normal to you as part

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>of a conversation. You might think like, wow, what that

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>What a freak? I know, people probably think the same

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thing about me all the time. Oh, I'm sure people

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>think that about I mean I think about this all

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the time, Like I'll be out somewhere having a conversation

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>about Highlander to the Quickening, and I'm like, what do

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I sound like? What kind of what kind of idiot

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>do I sound like? To somebody who doesn't know me?

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I probably maybe I sound that bad to

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>people who do know me, but no, alright, So but anyway,

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>coming back to linear here, he's getting some of this

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>applies to his case, but basically he's saying that you know,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>with context or the lack of context. You know, it

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the lack of individual control over context

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on social media, and he points to two extreme examples

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of this online to sort of hu, you know, better

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>illustrate what's happening elsewhere. So, like the two extreme cases

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>would be when, um, when you have legit ads popping

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>up on say, terrorist recruitment videos on YouTube, which was

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>which was a problem at least early on, is that

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you would have a legitimate advertiser and ultimately an illegitimate

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>content or an illegitimate user, and those will be matched

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>together in the context it would would be you know,

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>accidental and terrible. Platforms are juxtaposing content without understanding what

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that content is, and it very often doesn't reflect well

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on any of the content, or certainly on some of it. Right.

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And then the other example he brought up, we're when

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you have images of say women and girls whose whose

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>images are are sexualized or incorporated into violent media without

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 1>their consent. Again, that's like a that's that's horrible, and

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it is an extreme example. But he argues that these

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>extreme cases are possible because social media in general robs

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>us of control over context. When we express ourselves online.

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We have no idea how that expression will be presented

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically to anybody else. How often is there some public

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>controversy about like a tweet where you know, somebody is

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like somebody's like, hey, I found a tweet by ex celebrity,

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, where they said something that looks really bad,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and then that person defends themselves by saying, but you

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>took it out of context. What you really feel about this,

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, is going to very highly case by case

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>because maybe the context changes the meaning of it, and

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe it doesn't, right, But when it's just presented as

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a snippet, that individual doesn't have control of the context.

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you have control of the context, but but they don't.

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>It's similar when and we certainly see this, uh in

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>our political cycles as well. You know, something that a

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>candidate said or wrote ten years ago is you know,

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, what have you? Uh? Is taken out

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>as a snippet and presented often without completely either without

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>context or without like complete context or to what they

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>were talking about. Uh. And you know, and in some cases,

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anytime you're quoting somebody, you are you are

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>literally taking them out of context. But like, uh, there

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>are ways that being taken out of context can be pernicious,

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they're I mean, they're totally normal ways to

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>do it too. But then again, is when when something

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is taken out of context, is there's kind of implied

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>by that statement that context is usually in place. And

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like saying, who who left this toy on the

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>kitchen floor, Let's put it back where it goes. You

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to live in a reality where the toys

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are always on the kitchen floor, in which context is

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>always out of place. And and so that's ultimately what

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he's getting out of social media. I'm gonna going to

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>read just a quote from his writings here, quote, we

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have given up our connection to context. Social media mashes

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>up meaning whatever you say will be contextualized and given

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning by the way algorithms and crowds of fake people

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>who are actually out rhythms match it up with what

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>other people say. And he continues, speaking through social media

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't really speaking at all. Context is applied to what

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you say after you say it for someone else's purposes

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and profit. So essentially we have surrendered context to the

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>bummer platform. He's saying, rendering communication quote petty, shallow and predictable,

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and as such, only the extreme voices, the worst of us,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the loudest, the you know, the most acidic voices in

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>our culture are going to be the ones that rise up.

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean this is a whole other point

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he makes that I guess we're not going into in depth,

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he argues that these platforms necessarily promote

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the worst voices because the worst voices tend to drive engagement, right,

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and the platforms want to drive engagement. What gets people

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>using the platforms more keeps people glued to Twitter, glued

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook. It's like whatever, gin's up the most net

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>gative emotion, right, and one click word on engagement. One

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that he hammers home a number of times in

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the book is that when you hear the word engagement

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.439
<v Speaker 1>used in a social media context, what we're talking about

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>is manipulation. So try to think about that next time.

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're attending a meeting or reading an article, uh

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of like especially a pro social media argument, uh

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know about social about engagement, Just uh switch it

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>out for the word manipulation and see how the taste

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fits you. But called engagement caught manipulation, whatever you like,

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it ends up creating this environment where everybody has to

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>play that game in order to be heard, And of

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>course that means it changes the way that say, legitimate

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>journalistic uh um publications have to play the game. You know,

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>you have to lean into even you know, more ridiculous

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>headlines for instance, click bad headlines in order to get

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that precious and engagement, and that can have an eroding

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>effect on the institutions of journalism and themselves. Oh absolutely,

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean well that also goes with the just like

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it is the most uh, the most toxic or most

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>uh whatever voices gin up the most negative emotion tend

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to be promoted on these platforms because they drive engagement.

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>The same could be true of topics. So like you

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 1>might not say that, well, my voice is toxic, but

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 1>like whatever topics get people the most like upset and

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>worried and aggravated and angry and all that, those topics

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be favored by algorithms that are trying

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to increase engagement. So they know, you know, I think

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times, um publishers of online media know

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that there are certain topics that get people really upset,

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and those will be the highest performing articles on our

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>videos on social media those days, like think of chemicals

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>as engagement, Like which chemicals are most engaging when you

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>get them on your skin? You know, I instantly think

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that are going to sting right, uh

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And suddenly I can't think of anything but those stingy

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>places on my skin. Um. So you know again, one

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he comes back around to too

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is that you know what in this context situation is

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that what you were saying is only valuable or relevant

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 1>insofar as it serves the platform. And again, you were

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>not the customer on this platform. You are the product.

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>The customers are those uh, those corporations or even state

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to players that have the money to pay into the

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bummer system. Yeah. Now I was glad to see that

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he thinks podcasts have not been ruined yet. Yes, yes,

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 1>so there there's a whole section in this uh this

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>argument where he goes under discussed podcasts and uh and

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he makes in an argument that podcasts are a rare

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>area of our media that are not bummer yet. But

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>he does dream up and describe an absolute nightmare scenario

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for the future of podcasts that I hope never comes

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to pass. And while I was reading it. I was

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>literally breaking out in sweats. Yeah, because think about what

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>we do on the show, you know, stuff to blow

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>your mind. Is full of our personalities and our context,

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and we have the time and we have the space

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to present topics and ideas, to present our takes and

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>topics and ideas, and a chance to share our personalities

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>with the listener in a continuous episodic manner. And as

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a result, you, the listener, you kind of know us.

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You you know, when when we get something wrong, you

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have the context to understand what's going on generally, you know,

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and what we do on this show is not easily

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>reduced to sound bites. That's true. And this has been

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>a problem before, right, Yeah, you should trust us on

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this because every now and then, not currently, but it's

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 1>did with a fair amount of regularity, someone will come

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to us and say, we need some sound bites. Yeah,

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>give us fifteen second clips of your show to show

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>what the show is really about, to show what the show.

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>That should be the clip. But no, it's like it's

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.760
<v Speaker 1>impossible to do. When you try to pull out fifteen

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>seconds of our show, nothing sounds right, I mean, nothing

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>really make sense on its own. That's that short, Yeah,

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not. We're not a Zinger factory here. We're not

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>calculating celebrities or want to be celebrities, and we're not

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>actively trying to play the SoundBite game. We're not trying

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to play the bummer game with this show. But to

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>clarify all this and really explain what he's talking about, uh,

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Lanear devises a way to quote ruined podcasting. Uh. And

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 1>then he adds, nobody do this. Okay, so somebody's gonna

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>do it. I mean, I yeah, I can second see

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it happen. Basically, he describes a sort of podcast aggregator

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>app that serves up snippets from podcasts with ads, of course,

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and the resulting situation would be that podcasts would then

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be incentivized to produce the sort of content that lends

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>itself to this format, so fiery, you know, extreme attention

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 1>grabbing sound bites the kind. Okay, So imagine clips of

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>podcasts that are that are prioritized the same way that

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like tweets or Facebook posts or YouTube videos are prioritized

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>by the content recommendation algorithms. So just basically like pulling

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>out the most egregious and like negative emotion conjuring moments

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of things. Yeah, and the horrible outside of context. Yeah,

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and the horrible thing is that I can well imagine

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the marketing on social aggregator. You know, it would be

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>something like, don't have time for all the podcasts in

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 1>your life? Well, now you don't have to let telepod

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>pick out the best parts of the shows and topics

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you love and serve it up to you in an

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 1>easy to consume dose of wonder that fits into your

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 1>busy schedule. And I and it sounds kind of convincing,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like, yeah, I'm busy. I don't have

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.399
<v Speaker 1>time for a whole bunch of hour long podcasts. There's

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so many of them. Why not let the algorithm slice

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>out just the choice cuts from all my favorite shows

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and give them to me. Friends out there in podcast land.

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:58.879
<v Speaker 1>If this happens, boycott I. Do not do this. Do

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 1>not unless you're already this type of show that is,

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, leaning, because there are shows out there that

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>doling themselves well to uh to this sort of thing,

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily by design, but just by sort of the

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>suit that the type of topics are already covering, or

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the individuals involved, the personalities involved. You know, and then

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not saying that you know that their villains because

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. But I think there are a lot of

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:23.879
<v Speaker 1>great shows and you know, hopefully ours is on that

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>list where yeah, you you you can't cut out these

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>little segments and expect the host organism to survive or

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to communicate what it's trying to communicate.

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be called pod butcher. And if pod

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Butcher came to pass, you know, I can tell you

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that we would not be able to produce the sort

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>of show we produced now that you presumably like if

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>we had to satisfy such an algorithm, and what you

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like would have even less to do with it, because

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you would have handed your likes and choices over to Bummer,

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>just as we, uh you know, would have handed over

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>context itself. And the interesting thing is Linear is not

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the only person, or the first really to to recognize

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the death of context in social media. I was looking

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 1>back at an article from twelve and Forbes from Susan Tardonico,

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and she wrote, quote, every relevant metrics shows that we

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are interacting at breakneck speed with frequency through social media,

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but are we really communicating with our communication context stripped away?

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We are now attempting to forge relationships and make decisions

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>based on phrases, abbreviations, snippets, emoticons, which may or may

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not be accurate representations of the truth. And we can

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>we can actually go back even even further on this

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>notion as well. Um on the show. In the past,

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I've discussed the work of futurists Alvin and Heidi Toffler. Uh.

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>They wrote an important nineteen seventy book titled Future Shock,

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>which was also made into a uninformative but also kind

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of more entertaining than informative orson Wells narrated TV show.

0:46:57.920 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That's also that's wonderful in its own right. But the book,

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>uh was pretty great, and they discussed the apparent and

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:07.879
<v Speaker 1>possible disruptions of the human experience and human society due

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to rapid advances and technology. And I would like everybody

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to consider this quote from Future Shock nineteen seventy again. Quote.

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Rational behavior in particular depends upon a ceaseless flow of

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>data from the environment. It depends upon the power of

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the individual to predict, with at least fair success, the

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 1>outcome of his own actions. To do this, he must

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 1>be able to predict how the environment will respond to

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>his acts. Sanity itself thus hinges on man's ability to

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>predict his immediate personal future on the basis of information

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>fed him by the environment and me personally. I would

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate this to the digital environment that we've grown increasingly

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon. You know, it's like every day, like multiple

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>times a day, over and over again, we're plugging into

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the digital environment and checking out of our physical environment

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 1>as being a main determiner of our behavior of year.

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>But it's not an environment that's chiefly mechanically dominated by

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>things like you know, everyday Newtonian physics that we can

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>predict pretty well. It's more like the main environments that

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we're participating in are like the giant, you know, super

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 1>complex slot machine where you you pull the lever and

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can pull the lever in a few

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of ways and you don't know exactly what's

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>going to come back out at you. So this is

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 1>this is the digital context, the digital environment. I want

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>every want to keep that in mind. Is I continue

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>reading this quote from the Tofflers here quote, when the

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 1>individual is plunged into a fast and irregularly changing situation

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:42.439
<v Speaker 1>or a novelty loaded context. However, his predictive of accuracy plummets.

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>He can no longer make the reasonably correct assessments on

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which rational behavior is dependent. To compensate for this, to

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 1>bring his accuracy up to the normal level again, he

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>must scoop up and process far more information than before,

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and he must do this it extremely high rates of speed.

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>In short, the more rapidly change and novel the environment,

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the more information the individual needs to process in order

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to make effective rational decisions. And of course there are

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 1>limits to our speed. So anyway that the tofflers, I think,

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>really strike a chord with our current situation in this passage,

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at least from my standpoint. I mean, sanity itself hinges

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 1>on our ability to predict our immediate personal future on

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the basis of information fed to us by the digital environment.

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And here we are attempting to communicate, act and absorb

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>knowledge in a social media environment that makes it impossible

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to control the information fed to us, absorb it all properly,

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and control the context of our own voices. Yeah, all true,

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean it's it's kind of scary. I mean,

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to think about the fact that I'm quite sure that nobody.

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>There is nobody at Facebook who fully understands all the

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>decisions made by the you know, the content recommendation algorithm

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:59.879
<v Speaker 1>that creates the Facebook feed, right, I mean there. I mean,

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe they could go maybe they have some way of

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>going through if they could look at an individual one

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, Okay, here are probably some reasons why you

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>were shown this, why you were shown that. But they can't, like,

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they can't predict it all. You know, you can't generate

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>one of these feeds just uh, you know, with your

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>own brain. Yeah, I mean, and we're we're ultimately, we're

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just continuing to understand what and to what extent, you know,

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the harm is. I was looking around, um at some

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>various uh you know, posts and sort of industry thoughts

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about about how social media has been linked to struggles

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with depression and anxiety. Uh. And there are actually some

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>serious discussions going on within the journalism field where journalists

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>often feel the need to maintain a social media presence

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:48.200
<v Speaker 1>or are mandated to and are forced to deal with

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the resulting actually, I mean actual trauma and PTSD. Oh man,

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're a journalist, especially working in some kinds of fields,

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you are going to be inundated day in and day

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>out with with hateful messaging from people who don't like

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're you're saying or doing in your career. People

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>telling you to go kill yourself, people telling you that

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you're a fraud, and you know, and heaven and Heaven

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>forbid your your gender, your gender identity, your your your race,

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>um or what have you. Uh, you know, happens to

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to you know, put you in the lines of sights

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, particular troll groups on social media totally

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and and I know that there is a kind of

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 1>common reaction, I think, especially from people who don't deal

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 1>with this problem themselves, to say, like, you know, it's

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 1>just people, it's just trolling. Just get over it. You know,

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 1>it's just trolling. Like you're probably just failing to imagine

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:44.919
<v Speaker 1>what it is like to to actually face this kind

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of like hate and abuse all the time. You know,

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>we're we're highly social creature. I mean, even if you

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>don't actually fear violence against yourself, which you might have

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 1>good reason to, depending on you know, who you are

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 1>and who these people are and what they say. But

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if anything, should be clear that the digital

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>world in the physical world are are not separated by

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:07.800
<v Speaker 1>an impassable chasm, you know, I mean we online Israel

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>life is reel life, and we see violence stemming from

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>digital activities. Yeah. But even if you're not in that category,

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an onslaught of just hate and abuse all

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the time, is it does life ruining? Yeah? And and

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>generally we're not trained to deal with it. So a

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of the discussions going on in journalism are are

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, should we be training people to to cope

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 1>with the flood of negative commentary and effectively sort out

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:36.239
<v Speaker 1>what should be ignored, what requires attention, and what constitutes

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>an actual threat that should be you know, reported to

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:43.280
<v Speaker 1>authorities and to reiterate. Of course, it's not just journalists

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that deal with this kind of issue, but like journalism

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is one field where a lot of times people have

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be on these platforms, whether they want to be

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or not, and also by the nature of their work

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just naturally just attract a lot of negative attention. Right

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if if, if someone wants to learn more about this,

0:52:59.840 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I should point out that Kyle Bessie wrote a great

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>post just last month at journalism dot co dot uk

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>titled how social media impacts mental health and journalists and

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:12.279
<v Speaker 1>of course in thinking about all this, you know, comes

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:14.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the fact that like this is the reality

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we've built for ourselves, you know. I mean it's it's

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:21.400
<v Speaker 1>through this complex interface of you know, of corporate interests

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and algorithms and and so forth. But still like this

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is the world we've made for ourselves. We've created, we've created,

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, through our use of technology, these new pitfalls

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and these new perils to social engagement. All right, we

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>need to take another break, but after this we will

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be back with more of our discussion. Alright, we're back.

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:48.839
<v Speaker 1>So one of Jarren Lanier's arguments from this book ten

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>arguments to what is it? How exactly does it go

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for deleting your social media accounts? Right now? Yeah, there

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. Um. One of them is that quote social

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>media hates your soul? Now, Robert, what are we to

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>make of this? So this is this is argument ten.

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is the like, the final, all encompassing argument.

0:54:10.000 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So in a sense, it's almost a little bit unfair

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for me to skip to it because it it hinges

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>upon all the arguments that he's made. But it's not

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 1>going to spoil the book, it's not. But to give

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you a test of it. I'm just gonna read the

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 1>second paragraph from the first page of this argument quote

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to review. Your understanding of others has been disrupted because

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what they've experienced in their feeds, while

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the reverse is also true. The empathy others might offer

0:54:35.080 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you is challenged because you can't know the context in

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which you'll be understood. You're probably becoming more of an

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:46.319
<v Speaker 1>but you're also probably sadder. Another pair of Bummer disruptions

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that are mirror images. Your ability to know the world

0:54:49.760 --> 0:54:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to know truth has been degraded, while the world's ability

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to know you has been corrupted. Politics has become unreal

0:54:57.800 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and terrifying, while economics has become unreal and unsustainable, two

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:06.279
<v Speaker 1>sides of the same coin. That's pretty bleak, and it's

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine just from that paragraph that he is

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately presenting an optimistic message. Though he is. He is, yeah,

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know he's he's saying though that. Look, Bummer's

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>behavioral modification is taking place not only at an individual scale,

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but at a societal scale. In this it's reach is

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>more like a religion, and it's and it concerns not

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>only the way you live your life online but what

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it means to be a person at all, which again

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>may sound a bit extreme and a bet out there,

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think he really makes a strong case for this. Uh.

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 1>First of all, coming back to free will, which we

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier, free will is central to most religions.

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:46.759
<v Speaker 1>You're you're hard pressed to find a spiritual model in

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>which humans are mere automatons. But under Bummer, he argues,

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 1>free will isn't destroyed, but it is assaulted. It's degraded.

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:56.400
<v Speaker 1>You have less of it, and certain parties wind up

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with more alongside, you know, their wealth and power that

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they've already accumulated or are accumulating as they take a

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>more and more of your free will, you know. And this, actually,

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think does does go along with I don't know.

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked before about the coherence of the idea

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of free will on the show, and I'm sure we're

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:16.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a lot of kind of like a materialist

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:18.759
<v Speaker 1>push back on the idea of free will, saying, hey,

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, free will is an incoherent concept. I

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>think you could make that argument based on some definitions

0:56:25.120 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of free will, but in this sense the sense that

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.320
<v Speaker 1>he uses it, I think free will is an important

0:56:30.320 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 1>thing to consider and is a real concept. Basically, it

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:37.320
<v Speaker 1>free will means um the feeling that you have control

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:42.320
<v Speaker 1>over your own behavior by understanding the influences on yourself

0:56:42.400 --> 0:56:45.399
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about them consciously. And you know, you can

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:48.719
<v Speaker 1>never understand all of the influences on yourself, but there

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:50.880
<v Speaker 1>are definitely ways in which you can be in a

0:56:50.960 --> 0:56:54.360
<v Speaker 1>system where you you feel like you understand most of

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the inputs that are coming in on you and you

0:56:56.400 --> 0:57:00.320
<v Speaker 1>can process them consciously and your decision making. For is

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a system like like a kind of behavioral modification system

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 1>where you in fact don't know you're being influenced. You

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know who's influencing you, and this is all opaque.

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:14.360
<v Speaker 1>You're just suddenly producing behaviors that feel alien and you

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know why you're doing them. Yes. Now, another religion

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>based argumently makes uh in this chapter is that Bummer

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately wants you to believe it is the Internet and

0:57:25.720 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it is the main part of your devices. Uh. But

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but it but it ultimately is separated. You know. He

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>says you can have the Internet without social media, and

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>he makes a strong argument for that. You know, that's

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 1>ultimately I think his point is that you know, you

0:57:38.360 --> 0:57:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you could have a great Internet just by sort of

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>switching everything from the behavior modification pay for a model

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to like a subscription model where you know, like you

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 1>could have something like Facebook, but instead of modifying your

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:53.160
<v Speaker 1>behavior to pay for it, you just you just pay

0:57:53.200 --> 0:57:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to get access. Right and uh and uh, Lanier argues that,

0:57:56.880 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the same way the Protestants rejected papal indulgence,

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is you know, you can you can reject the social

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>media but keep the Internet. You can reject the version

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of your faith that is uh that is, you know,

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tiresome or offensive or dangerous, and keep the parts that

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>work for you. I mean, I've said that before regarding

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just a religion in general. You know, whatever religion you

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 1>adhere to, uh, I can almost guarantee you there is

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>some version of it, uh that is that is ultimately

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>more accepting and uh, you know, and more liberal in

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>its outlook. Uh you know, whether it's in your immediate

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>area or you have to you know, go out to

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>find it. As another issue, Uh. He also makes the

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>argument that bummer activates pack the pack setting of her mind. Uh,

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and in doing so, it quote resurrects old conflicts that

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>had been associated with religion in order to engage people

0:58:50.160 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as intensely as possible. So basically, social media riles us

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 1>up and causes the kind of like pack mentality and

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:01.360
<v Speaker 1>tribalism that normally you would have to look to a

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>religion to do. Yeah what he This is part of

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>an earlier argument in the book, but basically it's part

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of an argument he makes about how, uh, social media

0:59:10.000 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is making us meaner and and worse by by triggering

0:59:14.760 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>types of thought patterns that are more associated with obsession

0:59:18.040 --> 0:59:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with hierarchies and and in group out group thinking and

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Yeah, and domination mentality, yeah, dominated culture.

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And then he he also points out that Bummer ultimately

0:59:30.080 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>asked you to have faith not in in God or

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 1>God's or a godess, but in the almighty algorithms that

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 1>decide what slice of news, political commentary, fake news, parody,

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theory, or just outright hate you see in your feed,

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and that it's you know, entirely anti ENLiGHT enlightenment in

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that regard, and that it makes learning subservient to human

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>power hierarchies. Well, yeah, I mean by allowing these algorithms

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to control what you see all day you are in practice,

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you know you think about this or not, in practice,

1:00:03.960 --> 1:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you're giving your consent to somebody to shape who you

1:00:07.240 --> 1:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>become as a person. And uh, and that that's a

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of power, that's a lot of faith to put

1:00:13.000 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in some business. He goes on from here to discuss

1:00:16.160 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>another destructive force in human discourse, memes. Um. So this

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is that this is one of these areas where when

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I talk about memes, I feel like often just come

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>off like an old person, an old, grumpy person who

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't understand how the kids talk, you know, complaining about memes.

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But no, I I am with you there. Even when

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I see a meme that's funny, and I see him

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time, you know, I'm not. I'm not above memes.

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, some are really funny and I like them,

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but there's a part of me that always sort of rebels.

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think it has to do with what we

1:00:45.280 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>were talking about about context earlier. You know, I worry

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about meme culture degrading the context of original images and

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>text in a way that that just constantly batters down

1:00:57.800 --> 1:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>our defenses and batters down our desire to understand things.

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And in their original meaning. Yeah, he He writes that

1:01:04.720 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>memes may at first, you know, when we first engage

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with them, they might seem to amplify what we're feeling

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or trying to say. And you know, for instance, somebody

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>posts a bit of h it's news or thought, and

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you back it up with like, what do you see

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in so many Facebook responses? Or I guess on other

1:01:20.120 --> 1:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms as well, you see like gifts and

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>memes that seem to be sort of an amen brother

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of an argument or or or some other interaction

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with the content. But but but ultimately, like this, this

1:01:33.320 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>feeling of amplification is an illusion. You're only reinforcing the

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>notion that virality is truth. Whatever is the most viral

1:01:41.040 --> 1:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is rewarded, and that's a key part of Bummer's design.

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But just because it's viral does not mean it is

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the truth. And uh, which seems like an overstatement of

1:01:51.440 --> 1:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the obvious when I say it like that, But but again,

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think about you know, think about the way we

1:01:57.080 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>interact with it and the way we use memes. I mean,

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>if you go to any fact checking website, just pick

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite, I mean, and pull it a fact or

1:02:05.920 --> 1:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever and you like, scroll down and you scroll down

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to see you know, like truth ratings by source, what's

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>always the number one source of total fabrications. You might

1:02:19.240 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think of immediately your least favorite politician, But no, it's

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not a person. It's viral image, right, Viral image is

1:02:26.000 --> 1:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>always the number one source of false facts that are

1:02:28.680 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>spreading around the internet. Why is that, Well, because viral

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>image is an extremely powerful method for spreading falsehoods. It

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>spreads way easier than somebody going on TV and saying them.

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And here goes on from here to you know, also

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>point out that in many of the these bummer companies

1:02:47.560 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and in some of the key individuals associated with them,

1:02:50.320 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're also they also put a lot of

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on grander ideas of organizing all information, of providing

1:02:57.520 --> 1:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>communities with purpose of creating AI. And ultimately, he says,

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a this is a danger to

1:03:04.960 --> 1:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to personhood. You know that there's a spiritual danger uh,

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to us in our sense of personhood when we start,

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, putting too much emphasis on these these non

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>human models of of thinking and humanity. Uh. You know which, again,

1:03:20.920 --> 1:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this is getting into kind of heavy, headier territory than

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>most of the book. But I think it's it's an

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting case. You know what is how how are these

1:03:29.960 --> 1:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>powerful corporations thinking about what it is to be human?

1:03:33.880 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And then how is that changing the definition at least

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like the sort of the spiritual definition and the self

1:03:39.520 --> 1:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>defining principle of personhood. So again, like this this argument

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in the book, I it does have I think there

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility that you hear this or even you

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>read it and you start, you know, asking yourself, well,

1:03:52.120 --> 1:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is that that really the case? Are we're really thinking

1:03:54.760 --> 1:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>about social media like it's a religion? Is it still?

1:03:57.120 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Is it actually uh serving a purpose us

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that is akin to religion? And I think I think

1:04:04.440 --> 1:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he makes a strong case. I think that I think

1:04:06.640 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where you kind of like

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you wake up one day and you realize, oh, I

1:04:11.040 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have joined the church social media and I've actually I've

1:04:13.960 --> 1:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>been attending services for years and I didn't quite realize it.

1:04:17.480 --> 1:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, you tend to think of of

1:04:21.040 --> 1:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a religion as you know, as this as a as

1:04:23.560 --> 1:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a church or a temple, as these images of God's

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and you don't think of the roles that they play

1:04:28.960 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in a culture and how even as you know, for

1:04:32.840 --> 1:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the most part, and you know in many cultures there

1:04:35.840 --> 1:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is a movement away from these organized religions. You know,

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there's this there's this possibility that we are we are

1:04:41.400 --> 1:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding something that operates in much the same way, or

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe in just some of the same worst ways, Yeah,

1:04:49.120 --> 1:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>without without some of the same, without providing some of

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the best. Because I've you know, as I've discussed in

1:04:54.200 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the show before, you know, I think they're I think

1:04:56.520 --> 1:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>religion and spirituality, uh that they both have tremendous benefits

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>uh to individuals and as certainly to uh uh to

1:05:06.280 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>societies and uh you know, you can get that sense

1:05:08.760 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of community with a religious organization. You know, they can

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>do a great deal of harm if they are you know,

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>if they have toxic beliefs wound up into their their fabric,

1:05:20.960 --> 1:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or they they promote uh toxic personality dynamics. Sometimes yes, certainly,

1:05:26.560 --> 1:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but but yeah, we we would. What we don't want

1:05:29.280 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to do is certainly to put all the of that

1:05:31.920 --> 1:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>aside and then rebuild. Yeah, like like you say, a

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>new digital religion that is based on most of the

1:05:37.200 --> 1:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>worst qualities of what came before. Yeah, I mean, I

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I find most of this book a pretty compelling message.

1:05:44.160 --> 1:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But I do want to emphasize again that it's like

1:05:46.600 --> 1:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>um it emphasizes a lot of what's negative about the

1:05:50.000 --> 1:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>current model of social media. But even with these like

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>bummer companies, he doesn't demonize. He's not saying, and we're

1:05:57.440 --> 1:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>not saying that like all the people who work at

1:05:59.280 --> 1:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>these companies are bad people. We're not even saying that

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like necessarily all the things done by these companies are

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>all their products are bad. I mean, like you know,

1:06:07.320 --> 1:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Google and all these companies have. They provide

1:06:10.920 --> 1:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>real technologies and real products that do you know, great

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>things for people's lives, that make all kinds of things easier.

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They provide enormous wealth and convenience and stuff like that.

1:06:20.160 --> 1:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's not that like everything these companies do is bad.

1:06:23.560 --> 1:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's not true by any stretch of

1:06:25.440 --> 1:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the imagination. It's just that there are certain elements about

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the business model of especially the social media platforms, and

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>specifically it's the element that its behavior modification for rent

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that really do need to be reformed. And that's where

1:06:39.960 --> 1:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>his recommendation comes in. He says, if you want to

1:06:41.960 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>give these companies financial incentive to reform delete your accounts. Right, Yeah,

1:06:47.520 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the bummer illness is there in social media, and the

1:06:51.800 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>only way to get rid of it, to rid the

1:06:53.960 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>host of that that infection, is to step away from it.

1:06:57.480 --> 1:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>To have to create this financial incentive for those for

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>these corporations to change and and ultimately, yeah, he has

1:07:05.360 --> 1:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this positive view, this optimistic view that it can change

1:07:09.120 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that if we were to do this, if we're all

1:07:10.640 --> 1:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this, not all at once, but perhaps this

1:07:13.080 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>gradual awakening, uh to the reality, you know, we could

1:07:16.840 --> 1:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>reach the point where social media can exist in a

1:07:19.960 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>form that is not not demeaning of our personhood, that

1:07:24.200 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is not modifying our behavior to the benefit of you know,

1:07:28.680 --> 1:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, unknown corporations or by state or non state players. Yes. There.

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So there are a ton of other arguments he gets

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>into in the book that we did not have time

1:07:37.760 --> 1:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to address today. Of course, you know, we're not going

1:07:39.920 --> 1:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to address everything in the book. If we can get

1:07:41.760 --> 1:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Jared Lannier to come on the show sometime, I'd be

1:07:44.280 --> 1:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>interested in talking about some of the other ones, uh, especially,

1:07:48.040 --> 1:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>but also I am interested in hearing from listeners who

1:07:51.360 --> 1:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>who disagree maybe who or you know agree or disagree

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>because one thing I recognize is that I think I

1:07:58.000 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have an emotional predispos position to bias in favor of

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>these arguments. Uh, simply because I I feel like in

1:08:04.960 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>my life I have witnessed a lot of negativity growing

1:08:08.520 --> 1:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>out of social media. I personally, emotionally don't like platforms

1:08:13.360 --> 1:08:16.759
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook and Twitter and and so you know, I

1:08:16.760 --> 1:08:19.599
<v Speaker 1>I've got a predisposition that makes this scene, this all

1:08:19.640 --> 1:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>seemed good to me. So I'd be interested in hearing,

1:08:22.160 --> 1:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the arguments presented to the contrary that that

1:08:25.000 --> 1:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>would go against my biases that say, no, maybe it's

1:08:27.439 --> 1:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>not as bad as he's representing. Right. And likewise, if

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>anyone out there has quit social media, if you have

1:08:34.720 --> 1:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>deleted your social media accounts, I'd be interested to hear

1:08:38.320 --> 1:08:40.519
<v Speaker 1>your take on how that went. You know why, you know,

1:08:40.560 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>why did you do it? Uh? Did did you accomplish

1:08:43.439 --> 1:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what you hope to accomplish by stepping away? Uh? You know,

1:08:46.760 --> 1:08:49.479
<v Speaker 1>all this is a fair game for discussion. So again,

1:08:49.640 --> 1:08:51.599
<v Speaker 1>the title of the book is Ten Arguments for Deleting

1:08:51.600 --> 1:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Your Social Media Accounts right Now by Jared Lanier. That's

1:08:55.040 --> 1:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>l A in I E. R. It's as of this recording,

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it's currently available in hard back and it's coming out

1:09:01.280 --> 1:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in paperback very soon. Yeah. If it's not out by

1:09:03.920 --> 1:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the time this episode publishes, it will be coming out soon. Yeah.

1:09:07.280 --> 1:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, highly recommend this read and would love to

1:09:10.280 --> 1:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>hear from listeners who read it as well. In the meantime,

1:09:13.720 --> 1:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>If you want to follow what we do, head on

1:09:15.840 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>over to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. And

1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>if you want to support the show, rate and review

1:09:20.360 --> 1:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>us wherever you have the power to do so and

1:09:22.400 --> 1:09:25.479
<v Speaker 1>make sure you have subscribed huge thanks to our excellent

1:09:25.520 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>audio producer, Maya Cole. If you would like to get

1:09:28.360 --> 1:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us with feedback on today's episode to

1:09:31.000 --> 1:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>suggest a topic for the future to follow up on

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>any of the prompts we just issued, you can email

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:09:46.760 --> 1:09:48.599
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is a production of iHeart

1:09:48.680 --> 1:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

1:09:51.439 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

1:09:54.200 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows. The twin fourth Foot, Proper

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Foo